Loading...
091393 EDA Official File Copy CiTY OF NEW HOPE EDA AGENDA EDA Regular M~ting//12 September 13, 1993 Agenda//12 President Edward J. Erickson Commissioner W. Peter Enck Commissioner Gerald Otten Commissioner Terri Wehling Commissioner Marky W~lliamson 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes of August 9, 1993 4. Resolution Approving Multi-Family Housing Policies (Project//510) 5. Adjournment CITY OF NEW HOPE 4401 XYLON AVENUE NORTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 55428 Approved EDA Minutes August 9, 1993 Meeting //11 CALL TO ORDER President Pro tem Enck called the meeting of the Economic Development Authority to order at 7:07 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Enck, Otten, Williamson, Wehling Absent: Erickson APPROVE MINUTES Motion was made by Commissioner Otten, seconded by Commissioner Williamson, to approve the EDA minutes of July 26, 1993. Voting in favor: Enck, Otten, Williamson; Abstained: Wehling; Absent: Erickson. Motion carried. BROADWAY LANEL President Pro rem Enck introduced for discussion Item 4, Resolution Item 4 Relating to a Redevelopment Agreement with Broadway LaNel, a Limited Partnership; Waiving the HRA Lien Maturity Under the Redevelopment Agreement in Connection with the Issuance of Refunding Bonds by the City and Authorizing Execution of Various Documents in Connection with Such Refunding Bonds. EDA RESOLUTION Commissioner Williamson introduced the following resolution and moved 93-12 its adoption: "RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REDEVELOPMENT Item 4 AGREEMENT WITH BROADWAY LANEL, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; WAIVING THE HRA LIEN MATURITY UNDER THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF REFUNDING BONDS BY THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH REFUNDING BONDS". The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Commissioner Wehling and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Enck, Otten, Wehling and Williamson; and the following voted against: None; Absent: Erickson; whereupon the resolul~ion was duly oassed and adooted, signed by the president which was attested to by the executive director. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Wehling, seconded by Commissioner Otten, to adjourn the meeting. All present voted in favor. The New Hope EDA adjourned at 7:09 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Valerie Leone City Clerk New Hope EDA August 9, 1993 Page 1 ~ REQUEST FOR ACTION Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section City Manager 9-13-93 rna Kirk McDonald Item No. By: Management Assistant By:Jy/ 4 RESOLUTION APPROVING MULTI-FAMI~~ HOUSING POLICIES (PROJECT #510) At the July 26th EDA Meeting a consultant agreement was approved with Public- Private Ventures, Inc. to assist the staff in formulating policies to address requests for funding assi stance for bui 1 ding rehabil i tation/renovati on work from owners of multi-family buildings in the City. The enclosed resolution is a draft of the policies which have been developed and staff requests to discuss/review said policies with the EDA. TO: _. / Review: Administration: Finance: RFA-O01 EDA RESOLUTION NO. 93- RESOLUTION APPROVING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING POLICIES {PROJECT #510) WHEREAS, the City of New Hope contains over 3,839 units of rental multiple unit housing; and WHEREAS, many of those units have been constructed during the period from 1960 to 1979; and WHEREAS, many of those units have begun to show signs of aging and obsolescence; and WHEREAS, many private owners are having difficulty obtaining private capital necessary to rehabilitate and properly maintain their units; and WHEREAS, many of these rental housing projects have been subjected to the real estate recession that has involved most of the United States as well as the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, this housing stock, if maintained, can provide a decent, safe, and desirable source of affordable housing for the current and future residents of New Hope; and WHEREAS, the City of New Hope Economic Development Authority (EDA) has a desire to provide assistance where that assistance is clearly needed and warranted; and WHEREAS, the purpose of that assistance would be to.' stem physical property deterioration, improve public safety, improve values, enhance neighborhood cohesiveness, and assist in the provision of modern rental amenities; and WHEREAS, the City of New Hope must target its limited resources, reflecting the reality that it can provide only limited funding, compared to the funding that might potentially be required to renovate a significant percentage of the 3,839 multi-family rental units in the City; and WHEREAS, the goal of the EDA's involvement would be to meet public policy needs in the housing and human services area~ rather than to resolve project financial problems and issues that private owners and lenders may have, and WHEREAS, the EDA recognizes that financial assistance to real estate projects involve some risk. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following policy shall be used by the EDA to evaluate potential future requests for assistance by rental unit owners: 1. The minimum amount of public funding required shall be provided in each case. 2. Funding priority will be given to basic needs (such as roof replacement, wiring, heating, etc.) as opposed to provision of amenities (such as washers and dryers in each unit, new office and lobby furniture, etc.) 3. No funding will be provided which, directly or indirectly, is used for fees by the owner or related parties (including construction management fees, developer fees, use of "contingency funds", fee sharing, etc.) 4. At least two bona fide bids, from non-related parties, will be required for each item that is a part of an overall program of rehabilitation funded partially or completely with City funds. Normally, "in house" contracting and/or related party contracting will be prohibited. 5. No funds will be provided to bring defaulted mortgages current. 6. No funds will be provided to bring taxes current. 7. Public funds will be used to leverage private funding wherever possible. Normally a 50/50 matching of funds for eligible activities would be required. 8. Wherever possible, loans shall be used as the preferred financing vehicle, rather than grants or equity investments. 9. In the case in which a project has substantial private financial stress, appropriate participation by the lender and the equity owner will be a requirement for City investment. The private investment may take the form of additional equity, debt forgiveness, interest rate reduction, loan term extension, payment deferrals, management fee reduction, reduced cash flow distribution, etc. In no case will tax funds be used to solve financial problems that would otherwise be solved privately in the absence of public participation. 10. Public funds will only be provided in those instances in which the public funds are essential to the rehabilitation of the project. Public funds will not be provided when the primary result of that provision would be to merely raise the profitability of a building. 11. Public funds will not be substituted for private funds that could reasonably be raised in the private market. For example, if a private loan could be obtained, and/or if Iow income tax credits would be available, EDA funds will not be used to displace these other potential resources. 12. Each financial assistance agreement will contain an accelerated repayment provision in the event of property sale, or other significant changes in circumstances. 13. Funds will not be provided that will allow the owner to displace moderate income residents and attract higher income tenants. Nothing in this statement shall be construed to preclude the attraction of desirable tenants to a project, and the displacement of undesirable tenants. 14. Funds would not be provided for projects that would result in lower property tax payments, unless such projects meet other City objectives. 15. EDA Rehabilitation funds shall not be provided for use in such a way that Relocation statues and payments are triggered. 16. No funding will be considered for approval without a prior objective financial analysis of the project, and an independent recommendation as to the amount and type of proposed funding. Adopted by the C-Fef-C-ooncll of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota, this 13th day of September, 1993. Edward J. Erickson, President Attest: Daniel J. Donahue, Executive Director