022796 EDA Special Agenda
CITY OF NEW HOPE EDA
4401 XYLON AVENUE NORTH
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 55428
EDA Tuesday, February 27, 1996
Special Meeting #1 City Hall, 6:00 p.m.
President: Edward J. Erickson
Commissioners: W. Peter Enck
Pat La Vine Norby
Gerald Otten
Terri Wehling
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Not Applicable)
4. DISCUSSION REGARDING CONCEPT PROPOSAL FOR DEVELOPMENT
EXPANSION ON PROPERTY OWNED BY DAVID LASKY AT 7180 42ND
AVENUE NORTH (PLANNING CASE 95-15)
5. ADJOURNMENT
EDA
I m tW_ T CTXO
Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section
City Manager Special EDA Meeting
Kirk McDonald ~ 2-27-96 Item No.
By: Management Assistant By:// 4
/
DISCUSSION REGARDING CONCEPT PROPOSAL FOR DEVELOPMENT EXPANSION ON
PROPERTY OWNED BY DAVID LASKY AT 7180 42ND AVENUE NORTH (P.C.//95-15)
Mr. Lasky appeared before the City Council on February 12, 1996, to get input on his concept
proposal for development expansion on the property he owns at 7180 42nd Avenue North. The
City Council decided to give further consideration to the project at tonight's work session.
There is currently a 4,400 square foot building containing the "G.I. Joe Surplus" and "Down On
42nd Consignment" stores on the property. Lasky appeared before the Planning Commission on
several occasions this past fall with a proposal to add a second building to the site which would
be a Car-X facility. Two buildings on one lot require a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
approval. The request was tabled at the Commission level due to a number of problems with the
plans, including traffic circulation on a site containing two buildings.
Lasky has developed a new proposal to develop a mini-convenience center on the site, which
would include a Car-X facility and future retail space. The building additions would be added
on to the existing building on the site and would require site/building plan review/approval and
a conditional use permit. Staff is more receptive to the new plan and Lasky has included some
nice amenities on the site, including a proposed clock tower. He has submitted revised plans to
the City and will be meeting with the Design & Review Committee on February 15th in
preparation for the March 4th Planning Commission meeting. While it is unusual for a petitioner
to appear before the Council prior to seeking approval from the Planning Commission, he wants
Council input on the concept before proceeding further.
MOTION BY SECOND BY
' '-
0/- '-
Review: Administration: Finance:
RFA-O01 ~
REAL ESTATE
FAX (612) 922-8540 r=
2506 MONTEREY AVENUE SOUTH ~ ST. LOUISPARK, MINNESOTA 55416 ~ PHONE(612) 922-3334 or 377-1167
February 6, 1996
Mr. Doug Sanstad
Building Specialist
City of New Hope
4401 Xylon Avenue North
New Hope, MN 55428
RE: 7180 42nd Avenue North revised building project
Dear Mr. Sanstad:
As we have discussed with some of the staff of the City of New Hope, we have
revised the plans for the site to become a mini-mall.
With the changes outlined on the following pages, we will be adding to the
existing structure at 7180 42nd Avenue, and will be requesting a Conditional use
Permit for the additions.
The first addition will be for a Car-X facility which is a permitted use under the
present B-4 zoning, the current zoning of the property.
We hope that the New Hope City Council and the other review committees will find
this project as appealing as others have.
Sincerely,
David Lasky
DL/mw
eric.
APPLICATION TO THE CITY OF NEW HOPE
FOR CONDITIONAL USE
7180 42ND AVENUE NORTH
FOR
CAR-X MUFFLER & BRAKE FACILTY
Property Owners
The Lasky Family
Designem
Bernard Herman Architects
HISTORY
The site, the northeast quadrant of 42nd Avenue North and Nevada, was the
original location of the New Hope City Hall. Later it became the New Hope
Municipal Bar, then Paros Pub and now is G.I Joe Army Surplus and Down on
42nd, a consignment shop. The site is approximately an acre and a half with
extremely complex topography. The property slopes from east to west along 42nd
and from west to east along the northern edge. In addition there is an elevation
drop of more than ten feet from the south to the north property lines.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
After many months of designing, planning and meeting with various staff and
committees of the City of New Hope, the owners of the property have completely
revised the planning. We are now proposing to add to the existing building to
accomplish all of the objectives suggested to us by the City.
The proposed project is now a mall with the existing building on the west end, an
attached tower, the Car-X facility and a future retail building, not yet marketed.
The new Car-X facility will be brick to match the existing building, as closely as
possible. The end result will be an integrated development with attractive
landscaping and good traffic flow.
ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION, MARKET EVALUATIONS, ETC.
All of these items have been dealt with earlier and approved by the committees at
the time the project was a PUD application. This material is a matter of your
record and file.
THE ITEMS OF CONCERN TO THE CITY STAFF
Although all aspects of the development of the site are of concern to the owners,
the future tenants and the City, there have been a few that had not been resolved
earlier.
First, the drainage, and we have agreed to participate in a catch basin or two on
the north edge of the property.
Secondly, we have relocated and redesigned the building to provide for a semi-
trailer berth, although none has been needed or expected to be needed by Car-X.
Thirdly, to tie the new structures to the existing building to make the site more
homogenous. The new plans do this.
Fourth, we have eliminated noise questions by having the building to face 42nd
Avenue as well as set-back over 70 feet.
OBJECTIVES
For more than five years, the owners and previous tenants have searched for
desirable businesses for the property. Although there have been a variety of
interests, they have proved to be either undesirable, unfeasible or uninterested.
The proposed Car-X facility and future structure produce what we believe to be as
good a use of the property as history and the future indicate.
BENEFITS OF THE CAR-X PROJECT
Since the 42nd Street redevelopment project started, there have been a number of
improvements on the properties along the street. As we view the plans for this
property, I think you will agree that it is a vast improvement over the existing
conditions, In addition there are many other benefits to the community, such as:
Increased tax revenue.
Employment at a higher wage rate.
A benefitting service to the area.
A source of additional customers to the area.
An attractive development for the street.
X
906.2
o
907.0
'dE 903. ~ NORTH
~ x .8 X905.4
/
SIT[ PLAN LASKY NEW HOPE MINI MALL
ARCHITECTS, INC.
I~llk BERNARD HERMAN ! LASKY NEW HOPE MINI MALL
~----~-- ARCHITECTS, INC.!
III ......................... ! ~ ~w~. N~w ~o~, ~SOT~
I I~. BERNARD HERMAN I LASKY NEW HOPE MINI MALL
~> I '~... ARCHITECTS, INC. I
BERNARD HERMAN! LASKY NEWHOPE MINI MALL
7180 42ND. AV~ N' NEW HOPF
SITE PLAN CAR-X MUFFLER SHOP .,~.~,,.~.'At,:'Y''~'"~"°"~" co.,~..o.
L~ ARCHITECTS. INC. I
Properties at 42nd & Louisiana Avenues
7180 42nd Avenue PID #17-118-21-21-0031
Owner/Taxpayer: Market Value: Land: $259,(130
Lasky Company Real Estate 1/1/95 Building: $43,0(10
2506 Monterey Avenue S. Total: $302,000
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
7140 42nd Avenue PID #17-118-21-21-0035
Owner/Taxpayer: Market Value: Land: $152,(130
Nancy Day 1/1/95 Building: $212,030
Champion Auto Total: $364,030
5520 Highway 169 N.
New Hope, MN 55428
7100 42nd Avenue PID #17-118-21-21-0032
Owner/Taxpayer: Market Value: Land: $ 81,000
Cook Automotive Enterprises 1/1/95 Building: $ 36,0130
7100 42nd Avenue Total: $117,000
New Hope, MN 55428
4215 Louisiana Avenue PID #17-118-21-21-0034
Owners: Market Value: Land: $42,000
I. Brattelid 1/1/95 Building: $56,000
W. Silvan Total: $98,000
Taxpayer:
Gerald Anderson
6321 Cheshire Lane
Maple Grove, MN 55369
4229 Louisiana Avenue PID #17-118-21-21-0033
Owner/Taxpayer: Market Value: Land: $21,500
J. Anderson 1/1/95 Building: $73,500
4229 Louisiana Avenue Total: $95,000
New Hope, MN 55428
Total Estimated
Acquisition Cost: $976,000
i ~ ~L ~ FIRED m
L
' ~ 42 NO AVE. N. ROC~FOR
Figure 13 Hap ~of TIF District No. 1606
FEB-27-96 TUE 09;30 P, O1/12
Cop. rocK & SONS.ALL, P.A.
A~O~YS AT LAW ~
~inbur~ Execu~ Office PI~ ~ v. ~
8525 Edinbr~k Crossing
Suite ~203
Brookl~ P~k, Minueso~ 55~3
~ ($i~) 4~7
DATE: February 27, 1996 TIME: 9:30 am
PLEASE DELIVER TO: Kirk McDonald
FROM: Steve 5ondrall
RE: Business Relocation Info
OUR FILE NO: 99.10000
TOTAL NLTMBER OF PAGES, INCI,tTDiMG THIS PAGE: 12
( ) RUSH
( ) MESSENGER TO
(x) P~X TO CN~
( ) PLEASE CALL ME UPON RECEIPT OP A~OVE FAX.
( ) PHOTOCOPY PROMPTLY TO RgSERVE TEXT.
( ) OTHER
IF YOU DO NOT RECeiVE LEGIBLE COPIES OF ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL
BACK AS 8OON A~ POSSIBLE. THANK YOU. (612) 425-5671
FEB-27-96 TUE 09:30 P, 02/ 2
February 27, 1990
Mr. Kirk MCDonald
City of New Hope
4401Xylon Ave. No.
New Hope, Mr]. 55428
re: business relocation info
our file- 99.10000
Dear Kirk:
In response to our phone conversation today~ please find enclosed
the inTormation on business relocation you requested.
Basically, payment of all documented relocation costs are required.
These costs are set out in the federal Ur)iform Relocation Act, It
is a good policy to hike a relocation consultant to handle the cost
documentation proce~ when relocation benefits become an issue im
condemnat ion cas~s. Remember', Lhese ber~erits cannot be waived OF
contracted away by either the property owner or the tenant.
A summary of the costs can be found in sections Z4,301-Z4.307 of
lhe ecl. of course, relocation costs will be different for each
business. Also, a $20,000.00 payment can bm requested im lieu of
aotua~ costs if qualifyims informa%ion on income is p~ovided as set
out In sectlo~ 24.306 of the Act. It would ~ot be unusual to see
relocation costs in the $50,000.00 or more range.
CoRrect mo (f y~u have ar~y ulher' que5li~r)5 oF comments,
Very %ruly yours~
Steven A, Sondrall
09:30 ?, 03/12
' ·~ : r "-~
m~ . .
'~ ~ /
~ ~ __ ~ ~"~ ~- · i
". ; .... ,~ I · · _ ~m
/
- - - - ~ - ........ "
m--' -- --' z~ , ~ ~ mN~mZ ~ ~ m m=
!
, ~ ~ ~m--~ ,,
~ Mv,--~ -- ,,,' Z~ ~
FEB-27-96 TUE 09:31 P, 04/12
t
?MM?.Y OF MONETARY BENE..F..IT$
Bus,ness concerns who move on or after Apr11 Z, 3989, ~ be
eltgtble For eithert
a) Payments to cover the following wtthln certain limitations:
1) Actual reasonable moving and related expenses,
~ 2) Actual direct loss of personal property liquidated because
of the move,
3) Actual reasonable expenses Incurred In searchlng for a
replacement site, and
4) Reestablishment expenses.
o_R
b) A ftxed payment, except for payment to a nonprofit
organization, shall equal the average annual net earnings of
the business, but not less than $1,000.00 nor more than
$20,000.00. The displaced business ts eligible for the payment
if the Agency determines that the bustness cannot be relocated
wlthOUt a Substantial loss of 1ts exlstlng patronage, and It is
not part of a commercial enterprise having more than three
other entities which are not being acqutred by the Agency, and
whlch are under the same ownershtO and engaged In the same or
similar business actlvltte$, and the buslness is not operated
at a displacement dwelling solely for the purpose of rent~n~
such dwe111ng to others.
-7-
ELZ6]BLE MOVING EXPEN~[R
a) [ltglble costs. Any buslfless or lam operation which qualifies
as a displaced person is entitled to payment for such actual moving end
related expenses, as the Agency determines to be reasonable and
necessary, Including expenses for:
1) Transportation of personal property. Transporta:Jon costs for
a distance beyond 50 miles are not eligible, unless the Agency
determines that reloca:Jon beyond 50 miles ts
2) Packing, crating, unpacking, and uncrating of ~he personal
property.
3) Insurance for t~e replaceeent value of the personal ~roperty
connection wtth the move and necessary storage.
4) 0tsconnecttng and reinstalling leased equipment, such as
[elephone. burglar and fire alarm systems.
5) Reasonable replacement value of property lost' stolen, or
damaged in the process of moving (not through the fault or
negligence of the displaced person, h~s o~ hep agent,
employee) where Insurance covering such loss, theft, or damage
is not reasonably available.
~6) Labor expenses, ~ncludtng supervisory costs, associated with
the actual move.
0tsconnecttng, dismantling, removing, reassembling, and
reinstalling relocated machinery, e~utpment, and other personal
property, Including substitute personal property. This
includes connection to utilities available nearby. It also
FEB-2?-96 TUE 09:32 P, 06/t2
!
includes modifications to the personal property necessary to
adapt it to the replacement structure, the replacement site, or
the utilities at the replacement site, and modifications
necessary to adapt the utilities at the reDlacement ~tte to the
personal property. (Expenses for providing utilities from the
right-of-way to the building or improvements are excluded,)
The Agency's payments are llmlted to the least expensive method
of actually plactng equipment and making it functional in the
new site,
The methods of eetermlnlng the costs of the actual move are
discussed tn more detall tn the next sectlon, The other element of these
e11gtble movtng expenses warranting further discussion ts the reconnect
and reinstalling of machinery and equipment. Here, tt ts important to
remember that the Agency's obligation to reimburse you is limited by the
following factors:
a) A revtston related to reconnecting personal property is not
compensable If It was no: requlred at another sultable site
referred to you.
The revlslon Is not compensable unless it ts directly related
to personal property lnvolved In the move,
c) The revtston is not compensable if tt ts associated wlth a
change In the business.
d) The revtslon is not compensable lra simllar Improvemen: was
purchased by the Agency at the old location,
e) Under no con¢ltlon w111 the cost of brtnglng ut111ty servtce to
the butldtng ttself be reimbursable,
-9-
Once again, we urge you to plan the move w~h your counselor and
receive aUthOriZation for all ex~anses to avoid any misunderstandings.
-104
FEB-2?-96 ?UE 0@ 32 P. 08/ 2
§ 24,301 49 CI:R Subflfl~ A CI0-1-.94 I~dition) Office o~ the secmta~ ~
which has been redestcnated as the In- for actual moving and rel~tecl cxI>ense~ ~, the replacemellt ]cc&eton.
~erp~l Revenue Code of 1986 or for the under §24.301. Thi~ allowance ~h~l] be the paffment may l~e based on
purl)ese of de~ermlning the eligibility deterrntne, d accordine to the applicable madnlng useful life of the extel
or the extent of eliffibllity of ~ny per- schedule approved by the }~eder/cl High. cerise, P~rmi:. Or certification,
so~l for a~ist~nce under the Secant Se- way Administration. Thi~ includes .a (?) Tile reDlacement value of
curit~' Act or any o~her Federal law, provision that the p. xpen~ ~nd disloca, lost, s~olen, or ~larna~ed in the -
except for any Federal law providintl lion allowlnae t~ a pe~son wi~.h mini- of moving Ino~ tin'ouCh the
Iow.income housing assistance, mai personal DO.~ses.~ions who is in cc- negligence of the displa~ed per~
c~lDaneY of a dormitory .~ty]e room or her a/Ielll;, Or employee) wher~
Subl:~r$ O--Paymenfs for Moving shared by two or m~re other unrelated a~lce covering such loss, theft, c
ofld RelC~K:[ ~p~nses oerson~ or · person who.~e residenti.',: age is no~ reasonably available,
move is performet by an ~,enc~- at. no (ii) Professional services
§PAn[01 Payment for actual reasosmble cost to the person sh~ll !~. )irnited to for:
dentisl moves. (1) Pla.mltn~ the move of the
§ ~4~03 Payment for actual reasonable proper~y,
Any displa~ed owner-occu~nt or ten- morros a~d. related expenm~-- (iii Movir~ the personal
· nt of a dwelling who qualifies as a dis- nonresidential moves, and
pla,ced person Ide~ned at §24.~)) is
: tA~led ~c Dayment of his or her actual (e) F_Jigibie co~=. Any business or farm (iii) Instai~in~ the relented
movin~ ~nd related expez~es, as the operatio~ which qualifies as a dis- property at the replacement
'"' A~ency determines to be reuol~le pla~edperson(defineda~§2~.2~)) is eh- (9} l~eletterin~ sierra ~nd re;
~ud necessary', includir~ expenses for: t~led to p&ymen~ for such aa~ual mcr- ,,:: stationery on hand &t the time
.,.,. (~) Transportation of the displaced in/r a.ud role. ted expenses, as the A~enoy plicement time are fnade obeole',
. person ~nd pe~onal lrrope~y. 5~r~ determines ~o be reasonable &nd nec- result of the move.
, portation cosr~ for & disTAnce beyond 50 essay', including expenses for: {10~ Actual direct loss of
: miles are not eligible, unless l~e A~en. {I) Tr~uspor~ation of ~ersozml prop- aerial property incurred ~s ~ re:
,"i ~:. c~ determines rnze.~ reloc~1fion beyond ercy, Transpor~tion cos~ for ~ dis- movin~ or discontinuing the
~, ~/) miles m ~uS~;lfied, r~ace beyond 50 rl~les ale not elilFlble, or farm opera, teen. The ~xrnen:
(b) P~clan/L crating, unlocking, slid unless the Agency determines that r~- consist of the lesser of:
:: uncr~un~ of c~e person~ property, loc~rao~ ~eyona 50 miles is justified, ii) The fair marlcet value of th
~,.. lc) Di~com~ec~in~, a~...mffla~l;lln~, re` (2) Faclcln~, craraz~, unpacking, and for con~inued use at the dia=l~c
!. moving, r~rnlghng, a. lld l'e[nsTAi[[ll~ B31cr&~l~ of tl~e person~I property, site, less the proceeds from its sa
~'. rcloc~d hou~eholcl appLe&ness, ltllrt f3) Disco~mec~II~, alsma=t~inK, re- be eli/lble for pa.vrnent, ~he cl~
i! o~her De~aol:~l proI~l-~y, morillO, ~ssseml)Ltng. a.u(i rel~stanli~tl must make & good faith effor~
· .,. (d) Stora~ of the pe~soz~l proper~y r~loca~ed maclnnel'y, equipment, and the personal property, u~ess the
' for a pc=lcd ~ot to exceed 12 rnon~lm, other persona~ proper=y, mclu~r~ su~ cy de,ermines th~ such effort
,~, unlcae the A~ncy der~erm~e.s t,l~, a ~M~Ut~ penmn~l property 2escrl~ed ~ necessarlr, When payment for pr,
lon~er pe~od i~ ~eoe~.,'-y, §~1.303(a)(1~). Thi~ includes conllectlon loSs is claimed for goods held
; (e) InSurance ~or the replax:ei-n~nt~ to utlllLi~ ~va/la, ble nesxDy, l~ ILLS0 ii1- Che ~a~ marlget va311e shall i~ be-,
~ v~lus of the propcr~y in ¢o~uec~ion eludes modlfic~io~ ~ r, he person~l lale cost o! ~he goods ~0 the bm
'~ w,D,h the move a~d neceaeaz7 storage, property necea.-~ry ~ ad~p~ 1~ ;o l~he not the Votential seLllIl~ price,);
(f) The t. epl~cement Ye. lug of la'op~z~y repis~c~clli; strtlctu~e, bbc repla~'~ (Il) Tl~e estirn[ted cost of merit
lost, sl:olen, or da4.z~gcd in ~he proc. e~ mcal~ ~e, or the u~tlti,ie~ t~ the r~- ir~n, but with no allowance for
of rnovis~ (nog through thc fault or, placement a/to, amd modl/Ic~tiova ne~- e~e. (If 1;lie busi~leSS or fa4'~ ODe:
negligence of the displaced per~o~, his eesa.,~ to a~i~p2 the ut/li~ie~ ,,~ thc ~e- i~ discontinue(I, the estimated
~, or her ~ent. or emD~oyee) where i~ur- l~l~ccmcnt sit~ r.o ~ pemsov~l prop- 1~ l:lad~(l O~ a mo~ ~
,~' a~ue eove~in~ suah loss, theft, or da4~- erty, CExpez~4.~s for providi~ utilities . ~0 miles.)
i!~ a~. iS not reasonably ~vail~ble. /l'om the right-of-way ~o the building (11) T~e reasonable cos~ lncu~,
~) Other moving.related ex~es or impr~vem~ aec excluded.) ~ttempcin~ to aeu an item
~ tlurt s.~e not, listed ~s ineligible u~der (t) Ignore of r~hc pcr~o~l prop~'cy to be rel0c~,te/L
~.' §~,~K~, as the A~ency der~mllines ~o be for a period not t~ exceed 12 meninx, laUl~ of sllbS~i;ui;e
'~ reasonable ~nd nee~.ss.al~, unle~ the A~enoy de~:rmi~s ~h~.~ a 'If ~ itelll Of
:';' lo~ge~ peeled is neeemsary, which is W/ed as ~ of ·
:: §~ Fixed payment for aovia~ ex- is) I.~surl~oe for t. he repla~nent faz~ Opet'&~On iS not; l~oved"
,: Any persoll disifl&ced/1-om & dwellin~ ~e~tton with the move a~i neeess.~rY tho,r, pel'f01Tns a
" receive /~n expense and dialoc&~io,~: ~i, (6) a~, :'.c. en~e. T~nllit, or eertifi' Per~n is ell~l~le/t to
;, lowance aa a.n ad~erns:ive ~O I I~ayment ~tton reqvired of the displa~ed pc?goD lea~r of;
22/)
09:33 P, 09/].2
:~ Sul3ftfle A (10-1.-94 Otlice of ltte Sec, rotary of Tmmpoftaflan §24.303
~ moving and related ~c ~he ~epia~emcn~ loc~t~on. However, (D ~e coac of ~he au~l~u~
~,~I, T~s ~low~ s~l ~he ~men~ ~y ~ ~d on ~e ~- lncl~ t~latlon coa~ a~
~pp~oved by the F~e~ cent, ~, or ce~2~lon. ~om ~e ~e or ~e:ln of the
uinM~Ct0n, ~t~ Includes (T) ~e ~l~ement v~ue of ~y ~I~ t~m: or
~ ~c the ex~n~ ~d 1o~, a~leu, or ~ In t~e ~oc~ l~) ~e es~d cost of ~o~n~ ~d
w~ce to a ~on with or mo~ (not t~ough the f~t or relns~ ~e ~91~ l~m but
cn~l ~easto~ who is in ~. neg~gen~ of ~e ~18~1~ ~o~, ~8 ~o ~lo~c~ fo~ 8~e. A~ ~he Age,-
of · dormitory style mo~: or ~er ~en~ or employee) where i~- cy's ~on. ~he est~ coa~ for
~ two ~ more other ~el~t~. ~ce cove~n~ su~ 1o~. ~ef~. or ~- low c~t or uncomDll~ move ~y
~ a ~on whose residena~ ~ ~e ia no~ ~Uly ~v~l~le, ~ b~ on · 81~le Did or ~l~.
~o~ed by ~ ~ency at no' (6) ~f~o~ ~c~ ne~ (la) Se~n~ for a ~p~emen~
.he ~on shall be limi~d ~ for: c~on. A ~Spl~ U~ln~
~1) PI~ ~he move of ~e ~o~ o~0n lS end,lea ~ ~lm~ment
Pu~ent [or~ ~le pro~y, for ~ ex~s, no~
~o[e co~. ~y b~in~ or f~ (l~l) ~lin~ the relo~ ~ ~~ for · repl~men~
~a(de~ned at~Ci,~g))[sen- (9) ~let~ si~ ~d ~e~l~i~ (ID Me~ ~na l~ng ~w~ ~o~
~en~ for Such ~ ~ov- s~one~ on ~nd &~ ~he ~tme of ~- home.
· ~t~a ex~s. ~ ~e ~ncy p~emen~ ~ ~e ~e ob~le~e ~ · (lid ~me ~n~ ~~,
~8 ~ ~ ~ble ~d n~ ~sul~ of ~he move.
~on or ~o~ DF0~ :i~; so~l ~o~ inched ~ ~ ~t of or b~er ~ loc~ ~ repl~emen~
-~r~ion c~ Ior& ~- ..~/:.. ~o~ or ~onMn~n~ ~e b~iue~ excluMve of ~ny fees or co~o~
'ond ~ ~leu ~ no~ el~le, or ~ o~on. ~e ~en~ 8~1 ~l~d ~ ~he p~c~e of such ~.
~ A~en~y de~es t~ ~ co~tS~ or,he l~r of: ail O~h~ mo~-~l~d e~
~yond ~ ~ea is l~l~e~. (t) ~e f~ ~e~ value of the i~ ~a~ ~c no~ lt~d ~ ineli~ble ~dcr
~, c~in~, un~XI~, ~ for conUnu~ ~ It ~e disDl~eme~t f~4.~. ~ ~he A~oncy dc~c~ncs
- of ~hc ~o~ pro~y, sl~e, le~ ~e proc~ ~m l~ s~e. ftc ~on~le ~nd neck.
~o~ec~lng, ~sn~lln~, ~- be ell~ble for ~e~, ~e et~ (b) ~o~fic~zi~ ~ i~i~. ~c fol-
· ~embltng, ~nd rel~ll~ ~ ~ke a gO~ f~th effort ~ sell lowing r~uiremen~ ~pply co ~,
m~hine~-, cquipmen~, ~ ~e ~o~ p~rty, unless the A~en- men~s unde~ ~hi~ s~tion:
:o~ P~F, incIulin8 su~ cy dete~ t~ s~c~ effo~ is ~0~ (1~ ~e ~e~y s~l info~
~rao~al ~o~ de~rlbed ~ nece~, ~en ~y~en~ for 9ro~r~y Dl~ed ~on, in ~i~tnE.
s av$ilablo nc~by, I~ ~so ~- ~he f~r ~Ee~ v~ue sh~l ~ ~ on of this ~tlon ~q ~6n ~s ~ible
o~fle~tio~ ~o ~ho ~n~ ~e co~ of ~e ~ooa~ ~o the b~ne~; the i~t~ton of negotiations.
nec~ ~o ~V~ 1~ to ~he no~ ~e ~n~a selll~ p~ee.); of fox,on ~ be l~ed
mt s~c~e. ~he repl~ ~11) ~ ~l~d cOS~ Of mo~ ~e oiMon info~on 9~ded
.. or the utlli~c~ ~ ~he r~ 1~. ~B~ Wl~ ~0 ~lOW~ for s~or- vl~ed ~on ~ ~ for~ ~ ~.
~pt :he u~lt~i~ ~ ~he ~ ~ ~o~ued, the es~ cost tke A~encY ~o~[e ~ ~t~n
; site ~ th~ ~o~ ~ =~1 ~ ~ on · movl~ ~ce of no~tce of the a~v~x~
~s for ~o~ding u~iH~ic~ ~ ~1~,) s~t of ~e mov~ or ~s~l~on of
~ght-of-w~ ~ t~ b~l~ (~) The re~cnable cost ine~ In ~r~o~ ~r~y ~d a
emen~ ~ excluded.) ~m~ ~ ~U an l~m ~ ia no~ i~ ~ ~ move, Howev~.
.~e of ~e ~o~ prc~ W ~ rel~. cY ~ w~ve ~s notice
':d not ~ ex~ ~ mon~, (~) ~ Of subs~tu~ ~o~ ~e~ d~enti~ l~ file
Sod is ne~. e~y w~ic~ la ~d ~ ~ of ~ b~ ~he A~ncY w ~ke ~ble
~ce for the ~vl~ement Or ~ o~zlon ls ~o~ move~ b~ ~ ~ ~8~cMo~ of ~he ~o~1
he ~o~ ~o~rty in con- p~mp~ly ~ m~ · su~tu~ pro~y &~ ~th ~he ~spl~men~ ~d
:~h the move and ~ece~y i~em ~ ~o~ a com~le ~nc- ~p~en~ si~ ~d ~ mo~r
~on a~ ~e ~a~men~ sl~. ~Be ~ move.
uired of the dt~pl~ed ~n ~he le~r oR elec~ ~ ~e ~1 ~ibillty for
381
FEB-27-96 TUE 09:34 P. IO/12
§ ~M,.31~ 49 CFR S~btttl~ A (10--I-94 Edition] Off~e of ~e ~creta~ ~ Tra~
the move of'the busi~ or f~ o~ mcn~ ~t~e, ~ugh ~ ~, ~el~, o~ (d) ~o~ of ~r0f~:
~on. the A~ey ~y ~ke ~ ~- ~r~tin~. (e) Lo~ of t~ined employee~
ment for ~e ~on's mo~n~ ~ (6) ~i~n~, fee~ and ~i~ W~e~ (~ Any ~dltional
~ined By the ~en~y o~ p~ed by ~d m~ke~l~ a~udie~. 10~tion e~gt
~lfied s~ff. At the A~enoy's ~so~o- ($) Adve~tis~men~ of repl~e~n~ lo- ~.~[~1(10): or
rios. a ~ent for ~ low ~v~ or un-
(~) Pe~o~I in}~yl or
COmptieAt~ move ~ ~ b~ed on · (9) ~ofes~io~ ~ice~ In
lin~le bid or ~, ~ion wi~h ~C p~ or le~e ~f ~ r~ (h) Any le~l fee or othcr
p~in~ ~ cl~m for ~ ~lo~t
~ ~fo~ th~ A~oy; or
bls l~w, the clot sh~l' ~fer ~ a~tio~ d~n~ ~e fl~t ~ y~ ~ ~h~
~he ~en~y ~e~p of ~ ~o~ reDl~me~ ~ for ~oh 1~ ~: iii ~n~e~ for a~rchin~
Dr0~Y that ~ not ~en moved, ii) ~e ~ ren~ ch~o~, pl~emen~ dwcllin6;
sold. or ~ed in. iii] ~o~al or ~ ~o~ty ~, ~} Physical c~
is) Ag~ ~. ~e ~o~t of a (iii) Insu~n~ ~u~, ~d ~y at the replacemen~
~eB~ for ~t lo~ of ~ ~ve~ (iv] ~titity c~es. exclu~ng emmet b~inee~ or f~ o~ra~on
lng si~ which Is ~1 p~F fe~. ~vided in ~4.~1{3)
sh~l ~ the tear of: {11} ~ f~s or on,time ~ss. or
(1) The depressed reDroduc~n oost men~ for ~cl~d he~ ucllitl- (h~ oos~s for ~ffe of ~o
of ~e si~, ~ de~lned bl' tbs Ages- ~e. e~, on re~l ~y ~lrc~dy
i~l O~her t~ th~ ~e A~e~cy con- le~ed by the dia~l~ccd
CY, le~ the p~cee~ from t~ ~le: or
I2) ~e es:ima~d cos: of m~n~ ~he side~ e~nti~l ~ ~he
st~, bu~ wi~ no ~low~ce for s~. of ~he b~ine~. ~ P~ p~e~
di~pl~ed
nu~id~l m~m. ment ex~n~c~es no~ co~ide~d to ~ ~y ~ cligtble ~o choose ~ fz
~ ~Mo~ ~ ~he ~~ KV~l~ble ~uo~le, ne~.Fy, or o~e~i~ eli- men~ l~ lieu of thc ~ymen~
~let movi~ ~d ~l~d ex~nae~.
u~der ~24,~ of ~is sub~, ~ s~] {i) F~Ch~ of ~pi~ ~. such . ~u~ ~o~bl¢ ~e~bli~hm
celv2 ~ ~yme~, not ~ exceed ~10,~, c~ne~', or ~e fixtures. ~ueh F~d ~ment, exoe~c
for ex~es ~u~ly inc~d In ml~ (2) ~ of ~c~l~ ma~- me~t to a non~rofit o~i.
~, prod=c~io~ ~u~lles. p~auct ~-
oa~l~ anti r~s~blis~ng su~ ~ll ~ tbs ave~e ~nual
b~nes$, f~ o~ non~fi~ o~- nor~ co~ of ~he b~ine~
~lon a~ a ~pl~ment site. ~ce with ~e~r.. ph
' (~) EIt~OIe ~p~e~. ~ees~bl~e~ ~io~. but nm. ~e~ t.l;~ $1~; r..
(3) ~:orcs~ on money borI-ow~ ~u ~.~. ~e diSDl~ed b~ine~
ex~ m~t ~ redouble ~d nec- ~ke ta~ mo~ or p~ch~ ~ ~ bi0 for ~he ~int
~, ~ de~Inea Dy ~he ~¢y, plaeemen~ p~o~y. ~es
~ey include, but ~e no~ Ii~M ~, (4) P~ent to ~ ~-t~e b~ine~
~e foBowl~: tn ~e home w~ch d~ no~ oon~bn~ I1) ~e buatne~ owns or
(I) ~ or lm~ve~enM ~ the ~fl~y ~ ~e houss~ld income. ~ ~y wht~
by ~, ~m~ or 1o~ law. c~e or ~ A~. ~. 1~) for ~Qh ~ e~nse would
~c6. ~ such move: ~.
(2) M~fi~o~ ~ ~he ~pl~t ~ ~ble mo~g ~d ~ ~ r~s from ~
o~tion or ~e ~pl~cemen~ s~O- A ~spl~ ~on is' not en~ed ~ ~out ~ su~ti~
~s sm~blc for ~nduc~ ~he buai- ~ent f0m : ~ ~on~ (clien~le
~. (~) ~e cost 0f mo~ ~ s~c~ ~), A b~ne~
~) Co=~o~on ~d i~la2on Or other ~ pro~y ~ov~en~ l~ ~ ~ ~e~ ~he A~encF dst
c~ f~ ex~or ~ ~ ~e~ W~C~ ~e ~d ~on ~ '~t i~ ~ not ~ffer
~e b~lne~, o~e~Dlp. ~owever, ~s ~ d~ no~ .~ 1~ e~st~ ~o~e: ~d
(4) ~sion of u~iIl~tea ~m ~h~ ~l~e ~he co~Pu~0~ ~d~ (3) ~e b~i~
Dl~ent ai~, (b) ~ on · l~ ~ cov~ mov- ~e o~er en~les which
(~) ~edeco~Cion or ~p~emen~ of ~~1 or ~ by
~il~ or wo~ s~oes ~ ~ho ~p~ (c) ~ of ~oodwlll; or ~ under the ~e ow
FEB-27-~8 ~!~,.~. 0~'35, P, 11/12
~t:R Subtle A CIC~I-.94 Office of the $~'.mtaW of Trcnmooduffon ~.~
u ~ Of~o~ e~. of · b~ine~ Or f~ o~Gton in- ~pl~en~ dwellin~ ~lely for ~he
~lblllcy s~e~s, $oll e~ ~o of o~ in ~ new P~ Of ~n~n~ such dwelH~
ke~/~ s~U~eS, l~on except ~ ~dod tn other.
h the ~ Or le~ 0i & ih) ~y leg~ fee Ur o~her cos~ ~r p~ of ~n~n~ the ~ ~
lncr~ed
d~n~ ~he f~ 2 ye~ ~ ~e ' ~fore ~he Agency; or son d~ ~e 2 ~ble ye~ ~o~ ~o
s~n~ p~. ~d ~r~ ~ ~e ~pl~e~enc l~Glon of & stitu~ a s~le b~ w~oh Is entt-
ilf~ e~es. exe~ ~t b~in~ or f~ o~ra~on excep~ ~ ~ad ~ o~y one ~ ~ent, ~
a~t f~ o~ on. time ~ or ' -'
br ~Ci~ hea~ u~ (k) Coa~ for:~to~e of ~D~ ~ clu~n~ the e~nt ~ w~oh:
her l~ ~ ~he Agency co~ le~ b~ ~he ~apl~ed ~. (2) Su~t~lly ldenti~ o~
',~e~. ..,c, }~ F~ pm~t for mo~g ~- m~Ced b~ine~ functions ~ ~
Such flx~ ~ymen~. excep~ ~r ~* (C} F~ O~ion. A ~spl~ed f~
-c~ of ~t=n~ ~ men~ ~o ~ nonprofit o~ani~lon, s~l o~on tdefln~ a~ i2t.2(i))
~uc~lon supplies. Dr~uc~ In- e~l t~e &ve~c ~nB&l ne~ e~-m~ choo~ & fixed ~ent, in lieu of
ur o~her lce~ u~d in ~e of ~he bu~inc~. ~ computed in ~co~-
~00 wibh ~ph tO) O[ ~hla ~c~lOU. ed ex~s ~d ~ ~o~ble
e~'e~ on ~oney Oo~owed ~ ~u~ no~ le~ ~h~n ~1.~ n~r more ~han ~blishmen~ e~, In ~
,mo w~ch doe~ hoc con~bu~ ~ (1) ~e buaine~ o~ or ren~ ~ le~ ~ $1,~ ~0~ mote ~
!y ~o the ho~chold income. ~ ~o~r~ w~ch m~ ~ mov~ in ~ ~Be C~ Of · ~ ~q~SttlO~ Of
~ed ~on is not entitled ~ ' without ~ su~ lo~ of i~ e~ ~ ~he o~;Or ~ ~ ~apl~ed
:e&t Dr0~Y improvement ~ : ~s ~ u~e~ ~h~ Agency de~n~ (2) ~e ~ ~t~ ~
~. However, ~s D~ does not ] ~ i~ e~ ~~: ~d f~
scs; Or ~ ~quir~ by ~e A~enoy. ~d ~eu of ~ ~~ ~
· of ~dwill; or w~ch ~ under the ~e ownc~p ~d ~d e~ ~d ~ re~on-
FEB-2?-96 TUE 09:36 P, 12/t2
~24,,,~7 49 CFR Subtttle A (10-1-94 J:dlft~ '~i ~o ~ ~ ~m~
~ble ~blls~en~ ex~s. If ~he or lo~1 gove~e~ h~ ~ ~ement ~b~ E--Replacement Ho~
~ency de~o~ln~ ~t It ~ot ~ or right,f-way; ~d
~lg~ ~out ~ SUDS~t~ I~ of ,(2) ~e u~lli~y ~flJ~'s ~i~h~ of
e~ ~c~n~e (mem~ or eli- cu~ncF the~on i~ ~t ~ ~ J~,~l ~pl~men~ hou~
en~le), A nonwoflt o~ion is ~ law or I~AI o~n~ee s~fl~l~ ~u- fo= 1~
8~ ~ meet ~ts [~t, u~ ~he thofla~ such u~, or where such u~ (a) SJlgibflily, A ~splaced
~enc~ demons~ o~e~. ~y and o~ey h~ ~en ~d i~le for t2e ~pi~em~t
~ent In ex~ of $1.~ m~t ~ t~ou~h ~ &~no~se, u~ ~d o~u~cy ~r ~ l~y ~omeow~e~
~or the ~o 12-mo~h ~fl~ prior to ~d (1~ ~ ~ly, o~e~
~ ~de;~en by ~e disD~l~ ~c, ~=d ~y
i~ ~t~n one F~ ~f~er
(e) A~age a~u~ ~ ~s of ~ (4) ~e~ lS no Feds~ ~w, .other ~c follo~n~ d~
b~l~ ~/a~ ~. ~e ~ve~e ~.h~, ~e U~fo~ ACt, w~ch cle~ly
~ net e~in~ of a b~e~ or A~cy ma~ cx~d such
2- e~ ~fore Fede~l, S~e. ~d ut~ll~ mo~ cos~ ~t ts a~ti~ble (~ .~e d~ thc ~on
," io~ i~come ~es d~ng ~he 2 ~ble ~ the ~spl~i~ ~en~'s ~ or ~t for ~he di~p~emcn~ d~
~' y~ in which it w~ ~spl~, H ~e (5) S~ or I~ ~vemment ~im- ~ ~he ~11 ~oun~ of ~he
~ b~ne~ or ~ w~ no~ in o~on b~ment for utility mo~n~ ca~ or jus~ oom~tio~ i~ de~o~e~ '
'., for ~ fuI1 ~ ~ble ye~ p~or ~ di~ ~ent of such cos~ by the ~apl~- ~o~t. or
,, pi~c~en~, net e~ ~1 ~ b~ed ~g ~ency in i~ accar~ ~th ~ (it~ ~e d~e the
· ~. ~ o~ ZAe ~ct~ ~ of o~raMo~ at the l~w. o~li~atio~ unde~ ~ ~.~ i~ met.
~ ~s~lac~en~ st~ d~n~ the 2 ~ble ih) For ~e ~s ~f t~ ~ee~o~, (h~ ~o~f o/~m~t. ~e re
· ' ye~ ~or to ~spI~en~. projec~d the ~ ~tr~ordina~ ~es me~ merit ho~in~ ~ent for an eL
~ ~ ~ ~ ~a~. Avers ~ ~e~ ~o~ ex~ which, i~ the opi~on of
~ ~ ~ b~d ~ a ~fferent ~e ~sDlaciM ~cy, a not routine ~d ~.~. f~e also i~.~.
~; ~ el tl~e whe~ ~he ~e~cy de~- or D~dia~ble ex~es ~la~ ~o thc ~ent ~de~ this sub~t ~ Ii
~. ~es It W ~ mo~ equable, Net utlHty'a ~cu~e~ of ~h~f-w~. ~ ~he ~o~t n~ ~ ~)oc
e~ lnCluae ~y co~n~ion o~ ~d &~ not o~1~ bu~e~d ~ o~ a c~'~ble ~l~ement d~
p~ homeo~e~occu~nt
~o~ ~y its o~er. ~e o~er's s~. ~e uttlitF f~li~y ~ e~lici~lF ~d ~e ~svl~ement dwellinz.
~d de~n~en~. ~e ~s~d ~on ~owt~l~ ~d to ~ such ex- ~ com~ble ~pl~en~ dwell
~h~I ~sh the ~en~ Drool of ~et ~nses ~ ~ con~o~ fo= ~ of ~e ~e ~v~ble ~o such ~o2.
o~ ~c1~ s~en~, or oth~ ~ ~s~ible for such ~. ~ off
~ble e~ae~ w~c~ the A~e~cy (o) A ~l~lon ~en~ tv a u~y (l) ~e ~o~t bY w~ch ~he'c
de~nes Is ~~. ~fli~y o~er for mo~ o~ ~der · ~pl~e~n~ dwel~ ex~
(a) ~enever a ~o~ ~ ~ject ~ or ~ject. le~ ~y l~c~ 1~ (2) ~e lnc~d ~s~ cost
~aer~k~ by a displ~ ~cy v~ue of ~e n~ ~ill~y ~a ~v~e . o~her ae~ se~ cos~ which a
~e~ ~he relo~on of ~ u~ty ~fl- v~e of ~ o1~ f~ili~y, ~e ~pl~l~ c~e~ ~ ~ec~ion wi~h
l~y (~ ~242 {~) ~d (bb)) ~d ~he ~- ~n~y ~ ~e u~lll~ i~ility o~er mo~s) on t~e ~pl~ement.
~ ~l°~°nex~°r t~ fa~ll~Yfor 1~ c~ao~er, ex~r-~he ~s- -h~!l ~h p~or ~men~ on ~e ~- ~, ~ 2e~l~
~ ~e~c7 ~. ~ i~ op~on, ~ of ~e ~Mll~ ~10~o~ work ~ ~p~ (a)of ~s ~ctlOn;
, ~e · ~1o~clo~ ~ent ~ ~ ~ ~omp~ed, ~e e2~bili~ of the ~ ~ ~e ~h~ or ~e
} o~er ~or al or ~t of such e~. w~k ior ~ement. the ~n- dweU~, ~ d~n~ m ~r
~ ~e foEo~ ~ ~e met: sl~lUti~ f~ ~cl~ ~d ~m~t~- ;' ~ ~~ (e) of ~s ~loB,
{j (1) ~e u~Uty ~l~Cy le~ly o~u- 1~ ~e work, and ~e me~ of ~cu- (c) ~e ~/f~~)
~ ~es ~ or 1~ gove~ent vro~ ~a~ cos~ ~d ~ ~ent. ~on. ~e ~ diffe~n~l~
: ~y, ar p~r~y over whi~ ~e S~ (~ ap~n~ A, of t~S ~, [ ~,) ~d ~der ~ph ih)(1) of
october 1985
"42nd_ ,.avenue
?!i
] s
~ ~ar~ ~:
...... city of:
~~rth~st -
~ ,.s~,~ hop
~ ~ ~ ,co.,u,~n~.,~ new e, minnesota
I J ~2o ~;~ ~. ~e.-~"
m,n~[ m,n~ 55416
introduction
Since the 1976 New Hope Community Development Plan, the commercial
strip along and the City's
42nd
Avenue
between
Winnetka
Avenue
eastern boundary has been iden~tified as a controversial area. The
commercial strip development in this area of New Hope has resulted
in land use and traffic concerns that notably impact the existing
businesses and residents in this area.
In an effort to provide some direction in dealing with the area
land use and traffic concerns, zoning issues and recent development
requests along the 42nd Avenue corridor, the City has decided to
formulate an area physical improvement plan. The study area of this
will be the 42nd Avenue corridor between Winnetka Avenue and
report
Louisiana Avenue. The study area will be bounded on the north by
'45th Avenue North and the south by 40th Avenue North. The plan will
be focusing on the specific development concerns within the 42nd
Avenue study area. The_~a~l will th~l..provide con~eotual ~uidel.ines
to assist in directin~g future dev~elopme~t and redeve~opmen~ efforts ~
in-~t-his area of New Hope.
New Hope has established the planning background for the area through
past planning efforts, including the 1977 Community Development Plan,
1977 Commercial Core Guidelines, and the 1985 42nd Avenue/City Center
Market Study. This plan will attempt to go beyond these previous
planning efforts with a more detailed focus and more specific recom-
mendations forland use and development goals.
The 42nd Avenue Improvement Plan will be developed through a methodical
planning process composed of six stages. These stages are identified
in sequence graphically (with the exception of stage six) on the
following page. With respect to this report, the tactical stage of
the planning process was initially accomplished with the 1977 New
Hope Community Development Plan and the 1977 Commercial Core Guideline
Study and subsequently updated during the recent 42nd Avenue/City
Center Harket Study. The Community Development Plan identified general
land use issues and opportunities and provided recommendations for deal-
ing with these planning issues. The 42nd Avenue Improvement Plan will
focus more specifically on a single study area and re-evaluate the
issues, opportunities and recommendations of the 1977 Community Develop-
ment Plan determine if still to the curren~ study
to
they
are
applicable
area environment.
I
I
42nd avenue
improvement
study
STUDY AREA
BOUNDARIES
new hope, minn.
-- ZOt'lSUl[,:~t q[5. It3C
New Hope Apartments are located in center block between Nevada
Avenue and Louisiana Avenue. Site inspection reveals four structures
containing twelve dwelling units on a 3.2 acre site. The overall
density is 15 units per area which is consistent with the R-4 zoning.
The apartments are in good structural condition. The site is well
kept, however, the area lacks any landscape treatment and does not
provide any garage spaces as required by the New Hope Zoning
Ordinance.
Comme rc i a 1
As shown on the existing land use map, a strip of commercial develop-
ment has occurred. This strip of commercial development is comprised
of 31.4 acres and is contained in four zoning districts.
The commercial land uses south of 42nd Avenue and west of the rail-
road tracks are for the most part located in industrial zoning districts.
The New Hope Zoning Ordinance allows for some commercial uses that
compliment industrial development to locate within industrial districts.
The commercial uses in this portion of the Study Area conform with the
uses allowed in the industrial districts.
An "R-O", Residential/Office Zoning District covers one lot in this
industrial area. The lot contains an animal hospital which is permitted
by conditional use permit in the R-O District. The lot, however, is
substandard by the R-O zoning standards.
The greatest portion of the commercial uses within the Study Area are
zoned "B-3", Auto-Oriented Business District, intended to serve motor
vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities.
Review of the Study Area reveals that the majority of uses are
appropriately zoned, however, several retail, service and office uses
are not allowed within the B-3 District and as such exist as non-
conforming uses.
The commercial development along 42nd Avenue has occurred in an un-
coordinated strip pattern, resulting following concerns:
in
the
· Multiple access. The strip development has created multiple site
access points occurring along 42nd Avenue, resulting in conflicts
between traffic oriented to commercial activities and through
traffic.
· Substandard lots. Commercial lots east of the railroad tracks
have occurred on small lots, lacking sufficient area to support
the commercial use. In many cases, the small lots are over
utilized, lacking sufficient area to meet City performance stan-
dards such as setbacks parking, loading, and landscaping. The
small lots also encourage smaller, low value buildings which have
limited reuse by contemporary commercial uses.
Public
Fred Sims Park is located in the northeast corner of the 42nd Avenue
Study Area. The park is approximately six acres in size, providing
open space for the surrounding residential neighborhood. The park
has not been developed and contains no recreational equipment.
Urban barriers are natural environmental features, as well as man-
made elements that act as major influences confining or restricting
land use and access. These barriers typically serve to divide a
community into identifiable subareas which provide boundaries for
land use changes.
The barriers that exist in the 42nd Avenue Study Area are shown on
the following map. The major barriers are 42nd Avenue, Winnetka
Avenue, Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad tracks and the
Crystal city boundary. These barriers have greatly impacted the
development in the Study Area and contribute to the numerous land use
concerns.
Forty-Second Avenue is a four lane minor arterial street that runs
east and west through the Study Area. Traffic volumes and traffic
speeds create a significant barrier for north-south vehicle and
pedestrian traffic. The street traffic also presents problems for
site access and egress for those businesses abutting the street.
This barrier effectively restricts north and south traffic movements.
The Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad runs north and
south through the middle of the Study Area. The operational
characteristics of the railroad have greatly influenced the type
of land use that has occurred adjacent to the railroad right-of-way.
With the exception of the single family homes along the southeast
portion of the Railroad Avenue, the City has encouraged more intense
land use to develop along the track right-of-way.
The railroad tracks are elevated and serve to physically divide the
Study Area, both visually and for traffic movement. 42nd Avenue
represents the only street underpass for 4,000 feet north and south
of 42nd Avenue. The limited number of east-west access routes
created by the railroad tracks contribute to the traffic volumes
on 42nd Avenue. The railroad track also presents a visual obstruc-
tion for motorists traveling east and west on 42nd Avenue. This
visual obstruction along with the numerous site access points onto
42nd Avenue have contributed to a!high volume of traffic accidents.
crystal border
] Il I
42nd avenue north
[]~f-'k] III~ I!lll Ill~l ~1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
..... .- '0 · s~ .
jl ~w'nne~'aavl~"e = ~ I ]~~'P~-F~
~ ~ tl ~1 ~ I~ SSI elevated railroad grade il I~?'~1
~2nda~enue improvement study
~ URBAN BARRIERS
~nonnwes~
'I lassooa~ed ~ orth
__~ new hope, minnesota o ~oo, 2oo, ~oo,
Standard five foot sidewalks are currently provided on both sides of
42nd Avenue for pedestiran use. 42nd Avenue is, however, an unpleasant
walking environment and portions of the sidewalks are in need of
repair. Young bicyclists often ride on the sidewalks as they are
unable to compete with vehicular traffic in the streets. Bicycles
and pedestrians on the narrow sidewalk are not compatible. Between
the street and sidewalks is a strip of rough asphalt paving which
has an unfinished appearance and is not suitable for pedestrian use.
Under the railroad bridge, this strip disappears and the sidewalk is
right along the curb with only five feet of useable right-of-way on
either side. This condition limits possibilities for improving the
walking environment, but only immediately beneath the bridge.
Residential Street Patterns
The residential streets in the Study Area have been designed to dis-
courage through traffic and to preserve the tranquility of the low
density single family neighborhoods. The Minneapolis, Northfield and
Southern Railroad has had a pronounced effect on this street development
by limiting the number of streets crossing the tracks. Similarly, few
streets are continuous across 42nd Avenue. These patterns, plus the
curved residential streets, cul-de-sacs and center block high density
housing development have created quiet, safe residential areas. The
higher density developments located in the center of the large blocks
are often served by private or dead-ended public streets. The tenants
and property managers of these developments seem to prefer to maintain
their private streets and thereby limit traffic to residents only. However,
direct access from these large developments onto 42nd Avenue adds to the
traffic problems by allowing uncontrolled access for a high volume of
traffic during peak hours. These access points, as well as the streets
and alleys in the commercial areas should be evaluated for use as common
entrances, thereby reducing the number of access points and potential
accident areas on 42nd Avenue. It may also be possible to abandon under-
utilized rights-of-way, returning them to the tax rolls.
~Q~ MARKET CONDITIONS ~"'""~
In the Summer of 1985, the City of New Hope Conducted a market study to
evaluate the commercial development of the City. The Market Study
findings indicated that New Hope was near saturation in the amount of
supportable retail floor space. While certain retail areas provide
some retail expansion potential, the overall retail market is limited.
The Market Study outlines retail target areas and planning objectives
to promote New Hope as a retail area. These objectives include:
/x~e Creating a common recognizable retail identity for the New Hope
{ ~ity Center through the use of joint advertising, coordinating a
~ .... cohesive City Center design, promoting the introduction of selected
commercial uses into the City Center area.
· Discourage strip commercial development on substandard lots which
lack sufficient space to accommodate a functional commercial use.
In light of the limited available retail market, commercial develop-
ment should be concentrated in the City Center area. Redevelop-
ment of outlying commercial areas in New Hope should consider
alternative land use options.
The Market Study also identified the same physical limitations at issue
along 42nd Avenue that are described in this report. The implementation
of this 42nd Avenue Land Use Concept Plan must consider its
impact
on
local market conditions and its impact on the City Center area.
BUILDING AND SITE CONDITIONS
Conti nui ty
Development between Winnetka and the railroad overpass is generally
continuous. The larger lots and buildings, and often landscaped
frontage, create an urban character which relates well to the City
Center. East of the railroad overpass the development has occurred
as smaller projects and is thus less homogeneous in size of lot or
structure and in setback from the street. The only actual vacant lot
is in the southwest corner of the Nevada and 42nd Avenue intersection.
However, the landscaped access road to Oregon Estates as well as the
deep setback on Jeff's Print Shop and the large parking areas at
Steve's Auto Repair, Paro's Pub and the New Hope Bowl also give the
initial appearance of being vacant properties.
Building and Site Conditions
Inspections of properties within the Study Area raised concern about
deterioration and lack of maintenance on a few sites. Several of the
commercial parking lots located east of the railroad and the area in
front of the industrial sites west of the railroad have broken pave-
ment, pot holes and weed growth. The vacated Louisiana Avenue right-
of-way is in similar condition. The occurence of a small wetland behind
the three industrial buildings has created circulation problems and an
undefined paved area. The rear yards of the commercial uses between
Nevada and Maryland Avenues and the New Hope Bowl also require main-
tenance attention. These lots are especially critical as they border
and impact residential areas.
The structures along 42nd Avenue east of the railroad are generally
older and requiring more maintenance attention than those to the west.
New Hope Bowl is currently making improvements to the interior and
will hopefully follow with attention to the exterior of their build-
ing. The Jeff's Print building is a converted single family home.
This vacant structure is in need of general maintenance. Three of
the single family homes north of the Oregon Estates entrance on
Nevada Avenue, as well as the home in the northwest corner of Fred
Sim's Park also show signs of deterioration. These conditions detract
from the quality of the surrounding uses.
3O
policy plan
The 42nd Avenue Improvement Study has been prepared to guide develop-
ment through several ~hases and many years. The Policy Plan when
applied with the Physical Improvement Plan and policies and goals
established in the City Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide a
framework for evaluating development proposals. The following goals
and policies were established in conjunction with the New Hope
Comprehensive Plan to address in a written format the issues identified
in the previous chapter. This plan is an important element in resolv-
ing these issues and achieving the goals. Despite the deviations which
may occur from the more detailed Physical Plan, the general policies,
once established, will remain pertinent.
The following goals provide the focus of the improvements reconm~ended
in this study. They address the major issues identified and are aimed
toward the general improvement of the living, working and play environ-
ments in the 42nd Avenue area.
~~.. Provide safe access onto and across 42nd Avenue for motorized
vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles.
42nd Avenue as one of the few east-west through streets is of major
importance to the surrounding commercial, industrial and resi-
dential development. Development must improve the safety of use
of this arterial s~reet for all. Proposed land use, access and
streetscaping projects must be evaluated according to the effect
they will have on the safe use of 42nd Avenue.
To help achieve this goal, access points to commercial and industrial
enterprises must be coordinated and limited. Traffic speeds must
be controlled to allow greater reaction time in areas with obstructed
visibility. Provisions are needed to aid vehicular, bicycle and
pedestrian traffic in crossing or gaining access to 42nd Avenue.
.~21 Promote compatible and complementary land uses
Land use has been identified as an issue of needed change. Land
use both affects and is affected by the local market and 42nd
Avenue traffic situations. The 1977 City Comprehensive Plan
identified the automobile-oriented commercial strip east of the
railroad overpass as an undesirable land use and competition for
the City Center. The 1985 City Market Study revealed a limited
retail market in New Hope and supported the development of mid to
high density housing along 42nd Avenue east of the railroad as
a base to support the local business community.
35
In addition to these major proposals, attention must be paid to the
existing small lot sizes, need for buffering between commercial and
residential uses and improvement of site and building conditions.
Nonconformance of developments with regard to off-street parking,
provision of garages and density of development must also be addressed.
3., Develop 42nd Avenue in accordance with City Comprehensive Plans.
As outlined in the previous goal, the New Hope Comprehensive Plan
empahsizes a need to consolidate commercial development into one
convenient, comprehensive and aesthetic location. The 1985 Market
Study underlines this emphasis, having identified a very limited
market for commercial expansion and in some cases, an actual over
supply of retail goods. The location of the 42nd Avenue Study Area
in relation to the City Center makes it important for the land use
to complement the City Center. Accepting these guidelines and
priorities, the strip development should be halted and
reversed
by
providing suitable locations for businesses in or adjacent to the
City Center. _
/ 4. ~Unlfy development and present a positive image as the City of
~New Hope.
The 42nd Avenue Study Area can be divided at the railroad overpass
into two distinct areas. To the west development is commercial
and industrial and continuous in use, density and set back from
42nd Avenue. The eastern section has a mixture of commercial,
industrial and residential uses, generally smaller in scale and
less continuous. Although continuity between the two sections
is not proposed, within each of the areas, a more homogeneous
land uses and street treatment would improve the area's image.
Traffic along 42nd Avenue traverses the cities of Robbinsdale,
Crystal and New Hope between Highway 100 and Hennepin County 18.
New Hope, even with its City Center along 42nd Avenue does not
present an identity separate from the other cities. Implementation
of a streetscaping project is recommended to help unify develop-
ment, as well as present a separate positive image. Such a project
would include burial of overhead power lines, uniform street lights
and improved pedestrian facilities. Improvement should be coor-
dinated with similar projects planned for the City Center block.
5. Encourage cooperation between public and private agencies in
~ implementation of improvement and development plans.
The implementation of the improvements outlined in this study
will require acceptance by and cooperation between private
enterprises and public agencies over several years. In addition
to better understanding between the City and local
fostering
business persons, the coordination effort will provide a forum for
communication within the business community. This communication
should foster cohesion within this community and establish a
greater pride in the City of New Hope.
When relocation and purchase of lands for expanded rights-of-way
or redevelopment are necessary, the City of New Hope should
investigate and utilize public financing alternatives to assist
private interests in achieving such improvements.
OBJECTIVES AND POLICY GUIDELINES
To help achieve these broad goals a series of policy guidelines has
been prepared. The guidelines have been broken down into land use,
transportation, administrative action, codes and ordinances and public
participation categories. They too are general in nature and intended
to guide the evaluation of a variety of development proposals. The
policies often overlap somewhat in content and are intended for this reason
to be used collectively. No time framework or priority has been assigned
to the policies or is implied.
PHYSICAL PLAN~ING
Land Use Objectives
The character, quality, intensity of activity and service and trans-
portation demands of New Hope are created and shaped by land use and its
arrangement. Land use is, therefore, a basic building block for compre-
hensive physical planning, development and redevelopment of the 42nd
Avenue Study Area.
Present and projected market situations and the strip development pattern
in the eastern section of the study area have resulted in a need for change
in land use policy. To achieve the goal of compatible and complimentary
land uses which follow the development direction outlined in the City
Comprehensive Plan, the commercial and industrial development east of the
Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad must be halted. For the
purpose of directing land use development within the 42nd Avenue Study
Area, the following objectives are established:
1. Functionally arranged and compatible land use relationships.
2. Efficient utilization and conservation of land on a neighborhood
as well as project basis.
3. Prevention of over-crowding and over-intensification of land uses.
4. Provision for and service of the full and total needs of the
project area relative to 42nd Avenue's function and purpose
within the context of New Hope and the metropolitan region.
5. Preservation and protection of property values.
6. Preservation and improvement of land use and environmental
quality.
Land Use Policy-Guidelines
Ge ne ra 1
1. The 42nd Avenue Area shall be planned and developed in units as
determined by either physical barriers and/or homogeneous land
use characteristics which reinforce continuity and create a sense
of community.
2. Whenever possible, the impact of physical barriers are to be
reduced to increase relationships between segregated areas and
reinforce continuity and a sense of community.
3. Related uses and activities when compatible are to be concentrated
and clustered into functionally related subunits of the project
area.
4. Land use development must be related to needs and desired develop-
ment and priorities, plus transportation and service demands.
5. Intensification of land use activity and development is to be
accompanied by corresponding increases in related supportive and
service facilities.
6. Within the 42nd Avenue Study Area, as well as on a City-wide basis,
land use development is to be limited and restricted to prevent
competition which is detrimental.
7. Programs and incentives are to be created for continued main-
tenance and improvement of existing land use.
8. Renewal, replacement and redevelopment of substandard and in-
compatible development is to be acComplished through public action
and private means, if compatible.
38
n
L 9. Eliminate, through removal and relocation, conflicting and non-
complementary uses.
~-- 10. The amount of land devoted to streets is to be minimized and
reduced.
L 11. Transitions between varying types of land use are to be accomplished
in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative impact on
t adjoining developments.
12. Wherever possible, changes in types of land use should occur at
mid-block points with similar uses fronting both sides of a
street or at streets or other boundaries created by major urban
and natural barriers.
13. Collector and arterial streets are to .border not penetrate
neighborhoods.
Residential
~ 1. Where appropriate within the Study Area, the existing housing
stock is to be preserved and improved through inspection, code
L~ enforcement and resultant updating.
2. Wherever possible, existing housing which is to remain within the
area is to be rehabilitated and upgraded through private means
and public assistance where feasible.
3. In all cases, substandard housing incapable of being corrected
to to prevent spreading deterioration and blight.
is
be
removed
/~-~ 4. Adequate living space and fully utilized housing are to be
encouraged and promoted through the provision of a range of choice
-~' among housing types and options.
--~ 5. A variety of housing types, densities, styles, and ownership options
~ is to be created and maintained.
-i 6. Housing styles and development techniques which conserve land and
increase efficiency are to be encouraged.
7. New housing construction is to reflect modern and emerging con-
. struction techniques and styles compatible with adjacent
development.
8. Residential neighborhoods within the Study Area shall be defined,
planned and developed as units with related, but limited suppor-
tive and complementary commercial and service uses.
9. Low and medium density neighborhoods to remain within the Study
Area are to be preserved through prevention of encroachment or
expansion of higher use types and by adequate buffering and
separation from other use categories.
10.Major streets and traffic flows are to border not penetrate
residential neighborhoods.
11. Rental housing standards applicable to existing and new units
are to be upgraded to require adequate soundproofing, increased
energy conservation and provisions for social and recreational
facilities.
12. Higher density housing shall be used to anchor and define the
limitations of commercial expansion.
The shall respond to the housing'needs of the elderly, the
13.
City
disabled and individuals with a low or moderate income.
14.Low and moderate income housing is not to be concentrated in
one area.
15. Elderly housing is to be located in areas of high activity
providing close proximity and easy access to required services and
facilities.
Residential areas shall be protected from through traffic and
16:
incompatible activities which intensify disruption.
~o~merc ia 1 ~_~
1.No presently developed land zoned residential is to be converted
into service or commercial uses.
2. The City Center commercial core area is to be the commercial and
service focal point of the community.
3. High intensity commercial and service centers are to be supported
by high and medium density housing in close proximity.
4. Commercial and service uses shall be adequately and appropriately
landscaped and designed according to City standards.
5. Commercial areas are to encourage, promote, and provide for
edestrian and bicycle circulation systems suitable also for
andicapped persons.
4O
6. Piecemeal and strip type development of commercial uses shall be
prohibited. Unit and coordinated development is the only pattern
acceptable.
7. When opportunities arise, existing spot or linear commercial
development shall be eliminated or consolidated into more functional
and coordinated unit patterns.
8. Visual pollution from signs, utility lines and franchised archi-
tecture is to be eliminated through the strict enforcement of
City ordinances.
9. Uses identified as necessary or desirable for the 42nd Avenue Area
are to be actively pursued, promoted, and assisted by the City.
10. A commercial maintenance code shall be enacted and uniformly
enforced to ensure proper upkeep and Constant improvement of the
42nd Avenue Area.
Industrial
1. Retain existing industrial uses and encourage new industrial
development to locate in existing industrial zoned areas.
2. Prohibit penetration of residential neighborhoods by traffic
generated by industrial activity.
3. Industrial uses shall be adequately screened and appropriately
landscaped and designed according to City standards.
4. An industrial maintenance code shall be enacted and uniformly
enforced to ensure proper upkeep and constant improvement of
the 42nd Avenue Area.
Transportation Objectives
The location of the City of New Hope as a suburban community in the
Twin Cities metro region makes transportation an issue of primary
imPortance. 42nd Avenue provides convenient access to and between
major metropolitan expressways. The volume of traffic on 42nd Avenue
only underlines the importance of the automobile and of 42nd Avenue
as a throughfare. The conflict of the slower neighborhood traffic
merging with the fast through traffic along 42nd Avenue has created the
high accident rates. Separation is difficult because of the lack of
east-west railroad crossings. The proximity of 42nd Avenue neighbor-
hoods to the City Center shopping facilities justifies the separate
safe development for other, especially non-motorized modes of trans-
portation. Taking into account these needs and situations, the follow-
ing objectives reflect the results to be produced within the 42nd
Avenue Study Area.
1. A comprehensive system approach to transportation, giving due
attention to all modes and related facilities.
41
10. Adequate lighting and outdoor furniture is to be provided in all
areas of heavy pedestrian movement.
OPERATIONS/ADMINISTRATION
As a consequence of the implementation aspects and orientation of the
42nd Avenue Area Improvement Plan, operational and administrative
objectives and policies are of a prime concern. All involved need to
have a clear understanding of how development and redevelopment in
this area will be achieved. To this end, the following paragraphs
provide a statement of how redevelopment will be pursued and accomplished
and how the goal of an improved 42nd Avenue Area will be achieved.
.~.operty Acquisition Objectives ~
In order to facilitate the desired type and form of development, the
City of New Hope will acquire and clear land. A "write-down" of
expenses will occur in the resale of property in order to make re-
development of parcels economically feasible for new construction.
The acquisition of land and subsequent write-down facilitated through
the tax increment process and other public assistance mechanisms to
achieve the following objectives:
1. Elimination of substandard, hazardous, and obsolete buildings
within the Study Area.
2. Elimination of blight and negative environmental influences.
3. Assembly of land into parcels which are functionally adaptable
in shape and size to accommodate desired redevelopment which
responds to needs and services required by the community.
4. Assembly of land parcels which are required to implement traffic
circulation and parking improvements required for the efficient
functional operation of the area.
..~ Propert~ Acquisition Polic~ Guidelines _)
1. Fair market value will be paid for all property interest acquired.
2. Every reasonable attempt will be made to acquire property through
negotiation.
3. Condemnation (Eminent Domain) will be exercised only as a last
resort, but will be utilized where necessary to achieve overall
project objectives.
45
Consistent impartial and equitable treatment and assistance will
be provided to all property owners and tenants whose property is
acquired.
Any properties acquired as part of a redevelopment project must
qualify as blighting influences upon the area. Blighting in-
fluences are defined as:
a. Overcrowding or improper location of structures on the land.
b. Excessive dwelling unit density.
c. Conversions to incompatible type of uses.
d. Obsolete building types, such as large buildings which
through lack of use or maintenance have a blighting
i nfl uence.
e. Detrimental land uses or conditions, such as incompatible
uses, structures in mixed use, or adverse influences from
noise, smoke, or fumes.
f. Unsafe, congested, poorly designed, or otherwise deficient
streets.
g. Inadequate public utilities or community facilities contri-
buting to unsatisfactory living conditions or economic
decl i ne.
h. Other equally significant environmental deficiencies.
Acquisition priority will be given to those sites which meet one
or more of the following criteria (ordering indicates priority):
a. Necessary for street right-of-way.
b. Necessary for land assembly to attract a desired use or
ac ti vi ty.
c. Necessary for increased parking space supply.
d. Necessary for land assembly to serve as a relocation site.
e. Incompatible or non-conforming.
f. A high feasibility for redevelopment and major tax increment.
g. Structurally substandard or hazardous.
I~ h. *Economically obsolete.
i. A low assessed valuation.
j. Offered for sale by the owner.
m *Economically obsolescent: A structure which be
may
basically
sound, but no longer economically serves its original intended
use and cannot be economically converted to an acceptable new
,~ use.
7. A property appraisal from a duly qualified individual or corpora-
tion shall be secured for any property purchased prior to the
time of acquisition.
8. Owners of property to be acquired shall be informed of the fair
market value of their property as determined by the required
appraisal report prior to sale.
9. Prior to the acquisition of property, redevelopment or reuse
commitments shall be secured.
elocation Objecti ves_~~
It is anticipated that some existing owners and tenants will need to be
relocated if the overall goals of an improved 42nd Avenue Area is to be
accomplished. Such a situation creates difficulties for all concerned.
In an attempt, however, to minimize the negative impacts of relocation,
the following objectives and policies will guide the process and
procedure:
1. Where possible, relocation of existing families or buSi:ness is
to be minimized.
2. Relocation is to be handled in a uniform and equitable manner.
3. Relocation sites to to the needs of the
are
respond
specific
family or business involved.
ILl ~,_ ..... Relocation Policy Guidelines~
1. Families and individuals to be displaced by improvement activities
shall have full opportunity to occupy standard housing that is
within their financial means and adequate to their need, is
reasonably accessible to their places of employment, transporta-
tion, and other commercial, public, and other facilities, and is
available on a non-discriminatory basis.
2. Business concerns and nonprofit organizations to be displaced
by 42nd Avenue improvement activities shall be provided all reason-
able assistance to aid in their satisfactory re-establishment with
a minimum of delay and loss of earnings.
47
3. Project or program activities shall be planned and carried out in
a manner that minimizes hardship to site occupants and that in-
volves the smallest magnitude of displacement consonant with the
needs of the area and the persons to be displaced.
4. Relocation shall be carried out in a manner that will promote
maximum choice within the community's total housing supply,
lessen racial, ethnic, and economic concentrations, and facili-
tate desegregation and racially inclusive patterns of occupancy
and use of public and private facilities.
5. Service shall be provided by the City to assure that the reloca-
tion process will not result in different or separate treatment
on account of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or
source of income,
6. Persons to be displaced shall be afforded the opportunity of
participating in the formulation of relocation plans and in
establishing procedures for handling relocation grievances, and
be provided full information relating to program or project
activities which may have an impact on the residents of the project
or program area.
7. Arrangements shall be made to provide relocation assistance in
accordance with the needs of those to be displaced, including
social services counseling, guidance, assistance, and referrals
as well as rehousing.
8. Relocation payments shall be made promptly to all eligible persons,
business concerns and nonprofit organizations to the full extent
to which they are eligible.
9. In all procedures connected with relocation, the City of New Hope
shall follow the guidelines of the Housing and Urban Development
Handbook 1376.1, Relocation and Real Property Acquisition, as
amended, limited to the extent that they are applicable when no
federal funds are involved.
10. Every attempt possible shall be made to relocate displaced
individuals, families and businesses within the City of New Hope
when such activities are compatible with established and planned
development.
_Land Disposition Objective~.~
The sale of acquired land parcels will become an exceedingly critical
factor contributing to the success of improving the 42nd Avenue Area.
It is important that the land be utilized for desired uses and that
those whom acquire the property have the capability to follow-through
on the development proposed. In response to these needs, the following
criteria will govern land disposition within the 42nd Avenue Area:
48
1. Respond to unmet needs of the community by the resale of
publicly acquired parcels to interests which will develop uses
not provided or not sufficiently serviced.
2. Strengthen the area by sale of land to those interests which will
encourage related new private investments.
3. Increase the tax revenue generated in the 42nd Avenue Area.
4. Provide improved and intensified compatible and complementary
land usage which is environmentally sound.
5. Provide housing for low and moderate income elderly, individuals
and families in close proximity to related service needs.
6. Encourage coordinated development of parcels and structures in
order to achieve efficient building design, multi-purpose
utilization of sites, unified street access and internal
pedestrian circulation.
7. Enhance the identity and attractiveness of the area and its
subunits.
Land Disposition Policy Guidelines
1. Land will be sold in an equitable manner open to public scrutiny.
2. Procedures for land deposition will follow state law where
applicable.
3. Purchasers shall be required to demonstrate financial capability
of implementing proposed projects and uses as a condition of
sale.
4. Economic market feasibility must be demonstrated for the proposed
reuse of the land as a condition of sale.
5. The City shall specify in detail within offering documents:
a. Use to be made of the property.
b. Zoning and building restrictions.
c. Design and construction standards.
d. Special easement or reservation of rights to be part of
the property deed.
e. The posting of security to ensure compliance with conditions.
49
6. Land shall be offered for sale with City of New Hope consent
in one of the following manners'
~ a. Fixed price competition - the value of the land is to be
fixed by acceptable reuse appraisal which is to 'be secured
~ through procedures similar to those used for acquisition.
--i b. Sealed bids - bids shall be received according to specifica-
~ tions established. Cash value of land shall be part of the
bid and added to other criteria in selecting the successful
~-~ bidder.
~ c. Public auction - a public auction may be held to sell land
~-~ after appropriate public notice. A minimum bid shall be
included as part of the public notice.
~_~ d. Direct negotiation - when it is found desirable, the HRA or
its delegated agent may negotiate directly with a redeveloper.
Sale shall not be finalized until a public hearing is held
_] after required public notice. Direct negotiation will be
appropriate when dealing with preferred developers as defined
in policy 8 below.
Redevelopers shall be evaluated upon the basis of the following
criteria:
I[~ a. Achievement of project goals and objectives.
b. Design excellence and quality of proposed development and
construction.
c. Tax increment financial contribution of the redevelopment
w-I project.
d. Technical and financial capability to accomplish the project.
i e. Timetable for initiation and completion of the project.
8. Selection of a redeveloper shall be based upon the following
~ criteria:
a. First priority of resale shall be given to those persons or
IL -] businesses which have been displaced by the City when
appropriate and such use contributes to the improvement of
the 42nd Avenue Area.
I~l b. A priority of resale shall be given to adjoining property
owners when expansion of such activities is documented as
desirable.
c. A priority of resale shall be given to businesses existing
within the City when documented that such uses are desired
and of benefit to the community.
d. Proposals which must successfully meet the evaluation
criteria.
9. In fixed price competition or sealed bid offerings, the following
administrative procedures shall be followed:
a. Bids shall be publicly opened on the specified date by the
~ayor, or his designated representative in the presence of
one witness. The date of opening shall be set to allow
sufficient time for reviews to be prepared and considered
prior to the regular City Council meeting where action may
be taken.
b. A certificate attesting to the outline of the bids received
shall be prepared and signed by the Mayor of New Hope and
attested to by the City Clerk.
c. Sufficient copies of the bids shall be available for distri-
bution to staff for evaluation and analysis.
d. Within one week after bid opening, it shall be determined
whether additional information or interviews with bidders
are necessary.
e. The Comprehensive Report and Evaluation on each proposal or
group of proposals shall be distributed one week prior to
the City Council meeting at which the matter is to be con-
sidered for action.
Rehabilitation Objectives
In some cases along 42nd Avenue and in the residential areas, sound
structures exist, but maintenance work is needed. In such instances,
and where such types of use are to remain, efforts are to be under-
taken to maintain and upgrade properties through rehabilitation.
These efforts will add to the quality of the area and its improve-
ment, plus minimize disruption and area costs.
1. Where practical and in compliance with area plans, maintain and
improve existing structures.
Rehabilitation Policy Guidelines
1. Upgrade all sound structures which are to remain to conform to
City codes and ordinances.
The increased development of residential units each with their own
landscaping will greatly enhance the pedestrian environment and overall
image of this area. The incorporation of boulevard plantings will
further improve the streetscape and provide a continuity through the
Study Area. Business managers in this area were also very concerned
about young bicyclists riding along and crossing 42nd Avenue. The
signal light will provide safe crossings, but bicyclists still cannot
compete with the automobile traffic on 42nd Avenue. Special attention
should be given to this problem and the potential of providing a
bicycle link between neighborhoods, parks and the City Center utiliz-
ing 42nd Avenue as a major east-west route.
I _.-.---~---~-
~"-~T--~7~and Louisiana Avenues serve as access points to 42nd Avenue
from the residential areas to the south and north. In addition,
Haryland is used for access to Tom Thumb, Broadway Pizza and New
Hope Bowl. Of the 13 accidents which have occurred over the last
five years, two were blamed directly on excessive speed, six involved
vehicles headed east hitting cars turning onto or off of 42nd Avenue
and three vehicles were rear-ended by vehicles headed west, while
slowing to make a turn. Four of the five accidents recorded at the
Louisiana intersection involved vehicles slowing to make a left turn
off of 42nd Avenue rear-ended by vehicles also headed east. South
of 42nd Avenue, Louisiana is a vacated alley now serving as entrance
to the Hew Hope Bowl. A wooden screen runs along the Crystal border.
Probl ems:
- traffic accidents primarily involve vehicles heading east
unable to stop
- large open parking lots give vacated appearance
- buffering needed between commercial and residential areas,
especially south of 42nd Avenue
Opportunities:
- Louisiana south of 42nd Avenue vacated
Proposed Improvements
The existing businesses bordering 42nd Avenue are all solid businesses
with no plans or intentions of relocating. As a result, the plan
proposes no change in land use for this area. If, however, Crown Auto,
Cook Automotive or the dentist office would choose to leave this
location,' redevelopment for mid to high density housing would be
recommended.
The major improvements proposed deal primarily with controlling access
to 42nd Avenue. The commercial development between Nevada and Maryland
especially, seems to generate numerous accidents. The curb cuts onto
42nd Avenue from Grobe's Cafe and Tom Thumb are to be eliminated, moving
primary access to the Maryland Avenue entrance. It is proposed that
Maryland be partially vacated with the northern 175 feet serving only as
75
,!i!i ]--!l r--1 J- subarea four
density housing
~~'~:~'~ , ' incorporate streetscaping
J~'~"~,iijj L~'J:J,,~-'T',,i"-'~,I,,'~T;,,~m,,,==~ ~__ -iminate curb cuts
-~ ~ ~ ii ~ : ev~ ~P~°m°~e ~n~e~nal
~ ~ ' IJllllllJJlJllJll J~' c~rcula~on
L~~~ __h Maryland Avenue
i~ commercial
41st .,aV~~ ~ x' ~11 te end of 41st Avenue
access ~o these commercial establishments, plus B~oad~a~ P~zza and
the ~e~ Hope Bo~l. Th~s action eliminates one of the uncontrolled
accesses from the residential area directing traffic instead to the
controlled intersection at Nevada. The vacated right-of-way would
be split between the Nevada apartments and New Hope Bowl. The addi-
tional prOperty will help to .reduce the density of the apartment complex.
The additional area on the New Hope Bowl site should be used at least
partially to provide the.needed buffer for residences to the south and
west.
· Realignment of Nevada Avenue to create a full intersection.
Signalization and a left turn lane on 42nd Avenue are also
proposed in this intersection redesign.
The street construction of the Nevada Avenue realignment could
be financed with monies from the City's Community Development
Block Grant Funds.
The alteration of 42nd Avenue to expand the street at the Nevada
intersection for the provision of left turn lanes is a shared
expense with Hennepin County. Street improvement costs are
shared on a 50/50 percentage between the City and the County.
As noted in the Land Use Plan, signalization of the 42nd Avenue/
Nevada Avenue intersection must be warranted under,.the conditions
outlined in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
for Streets and Highways. If the warrants are met, the cost of
a traffic signal is shared by the County and the City. Twenty-
five percent of the signal cost is covered by the County and the
75% balance is the responsibility of the City.
The realignment of Nevada Avenue will affect two lots containing
Steve's Auto Repair and a single family home to the north. The
street improvement will involve land acquisition, resident reloca-
tion, building demolition or relocation, site improvements, and
the actual street construction.
To assist in the land acquisition and site preparation, tax
increment financing is proposed to be utilized to promote the
redevelopment of these two sites, along with the vacant Jeff's
Print Shop site. Multiple family residential development is
proposed for the area. The owners of Oregon Estates have ex-
pressed an interest in developing the area into multiple family
uses.
The map on the following page shows the boundaries of the pro-
posed Phase I Tax Increment District. This TIF District includes
the single family home, Steve's Auto Repair, Jeff's Print Shop
and the Oregon Estates southern access. With this arrangement,
we are assuming the involvement of Oregon Estates in the area
development. Future redevelopment efforts would include addi-
tional land, however, this option addresses only the immediate
cost of Phase I. The following table provides some "ball park"
estimated densities required to make the tax increment district
feasible.
84
phase one
.. I~t 45th avenue nort___h_h
', i .... :
', [ i
'~--~r-~ ave. ~ .~.
I~ !--1 -
''~ ~1~ ~'------= 4:]nd avenue
= t-[ i
Nort wes sso at Consultants, Inc
U R B A P L A N G DES N · M A R K E T R E S E A R C H
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Kirk McDonald
FROM: Robert Kirmis/Alan Brixius
DATE: 29 August 1990
RE: New Hope' - 42nd Avenue Rezoning
FILE NO: 131.00 - 90.03
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background:
The City has identified several properties along the 42nd Avenue
corridor between Winnetka and Louisiana Avenues which hold zoning
designations which are not reflective of their use. In an
attempt to unify existing and future land uses in the area and
establish a cohesive commercial district within the City, the
City is investigating the possibility of rezoning certain
properties from B-3, Auto Oriented Business to B-4, Community
Business. This report shall review existing conditions in the
area, cite area use and zoning incompatibilities and make
recommendation on suggested rezoning appropriateness.
Attached for reference:
Exhibit A - Study Area
Exhibit B - Existing Zoning and Land Use
Exhibit C - Proposed Land Use
Exhibit D - Existing Property Occupancy
Exhibit E - Proposed Zoning Changes
Recommendations
Based on the following review, our office finds that many
properties within the 42nd Avenue study area hold zoning
designations which do not reflect their use. Because the area in
question has changed in character from an auto-oriented service
area to a community wide commercial center, and a rezoning would
follow City policy in rezoning areas which have changed in
character, it is recommended that noted properties in this report
4601 Excelsior Blvd.-Suite 410.Minneapolis, MN 55416.(612) 925-9420. Fax 925-2721
and illustrated in Exhibit E be rezoned from their existing base
zoning to B-4, Community Business District. Such an action would
allow area zoning designations to reflect area uses and allow the
City considerably greater flexibility in future area
redevelopment efforts.
In addition, an amendment to the 42nd Avenue Improvement Study
will be required to allow the proposed rezonings to lie
consistent with the said document.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
42nd Avenue Improvement Study. In 1985, the City adopted the
42nd Avenue Improvement Study as a guide for land use development
along the 42nd Avenue corridor between Winnetka and Louisiana
Avenues. The plan established a number of goals aimed toward the
improvement of the area which lie applicable to the proposed
rezoning. According to the said plan, an adopted City goal is to
unify area development and present a positive commercial image
for the City of New Hope. The proposed rezoning would unify the
area by eliminating several use non-conformities.
The plan also stipulates that area development should be related
to needs and desired development priorities of the City. In
conjunction with the New Hope City Center, it is the intention
of the City to establish the 42nd Avenue corridor under study as
one of the City's prominent commercial areas. As such, the
proposed rezoning would provide a vehicle by which this objective
may be more readily attained.
With the exception of those properties which flank 42nd Avenue
between Nevada Avenue and the Soo Line Railroad, the proposed
Land Use Plan contained within the 42nd Avenue Improvement Study
is consistent with the proposed rezoning (see Exhibit C).
According to the 42nd Avenue Plan, the said properties had been
designated for future residential use. In an attempt to realize
this initial land use proposal, the City attempted to locate a
handicapped housing complex in the area. Due to site
complications, however, the project was moved to the City Center
area. Aside from the said public handicapped housing complex, no
other residential projects have presented themselves to the area.
Due to the commercial amenities offered by 42nd Avenue (access,
visibility, etc.), .however, commercial businesses may choose to
locate in this area. With the City's approval of the 36th and
Winnetka commercial rezoning, the City presented a position to
allow the market to dictate commercial locations. To provide
greater development flexibility in the area, a O-ommercia±
re~fi-~~De strongly considered. Generally, existin9 and
p~'~Posed' commercial uses are considered acceptable in that they
are highly compatible to adjacent uses. Noting the discrepancy
2
between the 42nd Avenue Land Use Plan and the proposed rezoning,
an amendment to the 42nd Avenue Improvement Study should be
pursued.
Existinq Conditions. Contrary to 42nd Avenue and Comprehensive
Plan objectives, the existing mixture of zoning in the area
serves to limit redevelopment efforts and presents a barrier in
the City's attempt to establish a high quality commercial area.
.As shown on the existing Land 'Use ~ap (Exhibit B), properties
which flank that segment of the 42nd Avenue corridor under study
contain a wide variety of uses and zoning designations. The
majority of land within the corridor is commercially used and
holds B-3 zoning designations. The study corridor does, however,
contain both I-l, Limited Industrial and I-2, General
Industrially zoned land. I-1 zoned property lies southeast of
the Winnetka/42nd Avenue intersection and contains School
District offices and a Country Kitchen Restaurant. Property
zoned I-2 lies north and south of 42nd Avenue between Quebec
Avenue and the Soo Line Railroad. The district includes both
industrial (north of 42nd Avenue) and office related uses (south
of 42nd Avenue).
The corridor also contains residentially zoned property. The
central one-third of the vacant parcel lying north of 42nd ~venue
and east of the Soo Line Railroad holds an R-4, High Density
Residential zoning designation. Finally, the corridor also
contains two relatively small parcels of land zoned R-0,
Residential-Office. One of the said properties holds a "Dental
Lab" facility, while the other currently lies vacant.
Zoninq ADpropriateness. As noted previously, the City has raised
questions regarding the appropriateness of certain zoning
designations within the 42nd avenue corridor. In determining the
suitability of the existing zoning, an examination of the intents
of the area's existing zoning designations and B-4 Districts is
warranted.
The following are excerpts from the City Zoning Ordinance in
regard to stated purpose for each district:
R-4, High Density Residential District
4.081 Purpose. The purpose of the R-4, High Density
Residential District is to provide for high density
residential uses, and directly related uses.
R-O, Residential-Office District
4.091 Purpose. The purpose of the R-O, Residential-Office
District is to provide for high density residential use
and for the transition in land use from mid density
residential to low intensity business allowing for the
intermixing of such uses.
B-3, Auto-Oriented Business District
4.121 Purpose. The purpose of the B-3, Auto-Oriented
Business District is to provide for and limit the
establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent
commercial and service activities.
B-4, Community Business District
4.131 Purpose. The purpose of the B-4, Community Business
District is to provide for the establishment of
commercial and service activities which draw and serve
customers from-the entire community or subregion.
I-l, Limited Industrial District
4.141 Purpose. The purpose of the I-l, Limited Industrial
District is to .provide for the establishment of
industrial development in a well planned, residentially
compatible setting.
I-2, General Industrial District
4.151 Purpose. The purpose of the I-2, General Industrial
District is to provide for the establishment of heavy
industrial and manufacturing development and use which
because of the nature of the product or character of
activity, requires isolation from residential or non-
compatible commercial uses. The I-2 District is also
intended to provide for large scale activities of a
sociological nature not suited to other districts but
reasonably compatible with the same characteristics
suitable for general industrial use.
f the City is attempting to achieve a cohesive zoning pattern
hat facilitates commercial redevelopment along 42nd Avenue, the
esidential and industrial zoning district are inappropriate.
ecause the majority of commercial uses which lie within the
tudy area are not totally motor vehicle oriented and provide
ervices which draw from the entire community, a more intense B-4
oning designation should be considered more reflective of a
ety of existing uses.
4
A B-4 zoning designation would expand the commercial
redevelopment opportunities over the more limited B-3 District.
A change from B-3 to B-4 would, however, maintain the same
performance standards with regard to lot size, lot width,
setbacks, and building height.
In evaluating any rezoning proposals, the City must also consider
the following established policies regarding such actions:
1. Has the character of the area changed to warrant
consideration of a zoning change?
2. Has the rezoning request resulted from a past zoning
mistake?
Generally, it would appear that the area in question has changed
in character from an auto-oriented service area to a community-
wide commercial center. As such, a rezoning to a B-4 would
appear appropriate by more closely reflecting existing area uses
and allowing the City more flexibility in area redevelopment
efforts.
Property Inventory. In order to make specific and concise
determinations of appropriate zoning, the study area must be
examined on a more detailed and intimate scale. The following is
a listing of existing area properties, their existing zoning
designation and the conformance to their particular zoning
district. The following table should be used in reference to
Exhibit D which illustrates specific parcel occupants.
42ND AVENUE REZONING STUDY
Existing Conformancy
Existing District with Proposed
Site # Occupant/Address Zoninq Conformancy B-4 Zoning
1 Hardee's B-3 Yes Yes
4210 Winnetka (Conditional) (Conditional)
2 Unocal B-3 Yes Yes
4200 Winnetka (Conditional) (Conditional)
3 Port Arthur B-3 Yes Yes
7858 42nd Avenue (Permitted) .(Permitted)
4 Phillips 66 B-3 Yes Yes
7820 42nd Avenue (Conditional) (Conditional)
5 Vacant Building B-3 ---
4211 Rhode Island
6 Kupenheimer B-3 No Yes
7700 42nd Avenue (Permitted)
7 Sunshine Factory B-3 Yes Yes
7600 42nd Avenue (Permitted) (Permitted)
8 Foremost* I-2 Yes N.A.
7528 42nd Avenue (Permitted)
9 Vacant Building* I-2 ......
7516 42nd Avenue
10 Ardel Eng. & Manf.* I-2 Yes N.A.
7500 42nd Avenue (Permitted)
11 Ind. School District I-1 Yes Yes
4148 Winnetka (Permitted) (Permitted)
12 Country Kitchen I-1 Yes Yes
7849 42nd Avenue (Conditional) (Permitted)
13 Autohaus B-3 Yes Yes
7701 42nd Avenue (Permitted) (Conditional)
14 Vacant Buildin'g R-0
7675 42nd Avenue
15 Y.M.C.A. I-2 Yes Yes
7601 42nd Avenue (Conditional) (Conditional)
*Properties to retain existing zoning
6
Existing Conformancy
Existing District with Proposed
Site # Occupant/Address Zoninq Conformancy B-4 Zoninq
16 Office Building I-2 Yes Yes
4124 Quebec (Permitted) (Permitted)
17 Office Building B-3 No Yes
7401 42nd Avenue (Permitted)
18 First Line Engine B-3 No No
4125 Oregon Avenue
19 All-Star Sports B-3 No ~es
7321 42nd Avenue (Permitted)
20 Vacant Land B-3 ---
7305 42nd Avenue
21 Total Gas B-3 Yes Yes
7231 42nd Avenue (Conditional) (Conditional)
22 Cafe B-3 Yes Yes
7181 42nd Avenue (Permitted) (Permitted)
23 Tom Thumb B-3 No Yes
7141 42nd Avenue (Permitted)
24 Broadway Pizza B-3 Yes Yes
7117 42nd Avenue (Permitted) (Permitted)
25 New Hope Bowl B-3 Yes Yes
7107 42nd Avenue (Permitted) (Permitted)
26 Cook Auto B-3 Yes Yes
7100 42nd Avenue (Conditional) (Conditional)
27 Dental Lab* R-0 Yes N.A.
4215 Louisiana Avenue (Conditional)
28 Crown Auto B-3 Yes Yes
7140 42nd Avenue (Conditional) (Conditional)
29 Vacant Building B-3 ---
7180 42nd Avenue
30 Vacant Lot R-4/B-3 ---
7301 42nd Avenue
*Properties to retain existing zoning
7
Auto-Oriented Uses. As shown in the previous table, the study
area does hold a number of auto-oriented uses which are
appropriate to their existing B-3 zoning designation. These uses
include Unocal, Phillips 66, Autohaus, Total Gas, Cook Auto, and
Crown Auto facilities. While the uses do reflect their zoning
designation, they also represent a minority in regard to area use
type. Because these B-3 uses are allowed as conditional uses
within B-4 Districts, and would present no change in terms of
.development rights, a rezoning 'to B-4 is recommended. Such a
zoning designation shall unify the commercial area and provide
the City with greater flexibility in regard to redevelopment
efforts.
Industrial Uses. As noted previously, the subject area holds two
industrial uses which exhibit I-2 zoning designations.
Specifically, these include the Foremost Metal Specialties and
the Ardel Engineering and Manufacturing facility. Because the
two uses represent established uses within the corridor and are
neither permitted or conditional uses within the B-4 District, it
is suggested that their I-2 zoning designation remain until
redevelopment opportunities arise. At such time, a rezoning to
B-4 should, however, be strongly considered.
The study area also contains an area of I-l, Limited Indus'trial
and I-2 General Industrial zoned land (south of 42nd Avenue and
east Winnetka Avenue). While the uses along the south side of
42nd Avenue are allowed in the industrial zoning district, they
are commercial in nature. Rezoning of the properties to a
commercial designation will be consistent with the existing
development and would eliminate the potential for industrial
redevelopment along this portion of 42nd Avenue. A rezoning of
these properties to a B-4 zoning designation is suggested.
Residential/Residential-Office Uses. As noted previously, a
portion of the subject area holds a R-4, High Density Residential
zoning designation. Because the R-4 property currently lies
vacant, provides a disruption in a contiguous zoning pattern, and
because market conditions have not evidenced a need for such a
use in the area, it is recommended the vacant R-4 parcel be
rezoned to B-4.
The study area also contains two parcels of land which hold R-O,
Residential-Office zoning designations. One of the said parcels,
which lies adjacent to the Autohaus facility, currently lies
vacant and exists ~ssentially as a "spot" zoning district. The
said parcel which had held the New Hope Veterinary Clinic is
currently .being incorporated into the expansion plans of the
adjacent Autohaus facility. Due to the parcel's inconsistency in
contextual zoning, a rezoning of the parcel to B-4 is
recommended.
A second R-O Zoning District lies northwest of the intersection
of 42nd and Louisiana Avenues. The parcel currently contains a
"dental lab" facility and due to its adjacency to a single family
neighborhood, should retain its R-O zoning designation. This is
not to say, however, that when redevelopment proposals do arise,
a rezoning of the property to B-4, Community Business should not
be considered if the site is incorporated into a larger project
abutting 42nd Avenue.
Non-Conformities. The subject area does contain a single
property which currently exists as a legal, non-conforming use
within its B-3 zoning and would remain so under a B-4
designation. The First Line Engine Rebuilders facility, located
southwest of the intersection of 42nd and Oregon Avenues, is not
considered either a permitted or conditional use within either
B-3 or B-4 Zoning Districts. Because a rezoning of the non-
conforming property would not result in the change of any
development rights to the property and would unify area zoning
designations, a rezoning to B-4 is recommended.
CONCLUSION
Based on the preceding review, our office 'finds that many
properties within the 42nd Avenue study area hold zoning
designations which do not reflect their use. Because the area in
question has changed in character from an auto-oriented service
area to a community wide commercial center, and a rezoning would
follow City policy in rezoning areas which have changed in
character, it is recommended that noted properties in this report
and illustrated in Exhibit E be rezoned from their existing base
zoning to B-4, Community Business District. Such an action would
allow area zoning designations to reflect area uses and allow the
City considerably greater flexibility in future area
redevelopment efforts.
In addition, an amendment to the 42nd Avenue Improvement Study
will be required to allow the proposed rezonings to lie
consistent with the said document.
cc: Doug Sandstad
· ',i ~ .~
EXHIBIT A - STUDY Al:lEA
45th avenuo north
PARK
~ ~; 3rd ave,
,12 ~ nvellu~ nolth
R-3 Medium Density Residential I land use
R-4 Iligh Density Residential
R-O Residential-Office ~ ~ co~m~ercial, office
B-3 Auto-Oriented Dusiness District ~ ~:~:~:~:?~:~: single Family residential
~-1 Limited Industrial r?.: ::::::.:.::::: mid-high density residential
I-2 General Industrial I ~'H industrial
42nd avenue improvement study
EXISTING ZONING& LANDUSE
J~. onsull,~n~s. ~nc r~~ orth
hope, minnesota0 100,200, 400,
new
EXHIBIT B - EXISTING ZONING & LAND USE
_ _ ,~ ~:* ......... ~[~2~~
42n ~venu( norlh ~ __
~.~ ...... ~__ ~ _.ZU
??kk industrial / ~B-J. ~.1/li.~_l ~ i/Ir~-/~-'1/
I I single family residential . J ....... ~o~;~o,~ ....
42nd avenue~mprovement study
PROPOSED LAND USE
~~ Jc,ssoc,~,mo ~orth
~ J ~c new hope, minnesota o ~oo,~oo, 400'
EXHIBIT C PROPOSED LAND USE
~ ~ °~
~aTa~snp~l
0 0 ~
~O
~ ~ O~
~ 0 >,c
.[nu~aV ~Od~ ·
anua~v
EXHIBIT D - EXISTING PROPERTY O~CUPANCY
'~ ~ ~ .¢..:~ ::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::.:.:::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::
.................. :-:.:,:,:.:.:.:
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ ~¥"i'~ '~
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: ....... ~:~::::::::: ~ ~
:.:.:::.:.:::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::
~:F::::::::::~:::'
:~;~:~:~:~:~;??}:~:?~:?~:~.'::~:::~?~:i:~:~ ::
E:~:~:~:~::::~:: :~:: ~ ' ::: :'":
¢......~.~;. ~ a::~:~:::::::::~:~:~::
~ ~ ~ ~.r.:~..., :::::::::::::::::::::::::::
i*: *. s ~ _... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .
======================
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::: :::: :::::::: :~:~: :::::: :~:~[:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:: :~:~:~:~:~:::::
~?:}:;?:~?:~::~::~?:i:, ?::. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::
~ ~; ~ ~i~i~;~i ~i: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::~::::~:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::
;:: :~::::::: :~: ::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;
EXHIBIT E - PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES
ssO ,y
Nor wes ciat Consul ants, Inc.
U R B P L A N G DES N M A R K E R E S E A R C H
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kirk McDonald
FROM: Kris Aaker/Alan Brixius
DATE: 25 October 1990
RE: New Hope - 42nd Avenue Rezoning
FILE NO: 131.00 - 90.03
Enclosed you will find a number of revised pages and graphics
from the New Hope 42nd Avenue Improvement Study. The text and
graphics were revised to reflect the B-4 zoning change along 42nd
Avenue. Changes were conducted to update the 42nd Avenue
Improvement Study to be consistent with B-4 Community Business
Zoning District standards. You will also find a Minor
Comprehensive Plan Submission Form attached to be submitted to
the Metropolitan Council for their review of the 42nd Avenue
Improvement Study. If you should have any questions or require
additional assistance, please contact me at your earliest
opportunity. For reference, pages from the Improvement Study
have been underlined where additions to text have occurred.
Pages not highlighted had text deleted or had only minor
revisions.
4601 ExCelsior Blvd.. Suite 410.Minneapolis, MN 55416.(612) 925-9420- Fax 925-2721
INFORMATION SUBMISSION FOR
MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
Tb_~s summary worksheet must be filled out and submitted to the Metropolitan
Codncil with a copy of each proposed minor comprehensive plan amendment. Minor
amendments include but are not limited to:
1. changes to the future land use plan where the affected area is
small or where the proposed future land use will result in minor
changes in metropolitan service demand,
2. changes (land trades or additions) in the urban service area involving
less than 40 acres.
3. minor changes to plan goals and policies that do not change the
overall thrust of the comprehensive plan.
Please be as specific as possible; attach additional explanatory materials if
necessary. If a staff report was prepared for the Plan Commission or City
Council, please attach it as well. Communities submitting regular plan
amendments may wish to enter this form or a reasonable facsimile into their
word processing menu for ease in preparation of the form.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Sponsoring governmental unit City of New Hope
Name of local contact person Kirk McDonald
Address .4401 Xylon Avenue North~ New Hope, MN 55428
Telephone 612/533-1521
B. Name of amendment 42nd Avenue Rezoninp-42nd Avenue Improvement Study 1985
Deseription/Su4mmary In an attempt to unify existin§ and future land
uses alonq 42nd Avenue and establish a cohesive commercial district within
the City~ the City has rezoned certain properties from B-3, Auto Oriented
Business to B-4, Commercial Business District. A minor Comprehensive
Plan amendment to the district.
C. Please attach the following:
1. a copy of the proposed amendment
2. a city-wide map showing the location of the proposed change
3. the current plan map(s), indicating area(s) affected by
amendment (see sample attached)
4. the proposed plan map(s), indicating area(s) affected by
amendment (see sample attached)
D. What is the official local status of the proposed amendment? (Check
one or more as appropriate.)
X Acted upon by planning commission (if applicable) on ·
Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council
review, on
Considered but not approved by governing body on .
Other
E. Indicate what adjacent local governmental units and other
jurisdictions (school districts, watershed districts, etc.) affected
by the change have been sent copies of the plan amendment, if any, and
the date(s) copies were sent to them.
Not applicable
ii. LAND USE
A. Describe the following, as appropriate:
1. Size of affected area in acres 3.5
2. Existing land use(s) residential, commercial
3. Proposed land use(s) commercial
4. Number of residential dwelling units involved -0-
5. Proposed density -0-
6. Proposed square footage of commercial, industrial or public
buildings Approximately 50,000 square~eet
III.METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT GUIDE
A. Population, Household and Employment Forecasts
Will the proposed amendment affect the city's population, household or
employment forecasts for 2000, or any additional local staging
contained in the original plan?
X No/Not Applicable
Yes. Describe effect.
B. Changes to Urban Service Area Boundary
Will the proposed amendment require a change to the boundary of the
community's urban service area?
No/Not Applicable.
Yes. Under I.C., a map should be attached to show the proposed
change.
C. Changes to Timing and Staging of Urban Service Area
Will the proposed amendment require a change to the timing and staging
of development within the urban service area?
X No/Not Applicable.
Yes. Under I.C., a map should be attached to show the proposed
change.
-3-
D. Sewer Flows
1. Will the proposed amendment result in a change in the projected
sewer flows for the community?
X No/Not Applicable.
~ Yes. Indicate the expected change.
Total Year 2000 flow for community based
on existing plan million
gallons/day
Total 2000 flow for community based on plan
amendment million
gallons/day
2. If your community discharges to more than one metropolitan
interceptor, indicate which interceptor will be affected by the
amendment.
E. Transportation
Will the proposed amendment result in an increase in the trip
generation rate(s) for the affected area?
X No/Not Applicable.
Yes. Describe effect.
F. Aviation
Will the proposed amendment affect the function of a metropolitan
airport or the compatibility of land uses with aircraft noise?
No/Not Applicable.
Yes. Describe effect.
G. Housing
Will the proposed amendment affect the community's ability or intent
to achieve the long-term goals for low- and moderate-income and
modest-cost housing opportunities contained in the existing plan?
No/Not Applicable.
Yes. Describe effect.
III. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
, A. Official Controls
Will the proposed amendment require a change to zoning, subdivision,
on-site sewer ordinances or other official controls9
No/Not Applicable.
Yes. Describe effect.
LTO12A
commercial development is to occur primarily within the three estab-
lished shopping centers and surrounding pads on this site and along
the 42nd Avenue corridor.
The office and restaurant development immediately across Winnetka
within the Study Area does relate well in land use and density to
the City Center. Development alonq 42nd Avenue North should be rel~e~
to the needs and d~velopment priorities of the City. Due to the
commercial amenities offered by 42nd Avenue (access~ visibility~ etc.),
commercial businesses may choose to locate along 42nd Avenue. To
provide greater development flexibility in the area, a commercial re-
zoning trom B-3, Auto Oriented Business District to B-4. Community.
Business District would be appropriate.
Residential Concerns
The existing zoning and land use patterns generally work well to buffer
lower density residential areas from the 42nd Avenue development. The
higher density housing developments utilize garages, private streets,
parking lots and open spaces as buffers from the adjacent railroad,
commercial and industrial uses. North of 42nd Avenue along Nevada
there are single family homes which border con~nercial properties to
the south, are surrounded by higher density developments and show some
deterioration. It may be desirable to eventually redevelop these sites
also for higher density residential uses. The home located in the
northwest corner of Fred Sim's Park is showing similar signs of
deterioration and may be considered for acquisition as part of the
park.
The conditions of the rear yards of the businesses bordering the
residential development south of 42nd Avenue also deserves special
attention. New Hope Bowl, Broadway Pizza, Grobe's Cafe, Video Movie
Rentals, First Line Auto Repair and to a lesser extent Tom Thumb
require maintenance and screening behind their buildings to buffer the
adjacent residential uses.
South of these businesses, the R-3 zoned, mid-density residential
development separates the single family homes from the 42nd Avenue
commercial sites. Although zoned mid-density, none of the existing
developments currently meet the density standards set for R-3 and
should be considered for rezoning to R-4. The rezoning would reduce
the non-conformity of the existing development, while maintaining a
land use appropriate to and compatible with both the 42nd Avenue uses
and the single family residential area. Any future redevelopment of
sites for similar housing would require the increased density to be
cost effective on the smaller lots in this area.
27
Standard five foot sidewalks are currently provided on both sides of
42nd Avenue for pedestiran use. 42nd Avenue is, however, an unpleasant
walking environment and portions of the sidewalks are in need of
repair. Young bicyclists often ride on the sidewalks as they are
unable to compete with vehicular traffic in the streets. Bicycles
and pedestrians on the narrow sidewalk are not compatible. Between
the street and sidewalks is a strip of rough asphalt paving which
has an unfinished appearance and is not suitable for pedestrian use.
Under the railroad bridge, this strip disappears and the sidewalk is
right along the curb with only five feet of useable right-of-way on
either side. This condition limits possibilities for improving the
walking environment, but only immediately beneath the bridge.
Residential Street Patterns
The residential streets in the Study Area have been designed to dis-
courage through traffic and to preserve the tranquility of the low
density single family neighborhoods. The Hinneapolis, Northfield and
Southern Railroad has had a pronounced effect on this street development
by limiting the number of streets crossing the tracks. Similarly, few
streets are continuous across 42nd Avenue. These patterns, plus the
curved residential streets, cul-de-sacs and center block high density
housing development have created quiet, safe residential areas. The
higher density developments located in the center of the large blocks
are-often served by private or dead-ended public streets. The tenants
and property managers of these developments seem to prefer to maintain
their private streets and thereby limit traffic to residents only. However,
direct access from these large developments onto 42nd Avenue adds to the
traffic problems by allowing uncontrolled access for a high volume of
traffic during peak hours. These access points, as well as the streets
and alleys in the commercial areas should be evaluated for use as common
entrances, thereby reducing the number of access points and potential
accident areas on 42nd Avenue. It may also be possible to abandon under-
utilized rights-of-way, returning them to the tax rolls.
MARKET CONDITIONS
In the Summer of 1985, the City of New Hope conducted a market study to
evaluate the commercial development of the City. While certain retail
areas provide some retail expansion potential, the overall retail market
is somewhat limited. The Market Study outlines retail target areas and
planning objectives to promote New Hope as a retail area. These objec-
tives include:
Creating a common recognizable retail identity for the New Hope
City Center through the use of joint advertising, coordinating a
cohesive City Center design, promoting the introduction of selected
commercial uses into the City Center area.
29
Discourage commercial development on substandard lots which lack
sufficient space to accommodate a functional commercial use.
Commercial development should be concentrated in the City Center
area or along 4zn~ Avenue.
The Market Study identified some physical limitations at issue along
42nd Avenue that are described in this report. The implementation of
this 42nd Avenue Land Use Concept Plan must consider its impact on
local market conditions and its impact on the City Center area.
BUILDING AND SITE CONDITIONS
Continuity
Development between Winnetka and the railroad overpass is generally
continuous. The larger lots and buildings, and often landscaped
frontage, create an urban character which relates well to the City
Center. East of the railroad overpass the development has occurred
as smaller projects and is thus less homogeneous in size of lot or
structure and in setback from the street. The only actual vacant lot
is in the southwest corner of the Nevada and 42nd Avenue intersection.
However, the landscaped access road to Oregon Estates as well as the
deep setback on Jeff's Print Shop and the large parking areas at
Steve's Auto Repair, Paro's Pub and the New Hope Bowl also give the
initial appearance of being vacant properties.
Building and Site Conditions
Inspections of properties within the Study Area raised concern about
deterioration and lack of maintenance on a few sites. Several of the
'commercial parking lots located east of the railroad and the area in
front of the industrial sites west of the railroad have broken pave-
ment, pot holes and weed growth. The vacated Louisiana Avenue right-
of-way is in similar condition. The occurence of a small wetland behind
the three industrial buildings has created circulation problems and an
undefined paved area. The rear yards of the commercial uses between
Nevada and Maryland Avenues and the New Hope Bowl also require main-
tenance attention. These lots are especially critical as they border
and impact residential areas.
The structures along 42nd Avenue east of the railroad are generally
older and requiring more maintenance attention than those to the west.
New Hope Bowl is currently making improvements to the interior and
will hopefully follow with attention to the exterior of their build-
ing. The Jeff's Print building is a converted single family home.
This vacant structure is in need of general maintenance. Three of
the single family homes north of the Oregon Estates entrance on
Nevada Avenue, as well as the home in the northwest'corner of Fred
Sim's Park also show signs of deterioration. These conditions detract
from the quality of the surrounding uses.
30
policy plan
The 42nd Avenue Improvement Study has been prepared to guide develop-
ment through several phases and many years. The Policy Plan when
applied with the Physical Improvement Plan and policies and goals
established in the City Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide a
framework for evaluating development proposals. The following goals
and policies were established in conjunction with the New Hope
Comprehensive Plan to address in a written format the issues identified
in the previous chapter. This plan is an important element in resolv-
ing these issues and achieving the goals. Despite the deviations which
may occur from the more detailed Physical Plan, the general policies,
once established, will remain pertinent.
GOALS
The following goals provide the focus of the improvements recommended
in this study. They address the major issues identified and are aimed
toward the general improvement of the living, working and play environ-
ments in the 42nd Avenue area.
1. Provide-safe access onto and across 42nd Avenue for motorized
vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles.
42nd Avenue as one of the few east-west through streets is of major
importance to the surrounding commercial, industrial and resi-
dential development. Development must improve the safety of use
of this arterial street'for all. Proposed land use, access and
streetscaping projects must be evaluated according to the effect
they will have on the safe use of 42nd Avenue.
To help achieve this goal, access points to commercial and industrial
enterprises must be coordinated and limited. Traffic speeds must
be controlled to allow greater reaction time in areas with obstructed
visibility. Provisions are needed to aid vehicular, bicycle and
pedestrian traffic in crossing or gaining access to 42nd Avenue.
2. Promote compatible and complementary land uses.
The City has identified several properties alonc~ the 42nd Avenue
corridor between Winnetka and Louisiana Avenues which hold zoninq
designations which are not reflective of their use. Land use boLh
'~ffects and is affected by the local market and 42nd Avenue traffic
situations. The 1977 City Comprehensive Plan identified the
automobile-oriented commercial strip east of the railroad overpass
as an undesirable land use and competition for the City Center.
The City is investigatin~ the possibility/ of rezonin~ certain
! properties from B-3, Auto-Oriented Business to B-4, Communil;_y Business.
35
~9 Cits has identified the need to consolidate some zonin~
districts in this area under one B-4, Communits Business Zoning
~istrict to reduce the number of non-conformin§ uses in the area.
In addition to zoning changes, attention must be paid to the
existing small lot sizes, need for buffering between commercial
and residential uses and improvement of site and building conditions.
Nonconformance of developments with regard to off-street parking,
provision of garages and density of development must also be
addressed.
3. Develop 42nd Avenue in accordance with City Comprehensive Plans.
As outlined in the previous goal, the New Hope Comprehensive Plan
emphasizes a need to cultivate commercial development into one
convenient, comprehensive and aesthetic location. The 1985 Market
Study underlines this emphasis, having identified a somewhat
limited market for commercial expansion. The location of the 42nd
Avenue Study Area in relation to the City Center makes it important
for the land use to complement the City Center.
4. y/~nify development and present a positive image as the City of -"~
LNffw Hope.
The 42nd Avenue Study Area can be divided at the railroad overpass
into two distinct areas. To the west development is commercial
and industrial and continuous in use, density and set back from
42nd Avenue. The eastern section has a mixture of commercial,
industrial and residential uses, generally smaller in scale and
less continuous. Although continuity between the two sections
is not proposed, within each of the areas, a more homogeneous
land use and street treatment would improve the area's image.
Traffic along 42nd Avenue traverses the cities of Robbinsdale,
Crystal and New Hope between Highway 100 and Hennepin County 18.
New Hope, even with its City Center along 42nd Avenue does not
present an identity separate from the other cities. Implementation
of a streetscaping project is recon~ended to help unify develop-
ment, as well as present a separate positive image. Such a project
would include burial of overhead power lines, uniform street lights
and improved pedestrian facilities. Improvement should be coor-
dinated with similar projects planned for the City Center block.
36
5. Encourage cooperation between public and private agencies in
implementation of improvement and development plans.
The implementation of the improvements outlined in this study
will require acceptance by and cooperation between private
enterprises and public agencies over several years. In addition
to fostering better understanding between the City and local
business persons, the coordination effort will provide a forum for
communication within the business community. This communication
should foster cohesion within this community and establish a
greater pride in the City of New Hope.
When relocation and purchase of lands for expanded rights-of-way
or redevelopment are necessary, the City of New Hope should
investigate and utilize public financing alternatives to assist
private interests in achieving such improvements.
OBJECTIVES AND POLICY GUIDELINES
To help achieve these broad goals a series of policy guidelines has
been prepared. The guidelines have been broken down into land use,
transportation, administrative action, codes and ordinances and public
participation categories. They too are general in nature and intended
to guide the evaluation of a variety of development proposals. The
policies often overlap somewhat in content and are intended for this reason
to be used collectively. No time framework or priority has been assigned
to the policies or is implied.
PHYSICAL PLANrlING
Land Use Objectives
The character, quality, intensity of activity and service and trans-
portation demands of New Hope are created and shaped by land use and its
arrangement. Land use is, therefore, a basic building block for compre-
hensive physical planning, development and redevelopment of the 42nd
Avenue Study Area.
Present and projected market trends in the Study Area have resulted in
a need for change in zoning policy. To achieve the goal of compatible
and complimentary land uses which follow the development direction out-
lined in the City Comprehensive Plan, the following objectives are
established:
1. Functionally arranged and compatible land use relationships.
37
6. Piecemeal development of commercial uses shall be prohibited.
Unit and coordinated development is the only pattern acceptable.
7. When opportunities arise, existing spot commercial development
shall be eliminated or consolidated into more functional and
coordinated unit patterns.
8. Visual pollution from signs, utility lines and franchised archi-
tecture is to be eliminated through the strict enforcement of
City ordinances.
9. Uses identified as necessary or desirable for the 42nd Avenue Area
are to be actively pursued, promoted, and assisted by the City.
10. A commercial maintenance code shall be enacted and uniformly
enforced to ensure proper upkeep and constant improvement of the
42nd Avenue Area.
Industrial
1. Retain existing industrial uses and encourage new industrial
development to locate in existing industrial zoned areas.
2. Prohibit penetration of residential neighborhoods by traffic
generated by industrial activity.
3. Industrial uses shall be adequately screened and appropriately
landscaped and designed according to City standards.
4. An industrial maintenance code shall be enacted and uniformly
enforced to ensure proper upkeep and constant improvement of
the 42nd Avenue Area.
Transportation 0bjecti yes
The location of the City of New Hope as a suburban community in the
Twin Cities metro region makes transportation an issue of primary
importance. 42nd Avenue provides convenient access to and between
major metropolitan expressways. The volume of traffic on 42nd Avenue
only underlines the importance of the automobile and of 42nd Avenue
as a throughfare. The conflict of the slower neighborhood traffic
merging with the fast through traffic along 42nd Avenue has created the
high accident rates. Separation is difficult because of the lack of
east-west railroad crossings. The proximity of 42nd Avenue neighbor-
hoods to the City Center shopping facilities justifies the separate
safe development for other, especially non-motorized modes of trans-
portation. Taking into account these needs and situations, the follow-
ing objectives reflect the results to be produced within the 42nd
Avenue Study Area.
1. A comprehensive system approach to transportation, giving due
attention to all modes and related facilities.
41
development framework
The Improvement Plan is a graphic portrayal of application of the
Policy Plan established in the last chapter. This plan addresses
the issues raised through the inventory and analysis of the Study
Area. The changes shown on the plan are intended to occur in phases
over time as financially feasible. This Development Framework is
submitted as a concept addressing current issues and anticipated
feasible change. Because unforeseeable physical and circumstantial
changes are expected, the plan is only a concept and must be applied
with the Policy Plan in evaluating proposed development. Combination of
the improvement and policy plans provide the comprehensive guidelines
toward achievement of the goals established in this study and the
City Comprehensive Plan.
Throughout the inventory and analysis of the existing conditions and
market trends, transportation and land use have evolved as the pri-
mary improvement issues. This portion of the chapter will outline
the general improvements proposed in land use and circulation, their
interdependencies and ramifications. Further improvements will then
be presented on a section by section basis in greater detail.
PROPOSED LAND USE
The proposed Land Use Plan portrays the maintenance of the land use as
existing along 42nd Avenue. The 1985 Market Study supports some re-
location of the commercial businesses into the City Center to avoid
competiton between areas. The major development market identified by
the 1985 Market Study is mid to high density housing. The City's
objective~ however~ is to achieve a cohesive land use pattern that is
compatible with residential and industrial land use. In this reqard,
'the plan promotes co~ercial and high density residential land uses for
the redevelopment along 42nd Avenue. It is expected that change will
occur over an extended period of time with the phasing and options
addressed in the implementation chapter of this plan. Development
priority will be evaluated on compatibility of the existing uses with
surrounding land uses, willingness of business owners to relocate or
redevelop and the necessity for lot combination of small lots to allow
for more economically feasible development. Specific instances are
addressed further in the subarea plans.
The abandonment of portions of city streets occurs in three areas in
the plan. Wherever abandonment occurs, it is assumed that right-of-way
is split between the adjoining land owners. The two hundred feet of
Maryland Avenue right-of-way is split between the Nevada Apartments
(Wendy Jane Terrace) and New Hope Bowl. The dead-ended portion of 41st
Avenue, which connects to the vacated Louisiana alley can also be
vacated. Unfortunately, the right-of-way is only sixty feet wide,
57
Probl ems:
- off-set intersection
- visibility of intersection obscurred
- uncontrolled access to 42nd Avenue, streets and curb cuts
- inadequate parking for Reel Video and Grobe's Cafe
- strip commercial development competing with City Center
- Some apartment housing exceeds density standards
- maintenance and buffering needed on some commercial lots
- small lots difficult for redevelopment
- major apartment complex has direct uncontrolled access to 42n~
Opportuni ti es:
- Paro's Pub, Reel Video and All Star Sports have expressed
interest in relocating
- Steve's Auto Repair is transitional use with redevelopment
intended
- two vacant lots open for development - Jeff's Print and former
gas station on southwest corner of Nevada intersection
- interest has been expressed by adjacent higher density housing
development management in expansion
Proposed Improvements
The"opening section of this chapter outlined the general changes in
land use. This is the section proposed in commercla~ and ottlce uses
and hi§her density residential land use as redevelopment alterantlves
to existinq conditions. The plan shows a very long range proposal
for land use. The change is expected to occur in phases with the plan
representing an optimal situation.
The proposed realignment of Nevada Avenue to create a safer intersec-
tion will have a great deal of impact on further development in this
area. Throughout preparation of this study, alternative realignment
schemes were explored. From a disruption, economic and land use
perspective the plan shows the most desirable option. The alignment
is moved only on the north side of 42nd Avenue, requiring acquisition
of two lots to amass the 200 feet of 60 foot right-of-way necessary
for a smooth transition and stacking space at 42nd Avenue. The
former gas station site now being used by Steve'$ Auto Repair is pro-
posed by the owners for redevelopment at some time in the near future.
Although the proposed Nevada Avenue right-of-way would reduce the size
of the remaining lot by about half, the Jeff's Print site is currently
vacant and could presumably be combined to create one larger lot
from the two small parcels without adversely affecting development
potential of that site. If combined with the Oregon Estates front-
age and eventually the lots occupied by the office building and
small machine shop, this site can be more efficiently developed for
additional housing units. The single family residence north of
Steve's Auto would need to be relocated to accommodate the realignment.
71
The Paro's Pub site would benefit from the realignment with approxi-
mately 60 feet added to the west boundary. This addition and Paro's
interest in relocation opens a second large lot for redevelopment.
The--p¥b-X~i~ft~-~o-the-C'ft]/-Ce~-[er-f-~-n-~--h~rgh level of activity make this
a consTd~-bl-e--sh-t~--fo-r--cd~e-r~a---1---~e-~elopment. South of 42nd Aven~e,
Ail Star Sports has expressed an interest in relocating closer to the
Oity Center and Reel Video has plans to move out within the coming,months.
The All Star Sports lot can be combin.ed with the vacant service station
lot to support a commercial use. Grobe's Cafe is interested in expanding
into the Reel Video space which would reduce the number of uses in that
small complex, providing extra parking spaces for the cafe. Eventually,
the First Line Engine Repair and adjacent office building lots could
also be combined for redevelopment.
There are two other possible options for the realignment of Nevada
Avenue. The curve could instead be made on the south side of 42nd
Avenue or made less drastic by realigning both north and south as
illustrated in the following diagrams. Realignment on the south,
whether totally or partially, would necessitate the relocation of
Vickers, probably west across Nevada to the currently vacant service
station lot which would be expanded somewhat by vacation of the
existing right-of-way. The relocation has both positive and negative
ramifications. Although site circulation problems for Vikers and
parking problems for Grobe's Cafe could be corrected, the commercial
area would again include the block between Nevada and Oregon. The
All Star Sports lot alone is too small for feasible multi-family
residential development and would probably need to remain commercial
with the strip pattern of development remaining. Economic considera-
tions include the disruption of Vickers which had expressed no
interest in relocating or remodeling. The realignment of both north
and south would require City acquisition costs of the Steve's Auto,
Vickers and vacant lots, however, the reduced curve would create a
be~ter alignment.
After the intersection has been corrected, the City can request a
traffic study on 42nd Avenue from the Hennepin County Department of
Transportation. Then while the properties adjacent to the inter-
section are disrupted, acquisition of additional right-of-way for
left turn lanes could be easily accomplished. The turn lanes are
proposed as a measure to avoid recreation of existing Quebec inter-
section conditions and accident rates. The Nevada intersection has
many of the same visibility problems as Quebec and would be encoun'tered
first by the traffic from the east which has built up speed from Douglas
Avenue, making it difficult to stop for slowed or stopping traffic.
It is proposed that an 80 foot right-of-way be assembled for the con-
struction of the left turn lane at Nevada Avenue. This would pre-
scribe the additional purchase of five feet of right-of-way from the
commercial blocks south of 42nd Avenue on either side of Nevada. ~lore
than five feet of right-of-way is not required from these establish-
ments, as on-site parking conditions are already critical and would
only be compounded by any additional loss. The redevelopment proposed
72
for the properties north of 42nd Avenue allows the flexibility to
acquire the additional needed right-of-way before uses become established.
Nine feet would be purchased from the east half of the Oregon Estates
frontage through the Paro's site. The 80 feet allows for sixty feet
of driving area - four through lanes with one left turn lane and ten
feet of pedestrian useable area on either side. The use of the ten
feet will be addressed in more detail in the next chapter.
The assumption is made that erection of a signal light at the Nevada
intersection can be warranted by the county study and approved by the
state. Hennepin County has been aware of the problems in this area
since the 1976 preparation of the New Hope Comprehensive Plan. At that
time, traffic volume on Nevada Avenue was not sufficient to warrant
installation of a signal before'which realignment woUld have been
mandatory. As a result, no improvement plans were made. Current
traffic volume also does not warrant the light, however, the develop-
ment of additional commercial or high density housing and relocation
of the Oregon Estates access from 42nd Avenue to Nevada should sufficiently
increase that volume. As such, the erection of a singal light is proposed
as a viable and desirable option.
The turn lanes could be installed without the signal light, however,
such treatment only minimally addresses the existing traffic problems.
The signal will stop traffic before reaching Quebec Avenue, thereby
regulating traffic speeds through the entire 42nd Avenue Study Area.
In addition, the light allows safe, controlled access for residents
off of and onto 42nd Avenue. Pedestrian and bicyclists needs will
also be served by the installation of a safe crossing near the bus sto~,
restaurants and convenience store. Opportunity for automobile traffic
to access local businesses not located at the intersection is enhanced
by the timing of the signal lights.
In addition to controlling the Nevada intersection, it is proposed
that curb cuts be reduced in number along 42nd Avenue in this area.
With the development of multi-family residential units, it is possible
to eliminate many of the commercial access points. It is also recom-
mended that residential traffic not be allowed direct access onto
42nd Avenue, but instead be directed to the controlled Nevada inter-
section. Direct access from 42nd Avenue to Tom Thumb, Grobe's Cafe
and the Vickers Station could also be eliminated with circulation
between parking areas developed for internal throughfare between
Nevada and ~laryland. The cramped parking conditions will be eased
somewhat by the reduction from four uses to three and with the lots
better organized to accommodate through circulation. Similarly, the
All Star Sports site, the owners of which are interested in relocating
within the City Center block, can be combined with the vacant gas
station site for development of additional housing units. The curb
cut on 42nd Avenue could thus be eliminated with access provided pri-
marily on Nevada Avenue. This policy would eliminate many of the un-
controlled access and potential accident points along this section of
42nd Avenue.
74
4. The 1985 City__C~enter/42nd Avenue Market Study recommended that
commercial uses be concentrated in the near City Center area.
This study__e_n_c_o~.r_a__ges the area of 42nd Avenue east of the railroad
_tr__acks to devel_o_p_ with commercial or high density residential uses
._to increase the available market and to complement the City c~nt'er
as a community commercial focal point.
To implement the City's redevelopment projects, the City will have to
utilize a number of financing and planning instruments:
· Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). New Hope is an
entitlement City for CDBG funds in 1986 and shall receive
approximately $136,000. These funds can be utilized at the City's
discretion to assist in community planning, redevelopment or
improvement projects. .
· Capital Improvement Plan. This plan is a budgeting device to
identify and prioritize needed community capital improvements.
Through the process of capital improvement planning, the City is
able to budget for needed improvements each year.
· Tax Increment Financing (TIF). The major financing tool in the
area redevelopment is anticipated to be tax increment financing.
'~ax increment financing will be utilized to finance land acquisi-
tion, resident relocation, building demolition or relocation,
site improvements and City capital improvements involved in the
City's redevelopment efforts.
Due to the scale of redevelopment being proposed in the Land
Use. Plan, it is recommended that the City establish a redevelop-
ment district that includes the entire 42nd Avenue Study Area
and the adjacent City Center area. This will allow the City to
collect tax increments from any new development in this area and
target it at redevelopment priorities. Collecting tax increment
revenues from a larger redevelopment district will reduce the
need for higher density residential development in the redevelop-
ment areas.
· Private Sector Assistance. The redevelopment policies of this
report emphasize the use of local private interests to assist
in redevelopment efforts. Interviews with property owners
indicated some interest in cooperative relocation and some
interest in multiple family development.
The redesign of the Quebec Avenue Intersection to provide left
turn lanes.
The construction of the fifth traffic lane will require acquisi-
tion of additional right-of-way. The cost of land acquisition
and street construction are expenses that are shared between
the City and the County on a 50/50 basis.
The cost of the street improvement should be budgeted for in
the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. While TIF
monies generated in the redevelopment district could be targeted
at this street improvement, these funds may be more appropriately
used in other redevelopment efforts.
Two other street improvements could be considered first phase
improvements. These include putting a cul-de-sac at the end of
44th Avenue and the vacation of Maryland.
The provision of a cul-de-sac at 44th Avenue is seen as necessary
to provide convenient access and egress to and from this area
for City maintenance and emergency vehicles. This improvement
should be included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan.
':The vacation of Maryland Avenue should occur in conjunction with
the realignment of Nevada Avenue. This street vacation will
channel traffic from south of 41st Avenue over to Nevada Avenue
when accessing 42nd Avenue. The demolition of the street is a cost
that the City would incur. Reclamation of the land should be
a cost shared with the adjacent property owners.
:FUTURE PLANS
The Land Use Plan prop_o}es that the commercial uses between Nevada
Avenue and the railroad tracks and the single family land uses along
._N~ad~"-b6--redev61 ~.P~ ~f~]~o_mmun i~y bus i ness or mu l ~i'p~f~-i~ y ~s'es.
The existing commercial use in this area is located on small lots
lacking sufficient area to accommodate the use. Most of the commercial
uses are nonconforming with the current zoning regulations. Single
family homes are surrounded by high density development with some
homes showing signs of structural deterioration. From a land use
pe~6pective~_ commercial and multiple family development in this area
is appropriate as it is compatible with the existing development, its
~'~TO-~--t6-42~-A~~-~l~ ~i 1 i tare ~ood access, and wi i 1 improve
--'th~da] retail mar-l<~t.
'87
OPTION 5: This option includes all of the land west of Nevada and
the single family lot in the northeast corner of Fred Sim's Park.
Land Area: 224,225 ~quare feet - 5.15 acres
Land Cost to 10 Year Bonding Term 15 Year Bonding Term
the Developer Total Units Units/Acre Total Units Units/Acre
$0 land cost 399 77 304 59
$1,200/unit 314 61 241 47
$2,000/ un i t 188 37 145 28
The single family homes along Nevada north of Oregon Estates' eastern
driveway show signs of structural deterioration and poor site maintenance.
The development of these sites may be a higher priority than homes to
the south.
Due to the expanding development district, the densities required in
Option 5 is similar to Option 4.
As in the case of the first phase density projection, the density pro-
jections for the various options are "ball park" estimates.with a possible
error factor of plus or minus 10 units. The projections are intended for
planning purposes only, and more detailed analysis must be performed to
determine the feasibility of the tax increment project when development
is pending.
Other areas have been identified for redevelopment, however, no densities
have been projected at this time. The areas are not seen as a priority
area unless a redevelopment opportunity presents itself.
1. The single family lots along the west side of Nevada Avenue are
proposed to be redeveloped into high density residential uses.
The high density use would be consistent with the redevelopment
area to the west and the existing New ~lope development to the east.
2. Paro's Pub. This site has been controversial in regard to licensing
requests and policing concerns. The owner indicated some concern
with the area's traffic problems and expressed a willingness to re-
locate to the City Center area. The redevelopment of this site is
proposed to be high density residential or commercial development.
Due to 'the high'~cquisition and relocation costs involved in re-
developing this site, tax increment financing funds from outside the
site will have to be utilized.
3. The vacant gas station site and the All Star Sports site on the
southwest corner of the Nevada Avenue/42nd Avenue intersection.
Due to the size of the sites, it is recommended that these lots
be combined for redevelopment in order to sustain development in
quality design. The owner of All Star Sports expressed a willing-
ness to relocate his business to a freestanding pad near the
City Center. All Star Sports is a high value structure and as
such the redevelopment cost will be substantial. Redevelopment
of the individual site will not provide sufficient tax increment
to fully support the proposed redevelopment. Funds from other
areas of the redevelopment district will be required to finance
this project.
4. The two sites abutting the railroad containing 1st Line Automotive
Repair and a small office building. These sites are currently
over-utilized and are incompatible with the residential areas to
the south. Due to the size and location of the sites, however,
it is not anticipated that this area will be redeveloped in the
near future.
The aforementioned projections provide some indication as to what will
be required to redevelop the various option areas. In each case, the
projected densities exceeded the existing densities and those permitted
in the R-4 zoning district. To assist in the redevelopment efforts, the
City of New Hope may have to provide for some increase in the permitted
density in this area. In order l;o minimize the required density, the
following recommendations should be considered:
1. Create a redevelopment district that encompasses both the 42nd
Avenue Study Area and the City Center to allow for a larger area
to generate redevelopment funds.
2. Utilize a tax increment bonding period of 15 years or greater to
allow for a longer period of tax increment collection.
3. Sell the land acquired by the City to the interested developer.
The land sale can be at a price below market rate and still provide
some funds to recoup City investment.
4. Encourage private-investment in redevelopment efforts.
5. Utilize local development interests such as Oregon Estates to allow
the required development to be interspersed over the entire Oregon
Estate site.
6. The City may consider using a portion of Fred Sim's Park for develop-
ment. This alternative would not require any land acquisition and
minimal site preparation. Whether or not this alternative is chosen,
the balance of Fred Sim's Park should be improved to provide useable
open space for the surrounding high density area.
92
_ Affected by Amendment
42m avenue north
legend ' ~ T'~ E.~ _.~
industrial
~'ll ~d-h~gh densi~ res~denda] __
~ single family residential 40th a..~ north I
.. 42nd avenue improvement study
PROPOSED LAND USE
c n°rtnweS[ ~
assooated ~ orth
o~,,~.,~ new hope, minnesota o mo, eoo, 400,
58
which would create a nonconforming residential lot as it exists, so
it has been split between the New Hope Bowl and single family lots.
44th Avenue off of Winnetka could also be restructured as a cul-de-
sac instead of dead-ending to the south and east. This small portion
of land is divided between the two single family lots and Northumberland
Place Apartments. The latter two abandonments do not involve major
changes in circulation or land use, but are necessary parcels held
in public ownership.
PROPOSED ZONING
Along with the changes proposed in land use comes the necessity of
neking complementary changes in zoning. Between the railroad over-
pass and Winnetka Avenue, existing uses are viable and appropriate.
Land use transitions are made with compatible uses or are adequately
buffered, thus avoiding major conflicts. Proposed zonin§ changes occur
north and south of 42nd Avenue, flankin.~ the street corridor. The B-3,
Automobile-Oriented Commercial Zones are recommended {6r change to
to accommodate the proposed change'"in land use to c6mmunity businesses.
This leSsens the nonconform'~ty, While providing for compatible land uses
and would make development on adjoining properties more economically
feasible. The apartments fronting on Oregon Avenue will remain non-
conforming as garage stalls are not provided for residents on the site.
Although the single family homes along Nevada north of 42nd Avenue are
also shown as rezoned to R-4, higher density development is not imminent.
The homes south of 43rd Avenue are maintained in good condition and not
in need of improvement at this time, while the homes north of 43rd Avenue
across from Fred Sim's Park are older, smaller and needing some main-
tenance. From a maintenance perspective, these homes may be considered
for redevelopment before the homes to the south. Then eventually, the
expansion of higher density developments around these homes and the
realignment of Nevada increasing the traffic at the Nevada, 42nd Avenue
intersection may increase the feasibility for the redevelopment of these
lots into higher density housing.
PROPOSED CIRCULATION
Several major changes are proposed for 42nd Avenue through the Study
Area. The accident counts and concern expressed by local residents,
property and business owners have helped shape the recommendations
made. Conversations with the Hennepin County Department of Trans-
portation about the problems on 42nd Avenue (County State Aid Highway
#9) underline the need for a traffic study in this area. Before the
County will consider signal lights, turn lanes or any other major
improvements for the Nevada Avenue area, the offset intersection must
be corrected and then a traffic study made. This plan was prepared
assuming that improvements will be justified by the County study and
shows the necessary recommended realignment of Nevada Avenue.
59
45th avenue north
h'
I~n~ ~:~:~. ~1~..... ~.:.-.-.-.....
~ R-~ Single Family Residential ~::~
~ R-4 High Density Residential ~~j
~:~:~:~ R-O Residential-Office ~~
~¢~ B-4 Community Business ~~
~1111 I-1 Limited Industrial 4ct a,en.e norm
~ I-2 General Industrial
42nd avenue improvement study
PROPOSED ZONING
as..~:x3ate~ ~ orth
COrlsul[c~n[s. inc ~'
new hope, minnesota0 100,200, 400,
6n