102620 City Council Meeting Packet
NEW HOPE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING AGENDA
October 26, 2020
7:00 p.m.
City Hall – Council Chambers
4401 Xylon Avenue North
Mayor Kathi Hemken
Council Member John Elder
Council Member Cedrick Frazier
Council Member Andy Hoffe
Council Member Jonathan London
The City Council wants and encourages citizen participation at Council Meetings. Your input and
opinions count and are valuable. You are encouraged to bring forth your comments and issues at
the appropriate point on the agenda.
A 15-minute maximum Open Forum is held at the beginning of each Council Meeting. At this time
any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to City business not listed on this
agenda or scheduled as a future agenda item. The Council requests that you limit your presentation
to 3 minutes. Anyone wishing to address the City Council on a particular item should raise their
hand and be recognized by the Mayor. Approach the podium and speak into the microphone by
first stating your name and address. Also, please record your name on the roster at the table near
the door so that your name will be spelled correctly in the minutes.
Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight; Council
may refer the matter to staff for handling or for consideration at a future meeting. You are welcome
to contact the city clerk at 763-531-5117 after the council meeting.
COUNCIL MEETING BROADCASTS AND STREAMING
Government Access channel 16 programming includes live/taped meeting replays
Live on-line meetings and past meetings on-demand are available through
https://ccxmedia.org/ccx-cities/new-hope/.
www.newhopemn.gov
New Hope Values and Vision
City Mission
Strong local government that is proactive in responding to the community needs and issues by delivering quality
public service to all city residents, businesses, property owners, and organizations in a prudent and e cient manner.
Values
Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services
We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a
highly professional and cost-e ective manner.
Fiscal Responsibility
We believe that fi scal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds and city assets is essential if
residents are to have confi dence in government.
Ethics, Integrity and Professionalism
We believe that ethics, integrity, and professionalism are the foundation blocks of public trust and confi dence and
that all meaningful relationships are built on these values.
Respect for the Individual
We believe in the uniqueness of every individual, and welcome, appreciate, and respect diversity and the di ering
of opinions.
Open, Honest, and Respectful Communication
We believe that open, honest, and respectful communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry
and to foster a positive environment for those interacting with our city.
Cooperation and Teamwork
We believe that the public is best served when all work cooperatively.
Visionary Leadership and Planning
We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be responsive to current goals and needs, and visionary in
planning for the future.
Vision
e city is a great place to grow as a family, individual, or business.
All within our city are safe and secure.
Essential services will be those that promote a safe and healthy environment for all residents.
Essential services and programs will be enhanced and streamlined, and will be provided in an economical manner
and with measurable results.
e city views residents as its greatest asset and seeks their input and participation.
e city will meet the communication needs of citizens, elected o cials, and city sta .
Strategic Goals
e city will maintain and improve its infrastructure (water distribution, storm water, sewer, roads, parks,
lighting, and city facilities).
e city will use frugal spending and resourceful fi nancial management to maintain its fi scal health.
e city will encourage maintenance, redevelopment, and reinvestment of existing properties to improve
or enhance its tax base.
e city will provide core services with a professional sta who are equipped with the necessary tools and
equipment and given necessary direction.
e city will facilitate and improve communications to promote e ective intergovernmental cooperation
between sta , citizens, and Council.
Adopted by the New Hope City Council, August 2006
Reaffirmed by the New Hope City Council, February 2019
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue North
Monday, October 26, 2020
7:00 p.m.
Regular Session
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – October 26, 2020
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Council Meeting Minutes – September 28, 2020
Council Meeting Minutes – October 12, 2020
4. OPEN FORUM
5. PRESENTATIONS
6. CONSENT BUSINESS
6.2 Approval of financial claims through October 26, 2020
6.4 Resolution electing to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program
under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act
6.5 Resolution approving assessment services agreement with Hennepin County for years
2021‐2024
6.6 Resolution approving 2021 maintenance agreement with Embedded Systems, Inc. for
tornado/civil defense siren maintenance in the amount of $1,660.32
6.7 Resolution approving final payment to American Liberty Construction, Inc. in the
amount of $5,000.00 for the construction of the outdoor theater and picnic shelter at Civic
Center Park (Improvement Project No. 941)
7. PUBLIC HEARING
7.1 Resolution ordering the construction of and preparation of plans and specifications for the
2021 Infrastructure Project (Improvement Project No. 1054)
8. DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING
9. PETITIONS AND REQUESTS
10. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
10.1 Resolution establishing city’s monthly contribution for health benefits programs effective
January 1, 2021
10.2 Resolution authorizing the purchase of equipment and appropriation of funds in the
amount of $274,956.96 for the purchase of a 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump
box, asphalt patch trailer and ancillary equipment to replace the city’s asphalt patch truck
and the purchase of two 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump box and ancillary
equipment to replace two plow trucks in the amount of $464,415.72, totaling $739,372.68
11. UNFINISHED AND ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS
12. OTHER BUSINESS
12.1 Exchange of communication between members of the city council
13. ADJOURNMENT
Memorandum
To: New Hope City Council
From: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Date: October 22, 2020
Subject: Agenda Items for Monday, October 26, 2020
Note: HRC Candidate interviews have been scheduled beginning at 6:15 p.m. Contact the city clerk if
you need copies of the applications.
Open Forum
Staff is not aware of anyone planning to address the Council for the Open Forum.
Item 6.1
There are no new business license requests.
Item 6.2
This item involves routine financial claims.
Item 6.3
There are no new liability claims to report.
Item 6.4
The city has been a participant in the Metropolitan Councilʹs Livable Communities Act (LCA) Local
Housing Incentives program since 1996 which makes the city eligible to receive LCA housing grants
and loans. The resolution re‐enrolls the city in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Act for calendar years 2021 through 2030. The city must adopt a
resolution approving affordable and life‐cycle housing goals. The majority of the action plan will be
obtained from the cityʹs housing section of the most recent Comprehensive Plan. The Council discussed
this issue at the October 19 work session and was supportive. Director Sargent and I recommend
approval.
Item 6.5
This item approves an assessment services agreement with Hennepin County for years 2021‐2024. Staff
reviewed the information with Council at the October 19 work session and the county assessor was in
attendance to respond to questions. The existing four‐year agreement expired on July 31, 2020. The
agreement specifies a sum of $165,000 for the 2020‐21 assessment year which is an increase of $5,000 over last
year. The amount may vary depending on new construction and new parcels. Funds are available in the
proposed 2021 budget. The city attorney has reviewed the agreement on behalf of the city. I recommend
approval.
Item 6.6
This is the annual maintenance agreement with Embedded Systems for the city’s three warning sirens.
This vendor has provided the siren maintenance service for many years. The agreement pricing of
$1,660.32 has not increased since 2018. Funds are available in the Fire/Emergency Management Services
budget. I recommend approval of the maintenance agreement.
Item 6.7
This item authorizes final payment to American Liberty Construction for $5,000 for the construction of
the outdoor theatre and picnic shelter at Civic Center Park. The contract amount was $1,478,790.42 and
over the course of the construction, there were five change orders bringing the revised contract amount
to $1,490,082.75. The final contract value is $1,490,237.25 or $154.50 over the revised contract amount
due to additional quantity earthwork costs. The funding source is the park/pool bonds issued in
December of 2018 and July of 2019. All paperwork including IC‐134s has been submitted. Director
Rader and I recommend approval.
Item 7.1
On September 28, Council accepted the feasibility report on the 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project and
called for a public hearing on October 26 to consider ordering the project. The city engineer updated the
Council on revised estimates for reclaim/overlay costs at the October 19 work session. The project consists of
street and utility improvements in the Lions Park neighborhood and Erickson Drive. The estimated project
cost is $1,706,932.89 (base bid) and could increase if one of the two alternates for storm sewer line on Oregon
Avenue is awarded. The majority of the project will be funded by the city’s street infrastructure and
enterprise funds. There are two tax‐exempt properties (Lions Park and The Salvation Army) that will also
contribute as a funding source through special assessments. After conducting the public hearing, staff
recommends Council authorize preparation of plans and specifications. Director Weber and I recommend
approval.
Item 10.1
At the October 19 work session, Director Johnson presented information on premiums for employee health
insurance costs. In 2019 and 2020, the City Council agreed to provide employees with the “typical” increase
of ½ of the mid‐range plan’s premium plus an additional amount which was equal to one‐half of the amount
the city’s contribution towards health insurance had fallen below that of its 12 comparable cities. One‐half of
the shortfall was implemented each year to reduce the impact on each of the annual budgets. Although New
Hope’s current city contribution towards insurance is again below its comparable cities contribution, only
the “typical” increase is being requested for 2021 as staff was able to negotiate a 14.7% decrease in health
insurance premiums for 2020. Staff is recommending increasing the city’s contribution amount by $18, $39,
and $46 for single, employee plus one, and family health insurance coverage, respectively, effective January
1, 2021. It is necessary to set the contribution amounts prior to the open enrollment period which begins in
November. The proposed increase to the city contribution was discussed at the October 19 work session and
the Council was supportive. This expenditure is included in the 2021 budget. Director Johnson and I
recommend approval.
Item 10.2
This item authorizes the purchase of a 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump box and asphalt patch
trailer for $275,003.64 to replace the city’s asphalt patch truck. It also authorizes the purchase of two 2021
Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump box and ancillary equipment to replace two plow trucks in the
amount of $464,349.32, for a total purchase of $739,352.96. One truck is included in the 2020 CIP and two
trucks are included in the 2021 CIP. The vehicle replacement fund has $782,105 dedicated for these purchases
so the purchase is $42,753 under the CIP amount. Staff recommends sending to auction three dump trucks
(1999 Sterling, 2000 Sterling, and 2010 International models). The advantages of ordering the trucks now
include cost savings by getting 2020 vehicle rates, not having to pay until 2021, and the ability to use the
equipment for snow plowing in early 2021. Director Weber and I recommend approval.
Item 12.1
Mayor Hemken will review upcoming meetings and events.
If you have any questions regarding items in the agenda packet, please call the city clerk or me
before the meeting so that staff can research any issues and be prepared to respond at the meeting.
New Hope City Council September 28, 2020
Page 1
City of New Hope
4401 Xylon Avenue North
New Hope, Minnesota 55428
City Council Minutes September 28, 2020
Regular Meeting City Hall, 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER The New Hope City Council met in regular session pursuant to due call and notice
thereof; Mayor Hemken called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
The City Council and all present stood for the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL Council present:
Absent:
Staff present:
Kathi Hemken, Mayor
John Elder, Council Member
Cedrick Frazier, Council Member
Andy Hoffe, Council Member
Jonathan London, Council Member
Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Jeff Alger, Community Development Specialist
Dan Boyum, City Engineer
Tim Fournier, Director of Police
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
Susan Rader, Director of Parks & Recreation
Jeff Sargent, Director of Community Development
Aaron Thelen, Recreation Supervisor
Bernie Weber, Director of Public Works
Stacy Woods, Assistant City Attorney
ANNOUNCEMENT Council Member Elder announced that as of 7 p.m. the 9‐1‐1 system is down
nation‐wide. He directed persons to call 952‐258‐5321 for emergencies for
Hennepin County dispatch.
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
Motion was made by Council Member Hoffe, seconded by Council Member
Frazier, to approve the regular meeting minutes of September 14, 2020. Voted in
favor thereof: Hemken, Elder, Frazier, Hoffe; and the following voted against the
same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: London. Motion carried.
OPEN FORUM
There was no one present desirous of addressing the council.
PRESENTATIONS
P&R AWARDS OF
EXCELLENCE
Presentation of two Awards of Excellence from Minnesota Recreation and Park
Association.
Ms. Alyssa Fram, MRPA Awards Committee, was recognized. She provided
background of the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association and commended
the city on receiving two awards of excellence – one for the New Year’s Eve movie
at the ice arena and the second award for the Urban Orchard at Little Acre Park.
New Hope City Council September 28, 2020
Page 2
Mr. Aaron Thelen, recreation supervisor, was recognized. He described both
events and thanked Ms. Fram for the recognition and awards to the city.
Mayor Hemken congratulated Mr. Thelen for the two new successful initiatives.
Council Member Elder commended Director Rader and her staff. He noted
members of the community enjoy the various recreation amenities.
RAVE! AWARDS Mr. Jeff Alger, community development specialist, provided background of the
RAVE! Residential property recognition program that was developed in 2006. He
stated due to the pandemic, the award winners were not invited to the council
meeting. He stated the awards will be delivered to their homes. Mr. Alger also
thanked the panel of judges.
Mr. Alger recognized the following award winners for each category and
illustrated the properties:
Environmentally Sensitive Design ‐ Deb O’Davis, 6000 Xylon Avenue North
Neighborhood Inspiration ‐ Broadway Village Apartment tenants Ruth
Schueneman, Lanna Holmes, and Kathy Pierce
Outstanding Curb Appeal – Julie Weiser and Tom Peterson, 3507 Aquila
Avenue North
Outstanding Landscaping – Jon Tate and AJ Gerst, 8301 46th Avenue North
Outstanding Interior Remodel – Felicia Johnson and Preston Ghizoni, 3657
Maryland Avenue North
Council congratulated the award winners and thanked all nominees for their
participation.
ROTATING VOTES
Please note that votes taken on each agenda item are called by the secretary on a
rotating basis; however, the written minutes always list the mayor’s name first
followed by the council members’ in alphabetical order.
CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Hemken introduced the consent items as listed for consideration and stated
that all items will be enacted by one motion unless requested that an item be
removed for discussion. Mr. Kirk McDonald, city manager, reviewed the consent
items.
FINANCIAL CLAIMS
Item 6.2
Approval of financial claims through September 28, 2020.
RESOLUTION 2020‐90
Item 6.4
Resolution approving change order to AEM Financial Services contract for
COVID‐19 pandemic FEMA/CARES funding consultation, reporting and grant
administration.
RESOLUTION 2020‐91
Item 6.5
Resolution approving contract with Brycer, LLC regarding monitoring of reduced
pressure zone devices.
MOTION
Item 6.6
Motion waiving permit fees for temporary signs for Armstrong Cooper Youth
Hockey Association registration.
New Hope City Council September 28, 2020
Page 3
MOTION
Consent Items
Motion was made by Council Member Elder, seconded by Council Member Hoffe,
to approve the Consent items. All present voted in favor. Motion carried.
FAREWELL TO CHIEF
FOURNIER
The City Council thanked Police Chief Tim Fournier for his years of service to the
city in the public safety sector and for his leadership. They wished him well in his
future endeavors. Mr. Fournier stated it has been an honor to serve the city. He
spoke fondly of his career and department “family”.
2021 FEASIBILITY
REPORT
(IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1054)
Item 8.1
Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 8.1, Resolution accepting feasibility
report on 2021 infrastructure improvements project and calling for a public hearing
to consider ordering project (Improvement Project no. 1054).
Mr. Dan Boyum, city engineer, described the proposed 2021 infrastructure
improvement project including streets on the east side of the city near Lions Park
neighborhood. He reviewed the project components, pavement management
philosophy, and water main break history. He stated two alternates are included
in the project (costs for sliplining the storm sewer pipe and costs for open‐cut
replacement of the storm sewer pipe).
Mr. Boyum reviewed cost estimates and funding sources including two tax‐
exempt properties that will receive special assessments. He stated if Council
accepts the report the next step is preparation of plans and specifications. He
indicated the project would be undertaken in 2021 with final completion by
summer of 2022.
RESOLUTION 2020‐92
Item 8.1
Council Member Frazier introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: “RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT ON 2021
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND CALLING FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ORDERING PROJECT (IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1054)).” The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was seconded by Council Member Elder, and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: Hemken, Elder, Frazier, Hoffe; and the following
voted against the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: London; whereupon the
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was
attested to by the city clerk.
EXCHANGE OF
COMMUNICATION
Item 12.1
Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 12.1, Exchange of communication
between members of the City Council.
Mayor Hemken reported on upcoming events.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Council Member Frazier, seconded by Council Member
Elder, to adjourn the meeting, as there was no further business to come before
the Council. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. The New Hope City
Council adjourned at 7:52 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
New Hope City Council September 28, 2020
Page 4
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
New Hope City Council October 12, 2020
Page 1
City of New Hope
4401 Xylon Avenue North
New Hope, Minnesota 55428
City Council Minutes October 12, 2020
Regular Meeting City Hall, 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER The New Hope City Council met in regular session pursuant to due call and notice
thereof; Mayor Hemken called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
The City Council and all present stood for the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL Council present:
Staff present:
Kathi Hemken, Mayor
John Elder, Council Member
Cedrick Frazier, Council Member
Andy Hoffe, Council Member
Jonathan London, Council Member
Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Vicki Holthaus, AEM
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
Stacy Woods, Assistant City Attorney
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
Motion was made by Council Member London, seconded by Council Member
Hoffe, to approve the work session meeting minutes of September 21, 2020.
Voted in favor thereof: Hemken, Elder, Frazier, Hoffe, London; and the following
voted against the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None. Motion carried.
OPEN FORUM
There was no one present desirous of addressing the council.
ROTATING VOTES
Please note that votes taken on each agenda item are called by the secretary on a
rotating basis; however, the written minutes always list the mayor’s name first
followed by the council members’ in alphabetical order.
CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Hemken introduced the consent items as listed for consideration and stated
that all items will be enacted by one motion unless requested that an item be
removed for discussion. Mr. Kirk McDonald, city manager, reviewed the consent
items.
BUSINESS LICENSE(S)
Item 6.1
Approval of business licenses(s).
FINANCIAL CLAIMS
Item 6.2
Approval of financial claims through October 12, 2020.
RESOLUTION 2020‐93
Item 6.4
Resolution adopting the city of New Hope 2040 Comprehensive Plan and placing
the plan into effect.
New Hope City Council October 12, 2020
Page 2
RESOLUTION 2020‐94
Item 6.5
Resolution appointing election judges for General Election of November 3, 2020.
RESOLUTION 2020‐95
Item 6.6
Resolution proclaiming October 13, 2020, as Honerene Keppel Day.
Council Member Elder commented on the milestone and thanked the manager of
Broadway Village for allowing the city to participate in the celebration of Ms.
Keppel’s 100th birthday.
RESOLUTION 2020‐96
Item 6.7
Resolution approving final payment request to Flagship Recreation for Begin Park
playground project in the amount of $43,699.43 (Improvement Project No. 1040).
KENLAWN CO.
Item 6.8
Resolution approving a contract with Kenlawn Co. for snow removal and
maintenance services.
CONSENT ITEM
REMOVED
Council Member London requested that Item 6.8 be removed for discussion.
MOTION
Consent Items
Motion was made by Council Member Elder, seconded by Council Member Hoffe,
to approve the remaining Consent items. All present voted in favor. Motion
carried.
KENLAWN
COMPANY
CONTRACT
Item 6.8
Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 6.8, Resolution approving a
contract with Kenlawn Co. for snow removal and maintenance services.
Council Member London stated he believes the contract amount is excessive based
on the small area to be maintained in the City Center area near city hall. He
acknowledged that the prior contractor performed poorly. He suggested utilizing
volunteers for the work or seeking more bids from contractors. He also questioned
pricing of materials such as the wood fiber. Council Member Elder pointed out
that engineered wood fiber is different than wood mulch.
Mr. Kirk McDonald, city manager, stated a priority of the city is to keep the City
Center area in good condition. He indicated the contractor does an excellent job,
and there is no price increase in the contract. He stated he would ask staff to obtain
the price of materials if the Council requested.
RESOLUTION 2020‐97
Item 6.8
Council Member Elder introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: “RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH KENLAWN
CO. FOR SNOW REMOVAL AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES.” The motion
for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Council Member
Frazier, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Hemken, Elder, Frazier, Hoffe; and the following voted against the same: London;
Abstained: None; Absent: None; whereupon the resolution was declared duly
passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was attested to by the city clerk.
PUBLIC HEARING
DELINQUENT CITY
CHARGES
Item 7.1
Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 7.1, Public hearing and resolution
adopting and confirming assessments for delinquent utility service charges and
administrative citations.
New Hope City Council October 12, 2020
Page 3
Mr. Kirk McDonald, city manager, explained the public hearing is to adopt the
assessment rolls for delinquent city service charges incurred between June 1, 2019,
and May 30, 2020. He stated all impacted property owners were notified of the
hearing, and staff has not received any written objections. He reported the total
delinquent utility charges is $246,639.76; the total delinquent city services (alarm
calls) is $3,347.08; and the total for delinquent administrative citations is $31,910.
Mayor Hemken called for a vote to close the public hearing as there was no one
present desiring to speak at the public hearing.
CLOSE HEARING
Item 7.1
Motion was made by Council Member Hoffe, seconded by Council Member Elder,
to close the public hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION 2020‐98
Item 7.1
Council Member Hoffe introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: “PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND
CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY SERVICE
CHARGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS.” The motion for the
adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Council Member Elder, and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Hemken,
Elder, Frazier, Hoffe, London; and the following voted against the same: None;
Abstained: None; Absent: None; whereupon the resolution was declared duly
passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was attested to by the city clerk.
CARES ACT FUNDS
Item 8.1
Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 8.1, Resolution allocating
coronavirus aid, relief, and economic security (CARES) Act funds.
Mr. Kirk McDonald, city manager, stated the city received $1,641,664 for eligible
COVID‐19 pandemic expenses from the Federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief and
Economic Security (CARES) Act or Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF). He stated at
the September 21 work session Council discussed the allocation of the funds and
the need to adopt a plan allocating the use of the funds. He stated subsequent to
the work session additional information on expenditure eligibility was provided
that clarifies that all public safety payroll costs are eligible expenses and that cities
may distribute funds to public safety joint powers organizations.
Ms. Vicki Holthaus, AEM, recommended adoption of a plan allocating an amount
not to exceed $235,277 be provided to West Metro Fire‐Rescue District for
personnel costs and that the remainder of the $1,641,664 CARES allocation be
submitted for police department personnel costs. This is consistent with the intent
of the federal guidelines for CARES Act expenditures. She stated the city’s auditor
(MMKR) agrees with this approach. Ms. Holthaus explained that the city has
incurred other eligible expenses as discussed at the September work session but
management and auditor determined that public safety personnel costs provide a
much more streamlined audit and reduce the administrative burden associated
with the program.
Council supported the plan and thanked staff for tracking expenses and evaluating
the best approach to utilize the funds.
New Hope City Council October 12, 2020
Page 4
RESOLUTION 2020‐99
Item 8.1
Council Member Elder introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: “RESOLUTION ALLOCATING CORONAVIRUS AID, RELIEF,
AND ECONOMIC SECURITY (CARES) ACT FUNDS.” The motion for the
adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Council Member Frazier,
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Hemken,
Elder, Frazier, Hoffe, London; and the following voted against the same: None;
Abstained: None; Absent: None; whereupon the resolution was declared duly
passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was attested to by the city clerk.
COUNCIL SALARIES
ORDINANCE
Item 10.1
Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 10.1, Ordinance No. 20‐12, An
ordinance amending New Hope code section 2‐11 setting mayor and council
members’ salaries.
Mr. Kirk McDonald, city manager, stated at the September 21 work session Council
discussed the proposed ordinance to increase salaries for the mayor and council
members by 3% for years 2021 and 2022. He stated a 3% increase is included in the
budget for employees, as the police and public works labor contracts were
previously approved with a similar increase. He stated the change must take place
before the November 3 city election. He indicated the current bi‐weekly salary for
the mayor is $516 and it will increase to $532 in 2021 and to $548 in 2022. He stated
the council member bi‐weekly salary is $377 and it will increase to $389 in 2021 and
to $400 in 2022. The overall budget impact for 2021 is $1,758 and the 2021 budget
contains funds for the proposed increase.
ORDINANCE NO.
20‐12
Item 10.1
Council Member Frazier introduced the following ordinance and moved its
adoption: “ORDINANCE NO. 20‐12, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING NEW
HOPE CODE SECTION 2‐11 SETTING MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS’
SALARIES.” The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was
seconded by Council Member Elder, and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: Hemken, Elder, Frazier, Hoffe, London; and the
following voted against the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None;
whereupon the ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the
mayor which was attested to by the city clerk.
EXCHANGE OF
COMMUNICATION
Item 12.1
Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 12.1, Exchange of communication
between members of the City Council.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Council Member Frazier, seconded by Council Member
Elder, to adjourn the meeting, as there was no further business to come before
the Council. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. The New Hope City
Council adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
G:\City Manager\AGENDA\6.2 R-Approval of Claims Merge Doc.docx
Request for Action
October 26, 2020
Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Originating Department: City Manager
By: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Agenda Title
Approval of claims through October 26, 2020
Requested Action
Claims for services and commodities purchased through this period are listed on the Check Disbursement
Report
Attachments
x Check Disbursement Report
Agenda Section
Consent
Item Number
6.2
I:\RFA\COMM DEV\2020\City Council\10‐26‐20 LCA Resolution\6.4 Q ‐ LCA Re‐Enrollment 10‐26‐20.docx
Request for Action
October 26, 2020
Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Originating Department: Community Development
By: Jeff Sargent, Director
Agenda Title
Resolution electing to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Metropolitan
Livable Communities Act
Requested Action
Staff requests the City Council to consider the attached resolution to re‐enroll in the Local Housing Incentives
Account Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (LCA).
Policy/Past Practice
The city has participated in this program in the past, which makes the city eligible to receive LCA housing
grants.
Background
The Metropolitan Council administers funds through the Livable Communities Act (LCA). The LCA provides
funding for communities to invest in local economic revitalization, workforce housing initiatives, and
development or redevelopment that connects different land uses and transportation. The program is a
voluntary, incentive‐based approach to help communities grow and redevelop, and to address the region’s
affordable and lifecycle housing needs.
Under the LCA, the Met Council makes grant and loan awards from four accounts:
Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA) – Cleans up brownfields for redevelopment, job creation
and housing for families with low to moderate incomes.
Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) – Supports development and redevelopment
that links housing, jobs and services while demonstrating efficient and cost‐effective use of land and
infrastructure.
Local Housing Incentives Account (LHIA) – Produces and preserves housing choices for households
with low to moderate incomes.
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) – Catalyzes development around light rail, commuter rail, and
high‐frequency bus stations.
The city of New Hope has taken advantage of these programs in the past, and must re‐enroll in the LCA
program to be eligible for grants during the 2021‐2030 period. To re‐enroll, the city must adopt a resolution
approving affordable and life‐cycle housing goals for the 2021‐2030 decade by November 15, 2020. Staff has
already considered new affordable and life‐cycle housing goals when updating the 2040 Comprehensive Plan,
which have been incorporated into the resolution for consideration. They are as follows:
Affordable Housing Goals Range Life‐Cycle Housing Goal
84 units between 2021 ‐ 2030 300 units between 2021 ‐ 2030
Agenda Section
Consent
Item Number
6.4
Request for Action, Page 2
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the resolution electing to participate in the Local Housing
Incentives Account Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, as this will make the city
eligible to apply for LCA grants in the future.
Attachments
Draft Resolution
Livable Communities Goals Methodology
Livable Communities Act grant history
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
RESOLUTION ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE IN
THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM
UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT
CALENDAR YEARS 2021 THROUGH 2030
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes sections 473.25 to
473.255) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address
housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes
section 473.121; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization
Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account, the Local Housing Incentive Account
and the Inclusionary Housing Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance
to metropolitan-area municipalities; and
WHEREAS, a metropolitan-area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup
funding from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development unless the
municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under Minnesota
Statutes section 473.254; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires that each municipality establish
affordable and life-cycle housing goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote
the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development
Guide; and
WHEREAS, a metropolitan-area municipality can participate in the Local Housing Incentives
Account Program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 if: (a) the municipality elects to
participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program; (b) the Metropolitan Council and the
municipality successfully negotiate new affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the
municipality; (c) the Metropolitan Council adopts by resolution the new negotiated affordable and
life-cycle housing goals for the municipality; and (d) the municipality establishes it has spent or will
spend or distribute to the Local Housing Incentives Account the required Affordable and Life-Cycle
Housing Opportunities Amount (ALHOA) for each year the municipality participates in the Local
Housing Incentives Account Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the city of New Hope:
1. Elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan
Livable Communities Act for calendar years 2021 through 2030.
2. Agrees to the following affordable and life-cycle housing goals for calendar years 2021
through 2030:
Affordable Housing Goals Range Life-Cycle Housing Goal
84 units between 2021 - 2030 300 units between 2021 - 2030
3. Will prepare and submit to the Metropolitan Council a plan identifying the actions it plans to
take to meet its established housing goals.
Dated the 26th day of October, 2020.
__________________________
Kathi Hemken, Mayor
Attest:
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
Attachment: 2021-2030 Affordable and Life-cycle Housing Goals
Methodology
Months of cumulative outreach and discussion about how 2021-2030 affordable and life-cycle housing
goals should be calculated (summarized at a May 4 Communities Development Committee meeting),
has led to a methodology that is consistent and easy to understand. The selected methodology
attempts to strike a reasonable, balanced approach that considers the variety of differing
circumstances across communities. The 2021-2030 affordable housing goals will be a range to reflect
the uncertainty and variety of local affordable housing development, and use a similar approach that
2011-2020 goals used.
How were 2011-2030 affordable housing goals calculated?
In 2009 and 2010 broad discussions were had about how to determine 2011-2020 affordable housing
goals, including some of the same stakeholders - and even some of the same people! - that provided
input for the coming decade’s goals. In summary, an estimate of available funding for affordable
housing was determined for the 2011-2020 decade and used to calculate what percent of the decade’s
need for affordable housing could possibly be developed. This percentage was calculated at 65%,
which was then applied to each community’s share of affordable housing need for 2011-2020 to create
a low end of an affordable housing goal range. The high end of a community’s goal range was the
need number itself. Some communities had access to additional funding sources and therefore the
low end of their range was increased, but most communities’ 2011-2020 affordable housing goal
was a range between 65% and 100% of their 2011-2020 share of affordable housing need.
How are 2021-2030 affordable housing goals being calculated?
Affordable and life-cycle housing goals are calculated based on each community’s share of the region’s
need for affordable housing in the coming decade. Each community has, or is in the process of,
updating their comprehensive plans to acknowledge this “need” number, which is based on their
forecasted sewer-serviced growth, their existing affordable housing choices relative to the regional
average, and whether or not they import or export low-wage workers. Forecasted growth considers a
community’s transit capacity, land use guidance, employment growth, and other economic and
demographic trends. “Need” numbers are further adjusted as described above to encourage affordable
housing development that will provide reasonable housing options at all incomes throughout the region.
Determining affordable housing “goals” (which are required for LCA participation) based on affordable
housing “needs” (which are required to be addressed per the Metropolitan Land Planning Act) ensures
that those goals factor in all the unique characteristics of a community. However, it is widely
acknowledged that there is not sufficient funding available to meet the forecasted affordable housing
“need,” and affordable housing goals are an opportunity for cities to consider a more realistic, if still
ambitious, number of affordable housing units that could be built in the coming decade.
For this reason, the amount of funding anticipated for affordable housing development in the coming
decade is the primary consideration in determining affordable housing goals. Working closely with
Minnesota Housing, we have estimated that funding in 2021-2030 could support the construction of
about 45% of the forecasted need for affordable housing.
Page - 2 | October 21, 2020 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
We must acknowledge that not every source of affordable housing funding is captured in this
calculation. We also acknowledge that there are many things individual local governments can do to
incentivize and partner with affordable housing developers to increase their chances of accessing
available funding. Finally, many focus group participants and survey respondents indicated a desire to
set goals above minimum funding limitations as an incentive to do more. For this reason, we have set
the low end of your community’s 2021-2030 affordable housing goals at 55% of your share of the
region’s need for affordable housing (also known as the “need” number in your comprehensive plan).
That percentage reflects the funding availability estimate (45%), plus an additional 10% to account for
local policies and less common funding sources. Shown another way:
We heard from survey respondents and stakeholder conversations that funding has historically limited
our ability to meet all affordable housing needs, but many partners – both cities and other stakeholders
– felt that affordable housing goals should also reflect the future need. There is no penalty for not
meeting affordable housing goals, and equating “goals” with “needs” may incentivize us to work harder
to address affordable housing needs and bring attention to the need for more funding to create resilient
communities where housing choices are robust.
For that reason, the high end of your community’s 2021-2030 affordable housing goal is equal to your
2021-2030 affordable housing need number from your comprehensive plan. For example, if your share
of the region’s need for affordable housing in the coming decade is 100 units, your goal range would
look like this:
How were 2011-2020 life-cycle housing goals being calculated?
Life-cycle housing goals were also considered in partnership with communities and stakeholders in
2009-2010. In summary, life-cycle housing goals were also determined as a range. The low end of the
range was the 2011-2020 share of affordable housing need. The high end of the range was calculated
by multiplying all land guided multi-family residential AND expected to develop in the 2011 decade by
the maximum densities of those land uses. This resulted in some very high life-cycle housing goals!
Page - 3 | October 21, 2020 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
How are 2021-2030 life-cycle housing goals being calculated?
Life-cycle goals are intended to ensure communities are allowing for a variety of housing types;
specifically a mix of densities within their residential land. Although all communities must allow
minimum average residential densities for sewer serviced growth, and additional average density
minimums near certain transit investments, this measure is more about knowing how many multi-family
units are possible. Therefore, life-cycle goals are being measured by looking at all multi-family land
uses (defined as land uses with a minimum of 8 units per acre or more), and multiplying the acres of
land expected to develop in the coming decade by the median density of those multi-family land use
designations. Shown another way:
Livable Communities Act Grant Program Activity
Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA)
10/22/01 application for city owner properties at 7500‐7528 42nd Ave N. Improvement
Project 665. Application denied because firm development commitment has not been
identified.
3/14/2011 Contamination Cleanup grant for $443,150 for 5121 Winnetka Ave N, lead
contamination from previous occupant
2013 purchased Winnetka Learning Center/Centra Homes, TBRA grant $200,000
Application for grant 5550 Winnetka Ave N and 7809 BLR, improvement project 697.
$67,672 to clean up old BOSA donut site. GRANT NOT FUNDED because zero jobs
would be created.
Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA)
2001: $60,000 livable community grant to match city funds to conduct study of
redevelopment options for Hope Village Development Area (BLR corridor)
2003: City Center Task Force‐ $55,000
2007: applied for Bass Lake Road Apartments redevelopment and was denied
Local Housing Incentives Account (LHIA)
Bass Lake Court Townhomes‐ Grant award: $200,000 in 1998
Boone Avenue Condos‐ Grant Award: $125,000 in 2004
Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
2006: $350,000 grant, $250,000 to partially fund water main improvements associated
with Bass Lake Road Apartments site adjacent to golf course and $100,000 for transit
improvements.
2014: Applied for $250,000 grant to help pay for some of the upcoming Xylon streetscape
improvements
I:\RFA\City Manager\2020\Assessment Services\CM 102620\6.5 Q ‐ Assessment Services Agreement 2021 to 2024.docx
Request for Action
October 26, 2020
Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Originating Department: City Manager
By: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Agenda Title
Resolution Approving Assessment Services Agreement with Hennepin County for years 2021‐2024
Requested Action
Staff recommends adoption of the resolution approving the Assessment Services Agreement with Hennepin
County for years 2021‐2024. The City Council discussed this matter at the October 19 work session and
Hennepin County Assessor, Jim Atchison, was in attendance.
Policy/Past Practice
The city has been contracting with Hennepin County for assessment services since 1974. The existing formal
four‐year agreement expired on July 31, 2020 and a new agreement has been prepared by the county for
another four‐year period from August 1, 2020 until July 31, 2024. The city received the new agreement on
September 12.
Background
The services provided by the agreement include:
1. Physically inspect and revalue 20% of the real property, as required by law.
2. Physically inspect and value all new construction, additions and renovation.
3. Adjust estimated market values on those properties not physically inspected as deemed necessary per
sales ratio analysis.
4. Prepare the initial assessment roll.
5. Print and mail valuation notices.
6. Respond to taxpayers regarding assessment or appraisal problems or inquiries.
7. Conduct valuation reviews prior to Board of Review or Open Book meetings, as determined by the city –
approximate dates: March through May 15.
8. Attend Board of Review or conduct Open Book meeting. Prepare all necessary review appraisals.
Approximate dates: April 1 – May 31.
9. Maintain an updated property file – current values, classification data and characteristic data.
10. Prepare divisions and combinations as required.
11. Administer the abatement process pursuant to Minn. Stat. §375.192.
12. Prepare appraisals; defend and/or negotiate all tax court cases.
13. Provide all computer hardware and software applications necessary to complete contracted services.
14. Process all homestead and special program applications.
The agreement specifies a sum of $165,000 for the 2020/21 assessment and that amount is included in the 2021
budget. The amount may be increased or decreased depending on the estimated cost of appraising new
construction and new parcels. The payment formula is based on the number of commercial, industrial and
residential properties located in the city. Actual bills for assessment services over the past several years are as
follows:
Agenda Section
Consent
Item Number
6.5
Request for Action, Page 2
2016 ‐ $125,201
2017 ‐ $130,000
2018 ‐ $147,000
2019 ‐ $154,000
2020 – $160,000
Per the attached correspondence from the county assessor, the original plan was to execute a contract
extension but with several changes to the agreement it was advised to have a new agreement. The standard
language found in all the agreements is being updated and other additions or deletions are noted per the
color coding. The final agreement will be forwarded to the city for electronic signatures. The main deletions
reference the city no longer needing to provide clerical support staff and office supplies and references to the
homestead application process. The city attorney has reviewed the agreement.
Attachments
Resolution
September 12 County Correspondence
New Assessment Services Agreement
Excerpts: 2021 Budget
City of New Hope
Resolution No. 2020‐
Resolution Approving Assessment Services Agreement with Hennepin County
For Years 2021‐2024
WHEREAS, the City of New Hope has been contracting with Hennepin County for assessment
services since 1974; and
WHEREAS, the county assessor conducts assessments of all commercial, industrial and
residential properties located in the City of New Hope, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §273.072
and §471.59; and
WHEREAS, the county physically inspects and revalues 20% of the real property, as required
by law, and adjusts estimated market values as deemed necessary per sales ratio analysis; and
WHEREAS, the city’s current four year Assessment Services Agreement is expiring and a new
agreement has been submitted for years 2021‐2024; and
WHEREAS, the agreement states that the city shall pay a sum of $165,000 to the county for 2021
assessment services and the payment maybe increased or decreased by that amount which
exceeds or is less than the county’s estimated cost of appraising new construction and new
parcels for the current year’s assessment; and
WHEREAS, the amount of any increase or decrease shall be specified in the billing for the
current year’s assessment.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City of New Hope City Council:
1. That the City Council approves the Assessment Services Agreement with Hennepin
County for years 2021‐2024.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota, this 26th day
of October, 2020.
____________________________________
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
I:\RFA\City Manager\2020\siren maint\6.6 Q&R‐siren maint 10.26.20.docx
Request for Action
October 26, 2020
Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Originating Department: City Manager
By: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Agenda Title
Resolution approving 2021 maintenance agreement with Embedded Systems, Inc. for tornado/civil defense
siren maintenance in the amount of $1,660.32
Requested Action
Staff recommends the City Council approve the enclosed resolution which approves the attached 2021
maintenance agreement. The cost for the agreement is $1,660.32 or $46.12 per month for each of the three
warning sirens located in the city. This is the same price as last year’s fee. Adequate funds are budgeted in
the 2021 Fire/Emergency Management Services budget to cover this agreement.
Policy/Past Practice
One of the top priorities in the New Hope City Plan is to keep all residents and businesses in the city safe and
secure and the City Council supports programs and agreements that promote a safe and healthy environment.
Background
The city has utilized the services of Embedded Systems, Inc. for tornado/civil defense siren maintenance since
1997 and has found them to be a reliable provider. The contract includes preventative maintenance as well as
service call requests. The “decoder” portion of the siren system is responsible for the receipt and transmission of
control commands and information and the activation of the circuitry which sounds the siren.
There are three sirens in the city. They are at the following locations:
5437 Yukon Avenue N
4301 Xylon Avenue N on a pole behind the fire station
8800 32nd Avenue N on a pole at northeast corner of Hidden Valley Park on the west side of Boone
Avenue N
The sirens include battery backup systems. The monthly siren maintenance fee is $46.12 per siren, per month.
The cost to the city on an annual basis is three sirens x $46.12 per month = $138.36 per month x 12 months =
$1,660.32. A brief history of contractual costs is as follows:
YEAR
PER MONTH SIREN
MAINTENANCE
COST
TOTAL COST
FOR
THREE SIRENS
2008‐2010 $37.95 $1,366.20
2011 $39.85 $1,434.60
2012‐2014 $41.84 $1,506.24
2015‐2017 $43.93 $1,581.48
2018‐2021 $46.12 $1,660.32
Agenda Section
Consent
Item Number
6.6
Request for Action, Page 2
Battery replacement occurs every two years for cities in Hennepin County. The agreement states that the decoder
batteries for the sirens in New Hope are scheduled to be replaced in 2021 for preventative maintenance. The cost
of the battery replacement is included in the monthly maintenance fee.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution approving the agreement.
Funding
The cost for this maintenance agreement is included in the 2021 Fire/Emergency Management Services budget.
Attachments
Resolution
Embedded Systems 2021 Siren Maintenance Contract Renewal
City of New Hope
Resolution No. 2020‐
Resolution approving 2021 maintenance agreement
with Embedded Systems, Inc.
for tornado/civil defense siren maintenance in the amount of
$1,660.32
WHEREAS the City of New Hope has three civil defense siren systems which must be in working
order at all times; and
WHEREAS the “decoder” is defined as the portion of the siren system which is responsible for the
receipt and transmission of control commands and information and the activation of
the circuitry which actually sounds the siren; and
WHEREAS service covered by the agreement includes preventative maintenance, battery
replacement, and service call requests; and
WHEREAS Embedded Systems, Inc. will provide maintenance of the three civil defense siren
receiver/decoders at a cost of $1,660.32 per year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the New Hope City Council hereby approves entering into an
agreement for 2021 with Embedded Systems, Inc. for siren receiver/decoder
maintenance.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota, this 26th day of
October, 2020.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
I:\RFA\P&R\Pool and Civic Center Pk Projects\2020\Project Close Outs\American Liberty ‐ Theater\6.7 Q ‐ Closeout theater project contract.docx
Request for Action
October 26, 2020
Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Originating Department: Parks & Recreation
By: Susan Rader, Director
Agenda Title
Resolution approving final payment to American Liberty Construction, Inc. in the amount of $5,000.00 for the
construction of the outdoor theater and picnic shelter at Civic Center Park (Improvement Project No. 941)
Requested Action
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the construction of the theater project (improvement project
no. 941) and authorize final payment to American Liberty Construction, Inc. in the amount of $5,000.00.
All of the necessary paperwork has been provided by the contractor.
Background
The city began discussing the police department and city hall space needs issue in 2013. Following citizen
task force reports, the City Council approved a contract for design and construction services with Wold
Architects and Engineers in January 2017. On December 11, 2017, the Council awarded a contract for the
construction of a new police station/city hall facility on the site of the 50‐year old outdoor pool.
In June 2018, the Council approved an agreement with Stantec for the engineering and planning of the city
hall landscaping, parking lots, pool and Civic Center Park improvements. On December 10, 2018, the City
Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized the advertisement of bids for each of the
projects: Demolition; City Hall Landscaping, Parking Lots, Trails, Stormwater, and Park Landscaping;
Theater; Skatepark; and Pool.
The outdoor theater and picnic shelter construction contract for $1,478,790.42 was awarded to American
Liberty Construction, Inc. on March 25, 2019. Five change orders were approved for the contract, bringing the
revised contract amount to $1,490,082.75. The final Contract Value is $1,490,237.25 or $154.50 over the revised
contract amount, which is due to additional earthwork costs. Construction started in the summer of 2019 and
was completed late summer 2020.
Funding
The outdoor theater and picnic shelter construction project will be paid for with the park/pool bonds issued
in December 2018 and July 2019.
Attachments
Resolution
Letter from Dan Boyum, City Engineer
American Liberty Construction, Inc. invoice in the amount of $5,000.00
Agenda Section
Consent
Item Number
6.7
I:\RFA\P&R\Pool and Civic Center Pk Projects\2020\Project Close Outs\American Liberty ‐ Theater\6.7a1 R ‐ Closeout theater project.docx
City of New Hope
Resolution No. 2020‐
Resolution approving final payment to American Liberty Construction, Inc. in the amount of $5,000.00 for the
construction of the outdoor theater and picnic shelter at Civic Center Park (Improvement Project No. 941)
WHEREAS, the city entered into a contract with American Liberty Construction, Inc. to complete the
construction of the outdoor theater and picnic shelter at Civic Center Park; and,
WHEREAS, staff is recommending that the Council adopt a resolution to accept the completion of work for
the outdoor theater and picnic shelter project (Improvement Project No. 941) and approve final
payment to American Liberty Construction, Inc. in the amount of $5,000.00; and,
WHEREAS, staff has reported that all work has been satisfactorily completed and recommends that final
payment be made to American Liberty Construction, Inc.; and,
WHEREAS, the funding source for this project is the park/pool bonds issued in December 2018 and July
2019.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the city of New Hope, Hennepin County,
Minnesota:
1. That the City Council accepts the work for the construction of the outdoor theater and picnic
shelter, Improvement Project No. 941, from American Liberty Construction, Inc.
2. That the city manager is hereby directed to authorize the final payment of $5,000.00 to
American Liberty Construction, Inc.
Adopted by the City Council of the city of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota this 26th day of October
2020.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000, Minneapolis MN 55402-2309
October 20, 2020
File:193804338
Attention:Susan Rader, Director of Parks and Recreation
City of New Hope
4401 Xylon Avenue North
New Hope, MN 55428
Dear Susan,
Reference: Final Payment Request 13 & Final – New Hope Outdoor Theater
City Project No. 941
Enclosed find Payment Request No. 13 & Final for the above referenced project. The contractor,
American Liberty Construction, Inc. has completed the work in accordance with the contract
plans and specifications and supplied final closeout forms. Therefore, it is recommended that the
City of New Hope accepts the project and approves final payment of $5,000.00.
The original contract amount was $1,478,790.42. Various changer orders approved on the project
resulted in a revised contract amount of $1,490,082.75. The final Contract Value is $1,490,237.25,
or $154.50 higher than the revised contract amount due to additional earthwork costs.
If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (612) 712-2021.
Regards,
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Dan D. Boyum, P.E.
City Engineer
Phone: 612 712 2021
dan.boyum@stantec.com
Attachments:Pay Request 13 & Final
c.Kirk McDonald, Valerie Leone, Jeff Sargent, Bernie Weber – New Hope; Stacy Woods – City Attorney; Bruce
Paulson, Lucas Miller, Ann Dienhart – Stantec.
I:\RFA\PUBWORKS\2020\Council\1054 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project\10‐20 Public Hearing Authorize P&S
Request for Action
October 26, 2020
Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Originating Department: Public Works
By: Bernie Weber, Public Works Director
Agenda Title
Resolution ordering the construction of and preparation of plans and specifications for the 2021
Infrastructure Project (Improvement Project No. 1054)
Requested Action
Staff is requesting that the Council conduct a public hearing and receive a presentation by the city engineer
regarding a proposed 2021 infrastructure improvement project. Staff recommends that the Council pass a
resolution ordering 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project and authorizing Stantec, the city’s consulting
engineer, to prepare the plans and specifications.
Policy/Past Practice
The City Council routinely considers public infrastructure improvement projects to extend the useful life of the
infrastructure and/or improve the level of service. The city’s pavement management plan identifies these areas
in the Street Infrastructure Projects portion of the plan.
Background
The general location of the potential 2021 project includes streets in the Lions Park neighborhood and Erickson
Drive, as shown on the attached project map. Streets included in the project were recommended based upon
pavement conditions identified in the 2019 Pavement Management Plan as well as underlying utility
condition.
The feasibility report was presented and approved on September 28 and identified specific street and utility
improvement strategies. The feasibility report also identified all tax‐exempt properties that will be affected by
this work and provides an estimated assessment rate for these properties. These assessments will be one
funding source for the project.
A notice has been sent to neighbors along the project area to make them aware of the Public Hearing at the
October 26 Council meeting. Residents were invited to submit any comments or questions regarding the
project prior to the Public Hearing. In this public comment period staff received one inquiry regarding
potential drainage improvements at 38th and Maryland Avenues. This intersection has a history of drainage
issues and is included in the Feasibility Report for storm sewer improvements to address the drainage issues.
In addition, staff have received a few comments over the past months regarding drainage issues along
Louisiana Avenue and on Erickson Drive. If possible these issues will be addressed during the design or
construction of the project.
Funding
The total project cost estimate for work proposed in the feasibility report is $1,706,932.89 (Base Bid). If one of
the two storm alternates associated with the sliplining or open‐cut replacement of the storm sewer line on
Oregon Avenue are awarded, the total project cost would increase to $2,000,082.89 (Base Bid + Alternate 1:
Slipline Oregon Storm Sewer) or $2,052,294.14 (Base Bid + Alternate 2: Open‐cut Oregon Storm Sewer). The
Agenda Section
Public Hearing
Item Number
7.1
Request for Action, Page 2
majority of the project will be funded by the city’s street infrastructure and enterprise funds, as well as
assessments to tax‐exempt properties. The tables below reflect the project costs and funding.
Improvement
Estimated Costs (with
Alternate 1 ‐ Sliplining)
Estimated Costs (with
Alternate 2 – Open‐cut)
Mill and Overlay ‐ Streets $739,072.49 $739,072.49
Reclaim and Overlay ‐ Streets $665,532.40 $665,532.40
Subtotal – Streets $1,404,604.89 $1,404,604.89
Water Main $99,827.00 $99,827.00
Sanitary Sewer $95,810.00 $95,810.00
Storm Sewer – Base $106,691.00 $106,691.00
Subtotal – Streets & Utilities ‐ Base $1,706,932.89 $1,706,932.89
Storm Sewer ‐ Alternate $293,150.00 $345,361.25
Total Estimated Project Costs $2,000,082.89 $2,052,294.14
Funding Summary
Funding Source
Feasibility Report
Estimate with
Alternate 1
(Sliplining)
Feasibility Report
Estimate with
Alternate 2
(Open‐cut)
Capital
Improvements
Plan (CIP)
Budget Amount
Difference Notes Mill and Overlay $739,072.49 $739,072.49
$1,521,330.60
$116,725.71
Reclaim and Overlay $665,532.40 $665,532.40
Subtotal ‐ Street Fund $1,404,604.89 $1,404,604.89
Water fund $99,827.00 $99,827.00 $100,000.00 $173.00
Sanitary Sewer fund $95,810.00 $95,810.00 $50,000.00 ($45,810.00)
Storm Water fund $399,841.00 $452,052.25 $200,000.00 ($199,841.00) Alt 1
($252,052.25) Alt 2
Total Project Costs $2,000,082.89 $2,052,294.14 $1,871,330.60 ($128,752.29) Alt 1
($180,963.54) Alt 2
Per AEM, the storm water fund has adequate funding for the projected overage for the Alternate 1 or 2 storm
sewer infrastructure repairs.
Recommendation
After closing the public hearing, staff recommends Council adopt the resolution. Plans will be presented in
late January, with contractor bids being received in February and construction starting in spring 2021.
Attachments
Resolution
Engineer’s Memo
Project Map
Tax‐Exempt Property Map
Feasibility Report
1
City of New Hope
RESOLUTION NO. 20-___
RESOLUTION ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1054
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows:
1. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2020-92 adopted at its September 28, 2020 meeting,
this Council held a public hearing on the 26th day of October, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. at the New Hope
City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue North, on the proposed 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project
No. 1054 of the City. The public hearing was held after notice of the public hearing was duly
published on the 15th and 22nd days of October, 2020 in the City’s official newspaper the New
Hope-Golden Valley Sun-Post in accordance with and as required by law.
2. The Council has examined and approved the City Clerk’s Affidavit Of Mailing
pertaining to the mailing of notices of said hearing to the owners of all parcels within the area
proposed to be assessed, and has examined and approved the mailing list containing the names and
addresses of all such owners; and this Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
notice of said hearing was duly mailed to the owners of each and all parcels within the area
proposed to be assessed at least 10 days before the October 26, 2020 public hearing in accordance
with and as required by law.
3. That all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard at the
October 26, 2020 public hearing with respect to the 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project No.
1054. This Council having considered the views of all persons interested and being fully advised
as to the pertinent facts relating to Project No. 1054, does hereby determine the improvement is
necessary, cost-effective and feasible as detailed in the September 2020 feasibility report prepared
by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Engineers for the City. Further, the Council hereby
determines to proceed with the making of said proposed improvement, and said improvement is
hereby ordered as proposed in Resolution No. 2020-92.
4. The area proposed to be assessed to pay the cost of said improvement shall include
the property described in the notice of public hearing pertaining hereto as described in paragraph 1
of this resolution.
5. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., as the city engineer, shall prepare plans and
specifications for the making of the 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Project No. 1054.
6. The City Council further determines Improvement Project No. 1054 bears no
relationship with the City’s comprehensive municipal plan and therefore has not referred this
project to the New Hope Planning Commission for construction consideration and the City
Council further declares, per federal Treasury Regulation §1.50-2, its official intent to reimburse
itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds.
2
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of October, 2020.
____________________________________
Kathi Hemken, Mayor
Attest: _______________________
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
P:\Attorney\SAS\1 Client Files\2 City of New Hope\99-61054 2021 Imp Project 1054\Resolution Ordering Construction and prep of plans and specs.docx
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, MN 55402
October 20, 2020
File: 193805078
Attention: Bernie Weber, Director of Public Works
City of New Hope
5500 International Parkway
New Hope, MN 55428
Reference: 2021 Infrastructure Improvements -
Public Hearing and Authorization to prepare Plans and Specifications
City Project No. 1054
Dear Bernie,
A feasibility report and cost estimate were prepared and presented for this project at the
September 28, 2020 Council Meeting in compliance with Chapter 429 requirements. At that
meeting, the Council accepted the feasibility report and called for the public hearing to be held
on October 26, 2020. The Council was updated on adjustments made to the feasibility report at
the October 19, 2020 Work Session.
The project generally consists of street and utility improvements in the residential areas along
Erickson Drive and the Lions Park neighborhood. (see attached location figure drawing).
The estimated total project cost for the street, water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer
improvements, including indirect costs, is approximately $2.000 million (with Alternate 1 - Sliplining)
to $2.052 million (with Alternate 2 - Open-cut) as shown below.
Improvement
Estimated Costs (with
Alternate 1 - Sliplining)
Estimated Costs (with
Alternate 2 – Open-cut)
Mill and Overlay - Streets $739,072.49 $739,072.49
Reclaim and Overlay - Streets $665,532.40 $665,532.40
Subtotal – Streets $1,404,604.89 $1,404,604.89
Water Main $99,827.00 $99,827.00
Sanitary Sewer $95,810.00 $95,810.00
Storm Sewer – Base $106,691.00 $106,691.00
Subtotal – Streets & Utilities - Base $1,706,932.89 $1,706,932.89
Storm Sewer - Alternate $293,150.00 $345,361.25
Total Estimated Project Costs $2,000,082.89 $2,052,294.14
October 20, 2020
Mr. Bernie Weber
Page 2 of 2
Reference:2021 Infrastructure Improvements – Public Hearing and Authorization to prepare
Plans and Specifications
At the Public Hearing, it is recommended a summary of the project scope be presented along
with the proposed assessment roll. Using cost estimates prepared for the report, assessment
amounts were calculated for assessable properties within the project area (see tax exempt
properties figure drawing). The assessable properties and corresponding estimated assessments
are shown in the table below:
Owner Address Assessment
Amount
1 The Salvation Army 4860 Erickson Drive North $4,798.20
2 City of New Hope (Lions Park 3810 Oregon Avenue North $4,798.20
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS $9,596.40
If Council chooses to move forward with this project, authorization of plans and specifications
could be given at the October 26, 2020 meeting. The improvements could be designed in the
winter, and bids could be opened in February 2021. Construction would begin in Spring/Summer
2021 with substantial completion being done in Fall 2021.
If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (612) 712-2021.
Sincerely,
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Dan D. Boyum, P.E.
City Engineer
dan.boyum@stantec.com
Attachments: Figure 1 – Location and Figure 9 – Tax Exempt Properties
Cc: Kirk McDonald, Valerie Leone, Andrew Kramer, Dave Lemke, Shawn Markham, Megan Hedstrom, Matt Rowedder – New Hope; Stacy Woods -
Jensen Sondrall Persellin & Woods, P.A.; Lucas Miller, Ann Dienhart – Stantec.
New HopePlymouth
Crystal
Robbinsdale
£¤169
PlymouthNew Hope49th Ave N
Flag Ave NErickson Dr48th Ave NEnsign Ave N47 1/2 Ave N
($$¯
Revised: 2020-09-22 By: dmericksonV:\1938\active\193805078\GIS\Projects\Location_Map.mxd
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data.New Hope, Minnesota
Location and Proposed Street Improvements2021 Infrastructure Improvements Project
Figure 1 ³±9
New HopeCrystalCrystalLions ParkCP RailroadOregon Ave NNevada Ave NMaryland Ave N42nd Ave N
Louisiana Ave N40th Ave N
36th Ave N
38th Ave N
39th Ave N
41st Ave N
41 1/2 Ave N
39 1/2 Ave N
Louisiana Ave NMaryland Ave NProposed Street Improvements
Boring with Petromat
Boring without Petromat
1.5" Mill and Overlay
1.5" Mill and Overlay (By Others)
Reclaim and Overlay
Full Reconstruction (By Others)
500 0 500250 Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11)
Site 1
Site 2
Site 1 Site 2
New HopePlymouth
Crystal
Robbinsdale
£¤169
PlymouthNew Hope0711821320071
0711821320053
!
49th Ave N
Flag Ave NErickson Dr48th Ave NEnsign Ave N47 1/2 Ave N
($$¯
Revised: 2020-09-22 By: dmericksonV:\1938\active\193805078\GIS\Projects\Tax_Exempt_Properties.mxd
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data.³±9
New HopeCrystalCrystalCP RailroadOregon Ave NNevada Ave NMaryland Ave N42nd Ave N
Louisiana Ave N40th Ave N
36th Ave N
38th Ave N
39th Ave N
41st Ave N
41 1/2 Ave N
39 1/2 Ave N
Louisiana Ave NMaryland Ave NProposed Improvements
Reclaim and Overlay
1.5" Mill and Overlay
1.5" Mill and Overlay (By Others)
Full Reconstruction (By Others)
Tax Exempt Properties *
500 0 500250 Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11)
Site 1
Site 2
Site 1 Site 2
1711821310080
Figure 9Tax Exempt Properties2021 Infrastructure Improvements Project
New Hope, Minnesota
* As of July 28, 2020
Revised Feasibility Report For
2021 Infrastructure Improvements
Prepared for:
City of New Hope, Minnesota
City Project No. 1054
October 2020
Stantec Project No. 193805078
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000, Minneapolis, MN 55402-2309
October 2, 2020
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of New Hope
4401 Xylon Avenue North
New Hope, MN 55428-4898
Re:2021 Infrastructure Improvements
Client Project No. 1054
Stantec Project No. 193805078
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
We are pleased to present our Revised Feasibility Report for the 2021 Infrastructure Improvements
project. The general location of the work includes streets between 36th Avenue N to the south,
Oregon Avenue N to the west, 42nd Avenue N to the north, and the City of Crystal border to the
east. The work also includes Erickson Drive N.
Streets included in the project were recommended based upon the current condition of the
pavement and underlying utilities.
The improvements identified include utility replacement on Oregon Avenue North, as well as the
continued focus on a more aggressive pavement management strategy to improve the driving
surface of more streets utilizing overlays and reclamation. This pavement management
philosophy will provide for quicker street improvements and will allow the utility funds to build for
future full reconstruction. The new overlays and reclaim streets will improve the quality of life,
increase the aesthetic value, and increase the safety of the roadways.
The original report be presented and discussed at the September 28, 2020, Council meeting. The
report was revised to address corrections needed to the Reclaim and Overlay Street Costs.
Respectfully submitted,
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
Dan D. Boyum, P.E.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Dan D. Boyum, P.E.
Date: October 2, 2020 Reg. No. 23451
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 3
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................................................. 3
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 5
HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................................... 5
SCOPE OF STUDY ................................................................................................................................................... 5
FIGURE 1 – 2021 LOCATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................ 6
EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 7
TABLE 1 – PAVEMENT RATING INDEX (PRI) SUMMARY ................................................................................. 7
TABLE 2 – GEOTECHNICAL PETROMAT FINDINGS ........................................................................................ 8
FIGURE 2 – PAVEMENT RATINGS INDEX .......................................................................................................... 9
FIGURE 3A – BORING AND GPR TESTING ..................................................................................................... 10
FIGURE 3B – BORING AND GPR TESTING ..................................................................................................... 11
FIGURE 4 – WATER MAIN BREAK HISTORY .................................................................................................... 12
STREET IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................................................................................................... 13
Full-depth reclamation ...................................................................................................................................... 13
TABLE 3 – FULL-DEPTH RECLAMATION STREETS ............................................................................................ 13
MILL AND OVERLAY ............................................................................................................................................ 14
TABLE 4 – MILL AND OVERLAY STREETS ........................................................................................................ 14
FIGURE 5 – TYPICAL SECTIONS ....................................................................................................................... 15
COMPLETE STREETS.............................................................................................................................................. 16
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 17
FIGURE 6 – PROPOSED WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS.............................................................................. 18
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 19
FIGURE 7 – PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................... 20
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 21
MILL AND OVERLAY ............................................................................................................................................ 21
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................................... 21
FIGURE 8 – PROPOSED STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................... 23
COST ESTIMATES ...................................................................................................................................................... 24
TABLE 5 –STREETS COST ESTIMATE .................................................................................................................. 24
TABLE 6 – UTILITY COST ESTIMATE................................................................................................................... 24
TABLE 7 – TOTAL PROJECT COSTS ................................................................................................................. 25
FINANCING .............................................................................................................................................................. 26
REVENUES ............................................................................................................................................................. 26
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 4
ASSESSMENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 26
TABLE 8 – PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES ................................................................................................... 26
TABLE 9 – ASSESSABLE REVENUE .................................................................................................................... 26
TABLE 10 – FUNDING SOURCE ....................................................................................................................... 27
ALTERNATES DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................... 27
FIGURE 9 – TAX EXEMPT PROPERTIES – ASSESSMENTS ................................................................................ 28
PROJECT SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................................................... 29
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 30
Appendices
Appendix A – Preliminary Cost Estimate Summary
Appendix B – Preliminary Assessments
Appendix C – Pavement and Geotechnical Evaluation, Braun Intertec
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 5
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to investigate the feasibility of performing improvements to
reconstruct/rehabilitate existing local streets and local utilities within the proposed project area
shown on Figure 1.
HISTORY
In order to improve the overall quality of its local infrastructure system, the City of New Hope
continues with a more aggressive pavement management philosophy to improve the existing
driving surface and extend the pavement life of its streets.
As the road conditions and Pavement Rating Index’s (PRI’s) continued to decline, it was apparent
the City was not keeping up with street rehabilitations. The Pavement Management Plan continued
to fall behind, and a more aggressive approach to pavement management was agreed upon by
the City Council in May of 2014.
Interim overlays will be utilized to add structural integrity to the existing street sections. Full
reconstruction of the streets is to be completed with streets showing significant roadway subgrade
and drainage issues, as well as those having a significant amount of utility issues. Utility rehabilitation
on the overlay streets will be limited in efforts to build up water and other utility funds.
The pavement management strategy will improve the driving surface and will provide the ability to
improve more streets. The new overlays will improve the quality of life, increase the aesthetic value,
and increase the safety of the roadways.
SCOPE OF STUDY
The purpose of this report is to provide the feasibility of the utility improvements and a total of
approximately 3.17 miles of mill and overlay and reclaim and overlay street and parking lot
improvements. The type of improvement required will be determined by the existing condition of the
pavement, roadway subgrade, as well as the condition of the underlying utilities. For each type of
improvement, costs and funding will be evaluated. The report breaks down the project into logical
sections to allow for reduction in scope, if desired, at the time of deciding if the project should move
forward into the design stage.
New HopePlymouth
Crystal
Robbinsdale
£¤169
PlymouthNew Hope49th Ave N
Flag Ave NErickson Dr48th Ave NEnsign Ave N47 1/2 Ave N
($$¯
Revised: 2020-09-22 By: dmericksonV:\1938\active\193805078\GIS\Projects\Location_Map.mxd
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data.New Hope, Minnesota
Location and Proposed Street Improvements2021 Infrastructure Improvements Project
Figure 1 ³±9
New HopeCrystalCrystalLions ParkCP RailroadOregon Ave NNevada Ave NMaryland Ave N42nd Ave N
Louisiana Ave N40th Ave N
36th Ave N
38th Ave N
39th Ave N
41st Ave N
41 1/2 Ave N
39 1/2 Ave N
Louisiana Ave NMaryland Ave NProposed Street Improvements
Boring with Petromat
Boring without Petromat
1.5" Mill and Overlay
1.5" Mill and Overlay (By Others)
Reclaim and Overlay
Full Reconstruction (By Others)
500 0 500250 Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11)
Site 1
Site 2
Site 1 Site 2
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 7
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The streets identified in this report were generally constructed in the 1960s.
City records have been reviewed and field inspections were performed on the structures and pipes
to identify warranted storm sewer and sanitary sewer improvement work in the project area.
Overall, the condition of the existing storm and sanitary systems in the mill and overlay segments is
fair. Several deteriorating storm structures and specific sanitary pipe issues have been identified.
The streets in the project area were rated in Fall of 2018 and Spring 2019 based on the City’s
Pavement Ratings Index (PRI). The index ranges from 0-100 and assigns a value to each street
segment based on the visual condition of the pavement. In general, a low PRI indicates a roadway
that is failing structurally, while a higher value indicates a segment in good condition. The table
below is a summary of the PRI ratings for the project area.
TABLE 1 –PAVEMENT RATING INDEX (PRI)SUMMARY
PRI Range Rating Description Length in Feet Length in Miles
0-20 Failing 0 0
21-40 Very Poor 0 0
41-60 Poor 16,533 3.17
61-80 Good 0 0
81-100 Excellent 0 0
Totals 16,533 3.17
AVERAGE PRI = 52
Figure 2 shows the pavement ratings for each street within this project area.
In addition to the PRI ratings, soil borings and ground penetrating radar have been completed to
assist us in further understanding the existing street section characteristics. Figures 3A and 3B
identifies the locations and limits of this field exploration. Final data and the accompanying reports
have been received and generally support the identified street improvements proposed in this
report.
As experienced in past projects, Petromat material has been found within some of the existing
pavement sections. Petromat is a fabric material that was placed between the layers of bituminous
pavement as an interim improvement to provide strength in the street and reduce cracking.
Although this material extended the original pavement life, Petromat does require additional costs
to remove and dispose. As such, field staff investigated several areas to determine if Petromat is in
the road sections. Following the investigation of the proposed improvement area, Petromat was
discovered on many of the streets previously planned for Full-depth reclamation. As a result of the
field findings, the improvement method for some streets has been revised. The Pavement and
Geotechnical Evaluation Report, completed by Braun Intertec dated September 11, 2020 is
included in Appendix C of this report.
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 8
TABLE 2 –GEOTECHNICAL PETROMAT FINDINGS
Street From To
Petromat
Depth (in.)
Prelim.
Improvement
Recommended
Street
Improvement
38th Ave N Oregon Ave N Louisiana Ave N 2 FDR 1.5" M&O
40th Ave N Nevada Ave N Maryland Ave N 3.5 FDR 1.5" M&O
Louisiana Ave N 36th Ave N 38th Ave N 4 FDR 1.5" M&O
Louisiana Ave N 38th Ave N 38th Ave N 2 FDR 1.5" M&O
Louisiana Ave N 40th Ave N 41st Ave N 2 FDR 1.5" M&O
Maryland Ave N 36th Ave N 38th Ave N 3 & 2 FDR 1.5" M&O
Maryland Ave N 39th ½ Ave N 40th Ave N 4.25 FDR 1.5" M&O
Maryland Ave N 40th Ave N 41st Ave N 2 FDR 1.5" M&O
Maryland Ave N 41st Ave N 42nd Ave N (CSAH
9)2 FDR 1.5" M&O
Nevada Ave N 39th ½ Ave N 40th Ave N 2.25 FDR 1.5" M&O
Nevada Ave N 40th Ave N 41st Ave N 3.5 FDR 1.5" M&O
Oregon Ave N 38th Ave N 39th Ave N 3 Full Recon 1.5" M&O
Oregon Ave N 40th Ave N 41st Ave N 2 FDR 1.5" M&O
All the water main within this project area is cast iron. As is typical with other existing cast iron water
main in the City, a history of breaks has been confirmed on several of the project streets and are
shown on Figure 4. The water main breaks are especially prevalent on Oregon Avenue between
38th and 39th Avenue. The water main will be replaced in this area; however, only the trench of the
water main will be reconstructed. The remaining streets will receive a 1.5” mill and overlay.
New HopePlymouth
Crystal
Robbinsdale
£¤169
PlymouthNew Hope49th Ave N
Flag Ave NErickson Dr48th Ave NEnsign Ave N47 1/2 Ave N
($$¯
Revised: 2020-09-22 By: dmericksonV:\1938\active\193805078\GIS\Projects\PRI_Ratings_map.mxd
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data.New Hope, Minnesota
Pavement Rating Index (PRI)2021 Infrastructure Improvements Project
Figure 2 ³±9
New HopeCrystalCrystalLions ParkCP RailroadOregon Ave NNevada Ave NMaryland Ave N42nd Ave N
Louisiana Ave N40th Ave N
36th Ave N
38th Ave N
39th Ave N
41st Ave N
41 1/2 Ave N
39 1/2 Ave N
Louisiana Ave NMaryland Ave NPRI : 41 - 60 Poor
500 0 500250 Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11)
Site 1
Site 2
Site 1 Site 2
Boone AveBoone AveSchmidt Lake RdSchmidt Lake Rd
Flag AveFlag AveGettysburgAveGettysburgAve49th Ave49th Ave
IndependenceAveIndependenceAveIndependence AveIndependence AveHillsboroAveHillsboroAve44th Cir N44th Cir NFlag
AveFlag
Ave
Aquila CirAquila Cir
47 1/2 Ave47 1/2 Ave Decatu
r
P
lDecatu
r
P
l
42nd Ave42nd Ave
45th Ave45th Ave
46th Ave46th Ave
Aquila AveAquila AveIndependence AveIndependence AveIndependenceAveIndependenceAveStateHwy169ServiceDrStateHwy169ServiceDrNathanLaNathanLaDecaturAveDecaturAve47thAveN47thAveN47th Ave47th Ave Yukon AveYukon Ave48th Ave48th Ave Zealand AveZealand Ave47thAve47thAve
44t
h
A
v
e
44t
h
A
v
eDecaturAveDecaturAve46thAveN46thAveN
Boone CtBoone Ct Aquila AveAquila AveEnsign AveEnsign Ave46thAve46thAve
Cavell AveCavell AveRockford RdRockford Rd 42nd Ave42nd Ave Decatur AveDecatur AveZealand AveZealand Ave48thAve
48thAve
Ensign
AveEnsign
Ave
45th Ave45th Ave
Er ic k s o n Dr
E r ic k s o n Dr
NathanLaNathanLaM e n d e ls s o h n S e rviceR o ad
M e n d e ls s o h n S e rviceR o ad
£¤169
")9
C1
WBroadwayAve36thAveNMissionFarms
NewHope
Crystal
£¤169
")8
")9
")102
")156
1
2
Project Information
Drawing Information
Drawn By:
Drawn Drawn:
Checked By:
Last Modified:
Sheet: 1 of 2
o
0 400200
Feet
Project No:
B2006966
CMF
8/31/2020
AJG
8/31/2020
Pavement Core,
Hand Auger
Boring, & GPR
Location Sketch
CoreSktch
Drawing No:F:\2020\B2006966\GIS\B2006966.aprxCity of New Hope
2021 Infrastructure
Improvement Projects
Various City Streets
New Hope, Minnesota
1" = 400 Feet
Approximate Location of
Pavement Core &
Hand Auger Boring
Roadway where GPR Testing
was Completed 11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
braunintertec.com
38th Ave N38th Ave N
LouisianaAveLouisianaAve40thAve40thAve
NevadaAveNevadaAveJerseyAveJerseyAveGeorgiaAveGeorgiaAveIdaho AveIdaho AveWinnetkaAveWinnetkaAveNevada AveNevada AveQuebec AveQuebec AveWinnetka AveWinnetka Ave36th Ave36th Ave
42nd Ave42nd Ave
Winnetka AveWinnetka AveLouisianaAveLouisianaAve38th Ave38th Ave Georgia AveGeorgia AveKentucky AveKentucky AveHampshire AveHampshire AveKentucky
C
i
rKentucky
C
i
r
Kentucky AveKentucky AveJerseyCirJerseyCir IdahoAveIdahoAveIdaho
C
ir
Idaho
C
ir
41st Ave N41st Ave N
36th Ave N36th Ave N IdahoAveIdahoAve41st Pl41st Pl
41st Ave41st Ave
40th Ave40th Ave
38th Ave38th Ave
40th Ave N40th Ave N
MarkwoodDrMarkwoodDr
39th Ave N39th Ave N
Hampshire Ave NHampshire Ave NGeorgiaAveGeorgiaAveMaryland AveMaryland Ave37th Ave N37th Ave N
42nd Ave N42nd Ave N
JerseyAveJerseyAveOregonAveOregonAveJersey AveJersey Ave38 1/2 Ave38 1/2 Ave
37thAve37thAve Louisiana AveLouisiana AveGeorgia AveGeorgia Ave39th Ave N39th Ave N
39thAve39thAve
Maryland AveMaryland AveUtahAveUtahAve")9
")156
C19
C18
C17
C21
C20
C15
C13
C12
C22
C8
C5
C2
C3
C10
C9
C6
C7
C11
C14
C4
C16
WBroadwayAve36thAveNMissionFarms
NewHope
Crystal
£¤169
")8
")9
")102
")156
1
2
Project Information
Drawing Information
Drawn By:
Drawn Drawn:
Checked By:
Last Modified:
Sheet: 2 of 2
o
0 400200
Feet
Project No:
B2006966
CMF
8/31/2020
AJG
8/31/2020
Pavement Core,
Hand Auger
Boring, & GPR
Location Sketch
CoreSktch
Drawing No:F:\2020\B2006966\GIS\B2006966.aprxCity of New Hope
2021 Infrastructure
Improvement Projects
Various City Streets
New Hope, Minnesota
1" = 400 Feet
Approximate Location of
Pavement Core &
Hand Auger Boring
Roadway where GPR Testing
was Completed 11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
braunintertec.com
New HopePlymouth
Crystal
Robbinsdale
£¤169
PlymouthNew Hope49th Ave N
Flag Ave NErickson Dr48th Ave NEnsign Ave N47 1/2 Ave N
($$¯
Revised: 2020-09-22 By: dmericksonV:\1938\active\193805078\GIS\Projects\Watermain_Break_Histo ry_map.mxd
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and co mpleteness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its o fficers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data.New Hope, Minnesota
Water Main Break History2021 Infrastructure Improvements Project
Figure 4 ³±9
New HopeCrystalCrystalLions ParkCP RailroadOregon Ave NNevada Ave NMaryland Ave N42 n d A ve N
Louisiana Ave N40th Ave N
36th Ave N
38th Ave N
3 9 t h A v e N
41st Ave N
41 1/2 Ave N
3 9 1 /2 A v e N
Louisiana Ave NMaryland Ave NWatermain Break
Reclaim and Overlay
1.5" Mi ll and Overlay
1.5" Mi ll and Overlay (By Others)
Full Reconstr uction (By Others)
500 0 500250 Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11)
Site 1
Site 2
Site 1 Site 2
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 13
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Approximately 3.17 miles of streets are proposed to be improved as identified in Figure 1. Two
different potential street improvement methods have been identified for this project. The typical
proposed street sections corresponding to the proposed improvements are shown on Figure 5. The
rehabilitation methods were generally chosen based on the following criteria:
·Full Depth Reclamation
o Poor street and underlying base conditions that cannot be significantly improved by mill
& overlay
o Very poor PRI rating – failing base and wear course pavement
o Limited or lesser amount of water main breaks than full reconstruct streets
o Additional storm sewer required
·Mill and Overlay
o Poor street conditions of which can have an effective benefit with a mill and overlay
o Average PRI rating
o Limited or lesser amount of water breaks than full reconstruct streets
o Minimal utility improvements required
Miscellaneous
Boulevards disturbed by construction in all areas will be graded, shaped, and restored. New 6-inch
thick concrete driveway aprons will be constructed to a distance of 5-feet behind the curb. All
traffic signs within the project limits will be replaced, as signs and posts will continue to be updated
to meet current code and sign retro-reflectivity standards. Streetlight replacement or upgrades are
not planned with this project, and costs are not included in this report.
FULL-DEPTH RECLAMATION
Full-depth reclamation (or Reclaim and Overlay) consists of grinding up the entire pavement section
and mixing it with the underlying aggregate base, creating a homogeneous roadway base. This
material is then shaped, compacted, and excess material is hauled away. A new, 3-inch lift of
bituminous wear pavement is then placed over the entire roadway. Curb replacement will be
completed on areas with severe damage or poor drainage prior to paving, and spot patching will
be completed on any areas with soft subgrade soils. There will be some improvements to the
existing storm sewer system as well. Table 3 below summarizes the areas identified to be reclaimed.
TABLE 3 –FULL-DEPTH RECLAMATION STREETS
Street From To Length (FT)
39th Ave N Oregon Ave N Maryland Ave N 858
Louisiana Ave N 40th Ave N Maryland Ave N 533
Maryland Ave N 39th Ave N 38th Ave N 907
41st Ave N Nevada Ave N City Limits 700
Nevada Ave N 42nd Ave N 41st Ave N 480
41st ½ Ave N Oregon Ave N Nevada Ave N 304
Erickson Dr 49th Ave N Culdesac 1244
Total:5,026 feet (0.95 mi)
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 14
MILL AND OVERLAY
The full width mill and overlay consists of milling the upper 1.5 inches of the existing bituminous
surface across the entire width of the street, followed by an equivalent depth overlay over the entire
bituminous surface. The depth of the mill and overlay has been determined by the presence of
Petromat paving fabric. If Petromat was not discovered during the preliminary pavement cores, a
city standard full-depth reclamation was planned. The full width mill and overlay increases structural
strength of the road. Curb replacement will be completed on areas of severely damaged or poorly
draining curb prior to paving. Spot patching will be completed on any severely cracked or failing
pavement prior to the new bituminous overlay. The following streets as well as Lion’s Park parking lot
are recommended to be rehabilitated with a full width mill and overlay.
TABLE 4 –MILL AND OVERLAY STREETS
Street From To Length (FT)
38th Ave N Oregon Ave N Louisiana Ave N 873
38th Ave N Louisiana Ave N City Limit 153
Oregon Ave N 42nd Ave N 39th Ave N 2236
Oregon Ave N 39th Ave N 38th AVE N 459
Louisiana Ave N 41st Ave N 40th Ave N 885
Louisiana Ave N 38th Ave N 36th Ave N 1159
Maryland Ave N 42nd Ave N Nevada Ave N 1912
Maryland Ave N 38th Ave N 36th Ave N 1320
39th ½Ave N Oregon Ave N Nevada Ave N 299
40th Ave N Oregon Ave N Louisiana Ave N 886
Nevada Ave N 41st Ave N 39th ½Ave N 1325
Total:11,507 feet (2.18 mi)
On past projects, the City has also utilized an edge mill and overlay improvement method. This
technique consists of milling off the upper portion of bituminous on only the outer 6’ of each side of
the roadway and is generally utilized in areas of poor drainage when the existing roadway crown is
too low. Given that there do not appear to be poorly drained areas as a result of a low centerline
crown, as well as the poor overall pavement conditions across the entire width of the roadway, a full
width mill and overlay is recommended on all the identified segments for this project.
LC
EXISTING PROPOSED
VARIES VARIES
TACK COAT1.5" MILL
SPOT REPAIR EX. CURB AND
GUTTER ONLY AS DIRECTED
BY ENGINEER
1.5" - WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240B)
MILL & OVERLAY
NOT TO SCALE
LC
EXISTING PROPOSED
VARIES VARIES
FULL DEPTH RECLAIM OF
EXISTING PAVEMENT AND
BASE
SPOT REPAIR EX. CURB AND
GUTTER ONLY AS DIRECTED
BY ENGINEER
3" - WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240B)
FULL DEPTH RECLAIM
NOT TO SCALE
SHAPE EXISTING RECLAIM
MATERIAL/HAUL EXCESS
3%
VARIES
DATE:PROJ. NO.:PlotDate:09/22/2020-4:49pmDrawingname:V:\1938\active\193805078\Reports\Feasibility\Figures\193804756-Fig5.dwgXrefs:2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul, MN 55113
www.stantec.com
TYPICAL SECTION
NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA
2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
SEPT 2020
FIGURE:5
193805078
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 16
COMPLETE STREETS
In May 2011, the City of New Hope approved a Complete Streets policy. The policy outlined the
city’s commitment to consider the safety and functionality of streets for people of all ages and
abilities, and for various modes of transportation. Examples of modes of transportation include
walking, biking, wheelchairs, public transit, and automotive. In accordance with the policy, a
Complete Streets network has been reviewed with this project.
While streets will be further reviewed during the design phase for all street improvement areas, it is
not anticipated that any trails, sidewalks, bike lanes, or other complete streets elements will be
incorporated into this project area. All the streets are local streets which currently do not have any
of these elements and are not designated to have them within the City’s comprehensive plan.
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 17
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
The water main on the street segments identified in this report is made of cast iron pipe (CIP).
Historically, the CIP water main throughout the city has been a significant maintenance issue.
Numerous breaks have occurred over the years, causing considerable inconvenience to residents
and maintenance cost to the City. Figure 4 shows the history of water main breaks throughout the
project area.
Mill and Overlay
The proposed water main improvements can be seen in Figure 6, located on Oregon Avenue North
between 38th Avenue North and 39th Avenue North. In this area, the number of consecutive breaks is
driving the replacement of the watermain in this area. Being the street improvement type will remain
mill & overlay, services and curb stops will not be replaced. Each service saddle and corporation
stop will be replaced at the new PVC main and reconnect to the service next to the main.
Replacement of the watermain in this area will include new hydrants and gate valves in the area.
Alternative methods of watermain installation including trenchless directional drilling or pipe-bursting
can be investigated during the design stage and bid as alternates if appropriate.
Any breaks that may occur in the future will require repair and patching of the roadway. The
primary goal of the mill and overlay improvements is to improve driving surface and not spend funds
on utility replacement until the scheduled reconstruction of these streets.
New HopePlymouth
Crystal
Robbinsdale
($$¯
Revised: 2020-09-22 By: dmericksonV:\1938\active\193805078\GIS\Projects\Proposed_Wate rmain_Improvments.mxd
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and co mpleteness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its o fficers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data.New Hope, Minnesota
Proposed Watermain Improvements2021 Infrastructure Improvements Project
Figure 6 ³±9
New HopeCrystalCrystal8" CIP8" CIP6" CIP6" CIP6" CIP
6" CIP8" CIP4" PVC
8" CIP 6" CIP8" CIP6" CIP8" PVC42 n d A ve N
Winnetka Ave NOregon Ave NCP Railroad36th Ave NQuebec Ave NMaryland Ave NNevada Ave NUt
ah Ave NLouisiana Ave N38th Ave N
40th Ave N
3 9 t h A v e N
41st Ave N
38 1/2 Ave N
3 7 th A v e NVirginia Ave N41 1/2 Ave N
3 9 1 /2 A v e N Maryland Ave N36th Ave N Louisiana Ave N38th Ave N40th Ave N
Proposed Watermain Impro vemen ts
Watermain - Remove and Replace
Service
Existing Waterm ain
Study Area
Site 1
Site 2
Site 2
500 0 500250 Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11)
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 19
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
The sanitary sewer mains have been televised and overall appear to be in satisfactory condition.
There is one length of sanitary main that Staff identified for lining between the manhole connecting
the park shelter service and the manhole located at the corner of Oregon Avenue North and 38th
Avenue North. This same corner manhole has also been identified as having inflow and infiltration
between the sections on the pre-cast structure. Staff will plan on bidding out this work in 2021 with a
lining contractor. By lining both these items, it will alleviate a known source of Inflow and Infiltration
(I&I).
No other spot repairs will be required in the mill and overlay or reclaim and overlay areas based on
current televising reports, which will be verified during final design.
All manhole covers within the project area that have open pick holes are proposed to be replaced
with covers with concealed pick holes. This will remove any unnecessary inflow into the sanitary
sewer system through those openings. All existing manholes covers with potential inflow are
identified on Figure 7.
All costs associated to removing inflow and infiltration can be credited to Metropolitan Council I/I
(Inflow/Infiltration) Excess Surcharge amounts.
New HopePlymouth
Crystal
Robbinsdale
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
£¤169
PlymouthNew Hope49th Ave N
Flag Ave NErickson Dr48th Ave NEnsign Ave N47 1/2 Ave N
($$¯
Revised: 2020-09-22 By: dmericksonV:\1938\active\193805078\GIS\Projects\Proposed_Sanitary_Sewer_Improvments.mxd
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data.New Hope, Minnesota
Proposed Sanitary Improvements2021 Infrastructure Improvements Project
Figure 7
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(³±9
6" CIP
Oregon Ave NCP RailroadMaryland Ave NNevada Ave N42nd Ave N
Louisiana Ave N40th Ave N
38th Ave N
36th Ave N
39th Ave N
41st Ave N
41 1/2 Ave N
39 1/2 Ave N
Louisiana Ave NMaryland Ave NProposed Sanitary Improvements
!(
!(
Manhole - Lids/Rings Replacement
Existing Manhole
Existing Sanitary Sewer Main
Project Area
Site 1
Site 2
Site 1 Site 2
500 0 500250 Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11)New HopeCrystalCrystal!(!(
!(!(
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 21
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
MILL AND OVERLAY
The storm sewer improvements planned for the Lion’s Park neighborhood will be minimal as the
amount of structures identified to be in poor condition during field investigations would exceed
designated 2021 budgets. The storm facilities on Erickson Drive were installed more recently and
have been found to be in good operational condition.
Some cost has been allocated to remove and replace several storm sewer casting, frame and rings
for structures that are determined to be in critical structural condition. In addition, storm drainage
issues are known to occur at the intersection of Maryland Avenue North and 38th Avenue North.
Currently there are not any storm structures located in this intersection causing significant surface
pooling which affects driver safety and impacts the long-term integrity of the curb and gutter and
pavement from the standing water. Upon field investigation, the low points are located at each
mid-rad of the curb at each corner. It is proposed to install storm inlet structures on each quadrant
corner of the intersection and use a sump structure before the new portion of storm run-off connects
with the existing system. The impact of these improvements to the surrounding areas will be isolated
to this intersection. To connect to the existing storm system while not negatively impacting Lion’s
Park and fields, the connecting pipe will be installed using a trenchless directional drill method. It is
recommended to complete these improvements with this project.
Another storm improvement proposed is to address a length of 18” corrugated metal pipe (CMP) on
Oregon Avenue North between 42nd and 40th Avenue North that has become mostly clogged from
sedimentation and is effectively non-functioning. The CMP pipe is also suspected to have
deteriorated and requires attention before critical structural failure occurs. The suggested method
for addressing the approximate 1,200 lineal feet of pipe is to first clean the sediment from the system,
followed by sliplining or pulling a new pipe into the existing CMP pipe. MnDOT and other agencies
have used sliplining as a trenchless, cost-effective option to extend the service life of an existing
pipe and avoid digging up a street/roadway. The other option would be to open cut and replace
the existing pipe that is no longer working and deteriorating. We have looked at both of those
options in the report and are treating both options as alternates.
During the design phase of this project, additional localized drainage issues may be reviewed to be
completed within this project or added to a future backyard drainage project. Figure 8 identifies
storm sewer structures within the project area with the proposed storm improvements.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
This project lies within the Bassett Creek Watershed. As this project does not propose to create more
than one acre of fully reconstructed impervious surface, the Bassett Creek Watershed Management
Commission (BCWMC) requirements for improvements and development proposals do not apply.
Rain Gardens
Rain gardens provide for a natural filtration and storage area for rainwater prior to entering the
ground or the storm sewer system. This natural process helps to filter out pollutants that are washed
from streets and lawns with rainwater. Rain gardens also reduce peak flows during storm events.
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 22
Potential locations for rain gardens will be identified during the design process. The criteria used in
determining the potential rain garden locations include the following:
·Catch basin, existing water body, or drain tile near proposed location to allow discharge
from the rain garden drain tile.
·Existing slopes allowing for a rain garden without the need to install a retaining wall.
·Existing space acceptable for a rain garden (some locations may be limited by existing
sidewalks, mature trees, or right of way constraints.
Property owners that indicate a desire to have a rain garden will be contacted, and the area
analyzed to determine if a rain garden option will work at a given location during the design phase.
Storm Sump Structures
Storm Sump structures are storm structures that allow for separation of sediments by having a
reservoir that holds the storm water before out letting to the remainder of the storm system. One
sump structure is planned to be installed as the last structure before connecting to the existing storm
system at the intersection of Maryland Avenue North and 38th Avenue North. The sump structure will
be outfitted with guardian or ‘snout’ outlet which prevents trash and other debris from continuing
down the storm system.
There are several requirements set forth in the City of New Hope’s Local Water Management Plan
(LWMP) that this project must adhere to. These include the following:
·Use a 10-year rainfall event as the minimum criteria for all storm water conveyance facility
designs.
·Establish and maintain overflow routes from storm water basins and low areas to provide
relief during storm conditions which exceed design conditions, where possible.
New HopePlymouth
Crystal
Robbinsdale
")!(!(!(!(
!(
")
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
")
#*
#*#*
#*")")
")
")#*
!(
")
")")
")")")
")")
")")")
")")")")
")
#*
")")
#*#*
£¤169
PlymouthNew Hope49th Ave N
Flag Ave NErickson Dr48th Ave NEnsign Ave N47 1/2 Ave N
($$¯
Revised: 2020-09-23 By: dmericksonV:\1938\active\193805078\GIS\Projects\Proposed_Storm_Sew er_Improvments.mxd
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and co mpleteness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its o fficers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data.New Hope, Minnesota
Proposed Storm Improvements2021 Infrastructure Improvements Project
Figure 8
#*!(
#*
#*")
")")
!(
")
")")
")")
")
!(!(
!(
#*
!(!(")
")
")")
")")
#*
!(")")
")")
")")
")
")
")
!(
!(
")
")")")")")
!(
!(
")")!(
!(
")
")!(
")
")")")!(")")")")#*!(
")
!(")")")")!(!(")")
")!(
#*
#*!(
#*
!(
!(
")
")
")
")
")
")!(
!(!(!(
#*!(!(")
")
!(
")
")")")")
")
#*
!(
!(
")
!(
!(!(")!(
!(
!(")")!(
")")")
!(
")")")
")³±9
Oregon Ave NCP RailroadMaryland Ave NNevada Ave N42 n d A ve N
Louisiana Ave N40th Ave N
38th Ave N
36th Ave N
3 9 t h A v e N
41st Ave N
41 1/2 Ave N
3 9 1 /2 A v e N
Louisiana Ave NMaryland Ave NProposed Storm Improvements
")Catch Basin - P roposed
!(Manhole - E xisting
")Catch Basin - E xisting
#*Flared E nd Section - Existing
Storm Pipe - Proposed
Storm Pipe - Sliplining (Alt 1) or Open Cut (Alt 2)
Storm Pipe - Existing
Study Area
Site 1
Site 2
Site 1 Site 2
500 0 500250 Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11)New HopeCrystalCrystal
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 24
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
COST ESTIMATES
The total project cost estimate for work proposed to be completed as part of the 2021 Infrastructure
Improvements project is $1,706,932.89 (Base Bid). If the two storm alternates associated with
sliplining or open-cutting repair of the storm sewer line on Oregon Avenue are included, then the
total project cost would increase to $2,000,082.89 (Base Bid + Alternate 1 (Slipline Oregon Storm
Sewer)) or $2,052,294.14 (Base Bid + Alternate 2 (Open-cut Oregon Storm Sewer)).
Detailed cost estimates have been prepared and can be seen in Appendix A. Estimated indirect
costs include engineering, legal, fiscal, and contract administration. Summaries of the estimated
costs are shown below:
TABLE 5 –STREETS COST ESTIMATE
(Includes estimated 10% Contingencies and 20% Indirect Cost)
Improvement Strategy Streets Total Cost
Mill & Overlay – Street and Parking Lot $739,072.49
Reclaim & Overlay $665,532.40
Total $1,404,604.89
TABLE 6 –UTILITY COST ESTIMATE
(Includes estimated 10% Contingencies and 20% Indirect Cost)
Street Water Main Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Utility Total Cost
Mill & Overlay Streets $99,827.00 $65,650.00 $106,691.00 $272,168.00
Reclaim & Overlay Streets $30,160.00 $30,160.00
Total Project Utility Cost – Base
Bid $99,827.00 $95,810.00 $106,691.00 $302,320.00
If Alternate 1 (Sliplining)–
Oregon Storm Sewer $293,150.00 $293,150.00
Total Project Utility – Base +
Alternate 1 $99,827.00 $95,810.00 $399,841.00 $595,470.00
If Alternate 2 (Open Cut)–
Oregon Storm Sewer $345,361.25 $345,361.25
Total Project Utility – Base +
Alternate 2 $99,827.00 $95,810.00 $452,052.25 $647,681.25
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 25
TABLE 7 –TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
(Includes estimated 10% Contingencies and 20% Indirect Cost)
Improvement Strategy Total Cost
Streets and Utilities – Base Bid $1,706,932.89
+ Alternate 1 – Sliplining – Oregon Storm Sewer $293,150.00
Total Project Cost - Street and Utilities + Alternate 1 $2,000,082.89
Street and Utilities – Base Bid $1,706,932.89
+ Alternate 2 – Open-Cut – Oregon Storm Sewer $345.361.25
Total Project Cost - Street and Utilities + Alternate 2 $2,052,294.14
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 26
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
FINANCING
REVENUES
The following are possible sources of funding for the 2021 Infrastructure Improvements project:
·Street Improvement Fund
·Sanitary Sewer Fund
·Sanitary Sewer I/I Fund
·Water Main Fund
·Storm Water Fund
·Assessments
ASSESSMENTS
Benefiting, tax-exempt properties are proposed to be assessed for street improvements as part of
the construction of this project. Figure 9 shows the locations of these properties. Assessments will not
be levied against taxable residential and commercial/ industrial properties in accordance with the
New Hope’s Assessment Policy, nor will any utility improvements be assessed to any benefitting
property. The following tabulates the assessment rates for this project:
TABLE 8 –PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES
Improvement Strategy Commercial Rate
per Front Foot
Residential Rate per Front
Foot
Mill and Overlay and Reclaim and Overlay $87.24 $58.16
The assessable properties with their respective property types and assessments are as follows:
TABLE 9 –ASSESSABLE REVENUE
Owner Address Improvement
Strategy
Front
Footage Property Type Assessment
Amount
1 The Salvation Army 4860 Erickson
Drive N Reclaim 82.5 Residential $4,798.20
2 City of New Hope
(Lions Park)
3810 Oregon
Ave N Reclaim 82.5 Residential $4,798.20
Total Assessments $9,596.40
We did not include the city-owned property to the west of Erickson Drive North since it is a wetland.
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 27
TABLE 10 –FUNDING SOURCE
Funding
Source/
Improvement
Street Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund
*
Storm
Sewer Fund
**
Assessments
***Total
Street $1,395,008.49 $9,596.40 $1,404,604.89
Water Main $99,827.00 $99,827.00
Sanitary Sewer $95,810.00 $95,810.00
Storm Sewer $452,052.25 $452,052.25
Totals $1,395,008.49 $99,827.00 $95,810.00 $452,052.25 $9,596.40 $ 2,052,294.14
* Funding for I/I related improvements is estimated at $64,800.00, which can be funded from
separate Capital Improvement Projects within the Sewer Fund.
**The Storm Sewer Fund numbers above include the Base Bid Storm Sewer Improvements + Alternate
2 (Open Cut) – Oregon Storm Sewer since Alternate 2 is the more expensive alternate.
***The City of New Hope Assessment is estimated at $4,798.20.
ALTERNATES DISCUSSION
This report breaks down the project into logical sections to allow for reduction in scope, if desired, at
the time of deciding if the project should move forward into the design stage. As the estimated
costs are higher than the original Capital Improvement Plan 2021 Budget, we will work with Staff to
identify logical improvement streets as a potential bidding alternate. Preliminarily, during the design
phase, once authorized, a portion of the Storm and Sanitary Improvements will be the most likely
area to be bid as alternates to review the actual bid costs with the budget amounts.
TABLE 11 – FEASIBILITY ESTIMATE COST COMPARED TO CIP BUDGET
Funding Source Feasibility Report
Estimate
Capital
Improvements
Plan (CIP)
Budget Amount
Difference
Proposed non-city assessment amount $4,798.20
$1,521,330.60 $116,725.71Proposed city assessment amount $4,798.20
Street Infrastructure fund $1,395,008.49
Water fund $99,827.00 $100,000.00 $173.00
Sanitary Sewer fund $95,810.00 $50,000.00 ($45,810.00)
Storm Water fund (with Alternate 2)$452,052.25 $200,000.00 ($252,052.25)
Totals $2,052,294.14 $1,871,330.60 ($180,963.54)
New HopePlymouth
Crystal
Robbinsdale
£¤169
PlymouthNew Hope0711821320071
0711821320053
!
49th Ave N
Flag Ave NErickson Dr48th Ave NEnsign Ave N47 1/2 Ave N
($$¯
Revised: 2020-09-22 By: dmericksonV:\1938\active\193805078\GIS\Projects\Tax_Exempt_Properties.mxd
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data.³±9
New HopeCrystalCrystalCP RailroadOregon Ave NNevada Ave NMaryland Ave N42nd Ave N
Louisiana Ave N40th Ave N
36th Ave N
38th Ave N
39th Ave N
41st Ave N
41 1/2 Ave N
39 1/2 Ave N
Louisiana Ave NMaryland Ave NProposed Improvements
Reclaim and Overlay
1.5" Mill and Overlay
1.5" Mill and Overlay (By Others)
Full Reconstruction (By Others)
Tax Exempt Properties *
500 0 500250 Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 8.5x11)
Site 1
Site 2
Site 1 Site 2
1711821310080
Figure 9Tax Exempt Properties2021 Infrastructure Improvements Project
New Hope, Minnesota
* As of July 28, 2020
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 29
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Authorize Feasibility Report July 27, 2020
Receive Report and Authorize Public Hearing September 28, 2020
Hold Public Hearing October 26, 2020
Authorize Plans and Specifications October 26, 2020
Possible Open House (90% Plans)November/December
2020
Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Bids December 14, 2020 or
January 11, 2021
Receive Bids/Award Contract February 22, 2021
Start Construction Spring 2021
Substantial Completion Fall 2021
Final Completion/Hold Final Assessment Hearing Spring/Summer 2022
City of New Hope Stantec Project No: 193805078
2021 Infrastructure Improvements Page 30
CITY OF NEW HOPE – 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is the finding of this study that the proposed improvements are necessary, feasible, and cost
effective. The following steps are recommended:
·Adopt this report as the guide for development of the proposed improvements
·Hold a Public Improvement Hearing
·Order the preparation of plans and specifications
·Review plans and specifications – authorize bidding
·Provide alternate bid improvement options
·Receive bids
·Install the public utilities and streets, with construction anticipated to be completed in 2021,
and final completion in Spring/Summer of 2022
·Hold an Assessment Hearing after final completion in Spring/Summer 2022
Appendix A – Preliminary Cost Estimate
Summary
Table A-1
Project Cost Summary:
Improvement Type
MILL &
OVERLAY
STREETS
RECLAIM &
OVERLAY
STREETS
Total
Construction
Cost
10%
Contingencies 20% Indirect
Total Project
Cost
Streets & Parking Lot $568,517.30 $511,948.00 $1,080,465.30 $108,046.53 $216,093.06 $1,404,604.89
Water Main $76,790.00 -$76,790.00 $7,679.00 $15,358.00 $99,827.00
Sanitary Sewer $50,500.00 $23,200.00 $73,700.00 $7,370.00 $14,740.00 $95,810.00
Storm Sewer $82,070.00 -$82,070.00 $8,207.00 $16,414.00 $106,691.00
Total Construction Cost $777,877.30 $535,148.00 $1,313,025.30
Contingencies (10%)$77,787.73 $53,514.80 $131,302.53
Indirect (20%)$155,575.46 $107,029.60 $262,605.06
Total Project Cost - Base Bid $1,011,240.49 $695,692.40 $1,706,932.89 $131,302.53 $262,605.06 $1,706,932.89
Alternate 1 - Line Oregon Storm Sewer $225,500.00 $22,550.00 $45,100.00 $293,150.00
Contingencies (10%)$22,550.00
Indirect (20%)$45,100.00
Total - Alternate 1 $293,150.00
Alternate 2 - Open Cut Oregon Storm Sewer $265,662.50 $26,566.25 $53,132.50 $345,361.25
Contingencies (10%)$26,566.25
Indirect (20%)$53,132.50
Total - Alternate 2 $345,361.25
Total Project Cost - Base Bid + Alternate 1 $1,304,390.49 $695,692.40 $2,000,082.89 $153,852.53 $307,705.06 $2,000,082.89
Total Project Cost - Base Bid + Alternate 2 $1,356,601.74 $695,692.40 $2,052,294.14 $157,868.78 $315,737.56 $2,052,294.14
September 2020
2021 Infrastructure Improvements
Preliminary Cost Estimate Summary
Appendix A-1
A.WATER MAIN - MILL AND OVERLAY STREETS
No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $2,930.00 $2,930.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $730.00 $730.00
3 REMOVE CIP WATER MAIN LF 460 $10.00 $4,600.00
4 REMOVE WATER SERVICE EA 6 $150.00 $900.00
5 REMOVE HYDRANT, VALVE, AND BOX EA 2 $700.00 $1,400.00
6 REMOVE VALVE AND BOX EA 4 $300.00 $1,200.00
7 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00
8 CONNECT TO EXISTING WM EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00
9 6" PVC WATER MAIN, C900-DR18, WITH TRACER WIRE LF 460 $40.00 $18,400.00
10 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 6 $2,050.00 $12,300.00
11 INSTALL HYDRANT EA 2 $6,000.00 $12,000.00
13 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 800 $7.00 $5,600.00
14 INSULATION - 4" THICK SY 5 $50.00 $250.00
15 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF 460 $3.00 $1,380.00
16 1" CORPORATION STOP AND SADDLE EA 6 $500.00 $3,000.00
18 1" TYPE "K" COPPER PIPE LF 30 $80.00 $2,400.00
19 CONNECT WATER SERVICE EA 6 $200.00 $1,200.00
Subtotal $76,790.00
Contingencies (10%)$7,679.00
Indirect (20%)$15,358.00
Total Cost $99,827.00
B.SANITARY SEWER - MILL AND OVERLAY STREETS
No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $1,920.00 $1,920.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $480.00 $480.00
3 REMOVE AND REPLACE SANITARY SEWER FRAME AND RINGS EA 37 $1,300.00 $48,100.00
Subtotal $50,500.00
Contingencies (10%)$5,050.00
Indirect (20%)$10,100.00
Total Cost $65,650.00
C.SANITARY SEWER - RECLAIM AND OVERLAY STREETS
No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $880.00 $880.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $220.00 $220.00
3 REMOVE AND REPLACE SANITARY SEWER FRAME AND RINGS EA 17 $1,300.00 $22,100.00
Subtotal $23,200.00
Contingencies (10%)$2,320.00
Indirect (20%)$4,640.00
Total Cost $30,160.00
Appendix A-2
Preliminary Cost Estimate
2021 Infrastructure Street Improvements
September 2020
D.STORM SEWER - MILL AND OVERLAY STREETS
No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $3,130.00 $3,130.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $780.00 $780.00
3 REMOVE MH OR CATCH BASIN EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00
4 REMOVE EXISTING STORM PIPE LF 5 $12.00 $60.00
5 REMOVE AND REPLACE STORM SEWER FRAME AND RINGS WITH
HDPE RINGS AND FRAME EA 7 $1,300.00 $9,100.00
6 12" RCP STORM SEWER, CL 5 LF 130 $50.00 $6,500.00
7 4' DIA STORM SEWER CBMH EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
8 4' DIAMETER STORM SEWER MH OR CBMH WITH SUMP EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
9 2'X3' STORM CBMH EA 2 $2,500.00 $5,000.00
10 FURNISH AND INSTALL TRASH SEPARATOR EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
11 DIRECTIONALLY DRILL STORM 18" HDPE LF 400 $100.00 $40,000.00
12 6" PVC PERFORATED DRAIN TILE, WITH SOCK LF 100 $20.00 $2,000.00
13 CONNECT TO STRUCTURE (DRAINTILE)EA 8 $500.00 $4,000.00
14 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Subtotal $82,070.00
Contingencies (10%)$8,207.00
Indirect (20%)$16,414.00
Total Cost $106,691.00
E.STORM SEWER - ALTERNATE 1 - LINE EXISTING OREGON STORM SEWER
No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $8,590.00 $8,590.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $2,150.00 $2,150.00
3 CLEAN AND CIPP LINE EX. 18" CMP LF 1180 $182.00 $214,760.00
Subtotal $225,500.00
Contingencies (10%)$22,550.00
Indirect (20%)$45,100.00
Total Cost $293,150.00
F.STORM SEWER - ALTERNATE 2 - OPEN CUT AND REPLACE EXISTING OREGON STORM SEWER
No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $10,120.00 $10,120.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $2,530.00 $2,530.00
3 MILL 4" WITH PETROMAT, HAUL AND STOCKPILE IN CITY CY 122 $10.00 $1,220.00
4 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 1,180 $20.00 $23,600.00
5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 2,700 $2.00 $5,400.00
6 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 2,700 $3.00 $8,100.00
7 REMOVE MH OR CATCH BASIN EA 4 $500.00 $2,000.00
8 REMOVE EXISTING STORM PIPE LF 1180 $12.00 $14,160.00
9 18" RCP STORM SEWER, CL 5 LF 1180 $60.00 $70,800.00
10 4' DIA STORM SEWER CBMH EA 4 $3,500.00 $14,000.00
11 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
12 COMMON EXCAVATION (PLAN)CY 390 $30.00 $11,700.00
13 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 - (SPECIAL)TN 1,120 $30.00 $33,600.00
14 BITUMINOUS PATCHING (SPECIAL) - TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING
COURSE MIXTURE(B)TN 130 $130.00 $16,900.00
15 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (2,B)TN 60 $150.00 $9,000.00
16 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SF 2,700 $8.00 $21,600.00
17 EROSION CONTROL COMPOST BLANKET - BLOWN WITH SEED SY 1,310 $5.75 $7,532.50
18 TOPSOIL BORROW, MNDOT 3877.2B (LV)CY 310 $40.00 $12,400.00
Subtotal $265,662.50
Contingencies (10%)$26,566.25
Indirect (20%)$53,132.50
Total Cost $345,361.25
G.
No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $21,660.00 $21,660.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $5,420.00 $5,420.00
3 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 1.5" DEPTH SY 43,029 $1.20 $51,634.80
4 MILL 4" WITH PETROMAT, HAUL AND STOCKPILE IN CITY CY 120 $15.00 $1,800.00
5 RECLAIM AND SHAPE BITUMINOUS SY 0 $4.50 $0.00
6 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 2,850 $40.00 $114,000.00
7 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 1,800 $2.00 $3,600.00
8 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 1,400 $3.00 $4,200.00
9 REMOVE BITUMINOUS STREET PAVEMENT SY 0 $1.50 $0.00
10 COMMON EXCAVATION (PLAN)CY 250 $30.00 $7,500.00
11 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 0 $1.50 $0.00
12 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (MODIFIED)TN 0 $18.00 $0.00
13 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 0 $20.00 $0.00
14 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 - (SPECIAL)TN 2,290 $30.00 $68,700.00
15 BITUMINOUS PATCHING (SPECIAL) - TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING
COURSE MIXTURE(B)TN 490 $130.00 $63,700.00
16 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 2,150 $3.50 $7,525.00
17 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TN 1,960 $68.00 $133,280.00
18 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TN 0 $61.00 $0.00
19 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (2,B)TN 40 $150.00 $6,000.00
20 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SF 1,400 $8.00 $11,200.00
21 MASTIC PRIOR TO WEAR PAVING LF 23,680 $1.00 $23,680.00
22 EROSION CONTROL COMPOST BLANKET - BLOWN WITH SEED SY 2,670 $5.75 $15,352.50
23 TOPSOIL BORROW, MNDOT 3877.2B (LV)CY 630 $40.00 $25,200.00
24 24" SOLID WHITE STOP BAR LF 63 $5.00 $315.00
25 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HR 25 $150.00 $3,750.00
Subtotal $568,517.30
Contingencies (10%)$56,851.73
Indirect (20%)$113,703.46
Total Cost $739,072.49
STREET IMPROVEMENTS - MILL AND OVERLAY STREETS AND PARKING LOT
H.
No.Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $19,500.00 $19,500.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $4,880.00 $4,880.00
3 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 1.5" DEPTH SY 0 $1.20 $0.00
4 MILL 4" WITH PETROMAT, HAUL AND STOCKPILE IN CITY CY 0 $15.00 $0.00
5 RECLAIM AND SHAPE BITUMINOUS SY 17,983 $4.50 $80,923.50
6 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 1,210 $40.00 $48,400.00
7 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 1,000 $2.00 $2,000.00
8 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SF 600 $3.00 $1,800.00
9 REMOVE BITUMINOUS STREET PAVEMENT SY 358 $1.50 $537.00
10 COMMON EXCAVATION (PLAN)CY 210 $30.00 $6,300.00
11 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 380 $1.50 $570.00
12 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (MODIFIED)TN 285 $18.00 $5,130.00
13 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 190 $20.00 $3,800.00
14 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 - (SPECIAL)TN 660 $30.00 $19,800.00
15 BITUMINOUS PATCHING (SPECIAL) - TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING
COURSE MIXTURE(B)TN 210 $130.00 $27,300.00
16 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 915 $3.50 $3,202.50
17 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TN 3,600 $68.00 $244,800.00
18 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TN 50 $61.00 $3,050.00
19 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (2,B)TN 22 $150.00 $3,300.00
20 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SF 600 $8.00 $4,800.00
21 MASTIC PRIOR TO WEAR PAVING LF 10,250 $1.00 $10,250.00
22 EROSION CONTROL COMPOST BLANKET - BLOWN WITH SEED SY 1,340 $5.75 $7,705.00
23 TOPSOIL BORROW, MNDOT 3877.2B (LV)CY 310 $40.00 $12,400.00
24 24" SOLID WHITE STOP BAR LF 0 $5.00 $0.00
25 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HR 10 $150.00 $1,500.00
Subtotal $511,948.00
Contingencies (10%)$51,194.80
Indirect (20%)$102,389.60
Total Cost $665,532.40
STREET IMPROVEMENTS - RECLAIM AND OVERLAY STREETS
Appendix B – Preliminary Assessments
Commercial FF
Streets Subtotal 1,618
Total 1,618
Residential Rate = 2/3*Commercial Rate
Duplex/Zero Lot Line Residential Rate = 65%*Residential Rate
Estimated Cost = (Residential FF)*2/3*(Commercial Rate)+(Commercial FF)*(Commercial Rate)
2/3 x Residential FF +Commercial FF
Mill & Overlay and Reclaim & Overlay Rates
2/3 x 21,725 +1,618
Commercial Rate = per FF
Single Family Residential Rate = per FF
Duplex/Zero Lot Line Residential Rate = per FF
Commercial Rate =
Estimated Cost
$1,404,605
$87.24
Commercial Rate =
$58.16
$37.80
21,725
21,725
$1,404,604.89
$1,404,604.89
Appendix B-1
Preliminary Assessments
2021 Infrastructure Improvements
September 2020
Total Est Cost Residential FF
Property
Type Street Improvement
Front
Footage
Assessment
Rate
Assessment
Amount
1.
4860 Erickson Dr Residential Reclaim & Overlay 82.5 $58.16 $4,798.20
PID
Total Assessment $4,798.20
2.
Residential Reclaim & Overlay 82.5 $58.16 $4,798.20
PID 17-118-21-31-0080
Total Assessment $4,798.20
Total Assessment Value $9,596.40
07-118-21-32-0053
City of New Hope (Lions Park)
3810 Oregon Ave N
Appendix B-2
Preliminary Assessments
2021 Infrastructure Improvements
September 2020
Entity
The Salvation Army
Street Name From To
Residental
Properties
Residental
Properties
Front Footage
(82.5 LF /lot)
Multi Family
Units
Multi Family
Front Footage
(10.5 LF/Unit)
Commercial
Properties
Commercial
Property
Front
Footage
Total
Residential
Front
Footage
Total
Commercial
Front
Footage
Total
Front
Footage
Mill & Overlay and
Reclaim & Overlay
38TH OREGON CITY LIMIT 3 248 248 0 248
39TH OREGON MARYLAND 9 743 743 0 743
OREGON 42ND 39TH 40 3,300 32 336 3 267 3,636 267 3,903
OREGON 39TH 38TH 7 578 578 0 578
LOUISIANA 41ST MARYLAND 28 2,310 2,310 0 2,310
LOUISIANA 38TH 36TH 25 2,063 2,063 0 2,063
MARYLAND 42ND NEVADA 27 2,228 3 531 2,228 531 2,759
MARYLAND 39TH 36TH 32 2,640 56 588 3,228 0 3,228
39 1/2 OREGON NEVADA 3 248 248 0 248
41ST NEVADA CITY LIMIT 5 413 1 309 413 309 722
40TH OREGON LOUISIANA 10 825 825 0 825
NEVADA 42ND 39 1/2 29 2,393 56 588 4 270 2,981 270 3,251
41 1/2 OREGON NEVADA 0 0 2 241 0 241 241
ERICKSON 49TH CDS 20 1,650 1,650 0 1,650
OREGON AVE N 39TH AVE N 38TH AVE N 7 578 578 0 578
Mill & Overlay and Reclaim and Overlay Total 245 20,213 144 1,512 13 1,618 21,725 1,618 23,343
Project Totals 245 20,213 144 1,512 13 1,618 21,725 1,618 23,343
Appendix B-3
Preliminary Assessments
2021 Infrastructure Improvements
September 2020
Appendix C – Pavement and Geotechnical
Evaluation Report, Braun Intertec
Pavement and Geotechnical Evaluation
Report
City of New Hope 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Projects
New Hope, Minnesota
Prepared for
City of New Hope
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Amy J. Grothaus, PE
Account Manager, Senior Engineer
License Number: 51327
September 11, 2020
Project B2006966
Braun Intertec Corporation
AA/EOE
Braun Intertec Corporation
1826 Buerkle Road
Saint Paul, MN 55110
Phone: 651.487.3245
Fax: 651.487.1812
Web: braunintertec.com
September 11, 2020 Project B2006966
Mr. Bernie Weber
Director of Public Works
City of New Hope
5500 International Parkway
New Hope, MN 55428
Re: Pavement and Geotechnical Evaluation Report
City of New Hope 2021 Infrastructure Improvement Projects
New Hope, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Weber:
We are pleased to present this Pavement and Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the City of New Hope’s
2021 Infrastructure Projects.
Thank you for making Braun Intertec your pavement consultant for this project. If you have questions
about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please
contact Amy Grothaus at 651.261.7122 (agrothaus@braunintertec.com).
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
Amy J. Grothaus, PE
Account Manager, Senior Engineer
Charles M. Cadenhead Jr, PE
Vice President, Principal Engineer
c: Ms. Ann Dienhart, Stantec
Mr. Dan Boyum, Stantec
Table of Contents
Description Page
A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1
A.1. Project Description ......................................................................................................... 1
A.2. Purpose.......................................................................................................................... 1
A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents....................................................... 1
A.4. Scope of Services............................................................................................................ 2
B. Results ........................................................................................................................................ 3
B.1. GPR Testing .................................................................................................................... 3
B.2. Pavement Core and Hand Auger Boring Results .............................................................. 3
C. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 4
C.1. Design and Construction Discussion ............................................................................... 4
C.1.a. Pavement Condition .......................................................................................... 4
C.1.b. Discussion of Planned Repairs ............................................................................ 4
C.1.c. Pavement Reuse ................................................................................................ 6
C.2. Reconstruction ............................................................................................................... 6
C.2.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofroll ................................................................... 6
C.2.b. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction ......................................................... 6
C.2.c. Design Section ................................................................................................... 8
C.3. Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) ......................................................................................... 8
C.3.a. Pulverization and Compaction ........................................................................... 8
C.3.b. Proofroll ............................................................................................................ 9
C.3.c. Design Section ................................................................................................... 9
C.4. Mill-and-Overlay ............................................................................................................ 9
C.5. Utilities .......................................................................................................................... 9
C.5.a. Excavation Oversizing ........................................................................................ 9
C.5.b. Subgrade Stabilization ....................................................................................... 9
C.5.c. Excavated Slopes ............................................................................................. 10
C.5.d. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill ............................................. 10
C.5.e. Corrosion Potential .......................................................................................... 10
D. Procedures ............................................................................................................................... 11
D.1. Ground Penetrating Radar............................................................................................ 11
D.1.a. GPR Data Collection ......................................................................................... 11
D.1.b. GPR Analysis .................................................................................................... 11
D.2. Pavement Coring and Hand Auger Borings ................................................................... 11
E. Qualifications ........................................................................................................................... 12
E.1. Continuity of Professional Responsibility ...................................................................... 12
E.1.a. Plan Review ..................................................................................................... 12
E.1.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................ 12
E.2. Use of Report ............................................................................................................... 12
E.3. Standard of Care .......................................................................................................... 12
Appendix A
Planned Repair Map provided by Stantec, Inc.
Appendix B
Map of GPR Testing, Pavement Coring and Hand Auger Borings
Table of Contents (continued)
Appendix C
GPR Graphical Results
Appendix D
Core Photo Log
Appendix E
Matrix of Pavement Results and Recommendations
A. Introduction
A.1. Project Description
This Pavement and Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the City of New Hope’s 2021 Infrastructure
Improvement Projects. The streets included total approximately 3.3 miles in length and have a
bituminous surface. The project includes Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR), with the exception of one small
reconstruction area on Oregon Ave N where watermain replacement work will be performed.
Stormwater repairs are planned for the 38th Ave N and Maryland Ave N intersection, and curb
replacement work will be performed in areas where drainage issues exist.
It was requested that we perform Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), pavement cores and hand auger
borings. Table 1 provides additional project details.
Table 1. Site Aspects and Grading Description
Aspect Description
Pavement type(s) Bituminous
Assumed pavement loads 100,000 ESALs*
Grade changes Given the presence of curb and gutter, we assume
existing grades will be met
*Equivalent 18,000-lb single axle loads based on 20-year design.
A.2. Purpose
The purpose of our pavement and geotechnical evaluation will be to determine in-place pavement layer
thicknesses and characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected explorations for use in assessing
the planned repairs.
A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents
We reviewed the following information:
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 2
Sketch indicating the streets to be tested and recommended exploration locations, as
provided by Stantec.
Aerial Maps available from Google Earth®.
USDA Websoil survey of Hennepin County.
Pavement management data provided by Stantec.
City of New Hope Plate No.STR-40 (Residential Typical Street Section) provided by Stantec.
We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others
reported it to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions
based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the
project details, the project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional
evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations.
A.4. Scope of Services
We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Proposal QTB124650 to Mr.
Bernie Weber, dated August 3, 2020, and authorized on August 6, 2020. The following list describes the
tasks completed in accordance with our authorized scope of services.
Estimating pavement thickness data on each street in a single direction of travel with an air-
coupled Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR).
Conducting bituminous pavement coring and hand auger borings in 22 locations on the
streets, noting their conditions and measuring their thicknesses.
Preparing this report containing our findings and recommendations for pavement
rehabilitation.
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 3
B. Results
B.1. GPR Testing
GPR was used to approximate pavement layer thicknesses along the streets. The data was collected at a
nominal 1-foot interval. Where “ground truth” data (pavement coring and hand auger borings) were
performed, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured
thicknesses to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis.
Based on our analysis using the RADAN software program, the average pavement layer thicknesses are
provided in the matrix include in Appendix E. Within some of the GPR scans, there was excessive ambient
noise within some of the scans, which can affect the clarity and penetration depth of the data.
Appendix C provides the GPR data in graphical form. We highly recommend referring to Appendix C to
see how thicknesses vary along each street.
B.2. Pavement Core and Hand Auger Boring Results
On streets planned for FDR and reconstruction, we performed 22 pavement core and hand auger
borings. All explorations were performed within drive lanes at locations initially recommended by
Stantec. Following analysis of the GPR data, Braun Intertec revised a few of the locations based on the
preliminary GPR results. A final map of exploration locations is provided in Appendix B.
Information from the cores and hand auger borings was used to obtain pavement layer thicknesses for
the bituminous and aggregate base layers, if present, as well as to assess bituminous material conditions.
Results are provided in the matrix provided in Appendix E. Although not tested, underlying subbase
materials appeared to consist of brown and gray clayey soils.
As noted in the matrix, many of the pavement cores encountered Petromat™ paving fabric, which was
previously placed on some streets to help slow the progression of reflective cracking. The depth of the
fabric varied from approximately 2 inches to 4 1/4 inches deep, as noted in the matrix. Also noted is
whether or not stripping was observed within the pavement core. Stripping is the deterioration of the
asphalt/aggregate bond in a bituminous pavement due to the presence of moisture. Stripping often
begins at the bottom of the bituminous layer, where it may be in contact with saturated aggregate or
soil, and proceeds upward.
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 4
Low-severity stripping is common in bituminous pavements over time. However, those that have
stripped to moderate to severe degrees would typically not be considered for rehabilitation methods
that may leave any damaged portion of the pavement in place, such as mill-and-overlay.
Photographs of the pavement cores are provided in Appendix D.
C. Recommendations
C.1. Design and Construction Discussion
C.1.a. Pavement Condition
The City is utilizing a Pavement Rating Index (PRI) to rate the streets from 0 to 100 as follows:
Excellent – PRI 81 to 100
Good – PRI 61 to 80
Poor – PRI 41 to 60
Very Poor – PRI 21 to 40
Failed – PRI 0 to 20
Based on our discussion, we understand the streets were being evaluated at the time of our report.
However, it was noted the PRI ratings for the streets planned for repair are in poor condition. Although
we did not perform a review of pavement surface conditions, using the rating system described above,
we assume the tested streets have likely deteriorated beyond the point of benefiting from any type of
preventive maintenance, such as a seal coat. Instead, we assume the pavements are in need of some
type of major repair that restores surface condition. Depending on underlying conditions, applicable
repairs may include mill-and-overlay, FDR or removal and replacement.
C.1.b. Discussion of Planned Repairs
As depicted in blue on the map provided in Appendix A, we understand that the planned repair for the
segment on Oregon Ave N between 38th Ave N and 39th Ave N includes reconstruction or full-depth
replacement. In this area, the existing pavement layers, fabric and drain tile will be removed and fully
replaced. Watermain replacement work will also be performed.
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 5
Streets depicted in green on the map in Appendix A are planned for FDR. The FDR process involves
pulverizing and blending the existing bituminous pavement along with a portion of underlying aggregate
base. In general, the reclaimed material can either be left in place or windrowed and stockpiled so that
grading, excavation work, utility repairs or stabilization of subgrade soils can proceed. The left-in-place or
replaced reclaim is then compacted and overlaid with bituminous pavement.
From a design perspective, we provide the following considerations when performing FDR:
Reclamation should not be performed where paving fabric exists. Reclamation should also
not extend into materials that are unsuitable for reclamation, such as silts and clays. Based
on soil and hand auger boring results, underlying subgrade materials likely consist of clayey
soils that should be avoided. During FDR, variation of existing pavement depth should be
anticipated. Adjustments to the reclamation depth will be required where the pavement
section depths change along each street.
Based on the need to match existing curb sections, following reclamation, reclaimed material
should be surface compacted and graded as new aggregate base. Excess material should be
removed to allow the new bituminous overlay to match in-place curb lines. Slightly increasing
the cross slope (crown) of the roadway could be considered to accommodate more reclaim
material and improve drainage.
In addition to the repairs discussed above, stormwater repairs are planned for the 38th Ave N and
Maryland Ave N intersection, and curb replacement work will be performed in areas where drainage
issues exist.
Although mill-and-overlay is not shown on the planned repair map, given the presence of underlying
paving fabric and the desire to leave it in place, we understand mill-and-overlay will be performed
instead of FDR. With a mill-and-overlay repair approach, we assume reflective cracking may occur
quickly. It should be noting that the paving fabric should slow the progression of reflective cracking.
Within the matrix, based on our testing and review of the available data, the planned repairs are noted
as ideal, marginal, or poor. Mill-and-overlay streets with moderate to severe stripping have been noted
as poor within the matrix. Mill-and-overlay can be performed on these streets, however, the underlying
stripping may shorten the life provided by the repair. As noted in the matrix, a deeper mill of 3 to 4
inches is recommended for streets where the fabric is deeper. Performing a deeper mill-and-overlay will
provide additional benefit to the mill-and-overlay approach.
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 6
C.1.c. Pavement Reuse
If desired, the existing pavements can be milled or reclaimed for use as recycled aggregate base, or as a
component to new pavements. We recommend implementing thorough quality control practices,
including frequent sieve analyses, to achieve a desirable gradation of the reclaimed material.
C.2. Reconstruction
C.2.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofroll
Based on a websoil survey and hand auger boring results, we anticipate pavement subgrades will
generally consist of clayey sand and sandy lean clay. Since grade changes are not proposed, subgrade
soils on Oregon Ave N will generally be suitable for pavement support. However, it should be noted that
clayey and silty soils will be highly susceptible to strength loss upon exposure to moisture or traffic.
Depending on conditions at the time of excavations, watering or drying (moisture conditioning) of the
clayey and silty soils may be necessary to achieve the recommended levels of compaction. These soils
may require subcutting and replacement with imported, engineered material.
To improve drainage and reduce frost heave, the City standard section for reconstruction includes 18
inches of select granular, geotextile fabric and drain tile. We recommend drain tile be trenched at least 8
inches below the aggregate base (or subbase), wrapped in filter fabric and backfilled with highly
permeable aggregate.
After preparing the subgrade and prior to the placement of the aggregate base, we recommend
proofrolling the subgrade soils with a fully loaded tandem-axle truck. We also recommend having a
geotechnical representative observe the proofroll. Areas that fail the proofroll likely indicate soft or weak
areas that will require additional soil correction work to support pavements.
The contractor should correct areas that display excessive yielding or rutting more than 1 inch during the
proofroll, as determined by the geotechnical representative. Possible options for subgrade correction
include moisture conditioning and recompaction, subcutting and replacement with soil or crushed
aggregate, chemical stabilization and/or geotextiles. We recommend performing a second proofroll after
the aggregate base material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous pavement.
C.2.b. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction
Table 2 below contains our recommendations for fill materials.
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 7
If any clayey soils or silty sands are used as fill, the contractor may have more difficulty compacting those
soils if they become wet or allowed to become wet, or if spread and compacted over wet surfaces. In
these cases, the soils will need to be moisture conditioned prior to compaction, or imported fill that
consists of clean sands should be used as fill.
Table 2. Engineered Fill Materials*
Locations To Be Used
Engineered Fill
Classification
Possible Soil
Type
Descriptions Gradation
Additional
Requirements
Pavements Pavement fill SM, SC, CL, SP,
SP-SM
100% passing 3-inch
sieve
Organic Content
(OC) < 5%
Plasticity Index
(PI) < 15%
Below landscaped
surfaces, where
subsidence is not a
concern
Non-structural
fill 100% passing 6-inch
sieve < 10% OC
*More select soils comprised of coarse sands with < 5% passing #200 sieve may be needed to accommodate work occurring in
periods of wet or freezing weather.
We recommend spreading engineered fill in loose lifts of approximately 12 inches thick. We recommend
compacting engineered fill in accordance with the criteria presented below in Table 3.
Table 3. Compaction Recommendations Summary
Reference
Relative
Compaction, percent
(ASTM D698 –
Standard Proctor)
Moisture Content Variance from Optimum,
percentage points
< 12% Passing #200 Sieve
(typically SP, SP-SM, SP-SC)
> 12% Passing #200 Sieve
(typically CL, SC, SM)
Within 3 feet of
pavement subgrade 100 ±3 -1 to +3
More than 3 feet below
pavement subgrade,
utility trench backfill
95 ±3 ±3
Below landscaped
surfaces 90 ±5 ±4
*Increase compaction requirement to meet compaction required for structure supported by this engineered fill.
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 8
The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill
or to place engineered fill on frozen material. Frost should not penetrate under foundations
during construction.
We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively
compacting the soil and meeting project requirements.
C.2.c. Design Section
Based on information provided, we understand the City’s standard design for reconstruction of
residential roadways consists of the following pavement section:
1.5 inches SPWEA240C
2 inches SPNWB230B
8 inches Class 5 aggregate base
18 inches select granular
Geotextile fabric, Type V
We recommend requirements outlined in MnDOT Specification 2360. We recommend tack coat meeting
MnDOT Specification 2357 as required between lifts as well as placed along vertical faces where paving
will match adjacent pavement.
C.3. Full Depth Reclamation (FDR)
C.3.a. Pulverization and Compaction
We recommend following MnDOT Specification 2215 for FDR for the reclaiming process.
Recommended reclaim depths are provided in the matrix. As thicknesses vary within the GPR scans,
reclaim depths should be adjusted.
Following reclamation, reclaimed material should be graded to allow for the required bituminous section.
Any excess material should be removed.
Following pulverization of the in-place materials, we recommend all exposed materials be surface
compacted.
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 9
C.3.b. Proofroll
Following compaction, we recommend exposed materials be proof rolled to check for the presence of
localized weak areas. The proofroll should be performed with a fully loaded, tandem axle dump truck at
walking speed.
The proofroll should be observed by a geotechnical engineer or qualified observer. Any detected weak
areas should be corrected with a subcut and backfilled with excess reclaimed material or other suitable
material such as MnDOT Class 5 aggregate base or Select Granular.
C.3.c. Design Section
Based on information provided, we understand the City’s standard design for FDR will consist of the
following pavement section:
3 inches SPWEA240C
Reclaim material (variable).
C.4. Mill-and-Overlay
For streets where mill-and-overlay will be performed, we recommend a minimum of 1 1/2 inches. We
recommend deeper depths on streets with deeper paving fabric. We recommend a mix consisting of
SPWEA240C.
C.5. Utilities
C.5.a. Excavation Oversizing
When removing unsuitable materials below utilities or pavements, we recommend extending the
excavation outward and downward at a slope of 1H:1V (horizontal:vertical) or flatter.
C.5.b. Subgrade Stabilization
We anticipate the soils at typical invert elevations will generally be suitable for utility support. However,
if construction encounters unfavorable conditions such as soft clay, organic soils or perched water at
invert grades, the unsuitable soils may require some additional subcutting and replacement with sand or
crushed rock to prepare a proper subgrade for pipe support. If these unsuitable or unstable soils remain
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 10
in place, there is a risk of excessive settlement of the utility pipe or structures due to consolidation of the
underlying soft clay soils. If crushed rock is used as pipe bedding, we recommend wrapping the aggregate
in geotextile fabric to prevent the migration of fine-grained materials into the voids of the aggregate.
We recommend a geotechnical engineer observe all utility trench excavations and subcuts.
C.5.c. Excavated Slopes
Based on the hand auger borings, we anticipate the majority of on-site soils in excavations will consist of
fill and/or native clayey sands or sandy lean clay. These soils are typically considered Type C Soil under
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) guidelines. OSHA guidelines indicate unsupported
excavations in Type C soils should have a gradient no steeper than 1 1/2H:1V. Slopes constructed in this
manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. OSHA requires an engineer to evaluate slopes or excavations
over 20 feet in depth.
An OSHA-approved qualified person should review the soil classification in the field. Excavations must
comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations and Trenches.” This
document states excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. The project specifications
should reference these OSHA requirements.
C.5.d. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill
We recommend compacting backfill placed above and below utilities to a minimum of 95 percent of
standard Proctor density. The exception is within 3 feet vertically of pavement subgrades, where the
minimum compaction level should be increased to 100 percent. The fill should be within 3 percentage
points of its optimum moisture content for sands; clays should only exceed their optimum moisture
contents by 1 percent.
To achieve compaction over wet subgrades, we recommend the use of sands or gravel with less than 5
percent by weight passing the number 200 sieve and less than 50 percent passing the number 40 sieve.
C.5.e. Corrosion Potential
Based on our experience, the soils encountered within the borings are moderately corrosive to metallic
conduits. We recommend specifying non-corrosive materials or providing corrosion protection, unless
project planning chooses to perform additional tests to demonstrate the soils are not corrosive.
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 11
D. Procedures
D.1. Ground Penetrating Radar
D.1.a. GPR Data Collection
GPR data was collected on August 7, 2020. GPR collection occurred at posted speed limits and data was
recorded continuously along the streets to a depth of up to 2 feet. Analysis of this data provides a
continuous estimate of layer thickness for identifiable layers.
Scans of the pavement were collected according to GSSI, Inc. (manufacturer) SIR-20 processor settings at
a specified interval of approximately one scan per lineal foot in the outer wheel path in a single travel
direction. A calibration file, required for data post-processing, was collected at the onset of testing.
Distance along the roadway is measured using a Distance Measuring Instrument (DMI).
D.1.b. GPR Analysis
Data collected by the GPR unit was returned to our office and analyzed to estimate the pavement
thickness. Pavement layer interpretation was accomplished using RADAN 7.0, a software package
included with the GSSI RoadScan system.
The software includes tools to aid in delineating pavement layer transitions and automatically calculates
their depths from the pavement surface using the calibration file(s) collected prior to or following testing.
Where “ground-truth” data (pavement cores and hand auger borings) were performed, the interpreted
layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses from the pavement cores
and hand auger borings to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis.
D.2. Pavement Coring and Hand Auger Borings
Pavement coring and hand auger borings were performed on August 28, 2020. Explorations were
conducted within drive lanes using a 4-inch core barrel. The bituminous pavement was repaired with a
cold-mix bituminous patch immediately after coring.
The cores were measured to obtain approximate bituminous thickness and their material conditions
were noted based on visual observation. Images of the cores can be found in the Core Photo Log
attached to this report in Appendix D.
City of New Hope
Project B2006966
September 11, 2020
Page 12
E. Qualifications
E.1. Continuity of Professional Responsibility
E.1.a. Plan Review
We based this report on a limited amount of information, and we made a number of assumptions to help
us develop our recommendations. We should be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the
designs and specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design
correctly, if any design changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and
specifications correctly interpret and implement our recommendations.
E.1.b. Construction Observations and Testing
We recommend retaining us to perform the required observations and testing during construction as
part of the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions
exposed during construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity
from the design phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during
construction, it becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the
preparation of this report and to accept the construction-related geotechnical engineer-of-record
responsibilities.
E.2. Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no
responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may
not be appropriate for other parties or projects.
E.3. Standard of Care
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality.
No warranty, express or implied, is made.
Appendix A
49TH AVE N
DRIVEERICKSONAVENDECATURAVENENSIGNFLAGAVEN48TH AVE
LEGEND
RECON - UTILITY REPLACEMENT (0.27MI)
FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAIM (2.86 MI)
PAVEMENT CORE AND HAND AUGER (21)
*ALL STREETS TO RECEIVE GPR
4 2ND AVE N (CSAH 9)AVEN38TH AVE N
3 9 T H A V E N
40TH AVE N
MARYLANDMARYLANDAVENNEVADAAVENOREGONAVEN41ST AVE.N.AVEN3 9 1 /2
MARYLANDAVENLOUISIANAAVENLOUISIANAAVENLIONS
PARK
OREGONAVENSOOLINERAILROAD36TH AVE N
DATE PROJ. NO.PlotDate:07/29/2020-8:30amDrawingname:V:\1938\active\193805078\CAD\Dwg\193805078-GeotechFigure.dwgXrefs:,34HORIZON_PLANIMETRICS,34Parcel733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, MN 55402
www.stantec.com
REQUEST FOR QUOTE: GEOTECHNICAL STUDY AREA
CITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA
2021 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
7/29/2020 193805078
SEE ABOVE
SEE BELOW
Appendix B
Boone AveBoone AveSchmidt Lake RdSchmidt Lake Rd
Flag AveFlag AveGettysburgAveGettysburgAve49th Ave49th Ave
IndependenceAveIndependenceAveIndependence AveIndependence AveHillsboroAveHillsboroAve44th Cir N44th Cir NFlag
AveFlag
Ave
Aquila CirAquila Cir
47 1/2 Ave47 1/2 Ave Decatu
r
P
lDecatu
r
P
l
42nd Ave42nd Ave
45th Ave45th Ave
46th Ave46th Ave
Aquila AveAquila AveIndependence AveIndependence AveIndependenceAveIndependenceAveStateHwy169ServiceDrStateHwy169ServiceDrNathanLaNathanLaDecaturAveDecaturAve47thAveN47thAveN47th Ave47th Ave Yukon AveYukon Ave48th Ave48th Ave Zealand AveZealand Ave47thAve47thAve
44t
h
A
v
e
44t
h
A
v
eDecaturAveDecaturAve46thAveN46thAveN
Boone CtBoone Ct Aquila AveAquila AveEnsign AveEnsign Ave46thAve46thAve
Cavell AveCavell AveRockford RdRockford Rd 42nd Ave42nd Ave Decatur AveDecatur AveZealand AveZealand Ave48thAve
48thAve
Ensign
AveEnsign
Ave
45th Ave45th Ave
Er ic k s o n Dr
E r ic k s o n Dr
NathanLaNathanLaM e n d e ls s o h n S e rviceR o ad
M e n d e ls s o h n S e rviceR o ad
£¤169
")9
C1
WBroadwayAve36thAveNMissionFarms
NewHope
Crystal
£¤169
")8
")9
")102
")156
1
2
Project Information
Drawing Information
Drawn By:
Drawn Drawn:
Checked By:
Last Modified:
Sheet: 1 of 2
o
0 400200
Feet
Project No:
B2006966
CMF
8/31/2020
AJG
8/31/2020
Pavement Core,
Hand Auger
Boring, & GPR
Location Sketch
CoreSktch
Drawing No:F:\2020\B2006966\GIS\B2006966.aprxCity of New Hope
2021 Infrastructure
Improvement Projects
Various City Streets
New Hope, Minnesota
1" = 400 Feet
Approximate Location of
Pavement Core &
Hand Auger Boring
Roadway where GPR Testing
was Completed 11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
braunintertec.com
38th Ave N38th Ave N
LouisianaAveLouisianaAve40thAve40thAve
NevadaAveNevadaAveJerseyAveJerseyAveGeorgiaAveGeorgiaAveIdaho AveIdaho AveWinnetkaAveWinnetkaAveNevada AveNevada AveQuebec AveQuebec AveWinnetka AveWinnetka Ave36th Ave36th Ave
42nd Ave42nd Ave
Winnetka AveWinnetka AveLouisianaAveLouisianaAve38th Ave38th Ave Georgia AveGeorgia AveKentucky AveKentucky AveHampshire AveHampshire AveKentucky
C
i
rKentucky
C
i
r
Kentucky AveKentucky AveJerseyCirJerseyCir IdahoAveIdahoAveIdaho
C
ir
Idaho
C
ir
41st Ave N41st Ave N
36th Ave N36th Ave N IdahoAveIdahoAve41st Pl41st Pl
41st Ave41st Ave
40th Ave40th Ave
38th Ave38th Ave
40th Ave N40th Ave N
MarkwoodDrMarkwoodDr
39th Ave N39th Ave N
Hampshire Ave NHampshire Ave NGeorgiaAveGeorgiaAveMaryland AveMaryland Ave37th Ave N37th Ave N
42nd Ave N42nd Ave N
JerseyAveJerseyAveOregonAveOregonAveJersey AveJersey Ave38 1/2 Ave38 1/2 Ave
37thAve37thAve Louisiana AveLouisiana AveGeorgia AveGeorgia Ave39th Ave N39th Ave N
39thAve39thAve
Maryland AveMaryland AveUtahAveUtahAve")9
")156
C19
C18
C17
C21
C20
C15
C13
C12
C22
C8
C5
C2
C3
C10
C9
C6
C7
C11
C14
C4
C16
WBroadwayAve36thAveNMissionFarms
NewHope
Crystal
£¤169
")8
")9
")102
")156
1
2
Project Information
Drawing Information
Drawn By:
Drawn Drawn:
Checked By:
Last Modified:
Sheet: 2 of 2
o
0 400200
Feet
Project No:
B2006966
CMF
8/31/2020
AJG
8/31/2020
Pavement Core,
Hand Auger
Boring, & GPR
Location Sketch
CoreSktch
Drawing No:F:\2020\B2006966\GIS\B2006966.aprxCity of New Hope
2021 Infrastructure
Improvement Projects
Various City Streets
New Hope, Minnesota
1" = 400 Feet
Approximate Location of
Pavement Core &
Hand Auger Boring
Roadway where GPR Testing
was Completed 11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
braunintertec.com
Appendix C
38th Ave N
Louisiana Ave N
East End
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: 38th Ave N - Louisiana Ave N to East End
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
0
10
20
30
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Depth (in.)Station (ft)
38th Ave N (EB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
38th Ave N
Oregon Ave N
Louisiana Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: 38th Ave N - Oregon Ave N to Louisiana Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-16 C-17
0
10
20
30
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800Depth (in.)Station (ft)
38th Ave N (EB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
39 1/2 Ave N
Oregon Ave N
Nevada Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: 39 1/2 Ave N - Oregon Ave N to Nevada Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
0
10
20
30
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Depth (in.)Station (ft)
39 1/2 Ave N (EB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
39th Ave N
Marylane Ave N
Oregon Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: 39th Ave N - Marylane Ave N to Oregon Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-14
0
10
20
30
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900Depth (in.)Station (ft)
39th Ave N (WB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
40th Ave N
Oregon Ave N
Louisiana Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: 40th Ave N - Oregon Ave N to Louisiana Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-10
0
10
20
30
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900Depth (in.)Station (ft)
40th Ave N (EB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
41 1/2 Ave N
Nevada Ave N
Oregon Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: 41 1/2 Ave N - Nevada Ave N to Oregon Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-22
0
10
20
30
0 50 100 150 200 250Depth (in.)Station (ft)
41 1/2 Ave N (WB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
41st Ave N
East End
41st Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: 41st Ave N - East End to 41st Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-8
0
5
10
15
20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600Depth (in.)Station (ft)
41st Ave N (WB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
Erickson Drive
49th Ave N
CDS
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: Erickson Drive - 49th Ave N to CDS
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-10
5
10
15
20
0 200 400 600 800 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft)
Erickson Drive (SB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
Louisiana Ave N
Maryland Ave
41st Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: Louisiana Ave N - Maryland Ave to 41st Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-13 C-12
0
10
20
30
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400Depth (in.)Station (ft)
Louisiana Ave N (NB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
Louisiana Ave N
38th Ave N
36th Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: Louisiana Ave N - 38th Ave N to 36th Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-21
C-200
10
20
30
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200Depth (in.)Station (ft)
Louisiana Ave N (SB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
Maryland Ave N
36th Ave N
39th Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: Maryland Ave N - 36th Ave N to 39th Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-19 C-18 C-15
0
10
20
30
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft)
Maryland Ave N (NB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
Maryland Ave N
42nd Ave N
41st Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: Maryland Ave N - 42nd Ave N to 41st Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-22
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400Depth (in.)Station (ft)
Maryland Ave N (SB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
Maryland Ave N
39 1/2 Ave N
41st Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: Maryland Ave N - 39 1/2 Ave N to 41st Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-11 C-90
10
20
30
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400Depth (in.)Station (ft)
Maryland Ave N (NB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
Nevada Ave N
42nd Ave N
39 1/2 Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: Nevada Ave N - 42nd Ave N to 39 1/2 Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
C-5 C-6 C-7
0
10
20
30
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600Depth (in.)Station (ft)
Nevada Ave N (SB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
Oregon Ave N
42nd Ave N (CSAH 9)
38th Ave N
Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed
GPR Results: Oregon Ave N - 42nd Ave N (CSAH 9) to 38th Ave N
City of New Hope
From
To
B2006966
Location
Project No.
Roadway
0
10
20
30
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500Depth (in.)Station (ft)
Oregon Ave N (SB)
Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger
Appendix D
Core #: C-1 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 3 1/2 inches Agg Base: 7 1/2 inches
Location: Erickson Drive
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-2 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 3 1/2 inches Agg Base: 3 1/2 inches
Location: 41 1/2 Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-3 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 4 inches Agg Base: 15 inches
Location: Oregon Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-4 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 4 inches Agg Base: 12 inches
Location: Oregon Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-5 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 5 1/2 inches Agg Base: 6 1/2 inches
Location: Nevada Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-6 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 5 1/2 inches Agg Base: 9 1/2 inches
Location: Nevada Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-7 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 5 inches Agg Base: 8 inches
Location: Nevada Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-8 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 2 inches Agg Base: 13 inches
Location: 41st Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-9 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 4 inches Agg Base: 12 inches
Location: Maryland Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-10 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 3 1/2 inches Agg Base: 9 1/2 inches
Location: 40th Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-11 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 7 1/2 inches Agg Base: 14 1/2 inches
Location: 39 1/2 Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-12 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 3 inches Agg Base: 9 inches
Location: Louisiana Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-13 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 6 inches Agg Base: 12 1/4 inches
Location: Louisiana Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-14 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 5 inches Agg Base: 9 inches
Location: 39th Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-15 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 6 inches Agg Base: 9 inches
Location: Maryland Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-16 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 5 1/2 inches Agg Base: 10 1/2 inches
Location: 38th Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-17 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 4 1/2 inches Agg Base: 4 1/2 inches
Location: 38th Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-18 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 3 1/2 inches Agg Base: 10 1/2 inches
Location: Maryland Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-19 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 7 1/2 inches Agg Base: 3 1/2 inches
Location: Maryland Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-20 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 8 inches Agg Base: 5 inches
Location: Louisiana Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-21 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 4 1/2 inches Agg Base: 10 1/2 inches
Location: Louisiana Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Core #: C-22 Project: B2006966
Pavement: 3 inches Agg Base: 10 1/2 inches
Location: Maryland Ave N
Date: August 28, 2020
Appendix E
Pavement Condition Matrix and Recommendations (sorted alphabetically by street name)
City of New Hope
Braun Intertec Project B2006966
Direction
Avg
Bituminous
Thickness
(in.)
Avg
Aggregate
Base
Thickness
(in.)Core #
Bituminous
Thickness
(in.)
Aggregate Base
Thickness (in)
Petromat
Depth (if
present)Notes
Recommended
Mill or Reclaim
Depth (in)
CL606 38th Ave N Oregon Ave N Maryland Ave N Bituminous EB 6.8 6.7 C-16 5.50 10.50 2.00 Core separated at top; medium severity stripping
throughout core Mill-and-overlay Marginal 1.50 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL607 38th Ave N Maryland Ave N Louisiana Ave N Bituminous EB 7.0 5.6 C-17 4.50 4.50 2.00 Top of core separated; medium severity throughout core Mill-and-overlay Marginal 1.50 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL508 38th Ave N Louisiana Ave N East End Bituminous EB 4.8 5.9 FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL608 39th Ave N Maryland Ave N Oregon Ave N Bituminous WB 6.4 8.8 C-14 5.00 9.00 --Low severity stripping in bottom 1 inch of core FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL626 39 1/2 Ave N Oregon Ave N Maryland Ave N Bituminous EB 5.4 6.5 FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL635 40th Ave N Oregon Ave N Nevada Ave N Bituminous EB 4.3 6.7 FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL636 40th Ave N Nevada Ave N Maryland Ave N Bituminous EB 4.4 7.8 C-10 3.50 9.50 3.50 Top of core separated; medium- to high-severity
throughout core Mill-and-overlay Poor 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL637 40th Ave N Maryland Ave N Louisiana Ave N Bituminous EB 4.4 7.2 FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL630 41st Ave N Maryland Ave N Nevada Ave N Bituminous WB 4.2 7.2 C-8 2.00 13.00 --Low- to medium-severity stripping throughout core FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL629 41st Ave N Maryland Ave N Maryland Ave N Bituminous WB 4.7 7.1 FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL628 41st Ave N Louisiana Ave N Maryland Ave N Bituminous WB 4.8 7.4 FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL627 41st Ave N East End Louisiana Ave N Bituminous WB 4.8 6.4 FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL803 41 1/2 Ave N Nevada Ave N Oregon Ave N Bituminous WB 4.0 4.6 C-2 3.50 3.50 --Medium- to high-severity stripping throughout core FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL778 Erickson Drive 49th Ave N CDS Bituminous SB 4.4 7.0 C-1 3.50 7.50 --Low- to medium-severity stripping in bottom 1 inch of
core FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL612 Louisiana Ave N 38th Ave N 36th Ave N Bituminous SB 5.5 7.6 C-20 8.00 5.00 4.00 Core broken 2 inches from top; medium severity
throughout core Mill-and-overlay Marginal 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL611 Louisiana Ave N 38th Ave N 38th Ave N Bituminous SB 5.3 10.3 C-21 4.50 10.50 2.00 Low severity stipping in bottom 2 inches of core Mill-and-overlay Ideal 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL647 Louisiana Ave N Maryland Ave N 40th Ave N Bituminous NB 6.7 6.3 C-13 6.00 12.25 --Low severity stripping throughout core FDR Ideal 8 to 10
CL646 Louisiana Ave N 40th Ave N 41st Ave N Bituminous NB 5.1 7.1 C-12 3.00 9.00 2.00 Medium- to high-severity stripping throughout core Mill-and-overlay Poor 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
C-18 3.50 10.50 2.00 Top of core separated; medium severity throughout core Mill-and-overlay Poor 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
C-19 7.50 3.50 3.00 Low severity stipping in bottom 2 inches of core Mill-and-overlay Ideal 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL613 Maryland Ave N 38th Ave N 39th Ave N Bituminous NB 7.2 6.5 C-15 6.00 9.00 --Low severity stipping in bottom 2 inches of core FDR Ideal 8 to 10
CL 650 Maryland Ave N 39 1/2 Ave N 40th Ave N Bituminous NB 6.3 5.5 C-11 7.50 14.50 4.25 Low severity stripping in bottom 2 inches of core Mill-and-overlay Ideal 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL649 Maryland Ave N 40th Ave N 41st Ave N Bituminous NB 5.2 7.1 C-9 4.00 12.00 2.00 Core separated at top; medium severity stripping
throughout core Mill-and-overlay Marginal 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL648 Maryland Ave N 42nd Ave N 41st Ave N Bituminous SB 3.3 7.6 C-22 3.00 10.50 2.00 Top of core separated; medium severity throughout core Mill-and-overlay Marginal 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL642 Nevada Ave N 40th Ave N 39 1/2 Ave N Bituminous SB 6.4 7.3 C-7 5.00 8.00 2.25 Low severity stripping in bottom 2 inches of core Mill-and-overlay Ideal 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL641 Nevada Ave N 41st Ave N 40th Ave N Bituminous SB 4.7 7.4 C-6 5.50 9.50 3.50 Core separated at top; medium severity stripping
throughout core Mill-and-overlay Marginal 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL 640 Nevada Ave N 42nd Ave N 41st Ave N Bituminous SB 5.0 6.9 C-5 5.50 6.50 --Low- to medium-severity stripping throughout core FDR Ideal 6 to 8
CL610 Oregon Ave N 39th Ave N 38th Ave N Bituminous SB 5.9 6.9 C-4 4.00 12.00 3.00 Core broken; medium severity stripping throughout core Reconstruction Ideal
CL609 Oregon Ave N 39 1/2 Ave N 39th Ave N Bituminous SB 6.0 5.8 FDR Ideal 8 to 10
CL644 Oregon Ave N 40th Ave N 39 1/2 Ave N Bituminous SB 6.3 5.8 FDR Ideal 8 to 10
CL643 Oregon Ave N 41st Ave N 40th Ave N Bituminous SB 5.4 6.6 C-3 4.00 15.00 2.00 Low severity stripping in top 1 inch of core Mill-and-overlay Ideal 1.5 Due to the presence of Petromat, the proposed repair of FDR was revised
to a mill-and-overlay
CL131 Oregon Ave N 42nd Ave N 41st Ave N Bituminous SB 6.8 6.6 FDR Ideal 8 to 10
*For mill-and-overlay streets, a minimum depth of 1 1/2-inch is noted in the matrix. Deeper mill-and-overlay depths could be considered to help delay the development of reflective cracking.
NB 7.4 5.8CL614Maryland Ave N 36th Ave N 38th Ave N Bituminous
Project
Ranking
Coring Data GPR Testing
Repair*NotesMapkeyStreetFromToSurface Type
I:\RFA\HR & Admin Svcs\Human Resources\2020\10262020 Council Meeting\City Contribution\10.1 Q&R City Contribution 2021.docx
Request for Action
October 26, 2020
Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Originating Department: HR & Admin Services
By: Rich Johnson, Director
Agenda Title
Resolution establishing city’s monthly contribution for health benefits programs effective January 1, 2021
Requested Action
Staff recommends the Council adopt a resolution regarding the city contribution for health benefits programs
for 2021 increasing the monthly amounts are as follows:
$18.00 per month increase towards the purchase of single health insurance coverage
$39.00 per month per employee towards the purchase of employee plus one health insurance coverage
$46.00 per month towards the purchase of family health insurance coverage
Policy/Past Practice
Past practice has been to adjust the city’s contribution based upon the cost of the premiums. In the past,
increases have ranged from $0 (2005, 2012 & 2013) up to $175 (2010) per month.
Background
HealthPartners has been the city’s health insurance provider since 2009, and 17 of the past 21 years.
In 2019 and 2020, the City Council agreed to provide employees with the “typical” increase of ½ of the mid‐
range plan’s premium plus an additional amount which was equal to one‐half of the amount the city’s
contribution towards health insurance had fallen below that of its 12 comparable cities. One‐half of the
shortfall was implemented each year to reduce the impact on each of the annual budgets. Although New
Hope’s current city contribution towards insurance is again below its comparable cities contribution, only the
“typical” increase is being requested for 2021 as staff was able to negotiate a 14.7% decrease in health
insurance premiums for 2020.
The proposed increase to the city contribution was presented to the city council at the October 19, 2020 work
session where council indicated its support.
The current agreement with HealthPartners includes a 9% cap in health insurance premiums for 2022 as well.
Please see the attached 2020 to 2021 plans and premiums spreadsheet for more details.
Funding
The cost to implement these changes is included in the proposed 2021 budget.
Attachments
Resolution
City of New Hope Health Insurance Premium Rates 2020
City of New Hope Health Insurance Premium Rates 2021 (tentative)
Agenda Section
Ordinances &
Resolutions
Item Number
10.1
City of New Hope
Resolution No. 20 ‐
Resolution establishing city’s monthly contribution for
health benefits programs effective January 1, 2021
WHEREAS, the city currently contributes $903.00 per month for each regular full‐time employee taking
single health insurance, $1,187.00 per month for each regular full‐time employee taking
employee plus one health insurance, and $1,320.00 per month for each regular full‐time
employee taking family health insurance benefits; and
WHEREAS, the City will continue to pay for the basic employee life, short‐term disability (for employees on
the city’s personal leave plan), and long‐term disability insurance benefits in addition to the
monthly insurance contribution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of New Hope, Minnesota, hereby
approves increasing the city’s monthly contribution to $921 for each employee electing single
health coverage, $1,226 for each employee electing employee plus one health coverage, and
$1,366 for each employee electing family health coverage towards health insurance benefit
programs effective January 1, 2020. Employees hired prior to November 1, 2009 who waive
health coverage, meet certain requirements, and provide proof of coverage will receive $658 per
month in 2021.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota this 26th day of October,
2020.
Mayor
Attest:_____________________________
City Clerk
24 pay periodsSingle CoverageEmployee + 1 CoverageFamily CoverageSingle CoverageEmployee + 1 CoverageFamily CoverageHigh Deductible A (Non-embedded & Creditable) - CG 349$1,500/$3,000 $612.12 $1,377.24 $1,597.30 $306.06 $688.62 $798.65High Deductible B (Embedded & Creditable) - CG 347$2,800/$5,600 $545.21 $1,226.68 $1,422.68 $272.61 $613.34 $711.34High Deductible C (Embedded & Non-creditable) - CG 348$4,000/$8,000 $495.30 $1,114.39 $1,292.45 $247.65 $557.20 $646.23HealthPartners Dental InsuranceDistinctions 6$38.35 $76.69 $115.04 $19.18 $38.35 $57.52City Contribution$903.00 $1,187.00 $1,320.00 $451.50 $593.50 $660.00Single* $3,550.00 $295.83 $147.92Family or 1+1* $7,100.00 $591.67 $591.67 $295.83 $295.83*Age 55+ add $1,000 to annual HSA = $4,500 single; $8,000 1+1 or family$750.00 $62.50 $31.25$1,400.00 $116.67 $58.33$2,000.00 $166.67 $83.33Flex & Deferred Comp(FSA deductions are made from 24 pay periods) Max Per Year Max PPPFlex Medical $2,700.00 $112.50Flex Limited (Dental and Vision Only) $2,700.00 $112.50Dependent Care $5,000.00 $208.33Deferred Comp $19,500.00 $812.50Deferred Comp Age 50+ $26,000.00 $1,083.33HSA Contribution Annual MaximumsHSA cont. from city cont. for FTVS & FTPL11 single coverage is half of single medical deductible ($1,500=$750; $2,800=$1,400; $4,000=$2,000)City of New Hope Health Insurance Premium RatesPREMIUM per MONTH PREMIUM per PAY PERIODHealthPartners Medical Insurance (Group 10734)Waive (FT Emp on PL hired prior to 11/2009) = Month $655.00; PPP $327.50Effective January 1, 2020G:\City Manager\Human Resources\INS\2020 Renewals\Open Enrollment for 2020\2020 Insurance Rates.xlsx10/30/2019 3:48 PM
I:\RFA\HR & Admin Svcs\Human Resources\2020\10262020 Council Meeting\City Contribution\2021 Insurance Rates DRAFT.xlsx 10/21/2020 12:47 PM
24 pay periods
Single Coverage Employee + 1 Coverage Family Coverage Single Coverage Employee + 1 Coverage Family Coverage
High Deductible A (Non-embedded & Creditable) - CG 349 $1,500/$3,000 $651.20 $1,465.16 $1,699.27 $325.600 $732.580 $849.635
High Deductible B (Embedded & Creditable) - CG 347 $2,800/$5,600 $580.02 $1,304.99 $1,513.50 $290.01 $652.50 $756.75
High Deductible C (Embedded & Non-creditable) - CG 348 $4,000/$8,000 $526.92 $1,185.53 $1,374.96 $263.46 $592.77 $687.48
HealthPartners Dental Insurance
Distinctions 6 $38.35 $76.69 $115.04 $19.18 $38.35 $57.52
City Contribution $921.00 $1,226.00 $1,366.00 $460.50 $613.00 $683.00
Single*$3,600.00 $300.00 $150.00
Family or 1+1*$7,200.00 $600.00 $600.00 $300.00 $300.00
*Age 55+ add $1,000 to annual HSA = $4,600 single; $8,200 1+1 or family
$750.00 $62.50 $31.25
$1,400.00 $116.67 $58.33
$2,000.00 $166.67 $83.33
Flex & Deferred Comp(FSA deductions are made from 24 pay periods)Max Per Year Max PPPFlex Medical $2,750.00 $114.58Flex Limited (Dental and Vision Only) $2,750.00 $114.58Dependent Care $5,000.00 $208.33
Deferred Comp $19,500.00 $812.50Deferred Comp Age 50+ $26,000.00 $1,083.33
HSA Contribution Annual Maximums
HSA cont from city cont for FTVS & FTPL11 single coverage is half of single medical deductible ($1,500=$750; $2,800=$1,400; $4,000=$2,000)
City of New Hope Health Insurance Premium Rates
PREMIUM per MONTH PREMIUM per PAY PERIOD
HealthPartners Medical Insurance (Group 10734)
Waive (FT Emp on PL hired prior to 11/2009) = Month $658.00; PPP $329.00
Effective January 1, 2021DRAFT
I:\RFA\PUBWORKS\2020\Council\2020‐21 Mack Trucks\10.2 ‐ Q 2020‐21 Mack Trucks RFA Resolution.docx
Request for Action
October 26, 2020
Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Originating Department: Public Works
By: Bernie Weber, Director
Agenda Title
Resolution authorizing the purchase of equipment and appropriation of funds in the amount of $275,003.64 for
the purchase of a 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump box, asphalt patch trailer and ancillary
equipment to replace the city’s asphalt patch truck and the purchase of two 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab,
chassis, dump box and ancillary equipment to replace two plow trucks in the amount of $464,349.32, totaling
$739,352.96.
Requested Action
Staff is recommending purchase of a 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump box and asphalt patch
trailer as proposed in the 2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). In addition, staff is recommending the
purchase of two 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump box and ancillary equipment as proposed in the
2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Policy/Past Practice
The city develops a ten‐year capital improvement program (CIP) for capital equipment, facility
improvements, and infrastructure projects. Every two years the CIP is reviewed, updated, and extended two
years for another ten‐year period. The purchase of one dump truck is listed in the 2020 CIP and the purchase
of two dump trucks is listed in the 2021 CIP.
Background
Truck 1: Up for replacement in 2020 is a 2010 International dump truck (#40). This vehicle was originally
designed to be used as a general purpose dump truck that utilized a hook/winch system and a specially
fabricated, removable asphalt box (#70) to make the truck more seasonally versatile. The design had flaws,
making the winch system difficult to use. Several years after, the city purchased a used, towable asphalt
trailer (#42). Though easier to use, the trailer was already well worn and had a limited useful life.
The purchase of a 2020 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump box, asphalt patch trailer would allow the truck
to be used for many purposes, as opposed to a dedicated asphalt truck and the purchase of the asphalt patch
trailer will provide street department staff with a safer and more reliable way to make street repairs.
Truck 2 and 3: Up for replacement in 2021, is a 2011 International dump truck (#47) and a 2011 International
dump truck (#84). Staff is recommending authorization to purchase the two trucks in 2020. Once the purchase
is authorized, with the amount of time to build the vehicle, install the dump body and ancillary equipment;
the city would not receive the vehicles, nor be billed for them until 2021. The trucks up for replacement in
2021 are used for general maintenance purposes including; hauling of asphalt for road repairs, clay from
water main breaks, hauling out street sweepings and general debris, and snow plowing. Ordering the
vehicles now will save the city money by getting 2020 vehicle and equipment rates. This will also allow the
vehicles to be used for snow plowing in the early winter months of 2021.
Agenda Section
Ordinances &
Resolutions
Item Number
10.2
Staff recommends using the purchasing opportunity provided through the Minnesota Department of
Administration’s Materials Management Division, called the cooperative purchasing venture (CPV). The
state of Minnesota Department of Administration has awarded contract No.124649 to Nuss Truck Group, Inc.
the Mack‐Granite 64BR cab and chassis, contract No. 167118 to J‐Craft for the Dump body and ancillary
equipment and contract No. 169624 to Stepp Manufacturing for the asphalt patch trailer.
Staff recommends keeping and repurposing the two 2011 International dump trucks and in their place, auctioning
two older dump trucks: a 2000 Sterling dump truck (#31) and a 1999 Sterling dump truck (#19). The city would also
auction off the 2010 International asphalt dump truck (#40), Asphalt hot box (#42) and asphalt trailer (#70).
Funding
The vehicle replacement fund currently has $271,936.63 for the Mack‐Granite 64BR, $34,487 for the asphalt
dump body and $1,479 for the asphalt trailer, totaling $307,902.63 for 2020 CIP purchase. The vehicle
replacement fund currently has $474,202.40 for the Mack‐Granite 64BRs for 2021 CIP. Total expenditures for
all three vehicles, including ancillary equipment and set‐up is $739,352.96. The vehicle replacement fund has
current funds in the amount of $782,105.03 dedicated to these purchases.
Attachments
Resolution
Central Garage Supervisor Memorandum
Vehicle Costs Spreadsheet
Quotations from Nuss Truck Group, Inc., J‐Craft and Stepp Manufacturing
City of New Hope
Resolution No. 20‐
Resolution authorizing the purchase of equipment and
appropriation of funds in the amount of $739,352.96
for purchase of a three 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab/chassis,
dump boxes, asphalt patch trailer and ancillary equipment.
WHEREAS, the city of New Hope prepares a ten‐year capital improvement program (CIP) as a guiding
document for equipment acquisition and improvement projects to assist with preparation of each
annual operating budget; and,
WHEREAS, the CIP is not formally adopted as a budget document, nor does it authorize the acquisition of
individual equipment and/or projects listed therein; and,
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department recommends the acquisition of three 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR from
Nuss Truck Group, Inc., Dump body / hoist and ancillary equipment from J‐Craft and and
asphalt patch trailer from Stepp Manufacturing; and,
WHEREAS, the funds for this equipment have been provided within the central garage equipment
replacement fund CIP account for the Public Works Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council, of the city of New Hope, Minnesota, that the
appropriation of $338,161.98 for payment to Nuss Truck Group, Inc., $358,362 to J‐Craft for a
Dump body / hoist/ ancillary equipment and $42,828.98 for an asphalt patch trailer from Stepp
Manufacturing, from the central garage equipment replacement fund, is authorized and the
central garage equipment replacement fund budget is hereby amended.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota this 26th day of October,
2020.
__________ __________________
Mayor
Attest: ________ _________________
City Clerk
Memorandum
To: Bernie Weber‐Director of Public Works
From: Bill Robberstad‐Central Garage Supervisor
Date: October 10, 2020
Subject: Purchase of Three Dump Trucks, Asphalt Trailer and Ancillary Equipment
Staff is recommending purchase of a 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump box and
asphalt patch trailer as proposed in the 2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). In
addition, staff is recommending the purchase of two 2021 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis,
dump box and ancillary equipment as proposed in the 2021 Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) for a total of $739,352.96
Up for replacement in 2020 is the city’s 2010 International dump truck (#40). This
vehicle was originally designed to be used a general purpose dump truck that utilized a
hook/winch system and a specially fabricated, removable asphalt box (#70) to make the
truck more seasonally versatile. Unfortunately, the asphalt box spent considerable time
at the shop of the hot box manufacturer making adjustments, so the hot box would
work as intended. The design had flaws, making the winch system difficult to use as
well as the hot box itself for making asphalt repairs.
Several years after, the city purchased a used, towable asphalt trailer (#42). Though
easier to use than the hot box, the trailer was already well worn and had a limited
useful life.
If approved, the purchase of a 2020 Mack‐Granite 64BR cab, chassis, dump box, asphalt
patch trailer would allow the truck to be used for many purposes, as opposed to a
dedicated asphalt truck and the purchase of the asphalt patch trailer will provide street
department staff with a safer and more reliable way to make street repairs.
In 2021, two trucks are up for replacement; a 2011 International dump truck (#47) and a
2011 International dump truck (#84). Staff is recommending authorization to purchasing
the two trucks in 2020. If the purchase is authorized, with the amount of time to build
the vehicle, install the dump body and ancillary equipment; the city would not receive
the vehicles, nor be billed for them until 2021. The trucks up for replacement in 2021 are
used for general maintenance purposes including; hauling of asphalt for road repairs,
clay from water main breaks, hauling out street sweepings and general debris, and
snow plowing. Ordering the vehicles now will save the city money by getting 2020
vehicle and equipment rates. It will also allow the vehicles to be used for snow plowing
in the early winter months of 2021.
Staff recommends using the purchasing opportunity provided through the Minnesota
Departmentof Administration’s Materials Management Division, called the cooperative
purchasing venture (CPV). The state of Minnesota Department of Administration has
awarded contract No.124649 to Nuss Truck Group, Inc. the Mack‐Granite 64BR cab and
chassis, contract No. 167118 to J‐Craft for the Dump body and ancillary equipment and
contract No. 169624 to Stepp Manufacturing for the asphalt patch trailer.
Staff recommends repurposing the two 2011 International dump trucks and auctioning two
older dump trucks in their place: a 2000 Sterling dump truck (#31) and a 1999 Sterling dump
truck (#19). The city would also auction off the 2010 International asphalt dump truck (#40),
Asphalt hot box (#42) and asphalt trailer (#70).
The vehicle replacement fund currently has $271,936.63 for the Mack‐Granite 64BR,
$34,487 for the asphalt dump body and $1,479 for the asphalt trailer, totaling
$307,902.63 for 2020 CIP purchase. The vehicle replacement fund currently has
$474,202.40 for the Mack‐Granite 64BRs for 2021 CIP. Total expenditures for all three
vehicles, including ancillary equipment and set‐up is $739,352.96. The vehicle
replacement fund has current funds in the amount of $782,105.03 dedicated to these
purchases.
Vehicle Supplier Component Quote Tax 6.5% Total Notes
Truck 1
2021 Mack-Granite 64BR
Nuss Trucking
TBEI-J-CRAFT
Cab and Chassis
Dump Body and
Ancillary
Equipment
$105,841.00
$119.454.00
$6,879.66
N/A
$112,720.66
$119,454.00
Price on Page 22 on Quote
Taxable Purchase
Price on Page 11 on Quote
Non-Taxable
2020 Asphalt Patch Trailer Stepp
Manufacturing
Patch Trailer $40,215.00 $2,613.98 $42,828.98 One Page Quote
Non-Taxable
Truck 2
2021 Mack-Granite 64BR
Nuss Trucking
TBEI-J-CRAFT
Cab and Chassis
Dump Body and
Ancillary
Equipment
$105,841.00
$119,454.00
$6,879.66
N/A
$112,720.66
$119,454.00
Page 22 on Quote
Taxable Purchase
Page 11 on Quote
Non-Taxable
Truck 3
2021 Mack-Granite 64BR
Nuss Trucking
TBEI-J-CRAFT
Cab and
Chassis
Dump Body and
Ancillary
Equipment
$105,841.00
$119,454.00
$6,879.66
N/A
$112,720.66
$119,454.00
Page 22 on Quote
Taxable Purchase
Page 11 on Quote
Non-Taxable
Total $739,352.96
52182 Ember Road
Lake Crystal MN 56055
507-726-2728
Taken By:Brandon Oachs
Customer:
End User:
BILL ROBBERSTAD
NEW HOPE, CITY OF - PUBLIC WORKS
4401 XYLON AVE
NEW HOPE MN 55428
Phone:
Fax:
763-592-6769
101580
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
EA 1.00 2336044 MAB ULTRA-MX-84/96-1006-LR27-NEW HOPE-IN 21,266.00 21,266.00
Chassis Make / Model: Mack
Box Make and Model J-CRAFT - ULTRA-MX
List Truck Type Box Fits Single Axle
Box Style Square, Western Crossmemberless
Width & Length of Box 96" wide O.D.
Side Panel Description 10 ga Gr-50 outer panel, 3/16" Hardox inner panel, fully boxed top rails, horizontally braced, w/sloped
self cleaning rubrails, with or without board pockets, with or without inverted box top rails dirt shedding.
Front Panel Description 3/16" Hardox construction, reinforced top lip, with reinforcings at 1/3 points.
Floor Description 1/4" thick Hardox Material, approx 95" wide.
Corner Post Description 7 ga 201 STAINLESS steel, full depth, located at rear of body. 1/4" SS Rear Apron and latching
hardware
Under Structure Description Structural I-BEAM longsills (no crossmembers)
Tailgate Description 3/16" Hardox main panel, 10 ga GR-50 reinforcings.
1-1/4" dia top & bottom pins, Airtrip linkage standard.
Hinge Description Upper gate hinges constructed of 1" thick steel, supported by dual 1/2" ears.
Description of Peripheral Items (Lights, Access Steps, etc.) FMVSS-108 approved (rubber grommet mounted) L.E.D. clearance
lights, wiring harness, and L.E.D. cluster of 3 included. Airtrip tailgate linkage, Rear mudflaps included.
Is Installation included in price? Yes__X__ or No____
Is Box Painted? Yes_X___ or No____
Warranty Information 24 Months from "in service" date
Includes:
1.003 - 10'6" 106ULTRAMX-LR27-46-30-36
1.1 - Air operated tailgate latch
1.2 - Box Vibrator - Cougar DC 3200
1.7 - Installation of Body
1.8 - Installation of Air Trip - (Solenoid Mounted in Valve Enclosure)
1.9 - Installation of Vibrator - (Solenoid Mounted in Valve Enclosure)
1.10 - Single Axle Painting of Box - Shot Blast entire exterior of body & understructure, Polyurethane Primer, with Polyurethane
Top Coat Painted 1 Color with undercoated understructure between longsills only. (Single stage paint only)
Code: _____________________ / Color:__FORD KM BLUE___ (NEED CODE AMND VERIFY COLOR)
1.268 - Frame Paint Black after Equipments Installed
1.006 - Interior Step, Installed (1 ea) - Left Rear
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 1 of 11
1.008 - Grab Handle, installed (1 ea) - Left Rear
1.091 - Fold-A-Way Access ladder (CARBON STEEL) (1 ea) - Left Rear
1.075 - Walkrail (3-1/2" open-grip) full length, both sides of 10'-6" MX body(Weld-on)
1.067 - Cabshield, 1/2 type Stationary Free-Standing style, w/painted carbon steel canopy, shovel holders, & mounts for cabshield
mounted reservior, Installed.
1.045 - Dual "split" line sander manifolds in rear corner posts
1.021 - SGL AXLE Formed Tapered steel side boards, Painted, Installed.
(Note: Approx 20" at front tapered to 10" at rear - 10 ga steel inner and outer formed and welded to make a board) - Boards
Painted Same Color as Body and Installed to work with Tarp**
1.224 - Arm Tarp Parts - Steel Body - Weld on Style
Hoist:
2.0 Box Hoist Make and Model RUGBY LR-27
Class & type NTEA class 50, Type I underbody
Rated capacity 14.1 ton - 10' body 12.7 ton - 11' body
Maximum PSI operating pressure 2450 PSI
Cylinder bore & stroke 7" dia x 20" Stroke
Piston rod diameter & description 2" dia Hard Chrome Plated
Sub-frame construction Hinge point constructed of 5"angle, with 1" pin supports, 3-1/2"solid block hinges, & 2" dia pins
(greasable), and 2 safety props included.
Is installation included in price? Yes__X__ or No____
Warranty Info 24 Months from "in service" date
-
EA 1.00 2303635 BODY UP SWITCH(SWITCH ONLY)-INS 245.00 245.00
-
2.3 - Body "UP" Switch
-
EA 1.00 1318344 BACKUP ALARM PACKAGE - PRECO 1020 INST 130.00 130.00
-
1.011 - Backup Alarm, PRECO model 1020, installed
-
EA 1.00 1817152 WHELEN-DOT3410D SYSTEM W/TIR3 -INST 4,124.00 4,124.00
-
1.102 - WHELEN PACKAGE /J-CRAFT (DOT3410D) warning light system 410, consisting of:(2) STAINLESS STEEL Micro
400 3 Lamp with 60¶TPR Cable, 400 Series Rear Lightheads with Stainless Steel boxes with side TIR3 (ADD4TIR3). Rear lights
include (2) Linear 400 Amber, (2) LED Back Up, and (2) LED BTT. Includes DOT-LED Flasher/Junction box and install kit. -
Installed
-
EA 1.00 1930124 PLOW LIGHT-JW SPEAKER HEATED-AL-INST 1,170.00 1,170.00
-
1.152 - Mirror mounted JW Speaker (Heated) Plow light package (Alum brackets)
with 4th Leg Installed to Secure Mirror better.
Note: Chassis must come with Hood Mirrors for this to work
-
EA 1.00 1808860 FENDERS, MIN2260 SGL AXLE INSTALLED 900.00 900.00
-
1.190 - Fenders, Minimizer, model MIN2260B SGL AXLE black (1pc) Poly fender set, Installed
-
EA 1.00 2133391 SHUR-CO-ARM MATIC SHORT ARM W/ROLLER-INS 2,189.00 2,189.00
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 2 of 11
52182 Ember Road
Lake Crystal MN 56055
507-726-2728
Taken By:Brandon Oachs
Customer:
End User:
BILL ROBBERSTAD
NEW HOPE, CITY OF - PUBLIC WORKS
4401 XYLON AVE
NEW HOPE MN 55428
Phone:
Fax:
763-592-6769
101580
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
-
1.211 - SGL & TDM AXLE SHUR-CO - Electric Arm-Matic Flip Tarp System, w/alum side arms, external springs, Complete
tarp housing, Installed
1.219 - SHUR-CO - Tarp Roller Bar Kit, Installed on front of housing
-
EA 1.00 1929429 SHUR-CO-SHUR LOCK AIR KIT-INST 853.00 853.00
-
1.218 - SHUR-CO - Arm Lock Kit - Locks rear cross tube in closed position
-
EA 1.00 1922962 ADDITIONAL CAMERA, NV-PC-1110-VLI-INST 311.00 311.00
-
1.276 - PC-1110-VLI SeriesNight Vision Camera KIT «(Includes: Camera and 10m AV Cable) Installed.
Single Camera Mounted on right hand front plow light bracket aimed down and out at front wing for front wing veiwing.
Hooked into GEN5 Force 6100 Screen.
-
EA 1.00 2190624 PRECISE-"ARC"-SENSOR-WIRELESS-GEN5-INS 565.00 565.00
-
5.1 - Air and Road Temperature Sensor, Wireless (GEN 5) 1117640 - Installed
-
EA 1.00 2336257 MAB PREWET TAILGATE KIT LDS-TG100-EGF-IN 2,439.00 2,439.00
**REF: 1650478 - UPDATE KIT**
-
1.240 - LDS-TG100-EGF Tailgate mount for all dump bodies. 100 gallon tank, STEEL mtg hardware, plumbing, & Electric
Gravity Feed Valve system, installed
-
EA 1.00 2336258 MAB HENKE-UBS-10-FIXED-SGL LIFT-CARBIDE-9,707.00 9,707.00
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 3 of 11
52182 Ember Road
Lake Crystal MN 56055
507-726-2728
Taken By:Brandon Oachs
Customer:
End User:
BILL ROBBERSTAD
NEW HOPE, CITY OF - PUBLIC WORKS
4401 XYLON AVE
NEW HOPE MN 55428
Phone:
Fax:
763-592-6769
101580
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
3.0 Underbody Plow, Make and Model Henke UBS-FXD (Fixed Underbody)
Moldboard Description 1" thick x 20" SEF carbon steel x SEE BELOW FOR LENGTH, AASHO punched
Moldboard Cutting Edge Description See options below for cutting edge
Moldboard Hydraulic Cylinder Description One (1) 3" bore D.A. actuating cylinders with 2" nitrited rod. No Reversing Cylinders.
Moldboard maximum PSI operating pressure Downpressure relief set at 500 PSI (for actuating cylinders), Downpressure Relief
Valve Included.
Circle Drive Description None - Fixed Angle Unit
Circle Drive Hydraulic Cylinder description None - Fixed Angle Unit
Mounting Hardware 1 3/4" solid cold rolled hinge shaft, three (3) or four (4) 1" hinge-anchor points, and three (3) 2 1/4"
adjustable mounting legs.
Paint UBS painted Satin Black
Warranty Information 12 Months from "in service" date
Includes:
3.001 - Scraper-10'-1" MB w/Single Lift Cylinder LESS CUTTING EDGES
3.101 - Installation of underbody plow w/single lift cylinder
3.4 - UBS10 Carbide Cutting Edge .875X5 DB
**AUTO REVERSE UNDERBODY LIFT FIGURED UNDER VALVE**
**PRESSURE TRANSMITTER FIGURED UNDER VALVE**
-
EA 1.00 2336259 MAB HENKE-PPW-10'-FM/RL-28"HYDPB-TE-31-I 17,315.00 17,315.00
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 4 of 11
52182 Ember Road
Lake Crystal MN 56055
507-726-2728
Taken By:Brandon Oachs
Customer:
End User:
BILL ROBBERSTAD
NEW HOPE, CITY OF - PUBLIC WORKS
4401 XYLON AVE
NEW HOPE MN 55428
Phone:
Fax:
763-592-6769
101580
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
4.0 Wing Plow - Make and Model Henke Postless Plow Wing Rear Lift
Where Mounted on Truck Front of Chassis
Post Structure 23" by 15" HD Parallel Arm Structure with 3" x 10" x 2" Double Acting Lift Cylinder. With Rear Lift for Heel
Stow Cylinder.
Moldboard Description Smooth Rolled 3/16" hi-tensile 50,000psi Steel Plate, Leading end height 31" and discharge end height
31", non-tripping edge. Anti- Chatter Feature.
Moldboard Cutting Edge Description See options below for cutting edge
Lift Height Front Mount Lift 14.5" of Float
Hydraulic Cylinder Description 4" x 15" x 2" Double Acting Wing Stow Cylinder with built in Counter Balance Valve. 3" x 10" x
2" Post Cylinder.
Push Beam Type 28" Single hydraulic push beam with built in accumulator
Rear Attached Structure J-Craft Rear Attach (Rear Mount Only) or Standard Henke Rear Attach (Front or Rear Mount Capable)
Paint Postless Wing painted to your color specification (GLOSS BLACK)
Warranty Information 12 Months from "in service" date
Includes:
4.003 - Wing 10', Spring Cushion Pushbeam, LESS CUTTING EDGES
4.2 - Installation of Wing Plow - w/Dripless Couplers
4.7 - Leading end height 31" and discharge end height 31" moldboard IN LIEU of the Leading end height 29" and discharge end
height 36" Moldboard Quoted. (Non-trip & Full-trip Only)
4.8 - Front Mount PPW IN LIEU of the Rear Mount
4.12 - Front Mount Wing Trip Edge Moldboard
4.18 - Single Hydraulic push-beam 4 x 28 with built in accumulator IN LIEU of Spring Cushioned push-beam
4.47 - Carbide Cutting Edge .75X8X120
-
EA 1.00 2336260 MAB HENKE-HITCH-QCP-SPNRTN-3X10SA-INS 4,429.00 4,429.00
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 5 of 11
52182 Ember Road
Lake Crystal MN 56055
507-726-2728
Taken By:Brandon Oachs
Customer:
End User:
BILL ROBBERSTAD
NEW HOPE, CITY OF - PUBLIC WORKS
4401 XYLON AVE
NEW HOPE MN 55428
Phone:
Fax:
763-592-6769
101580
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
11.0 Front Hitch - Make and Model Henke Drop Pin (QCP) - Pick Truck Attach in Options Below
Lift cylinder description See Options Below
Truck frame mounting requirements 18"-24" front frame extensions.
Warranty Info 12 months from ³In-Service´date
Includes:
5.1 - Installation of Front Hitch
5.2 - 3 line standard bulkhead coulpers
(Direct Line to Lift Cylinder and Plow Hoses to Multi-Fastner Coupler figured in Force Kit)
5.11 - Truck Attach kit, J-Craft Style
5.17 - Spring Return
-
EA 1.00 2336261 MAB HENKE-43R11-J-PLOW-SSTE-POLY-INS 10,251.00 10,251.00
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 6 of 11
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
6.0 Two-Way Reversible Snow Plow - Make and Model Henke 2 -Way Reversible J-Plows SSTE
Moldboard height 43"
Discharge Height 43"
Plow Throat depth from vertical to deepest point in. 26"
Plowing Angle 35 degrees
Moldboard thickness & type 3/8" Poly Moldboard
Type, size and number of vertical reinforcement ribs. (10) Vertical ribs, notched for water drainage
Adjustable Cutting Edge Angles to Pavement Measured from Roadway Surface through Perpendicular Back Toward Truck 3
positions from 10 to 25 degrees
State number of hook up points from moldboard to frame. 4 points with 1" bearing surface in bushings
Type and size of reinforcement of frog at either end. 5/8" x 4" x 4" with 1/2" gussets between bolt holes
Type of Left Side Nose Open
Type and size of circle frame A-Frame-to-push frame pivot pin is 2.5" diameter, Heavy-duty, tubular steel push frame
Size of double acting reversing cylinders. Hydraulic power reverse with (2) 3" x 16" x 3" D.A. cylinders & cushion valve
Size and type of reinforced snow flap 2 ply 12" rubber flap (optional)
Type and size of push frame Heavy-Duty Triangular Shaped A-Frame with 3/8" Thick Upper & Lower Plates
Cutting Edge (AASHO punched) size. See Below for Cutting Edges
Distance beyond vertical that snow deflectors integral with moldboard extends. 26.5" at 10 degree layback
Size of adjustable snow shoes See Below for Shoe Options
Weight of plow (less hitch and hydraulics) 2,364 lbs average weight between 10' - 12' plows
Type and number of resettable HD compression spring trip mechanisms. SSTE - Square Spring Trip-Edge (5 Springs)
Mechanical trip stops prevents over-stressing trip springs. Adjustable tension, torsion trip-edge with full length, 1.875" diamete
trip shaft
Painting system with type of paint Commercial Blast, Industrial primer, Plow painted to your color specification (GLOSS
BLACK FRAME - POLY MOLDBOARD ORANGE)
Warranty Info 12 months from ³In-Service´date
Includes:
6.011 - J-PLOW - 43R11J-SSTE-3/8" POLY MOLDBOARD - LESS CUTTING EDGES
6.7 - Plow Portion QCP
6.21 - Carbide Cutting Edge .75X8X132
6.41 - Rod Markers (Pair)
6.42 - Jack Stand
6.44 - Rubber Shield 11
6.46 - "J" Plow Sixth (6th) Spring Kit (5 are standard)
See hydraulics for 2 port Multi Couplers for Plow angle - Mount off Side of Plow Hitch
-
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 7 of 11
52182 Ember Road
Lake Crystal MN 56055
507-726-2728
Taken By:Brandon Oachs
Customer:
End User:
BILL ROBBERSTAD
NEW HOPE, CITY OF - PUBLIC WORKS
4401 XYLON AVE
NEW HOPE MN 55428
Phone:
Fax:
763-592-6769
101580
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
EA 1.00 2336262 MAB HITCH-5/8" PLT ONLY-NO D-RINGS-INS 639.00 639.00
7.0 Hitch - Make & Model 5/8" thick pull plate & bracing to truck frame.
Vertical Tongue Weight 8,000 lbs max
Horizontal Tongue Weight 40,000 lbs max Gross Trailer Weight
Latching Tensile Strength Data not available
Rated Capacity 40,000 lbs max Gross Trailer Weight
Is Installation included? Yes__X__ or No____
Warranty Information 24 Months from "in service" date
Includes:
7.2 - Insallation of Pup Hitch
Plate only
D-Rings on Plate
No Pintle or Electrical on Plate - No Holes Either
ICC Bumper
-
EA 1.00 2238804 J-CRAFT 6x4TG-SS-NEW STYLE-INS 6,124.00 6,124.00
8.0 Sander - Make and Model J-Craft 6TGS SS Salt Special
Auger size 6" Auger
Type of Sander Stainless Steel Under tailgate type, 6" dia (carbon steel) 4" pitch single auger, direct hydraulic drive, Oversized
auger motor for low speed operation & continuous flow, LH Discharge w/POLY self-leveling spinner assembly, Dual over-center
locks on hopper cleanout door, mtg brackets and mtg tabs welded to hopper, In Stainless Mill Finish.
number of spinners Single Left Hand Spinner
Warranty Information 24 Months from "in service" date
Includes:
8.1 - Installation of Sander
8.2 - Sander with dripless couplers installed
8.9 - Exterior spill plates (Removable) made from stainless steel
-
EA 1.00 2336263 MAB HYDRAULICS-6100-9SEC-NEW HOPE-INST 32,394.00 32,394.00
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 8 of 11
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
9.0 - Hydraulics - Make and Model Force America pump, Force/Parker MCV-ISO Add-A-Fold Valve Series
Cab Controls Description Force America electronic control assembly, (Seat Mount)
Sander Control Description Force America model 6100 manually or programable adjustable Electronic control, w/stand-by, blast,
ground-speed interrupt, & liquid hookup.
Pump Drive Description Front Frame Mounted, Engine Crankshaft driven
Pump Type Variable displacement, axial piston type, load-sensing,
Valve Description Closed center load-sensing type, w/mid-inlet, manifold design
Number and Type Functions 9 functions: Body Hoist Underbody LR27 DA, Plow Lift SA, Plow Angle DA, Wing Toe DA,
Wing Heel DA, Wing Pushbar DA, Underbody DA, Sander Auger DA, Sander Spinner DA.
Type of Valve Actuation Elect solenoid, w/manual over-ride
Reservoir Size Selectable, w/filler-breather, sight glass, suction screen, and magnetic plug
Fluid Type ATF (equivalent to Dexron III)
Filter Style Remote mount, or intank w/12 volt DC condition indicator, & return line check valve.
Valve Enclosure Stainless Steel construction, frame mount design, w/removable cover. Valve Enclosure Mounted on Stainless
Steel Mounting Brackets.
Hose Recommendation 2" dia suction, 1-1/4" dia return, 1" dia pressure, w/balance to match equipment port sizing. R2 for
pressure lines, R1 for return lines, R4 for suction line. Return line manifold included.
Warranty Information 24 Months from "in service" date
Includes:
9.1 - Installation (Hose, plumbing, hardware, labor, etc.) of hydraulics.
9.7 - MCV-ISO VALVE 9 FUNCTIONS INSTALLED
9.22 - MODULAR ULTRA-4-6100 Patrol Commander control, Installed
9.25 - FORCE BRACKET, ARM, DISPLAY MOUNT, PIPING-SCREEN MOUNT
9.26 - SEAT MOUNTED CONTROL BRACKET, INSTALLED (ADDER)
9.28 - HORIZONTAL VALVE UNDERSIDE HOSE GUARD
9.31 - IN-TANK mounted filter w/12 volt indicator, installed
9.41 - J-Craft Stationary Cabshield mounted reservoir 30 gal (stainless steel) w/intank filter provision, installed
9.47 - Force FASD45L LS pump (6.0 CID) W / Electric shut down installed
9.72 - Temp/Low oil indicator system, SLIM-LINE AND CABSHIELD MOUNTED w/light mounted in cab installed
9.75 - 2-port 1/2" stucchi multi hose coupler system, w/parking station installed (Plow Angle)
9.84 - (ADDER) Internal Counter Balance Valve (Intergraded into Valve for Postless Wing Toe Lock)
9.92 - (ADDER) for Auto Reverse Scraper Lift
9.93 - (ADDER) for Pressure Transmitter to Read Scraper Pressure on LCD Screen, installed
9.026 - (ADDER) for optional Harness for Gravity Prewet
9.027 - (ADDER) for optional Harness for Camera
9.32 - (ADDER) U-2 nitrogen accumulator, Installed
-
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 9 of 11
52182 Ember Road
Lake Crystal MN 56055
507-726-2728
Taken By:Brandon Oachs
Customer:
End User:
BILL ROBBERSTAD
NEW HOPE, CITY OF - PUBLIC WORKS
4401 XYLON AVE
NEW HOPE MN 55428
Phone:
Fax:
763-592-6769
101580
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
EA 2.00 1852519 WHELEN-LED SPOT LIGHT(P36SLCHG)-INS 250.00 500.00
-
1.166 - Accessory LED work light with disconnect (WHELEN SPOT/FLOOD P36SLCHG)
One Mounted at the back of the truck for the Sander Spinner with a Plug for Disconnect
& One off the Side of the Cabshield on Aluminum Bracket for the Wing.
-
EA 1.00 1818419 WHELEN WING STROBE TIR3(WPLOWZ1A) INST 302.00 302.00
-
1.095 - Whelen Amber Wing Strobe Super LED TIR3 w/20' HD TPR (WPLOWZ1A) Installed
Note: Mounted at end of Wing Facing the Back of Truck
-
EA 1.00 1650584 MAB AIR SPRING KIT, MANL MACK GRANITE IN 1,256.00 1,256.00
10.0 - Air Bag System, Make & Model Canadian LoadShare model HS
Air Bag Load Capacity at Installed Height (pounds/inches) 9,500 lbs
Air Bag Diameter 8" Diameter
Air Bag Minimum Operating Pressure 20 psi
Air Bag Maximum Operating Pressure 100 psi
Grade of Fasteners Used to Mount System Grade 8
Should Air Bag System be installed before Snow Fighting equipment is installed? Yes__X__ or No____
Warranty Information 24 Months from "in service" date
Includes:
10.3 - Air spring kit, manual adj., Mack
-
EA 1.00 1350422 INSTALL, ON SPOT TIRE CHAIN KIT(GENERIC)2,345.00 2,345.00
-
1.037 - On Spot Tire Chains System Installed (Per axle)
-
EA 1.00 2266960 MNDOT STATE CONTRACT PURCHASE (167118)0.00 0.00
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 10 of 11
52182 Ember Road
Lake Crystal MN 56055
507-726-2728
Taken By:Brandon Oachs
Customer:
End User:
BILL ROBBERSTAD
NEW HOPE, CITY OF - PUBLIC WORKS
4401 XYLON AVE
NEW HOPE MN 55428
Phone:
Fax:
763-592-6769
101580
Estimate Terms Quote Date Expiration Date Salesperson Customer Currency
LC00110306 Net 30 Days.9/28/2020 10/28/2020 CASSEM, MARTY USD
UM Quantity Item Description Extended PriceUnit Price
-
After reviewing your equip. needs, and per the State of MN contract number (167118) release number S-863(5) and J-Craft
contract number 167118, valid thru March 31, 2021 we offer this for your consideration.
Note:
1. This quote is a summary of the State of MN price pages, and detailed spec sheets.
2. Warranty is 24 months from In-Service date.
ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED
J-Craft is certified as a NTEA MVP member.
-
Municipal Terms of Sale:
-
If you accept this proposal please sign and date below with PO# if you use one:
PO#_______________________________
Accepted By (Print):_______________________________
Accepted By (Signature):___________________________
Date:_______________________________
Note: If Changes need to be made after PO is submitted we will need a revised PO reflecting the changes.
Visit us online at www.j-craftinc.com/
-
Sale Amount:119,454.00
Freight:0.00
Sales Tax:0.00
FET Charges:0.00
Total Amount:119,454.00
10/06/2020 08:38 AMQuote Response Form Page 11 of 11
TO Bill Robberstad COMPANY
PHONE/FAX 763‐592‐6769 ADDRESS 5500 international parkway
EMAIL brobberstad@ci.new‐hope.mn.us CITY/STATE/ZIP New Hope, Mn 55428
CONTRACT:MN CONTRACT
DATE EARLIEST SHIP
9/10/2020 45‐60 DAYS ARO
ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL LINE TOTAL
SPHD‐2.0 Stepp Dump Style Premix Heater 2.0 CY (3 Ton) Diesel 1 $29,994.00 29,994.00$
Flush Mounted Strobe Lights Set of 2 1 714.00 714.00$
Electric Overnight Heat 110V 1500W 1 2,179.00 2,179.00$
10# Fire Extinguisher 1 272.00 272.00$
Stainless Steel Tool Holders 1 129.00 129.00$
Platform With Railing 1 544.00 544.00$
Washdown System 1 784.00 784.00$
Hose Reel for Washdown 1 587.00 587.00$
Shovel Cleaning Compartment 1 764.00 764.00$
Hydraulic Top Doors only 1 2,450.00 2,450.00$
LP hand Torch 1 860.00 860.00$
Hose Reel for LP Hand Torch 1 863.00 863.00$
NOTE:Subtotal 40,140.00$
PAINT: HWY ORANGE 0 % Dealer Discount ‐$
LIGHT PLUG: 7 PIN RV % Demo Discount ‐$
HITCH: 3" Pintle % Mult‐Unit Disc.‐$
STEPP TRADE IN VALUE
Freight 75.00
Total Due 40,215.00$
Please remit back a signed copy to process the quote as an order to joan@steppmfg.com Special Instructions:
Ordered By Signature
Approved By Signature
INTERNAL USE ONLY:
Stepp Order # Down Payment Amount:
Date Ordered Credit Card Card Type
Delivery Date Card Number:
P. O. # On Terms X
Ship Via Letter of Credit
All prices herein quoted are exclusive of sales, use, and other excise taxes. All such taxes, and any other taxes
measured in whole or part, by gross receipts applicable to this transaction are to be borne by the purchaser. All
export, import, and other duties, tariffs, and customs shall be paid for by the purchaser. If exemption is claimed by
the purchaser from any of the foregoing, the purchaser shall furnish satisfactory proof of such exemption. *Please
note: This quote is valid for 60 days from the above date.
Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. 12325 River Road North Branch MN 55056 Ph: 651‐674‐4491 Fx: 651‐674‐4221
FOB
DESTINATION
DESCRIPTION
SALES REPRESENTATIVE
CARL ABBOTT
City of New Hope
QUOTESPHD20-102
jason@steppmfg.com / VP Sales ~ joan@steppmfg.com / Sales Coord
WWW.STEPPMFG.COM
S:\October 26, 2020 Council Meeting\12.1 Q - Upcoming Events.docx
Request for Action
October 26, 2020
Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Originating Department: City Manager
By: Kirk McDonald, City Manager
Agenda Title
Exchange of communication between members of the city council
Upcoming meetings and events:
Oct. 28 3:15 p.m. – District 281 Partnership Meeting (Virtual)
Oct. 31 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. – City Hall open Saturday for Absentee Voting
Nov. 2 7 p.m. – Human Rights Commission Meeting (Virtual)
Nov. 3 General Election, polling locations open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
Nov. 4 8:30 am – Business Networking Group Meeting, location TBD
1:30 p.m. – Joint Water Commission Meeting (Virtual)
7 p.m. – Planning Commission Meeting (Virtual)
Nov. 9 4 p.m. – Blue Line Coalition Meeting (Virtual)
7 p.m. – City Council Meeting (In person – Council Chambers)
Agenda Section
Other Business
Item Number 12.1