Loading...
120401 Planning AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 4, 2001 CITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA 7:00 p.m. 2. 3. 4. 4.1 4.2 o 6.1 6.2 7. 7.1 7.2 8. 8.1 8.2 9, 10. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSENT BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING Case 01-22 Case 01-19 Consideration of a Text Amendment to Section 4.205 Conditional Uses in the Industrial Zoning District Dealing with Mini-Storage Facilities Within an Existing Warehouse Building in an I District and a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Mini-Storage Facility in an I District, 4401 Quebec Avenue North, Hudson Properties, Inc., Petitioner Request for Ordinance No 01-14, An Ordinance Amending New Hope Code §4.204(3) by Permitting by Administrative Permit the Retail Sale of Bulk Product in the Industrial Zoning District Delivered or Repackaged for Resale at Principal Building, City of New Hope, Petitioner COMMITTEE REPORTS Report of Design & Review Committee - Meeting December 13, 8 a.m. (if needed) Report of Codes & Standards Committee OLD BUSINESS Miscellaneous Issues Council Action on November Planning Cases · Ord. 01-08, Administrative Permit Fees, Adopted · Ord. 01-09, Voting Requirements for Zoning Code Text or District Changes, Adopted · Ord. 01-10, Amending Sign Code, Adopted · Ord. 01-11, Personal Wireless Service Antennas and Towers, Adopted Livable Communities Grant Update NEW BUSINESS Review/Approval of Planning Commission Minutes of November 6, 2001 Review of City Council Minutes of November 13, 2001 ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT · Petitioners are required to be in attendance Planning Commission Guidelines for Public Input The Planning Commission is an advisory body, created to advise the City Council on land use. Th~. Planning Commission will recommend Council approval or denial of a land use proposal based upon the Planning Commission's determination of whether the proposed use is permitted under the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan, and whether--the proposed use will, or will not, adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood. The Planning Commission holds informal public hearings on land use proposals to enable you to learn, first-hand, what such proposals are, and to permit you to ask questions and offer comments. Your questions and comments become part of the record and will be used by the Council, along with the Planning Commission's recommendation, in reaching its decision. To aid in your understanding and to facilitate your comments and questions, the Planning Commission will utilize the following procedure: 1. The Planning Commission Chair will introduce the proposal. 2. City staff will outline the proposal and staffs recommendations and answer any questions from the Planning Commission. 3. The petitioner is in, vited to describe the proposal, make comments on the staff report, and answer questions from the Planning Commission. 4. The Chair will open the public hearing, asking first for those who wish to speak to so indicate by raising their hands. The Chair may set a time limit for individual questions/comments if a large number of persons have indicated a desire to speak. Spokespersons for groups will have a longer period of time for questions/comments. 5. When recognized by the Chair, the person wishing to speak is asked to come forward and to give their full name and address clearly. Remember, your questions/comments are for the record. 6. Direct your questions/comments to the Chair. The Chair will determine who will answer your questions. 7. No one will be given the opportunity to speak a second time until everyone has had the opportunity to speak initially. Please limit your second presentation to new information, not rebuttal. 8. At the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission will discuss the proposal and take appropriate action. Al If the Planning'Commission recommends that the City Council approve or deny a request, the planning case will be placed on the City Council agenda for the next regular meeting. Usually this meeting is within one to two weeks of the Planning Commission meeting. B. If the Planning Commission tables the request, the petitioner will be asked to return for the next Commission meeting. Planning Case: Petitioner: Address: Request: PLANNING CASE REPORT City of New Hope Meeting Date~: -' December 4, 2001 Report Date: November 30, 2001 01-22 Hudson Properties, Inc. 4401 Quebec Avenue North Consideration of an Ordinance Amending the New Hope Zoning Code by Amending Section 4.205(7) Regulating Self Storage Facilities and Adding Section 4.205(15) Permitting by Conditional Use a Warehouse Conversion to a Self Storage Facility and a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Mini-Storage in an I District Request The petitioner is requesting consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment by modifying Section 4.205(7) regulating self storage facility and creating a new Section 4.205(15) for a conditional use permit for a "warehouse conversion to a mini-storage" facility and approval of this new conditional use permit to convert a warehouse to mini-storage in the I District. II. Zoning Code References III. Section 4.20 Section 4.205 Section 4.205(7) Section 4.32 Section 4.33 Property Specifications Zoning: Location: Adjacent Land Uses: Site Area: Building Area: Lot Area Ratios: Planning District: Specific Information: Industrial District Conditional Uses, I "Self Storage (mini warehouse) Facilities" Text Amendments Conditional Use Permits I, Industrial District On the west side of Quebec Avenue, 900 feet north of 42nd Avenue. R-4 high-density apartments to the west and northwest of the site, Sunnyside Park to the northeast, industrial uses to the east and south. 433'x 279' = 121,006 square feet (2.78 acres) 294' x 180' +/- = 48,000 square feet Building 38% Green 35% Paved 27% No. 9; The Comprehensive Plan indicates the City will continue to promote industrial business retention and in-place expansion within this District. The property is generally flat, except for the northwest corner, which rises about six feet to the residential street, Rhode Island Avenue, providing no access to this lot. No storm sewer or ponding was provided on site, per the Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 1 11/30/01 standard practice of the time. The parking lot to the south has been pav~-'~ onto the adjacent warehouse lot over the years, in violation of a minimb... setback requirement. Since the north and west walls are blank without major openings or access to the adjacent residential area, land use conflict has been avoided. A recorded 15-foot wide utility easement parallels the north lot line for underground utilities and no easement exists for the power lines that parallel the west lot line. IV, Background The applicant, Hudson Properties, Inc., is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the redevelopment of an existing office/warehouse building into a self-storage facility with 176 units. The self-storage facility will occupy only the warehouse portion of the building while the office section will remain open for an additional tenant. The subject property is located at 4401 Quebec Avenue North and is zoned Industrial. The original single-tenant office/warehouse was built in 1968 and an addition was erected on the north end in 1974. The building had been occupied by Displaymasters for the entire time, until this spring. The owners/applicants have been good stewards of the property for many years. Self-storage facilities are allowed in the Industrial District through a conditional use permit. However, staff was concerned with certain aspects of this proposal, which were not addressed in the existing language. Therefore, the applicant is requesting an amendment to the City Code to specifically permit the conversion of a warehouse building into a self-storage facility. Staff developed the ordinance amendment and it was reviewed by the Codes & Standards Committee on November 27. This Committee approved the proposed amendment with minor revisions. V. Petitioner's Comments The petitioner states in correspondence that "The request of Hudson Properties, Inc. for a conditional use permit should be granted for the following reasons: 1. Hudson Properties is owned by Steven Gregerson and David Gregerson, former owners of Displaymasters, which maintained business operations at 4401 Quebec Avenue for approximately 32 years. Hudson Properties is a known, proven corporate citizen of New Hope and will operate a successful operation in a clean and pleasing environment. 2. The premises at 4401 Quebec have been vacated by the current owners of Displaymasters/Giltspur Exhibitgroup. Despite a commercial sale/lease listing of two years, the facilities remain empty with no purchase or lease candidates known to the property owners or their agents, CB Ellis. The loss of all rental revenue from a leasehold tenant creates a significant hardship upon the present property owners and the city's tax base. 3. The mini-storage facility will be a climate-controlled facility fully enclosed within the existing building parameters. The storage facility will provide local, climate controlled storage access to New Hope residents in an area densely populated by rental property. An on-site manager will supervise all facility daily usage. 4. The new mini-storage usage will constitute a safer, cleaner, and quieter use than its previous manufacturing and sales usage. Instead of traffic precipitated by approximately 100 employees, semi-trailer access, and customer influx, as well as the presence of industrial manufacturing equipment, saws, flammables, forklifts, and chemicals, the storage facility may employ one or two emPloyees who will provide supervised access to inside storage facilities. Specific zoning code considerations may be addressed as follows: · Green Space. Zoning code provision 4.205(7)(a) requires 35% green space on the site. The existing facility configuration has approximately 32.5% green space. Projected plans add green space Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 2 11/30/01 sodding at the southern border of the property, replacing a portion of existing parking lot to meet or exceed green space requirements. Further, additional plants will occur at the south and southeast perimeter points as indicated upon submitted drawings. · Buildinq Location. The facility is an existing building and abuts no other building within 35 feet to impede parking, loading, driveway or fire lanes. · Buildinq Length. The facility exceeds 150 feet in length but is a currently existing building, which has been used for manufacturing, storage, and sales for approximately 32 years. · Snow Storage. Adequate space exists on the parking lot for snow storage at the southwest, southeast, and northeast locations. (The storage operation will employ only one or two people on site, whereas previous staffing of manufacturing operations required parking for approximately 60 employees.) · Sprinkler System. The present facility is equipped with fully automated overhead sprinkling throughout. Additionally, the owner will have the sprinkler system evaluated by a licensed sprinkler systems company and updated as necessary and verified to the City as reviewed, evaluated, and updated. · Fire Alarm System. The facility maintains a Honeywell full security and ADT fire alarm system. · Driveways and Parkinq Area. The parking area and driveway (blacktop) was resurfaced and re- striped in 2001. The parking lot, as modified, may accommodate approximately 40 automobiles. The parallel parking previously provided on the east side of the building will be removed to allow for adequate fire lane dimensions. The parking lot will be curbed at the south perimeter along newly added green space at the southern border of the property. · Site Management. The site shall be subject to continuous management by owner representatives on-site during hours of operation, not to exceed maximum hours of 6 a.m. through 10 p.m. Monday through Friday and 6 a.m. through 6 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. Office location shall allow for full- time monitoring of internal driveway areas, as enhanced by video cameras as necessary. Additionally, the owner shall provide a rolling ladder or other suitable device to allow for overhead inspection of storage units by owner and city representatives. · Caretaker Apartments. Although the facility shall be staffed by an on-site manager at all access times, no caretaker shall live on the premises. · Building Appearance. The current facility is a mix of brick far,.ade and block exterior. The block exterior was painted within the previous 12 months and constitutes a pleasing exterior consistent with surrounding industrial facilities. · Buildinq Code Compliance. The owner shall comply with all applicable building code provisions. · Storaqe Use. Use of storage facilities by storage tenants shall be limited and consistent with city requirements. A copy of proposed sample rental agreement is attached hereto. · Other Business Activity. The facilities contemplated for mini-storage operations stand vacant and no other activity is contemplated within the self-storage warehousing facility. · Si.qna.qe. Signage projections include a temporary banner (consistent with city limitations) at time of opening and permanent, new panel signage at the driveway and south office locations consistent with regulations and immediate neighboring facilities. Specifically, plans contemplate a two-sided, 40-square foot maximum allowable by code. · Lighting. Perimeter lighting exists on the east and south sides of the facility. Enhanced lighting is contemplated at the southwest and northeast exteriors as indicated on submitted plans. Refuse Storaqe. Refuse storage will be internal. Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 3 11/30/01 · Lawn Irriqation. A lawn irrigation system currently exists. · Rooftop Ventilation. The facility has eight existing rooftop units and may be modified, as necessity requires. Carbon monoxide sensor units shall be installed intemally consistent with city requirements and industry Standards -- The concept of indoor, climate-controlled mini-storage facility operations is relatively new. Other indoor mini-storage operations are located at 5525 Highway 169, Plymouth, and 5217 Hanson Court, Crystal. The indoor mini-storage facility operation affords a clean and pleasing enterprise without exposure of rental units or contents to neighborhood facilities or residents. Further, the indoor facility allows for close monitoring and safety inasmuch as access is limited to time and supervision of the on-site manager. VI. Notification Property owners within 350 feet of the property were notified and staff has received no comments VII. Development Analysis A. Zoninq Code Amendment The applicant approached the City with a "new concept" that does not fit into an existing choice of land uses. Staff reviewed the matter and proposed a new CUP that fits this warehouse conversion, while updating and correcting existing mini-storage language. The Codes & Standard Committee met to review the proposed ordinance amendment and made recommendations regarding the final language and the recommendations from the Committee have been incorporated into the ordinance, which was prepared in final form by the City Attomey. The proposed ordinance amendment and text change would read as follows: The City Council of the City of New Hope ordains: Section 1.. Section 4.205(7) "Self Stora.qe (mini warehouse) Facilities" of the New Hope City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 4.205(7) "Self Storaqe (mini warehouse) Facilities". Provided that: 4.205(7)(a) "~"'-~"'~. ~., ~ ~ .... _~" ^, ,,.~.., ,~..,.,,,..,.. ~,,~, ~-~o~_~ ...... + ..~ ,~.....~,..; 4.205(7,,.,(a) "Buildin.q Location". No building shall be located closer than thirty-five (35) feet to each other to allow for parking, loading, driveway and fire lanes. 4.205(7){-e-)(b) "Buildin.q Len.qth". No building shall be greater than one hundred fifty (150) feet in length. 4.205(7,~.~c) "Snow Storaqe". Adequate space is provided for snow storage. 4.205(7)(.e-)(d) "Fire Hydrant". All structures are to be within two hundred (200) feet of a fire hydrant. 4.205(7)(f)(e) "Sprinkler Systems". All storage buildings are to be equipped with dry sprinkling systems which will be subject to review and approval of the C!~' ~u!Idi,-. and the Fire Department. ~1,-,~ 4.205(7,~/(f) "Fire Alarm System". Every two thousand (2,000) square feet of the storage structure ;~ tc mustEbe separated by a one-hour rated firewall and sha// be equipped with a complete and comprehensive fire alarm system d:t='c!cm :hc!! b: ~n!t!ctcd !n c:ch :tr'--'ct'--'rc subject to the review and approval of the Fire department. Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 4 11/30/01 4.205(7)(-h-)(g) "Driveways and Parkin.q Area". All driveways and parking area are to be hard (b!=c~cp cr cc.".crcte) surfaced with concrete or blacktop and provided with adequate turning radius for fire vehicle truck maneuverability. Parking spaces shall be striped in white and city required fire lanes shall be striped in yellow, is tc ~,,,, ,~- bc...-....-...~-""":"*"~"",4 *~'"'"'g....~- ..v,. *~,,-...~ ~..~.,-~*,- Des noted~..~.. ...... stcrcgc sp=cc 4.205(7)¢,)(h) "Caretaker Apartment". If an "on-premises" caretaker dwelling unit is provided on site, construction of said dwelling unit shall conform to all design standard regulations for multiple family dwelling units of the Minnesota State Building Code and the New Hope Zoning and Building Code. Two off-street parking spaces and one garage stall must be provided for the caretaker dwelling unit. The occupancy and minimum dwelling unit and room floor sizes intedor and floor area standards shall be controlled by Sections 3.353, 3.361, 3.362, and 4.032(2)(b) of this Code. 4.205(7)~)(i) "Buildin.q Appearance". Any structures having exposure to an adjacent residential use or public right-of-way, park or similar public use areas shall be of brick, natural stone, wood, or stucco facing material. 4 205(7)0~-)0~) ,,~m,,, ,~,,,.; .... ^,.,;,,;,,e, "Prohibited Uses". ..... ;,,,-,,,,; ...... ; ....*~, ...... ~' '-"*;";~' Any and ali commercial, industrial or resident/a/uses other than storage '" t: :c:'-'-r is prohibited within the self-storage mini ,:::r:~:'--':!ng facility. 4.205(7)(k) "Prohibited Storage". Storage of any hazardous materials, chemicals, gasoline, or flammable liquids is prohibited in any storage space, except for normal household quantities. Any storage of propane tanks or flammable gases is prohibited. No more than four (4) vehicle tires may be stored in any rental space. Section 2. Section 4.205(15) "Warehouse Conversion to Mini-Storaqe" of the New Hope City Code is hereby added to read as follows: Section 4.205( ~ 5) "Warehouse Conversion to Mini-Storaqe': 4.205(~5)(a) "On-Site Manaqer Required". A full-time on-site manager must be employed to manage the facility, control access and supervise operations during ali open hours in full compliance with the conditional use permit. 4.205(15)(b) "Fire Sprinkler System': The bu#ding shall be equipped with an auto-fire sprinkler system approved by the Fire Department adequate to protect all storage within the building. The adequacy of any existing system must be certified in writing by a qualified fire consultant acceptable to the City. Any existing system or proposed changes, certified by the fire consultant, must also be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. 4.205(~5)(c) "Prohibited Storage". Storage of any hazardous materials, chemicals, gasoline or flammable liquids is prohibited in any storage space, except for normal household quantities. Any storage of propane tanks or flammable gases is prohibited. No moro than four (4) vehicle t/res may be stored in any rental space. 4.205(~5)(d) "Rout/ne Inspection Access". Inspection visibility must be provided to each space through an open ceiling or master lock system. Inspection of storage spaces by the fire or building inspector shall be portaged by acceptable means such as use of an on-site wheeled ladder, elevated catwalks or master key. Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 5 11/30/01 4.205(15)(e) "Prohibited Uses: Any and afl commercial, industrial or residential uses oth",~ than storage is prohibited within the self-storage facility. 4.205(15)(f) "interior Access Onll/'. Storage spaces must be accessible only from the interior of the building. Acce~ ssibility from the exterior of the building to any storage space is prohibited. Conditional Use Permit 1. The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit is to provide the City with a reasonable and legally permissible degree of discretion in determining suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare, public health, and safety. In making this determination, to allow a conditional use permit application, the City may consider the nature of adjoining land or buildings, similar uses already in existence and located on the same premises or on other lands close by, the effect upon traffic into and from the premises, or on any adjoining roads, and any other factors bearing on the general welfare, public health, and safety from the approval of the conditional use permit. 2. Criteda for Decision. The Planning Commission and City Council shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use. In determining whether to approve or deny a conditional use permit, the City Council and Planning Commission shall find that the conditional use permit complies with the following criteria. The burden of proof demonstrating compliance with the following cdteria shall be the responsibility of the applicant. A. Comprehensive Plan. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official Comprehensive Municipal Plan of the City. B. Compatibility. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent present and future anticipated land uses. C. Performance Standards. The proposed use conforms with all applicable performance standards contained in the Code. D. No Depreciation in Value. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. E. Zonin.q District Criteria. In addition to the above general criteria, the proposed use meets the criteria specified for the various zoning districts: 1. In Industrial Districts (I): a. Nuisance. Nuisance characteristics generated by the use will not have an adverse effect upon existing and future development in adjacent areas. b. Economic Return. The use will provide an economic retum to the community and be commensurate with other industrial uses for which the property could feasibly be used. In considering the economic return to the community, the Planning Commission and City Council may give weight to the sociological impact of a proposed use, both positive and negative. Per the Planner's report, the City Code outlines 11 criteria to weight when considering a conditional use permit for a self-storage facility. However, staff felt that these criteria did not address certain aspects of this proposal. Therefore, the applicant requested an amendment to the City Code to add specific language for the conversion of a warehouse building into a self-storage facility. This new language was developed by city staff and approved by the Codes & Standards Committee. It should be noted that the following analysis is based on the assumption that the City Council approves this new language. A. On-Site Mana.qer Required. A full-time person must be employed to manage the facility, control access, and supervise operations during open hours in full compliance with all parts of the conditional use permit. Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 6 11/30/01 Finding: The operator must provide a full-time manager to supervise the facility dudng all hours of operation. B. Fire Sprinkler System. The building is equipped with an approved auto-fire sprinkler system that is adequate to protect the variety of items stored in the building. A qualified fire protection consultant shall evaluate the existing system and proPose changes 'to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. Findinq: According to the applicant, the facility has an existing automated overhead sprinkler system. The applicant must provide wdtten evidence prior to issuance of a building permit that a qualified fire protection consultant has evaluated the existing system and that they have made all necessary additional or improvements. This written evidence is subject to the review and approval of the Fire Department. C. Prohibited Storage. No hazardous materials, chemicals, gasoline, or flammable liquids can be stored in any storage space, except for normal household quantities. A maximum of four (4) vehicle tires may be stored in any rental space. Absolutely no propane or flammable gases are permitted in the building. Findinq: The applicant must submit a copy of their rental contract prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy that specifies the following: (1) no hazardous materials, chemicals, gasoline, or flammable liquids can be stored in any storage space, except for normal household quantities, (2) a maximum of four vehicle tires may be stored in any rental space, and (3) absolutely no propane or flammable gases are permitted in the building. D. Routine Inspection Access. Continue the established fire prevention abilities of the City by providing visibility of each space through an open ceiling or master lock system: Inspection of spaces by the manager and Fire or Building Inspector can be arranged with an on-site wheeled ladder, elevated catwalks or master key, for example. Findinq: The applicant has agreed to an open ceiling design that will allow inspection of individual units via an on-site wheeled ladder system. E. Prohibited Uses. No repair, living, sleeping, cooking, commercial or industrial uses, except for storage, shall occur within the mini-storage facility. Findinq: The applicant agrees with the condition that no living, sleeping, cooking, commercial or industrial uses, except for storage shall occur within the mini-storage facility. F. Interior Access Only. No storage space may be directly accessible from the extedor of the building. Finding: According to the applicant's plans, no storage space will have direct exterior access. All tenants will access their storage spaces from an internal ddve lane. Development Review Team The Development Review Team met on November 14, was supportive of the request, and recommended the following: provide a fire lane in front by deleting the nine parallel parking spaces; identify hours of operation; consider changing the warehouse manager's office location to a more visible, central area; submit comprehensive sign plan for change to multi-tenant building; upgrade fire-sprinkler system; provide intedor security cameras; submit lease language; provide architect- signed complete plans within one week or statement agreeing to full compliance with the State Building Code at the time of building permit application; provide concrete curbing, per the City Engineer; identify new plant species, sizes and planting schedule; submit illumination contours for new exterior lights. Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 7 11/30/01 D. Design & Review Committee ~-' The Design & Review Committee met on November 15 to review the concept-only plans ana sustained the recommendations of the Development Review Team, adding: provide south concrete curbing by the new greenery; identify trash dumpster locations; routine inspection access language makes this conversion possible from the building department and fire department standpoint. The Committee and staff agree with the applicant predicting that this type of conversion could be a big improvement over other existing mini-storage facilities. E. Plan Description Revised plans were submitted as a result of the Design & Review Committee meeting that include the following details and excerpts from the Planner's report and Building Official comments are also included. 1. Zoning. The existing office/warehouse building conforms to the lot and building performance standards for the !, Industrial District. The relevant existing performance standards for sites in the Industrial Distdct are listed below. However, in order for the proposed use to be approved, the City must also approve the proposed text amendment. I, Industrial District Performance Standards Category Standard Existing Status Front yard 30 ft. 60 ft. 'Conforming Rear Yard 30 ft. 37 ft. Conforming Side Yard (interior) 10 ft. 15/121 ft. Conforming Building Height 6 stories or 72 ft. N/A Conforming Impervious Surface Not more than 80% 65% Conforming 2. Comprehensive Plan. The Proposed Land Use Map guides this site for industrial use. Therefore, the conversion of this site into a self-storage facility through a conditional use permit is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Parking. The City Code does not identify a specific parking standard for self-storage facilities. In this case, the Ordinance dictates that staff consults other professional sources for a parking standard. According to the American Planning Association (APA), self-storage facilities should provide three off-street parking stalls plus one stall for every 100 units. Given this standard, the site should provide five stalls. By comparison, the parking standards for an office/warehouse use are one stall for every 300 square feet of office space and one stall for every 1,500 square feet of warehouse space, or 52 stalls. As proposed, the site will have 41 off-street parking stalls. While requiring the 52 stalls for a self- storage use would be too intense, providing only five stalls could severely limit the marketability of this site should it ever return to an office/warehouse use or add an additional office tenant. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant provide the 41 stalls shown in the parking area on the south side of the building. The nine (9) existing parallel parking stalls in the front yard on the east side of the building along the ddve in the front of the building have been eliminated, per the request from staff, West Metro Fire, and the Design & Review Committee. Staff is recommending as a condition of approval that the front driveway be identified as a fire lane, per West Metro, and be appropriately signed and painted. Two (2) handicapped accessible stalls are shown in the south parking lot. 4. Loading. The applicant's plans allow all loading and unloading to occur within the building. Tenants will enter the building through the garage door next to the manager's office on the south side of the building. Once inside the building, tenants may load or unload their items and then Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 8 11/30/01 drive through the building and exit on the east side. A loading dock is also available to serve large trucks. 5. Access. The subject property has two existing access points along Quebec Avenue North. The first is at the south end and will allow access to the parking area and building entrance. The second is at the north end and will ailow vehicles to leave the site once they exist the building. 6. Li(~htin.q. The petitioner has submitted reasonable lighting contours. The site plan illustrates exterior lighting on the east and south sides of the building. AcCording to the applicant's site plan, these lights meet the City's glare standards outlined in Section 4.034(5). Two (2) new wall lights will be installed on the south side of the building along with one existing. One new light will be installed on the east side of the building (far north) along with the four (4) existing lights on the east side. The plans show that the exterior wall lights are to be RUUD-lighting "WACW" Series, wedge luminaire with 250w lamp or equal. The Planner is recommending that the applicant submit a cut sheet illustrating the design of the proposed lights to insure they will direct all light down toward the ground. 7. Snow Storage. The site plan identifies three snow storage areas on the southwest, southeast, and northeast areas of the property. 8. Curbing. A new curb is shown on the site plan to be installed along the south property line, as recommended. The site plan shows the material to be bituminous and the City Engineer is recommending that concrete curbing be considered. 9. Landscaping. The petitioner has submitted a detailed landscape plan and schedule, as requested. According to the applicant, the site currently has approximately 32.5% green space. The existing green space is made up of grass and a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees. In addition to this, the applicant plans to add a green strip with sod and five (5) sugar maples along the south side of the site. The plans show that the existing irrigation system will be extended into the new sod area. 10. Trash Storaqe. According to the applicant, all refuse containers will be stored inside the principal building. 11. Siqnage. The site plan shows a two-sided 40 square foot ground sign on the east side of the building and a one-sided 250 square foot (maximum) wall sign on the south wall of the building. The applicant's proposed sign plan is in conformance with the sign standards for single occupancy industrial uses as outlined in Section 3.49. However, the current design of the building allows another future use in the office portion of the building. Therefore, staff recommends that this site meet the sign standards for multiple occupancy businesses outlined in Section 3.493. These standards limit total wall signs to 15% of the wall on which they are placed; however, no individual tenant wall sign may exceed 100 square feet in size. Therefore, the applicant must reduce its proposed wall sign from 250 to 100 square feet while its proposed ground sign may remain. Staff recommends that a condition of approval be that the applicant submits a Comprehensive Sign Plan for change to a multi-tenant building, including scaled elevation drawings of front wall and ground sign. 12. Interior/Number of Stora.qe Units. The floor plan shows that the following number and sizes of storage units will be located in the building: Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 9 11/30/01 Storage Unit Key Code Size of Unit Quantity A 7'a6" x 7'6" unit 4 B 10' x 7'6".unit 3 C 10'-x 10' Unit 72 D 10'x 15' unit 38 E 10' x 20' unit 59 13. Manaqer's Office. The manager's office has been relocated to the south entrance for improved supervision of the facility as recommended. 14. Hours of Operation. In the revised narrative, the petitioner has stated that the hours of operation will be: 6 a.m. - 10 p.m. Monday through Friday 6 a.m. - 6 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 15. Rental Aqreement. The petitioner has submitted a draft Rental Agreement, as requested. F. Planning Considerations Excerpts from the Planner's report have been incorporated into this report. G. Buildin.q Considerations No detailed architectural plans have been submitted. Many complications exist and full compliance with the state building code is required before any construction may begin. The Building Official has stated that it would be desirable to have a utility easement created under the common power lines along the west boundary, where none appears to exist. H. Legal Considerations The City Attorney's comments are included in the Text Amendment section of this report. I. En.qineerin.q Considerations The City Engineer reviewed the revised plans and made the following comments: We have reviewed the proposed improvements at 4401 Quebec Avenue. The improvements include the conversion of an existing warehouse to a mini storage facility. Minimal site improvements are shown. The site's impervious area will be reduced slightly. A portion of the existing parking lot will be removed along the south edge of the property and landscaped buffer strip will be added. The site improvements will not require any storm water improvements for the overall site. The existing parking lot does not include any curb and gutter. This is typical for the majority of parking lots for the industrial properties along Quebec Avenue. It was recommended that the applicant install curb and gutter along the new landscaped buffer strip to efficiently handle runoff and to prevent traffic from crossing the buffer strip. The submitted plans show a proposed bituminous type curb in this area. Concrete curb would be more durable and could be considered. All other site items are acceptable from an engineering perspective. J. Police Considerations The Police Department was included in the review of these plans and the recommendations have been considered and incorporated into the plans. Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 10 11/30/01 K. Fire Considerations West Metro Fire reviewed the original plans and made the following comments: Parking on east side of building to be removed and fire lane established. Curbs shall be painted yellow and "No Parking Fire Lane" signs installed. · Sprinkler system needs to be evaluated by a licensed sprinkler company. The system must be able to handle storage such as cars, trailer, boats, etc. A copy of this report must be sent to my office for review. · The outside bell for the water flow alarm shall be replaced with a horn and strobe. · Horns and strobes will be placed throughout the building to warn occupants of and water flow alarms. · ABC fire extinguishers will need to be placed throughout the building. VIII. Summary Staff feels that this is a reasonable proposal for the re-use of an existing warehouse building and that the applicant has done a good job addressing a number of issues. There are still a number of Building and Fire Code issues that will need to be addressed, but if the petitioner is willing to cooperate with staff on addressing outstanding issues, staff is supportive of this request. IX. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the text change amendment and the conditional use permit application to allow an interior mini-storage facility within an existing warehouse, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to any site work, submit detailed, signed plans that demonstrate full compliance with the State Building Code. 2. Compliance with all recommendations from West Metro Fire. The applicant shall provide written evidence prior to issuance of a building permit that a qualified fire protection consultant has evaluated the existing system and that they have made all necessary additions or improvements. This written evidence is subject to the review and approval of West Metro Fire. 3. Submit Comprehensive Sign Plan details. The site shall meet the sign standards for multiple occupancy businesses outlined in Section 3.493. Because the building is a multiple occupancy building, future tenant occupancy of the office space shall require review by city staff to insure proper compliance with all zoning and building regulations prior to occupancy. 4. Comply with City Engineer recommendations for concrete curb along south property line. 5. Establish fire lane along east driveway with appropriate painting/signage. 6. The applicant shall submit a cut sheet illustrating the design of the proposed lights to insure that all light will be directed down toward the ground. 7. The applicant must submit a copy of their rental contract prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy that specifies the following: (1) no hazardous materials, chemicals, gasoline, or flammable liquids can be stored in any storage space, except for normal household quantities, (2) a maximum of four vehicle tires may be stored in any rental space, and (3) absolutely no propane or flammable gases are permitted in the building. No living, sleeping, cooking, commercial or industrial uses, except for storage, shall occur within the mini-storage facility. There shall be a full-time manager supervising the facility during all hours of operation. 8. Petitioner to submit statement agreeing to all 6 conditions in new code amendment. 9. Have surveyor descdbe a drainage and utility easement over the west 20 feet of property, submit to the City for approval and then record the easement on title at Hennepin County. Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 11 11/30/01 10. Execute Development Agreement with City and submit performance bond improvements (amount to be determined by Building Official and City Engineer). Attachments: Address/Zoning/Topo Maps ..... Petitioner Application/Narrative Certified Survey Floor Plan Storage Unit Key Site Plan Landscape Plan Lighting Plan Rental Agreement Ordinance Amendment 11/27 City Attorney Correspondence City Engineer Comments Planner's Report Current City Code Sign Code excerpts Application Log for minor Planning Case Report 01-22 Page 12 11/30/01 a 4'/40 474~ 4732 4733 4724 472~ ~'-"~ 4717 ~ o 8 420.3 - 4237 4.511 4301--44.71 o ?. 8 4656 4657 4616 ~ 4617 ~6o~ 4609 4800 4801 4616 4617 4~00 4601 4730 47oO 451 ~E N 4549 454.1 4517 4425 4401 4.301 4224 4220 4215 ~ 4215 4210 4211 760O 42OO 73O0 Z FRED SIMS PARK 43RD 7180 726O 7246 7220 7200 COOPER i-II(~H SCHOOL ;.~-~ ..... ~ ....... : .... .~_ (~LU'~Hli~Afll Ci~IETERY R-2 Sir R-3 Me R-4 Hi.c R-5 "Se R-O Ree R-B Res LB Limi CB Cor~ I Indus Open City Size 33..5 /. FRD~ CZTV OE HEM HOPE R~ceiv~a' by PLJ%N~ING APPLICATION TO PLANNII~G COF94IS~ ~ CITY COUNCIL City of New Hope 4~0! Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Name of Applicant: PID # 1711821220003 Hudson Properties, Inc. Street Location of ProDerty: 4401 Quebec Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota 55428 Legal Description of Property: See attached Exhibit 1 OWNER OF RECORD: Name: Hudson Properties Addre s s: 640 Baker Buildinq, Minneapolis, M~nnesota 55402 Home Phone: 651-698-8339 Work Phone: 612-288-9490 Applicant,s nature, of Legal or Equitable Interest: 100% .legal fee title Fax: 612-349-6718 Type of Request.. (pertaining to what section of City Code) Conditional use permit, New Hope Zoning Code 4.205(7) Please outline Description of Request: Conditional ~se permit for mini-storage operation in existing facility (use additional 'pages if' n'~cessary) Why Should Request be Granted: See attached Exhibit 2 form if ne~~ 3/99 EXItlBIT 2 The request of Hudson Properties, Inc. for a conditional use permit should be granted for the following reasons: 1. Hudson Properties, Inc. is owned by Steven Gregerson and David Gregerson, former owners of Displaymasters, Inc., which maintained business operations at 4401 Quebec Avenue North for approximately 32 years. Hudson Properties is a known, proven corporate citizen of New Hope and will operate a successful operation in a clean and pleasing environment. The premises at 4401 Quebec Avenue North have been vacated by the current owners ofDisplaymasters/Giltspur Exhibitgroup. Despite a commercial sale/lease listing of two years, the facilities remain empty with no purchase or lease candidates known to the property owners or their agents, CB Ellis. The loss of all rental revenue from a leasehold tenant creates significant hardship upon the present property owners and the city's tax base. The mini storage facility will be a climate controlled facility fully enclosed within the existing building parameters. The storage facility will provide local, climate controlled storage access to New Hope residents in an area densely populated by rental property. An on-site manager will supervise all facility daily usage. The new mini-storage usage will constitute a safer, cleaner, and quieter use than its previous manufacturing and sales usage. Instead of traffic precipitated by approximately 100 employees, semi-trailer access, and customer influx, as well as the presence of industrial manufacturing equipment, saws, flammables, fork-lifts, and chemicals, the storage facility may employ one or two employees who will provide .supervised access to inside storage facilities. Specific zoning code considerations may be addressed as follows: Green Space. Zoning code provision 4.205 (7)(a) requires 35% green space on the site. The existing facility configuration has approximately 32.5% green space. Projected plans add green space sodding at the southern border of the property, replacing a portion of existing parking lot to meet or exceed green space requirements. Further, additional plantings will occur at the south and southeast perimeter points as indicated upon submitted drawings. Building Location. The facility is an existing building and abuts no other building within thirty-five (35) feet to impede parking, loading, driveway or fire lanes. Building Length. The facility exceeds 150 feet in length bm is a currently existing building which has been used for manufacturing, storage, and sales for approximately 32 years. Snow Storage. Adequate space exists on the parking lot for snow storage at the southwest, southeast, and northeast locations. (The sWrage operation will employ only one or two people on site, whereas previous staffing of manufacturing operations required parking for approximately 60 employees.) Sprinkler System. The present facility is equipped with fully automated overhead sprinkling throughout. Additionally, the owner will have the sprinkler system evaluated by a licensed sprinkler systems company and updated as necessary and verified to the City as reviewed, evaluated, and updated. Fire Alarm System. The facility maintains a Honeywell full security and ADT fire alarm system. Driveways and Parking Area. The parking area and driveway (blacktop) was resurfaced and re-striped in 2001. The parking lot, as modified, may accommodate approximately 40 automobiles. The parallel parking previously provided on the east side of the building will be removed to allow for adequate fire lane dimensions. The parking lot will be curbed at the south perimeter along newly added green space at the southern border of the property. Site Management. The site shall be subject to continuous management by owner representatives on-site during hours of operation, not to exceed maximum hours of 6:00 a.m. through 10:00 p.m., Monday through Friday;, 6:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m., Saturday and Sunday. Office location shall allow for full-time monitoring of internal .driveway areas, as enhanced byvideo cameras as necessary. Additionally, the owner shall provide a rolling ladder or other suitable device to allow for overhead inspection of storage units by owner and City representatives. Caretaker Apartments. Although the facility shall be staffed by an on-site manager at all access times, no caretaker shall live on the premises. Building Appearance. The current facility is a mix of brick facade and block exterior. The block exterior was painted within the previous 12 months and constitutes a pleasing exterior consistent with surrounding industrial facilities. Buildin~ Code Compliance. The owner shall comply with all applicable building code provisions. 2 ~. Use of the storage facilities by storage tenants shall be limited and consistent with City requirements. A copy of proposed sample rental agreement is attached hereto. Other Business Activity. -~"he facilities contemplated for ministorage operations stand vacant and no other activity is contemplated within the self storage warehousing facility. Signage. Signage projections include a temporary banner (consistent with city limitations) at time of opening and permanent, new panel signage at the driveway and south office locations consistent with regulations and immediate neighboring facilities. Specifically, plans contemplate a two-sided, 40-square foot (maximum) per side sign at the building entrance on Quebec Avenue and a one-sided wall sign on the south side of the building, not to exceed the 250 square foot maximum allowable by code. Lighting. Perimeter lighting exists on the east and south sides of the facility. Enhanced lighting is contemplated at the southwest and northeast exteriors as indicated on submitted plans. Refuse Storage. Refuse storage will be internal. Lawn Irrigation. A lawn irrigation system currently exists. Rooftop Ventilation. The facility has eight existing rooftop units and may be modified as necessity requires. Carbon monoxide sensor units shall be installed internally consistent with City requirements and industry standards. The concept of indoor, climate-controlled ministorage facility operations is relatively new. Other indoor ministorage operations are located at 5525 Highway 169 North in Plymouth, and 5217 Hanson Court in Crystal. The indoor ministorage facility operation affords a clean and pleasing enterprise without exposure of rental units or contents to neighborhood facilities or residents. Further, the indoor facility allows for close monitoring and safety inasmuch as access is limited to time and supervision of the on-site manager. A typical corridor- well lit and plenty of space to maneuver push carts provided by Lessor. For current proposal, with 16 foot clear ceilings, tops of units will be covered with chain-link fencing. Examples of smaller and largir unit~ A smaller unit with Handicap Accessible doors. 2031-27~ 2499--20 1730 ~ o~ I ~ NO. 4al PARKS DEPT. [//////////////1 ~ NUI~RY ~TY Z~E R-4 '/-/ Drw¢ Thru J Dnv~ Thru STORAGE UNIT KEY C 7'-G" x .7'-G"UNIT - QTY = 4 I O'X 7'-G" UNIT - QTY = 3 IO'X I0' UNIT - QTY = '72. D I O'X 1 5' UNIT - QTY -- 3~ I O'X 20' UNIT - QTY = 55) E · · · . · · · · . . · · . . . . . · , SITEDRAINAGE"~ .................. ilTE D~ N,~E--'~ : ~ ..................... ~ ! ~ ITl DP,/INAG'~*.~. ~J m 2SIC D. 40 SO CaP, gL ID 51GN il I WALL dGN ......... SITE DRAINAGE--~~ SITE .~ :CT..~S I'~ 5~ IP'~,OJFCT W~LL C~M~LY Wt' MINN~.~OTA I~UILDING CC)Df' ~.Y R~I~P,[NC[ LINIfeO~Jd MFC~'I,e~IIC. AL COO[. MINNt~.~TA PLUM~ING. CO~ ~. NATIONAL ,~J..~CTRIC COO~), AME[P,.tCAN~ WIT["1DIE~.~LITI,~..~ ACT · LOCAL ZONING. O~INANC~ EXISTING DI~CIDUOU5 EXISTING DFCIDUOU~ EXISTING DECIDUOUS DECID~ DECIDUOUS LANDSCAPE P'LAN ,~o .~ soo ,,~e.. BOTANIC~. WE ACER SACCMARUM 'tvlA,IESTY' QLIGHTING PLAN [XTEI~JOR. WALL LIGI"IT~, TO DE ~J. JUD UGIITING,--'WACW' ..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.~PJ~.~. WEDGE LUlelINAIIP~ WI ZSOW MI1 LAMP OR. EQUAL RENTAL AGREEMENT DRAFT This Agreement is made and entered into by the undersigned this day 1. PROPERTY RENTED. Tenant agrees to rent the following property located at the selfo storage facility at 4401 Quebec Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota. Enclosed Space Number: ; Space Size 2. RENT. Tenant will rent the property beginning on Tenant agrees to pay rent in the sum of $ per month, payable in advance on the day of each and every calendar month to Landlord, or Landlord's designated agent. Landlord reserves the right to require that rent and other charges be paid in cash, certified check or money order. In addition, costs incurred by Landlord by reason of Tenant's breach of any provision of this agreement shall be deemed additional rent, and may be demanded by Landlord of Tenant at any time, withheld fi'om Tenant's deposit, or waived, all at Landlord's sole discretion. Landlord may change the monthlyrental rate at any time by giving Tenant at least thirty days' written notice at Tenant's last known address. If Tenant has made advanced rental payments the new rent will be charged against such payments, effective upon notice. Tenant shall not be entitled to a refund of the first full month's rent for any reason. Tenant shall not be entitled to a refund of the pro rate portion of rent for the monthly rental period in which the rental agreement ends. 3. LATE CHARGE. Rent paid more than 10 days late causes Landlord to incur damages which are extremely difficult to measure, and because of this, Tenant agrees to pay Landlord, as additional rent, $10.00 if rent is not paid within I 0 days of the monthly due date by close of'business and an additional $10.00 if rent is not paid within 20 days of the monthly due date by close of business. 4. FEES AND DEPOSITS. (a) Administration Fee. Tenant will pay Landlord a $5.00 non-refundable administration fee on the day Tenant Signs the Rental Agreement. (b) Security Deposit. Tenant will pay in advance a security deposit of $ to secure Tenant's faithful performance of all terms of this agreement. Occupant agrees that Landlord need not segregate this deposit from other fimds, and that no interest will be due for the period of time during which the deposit is held. This deposit maybe picked up, at the rental office, byTenant within 14 days after Tenant surrenders the rented enclosed space to Landlord, less all charges for cleaning, repairing or otherwise preparing the space for rental to others. At Landlord's sole option, amounts may be withheld from the security deposit to compensate Landlord for rent, or any other charges due and unpaid under this Agreement, at the time Tenant relinquishes, abandons or otherwise loses possession of the storage space. 5. DENIAL OF ACCESS. If Tenant is in default of any obligation set forth in this Rental Agreement, Landlord may deny Tenant access to Tenant's enclosed storage space. 6. LANDLORD'S RIGHT TO ENTER. Tenant grants Landlord, Landlord's agents, or representatives of any governmental authority access to the Enclosed Space upon three (3) days written notice to Tenant. In the event of an emergency, or to preserve the premises, to complywith applicable law, of or enforce any Landlord' s rights, Landlord, Landlord' s agents, or representatives o f any government authority shall have the right to remove Tenant' s lock and enter the Enclosed Space, without notice to Tenant, and take such actions as may be appropriate. 7. ACCESS. Tenant understands that Tenant's cost of renting the Enclosed Space is based on Landlord's cost of operating the Enclosed Space. Both of these costs are reduced if access to the Enclosed Space is limited to fixed hours. Tenant will have access only during the hours posted by Landlord. Tenant' s access to the premises maybe limited by Tenant' s faithful compliance of all rental conditions, upon access during normal hours of storage operations, and in any manner deemed reasonably necessary by Landlord to maintain order on the premises.. 8. USE. Landlord is not engaged in the business of storage for hire. No bailment is created by terms of this Agreement. Landlord exercises neither care, custody, nor control over tenant's property. 9. STORAGE PURPOSES. Tenant agrees to use the storage premises only for storage purposes. Tenant agrees to use the storage space only for the storage of property wholly owned by tenant. Tenant shall not store any animals, perishable goods nor conduct a business or work on vehicles of any type in the enclosed space. Tenant agrees not to store collectibles, heirlooms, jewelry, works of art or any property having special or sentimental value to Tenant. Tenant waives any claim for emotional or sentimental attachment to the stored property. Tenant agrees not to store property with a total value in excess of $2,500 without thewfitten p;ts~-dssion ofthe Landlord. Ifsuch written permission is not obtained, the value of Tenant's property shall be deemed not to exceed $2,500. Nothing herein shall constitute any agreement or admission by Landlord that Tenant's stored property has anyvalue, nor shall anything after the release of Landlord's liability set forth below. 10. HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC MATERIALS PROHIBITED. Tenant is strictly prohibited from storing or using materials in the enclosed storage space or on the premises classified as hazardous or toxic under any local, state or federal law or regulation, including chemicals, gasoline, flammable liquids, propane tanks, or flammable gases, and from engaging in any activity which produces such materials. Tenant's obligations of indemnity as set forth below specifically includes any cost, expenses, fmes or penalties imposed against the Landlord, arising out of storage or use of any hazardous or toxic material by Tenant, Tenant's agents, employees, invitees or guests. Landlord may enter the enclosed storage unit at any time to remove and dispose of prohibited items. 11. CONDITION OF PROPERTY. Tenant has looked at the Enclosed Space and surrounding areas and found them to be in satisfactory condition. Tenant understands that Landlord has made no promises about the condition of the Enclosed Space or surrounding areas, its safety or its security. Tenant will keep the Enclosed Space in good condition. Tenant will pay for any damage to the Enclosed Space caused by Tenant or his agents during the term of this Agreement beyond reasonable wear and tear. 12. LANDLORD'S LIEN. UNDER THE MINNESOTA LAW, LANDLORD HAS A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY OR UPON THE PROCEEDS OF THE PROPERTY STORED BY TENANT AT THE FACILITY. THE LIEN COVERS OVERDUE RENT, LABOR CHARGES AND OTHER CHARGES, INCLUDING EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE PRESERVATION, SALE OR DISPOSITION OF TENANT'S PROPERTY, PERMITTED UNDER MINNESOTA LAW. IF THE RENT OR ANY OF SUCH OTHER CHARGES DUE REMAIN UNPAID FOR 2 FIFTEEN (15) CONSECUTIVE DAYS, LANDLORD HAS THE RIGHT TO DENY ACCESS TO CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY STORED IN TENANT'S SPACE AND TO ENFORCE AND SATISFY THE LIEN BY SELLING THE PROPERTY STORED BY TENANT AT THE FACILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA LIENS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY IN SELF-SERVICE STORAGE ACT (MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 514.970, ET SEQ.), WHICH AUTHORIZES SUCH ACTIONS. 13. INSURANCE. Tenant, at Tenant's expense, shah maintain a policy of fu'e, extended coverage endorsement, burglary, vandalism, water damage and malicious mischief insurance for the actual value of stored property. Insurance on Tenant's property is a material condition of this agreement and is for the benefit of both Tenant and Landlord. Failure to carry the required insurance is a breach of this agreement and Tenant assumes aH risk of loss to stored property that would be covered by such insurance. Tenant expressly agrees that the insurance company providing such insurance shah not be subrogated to any claim of Tenant against Landlord, Landlord's agents or employees for loss or damage to stored property. 14. RELEASE OF LANDLORD'S LIABILITY FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE. All personal property stored within or upon the enclosed storage space by Tenant shah be at Tenant's sole risk. Landlord and Landlord's agents and employees shall not be liable for any loss of or damage to any personal property while at the serf storage facility arising from any cause whatsoever including, but not limited to, burglary, mysterious disappearance, in-e, water damage, sprinkler damage, rodents, Acts of God, the active or passive acts or omissions of the Landlord, Landlord's agents or employees. 15. RELEASE OF LANDLORD'S LIABILITY FOR BODILY INJURY. Landlord, Landlord's agents and employees shah not be Hable to Tenant for injury or death as a result of Tenant's use of the self storage facility, even if such injury is caused by the active or passive acts or omissions or negligence of the Landlord, Landlord's agents or employees. 16. INDEMNITY. Tenant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Landlord from aH claims, demands, actions or causes of action (including attorneys' fees and all costs) that are hereinafter brought by others arising out of Tenant's use of the 'enclosed storage space and common areas, including claims for Landlord's active negligence. 17. TIME TO BRING SUIT. Any claims, suits or defenses to any suit by Tenant that arise out of this rental agreement, the negotiations that proceeded this tenancy, or for loss or damage to stored tenant property shall be barred unless Tenant commenced an action within 12 months, after the date of the acts, omissions, or inactions that gave rise to such claim, suit or defense. 18. LOCKS. Tenant shall provide, at Tenant's expense, alock for the enclosed storage space which Tenant, in Tenant's sole discretion, deems sufficient to secure the enclosed storage space. Landlord may, but is not required, to lock the Enclosed Space if it is found open. Landlord may assess a charge for providing a lock for Tenant's Enclosed Space. 19. ALTERATIONS. Tenant will not make any alteration to the Enclosed Space unless Landlord has given written permission. 3 20. ENDING TItE TENANCY. Landlord may terminate this tenancyby giving Tenant at least 30 days' written notice at Tenant's last known address. Tenant must give Landlord at least 10 days' written notice of termination of the tenancy. Tenant shall leave the Enclosed Space clean and in good condition. Tenant is respons~le for all damages ..... ~ 21. RELEASE OF TENANT INFORMATION. Tenant hereby authorizes Landlord to release any information regarding Tenant and Tenant's tenancy as may be required by law or requested by governmental authorities or agencies, law enforcement agencies or courts. 22. CltANGE OF ADDRESS. Tenant will inform Landlord in writing if Tenant changes his or her address or alternate address. 23. CHANGE OF TERMS. All of the terms, charges, conditions and covenants are SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY LANDLORD UPON THIRTY (30) days' prior written notice to Tenant. ffchanged, the Tenant may terminate this agreement on the effective date of such change by giving the Landlord TEN (10) days' prior written notice to terminate. If the Tenant does not give such notice, the change shall become effective and apply in accordance with the terms of the notice. 24. NO SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNMENT. Tenant will not rent the Enclosed Space, in whole or in part, to anyone else, and Tenant will not assign any of the fights under this Agreement to anyone else. 25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Rental Agreement states Landlord's and Tenant's complete agreement and replaces all other oral and written agreements between Landlord and Tenant. 26. NOTICES. All notices required by this Rental Agreement shall be sent by first class mail postage pre-paid to Tenant's last known address. Notices shall be deemed given when deposited in the United States mail. Tenant agrees that any such notice is conclusively presumed to have been received by Tenant 5 days after mailing. All statutory notices shall be sent as required by law. Tenant will obey all Landlord's rules and regulations, now or hereafter posted on the premises. 27. ALTERNATE ADDRESS. Tenant shall provide Landlord with an alternate address to where notices maybe sent, if such address is available. Landlord may, but is not obligated to, send any notice required by this Rental Agreement or by law to the alternate address provided by Tenant in addition to Tenant's last known address. 28. INDIVIDUALS AUTHORIZED FOR ACCESS. Any person with a valid gate number and key to the Enclosed Space is presumed to have Tenant's authorization for access. 29. VALIDITY OF RENTAL AGREEMENT. This Rental Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota Ii'any part of this Rental Agreement is declared invalid, the rest of the Rental Agreement shall remain in effect. If any part of the Rental Agreement is inconsistent with Minnesota law, the applicable provisions ofMinnes ota law shall be considered to be substituted for the inconsistent provisions. 4 30. MODIFICATION. This RentaiAgreement maynot be modified, mended or terminated orally, and no modification, termination or amendment or attempted waiver shall be valid unless in writing, signed by Landlord. 31. CONSTRUCTION. The headings preceding the sections of this Rental Agreement are for the purpose of identification only and shall not in any event be employed or used for the purpose of construction or interpretation ofanyportion ofthis Rental Agreement. No waiverbyanypartyofany default or nonperformance hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default or nonperformance. As used herein and when necessary, the singular imports the plural and vice versa, and masculine, feminine and neuter expressions shall be interchangeable. 32. RULE OF STRICT CONSTRUCTION. The language used in this Rental Agreement shall be deemed to be the language chosen by the parties hereto to express their mutual intent, and no rule of strict consumction will be implied against any part. TENANT: (Printed Name) Tenant Signature Date Street Address City, State, Zip Phone Tenant Alternate Address Alternate Name Alternate Address City, State, Zip Tenant Photo Identification 5 LANDLORD SAFE-STOR MINISTORAGE COMPANY By sa£e-s~or~r~tal agrccm=t 11/27/01 17:19 FAX 7634935193 JENSEN & $ONDI~T.L, P& ~ NEW HOPE CH 1~004 ORDINANCE NO. 01- A~ ORDINANCE AMENDING Tmz. NEW HOPE ZONING CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 4.205(7) REG~&~G SELF STORAGE FACILIT~__-~ AND ADDING ~ON 4.205C15) PERMITTING BY CONDITIONAL USE A WAR]~OUSE CONVER6TON TO A SET~ STORAGE FACILITY The City Council of thc City of New Hope ~io_~_!. Section 4.205(7) "Sci Storage (mi,i warehouse) Facilities" of the New Hope City Code i~ hcreby amended to read as foUows: Section 4.205(7) "$clf Storn_~c (ni.i wa~__house) Facilities". Provided that: 4.2os( "Building_ Location". No bm'Idin_~s sh.ll bc local~d closer than thirty-five (~ feet ~o each other to allow for parking, loading, d:iveway and fire lanes. "BuildinE Length_ ". No building shall be greater than onc hlm~l'(X1. ~ (150) feet in le~lh. 4.20si"O(-eli "Snow Storage". Adequate space is provided for snow storage. "Fire Hvdrant". AU str~tm~ arc to bc wjth~ two hundred (200) fi:ct of a tLc hydram. 4.205(7)(-0~ "S'orinlder Systems". AU storage build~gs are to be cquipp~ with dry spri,l:li,_~ systems which will be subject to review .nd approval of .-.'.a CX'y D-ail,li~,~,,,~,~'~ ' ~ the "Fir~ Alarm by_stem'. E~ two thousand (2.000) square feet of the storage stmcan'e ~o ~]be separated by a~ ~.~T'~'e wall and ~~~ a complete -1- 17:19 F&X 7634935193 JENSE.N & SONDRALL, PA -, NEW It0PI~ C~ iglOOS 11/27/01 4.205(7)0)~ 4.zo and compr~ive fire alarm sysmm wi~ ~,~ appr~v~ of ~e Fkc D~c~. 'Dfivc~vs sna Pakin~ Ar~". AU ~ways ~ p~ng ~ ~e to be h~d ~'--' ........... ' ~c~ ~a~ for fire ~~ ~neuvcrab~ dw~g ,mit-~ provid~ om site. ~cfi~ of smd dwell~g ~it shsll ~n~ tO ~1 d~i~ re.flora for mMfiplc ~y dwelling Minn~ta S~te B~dlng CO~ ~d ~e New Hppe ~ping ~o~d by S~o~ 3.353, 3.361.3.362 ~ of ~ Code = ~ ~ -~3ildlrL~ A_ovcarance". Any struc~res having cxposttre to an adjacent residential usc or public right-of-way, park, or similar public usc areas shall bc of brick, natural stone, wood, or stucco facing m~terial. -2- 11/27/01 17:19 Fi.I 7634936193 .TI~SI~I & SONDR&LL, ~A ~ t~W HOFB CR t~005 .J 11/27/01 17:20 F~ 7634935193 J]~Ns~ & $O]~DP~T.I~, PA -~ N~W HOPE CH ~t~007 Dated the day of This Ordinam:e shall ~ effective upon its pa~sa~ aud '., W. Peter Enck, Mayor Attest: Valeri¢ Leone, City Cl~k (Pub~ in the New Ho~-Crolden Valley b'~m-Post tl~ ~ day of 11/27/01 17:18 FAX 7654935193 JENSEN & SONDRALL, ?A ~ NEW BOFB CH ~002 STACY ,ds_ Woons JENSEN & SONDRALL, P.A. Novcmbcr 27, 200I Kirk McDonald Community Dovelopment Director City of New Hopc 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 TO: (763) $31-$136 AND BY REGULAR MAIL Warehouse Conversion to Self Storage Facility CUP Our File No.: 99.40111 Please find enclosed 8 r~vised Ordinauc~ ~n follow up to our November 27a Codes aud Standsrds Meeting discussion reg~ding warehouse conversions to n self storage facility as a conditional use pu, mit. Basically. we discussed a number of itc-ms ~s follows: The Pro~'bited Uses sections are being completely reworded to ~ndicatc no commercial, h~dustrial or residential use may be ,~=a~_ of a self storage space or bay. Specifically, the only use permitted will be storage activity. (See Section 4.205(7)0) and Section 4.205(13)(e)) s We m-e changfl~ thc "On-Site Mznag~ Reqttired" regulation found in Section 4.205(15Xa) to indicate supervision of the facility must be made in full compl+n-ce with th~ condid, onal use permit requirements. The "Rw,ti~e InspectionAccess" section found at4 9-05(1 S)(d) is being changed to · eliminate the word aperiodic" prior to thc word "inspection" in the second sentence. We don't want the Ordinanc~ to imply scheduled inspections of the storage spaces will be made by our ~ to Euard against a.~,mi,~g liabilit7 agnin~ the City in the, event some form of fflegal storage occurs at thc faoilitics and ca,,-c~ damagc tO a third party. 17:18 FAX 7634935193 JENSEN & $01~DRAT.T., PA .~ NEW HOPI~. CH ~005 11/27/01 November 27, 2001 Page 2 - ' '" · ' Also, let me know if this Please contact me ifF°u lmve ar0r questi°ns °r c°mm~ts regm'ding these ~' givcn 2001 Orai,~,n~e¢ will bo considered at thc December 10~ Council Meeting. If so, it should be a O~'~nnnc= ~O~D,bcr. S~~~ Sondrall, City Attorney. City of New Afire, ~om~ Ex'linden ~47 En~losm'e cc: Valcrie Leone, City Clerk, City of New Hope (w/enc.) Engineers & Arcl~itects Bonestroo, Rosene. Andertik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Ptfncipals: Otto Bonestroo, P.E. · Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E, · Glenn R. Cook, P.E. · Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. - Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene, P.E. · Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. · Richard E. Turner, P,E. · Susan M. Et)erlin, C.P.A. Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford, P.E~ · Keith A. Gordon, P.E., Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. · Richard W, Foster, P.E. · David O. Loskota, P.E., Robert C. Russek, AA.A. ° Mark A, Hanson, P.E. · Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. · Ted K. Field, P.E. · Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. ° Mark R, Rolls, P.E. · David A. Bonestroo, M.B.A.· Sidney P. Wiliiamson, P.E., L.S. · Agnes M Ring, M.B.A., - Allan R_J.c~; Schmidt, P.E. Offices: St. Paul, Rochester, Willmar and St. Cloud, MN · Milwaukee, WI Website: www.bonestroo.com MEMO TO: FROM: CC: DATE: SUBJECT: Kirk McDonald Doug Sandstad Vince Vander Top Mark Hanson November 28, 2001 4401 Quebec Ave. N. Our File No. 34-Gen E01-29 We have reviewed the proposed improvements at 4401 Quebec Ave. N. The improvements include the conversion of an existing warehouse to a mini storage facility. Minimal site improvements are shown. The site's impervious area will be reduced slightly. A portion of the existing parking l°t will be removed along the south edge of the property and landscaped buffer strip will be added. The site improvements will not require any storm water improvements for the overall site. The existing parking lot does not include any curb and gutter. This is typical for the majority of parking lots for the industrial properties along Quebec Ave. It was recommended that the applicant install curb and gutter along the new landscaped buffer strip to efficiently handle runoff and to prevent traffic from crossing the buffer strip. The submitted plans show a proposed bituminous type curb in this area. Concrete curb would be more durable and could be considered. All other site items are acceptable from an engineering perspective. 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113 · 651-636-4600 · Fax: 651-636-1311 #GI~lrHWI~$'t &$$GC~Ii&?I~IG C:GHISUKlr,4kHY$,, IIHC:, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 MEMORANDUM Louis Park, MN 55416 planners@nacplanning.com TO: Kirk McDonald FROM: Jason Lindahl/Alan Brixius DATE: November 29, 2001 RE: Hudson Properties CUP and Zoning Text Amendment FILE: 131.01 - 01.11 The applicant, Hudson Properties, Inc., is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the redevelopment of an existing office/warehouse building into a serf storage facility with 176 units. The self storage facility will occupy only the warehouse portion of the building while the office section will remain open for an additional tenant. The subject property is located at 4401 Quebec Avenue North and zoned Industrial. Self storage facilities are allowed in the Industrial District through a conditional use permit. However, staff was concerned with certain aspects of this proposal which were not addressed in the existing language. Therefore, the applicant is requesting an amendment to the City Code to specifically permit the conversion of a warehouse building into a self storage facility. Staff developed the ordinance amendment and it was reviewed by the Codes and Standards Committee on November 27, 2001. This committee approved the proposed amendment with minor revisions. It is included in this report as Exhibit B. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: Exhibit F: Site Location Map Proposed Zoning Text Amendment Site Survey Floor Plan Site and Landscape Plan Lighting Plan. Comprehensive Plan The Proposed Land Use Map guides this site for industrial use. Therefore, the conversion of this site into a self storage facility through a conditional use permit is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Zoning The existing office/warehouse building conforms to the lot and building performance standards for the I, Industrial District. p. The-relevant existing performance standards for sites in the Industrial District are illustrated in the table below. However, in order for the proposed use to be approved, the City must also approve the proposed text amendment. !, Industrial District Performance Standards Category Standard Existing Status Front Yard 30 ff. 60 fl. Conforming Rear Yard 30 ft. 37 ft. Conforming Side Yard (Interior) 10 ft. 15/121 ft. Conforming Building Height 6 Stodes or 72 ft. N/A Conforming Impervious Surface Not more than 80% 65% Conforming Parking The City Code does not identify a specific parking standard for self storage facilities. In this case, the Ordinance dictates that staff consult other professional sources for a parking standard. According to the American Planning Association (APA), self storage facilities should provide three off-street parking stalls plus one stall for every 100 units. Given this standard, the site should provide five stalls. By comparison, the parking standards for an office/warehouse use are one stall for every 300 square feet of office space and one stall for every 1,500 square feet of warehouse space, or 52 stalls. As proposed, the site will have 41 off-street parking stalls. While requiring the 52 stalls for a self storage use would be too intense, providing only five stalls could severely limit the marketability of this site should it ever return to an office/warehouse use or add an additional office tenant. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant provide the 41 stalls shown in the parking area on the south side of the building. Loading The applicant's plans allow all loading and unloading to occur within the building. Tenants will enter the building through the garage door next to the manager's office on the south side of the building. Once inside the building, tenants may load or unload their items and then drive through the building and exit on the east side. A loading dock is also available to serve large trucks. Access The subject property has two existing access points along Quebec Avenue North. The first is at the south end and will allow access to the parking area and building entrance. The second is at the north end and will allow vehicles to leave the site once they exit the building. Lighting The site plan illustrates exterior lighting on the east and south sides of the building. According to the applicant's site plan, these lights meet the City's glare standards outlined in Section 4.034 (5). However, the applicant should submit a cut sheet illustrating the design of the proposed lights to insure they will directed all light down toward the ground. Landscaping According to the applicant, the site currently has approximately 32.5% green space. The existing green space is made up of grass and a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees. In addition to this, the applicant plans to add sod and four Sugar Maples along the south side of the site. Signage The applicant's proposed sign plan is in conformance with the sign standards for single occupancy industrial uses as outlined in Section 3.49. However, the current design of the building allows another future use in the office portion of the building. Therefore, staff recommends that this site meet the sign standards for multiple occupancy businesses outlined in Section 3.493. These standards limit total wall signs to 15% of the wall on which they are placed; however, no individual tenant wall sign may exceed 100 square feet in size. Therefore, the applicant must reduce its proposed wall sign from 250 to 100 square feet while its proposed ground Sign may remain. Trash Enclosure According to the applicant, all refuse containers will be stored inside the principal building. CUP Section 4.205 (7) of the City Code outlines eleven criteria to weigh when considering a conditional use permit for a self storage facility. However, staff felt that these criteria did not address certain aspects of this proposal. Therefore, the applicant requested an amendment to the City Code to add specific language for the conversion of a warehouse building into a self storage facility. This new language was developed by City staff and approved by the Codes and Standards Committee. It should be noted that the following analysis is based on the assumption that the City Council approves this new language. A. On-site Manager Required. A full-time person must be employed to manage the facility, control access, and supervise operations during open hours in full compliance with all parts of the conditional use permit. Finding: The operator must provide a full-time manager to supervise the facility during all hours of operation .... Fire Sprinkler System... The building is equipped with an approved auto-fire sprinkler system that is adequate to protect the variety of items stored in the building. A qualified fire protection consultant shall evaluate the existing system and propose changes to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. Finding: According to the applicant, the facility has an existing automated overhead sprinkler system. The applicant must provide written evidence prior to issuance of a building permit that a qualified fire protection consultant has evaluated the existing system and that they have made all necessary additions or improvements. This written evidence is subject to the reviewed and approval of the Fire Department. Prohibited Stora,qe. No hazardous materials, chemicals, gasoline, or flammable liquids can be stored in any storage space, except for normal household quantities. A maximum of four (4) vehicle tires may be stored in any rental space. Absolutely no propane or flammable gases are permitted in the building. Finding: The applicant must submit a copy of their rental contract prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy that specifies the following: (1) no hazardous materials, chemicals, gasoline, or flammable liquids can be stored in any storage space, except for normal household quantities, (2) a maximum of four vehicle tires may be stored in any rental space, and (3) absolutely no propane or flammable gases are permitted in the building. Routine Inspection Access. Continue the established fire prevention abilities of the city by providing visibility of each space through an open ceiling or master lock system. Inspection of spaces by the manager and Fire or Building Inspector can be arranged with an on-site wheeled ladder, elevated catwalks or master key, for example. Finding: The applicant has agreed to an open ceiling design that will allow inspection of individual units via an on site wheeled ladder system. Prohibited Uses. No repair, living, sleeping, cooking, commercial or industrial uses, except for storage, shall occur within the mini-storage facility. Finding: The applicant agrees with the condition that no living, sleeping, cooking, commercial or industrial uses, except for storage, shall occur within the mini-storage facility. Interior Access Only. No storage space may be directly accessible from the exterior of the building. Finding: According to the applicant's plans, no storage space will have direct exterior access. All tenants will access their storage spaces from an internal drive lane. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a zoning text amendment to allow the conversion of an existing office/warehouse building into a self storage facility through a conditional use permit. Should the City approve this amendment, staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit to allow the conversion an existing office/warehouse building into a self storage facility. This recommendation is based on the findings made in this report and the following plans date 11-21-01: Site Survey, Floor Plan, Site and Landscape Plan, and Lighting Plan. This recommendation is subject to the following conditions. Approval of the zoning text amendment to allow the conversion of an existing office/warehouse building into a self storage facility through a conditional use permit. The applicant shall submit a cut sheet illustrating the design of the proposed lights to insure that all light will be directed down toward the ground. There shall be a full-time manager supervising the facility during all hours of operation. The applicant shall provide written evidence prior to issuance of a building permit that a qualified fire protection consultant has evaluated the existing system and that they have made all necessary additions or improvements. This written evidence is subject to the reviewed and approval of the Fire Department. The applicant must submit a copy of their rental contract prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy that specifies the following: (1) no hazardous materials, chemicals, gasoline, or flammable liquids can be stored in any storage space, except for normal household quantities, (2) a maximum of four vehicle tires may be stored in any rental space, and (3) absolutely no propane or flammable gases are permitted in the building. ° No living, sleeping, cooking, commercial or industrial uses, except for storage, shall occur within the mini-storage facility. Because the building is a multiple occupancy building, future tenant occupancy of the office space shall require review by City staff to insure proper compliance with all zoning and building regulations prior to occupancy. pc: The site shall meet the sign standards for multiple occupancy businesses outlined in Section 3.493. Doug Sandstad Steve Sondrall Vince Vandertop Hudson Properties, Inc. Subject Property City of New Hope EXHIBIT A Add New Conditional Use Permit: 4.205 [15] Warehouse Conversion to Mini-Storaoe: 1. On-site Manager Required. A~full-time person must be employed to manage the facility, control access, and supervise operations during open hours in full compliance with all parts of the conditional use permit. 2. Fire Sprinkler System. The building is equipped with an approved auto-fire sprinkler system that is adequate to protect the variety of items stored in the building. A qualified fire protection consultant shall evaluate the existing system, and propose changes to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. 3. Prohibited Storage. No hazardous materials, chemicals, gasoline, or flammable liquids can be stored in any storage space, except for normal household quantities. A maximum of four (4) vehicle tires may be stored in any rental space. Absolutely no propane or flammable gases are permitted in the building. 4. Routine Inspection Access. Continue the established fire prevention abilities of the city by providing visibility of each space through an open ceiling or master lock system. Inspection of spaces by the manager and Fire or Building Inspector can be arranged with an on-site wheeled ladder, elevated catwalks or master key, for example. Prohibited Uses. No repair, living, sleeping, cooking, commercial or industrial uses, except for storage, shall occur within the mini-storage facility. o Interior Access Only. No storage space may be directly accessible from the exterior of the building. EXHIBIT B I, INDUSTRIAL DISTRI~2T 4.201 5/14/'200,1 Purpose. The purpose of the I, Industrial District is to provide for the establishment of heavy industrial and manufacturing development use which, because of the nature of the product or character o factivity, requires isolation from residential oi non-compatible commercial uses. The I District is also intended to provide for large scale activities ora sociological nature not suited to other districts, but reasonably compatible with the same characteristics suitable for General Industrial Use. 4.202 Permitted Uses. The following are permitted uses in an I District: 4.202 (1) Radio and Television Antenna Farm. 4.202 (2) Research, Medical, Dental or Optical Laboratories. 4.202 (3) Trade School/Training Schools/Specialty Schools. 4.202 (4) Warehouses. 4.202 (5) Essential Services. 4.202 (6) Governmental and Public Utility Buildings and Structures. 4.202 (7) Building Materials/Appliance and Furniture Retail Sales. 4.202 (8) Eno'raving, Printing and Publishine. 4.202 (9) Wholesale Business. 4.202 (10) Manufacturin~ etc. The manufacturing, compounding, assembly, packaging, processing, treatment or storage of products and materials. 4.202 (11) Automobile Major Repair. 4.202 (12) Office Business. 4.202 (13) 4.203 4.203 (1) Cable TV. Limited scope production studio for franchised Cable TV company allowing for production of community oriented cable television programming produced by and for members of the community or commercial programming limited to presentation on the cable system serving only New Hope and other member cities of the Northwest Suburban Cable Communications Commission. Said use shall require all antennae conform to height limits of Section 4.032(5). Additional antenna height may be permitted by Conditional Use Permit pursuant to those procedures set forth and regulated by Section 4.33. Notwithstanding Section 4.33, no Conditional Use Permit shall be grouted unless a public hearing is held and there is a finding that the additional height is technically necessary to serve the New Hope area and that this additional height will have no adverse effect on the area surrounding the studio. Permitted Accessory Us¢~, The following are permitted accessory uses in an I District: Accesso Buildin . Accessory building for commercial uses shall not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor space of the principal building. 4 - 130 5/14/2001 4.204(5) (t') Access. Storage sites shall be accessible by service and emergency vehicles. 4.204(5) (g) Valves.. All £dlmg valves of the storage maks shall be enclosed and have locking devices: 4.204(5) (h) ~- A warning sign shall be required for every tank and shall be placed in a conspicuous location directly on the ~ indicating a supplier's name, address, phone number, that highly dangerous and flammable material is stored therein and that no smoking requirements must be observed or a sufficient warning ~ ~at affect. Said signage may not exceed four (4) square feet nor may it be used ~ for'~v¢~ing purposes. 4.2~ Conditional Uses I. The~ollowing are conditional uses in an I District: (Requires a conditional (~ ,~.~e permit based u~o~rocedures set forth in and regulated by Sections 4.303 and 4.33 and ~dards set forth in Section 4.03 of this Code. 4.205 (1) Open Outdoor Storage as a Principal or Accesso~ Use. Open outdoor storage as a conditional accessory use, where the open outdoor storage area exceeds twenty (20) percent of the gross floor area of the principal slxucmre provided that: 4.205(1)(a) Screening/Landscaping. The open outdoor storage area is screened and landscaped from adjacent residential uses and public right-of-way in compliance with Section 4.034 of this Code. 4.2o5rl) Fencing. A wire weave/chain link security fence shall be required around the open outdoor storage area in conformance with Section 4.034(3)(c) of this Code. Open outdoor storage areas intended for the exclusive storage of semi-trailers may be exempt from the required security fencing provided the storage area is delineated and the individual trailers are secured. 4.205(1 ) (c) Surfacine. The open outdoor storage area is surfaced with concrete or bituminous. 4.205t' l ) (d) Setbacks. The open outdoor storage area shall not be located within any front yard or side yard abutting a public right-of-way. The open outdoor storage shall be set hack five (5) feet from all side and rear lot lines and shall not be located within a utility or drainage easement. 4.205(1) (e) Required Space. The open outdoor storage area shall not utilize any required off- street parking, loading areas, or access space, as required by Section 4.035 and 4.036 of this Code. 4.~o5(1~(0 Hazardous Materials. The open outdoor storage area shall not be used for storage of hazardous liquids, solids, gases or wastes. This provision does not prohibit the property owner from obt~inlng an administrative permit for the outdoor storage of propane or LP gas per Section 4.204(5) of this Code. 4.205(11 (g) lRefuse and Upkeep. The property owner shall keep open outdoor storage areas free of refuse, trash, debris, weeds, and waste fill. 4.205 (2) Planned Unit Development, Industrial. Industrial planned unit development as regulated by Section 4.34 of this Code. 5/14/2001 4.205 (3) Restaurants. 4.205 (4) 4.205 (5) Motels/Hotels. Commercial Reereatior~ Facilities. Commercial Recreation, provided that: 4.205(5) (a) ~ Access. The site of the proposed use has direct access to an arterial street as defined in the City Code, without utilizing pubhc streets ora lower traffic handling classification to reach the arterial street. 4.205(5) (b) Compatibility. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence. 4.205(5) (c) Li~htin~ Shielded. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the right-of-way or from a residential zone or use. 4.205(5) (d) Surfacing. Thc entire area other than that occupied by buildings, structures or plantings shall be surfaced with a bituminous or concrete material which will control dust and drainage. The material and grading shall be subject to the approval of the City. 4.205 (5) (e) Landscapine. Landscaping shall be provided and the type of planting material and the number and size of plants shall be subject to the approval of the City. 4.205 (6) Solid and Hazardous Waste Transfer Station;, 4.205(6) (a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish standards for the development of energy resource recovery-solid and hazardous waste transfer facilities. 4.205(6) (b) General Provisions. 4.205(6)(b) (i) 4.205(6)(b) (ii) Area. The site must be five (5) acres, or larger. Access. The site shall not be more than one (1) mile from a nine (9) ton roadway. Sites adjacent to State Highway No. 169, or arterial streets, are to be preferred. 4.205(6)(b)(iii) Development. Thesitedevelopmentshallnotrequiremajorslope cutting, filling or off-site utility work. 4.205(6)(b) (iv) Ownership. The site must be owned by Hennepin County or privately held and currently for sale. 4.205(6)(b) (v) 4.205(6)(b) (vi) .Traffic. A thorough Traffic Analysis must be made of the existing and anticipated impacts upon streets within the City of New Hope. This study would be based upon the Goals and Objectives of the 1998 New Hope Transportation Plan. Development shall be consistent with this Plan and shah be evidenced by the Traffic Analysis. Environmental. The site must be well-buffered and have minimal visual, activity, and noise impact on residences. 5/14/2001 4.205(6)(b) (vii) Noise.. The site must be one thousand (1000) feet from the nearest residence and well buffered from residential areas as to sound pollution, and shall conform with the Noise Ordinance of the City of New Hope. 4.205(6)(b) (viii) ~. The site development shallminimize impacts on wetlands, streams, lakes and pondmg areas. 4.205(6)(b) (ix) Recreation. The site development shall not conflict with existing recreational facilities in the City. 7) Self Storage (mini warehouse) Facilities. Provided ~t: ~ 5.205(7) (a) Green Spac.e.. At least thirty-five (35) percent of the.site is open green s. ,pace. wh.?~h is sodded and intensely landscaped in accordance w~th a plan approvea oy me ~.~ry Council. 4.205(7) (b) ~. No buildings shall bc located closer than thirty-five (35) feet to each other to allow for parking, loading, driveway and fire lanes. 4.205(7) (c) ~. No building shall be greater than one hundred fifty (150) fcct in length. 4.205(7~ (d) 4.205(7) (e) 4.:05(7) (0 Snow Stora.~.e. Adequate space is provided for snow storage. Fire Hydrant. All structures are to be within two hundred (200) feet of a fire hydrant. ~. All storage buildings are to be equipped with dry sprinkling systems which will be subject to review and approval of the City Building Official and the Fire Department. 4.205(7) (g) Fire Alarm System. Every two thousand (2,000) square feet of the storage structure is to be separated by a fixe wall and a complete and comprehensive fire alarm system with smoke detectors shall be initiated in each structure subject to the review and approval of the Fire Deparlment. 4.205(?) (h) 4.205(7~ (i) Driveways and Parkin~ Area. All driveways and parking areas are to be hard (blacktop or concrete) surfaced and adequate turning radius for lure truck maneuverability is to be maintained throughout the site. Designated snow storage space is to be provided to insure adequate and safe access during winter months. Caretaker AparUnent. If an "on-premises" caretaker dwelling unit is provided on site, construction of said dwelling unit shall conform to all design standard regulations for multiple family dwelling units of the Minnesota State Building Code and the New Hope Zoning and Building Code. The occupancy and minimum interior and floor area standards shall be controlled by Sections 3.353, 3.361, 3.362 and 4.032(2)(b) of this Code. Off-street parking shall be made available for said dwelling trait in conformance with Section 4.035 of this Code. 4.205(7 Buildin~ Appearance. Any structures having exposure to aa adjacent residential use or public fight-of-way, park, or similar Public use areas shall be of brick, natural stone, wood, or stucco facing material. S/14/'2001 4.205/7)(k) OtherBusinessActivitv. No retailing, wholesaling, manufacturing, repair, or other such activity other than storage is to occur within the self storage, mini warehousing facility. 4.205 (8) Personal Wireless Service Antenna Towers. perSonal wireless service antenna towerS in conformance with Section 4.039D of this Code. 4.205 (9) Commercial and Public Radio and Television Transmitting Antennas and Public Utility Microwave Antennas and Related Antenna Towers. Commercial and public radio and television transmitting antennas and public utility microwave antennas and related antenna towers in conformance with Section 4.039D of this Code. 4.205 (10) Tracking Operation. Truck terminals and major truck repair provided the site is adjacent to an arterial street, provided that: 4.205(1 O) (a) Regardless of whether the dispensing, sale or offering for sale of motor fuels and/or oil is incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the standards and requirements imposed by this Code for motor fuel stations shall apply. These standards and requirements are, however, in addition to other requirements which are imposed for other uses of the property. 4.205~ l O) (b) The entire site other than that taken up by a building, s~uctu~e or plantings shall be surfaced with blacktop or concrete to control dust and drainage which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 4.205(1 O) (c) 4.205(10) (d) 4.205(10) (e) 4.205(10) (0 4.205(! 0) (g) 4.205 (11) 4.205 (12) 4.205 (13) 4.205 (14) A drainage plan subject to the approval of the City Engineer shah be installed. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the public right- of-way and shall be in compliance with Section 4.034(5) of this Code. Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. Parking or track magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 4.034(3) of this Code. No outside storage, sales, service or rental shah be permitted, unless otherwise approved in accordance with applicable provisions of this Code. .Health and Social Services. Private, non-profit social service organizations providing broad based family and individual activities of a health, athletic and social nature, provided the site is adjacent to an arterial street. ~. Group day care centers operated in conjunction with a health and social services use which qualified under Section 4.2050 1). Adult Use, Principal Subject to the reguhtious of Section 4.039C of this Code. County, state or federal government buildings or slructures necessary for the health, safety or welfare of thc community. 4 - 136 5/14/2001 4.206 Lot Requirements, Buildin~ Heights, and Setbacks. Thc following minimum requirements shall be observed in thc I Dislrict subject to additional requirements, exception, and modification set forth in this Code. ~.206 (1) ~inimum Lot Area. one (1) acr~. 4.206 (2) ]Vfin~mum Lot Wide. One htmcLred (100) feet. 4.206 (3) Impervious Surface~. ~ot more than eighty (80) percent o£ the lot area shall be impervious surface. 4.206(3) (a) The pervious portion of the lot area shall be maintained as landscaping in conformance with Section 4.034(4) of this Code. 4.206 (4) ~. Six (6) stories or seventy-two (72) feet, whichever is greater. Four (4) stories of forty-eight (48) feet, whichever is greater, shall be required where an I District lot abuts the side or rear lot lines of lots in an R-1 or R-2 Zoning District. 4.206 (5) Setbacks. Front: Local Front: Arterial or Rear Co)(c) Side Interior Side Side: Comer Side: Anerial or Street Community Yard (b)(¢) Local Street Community Collector Street Collector Street (a) (a) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 10 (b) 30 feet 30 feet (a) See Section 4.033 (6)(b) ofthis Code. (b) A seventy-five (75) foot side or rear yard setback will be required where the lot abuts an R-1 or R-2 Zoning District. (c) For each additional story over three (3) stories or for each additional ten (10) feet over forty (40) feet, the rear and side yard setback requirements shall be increased by five (5) feet. 4.21-4.23 RESERVED 3.492 C/) Reader Boards. 3.492(7) (a) The reader board shall be a wall, freestanding, or monument sign. The reader board sign area shall count as pan of the total sign area allowed within a respective district. 3.492(7) Ih) The reader board area shall not exceed more than fifty (50) percent of the wall, freestanding, or monument sign erected. 3.492(7) (e) No more than one (1) reader board per premim is permitted. 3.492(7). (d) The reader board may display a given copy or graphic image for a minimum of three (3) seconds within the reader board frame. Continuous scrolling messages are not permitted. //~.493 Signs Accessory to Multiple Occupancy Business and Industrial Uses, Includin~ Shoppine, Cenmrs. When a single principal building is devo~l to two (2) or more businesses or induswial uses, a comprehensive sign plan for the entire building or shopping cemer .~hall be submilled and shall include the information required by section 3.493' (1) of this Code to permii a determlnafion as lo whether or not the plan is consistent with secfious (2) through (4) of section 3.493. No permit shall be issued for an individual use except upon a de~ermlnation that it is consis~mt with a previously or concurrently zpproved comprehensive sign plan. The effect of said comprehensive sign plan is w allow and require the owner of multiple occupancy slruc~res to de~ermine the specific indiviitual sign requirem~s for the tenan~ of his building. As sign locations, size and other sign derails may be of some si~ificant importance in lease arrangemems between owner ami ~enant, it is the City's intention lo establish general requiremems for the overall building only, thus providing a building owner with both the flexibility and responsibility lo deal with his individual ~n~s on their specific sign needs. .493 (1) Comprehensive Si~n Plan Information. The applicant shall prepare a wfillen and graphic comprehensive signage plan for submission to the City. Said plan shall include, but not be limi~l lo the following information: 3.493(1) (a) Sign location (both wall signs and freestanding signs) 3.4930) (b) Sign area 3.493(1) (c) sign height 3.493(1) (d) Scaled building elevations 3.493(1) (e) Scaled floor plan that outlines ~enant bays 3.493(1) (~) Identification of sign design 3.493(1) (g) Sign construction drawings (sections) (h) .'l~.e Co .uncll, planning Commission and City S~fff may request ~d4ifional informau.on, from the applicant concerning the application or may retain expert .o. pmlo.~..at the expense of the City, or may require as a comiifion of proceeding with l~s consideration that the applicant furnish expert opinion and dam at the expense of the applicant. 3.493 (2) .Wall Signs. 3.493(2) (a) Maximum Area. The total allowable sign area for a multiple occupancy structure shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the combined wall mrfaces on walls which abut streets in business or industrial zoning dislricts. No individual tenant identification sign may exceed one hundred (100) square feet in area. 3 -48 072684 CITY OF NEW HOPE SPECIAL ZONING PROCEDURES APPLICATION LOG A B C D E F G H I J Appli- Applicant Date Date Applicant Date 60- Date 120- Date Deadline Date City Date City cation application was sent day time day time Applicant for City approved or sent response number Name received notice limit limit was notified action denied the to Applicant Address by City that required expires expires of under application 3hone information extension extension was missing or waiver 01-22 Hudson Properties, Inc. 11/09/01 1/08/02 3~09~02 640 Baker Building 706 2n~ Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Steve Greverson 612-288-9490 612-349-6718 fax Boxes A-C and E-F will always be filled out. Whether the other boxes are filled out depends on the City's procedures and the date of a specific application. Ao B. C. D. Assign each application a number. List the Applicant (name, address and phone). List the date the City received the application. List the date the City sent the Applicant notice that required information was missing. If the City gives such notice, it must do so within 10 business days after the date in Box C. If the time clock is "restaded" by such a notice, assign the application a new number and record all subsequent deadlines on a new line. To calculate the 60-day limit, include all calendar days. To calculate the 120-day limit, include all calendar days. Despite the automatic extension, the City will notify the Applicant a second time by mail that a 120-day approval period applies to the application. (The date in Box G must come before the date in Boxes E and F.) List the deadline under any extension or waiver. The City must act before the deadline. (The date in Box I must come before the date in Boxes E or F, or, if applicable, Box H.) List the date that the City sent notice of its action to the Applicant. It is best if the City not only takes action within the time limit, but also notifies the Applicant before the time limit expires. Planning Case: Petitioner: Address: Request: PLANNING CASE REPORT City of New Hope Meeting Date-: Report Date: 01-19 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North December 4, 2001 November 30, 2001 Ordinance No. 01-14, An Ordinance Amending New Hope Code §4.204(3) by Permitting by Administrative Permit the Retail Sale of Bulk Product in the Industrial Zoning District Delivered or Repackaged for Resale at Principal Building II. III. Request City staff is requesting that the Planning Commission and City Council approve the attached minor ordinance amendment, which amends New Hope Code {}4.204(3) by permitting by administrative permit the retail sale of bulk product in the Industrial Zoning District delivered or repackaged for resale at principal building. This amendment is related to a request by Simon Delivers to distribute/sell beer and wine in conjunction with its grocery delivery business. Zoning Code References The attached ordinance amendment references the following section of the New Hope Code: Section 4.204(3) "Retail Sale, Limited" This portion of the Zoning Code is contained under the Administrative Permit Section (4.204) under the Industrial Zoning District (Section 4.20) Background In the summer of 2001, Simon Delivers began making informal inquiries to the City regarding the possibility of obtaining an off-sale liquor license for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquor, wine and beer, along with its food delivery service. The City has previously approved two large building expansion projects at 3440 Winpark Drive to accommodate the growth of Simon Delivers' business. One building expansion (to the west of the original building) has been completed and an additional expansion (to the north) is yet to be constructed. Simon Delivers formalized this request in September with a presentation to the City Council. Over the past several months the City Council has studied the issue of expanding the number of off-sale licenses (in part to retain the Simon Delivers business) and on-sale licenses to encourage new development in the City. The City Council recently approved ordinance amendments to the liquor ordinance expanding the number of on- and off-sale licenses available in the City. The City Council will conduct a public hearing on December 10 to consider Simon Delivers' application for an off- sale license. It is the opinion of city staff, Planning Consultant and City Attorney that the Zoning Code needs a minor amendment to allow this activity in an Industrial Zoning District and staff initiated a minor code amendment to address this issue. Planning Case Report 01-12 Page 1 11/2/01 IV. Petitioner's Comments Staff requested that the Planning Consultant review this issue and make recommendations for changes, in conjunction with city staff and the City Attorney. The City, not Simon Delivers, initiated this minor amendment, so there is no correspondence from Simon Delivers specifically requesting this change. Simon Delivers representatives did make a presentation to the City Council in September regarding the liquor license issue and those materials are attached. V. Notification Amendments to the Zoning Code require a public hearing and the enclosed notice was prepared by the City Attorney and published in the official newspaper. No mailings or other notification to property owners is required because this amendment would be effective citywide where retail sales are allowed in the Industrial District. VI. Development or Code Analysis Per the Planner's report, Simon Delivers would like to obtain an off-sale liquor license for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquor, wine and beer, along with its food delivery service in the City of New Hope. The City Attorney has looked at this issue and documented his findings in correspondence to the City. It appears that to obtain an off-sale liquor license, the New Hope Code and State Statutes would require that an exclusive liquor store be established on site to allow for the issuance of the permit. By exclusive liquor store, this would require that part of the building be separated from the balance of the grocery sales with a separate entrance and separate delivery service to accommodate the liquor store. The City Attorney also indicates that it would require Simon Delivers to establish a separate liquor store that would permit customers to actually come to the store and purchase alcoholic beverages. The City Attorney further stated that based on his interpretation of Code, that store would refer to an on-premise sale of merchandise. Based on this interpretation of the Statute, the City needs to look at what would be permitted within the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate such a facility. Simon Delivers' site is zoned I, Industrial, which allows for the warehousing facility that allows for the present use. In looking at Section 4.204, Administrative Permits, provision 3 allows for retail sales of products manufactured or processed on the site provided the sales area does not exceed 30 percent of the gross floor area of the building. This provision would allow retail sales, however, as described, an amendment would be necessary to address products that were not specifically manufactured or processed on site. City staff and consultants believe that this section could be modified to accommodate Simon Delivers by stating: "retail sales of products manufactured, processed, or received in bulk and packaged on site for redistribution, provided the sales area did not exceed 30 percent of the gross floor area of the building." With this amendment, staff believes an administrative permit could be approved to accommodate Simon Delivers and other similar situations. In discussion with city staff, a number of conditions were looked at being assigned to this approval would be the expansion of the Simon Delivers' building to include third phase of development, adequate parking, and the establishment of an entrance for walk-in liquor sales. These issues would all be addressed at the time of Administrative Permit application/approval. The Planning Commission is being requested to amend the Zoning Code to allow this expanded use of retail sales by administrative permit; not approve the plan for this specific site or application. Finally, other issues not necessarily related to the Planning Commission or this code amendment, the Minnesota Liquor Control Board must approve Simon Delivers' operation for off-sale license. The City Attorney indicated that beyond the zoning issues, the Liquor Control Board needs to resolve issues pertaining to age verifications, delivery arrangements, and the segregation of grocery and liquor sale deliveries as part of the licensing approval. These issues are all being coordinated with the Police Department and Liquor Control Board and will be addressed at the public hearing for the off-sale license on December 10. Planning Case Report 01-12 Page 2 11/2/01 VII. City Attorney Comments/Draft Ordinance The City Attorney has prepared the enclosed proposed Ordinance Amending New Hope Code Section 4.204(3) by Permitting by Administrative Permit tl~e Retail Sale-of Bulk Product in the Industrial Zoning District Delivered or Repackaged for Resale at Principal Building. The only change to the ordinance is that the phrase "or delivered in bulk and repackaged for sale" has been inserted into the current language. "The City Council of the City of New Hope ordains: Section 1. Section 4.204(3) "Retail Sale, Limited" of the New Hope City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 4.204(3) "Retail Sales, Limited." Retail sales of products manufactured, e~ processed or delivered in bulk and repackaged for sale on the site, provided that the sales area not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area of the principal building. Section 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication." VIII. Codes & Standards Committee The Codes & Standards Committee of the New Hope Planning Commission met and discussed this ordinance amendment on October 17 and was supportive of the change. The Committee made recommendations on the final wording of the ordinance and the ordinance was revised, per its recommendations. The Committee is recommending approval of the minor amendment to the full Planning Commission. IX. Staff Recommendations Staff recommends approval of the ordinance amendment. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance No. 01-14 11/21 City Attorney Correspondence 11/12 City Attorney Correspondence Public Hearing Notice 10/17 Planner's Report 9/14 Planner's Report Excerpts: Current Zoning Code 11/28 SunPost Article Simon Delivers' Presentation Planning Case Report 01-12 Page 3 11/2/01 ORDINANCE NO. 01-14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING NEW HOPE CODE .~4.204(3) BY PERMITTING-BY ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT THE RET,a,H. SALE OF BULK PRODUCT IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT DELIVERED OR REPACKAGED FOR RESALE AT PRINCIPAL BUILDING The City Council of the City of New Hope ordains: Section 1. Section 4.204(3) "Retail Sale, Limited" of the New Hope City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: ecfion 4 204(3) "Retail Sales, Limited" ~ Retail sales ~f products manufactured, or processed ~:~.h.',~.~:~b~!~O:r~pa,~.ka'g~,~. on the Site, provided that the sales area not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area of the principal building. Section 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication. Dated the 10th day of December, 2001. W. Peter Enck, Mayor Attest: Valerie Leone, City Clerk (Published in the New Hope-Golden Valley Sun-Post the day of ,2001.) -1- GORDON L. JENSEN* STEVEN A. SONDRALL WILLIAM C. STRAI~ STACY A. WOODS OF COUNSEL LOREN$ Q. BRYNESTAD *Real Pro~r~ L~w Speclalm Ce~ified By 'fhe Mmn~x,a S~e Bar ~lifi~ ADR Neulrai JENSEN & SONDRALL, P.A. Attorneys At Law 8525 EDINBROOK CROSShNG, STE. 201 BROOKLYN PARK, MINNESOTA 55443-1968 TELEPHONE (763) 424-8811 · TELEFAX (763) 493-5193 e-mail law~j ensen-sondrall.com November 2 I, 2001 Valerie Leone City Clerk City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Ordinance No. 01-14 Permitting Retail Sale Of Bulk Product By Admin. Permit In "I" Zoning District Our File: 99.80114 Dear Val: Per your request, enclosed is a revised Ordinance No. 01-14 An Ordinance Amending New Hope Code 3~4.204(3) By Permitting By Administrative Permit The Retail Sale Of Bulk Product In The Industrial Zoning District Delivered Or Repackaged For Resale At Principal Building for consideration at the December 10, 2001 Council Meeting. Very truly yours, Steven A. Sondrall, City Attorney, City of New Hope JENSEN & SONDRALL, P.A. After Hours Extension # i 47 Enclosure cc: Kirk McDonald GORDON L. JENSEN* STEVEN A. SONDRALL WILLIAM C. STRAIT'[' STACY A. WOODS OF COUNSEL LORENS Q. BRYNESTAD *Real Property Law Sp~eiaiiat C~-tified By The Minn~ota State Bar ~sociation *Qualified ADR Neutral JENSEN & SONDRALL, P.A. Attorneys ~It Law 8525 EDINBROOK CROSSING, STE. 2P BROOKLYN PARK, MINNESOTA 55443-1960 TELEPHONE (763) 424-8811 · TELEFAX (763) 493-5193 e-mail law~j ensen-sondrali.com November 12,2001 Kirk McDonald Community Development Director City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Re.' SENT BY FAX TO: (763) 531-5136 AND BY REGULAR MAIL Amendment to New Hope Code §4.204(3) "Off-Sale" Liquor in the "I" Zoning District Our File No.: 99.40110 Permitting the Retail Sale of Dear Kirk: Please find enclosed for consideration at the December 4, 2001, Planning Commission metting, a proposed Ordinance Amending New Hope Code 3~4.204(3) by Permitting by Administrative Permit the Retail Sale of Bulk Product in the Industrial Zoning District Delivered or Repackaged for Resale at Principal Building. As you know, this'Amendment will permit the proposed retail sale on an "off-sale" basis of alcohol in the Industrial Zoning District to accommodate the Simon Delivers' request for an off-sale liquor license at its current location. Also enclosed is a copy of the Public Hearing Notice transmitted to the paper requesting a Publication of Notice for a Public Hearing at the December 4, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. Please call me if you have any questions or comments regarding the enclosed Ordinance or Notice of Public Hearing. Very L~-uly yours, Steven A. Sondrall, City Attorney, City of New Hope JENSEN & SONDRALL, P.A. sas,,blje,,sen-sondra Il.corn After Hours Extension #147 Enclosures cc: Valerie Leone, City Clerk, City of New Hope (w/enc.) CNH99.40110-001-]Grk Ltr NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING NEW HOPE ZONING CODE BY PERMITTING BY ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT THE RETAIL SALE OF BULK PRODUCT IN THE INDusTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT DELIVERED OR REPACKAGED FOR RESALE AT pRINCIPAL BUILDING City of New Hope, Minnesota Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of New Hope, Minnesota, will meet on the 4th day of December, 2001, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., at the City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue North, in said City for the purpose of holding a public hearing to consider the adoption of an ordinance amending the New Hope Zoning Code. Said ordinance will have the affect of amending {}4.204(3) by permitting the retail sale of bulk products processed or delivered and then repackaged for sale in a building located in the Industrial Zoning District by administrative permit. Ail persons interested are invited to appear at said hearing for the purpose of being heard with respect to the zoning code amendment. Accommodations such as sign language interpreter or large printed materials are available upon request at least 5 (five) working days in advance. Please contact the City Clerk to make arrangements (telephone 531-51 I7, TDD number 531-5109). Dated the 13t~ day of November, 2001. s/Valerie J. Leone Valerie J. Leone City Clerk (Published in the New Hope-Golden Valley Sun-Post on the 21st day of November, 2001. -1- 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park. MN 5541K-~ Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: Kirk McDonald Alan Brixius October 17, 2001 New Hope - Simon Delivers Off-Sale Liquor License 131.01 -01.10 Simon Delivers would like to obtain an off-sale liquor license for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquor, wine and beer, along with its food delivery service in the City of New Hope. The City Attorney has looked at this issue and documented his findings in a September 15, 2001 letter to the City. It appears that to obtain an off-sale liquor license, the New Hope Code and State Statutes would require that an exclusive liquor store be established on site to allow for the issuance of the permit. By exclusive liquor store, this would require that part of the building be separated from the balance of the grocery sales with a separate entrance and separate delivery service to accommodate the liquor store. The City Attorney also indicates that it would require Simon Delivers to establish a separate liquor store that would permit customers to actually come to the store and purchase alcoholic beverages. I have a chance to speak with Mr. Sondrall to determine what in the Statute requires the provision for walk up sales. He indicated that based on his interpretation of Code, that store would refer to an on-premise sale of merchandise. I believe that Mr. Sondrall is accurate in his depiction of this and as such, we have to now look at what would be permitted within the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate such a facility. Simon Delivers' site is zoned I, Industrial, which allows for the warehousing facility that allows for the present use. In looking at Section 4.204, Administrative Permits, provision 3 allows for retail sales of products manufactured or processed on the site provided the sales area does not exceed 30 percent of the gross floor area of the building. This provision would allow retail sales, however, as described, an amendment would be necessary to address products that were not specifically manufactured or processed on site. In conversation with Mr. Sondrall, we believe that this section could be modified to accommodate Simon Delivers by stating: "retail sales of products manufactured, processed, or received in bulk andpaC~(aged for redistribution, packaged on site provided the sales area did not exceed 30 percent of the gross floor area of the building." With this amendment, we believe an administrative permit could be approved to accommodate Simon Delivers. In discussion with City staff, a number of conditions that we looked at being assigned to this approval would be the expansion of the Simon Delivers' building to include third phase of development, adequate parking, and the establishment of an entrance for walk in liquor sales. Finally, in my discussion with Mr. Sondrall related to this topic, he indicated to me that the Minnesota Liquor Control Board must approve Simon Delivers operation for off-sale license. He indicated that beyond the zoning issues, the Liquor Control Board needs to resolve issues pertaining to age verifications, delivery arrangements, and the segregation of grocery and liquor sale deliveries as part of the licensing approval. pc: Steve Sondrall 2 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416/-`` Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.¢om MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: Kirk McDonald Alan Brixius September 14, 2001 New Hope - Simon Delivers Off-Sale Liquor License 131.01 - 01.10 Simon Delivers would like to obtain an off-sale liquor license for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquor, wine and beer, along with its food delivery service in the City of New Hope. The City Attorney has looked at this issue and documented his findings in a September 15, 2001 letter to the City. It appears that to obtain an off-sale liquor license, the New Hope Code and State Statutes would require that an exclusive liquor store be established on site to allow for the issuance of the permit. By exclusive liquor store, this would require that part of the building be separated from the balance of the grocery sales with a separate entrance and separate delivery service to accommodate the liquor store. The City Attorney also indicates that it would require Simon Delivers to establish a separate liquor store that would permit customers to actually come to the store and purchase alcoholic beverages. I have a chance to speak with Mr. Sondrall to determine what in the Statute requires the provision for walk up sales. He indicated that based on his interpretation of Code, that store would refer to an on-premise sale of merchandise. I believe that Mr. Sondrall is accurate in his depiction of this and as such, we have to now look at what would be permitted within the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate such a facility. Simon Delivers' site is zoned I, Industrial, which allows for the warehousing facility that allows for the present use. In looking at Section 4.204, Administrative Permits, provision 3 allows for retail sales of products manufactured or processed on the site provided the sales area does not exceed 30 percent of the gross floor area of the building. This provision would allow retail sales, however, as described, an amendment would be necessary to address products that were not specifically manufactured or processed on site. In conversation with Mr. Sondrall, we believe that this section could be modified to accommodate Simon Delivers by stating that retail sales of products manufactured, processed, or packaged on site provided the .sales area did not exceed 30 percent of the gross floor area of the building. With this amendment, we believe an administrative permit could be approved to accommodate Simon Delivers. The City must evaluate what impact this type of amendment may have on the other I zoned properties in the City. Any amendment should take precautions to avoid negative retail sales situations such as the S.R. Harris site in 1983. Additionally, in discussion with City staff, a number of conditions that we looked at being assigned to this approval would be the expansion of the Simon Delivers' building to include third phase of development, adequate parking, and the establishment of an entrance for walk in liquor sales. Finally, in my discussion with Mr. Sondrall related to this topic, he indicated to me that the Minnesota Liquor Control Board must approve Simon Delivers operation for off-sale license. He indicated that beyond the zoning issues, there are other issues that needed to be resolved with the Liquor Control Board that may make the land use concerns moot. Those being age verifications, delivery arrangements, and the segregation of grocery and liquor sale deliveries. These being the bigger issues, Mr. Sondrall indicated that we should probably hold on any action by the City pending the Liquor Control Board's action. pc: Steve Sondrall 2 5/~4/2oo~ 4.20 I, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ose.' The purpose of the I, Industrial District is to provide for the establishment of heavy industrial and manufacturing development use which, because of the nature of the product or character of activity, requires isola-fi0n from residential or non-compatible commercial uses. The I District is also intended to provide for large scale activities of a sociological nature not suited to other districts, but reasonably compaffble with the same characteristics suitable for General Induslrial Use. 4.202 Permitted Uses. The following are permitted uses in an I District: 4.202 (1) 4,202 (2) 4,202 (3) 4.202 (4) 4.202 (5) 4.202 (6) 4.202 (7) 4.202 (8) 4.202 (9) 4.202 (10) 4.202 (11) 4,202 (12) 4.202 (13) Radio and Television Antenna Farm. Research, Medical, Dental or Optical Laboratories. Trade School/Training Schools/Specialty Schools. Warehouses. Essential Services. 4.203 4.203 (1) Governmental and Public Utility Buildings and Slxuctures. Building Materials/Appliance and Furniture Retail Sales. Engraving, Printing and Publishing. Wholesale Business. Manufacturing etc. The manufacturing, compounding, assembly, packaging, processing, Ixeatmcnt or storage of products and materials. Automobile Maior Repair. Office Business. Cable TV. Limited scope production studio for franchised Cable TV company allowing for production of community oriented cable television programming produced by and for members of the community or commercial programming limited to presentation on the cable system serving only New Hope and other member cities of the Northwest Suburban Cable Communications Commission. Said use shall require all antennae conform to height limits of Section 4.032(5). Additional antenna height may be permitted by Conditional Use Permit pursuant to those procedures set forth and regulated by Section 4.33. Notwithstanding Section 4.33, no Conditional Use Permit shall be granted unless a public hearing is held and there is a f'mding that thc additional height is technically necessary to serve the New Hope area and that this additional height will have no adverse effect on thc area surrounding the studio. Permitted Accessory Uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in an I District: Accessory Building. Accessory building for commercial uses shaU not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor space of the principal building. 4 - 130 4.17-4.19 5B4/'2ool 4.166 (4) Setbacks. Front: Local Front: Arterial or Rear Side: Interior Side: Comer: Arterial or Sn'eet "Community ..... ..- Side Yard (b) Local Street Community Collector Street Collector Street (a) (a) 20 feet 20 feet 30 feet 10 feet Co) 20 feet 20 feet (a) See Section 4.033 (6)(b) of this Code. (b) Ten (10) foot side yard setbacks are required except a twenty (20) foot side yard setback will be required where the lot abuts an R-1 or R-2 Zoning District. RESERVED 5/14/2001 4.203 (2) 4.203 (3) 4.203 (4) 4.203 (5) Parking. Off-street parking as regulated by Section 4.035. ~. Off-street l~ading as regulated by Section 4.036. Si~s. Signs in compliance with Chapter 3. Personal Wireless Service Antennas. Personal wireless service conformance with Section 4.039D of this Code. antennas in 4.203 (6) Accessory Antennas. Accessory antennas in conformance with Section 4.032(6)(h) of this Code. 4.203 (7) 4.203 (8) Eating Establishments. Cafeterias, restaurants, snack bars and similar uses, provided such uses are primarily for the use of employees in the immediate area. Open Outdoor Storage. Open outdoor storage as a permitted accessory use provided that: 4.203(8) (a) Accessory Us.e. The open outdoor storage must be an accessory use, as defined by Section 4.022 of this Code, to a permitted or conditional principal use on the site. 4.~0~(8) (b) 4.203(8) (c) Maximum St~ace. The open outdoor storage area may not exceed twenty (20) percent of the gross floor area of principal stxueture. Setbacks. The open outdoor storage area shall not be located within any front yard or side yard abutting a public right-of-way. Open outdoor storage shall be set back five (5) feet from all side and rear lot lines and shall not be located within a utility or drainage easement. 4.203(8) (d) Surfacing. The open outdoor storage area shall be surfaced with concrete or bituminous. 4.203(8) (e) Fencing. A wire weave/chain link security fence shall be required around the open outdoor storage area in conformance with Section 4.034(3)(c) of this Code. Open outdoor storage areas intended for the exclusive storage of semi-trailers may be exempt from the required security fencing provided the storage area is delineated and the individual trailers are secured. 4.203(8) (f) Screening/Landscaping. The open outdoor storage area shall be screened and landscaped from adjacent residential uses and public rights-of-way in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.034(3) of this Code. 4.203(8) (g) Required Space. The open outdoor storage area shall not utilize any required off- street parking, loading areas, or access space, as required by Section 4.035 and 4.036 of this Code. 4.203(8) (h) Hazardous Materials. The open outdoor storage area shall not be used for storage of hazardous liquids, solids, gases or wastes. This provision does not proba'bit the property owner from obtaining an administrative permit for the outdoor storage of propane or LP gas per Scction 4.204(5) of this Code. 4 - 1~1 5/14/2001 4.203(8) (i) Refuse and Upkeep. The properly owner shall keep the open outdoor storage areas free of refuse, trash, debris, weeds, and waste fill. 4.2 4~ .Uses by Administrative Permit. ~l~he following are uses by administrative permit in the I Distxict. (Requires an admi~i-qtrative p~-rmi~ based on the procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 4.31 and the performance standards set forth in Section 4.03 of this Code. 4.204 (1) Personal wireless antennas per Section 4.039D(2) of this Code. 4.204 (2) Outdoor sales of seasonal produce subject to the permit requirements of Chapter 8 of this Code. 04 (3) Retail Sales, Limited. Retail sales of products manufactured or processed on the site, provided that the sales area not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area of the principal building. ~ 4.204 (4) Outdoor Sales and Display, Accessory. Open or outdoor service, sale and rental as an accessory use provided that: 4.204(4) (a) Area limit. Accessory outside service, sales and equipment rental connected with a principal use is limited to thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area of the principal use. 4.204(4) (b) Screened from Residential. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses. 4.204(4) (c) Surfacing. Sales area is surfaced with concrete or bituminous. 4.204 (5) Outdoor Storage of Propane or LP Gas, Accessory. Outdoor storage of propane or LP gas shall be allowed as a conditional accessory use provided it is used exclusively by the occupant of site where it is stored for a use incidental to said occupant's business, it is not stored for wholesale or retail sale unless specifically permitted by another section of this Code, and the following requirements are satisfied. 4.204(5) (a) 4.204(5) (b) Location. AH propane or LP gas outdoor storage tanks shah be located in the rear yard not less than twenty-five (25) feet from any property boundary lines. No tanks shall be permitted in the front yard and side yard abutting public streets. Open Area. Storage tanks shah be surrounded by twenty-five (25) feet of open area. Storage of any kind is prohibited in said open area, except equipment incidental to the storage tank. Approved parking areas must be set back ten (10) feet from any storage tank. 4.204(5) (c) Setbacks from Buildim,. Storage tanks shall be set back from existing structures, as outlined in the Uniform Fire Code, based on tank size. 4.204(5)(d) 4.204(5) (e) Circulation. Storage tanks shall not interfere with site circulation including, but not limited to, parking, driveway, curb cuts and loading areas. Fencing. A wire weave/chain link security fence shall be required around all storage tanks. The location of the fence shall be as per the Uniform Fire Code. 5/14/2001 4.205 4.204t5) (0 4.2o4(5) (g) 4.204(5) (h) Access. Storage sites shall be accessible by service and emergency vehicles. Valves. All filling valves of the storage tanks shall be enclosed and have locking devices: Warning Simaaee. A warning sign shall be required for every tank and shall be placed in a conspicuous location directly on the tank indicating a supplier's name, address, phone number, that highly dangerous and flammable material is stored therein and that no smoking requirements must be observed or a sufficient warning to that affect. Said signage may not exceed four (4) square feet nor may it be used for advertising purposes. Conditional Uses, I. The following are conditional uses in an I District: (Requires a conditional usc permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Sections 4.303 and 4.33 and performance standards set forth in Section 4.03 of this Code. 4.205 (1) Open Outdoor Storage as a Principal or Accessory Use. Open outdoor storage as a conditional accessory use, where the open outdoor storage area exceeds twenty (20) percent of the gross floor area of the principal structure provided that: 4.205(1) (a) Screening/Landscaping. The open outdoor storage area is screened and landscaped from adjacent residential uses and public fight-of-way in compliance with Section 4.034 of this Code. 4.205(1 ) (b) Fencing. A wire weave/chain link security fence shah be required around the open outdoor storage area in conformance with Section 4.034(3)(c) of this Code. Open outdoor storage areas intended for the exclusive storage of semi-trailers may be exempt from the required security fencing provided the storage area is delineated and the individual trailers are secured. 4.205(1 ) (c) Surfacing. The open outdoor storage area is surfaced with concrete or bituminous. 4.205(1) (d) Setbacks. The open outdoor storage area shall notbc located within any front yard or side yard abutting a public right-of-way. The open outdoor storage shall be set back five (5) feet from all side and rear lot lines and shall not be located within a utility or drainage easement. 4.20511) (e) Required Space. The open outdoor storage area shah not utilize any required off- street parking, loading areas, or access space, as required by Section 4.035 and 4.036 of this Code. 4.205(1 ) (f) Hazardous Materials. Thc open outdoor storage area shall not be used for storage of hazardous liquids, solids, gases or wastes. This provision does not prohibit the property owner from obtaining an administrative permit for the outdoor storage of propane or LP gas per Section 4.204(5) of this Code. 4.205(1) (g) Refuse and Upkeep. The property owner shall keep open outdoor storage areas free of refuse, trash, debris, weeds, and waste fill. 4.205 (2) Planned Unit Development, Industrial. Industrial planned unit development as regulated by Section 4.34 of this Code. 133 ~p & Bread ~ift Boxes Only 3-560-4947 ings wanted ~ the coming weeks New Hope/Golden Val- Sun-Post will publish resses of local homes businesses with holi- lights and decora- s. This list will be ,ted each week ugh the first week in ~ary. You may submit ,' home or business ad- ;s through mail, e-mail t'ax. Please indicate the submission is for holiday lights listing include a name and i)hone number for ver- . tion, which will not be ted in the newspaper. ttn-Post newsroom is at ) W. Broadway, Rob- dale, MN 55422; e-mail ~unpost@mnsun.com; ~t 763-536-7519. ~ter cont.,' - ry fOrm inside HoP , · Gol S VAIi Vol. 46, No. 33 November 28, 2001 75~ Newsstand POKER CHIP SALE Thru Dec. 1st 8501 Wyoming Ave. N 763-425 2214 Liquor licenses expanded in New Hope City Council will hear request from Simon Delivers on Dec. 10 By Sue Webber Sun Newspapers New Hope city officials are hopeful that liquor code changes approved 4-1 by the City Coun- cil on Nov. 19 will spur new de- velopment. Since 1979, the city's ordi- nance has limited the number of off-sale licenses to three and the number of on-sale license to -four. Last week, the city council increased that number to six on- sale and six off-sale licenses. The council first began dis- cussing the idea of expanding liquor licenses in September, in an attempt to spur new busi- ness development in the city. "It is staff's feeling that ex- panding the number of on-sale li- censes to six will allow additional quality restaurants to locate in several locations in the city, in- duding the Winnetka/Bass Lake Road, 42nd/Winnetka, and Mid- ]and Shopping Center areas; said a memo to the council from Kirk McDonald, Now Hope's director of community development. Councilmember Don Collier cast the lone dissenting vote last week, at~er objecting to the number of off-sale licenses ap- proved. 'Going from three to six is one too many,' Collier said. 'I re- ally would like to see more de- mand [for licenses] there. I don't think you build redevelopment on the back of off-sale liquor. We haven't had a demand there.' The investment requirement for an on-sale license also was amended last week. The current investment requirement for an on-sale license is at least $1 mil- lion, excluding land value. Al-' though the city staffl~ad recom- mended amending that amount to $500,000, the council settled on $750,000, including the land value. The council also approved changing the fee for off-sale '3.2 beer licenses from $50 to $100, the maximum fee allowed by the state. "The fee has not changed since 1984, and the city can eas- ily justify the increase based upon the time the police depart- ment spends on compliance checks,' McDonald's memo said. LIQUOR: To Page 17A Community Center opening in GV Nov. 29 An open house celebration marking the opening of the com- munity center addition to Mead- owbrook Elementary School in C www.mnSun.com CrystaVRobblnedale, New Hope/Golden Valley Sun,Post~/ednesday,.l~i)v, 28, 2001. 17A, Liquor:. Simon Delivers looking to inclUde delivery of alcoholic beverages From Page lA Last week's changes are expected to clear the way for the council to consider on Dec. 10 an earlier request from Simon Delivers, a New Hope-based company at 3340 Winpark Drive that opened an In- ternet delivery grocery store in the Twin Cities area in July 2000. Representatives from Simon Delivers asked the New Hope City Council Sept. 10 to consider amending its ordinance to allow an additional off-sale liquor license so the company can include beer and 'I don't think you build redevelopment on the back of off-salo liquor.' w Don Collier New Hope City Council member wine in conjunction with its grocery de- livery business. If New Hope doesn't grant the li- cense, Simon Delivers will move its up- coming expansion to a city that will grant the license, said Chuck Karpinske, the company's chief finan- cial officer. Simon Delivers is proposing to create a separate liquor store within its opera- tion, similar to what Byerly's has done. Proof of age (21 years old) and a signa- ture would be required on all home deliv- eries of alcoholic beverages, and a person wold need to be present to accept the de- livery. Trucks would be locked at each stop, company officials said. If Simon Delivers' request were grant- ed, New Hope's zoning code would have to be amended. The city's current zoning code does not allow retail liquor stores in an I-1 (industrial) zoning district. It only allows 10 percent limited retail sales in an industrial district if the product is processed on site. COUNCIL REQUEST FOR ACTION Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section Community Development 9-10-01 Petitions & Requests Item No. By: Kirk McDonald B,/: PRESENTATION BY SIMON DELIVERS REQUESTING CONSIDERATION FOR ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR AN ADDITIONAL "OFF SALE" LIQUOR LICENSE REQUESTED ACTION Simon Delivers, 3440 Winpark Drive, has contacted city officials regarding the potential to apply for an "off- sale" liquor license to allow delivery and sale of beer and wine in conjunction with their grocery delivery business. They will be making a presentation to the City Council regarding this request. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE The Current New Hope liquor ordinance limits the number of "off-sale" licenses in the City to three and those licenses are currently issued. An ordinance amendment would be necessary to create a fourth license. BACKGROUND Please refer to the attached presentation information provided to the City by Simon Delivers. Representatives from the company will be present to discuss this issue with the City Council and answer questions. The City Attorney has prepared the attached correspondence on this issue for your review. No particular action is being requested of the City Council at this time, as this is considered an initial ~resentation of the request and issues only. ATTACHMENTS · Simon Delivers Information · September 5 Correspondence from City Attorney MOTION BY SECOND BY TO: JENSEN & S0~DRALL, PA ~]002;008 09/05/01 15:33 FAX 7634935193 STAY A. W001~S O1. COONSnL Lop.~s (2- BRYn~-r~o JENSEN & SONDRAI,L, P.A. Attorneys At Law /"' 8525 Emn-saoox CROSSING, S'r£, ~01 BR~ ~ M~OTA &~3-1968 TgL~HO~ ~) 4~811 m T~ ~) 49~193 Sep~nnber 5, 2001 Kirk McDonald Community Developmen~ Director City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, ~ 55428 SENT BY FAX TO: (763) 531-.5136 AND BY REGULAR MAIL Request by Simon Delivers for "Off Sale" Liquor License Our File No.: 99.40108 Dear Kirk: This letter is in follow up to our telephone conversation regard/rig Simon Deliver's request for an "offsale" liquor license. The purpose of the license is to deliver intoxicating liquor, wine and be~r along with its food delivery service in the City of New Hope. This request is regulated by New Hone Code Chapter 10, Minn. Stat Chapter 340A and ~ Chapter 7515. The request will require an ordinance amendment to New ~ Section 10.412. This section limits the number of"off sale" licenses in the City to three, h is my recollection that all three licenses have been issued. Therefore, a fourth license would need to be created for this request Also, it would appear Simon Delivers would not be able to deliver alcoholic beverages along v~th its regular grocery delivery service. ~ Section 10.4 t8 indicates "off sale*' liquor licenses shnl! be issued only to exclusive liquor stores. An ex~lnsive liquor store is defined by both ~ Section 10.025 and _l.l.~t. Section 340.A 101 (10) as an establtehmentused exclusively for the sale of intoxicating liquor, except for the incidental sale of ice, teba~co, rtoa-intoxicaling malt liquor, and things of like nature. In other words, a gen~ml food store, as defined by ~. Section 340A. 101(12) enga~.ed primarily in the business ofselling food and grocery products to the public for off- premises consumption, would not be allowed to make "off sale" sales of alcoholic beverages. This is probably why Byerly's stores, as an example, are clearly separated for the "offsale" sale of alcoholic beverages and other grocery items. Therefore, if Simon Delivers is serious about thc sale and delivery over the interact of alcoholic beverages, it will need to establish two separate stores, much like the Byerly's situation, and keep separate its delivery of grocery products and alcoholic beverage products. It will also require Simon Delivers to establish a retail hquor store that would permit customers to actually come into a store for purchase of alcoholic beverages. The City Manager mentioned Simon Delivers may propose only a drive-up service window for in-person sales. This would not be allowed by Minnes ta Rules Section 7515.0570. This rule specifically states, °Ho alcoholic beverages shall be sold through any op~ing or 09/05/01 15:34 FAX 7534935193 JENS~ & SONDRALL, PA ~00~;003 September 5, 2001 Page 2 windowto any persons outside of the licensed premiSes.'' An au-mai store cater~g to walk-in customers will be required. The "offsale" license will also be subject to State approval per Minnesota Rules Seetiou 7515.0440. ! have spoken with the Mimaesota Liquor Control Board rega~dhag the Simon Deliver's proposal. The position ! have expressed i~ this letter is consistent with their opinion as well. Therefore, we probably should not take may a~tion ~m ~ matter until we hear from the Liquor ComroI Board that it will approve Simon Dcliver's operation fo~ aa "offsale" Iieense. W/th the foregoing considerations ha m/nd, it is my opinion S/mon Delivers could obtain aa "off sale" liquor license. It would require the City to amend our liquor code to provide for four '~off sale" liquor licenses. Sknon Delivers would need a separate store for liquor sales to walk-in customers and keepe delivery of grocery products separate from the delivery of alcoholic beverage products. Please co~aet me if you have any questions or comments regarding this issue. Very truly yours, Steven A. o~ndrali. City of New Hope J~S~N & So~I.L.P.A. A~e~ HZur~ '.~c~e~oa #147 CityAttomey, cc; Dan Donabue, City Manager, City of New Hope Valerie Leone, City Clerk, City of New Hope P~esentation to City of Hew Hope August 2001 B ckground · 5imonbelivers.com, Inc. · Fast-growing Intcrnct delivery grocery store · 46,000 customers in Twin Cities or~o · Currently cover 90% of thc $~vcn-county metro or~o · Potential to deliver to major outstot~ cities (St. Cloud, Rochester, etc.) · Employs approximately 600 p~opl¢ · b¢$ircs to retain cor~ operations in New Idop~ os w~ grow (likely expansion within n~xt 12 months) About 5imonD¢livcrs.com · Simplifying the lives of busy fomilics · Steady ond con$¢rvotiv¢ growth of business despite (dot.corn) foilup¢s · $70 million revenue run · Committed to fomily volu¢$ · Committed to meeting thc needs of our customers ond to be o I¢odcp in communities we serve $imonb¢livers.com p ys ettention to its customers · 5olicits informotion ~¢9o~din9 p~oducts desired by customers · Beer ond wine ore the most frequently requested products to be includes os o port of Simonbelivevs.com'$ business · belivery of beer and wine not new · Similov to Hoskell'$ & Suvdyk'$ · This would require thc gronting of o "liquor license" by th~ City of N~w Hope Regulatory Compliance · Strictest complia.nce of all m.unicipality and state laws regard,rig sole of I,quor · High security (camera)in liquor store · Proof of age (21 years old even though State Iow is 19) & signature required on oil deliveries · Website will only allow customers who are attended delivery and are in the appropriate time window to put alcohol in their "shopping cart" · Employee training in all phases of business · Trucks will be locked at each stop · Absolutely zero sale of tobacco products despite regulatory ability to do so Regulatory Compliance (con .) · Emphasis on beer end wine soles which match customer requests · Very limited "retail" in-person soles · State requirements only · Committed to no advertising · Minimal "state mandated" open hours · Ci ty can do compliance checks by: Ordering product and having on underage person try accept or delivery after hours and Stop 5imonbelivers van to see if they hove signatures of the people they delivered to or check the person's age that they are delivering to Benefits · Ability to expand 5imonbeliveps.com's business · Ability to m¢~t consumer requests for odditionol products ond services · Minimol competition with othe~ licensed liquor retoile~s in New Hope Memorandum To: From: Date: Subject: Planning Commission Members Kirk McDonald, Director of Community Development November 30, 2001 Miscellaneous Issues NOTE: The purpose of this miscellaneous issues memo is to provide commissioners with additional detail on CouncilIEDA/HRA actions on Community Development related issues or other City projects. It is not required reading and is optional information provided for your review, at your discretion. 1. November 13 Council Meeting - At the November 13 Council meeting, the Council took action on the following planning/development/housing issues: Project #692, Public Hearing, Resolution Adoptin.q Assessment for 60~ Street Extension, Draina.qe and Watermain Proiect: Approved, see attached Council request. Project #678, Public Hearin.q, Resolution Approvin.q Sale to Northwest Community Revitalization Corporation for 4864 Flaq Avenue: Approved, see attached Council request. · PC99-27, Resolution Approving Request for an Additional Extension of Concept StaRe Planned Unit Development Approval for a Third Buildinq on an Existinq Lot and CUP Approval for a Commercial Recreation Use for the Mosaic Youth Center, 7601 42nd Avenue: Approved, see attached Council request. Granted an 18-month extension to June 13, 2003. · Proiect #699, Resolution Approvin.q Plans and Specifications and Advertisement for Bids for Rehabilitation of Home at 7901 49th Avenue: Approved, see attached Council request. · Project #685, Motion to Allow Staff to Seek Proposals from Desiqn Firms for the Design of an Accessible Twinhome at 7105 62"~ Avenue: Approved, see attached Council request. · Ordinance #01-08, An Ordinance Amendinq the New Hope City Code by Establishin.q Administrative Permit Fees: Adopted, as recommended by the Planning Commission. · Ordinance #01-09, An Ordinance Amendinq the Votin.q Requirements for Zoninq Code Text or District Changes: Adopted, as recommended by the Planning Commission. · Ordinance #01-10, An Ordinance Amending the New Hope Si.qn Code Regulating Accessory Si.qna.qe in the R-B, L-B, C-B, and I Zoninq Districts: Adopted, as recommended by the Planning Commission. · Ordinance #01-11, An Ordinance Amending Chapter 4.039D of the New Hope City Code Regulating Personal Wireless Service Antennas and Towers: Adopted, as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. November 26 Council/EDA Meetings - At the November 26 Council/EDA meetings, the Council/EDA took action on the following planning/development/housing issues: · Proiect #678, Motion Approving Final Payment to Fair's Nursery and Landscal~inq in the Amount of $7,552.50 for Landscaping at City-Owned Property Located at 4864 Flail Avenue: Approved for payment, see attached Council request. · Proiect #705 and #685, Motion Approvin,q Final Payment to Kevitt Excavating Inc. in the Amount of $37,111.50 for the Site Cleanup at City-Owned Properties in the Winnetka~ Bass Lake Road, and Sumter Area and at 7105 62"d Avenue: Approved for payment, sec attached Council request. · Proiect #707, Discussion Regarding Redevelopment/Rehabilitation Proiect at 7610 Bass Lake Road: EDA directed staff to prepare a resolution authorizing condemnation and acquisition of appraisal, see attached Council request. 3. Codes & Standards Committee - Codes & Standards met in November to discuss the following items, which will be considered at the November Planning Commission meeting. · Mini-storage in an I District · Body piercing The mini-storage code amendment will be discussed at the December Planning Commission meeting. An amendment to the Zoning Code to address body piercing will be discussed in January, if other applications are received. 4. Design & Review Committee - Design & Review met in November to review plans for the mini- storage facility. The application deadline for the January Planning Commission meeting is December 7, and staff will notify the committee and other commissioners about the status of applications after that date. Staff is not aware of any applications at this time. 5. Livable Communities Grant - The fourth meeting of the task force was held on November 15. The discussion focused on the concept plans for the Hosterman site and visioning for the site west of the golf course. The next meeting is scheduled for December 6. Enclosed are the meeting notes from the November 15 meeting and a recent project bulletin. 6. Council Minutes - Minutes from the November 13 meetings are enclosed for your information. 7. Commission Re-Appointments - The terms for Commissioners Brauch, Green and Svendsen expire on December 31. Larry and Steve have elected to remain on the Planning Commission for another three-year term, which will expire on December 31, 2004. A letter of resignation from the Planning Commission was received from Patsy so she can devote more of her attention to her position with the School Board. The Council will formally accept Green's resignation at the December 10 Council meeting (effective December 31) and the City will advertise to fill the position on the Commission. 8. 2002 Planninq Commission Schedule - Enclosed is the final 2002 Planning Commission schedule. Months with dates other than the first Tuesday are: January 8 (second Tuesday), July 9 (second Tuesday), August 7 (first Wednesday), and November 6 (first Wednesday). 9. Officer Elections - Election of Planning Commission officers for 2002 will be conducted at the first meeting held in 2002. 10. 11. January meetinq - At this time staff is not anticipating any applications for the January Planning Commission meeting, unless an application is submitted next week. The only item that staff would have for consideration is the body-piercing ordinance, and staff does not feel it necessary to have a meeting for that one item. Therefore, if no applications are received, staff will be recommending that the January Planning Commission meeting be cancelled. Future Applications - Future applications or businesses that include: · · · · · 6. If you have staff is currently working with Olson Construction expansion Charter school at former Prudential building Body piercing ordinance Navarre expansion 7610 Bass Lake Road garages any questions on any of these items, please feel free to contact city staff. Attachments: 60~ Street Extension Drainage Project 4864 Flag sale to CHDO Mosaic Youth Center 7901 49th Avenue 7105 62nd Avenue 4864 Flag landscaping final payment City-owned properties site cleanup final payment 7610 Bass Lake Road Livable Communities Task Force Notes Council Minutes 2002 Planning Commission Schedule COUNC~ REQUEST FOR ACTION ~ Agenda Section Originating Department Approved for Agenda Community Development 11-13-01 Public Hearing Item No. By: Kirk McDonald By: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 692 (60TM STREET EXTENSION, DRAINAGE AND WATERMAIN PROJECT) REQUESTED ACTION This is the public hearing to consider the adoption of the assessments for the Hidden Park Condo ~mprovements, including the street/easement extension and drainage improvements. The Condo Association petitioned the City for the improvements. The enclosed resolution adopts the assessments for the improvements and staff recommends approval of the resolution. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE In the past, the City has completed projects involving public and private improvements if there is an assessment agreement in place with property owners agreeing to pay the cost of the private improvements. When the project is completed, it is routine procedure to schedule a public hearing and assess the final project costs against the benefiting property owners. BACKGROUND The Hidden Park Condo Association petitioned the City for this improvement. At the February 12, 2001, Council meeting, the City Council approved plans and specifications for this project and authorized staff to seek bids. Bids were opened, reviewed by the Association, and the City Council awarded the contract for the work at the April 9 Council meeting to Don Zappa & Son Excavating, the Iow bidder, with a base bid of $81,720.55. The construction work was undertaken this summer, has been completed, and final payment made to the contractor. Per the City Engineer's correspondence, the improvements included the construction of storm sewer, water main, curb and gutter and the reconstruction of the private drive. Xcel Energy still has to complete some lighting improvements, however, this is outside the City's project contract. (Cont.) MOTION BY SECOND BY TO: Request for Action The total project costs are as follows: Driveway and storm sewer construction Watermain construction Indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Page 2 $56,707.15 21,994.90 24,563.83 $103,265.87 11-13-01 The previously approved assessment agreement calls for all work except the water main improvements to be assessed to the Hidden Park Condos. The total costs can be divided as follows: City Costs: Watermain construction Indirect costs Total City Cost $21,994.90 5,486.22 $27,431.12 Hidden Park Condo Costs: Driveway and storm sewer construction Indirect costs Total Hidden Park Condo Cost to be assessed $56,707.15 19,077.60 $75,784.75 The Indirect Costs to Hidden Park Condos include 25% of the construction total ($14,176.79) and $4,900.81 in rebidding costs. The costs identified in the assessment agreement are slightly higher than the actual costs. Consequently, the levied assessment will be lower than the assessment estimated in the agreement: Item Driveway and Storm Sewer Construction Street Light Modifications Cost Identified in the Assessment Agreement $62,061.75 $2,550.00 Final Pr~ect Coststo be Assessed $56,707.15 $0.00 Indirect Costs $15,538.25 $19,077.60 * Total Coststo Hidden Park Condos $80,150.00 $75,784.75 *Indirect costs include costs for rebidding A direct project cost will not be incurred for the lighting modifications. Xcel Energy will make the required modifications. The typical monthly lighting billings cover the cost of the modifications. The City Engineer recommends assessing the total cost of 75,784.75 equally to the 68 units in the Hidden park Condos ($1,114.48 per unit). At the October 8 Council meeting, the City Council approved a Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Calling for a Public Hearing on Proposed Assessment. The attached notices were mailed to all property owners within the Association being assessed. The City Attorney has prepared the enclosed Resolution Adopting Assessment. The term of the assessments will be ten (10) years and the first installment shall be collected with taxes in the year 2002. The interest rate is established at 7.0 percent. Property owners can pay the assessment in full 30 days after the adoption of the resolution by the Council with no interest payment. After that time, property owners can pay off the assessment at any time during the 10-year period, less the current year's installment. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. AVE N KENTUCI~ AVE JEESEY LOUISIANA AVE m m m I IIIWlII~IIIWlIIWlIIWlII J t Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects To: Kirk McDonald, Steve Sondrall From: Vince Vander Top cc: Mark Hanson Subject: 60th Street Extension/6003 West Broadway Assessment Information Our File No. 34-00-12 ! Date: October 22, 2001 All work associated with the 60th Street Extension/Private Driveway contract is complete. The improvements included the construction of storm sewer, water main, curb and gutter and the reconstruction of the private drive. Excel Energy still has to complete some lighting improvements, however, this is outside the City's project contract. The total project costs are as follows: Driveway and storm sewer construction Watermain construction Indirect Costs $ 56,707.15 $ 21,994.90 $ 24,563.83 Total Project Costs $103,265.87 The previously approved assessment agreement calls for all work except the water main improvements to be assessed to the Hidden Park Condos. The total costs can be divided as follows: City Costs: Watermain Construction Indirect Costs $ 21,994.90 $ 5,486.22 Total City Cost Hidden Park Condo Costs: Driveway and storm sewer construction Indirect Costs $ 56,707.15 $ 19,077.60 Total Hidden Park Condo Cost to be assessed $ 75,784.75 The Indirect Costs to Hidden Park Condos include 25% of the construction total ($14,176.79) and $4,900.81 in rebidding costs. 2335 ~{/est Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113 · 651-636-4600 · Fax: 651-636-1311 The costs identified in the assessment agreement are slightly higher than the actual costs. Consequently, the levied assessment will be lower than the assessment estimated in the agreement: Item Cost Identified in the Final Project Costs to be Assessment Agreement Assessed Driveway and Storm $62,061.75 $56,707.15 Sewer Construction Street Light Modifications $2,550.00 $0.00 Indirect Costs $15,538.25 $19,077.60' Total Costs to Hidden $80,150.00 $75,784.75 Park Condos ~ Indirect costs include costs for rebidding A direct project cost will not be incurred for the lighting modifications. Excel Energy will make the required modifications. The typical monthly lighting billings cover the cost of the modifications. In summary, we recommend assessing the total cost of $75,784.75 equally to the 68 units in Hidden Park Condos ($1,114.48 per unit). Please contact me at 651-604-4790 with questions. COUNC/I. REQUEST FOR ACTION Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section Community Development 11-13-01 Public Hearing By: Ken Doresky, Community ~ Item No. Development Specialist By: 7.3 PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION APPROVING SALE TO NOR'I'WEST COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION CORPORATION OF 4864 FLAG AVENUE NORTH (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO 678) ACTION REQUESTED This is a public hearing to consider the attached resolution approving the sale of 4864 Flag Avenue North to the Northwest Communities Revitalization Corporation (NCRC), Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) for $1.00. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE City goal #2 is to pursue the maintenance and redevelopment of commercial and residential properties within the City. The City Council has been addressing the residential portion of this goal through the City's many housing activities, including partnering with different agencies and organizations on housing projects. At times, third party development agreements and property transfers are necessary for obtaining project funding. BACKGROUND On March 26, 2001 the Council approved a development contract and sale of 4864 Flag Avenue North to the NCRC CHDO. In order to utilize Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for the installation of pilings, the City was required to transfer ownership of the property to a third party entity. The NCRC CHDO agreed to act as this third party entity in the development agreement. Also, Hennepin County agreed that this scenario would fulfill the necessary requirements to obtain the CDBG funds in question. It has been determined by the City Attorney that the sale of this property to the NCRC CHDO required a public hearing that was not held when the Council initially approved the sale and development agreement on March 26, 2001. State law requires that a public hearing be held for the sale of public property. Therefore, ~rocedurally it is necessary to hold this public hearing. Currently, staff is accepting purchase applications for the home and is expecting to complete the sale to a qualified family under the City's Scattered Site Housing Program shortly. Due to the fact that the NCRC CHDO will be the official seller of the real estate at 4864 Flag Avenue North, a public hearing will not be required for this third party sale. Once a purchase application is accepted, staff will present the information to the Council at a future Council meetin~l. MOTION BY , SECOND BY TO: Request for Action ~taff recommends approval of this resolution. Page 2 11-13-01 FUNDING CDBG funds were used to pay for land acquisition, piling installation and predevelopment work. HOME funds are available from the CHDO for a development grant and down payment assistance that will be secured in a second mortgage. The majodty of City EDA dollars in the project will be secured through a third mortgage. The proceeds from the sale of the home will be used to fund the construction. A'n'ACHMENTS · Resolution · Location Map · City Attorney Correspondence, 11/07/01 · Public Hearing Notice · City Attorney Correspondence, 03/21/01 · Development Agreement · Memorandum of Understanding . i /"- "-. ................... .~ /~,'. if ATHLETIC ,'" : "~ i ~ /FIELD ~ ~',, ': ~ ; i ~,- ~ .... . .. ............. ................... , ........ ~ .......... ~-~.~ :-'~ :,-~-~ ~~ ~'7=. ~, : ~' ~ I /] .'"~'r'~-: ~",;~'~" f'~- ~"'~ / /~ ....... ; ..... : ' ~ - · 'z: ......... :' H :~ ~" /~ ~ ',~:~ :~" - /:' ,' ~'~':;:.'ffz: --. -t~ ...... : .. --: I : : ; ~: .~;~' ~ .~. ~2 '..~.. / '/...'--.~L..~' ~t'~, ~ ' ":,~,'. ~" / ,....' ..,,.,.~-] ~7~; .... ..-. _ .'~' ....' .,~ / ..'" -...~." .~:.. ~ ........ ~: ~ ~ ."- . ~ ._. ~ .~~~,~" · . ~... . ., , _ ~. ~'. / ~~~Z~.T~''. .., .,,. , .... ~.. .... ,~-.~ ~,~... ~. ... f ~~.'~7'"' .-~ ,";~'" , ~: ~ · '~ :~',~ "' . /~;-' '~'~",] ,,~- ' "~ ~! ~ i ~ :~ ' " _z"~ j ~-.:..~.~,~, .._ , . ~, ~. ~, ~, ~ ._ ... ~ ~ '~ .~,.- ~1 ,~ / ~ ~. ·: .... ~ ...... ~ ..... ,~ ......... -' · ..~, .- .. ~: ~N ~ _.. .~ ~. -,,. ..,.- . . ~ . , .... ?., .... . __ ~.'.~ "',,.~,,".~',,.~. -.. '.--':., ......... ~"7'.. '~.' ~ :-~i; ,, ~ ~ ~: ~i ~; ~. ~' -~ ~ -~, ~ ..,. ~ ., ~ .., ~.4~. . ~.~ ~ ~i ~ ~'. . ...' .... "~ ~ "" -"' i "~';-~i' ~.-.-~. '-r .... .--'-- ..... : -:" , ~ ~', . )' "-.~ ~ ...... ~ ff ...... ~.__ : . , .-, -: -: . -: ..~-' · _ .... ~ ~ ~ ........ . ~ ~ / / ~ i4~ ~ [ "'" ~ -?-r" '~ . .... ...... ,.. , .~~, : ~'~ ~-~ ~, ....... - IHOL~,,~ . { ,B ,- I~, 1 ' ~ ;~ ~ 4711 COUNCIL z uzsa- ~ ~ Agenda Section Originating Department Approved for Agenda Community Development 11/13/01 8.1 Item No. Kirk McDonald By: and Erin See. man B~,: RESOLUTION APPROVING REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF CONCEPT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR A THIRD BUILDING ON AN EXISTING LOT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL FOR A COMMERCIAL RECREATION USE FOR THE MOSAIC YOUTH CENTER, 7601 42ND AVENUE NORTH, YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS AND ROBBINSDALE AREA REDESIGN, PETITIONERS (PLANNING CASE 99-27). REQUESTED ACTION Staff is recommending approval of an additional extension to the Concept Stage Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit approval granted to the Mosaic Youth Center by the City Council on November 27 2000. Staff is recommending that an 18-month extension be issued for submission of a Development Stage Planned Unit Development application. The current application expires on December 13, 2001, and the 18- month extension would extend the application to June 13, 2003. A representative from the Mosaic Youth Center will be present at the meeting to update the Council on the status of this project. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE The City Council, in the past, has issued extensions for special zoning procedures based on a written request by the petitioners. BACKGROUND On March 13, 2000, the City Council passed a resolution granting Concept Stage Planned Unit Development approval for the construction of the Mosaic Youth Center on the south portion of the YMCA property at 7601 42nd Avenue. The proposed Mosaic Youth Center is a three-stow building containing three youth service organizations and a youth activity center. Since the Concept Stage approval was granted, the collaboration has been working to complete the steps necessary to submit a Development Stage application. The Mosaic has completed a site survey, soil studies, feasibility study, and an integrated services plan in the past eighteen- months. The Zoning Code allows petitioners nine months to submit a Development Stage application following Concept Stage approval. According to this requirement, the Mosaic Youth Center had until December 13, 2000, to submit a Development Stage application. On November 13, 2000, the City received a request from the petitioners to extend the deadline for nine additional months. (Continued) MOTION BY SI~COND BY TO: Request for Action Page 2 11-13-0~-''' A one-year extension was granted by the City Council on November 27, 2000. The Mosaic Youth Center collaboration is currently in the fundraising p~ocess,, and the petitioners believe they will be prepared to submit development stage plans by late fall 2002. The current Concept Stage PUD will expire on December 13, 2001. On November 2, 2001, the City received a request from the petitioners to extend the deadline for eighteen additional months In order to ensure the petitioners ample time to submit Development Stage plans, staff is recommending the City grant the 18-month extension to the Concept Stage PUD approval. The 18-month extension would require the Mosaic Youth Center to submit a Development Stage application by June 13, 2003. The attached resolution approves the request and staff recommends approval of the resolution. ATTACHMENTS · Resolution · 11/02/01 Correspondence from petitioners requesting another extension · Mosaic Youth Center Capital Campaign Committed Funds · Mosaic Youth Center Use of Capital Funds · Campaign Planning Overview Information · 11/27/00 Resolution · 3/13/00 Resolution MOSAIC YOUTH CENTER USE OF CAPITAL FUNDS A. Development Costs Architects and other professional fees for design and development (excluding construction phase costs) Outside counsel to work with Mosaic in planning, technical support and development program design Sub Total: 5249.607 1 O5.84O 355,447 B. Construction Costs 25,511 sq. ft. ~ $150 per sq. ft. C. Contineencv 3,826,650 317,903 Total Capital Campaign Funds Needed: $4,500.000 D. Land Allocation The land will be allocated by the YMCA. There will be no costs incurred for demolition or environmental work to prepare the land. Utilities are included in the overall cost of construction. TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS 425,000 $4,925,000 ENDOWMENT (Phase II) An endowment, to be raised through planned gifts and other gifts bom individuals, will help to provide funds for maintenance and upkeep of the facility. $1,000,000 MOSAIC YOUTH CENTER MOSAIC YOUTH CENTER CAPITAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTED FUNDS Cash and Firm Pledges: Robbinsdale Area Redesign (year one of five-year commitment) Fairview (bridge funding, one-year commitment) McKnight Foundation (planning grant) Individual and Board of Directors contribmions Youth Fundmisers Crystal, Robbinsdale, New Hope Rotary Club Mosaic Youth Center Board & Search Institute Book Proceeds Twin West Chamber of Commerce Medtronic (match to employee gilt) Kiwanis of North Hennepin Xcel Energy Crystal Frolics New Hope Lions Club Subtotal: In-kind Capital Donations: Land donated by YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Architect donated time (Keith Sjoquist) Bidding costs (McGough Construction) Subtotal capital in-kind donations Other In-kind Donations: Business plan consulting (Howard Schwartz) Tom Honor[, T.L. Honon & Sons Contractors Project managemem (Brad Brown) Assistance with financial pro forma (SAFCO) Assistance with communications plan & brochure (LDI) Catering for evems (Chef Tiny Eckman) Subtotal other in-kind donations $250.000 $200.000 $ 35.000 $ 10.618 $ 2.710 $ 3.189 $ 1.700 $ 1.500 $ 1.000 $ 1.000 $ 500 $ 500 $ 350 $508.076 $425.000 $ 4.000 TBD $429,000 $ 1.000 $ 1.500 $ 15.000 $ 4.000 $ 2.500 $ 2,000 $ 26.000 Grand Total of Funding Secured: $963,076 HBH ASSOCIATES LLC 1 I/2/01 COUNCIL ] REi UEST FOR ACTION ~ ~ Agenda Section Originating Department Approved for Agenda Community Development 11-13-01 Development & Planning Item No. By: Ken Doresky, Community Development Specialist By: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR REHABILITATION OF HOME AT 7901 49TH AVENUE NORTH (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 699) ACTION REQUESTED Staff is requesting Council approval of a resolution approving plans and specifications and advertisement for bids for the total rehabilitation of a City-owned single-family home at 7901 49th Avenue North. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE For projects where bids are expected to exceed $50,000, City staff seeks closed bids from which the lowest responsible bid is brought back to the Council for consideration. BACKGROUND On July 23, 2001, the Council approved a motion for staff to proceed with a written offer to purchase the property located at 7901 49th Avenue North for its appraised value of $99,000. In August 2001, staff completed the purchase of this home. During the fall months, staff has developed rehabilitation specifications for the home. Staff has estimated that rehab costs will be approximately $60,000.00. Rehabilitation specifications include, but are not limited to, the following items: · Remediation of asbestos and lead per environmental hazards survey; · Roof replacement; · Gutter removal - replaced with rain diverters; · Siding replacement - including house wrap; · Window repair and aluminum wrap on extedor window frames (window sashes to be painted); · Removal of dining room window - replaced with sliding glass patio door; · Addition of 6' x 6' deck accessing sliding glass patio door; · Extedor doors, garage service door and garage overhead door replacement; · Interior doors replaced as needed; · Driveway and walkway (from driveway to front door) replacement; · Gut basement - all walls and finish materials removed (less structural supports); MOTION BY SECOND BY TO: Request for Action Page 2 11-13-01 · Installation of two-wide casement egress window in basement; · Attic insulation, minimum R-44; , · Existing furnace system are to be removed, replaced with 90% efficiency forced air furnace; · Bathroom remodel - new tub enclosure, tile floor, sink, vanity, mirror and stool; · All cabinets to be repaired and refinished; .- · Repair and replacement of intedor millwork; · Repair and painting of all intedor walls and ceilings; · Replacement of all lighting fixtures; · Correction of any electrical deficiencies; · Correction of any plumbing deficiencies; · All plumbing fixtures are to be replaced; · Wood floor refinishing in bedrooms; · Carpet installation in hallway and living room; · Vinyl installation in kitchen and dining area; · Tile installation in front entryway; · Appliance replacement - Refrigerator, range, range hood, disposal dishwasher and washer and dryer; · Installation of drain tile system, including sump pump Options · Central air conditioning · Roof sheathing, as needed replacement Landscaping of the property will take place separately from the house rehabilitation. Staff expects to develop a landscape plan and present the plan to the Council during the winter months. Landscaping is planned to occur in April 2002. Many of the current plantings will remain on site. Due to the small back yard close proximity to Winnetka, staff will be proposing the addition of a chain link, plastic coated fence for the rear yard. The fence will be proposed as a component of the landscape plan. The property is located at the southwest comer of 49th and Winnetka Avenues North. The property measures 10,597 square feet and has a lot width of 80 feet and a lot depth of 132 feet (see attached survey). The house is a one-story ranch with 1,092 sq. ft. of above grade living area and an additional 710 sq. ft. finished area in the basement. The home was constructed in 1967. Staff will be coordinating with the Northwest Community Revitalization Corporation (NCRC), Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) on this rehabilitation. HOME funds obtained through the NCRC are available for this project in the amount of $26,405.00. After rehabilitation is completed, the City will sell the home to a Scattered Site Housing Program qualifying first-time homebuyer. NCRC HOME funding in the form of down payment assistance will be secured through a second mortgage. Staff has scheduled a pre-bid site meeting for November 19, 2001. Sealed rehabilitation bids are due into City offices by December 14 at 11:00 a.m., a bid opening will be held at that time. Once the bids are received, staff will bring the bids back to the Council at the January 14, 2002 meeting to consider the contract award. Staff recommends approval of this resolution. FUNDING The City has approximately $75,000 available from CDBG for the acquisition and rehab of this property. Due to the fact that these CDBG funds are being utilized for a rehab homeownership project, the CDBG portion of the sale proceeds can be realiocated to other City CDBG projects as program income. EDA funding $88,886.00 will be necessary to supplement CDBG funding for this project. Any EDA funds used will be repaid with the sale of the home. In the summer of 2001, the City in conjunction with the NCRC, Request for Action Page 3 11-13-01 submitted a funding request to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) in the amount of $25,000 to ~educe any needed EDA funds. This grant was not funded. Staff intends to continue seeking additional funding sources for each Scattered Site housing project. The purchase price on the budget is a staff estimate.. Once plans and specifications are completed for the project, staff will hire an appraiser to determine-the appraised value. Staff will then present the appraisal to the Council for approval as the sales price. HOME funding in the amount of $26,405.00 has been allocated to this project. Please see the attached budget. A'i-I'ACHMENTS · Resolution · Location Map · Advertisement for Bids · Plans and Specifications · Floor Plan · Budget 2 Car Garage 20.0' ARE~ C. KLCUI,.ATIONS SUMMARY T(~TAi. L.N~ I~) 10~2 LIVING AREA BRF. AKDOWN SPECIFICATIONS FOR HOUSE REHABILITATION AT 7901 49TH AVENUE NORTH' The City of New Hope is seeking bids for the follOWing repairs 'needed on the City-owned house at 7901 49th Avenue North. Please contact Ken Doresky, Community Development Specialist, at 763-531-5137 for access to the home and/or specific information regarding the repairs. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. A separate contract will be developed for landscaping and grading of the property. 2. Lead paint and asbestos hazards identified in environmental must be disposed of per the requirements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. MINNESOTA STATUTES 144.9501-9509 REQUIRE ANY CONTRACTOR WHO ABATES LEAD-BASED PAINT TO HAVE A MINNESOTA LEAD ABATEMENT LICENSE. EACH MEMBER OF THE WORK CREW MUST BE A LICENSED LEAD WORKER. LEAD ABATEMENT LICENSES ARE ISSUED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (651-215-0890). Minnesota Rules, Chapters 4671, require that a licensed lead supervisor must notify the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) by mail or fax at least five working days before starting any regulated lead work. A property owner who intends to perform lead hazard reduction must notify MDH by mail or fax at least ten working days before starting regulated lead work. 3. General contractor to supply and maintain heat on site as needed through completion of project. 4. Site must remain secure at all times. 5. All contractors shall have a State Residential Contractor's License. 6. Contractors/subcontractors will submit evidence of insurance coverage. Specific requirements included in sample contract. 7. Contractor shall obtain all required permits, inspections and related contracts. Twenty-four hour notice is required for scheduling of all City inspections. City permit fees will be waived other than the required Minnesota State Surcharge. State electrical permits fees cannot be waived. Contractor shall include in bid all other fees and charges including State surcharges. 8. Equipment and materials must be installed according to State codes and manufacturers specifications and must perform the intended function. Please contact the New Hope Building Official or General Inspector for all questions regarding building codes. 9. Materials, patterns and colors to be approved by City. When it is required to remove or replace an item, the replacement item should be equal in quality, size and function to the replaced item as specified or determined by City staff. Equal substitutions will be determined and approved by City staff. 10. Any materials which differ from those specified below are to be approved by City Community Development Specialist. A list of alternate materials must be submitted in writing with Bid. 11. The City reserves the right to delete any portion of the work listed below without affecting the quoted costs of the remaining work, before or during the construction, due to budgetary concerns. 12. Contractor to provide all transferable warranties to the City and future buyer. 13. The City reserves the right to reject all bids. ' 2 Environmental Abatement - per enclosed specs 1. Follow attached Airtech Environmental survet pertaining'to the removal of asbestos. 2. Follow U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding lead paint requirements. REHABILITATION SPECIFICATIONS A. Demolition (Properly dispose of all debris) 1. Work to proceed in a manner that minimizes disturbances to adjacent and public properties. Damage to these areas will be repaired or replaced at the expense of the contractor. 2. Demolish driveway, sidewalk, rear service door step and landing. 3. Gut basement - Completely remove all walls and finish materials (less structural supports) from basement. Remove basement doors, walls, all patricians, heat registers, closets, bar area and bathroom. Completely remove basement ceiling to exposed joists. Remove all tile per MPCA requirements. 4. Remove all basement electrical not required by code. 5. Remove extedor vents. 6. Remove fence. 7. Remove siding. 8. Remove roof covering and felt and inspect. 9. Remove shutters. 10. Remove house numbers. 11. Remove gutters. 12. Demolish driveway, sidewalk, rear service door step and landing. 13. Remove all cable wires and cable box. 14. Remove all bathroom tile -floor and walls. 15. Remove all bathroom fixtures (tub, stool, sink and vanity). 16. Remove sink and faucet in kitchen. 17. Remove kitchen countertop. 18. Remove existing appliances. 19. Remove upper cabinets over island in kitchen. 20. Remove boiler unit, registers and related items. 21. Remove water heater. 22. Remove cabinet woodwork between living room and dining room. 23. Remove wallpaper, paneling, shelving and tile from interior walls. 24. Remove suspended ceiling in dining room. 25. Remove existing light fixtures and ceiling fans. 26. Remove exterior doors: rear, front and garage service door. 27. Remove garage door header. 28. Remove closet shelves and rods throughout house. 29. Remove existing floor covering including kitchen flooring. 30. Remove basement windows. 31. Remove dining room window. BID 32. Remove bathroom window. 33. Remove windows in southeast and northeast bedrooms (two total). B. Footings/Foundation/Flatwork 1. Install sidewalk, width equal to steps, 7' x 6', raised to proper elevation for proper dse of steps. 2. Clean garage floor with solvent, paint floor with approved sealing paint (oil based product). C. Rain Diverters 1. Install rain diverter over front door. D. Siding/Soffits/Fascia/House Wrap/Brick 1. Install 44 mil minimum vinyl siding. 2. Wrap soffits, and fascia with alluminum, add soffit ventilation holes as needed. 3. Repair rotted fascia and soffit in rear with new lumber prior to facia wrap. 4. Install Tyvek house wrap under siding, tape all seams and around doors and windows with approved tape. 5. Power wash brick. E. Garage 1. Install garage overhead door (steel paneled - 26 gauge). 3. Install garage door header - ML - 2 11 ¼ (size per requirements). 4. Repair firewall - paint. 5. Remove all shelving and misc. wood and debds in rafters. 6. Remove all items from walls. 7. Clean outlets and switches. 8. Remove insulation over walls. 9. Install garage door opener, ~ horsepower with remote keypad and service button. 10. Wrap all tdm with aluminum (C-2). F. Deck 1. Install 6' x 6' deck landing (cedar or treated decking) outside of patio door, two footings required with steps. G. Misc. Exterior 1. Install new house numbers (4" reflective). 2. Paint exterior, window sash and remaining trim not wrapped. 3. Install I dryer vent. J-Boxes for all vents to match siding. H. Exterior Doors (Peachtree or approved equal) 1. Install six-panel pre-hung steel insulated front door, double bored for 4 thumbtum deadbolt and lock and compression weather strip. Garage / house fire door - six panel steel with self closer, double bored for thumbtum deadbolt and lock. I. Interior Doors Replacement doors: flush oak w/Weiserm privacy latches in bedrooms and bathroom. Install new door stops at each door with hardware. Stain, seal and varnish to match existing doors. · Southeast bedroom o Replace bedroom door o Install new closet bi-fold door · Northeast bedroom o Keep door, replace hardware o Install new closet bi-fold door · North bedroom o Replace door o Install new closet bi-fold door Bathroom o Replace door Living Room o Replace closet door J. Windows/Patio Door 1. Replace all basement windows with glass block. 2. Install two-wide basement egress window on east side, Marvin WCM 2828. to include window well per codee 3. Wrap all windows with aluminum (C-2). 4. Install new handles on all windows. 5. Install maintenance free patio door - height to match existing header % insulated glass and screen. 6. Repair all damaged or broken windows, storms, screens, hardware - clean and oil all window hardware. 1. Roofing Replace roof sheathing, if needed, with material of equal thickness as existing - pdced as option. Install (5) new 8" plastic fixed attic vents Replace roof covering with 15 lb. felt, Ice & Water shield per code, and 3-tab 235 lb. fiberglass/asphalt shingles. Color to be selected by City. L. Driveway 1. Lay 2.5" asphalt driveway. Driveway to be 17' wide, (17' x 32') 2. Aggregate base course of 6" compacted limestone. Sub grade should be dry before placing aggregate and pavement. 3. Wear course shall be type 41 bituminous - minimum 2.5" thick 5 4. Immediately after placement, protect pavement from mechanical injury until Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Insulation Increase attic to minimum R-44 (blown fiberglass product) Add air chutes as needed N. HVAC 1. Install 90% efficiency up flow forced air furnace with pvc flue to rear wall Lennox or equal. 2. Install Honeywell chronotherm thermostat. O. Plumbing 1. Verify and correct all plumbing deficiencies per code 2. Install Moen faucets in all locations. a. Laundry faucet #4901 b. Kitchen faucet #7201 c. Vanity faucet #.4621 3. Install Kohler toilet with standard seat. 4. Install cultured marble tub surround color to match vanity top. 5. Install standard cast iron bath tub or approved equal. 6. Install single laundry tub and standard faucet in basement. 7. Install single lever faucet with spray and stainless steel 2-compartment sink 6.5 inches deep, Polar or approved equal. 8. Install Bradford, or equal, 40-gallon water heater. 9. Install shut off at all fixtures. P. Electrical 1. Verify and correct all electrical deficiencies. 2. Install Panasonic bath and laundry exhaust fans [50 cfm] insulated and ducted to extedor of building. 3. Install light fixtures, ($850.00 fixture allowance - selected by City) 4. Center light fixture in foyer with door. 5. Install (5) hard wired smoke detectors, one in each bedroom, one in hallway, one in basement - interconnected. 6. Install GFCl outlets in kitchen, bathroom, laundry and garage per code. 7. Remove existing clock outlet in kitchen, cap wires and install blank cover. 8. Replace all outlets and switches, except in garage and basement. 9. Replace all phone jacks. 10. Replace doorbell. Q. Interior Millwork 1. Repair or replace any damaged or broken interior miliwork, including doors and hardware, hardware to be approved by City. 2. Refinish woodwork, sand and re-varnish. 3. Refinish or replace baseboard and complete baseboard where heat register is removed. 4. Clean all base and casing 5. Remove screws in woodwork, fill holes 6. Install attic scuttle in hallway, per code (22" x 30"). 7. Install wire rods and shelves in all closets. R. Interior Paint/Stain 1. Treat any water marks with sealer and refinish. 2. Paint all ceilings with white fiat interior paint, provide brand for approval. 3. Patch and repair walls and ceilings as needed. Paint walls with two coats of flat interior pain, provide brand for approval. Color to be selected by City. 4. Paint bathroom cabinets/millwork and windows with semi or high-gloss paint, provide brand for approval. Color to be selected by City. S. Cabinetry 1. Refinish and repair all damaged or broken cabinets, shelves, and hardware. 2. Add approximate 12" cabinet to west of existing upper cabinet in kitchen. 3. Replace breadboard. 4. Install new cabinet hardware in kitchen and bathroom. Style to be selected by City. Countertops/Vanity Top Install vanity and vanity top in bathroom. Install plastic laminate countertop in kitchen with standard edge, backsplash, and overhang. Colors to be selected by City. U. Floors/Floor Covering 1. Paint finished floor with Kilz and level surface. 2. Install carpet and pad in living room and hallway. Allow $22/sq. yd., selected by City - spray Kilz on flooring prior to carpet installation. 3. Install vinyl in kitchen and dining room, Allow $30 sq. yd., selected by City. 4. Install 12" ceramic tile in bathroom, Allow $12 sq. ft., selected by City. 5. Install 12" ceramic tile at front entry to exiting size, selected by City. 6. Tile to be thin set on %" Du-Rock 7. Sand and refinish all wood floors in bedrooms, repair any holes V. Appliances (Brands approved by City) 1. Appliance allowance, $2500 - Refrigerator, Range, Hood, Disposal, W&D and dishwasher. 2. Install all appliances. W. Bathroom Accessories 1. Install two towel bars and one soap dish. 7 2. Install shower rod. X. Clean-up 1. Provide on-site dumpster, emptied as heeded or approved disposal method. 2. Keep site clean of debds. Y. Drain Tile 1. Install new interior drain tile system at all basement perimeter walls with 1/3 HP pump with check valve. Direct drainage to sump basket located in south center, discharge to exterior. Z. Cleaning 1. Entire home to be professionally cleaned prior to final inspection. ROOM.BY. ROOM SPECIFICS AA. Bedroom 1 - southeast 1. Fill in wall where window existed. 2. Repair seal at window crank. BB. Bedroom 2 - northeast 1. Fill in wall where window existed. CC. Bedroom 3 - north 1. Seal existing attic access in closet. DD. Hallway Linen closet - clean shelves, add shelf in lower half, adjust doom and refinish Replace hinges and hardware, repair face frame in upper right comer. Broom closet - clean, replace hardware, refinish. Bathroom 2. EE. 1. Remove and replace mirror, full width of vanity. 2. Center new fixture on vanity. 3. Install cultured marble vanity top, selected by City. 4. Clean and refinish linen shelves and doom. 5. Refinish laundry chute. 6. Fill in wall where window existed FF. Living Room 1. Remove hardware in ceiling. 8 GG. Basement 1. Install full length hand rail to meet code on oPen side of stairway. 2. Stud wall on open side of stairwell and drywall. 3. Paint sheetrock area in staircase. 4. Clean all joists and walls - paint exposed masonry wall with Kiiz. 5. Level floor surface and seal slab with concrete floor paint, Benjamin Moore or equal 6. Repair hole in block, laundry room. 7. Insulate rim joists w/R19. TOTAL BID I!. OPTIONS 1. Replace roof sheathing, with material of equal thickness as existing. 2. Central Air. Company Contact Person Address Telephone Number Fax Number Signature of Person Submitting Bid PLEASE RETURN BIDS BY FRIDAY~ DECEMBER 14~ 2001 at 11:00 a.m, TO: Ken Doresky New Hope City Hall 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Bids will be opened at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, December 14, 2001. The bids will be considered by the New Hope City Council at the Monday, January 14, 2002 City Council meeting. All work is to be completed by the end of April 2002. The lowest responsible bidder' will be expected to enter into a contract with the City to ensure the completion of the work in a timely manner. Payment will be made by the City upon acceptance of the quality and completion of the project. 9 COUNCIL REQUEST FOR ACTION Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section Community Development 11-13-01 Development & Planning Item No. By: Ken Doresky, Community Development Specialist By: MOTION TO ALLOW STAFF TO SEEK PROPOSALS FROM DESIGN FIRMS FOR THE DESIGN OF AN ACCESSIBLE TWINHOME AT 7105 62ND AVENUE NORTH (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 685) ACTION REQUESTED Staff is requesting a Council motion for the authorization to seek quotes from design consultants for the design of an accessible twinhome at 7105 62nd Avenue North. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE City goal #2 is to pursue the maintenance and redevelopment of commercial and residential properties within the City. The City Council has been addressing the residential portion of this goal through the City's many housing activities, including partnering with the CHDO to develop accessible housing for the disabled. In the 9ast, the Council has authorized staff to seek proposals and contract with design firms. BACKGROUND On March 26, 2001, the Council directed staff to remove the existing house at 7105 62nd Avenue North and ~roceed with the development of an accessible twinhome on the lot in partnership with the Northwest Communities Revitalization Corporation (NCRC) CHDO. Since that time, the home was sold to a house mover and removed from the site. Once the home was removed, the foundation was demolished and the site was restored. During the Zoning Code adoption in April, the site was rezoned to R-2, medium density residential. The R-2 zoning classification allows for a reduced lot size per dwelling unit, from 7,000 sq. ft. to 6,000 sq. ft. Staff is of the belief that this reduced lot size per dwelling unit should accommodate the development of an accessible twinhome on the site with no variances. Staff developed preliminary twinhome concept plans for the site, but has not requested the services of a professional design consultant for the development of a site plan and house plans. Over the years, staff has been actively working on residential redevelopment in the northwest comer of New Hope. The residential lots located from 7105-7315 62"a Avenue North are 300 feet deep. In 1994, the City ~urchased the rear portion of 7105 62nd Avenue North to facilitate the development of the accessible CHDO MOTION BY SECOND BY TO: Request for Action Page 2 1 twinhome fronting Louisiana Avenue North. The property was rezoned to R-2 and 6073/6081 Louisiana Avenue North (accessible twinhome CHDO project) was completed on the site in 1996. This newly proposed accessible twinhome CHDO project lies directly north of the previously completed accessible twinhome CHDO project at 6073/6081 Louisiana Avenue North._ If this motion is passed, staff plans to seek design proposals, evaluate and rank the proposals and present a recommendation in January to the Council for the selection of a firm that staff would work with to develop a house plan. Staff would then begin compiling the plans and specifications and advertisement for bid packet for Council consideration during the winter. Staff anticipates that a contract to build the accessible twinhome could be awarded in the spring, with construction commencing soon thereafter. Staff recommends approval of this motion. FUNDING This project is located in an area where TIF funds can be utilized. CDBG funding was used to acquire the property, remove the foundation and prepare the site. CHDO HOME funds are available in the amount of $30,250.00 for this project. Construction costs would be funded by the sale of the property. This past summer, the NCRC CHDO, in conjunction with City staff, submitted a funding application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) for this project to fill the expected gap. Staff was recently notified that the MHFA request was not funded, therefore staff plans to work with the NCRC staff to resubmit the funding request in the spring. Also, staff intends to seek additional CHDO HOME funding for this project. The HOME funding currently in the project ($30,250.00) is the typical amount for a single-family home CHDO project. The purchase price on the preliminary budget is a staff estimate. Once plans and specifications are completed for the project, staff will hire an appraiser to determine the appraised value. Staff will then present the appraisal to the Council for approval as the sales price. ATTACHMENTS · Location Map · Preliminary Twinhome Concept Site Plans (Developed by Staff) · Preliminary Twinhome Budget 61ST AVE 8100 6081 6O73 6O65 41 6O55 6O25 6017 16009 i 6001 60TH O0~2 60,33 6024 6025 6016 6017 6OO8 O0O0 6000 16001 AVE N OREGON AVE N 6042 O015 6026 6O54 6013 6040 7124 L,J _- LOMB, 60TH coNCEPT A ~11.1 ,.II ). - - iO0.O0- - ~;? O' LOTS 112. II.O~ L CAldRON 3RD ADOrrZON CONCEPT 1.0.8 B74.7 I I · ~7o- .4.~ · ,, ¢72. ~' o11.1 7105 62nd Avenue Twin Home, New Construction '105 62nd Avenue North - Twin Home, New Construction. 1,550 square feet each - estimate. 1/6/01 EXPENDITURES Estimated Accluisition $ 103.000.00 New Construction (($105 scl ft X 1550 sq ft) X 2) $ 325,500.00 5% Contingency on New Construction $ 16,275.00.. Landscapinc,~ $ 10,000.00 Demolition $ 8,000.00 Surve¥in~ $ 1,000.00 Lawnmowin~, Shoveling, Etc. $ 1,000.00 Appraisal $ 300.00 Utilities $ 500.00 Property Tax $ 2,000.00 ... CHDO Development Fee (HOME funds) $ 2,750.00 Desitin Fees $ 2,000.00 Subtotal - Hard Costs $ 472,325.00 SOFT PROJECT EXPENDITURES [Publishinc~ $ 300.00 !En~ineerin~ $ 8,000.00 :Legal $ 7,000.00 Copies/Blueprints $ 200.00 Admin/Clerical $ 2,000.00 Supplies $ 30.00 Postac~e $ 100.00 Photos $ 50.00 Open House $ 50.00 Subtotal - Soft Costs $ 17,730.00 ITotal Expenditures - Hard & Soft Costs $ 490,055.00 I REVENUES JProceeds from sale of homes ($155,000 each) Subtotal Revenues 310,000.00 310,000.00 GAP FINANCING CDBG Reimbursement $ 131,100.00 HOME Development Fee Reimbursement $ 2,750.00 EDA Reimbursement $ 3,430.00 HOME Grant $ 5,000.00 Subtotal Gap Financinc, I $ 142,280.00 PROJECT COST SUMMARY Total Expenditures $ 490,055.00 Total Revenues $ 310,000.00 Total Gap $ 180,055.00 Total Gap Financin~l {CDBG, HOME & EDA) $ 142,280.00 Remainincj Gap ($18,887.50 each} $ 37,775.00 Twin Home Purchase Price (each) - Program Eligible Buyer IPurchasePrice $ I HOME 2nd Mort~lac, le ($22,500 total} I $ Subtotal 155,000.00 11,250.00 $ 143,750.00 * Staff will attempt to obtain an additional gap funding ($37,775.00) for this project. REQUEST FOR ACTION Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section Community Development 11-26-01 Consent Item No. By: Ken Doresky, Community ~I/ 6.7 Development Specialist B r V/ MOTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMEN~ TO FAIR'S NURSERY AND LANDSCAPING IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,552.50 FOR LANDSCAPING AT CITY-OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4864 FLAG AVENUE NORTH (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 678) ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing final payment to Fair's Nursery and Landscaping for landscaping at city-owned property located at 4864 Flag Avenue North. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE Before final payment is made for city contracts, the request is brought before the Council for approval. BACKGROUND On October 8, 2001, the City Council awarded a contract to Fair's Nursery and Landscaping in the amount of $7,552.50 for the landscaping of city-owned property located at 4864 Flag Avenue North. Fair's Nursery has submitted an invoice in the original contract amount. No change orders have been issued for this project. Per the attached memorandum, the City Engineer has inspected the project and recommends final payment. Staff recommends approval of this motion. FUNDING All landscaping costs will be paid with proceeds from the home sale. A'i'FACHMENTS · Location Map · Fair's Nursery and Landscaping Invoice · City Engineer's Correspondence · Landscaping Plan · Planting Schedule · Fair's Nursery and Landscaping Quote Proposal MOTION BY SECOND BY TO: F L A .6 A w~.~.y - REQUEST FOR ACTION Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section Community Development~,) 11-26-01 Consent Item No. By: Ken Doresky, Community Development Sl3ecialist B~/:~ 6.8 / MOTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMEN'~ TO KEVITT EXCAVATING INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,111.50 FOR THE SITE CLEANUP AT CITY-OWNED PROPERTIES IN THE WINNETKA, BASS LAKE ROAD, AND SUMTER AREA AND AT 7105 62NDAVENUE NORTH (IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 705 & 685) ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing final payment to Kevitt Excavating, Inc. for the site cleanup at city-owned properties in the Winnetka, Bass Lake Road and Sumter area and at 7105 62nd Avenue North. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE Before final payment is made for city contracts, the request is brought before the Council for approval. BACKGROUND On July 23, 2001, the City Council awarded a contract for the site cleanup and development preparation at city-owned properties in the Winnetka, Bass Lake Road and Sumter area to Kevitt Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $28,055. Due to the complexity of the project and the large number of removals, quotes included a lump sum amount and alternate prices on a per unit basis. Although the City Forester spent many hours on the sites marking and mapping removals, staff was under the belief that the contractor and/or staff would discover additional removals. The City Engineer provided an estimate of black dirt, but was under the assumption that more may be required. By requesting alternate prices on a per unit basis, it was not necessary for staff to negotiate any additions to the contract. Additional costs incurred on the per unit quoted basis include the following: · Tree Removal - The additional cost to complete unforeseen tree removals on the twelve (12) lots was $3,300. The City Forester requested the removal and disposal of three failing cottonwood trees with diameters of thirty-nine inches (39"), twenty-eight inches (28") and twenty inches (20") located at 5406 and 5410-12 Winnetka. Please see the attached map showing the three trees removed. · Black Dirt - Staff initially estimated that one hundred and sixty (160) cubic yards of topsoil would be needed for this project. Due to the large amount of disturbed area, a total of three hundred and twenty- three (323) cubic yards of soil was needed to complete the site restoration. The increase of one hundred and sixty-three (1631 cubic yards of topsoil per the quoted unit cost of $28 per cubic yard MOTION BY SECOND BY TO: Request for Action Page 2 11-26-~,~ increased the site restoration cost by $4,564. The specs called for four inches (4") of topsoil to be placed upon any areas disturbed, due to the large area disturbed and associated cost staff relaxed this requirement. 7105 62nd Avenue North - Due to the fact that Kevitt Excavating had submitted a cost for removals: and restoration on a per unit cost, city staff ~6ntacted Kevitt to discuss the possibility of performing additional removals and restoration of another city-owned property at 7105 62nd Avenue North. The purpose of this request was to remove a small amount of debris from the site and restore the site to a more maintainable condition. Kevitt agreed to add the requested site work at 7105 62nd Avenue North to the contract. The total cost for this additional work was $1,052.50. The initial contract amount was $28,055. Additional cost for removals and site restoration along the Winnetka, Bass Lake Road and Sumter lots was $7,864. The added cost for removals and site restoration at 7105 62nd Avenue North was $1,052.50. Kevitt Excavating, Inc. has submitted an invoice including the additional work for a total amount of $36,971.50. Per the attached November 20 memorandum, the City Engineer has inspected the project and recommends final payment. Staff would like to make the Council aware that this fall, Public Works staff will prune trees on the publicly owned lots referenced in this request. Also, staff is continuing to request that the STS crews pick up accumulating leaf piles in the corners of the lots and along fences and pick up miscellaneous garbage, rocks and limbs on all city-owned lots. Staff recommends approval of this motion. FUNDING All clean-up costs on the Winnetka, Bass Lake Road and Sumter lots will be paid with TIF funds. Additional removals and site restoration at 7105 62nd Avenue North will be paid for with CDBG funds. ATTACHMENTS · Location Map · City Engineer's Correspondence · Kevitt Excavating, Inc. Invoice · Additional Tree Removal Map ....... '~ ~. : aS37 . i EtS.M : , ~,. . w 7301 ~: : ,: ., , s : "' ..... ' ......... , :' ..... ~i ...... b~i_ ?-'~ ~, ~ ~ · /..~ ...---.~ .... ~ ........ ' ......... ...... '"~ z .... ~ es~._ .~v['._..N_ ~ ..... ....... '~ '. ............. ~ .... ~ ......... ~ ..... ~ included in thi~ ~i~'" ~/...~.~ '~ "~' -' 'are follow~: 2~.~~~,... ~ ....... , .-. ~ . ~ _~.~.~~. ,~. : ~7603 Bass Lake Road ~~ ..... ~ .' ............. J7621 Bass Lake Road ' ~~~ ~ '~; ~ [ ~ ~ 5530 Sumter Ave. N. ~ ; . . -- ~_ ._~ ..... ; ..... · ' ~ ~ ~1 .~': ~, ~ ~5~6SumterAve. N. 5~0 Winn~tk~ Ave. ~. ~ , _. ~ ..=m-. , ..... p ..... ~10/12 Winnetka Ave. N. . ~, -, - --- : , ~, ~ ~20 Winnetka Ave. N. · ~ ~ ~ ~ : '~-.~..~ s : j ' ~' --~. ; ~: ~ ; ...... ~ ...... ~ Winnetka Ave. N. ,...... -~ ~,, · ~.-.~_ ._ 5532 Winnetka Ave. N. ----: '~-- : ...; ...~.,~ ~Ja 5550 Winnetka Ave. N. COUNTY ROAD 101 iil~lll~lll~itl~lll~lll~lll~lll~lll~lll~lll~ 73'19 To 7349 61ST AVE 6100 6054 6081 6073 6065 6052 (1 6O25 6017 6OO9 6001 60.t2 6024 602.5 6016 6017 6OO8 6OO~ 6000 6001 60TH AVE N OREGON AVE N ~ oo15 m 6042 6026 Te 6O54 6O2O 724O 7124 LU LOMB4 ! REQUEST FOR ACTION Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section Community Development 11-26-01 EDA Item No. By: Kirk McDonald, Director of Communit>, Development DISCUSSION REGARDING REDEVELOPMENT/REHABILITATION PROJECT AT 7610 BASS LAKE ROAD ACTION REQUESTED Staff requests to update the Council on a proposal for the redevelopment/rehabilitation of the l 1-unit apartment complex at 7610 Bass Lake Road in conjunction with Project for Pride in Living (PPL), the Northwest Community Revitalization Corporation (NCRC) and several other funding agencies. Representatives from PPL and NCRC will be in attendance to answer questions. The project was last discussed at a Council work session on September 17, and at that time the majority of the Council supported EDA funding for the project and directed staff to request input from the Livable Communities Task Force on the project. The purpose of this update is to discuss project modifications and the current status of the project. Staff encourages the Council to strongly consider continued participation in this project, as this property has been identified as one of the top priorities for rehabilitation in the Comprehensive Plan, the site is located within the Livable Communities Grant study area, funding has been committed from other agencies to this project and the City has a successful record in working with PPL on other similar projects. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE City goal #2 is to pursue the maintenance and redevelopment of commercial and residential properties within the City. The City Council has been addressing the residential portion of this goal through the City's many housing activities, including partnering with different agencies and organizations on housing projects. In the past, the City has participated in similar collaborations, most recently with the Bass Lake Court Townhomes project As the Council is aware, projects of this size require a variety of funding partners and usually require the expertise of an experienced development agency, such as PPL. This property has been identified in the Comprehensive Plan for redevelopment or rehabilitation and it is also identified in the Livable Communities Grant study area. BACKGROUND In 1999, the Northwest Community Revitalization Corporation, (NCRC) Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDO) and PPL approached the City and inquired about multiple-family properties in need of rehabilitation for a potential collaborative proiect. Staff had identified the 7610 Bass Lake Road property as a MOTION BY SECOND BY TO: Request for Action page 2 11-26-01 high priority. Also, the City's previous attempts to coordinate an apartment rehabilitation project with the owners have been unsuccessful. At the June 25 EDA meeting, the EDA requested that staff investigate additional financing options for the project. At the September 17 Council work session, staff and representatives from PPL and NCRC presented additional financial and rehabilitation options to the Council. At the work session, the majority of the Council voted to approve the rehabilitation project contingent on decreasing the City's contribution to $218,000 with the addition of a fourth MHOP unit and obtaining Livable Community Task Force input on the project. Also, the Council elected to contribute $5,000 for playground equipment on the site. PPL ensured the Council that an additional $5,000 could be raised to match the City's contribution for playground equipment. $78,000 of the City's contribution would be from CDBG funds, the remaining $145,000 would be a no interest loan to the project with EDA funds with payment deferred for 30 years. At the end of the 30 years, the City could collect payment on the $145,000 or opt to continue to defer payment as long as the property continued as affordable housing, thus insuring affordability in perpetuity. This is the mechanism that was used on the Bass Lake Court Townhome project. On October 2, staff presented this rehabilitation proposal to the Livable Communities Task Force. Staff prepared an information packet for the Task Force, gave a short presentation on the project and requested that the Task Force review the proposal and provide wdtten input on the project at the following meeting. The overwhelming input and direction from the Task Force was to proceed with the project. Attached, please find a summary of comments received from the October 25 Livable Communities Task Force meeting. Now that the amounts and sources of city financing have been determined and input has been received from the Livable Communities Task Force, staff requests to discuss other remaining issues and the next project steps with the EDA. · Potential Eminent Domain: PPL and NCRC have recently informed the City that one of the owners of 7610 Bass Lake Road are now unwilling to sell the property. Due to the importance of the project, positive community input and secured financing partners, staff is requesting that the Council consider condemnation procedures on the property. George Gamett, Executive Director of the NCRC has submitted a letter regarding this condemnation request, which states that the City's financial commitment to the project would not increase due to condemnation. Also, Mr. Garnett's letter states that relocation costs are currently adequately funded in the project budget and would not be impacted by condemnation. Also, the City Attorney has provided correspondence indicating that there is legal basis to show blight and public purpose for this action. If the EDA is willing to consider condemnation of this property, staff will prepare a resolution in support of condemnation and bring the resolution back to the EDA at a future meeting for consideration. · Development Agreement: If the EDA is supportive of condemnation, staff will begin to prepare a development agreement and other necessary agreements for this project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The following project description has been provided by PPL: PROPOSAL The project consists of the renovation of the 11-unit apartment building at 7610 Bass Lake Road in New Hope. The building contains six 2-bedroom apartments and five 1-bedroom apartments. DEVELOPERS The development partners are Project for Pride in Living (PPL) and Northwest Community Revitalization Corporation (NCRC). Request for Action Page 3 11-26-01 PPL is a nonprofit community development corporation, which has 27 years of experience rehabilitating building new housing. PPL has built over 900 units and owns and manages over 500 units in the Metro Ark.,, including 34 in New Hope. PPL's property management division maintains PPL's long-term commitment to the community, providing professional services and. access to support for residents who need it. PPL also developed and now manages over 50,000 square fe~t of commerCial space and operates four businesses, which provides job training for hard-to-employ adults. NCRC is a regionally focused nonprofit community development corporation providing affordable housing for Iow- and moderate-income residents of the northwest metro area. For the past five years, NCRC has been developing and providing financing for the redevelopment of over 30 units of scattered site housing. The corporation represents a unique collaboration of six cities including Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Maple Grove, New Hope and Robbinsdale. WHAT IS PROPOSED? The plans entail the exterior and interior renovation of the existing apartment building. The building exterior will be completely renovated, including painting, the repair or replacement of the soffits and fascia, the provision of a new roof, gutters and downspouts as necessary, spot tuckpointing and brick repair, and the repair or replacement of the windows. The landscaping will be improved, the drive expanded and resurfaced, the walkways repaired, and garages added for each unit. The interior work will include updating the existing units in their present configuration. New cabinets, counters and appliances will be provided in the kitchens. The plumbing and electrical will be updated. A new water heater will be provided and the existing boiler will be inspected and replaced, if necessary. The walls will be repaired and painted and new carpet will be installed throughout. The monthly rent for the units will vary from $555 to $710 depending on unit size. At a minimum, nine of the units would be rented to families earning less than 50% of the area median (e.g. $37,000 for a family of four). Three of the units would have rents subsidized for lower income families. Two of those three units would be reserved for residents on the Minneapolis Public Housing waiting list and the other one (and any of the two not filled by people on the first list) would be used for New Hope residents. PPL currently has an on-site management office at our other property less than two blocks from the proposed site. A full-time site manager lives and is employed there. All prospective tenants will be carefully screened: each must have a good rental history, adequate income to afford the rent, and no criminal background. FINANCING The total cost of this development is approximately $1.32 million. The financing is proposed to be a combination of a traditional bank mortgage, investments from the City of New Hope and Hennepin County HOME and AHIF funds. The three affordable units are paid for by the Metropolitan Housing Opportunities Program (MHOP), which was created to increase the supply of rental housing outside of the central cities. The attached Development Proforma shows a $223,000.00 contribution from the New Hope EDA including approximately $78,000 from CDBG and a $5,000 contribution from New Hope that has been added to the project for playground equipment, which PPL intends to match with $5,000 from an unidentified source. TIMELINE Acquire properties, design new units and rehab work, secure financing Neighborhood, City and Planning Commission review .Finish purchase of all property Start rehabilitation and construction Complete construction February 2000 - February 2002 February 2000 - March 2002 February 2002 May 2002 January 2003 11-26-01 Request for Action Page 4 _..'CURRENT RENTERS The work is intended to be performed without substantial displacement of the existing residents. If existing residents have incomes above 50% of median, they will receive assistance in finding a new place to live and help with the moving expenses. Tenants wishing.to re,main in the rehabbed units would be welcome to do so provided they meet PPL's screening requirements. ADVANTAGES TO THE COMMUNITY This development will provide reinve~tment in the area's aging housing stock by an owner committed to maintenance and a long-term relationship with the community. The improved appearance and stability of the new and rehabbed units will add to the surrounding area's value and iivability. These units will provide an opportunity for young families or single parents to stay in this community or become part of it. This development represents the next step in PPL and NCRC's continued commitment to the strength and stability of New Hope. A preliminary site plan and proposed scope of work is attached. SITE CONTROL Currently the owners are unwilling to sell. PPL has been attempting to purchase the property for many months. After initial offers, the owners, Engelking and Norbert, received a $520,000 offer to purchase this property. Despite the fact that they had verbally agreed to PPL's previous offer of $450,000, they felt entitled to a higher sales price. PPL agreed to increase their offer to $470,000. The owners agreed to this provided that closing could occur by January 31, 2002, that PPL would cooperate in a 1031 exchange, and that the City would agree to a friendly condemnation. PPL agreed to its part of these conditions contingent on receiving acceptable financing, which has happened, but now the owners have declined the sale. FACTORS IN PER UNIT DEVELOPMENT COST Please see the following per unit development cost factors: · High Acquisition Costs: The acquisition of property in a fully developed area such as New Hope is high almost regardless of the condition of the property. An MHFA study done in 2000 shows the development costs in urban areas to be as much as 80 to 100% higher than costs in an undeveloped area. This tendency is exacerbated by Iow vacancy rates in the last several years which have increased the values of existing rental properties. The acquisition costs for this project will be around $43,000 per unit. · High Construction Costs: Recent increases in construction costs (20 to 40% in the last few years) have been the single largest factor in the higher cost of development. Renovation prices have been particularly affected due in part to more stringent environmental regulations. · Quantity and Quality of Renovation: PPL would completely rehab the existing building to a high standard of quality. All of the deferred maintenance items would be treated and the units would be completely updated. It is unlikely that a private owner would make this level of investment in the building, since, for the foreseeable future, it can be rented in its present state. As mentioned before, PPL is completely willing to discuss the proposed scope of renovation provided we will have sufficient reserves or other means of future reinvestment in the building. The construction and acquisition costs account for over 80% of the project costs. · High Initial Investment to Insure Long-term Affordability: By making a larger than normal initial investment, the property has a much lower debt load and is therefore able to maintain a Iow rent structure. · Project Size and Complexity: Despite being relatively small (only 11 units), this project retains all of the complexity of a larger project with none of the economies of scale. Request for Action Page 5 11-26-01 DEVELOPER FEE The developer's role includes the following: Acquisition of the property: Identifying_.and researching a potential property, negotiating with the current owner(s), assembling the site, preparation of purchase agreements and other legal documents, investigating environmental issues and their mitigation, closing on the property. To date, this process has taken over a year and a half on this project and has involved a substantial amount of PPL's time, consultant's time, and legal expenses. Structuring the project financing: Preparing and updating the project budget, identifying potential sources of funding, preparing funding applications, coordinating the requirements of the various funders, preparing documents for closing, providing for project's ultimate financial and legal structure, closing on finances, monitoring the project finances during construction, closing out the construction financing, transitioning to permanent financing, coordinating the cost certification, project income, and taxes. To date, PPL has set up and updated the budget, making major changes when the Crystal project was separated. PPL has also completed five separate funding applications. (The cost of preparation for an application by a consultant is $5,000 to 8,000. The application fees alone were almost $2,000.) Assuming that the applications PPL currently has are approved, then about 25% of this portion of the project is finished. General project management: Selecting, hiring, and coordinating the work of the architectural and engineering consultants, obtaining necessary regulatory and governmental approvals, providing for the legal and insurance requirements of the project, soliciting and incorporating neighborhood or citizen input into the project, managing the property during construction including coordination of work with residents, scheduling and coordinating all activities and consultants. The bulk of this work occurs following the set up of the project's financing. PPL has, to date, inspected the property several times, provided for schematic design of garage location, consulted with environmental engineer, and had several discussions about the project with the City. Marketing: As units become available, advertising the property in accordance with fair housing standards, selecting and screening rental applicants, insuring that income and other requirements are met, coordinating tenant referrals with the MPHNMet Council. Standard market rates for unit leasing without the additional compliance work required by the funding institutions would be a minimum of a month's rent, a total of about $7,000 on this project. Construction management: Selecting, hiring, and coordinating the work of the General Contractor, monitoring the progress of the work, authorizing and coordinating pay requests, deciding on alterations to the work, choosing materials and finishes, monitoring the project contingency, preparing the punch list, coordinating inspections of various funding entities, and finalizing unit turn over. The architect will also be involved in this process in essentially a parallel capacity. His/her fee for that involvement will be $7,500 for this project. Assumption of project risks: Bearing costs associated with a project not proceeding (as in the case of the Crystal project on 56"~), covering costs discovered during the planning and construction phases over and above the contingency (e.g. soil corrections on the Bass Lake project), covering the cost of unforeseen or estimated items (such as condemnation and relocation costs of the gas station on the Bass Lake project), allowing for typical real estate ownership dsks such as vacancy, unit damage by tenants, and the like, and, lastly, covering costs associated with project delays due to weather, nonperformance by members of the project team, etc. As PPL has mentioned before, a private developer would probably charge in the range of 15 to 20% of the total project costs. PPL's fees would total about 9%, with 10% of that being recycled back into the NCRC. Request for Action Page 6 11-26-01 FINANCING OPTIONS FOR THE CITY The Council supported the addition of a fourth MHOP unit decreasing the City's contribution by $120,000, from $338,000.00 to $218,000 as a deferred loan. Please see the following financing option decided upon by the Council at the September 17 work session: · Deferred loan of approximately $223,000. As originally proposed, this would be a no interest loan to the project with payment deferred for 30 years. $78,000 of the City's contribution would be from CDBG funds, the remaining $145,000 would be a no interest loan to the project with payment deferred for 30 years. At the end of the 30 years, the City could collect payment or opt to continue to defer payment as long as the property continued as affordable housing, thus insuring affordability in perpetuity. This is the mechanism that was used on the Bass Lake project. · Increased funding from other sources. The number of MHOP units has been increased from three to four. This has increased MPHA's share of the project by approximately $120,000. FUNDING This property is currently not located in an area where TIF funds can be expended, therefore, EDA funds would need to be used for the New Hope portion of the project in conjunction with $77,992 in CDBG funds that are programmed for multiple family rehabilitation. Another option would be to add this property to the area where TIF funds can be expended. ATTACHMENTS · NCRC Condemnation Request Letter · Livable Communties Task Force Input · Location Map · City Attomey Correspondence · Project Modification Letter, Dated 8/19/01 · Project Description · Development Proforma · Scope of Work · Site Plan · Agency Description · Livable Communities Maps · Comprehensive Plan Goals · February 28, 2000, EDA Minutes · June 25, 2001, EDA Minutes · September 17, Council Work Session Minutes · Hennepin County2001 Valuation ~313 ST RAPHAEL DR. i ~din 7610 Bass Lake Road From October 25th Livabl~"~'mmunities Meetin~ · Be careful with the visual effects-of garages. · No due to cost and current planning. Would like to fit this in to the other development. N.H. budget and school referendum will increase taxes. There is a willing buyer that doesn't require taxpayer funds. · I think it was a good idea, go for it. · If it stays on tax roll, go for it. Nice looking building. · As long as the property pays taxes and keeps it up, will be fine. · Move forward. · I honestly didn't have time to drive by. My recollection of it is that it is old enough I would scratch it and use it for redevelopment. · Property needs improved landscaping, total makeover, and parking lot needs work, add garages to the back of lot. · I approve of proceeding ahead with PPL development. · Approve the upgrade plan. · Replace it. · Move forward, a good collaborative opportunity for the City. · Let PPL proceed, · Renovate it; rent needs to be higher to get better families. · Good project as planned. · .Replace it. · Good property for PPL to redo. · It needs some upgrading. · I think it is worth investing into, garages done right would make sense. · It needs to be upgraded, seems to be rundown. · Metro/State/County revenue still is tax money we strive like hell to create. November 1~, 2001 Mr. Dan Donahue City Manager City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Ave. N New Hope, MN. 55428 Re: 7610 Bass Lake Rd Dear Mr. Donahue, I am writing this letter to updaze you on the current stares of this project, and to solicit your support in the usc of the City's powers of emlnent dflmni~ to facilitate this project. As you know we have made substantial progress on this project over the last two years. Since the City of New Hope identified this property as a top priority for revitalization, we have worked diligently to obml- fimding ~ negotiate an acceptable acquisition price with the currant owners. As you are aware, the ~ owners have shown no interes~ in ~rking with the city on impmvi~ their propm~, despite generous financ~ terms offered by the city. Together, we have put together a viable financing approach which includes a $223,000 from the City of New Hope, $350,000 of Henuepin County HOME funds, and four MHOP units amounting to a $469,000 investment. The City's commitment is genem~m, and will not increase as a pan of ~ ptmject. Our project includes the implemenUttion of a playground at your request. The project has included n slgnificnnt financial commitment to relocation, which is adequate to meet the projects needs. Unforttmately, despite ved~l commltmerrts fi'om thc owners, we now find ourselves unable to complete an acceptable ~ agreemen~ We are therefore request, lng tha~ thc City Council approve the use of eminent domain. We have consulted with your City attorney, and he is confide~ thc~ is a legal basis to show blight and a clear public purpose for this action It is also clear that this action in no way affects our obligations and costs for relocation, since those requirements are tied to the finan~. As I have already notx~l, this cost is funded in our current budget. If we are ~mshle to proceed with acquisition at this time, the likely outcome is the loss of finnncing and the collapse of the projext. New Hope will have to continue to struggle with a blighting influence in the center of an important strategic redevelopment area for the city. f',Amn~nlty C~rlmmltsm P. O. P~x 281&9 *Rel,,ildlng nei~lhhorhood$ one ho.se at a time.' Please feel free to contact me ~t (612) 940-2785 if you require additional inform~on, Exccu~ve Director Northwest Cor~munity Rcvit~lizstion Corporation 2 ,/ BASS LAKE PROJECT Development Proforma USES ,-- Per Unit IAcquisition 1.00 rl 1 Unit Apartment Building 470,000 42,7271 Subtotal 470,000 42,727 Construction 2.00 Demo and Lead Mitigation 25,000 2,273 2.01= Rehab 11 Units 350,000 31,818 2.02 New Garages 120,000 10,909 2.03 Site Improvements 55,000 5,000 2.04 Playground Equipment 10,000 909 2.05 Contingency 50,000 4,5451 I Subtotal 610,000 55,455 Soft Costs 3.01 Architectural 30,000 2,727 3.02 Environmental 3,000 273 3.03 Legal 15,000 1,364 3.04 Cost Certification 3,000 273 3.05i Survey and Plat 3.000 273 3.06 Utilities and Insurance 2,000 182 3.07 Taxes 10,000 909 3.08 Closing Costs 3,000 273 3.09 Interim Holding Costs 7,000 636 3.10 Relocation 35,000 3,182 3.11 Marketing and Lease Up 1,000, 91 3.12 Construction Interest 5,000 455 3.13 Loan Origination Fee 1,300 118 3.14 Developer Fee 95,000 8,636 3.15 CHDO Fee/Processing Agent 15,000 1,364 3.16i Reserves - MHOP 15,000 1,364 Subtotal 243,300 22,118 4.00 ITotal Development Cost 1,323,300 120,300 SOURCES 5.00 1st Mortgage 126,3001 11,482 5.01 New Hope EDA 223,000 20,273 5.02 Hennepin Co. HOME 350,000 31,818 5.03 Hennepin Co. AHIF 150,000 13,636 5.041 M HOP 469,000 42,636 5.05 Playground Donations 5,000 455 Total Sources 1,323,300 120,300 Prepared by: PPL, November 16, 2001 ~j'~O Livable Communities Task Force November 15, 2001 1. Recap of October 25 Meeting Community Development Director Kirk McDonald opened the meeting at 5:10 p.m. and explained what the Task Force would be accomplishing at this meeting. Aimie Gourlay, consultant, stated that at the last meeting the task force heard presentations on New Hope's demographics, home values, transportation issues, and crime in the study area. The task force broke into small groups to develop a vision for the Hosterman site, including specific housing types, businesses, parks, roads, and other features on a map of the site. The groups shared and discussed their ideas at the end of the meeting. Gourlay asked the group whether it would be agreeable to meet one more time this year and the consensus was to meet on December 6. Additional meeting dates were scheduled for January 10 and February 7. 2. Presentation of Hosterman Concepts Alan Brixius, Planning Consultant, reminded the task force of the planning principles and that all elements should be integrated into the plans. He reviewed each of the concept plans with the task force. Common elements in each of the plans included medium and/or high-density townhomes, some upscale with underground parking, a commercial area, green space/walkway, expansion of Begin Park area, aligning streets along Bass Lake Road, and a bus stop. Brixius stated that the task force should keep in mind that there would be costs associated with the land acquisition, relocation of businesses and families, and demolition of buildings. Several questions arose after reviewing the concept plans that included the number of bedrooms in the townhomes and size of families, impact on the school district with additional enrollment, and what happens to the concept plans if the school does not sell either site. The task force was in favor of some single family homes, apartment above the commercial sites, no through traffic, and a minimum of asphalt. 3. Small Group Meetings and Discussion The Task Force broke into small groups for vision development. Each group was given an area map of the area west of the golf course, which is 3.63 acres in size. Each group was to draw on the map their vision of the area, including housing, green space, roads, etc. These ideas were shared at the end of the meeting, and most groups had similar ideas for either townhomes or condos, green area, a pond, plantings, aligning roadways, and possible access to the golf course through the development. Prior to the next meeting, the Planning Consultant will compile several concept plans incorporating the Task Force's ideas. 4. Reports to Large Group The group discussed the golf course entrance and how safety could be improved. Gourlay noted that there were several questions for staff to answer at a later meeting, including park area per resident, family size in the proposed residential units, and whether the school district could manage the increased enrollment. 5. Adjournment The Livable Communities Task Force meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Pamela Sylvester, Recording Secretary Bulletin # 2 PROJECT BULLETIN Livable Communities Grant Study Area The purpose of this bulletin is to inform residents living in the Livable Communities study area of the ongoing activities of the Livable Communities Task Force. The Livable Communities study area extends in approximately a half-mile radius from the intersection of Bass Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue. The area is comprised of 480 acres of residential neighborhoods, commercial businesses, and the Hosterman school site. On March 12, 2001, the New Hope City Council accepted a Livable Communities Demonstration Program Grant from the Metropolitan Council Local Planning Assistance Program to help fund a study of redevelopment opportunities in the Bass Lake Road/Winnetka Avenue area. In late June, the City Council approved a specific work plan for the study prepared by the City's planning consultant, Northwest Associated Consultants. In August, the Council authorized creation of a volunteer citizen task force that includes about 60 residents, business owners, members of the New Hope Planning and Human Rights commissions and Personnel Board, and representatives of the city of Crystal and School District 281. Overview On September 13, 2001, the Livable Communities Task Force met, for the first time, to learn about the grant and the goals of the study. This was an introductory meeting that included information about the Livable Communities Grant, what other cities have done as the result of similar studies, the background of the project, and maps of the study area and the city. Since the initial meeting, the task force has met three times. On October 3, participants discussed task force ground rules, learned about the Metropolitan Council's "Smart Growth" principles, and broke into small groups to begin developing their vision for the study area and identify strengths and weaknesses of the area. The group's initial vision included: a community gathering place, a variety of housing types, destination businesses (restaurants) and professional offices, open space and trails, and specific sites for redevelopment. The Smart Growth principles the task force will keep in mind throughout the study include: involving the public in the planning process, providing a mix of life cycle and affordable housing options, locating housing near job centers, and creating livable communities with higher density residential land uses, a complimentary mix of uses, transit and pedestrian friendly design, in-place infrastructure, and preservation of open space. 11/27/01 Livable Communities Grant Study Area On October 25, the task force heard prese_ntatio~s on New Hope's demographics, on home values in the area (the average estimated market value of homes in the.area is $134,250), on transportation issues in New Hope and the study area, and on cdme in the study area. The task force broke into several small groups to develop a vision for the Hosterman site, from Zealand to Winnetka and from 54th to Bass Lake Road. Each group developed its vision for the Hosterman site by locating specific housing types, businesses, parks, roads and other features on a map of the site. The small groups shared and discussed their ideas at the end of the meeting. On November 15, the task force reviewed five concept plans for the Hosterman site that had been prepared by the city's planning consultant based upon the small group concepts completed the previous meeting. The task force consensus was that all five concept plans would be appropriate to review with potential developers. The group then broke into small groups to perform a similar visioning exercise for a small site north of Bass Lake Road and just west of the golf course. Once again, the small groups joined together to share and discuss their ideas at the end of the meeting. Upcoming Livable Communities Task Force meetings are scheduled for December 6, January 10 and February 7. After the task force has completed its initial visioning process for targeted redevelopment sites within the study area, and the planning consultant has prepared concept plans for each of the sites, the city will take several steps to increase public participation in the study. First, the city will meet with key property owners within the study area to determine their interest in cooperating with or participating in redevelopment activities. Next, the city will meet with several developers to assess interest in and viability of the concept plans. Finally, city staff and the city's planning consultant will host a series of neighborhood meetings to present the redevelopment concepts to interested residents and get feedback. These meetings will hopefully begin in the early spring, depending on the progress of the task force. City Contacts If you have questions or comments regarding the project, please contact Erin Seeman, Community Development Intern, at 763-531-5196 or Kirk McDonald, Community Development Director, at 763-531-5119. Agendas, synopses and handouts for each Livable Communities Task Force meeting is available on the city's website at www.ci.new-hope.mn.us. The City appreciates the cooperation of all residents and businesses in the area that may be impacted by this redevelopment project. Additional bulletins will be sent to you periodically throughout the study. City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 November 24, 2001 Dan Donahue, City Manager City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 554284898 Dear Mr. Donahue, I am enclosing the Commission Re-appointment Response and I am sorry to say I will be declining re-appointment. At this time I feel the need to concentrate my attention on my upcoming position on the Robbinsdale School Board. It is also my intemion that my stepping down will allow for greater involvement fi.om interested citizens. I value my time spem on the Planning Commission and appreciate the opportunity to have served. I look forward to cominuing and promoting the relationship between the City of New Hope and the Robbinsdale School Board. Sincerely, Patsy Green Enc. Cc: Peter Enek, Mayor Kirk McDonald, Director of Community Development