Loading...
102323 City Council Meeting Packet    NEW HOPE CITY COUNCIL  MEETING AGENDA  October 23, 2023  7:00 p.m.  City Hall – Council Chambers  4401 Xylon Avenue North    Mayor Kathi Hemken  Council Member John Elder  Council Member Andy Hoffe  Council Member Michael Isenberg  Council Member Jonathan London      The City Council wants and encourages citizen participation at Council Meetings. Your input and  opinions count and are valuable. You are encouraged to bring forth your comments and issues at  the appropriate point on the agenda.     A 15‐minute maximum Open Forum is held at the beginning of each Council Meeting. At this time  any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to City business not listed on this  agenda or scheduled as a future agenda item. The Council requests that you limit your presentation  to 3 minutes. Anyone wishing to address the City Council on a particular item should raise their  hand and be recognized by the Mayor. Approach the podium and speak into the microphone by  first stating your name and address. Also, please record your name on the roster at the table near  the door so that your name will be spelled correctly in the minutes.    Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight; Council  may refer the matter to staff for handling or for consideration at a future meeting. You are welcome  to contact the city clerk at 763‐531‐5117 after the council meeting.    COUNCIL MEETING BROADCASTS AND STREAMING  Government Access channel 16 programming includes live/taped meeting replays  Live on‐line meetings and past meetings on‐demand are available through www.nwsccc.org.    www.newhopemn.gov New Hope Values and Vision City Mission Strong local government that is proactive in responding to the community needs and issues by delivering quality public service to all city residents, businesses, property owners, and organizations in a prudent and e cient manner. Values Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional and cost-e ective manner. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fi scal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds and city assets is essential if residents are to have confi dence in government. Ethics, Integrity and Professionalism We believe that ethics, integrity, and professionalism are the foundation blocks of public trust and confi dence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values. Respect for the Individual We believe in the uniqueness of every individual, and welcome, appreciate, and respect diversity and the di ering of opinions. Open, Honest, and Respectful Communication We believe that open, honest, and respectful communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive environment for those interacting with our city. Cooperation and Teamwork We believe that the public is best served when all work cooperatively. Visionary Leadership and Planning We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be responsive to current goals and needs, and visionary in planning for the future. Vision e city is a great place to grow as a family, individual, or business. All within our city are safe and secure. Essential services will be those that promote a safe and healthy environment for all residents. Essential services and programs will be enhanced and streamlined, and will be provided in an economical manner and with measurable results. e city views residents as its greatest asset and seeks their input and participation. e city will meet the communication needs of citizens, elected o cials, and city sta . Strategic Goals e city will maintain and improve its infrastructure (water distribution, storm water, sewer, roads, parks, lighting, and city facilities). e city will use frugal spending and resourceful fi nancial management to maintain its fi scal health. e city will encourage maintenance, redevelopment, and reinvestment of existing properties to improve or enhance its tax base. e city will provide core services with a professional sta who are equipped with the necessary tools and equipment and given necessary direction. e city will facilitate and improve communications to promote e ective intergovernmental cooperation between sta , citizens, and Council. Adopted by the New Hope City Council, August 2006 Reaffirmed by the New Hope City Council, February 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue North October 23, 2023 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – October 23, 2023 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: • Regular Meeting Minutes – October 9, 2023 4. OPEN FORUM 5. PRESENTATIONS 6. CONSENT BUSINESS 6.1 Approval of business licenses 6.2 Approval of financial claims through October 23, 2023 6.4 Resolution approving the separation agreement between the city and the former central garage supervisor 6.5 Resolution approving final payment to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $2,103.20 for the 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project (Improvement Project No. 1054) 6.6 Resolution approving final payment to Allied Blacktop Company for $32,849.23 for the 2023 Crack Repair and Seal Coat Project (Improvement Project No. 1099) 7. PUBLIC HEARING 8. DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING 8.1 Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit for deferment of required parking relating to real property located at 5017 Boone Avenue North (New Hope Planning Case 23-02) 8.2 Resolution accepting feasibility report, ordering the construction of and preparation of plans and specifications for the 2024 Infrastructure Project (Improvement Project No. 1107) 9. PETITIONS AND REQUESTS 10. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 10.1 Ordinance No. 2023-07, An ordinance amending section 8-29 Tattoo and body piercing establishments ordinance in the city of New Hope 10.2 Ordinance No. 2023-08, An ordinance amending section 8-7 Tobacco and related products in the city of New Hope 11. UNFINISHED AND ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS 11.1 Resolution approving contract with BS&A to provide Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software services 12. OTHER BUSINESS 12.1 Exchange of communication between members of the city council 13. ADJOURNMENT Memorandum              To:  New Hope City Council  From: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Date: October 19, 2023  Subject: Agenda Items for Monday, October 23, 2023      Open Forum  We are not aware of anyone wishing to address Council for the Open Forum.     Item 6.1  This is a business license request for THC license at 4212 Winnetka Avenue North. All required paperwork  and fees have been paid.     Item 6.2  This item involves routine financial claims.    Item 6.3  There are no new liability claims to report.    Item 6.4  This item approves a separation agreement with a former employee that releases the city of all claims.  Director Johnson and I recommend approval.     Item 6.5  This item approves final payment to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. for $2,103.20 for the 2021 infrastructure  project. The final construction amount was $110,662.65 over the contract amount primarily due to additional  watermain related work, storm sewer lining, and pavement work in the project area. The final payment will  be made after the city receives the necessary IC‐134 affidavits from the contractor. Director Weber and I  recommend approval.    Item 6.6  This item approves final payment to Allied Blacktop for $32,849.23 for the 2023 crack repair and seal coat  project. The final construction amount was under the original contract amount by approximately $30,000 due  to less cracks requiring repair than estimated. The final payment will be made after the city receives the  necessary IC‐134 affidavits from the contractor. Director Weber and I recommend approval.    Item 8.1   The owner of 5017 Boone Avenue North is requesting a conditional use permit for the deferment of  requirement parking. The building site requires a minimum of 71 on‐site parking stalls, and the site  plan includes 54 parking stalls, resulting in a required deferment of 17 parking stalls. The site plan  includes 20 possible future parking stalls (proof of parking) within the open outdoor storage area on  the west side of the property. The building is currently occupied by three tenants with a total of 20  employees based out of the location. The applicant has stated parking demand is significantly lower  than what is required by city code. The Planning Commission reviewed the request at its October  meeting and recommend approval subject to conditions outlined in the resolution. Director Sargent  and I recommend approval.      Item 8.2  This is a public hearing regarding the 2024 infrastructure project. Staff is requesting that the  Council conduct the public hearing and receive a presentation by the city engineer regarding a  proposed 2024 infrastructure improvement project. The streets included in the project were  recommended based upon pavement conditions identified in the 2022 pavement management plan.  Some improvements may be bid as alternates to stay within the CIP budget. Tax‐exempt properties  included in the project area were notified of the proposed assessment. The tax‐exempt property  owners include Hometown Church, St. Joseph Church, School District 287, and the city of New  Hope. Residents impacted by the proposed project have been notified of the feasibility report and  were encouraged to attend the council meeting to learn more about the project. After closing the  public hearing, staff recommends that the Council pass a resolution accepting the feasibility report,  ordering the 2024 Infrastructure Improvement Project, and authorizing the city engineer to prepare  the plans and specifications. Director Weber and I recommend acceptance of the feasibility report.     Item 10.1  This is a minor ordinance amendment relating to tattoo and body piercing license section of city code to  require the applicant to comply with Minnesota Statute 146B.03. An applicant must furnish a valid state‐ issued license as part of the city’s application process. The city attorney drafted the ordinance amendment.  City Clerk Leone and I recommend approval.    Item 10.2  This is an ordinance amendment to require verification of an approved business use certificate of occupancy  prior to issuance of a tobacco license. Council discussed the matter at its October 16 work session. The city  attorney drafted the ordinance amendment. City Clerk Leone and I recommend approval.    Item 11.1  This item approves a contract with BS&A as the vendor to provide enterprise resource planning software. At  the October 16 work session, staff reviewed steps taken to date regarding the city’s enterprise resource  planning evaluation process. Director Johnson and I recommend approval.    Item 12.1  Mayor Hemken will review upcoming meetings and events.        If you have any questions regarding items in the agenda packet, please call the city clerk or me  before the meeting so that staff can research any issues and be prepared to respond at the meeting.    New Hope City Council  October 9, 2023  Page 1   City of New Hope  4401 Xylon Avenue North  New Hope, Minnesota 55428    City Council Minutes October 9, 2023  Regular Meeting   City Hall, 7:00 p.m.      CALL TO ORDER The New Hope City Council met in regular session pursuant to due call and notice  thereof; Mayor Hemken called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.    PLEDGE OF  ALLEGIANCE    The City Council and all present stood for the Pledge of Allegiance.  ROLL CALL Council present:            Staff present:       Kathi Hemken, Mayor  John Elder, Council Member  Andy Hoffe, Council Member  Michael Isenberg, Council Member  Jonathan London, Council Member    Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Sarah Larson, WMFRD Chief  Valerie Leone, City Clerk  Jeff Sargent, Director of Community Development  Stacy Woods, City Attorney    APPROVAL OF  MINUTES  Motion was made by Council Member Hoffe, seconded by Council Member Elder,  to approve the work session meeting minutes of September 18, 2023. Voted in  favor thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg, London; and the following voted  against the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None. Motion carried.    Motion was made by Council Member Elder, seconded by Council Member Hoffe,  to approve the regular meeting minutes of September 25, 2023. Voted in favor  thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg; and the following voted against the same:  None; Abstained: London; Absent: None. Motion carried.    OPEN FORUM    Mr. Ayman Issa, 4210 Winnetka Avenue North, expressed interest in obtaining a  tobacco license. He stated he obtained a list of the 21 tobacco licenses and believes  one of the licenses is not valid. He explained the city issued a tobacco license for  the strip mall space of 4361 Winnetka Avenue North to the owner of Quebec  Smoke Shop, but the space is leased by a Mexican supermarket. He alleged the  tobacco license was improperly issued as the applicant had not secured a valid  lease and provided a false business address. He pointed out some cities require  evidence of a valid lease before issuing a license. He indicated he has spoken with  both the city clerk and the city attorney regarding the situation and was informed  that the license was issued per city ordinance. He requested Council’s  authorization to apply for the city’s last tobacco license.    New Hope City Council  October 9, 2023  Page 2   Mayor Hemken informed Mr. Issa that he can check with the city in December  following the license renewal period to inquire if any licenses are available. She  stated Council will discuss the tobacco ordinance at a future work session.    ROTATING VOTES    Please note that votes taken on each agenda item are called by the secretary on a  rotating basis; however, the written minutes always list the mayor’s name first  followed by the council members’ in alphabetical order.    CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Hemken introduced the consent items as listed for consideration and stated  that all items will be enacted by one motion unless requested that an item be  removed for discussion. Mr. Reece Bertholf, city manager, reviewed the consent  items.    BUSINESS LICENSES  Item 6.1    Approval of business licenses.    Council Member London pointed out the gas station at 7900 Bass Lake Road has  been inoperable for an extended period, and he is grateful it will soon be re‐ opening. He asked that Council review the city code at a future work session  agenda to determine if an ordinance change can be made to promote the  completion of remodeling projects and discourage vacant or unoccupied  properties.    FINANCIAL CLAIMS  Item 6.2    Approval of financial claims through October 9, 2023.  RESOLUTION 2023‐104  Item 6.4    Resolution approving contract between the city of New Hope and Daniels Health  for the disposal of biohazard waste items.  MOTION  Item 6.5    Motion waiving permit fees for temporary signs for Armstrong Cooper Youth  Hockey Association registration.  RESOLUTION 2023‐105  Item 6.6    Resolution Approving Access to Minnesota Court Data Services for the City of  New Hope on behalf of the Prosecuting Attorneys.  RESOLUTION 2023‐106  RESOLUTION 2023‐107  Item 6.7  Resolution declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed  assessments in connection with infrastructure improvement no. 1054; and  Resolution calling for a public hearing on assessments for infrastructure  improvement no. 1054 (2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project).    RESOLUTION 2023‐108  Item 6.8    Resolution approving LG214 Premises Permit Application for West Metro Fire‐ Rescue Relief Association to conduct lawful gambling at Hy‐Vee Market Grille,  8200 42nd Avenue North.    MOTION  Consent Items  Motion was made by Council Member Elder, seconded by Council Member Hoffe,  to approve the Consent items. All present voted in favor. Motion carried.    PUBLIC HEARING  DELINQUENT CITY  CHARGES  Item 7.1  Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 7.1, Resolution adopting and  confirming assessments for delinquent utility service charges, administrative  citations, alarm, mowing and abatement charges.    New Hope City Council  October 9, 2023  Page 3    Mr. Reece Bertholf, city manager, explained this is the annual public hearing to  adopt the assessment rolls for delinquent city service charges incurred between  June 1, 2022, and May 31, 2023. He stated all impacted property owners were  notified of the hearing date, the process for challenges, and payment options.  Presently the total of delinquent utility charges is $268,028.70, the total of  delinquent city services is $6,800.16, and the total for delinquent administrative  citations is $74,600. To date staff has not received any written objections, but staff  was contacted by a company that has incurred significant fees for failure to address  corrections required by a point of sale inspection.     Mr. Bertholf informed Council that after accepting public input, a motion should  be made to close the public hearing, followed by another motion to adopt the  resolution and assessment rolls. He noted the final assessment roll may differ as  payments will be accepted through November 20.    Mayor Hemken opened the floor for comments. There was no one desirous of  addressing Council for the public hearing.    CLOSE HEARING  Item 7.1  Motion was made by Council Member Elder, seconded by Council Member  London, to close the public hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried.    RESOLUTION 2023‐109  Item 7.1  Council Member London introduced the following resolution and moved its  adoption: “RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS  FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY SERVICE CHARGES, ADMINISTRATIVE  CITATIONS, ALARM, MOWING AND ABATEMENT CHARGES.” The  motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Council  Member Isenberg, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor  thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg, London; and the following voted against  the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None; whereupon the resolution was  declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was attested to by  the city clerk.    TOBACCO &   TETRAHYDROCAN‐ NABINOL  PRODUCTS   Item 10.1    Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 10.1, Ordinance No. 2023‐05, An  Ordinance Amending Section 8‐7 (Tobacco and Related Products) and Section 8‐ 41 (Tetrahydrocannabinol Products) in the New Hope City Code.    Mr. Reece Bertholf, city manager, stated the amendment impacts the hearing  portion of sections 8‐7(j)(1) and 8‐41 by deleting some language so that city code  aligns with current practices relative to citations for tobacco and THC licenses. It  was noted that the language was inadvertently added when the city adopted a  model ordinance in 2020.     ORDINANCE 23‐05  Item 8.1  Council Member Elder introduced the following ordinance and moved its  adoption: “ORDINANCE NO. 2023‐05, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING  SECTION 8‐7 (TOBACCO AND RELATED PRODUCTS) AND SECTION 8‐41  (TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL PRODUCTS) IN THE NEW HOPE CITY  CODE.” The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was seconded by  Council Member Hoffe, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted  in favor thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg, London; and the following voted  against the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None; whereupon the  New Hope City Council  October 9, 2023  Page 4   ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was  attested to by the city clerk.    EXCHANGE OF   COMMUNICATION  Item 12.1  Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 12.1, Exchange of communication  between members of the City Council.    Mayor Hemken reported on upcoming events.    Council congratulated Council Member Isenberg and spouse Allison Isenberg as  recipients of the “2023 Volunteer of the Year Award” by the Minnesota Crime  Prevention Association for hosting the Toyfest event since 2007 and their  involvement in many other community events.    Mayor Hemken commented on the recent house burning training at 4965  Winnetka Avenue North and congratulated both the community development  department for coordination efforts and the fire department for a successful  training exercise.    ADJOURNMENT    Motion was made by Council Member Isenberg, seconded by Council Member  Elder, to adjourn the meeting, as there was no further business to come before  the Council. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. The New Hope City  Council adjourned at 7:22 p.m.  Respectfully submitted,    Valerie Leone, City Clerk      I:\RFA\City Manager\2023\6.1 Business Licenses\6.1 Q ‐ Business Licenses 102323.docx   Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Valerie Leone, City Clerk‐Treasurer    Agenda Title  Approval of business license(s)  Requested Action  In accordance with Chapter 8 of the New Hope Code, all applications for business licenses must be presented  to the City Council for consideration. Staff recommends approval of all listed requests.    Background  All required paperwork and fees have been received for the following business:      AM 7th LLC dba 42nd Smoke Shop 4212 Winnetka Avenue North THC License                 Agenda Section Consent Item Number  6.1  G:\City Manager\AGENDA\6.2 R‐Approval of Claims Merge Doc.docx   Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Reece Bertholf, City Manager    Agenda Title  Approval of claims through October 23, 2023  Requested Action  Claims for services and commodities purchased through this period are listed on the Check Disbursement  Report  Attachments   Check Disbursement Report  Agenda Section Consent Item Number  6.2    I:\RFA\HR & Admin Svcs\Human Resources\2023\Council Meetings\10232023\Item 6.4\6.4 Q&R Settlement Agreement ‐ Robberstad.docx    Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: HR & Admin Services  By: Rich Johnson, Director of HR/Admin Services    Agenda Title  Resolution Approving the Separation Agreement Between the City and the Former Central Garage  Supervisor  Requested Action  Approval of the separation agreement between the City and the Former Central Garage Supervisor.  Background  At the September 18, 2023, work session, staff shared the city manager’s decision to abolish the central garage  supervisor position. This is due to the ongoing transition from the City owning and maintaining its fleet of  vehicles, to moving towards leasing and outsourcing the maintenance of many vehicles in its fleet. Staff  requested and was given Council’s approval to attempt to reach a reasonable and fair separation agreement  between the City and a long‐term employee who has made significant contributions to the city.    After receiving direction from the City Council to recognize Bill Robberstadʹs dedication and years of service  with the city as well as the opportunity to receive a release of all claims against the city, staff has negotiated  the attached separation agreement.    Attachments  Resolution  Separation Agreement                                Agenda Section Consent Item Number  6.4              RESOLUTION NO. 23 ______ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SEPARATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE FORMER CENTRAL GARAGE SUPERVISOR, BILL ROBBERSTAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows: WHEREAS, the central garage supervisor position has been abolished; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to attempt to reach a reasonable separation agreement with the central garage supervisor, Bill Robberstad; and WHEREAS, staff has negotiated with and has provided Bill Robberstad with the attached settlement agreement; and WHEREAS, Bill Robberstad has indicated his acceptance of the attached agreement; and WHEREAS, following City Council approval, and the expiration of the rescission period, $19,497 shall be paid to Bill Robberstad in a lump sum, plus $2,122 (the equivalent of the current city contribution of $530.50/pay period for four pay periods), plus 454.85 personal leave hours as indicated in the attached settlement agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council in and for the City of New Hope as follows: 1. The settlement agreement reached between the City of New Hope and Bill Robberstad is approved effective October 23, 2023. Dated the 23rd day of October, 2023. ______________________ Kathi Hemken, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Valerie Leone, City Clerk   I:\RFA\PUBWORKS\2023\Council\1054 2021 Infrastructure Improvement\Final Payment   Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: Public Works  By: Bernie Weber, Director    Agenda Title  Resolution approving final payment to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $2,103.20 for the 2021  Infrastructure Improvement Project (Improvement Project No. 1054)  Requested Action  Staff recommends that the Council accept the 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project and authorize final  payment.  Policy/Past Practice  The City Council routinely considers public infrastructure improvement projects to extend the useful life of  the infrastructure and/or improve the level of service.   Background  The 2021 infrastructure project included improvements for utilities, mill and overlay, and reclaim and  overlay pavement improvements in the Lions Park neighborhood and along Erickson Drive. Also included  were storm sewer lining improvements on Oregon Avenue North between 40th Avenue North and 42nd  Avenue North and trail improvements were made at Liberty Park.   Funding  T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. was the low bid contractor with a contract amount of $1,203,715.68. The final  construction amount is $1,314,378.33, or $110,662.65 over the contract amount. The overrun was primarily  due to additional watermain related work on Oregon Avenue, additional storm sewer work at 42nd and  Oregon avenues, adding mill and overlay improvements on Sumter Place to the project due to its pavement  condition, paving two watermain break patches on Quebec Avenue, increasing existing 8’ to 10’ wide trails in  Liberty Park, and additional storm sewer lining related costs of the deteriorated storm culvert on Oregon  Avenue North.    Attachments   Resolution   City Engineer’s Memorandum   Final Pay Request            Agenda Section Consent Item Number  6.5  City of New Hope  Resolution No. 23‐  Resolution approving final payment to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.   in the amount of $2,103.20 for the 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project   (Improvement Project No. 1054)    WHEREAS, the infrastructure improvement identified followed the pavement management strategy  adopted by the Council; and  WHEREAS, the city has entered into a contract with T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. for construction of the  2021 Infrastructure Improvements; and  WHEREAS, staff is recommending that the Council adopt a resolution to accept improvement project  number 1054 and approve final payment to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. in the amount of  $2,103.20 and  WHEREAS,     the city engineer has reported that all work and documentation has been satisfactorily  completed and recommends, along with staff, final payment be made to T.A. Schifsky &  Sons, Inc.      NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,     1. That the City Council accepts the 2021 Infrastructure Improvement project from T.A.  Schifsky & Sons, Inc.    2. That the city manager is hereby directed to authorize the final payment in the amount of  $2,103.20.    Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota, this 23rd day of  October, 2023.                                                                                                          __________________________________                                               Mayor    Attest:       City Clerk  Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000, Minneapolis MN 55402-2309 September 29, 2023 File:193805078 Attention:Bernie Weber, Director of Public Works City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Dear Bernie, Reference: Final Payment Request No. 8 & Final – 2021 Infrastructure Improvements City Project No. 1054 Enclosed find Payment Request No. 8 & Final for the above referenced project. The contractor, T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc., completed the work in accordance with the contract plans and specifications and has submitted all closeout documents. Therefore, it is recommended that final payment of $2,103.20 be made, and the City of New Hope accepts the project. The Final Construction Amount is $1,314,378.33, or $110,662.65 over the Contract Amount of $1,203,715.68. The overrun was primarily due to additional watermain related work on Oregon Avenue, additional storm sewer work at 42nd and Oregon Avenue North, adding milling and overlay of Sumter Place N. to the project due to its pavement condition, paving two watermain break patches on Quebec Avenue North, increasing existing 8’ to 10’ wide trails in Liberty Park, and additional storm sewer lining related costs of the deteriorated storm culvert on Oregon Avenue North. If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (612) 712-2021. Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Dan D. Boyum, P.E. City Engineer Phone: 612 712 2021 dan.boyum@stantec.com Attachments: Pay Request No. 8 & Final and IC-134 Forms c.Reese Bertholf, Valerie Leone, Dave Lemke, Matt Rowedder, Andrew Kramer, Nick Macklem – New Hope; Stacy Woods – City Attorney; Ann Ackerson – Stantec. City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope , MN 55428 Page 2 of 7 Client Project Number: 1054 Payment Number: 8/ FINAL Payment Summary No.Up To Date Work Certified Per Request Amount Retained Per Request Amount Paid Per Request 1 2021-05-27 $500,661.86 $25,033.09 $475,628.77 2 2021-06-29 $514,447.11 $25,722.36 $488,724.75 3 2021-08-27 $167,406.62 $8,370.33 $159,036.29 4 2021-11-12 $65,564.16 $3,278.21 $62,285.95 5 2022-03-30 $42,468.58 $2,123.43 $40,345.15 6 2022-07-28 $0.00 ($63,419.67)$63,419.67 7 2022-12-13 $23,830.00 $995.45 $22,834.55 8 /FINAL 2023-04-25 $0.00 ($2,103.20)$2,103.20 Funding Category Name Work Certified to Date Less Amount Retained Less Previous Payments Amount Paid this Request Total Amount Paid to Date Park Funds $44,310.21 $0.00 $44,239.31 $70.90 $44,310.21 Sanitary Sewer Fund $73,345.00 $0.00 $73,227.63 $117.37 $73,345.00 Storm Fund $206,438.93 $0.00 $206,108.60 $330.33 $206,438.93 Street Fund $869,931.74 $0.00 $868,539.72 $1,392.02 $869,931.74 Water Main Funds $120,352.45 $0.00 $120,159.87 $192.58 $120,352.45 Contract Item Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Request Amount This Request Quantity To Date Amount To Date Part A: General 1 2021.501/ 00010 MOBILIZATION LS $50,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $50,000.00 2 2563.601/ 00010 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $45,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $45,000.00 Part A: General Totals:$0.00 $95,000.00 Part B: Water Main 3 2104.503/ 00271 REMOVE CIP WATER MAIN LF $5.00 480 0 $0.00 542 $2,710.00 4 2104.501/ 00085 REMOVE WATER SERVICE EA $100.00 9 0 $0.00 9 $900.00 5 2104.503 REMOVE HYDRANT, VALVE AND BOX EA $350.00 1 0 $0.00 2 $700.00 6 2104.502/ 00871 REMOVE VALVE AND BOX EA $225.00 4 0 $0.00 4 $900.00 7 2504.601/ 00040 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LS $10,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $10,000.00 8 2504.602/ 00010 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EA $750.00 8 0 $0.00 10 $7,500.00 9 2504.603 6" PVC WATER MAIN, C900- DR18, WITH TRACER WIRE LF $41.00 40 0 $0.00 66 $2,706.00 10 2504.601 8" PVC WATER MAIN, C900- DR18, WITH TRACER WIRE LF $42.00 475 0 $0.00 481 $20,202.00 11 2504.602/ 00806 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA $1,950.00 3 0 $0.00 7 $13,650.00 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope , MN 55428 Page 3 of 7 Client Project Number: 1054 Payment Number: 8/ FINAL Contract Item Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Request Amount This Request Quantity To Date Amount To Date 12 2504.602/ 00808 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA $2,400.00 4 0 $0.00 5 $12,000.00 13 2504.602/ 00023 INSTALL HYDRANT EACH $5,850.00 3 0 $0.00 4 $23,400.00 14 2504.608/ 00020 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB $0.01 1100 0 $0.00 1100 $11.00 15 2502.604 INSULATION - 4" THICK SY $39.00 15 0 $0.00 25.55 $996.45 16 2451.607/ 00001 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF $0.01 450 0 $0.00 200 $2.00 17 2504.602/ 00411 1" CORPORATION STOP AND SADDLE EA $550.00 9 0 $0.00 9 $4,950.00 18 2504.603/ 00710 1" TYPE "K" COPPER PIPE LF $32.00 45 0 $0.00 53 $1,696.00 19 2504.602/ 00014 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EA $745.00 9 0 $0.00 9 $6,705.00 20 2104.602/ 00003 REMOVE AND REPLACE WATER GV BOX SECTION EA $425.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $850.00 21 2453.610/ 00010 EXPLORATORY DIGGING HR $340.00 6 0 $0.00 5.1 $1,734.00 22 2503.602/ 00411 REPAIR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EA $300.00 2 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Part B: Water Main Totals:$0.00 $111,612.45 Part C: Sanitary Sewer 23 2104.601/ 0003 REMOVE AND REPLACE SANITARY SEWER FRAME AND RINGS WITH HDPE RINGS AND FRAME EA $975.00 49 0 $0.00 58 $56,550.00 24 2503.503/ 00001 INTEGRAL CONCRETE RING LF $295.00 62 0 $0.00 36 $10,620.00 Part C: Sanitary Sewer Totals:$0.00 $67,170.00 Part D: Storm Sewer 25 2104.502/ 00770 REMOVE STORM SEWER MH OR CATCH BASIN EA $350.00 3 0 $0.00 2 $700.00 26 2104.503/ 00285 REMOVE EXISTING STORM PIPE LF $8.00 30 0 $0.00 28 $224.00 27 2104.601/ 00004 REMOVE AND REPLACE STORM SEWER FRAME AND RINGS WITH HDPE RINGS AND FRAME EA $750.00 7 0 $0.00 6 $4,500.00 28 2104.521/ 02305 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCE LF $50.00 40 0 $0.00 126 $6,300.00 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope , MN 55428 Page 4 of 7 Client Project Number: 1054 Payment Number: 8/ FINAL Contract Item Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Request Amount This Request Quantity To Date Amount To Date 29 2503.603/ 00001 12" RCP STORM SEWER, CL 5 LF $48.00 98 0 $0.00 45 $2,160.00 30 2503.603/ 00005 15" RCP STORM SEWER, CL 5 LF $52.00 77 0 $0.00 82 $4,264.00 31 2503.503/ 19185 18" RCP STORM SEWER, CL 5 LF $64.00 8 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 32 2630.0210 9 27" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 5 LF $112.00 16 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 33 2630.0002 2 4' DIAMETER STORM SEWER CBMH EA $2,775.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $5,550.00 34 2630.0002 3 5' DIAMETER STORM SEWER CBMH EA $5,275.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $5,275.00 35 2630.0198 5' DIAMETER STORM SEWER CBMH, WITH SUMP EA $4,800.00 1 0 $0.00 4.5 $21,600.00 36 2506.602/ 06062 2'X3' STORM SEWER CB EA $1,450.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $2,900.00 37 2502.602/ 00111 FURNISH AND INSTALL TRASH SEPARATOR EA $925.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $925.00 38 2503.603/ 36182 DIRECTIONALLY DRILL STORM 18" HDPE LF $139.00 400 0 $0.00 351 $48,789.00 39 2502.541/ 06060 6" PVC PERFORATED DRAIN TILE, WITH SOCK LF $28.00 100 0 $0.00 150 $4,200.00 40 2502.602/ 00241 CONNECT TO STORM STRUCTURE (DRAINTILE)EA $500.00 10 0 $0.00 10 $5,000.00 41 2630.0005 6 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE EA $450.00 4 0 $0.00 1 $450.00 42 2635.0001 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EA $500.00 1 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 43 2530.07 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER EXISTING PIPE EA $3,450.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $3,450.00 44 2503.603/ 20090 TELEVISE STORM SEWER LF $4.40 514 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Part D: Storm Sewer Totals:$0.00 $116,287.00 Part E: Street Improvements – Mill and Overlay, Reclaim Streets and Parking Lot 45 2573.530/ 00010 INLET PROTECTION EA $125.00 55 0 $0.00 22 $2,750.00 46 1570.0013 7 SILT FENCE, MACHINE SLICED LF $3.00 450 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 47 2504.602/ 00034 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA $350.00 4 0 $0.00 1 $350.00 48 2232.504/ 00040 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 1.5" DEPTH SY $0.95 37000 0 $0.00 40330 $38,313.50 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope , MN 55428 Page 5 of 7 Client Project Number: 1054 Payment Number: 8/ FINAL Contract Item Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Request Amount This Request Quantity To Date Amount To Date 49 2232.607/ 00471 MILL 4" WITH PETROMAT, HAUL AND STOCKPILE IN CITY CY $40.00 120 0 $0.00 81 $3,240.00 50 2232.604/ 00001 RECLAIM AND SHAPE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $3.50 15750 0 $0.00 16566 $57,981.00 51 2104.501 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF $30.00 3420 0 $0.00 4351 $130,530.00 52 2104.503/ 00123 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF $1.00 2800 0 $0.00 4638 $4,638.00 53 2104.503/ 00024 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF $1.50 2000 0 $0.00 1763 $2,644.50 54 9990.0633 3 REMOVE BITUMINOUS STREET PAVEMENT SY $15.00 61 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 55 2225.0001 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF $4.00 690 0 $0.00 252 $1,008.00 56 2105.501/ 00010 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) (P)CY $25.00 250 0 $0.00 347 $8,675.00 57 2105.604/ 00034 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V, NON-WOVEN SY $6.00 50 0 $0.00 575 $3,450.00 58 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (MODIFIED)TN $30.00 40 0 $0.00 309.16 $9,274.80 59 2211.501/ 00010 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN $35.00 10 0 $0.00 355.42 $12,439.70 60 2211.609 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 - (SPECIAL)TN $0.01 2980 0 $0.00 2981 $29.81 61 2231.500 BITUMINOUS PATCHING (SPECIAL) - TYPE SP 12.5 NON- WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(B) TN $70.00 700 0 $0.00 363.15 $25,420.50 62 2357.502/ 00010 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $0.01 3053 0 $0.00 2425 $24.25 63 2360.501/ 12200 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B)TN $64.00 5534 0 $0.00 6372.52 $407,841.28 64 2360.501/ 0003 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TN $135.00 63 0 $0.00 100.27 $13,536.45 65 2360.505/ 00002 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS/TRAIL (2,B) TN $135.00 82 0 $0.00 88.9 $12,001.50 66 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SF $6.45 2000 0 $0.00 1796 $11,584.20 67 2531.618 6" CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP SF $11.45 107 0 $0.00 367 $4,202.15 68 2531.618/ 00011 TRUNCATED DOME SURFACE SF $60.00 36 0 $0.00 79 $4,740.00 69 2540.603/ 00016 MASTIC PRIOR TO WEAR PAVING LF $0.55 33730 0 $0.00 32491 $17,870.05 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope , MN 55428 Page 6 of 7 Client Project Number: 1054 Payment Number: 8/ FINAL Contract Item Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Request Amount This Request Quantity To Date Amount To Date 70 2574.604 EROSION CONTROL COMPOST BLANKET -BLOWN W/ SEED SY $4.25 3790 0 $0.00 2413 $10,255.25 71 2574.525/ 00010 TOPSOIL BORROW, MNDOT 3877.2B(LV)CY $35.00 890 0 $0.00 201 $7,035.00 72 2564.531/ 10000 SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $45.00 25 0 $0.00 35 $1,575.00 73 2582.503/ 10125 24" SOLID WHITE STOP BAR (PAINT)LF $7.00 100 0 $0.00 52 $364.00 74 2582.602/ 09000 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EFT- TURN ARROW PAINT EA $85.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $170.00 75 2582.502/ 10104 4" SOLID LINE PAINT LF $1.20 120 0 $0.00 123 $147.60 76 2582.502/ 12404 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT LF $2.40 120 0 $0.00 123 $295.20 77 2123.610/ 00045 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HR $145.00 35 0 $0.00 43 $6,235.00 78 2130.523/ 00010 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL $85.00 10 0 $0.00 10 $850.00 Part E: Street Improvements - Mill and Overlay, Reclaim Streets and Parking Lot Totals: $0.00 $799,471.74 Alt. 1: Oregon Ave N Sewer CIPP Lining 79 2021.501/ 00010 MOBILIZATION LS $2,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $2,000.00 80 2563.601/ 00010 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $2,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $2,500.00 81 2503.607/ 00020 SEWER PIPE CLEANING CY $1.00 50 0 $0.00 50 $50.00 82 2957.0006 1 PRE-LINER LF $1.00 1180 0 $0.00 7 $7.00 83 2957.0020 0 SERVICE REINSTATEMENT EA $150.00 4 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 84 2507.603/ 10018 CIPP LINE EX. 18" CMP LF $49.00 1180 0 $0.00 1533.57 $75,144.93 Alt. 1: Oregon Ave N Storm Sewer CIPP Lining Totals:$0.00 $79,701.93 Alt. 3: Liberty Park Bituminous Trail Improvements 85 2021.501/ 00010 MOBILIZATION LS $1,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,500.00 86 2563.601/ 00010 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $1,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,000.00 87 2573.530/ 00010 INLET PROTECTION EA $135.00 5 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope , MN 55428 Page 7 of 7 Client Project Number: 1054 Payment Number: 8/ FINAL Contract Item Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Request Amount This Request Quantity To Date Amount To Date 88 2104.501 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF $30.00 30 0 $0.00 42 $1,260.00 89 2232.604/ 00003 RECLAIM AND SHAPE EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL SY $5.00 687 0 $0.00 1338 $6,690.00 90 2105.501/ 00010 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CY $40.00 40 0 $0.00 96 $3,840.00 91 2360.501/ 12201 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING BITUMINOUS MIXTURE (2,B)TN $78.00 136 0 $0.00 155.17 $12,103.26 92 2574.525/ 00010 TOPSOIL BORROW, MNDOT 3877.2B(LV)CY $60.00 150 0 $0.00 89 $5,340.00 93 2531.618/ 00011 TRUNCATED DOME SURFACE SF $11.45 48 0 $0.00 40 $458.00 94 2531.618 6" CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP SF $11.45 120 0 $0.00 126 $1,442.70 95 2574.604 EROSION CONTROL COMPOST BLANKET -BLOWN W/ SEED SY $4.25 850 0 $0.00 1065 $4,526.25 96 2130.523/ 00010 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL $55.00 15 0 $0.00 15 $825.00 97 2753.604/ 0002 TEMPORARY SEED SY $3.00 850 0 $0.00 2050 $6,150.00 Alt. 3: Liberty Park Bituminous Trail Improvements Totals:$0.00 $45,135.21 Project Total:$0.00 $1,314,378.33 Project Category Totals Category Amount This Request Amount To Date Part A: General $0.00 $95,000.00 Part B: Water Main $0.00 $111,612.45 Part C: Sanitary Sewer $0.00 $67,170.00 Part D: Storm Sewer $0.00 $116,287.00 Part E: Street Improvements -Mill and Overlay, Reclaim Streets and Parking Lot $0.00 $799,471.74 Alt. 1: Oregon Ave N Storm Sewer CIPP Lining $0.00 $79,701.93 Alt. 3: Liberty Park Bituminous Trail Improvements $0.00 $45,135.21 Contract Total $1,314,378.33 I:\RFA\PUBWORKS\2023\Council\1099 2023 Seal coat fog seal\10‐23 Final payment & close out\Q & R ‐1099 2023 Seal Coat Final Payment.docx   Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: Public Works  By: Bernie Weber, Director    Agenda Title  Resolution approving final payment to Allied Blacktop Company for $32,849.23 for the 2023 Crack Repair  and Seal Coat project (Improvement Project No. 1099)  Requested Action  Staff recommends approval of a resolution to accept the 2023 Crack Repair and Seal Coat project  (Improvement Project No. 1099) and authorize final payment to Allied Blacktop Company in the amount of  $32,849.23.  Policy/Past Practice  To maximize the life of the city pavement, New Hope annually schedules crack repair, seal coating and fog  sealing on selected city streets. This is an activity critical to the city’s current pavement management strategy.  If delayed, maintenance costs increase and may also result in premature expenditures for pavement overlays  or reconstruction.  Background  This project included crack repair, seal coat, and fog seal on in the Liberty Park neighborhood, the Dorothy  Mary Park neighborhood, the West Broadway neighborhood, the Begin Park neighborhood, areas west of  Holiday Park, the Northwood Parkway area, Quebec Avenue between 49th and Winnetka avenues, Winpark  Drive, Nevada Avenue from 36th Avenue to the city limits, and 49th Avenue from Boone to Winnetka avenues.  Funding  The CIP listed $622,277.53 for roadway crack repair, seal coat, and fog seal in 2023 funded by the street  infrastructure fund. The original engineer’s estimate for the entire seal coat project, including alternates,  mastic repair, and indirect costs, was $606,496.41. Bids came in lower than expected and the original contract  amount with Allied Blacktop Company was $481,346.35. The final construction amount for the crack repair,  seal coat, fog seal is $448,444.45, or $32,901.91 under the original contract amount of $481,346.36. The  underrun was primarily due to less cracks requiring repair than estimated on the project streets.    Attachments   Resolution   City Engineer’s Memo   Final Pay Request             Agenda Section Consent Item Number  6.6  City of New Hope  Resolution No. 23    Resolution approving final payment to Allied Blacktop Company   for $32,849.23 for the 2023 Crack Repair and Seal Coat project   (Improvement Project No. 1099)    WHEREAS, the infrastructure improvement identified follow the pavement management strategy  adopted by the Council; and    WHEREAS, the city has entered into a contract with Allied Blacktop Company for construction of the  2023 Crack Repair and Seal Coat project; and    WHEREAS, staff is recommending that the Council adopt a resolution to accept improvement project  no. 1099 and approve final payment to Allied Blacktop Company in the amount of  $32,849.23; and    WHEREAS,     the city engineer has reported that all work and documentation has been satisfactorily  completed and recommends, along with staff, final payment be made to Allied Blacktop  Company.     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,     1. That the City Council accepts the 2023 Crack Repair and Seal Coat project from Allied Blacktop  Company.     2. That the city manager is hereby directed to authorize the final payment to Allied Blacktop Company  in the amount of $32,849.23.    Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota, this 23rd day of  October, 2023.                                                                                                         __________________________________                                                                 Mayor     Attest:                 City Clerk           Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000, Minneapolis MN 55402-2309 October 4, 2023 File:193805566 Attention:Bernie Weber, Director of Public Works City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Dear Bernie, Reference: Final Payment Request No. 2 & Final – 2023 Crack Repair and Seal Coat City Project No. 1099 Enclosed find Payment Request No. 2 & Final for the above referenced project. The contractor, Allied Blacktop Company, has completed the work in accordance with the contract plans and specifications and submitted final closeout forms. Therefore, it is recommended that final payment of $32,849.23 is made and the City of New Hope accepts the project. The Final Construction Amount for Allied Blacktop Company is $448,444.45, or $32,901.91 under the Original Contract Amount of $481,346.36. The underrun was primarily due to less cracks requiring repair than estimated on the project streets. If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (612) 712-2021. Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Dan D. Boyum, P.E. City Engineer Phone: 612 712 2021 dan.boyum@stantec.com Attachments:Pay Request No. 2 & Final c.Reece Bertholf, Valerie Leone, Dave Lemke, Andrew Kramer, Nick Macklem – New Hope; Stacy Woods – City Attorney; Ann Ackerson – Stantec. City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope , MN 55428 Page 2 of 4 Client Project Number: 1099 Payment Number: 2 / FINAL Payment Summary No.Up To Date Work Certified Per Request Amount Retained Per Request Amount Paid Per Request 1 2023-08-31 $437,468.65 $21,873.43 $415,595.22 2 /FINAL 2023-10-02 $10,975.80 ($21,873.43)$32,849.23 Funding Category Name Work Certified to Date Less Amount Retained Less Previous Payments Amount Paid this Request Total Amount Paid to Date Street Fund $448,444.45 $0.00 $415,595.22 $32,849.23 $448,444.45 Contract Item Status Line Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Request Amount This Request Quantity To Date Amount To Date PART 1: GENERAL 1 MOBILIZATION LS $25,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $25,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $40,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $40,000.00 PART 1: GENERAL TOTALS:$0.00 $65,000.00 PART 2: STREETS 3 CRACK SEAL (ROUT AND SEAL)LBS $2.85 20100 0 $0.00 14161 $40,358.85 4 CRACK SEAL (CLEAN AND SEAL)LBS $2.85 6700 0 $0.00 8693 $24,775.05 5 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COAT, CRS-2 GAL $2.30 31530 0 $0.00 29147 $67,038.10 6 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE, FA-2 (MOD), TRAP ROCK SY $1.03 111200 0 $0.00 111200 $114,536.00 7 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR FOG SEAL SY $0.69 111200 0 $0.00 111200 $76,728.00 8 4" SOLID LINE PAINT LF $1.55 650 0 $0.00 509 $788.95 9 24" SOLID LINE, PAINT LF $7.10 80 0 $0.00 98 $695.80 10 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, PAINT SF $8.10 348 0 $0.00 270 $2,187.00 11 REMOVE EXISTING ROADWAY STRIPING - PAINT LF $1.25 650 494 $617.50 494 $617.50 12 REMOVE EXISTING ROADWAY PAVEMENT MARKINGS - PAINT SF $4.10 508 500 $2,050.00 500 $2,050.00 PART 2: STREETS TOTALS:$2,667.50 $329,775.25 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope , MN 55428 Page 3 of 4 Client Project Number: 1099 Payment Number: 2 / FINAL Contract Item Status Line Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Request Amount This Request Quantity To Date Amount To Date ALTERNATE #1: 55TH AVENUE N 13 MOBILIZATION LS $1,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,500.00 14 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $2,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $2,000.00 15 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COAT, CRS-2 GAL $2.30 2050 0 $0.00 2050 $4,715.00 16 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE, FA-2 (MOD), TRAP ROCK SY $1.03 7210 0 $0.00 7210 $7,426.30 17 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR FOG SEAL SY $0.69 7210 0 $0.00 7210 $4,974.90 18 4" SOLID LINE PAINT LF $1.55 1790 0 $0.00 1790 $2,774.50 19 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE, PAINT LF $3.10 1865 0 $0.00 1860 $5,766.00 20 24" SOLID LINE, PAINT LF $7.10 30 0 $0.00 34 $241.40 21 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, PAINT SF $8.10 320 0 $0.00 318 $2,575.80 22 REMOVE EXISTING ROADWAY STRIPING - PAINT LF $1.25 3685 5538 $6,922.50 5538 $6,922.50 23 REMOVE EXISTING ROADWAY PAVEMENT MARKINGS - PAINT SF $4.10 444 338 $1,385.80 338 $1,385.80 ALTERNATE #1: 55TH AVENUE N TOTALS:$8,308.30 $40,282.20 ALTERNATE #2: MSA QUEBEC AVENUE N AND 48TH CIRCLE N 24 MOBILIZATION LS $1,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,000.00 25 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $1,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,000.00 26 CRACK SEAL (ROUT AND SEAL) - STREETS LBS $2.00 8163.3375 0 $0.00 1500 $3,000.00 27 CRACK SEAL (CLEAN AND SEAL) - STREETS LBS $2.00 2721.1125 0 $0.00 833 $1,666.00 28 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COAT, CRS-2 GAL $2.30 320 0 $0.00 320 $736.00 29 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE, FA-2 (MOD), TRAP ROCK SY $3.75 1140 0 $0.00 1140 $4,275.00 30 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR FOG SEAL SY $1.50 1140 0 $0.00 1140 $1,710.00 ALTERNATE #2: MSA QUEBEC AVENUE N AND 48TH CIRCLE N TOTALS:$0.00 $13,387.00 PROJECT TOTALS:$10,975.80 $448,444.45 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope , MN 55428 Page 4 of 4 Client Project Number: 1099 Payment Number: 2 / FINAL Project Category Totals Category Amount This Request Amount To Date PART 1: GENERAL $0.00 $65,000.00 PART 2: STREETS $2,667.50 $329,775.25 ALTERNATE #1: 55TH AVENUE N $8,308.30 $40,282.20 ALTERNATE #2: MSA QUEBEC AVENUE N AND 48TH CIRCLE N $0.00 $13,387.00 Contract Total $448,444.45 I:\RFA\COMM DEV\2023\City Council\10‐23‐23 5017 Boone CUP\8.1 Q ‐ PC 23‐02 5017 Boone Ave N CUP 10‐23‐23.docx   Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: Community Development  By: Jeff Alger, Community Development Specialist;   Jeff Sargent, Director of Community Development  Agenda Title  Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit for deferment of required parking relating to real property  located at 5017 Boone Avenue North, New Hope (New Hope Planning Case 23‐02)  Requested Action  Staff requests that the City Council approve a resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for the  deferment of required parking at 5017 Boone Avenue North.  Policy/Past Practice  The City Council has approved Conditional Use Permit requests in the past when proposals comply with the  requirements of the zoning code.  Background  The owner of 5017 Boone Avenue North is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the deferment of  required parking. The building requires a minimum of 71 on‐site parking stalls. The site plan submitted by  the applicant includes 54 parking stalls, resulting in a required deferment of 17 parking stalls. The site plan  includes 20 possible future parking stalls (proof of parking) within the open outdoor storage area on the west  side of the property. According to the applicant, approximately 20 employees are based out of the building  and parking demand is significantly lower than what is required by City Code.    The initial application also included a request for a variance related to the open outdoor storage area on the  west side of the property. The variance would have exempted the applicant from fencing portions of the open  outdoor storage area. After receiving feedback at the Design and Review meeting, the applicant withdrew this  request and now plans to fence the entire area. Because the proposed open outdoor storage area was less than  20% of the gross floor area of the principal building, the request was processed administratively.  Recommendation  The Planning Commission considered the request for a CUP for the deferment of required parking at 5017  Boone Avenue North and recommended approval with an 8‐0 vote, subject to the following conditions:  1. A restrictive covenant shall be executed by Owner and Tenant and recorded against the property in  the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder as the Property is Abstract.  The restrictive covenant shall  mandate the construction of the proof of parking area, if the City finds that the demand for on‐site  parking exceeds the available supply.  This restrictive covenant shall preserve the proof of parking  area from any type of construction.   2. All proposed on‐site parking shall occur in designated code compliant areas that meet dimensional  standards specified within the City Code.  Parking shall not take place within drive aisles, loading areas,  fire lanes, or on the street.  3. Exterior storage shall be restricted to approved open outdoor storage areas.  Agenda Section Development &  Planning Item Number  8.1    Request for Action, Page 2    4. Special hazard permit shall be obtained for the storage of any propane or LP gas tanks, which is subject  to approval by the deputy fire marshal.  5. Waste containers shall be located within enclosures or inside of approved open outdoor storage areas.  A building permit shall be obtained for the construction of any trash enclosures, which must comply  with standards for the district.  Attachments   Resolution   Draft Planning Commission minutes (October 3, 2023)    For more information, please refer to the staff and consultant reports included in the October 3, 2023,  Planning Commission packet, which was previously distributed.    1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-___ RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEFERMENT OF REQUIRED PARKING RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5017 BOONE AVENUE NORTH, NEW HOPE (New Hope Planning Case 23-02) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as follows: WHEREAS, Property Cents, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Owner”), is the owner of the real property located at 5017 Boone Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota, 55428 with Property Identification Number of 07-118-21-24-0013 and legally described as: Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, Keelor Steel 1st Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Property”) WHEREAS, Horizon Roofing, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Petitioner”) leases the Property and has petitioned the City as part of New Hope Planning Case 23-02 for a Conditional Use Permit for deferment of required parking relating to proposed open outdoor storage area on the west side of the Property (“Project”); WHEREAS, the Building requires a minimum of 71 on-site parking stalls. The proposed open outdoor storage area includes 54 parking stalls, resulting in a deferment of 17 parking stalls; WHEREAS, the site plan includes 20 possible future parking stalls (proof of parking) within the open outdoor storage area on the west side of the Property; WHEREAS, based on the City Staff Planning Case Report dated September 29, 2023, this Resolution incorporates the findings set forth therein; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the matter at its meeting on October 3, 2023; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after a complete review of the issues involved, recommended the City Council approve the application; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered Planning Case 23-02 for the Project at its meeting of October 23, 2023. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope that the request of Petitioner for a Conditional Use Permit, shall be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A restrictive covenant shall be executed by Owner and Tenant and recorded against the property in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder as the Property is Abstract. The restrictive covenant shall mandate the construction of the proof of parking area, if the City finds that the demand for on-site parking exceeds the available supply. This restrictive covenant shall preserve the proof of parking area from any type of construction. 2. All proposed on-site parking shall occur in designated code compliant areas that meet dimensional standards specified within the City Code. Parking shall not take place within drive aisles, loading areas, fire lanes, or on the street. 3. Exterior storage shall be restricted to approved open outdoor storage areas. 4. Special hazard permit shall be obtained for the storage of any propane or LP gas tanks, which is subject to approval by the deputy fire marshal. 5. Waste containers shall be located within enclosures or inside of approved open outdoor storage areas. A building permit shall be obtained for the construction of any trash enclosures, which must comply with standards for the district. Dated the 23th day of October, 2023. ____________________________________ Kathi Hemken, Mayor Attest: _______________________ Valerie Leone, City Clerk P:\Attorney\SAS\1 Client Files\2 City of New Hope\99-22302 5017 Boone Ave N - CUP\Resolution Approving CUP for deferment of required parking.docx CITY OF NEW HOPE 4401 XYLON AVE NORTH NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA 55428 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 3, 2023 City Hall, 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER The New Hope Planning Commission met in regular session pursuant to due call and notice thereof; Chair Landy called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Also Present: Ray Alkalai, Natalie Brown, Don Collier, Howard Kaplan, Roger Landy, Matt Mannix, Michael Redden, Mike Terres Heather Koshiol Jeff Sargent, Director of Community Development; Jeff Alger, Community Development Specialist; Al Brixius, City Panner; Stacy Woods, Assistant City Attorney, Linda Bergemann, Recording Secretary NEW BUSINESS Swearing in new Commissioner Natalie Brown. Commission discussion to reappoint chair positions. The Commission voted on the following olficer positions: Commissioner Mannix, Chair; Commissioner Redden, Vice Chair; Commissioner Koshiol, Third Olficer. Appoint members of Design & Review and Codes & Standards sub- committees. The Commission agreed on the following sub-committees: Design & Review: Commissioner Alkalai, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Kaplan, Commissioner Landy Codes & Standards: Commissioner Koshiol, Commissioner Mannix, Commissioner Redden, Commissioner Terres Floater: Commissioner Collier PUBLIC HEARING Planning Case 23-02 Items 4.1 Chair Mannix introduced the planning case. Item 4.1, Planning Case 23-02, Conditional Use Permit for deferment of required parking at 5017 Boone Ave North; Kurt Scepaniak, Petitioner. Mr. Jeff Alger, Community Development Specialist, gave background information on the planning case. The owner of 5017 Boone Ave North is requesting a conditional use permit for the deferment of required parking. The initial application also included a request for a variance related to an open outdoor storage area on the west side of the property. The var iance would have exempted the applicant from fencing portions of the open outdoor storage area. After receiving feedback at the Design & Review Committee, the applicant withdrawn that portion of the application and now plans to fence the entire area. Because the proposed open outdoor storage area was less than 20% of the gross ifoor area of the principal building, the request was processed administratively. Regarding the Conditional Use Permit request, the building requires a minimum of 71 on- site parking stalls. The site plan submitted by the applicant includes 54 parking stalls, resulting in the required deferment of 17 parking stalls. The site plan includes 20 possible future parking stalls, which is the proof of parking area, within the open outdoor storage area on the west side of the building. The building is currently occupied by three tenants with a total of 20 employees based out of the location. Alger then reviewed the zoning analysis. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the footprint of the building or the size of the parking lots or outdoor storage area. The interior ifoor plan indicates that there is about 8,600 square feet of olfice space and about 75,000 square feet of warehouse space within the building. Per city code regulations, this requires a minimum of 71 parking stalls. The site plan includes 54 parking stalls, and 71 stalls are required resulting in the deferment of 17 parking stalls. The plan includes 20 possible future parking stalls the proof of parking area within the paved open outdoor storage area on the west side of the property. Parking demand is signiffcantly lower than what is required by city code. The City Code allows for a deferment of required parking not less than one half of the amount required by ordinance. This request would result in the building having 76% of the stalls required by code. In the event of changes to the building occupancy or parking demand, the city can require that the proof of parking area be converted into parking stalls. This would be possible through the recording of a restricted covenant against the property title providing that additional parking shall be constructed if the demand exceeds the actual on-site parking supply. The building owner intends to make some repairs and stripe areas of the parking lot and open outdoor storage area in the fall of 2023. The parking stalls and drive aisles must match what is depicted on the submitted plans. Snow will be moved and stored to the east of easterly parking lot and to the north of the westerly parking lot. There is a snow storage area depicted within the open outdoor storage area as well. The site plan indicates a trash enclosure will be constructed for the trash container located near the entrance to the open outdoor storage area at the northwest corner of the west parking lot. The applicant must submit a building permit for the enclosure, which must comply with standards for the district. Additionally, there are several containers and dumpsters located within the westerly parking lot. Waste containers must be located within an enclosure or inside of an approved open outdoor storage area. Several parking stalls within the west parking lot are occupied by exterior storage. Exterior storage is restricted to the approved outdoor storage areas and may not take place within designated parking areas. There are also a few propane tanks being stored within the west parking lot. The storage of these tanks is not permitted within side yards abutting public streets. Therefore, the applicant must obtain a Special Hazard permit for the storage of these propane or LP gas tanks and that is subject to approval by the Deputy Fire Marshal. Alger concluded that property owners within 500 feet of the parcel were notiffed of the public hearing by mail, a legal notice was published in the Sun Post newspaper, and a “Notice of Land Use Petition” sign was installed at the property. The city did not receive any inquiries regarding the case. Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Redden, to open the Public Hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. No one addressed the commission. Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Redden, to close the Public hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. Chair Mannix asked if any of the commissioners had any questions. Kurt Scepaniak from 5017 Boone Ave North approached the podium. Commissioner Landy asked about on-street parking that is currently taking place and how it would be discouraged. Mr. Scepaniak stated he has discussed with staff that on-street parking is not allowed. Commissioner Landy then asked about the materials in the parking stalls and Mr. Scepaniak stated that they are working on consolidating the materials and restricting it to the approved outdoor storage areas. Commissioner Landy asked Mr. Scepaniak if he was in agreement with the conditions of approval listed. Mr. Scepaniak stated that he was okay with the conditions. Chair Mannix asked the commission for any discussion. Commissioner Redden stated that he does not foresee the applicant needing 74 stalls within the foreseeable future. Mr. Scepaniak conffrmed that the parking lot is already striped and repairs are being completed on the parking lot. Motion Item 4.1 Motion by Commissioner Redden, seconded by Commissioner Roger. To approve Planning Case 23-02, Conditional Use Permit for deferment of required parking at 5017 Boone Ave North, Kurt Scepaniak, petitioner, with the following conditions: 1. A restrictive covenant shall be recorded against the property that mandates the construction of the proof of parking area, if the city finds that the demand for on-site parking exceeds the available supply. This covenant shall preserve the proof of parking area from any type of construction. 2. All proposed on-site parking shall occur in designated code compliant areas that meet dimensional standards specified within the City Code. Parking shall not take place within drive aisles, loading areas, fire lanes, or on the street. 3. Exterior storage shall be restricted to approved open outdoor storage areas. 4. Special hazard permit shall be obtained for the storage of any propane or LP gas tanks, which is subject to approval by the deputy fire marshal. 5. Waste containers shall be located within enclosures or inside of approved open outdoor storage areas. A Building permit shall be obtained for the construction of any trash enclosures, which must comply with standards for the district. Voting in favor: Alkalai, Brown, Collier, Kaplan, Landy, Mannix, Redden, Terres Voting against: None Absent: Koshiol, Heather Motion approved: 8-0 Chair Mannix state the case will be brought to the October 23, 2023, City Council meeting. COMMITTEE REPORTS Design & Review Committee Item 5.1 The next meeting is scheduled for October 18, 2023. If an application is submitted, staff will notify commissioners of the meetings. Mr. Sargent explained the purpose of this subcommittee to the new member of the commission. Codes and Standards Committee Item 5.2 There currently is no meeting scheduled. Mr. Sargent explained the purpose of this subcommittee to the new member of the commission. CONSENT BUSINESS None OLD BUSINESS Approval of Minutes Item 7.1 Motion by Commissioner Roger, seconded by Commissioner Redden, to approve the Planning Commission minutes of February 7, 2023. Motion carried. ANNOUNCEMENTS Commissioner Landy welcomed Linda Bergemann, Recording Secretary, to the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission meeting was unanimously adjourned at 7:21 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda Bergemann, Community Development Administrative Specialist I:\RFA\PUBWORKS\2023\Council\1107 2024 Infrastructure Project\10‐23 Accept feasibility order construction and prep plans specs\RFA_Public  Hearing  preparation of plans.docx  Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: Public Works  By: Bernie Weber, Public Works Director     Agenda Title  Resolution accepting feasibility report and ordering the construction and preparation of plans and  specifications for the 2024 Infrastructure Project (Improvement Project No. 1107)    Requested Action  Staff is requesting that the Council conduct a public hearing and receive a presentation by the city  engineer regarding a proposed 2024 infrastructure improvement project. Staff recommends that the  Council pass a resolution accepting the feasibility report, ordering the 2024 Infrastructure Improvement  Project, and authorizing Stantec, the city’s consulting engineer, to prepare the plans and specifications.    Policy/Past Practice  The City Council routinely considers public infrastructure improvement projects to extend the useful life of the  infrastructure and/or improve the level of service. The city’s pavement management plan identifies these areas  in the Street Infrastructure Projects portion of the plan.    Background  The general location of the potential 2024 project includes streets in the Jaycee Park Neighborhood, Zealand  Avenue North from Bass Lake Road to 55th Avenue North, and Pennsylvania Avenue North at Oregon  Avenue North.  There are Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets being affected including: 36th Avenue North  between TH169 and 300‐ft West of Winnetka Avenue North, 56th Avenue North between Boone Avenue  North and Xylon Avenue North, and Xylon Avenue North from 56th Avenue North to Bass Lake Road. There  is also a smaller section of 62nd Avenue North between Utah Avenue North and Winnetka Avenue North  included in the project. Streets included in the project were recommended based upon pavement conditions  identified in the 2022 pavement management plan, additional pavement review done in the summer of 2023,  and the underlying utility condition.     Utility improvements will include the replacement of the sanitary sewer manhole lids, frames, and rings to  reduce inflow and infiltration. Various water gate valves will be replaced on Zealand Avenue North near Bass  Lake Road and along Hillsboro Avenue North between 27th Avenue North and 30th Avenue North.  These gate  valves are difficult to turn off, and the ones on Hillsboro Avenue North will need to close when the south  water tower is painted in the next few years.  Replacing of castings and rings on several storm sewer structures  is being proposed as well as some localized draintile placement.      The feasibility report also identified all tax‐exempt properties that will be affected by this work and provides  an estimated assessment rate for these properties. These assessments will be one funding source for the project.    A notice has been sent to neighbors along the project area to make them aware of the presentation of the  feasibility report. Residents may provide comments to the Council and staff at the October 23, 2023 public  hearing.  Because there is no reconstruction of streets or placement of larger stretches of watermain that affects     Agenda Section Development &  Planning Item Number  8.2  Request for Action, Page 2   properties, trees, driveways, curb and gutter replacement, storm sewer improvements, etc., staff is not  considering doing a walk‐through meeting with residents.  Staff plans to do mailings and website updates to  keep property owners informed on the project.     Funding  The estimated total project cost for the street, water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer improvements,  including contingencies and indirect costs, and inflation is approximately $3,051,296.45 million as shown  below. The majority of the project will be funded by the city’s street infrastructure and enterprise funds.     Project Cost Estimate  Item Subtotal Contingencies  (10%)  Total  Construction  Indirect  (20%)  Project   Costs  Mill & Overlay $1,505,207.72 $150,520.77 $1,655,728.49 $331,145.70 $1,986,874.19  Reclaim & Overlay $530,360.50 $53,036.05 $583,396.55 $116,679.31 $700,075.86  Subtotal ‐ Street $2,035,568.22 $203,556.82 $2,239,125.04 $447,825.01 $2,686,950.05  Water Main $91,940.00 $9,194.00 $101,134.00 $20,226.80 $121,360.80  Sanitary Sewer $66,690.00 $6,669.00 $73,359.00 $14,671.80 $88,030.80  Storm Water $117,390.00 $11,739.00 $129,129.00 $25,825.80 $154,954.80  Subtotal ‐ Utilities $276,020.00 $27,602.00 $303,622.00 $60,724.40 $364,346.40  Total ‐ Street &  Utilities  $2,311,588.22 $231,158.82 $2,542,747.04 $508,549.41 $3,051,296.45      The table below provides a summary of the various funding sources for this project.    Funding Source  Funding  Source/  Improvement  State Aid  Funds/Street  Fund*  Water Fund Sewer Fund  **  Storm  Sewer  Fund   Assessments *** Total  Street $2,534,425.07       $152,524.98 $2,686,950.05  Water Main    $121,360.80         $121,360.80  Sanitary Sewer      $88,030.80      $88,030.80  Storm Sewer         $154,954.80    $154,954.80  Totals $2,534,425.07 $121,360.80 $88,030.80 $154,954.80 $152,524.98 $3,051,296.45    *The city will need to ask for an advance in State Aid funding to cover the $963,831.53 in eligible street related  costs.      ** Funding for I/I related improvements is estimated at $88,030.80, which can be considered as credit to  Metropolitan Council I/I Surcharge.  *** The City of New Hope Assessment is estimated at $5,516.78, which is included in the total assessment  amount of $152,524.98.    The costs in the tables above compare to the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) estimate of $2,913,888.17 million  as shown in the table below. The estimated project costs for street, water, and storm sewer are over the CIP  Budget.  The estimated project costs for sanitary sewer are lower than the CIP Budget.      Request for Action, Page 3 Funding Summary  Funding Source Feasibility Report  Estimate  Capital Improvements  Plan (CIP) Budget  Amount  Difference  Street Infrastructure fund $2,686,950.05 $2,678,888.17 ($8,061.88)  Water fund $121,360.80 $60,000.00 ($61,360.80)  Sanitary Sewer fund $88,030.80 $100,000.00 $11,969.20  Storm Water fund $154,954.80 $75,000.00 ($79,954.80)  Totals $3,051,296.45 $2,913,888.17 ($137,408.28)  Based on the estimated costs exceeding the CIP budget, some portions of the proposed utility improvements  may need to be delayed until future reconstruction of the streets.  Some improvements for certain streets may  be listed as alternates to get the base bid improvements within the CIP budget.     Attachments   Resolution   Engineer’s Memo   Project Location Figures   Feasibility Report   1 RESOLUTION NO. 23-____ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING CONSTRUCTION AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1107 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows: 1. Pursuant to a motion by the City Council, a feasibility report has been prepared by the City Engineers, Stantec, with reference to the City’s proposed Improvement Project no. 1107 (2024 Infrastructure Improvement Project), and said feasibility report is hereby presented to and received by the City Council on October 23, 2023. 2. The feasibility report details street pavement and utility improvements in the following general locations: within the Jaycee Park Neighborhood, Zealand Avenue North from Bass Lake Road to 55th Avenue North, and drainage improvements on Pennsylvania Avenue North at Oregon Avenue North. The study area also includes Municipal State Aid (MSA) street sections including: 36th Avenue North between TH169 and 300-ft West of Winnetka Avenue North, 56th Avenue North between Boone Avenue North and Xylon Avenue North, Xylon Avenue North from 56th Avenue North to Bass Lake Road, and 62nd Avenue North between Utah Avenue North and Winnetka Avenue North as specifically set out in Figures 1 and 2 of the feasibility report. 3. The report provides information regarding whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate the individual assessments for affected parcels, if any. 4. The city has placed the proposed project in its capital improvement program. The total estimated cost of the improvement is $3,051,296.45. Table 9 indicates all funding sources for the project including the proposed assessable amounts to benefitting properties, if any. 5. The Council authorized the preparation of this feasibility report by motion at its August 28, 2023 meeting. 6. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2023-97 adopted at its September 11, 2023 meeting, this Council held a public hearing on the 23rd day of October, 2023, at 7:00 p.m. at the New Hope City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue North, on the proposed 2024 Infrastructure Improvement Project No. 1107 of the City. The public hearing was held after notice of the public hearing was duly published on the 12th and 19th days of October, 2023 in 2 the City’s official newspaper the Crystal/Robbinsdale/New Hope/Golden Valley Sun- Post in accordance with and as required by law. 7. The area proposed to be assessed to pay the cost of said improvement shall include the property described in the notice of public hearing pertaining hereto as described in paragraph 6 of this resolution. 8. That all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard at the October 23, 2023 public hearing with respect to the 2024 Infrastructure Improvement Project No. 1107. This Council having considered the views of all persons interested and being fully advised as to the pertinent facts relating to Project No. 1107, does hereby determine the improvement is necessary, cost-effective and feasible as detailed in the October 2023 feasibility report prepared by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Engineers for the City. Further, the Council hereby determines to proceed with the making of said proposed improvement, and said improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in Resolution No. 2023-97. 9. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., as the city engineer, shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of the 2024 Infrastructure Improvement Project No. 1107. 10. The City Council further determines Improvement Project No. 1107 bears no relationship with the City’s comprehensive municipal plan and therefore has not referred this project to the New Hope Planning Commission for construction consideration and the City Council further declares, per federal Treasury Regulation §1.50-2, its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Adopted by the City Council of the city of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota, this 23th day of October, 2023. Kathi Hemken, Mayor Attest: _________________________________ Valerie Leone, City Clerk P:\Attorney\SAS\1 Client Files\2 City of New Hope\99-61107 2024 Infrastructure Imp Porject 1107\Resolution accepting feasibilty report and ordering the construction and preparation of plans and specs.docx       Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 October 17, 2023 File: 193806617 Attention: Bernie Weber, Director of Public Works City of New Hope 5500 International Parkway New Hope, MN 55428 Reference: 2024 Infrastructure Improvements – Public Hearing and Authorization of Plans and Specifications, City Project No. 1107 Dear Bernie, The Council called for a public hearing on the above referenced project at the September 11, 2023 Council Meeting. Attached is the feasibility report and cost estimate that will be presented for this project at the October 23, 2023 Council Meeting in compliance with Chapter 429 requirements. At that meeting, the Council will accept the feasibility report and consider authorizing plans and specifications. The project consists of street and utility improvements as follows: ·Jaycee Park Neighborhood, Zealand Avenue North from Bass Lake Road to 55th Avenue North, and drainage improvements on Pennsylvania Avenue North at Oregon Avenue North. ·Municipal State Aid (MSA) street sections including: 36th Avenue North between TH169 and 300-ft West of Winnetka Avenue North, 56 th Avenue North between Boone Avenue North and Xylon Avenue North, Xylon Avenue North from 56th Avenue North to Bass Lake Road). ·62nd Avenue North between Utah Avenue North and Winnetka Avenue North. The estimated total project cost for the street, water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer improvements, including contingencies and indirect costs, and inflation is approximately $3,051,296.45 million as shown on the table on the next page. October 17, 2023 Mr. Bernie Weber Page 2 of 3 Reference:2024 Infrastructure Improvements – Public Hearing Improvement Type MILL & OVERLAY STREETS MILL & OVERLAY STREETS RECLAIM & OVERLAY STREET RECLAIM & OVERLAY STREET 10% Contin- gencies 20% Indirect Total Project Cost MSA LOCAL MSA LOCAL Streets $526,980.40 $978,227.32 $203,195.00 $327,165.50 $203,556.82 $447,825.01 $2,686,950.05 Water Main $4,080.00 $1,070.00 $1,070.00 $85,720.00 $9,194.00 $20,226.80 $121,360.80 Sanitary Sewer $12,005.00 $31,105.00 $12,005.00 $11,575.00 $6,669.00 $14,671.80 $88,030.80 Storm Sewer $46,200.00 $17,390.00 $25,500.00 $28,300.00 $11,739.00 $25,825.80 $154,954.80 Subtotal $589,265.40 $1,027,792.32 $241,770.00 $452,760.50 Contingen- cies (10%) $58,926.54 $102,779.23 $24,177.00 $45,276.05 Indirect (20%)$129,638.39 $226,114.31 $53,189.40 $99,607.31 Total Project Cost - Base Bid $777,830.33 $1,356,685.86 $319,136.40 $597,643.86 $231,158.82 $508,549.41 $3,051,296.45 This compares to the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) estimate of $2,913,888.17 million as shown in the table below. The estimated project costs for Sanitary Sewer are under the CIP Budget, but the estimated project costs for Street, Water Main, and Storm Sewer are higher than the CIP Budget. Funding Summary Funding Source Feasibility Report Estimate Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Budget Amount Difference Street Infrastructure fund $2,686,950.05 $2,678,888.17 ($8,061.88) Water fund $121,360.80 $60,000.00 ($61,360.80) Sanitary Sewer fund $88,030.80 $100,000.00 $11,969.20 Storm Water fund $154,954.80 $75,000.00 ($79,954.80) Totals $3,051,296.45 $2,913,888.17 ($137,408.28) The costs in the feasibility report are higher on street, water main, and storm sewer items due to: ·more streets were added to the proposed improvements from what was planned in the CIP due to pavement conditions. October 17, 2023 Mr. Bernie Weber Page 3 of 3 Reference:2024 Infrastructure Improvements – Public Hearing ·additional water gate valve repairs were added to the project that will be beneficial to future water tower improvements proposed in the next 5 years. ·additional drainage improvements were identified in the project streets after further review. Depending upon final feedback from the City Finance Consultant on the estimated costs exceeding the CIP budget, some portions of the proposed project may need to be delayed until future reconstruction of the streets. Staff may include some of those improvements as alternates to get the base bid improvements within the CIP budget. At the Public Hearing, it is recommended a summary of the project scope and the proposed assessment roll be presented. If Council accepts the information presented and chooses to move forward with this project after the Public Hearing, we then recommend that the Council approves a resolution ordering the construction of and preparation of plans and specifications for the 2024 Infrastructure Improvements at the October 23, 2023 meeting. Bids would be received on or around February 2024, construction work done in 2024, and substantial completion of the project in Fall 2024 with final completion in Spring/Summer 2025. If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (612) 712-2021. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Dan D. Boyum, P.E. City Engineer dan.boyum@stantec.com Attachments: 2023 Infrastructure Improvement Project Feasibility Report Cc: Reece Bertholf, Valerie Leone, Andrew Kramer, Dave Lemke, Matt Rowedder, Nick Macklem – New Hope; Stacy Woods - Jensen Sondrall Persellin & Woods, P.A.; Ann Ackerson– Stantec. New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale Flag Ave NBoone Ave N36th Ave N 28th Ave N 27th Ave N 29th Ave N 30th Ave NRamp 32nd Ave N Xylon Ave NEnsign Ave N34th Ave N Yukon Ave N Independence Ave N31st Ave N Hillsboro Ave NAquila Ave N35th Ave N 27th Pl N 36 1/2 Ci r N Cavell Ave NNorthw o o d P k w y Zealand Ave N33rd Pl N Gettysburg Ave N33rd Ave N Virginia Ave N34 1/2 Ave N 32nd Cir NBoone Ci r 35 1/2 Ave NJordan Ave NDecatur Ave NEnsign CtHillsboro Ct 32nd Ct NFlag Ct 32nd Pl N Flag Cir Ge t t y s b u r g C t Ensign Ave NIndependence Ave N35th Ave N 29th Ave N 33rd Ave N29th Ave N Ensign Ave N33rd Ave N 27th Ave N Ensign Ave N36th Ave N E n s i g n A v e N Ramp31st Ave NHillsboro Ave NGettysburg Ave N34th Ave N 34th Ave N Aquila Ave NYukon Ave NZealand Ave NXylon Ave N© 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS 0 400 800 Feet ($$¯ 1:8,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11) Revised: 2023-10-17 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Proposed Improvements Lakes City Boundaries Parcels 2" Mill & Overlay 2.5" Mill & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay 2" Mill & Overlay (MSA Street) New Hope, Minnesota Location Map and Proposed Improvements Figure 1 2024 Infrastructure Improvements - South New HopePlymouth Crystal RobbinsdaleBoone Ave NCP Railroad Winnetka Ave NBass La k e R d 54th Ave N 50th Ave N 62nd Ave N 55th Ave N 53rd Ave NZealand Ave N56th Ave N Sumter Ave N60th Ave NXylon Ave NCavell Ave N60 1/2 Ave N Oregon Ave NElm Grove AveSt Raphael Dr Ang e l i n e D rDecatur Ave NWe s t B r o a dw a y 59th Ave N Utah Ave NQuebec Ave N55th Ln NYukon Ave NVirginia Ave NRhode Island Ave N61st Ave N Boon e P l 61 1/2 Ave N 51st Ave NAquila Ave NWisconsin Ave N58th Av e N 59 1/2 Ave N Sumt er Pl Elm Grove Ct Lombardy Ln 55th Cir NWisconsin CirNevada Ave N52nd Ave N 60 1/2 Ave N 62nd Ave N Bass Lake Rd Zealand Ave N 61st Ave N 58th Ave N CP RailroadQuebec Ave NQuebec Ave N51st Ave N Xylon Ave NSumter Ave NSumter Ave N61st Ave N Yukon Ave N61 1/2 Ave N 60th Ave N Xylon Ave N55th Ave N 61st Ave N 60th Ave N Yukon Ave NXylon Ave N© 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS 0 200 400 Feet ($$¯ 1:10,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11) Revised: 2023-10-13 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Proposed Improvements Lakes City Boundaries Parcels Reclaim & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay (MSA Street) New Hope, Minnesota Location Map and Proposed Improvements Figure 2 2024 Infrastructure Improvements - North Feasibility Report For 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Prepared for: City of New Hope, Minnesota City Project No. 1107 October 2023 Stantec Project No. 193806617 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 2 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000 Minneapolis MN 55402-2314 October 23, 2023 Honorable Mayor and Council City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428-4898 Re:2024 Infrastructure Improvements Client Project No. 1107 Stantec Project No. 193806617 Dear Mayor and Council Members: We are pleased to present our Feasibility Report for the 2024 Infrastructure Improvements project. The general locations of the study area include local streets within the Jaycee Park Neighborhood, Zealand Avenue North from Bass Lake Road to 55th Avenue North, and drainage improvements on Pennsylvania Avenue North at Oregon Avenue North. The study area also includes Municipal State Aid (MSA) street sections including: 36th Avenue North between TH169 and 300-ft West of Winnetka Avenue North, 56th Avenue North between Boone Avenue North and Xylon Avenue North, Xylon Avenue North from 56th Avenue North to Bass Lake Road, and 62nd Avenue North between Utah Avenue North and Winnetka Avenue North. Streets included in the project were recommended based upon the current condition of the pavement, scattered sites addressing drainage issues, and pavement segments experiencing isolated deterioration. The improvements identified include 2” and 2.5" Mill and Overlay and Reclaim and Overlay. The city continues to focus on a more aggressive pavement management strategy to improve the driving surface of more streets utilizing overlays and reclamation. This pavement management philosophy will provide for quicker street improvements and will allow the utility funds to build for future full reconstruction. The new overlays and reclaim streets will improve the quality of life, increase the aesthetic value, and increase the safety of the roadways. This report will be presented and discussed at the October 23, 2023, Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. Dan D. Boyum, P.E. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dan D. Boyum, P.E. Date: October 23, 2023 Reg. No. 23451 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 3 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 SCOPE OF STUDY ................................................................................................................................................... 6 FIGURE 1 – 2024 LOCATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS- SOUTH .................................................. 7 FIGURE 2 – 2024 LOCATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - NORTH................................................. 8 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 9 TABLE 2 – PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL FINDINGS: SEGMENTS WITH PETROMAT® ............................ 10 TABLE 3 – ADDITIONAL STREET SEGMENTS REQUIRING REPAIR AS IDENTIFIED DURING SPRING 2023 REVIEW .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 FIGURE 3 – PAVEMENT RATINGS INDEX ........................................................................................................ 12 FIGURE 4 – PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY AREA ........................................................................... 13 STREET IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................................................................................................... 14 RECLAIM AND OVERLAY.................................................................................................................................... 14 TABLE 4 – RECLAIM AND OVERLAY STREETS ................................................................................................ 14 MILL AND OVERLAY ............................................................................................................................................ 15 TABLE 5 – MILL AND OVERLAY STREETS ........................................................................................................ 15 FIGURE 5 – TYPICAL SECTIONS ....................................................................................................................... 17 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES............................................................................................................................ 18 COMPLETE STREETS.............................................................................................................................................. 18 WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 19 FIGURE 7 – PROPOSED WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS.............................................................................. 21 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 22 FIGURE 8 – PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................... 23 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 24 MILL AND OVERLAY AND RECLAIM AND OVERLAY AREAS ......................................................................... 24 FIGURE 9 – PROPOSED STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................... 25 COST ESTIMATES ...................................................................................................................................................... 26 TABLE 6 – PROJECT COST ESTIMATE.............................................................................................................. 26 FINANCING .............................................................................................................................................................. 27 REVENUES ............................................................................................................................................................. 27 ASSESSMENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 TABLE 7 - PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES .................................................................................................... 27 TABLE 8 - ASSESSABLE REVENUE .................................................................................................................... 27 TABLE 9 – FUNDING SOURCE ......................................................................................................................... 28 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 4 ESTIMATE COMPARED TO CIP BUDGET ........................................................................................................... 28 FIGURE 10 – TAX EXEMPT PROPERTIES .......................................................................................................... 29 PROJECT SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................................................... 30 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 31 Appendices Appendix A – Preliminary Cost Estimate Summary Appendix B – Preliminary Assessments Appendix C – Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration, American Engineering Testing, Dated October 13, 2023 Appendix D – Municipal State Aid Street System City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 5 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to investigate the feasibility of performing improvements to rehabilitate existing local streets and local utilities within the proposed project study area. Figure 1 depicts the south half of the project extents, while Figure 2 shows the remaining northern project areas. HISTORY In order to improve the overall quality of its local infrastructure system, the City of New Hope continues with a more aggressive pavement management philosophy to improve the existing driving surface and extend the pavement life of its streets. As the road conditions and Pavement Rating Index’s (PRI’s) continued to decline, it was apparent the City was not keeping up with street rehabilitations. The Pavement Management Plan continued to fall behind, and a more aggressive approach to pavement management was agreed upon by the City Council in May of 2014. Interim overlays will be utilized to add structural integrity to the existing street sections, accompanied with limited historical utility improvements. A reclaim and overlay of the pavement section is another option for poor street conditions, but with curb and gutter and drainage in relative operational condition. Reclaiming the street is an economical balance between replacement of water main, improving drivability by removing street patches, and extending the service life of the overall street section. Utility rehabilitation on both overlay and reclamation streets will be limited in order to build up water and other utility funds and responsibly spend city funds to create the greatest ‘good’ within the available budgets. Finally, the most aggressive and expensive rehabilitation option is a full reconstruction where streets showing significant roadway subgrade, drainage issues, as well as those having a significant amount of utility issues. There are no full reconstruction street segments recommended for 2024 study area. The pavement management strategy will improve the driving surface and will provide the ability to improve more streets. The new overlays will improve the quality of life, increase the aesthetic value, and increase the safety of the roadways. Municipal State Aid System The Municipal State Aid (MSA) system was established in Minnesota in 1957 to distribute roadway user funds to local roadways. A City can designate up to 20% of its local street mileage as MSA routes and receive funds from the State based on the volume of traffic on these roadways, as well as the City’s population. The following criteria shall be used when establishing a State Aid route: ·The road is projected to carry a relatively heavier traffic volume or is functionally classified as collector or arterial as identified on the urban municipality's functional classification plan; ·The road connects the points of major traffic interest, parks, parkways, or recreational areas within an urban municipality; and ·The road provides an integrated street system affording, within practical limits, a state-aid street network consistent with projected traffic demands. City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 6 New Hope became eligible to designate local streets as State Aid routes in 1968, when its population reached 5,000. New Hope’s current Municipal State Aid Street System is identified in Appendix D. The City of New Hope is eligible to receive approximately $927,146 million in 2024 to apply towards construction and maintenance improvements on State Aid routes. As identified in the city’s Pavement Management Plan, 56th Avenue North, Xylon Avenue North and 36 th Avenue North roadways are identified for improvement and would qualify for State Aid funding. The city will have to request an advance from State Aid to cover eligible costs that exceed the city’s balance in their state aid account. SCOPE OF STUDY The purpose of this report is to provide the feasibility of the street and utility improvements. The area of study includes a total of approximately 4.41 miles of streets, with 1.29 miles of those streets are classified as Municipal State Aid (MSA), and therefore are eligible for State Aid funding. The type of improvement proposed has been determined by the existing condition of the pavement, roadway section and subgrade composition, as well as the condition of the underlying utilities. For each type of improvement, costs and funding will be evaluated. The report breaks down the project into logical sections to allow for reduction in scope, if desired, at the time of deciding if the project should move forward into the design stage. New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale Flag Ave NBoone Ave N36th Ave N 28th Ave N 27th Ave N 29th Ave N 30th Ave NRamp 32nd Ave N Xylon Ave NEnsign Ave N34th Ave N Yukon Ave N Independence Ave N31st Ave N Hillsboro Ave NAquila Ave N35th Ave N 27th Pl N 36 1/2 Ci r N Cavell Ave NNorthw o o d P k w y Zealand Ave N33rd Pl N Gettysburg Ave N33rd Ave N Virginia Ave N34 1/2 Ave N 32nd Cir NBoone Ci r 35 1/2 Ave NJordan Ave NDecatur Ave NEnsign CtHillsboro Ct 32nd Ct NFlag Ct 32nd Pl N Flag Cir Ge t t y s b u r g C t Ensign Ave NIndependence Ave N35th Ave N 29th Ave N 33rd Ave N29th Ave N Ensign Ave N33rd Ave N 27th Ave N Ensign Ave N36th Ave N E n s i g n A v e N Ramp31st Ave NHillsboro Ave NGettysburg Ave N34th Ave N 34th Ave N Aquila Ave NYukon Ave NZealand Ave NXylon Ave N© 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS 0 400 800 Feet ($$¯ 1:8,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11) Revised: 2023-10-17 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Proposed Improvements Lakes City Boundaries Parcels 2" Mill & Overlay 2.5" Mill & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay 2" Mill & Overlay (MSA Street) New Hope, Minnesota Location Map and Proposed Improvements Figure 1 2024 Infrastructure Improvements - South New HopePlymouth Crystal RobbinsdaleBoone Ave NCP Railroad Winnetka Ave NBass La k e R d 54th Ave N 50th Ave N 62nd Ave N 55th Ave N 53rd Ave NZealand Ave N56th Ave N Sumter Ave N60th Ave NXylon Ave NCavell Ave N60 1/2 Ave N Oregon Ave NElm Grove AveSt Raphael Dr Ang e l i n e D rDecatur Ave NWe s t B r o a dw a y 59th Ave N Utah Ave NQuebec Ave N55th Ln NYukon Ave NVirginia Ave NRhode Island Ave N61st Ave N Boon e P l 61 1/2 Ave N 51st Ave NAquila Ave NWisconsin Ave N58th Av e N 59 1/2 Ave N Sumt er Pl Elm Grove Ct Lombardy Ln 55th Cir NWisconsin CirNevada Ave N52nd Ave N 60 1/2 Ave N 62nd Ave N Bass Lake Rd Zealand Ave N 61st Ave N 58th Ave N CP RailroadQuebec Ave NQuebec Ave N51st Ave N Xylon Ave NSumter Ave NSumter Ave N61st Ave N Yukon Ave N61 1/2 Ave N 60th Ave N Xylon Ave N55th Ave N 61st Ave N 60th Ave N Yukon Ave NXylon Ave N© 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS 0 200 400 Feet ($$¯ 1:10,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11) Revised: 2023-10-13 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Proposed Improvements Lakes City Boundaries Parcels Reclaim & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay (MSA Street) New Hope, Minnesota Location Map and Proposed Improvements Figure 2 2024 Infrastructure Improvements - North City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 9 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS The streets identified in this report were generally constructed in the 1960’s, unless noted otherwise below. Overall, the condition of the existing storm and sanitary sewer in the study area is fair to satisfactory. During design, a detailed review of city records and field investigations will be performed to identify specific structures and/or pipe segments warranting an improvement or replacement. At this time, several deteriorating storm structures and specific sanitary infiltration issues have been identified. The existing water main is primarily cast-iron pipe (CIP), unless noted otherwise below, and is susceptible to breaks. The water main break history was reviewed and is discussed in further detail within the Water Main Improvements section. See Figures 7-9 for locations of proposed utility improvements. Jaycee Park Neighborhood Streets Primarily constructed in the early to mid-1960s, with the exception of 29 th Avenue North cul-de-sac located off Flag Avenue North, which was constructed in 1970, the majority of these identified streets were reconstructed in 2004 and are now proposed for the first Mill & Overlay as per the 2022 Pavement Management Plan. Several street segments in this area were improved with the 2020 Infrastructure Project. Once the proposed 2024 street improvements are completed, the entire area will have received new wear course pavement. The water main was replaced with ductile iron pipe along Independence Circle and Independence between 31st Avenue North and 30th Avenue North in 2004. Upcoming south water tower improvements are planned within the next few years, and Staff have recommended replacement of specific isolating valves in preparation for the water tower scope of work. 36th Avenue North – TH 169 to 300’ East of Winnetka Avenue North 36th Avenue North between TH 169 and 300’ east of Winnetka Avenue North is also in poor condition with areas of up to 1.75” rutting in the wheel path, with an average of 1.25” depth of rutting (average PRI = 70). However, it doesn’t appear to have the subbase failure or significant utility concerns along this segment. This section of roadway was reconstructed in 2002 along with extensive utility improvements. The existing width of this roadway ranges from 44’- 50’ from face of curb to face of curb, with bump-outs for parking on either side of the road. Most of the utilities on this segment were constructed in the 1961, with the majority being replaced within the 2004 infrastructure improvements. No significant utilities in this area require improvements. 56th Avenue North, Zealand Avenue North, and Xylon Avenue North The streets located immediately north and west of the North Education Center School (Intermediate District 287) site received street improvements in conjunction with the school’s construction in 2011- 2012. The remaining street segments, Xylon Avenue North, Zealand Avenue North (north of 56 th) and 56th Avenue North (west of Zealand) have received isolated storm and street improvements in the early 1990s. City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 10 The utilities on this segment appear to have been constructed between 1964 and 1966 with some small storm sewer improvements occurring periodically since then. Pavement Surface Condition The streets in the project area were rated in Fall of 2022 and Spring 2023 based on the City’s Pavement Ratings Index (PRI). The index ranges from 0-100 and assigns a value to each street segment based on the visual condition of the pavement. In general, a low PRI indicates a roadway that is failing structurally, while a higher value indicates a segment is in better surface condition. As part of the current pavement management program, doing timely mill and overlays and reclaiming of streets every 20 years will help extend the life of the street segments. Figure 3 show the pavement ratings for each street within this project area. Geotechnical Analysis Soil borings and ground penetrating radar (GPR) have been completed to assist in further understanding the existing street section characteristics and condition. Figure 4 identifies the locations and limits of this geotechnical and pavement field exploration. Final data and the accompanying reports have been received and generally support the identified street improvements proposed in this report. The Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration, completed by American Engineering and Testing, Inc. dated October 13, 2023 is included as Appendix C of this report. The preliminary geotechnical report scope also reviewed the field cores, hand augers and ground penetrating radar (GPR) for the presence of Petromat ® material within the pavement section. Petromat® is a fabric material that was placed between the layers of bituminous pavement as an interim improvement to provide strength in the street and reduce cracking. Petromat was discovered within the pavement cores and/or after reviewing the ground penetrating radar (GPR) data during the geotechnical investigation for the following street segments shown in Table 2 are located within the Jaycee Park neighborhood. TABLE 2 – PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL FINDINGS: SEGMENTS WITH PETROMAT® Street From To Length Ft. Initial Improv. Improv. Based on Geotech Findings 29TH FLAG AVE N CUL DE SAC E 688.4 RECLAIM & OVERLAY 2.5” MILL & OVERLAY CAVELL ENSIGN AVE N 31ST AVE N 305 RECLAIM & OVERLAY 2.5” MILL & OVERLAY CAVELL 30TH AVE N ENSIGN AVE N 433.8 RECLAIM & OVERLAY 2.5” MILL & OVERLAY 31ST ENSIGN AVE N CAVELL AVE N 346 RECLAIM & OVERLAY 2.5” MILL & OVERLAY 31ST CAVELL AVE N BOONE AVE N 323 RECLAIM & OVERLAY 2.5” MILL & OVERLAY Total 2,096 ft. (0.40 mi.) City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 11 During the Spring 2023 road rating, two additional sections of streets were identified as requiring attention since the sections are in poor condition. These street segments are summarized in the below Table 3. TABLE 3 – ADDITIONAL STREET SEGMENTS REQUIRING REPAIR AS IDENTIFIED DURING SPRING 2023 REVIEW Street From To Length Ft. PRI Rating (Spring 2023) Proposed Street Improvement 62ND AVE N UTAH AVE N WINNETKA AVE N 183 50 Reclaim and Overlay PENNSYLVANIA SOUTH END PAVEMENT CHANGE 52ND AVE N 158 50 *drainage issue Reclaim and Overlay Total 341 ft. (0.06 mi.) New Hope Plymouth Crystal Robbinsdale Brooklyn CenterFlag Ave NBoone Ave N27th Ave NRamp28th Ave N 29th Ave N 30th Ave N 32nd Ave N CP Railroad36th Ave N Winpark Dr Xylon Ave NLouisiana Ave NEnsign Ave N34th Ave N Yukon Ave N Independence Ave NNorth w o o d P k w y 31st Ave N Hillsboro Ave NWinnetka Ave NV a l l e V i s Quebec Ave NAquila Ave N35th Ave N 27th Pl N Nevada Ave NViewcrest LnJordan Ave NL am p h e r e D r 36 1/2 Cir N Cavell Ave NMaryland Ave NDecatur Ave NZealand Ave N33rd Pl N Gettysburg Ave N33rd Ave N Virg in ia Ave N 34 1/2 Ave N 32nd Cir NBoone Cir Wisconsin Ave NRosalyn CtEnsign CtHillsboro Ct 32nd Ct NFlag Ct 32nd Pl N Flag Cir Xylon Ave NIndependence Ave N27th Ave N Gettysburg Ave N 33rd Ave N27th Ave N 29th Ave N Boone Cir 34th Ave N 31st Ave NEnsign Ave NEnsign Ave NWinnetka Ave NGettysburg Ave NLouisiana Ave NHillsboro Ave NEnsign Ave NYukon Ave NCP Railroad31st Ave N RampHillsboro Ave N36th Ave N 35th Ave N City of Crystal City of Crystal City of Crystal City of Crystal 0 990 1,980 Feet ($$¯ 1:173,072 (At original document size of 11x17) Revised: 2023-10-17 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. PRI Rating 0 - 20 Failing 21 - 40 Very Poor 41 - 60 Poor 61 - 80 Good 81 - 100 Excellent CP R a i l r o a d Oregon Ave N Ang e l i n e D r Quebec Ave N52nd Ave NWinnetka Ave N62nd Ave N Utah Ave NBass La k e R d Boone Ave N55th Ave N Zealand Ave N56th Ave N Wisconsin Ave N55th L n NXylon Ave NVirginia Ave NYukon Ave NXylon Ave NYukon Ave NSite 5: 62nd Ave N (MSA) - Utah Ave N to Winnetka Ave N (South half only) Site 4: Pennsylvania Ave N (Local) - 53rd Ave N to Pavement Change Site 3: 56th Ave N. Xylon Ave N (MSA) and Zealand Ave N (Local) Site 2: 36th Ave N (MSA) - West of TH169 NB Ramps to 300' West of Winnetka Ave N (At Pavement Change) Site 1: Jaycee Park Neighborhood (Local Streets South of 36th Ave N and North of 27th Ave N) Pavement Rating Index (PRI) 2024 Infrastructure Improvements New Hope, Minnesota Figure 3 LEGEND PAVEMENT CORE &HAND AUGER (21) STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING (4) GPR STREET STUDY AREA (4.41 MILES) 52ND AVE N 53RD AVE N53RDAVEN QUEBECAVENANGELINEDR 51ST AVE N OREGONAVENRHODEISLANDAVENSUMTERPENNSYLVANIAAVENC.P.RAILROADWINNETKA AVE N (CSAH 156) PAVEMENT CHANGE 51ST AVE N A V E NAVEUTAH61STAVEN 61ST AVE SUMTERAVEN6 1STVIRGINIAAVEN62ND AVE N WINNETKAAVEN(CSAH156)AVE N 32ND N A V EFLAG CTENSIGNCIR.NAVE FLAGAVENC T CIR CI R CIR (CSAH 70)(MEDIC I NE LAKE RD)WINNETKA AVE N (CSAH 156)TRUNKHIGHWAY1693 2ND AVE N BOONEAVENENSIGN 32NDCAVELLAVENA VE N ENSIGNNAVE31ST N A V E FLAGAVENGETTYSBURGHILLSBORON AVE31ST IND EPENDENCE 30TH AVE N 29TH AVE N AVEENSIGN FLAGAVEN29TH AVE N HILLSBOROAVENNAVECTENSGE T T Y S C T FLA G CT FLA G CIR 33RD AVE N 34TH ENSIGN AVEN GETTYSBURGHILLSBORO NAVE35TH INDEPENDENCEAVENAVE.HILLSBORO34TH GETTYSBURGAVEN34 1/2 AVE N FLAGAVE NENSIGNAVENAQUILAAVENB O O N E AQUILA AVE N ZEALANDAVENYUKON 34TH AVE 36TH AVE N NORTHWOOD PKWYCIRCLEN 36 1/2 BOONEAVENDECATURENSIGNAVENFLAGBOONE BOONEAVEN32NDAVENAVEN27TH AVE N DECATURCT.WISCONSIN AVE NGETTYSBURGJORDAN AVE NHILLSBORO AVE N 3 0 T H A V E N 36TH AVE N PAVEMENT CHANGE 35TH AVE N 34TH AVE N AVENXYLONAVENYUKONAVENWISCONSIN56TH AVE N (CSAH10) BASSLAKERD YUKONAVENXYLON AVE N 55TH AVE N UTAHAVENWISAVENXYLONAVENZEALANDAVENBOONEAVENVIRAVENYUKONAVZEALAND AVE NAVE NWINNETKA AVE N (CSAH 156) 0 600 1200 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 www.stantec.comPlot Date: 09/01/2023 - 10:02amDrawing name: R:\client\municipal\new_hope_ci_mn\Projects\2023\2024_infrastructure\figure1_geotech_rfp.dwgXrefs:, 34Parcel, 34HORIZON_PLANIMETRICS PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL AND PAVEMENT STUDY AREA 8/28/2023 193806134 CITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE4 2024 INFRASTRUCTUR E IMPROVEMENT S PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 1107 DATE PROJ. NO. SITE 5: 62ND AVE N (MSA) - UTAH TO WINNETKA (SOUTH HALF ONLY) SITE 4: PENNSYLVANIA AVE N (LOCAL) - 53RD TO PAVEMENT CHANGE SITE 2: 36TH AVE N (MSA) - WEST OF TH 169 NB RAMPS TO 300' EAST OF WINNETKA (AT PAVEMENT CHANGE) SITE 1: JAYCEE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD (LOCAL STREETS SOUTH OF 36TH AVE AND NORTH OF 27TH AVE N) SITE 3: 56TH AVE N, XYLON AVE N (MSA) AND ZEALAND AVE N (LOCAL) City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 14 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS STREET IMPROVEMENTS Approximately 4.41 miles of streets are proposed to be improved as identified in Figures 1 and 2. Two different street improvement methods have been identified for this project. The typical proposed street sections corresponding to the proposed improvements are shown on Figure 5. The rehabilitation methods were generally chosen based on the following criteria: ·Reclaim and Overlay o Poor street and underlying base conditions that cannot be significantly improved by mill & overlay o Poor to Very poor PRI rating – failing base and wear course pavement o Ideally Petromat® not present o Other utility replacements/repairs required ·Mill and Overlay o Poor street conditions of which can have an effective benefit with a mill and overlay o Average PRI rating o Limited or lesser amount of water breaks than full-depth reclamation streets o Minimal utility improvements identified Miscellaneous Boulevards disturbed by construction in all areas will be graded, shaped, and restored. If driveways are disturbed during construction, they will be patched to match the existing driveway material. All traffic signs within the project limits will be reviewed to verify current code and sign retro-reflectivity standards. Streetlight replacement or upgrades are not planned with this project, and costs are not included in this report. RECLAIM AND OVERLAY Reclaim and Overlay (or Full-depth reclamation) consists of grinding up the entire pavement section and mixing it with the underlying aggregate base, creating a homogeneous roadway base. This material is then shaped, compacted, and excess material is hauled away. A new, 3-inch lift of bituminous wear pavement is then placed over the entire roadway. Curb replacement will be completed on areas with severe damage or poor drainage prior to paving, and spot patching will be completed on any areas with soft subgrade soils. Table 4 summarizes the street segments proposed to receive the full depth reclaim and overlay street improvement. TABLE 4 – RECLAIM AND OVERLAY STREETS Street From To Length Ft. 62ND UTAH AVE N WINNETKA AVE N 183 56TH ZEALAND AVE N XYLON AVE N 466 56TH BOONE AVE N ZEALAND AVE N 662 XYLON 56TH AVE N BASS LAKE RD 743.1 MSA Street Total 2,055 ft. (0.39 mi.) City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 15 HILLSBORO 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE N 377 ZEALAND 55TH AVE N 56TH AVE N 684 ZEALAND 56TH AVE N BASS LAKE RD 878 29TH HILLSBORO AVE N CUL DE SAC E 326 HILLSBORO 27TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 943 PENNSYLVANIA SOUTH END 52ND AVE N 158 Local Street Total 3,366 ft (0.64 mi.) Total 5,421 feet (1.03 miles) MILL AND OVERLAY The full width mill and overlay consists of milling the upper two inches of the existing bituminous surface across the entire width of the street, followed by an equivalent depth overlay over the entire bituminous surface. The full width mill and overlay increases structural strength of the road, with the assumption that the underlying bituminous and aggregate are in reasonable condition. The street segments identified to contain petromat® will receive a slightly deeper depth of mill and overlay of two and a half inches. This depth was determined by the approximate depth the petromat® is located within the existing pavement section. The objective is to remove the bituminous located above the fabric-like material, while leaving the petromat® undisturbed. Curb replacement will be completed on areas of severely damaged or poorly draining curb prior to paving. Spot patching will be completed on any severely cracked or failing pavement prior to the new bituminous overlay. Table 5 summarizes the recommended mill and overlay improvement streets and the total length of street improvement. TABLE 5 – MILL AND OVERLAY STREETS Street From To Length Ft. 36TH HIGHWAY 169 HILLSBORO AVE N 459 36TH HILLSBORO AVE N GETTYSBURG AVE N 373 36TH GETTYSBURG AVE N FLAG AVE N 311 36TH FLAG AVE N ENSIGN AVE N 334 36TH ENSIGN AVE N DECATUR AVE N 240 36TH DECATUR AVE N BOONE AVE N 731 36TH BOONE AVE N ZEALAND AVE N 648 36TH YUKON AVE N XYLON AVE N 305 36TH XYLON AVE N WISCONSIN AVE N 296 36TH WISCONSIN AVE N WINNETKA AVE N 788 36TH ZEALAND AVE N YUKON AVE N 300 36TH HIGHWAY 169 HILLSBORO AVE N 459 36TH HILLSBORO AVE N GETTYSBURG AVE N 373 36TH GETTYSBURG AVE N FLAG AVE N 311 36TH FLAG AVE N ENSIGN AVE N 334 36TH ENSIGN AVE N DECATUR AVE N 240 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 16 36TH DECATUR AVE N BOONE AVE N 731 36TH BOONE AVE N ZEALAND AVE N 648 36TH YUKON AVE N XYLON AVE N 305 36TH XYLON AVE N WISCONSIN AVE N 296 36TH WISCONSIN AVE N WINNETKA AVE N 788 36TH ZEALAND AVE N YUKON AVE N 300 MSA Street Total 4,785 ft. (0.90 mi.) INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE AVE N CUL DE SAC E 435 29TH FLAG AVE N CUL DE SAC E 688 FLAG ENSIGN AVE N 29TH AVE N 298 FLAG 27TH AVE N ENSIGN AVE N 705 FLAG 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE N 311 31ST INDEPENDENCE AVE N HILLSBORO AVE N 318 31ST FLAG AVE N ENSIGN AVE N 300 31ST ENSIGN AVE N CAVELL AVE N 346 31ST CAVELL AVE N BOONE AVE N 323 30TH INDEPENDENCE AVE N HILLSBORO AVE N 450 30TH HILLSBORO AVE N GETTYSBURG AVE N 332 30TH GETTYSBURG AVE N FLAG AVE N 328 30TH FLAG AVE N ENSIGN AVE N 309 CAVELL ENSIGN AVE N 31ST AVE N 305 CAVELL 30TH AVE N ENSIGN AVE N 434 ENSIGN 31ST AVE N 32ND AVE N 805 FLAG 30TH AVE N 31ST AVE N 602 HILLSBORO 33RD AVE N 34TH AVE N 552 HILLSBORO 32ND AVE N 33RD AVE N 776 INDEPENDENCE 32ND AVE N 33RD AVE N 776 INDEPENDENCE 31ST AVE N 32ND AVE N 671 INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE CIR N 31ST AVE N 326 INDEPENDENCE 30TH AVE N INDEPENDENCE CIR N 322 33RD INDEPENDENCE AVE N HILLSBORO AVE N 292 34 1/2 GETTYSBURG AVE N FLAG AVE N 488 GETTYSBURG 34TH AVE N 34 1/2 AVE N 313 HILLSBORO 34TH AVE N 35TH AVE N 482 34TH HILLSBORO AVE N GETTYSBURG AVE N 293 34TH GETTYSBURG AVE N FLAG AVE N 500 Local Street Total 13,080 ft. (2.48 mi.) Total 17,865 ft. (3.38 mi.) On past projects, the city has also utilized an edge mill and overlay improvement method. This technique consists of milling off the upper portion of bituminous on only the outer 6’ of each side of the roadway and is generally utilized in areas of poor drainage when the existing roadway crown is too low. Given that there do not appear to be poorly drained areas because of a low centerline crown, as well as some poor overall pavement conditions across the entire width of the roadway, a full width mill and overlay is recommended on all the identified segments for this project. LC EXISTING PROPOSED VARIES VARIES FULL DEPTH RECLAIM OF EXISTING PAVEMENT AND BASE, 6"-8" DEPTH SPOT REPAIR EX. CURB AND GUTTER ONLY AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER 3" - WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240B) RECLAIM & OVERLAY NOT TO SCALE SHAPE EXISTING RECLAIM MATERIAL/HAUL EXCESS 3% LC EXISTING PROPOSED VARIES VARIES TACK COAT2.5" MILL SPOT REPAIR EX. CURB AND GUTTER ONLY AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER 2.5" - WEARING COURSE 2.5" MILL & OVERLAY NOT TO SCALE VARIES LC EXISTING PROPOSED VARIES VARIES TACK COAT2" MILL SPOT REPAIR EX. CURB AND GUTTER ONLY AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER 2" - WEARING COURSE 2" MILL & OVERLAY NOT TO SCALE VARIES EX. PETROMAT TO REMAIN IN-PLACE DATE:PROJ. NO.:PlotDate:10/17/2023-8:30pmDrawingname:U:\193806617\Reports\Feasibility\Figures\CADF5\193805677-Fig5.dwgXrefs:733 S Marquette Ave Unit 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 www.stantec.com TYPICAL SECTIONS NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, CP NO. 1107 OCTOBER 2023 FIGURE:5 193806617 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 18 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES This feasibility report identifies utilizing current and typical bituminous materials for the type of improvements proposed. Although, as the type of pavement materials continue to evolve, we will continue to explore new and innovative technologies to improve the streets and extend the pavement life. There is potential for this project or future projects to utilize less expensive and/or better pavement materials. COMPLETE STREETS In May 2011, the City of New Hope approved a Complete Streets policy. The policy outlined the city’s commitment to consider the safety and functionality of streets for people of all ages and abilities, and for various modes of transportation. Examples of modes of transportation include walking, biking, wheelchairs, public transit, and automotive. In accordance with the policy, a Complete Streets network has been reviewed with this project. While streets will be further reviewed during the design phase for all street improvement areas, it is not anticipated that any trails, sidewalks, bike lanes, or other complete streets elements will be incorporated into this project area. All the streets are local or MSA streets which currently do not have any of these elements, have them already and are not affected by the street maintenance program, or are not designated to have them within the City’s comprehensive plan. City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 19 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS The water main on the street segments identified in this report is made of cast iron pipe (CIP). Historically, the CIP water main throughout the city has been a significant maintenance issue. Numerous breaks have occurred over the years, causing considerable inconvenience to residents and maintenance cost to the city. The water main incidents to-date is represented in Figure 6. Mill and Overlay Any breaks that may occur in the future will require repair and patching of the roadway. The primary goal of the mill and overlay improvements is to improve driving surface and not spend funds on utility replacement until the scheduled reconstruction of these streets. Reclaim and Overlay The proposed water main improvements are located on three street segments, Hillsboro Avenue North between 30th and 29th, Hillsboro Avenue North between 29th and 27th, and Zealand Avenue North to the south of Bass Lake Rd. The water improvements are shown in Figure 7. Only spot repair of water valves is planned for these improvement areas. Over the past decade, a minimal number of breaks have occurred relative to the amount of water main. New Hope Plymouth Crystal Robbinsdale Brooklyn CenterFlag Ave NBoone Ave N27th Ave NRamp28th Ave N 29th Ave N 30th Ave N 32nd Ave N CP Railroad36th Ave N Winpark Dr Xylon Ave NLouisiana Ave NEnsign Ave N34th Ave N Yukon Ave N Independence Ave NNorth w o o d P k w y 31st Ave N Hillsboro Ave NWinnetka Ave NV a l l e V i s Quebec Ave NAquila Ave N35th Ave N 27th Pl N Nevada Ave NViewcrest LnJordan Ave NL am p h e r e D r 36 1/2 Cir N Cavell Ave NMaryland Ave NDecatur Ave NZealand Ave N33rd Pl N Gettysburg Ave N33rd Ave N Virg in ia Ave N 34 1/2 Ave N 32nd Cir NBoone Cir Wisconsin Ave NRosalyn CtEnsign CtHillsboro Ct 32nd Ct NFlag Ct 32nd Pl N Flag Cir Xylon Ave NIndependence Ave N27th Ave N Gettysburg Ave N 33rd Ave N27th Ave N 29th Ave N Boone Cir 34th Ave N 31st Ave NEnsign Ave NEnsign Ave NWinnetka Ave NGettysburg Ave NLouisiana Ave NHillsboro Ave NEnsign Ave NYukon Ave NCP Railroad31st Ave N RampHillsboro Ave N36th Ave N 35th Ave N 0 1,000 2,000 Feet ($$¯ 1:173,072 (At original document size of 11x17) Revised: 2023-10-16 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Watermain Breaks 1980 - 1989 1990 - 1999 2000 - 2009 2010 - 2019 2020 - Present Watermain Break History 2024 Infrastructure Improvement New Hope, Minnesota CP R a i l r o a d Oregon Ave NQuebec Ave NPennsylvania Ave NAng e l i n e D r 52nd Ave NWinnetka Ave N62nd Ave N Utah Ave NBoone Ave NBass L a k e R d 55th Ave N 56th Ave N Zealand Ave NWisconsin Ave NXylon Ave N55th Ln N Site 5: 62nd Ave N (MSA) - Utah Ave N to Winnetka Ave N (South half only) Site 4: Pennsylvania Ave N (Local) - 53rd Ave N to Pavement Change Site 3: 56th Ave N. Xylon Ave N (MSA) - and Zealand Ave N (Local) Site 2: 36th Ave N (MSA) - West of TH169 NB Ramps to 300' West of Winnetka Ave N(At Pavement Change) Site 1: Jaycee Park Neighborhood (Local Streets South of 36th Ave N and North of 27th Ave N) Figure 6 New Hope Plymouth Crystal Robbinsdale Brooklyn Center 30th Ave N Flag Ave NRampHillsboro Ave N27th Ave N Ensign Ave N 29th Ave NGettysburg Ave NEnsi g n C i rIndependence Ave NEnsign Ave N27th Ave N 29th Ave N 0 250 500 Feet ($$¯ 1:173,072 (At original document size of 11x17) Revised: 2023-10-17 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Replaced Gate Valves Existing Watermain Propsed Study Area Proposed Watermain Improvements 2024 Infrastructure Improvements New Hope, Minnesota Bass La k e R d 55th Ave NBoone Ave NWinnetka Ave N56th Ave N Zealand Ave N55th Ln NWisconsin Ave NXylon Ave NUtah Ave NInter n a t i o n a l P k w y Virginia Ave NResearch Center Rd EYukon Ave N55th Cir N Elm Grove CtScience Center RailroadXylon Ave NInternational PkwyYukon Ave NFigure 7 0 500 1,000 Feet Site 3: 56th Ave N, Xylon Ave N (MSA) and Zealand Ave N (Local) Site 1: Jaycee Park Neighborhood (Local Streets South of 36th Ave and North of 27th Ave N) City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 22 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS The sanitary sewer mains in the study areas are in operable condition without any reported back- ups or significant sags. Roots will be an on-going challenge as the majority of the pipe main materials are the original 1960’s clay pipe. The televising will be reviewed during design to confirm the conditions of the mains. These pipes are planned to be lined in a future sanitary rehabilitation project. No other spot repairs will be required in the mill and overlay or reclaim and overlay areas based on current televising reports, which will be verified during final design. All manhole covers within the project area that have open pick holes are proposed to be replaced with covers with concealed pick holes. This will remove any unnecessary inflow into the sanitary sewer system through those openings. All existing manholes covers with potential inflow are identified on Figure 8. All costs associated to removing inflow and infiltration can be credited to Metropolitan Council I/I (Inflow/Infiltration) Excess Surcharge amounts. New Hope Plymouth Crystal Robbinsdale Brooklyn CenterFlag Ave NBoone Ave N27th Ave N 28th Ave NRamp29th Ave N 30th Ave N 32nd Ave N CP Railroad36th Ave N Winpark Dr Xylon Ave NLouisiana Ave NEnsign Ave N34th Ave N Yukon Ave N Independence Ave N31st Ave N Hillsboro Ave NWinnetka Ave NV a l l e V i s Quebec Ave NAquila Ave N35th Ave N 27th Pl N Nevada Ave NNorthw o o d P k w y Viewcrest Ln L am p h e r e D r 36 1/2 Cir N Cavell Ave NZealand Ave N33rd Pl N Gettysburg Ave N33rd Ave N Virg in ia Ave N32nd Cir NJordan Ave NBoone Cir Wisconsin Ave NRosalyn CtDecatur Ct NEnsign CtHillsboro Ct 32nd Ct NFlag Ct 32nd Pl N Flag Cir Gettysburg Ave N 33rd Ave NIndependence Ave N27th Ave N 27th Ave N 29th Ave N 34th Ave N Ensign Ave NEnsign Ave N31st Ave NWinnetka Ave NXylon Ave NHillsboro Ave NRampYukon Ave NCP Railroad31st Ave N Ensign Ave NHillsboro Ave N36th Ave N 35th Ave N 33rd Ave NCity of Crystal City of Crystal 0 1,000 2,000 Feet ($$¯ 1:173,072 (At original document size of 11x17) Revised: 2023-10-17 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Sanitary Flow Manhole - Remove and Replace Lid, Frame and Rings Existing Sanitary Sewer Parcels Proposed Study Area CP R a i l r o a d Oregon Ave NQuebec Ave NPennsylvania Ave NAng e l i n e D r 52nd Ave N City of Crystal City of Crystal 61st Ave N Sumter Ave N62nd Ave N Winnetka Ave NVirginia Ave NUtah Ave N61st Ave N Bass La k e R d Boone Ave N55th Ave N Zealand Ave N56th Ave N Wisconsin Ave NXylon Ave N55th L n N Virginia Ave NYukon Ave NXylon Ave NYukon Ave NSite 5: 62nd Ave N (MSA) - Utah Ave N to Winnetka Ave N (South half only) Site 4: Pennsylvania Ave N (Local) - 53rd Ave N to Pavement Change Site 3: 56th Ave N. Xylon Ave N (MSA) and Zealand Ave N (Local) Site 2: 36th Ave N (MSA) - West of TH169 NB Ramps to 300' West of Winnetka Ave N (At Pavement Change) Site 1: Jaycee Park Neighborhood (Local Streets South of 36th Ave N and North of 27th Ave N) Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements 2024 Infrastructure Improvements New Hope, Minnesota Figure 8 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 24 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS MILL AND OVERLAY AND RECLAIM AND OVERLAY AREAS The storm sewer improvements planned on the streets will be minimal as shown in Figure 9. A drainage improvement along Flag Avenue North has been identified as a key area where the adjacent Presidential Estates II Complex has a continuous sump pump discharging to the street. To remove this excess ground water from running continuously along the curb line, it is proposed to connect the existing sump pump by means of a solid pvc carrier pipe, underground to the nearest storm structure, located approximately 250-ft to the north across from 29 th Avenue North. This scope of work is planned to occur in the boulevard, reducing overall costs by not excavating into the roadway and restricting disturbances. Some cost has been allocated to remove and replace a few storm sewer casting, frame, and rings for structures that may be in critical structural condition. Further review of storm sewer structure conditions will be done during design. The impact of these improvements to the surrounding areas is minimal, and it is recommended to complete these improvements with this project. New Hope Plymouth Crystal Robbinsdale Brooklyn CenterFlag Ave NBoone Ave N27th Ave N 28th Ave N 29th Ave N 30th Ave N 32nd Ave N CP RailroadRamp36th Ave N Winpark Dr Xylon Ave NLouisiana Ave NEnsign Ave N34th Ave N Yukon Ave N Independence Ave N31st Ave N Hillsboro Ave NWinnetka Ave NV a l l e V i s Quebec Ave NAquila Ave N35th Ave N 27th Pl N Nevada Ave NViewcrest Ln L a m p h e r e D rCavell Ave NZealand Ave N33rd Pl N Gettysburg Ave N 33rd Ave N Virgini a Av e N Sumter Ave N34 1/2 Ave N 32nd Cir NBoone Ci r 35 1/2 Ave N Rosalyn CtDecatur Ct NEnsign CtHillsboro Ct 32nd Ct N Flag Ct 32nd Pl N Flag Cir Ensign C i rIndependence Ave N27th Ave NGettysburg Ave NEnsign Ave N29th A v e N Xylon Ave N27th Ave N 34th Ave N 31st Ave N CP RailroadWinnetka Ave NAquila Ave N 31st Ave N Ensign Ave N33rd Ave N 29th Ave N Yukon Ave NRampGettysburg A v e N Hillsboro Ave N35th Ave N 36th Ave N 33rd Ave NCity of Crystal City of Crystal 0 1,000 2,000 Feet ($$¯ 1:173,072 (At original document size of 11x17) Revised: 2023-10-17 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Storm Structures in Drainage Areas Drainage Improvement Area City Parks Lakes Parcels Drainage Improvements 2024 Infrastructure Improvements New Hope, Minnesota Bass La k e R d Boone Ave N55th Ave N Zealand Ave N56th Ave N Utah Ave N55th Ln N Virginia Ave NWisconsin Ave NBoon e P l Yukon Ave NCP R a i l r o a d 53rd Ave N Oregon Ave NQuebec Ave NPennsylvania Ave N52nd A v e N City of Crystal City of Crystal Site 4: Pennsylvania Ave N (Local) - 53rd Ave N to Pavement Change Site 3: 56th Ave N, Xylon Ave N (MSA) and Zealand Ave N (Local) Site 1: Jaycee Park Neighborhood (Local Streets South of 36th Ave and North of 27th Ave N) Figure 9 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 26 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATES The total project cost estimate for work proposed to be completed as part of the 2024 Infrastructure Improvements project is $3,051,296.45. Detailed cost estimates have been prepared and can be seen in Appendix A. Estimated indirect costs include engineering, legal, fiscal, and contract administration. Summaries of the estimated costs are shown in Table 6 below: TABLE 6 – PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Item Subtotal Contingencies (10%) Total Construction Indirect (20%) Project Costs Mill & Overlay $1,505,207.72 $150,520.77 $1,655,728.49 $331,145.70 $1,986,874.19 Reclaim & Overlay $530,360.50 $53,036.05 $583,396.55 $116,679.31 $700,075.86 Subtotal - Street $2,035,568.22 $203,556.82 $2,239,125.04 $447,825.01 $2,686,950.05 Water Main $91,940.00 $9,194.00 $101,134.00 $20,226.80 $121,360.80 Sanitary Sewer $66,690.00 $6,669.00 $73,359.00 $14,671.80 $88,030.80 Storm Water $117,390.00 $11,739.00 $129,129.00 $25,825.80 $154,954.80 Subtotal - Utilities $276,020.00 $27,602.00 $303,622.00 $60,724.40 $364,346.40 Total - Street & Utilities $2,311,588.22 $231,158.82 $2,542,747.04 $508,549.41 $3,051,296.45 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 27 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FINANCING REVENUES The following are possible sources of funding for the 2024 Infrastructure Improvements project: ·Street Improvement Fund ·Sanitary Sewer Fund ·Sanitary Sewer I/I Fund ·Water Main Fund ·Storm Water Fund ·Municipal State Aid (MSA) ·Assessments ASSESSMENTS Benefiting, tax-exempt properties are proposed to be assessed for street improvements as part of the construction of this project. Figure 10 shows the locations of these properties. Assessments will not be levied against taxable residential and commercial/ industrial properties in accordance with the New Hope’s Assessment Policy, nor will any utility improvements be assessed to any benefitting property. The following table shows the proposed assessment rates for this project: TABLE 7 - PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES Improvement Strategy Rate per Front Foot Mill and Overlay – Residential $66.87 Mill and Overlay – Non-residential $100.30 Reclaim and Overlay – Non-residential $72.88 The assessable properties with their respective property types and assessments are as follows: TABLE 8 - ASSESSABLE REVENUE Owner Address Improvement Strategy Front Footage Property Type Assessment Amount 1 City of New Hope (Jaycee Park) 86 Address Unassigned (Independence Circle) Mill & Overlay 82.5 Residential $5,516.78 2 Hometown Church 3351 Independence Avenue N.Mill & Overlay 150 Non – Residential $15,045.00 3 The Church of St Joseph 8701 36th Avenue N Mill & Overlay 560 Non – Residential $56,168.00 4 Intermediate School District 287 5530 Zealand Avenue N Reclaim & Overlay 1,040 Non – Residential $75,795.20 Total Assessments Mill & Overlay $152,524.98 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 28 Table 9 below provides a summary of the various Funding Sources for this project. TABLE 9 – FUNDING SOURCE Funding Source/ Improvement State Aid Funds/Street Fund* Water Fund Sewer Fund ** Storm Sewer Fund Assessments ***Total Street $2,534,425.07 $152,524.98 $2,686,950.05 Water Main $121,360.80 $121,360.80 Sanitary Sewer $88,030.80 $88,030.80 Storm Sewer $154,954.80 $154,954.80 Totals $2,534,425.07 $121,360.80 $88,030.80 $154,954.80 $152,524.98 $3,051,296.45 * The city will need to ask for an advance in State Aid funding to cover the $963,831.53 in eligible street related costs. ** Funding for I/I related improvements is estimated at $88,030.80, which can be considered as credit to Metropolitan Council I/I Surcharge. ** The City of New Hope Assessment is estimated at $5,516.78, which is included in the total assessment amount of $152,524.98. ESTIMATE COMPARED TO CIP BUDGET This report breaks down the project into logical sections to allow for reduction in scope, if desired, at the time of deciding if the project should move forward into the design stage. Since the estimated costs are higher and lower than the original Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2024 Budget as shown in Table 10, we will work with Staff to identify logical adjustments. For example, because there are street restoration costs tied to the watermain improvements and since watermain costs are coming in over budget at this time, some of those street restoration costs included under the watermain improvements could be associated to the street restoration costs. TABLE 10 – FEASIBILITY ESTIMATE COST COMPARED TO CIP BUDGET Funding Source Feasibility Report Estimate Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Budget Amount Difference Street Infrastructure fund $2,686,950.05 $2,678,888.17 ($8,061.88) Water fund $121,360.80 $60,000.00 ($61,360.80) Sanitary Sewer fund $88,030.80 $100,000.00 $11,969.20 Storm Water fund $154,954.80 $75,000.00 ($79,954.80) Totals $3,051,296.45 $2,913,888.17 ($137,408.28) New Hope Plymouth Crystal Robbinsdale Brooklyn Center Jaycee Park Hometown Church Church of St. Joseph Flag Ave NBoone Ave N27th Ave N 28th Ave NRamp29th Ave N 30th Ave N 32nd Ave N CP Railroad36th Ave N Winpark Dr Xylon Ave NLouisiana Ave NEnsign Ave N34th Ave N Yukon Ave NIndependence Ave N31st Ave N Hillsboro Ave NWinnetka Ave NV a l l e V i s Quebec Ave NAquila Ave NNorth w o o d P k w y 35th Ave N 27th Pl N Nevada Ave NViewcrest Ln L am p h e r e D r 36 1/2 Cir N Cavell Ave NZealand Ave N33rd Pl N Gettysburg Ave N 33rd Ave N Virgini a Av e N Sumter Ave NDecatur Ave NJordan Ave N34 1/2 Ave N 32nd Cir NBoone Ci r 35 1/2 Ave N Rosalyn CtEnsign CtHillsboro Ct 32nd Ct NFlag Ct 32nd Pl N Flag Cir Ensign Cir 33rd Ave N 27th Ave N Ensign Ave N29th Ave N 27th Ave N 29th Ave N 35th Ave N Boone Cir 34th Ave N Ensign Ave NAquila Ave NEnsign Ave N31st Ave NWinnetka Ave NXylon Ave N33rd Ave NRampYukon Ave NCP Railroad31st Ave NHillsboro Ave N36th Ave N 35th Ave N 1911821210057 1911821230001 1911821320113 0 1,000 2,000 Feet ($$¯ 1:173,072 (At original document size of 11x17) Revised: 2023-10-17 By: dmerickson V:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2024_Infrastructure_Project\Pro\2024_Feasibility_Figures\2024_Feasibility_Figures.aprx Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. City Parks Lakes Tax Exempt Property Parcels 2" Mill & Overlay 2.5" Mill & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay (MSA Street) 2" Mill & Overlay (MSA Street) Tax Exempt Improvements 2024 Infrastructure Improvements New Hope, Minnesota Intermediate School Bass La k e R d Boone Ave N54th Ave N Winnetka Ave N55th Ave NRamp Zealand Ave NInternational Pkwy56th Ave N Science Center Dr Sumter Ave NElm Grove AveUtah Ave NQuebec Ave NSt Raphael Dr 55th Ln N Virginia Ave NRhode Island Ave N53 r d A v e N Boon e P l Science Center RailroadXylon Ave NYukon Ave NPennsylvania Ave NResearch Center Rd EWisconsin Ave N58th Av e N Research Center Rd W Elm Grove CtGet tysbu rg Ave NDecatur Ave NMeadow La k e R d E 55th Cir N Elm Grove C i rSumter Ave NBass Lake Rd 58th Ave N 53rd Ave NQuebec Ave NYukon Ave NRa m p R a m p Xylon Ave N55th Ave N Ramp Wisconsin Ave N0611821430038 Figure 10 0 750 1,500 Feet City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 30 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT SCHEDULE Authorize Feasibility Report Preparation August 28, 2023 Authorize Public Hearing September 11, 2023 Hold Public Hearing and Present Feasibility Report October 23, 2023 Approve Feasibility Report/Authorize Preparation of October 23, 2023 Plans and Specifications Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Bidding January 22, 2024 Receive Bids (Bid Opening)February 22, 2024 Review Bids/Award Project Contract March 11, 2024 Begin Construction Spring 2024 Substantial Completion Fall 2024 Final Completion Spring/Summer 2025 Hold Final Assessment Hearing Summer/Fall 2025 City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193806617 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Page 31 CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2024 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is the finding of this study that the proposed improvements are necessary, feasible, and cost effective. The following steps are recommended: ·Adopt this report as the guide for development of the proposed improvements ·Hold a Public Improvement Hearing ·Order the preparation of plans and specifications ·Review plans and specifications – authorize bidding ·Provide alternate bid improvement options ·Receive bids ·Proceed with construction anticipated to be completed in 2024, and final completion in Spring/Summer of 2025 Appendix A – Preliminary Cost Estimate Summary Table A-1 Project Cost Summary: Improvement Type MILL & OVERLAY STREETS MILL & OVERLAY STREETS RECLAIM & OVERLAY STREET RECLAIM & OVERLAY STREET 10% Contingencies 20% Indirect Total Project Cost MSA LOCAL MSA LOCAL Streets $526,980.40 $978,227.32 $203,195.00 $327,165.50 $203,556.82 $447,825.01 $2,686,950.05 Water Main $4,080.00 $1,070.00 $1,070.00 $85,720.00 $9,194.00 $20,226.80 $121,360.80 Sanitary Sewer $12,005.00 $31,105.00 $12,005.00 $11,575.00 $6,669.00 $14,671.80 $88,030.80 Storm Sewer $46,200.00 $17,390.00 $25,500.00 $28,300.00 $11,739.00 $25,825.80 $154,954.80 Subtotal $589,265.40 $1,027,792.32 $241,770.00 $452,760.50 Contingencies (10%)$58,926.54 $102,779.23 $24,177.00 $45,276.05 Indirect (20%)$129,638.39 $226,114.31 $53,189.40 $99,607.31 Total Project Cost - Base Bid $777,830.33 $1,356,685.86 $319,136.40 $597,643.86 $231,158.82 $508,549.41 $3,051,296.45 Appendix A-1 October 2023 2024 Infrastructure Improvements Preliminary Cost Estimate Summary Construction Cost $526,980.40 Contingencies (10%)$52,698.04 Indirect (20%)$115,935.69 Total Cost $695,614.13 Cost Per C/L Foot, Base Improvement 4,785 $145.37 No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $19,900.00 $19,900.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $9,900.00 $9,900.00 3 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 2" DEPTH SY 24,890 $2.00 $49,780.00 4 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 1,500 $45.00 $67,500.00 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 250 $1.25 $312.50 6 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 400 $2.00 $800.00 7 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 - (SPECIAL)TN 310 $35.00 $10,850.00 8 BITUMINOUS PATCHING (SPECIAL) - TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(B) TN 200 $175.00 $35,000.00 9 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 1,250 $3.60 $4,500.00 10 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,E)TN 3,148 $85.00 $267,574.90 11 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (2,B) TN 10 $200.00 $2,000.00 12 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SF 400 $9.00 $3,600.00 13 MASTIC PRIOR TO WEAR PAVING LF 9,600 $0.70 $6,720.00 14 EROSION CONTROL COMPOST BLANKET - BLOWN WITH SEED SY 840 $6.00 $5,040.00 15 TOPSOIL BORROW, MNDOT 3877.2B (LV)CY 200 $50.00 $10,000.00 16 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HR 10 $175.00 $1,750.00 17 24" SOLID WHITE STOP BAR LF 60 $7.50 $450.00 18 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE, PAINT LF 4,500 $3.20 $14,400.00 4" BROKEN LINE, PAINT LF 250 $1.50 $375.00 20 4" SOLID LINE PAINT LF 6,550 $1.60 $10,480.00 21 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, PAINT SF 720 $8.40 $6,048.00 Subtotal $526,980.40 + Contingencies (10%)$52,698.04 Subtotal Construction $579,678.44 + Indirect (20%)$115,935.69 Total Project Cost $695,614.13 Appendix A-2 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2024 Infrastructure Street Improvements Mill & Overlay Streets - MSA Streets October 2023 Mill & Overlay: 1% Bituminous Patching, 15% Curb Replacement Street Base Improvement (Mill & Overlay) Construction Cost $978,227.32 Contingencies (10%)$97,822.73 Indirect (20%)$215,210.01 Total Cost $1,291,260.06 Cost Per C/L Foot, Base Improvement 13,081 $98.71 No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $36,900.00 $36,900.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $18,500.00 $18,500.00 3 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 2" DEPTH SY 38,863 $2.00 $77,725.11 4 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 2.5" DEPTH SY 4,599 $2.25 $10,347.33 5 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 4,000 $45.00 $180,000.00 6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 1,575 $1.25 $1,968.75 7 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 5,400 $2.00 $10,800.00 8 REMOVE SIDEWALK SY 20 $20.00 $400.00 9 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 - (SPECIAL)TN 1,350 $35.00 $47,250.00 10 BITUMINOUS PATCHING (SPECIAL) - TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(B) TN 110 $175.00 $19,250.00 11 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 2,180 $3.60 $7,848.00 12 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TN 5,643 $80.00 $451,464.80 13 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (2,B) TN 30 $200.00 $6,000.00 14 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SF 5,400 $9.00 $48,600.00 15 MASTIC PRIOR TO WEAR PAVING LF 26,200 $0.70 $18,340.00 16 EROSION CONTROL COMPOST BLANKET - BLOWN WITH SEED SY 2,489 $6.00 $14,933.33 17 TOPSOIL BORROW, MNDOT 3877.2B (LV)CY 520 $50.00 $26,000.00 18 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HR 10 $175.00 $1,750.00 24" SOLID WHITE STOP BAR LF 20 $7.50 $150.00 Subtotal $978,227.32 + Contingencies (10%)$97,822.73 Subtotal Construction $1,076,050.05 + Indirect (20%)$215,210.01 Total Project Cost $1,291,260.06 Street Base Improvement (Mill & Overlay) Mill & Overlay: 1% Bituminous Patching, 15% Curb Replacement Appendix A-3 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2024 Infrastructure Street Improvements Mill & Overlay Streets - Local Streets October 2023 Construction Cost $203,195.00 Contingencies (10%)$20,319.50 Indirect (20%)$44,702.90 Total Cost $268,217.40 Cost Per C/L Foot, Base Improvement 2,055 $130.55 No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $7,700.00 $7,700.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 3 RECLAIM AND SHAPE BITUMINOUS SY 6,700 $5.00 $33,500.00 4 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 700 $45.00 $31,500.00 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 0 $1.25 $0.00 6 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 270 $2.00 $540.00 7 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 - (SPECIAL)TN 240 $35.00 $8,400.00 8 MASTIC PRIOR TO WEAR PAVING LF 4,110 $0.70 $2,877.00 9 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 330 $3.60 $1,188.00 10 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TN 1,197 $80.00 $95,760.00 11 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (2,B) TN 0 $200.00 $0.00 12 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SF 270 $9.00 $2,430.00 13 INLET PROTECTION EA 17 $300.00 $5,100.00 14 EROSION CONTROL COMPOST BLANKET - BLOWN WITH SEED SY 400 $6.00 $2,400.00 15 TOPSOIL BORROW, MNDOT 3877.2B (LV)CY 90 $50.00 $4,500.00 16 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HR 20 $175.00 $3,500.00 Subtotal $203,195.00 + Contingencies (10%)$20,319.50 Subtotal Construction $223,514.50 + Indirect (20%)$44,702.90 Total Project Cost $268,217.40 Street Base Improvement (Reclaim & Overlay) Reclaim with 3" Overlay: 15% Curb Replacement Appendix A-4 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2024 Infrastrcuture Street Improvements Full Depth Reclaim Street - MSA Streets October 2023 Construction Cost $327,165.50 Contingencies (10%)$32,716.55 Indirect (20%)$71,976.41 Total Cost $431,858.46 Cost Per C/L Foot, Base Improvement 3,366 $128.32 No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $12,300.00 $12,300.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 3 RECLAIM AND SHAPE BITUMINOUS SY 11,000 $5.00 $55,000.00 4 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 1,100 $45.00 $49,500.00 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 390 $1.25 $487.50 6 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 120 $2.00 $240.00 7 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 - (SPECIAL)TN 400 $35.00 $14,000.00 8 MASTIC PRIOR TO WEAR PAVING LF 6,740 $0.70 $4,718.00 9 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 550 $3.60 $1,980.00 10 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TN 1,987 $80.00 $158,960.00 11 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (2,B) TN 10 $200.00 $2,000.00 12 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SF 120 $9.00 $1,080.00 13 INLET PROTECTION EA 20 $300.00 $6,000.00 14 EROSION CONTROL COMPOST BLANKET - BLOWN WITH SEED SY 700 $6.00 $4,200.00 15 TOPSOIL BORROW, MNDOT 3877.2B (LV)CY 140 $50.00 $7,000.00 16 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HR 20 $175.00 $3,500.00 Subtotal $327,165.50 + Contingencies (10%)$32,716.55 Subtotal Construction $359,882.05 + Indirect (20%)$71,976.41 Total Project Cost $431,858.46 Reclaim with 3" Overlay: 15% Curb Replacement Appendix A-5 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2024 Infrastrcuture Street Improvements Full Depth Reclaim Street - Local Streets October 2023 Street Base Improvement (Reclaim & Overlay) Water Sanitary Storm Total Construction Cost $4,080.00 $12,005.00 $46,200.00 $62,285.00 Contingencies (10%)$408.00 $1,200.50 $4,620.00 $6,228.50 Indirect (20%)$897.60 $2,641.10 $10,164.00 $13,702.70 Total Utilities $5,385.60 $15,846.60 $60,984.00 $82,216.20 A.WATER MAIN No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $200.00 $200.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $80.00 $80.00 3 REMOVE AND REPLACE WATER GV BOX SECTION EA 4 $950.00 $3,800.00 Subtotal $4,080.00 + Contingencies (10%)$408.00 Subtotal Construction $4,488.00 + Indirect (20%)$897.60 Total Project Cost $5,385.60 B.SANITARY SEWER No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $300.00 $300.00 3 INTEGRAL CONCRETE RING LF 6 $430.00 $2,580.00 4 REMOVE AND REPLACE SANITARY SEWER FRAME AND RINGS EA 5 $1,725.00 $8,625.00 Subtotal $12,005.00 + Contingencies (10%)$1,200.50 Subtotal Construction $13,205.50 + Indirect (20%)$2,641.10 Total Project Cost $15,846.60 C.STORM SEWER No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $900.00 $900.00 3 REMOVE AND REPLACE STORM SEWER FRAME AND RINGS WITH HDPE RINGS AND FRAME EA 29 $1,500.00 $43,500.00 Subtotal $46,200.00 + Contingencies (10%)$4,620.00 Subtotal Construction $50,820.00 + Indirect (20%)$10,164.00 Total Project Cost $60,984.00 Appendix A-6 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2024 Infrastructure Utility Improvements Utility Costs on Mill & Overlay - MSA Streets October 2023 Water Sanitary Storm Total Construction Cost $1,070.00 $31,105.00 $17,390.00 $49,565.00 Contingencies (10%)$107.00 $3,110.50 $1,739.00 $4,956.50 Indirect (20%)$235.40 $6,843.10 $3,825.80 $10,904.30 Total Utilities $1,412.40 $41,058.60 $22,954.80 $65,425.80 A.WATER MAIN No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $100.00 $100.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $20.00 $20.00 3 REMOVE AND REPLACE WATER GV BOX EA 1 $950.00 $950.00 Subtotal $1,070.00 + Contingencies (10%)$107.00 Subtotal Construction $1,177.00 + Indirect (20%)$235.40 Total Project Cost $1,412.40 B.SANITARY SEWER No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $600.00 $600.00 3 INTEGRAL CONCRETE RING LF 16 $430.00 $6,880.00 4 REMOVE AND REPLACE SANITARY SEWER FRAME AND RINGS EA 13 $1,725.00 $22,425.00 Subtotal $31,105.00 + Contingencies (10%)$3,110.50 Subtotal Construction $34,215.50 + Indirect (20%)$6,843.10 Total Project Cost $41,058.60 C.STORM SEWER No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $660.00 $660.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $330.00 $330.00 3 REMOVE AND REPLACE STORM SEWER FRAME EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 4 CONNECT TO STRUCTURE (DRAINTILE)EA 2 $600.00 $1,200.00 5 6" PVC NON-PERFORATED COLLECTION PIPE LF 300 $35.00 $10,500.00 6 6" PVC DRAIN TILE CLEAN OUT WITH METAL EA 2 $100.00 $200.00 Subtotal $17,390.00 + Contingencies (10%)$1,739.00 Subtotal Construction $19,129.00 + Indirect (20%)$3,825.80 Total Project Cost $22,954.80 Appendix A-7 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2024 Infrastructure Utility Improvements Utility Costs on Mill & Overlay - Local Streets October 2023 Water Sanitary Storm Total Construction Cost $1,070.00 $12,005.00 $25,500.00 $38,575.00 Contingencies (10%)$107.00 $1,200.50 $2,550.00 $3,857.50 Indirect (20%)$235.40 $2,641.10 $5,610.00 $8,486.50 Total Utilities $1,412.40 $15,846.60 $33,660.00 $50,919.00 A.WATER MAIN No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $100.00 $100.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $20.00 $20.00 3 REMOVE AND REPLACE WATER GV BOX EA 1 $950.00 $950.00 Subtotal $1,070.00 + Contingencies (10%)$107.00 Subtotal Construction $1,177.00 + Indirect (20%)$235.40 Total Project Cost $1,412.40 B.SANITARY SEWER No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $300.00 $300.00 3 INTEGRAL CONCRETE RING LF 6 $430.00 $2,580.00 4 REMOVE AND REPLACE SANITARY SEWER FRAME AND RINGS EA 5 $1,725.00 $8,625.00 Subtotal $12,005.00 + Contingencies (10%)$1,200.50 Subtotal Construction $13,205.50 + Indirect (20%)$2,641.10 Total Project Cost $15,846.60 C.STORM SEWER No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 3 REMOVE AND REPLACE STORM SEWER FRAME AND RINGS WITH CONCRETE RINGS AND FRAME EA 16 $1,500.00 $24,000.00 Subtotal $25,500.00 + Contingencies (10%)$2,550.00 Subtotal Construction $28,050.00 + Indirect (20%)$5,610.00 Total Project Cost $33,660.00 Appendix A-8 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2024 Infrastructure Utility Improvements Utility Costs on Reclaim and Overlay Streets - MSA Streets October 2023 Water Sanitary Storm Total Construction Cost $85,720.00 $11,575.00 $28,300.00 $125,595.00 Contingencies (10%)$8,572.00 $1,157.50 $2,830.00 $12,559.50 Indirect (20%)$18,858.40 $2,546.50 $6,226.00 $27,630.90 Total Utilities $113,150.40 $15,279.00 $37,356.00 $165,785.40 A.WATER MAIN No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,620.00 $1,620.00 3 REMOVE WATER VALVE MH EA 4 $800.00 $3,200.00 4 REMOVE CIP WATER MAIN LF 45 $10.00 $450.00 5 REMOVE VALVE AND BOX EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 6 REMOVE AND REPLACE WATER GV BOX SECTION EA 1 $950.00 $950.00 7 CONNECT TO EXISTING WM EA 12 $2,500.00 $30,000.00 8 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 15 $90.00 $1,350.00 9 12" PVC WATER MAIN, C900-DR18, WITH LF 30 $100.00 $3,000.00 10 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 2 $3,250.00 $6,500.00 11 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 3 $7,250.00 $21,750.00 12 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 560 $20.00 $11,200.00 Subtotal $85,720.00 + Contingencies (10%)$8,572.00 Subtotal Construction $94,292.00 + Indirect (20%)$18,858.40 Total Project Cost $113,150.40 Appendix A-9 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2024 Infrastructure Utility Improvements Utility Costs on Reclaim and Overlay Streets - Local Streets October 2023 B.SANITARY SEWER No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $300.00 $300.00 3 INTEGRAL CONCRETE RING LF 5 $430.00 $2,150.00 4 REMOVE AND REPLACE SANITARY SEWER EA 5 $1,725.00 $8,625.00 Subtotal $11,575.00 + Contingencies (10%)$1,157.50 Subtotal Construction $12,732.50 + Indirect (20%)$2,546.50 Total Project Cost $15,279.00 C. STORM SEWER No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $600.00 $600.00 3 REMOVE MH OR CATCH BASIN EA 2 $700.00 $1,400.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING STORM PIPE LF 20 $40.00 $800.00 7 12" RCP STORM SEWER, CL 5 LF 20 $120.00 $2,400.00 8 4' DIAMETER STORM SEWER MH OR CBMH EA 2 $6,500.00 $13,000.00 9 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE EA 4 $2,250.00 $9,000.00 Subtotal $28,300.00 + Contingencies (10%)$2,830.00 Subtotal Construction $31,130.00 + Indirect (20%)$6,226.00 Total Project Cost $37,356.00 Appendix B – Assessments Commercial FF Mill & Overlay Subtotal 2,294 Reclaim & Overlay Subtotal 1,040 Totals 3,334 Residential Rate = 2/3*Commercial Rate Duplex/Zero Lot Line Residential Rate = 65%*Residential Rate Estimated Cost = (Residential FF)*2/3*(Commercial Rate)+(Commercial FF)*(Commercial Rate) 2/3 x Residential FF +Commercial FF Mill & Overlay Rates 2/3 26,272.50 +2,294.00 Commercial Rate = per FF Single Family Residential Rate = per FF Duplex/Zero Lot Line Residential Rate = per FF Reclaim & Overlay Rates 2/3 12,849.00 +1,040.00 Commercial Rate = per FF Residential Rate = per FF Duplex/Zero Lot Line Residential Rate = per FF Commercial Rate =$700,076 $72.88 $48.59 $31.58 Commercial Rate = Estimated Cost $1,986,874 $100.30 Commercial Rate = $66.87 $43.47 26,273 12,849 39,122 $1,986,874.19 $700,075.86 $2,686,950.05 Appendix B-1 Preliminary Assessments 2024 Infrastructure Improvements October 2023 Total Est Cost Residential FF Property Type Street Improvement Front Footage Assessment Rate Assessment Amount Estimated (old 2020 rates) 1.Reclaim & Overlay 0 $48.59 $0.00 86 Address Unassigned (Independence Circle)Mill & Overlay 82.5 $66.87 $5,516.78 PID Total Assessment $5,516.78 2.Hometown Church Reclaim & Overlay 0 $72.88 $0.00 Mill & Overlay 150 $100.30 $15,045.00 Total Assessment $15,045.00 PID 19-118-21-23-0001 3.Reclaim & Overlay 0 $72.88 $0.00 Mill & Overlay 560 $100.30 $56,168.00 PID 19-118-21-21-0057 Total Assessment $56,168.00 4.North Education Center - School Dist 287 Reclaim & Overlay 1,040 $72.88 $75,795.20 5530 Zealand Ave N Mill & Overlay $100.30 $0.00 PID: 06-118-21-43-003819-118-21-21-0083 Total Assessment $75,795.20 Total Assessment Value $152,524.98 Appendix B-2 Preliminary Assessments 2024 Infrastructure Improvements September 2023 Entity Mailing Address - 2300 88th St. E., Bloomington, MN 55425 City of New Hope (Liberty Park) The Church of St. Joseph Non- Residential8701 36th Avenue North Non- Residential Residential 19-118-21-32-0113 Non- ResidentialProp. Address - 3351 Independence Ave. N. Appendix C – Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration by American Engineering Testing American Engineering Testing 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114-1804 TeamAET.com • 800.972.6364 Geotechnical ● Materials Forensic ● Environmental Building Technology Petrography/Chemistry REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL AND PAVEMNT EXPLORATION 2024 Street Improvements Project City Project No. 1107 New Hope, Minnesota AET Project No. P-0026728 Date: October 13, 2023 Prepared for: City of New Hope 5500 International Parkway New Hope, MN 55428 550 Cleveland Avenue North | Saint Paul, MN 55114 Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | TeamAET.com | AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc. October 13, 2023 City of New Hope 5500 International Parkway New Hope, MN 55428 Attn: Mr. Bernie Weber, Director of Public Works C/O: Ms. Ann Ackerson, Stantec RE: Report for Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements Project City Project No. 1107 New Hope, Minnesota AET Report No. P-0026728 Dear Mr. Weber: American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) is pleased to present the results of our subsurface exploration program and geotechnical engineering review for the 2024 Street Improvement Project in New Hope, Minnesota. These services were performed according to our proposal to you dated September 7, 2023. We are submitting an electronic copy (PDF) of the report to you. Please contact me if you have any questions about the report. I can also be contacted for arranging construction observation and testing services. Sincerely, American Engineering Testing, Inc. Jacob O. Michalowski, PE Senior Engineer jmichalowski@teamAET.com 651-283-2481 Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 SIGNATURE PAGE Prepared for: Prepared by: City of New Hope American Engineering Testing, Inc. 5500 International Parkway 550 Cleveland Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Saint Paul, MN 55114 (651) 659-9001/www.TeamAET.com Attn: Bernie Weber Authored by: Reviewed by: Jacob O. Michalowski, PE Thomas Evans, PE Senior Engineer Senior Engineer I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under Minnesota Statute Section 326.02 to 326.15 Name: Jacob O. Michalowski Date: October 13, 2023 License #: 54188 Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ..................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ................................................................................................ 1 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING ............................................................... 2 4.1 Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) ................................................................................ 2 4.2 Field Exploration Program ............................................................................................ 2 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................... 3 5.1 GPR Data ..................................................................................................................... 3 5.2 Pavement Section ........................................................................................................ 5 5.3 Pavement Condition ..................................................................................................... 7 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 7 6.1 Specifications and Definitions ...................................................................................... 7 6.2 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 7 6.3 Mill and Overlay Recommendations ............................................................................. 9 6.4 Bituminous Mixes ......................................................................................................... 9 6.5 Bituminous Pavement Comments .............................................................................. 10 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................... 10 7.1 Potential Difficulties .................................................................................................... 10 7.2 Excavation Backsloping ............................................................................................. 10 7.3 Observation and Testing ............................................................................................ 10 8.0 TEST STANDARDS ........................................................................................................ 11 9.0 LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................. 11 APPENDIX A – Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes Unified Soil Classification System AASHTO Soil Classification System Pavement Summary Table Figure 1-5 – Coring Location Maps Boring Logs Pavement Core Logs APPENDIX B – Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing GPR Data and Analysis Results APPENDIX C – Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of New Hope is proposing pavement improvements to various residential roadway segments in New Hope, Minnesota. To assist with planning and design, you have authorized American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) to conduct a subsurface exploration program at the site and perform a geotechnical engineering review for the project. This report presents the results of the above services and provides our engineering recommendations based on this data. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES AET's services were performed according to our proposal to you dated September 7, 2023, which was authorized on September 8, 2023. The authorized scope included the following: • Perform 3 standard penetration test (SPT) soil borings using a truck mounted drill rig to depths of 12 feet below the pavement surface. • Perform ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey in each driving lane. • Obtain 22, 4-inch diameter pavement cores and perform hand augers through the aggregate base layer or to a maximum depth of 18-inches beneath the pavement surface. • Conduct a geotechnical engineering review based on the collected data and preparation of this report. The results of the SPT borings will be reported under separate cover due scheduling constraints of the drill rig. These services are intended for geotechnical purposes only. The scope is not intended to explore for the presence or extent of environmental contamination in the soil or groundwater. 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION The City of New Hope (the City) is proposing various rehabilitation methods, such as mill and overlay and reclaim and overlay, on various residential roadway segments. We understand that the City is aware of the possible presence of Petromat® in some of the road segments. Construction is anticipated to occur in 2024. Traffic information for the various road segments was not provided. However, because the road segments are residential, we assume traffic volumes will be less than 400 vehicles per day. The above stated information represents our understanding of the proposed construction. This information is an integral part of our engineering review. It is important that you contact us if there are changes from that described so that we can evaluate whether modifications to our Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 recommendations are appropriate. 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING The subsurface exploration program conducted for the project consisted of ground penetrating radar (GPR) testing, twenty-two pavement cores and hand augers to 18-inches beneath the pavement surface, and three standard penetration test (SPT) soil borings. 4.1 Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) The pavement section thickness testing program conducted for this project consisted of a high speed (air coupled) GPR antenna that collected material layer thickness data at a rate of two scans per foot. The data was collected using a 2 GHz antenna, which generally allows material layer measurements to depths of approximately 18 to 20 inches with a resolution of less than about ½ inch. The GPR data collection is tied to GPS coordinates. The GPR data was collected on September 11, 2023, in accordance with SIR-30 processor settings established by GSSI RoadScan system. A calibration file, required for data post- processing, was collected prior to testing. Details of the methods used and pavement thickness test data, including summary statistics and plots of the thickness survey appear in Appendix B. The GPR interface identification was accomplished using RADAN 7.6, a proprietary software package included with the GSSI RoadScan system. The software includes tools to aid in delineating pavement layer transitions, and it calculates their depths from the pavement surface after the layers are identified by our personnel, using the calibration file and/or data processing tools. The identified layer(s) are also compared to the soil boring and pavement core data (when available) to interpret the type of layer materials and to validate the accuracy of the layer thicknesses. For this project, soil borings were not used for layer depth identification. The total depth of pavement is not always explicitly clear. Where gaps in clear identification of the pavement and base layer thicknesses are encountered, they are reported as a percent of the picking rate of the layer interface. A picking rate of 100 percent indicates the layer interfaces were visible in 100 percent of the scanned points. Factors influencing definition of radar scans include ambient electromagnetic interference, the presence of moisture, the presence of voids, and the similarity of material layer type between layers (e.g., gravel vs. gravelly sand). 4.2 Field Exploration Program The subsurface exploration program conducted for the project consisted of twenty-two pavement cores and hand augers up to 18-inches below the pavement surface. Stantec determined the number and locations of pavement cores, which were marked by AET in the field. Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 The coring locations are shown on Figures 1-5 in Appendix A. The coring location coordinates were collected by AET personnel using GPS equipment. Our GPS locations have accuracy within the submeter range. The provided location data is intended for reference and informational purposes. To obtain survey grade location data suitable for design, we advise retaining the services of a professional surveyor. Pavement core logs are provided in Appendix A. These logs include a photograph of the extracted core, recovered core thickness, downhole bituminous thickness, comments on core condition, and AET’s interpretations of the observed lift thicknesses. More information about the field exploration, including sample locations and core thickness can be found in the attached Pavement Summary Table in the appendix. The logs of the borings and details of the methods used appear in Appendix A. The logs contain information concerning soil layering, soil classification, geologic origins, and moisture condition. 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS 5.1 GPR Data The GPR data shows a clear interface between the bituminous and possible aggregate base with 100% picking rate Two cores (C-04 and C-05) indicated the presence of a Petromat® layer in the bituminous pavement. Based on the soil borings, the base and subbase interface is likely deeper than the 18-inch scope of the GPR, therefore, no base layer interface was able to be identified. Table 5.1 below presents the surface layer of bituminous as “BP” with the statistical results of the layer thickness measurements by GPR. The 15th percentile represents the value at which 85% of the section has a pavement layer thickness that is greater than identified. This is the value we generally recommend using for pavement design purposes. Table 5.1 GPR Thickness Results (inches) Section Road Termini BP Thickness (in) Begin End Avg CV 15th Min. S01-NB Flag Ave N/31st Ave N Medicine Lake Rd Boone Ave 3.7 16% 3.1 2.7 S01-SB 3.9 15% 3.4 2.8 S02-NB Ensign Ave N 31st Ave N 32nd Ave N 3.9 12% 3.4 3.2 S02-SB 3.7 8% 3.4 3.2 Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 Section Road Termini BP Thickness (in) Begin End Avg CV 15th Min. S03-NB Cavell Ave N 30th Ave N 31st Ave N 4.2 19% 3.5 2.6 S03-SB 4.0 14% 3.6 3.0 S04-NB 29th Ave N Flag Ave N End 4.7 18% 3.9 3.3 S04-SB 4.3 15% 3.7 2.9 S05-NB Hillsboro Ave N Medicine Lake Rd 30th Ave N 5.6 35% 4.2 3.7 S05-SB 5.3 39% 4.2 3.6 S06-EB 30th Ave N Independence Ave N Ensign Ave N 3.9 13% 3.4 2.8 S06-WB 3.8 11% 3.4 2.9 S07-EB 29th Ave N Hillsboro Ave N End 6.2 29% 4.6 4.5 S07-WB 6.0 20% 4.7 4.1 S08-EB Independence Cir Independence Ave N End 3.8 16% 3.2 2.8 S08-WB 3.4 10% 3.0 2.9 S09-NB Independence Ave N 30th Ave N 33rd Ave N 3.8 13% 3.3 2.6 S09-SB 3.3 14% 2.8 2.3 S10-EB 31st Ave N Independence Ave N Hillsboro Ave N 3.6 13% 3.2 2.9 S10-WB 3.2 21% 2.7 2.6 S11-EB 33rd Ave N Independence Ave N Hillsboro Ave N 3.4 17% 3.0 2.8 S11-WB 4.0 15% 3.2 2.6 S12-WB 34 ½ Ave N Flag Ave N End 3.7 9% 3.4 3.1 S12-EB 3.8 12% 3.3 3.0 S13-EB 34th Ave N Hillsboro Ave N Flag Ave N 3.8 9% 3.4 3.0 S13-WB 3.8 8% 3.5 3.3 S14-NB Hillsboro Ave N 32nd Ave N 35th Ave N 3.7 12% 3.4 2.9 S14-SB 3.7 11% 3.2 2.9 S15-EB 36th Ave N Hillsboro Ave N Winnetka Ave N 7.8 12% 7.0 5.8 S15-WB 7.8 11% 6.9 5.9 S16-NB Gettysburg Ave N 34th Ave N End 3.8 7% 3.5 3.2 S16-SB 3.7 11% 3.3 3.0 S17-NB Pennsylvania Ave N 51st Ave N 53rd Ave N 4.9 12% 4.3 3.4 S17-SB 4.0 19% 3.1 2.4 S18-SB 62nd Ave N Utah Ave N Winnetka Ave N 7.3 15% 6.2 5.5 S18-NB 6.6 16% 5.1 4.4 S19-NB Xylon Ave N 56th Ave N Bass Lake Rd 3.6 16% 3.1 2.5 S19-SB 3.9 14% 3.3 2.7 S20-NB 56th Ave N Boone Ave N 3.9 21% 3.2 2.8 Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 Section Road Termini BP Thickness (in) Begin End Avg CV 15th Min. S20-SB Xylon Ave N 4.4 16% 3.7 3.1 S21-NB Zealand Ave N 54th Ave N Bass Lake Rd 4.9 24% 3.9 2.8 S21-SB 5.1 39% 3.4 2.7 Note: Avg – Average; CV – Coefficient of Variation; 15th – 15th Percentile, Min – Minimum The plots identifying layer thicknesses, included in Appendix B, are data points collected at 6- inch spacing and averaged over 10 feet. 5.2 Pavement Section At the core locations, we generally observed a pavement section consisting of bituminous pavement over a possible aggregate base layer. Table 5.2 presents the thickness of the bituminous, as measured at the coring locations and from the recovered cores, along with the aggregate base thickness, measured up to a maximum depth of 18 inches. Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 Table 5.2 Pavement Thickness Summary Core Number Roadway Recovered Core Thickness (in) Downhole Pavement Thickness (in)A C-01 Flag Ave N 4.1 4 ¼ C-02 31st Ave N 3.8 4 C-03 Ensign Ave N 3.8 4 C-04 Carvell Ave N 4.1 4 C-05 29th Ave N 4.8 5 C-06 30th Ave N 4.2 4 ½ C-07 29th Ave N 5.9 6 C-08 Independence Circle 3.1 3 ½ C-09 Independence Ave N 3.5 3 ½ C-10 Independence Ave N 4.0 4 C-11 34 ½ Ave N 4.2 4 ½ C-12 34th Ave N 3.6 3 ½ C-13 Hillsboro Ave N 4.1 4 C-14 36th Ave N 7.7 8 C-15 36th Ave N 9.5 9 ½ C-16 Pennsylvania Ave 4.1 5 C-17 Pennsylvania Ave 4.1 5 C-18 62nd Ave N 8 8 C-19 Xylon Ave N 3.4 3 ½ C-20 56th Ave N 4.1 4 ¼ C-21 Zealand Ave N 3.9 4 C-22 Zealand Ave N 4 4 A. Measured downhole in the core hole to the nearest ¼ inch. At the coring locations, the bituminous thicknesses ranged from 3 ½ inches to 9 ½ inches. The recovered bituminous core thicknesses ranged from 3.1 inches to 9.5 inches. The possible aggregate base was classified as mostly silty sand with gravel, AASHTO classification A-1-b. One sample, C-04 base layer, was classified as a mixture of silty sand and clayey sand (A-2-4). The base layer generally extended to the hand auger termination depth of 18 inches below the pavement surface. Therefore, the depth of the aggregate base could not be determined, and we did not investigate the subgrade soils, which was beyond the scope. Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 5.3 Pavement Condition The condition of the bituminous was evaluated based on the pavement cores obtained at the site. Photographs of the pavement cores are provided on the pavement core logs in Appendix A. The twenty-two cores obtained were in variable condition. The general core conditions are as follows: • Cores C-04 and C-05 were found to have a layer of Petromat® about 2 ½ and 3 inches below the top of the pavement, respectively. The bituminous in each core was generally in good condition. However, core C-04 had a low severity stripping under the chipseal. • Cores C-17, and C-18 were separated at the chipseal layer and between lifts. Core C-17 exhibits medium severity stripping below the chip seal. Core C-18 exhibits medium severity stripping in the upper 4 inches and low severity in the bottom 4 inches. • Cores C-06, C-13, and C-16 were found to have the chipseal separated from the bituminous. The bituminous of each core was generally in good condition. • The remainder of the cores were in good condition with minimal signs of distress. Stripping occurs when water or water vapor gets between the asphalt film and the aggregates, thereby breaking the adhesive bond between the aggregate and asphalt binder. This will “strip” the asphalt from the aggregate, eventually leading to pavement failure. When stripping within the pavement becomes excessive, severe pavement deformation and fatigue cracking will occur, and then traffic loadings will result in local failures such as alligator cracking, potholes, and excessive rutting in the wheel paths. Stantec provided the Pavement Rating Index (PRI) for each street segment, and these are included in the attached Pavement Summary Table. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Specifications and Definitions This report references the 2020 MnDOT Standard Specifications for Construction (MnDOT Spec.) and recommend following the applicable sections of the MnDOT Spec. related to the proposed construction. 6.2 Discussion 6.2.1 Summary As mentioned previously, we understand the City is planning a mill and overlay and reclaim and overlay for various residential roadways. In the attached Pavement Summary Table, we have Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 indicated the proposed improvement method with our recommended depth of rehabilitation (i.e. mill thickness or reclaim thickness) for mill and overlay or reclaiming based on core thicknesses, condition, and GPR data. In general, we observed the following: • The proposed rehabilitation methods are suitable for each street segment with the exception of the areas where Petromat® was identified (31st Ave N, Cavell Ave N, and 29th Ave N). For these road segments, we recommend a mill and overlay. • Petromat® may be present along 30th Ave from Flag Ave to Ensign Ave. The GPR scans were not definitive without an additional core(s) taken in this segment. • To address rutting on 36th Ave, we recommend performing a deeper mill and overlay (4 inches) and overlaying with a higher-grade bituminous mixture, such as SPWEB440E. • The aggregate base material, within the roads planned for reclamation, is suitable for reclaiming operations; we recommend reviewing GPR plots for thicker areas of bituminous pavement to be considered during design and construction. 6.2.2 Mill and Overlay A mill and overlay includes milling the upper portion of the bituminous pavement layer and leaving the lower portion in place. Subsequently, a new bituminous pavement surface is placed and compacted. This approach requires a sufficient thickness of bituminous such that enough bituminous remains to prevent the paving equipment from breaking through into the base layer. Based on the GPR survey and pavement cores, it appears that sufficient bituminous thickness is present for milling to a depth of up to 2.0 inches. A good mill and overlay project candidate consists of a structurally sound pavement that needs only minor improvements and/or projects in which a limited design life is acceptable. A poor mill and overlay candidate is a pavement that exhibits structural problems and a large amount of surface distresses, as well as pavements in which a longer design life is desired. 6.2.3 Reclaim and Overlay Several road segments are proposed to receive a full depth reclamation (FDR) rehabilitation method (reclaim and overlay). Full depth reclamation involves crushing both the bituminous and at least a portion of the aggregate base layer in-place and blending the material with the intent of creating a recycled aggregate base. If grade increase is allowable, the FDR material is compacted and a new bituminous surface is then placed over the compacted reclaimed material. If grade increase is not tolerable, a portion of the reclaimed material is removed, the remainder is compacted, and Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 then a new bituminous surface is placed over the compacted reclaimed material. Another option to control grade is by milling the bituminous pavement prior to reclaiming. Full depth pavement reclamation can be either non-stabilized or stabilized. In stabilized FDR (SFDR), a stabilizing agent is blended with the reclaimed material to improve the material properties and strengthen the layer. Typical SFDR agents are engineered emulsion, foamed asphalt, or portland cement. SFDR typically allows for thinner surfacing, which can be significant where traffic levels are high or where grade cannot be raised significantly. Based on the conditions encountered along this roadway and the anticipated traffic, it is our opinion that SFDR is not needed for these road segments. The proposed reclaim depth is shown on the attached Pavement Summary Table with notes regarding areas where the reclaim depth may need to be deeper based on the bituminous pavement thicknesses identified in the GPR data. As the base material was deeper than the GPR window , we recommend monitoring the reclaiming process to avoid incorporating the subgrade material into the blend. 6.3 Mill and Overlay Recommendations After milling and prior to placement of the overlay, we recommend that deteriorated cracks and wheel-path areas be air blasted and power swept to remove loose material. Air blasting should be completed with high pressure (minimum of 100 psi) equipment. Removal of material at some deteriorated locations may require the use of a small milling machine or handwork, in addition to the high-pressure air blasting. Regardless of the patch depth, it is important to remove the entire existing deteriorated pavement. Depressions resulting after air blasting, sweeping, or milling operations that are greater than 1.5 inches in depth and width should be filled with a Bituminous Patching Mixture meeting MnDOT Spec. 2231 and compacted with a small vibratory or pneumatic roller. Depressions equal to or less than 1.5 inches in depth and width can be filled with the bituminous overlay mixture. We recommend a tack coat be applied between all bituminous layers in accordance with MnDOT Spec. 2357. 6.4 Bituminous Mixes The bituminous mixtures should meet the most current MnDOT Spec. 2360 (Plant-Mixed Asphalt Pavement) requirements. Compaction of all bituminous mixtures should be by the Maximum Density Method per MnDOT Spec. 2360.3D.1. Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 The use of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) in the bituminous mix is a cost saving measure that is often suggested; however, there will be a higher probability of pavement thermal cracking when RAP is used. We recommend a maximum of 10% RAP in the upper wear course mixes presented previously, in order to reduce thermal cracking. If bituminous mixes are utilized other than those recommended, a lower percentage of RAP may be needed. 6.5 Bituminous Pavement Comments Even if placed and compacted properly on stable subgrade conditions, bituminous pavements will likely experience cracking in 1 to 3 years, primarily due to temperature-related expansion and shrinkage. The design given above assumes that a regularly scheduled maintenance program consisting of patching cracks and repairing of locally distressed areas would be implemented. Seal coating of the pavement surface after 3 to 5 years often helps prolong pavement life. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 Potential Difficulties 7.1.1 Runoff Water in Excavation Water may collect in excavations at the site during times of inclement weather or snow melt. To reduce the potential for soil disturbance and to facilitate compaction operations, we recommend water be diverted or removed from milled surfaces or exposed aggregate base areas during construction. The exposed grading grade should be graded and sloped to drain surface water away from the pavement areas. 7.2 Excavation Backsloping If excavation faces are not retained, the excavations should maintain maximum allowable slopes in accordance with OSHA Regulations (Standards 29 CFR), Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations” (can be found on www.osha.gov). Even with the required OSHA sloping, water seepage or surface runoff can potentially induce sideslope erosion or sloughing which could require slope maintenance. 7.3 Observation and Testing The recommendations in this report are based on the subsurface conditions found at our pavement core locations. Since the soil conditions can be expected to vary away from the core locations, we recommend on-site observation by a geotechnical engineer/technician during construction to evaluate these potential changes. Soil density testing and/or DCP testing should also be performed on new fill placed to document that project specifications for compaction have Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 been satisfied. 8.0 TEST STANDARDS When we refer to an ASTM Standard in this report, we mean that our services were performed in general accordance with that standard. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. 9.0 LIMITATIONS Within the limitations of scope, budget, and schedule, we have endeavored to provide our services according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices at this time and location. Other than this, no warranty, express or implied, is intended. Important information regarding risk management and proper use of this report is given in Appendix C entitled “Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use.” Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes Unified Soil Classification System AASHTO Soil Classification System Pavement Summary Table Figures 1-5 – Coring Location Maps Subsurface Boring Logs Pavement Core Logs 01REP052C (7/11) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BORING LOG NOTES DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS TEST SYMBOLS Symbol Definition Symbol Definition AR: Sample of material obtained from cuttings blown out the top of the borehole during air rotary procedure. B, H, N: Size of flush-joint casing CAS: Pipe casing, number indicates nominal diameter in inches COT: Clean-out tube DC: Drive casing; number indicates diameter in inches DM: Drilling mud or bentonite slurry DR: Driller (initials) DS: Disturbed sample from auger flights DP: Direct push drilling; a 2.125 inch OD outer casing with an inner 1½ inch ID plastic tube is driven continuously into the ground. FA: Flight auger; number indicates outside diameter in inches HA: Hand auger; number indicates outside diameter HSA: Hollow stem auger; number indicates inside diameter in inches LG: Field logger (initials) MC: Column used to describe moisture condition of samples and for the ground water level symbols N (BPF): Standard penetration resistance (N-value) in blows per foot (see notes) NQ: NQ wireline core barrel PQ: PQ wireline core barrel RDA: Rotary drilling with compressed air and roller or drag bit. RDF: Rotary drilling with drilling fluid and roller or drag bit REC: In split-spoon (see notes), direct push and thin-walled tube sampling, the recovered length (in inches) of sample. In rock coring, the length of core recovered (expressed as percent of the total core run). Zero indicates no sample recovered. SS: Standard split-spoon sampler (steel; 1.5" is inside diameter; 2" outside diameter); unless indicated otherwise SU Spin-up sample from hollow stem auger TW: Thin-walled tube; number indicates inside diameter in inches WASH: Sample of material obtained by screening returning rotary drilling fluid or by which has collected inside the borehole after “falling” through drilling fluid WH: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod and hammer WR: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod 94mm: 94 millimeter wireline core barrel ▼: Water level directly measured in boring : Estimated water level based solely on sample appearance CONS: One-dimensional consolidation test DEN: Dry density, pcf DST: Direct shear test E: Pressuremeter Modulus, tsf HYD: Hydrometer analysis LL: Liquid Limit, % LP: Pressuremeter Limit Pressure, tsf OC: Organic Content, % PERM: Coefficient of permeability (K) test; F - Field; L - Laboratory PL: Plastic Limit, % qp: Pocket Penetrometer strength, tsf (approximate) qc: Static cone bearing pressure, tsf qu: Unconfined compressive strength, psf R: Electrical Resistivity, ohm-cms RQD: Rock Quality Designation of Rock Core, in percent (aggregate length of core pieces 4" or more in length as a percent of total core run) SA: Sieve analysis TRX: Triaxial compression test VSR: Vane shear strength, remolded (field), psf VSU: Vane shear strength, undisturbed (field), psf WC: Water content, as percent of dry weight %-200: Percent of material finer than #200 sieve STANDARD PENETRATION TEST NOTES (Calibrated Hammer Weight) The standard penetration test consists of driving a split-spoon sampler with a drop hammer (calibrated weight varies to provide N60 values) and counting the number of blows applied in each of three 6" increments of penetration. If the sampler is driven less than 18" (usually in highly resistant material), permitted in ASTM: D1586, the blows for each complete 6" increment and for each partial increment is on the boring log. For partial increments, the number of blows is shown to the nearest 0.1' below the slash. The length of sample recovered, as shown on the “REC” column, may be greater than the distance indicated in the N column. The disparity is because the N-value is recorded below the initial 6" set (unless partial penetration defined in ASTM: D1586 is encountered) whereas the length of sample recovered is for the entire sampler drive (which may even extend more than 18"). 01CLS021 (01/2022) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ASTM Designations: D 2487, D2488 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA Soil Classification Notes ABased on the material passing the 3-in (75-mm) sieve. BIf field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or boulders, or both” to group name. CGravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay DSands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt SW-SC well-graded sand with clay SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay (D30)2 ECu = D60 /D10, Cc = D10 x D60 FIf soil contains >15% sand, add “with sand” to group name. GIf fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. HIf fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name. IIf soil contains >15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name. JIf Atterberg limits plot is hatched area, soil is a CL-ML silty clay. KIf soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200 add “with sand” or “with gravel”, whichever is predominant. LIf soil contains >30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. MIf soil contains >30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. NPl>4 and plots on or above “A” line. OPl<4 or plots below “A” line. PPl plots on or above “A” line. QPl plots below “A” line. RFiber Content description shown below. Group Symbol Group NameB Coarse-Grained Soils More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Gravels More than 50% coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve Clean Gravels Less than 5% finesC Cu>4 and 1<Cc<3E GW Well graded gravelF Cu<4 and/or 1>Cc>3E GP Poorly graded gravelF Gravels with Fines more than 12% fines C Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelF.G.H Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelF.G.H Sands 50% or more of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve Clean Sands Less than 5% finesD Cu>6 and 1<Cc<3E SW Well-graded sandI Cu<6 and/or 1>Cc>3E SP Poorly-graded sandI Sands with Fines more than 12% fines D Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandG.H.I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandG.H.I Fine-Grained Soils 50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve (see Plasticity Chart below) Silts and Clays Liquid limit less than 50 inorganic PI>7 and plots on or above “A” lineJ CL Lean clayK.L.M PI<4 or plots below “A” lineJ ML SiltK.L.M organic Liquid limit–oven dried <0.75 Liquid limit – not dried OL Organic clayK.L.M.N Organic siltK.L.M.O Silts and Clays Liquid limit 50 or more inorganic PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clayK.L.M PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic siltK.L.M organic Liquid limit–oven dried <0.75 Liquid limit – not dried OH Organic clayK.L.M.P Organic siltK.L.M.Q Highly organic soil Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic in odor PT PeatR 3 2 ½1 ¾4 10 20 40 60 140 200 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 81 Sieve NumberScreen Opening (in.) 50 10 5 1.0 0.10.5 PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS SIEVE ANALYSIS PERCENT PASSINGPERCENT RETAINEDD60 = 15mm D30 = 2.5mm D10 = 0.075mm Cu = = = 200D60 D10 15 0.075 Cc = = = 5.6(D30) D10 x D60 2.5 0.075 x 15 2 2 CL-ML For classification of fine-grained soils and fine-grained fraction of coarse-grained soils. Equation of "A"-line Horizontal at PI = 4 to LL = 25.5. then PI = 0.73 (LL-20) Equation of "U"-line Vertical at LL = 16 to PI = 7. then PI = 0.9 (LL-8)"A" LIN E "U" LINECL OR OL CH OR OH 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 16 7 4PLASTICITY INDEX (PI)LIQUID LIMIT (LL) Plasticity Chart ADDITIONAL TERMINOLOGY NOTES USED BY AET FOR SOIL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION Grain Size Term Particle Size Boulders Over 12" Cobbles 3" to 12" Gravel #4 sieve to 3" Sand #200 to #4 sieve Fines (silt & clay) Pass #200 sieve Gravel Percentages Term Percent A Little Gravel 3% - 14% With Gravel 15% - 29% Gravelly 30% - 50% Consistency of Plastic Soils Term N-Value, BPF Very Soft less than 2 Soft 2 - 4 Firm 5 - 8 Stiff 9 - 15 Very Stiff 16 - 30 Hard Greater than 30 Relative Density of Non-Plastic Soils Term N-Value, BPF Very Loose 0 - 4 Loose 5 - 10 Medium Dense 11 - 30 Dense 31 - 50 Very Dense Greater than 50 Moisture/Frost Condition (MC Column) D (Dry): Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to touch. M (Moist): Damp, although free water not visible. Soil may still have a high water content (over “optimum”). W (Wet/ Free water visible, intended to Waterbearing): describe non-plastic soils. Waterbearing usually relates to sands and sand with silt. F (Frozen): Soil frozen Layering Notes Laminations: Layers less than ½" thick of differing material or color. Lenses: Pockets or layers greater than ½" thick of differing material or color. Peat Description Fiber Content Term (Visual Estimate) Fibric Peat: Greater than 67% Hemic Peat: 33 – 67% Sapric Peat: Less than 33% Organic Description (if no lab tests) Soils are described as organic, if soil is not peat and is judged to have sufficient organic fines content to influence the Liquid Limit properties. Slightly organic used for borderline cases. Root Inclusions With roots: Judged to have sufficient quantity of roots to influence the soil properties. Trace roots: Small roots present, but not judged to be in sufficient quantity to significantly affect soil properties. ML OR OL MH OR OH A-7 A-7-5 A-7-6 Sieve Analysis, Percent passing: No. 10 (2.00 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 max.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . No. 40 (0.425 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 max.50 max.51 min.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . No. 200 (0.075 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 max.25 max.10 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.36 min.36 min.36 min.36 min. Characteristics of Fraction Passing No. 40 (0.425 mm) Liquid limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min. Plasticity index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .N.P.10 max.10 max.11 min.11 min.10 max.10 max.11 min.11 min. General Ratings as Subgrade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Definitions of Gravel, Sand and Silt-Clay 01CLS022 (07/11)AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. The term "silty" is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 10 or less and the term "clayey" is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 11 or greater. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures GRAVEL - Material passing sieve with 3-in. square openings and retained on the No. 10 sieve. COARSE SAND - Material passing the No. 10 sieve and retained on the No. 40 sieve. FINE SAND - Material passing the No. 40 sieve and retained on the No. 200 sieve. COMBINED SILT AND CLAY - Material passing the No. 200 sieve Excellent to Good Group A-8 soils are organic clays or peat with organic content >5%. BOULDERS (retained on 3-in. sieve) should be excluded from the portion of the sample to which the classificaiton is applied, but the percentage of such material, if any, in the sample should be recorded. (35% or less passing No. 200 sieve)(More than 35% passing No. 200 sieve) General Classification A-4 A-5 The terms "gravel", "coarse sand", "fine sand" and "silt-clay", as determinable from the minimum test data required in this classification arrangement and as used in subsequent word descriptions are defined as follows: Granular Materials Silt-Clay Materials A-1 A-2 A-2-6 A-2-7 . . . . 6 max. Fine Sand Silty or Clayey Gravel and Sand Silty Soils Clayey Soils Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgroup is equal to or less than LL minus 30. Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgroup is greater than LL minus 30. A-3 A-2-4 A-2-5 Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand Fair to Poor A-6 The placing of A-3 before A-2 is necessary in the "left to right elimination process" and does not indicate superiority of A-3 over A-2. Usual Types of Significant Constituent Materials A-1-a A-1-b Group Classification -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 15 35 0 2 4 6 8 1012 1416 18 203040 506070 80 1020304050607080100140180 LIQUID LIMIT PLAS TI CI T Y I N D E X PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVEPARTIAL GROUP INDEXGROUP INDEX CHART Group Index (GI) = (F-35) [0.2+0.005 (LL-40) ] + 0.01 (F-15) (PI-10) where F = % Passing No. 200 sieve, LL = Liquid Limit, and PI = Plasticity Index. When working with A-2-6 and A-2-7 subgroups the Partial Group Index (PGI) is determined from the PI only. When the combined Partial Group Indices are negative, the Group Index should be reported as zero.A-2-6 and A-2-782% Passing No. 200 sieve LL = 38 PI = 21 PGI = 8.9 for LL PGI = 7.4 for PI GI = 16 Then:Example: 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Sub- G r o u p A-7-5 Sub-G roupA-7 -6 A-7A-5 A-4 A-6 PI = LL - 30PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) Liquid Limit and Plasticity Index Ranges for the A-4, A-5, A-6 and A-7 SubgroupsLiquid Limit AET Project No. P‐0026728Pavement Summary TableCore NumberStreetFromTo Direction of TravelBituminousThickness (in.)BaseThickness (in.)GPR Section IDPetromat Observed in Core(Y/N)Petromat visible in GPR?PetromatDepth (in.)ProposedRehabilitationRecommendedDepth (in)CommentsC‐01SB4.2513 3/4 S0180GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐02NB45S0180GoodNYes, Ensign Ave to Boone AveLayer from 2.5‐3in2.5‐3 Mill & Overlay2C‐03Ensign Ave N31st Ave N 32nd Ave NNB414S0280GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐04Cavell Ave N31st Ave N 30th Ave NSB46S0380GoodYLayer @ 2.52.5 Mill & Overlay2C‐0529th Ave NFlag Ave N CUL DE SACEB513S0480GoodYLayer @ 33 Mill & Overlay2C‐0630th Ave N Hillsboro Ave N Ensign AveWB4.513 1/2 S0680GoodNPossible from Ensign to Cavell (out of project scope)‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐0729th Ave N Hillsboro Ave N CUL DE SACWB612S‐0770GoodNNo‐‐Reclaim & Overlay8‐12Some deeper bit. visible in GPR (see Plot)C‐08Independence Cir Independence Ave N CUL DE SACWB3.514 1/2 S‐0880GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐09SB3.514 1/2 S‐0980GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐10NB414S‐0980GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐1134 1/2 Ave NFlag Ave N CUL DE SACEB4.513 1/2 S‐1280GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐1234th Ave N Hillsboro Ave N Flag Ave NEB3.514 1/2 S‐1380GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐13Hillsboro Ave N 32nd Ave N 35th Ave NSB414S‐1480GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐14EB810S‐1575GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐15WB9.58 1/2S‐1575GoodNNo‐‐Mill & Overlay2C‐16SB513S‐1750PoorNNo‐‐Reclaim & Overlay8C‐17NB513S‐1780GoodNNo‐‐Reclaim & Overlay8C‐1862nd Ave NUtah Ave N Winnetka Ave N EB810S‐1850PoorNNo‐‐Reclaim & Overlay10C‐19Xylon Ave N56th Ave N Bass Lake RdSB3.514 1/2 S‐1970GoodNNo‐‐Reclaim & Overlay8C‐2056th Ave NBoone Ave N Xylon Ave NEB4.2513 3/4 S‐2075GoodNNo‐‐Reclaim & Overlay8C‐21NB414S‐2175GoodNNo‐‐Reclaim & Overlay8C‐22SB414S‐2175GoodNNo‐‐Reclaim & Overlay82018 Pavement Rating Index and Description(Provided by City of New Hope)Flag Ave N Medicine Lake Rd Boone Ave NIndependence Ave N 30th Ave N 33rd Ave NZealand Ave N 54th Ave N Bass Lake Rd36th Ave N Hillsboro Ave NWinnetka Ave NPennsylvania Ave 51st Ave N 53rd Ave N Figure 1 Boring and Coring Location Map 2024 Street Improvements New Hope, MN Date Prepared: October 12, 2023 AET Project No. P-0026728 Bass Lake Pike Lake 9 100 169 DouglasDrNZachary LnNBass L ake R d 49th A v e N Winnetka AveNBoone Ave NW B r o a dw a y A v e 63r d Av e N Sc hm i d t Lake R d 56t h A v e N Ro c k f o r d R d 42nd Ave N42ndAveNBottineau B l vdBo t t i n e a u Bl vd Eagle Lake Regional Park Crystal Airport New Hope Crystal 100169 36t h Ave N DouglasDrNWinnetka Ave N Northwood Park Mission Farms C-01 C-02 C-03 C-04 C-05C-07 C-08 C-09 C-10 C-11 C-12 C-13 C-14 C-15 C-16 C-17 C-18 C-19 C-20 C-21 C-22 B-1 B-2 B-3 ± Chequamegon National Forest Minnesota Minneapolis SOURCE: MnGeo 2023 0 3000 6000 Feet Corings Borings 2024 Street Improvements New Hope, MN Date Prepared: October 12, 2023 AET Project No. P-0026728 Figure 2 Boring and Coring Location MapHillsboroAveNFlag AveNFlagAveN3 2n d Av e N 31s t A veNIndependence AveNGettysburg Ave N GettysburgAveN29th Ave N StateHwy 169 Service DrJC Park Sunrise Park 169 30th A ve N 28th A v e N FlagAve NNathan Ln N 2 6 th A v e N Hillsboro AveNMedicine Lake Rd Kilmer Park YukonAv e NCavell AveN32nd A v e N BooneAve NEnsi gn A v e N E nsi g n A ve N 31s t Ave N AquilaAve N Yunkers Park 70 30t h A v e N 29th Ave N Aqui l a AveNBooneAveNEnsignAveN27t h Pl N Med i c i n e L a k e Rd Sunny Hollow ParkC-01 C-02 C-03 C-04 C-05 C-06 C-07 C-08 C-09 B-2 B-3 ± Maple Grove 35E Minnetonka Eden Prairie St Paul Minneapolis SOURCE: MnGeo 2023 0 420 840 Feet Corings Borings Approximate Locations 2024 Street Improvements New Hope, MN Date Prepared: October 12, 2023 AET Project No. P-0026728 Figure 3 Boring and Coring Location Map 169 Gettysburg AveNFlagAveNHillsboroAveNHillsboroAveNJord a n A v e N 35th Av e N 34 1 / 2 Ave NIndependence AveN36th Av e N Arkady's Market 169 HillsboroAveNFlagAveN34th A ve N Gettysburg Ave N Boone Ave NBoone Ave NFlagA ve N Y u konAveNZ ealand AveNXylonAve N 3 6 1/2 Cir NEnsign AveNEnsign AveNDecaturAveNNort h w o od Pkwy 3 6 t h A v e N 3 6 th A ve N Northwood Park 32nd P l N Wisconsin AveN33rd Ave NBooneAveNEnsign AveNXylonAve NXylon AveN34 th Av e N 33r d Pl N Hidden Valley Park Vi r gi ni aAveN37th A v e N 3 8t h Ave N 3 5t h Av e N The Printmakers 33rd P l NUtahAveN UtahAveN34th Av e N 33 rd Av e N 32nd P l N 34t h P l N C-10 C-11 C-12 C-13 C-14 C-15B-1 ± 94 212 35W Mississippi National River and Recreation Area Minneapolis SOURCE: MnGeo 2023 0 480 960 Feet Corings Borings Approximate Locations 2024 Street Improvements New Hope, MN Date Prepared: October 12, 2023 AET Project No. P-0026728 Figure 4 Boring and Coring Location MapZealand Ave N 55t h Ave N YukonAve NWisconsin Ave NBoone Ave NXylon Ave N 54 t h A v e N Bass Lake R d Begin Park CP Ra il Sys t e m s Boone Ave N 54th Ave N OregonAve N 55th Ave N 5 5t h A v e N Pennsylvania Ave NQuebec Ave NNevada AveNSumter Ave NSumter Ave NRhode Island Ave NRhodeIsland Ave N55th L n N Virginia Ave NWinnetkaAveN5 6th A ve N CVS/pharmacy La Picante Market & Meat CPRail S yste ms 156 OregonAveN53rd A v eN An gelin eDr Pennsylvania AveNSumterAve N 51st A v e N 51st Ave N Winnetka Ave N 54 t h A v e NMarylandAve NMaryland Ave NNevada Ave NKentuckyAve NLouisianaAveNSally Beauty Supply 52nd A ve N 53r d Ave NMar yland AveN51 s t Av e N Iron Horse Park C-16 C-17 C-19 C-20 C-21 C-22 ± 94 212 35W Mississippi National River and Recreation Area Minneapolis SOURCE: MnGeo 2023 0 480 960 Feet Approximate Coring Location 2024 Street Improvements New Hope, MN Date Prepared: October 12, 2023 AET Project No. P-0026728 Figure 5 Boring and Coring Location MapYukonAveNWyomingAve NSunriseTer Northbrook Ave N 63rd Av e N 6 3rd A ve N Meadow Brook Lane Park Kelly's La Wireless 60 t h A v e N 62nd Ave N 62n d A ve N Xylon Ave N 61 1 / 2 Av e N 6 0 1/2 A v e N Mea d o w LakeRdNYukonAve NCavell Ave NAquila Ave NZealandAveNBoone Ave NBooneAveNMeadow Lake Park Dorothy Mary Park 8Utah Ave NSumter AveNVirginia Ave NRhodeIslandAveNQuebecAveNCarti sian Ave N 63rd Av e N 63rd Ave N Sunnylane Park 62nd Ave N 62 nd A ve N QuebecAve N QuebecAve NSumte r AveN61st A v e N 61 st A ve N 59th Ave N WinnetkaAveN60th Ave N 60th Ave N RhodeIslandAveNRhode Is l and Ave N 60 1 / 2 A v e N 59 1 / 2 A v e N 59th P l N WBr oadwa y A v e Maryland AveNLouisianaAve N 63 r d A v e N 62 nd Ave N Broadway Park C-18 ± 94 212 35W Mississippi National River and Recreation Area Minneapolis SOURCE: MnGeo 2023 0 480 960 Feet Approximate Coring Location FILL4.25" Bituminous Pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Flag Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-01 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) FILL, mostly sand with silt, a little gravel, brown (A-3) END OF BORING Location: 31st Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/18/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-02 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Ensign Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-03 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4" Bituminous pavement FILL, mixture of silty sand and clayey sand with gravel, brown (A-2-4) FILL, mostly silty sand, a little sandy lean clay and gravel, brown (A-2-4) END OF BORING Location: Carvell Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/18/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-04 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: 29th Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-05 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: 30th Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/18/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-06 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL6" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, light brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: 29th Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-07 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL3.5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Independence Circle CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-08 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL3.5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Independence Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-09 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Independence Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-10 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: 34½ Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-11 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL3.5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: 34th Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-12 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Hillsboro Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-13 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL8" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly gravelly sand with silt, light brown (A-1-b) (possible crushed limestone base) END OF BORING Location: 36th Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/18/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-14 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL9.5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly gravelly sand with silt, light brown (A-1-b) (possible crushed limestone base) END OF BORING Location: 36th Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/14/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-15 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Pennsylvania Avenue CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-16 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, a little clayey sand (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Pennsylvania Avenue CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-17 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL8" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: 62nd Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/18/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-18 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL3.5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Xylon Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/14/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-19 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: 56th Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/14/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-20 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Zealand Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/14/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-21 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 FILL4" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown (A-1-b) (possible aggregate base) END OF BORING Location: Zealand Avenue North CORE HA TIME SAMPLEDDEPTH0-1½'DATE BORINGCOMPLETED: ST KL DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS WATERLEVEL Rig: Surface Elevation LG: HA DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL DR: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG CASINGDEPTH 9/15/23 CAVE-INDEPTH 03/2011 01-DHR-060 WCN DENMATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECIN. C-22 (p. 1 of 1) MCGEOLOGY AET No: Project: DEPTHINFEET SAMPLETYPE 1 LL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Log of Boring No. %-#200PL P-0026728 SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP P-0026728.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 10/13/23 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-01 Kilmer LaneNorthCR 70 US 169 Date :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Flag Ave N Latitude : Longitude : Direction of Travel :SB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4.25 Base Thickness (in)** :13.75 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4.25 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 1 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-02 Boone Avenue NorthUS 169 Date :18 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :31st Ave N Latitude :45.012626 Longitude :-93.394364 Direction of Travel :NB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4 Base Thickness (in)** :14 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 2 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-03 Boone Avenue NorthUS 169 Date :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Ensign Ave N Latitude :45.013859 Longitude :-93.394597 Direction of Travel :NB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4 Base Thickness (in)** :14 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 3 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-04 Boone Avenue NorthCR 70 US 169 Date :18 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Cavell Ave N Latitude :45.011466 Longitude :-93.39226 Direction of Travel :SB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4 Base Thickness (in)** :14 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 4 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-05 CR 70 US 169 Date :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :29th Ave N Latitude :45.010163 Longitude :-93.393598 Direction of Travel :EB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :5 Base Thickness (in)** :13 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 5 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-06 Boone Avenue NorthCR 70 US 169 Date :18 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :30th Ave N Latitude :45.011133 Longitude :-93.396982 Direction of Travel :WB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4.5 Base Thickness (in)** :13.5 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4.5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 6 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-07 CR 70 US 169 Date :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :29th Ave N Latitude :45.010116 Longitude :-93.39748 Direction of Travel :WB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :6 Base Thickness (in)** :12 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :6 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 7 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-08 Boone Avenue NorthUS 169 Date :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Independence Cir Latitude :45.012038 Longitude :-93.398681 Direction of Travel :WB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :3.5 Base Thickness (in)** :14.5 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :3.5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 8 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-09 Boone Avenue NorthUS 169 Date :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Independence Ave N Latitude :45.014461 Longitude :-93.399728 Direction of Travel :SB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :3.5 Base Thickness (in)** :14.5 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :3.5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 9 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-10 Boone Avenue NorthDate :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Independence Ave N Latitude :45.016119 Longitude :-93.399657 Direction of Travel :NB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4 Base Thickness (in)** :14 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 10 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-11 36th Avenue North Boone Avenue NorthDate :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :34 1/2 Ave N Latitude :45.019209 Longitude :-93.396645 Direction of Travel :EB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4.5 Base Thickness (in)** :13.5 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4.5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 11 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-12 36th Avenue North Boone Avenue NorthDate :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :34th Ave N Latitude :45.018353 Longitude :-93.397691 Direction of Travel :EB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :3.5 Base Thickness (in)** :14.5 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :3.5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 12 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-13 36th Avenue North Boone Avenue NorthPil g r i m LaneNorthDate :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Hillsboro Ave N Latitude :45.019113 Longitude :-93.398597 Direction of Travel :SB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4 Base Thickness (in)** :14 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 13 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-14 36th Avenue North Boone Avenue NorthNorthwood Park Date :18 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :36th Ave N Latitude :45.021937 Longitude :-93.3912 Direction of Travel :EB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Turn Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :8 Base Thickness (in)** :10 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :8 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 14 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-15 36th Avenue North Boone Avenue NorthNorthwood Park Date :14 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :36th Ave N Latitude :45.021956 Longitude :-93.382423 Direction of Travel :WB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :9.5 Base Thickness (in)** :8.5 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :9.5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 15 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-16 53rd A v e n u e N o rth Paynesv ille S ubdivisionWindsor Ridge Crystal Shopping CenterDate :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Pennsylvania Ave Latitude :45.048781 Longitude :-93.374795 Direction of Travel :SB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :5 Base Thickness (in)** :13 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 16 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-17 53rd A v e nue N orth 49th Avenue North Fairview Avenue North Paynesv il le S ubdivisionWindsor Ridge Date :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Pennsylvania Ave Latitude :45.047586 Longitude :-93.374703 Direction of Travel :NB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :5 Base Thickness (in)** :13 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 17 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-18 62nd Avenue North Winnetka Avenue North 62nd A venue North Date :18 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :62nd Ave N Latitude :45.065698 Longitude :-93.380821 Direction of Travel :EB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :8 Base Thickness (in)** :10 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :8 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 18 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-19 CR 10 CR 10 Date :14 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Xylon Ave N Latitude :45.0562 Longitude :-93.38631 Direction of Travel :SB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :3.5 Base Thickness (in)** :14.5 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :3.5 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 19 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-20 CR 10 Science Center Drive CR 10 CR 10 Date :14 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :56th Ave N Latitude :45.054689 Longitude :-93.387121 Direction of Travel :EB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4.25 Base Thickness (in)** :13.75 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4.25 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 20 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-21 CR 10 Science Center Drive CR 10 CR 10 Date :14 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Zeal and Ave N Latitude :45.053981 Longitude :-93.388071 Direction of Travel :NB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4 Base Thickness (in)** :14 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 21 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:P-0026728 Pavement Core Log Core ID :C-22 CR 10CR 10 CR 10 Date :15 Sep 2023 Roadway Name :Zealand Ave N Latitude :45.055554 Longitude :-93.388088 Direction of Travel :SB Location Type :Right Wheel Path Lane ID :Drive Lane Core Diameter (in) :4 Recovered Core Thickness (in)* :4 Base Thickness (in)** :14 Down-Hole Pavement Core Thickness (in)** :4 Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Comments : *Rounded to the nearest 0.1 inch; **Rounded to the nearest 0.25 inch Page 22 of 22American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114 www.teamaet.com AET Project No:{PROJECTID} Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Report No. P-0026728 Appendix B – Page 1 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. A.1 FIELD EXPLORATION The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by extracting 22 pavement cores and performing hand auger borings. The locations of the cores appear on Figures 1-5 – Coring Location Map, preceding the Pavement Core Logs in this appendix. A.2 SAMPLING METHODS A.2.1 Hand Auger Sampling Sample types described as “HA” on the boring logs are continuous core samples collected by the hand auger method, typically through a core hole or along the shoulder of the roadway. The method consists of a 3.25 inch OD hand auger tool that is manually twisted into the ground to the desired depth or refusal. A.2.2 Disturbed Samples (DS)/Spin-up Samples (SU) Sample types described as “DS” or “SU” on the boring logs are disturbed samples, which are taken from the flights of the auger. Because the auger disturbs the samples, possible soil layering and contact depths should be considered approximate. A.2.3 Sampling Limitations Unless actually observed in a sample, contacts between soil layers are estimated based on the spacing of samples and the action of drilling tools. Cobbles, boulders, and other large objects generally cannot be recovered from test borings, and they may be present in the ground even if they are not noted on the boring logs. Determining the thickness of “topsoil” layers is usually limited, due to variations in topsoil definition, sample recovery, and other factors. Visual-manual description often relies on color for determination, and transitioning changes can account for significant variation in thickness judgment. Accordingly, the topsoil thickness presented on the logs should not be the sole basis for calculating topsoil stripping depths and volumes. If more accurate information is needed relating to thickness and topsoil quality definition, alternate methods of sample retrieval and testing should be employed. A.3 CLASSIFICATION METHODS Soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The USCS is described in ASTM: D2487 and D2488. Where laboratory classification tests (sieve analysis or Atterberg Limits) have been performed, accurate classifications per ASTM: D2487 are possible. Otherwise, soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are visual-manual judgments. Charts are attached which provide information on the USCS, the descriptive terminology, and the symbols used on the boring logs. Visual-manual judgment of the AASHTO Soil Group is also noted as a part of the soil description. A chart presenting details of the AASHTO Soil Classification System is also attached. The boring logs include descriptions of apparent geology. The geologic depositional origin of each soil layer is interpreted primarily by observation of the soil samples, which can be limited. Observations of the surrounding topography, vegetation, and development can sometimes aid this judgment. A.4 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS The groundwater level measurements are shown at the bottom of the boring logs. The following information appears under “Water Level Measurements” on the logs:  Date and Time of measurement  Sampled Depth: lowest depth of soil sampling at the time of measurement  Casing Depth: depth to bottom of casing or hollow-stem auger at time of measurement  Cave-in Depth: depth at which measuring tape stops in the borehole  Water Level: depth in the borehole where free water is encountered  Drilling Fluid Level: same as Water Level, except that the liquid in the borehole is drilling fluid The true location of the water table at the boring locations may be different than the water levels measured in the boreholes. This is possible because there are several factors that can affect the water level measurements in the borehole. Some of these factors include: permeability of each soil layer in profile, presence of perched water, amount of time between water level readings, presence of drilling fluid, weather conditions, and use of borehole casing. Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Report No. P-0026728 Appendix B – Page 2 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. A.5 LABORATORY TEST METHODS A.5.1 Water Content Tests Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-010, which is performed in general accordance with ASTM: D2216 and AASHTO: T265. A.5.2 Sieve Analysis of Soils (thru #200 Sieve) Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-040, which is performed in general conformance with ASTM: D6913, Method A. A.5.3 Percent Finer than #200 Sieve Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-060, which is performed in general conformance with ASTM: D1140. A.6 TEST STANDARD LIMITATIONS Field and laboratory testing is done in general conformance with the described procedures. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. A.7 SAMPLE STORAGE Unless notified to do otherwise, we routinely retain representative samples of the soils recovered from the borings for a period of 30 days Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 Appendix B Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing GPR Data and Analysis Results Appendix B Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing Report No. P-0026728 Appendix B – Page 1 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. B.1 FIELD EXPLORATION The pavement structural conditions at the site were evaluated nondestructively using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). The description of the equipment precedes the GPR Data and Analysis Results in this appendix. B.2 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION B.2.1 GSSI GPR Test System The GPR test system owned by AET is a bumper-mounted, 2 GHz air-coupled antenna; dual-channel controller/data acquisition system; wheel-mounted DMI (Distance Measuring Instrument); and laptop with the GSSI controller software. AET uses GPR systems for testing and analysis that meets the ASTM D4748-10 Determining the Thickness of Bound Pavement Layers Using Short-Pulse Radar and D6087 Evaluating Asphalt-Covered Concrete Bridge Decks Using Ground Penetrating Radar test standards. Figure A1 provides an example of a vehicle outfitted with the air-coupled antenna and the raw GPR data prior to processing. (a) (b) Figure B1. (a) GSSI 2 GHz Air-coupled GPR Test System mounted to the rear of an AET survey vehicle and (b) example of raw data collected using the GPR test system The GPR antenna emits a high-frequency electromagnetic wave into the material under investigation. The reflected energy caused by changes in the electromagnetic properties within the material is detected by a receiver antenna and recorded for subsequent analysis. The 2 GHz air-coupled GPR can collect radar waveforms at more than 100 signals per second, which allows for data to be collected at driving speeds along the longitudinal dimension of a road with the antennas fixed at the rear or in front of the vehicle. AET prefers the 2 GHz antenna for road surveys as it combines excellent resolution with reasonable depth penetration (18-24 inches in pavement materials). As data collection is performed at normal driving speeds (45-55 mph), no lane closures are required. At this speed the 2 GHz antenna can collect data at 6-inch interval (2 scans/foot), however data collection varies by project. Specific data collection rates (in scans per foot) will be described in project reports. Vertical scans consist of 512 samples and the recorded length in time of each scan is 12 nanoseconds. Data acquisition uses 300 MHz high pass and 5,000 MHz low pass filters. In a GPR test, the antenna is moved continuously across the test surface and the control unit collects data at a specified distance increment. In this way, the data collection rate is independent of the scan rate. Alternatively, scanning can be performed at a constant rate of time, regardless of the scan distance. Single point scans can be performed as well. Data is reviewed in the controller software in real-time during field testing to identify reflections and ensure proper data collection parameters. B.2.2 System Calibrations Prior to each use, the GPR test system is calibrated using metal plate and air calibration methods suggested by the GPR manufacturer. In addition, the DMI is calibrated to within +/- 1 foot/mile. • Metal plate calibration is obtained with the antenna placed over a metal plate at the same elevation as a scan obtained over pavement. Time-based collection (as opposed to distance) is performed to provide the velocity of the radar energy in terms of reflection strengths (amplitudes) from a pavement layer interface relative to a perfect reflector (a metal plate). Appendix B Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing Report No. P-0026728 Appendix B – Page 2 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. • Air calibrations are also performed in time-based collection mode to account for the vertical travel of the antenna during vehicle-mounted testing. To approximate the range of travel encountered during testing, data is collected for fifteen seconds while an operator moves the vehicle vertically (by jumping up and down on the mounting point at the bumper) to record data. This information is used in later GPR analysis. • The DMI is calibrated by laying out a long distance (typically 100 feet) with a tape measure, marking the termini, and traversing the known distance. Recorded distance in the controller software is confirmed against actual distance, and adjustments in the controller software are made to ensure that DMI information that is paired with GPR data is accurate. B.2.3 Linear Distance and Spatial Reference System The distance measuring instrument (DMI) is a trailer mounted two phase encoder system. When DMI is connected to the GPR controller it provides for automatic display and recording distance information in both English and metric units within a 1-foot (0.3 meters) resolution when calibrated using provided procedure in the controller software.The spatial reference system is provided using either Trimble or EOS Arrow Global Positioning System (GPS) systems that consist of a fully integrated receiver, antenna, and battery unit to provide subfoot (30 cm) post processed accuracy. All GPS information is coupled with raw GPR data within the GPR controller software. B.2.4 Camera Monitoring System A truck-mounted, battery-operated independent 4K waterproof multi-functional digital camera with an SD card is used to capture digital video of the pavement surface during GPR data collection. B.3 SAMPLING METHODS Sampling methods using the GPR test system comply with the test standard (ASTM D4748-10). Sampling rates (i.e. scans per foot), sampling location (e.g. right wheel path, middle lane, both wheel paths), and the use of alternative equipment for GPR collection, if applicable (e.g. ground-coupled antennas), are described in the body of the project report. B.4 QUALITY CONTROL (QC) AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) Beside the daily metal plate calibration, the DMI is also calibrated at regular intervals by driving the vehicle over a known distance to calculate the distance scale factor. The GPR will be monitored in real time in the data collection vehicle to minimize data errors. The GPR units will be identified with a unique number and that number will accompany all data reported from that unit as required in the QC/QA plan. Scheduled preventive maintenance ensures proper equipment operation and helps identify potential problems that can be corrected to avoid poor quality or missing data that results if the equipment malfunctions while on site. The routine and major maintenance procedures established by the Federal Highway Administration’s Long-Term Pavement Performance research program are adopted and any maintenance has been done at the end of the day after the testing is complete and become part of the routine performed at the end of each test/travel day and on days when no other work is scheduled. As noted in the applicable test standard (ASTM D4748-10), quality assurance of GPR data is compromised when suboptimal test conditions exist. Such conditions may include wet surfaces (including standing water), ambient electromagnetic interference, or pavement distresses that can significantly scatter the GPR signal. B.5 DATA ANALYSIS METHODS B.5.1 Data Editing Field acquisition is seldom so routine that no errors, omissions, or data redundancy occur. Data editing encompasses issues such as data re-organization, data file merging, data header or background information updates, repositioning, and inclusion of elevation information with the data. B.5.2 Basic Processing Basic data processing addresses some of the fundamental manipulations applied to data to make a more acceptable product for initial interpretation and data evaluation. In most instances this type of processing is already applied in real-time to generate the real-time display. The advantage of post survey processing is that the basic processing can be done more systematically and non-causal operators to remove or enhance certain features can be applied. Appendix B Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing Report No. P-0026728 Appendix B – Page 3 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. The Reflection Picking procedure is used to eliminate unwanted noise, detects significant reflections, and records the corresponding time and depth. It uses antenna calibration file data to calculate the radar signal velocity within the pavement. B.5.3 Advanced Processing Advanced data processing addresses the types of processing which require a certain amount of operator bias to be applied and which will result in data which are significantly different from the raw information which were input to the processing. This stage of analysis relies on supplementary resources (e.g. boring/coring logs, design plans, as-built records, historical records, conversations with road engineers/supervisors). B.5.4 Data Interpretation In some cases, automated layer interpretation modules within the analysis software can be used from preliminary analysis to map structural layers and calculate the corresponding velocities and depths. When used, the results from these modules require engineering review and approval. B.6 TEST LIMITATIONS B.6.1 Test Methods The testing we performed identified pavement conditions only at those points where we measured pavement thicknesses and observed pavement surface conditions. Depending on the sampling methods and sampling frequency, every location may not be tested. Test conditions may limit the quality of the data collected, and some anomalies may be present in the pavement that compromise data and/or data collection at a given location. Furthermore, because analysis procedures involve matters of engineering judgement, the final analysis developed represents our professional opinions about the subsurface conditions. More specifically, as relates to pavement systems, assessing layer thicknesses using GPR is a matter of engineering judgement. To enrich the analysis, we rely on supporting test methods and project information. However, even with supporting information, the distinction between layers in the road is not always explicit. Factors influencing definition of radar scans include ambient electromagnetic interference, the presence of moisture, the presence of voids, and the similarity of material layer type between layers. Other factors external to related to methods and analysis data may require that we alter our conclusions and recommendations accordingly. B.6.2 Test Standards Pavement testing is performed in general conformance with the described procedures. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. B.7 SUPPORTING TEST METHODS B.7.1 Soil Boring/Coring Field Exploration If both pavement thicknesses and subgrade soil types and conditions are desired, pavement cores and soil borings are obtained. The limited number of cores and borings are necessary to verify the GPR layer thickness data. B.7.2 Pavement Surface Condition Certain pavement distresses may affect the electromagnetic signal to an extent that complicates the analysis of GPR data. The results of a pavement condition survey are useful to identify near-surface features (e.g. stripped asphalt) or sub-surface features (e.g. local saturated layers due to ingress of water at the surface) when reviewing GPR data. When we do not perform a standard pavement condition survey alongside GPR data, we rely on GPR operators to note possible distresses as they traverse the pavement from about 1 ft (0.3 m) in front of vehicle to about 30 ft (9 m) ahead. These test notes are consulted during GPR analysis; however, they are not a substitute for a conventional rigorous pavement condition survey. American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-01 From:To:Boone Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.7 16%3.1 2.7 3.9 15%3.4 2.8 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Medicine Lake Rd Flag Ave N/31st Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP C-01 C-02 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-02 From:To:32nd Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.9 12%3.4 3.2 3.7 8%3.4 3.2 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN 31st Ave N Ensign Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP C-03 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-03 From:To:31st Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 4.2 19%3.5 2.6 4.0 14%3.6 3.0 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN 30th Ave N Cavell Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP C-04 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-04 From:To:End Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 4.7 18%3.9 3.3 4.3 15%3.7 2.9 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window EB WB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Flag Ave N 29th Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP C-05 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-05 From:To:30th Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 5.6 35%4.2 3.7 5.3 39%4.2 3.6 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Medicine Lake Rd Hillsboro Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-06 From:To:Ensign Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.9 13%3.4 2.8 3.8 11%3.4 2.9 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window EB WB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Independence Ave N 30th Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP C-06 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-07 From:To:End Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 6.2 29%4.6 4.5 6.0 20%4.7 4.1 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window EB WB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Hillsboro Ave N 29th Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP C-07 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-08 From:To:End Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.8 16%3.2 2.8 3.4 10%3.0 2.9 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window EB WB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Independence Ave N Independence Cir -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP C-08 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-09 From:To:33rd Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.8 13%3.3 2.6 3.3 14%2.8 2.3 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN 30th Ave N Independence Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP C-10C-09 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-10 From:To:Hillsboro Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.6 13%3.2 2.9 3.2 21%2.7 2.6 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window EB WB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Independence Ave N 31st Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-11 From:To:Hillsboro Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.4 17%3.0 2.8 4.0 15%3.2 2.6 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window EB WB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Independence Ave N 33rd Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-12 From:To:End Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.7 9%3.4 3.1 3.8 12%3.3 3.0 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window WB EB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Flag Ave N 34 1/2 Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP C-11 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-13 From:To:Flag Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.8 9%3.4 3.0 3.8 8%3.5 3.3 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window EB WB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Hillsboro Ave N 34th Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP C-12 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-14 From:To:35th Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.7 12%3.4 2.9 3.7 11%3.2 2.9 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN 32nd Ave N Hillsboro Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP C-13 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-15 From:To:Winnetka Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 7.8 12%7.0 5.8 7.8 11%6.9 5.9 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window EB WB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Hillsboro Ave N 36th Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP C-14 C-15 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-16 From:To:End Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.8 7%3.5 3.2 3.7 11%3.3 3.0 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN 34th Ave N Gettysburg Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-17 From:To:53rd Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 4.9 12%4.3 3.4 4.0 19%3.1 2.4 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN 51st Ave N Pennsylvania Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP C-17 C-16 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-18 From:To:Winnetka Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 7.3 15%6.2 5.5 6.6 16%5.1 4.4 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window SB NB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Utah Ave N 62nd Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP C-18 C-18 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-19 From:To:Bass Lake Rd Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.6 16%3.1 2.5 3.9 14%3.3 2.7 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN 56th Ave N Xylon Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP C-19 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-20 From:To:Xylon Ave N Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 3.9 21%3.2 2.8 4.4 16%3.7 3.1 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN Boone Ave N 56th Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP C-20 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Project:Date:9/18/23 AET Job No.:P-0026728 Test Date:9/11/23 Road:Section/Grid:S-21 From:To:Bass Lake Rd Units:inches Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. BP 4.9 24%3.9 2.8 5.1 39%3.4 2.7 Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *Possible aggregate base layer extends beyond the depth of the GPR viewing window NB SB Layer GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2024 Street Improvements Project; New Hope, MN 54th Ave N Zealand Ave N -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Depth (in)GPR Mileage Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP C-21 C-22 Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2024 Street Improvements, New Hope, Minnesota October 13, 2023 AET Report No. P-0026728 Appendix C Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Appendix C Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. P-0026728 Appendix C – Page 1 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. C.1 REFERENCE This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks relating to subsurface problems which are caused by construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. This information was developed and provided by GBA1, of which, we are a member firm. C.2 RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION C.2.1 Understand the Geotechnical Engineering Services Provided for this Report Geotechnical engineering services typically include the planning, collection, interpretation, and analysis of exploratory data from widely spaced borings and/or test pits. Field data are combined with results from laboratory tests of soil and rock samples obtained from field exploration (if applicable), observations made during site reconnaissance, and historical information to form one or more models of the expected subsurface conditions beneath the site. Local geology and alterations of the site surface and subsurface by previous and proposed construction are also important considerations. Geotechnical engineers apply their engineering training, experience, and judgment to adapt the requirements of the prospective project to the subsurface model(s). Estimates are made of the subsurface conditions that will likely be exposed during construction as well as the expected performance of foundations and other structures being planned and/or affected by construction activities. The culmination of these geotechnical engineering services is typically a geotechnical engineering report providing the data obtained, a discussion of the subsurface model(s), the engineering and geologic engineering assessments and analyses made, and the recommendations developed to satisfy the given requirements of the project. These reports may be titled investigations, explorations, studies, assessments, or evaluations. Regardless of the title used, the geotechnical engineering report is an engineering interpretation of the subsurface conditions within the context of the project and does not represent a close examination, systematic inquiry, or thorough investigation of all site and subsurface conditions. C.2.2 Geotechnical Engineering Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects, and At Specific Times Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs, goals, and risk management preferences of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil-works constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Likewise, geotechnical engineering services are performed for a specific project and purpose. For example, it is unlikely that a geotechnical engineering study for a refrigerated warehouse will be the same as one prepared for a parking garage; and a few borings drilled during a preliminary study to evaluate site feasibility will not be adequate to develop geotechnical design recommendations for the project. Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: • for a different client; • for a different project or purpose; • for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, the reliability of a geotechnical-engineering report can be affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying the recommendations in it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis after the passage of time – if any is required at all – could prevent major problems. 1 Geoprofessional Business Association, 15800 Crabbs Branch Way Suite 300, Rockville, MD 20850 Telephone: 301/565-2733: www.geoprofessional.org, 2019 Appendix C Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. P-0026728 Appendix C – Page 2 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. C.2.3 Read the Full Report Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical-engineering report did not read the report in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selective elements only. Read and refer to the report in full. C.2.4 You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer About Change Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project-specific factors when developing the scope of study behind this report and developing the confirmation-dependent recommendations the report conveys. Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: • the site’s size or shape; • the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, function or weight of the proposed structure and the desired performance criteria; • the composition of the design team; or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project or site changes – even minor ones – and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise would have considered. C.2.5 Most of the “Findings” Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a site’s subsurface using various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing is performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgement to form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ – maybe significantly – from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team through project completion to obtain informed guidance quickly, whenever needed. C.2.6 This Report’s Recommendations Are Confirmation-Dependent The recommendations included in this report – including any options or alternatives – are confirmation-dependent. In other words, they are not final, because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgement and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions exposed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation-dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation. C.2.7 This Report Could Be Misinterpreted Other design professionals’ misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a continuing member of the design team, to: • confer with other design-team members; • help develop specifications; • review pertinent elements of other design professionals’ plans and specifications; and • be available whenever geotechnical engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction-phase observations. C.2.8 Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated-subsurface-conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you’ve included the material for information purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that “informational purposes” means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or Appendix C Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. P-0026728 Appendix C – Page 3 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. recommendations in the report. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selected from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect. C.2.9 Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This happens in part because soil and rock on project sites are typically heterogeneous and not manufactured materials with well-defined engineering properties like steel and concrete. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled “limitations,” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’ responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. C.2.10 Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study – e.g., a “phase-one” or “phase- two” environmental site assessment – differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually provide environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not obtained your own environmental information about the project site, ask your geotechnical consultant for a recommendation on how to find environmental risk-management guidance. C.2.11 Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, the engineer’s services were not designed, conducted, or intended to prevent migration of moisture – including water vapor – from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material-performance deficiencies. Accordingly, proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer’s recommendations will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building-envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not building-envelope or mold specialists. Appendix D – Municipal State Aid Street System 58th Ave N 56th Ave N Bass Lake Rd Sumter Ave NWinnetka Ave N62nd Ave N Boone Ave NInternationalP k w y Science Center Dr 54th Ave NXylon Ave N56th Ave N 49th Ave N Louisiana Ave N169 ServiceRd49th Ave N Winnetka Ave NBoone Ave N45th Ave N Xylon Ave NQuebec Ave NLouisiana Ave N42nd Ave N 42nd Ave N 36th Ave N36th Ave N Nevada Ave NWinnetka Ave NLouisiana Ave N32nd Ave N Medicine Lake Rd 109114114 116115 108108 112 107 101107 103104104 110110105101106 106 105112 ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17) Revised: 2016-11-08 By: dmericksonR:\client\municipal\new_hope_ci_mn\34MAP\GISDATA\Projects\Municiapl_State_Aid_2016.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. County State Aid HighwaysMunicipal State AidTrunk HighwaysCity LimitsParcels Municipal State AidStreet SystemNew Hope, Minnesota 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Feet I:\RFA\City Manager\2023\Ordinances\Ord 23‐07\10.1 Q ‐ ord. 23‐07 adoption.docx    Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Valerie Leone, City Clerk‐Treas.  Agenda Title  Ordinance No. 23‐07, An ordinance amending section 8‐29(c) of the New Hope City Code related to Tattoo  and Body Piercing Licensing Requirements  Requested Action  Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance amendment to align with license requirements established by  the State of Minnesota.    Policy/Past Practice  Ordinances provide regulations to govern general and various activities and situations which actually or may  occur or exist in the city, and which will or may affect the general welfare and safety of residents of the city,  with the intention of promoting and protecting the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the city.       Background  Staff recommends an ordinance amendment to require that the applicant holds a valid state‐issued tattooing  or body piercing license or a valid dual body art technician license if the applicant performs both tattooing  and body piercing pursuant to Minn. Stat. §146B.03.     The city attorney drafted the ordinance amendment.   Recommendation  Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance amendment.  Attachment   Ordinance No. 23‐07   City code 8‐29(c)(4)a (current)    Agenda Section Ordinances &  Resolutions Item Number  10.1  1 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8-29 TATTOO AND BODY PIERCING ESTABLISHMENTS ORDINANCE IN THE NEW HOPE CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW HOPE ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 8-29 (c)(4) – Tattoo and body piercing establishments is hereby amended to repeal the stricken text and add the following underlined text: (c) License application. (2) If the applicant is a partnership: a. The name(s) and address(es) of all general and limited partners and all information concerning each general partner required in subsection (c)(1) a of thise section. (3) If the applicant is a corporation or other business: c. The name of the stockholder(s), manager(s), proprietor(s), or other agent(s) in charge of the business and all information concerning each stockholder, manager, proprietor, or agent required in subsection (c)(1) a of this section. (4) For all applicants: a. Whether the applicant holds a valid state-issued current tattooing or body piercing license or a valid dual body art technician license if the applicant performs both tattooing and body piercing pursuant to Minn. Stat. §146B.03 .for any other governmental unit. d. Whenever the application is for premises either planned or under construction or undergoing substantial alterationsalternations, the application shall be accompanied by a set of preliminary plans showing the design of the proposed premises to be licensed. If the plans of design are on file with the city building official, no plans need be submitted. (i) General license requirements. (7) Liability insurance. All licensees shall have at all times a valid certificate of insurance issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in the state indicating that the licensee is currently covered in the tattoo business by a liability insurance policy. The minimum limits of coverage for such insurance shall be: 2 Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication. Dated the 23rd day of October, 2023. ____________________________________ Kathi Hemken, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Valerie Leone, City Clerk (Published in the New Hope-Golden Valley Sun-Post the ____day of _______________, 2023.) P:\Attorney\SAS\1 Client Files\2 City of New Hope\99-82307 Tattoo Ordinance - Section 8-29\Ordinance 23-07 amending Section 8-29 Tattoo Ordinance.docx I:\RFA\City Manager\2023\Ordinances\Ord 23‐08\10.1 Q ‐ ord. 23‐08 adoption.docx    Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Valerie Leone, City Clerk‐Treas.  Agenda Title  Ordinance No. 23‐08, An ordinance amending section 8‐7 Tobacco and related products in the New Hope  City Code  Requested Action  Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance amendment to ensure a tobacco license applicant has a valid  BUCO prior to license issuance.    Policy/Past Practice  Ordinances provide regulations to govern general and various activities and situations which actually or may  occur or exist in the city, and which will or may affect the general welfare and safety of residents of the city,  with the intention of promoting and protecting the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the city.       Background  Staff recommends an ordinance amendment to require that the tobacco license applicant has an approved  business use certificate of occupancy before issuance of a license. Such action will ensure tobacco licensees  either own the property or have permission to rent the space. This issue was discussed at the October 16 work  session. The city attorney drafted the ordinance amendment.   Recommendation  Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance amendment.  Attachment   Ordinance No. 23‐08      Agenda Section Ordinances &  Resolutions Item Number  10.2  1 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8-7 TOBACCO AND RELATED PRODUCTS IN THE NEW HOPE CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW HOPE ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 8-7(b) – Tobacco and related products is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (b) License. (3) Action. The City Council may approve or deny the application for a license, or it may delay action for a reasonable period of time to complete any investigation of the application or the applicant deemed necessary. If the City Council approves the application, the City Clerk will issue the license to the applicant after verification of an approved business use certificate of occupancy pursuant to Section 3-33. If the City Council denies the application, notice of the denial will be given to the applicant along with notice of the applicant’s right to appeal the decision. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication. Dated the 23rd day of October, 2023. ____________________________________ Kathi Hemken, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Valerie Leone, City Clerk (Published in the New Hope-Golden Valley Sun-Post the ____day of _______________, 2023.) P:\Attorney\SAS\1 Client Files\2 City of New Hope\99-82308 Tobacco amendment - BUCO\Ordinance 23-08.docx I:\RFA\HR & Admin Svcs\Human Resources\2023\Council Meetings\10232023\Item 11.1\Q&R ‐ 11.1 Approval of Contract for BS&A to Provide ERP Software.docx      Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: HR & Admin Services  By: Rich Johnson, Director    Agenda Title  Resolution Approving Contract with BS&A to Provide Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software services  Requested Action  Staff recommends approval of a contract with BS&A to provide ERP software to the City.  Background  At the April 17, 2023, work session, staff informed Council of LOGIS’ pricing and the city’s options regarding  the enterprise resource planning software. Council supported utilizing Abdo’s services to assist the city in  evaluating various ERPs. The software review included programs such as accounts receivable, accounts  payable, financial reporting as well as payroll, human resources, special assessments, recreation,  license/permits/ inspections, and utility billing.     At the October 16, 2023, work session, staff shared the results of the evaluation process as well as its  recommendation to enter into an agreement with BS&A to provide ERP software to the city. After discussion,  the City Council indicated its agreement to enter into an agreement with BS&A and directed staff to bring the  contract to the October 23, 2023, Council meeting for approval.    Attachments  Resolution  Memo from Abdo dated October 11, 2023  Agreement Between the City of New Hope and BS&A                      Agenda Section Unfinished & Org  Business Item Number  11.1        City of New Hope    Resolution No. 2023‐    Resolution Approving Contract with BS&A Software  To Provide Enterprise Resource Planning   Software as a Service      WHEREAS,  staff identified the need for a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software; and,    WHEREAS,  this need was discussed with the City Council on April 17, 2023, and Council approved  issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP); and    WHEREAS,  an RFP was issued and the city has received acceptable bids; and    WHEREAS, the bids and services offered were reviewed with Council on October 16, 2023; and    WHEREAS,  BS&A Software is the preferred vendor as outlined in the memo from Abdo dated October 11,  2023; and    WHEREAS, the city desires to enter into a contractual arrangement with BS&A Software.    NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City of New Hope City Council:    1. That the contract with BS&A is hereby approved.  2. That city officials are authorized to execute said contract.      Adopted by the New Hope City Council on October 23, 2023.      ____________________________________    Mayor      Attest:         City Clerk  MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: REECE BERTHOLF ERIN ENSTAD, ABDO FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP) SYSTEM CHANGES OCTOBER 11, 2023 BACKGROUND LOGIS has decided to move away from the system that has been in place for over 20 years (JD Edwards) and has begun moving towards a new system. The new system will be implemented in many LOGIS cities/counties over the next few years. New Hope has worked with LOGIS since the 1970’s to provide IT services, including various software that is used daily in the city (JD Edwards, Hubble, CIS Infinity, PIMS, RecTrac, etc.). Over the past 2 years LOGIS has been working with its membership to research, evaluate, and select a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Utility Billing software solution. After LOGIS made their selections, each city had to choose between continuing with the solutions that LOGIS selected (at a very significant cost and would be required to make a 10-year commitment to the new software) or consider other options that would suit their needs. RECOMMENDATIONS We have evaluated LOGIS’ selections alongside management and felt it is in the best interest of the City to consider other options through a request for proposal (RFP). The timeline for the RFP, discovery, and selection is summarized below. The process has incorporated the appropriate staff from each department to evaluate and select the future ERP and subsidiary software selections, to ensure they meet the needs of the staff and City. -April 2023 – Met with the city council and get their approval to publish a request for proposals for a new ERP and ancillary applications -April 2023 - Began gathering software requirements from all departments -July 2023 – Sent out a request for software proposals -September 2023 – Demo ERPs and ancillary solutions -October 2023 – Sign contract -Estimated implementation would be January 2025 (depending on the software vendor’s implementation schedule at the time of contract execution) The City received five proposals, see list below. The evaluation was conducted based on a variety of important factors including functionality, efficiencies, customer service, experience with other Minnesota cities, experience with converting data from other LOGIS cities, and price. After thorough evaluation, the City selected two ERPs (BS&A and Tyler – ERP 10 Pro) for more detailed demonstrations. Based on the demonstrations and factors listed above, staff recommends moving forward with BS&A. Vendor Five Year Cost One-time Costs First Year Annual Total BS&A $739,151 $268,380 $95,750 $1,103,281 CentralSquare $3,027,954 $1,368,050 $312,651 $4,708,655 Harris Local Government – MIS $557,241 $233,915 $60,900 $852,056 N. Harris Corporation $3,442,338 $1,142,860 $368,287 $4,953,485 Tyler – ERP 10 Pro $711,925 $222,234 $60,441 $994,600 The City also has the option to continue with the solutions that LOGIS selected identified below. Vendor Five Year Cost One-time Costs First Year Annual Total LOGIS $1,690,411 $267,966 $267,924 $2,226,301 BS&A does not have a module for parks and recreation, but they do integrate well with the current parks and recreation software (RecTrac). We recommend that the City stays with LOGIS for this piece until the new ERP system is implemented and then at that time evaluate the future of that program. As part of implementing a new ERP system there is additional project management, and technical work that is outside of Abdo’s general scope of services. In the 2024-2026 Abdo contract it is outlined that technical work will be invoiced at our standard bill rates and a one-time project management fee will be charged of $28,500. The technical work that will be completed will be to ensure the financial information history is correct and balances, make sure all the modules are working correctly, balancing to the general ledger, and troubleshooting any problems that occur. Project management will include both overall responsibilities applicable throughout the project, as well as key responsibilities during the various phases. Some of the overall responsibilities throughout the project include providing internal coordination and communication with City leadership, monitor project plan and issues list to ensure tasks are completed and timelines are met by all members, identify and raise any issues for executive support with City leadership as well as the ERP implementation team, and listen to understand primary concerns and priorities of internal staff. Abdo and City management welcome your questions on this request for action. ENCLOSURES Appendix A – Abdo Proposal for Project Management SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE AGREEMENT This Software as a Service Agreement, including the attached Exhibits (“Agreement”), is entered into by and between BS&A Software LLC ("BSA"), a Delaware corporation and the City of New Hope, Hennepin County MN (“Customer”), effective the date of the signature of the last Party to sign the Agreement (“Effective Date”). Each party to the Agreement is referred to as a “Party” and the parties, collectively, are referred to as “Parties.” This Agreement sets the terms and conditions under which BSA will furnish certain Software as a Service (“SaaS”) and certain professional services described herein to Customer. SECTION A – SAAS SERVICES 1. Rights Granted. 1.1. Upon the Effective Date, subject to the terms of this Agreement and Customer’s ongoing compliance therewith, BSA hereby grants to Customer a non-exclusive, non-transferable, and non-assignable license to use the BSA Software Products. “BSA Software Product(s)” means, the: (i) BSA Software as a Service set forth in Schedule 1 to Exhibit A; (ii) related interfaces and customizations; (iii) BSA manuals, BSA official specifications, and BSA user guides provided in or with BSA software products set forth in Schedule 1 to Exhibit A (“Documentation”); and (iv) all modifications to the BSA software products set forth in Schedule 1 to Exhibit A, including, but not limited to, fixes, new versions, new releases, updates, upgrades, corrections, patches, work-arounds (collectively, “Modifications”). For the avoidance of doubt, Documentation does not include advertising, other general statements about products, or statements by sales or other staff members. 1.2. Customer acknowledges that BSA will not ship copies of the BSA Software Products as part of the SaaS Services. 2. Restrictions. Customer will not (i) sublicense, modify, adapt, translate, or otherwise transfer, reverse compile, disassemble or otherwise reverse engineer BSA Software Products or any portion thereof without prior written consent of BSA; (ii) access or otherwise use the BSA Software Products to create or support, and/or assist a third party in creating or supporting software products competing with the BSA Software Products; or (iii) assign, disclose, display, distribute, host, lease, license, outsource, permit timesharing or service bureau use, rent, sell, transfer or otherwise use the BSA Software Products for any commercial use other than fulfilling Customers own internal business purposes. Without limiting the foregoing, the BSA Software Products may not be modified by anyone other than BSA. If Customer modifies the BSA Software Products without BSA’s prior written consent, any BSA obligation to provide support services on, and the warranty for, the BSA Software Products will be void. All rights not expressly granted are reserved. 3. SaaS Fees. Customer agrees to pay BSA, and BSA agrees to accept from Customer as payment in full for the rights granted herein, the SaaS fees set forth in Schedule 1 to Exhibit A. 4. Ownership. 4.1. BSA retains all ownership and intellectual property rights to the SaaS Services, the BSA Software Product(s), and anything developed by BSA under this Agreement. Customer does not acquire under this Agreement any license to use the BSA Software Product(s) beyond the scope and/or duration of the SaaS Services. Customer agrees not to challenge such rights and hereby assigns any and all copyrights and other intellectual property rights in and to the BSA Software Products to BSA and agrees to execute any and all documents necessary to effect the purpose of this paragraph. “Intellectual property rights” means all trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets, moral rights, know-how, and all other proprietary rights. 4.2. Customer retains all ownership and intellectual property rights to the data. 5. Limited Software Warranty. 5.1. BSA warrants, for the term of use granted, that the BSA Software Products will perform without material defects in workmanship or materials. Customer’s exclusive remedy in the event of a breach of this warranty shall be to have BSA use reasonable efforts, consistent with industry standards, to repair or replace the non-conforming BSA Software Product so as to render it conforming to the warranty, in accordance with the maintenance and support process set forth below in Exhibit C and BSA’s then current Support Call Process. 5.2. THE FOREGOING LIMITED SOFTWARE WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES RELATING IN ANY WAY TO THE BSA SOFTWARE PRODUCTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THEIR FEATURES, ATTRIBUTES, FUNCTIONALITY, AND PERFORMANCE. THE FOREGOING LIMITED SOFTWARE WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL SUCH REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, MERCHANTABLE QUALITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND THOSE ARISING BY STATUTE OR OTHERWISE IN LAW OR FROM THE COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE. BSA DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE BSA SOFTWARE PRODUCTS WILL MEET ANY OR ALL OF CUSTOMER’S PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS, THAT THE OPERATION OF THE BSA SOFTWARE PRODUCTS WILL OPERATE ERROR FREE OR UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT ALL PROGRAMMING ERRORS IN THE BSA SOFTWARE PRODUCTS CAN BE FOUND IN ORDER TO BE CORRECTED. 6. One Year Money Back Guarantee. BSA offers a one (1) year Money Back Guarantee on all SaaS products. If, for any reason, Customer is not satisfied with the BSA Software Product, Customer may cancel service within one (1) year of the date that the BSA Software Product becomes available for use (“Activation Date”), for a full refund of the SaaS Fees, as identified in Schedule 1 to Exhibit A. Customer must notify BSA of intention to terminate at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the one (1) year period. 7. SaaS Services. 7.1. Customer will utilize shared hardware in a data center, but in a database dedicated to Customer’s use, which is not accessible to other customers. 7.2. Microsoft Azure data centers, or any replacement data centers utilized by BSA during the term of this Agreement are accessible only by authorized personnel, for specific business purposes, with prior approval required. 7.3. Data centers utilized by BSA will have redundant telecommunications access, electrical power, and the necessary hardware to provide access to the BSA Software Products in the event of a disaster or component failure. In the event any of Customer’s data is lost or damaged due to a negligent act or omission of BSA, or due to a defect in the BSA Software Product, BSA will use reasonable commercial efforts to restore data on servers in accordance with the system capabilities and with the objective of minimizing any data loss possible. BSA’s systems are reasonably designed to ensure that the recovery point shall not exceed a maximum of twenty-four (24) hours from declaration of disaster. For purposes of this section, the declaration of disaster shall be declared by BSA in response to issues discovered by BSA, or upon confirmation of issues relayed by Customer to BSA. Said declaration of disaster will not be unreasonably withheld by BSA. 7.4. In the event that a backup must be restored due to a declaration of disaster, or database failure, BSA will be responsible for importing backup data and verifying that Customer can log in. Customer will be solely responsible for running reports and testing critical processes to verify the restored data. 7.5. BSA’s systems are reasonably designed to ensure that, access to the BSA Software Products can be restored within one (1) business day of the declaration of disaster. 7.6. Customer will not attempt to reverse engineer, bypass, or otherwise subvert security restrictions in the BSA Software Products or the SaaS environment related to the BSA Software Products. Unauthorized attempts to access files, passwords, other confidential information, or unauthorized vulnerability and penetration testing of BSA’s system (hosted or otherwise) is prohibited without the prior express written approval of BSA. SECTION B – PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8. Professional Services. BSA shall provide the services (“Professional Services”) set forth in Schedule 2 to Exhibit A, for the prices indicated, provided Customer fulfills its obligations set forth in this Agreement. BSA and Customer may enter into future Statements of Work, which shall become part of this Agreement. Future Statements of Work resulting from a change in scope to the contracted services may necessitate Change Orders to indicate changes to the agreed upon scope of work and any increase or decrease in costs related to the change in scope. Customer acknowledges that the fees stated in the Cost Summary are good-faith estimates of the amount of time and materials required for Customer’s implementation. BSA will bill Customer for the actual fees incurred based on the services provided to Customer. 9. Change Orders. In the event of a change in the agreed upon project scope for professional services not covered or otherwise included in the existing Agreement, Customer shall deliver to BSA’s Project Manager a written change order and specify in such change order the proposed work with sufficient detail to enable BSA to evaluate it (“Change Order”). BSA may, at its discretion, prescribe the format of the Change Order. BSA shall provide the Customer with an evaluation of the Change Order, which may include a written proposal containing the following: (i) implementation plan; (ii) the timeframe for performance; and (iii) the estimated price for performance of such change, based on the then current rates for said services. Upon execution, all Change Orders shall be governed by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless mutually agreed upon otherwise in writing. Customer acknowledges that such Change Orders may affect the implementation schedule and dates otherwise established as part of the project plan. The implementation schedule and schedule of activities for contracted services (the “Project”) shall be established based on a timeline mutually agreed upon between the Parties following the execution of this Agreement. 10. License and Ownership. 10.1. All rights, including intellectual property rights, in and to work product delivered as a result of Professional Services under this Agreement shall be owned by BSA. For the avoidance of doubt, work product that constitutes a BSA Software Product, or portion thereof shall be governed by Section A of this Agreement, including Section 1.1 thereof. 10.2. Subject to Section 10.1 and Customer’s compliance with this Agreement (including payment in full), BSA grants to Customer a non-exclusive, non-transferrable, and non-assignable license to use the work product and the intellectual property rights therein for Customer’s internal business purposes only. 11. Cancellation. In the event Customer cancels or reschedules Professional Services (other than for Force Majeure or breach by BSA), and without prejudice to BSA’s other rights and remedies, Customer is liable to BSA for: (i) all non- refundable expenses actually incurred by BSA on Customer’s behalf; and (ii) daily Project Management or Training fees associated with the cancelled Professional Services (in accordance with the daily fee rate), if less than thirty (30) days advance notice is given regarding the need to cancel or reschedule and BSA cannot reasonably reassign its affected human resources to other projects where comparable skills are required. 12. Limited Professional Services Warranty. 12.1. BSA warrants that its Professional Services will be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner, consistent with industry standards. In the event of a breach of the foregoing warranty and a claim in accordance with the breach, BSA’s sole obligation and Customer’s exclusive remedy with respect to such claim will be to have BSA reperform the portion of the Professional Services with respect to which the warranty has been breached, to bring it into compliance with such warranty. Any claim for breach of the foregoing warranty must be made by notice to BSA within thirty (30) days of performance of the portion of the Professional Services with respect to which the claim is made or said claim shall be deemed waived. 12.2. THE FOREGOING LIMITED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, MERCHANTABLE QUALITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND THOSE ARISING BY STATUTE OR OTHERWISE IN LAW, OR FROM THE COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE. 13. Customer Site Access and Assistance. 13.1. Customer agrees and acknowledges that the implementation of the BSA Software Products is a cooperative process requiring time and resources of Customer personnel. Customer shall, and shall cause Customer personnel to, use all reasonable efforts to cooperate with and assist BSA as may be reasonably required to meet the project deadlines and other project milestones agreed to by the Parties for implementation. BSA shall not be liable for failure to meet such deadlines and milestones when such failure is due to force majeure (as defined in Section 30, below) or to the failure by Customer personnel to provide such cooperation and assistance (either through action or omission.) 13.2. At no cost to BSA, Customer agrees to provide to BSA full access to and use of personnel, facilities, and equipment as reasonably necessary for BSA to provide implementation and training services. Such access will be subject to any reasonable security protocols or written policies provided to BSA prior to Effective Date of this Agreement, or mutually agreed to thereafter. SECTION C – MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT 14. Maintenance and Support Generally. 14.1. For a one (1) year period, commencing on the Activation Date, and subject to Customer’s compliance with the Agreement, BSA will provide, at no charge to Customer, “Maintenance and Support”, meaning the following; (i) Modifications (such as patches, corrections and updates) as are generally provided at no additional charge by BSA to BSA customers; and (ii) technical support assistance, as further described in Section 14, during BSA’s normal business hours. 14.2. Commencing one (1) year from the Activation Date, Maintenance and Support will continue to be provided subject to compliance with the terms of the Agreement and payment of the SaaS Fees outlined in Exhibit B. 14.3. BSA guarantees that the annual SaaS Fees, as set forth in Exhibit B will not change for two (2) years from the Activation Date. After that date, BSA reserves the right each year to increase the fee over the previous year by no more than an amount that is proportionate to the increase (measured from the beginning of such previous year) in the Consumer Price Index as set forth by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index – All Urban Customers – U.S. City Average (CPI-U), or a similar measure should such data become unavailable. 14.4. Maintenance and Support and the SaaS fee do not include amounts that may be due for such items as additional training, additional BSA Software Products, custom development work, hardware purchases, BSA staff time to create or modify report writer based reports, configurable imports or exports, or data entry. Additional fees may be payable for items charged on a per event basis, such as Permit Application Submission Fees related to online permit applications. 15. Support. 15.1. With respect to Errors following expiration of the Limited Software Warranty, BSA’s sole obligation and Customer’s sole remedy are set forth in this Section 15. Subject to Customer’s compliance with the terms of the Agreement and payment of SaaS fees, BSA shall use commercially reasonable efforts, commensurate with the severity level, to achieve its support response and resolution targets with respect to Errors as set forth in Exhibit C. An “Error” means a verifiable and reproducible failure of a BSA Software Product to operate in accordance with the Documentation under conditions of normal use and where the Error is directly attributable to the BSA Software Product as updated with current Modifications. If the customer modifies the BSA Software Products without BSA’s written consent, BSA’s obligation to provide support services on the BSA Software Products will be void. 15.2. Support does not include the following: (i) installation or implementation of the BSA Software Products; (ii) onsite training/support, remote training, application design, and other consulting services; (iii) support of an operating system, hardware, or support outside of BSA’s normal business hours; (iv) support or support time due to a cause external to the BSA Software Products adversely affecting their operability or serviceability, which shall include, but not be limited to, water, fire, lightning, other natural calamities, misuse, abuse, or neglect; (v) repair of the BSA Software Products modified in any way other than modifications made by BSA or its authorized agents; and (vi) support of any other third-party vendors’ software, such as operating system software, network software, database managers, word processers, etc. All such excluded Maintenance and Support Services performed by BSA at Customer’s request shall be invoiced to Customer on a time and materials basis, plus reasonable expenses associated therewith. 15.3. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, Customer shall provide prompt notice of any Errors discovered by Customer, or otherwise brought to the attention of Customer. Proper notice may include, without limitation, prompt telephonic and written (either via e-mail or postal mail) notice to BSA of any purported Error. If requested by BSA, Customer agrees to provide written documentation of Errors to substantiate those Errors and to otherwise assist BSA in the detection and correction of said Errors. BSA will use its commercially reasonable judgment to determine if an Error exists, and the severity of the Error. 15.4. Customer acknowledges and agrees that BSA and product vendors may require online access to the BSA Software Product in order for BSA to provide Maintenance and Support Services hereunder. Accordingly, Customer shall provide a high-speed internet connection to facilitate BSA’s remote access to the BSA Software Products. BSA shall provide remote connection software, which may require installation of a software component on a workstation or server computer. SECTION D – THIRD PARTY PRODUCTS 16. Third Party Products. 16.1. BSA will sell, deliver and install onsite any hardware products not produced by BSA (“Third-Party Hardware”), if purchased by Customer, for the prices set forth in Schedule 1 to Exhibit A, as modified by any subsequent Change Order(s). 16.2. BSA shall not provide any warranty services on Third Party Hardware sold. BSA is not the manufacturer of the Third-Party Products. To the extent applicable, BSA will grant and pass through to Customer any warranty that BSA may receive from the supplier of the Third-Party Product(s). SECTION E – GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 17. BSA Proprietary Information. 17.1. Customer acknowledges that the information associated with or contained within the BSA Software Products and information used in the performance of Professional Services include information relating to BSA Software Products, BSA’s business, and the terms of this Agreement (the “Proprietary Information”). 17.2. Customer shall maintain in confidence and not disclose Proprietary Information, directly or indirectly, to any third party without BSA’s prior written consent. Customer shall safeguard the Proprietary Infor mation to the same extent that it safeguards its own most confidential materials or data, but in no event shall the standard implemented be less than industry standard. Proprietary Information shall be used by Customer solely to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Customer shall limit its dissemination of such Proprietary Information to employees within the Customer’s business organization who are directly involved with the performance of this Agreement and have a need to use such Proprietary Information. Customer shall be responsible for all disclosures by any person receiving Proprietary Information, by or through it, as if Customer itself disseminated such information. 17.3. Proprietary Information shall not include any information that: (a) is or becomes publicly known through no wrongful act of breach of any obligation of confidentiality by Customer; (b) was lawfully known to Customer prior to the time it was disclosed to or learned by Customer in connection with this Agreement, provided that such information is not known to Customer solely because of its prior business relationship with BSA; (c) was received by Customer from a third party that is not under an obligation of confidentiality to BSA; or (d) is independently developed by Customer for a party other than BSA without the use of any Proprietary Information. The following circumstances shall not cause Proprietary Information to fall within any of the exceptions (a) through (d) above: (i) a portion of such Proprietary Information is embraced by more general information said to be in the public domain or previously known to, or subsequently disclosed to, the Customer; or (ii) it is a combination derivable from separate sources of public information, none of which discloses the combination itself. 17.4. If Customer is required, or anticipates that it will be required, to disclose any Confidential Information pursuant to a court order or to a government authority, Customer shall, at its earliest opportunity, provide written notice to BSA so as to give BSA a reasonable opportunity to secure a protective order or take other actions as appropriate. Customer shall at all times cooperate with BSA so as to minimize any disclosure to the extent allowed by applicable law. 18. Limitation on Liability and Damages. BSA’S ENTIRE LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES, OR LOSSES ARISING FROM THE BSA SOFTWARE PRODUCTS (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THEIR USE, OPERATION AND/OR FAILURE TO OPERATE), PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT, ANY THIRD-PARTY PERFORMANCE OR LACK THEREOF, OR OTHERWISE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, SHALL BE ABSOLUTELY LIMITED IN THE AGGREGATE FOR ALL CLAIMS TO DIRECT DAMAGES NOT IN EXCESS OF THE INITIAL SAAS FEES PAID FOR THE FIRST YEAR OF SERVICE OF THE BSA SOFTWARE PRODUCTS PLUS, TO THE EXTENT APPLICABLE, THE PURCHASE PRICE OF ANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICE SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT THAT GIVES RISE TO A CLAIM. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION CONTAINED HEREIN, BSA SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONTINGENT DAMAGES OR EXPENSES, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE, ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, BSA SOFTWARE PRODUCTS, ANY THIRD -PARTY PERFORMANCE, OR LACK THEREOF, OR BSA’S PERFORMANCE, OR LACK THEREOF, UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE FOREGOING, LOSS OF REVENUE, PROFIT, OR LOSS OF USE. TO THE EXTENT THAT APPLICABLE LAW DOES NOT PERMIT THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE LIABILITY AND DAMAGES SHALL BE LIMTED AND RESTRICTED TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. 19. Additional Disclaimer. BSA PROVIDES NO WARRANTY FOR ANY THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE AND/OR HARDWARE, EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, BSA WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE, THIRD-PARTY SERVICES AND/OR HARDWARE. 20. Indemnification for Intellectual Property Infringement. If a claim is made or an action is brought alleging that a BSA Software Product infringes on a U.S. patent, or any copyright, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary right, BSA will defend Customer against such claim and will pay resulting costs and damages finally awarded, provided that: (a) customer promptly notifies BSA in writing of the claim; (b) BSA has sole control of the defense and all related settlement negotiations; (c) Customer reasonably cooperates in such defense at no expense to BSA; and (d) Customer remains in compliance with the Agreement and has continued to remain current on payment of SaaS fees. The obligations of BSA under this Section are conditioned on Customer’s agreement that if the applicable BSA Software Product, in whole or in part, or the use or operation thereof, becomes, or in the opinion of BSA is likely to become, the subject of such a claim, BSA may at its expense and without obligation to do so, either procure the right for the Customer to continue using the BSA Software Product or, at the option of BSA, replace or modify the same so that it becomes non-infringing (provided such replacement or modification maintains the same material functionality and does not adversely affect Customer’s use of the Update as contemplated hereunder). In the event that BSA provides a replacement for Customer, Customer shall cease use of the infringing product immediately upon receiving the replacement. THIS SECTION 20 SETS FORTH THE ENTIRE LIABILITY AND OBLIGATION OF BSA AND THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR CUSTOMER FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING FROM ANY CLAIM OR ACTION COVERED BY THIS SECTION 20. 21. No Intended Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is entered into solely for the benefit of BSA and Customer. No third party will be deemed a beneficiary of this Agreement, and no third party will have the right to make any claim or assert any right under this Agreement. 22. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the state of Michigan, without regard to its choice of law rules. BSA and the Customer agree that the exclusive venue for any legal or equitable action shall be the Courts of the County of Clinton, State of Michigan, or in any court in the United States of America lying in the Western District of Michigan. 23. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of Customer and BSA with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes any prior agreements, understandings, and representations, whether written, oral, expressed, implied, or statutory. Customer hereby acknowledges that in entering into this Agreement, it did not rely on any information not explicitly set forth in this Agreement. 24. Contract Term. This initial term of this Agreement extends from the Effective Date of the Agreement until one (1) year from the Activation Date. Upon expiration of the initial term, this Agreement will renew automatically for successive one (1) year terms under the same terms and conditions set forth herein without further documentation being required unless and until either party provides written notice to the other party, at least sixty (60) days prior to the end of the then current term. Customer’s right to access or use the BSA Software Product will terminate at the end of the Agreement. 25. Payment Terms. Customer shall pay BSA for all amounts in accordance with this Agreement and Exhibit A. 26. Termination. Without prejudice to other rights and remedies, and except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, either Party may terminate this Agreement as set forth below. Upon termination of this Agreement: (a) Customer shall promptly pay BSA for all fees and expenses that are not subject to a good faith dispute and that are related to the software, products, and/or services received, or expenses BSA has incurred or delivered, prior to the effective date of the termination (b) Customer shall return or destroy, at the direction of BSA, BSA’s Proprietary Information in its possession. The termination of this Agreement will not discharge or otherwise affect any pre-termination obligations of either Party existing under this Agreement at the time of termination. Sections 2, 4, 16 through 18, 21-23, 25 -39, and the provisions of this Agreement which by their nature extend beyond the termination of this Agreement, will survive the termination of the Agreement. No action arising out of this Agreement, regardless of the form of action, may be brought by Customer more than one (1) year after the date the action occurred. 26.1. Termination for Cause. If Customer believes that BSA has materially breached this Agreement, Customer may terminate this Agreement for Cause in the event BSA does not cure, or create a mutually agreeable plan to address, a material breach of this agreement within thirty (30) days after Notification by Customer. Notice shall be provided in accordance with Section 31, below. 26.2. Force Majeure. Either Party may terminate this Agreement if a Force Majeure event suspends performance of the SaaS Services for a period of forty-five (45) days or greater. 26.3. Lack of Appropriations. If Customer cannot appropriate, or otherwise make available funds sufficient to continue to utilize the SaaS Services, Customer may unilaterally terminate this Agreement with thirty (30) days written notice to BSA. Customer shall not be entitled to a refund, offset, or credit for previously paid, but unused SaaS fees. 26.4. Failure to Pay SaaS Fees. Customer acknowledges that timely payment of SaaS Fees is necessary to maintain continued access to the SaaS Services. If Customer does not make timely payment of SaaS fees, BSA may discontinue the SaaS Services, and deny access to the BSA Software Products. If such failure to pay is not cured within forty-five (45) days of receiving BSA’s notice of intent to terminate, BSA may terminate this Agreement. 26.5. Convenience. If Customer terminates SaaS Services for convenience, any SaaS fees already paid will not be prorated, and will be retained by BSA. 27. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof, to any extent, is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement will be valid and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 28. No Waiver. In the event that any terms or conditions of this Agreement are not strictly enforced by either Party, such nonenforcement will not act as, or be deemed as, a waiver or modification to this Agreement, nor will such nonenforcement prevent either Party from enforcing terms of the Agreement thereafter. 29. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors, permitted assigns, representatives, and heirs of the Parties hereto. For avoidance of doubt, any expanded use by Customer of the Program, for example, in the event of annexation or desired shared services, shall require the consent of BSA. 30. Force Majeure. “Force Majeure” is defined as an event beyond the reasonable control of a Party, including governmental action, war, riot or civil commotion, fire, natural disaster, epidemic, pandemic, other public health emergency, problematic weather, lack of availability of Customer provided technology, labor disputes, restraints affecting shipping or credit, delay of carriers or any other cause that could not, with reasonable diligence, be foreseen, controlled or prevented by the Party. Neither Party shall be liable for delays in performing its obligations under this Agreement to the extent that the delay is caused by Force Majeure. 31. Notice. All notices, requests, demands, and determinations under the Agreement (other than routine operational communications), shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given: (i) when delivered by hand; (ii) one (1) business day after being given to a nationally recognized overnight delivery service for next-business-day delivery, all fees prepaid; (iii) when sent by confirmed facsimile with a copy sent by another means specified in this provision; or (iv) six (6) calendar days after the day of mailing, when mailed by United States mail, via registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and in each case addressed as shall be set forth below. A Party may from time-to-time change its address or designee for notification purposes by giving the other prior written notice of the new address or designee and the date upon which it will become effective. If to BSA: BSA Software 14965 Abbey Lane Bath, MI 48808 Attn: Contracts Manager Telephone: 517-641-8900 If to Customer: City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave. N. Minneapolis, MN 55428 Telephone: (763) 531-5100 32. Independent Contractor. This is not an agreement of partnership or employment of BSA or any of BSA’s employees by Customer. BSA is an independent contractor for all purposes under this Agreement. 33. Cooperative Procurement. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, BSA agrees that this Agreement may be used as a cooperative procurement vehicle by eligible jurisdictions. BSA reserves the right to negotiate and customize the terms and conditions set forth herein, including but not limited to pricing, to the scope and circumstances fitting to that cooperative procurement. 34. Business License. In the event a local business license is required for BSA to perform the services under this Agreement, Customer agrees to promptly notify and inform BSA of such requirement, as well as to provide BSA with the necessary paperwork and contact information so that BSA can obtain such license in a timely manner. 35. Nondiscrimination. BSA will not discriminate against any person employed, or applying for employment, concerning the performance of BSA’s responsibilities under this Agreement. This discrimination prohibition will apply to all matters of employment including hiring, tenure, and terms of employment, or otherwise with respect to any matter directly or indirectly relating to employment concerning race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, ancestry, disability that does not impact the individual’s ability to perform the duties of a particular job or position, height, weight, marital status, or political affiliation. BSA will post, where appropriate, all notices related to nondiscrimination as may be required by applicable law. 36. Taxes. Fees for SaaS Services, Professional Services, or any other fees shown in Schedule 1 to Exhibit A do not include any taxes, including, without limitation, any sales, use or excise tax. Customer shall be responsible for all taxes, exclusive of taxes on BSA’s net income, arising out of this Agreement. If Customer is not validly tax-exempt, and BSA is required to remit taxes on customer’s behalf, Customer agrees to reimburse BSA for any taxes by BSA. 37. U.S. Government Rights. Each instance of the Documentation, Modifications and software that are constituents of BSA Software Products is a “commercial item” as that term is defined at 48 C.F.R. § 2.101, consisting of "commercial computer software" and "commercial computer software documentation" as such terms are used in 48 C.F.R. § 12.212. Any use, modification, reproduction release, performance, display or disclosure of the Application by the U.S. Government shall be solely in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 38. Export Control. Certain uses of the Software by Licensee may be subject to restrictions under United States regulations relating to exports and ultimate end uses of computer software. Licensee agrees to fully comply with all applicable United States laws and regulations, including but not limited to the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended from time to time, the Arms Export Control Act, as amended from time to time, any regulations promulgated thereunder to implement those statutes, and all sanctions programs administered by the U.S. Government. 39. Contract Documents and Order of Precedence. The text of this Agreement without any Exhibits and Schedules shall control over any inconsistent text in any of the Exhibits or Schedules. This Agreement includes the following Exhibits and Schedules: Exhibit A – Payment Terms Generally Schedule 1 to Exhibit A – SaaS/Interface/Customization Fees Schedule 2 to Exhibit A – Professional Service Fees Exhibit B – Annual Service Fees Exhibit C – Support Call Process IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the dates set forth below. BS&A SOFTWARE, LLC CUSTOMER By: ______________________________ By: ___________________________ Name: ___________________________ Name: _________________________ Title: ____________________________ Title: __________________________ Date: ____________________________ Date: __________________________ By: ___________________________ Name: _________________________ Title: __________________________ Date: __________________________ EXHIBIT A Payment Terms 1. Customer shall pay BSA within thirty (30) days of invoice. Payments not received within fifteen (15) days of the due date shall be subject to a one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month interest charge (or, if lower, the highest amount chargeable at law) assessed against the unpaid balance from the date due until the date payment is received 2. Any amount not subject to good faith dispute and not paid within fifteen (15) days of the due date of each invoice shall, without prejudice to other rights and remedies, be subject to an interest charge equal to the lesser of 1.5% monthly or the maximum interest charge permissible under applicable law, payable on demand. Any charges not disputed by Customer in good faith will be deemed approved and accepted by Customer. For purposes of this Agreement, a good faith dispute regarding amounts owed exists only if Customer provides in writing at least ten (10) days prior to due date of payment on the invoice, notification of such dispute, the specific portion of the invoice in dispute, and the specific grounds of the dispute (which must be asserted in good faith), and Customer pays in timely fashion such portions that are not subject to such dispute. 3. BSA shall invoice Customer $114,160 upon Effective Date for BSA’s Project Management/Implementation Planning Fees and Data Conversion fees as set forth in Schedule 2. 4. BSA shall invoice Customer $70,870 upon activation of Customer’s site for use of the BSA Software Product(s). Such amount equals BSA’s SaaS Fees as set forth in Schedule 1. 5. BSA shall invoice Customer $140,535 at completion of On-Site Implementation and Training. Such amount equals On-Site Implementation and Training costs, Customization and Interface costs, and travel expenses, as set forth in Schedule 2. Schedule 1 to Exhibit A SaaS Fees Schedule 2 to Exhibit A Professional Services Fees EXHIBIT B Annual Service Fees EXHIBIT C Support Call Process BSA’s standard hours for telephone support are from 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through Thursday, and from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EST), Fridays, excluding holidays. Customer can lodge a support request in three ways: (i) Contact Customer Support option located within the Help menu of all of BSA’s applications (ii) BSA’s toll-free support line (1-855-BSA-SOFT) or via email. BSA targets less than thirty (30) minutes for initial response (“Initial Response Target”). Customer service requests fall into four main categories: A. Technical. Questions or usage issues relating to I.T. functionality, future hardware purchases, and configuration. BSA tries to resolve these issues within BSA’s Initial Response Target or as soon thereafter as reasonably possible. B. Questions/Support. General questions regarding functionality, use, and set-up of the applications. BSA tries to resolve these issues within BSA’s Initial Response Target or as soon thereafter as reasonably possible. C. Requests. Customer requests for future enhancements to the applications. Key product management personnel meet with development staff on a regular basis to discuss the desirability and priority of such requests. BSA tries to resolve these issues within BSA’s Initial Response Target or as soon thereafter as reasonably possible. D. Issues/Bugs. Errors fall into three (3) subcategories: i. Critical. Cases where an Error has rendered the application or a material component unusable or not usable without substantial inconvenience causing material and detrimental consequences to business -- with no viable Customer workaround or alternative. The targeted resolution time for critical issues is less than one (1) business day. ii. Moderate. Cases where an Error causes substantial inconvenience and added burden, but the application is still usable by Customer. The targeted resolution time for all moderate issues is within two (2) weeks, which is within BSA’s standard update cycle. iii. Minimal. Cases that are mostly cosmetic in nature, and do not substantially impede functionality in any significant way. These issues are assigned a priority level at BSA’s regular meetings, and resolution times are based on the specified priority. Remote Support Process Some support calls may require further analysis of Customer’s database or set-up to diagnose a problem or to assist Customer with a question. BSA’s remote support tools share Customer’s desktop via the Internet to provide Customer with virtual on-site support. BSA’s support team is able to connect remotely to Customer’s desktop and view its setup, diagnose problems, or assist Customer with screen navigation. S:\October 23, 2023 Council Meeting\12.1 Q ‐ Upcoming Events.docx   Request for Action  October 23, 2023    Approved by: Reece Bertholf, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Reece Bertholf, City Manager    Agenda Title  Exchange of communication between members of the city council  Upcoming meetings and events:  Oct. 26  6 p.m. to 8 p.m. –Trunk or Treat, hosted by the New Hope Police Department featuring  Colors  of the World, hosted by the Human Rights Commission at New Hope City Hall    Oct. 31  5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. – West Metro Fire‐Rescue District Trunk or Treat at  Station 3,     4251 Xylon Avenue North, New Hope    Nov. 1  1:30 p.m. – Joint Water Commission     2 p.m. – New Hope/Crystal Business Networking Group Meeting hosted by Kathy  Peterson, Opus Music Academy at Crystal City Hall, 4141 Douglas Dr. with an update  on the Blue Line Extension from Kjerstin Yager of the Met Council    Nov. 6  4 p.m. – Connect Blue Line Now! Meeting    7 p.m. – Human Rights Commission Meeting    Nov. 7  No Planning Commission Meeting    Nov. 9  12:30 p.m. – Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission     1:30 p.m. – Corridor Management Committee Meeting    Nov. 10 Veterans Day – City Offices Closed    Nov. 13 7 p.m. – City Council Meeting        Agenda Section Other Business Item Number  12.1