Loading...
092694 EDA Official File Copy CITY OF NEW HOPE EDA AGENDA EDA Regular Meeting #12 September 26, 1994 Presidem Edward J. Erickson Commissioner W. Peter Enck Commissioner Gerald Otten Commissioner Terri Wehling Commissioner Marky Williamson 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes of September 12, 1994 4. Discussion Regarding Letter of Intent Submitted by Minne Mufflers, Inc. on City- Owned Parcel at 42nd and Nevada Avenues (Improvement Project No. 523) 5. Discussion Regarding Development of City-Owned Parcel at 5009 Winnetka Avenue North (Improvement Project No. 505) 6. Adjournment CITY OF NEW HOPE 4401 XYLON AVENUE NORTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 55428 Approved EDA Minutes September 12, 1994 Meeting #11 CALL TO ORDER President Erickson called the meeting of the Economic Development Authority to order at 8:50 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Erickson, Enck, Otten, Williamson, Wehling Staff Present: Sondrall, Hanson, Donahue, Leone, Bellefuil APPROVE MINUTES Motion was made by Commissioner Enck, seconded by Commissioner Williamson, to approve the EDA minutes of August 8, 1994. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. PROJECTS 523 & 505 President Erickson introduced for discussion Item 4, Discussion Regarding Items 4 and 5 Letter of Intent Submitted by Minne Mufflers, Inc. on City-Owned Parcel of 42nd and Nevada Avenues (#523); and Item 5, Discussion Regarding Development of City-Owned Parcel at 5009 Winnetka Avenue North (#505). Members of the Crystal Human Rights Commission were present to meet with the City Council following the EDA Meeting; therefore, the consensus of the EDA was to table the EDA agenda items. MOTION Motion was made by Commissioner Enck, seconded by Commissioner Items 4 and 5 Wehling, to table Items 4 and 5 until the September 26, 1994, Meeting. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Donahue asked the EDA to consider a request by Foremost to Delay IMP. PROJECT 474 Payment of Property Taxes (7528 42nd Avenue North), Improvement Project No. 474. Mr. Donahue stated previously the EDA directed staff to enforce the original contract. Discussion ensued regarding the payment schedule of real estate taxes by Foremost. Mr. Steve Sondrall, City Attorney, stated he has held a discussion with an attorney representing Mr. Fredendall and the City Attorney's office is prepared to start an unlawful detainer option. He stated the request tonight is an attempt to possibly circumvent the need for this type of action. Mr. Alan Fredendall, President and Owner of Foremost, was recognized. The EDA asked Mr. Fredendall if he was willing to comply with payment of the first installment to be paid within two days and the second installment due October 15th; and failure to do so will result in legal action by the City. Mr. Fredendall stated he cannot meet the October 15th deadline and asked for a 30-day extension to November 15th. Mr. Fredendall stated he is New Hope EDA September 12, 1994 Page I pursuing property tax abatements for prior years. Due to the pollution problem, he has been unable to obtain bank financing, and this has been a burden to his business. Mr. Donahue informed the EDA that a penalty will be imposed by Hennepin County to Foremost on unpaid taxes. MOTION Motion was made by Commissioner Wehling, seconded by Commissioner Otten, requiring Foremost's May 15th property tax payment to Hennepin County by September 14, 1994 and second half payment to be made by November 15, 1994. Voting in favor: Erickson, Otten, Wehling, Williamson; Voting against: Enck; Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Wehling, seconded by Commissioner Williamson, to adjourn the meeting. All present voted in favor. The New Hope EDA adjourned at 9:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Valerie Leone City Clerk New Hope EDA September 12, 1994 Page 2 EDA I ',~(k 4)t~,) REQUF~T FOR ACTION Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section City Manager EDA By: ~ 9-26-94 Kirk McDonald ' . Item No. By: Management Assistant 4 DISCUSSION REGARDING LETTER/OF INTENT SUBMITTED BY MINNE MUFFLERS, INC. ON CITY-OWNED PARCEL AT 42ND & NEVADA AVENUES (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 523) Welsh Companies has submitted the attached Letter of Intent by Miime Mufflers, Inc. on the City-owned property at 42nd & Nevada Avenues. The City executed an agreement with Thorpe Bros. earlier this summer to market the property on behalf of the City. The City Attorney has reviewed the Letter of Intent and responded with the attached correspondence. This matter was tabled at the September 12th EDA meeting, with only a brief discussion. Since that time, Mirme Mufflers, Inc. have prepared the enclosed concept site plans showing how the property could be utilized. The property is zoned as a B4 Community Business District and an "auto-oriented" business, such as a muffler shop, would require a conditional use permit in this zoning district. Staff requests direction from the EDA on how to proceed. MOTION BY SECOND BY Review: Administration: Finance: RFA-O01 ~ Companies Comprehensive Real Estate Services September 1, 1994 UIy Thompson Thorpe Bros. 8085 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 RE: Parcel of land on Nevada and 42nd, New Hope, Minnesota Dear Uly: This letter shall confirm the interest of Minne Mufflers, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation, a Franchisee of CARX Muffler and Brake, to purchase the above captioned property for the development of a CARX Muffler and Brake store on the following terms and conditions: Premises: An approximate 65,000 square foot parcel located at Nevada Avenue and 42nd Ave in New Hope, Minnesota as more accurately described in Exhibit "A". Survey: Seller to provide Buyer with survey at Seller's expense. Seller: City of New Hope. Buyer: Minne Mufflers, Inc. Price: $3.90 per square foot. Utilities: Seller to provide all utilities to the site as it is. Earnest Mone'~ $10,000.00 Brokerage Commission: Seller and Buyer represent that they have not dealt with any other real estate broker or agent in connection with the purchase of this property by Minne Mufflers, Inc. except Thorpe Bros. and Welsh Companies. All real estate brokerage fees shall be the sole responsibility of the Seller. Conditions: Buyer's attorney will prepare purchase contract in coordination with the Seller's attorney. All site design to be completed and alt costs associated with all site work to be done by Buyer. All improvements to be constructed by Buyer at Buyer's sole cost. Seller to provide Buyer with all environmental reports done on on the property. If additional environmental tests are needed to be done then the cost for such tests to be the responsibility of the Seller. Seller warrants the premises to have clear, good, marketable title and free of all liens and encumbrances. Title Insurance commitment from a Title Company acceptable to Buyer at Sellers expense. Seller agrees to indemnify Buyer from all costs associated with the contamination and\or removal of the contamination that are existing or found at a later time and not caused by the Buyer. Buyer receives a "No Association" letter or a similar letter of comfort from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and such letter is acceptable to Buyer at its sole discretion. Contingencies: Buyer receiving all necessary approvals, permits and licenses, including without limitation, all construction and operation of a CARX Muffler and Brake store. The execution of mutually agreeable Purchase Agreements. Buyer receiving necessary financing. It is understood and agreed that this Letter of Intent is a non binding offer and not a final binding Purchase Agreement, and that the agreement of the parties when finally reached will be embodied in a definitive Purchase Agreement containing such additional terms as are in all respects satisfactory to both parties. The actual Purchase Agreement detailing all rights, duties, and obligations will be drafted by Buyer to incorporate all of the business terms specified herein, as well as such other terms or conditions as are acceptable to both parties. If the foregoing is acceptable, please confirm by and returning a duplicate copy of this letter to the undersigned. Sincerely, MINNE MUFFLERS, INC. JI~F¢ BERNSTEIN ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO THIS ~ DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1994. City of New Hope By: · CORRICK & SONDRALL, P.A. STEVEN A. SONDRALL ATTORNEYS AT LAW ~ ~SS,STA.~S MICHAEL R. LAFLEUR MARTIN P. MALECHA Edinburgh Executive Office Plaza LAVONNE E. KESKE WILLIAM C. STRAIT 8525 Edinbrook Crossing SHARON D. DERBY Suite ~203 Brooklyn Park, Minneso~ 55443 TELEPHONE (S~2) 42S-SST~ FAX (S~ 2) 42~SaS7 September 9, 1994 Kirk McDonald Management Asst. City of New Hope 4401Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 RE: CARX /Proposed Purchase of 42nd and Nevada Avenue Property Our File No: 99.10000 Dear Kirk: At your request I reviewed the September 1, 1994 Statement of Intent to purchase a 65,000 sq. ft. parcel located at 42nd Avenue and Nevada Avenue. Said letter was prepared by the Welsh Companies on behalf of Minne Mufflers, Inc., ~/b/a CARX Muffler. 1. The $3.90 per sq. ft. price seems ]ow. Whenever we have condemned property along 42nd Avenue, we seem to always pay square foot prices in the $5.00 to $6.00 range. I realize land values have declined over the last several years and as a result, the offered price might be reasonable. An appraisal is probably necessary to determine if this is a reasonable offer. 2. I would object to providing the Buyer with a survey at the City's cost. I believe this is a Buyer's expense. However, if a survey had already been prepared which is acceptable to the Buyer, I would not see a problem with providing them with a copy of the survey. 3. The brokerage commission language requires clarification. We should not pay any brokerage commissions that exceed the percentage payment we agreed to in our listing agreement with our own agent. If this paragraph means the two agents are going to split that payment provided by our listing agreement, then it is Mr. Kirk McDonald September 9, 1994 Page 2 acceptable. However, we should not pay any commission to the Buyer's agent that exceeds the percentage payment we have agreed to with our own listing agent. 4. T have no problem with the Buyer's attorney being responsible for preparation of sales documents. However, this language must be clarified to insure that we reserve all rights to approve the sales documents. 5. The environmental language creates some problems. I have no problem with providing the Buyer with all environmental reports we have already done on the property, however we should not agree to pay the cost of any additional environmental testing required. Basically, this property should be sold "as is" and the Buyer should be free to enter onto the property and do whatever tests it believes necessary, at its cost, to satisfy itself that the property will suit its needs. It would not be unreasonable to provide the Buyer with an indemnification and hold harmless provision relating to environmental concerns, but not to the extent indicated in this letter. It should be limited only to remediation costs required by the MPCA, the Federal EDA or other governmental authorities if it is established that at the time of sale the contamination existed at the property. I would not recommend the very broad indemnification clause proposed by this document. Again, the better course of action would be sell the property "as is" without any guarantee concerning contamination. This may be a moot point anyway if the Buyer obtains a "no action" letter from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 6. Finally, the final paragraph should be amended to indicate the letter of intent is not a binding offer or acceptance, nor is it a binding purchase agreement. Please contact me if you have any other questions. Very truly yours, Steven A. Sondrall slf2 cc: Daniel J. Donahue ~ EDA REQUF~T FOR ACTION Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section City Manager EDA Kirk McDonald ~:~ Item No. By: Management Assistant By, 9-26-94 5 DISCUSSION REGARDING DEVE~O~PMENT OF CITY-OWNED PARCEL AT 5009 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 505) Staff requests to discuss with the EDA the development alternatives for the City-owned parcel at 5009 Winnetka Avenue North. This matter was tabled at the September 12th EDA meeting, with no discussion taking place. Please refer to the enclosed attachments for further information. · o: o2_ Review: Administration: Finance: RFA-O01 ~ . CITY OF NEW HOPE ii MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 1994 TO: Dan Donahue, City Manager FROM: Kirk McDonald, Management Assistant, Community Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Development Options for City-Owned Parcel at 5009 Winnetka Avenue North The New Hope Economic Development Authority needs to make a decision regarding the development of the City-owned parcel at 5009 Winnetlo. The original intent of acquiring the property was two-fold: 1) to demolish/remove the blighted structure from the site and 2) to construct handicapped accessible housing units in conjunction with the newly created 5-City CO-OP Northwest Community Revitalization Corporation (CRC) to provide affordable home ownership opportunities. The existing structure has been removed and it is time to determine exactly how the site is going to be developed. As I see it, there are three (3) options: Option 1 - Original Concept Proposal City staff cooperated with the CO-OP Northwest CRC in preparing a grant application for Federal HOME funds to construct new or rehab existing homes to provide additional affordable housing on scattered sites throughout the 5-City area. The application was successful and New Hope's portion of the application was based on the construction of a handicapped accessible duplex on this site. The HOME funds are to be used as a second mortgage write down to make the homes affordable for low/moderate income residents. The City has solicited interest from interested handicapped persons and currently has a list of about 10 persons who are interested in home ownership. In addition to the HOME funds, staff also wrote a grant which was funded with $40,000 through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's Land Trust Program. The City acquired the property for approximately $40,000 and the original intent was to use the MHFA funds to acquire the site. The MHFA program requires that the City own the site and it was thought that the project would be more affordable if the land cost was deducted from the sale price. Therefore, both the Land Trust funds (used for property acquisition) and the HOME funds (used for second mortgage write-downs) would be used in conjunction with one another to construct an affordable housing duplex for persons with low/moderate incomes. Over the past several months the EDA has indicated that they are not necessarily interested in owning the land. If that is the case, we should determine if we are going to forfeit the MHFA grant funds and not utilize them for this project. Option 2 - Orion. al Concept Proposal Revised If the EDA does not desire to own the land or use the MHFA Land Trust funds, staff is still encouraging the City to proceed with the development of a handicapped accessible duplex on the site using HOME funds as a second mortgage write down so that the goal of providing affordable housing in cooperation with CO-OP Northwest can still be accomplished. The amount of HOME funds requested from the CRC can be increased and other sources of funds, including CDBG and scattered site housing money (see attached project description/budget). After meeting with Hennepin County officials recently, we are confident that the CRC will approve an increase in their contribution and staff would like to present this to the CRC at their September meeting so that we can proceed with the construction yet this fall. The City would act as the developer on the site and the roll of the CRC would be to meet us at the closing with a $20,000 second mortgage write down for each of the two units. If the EDA is not agreeable with Option 1, I certainly hope they will respond positively to this option so that we can utilize the HOME funds that have already been secured. After all, this is the reason the CRC was formed in the first place and the other cities are already proceeding on their projects. Option 3 - Market the Property The third alternative would simply be to market the property as it exists. While this would accomplish the first objective of removing a blighted structure, it would not necessarily accomplish the second objective of providing a unique affordable housing home ownership opportunity for several handicapped persons. The City would also have little control over the development of the site except for approval of building plans. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. cc: Steve Sondrall, City Attorney PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5009 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH NEW HOPE, MN 55425 Detailed description of project: 5009 Winnetka Avenue North is a residential property purchased by the City of New Hope EDA from HUD on February. 7, 1994. The lot is large enough to be divided into two lots, both statable for construction of a new home. The site is currently vacant and ready for construction. The dimensions of the rectangular corner lot are 159' x 128' and contain 19,200 square feet. The lot faces east on Winnetka Avenue North. The site was zoned R-1 Single Family Residential but was rezoned to R-2 Single and Two-Family Residential due to the size of the lot, the surrounding zoning, and the proposed use of the site. The site is bordered on the north (across 51st Avenue) by R-2 and R-3 properties, on the west by R-1 properties, on the south by an R-O Residential Office Zoning District, and east, across Winnetka Avenue, by I-1 and I-2 Industrial Zoning Districts. Due to the size of the lot, the City of New Hope has determined that the highest and best usc for the site is as a twinhome. The twinhome will be handicap accessible and will face north on 51st Avenue North. The twinhomes will be built on grade, with a central dividing wall. The units will have two bedrooms, a living room, kitchen/dining area, utility room, bathroom, and garage. Accessibility requirements such as wider halls and doorways will be incorporated into the units. In addition, the developer will work with the buyer to incorporate additional accessibility needs into the unit. The homes are being marketed and sold to low/moderate income families. Responsibilities: The New Hope EDA is responsible for acquisition, demolition, and preparation of the site for consU'ucUon. In addition, New Hope staff is responsible for marketing the site, drafting specifications for the project, finding a developer/builder, and overseeing construction. If qualified buyers are found during the construction, the developer/builder will work with the buyer on accessibility details, ff no buyers are found, the developer/builder will construct the twinhome to meet accessibility guidelines. The City of New Hope will work with Marquette Bank New Hope to handle financing for qualified buyers. It is anticipated that the future buyers will be using first-time home buyer funds for the purchase of the units. Thompson Associates, has been hired through the CHI)O, to facilitate the application process and determine which applicants qualify for purchasing the property. Marketing: City staff has been mnrketmg the property through the City newsletter, local newspaper, and newspapers and newsletters targeted at the disabled commumty. In addition, City staff have sent flyers and press releases to a number of organizations that provide services to the disabled population. Currently, the City ~ 10 individuals who have requested applications forms for purchasing the homes. Income level of Homeowners: The qualifying homeowners must meet the income guidelines required for HOME-funded projects. City staff estimates that one twin home will cost between $75,000 and 80,000 dollars. An income of $27,000 to $29,000 is sufficient for purchase of of 'these properties. The following estimated amounts are for both units combined. .' EXPENDITURES ANTICIPATED A, CTUAL Acqmsmon/site prep $42,000 $42.467 Construcuon ($70/sq. ft. x 1220 sq. ft.) $170,800 Thompson Associates (marketing) . $2,000 Misc. (legal, staff, taxes, site upkeep, fees, etc.) $17,000 $13,006 TOTAL $231,800 $55,473 (to date) REVENUES Proceeds from sale of twin home $160,000 City contribution (CDBG/EDA/ScatIer sit~ funds) $29,800 HOME funds $42,000 ($20,000 ~cond mortgage, $1,000 marketin$ p~r unit) TOTAL S231,800 aOMl OW a x omm srs (Sso,ooo Cost p~r month (principle, inter, t, taxes, msnanc~) $700 Annual income reqmred $28,980 Monthly income requimt $2,415 S(~[I~puLF. FOR COMPLETION: Choose a developerfou/lder September 1994 Be~n Constrm:lion October 1994 Construction compk~ Mar~h 1995 CloseJT~ Dec~mber 1994-March 1995