Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1961 Planning
NEW HOPE ~FiNG CO~SSiON ~200 Nevada Avenue North February 9~ 1961 8:00 PoMe Members Present: ~chaletz; Kelso$ Krueger; Kuebelbeck; Tr~cker; Brusseau; Sundt. Members Absent: Member of Village Council; and Sicora. The minutes of January 19, 1961 were read by the chairman and the corrections are as follows: 1) The name Mr° Ray Peterson now reads: ~4r. Roy Peterson"o 2) The word trai!or which was used throughout the minutes now reads "trailer" o 3) Paragraph ~, page 1, line & to be stricken fr°m the records. ~) Page 1, paragraph 7, line 5 no~= reads -furthermore no one askes this question when a new house is be~!ng built"° 5) Paragraph 9, page 1 ~ the word 'I" now reads, '~, Sherman Hasbrouck" · 6) Page 2, paragraph !~ no%- read.% ?'L~ recognition of the facts presented by proponents of the tr~ier court and the ~ecommendations of the Village Planner, zotion by Trucker, .seconded by Sicora, to recommend to tko Oounoi!~ to reject at the present time ~hich would be in the best interest of the Village of New Hope, the. ~proposed tr~.~r '~°urt f~r- lack of .evidence.". 'Motion by Michalets, seconded by Trucker, to accept thc minutes as corrected. Motion car~sd. · ., ~. Roy Peterson and Mr. Black appeared before thc ~mimsion with addition~ information in reg~-d to the ?reposed Trailer Court. The ~dditional evidence was of two pages, headed as ~.~ibit A, which was discussed and placed on fileo Mr. Roy Petersen stated he ~s ~m agr~nent to pay in cash the ,~nount of $139,780 the d~v the trailer ¢o~ officially oponed~ $90,O00ooOfor se~er~ connection charge. $i~$~99,780.~ fo~~ ~ater connection charge. ,7~0.00 The annual charges thereafter would be: (estimated) $30.00 per trailer valued at $6,000.00 (estimated) : 5.00 real estate tax per lot 3.25 Registration Fee per trailer The Chair asked Mr. Peterson if he had any additional mvidence; Mr. Petereon said, "that this constituted ail of the additional evidence that he had to present at this time." Motion by Brusseau, seconded by Truck¢~, the additional evidence presented ~as insufficient to warrant a change in the previous decision of Jan,~y 19, 1961. Trucker; Brusseau; Kelso; S~ndt~ Erueger voting yes. Michaletz; Kuebelbeck abstaining to vote. ~tion carried. New Hop ~anningCommission Page2 The Plaunlng Report from Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. was read and referred to the Village Planner. The proposed locations for outsid~ storage of tire racks was received and viewed without recommendation and referred to the Building Inspector and to notify the Village Police Officer. Motion byMichaletz, s~condedby T~.ucker~ to ncauinate Joseph Kelso to serve for one year as Chairman ofthe Village Piar~tngCommission. No other nmninations, all votlr~ ye~ ~tion carried. Motion by M~chaletz, seconded by Truc!:er, to nominate Gay Brussea-.~ for one year to serve o~s Vice Chairman. No other nominations, all voting yes° Motion carried. Motion byMichaletz, seconded by Truckc~, to no~.Inate Iv~uKrueger to serve for one year as Planning Commission Sec~'etary. No other nominations, all voting yes. Motion carried. Motion by Bru~seau, seconded by Sundt, t~ adJourn~ Motion carried. Next regular meeting Th.~u~sd~y~ Feb~aAu 23, 1961. Secretary Ivan R. Xrueger, Sro NEW HOPE PLANNING CO~U~SION ~200 Nevada Avenue North January 19, 1961 8:00 P.M. Members Present: Kelso, Sicora, B~sseau, Krueger, Sundt, Hichaletz, lit. Hasbrouck, Iix'. Bob Moffitt, Trucker. Members Absent: Member of Village Co~ncil and Kuebelbeck. The minutes of Thursday, January 5, 1961 were read (correction) page 1, paragraph 5, sentence 1 now reads, "The minimum length of trailor which would be permitted in the trailor court would be 38 feet in length.,, The minutes stood a~ corrected. Mr. Ray Peterson s~d Mr. Black and ~S~s. Ms, ion Thompson representing the Proposed Trailor Park appeared before the Planning C~mmission, with material cmapiled by the Minnesota Mobile Home Association which was read and placed on file. : ~. Tr~er was asked to giTM his report. Mr. Newal!, the Business A¢~minist~rator for District 281 stated the budget set per child is 315.O0 dollars for 1961, this does not include transportaion nor the funded debtedness. Mr. Trucker's report on trailor valuation is ham]led by the State at the time of licensing. Which~em~$ the taxes are collected in advance. A 1961 trailor tax valuation is 10% of the p~zrchase price; 1960 trailor ~%; 1959 - 7½%; and 1958 - 6~% ect.; which meama the deterioration of a trailor is great. A report from NewBrighton, Mr. Gould states the State paid$3,~03.62 for the calendar year of 1960 for 200 trailorswhich consisted of 153 trailors in parks$ 20 lived in for Business; ~ud 25 privately owned, which means $17.00 per trai!or was paid to the village. ~So Marion Thampson of the ~tate ~bile Trailor Association, gave this report: from l,075 Mobile Hemes all of which are in parks, children in grades 1-8 amount to 161; children in grades 9-i2 amount to 39 and 110 persons attending co~_leges. This su~eywas taken November of 1959. Mrs. Thompson stated that 85% of all the Mobile Hemes being b~ilt today are 40 feet and over, some are as high as 70 feet In length, with crank out 9 x 9 foot rooms. Mr. Hasbrouck, the Village Planner, pointed out aS this point, tralior parks or courts as we know them today are the ne~t thLug to a Junk yard, but there are trailor courts in the suburbs today that are w~l! kept, modern, and very attractive. The point about the n~mber o:~ children which~uld attend scho~ls$ no one aekes this question when a new house is being built. A modern well kept t:.'ailor court today brec~<s about even when it c~mes to taxes. The question which should be asked is what ~ffect will this have upon the azmextng parts of Plymouth and the west boundary as it stands is a ~traight !ineo I object to this proposal because off the eff~ct to Plymouth and ~.~o the we~t boundary lin~ ~f the Vil!~ of New Hope~ it is ~ straight l~n~ which ~houid b~ Page 2 In be~ogniti°n of the facts presented by proponents of the trailer court and the recmm~edgtions of the Village Planner, motion byTrucker, seconded by SicOra to recommend to the Council to reject at the present time for lack of ~widence the proposed traiior court, which would be iht he best interest of the Village of New Hope. F~ueger, ~chs~.etz, Rrusseau, Sicora; Sundt voted in f~l~r oft he motion. None opposed. Motion carried. The ~ Cemmis~.~:!-on rec~ends that ~e Council inst~mct the Village Clerk ~ ~ meetings and agendas; to direct his asm~stau'bs to mail tl~e m~ut~s of cornel! public notices oct. to the Village Pi~nuer ~d the members of the New Hope Planning C~m~saion. Nr. Joseph J. Kelso (chairm~u) 5~J~+ Sumter Avenue N, rth ~tr. John M. Sicora &732 Utah Avenue North Mr. P~bert Euebelbeck 5~12 Wir~etka Avenue Mr. Ivan Krueger, Sr. 5306 Porte, sylvania Avenue North Leonard Michal~tz ~000 County Road ~lS ~.~. ~ Brusseau 5313 Rhode Island Avenue North Eugene Sundt ~?S~ lumen Avenue North Mr. Don Trucker /~708 Virginia Avenue Nortl~ Mr* Ralph Kirchoff (alternate) ~9~ Virginia Avenue North Mr, Sherman Hasb~ouek 2388 Univereitv Avenue ~t. Paul 34, ~:J_':~nesota Nm. Melvin Ohman (alternate) ~021 Neva~ Avenue North Moti°n by Michaletz~ seconded by Trucker, to adjourn. Motion carried; Secrete~y~ Ivan Re K~aeger, '~ent~ ~ ~er, Kelso, Kuebelbeck, Michaletz, Sundt~ ~sent: ~i ~, Ohm~u, Brusseau. Mimates of December 22, 1960 were read ~ the Ohairmm% and ~tood ~s read~ Mr. Bla~k ~ :~r of the zoning and plamT~g e~mmission in the village of Edina, and ~.'~:~ ~oy Peterson of X-Oel Properties, I~Oo presented a proposed Tr~ilor and :~ ~%rial Park. ple~'~ and speciflc~%~ ~ further · ~ti8tics ~ maintm~,~, Van Auken be sho~n ::::: ~gned f:'~ the P~-~mSag Cc:~mission~ Hoti~ by Krueger and seconded ~y Sundt to recommend to the Mr. D~n Trucker on the Village P~.~mim~ Commission. ~.~t!ou ~,.~ . Mmtion by Mich~letz, seconded by Yuebelbeck to adJo~x?a. M~tion c~:':::::o Next regular, meetiug, Thursday, January 19: 1961o ~ecretary Ivan R. Krueger, 8to NEW HOPE PLAN~NG CO~ffSSION ~200 Nevada Avenue North February23, 1961 8:00 P.M. Members Present: O~mu; Krueger; Kelso; ¥~chaletz; Kuebelbeck; Rrusseau; SicQr~$ Trucker; Hasbrouck, Members ASsent: Sundt. Letter from J~mes H, Bartlett was read and placed on file, The division of the Bartlett property was discussed. Motion by Brusseau, second'sd by~c~'~s&etz, to recommend to the council ~.~ 7, Block 8, of Howland Heights. to accept the division of lots 6 ~ Ail voting i~ favor. Motion carried, In the course of the discussion about. 'the industrial zo~ning in Howland Heights~ ~. Bartlett stated hew as ~muaware of the rezonir~ of the industrial property in Howland Heights, ¥~ George Robinson presented the Pla~ of ~dl~ud Terrace. A discussion was held on lots 22 th~a 28~ block ~ fo~" mu!t~ple dwelling u~e. ~ commission adviSe~'~ ~. Robinson if he desired to use these lots for multiples they~'o-.'~ have to meet v~th tb.~ Platting Ord~ce~ It was then'stated by Mr.....~bineon that he desi~ed' to plat or~y lots i~ thr~ 28, Block ~at'this time, The commission informed ~M. RobLuson ~e to the n~nber Of ~lots in the plat, the mi~m~z~ number of lots that he ~ould 'plat would be 2~. Motion by E~ueg~ secondod by Sisera, to r~fer the Plat to the Village Pl~r,~ Ail voting in favor, Motion carried.. Mr~ and Mrs. Don Snetsinger presented ap!~:~ of their property, Their desire is to split the lot to obtain another bui!dable lot due to a hardship, ~e to the discussion the Snetsingers decided to work out their problem and present their Plat ~t a later date. ~. Ed CofFmanpresented a re~.~est for rezoningof a sLugle lot to be used for a four-plex. It was pointed out to Mr. Ceffmanthat the minimum ~ize lot that could be u~ed for a four-plexis !5~000 square feet. ~, Coffm~n stated he wa~ under the impression that the requirement for a ~o~-pzex~as2,800 sq~re feet per unit. ~ commission recommends to reftuud the fee for rezoning, the amount of ~ich is $25.00~ due to misinfoxmmtion. Receipt No~ ~00~, ~,M. Carl Carlson, 5001 - >h Avenue North appeared before the Planning ¢o~mission to voice hi~ obJection~ aud op~mions Lu regards to the industrial prope~tynorth of >h Avenue No~%h aud ~i~metka Average North, Page 2 Mr. Carlson stated he was Lu f~vor of the recommended multiple zoning along ~gth Avenue North ~nd he also stated he was not in favor of extending the industrial zone any further south. Mr. Hasbrouck, the Village Pla~uer, pointed out the industrial property in ~mesti°n could be handled in varin~ ways, ~d he would make a proposed zoning layout of the properties ~ud mail them to the members of the Planning C~,mtssion for study, prior to 'the next regular meeting. The minutes of Febr~ma~y 9, 1961 were read and the corrections are as follows: Page 1, p~E~agraph 2, Item (6) now reads, -to recommend that the council reject the re~ueat of _Ray Peterson for a proposed trailer court since the evidence presented does not show that the trailer court ~m~ld be in the best interest of the Village of New Hope at this time. Minutes stood as corrected. Motion by Xrueger, ceconded by Kuebelbeck to adjourn. ~Mtio~ carried. Next regular meeting Thureda~ ~ch 9, 1961 at 8:00 P.M. Secretary Ivan Ro Er~g~r NEW HOPE PLANNI5~ Cf~R'IiSSION ,d200 Nevada Avenue North March 9, 1961 8:00 P.Mo Members Present: ~ch~letz, T~cker~ Su~dt, ~eger, Kelso, Brusseau~ Sicora. Members Absent: Member of Council ~nd ?,h~eb~lbeck. Th~ minutes of February 23, 1961~ ~,e~ re~d ~d th~ stood as read. ~ ~d ~s. Snet~er ~ppc~ed before th~ Co~sion ~th their Plat. ~e Oo~ssion ~scd th~ that if they ~.sh to ~de the pro~y, the lot m~t face on a de~.cated stroot ~ich they m~t de.cate. M~. Peterson c~e before the C~ission ~th md~tion~ ~or~tion pret~ to the proD~sed tra~sr A t~ m~u c~ittce consisti~g of ~mcksr, B~se~u, ~,~ch~etz ~ sat up to stu~ ~l the ~or~tion thus rec~iv~ fr~ ~. Peterson pret~g to the tr~er co~t~ A letter fr~ the S~ L~ue ~!z~oad ~ted Feb~ 28~ 1961~ Lu reference to the zoning ~fecting pro~y in the ~c~ty of ~9th ~venue ~d W~etka Avenuo ~$ ?~d ~ud plac~d on file. A letter from tho Vill~ Attornoy dated ~ch 8, 1961~ f~e No~ ~ read ~d placed on file. ~ J~es ~tlett ~p~ed befo~ the Pla~ C~ssion ~d requested rszo~ of ~t of ~s pro~y to !:~d~tri~ ~md the b~ce to m~tiple ~ll~. ~e to &iscussiou the co. isa!on referred to a ~tition from ~. AtP~on ~d J~? 6~ 1960 p~t~ to m~ti~e ~~ ~e of the ~.tlett pro~rty. ~. ~lett ~ ~o~ed of leg~ p~c~d~es r~d ~d ~ ~sed to ~e his ~tition ~ the ~e 0~pion s~ppea~cd ~fo~ the C~s~i~n ~th ~. floor pl~ of a mo~fied ~plit level h~e ~e x 36~ ~s contention ~s that the h~e had s~ feet of ~ ~e~ continual ~ the two l~vele one of ~ch below ~e surface of the g~d~ ~e Pl~ Co~.ssion ~fo~ed ~. C~p!on that the deflation of b~ent ~A ~oor partly benes.th the ~t~face of the gro~d but ~st~shed fr~ ~ cedar by b~ ?~l]. lighted ~d fitted for ling Black's l~w ~=tiona~ 3rd Ad.rich Motion ~ Sicorm, seconded ~ B~seau to rec~end to the Co~c~ to reject the ~oor pl~ of ~ ~ion because it does not meet ~th the V~l~e or~auce~ $~one op~sed. Motion c~rled~ HOPE PLANNING C01~iSSION Page 2 Mr. George Robinson appeared before the Pl~:.~uing Commission in reference to a recommendation of the Plat of Midland Terrace. Being there '~as no report from the Village Platter there was no recommendation given at this moeting~ Discumsion wa~ held on th~o method in ~tich n~gotiations would be h~dled in reference to the ¢~st boundsm~y of New Hope. Mo~_~on by Sfcora, seconded by ~ch~etz~ to reco~mend that the Chairman be a~thorized to contact the Cl~frman of the Planning O~mztssion of the V~Lltage of Orystal on the feasibility of establishing a Joint committe to stu~ our mutual boui~dary problems. None opposed. Motion carried. Reco~aendation to the Village Oler![ that the minutes of the Planning Commission be ~ item of continuJ~.g re. cord on the Village Couucil a~enda. The PlanniDq~ Commissic~ r~quests that the Council instate that one of their members attend Pl~ing Cemmio~.~ion meetings. ~fotion by Krueger, seconded by Brusse~:a, to e~l~o~rn. Secretary, Ivan R. Erueger, Sr. Next regular meeti~ Thursday, ~rch 23, 1961, S:00 P.M. ~ HOPE PI:AI~NG CO~ISSION ~2C~ Nevada Avenue North March 23, 1961 8:00 P.M. l~r~be, rs present: Michaletz, Kr~o~or~ Trucker, Kelso, Sicora, Kuebelbeck, ~ud Hasbrouck · Members absent: Sundt, B~seau and ~mber of Council. Minutes of March 9 ~ 1961 were read ~.~..... 'the b~halrm~ ~ud the minutes stood as read, discussion w~s held on the bo~ud.~-~t~ ~egotiatLug committee° Motion by Kuebelbeck, seconded by .Sic~'a to recommend that member C~y Brusseau contact th~ O~st~ ~:~:g C~szion to ~t~t bo~d~ ~egotiatio~. ~:~r.~ op~s~d. Motion c~rried. The r~rt fr~ T~.~k~r~ ~ssoau ~:~d l~:h~letz conceding the ~o~sed Tr~ler Co~t was read ~d placed on filc~ Motion by Sico~a~ ~econd~d by ~.eger to accept the c~ttee~s report and recom~.~end to the Co'~mc!l to reject tL~ l~o~sed Tr~ler Co~ of ~, Pe~erson~ Vot~ Y~s~ K~egc~ Sico~m~ Kelso~ ~ch~tz, T~cker. Abst~g to vote~ Kuobc!beck. Motion c~_ed. Xr, Levy appeared before tho Pla~Ing C~.~.[~asion w'Ith the Proposed Plat of M~dlaud Shopping Cent~.' ~:ich -.~ould be located at ,~'innetka Avenue and Medic~Jae L~:~ Eoado A discussion ~s held on the Proposed Pl~t. The fXeor pl~s of the shops w~uld contain .53,760 sq~re fo~to ~n~ shops would be faced with yellow ¢ia~ brick, The mtrom~ dr~in~g~ ~as ~ii~cussed at ler~th~ The opening date is August ~ 1961. ~otion by 'Trucker, ~econded by Sicora, to recommend to the Council to accept the Proposed Plat of Midland Shopping Center subject to the desirability of the Ce~mission t° have the Villag~ Engineer consider the south drainage area- drain to the south, r~ther tha~ t~ the east. None oppo~edo Motion ear~edo The Industrial Zone north of ~9~ Avenue North and east of Winnetka Avenue was discussed. Mr. Hasbrouck gav~ his report ~.%ud i~ was placed on file~ Mro S, M. ~$~, the A~ist~t Indu~tria~ C~siouer of the Soo L~e ~l~ad ~tated that th~e ~ no f~d pl~ for ~e ~a ~d he ~ther · ~ted he ~s not ~ ~a~r of ~te~ ~d~t~ Zor~ng~ ~ ~n~ ~' ;?'~ M~ N. ~d S~ R~"oa~ fel~ that the st~p ~d~tri~ m~nc aio~ the ~t sido of thc X,, H, ~:'~ $~ m~th of ~,gth ~%venu~ ~d ~ ~ ~cti.~%¥ mud it ~d bs ~ asset to. the ~ag~ Page. 2 ~'r. Hooney stated he was in a squeeze -with the railroad because they wo~d ,..or make a ,~ ¢ommitm~nt to mak~ a spur available for his property° ?~o Rooney further stated he ws~s ,~ .... ing to leave the zone stand if he got the c~tm~nt for the spu::' and a definite plan for the area~ Mr~ Glen Kuch ~tated t~.~_<~.b the ~:-' ~lo:~g the M~ No and $ Rail~omd should stand am is for a w~:ile to see ~*nzt could be wo~ced out~ ~ Booney th~ ~sked ~r~ ~os~: for . ::f~:::.te p~ ~:d ~ ~t~ a trac!~e e~:ent to .adioS: his prop':::-~:~~ so bis property cmld ~ plated ~d ~ke it possible for h~: to got f:::-:~c~ Then ~t t~:.s point Mr~ :~<>~-~ ~'~ed t:: :~mrk out m ::l~ by ~ich ~ Rooney ~:9_d ~.ats the u~e of his prope:~y:~ Motion ~ the cha/. :~o d~:fer s ,~.o.~.~..:on :...~l zh:~.~,o~v~ Ap~l 20~ 1961~ of ~y~l O~ks 1st Ad~tlon~ Motion by Kruoger~ sec,~=~,,. ~ Ee~!so~ to ~: jo~z~ No:~ op~med. Motion Secretary', Ivs~ Ro Y~eger, Sro 1961 M~b~rs preserd;~ Kuebeli?oeck~ If~.Icger~ 8i.cors.~ Kc!so, S~dt~ T~cker~ ~c .... ~e for the !~b~c ~~ on the Propos~d Plat of i~ 0~ Lddi<C..~:n (Boone and 36th irene) pa~ ~ o~ ~he N~ ~ of th~ N~E, ~d ~,~;- of the }~M, ~ of N,E, ~ anu th~ N~ o~ ,;h~ N,E,f; of Secti3n 19~ To~.ssship 1.18: P~ge ~ l?xmepl.n Century, }~ssota was read ~lld placed on fi!c, ~ie Play, ming Conoldere~tic~Is :~Id F. ecoic ::n~tions fr~ Sheen Hasbrouck ~m ro~d grid pl.ac~d f::n A ~isc'~Ioi% wes held on 'Nie ~e~s.~,n .~ Boone A~nue ~outh of }6th ~ch wo-uid ~ the p!att~r ~ p~titlon for the ~prov~ents ~ the st~et · ~ cc~nded I~:~e,~er to z~c~nd %o the C~ic~ to rec~d t~ tbs C.:..cii to accept the P::,:?sed ~at of EeY~ Oaks 1st Ad~tion subject to the rece~en~td.on ~r .":,he V~e ~eer ~d the V~e ~.~r, Nonm op~sed~ ~.:~tion caa:?ied~ ~re ~e no c~g:i+~uts ~de ~ the ~.gr~'!~ C~ssion on the abutt~ p~y to the e~st of Rey~ O~s !st Ad~m::.ione Notices of P~li= Hear~:g of the Replat ef H~d~ ~e 1st ~d ~d ld~tion ~ road ~d placed on Head~w I~e 2u:d Additio:~. ~ Th~ ~$t ~7,7 fe~t of the S,E,~ of the of Section 6, T~m~ms~p ~8~ ~ge 21'~ H~$p~ Oo~ty ~d the West H~p~ Co~mtY~ ~uesota ]~:~Z- nerth of Co~ty ~d No~ lO ~d ~lot 1, M~md~' ~c lmt Ad~tion - ~ts 1~20~ ~ock 15 ~%m ]4-~ Block 25 ~ts mud 16, Block 3 ~d ~tlot I of l~d~ ~s Heights l~t Ad~tion, ~s repoz%~ fi~ B~ W. Bo~e ~le No~ 5936 ~'¢~ ~d ~d placed ~ ~!e~ t~-~,~ report ~. the V~e ~er ~ read ~d ~ac~ ~ A ].~b~ ~~ion ~s b~ld on the pro~ ~plmtt~- At the r~est of I'~-~ H~ the ~lgtc He~ ~s a~o~ed to ~e it' Msmbers p~sent~ Sicorg~ Brus~eau~ l~ichaletz~ K~%:eger~ X~l~aii-~ck~ T~eker~ Mem~rs ~bsent~ M~m~r of ~c Ce~cll ~ga~.~ Kel~ Hasb~uck~ The ~utes of ¥~h 23~ 196! ~'~ ~ad ~ud ~e cor~e~ons ~ as Page ~ pa~graph l~ ~e J~ the ~ zen~ now~ ~s zo~. Also on page pa~g~ph 3, 1~ 2, ~e wo~ p!at~d n~ ~ads pl~d~ The ~u~s s~ as cor~cted. ~utes of M~rch 27~ 1961 ~ ~.'.d ~d tha co~tioxs ~ as fo~ows; ~e ~ the 5~, pa~graph. The Pubic He~ Notice for a ~ec~l U~ Pe~t ~ cons~ct one~ eleven ~t apa~nt on ~ts 13 ~d 14~ ~Tden K~e ~d Ad~tton was ~ad ~ Vice- c~~ ~sseau ~d ple. ced on f~.~ Mr. Jo~ Neide~.er ~p~seD~3.ug ~l~n E~e ?~d Ad¢&tion was p~nt, and ~e ~]~ %~ conta~ ~x, t%o ~C~-oom-~t= ~md fi~ one !:e~oz~ With ~:e ~ques~d n~r of ~.ts ~e ~q,. ft, ~ of th~ ~ot.~ s~.ll be ~..,~ sq. ft~ L~ts 13 ~d !4 combf~ed con~i:':~: or~ 24,9~ sq~ ft, }~. Nei~r~.er ~e~ Hasbrouck~s pl~iD~ conside~tionm ~ r~ad ~d p~c~d on fi?:~ Motion ~ ~cC~l~tz ~cond~d ~- Stcora ~ reco~nd ~ ~20 Covnci! ~ i~sue a ~ecial ~ ~t for ' "~ ~ 14, Golden Rula ~d ~x~.d~.tion for ~u ~!evan ~it ~u~ip~ d%~l~g %~Ith six t~ %edrco~ units ~x~d fi~o o~o ~oom VotL~ Yes: Si~ra~ ~_chalatz. . ~t~n did not Motion ~ Kueh~i~ck~ seconded '~ Hich:s.!otz to rceo~>end to %he Coc~_cil +~ a ~eclal u~s pe~t fc-r lots i. 5 snd. i4~ ~!den Ru!s kd Id~tion ii' ~e Vot~s No: Trucker~ S~dt, Motion A1 W~ske f~m F ~d A ~aity cane ~fors ~e Co~3,s~on ~'~ ~ ~a! pe~~ ~ +d%~ Snct~ugsr propo?tY~ As a ~t~r of fo~ ~d prooed~ ~ P~~ Co~ssion p~fers ~e Pubic He~g Not!~s pe~-~ ~ ~ Combine_on ~]1 ~ sen'~: out ~d pub~d ~bseq~nt ~ a ~est by the Pl~'P~g ~tion ~ ~c~etz, ~nded ~ S~cndt ~ ~jo~.~ 2.bt~n Ne~ ~g~ ~et~g Th~y~ Ap~! 20~ 1961 at 8:00 P. M. ~c~y, Iv~ R. ~eger, Sr~ HOPE PLA!~Ik~ 00~LSSION ~200 Nevada A~;snue North April 20~ 1961 8:00 Members Present 2~embers Absent: Ke!so~ Sicora, Kuebelbeck, Trucker, Sundt, Krueger, Council member Collier., Brusseau~ Mickaletz. Notice of ~mblic Hearing to consider the application of F and R Realty for a special use permit to construct multiple dwelli~gs on the Russell Young and Nellie Mandry property as described as follows: that part of the east ~01o13 feet of the South 563.9 feet of the NeE. ~ of the N.W. ~ of Section 5, T.WoP. 118~ Range 21 lying west of Registered Land Survey No. 326° The Village Platters report w~s r~d and placed on file. The cc~mon drive s~ggested by the Village Pleaser for the apartment adjacent to Louisiana Avenue w~s discussed° .~r° Rooney stated that the buil~ings would have individual owners, so the camuon ~rtvmeay to the par~ing area in the rear of each apartment could be hand.led with a -~ide drivewa~ with ~u island on the lot llne if we so wished. The ~.'ssistant Village Pl~nuer recom~ended that the screening, to be effeetive~ should Be a five foot solid board fence with a hedge on tb~ side to the adjoining property or street to scr~u the fence as shown on the pro:..',~ed plat. Comm~ssion member T~,cker brought up. 'the question of the dedication of 60th Avenue° Mro Rooney stated he was not aware of this but stmted he world take the necessary steps to have the street dedicated to the Village. Motion by Sicora~ seconded by Trucker to recommend to the Go~cll to accept the Proposed Plat of F and R Eealty with th~'.-~e, twelve unit multiple dwellings with each unit containing eleven, two bedroom aud one, one bedroom unit~ and each dwelling with Ludivldual driveways as sho~r, on tho proposed revised plato None opposed. ~tion carried. The Commission recommends to the Council that 60th A~enue North between West Breadwa~ and Loui~ Avenue be dedicated and a c~pleted street. Notice of Public Hearing to c~sider the application of Willie Realty Inc. for a special use permit to construct a seven unit multiple dwell~g on property described as lot 15, Block 2, Golden Rule 2md Addition~ was read by the Chairman° The Village Pl~uners report was read and placed on file~ It ~as suggested by the Commission that the property in question meet with the ordinance. Mr. ~=~llie stated that he ccn!d enlerge the lot by extending the ~ack lot line thirty-four feet if the Commission ~ould go along with an irregular back lot line. New HoF~ Planrd_ug Ap~-~l 20~ 1961 Bob.Moffet stated he had no obJectica if the lot meets with all the Village r~qutr~ments. The question was raised aud discussed about the black top ?~rktng lot over the Motion by Kuebelbeck, seconded by T~acker to rec~end to the ~uncil to acce~t the special use permit for multiple dwell.i:%~s on Lot 15, Block 2, ~olden Rule 2nd Addttion~ of which, the building will contain se~n, one bedroom apartments, and recmmmends that the back lot line of Lot 15 be moved back thlrty-f~ur (3A) feet to obtain the necessary lot area. ~tioa carried. Notic$ of Public Hearing of James B~rtlett to consider the remoning of Block 5 and 8, Howland Heights from resid~ntial to industrial ~ read by the Ohairman. Mr. Bartlett stated~ "At no time do I want a slaughter house to be a political issue in the Village %f New Hope". Mr. Bartlett also stated that his re~uest for industrial moniug is merely to meet with the requirememts ~f the village mud further stated he was unaware at ~he time of zoning of his property from industrial to residential~ and he strenuomsly objected to the residential zonimg~ Mr. Bartlett also stated -Ail .~I want is that the zoning of m~ property ~e zoned back to the original z~ning~% The Commission pointed out to Mr. Bartlett that the type indu~tria! zo~in~ which he ertgimally had, ne le~er existed in the Village. ~e c!~sification teda~ are Limited Iudustry or General Industrial. Mr. Bartlett stated then he wanted the industrial ~oning ~l~ich best fits his property, which would most probably be General Indust~y~ ~t that he wanted a permit to build multiple d~elling~ on the preper~y. Tae Commission pointed out to F~o D~rh!ett that building multiple dwellings en industrial zoned property was in ~iPect violmtien t~ the mo-~g ordinance, but with the present zoning of resident!~xl it is passible t~ build multiple dwellings ~y mear~ cf a special use permit. Mr. Bartlett said he wa~ted a special rose permit to build ~ultiple dwellings, but that Lot 10, Bl~ck 8 should be zoned f°r~ a pa~ h~a~e. The Cea~issi~ poimted est t~ Mr. Ba~!stt that the existing use of Lot 10, Bl~ek 8, ~as umder the no conformance use. At this p~int the ¥t~!lage Planners reP°~t ~s read a~d placed ma file. Mr. Nmrry stated that he had no right to tell his neighbor what to b~tld em his property and he ~d ~o obJectie~i~.i~o industrial zord~g or multiple d~e~ use. Mr o Nielsen sta~ed he had r~ ~Jeetion to industrial zonimg or multiple dwelling use in Howlamd Heights. Mr o Mvrry had an item read by the ChairmmD from the 5~[nneapolis Star ~.nd Trib~ue, date March 28th, 1961 in regard to the discussion of Judge ~eel~ ~u the c~e of the City of Hopkins versus the Mcnrow Sisters° Mr. Bartlett stated all he wants at t.bis time was to be ~ble to build multiple dwellings on Blocks 5 and 8, Howland Heights. The Chair asked the question whether a~yone else had ar~ objections to the request of ~[ro Bartlett. ~btion by Sundt, seconded by Sisera to reconmmud to the Covncll that the request for industrdal zoning be d~nied~ however, that it be recmmmended that a special use permit be granted for the ~rection of multiple dwelli~s on Blocks ~ and 8 subject to the .exietir~ codes a~d o ~rdin~CeSo None opposed. ¥~tion carried. Motion by Sicora~secomded by Sundt that the Public Nearing be closed° Motion carried~ N~tice of Public Heari~ on the T.~mberm property was read by the chairman and placed on file~ Mrs. Stechmann was present with no objection to the pla'~.. Mr, Murry stated, "Don~t let ~v~'~.:~g interfere ~ith the Tombera property due to the'. Plat of West Winnetka Park because the Plat has not been filed as yet with the County. A letter dated April 19, 1961 from ~uestroo, Ro~ene an.~d Associates, Inco signed by Re W~ Rosene -~s read and placed on file. The ViLlage Planners reccemmadations ~'~d considerations were read and placed on file~ T~tton by Erueger, seconded by Trucker to recomme~.d to the Co~c~ to accept the ~~d plat of the West,1 of the North h~e~ ~ of thc North West ~ of Section 19 ~o~ as the T~ers pro~y. S~Ject to the lot sizes me~t~ ~_th the ~a ~~~ts ~d ~ the appro~ of ~e V~ '~eer$ ~ao m ~ff~r zone be p~ded Lu ~ e~h ~~ of ~lot C~e~ ~ t~t t~$ rec~d~tion ~ acted ~on ~y the Oe~c~ ~er the Co~ty ~ t~ ~e~ te decide ~ether m se~ce ~ Cowry ~ad ~!8 Be ~dmd. None o~d. M~ion The minutes of the Planning Cc, mission meeting of Apr~ 6, 1961 were read by the Ohairman being no correction or ~missiene the minutes sto~d as read. A letter fr~m the S~ Line 12, R, addressed to }&.", N. Roeney dated April 17, 1961 signed by ~eo. To Bergren was ~ad and placed on fileo Also a plat of the SoW. ~ of the N.Wo ~, Section 8, T° 1i~ Range 21~4. s~.d the S.E,~ of the NoW.~ of Section T. 118, Range 21 sho~ng the possible track easement was vied by the Cemmissi~no N~ Hope ~ming C~mi~sion April 20, 1961 Nrc Rerg~en ~ present and pointed out to the Commission the views of the 30o Line R~U~oad in regards to the tr~ckage easemen%~ Mro N~ Rooney w~s present in his o~n b~lf ~u regards to the trac¥~mge e~semento Mr. Rocney and Mr. Bergren stated they ~re in agreement re~arding the trackage easement ~ud to the z~g of the properties, but it was ~ matter of the kordi~ in the contract that a question remaine~ Motion by Trueker, seconded by Sundt to recmm~end to the Gouneil to disregard the motion taken by the P!auning C ~omm~Isalon ps?raining to the property adjacent to amd North of >h Avenue North and Ernst of Wtnnetk~ Avenue North and South of the Soo Line E~ R~ property subject to a lette~~ by Mr. Rooney by April 2~, 1961 with- dr~ his application for multiple d~elIings on the said property. None opposed. Motion carried, ~o ~rlmn Peterson c~me before the Commission with a proposed Subdivision of Tract~ Q~ M~ and L, Registered ~and Survey No~ 9~'o The Plat was discussed and the Ommmi~$ion advised Mr~ Peterzon to notify the V~.lage Clerk to set up a P~blic Hearing for the next r~g~lar P!amn~ C~is~ion meetLug. ~ ~bdrow came before the Oc~mission with a ~.iatting problem and w~s referred to the Village Plmnner~ Mmtion by Kuebelbeck, seconded by $%mdt to Next regul~ me,ting Thursday, ~.~¥ 4~ 1961. Secretary, Iv~u Bo Members Present: Kuebe!heck, Tr~%cker~ Sicora~ B~ass-~au~ Michaletz~ Hasbrouck~ F~ueger~ N~mbers Absent: Council member, Kelso, S~dt. Hewitt Peterson come before the P"~arm/ng 0ommi~sion ~_th ~ ~e~t to r~o~e ~atlot 1 ~ the ~~n~ P~t of the T~rs ~perty~ ~e leg~f~ description of the pro~y is the No~h ~ feet of the W~ of the A~E~ ~ of ~~ i9~ To~p ~8~ ~e 21 as ~a~'~ed ~o~ the E. ~d W. l~e thereon ~d subject to eas~ent~ for . road p~ses, ~e ViSage ~_~er~s re~ ~s read~. ~scu~$~d ~d ~aced on file~ ~ ~b~uck ~L~d out that the pro~r tL~ is m fezt~e factor ~ de~lo~ t~s shopp~ center~ A ~so~sion ~s held ~ favor of m sho~p~ center berg located at this ~ersection~ subject to the proposed sit~ p!~o~ meetL~ ~Ith the vi~ ordi~ces ~d codem~ Motion ~ Sicorm~ seconded ~ ~oh~etz to r~o~end to tho Couuc~ that ~e ~~ fr~ ~ted ~es~ ~d s~-~<~ residentiml ~ Eot&il ~es~ t~t potion of the T~ers p~pe~y descend ~ C~tlot l, ~nd the p~~~ plat ~ de,ed at t~s t~e. No~ op~sed$ motion ~ed. Nctice of ~llc Hea~ ~ the Pro~ssd Eeplat of ~c~ ~ Q~ M, ~d L, Registe~d ~d S~ey No. 97 ~ud ~ts I ~d 2 ~s read ~ the ~c~ ~~ ~d placed on f~e. The Village Pl~uer~s report was read and placed on file. Mr. Alhcmquist, 7621 Bass Lake Eoad~ ~a~ present ~-d voicod him objectiom~ due to the relocation of the catch basin. Mr. Jones was present and voiced his objection du~ to the digging w4zich is taking place in the area of the n~w catch basin. t.~ ~ m~ving of the catch basin. Mr. Mickalie voiced his obJection~ to ~e The Cmmmission pointed out to the people objecting to the catch bamin~ ~A contract with the City of Crystal and New Hope ~s made and it must be up held~ ~d ~rther that removing the basin is not the reason for' the Public Hear~.~ugo# Motion by Krueger, seconded by Sicora to rec~mn~ud to the Cour. cil to accept the revised Pr~pe~ed Flat of Hat!au Peterson?e~ Voting yes: Brusse~u, Miohaletz, Kuebelbeck, $icora, Krueger. Voting no: T.~uck=~r. M~tion carried. Notice of Pmblic Hearing on the proposed r~zoning from Retail Bu~inese to Multiple- family Residence district Lot~ 5~ 6, 7~ 8~ 31, 32~ 33~ and 3~,, Block 6 Rockford Park Addition was read and pla~ed on file. Hr. Xennen, &053 Nevada Avenue L~orth voiced that Be would like to see as big a barrier as possible between the multiple and residential areas. NEW HOPE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 The Village Plannerts report was reed, discussed and placed on file. Motion by Nichaletz, sec~uded ~ Kuebe~.b®~ to recommend to the Co~ucil to accept the proposed rezoning of Lots 5, 6, 7, 32 ~ 33, 3]+ s~d all excopt the north 125 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3, ~nd ~ ~,u ~lock 6, Rockford Park Addition. The or~v change on the ~ Plat is ,that the park area be on the side of the b~ildir~s with indivi{b,a~ entrances° None opposed. Motion carried. Tb_e ~.blic Hea~lng for construction of a Filling Station on the north 12~ feet of ~-~ Lot~ 3 ~ud ~, Block 6 ~ not h~d ~eause ~e ~a on ~eh ~e stati~ ~d be located is zoned ~ner~ ~ees ~ pe~ts ~ so.ce static. ~e c~ssion ~c~ends t~t Norm ~oney be ~ded ~s .S~ci~ Use Pe~t f~. In re.-ds to the ~c~ of the se~ce station ~ Roc~o~ P~k, I~ ~r~ ~er ~iced ~s objection: ~e to the fact the~ !snot eno~ b~ess n~ to ~ep ~e s~o~ go~ that ~e."He~, ~ have ~othor. Mr~ Rooney stated that ~alker Oil Company we~J.d be the o~ner of the station and that they deal in pumping gas not lu servtcee of repa~tro Motice of P~blic Hearing on the Preliminary Pl~t of TW~ Terra Linda, that part of the SE~ of the SE~ of S~ci::2on 19, Te~mshlp 118, ?mm~ge 21 was read and placed on file. The Village Plamaer~s repo~t was read and placed on file. It was pointed out t~ Mr. L~mphere theft sidewalks on k~Lr~etka Avenue would be required° Motion by Kuebelbeekz~ seconded by Sfc~ra to rec~,~nd to the Cou~Oit to accept the proposed replat of T~i~ Terr~ Linda subject to ca,plying with the lot area sime in the ordiuance ~ud grant a lot depth variance of 115 feet and 120 feet indicated on the Pla,~:. None oppcsed~ Motion carried. Mr. }~dre~ amd Mr~ Zilge presented a proposed layout of the ba~k half of the lots facimg on Bass Lake Ro~d south of Meadow Lake aud east of Boone Avenue° The Ccmmissioa im in favor ~ thi~ proposal b~t the lots must meet with lot area size aud we further recosutze ~t the lot depth may not meet with the ordinance. letters from ~ Fl~m~hug Associates ~re read and placed on file~ Nin~tes of April 20, 1961 w~re reed a~d the correctlon~ ~re as follews~ Lin~ t~ Page I: Co~uci! Member Collier~ as being a Council Member present (~iI be stricken from the record) P~ge 2, Paragraph i2~ Li~e 2: The 3~r~ (mm conformance) n~ reads (non~conformauce) The mtnv. te~ were a~¢eptod as corseted. T~ cls~fy~ Co~¢Li M~nber Collier ~s being ;~t the mee~!ng of the Pla~ Ceam~.ssion on Apr~l 20~ 196i~ he w~ pr®m~nt ~ a r~si~k~t of I~ Hope~ NEW HOPE PLARNI~ CO~ISSION A discussion was held and here bT held that the Ce~aissien ~uest that a Council Member ~e present at all Plar~t-g Cmmaission moetings. A discussion was held on the meetLug night of the Planning C~,~mtssion$ action was not taken due to the absence of two members. Letter from the ~ As~o~_ates, dated April ~&~ 1961, signed by Bob Moffett was read and placed on Letter from the Planning Asmo~iate~ ~ated April 2d~ 1961, signed by Sherman Hasbrouck wa~ read aud placed on file~ Lettera from the Soo L~s R ~ailroad~ d~d ~ril 2!~. i961~ signed by Mr. Mrosak and Hro Bergr~n ~e~ read ~ud placed on file~ Letterm fram R~ W. Rosen~ dated ~ ~ 1961~ ~,~re read aud placed on ~ile~ ~otion by Sicora~ sec~d~d by B~u~ssec. u to ad~otu~n. ~,~ion carried~ Next Regular ~eeting on ~ 18~ 1961 at ~t:00 p.m. Secretary Ivan R. Xra~ger, Sro NEW HOPE PLkk~G CO~iSSION ~200 Nevada Avenue North ~.~y 18, 1961 8:00 P.M. Me~bars preser~t: Kelso, Ohman~ Sicora, Kuebelbeck, Trucker, Michaletz, Krueger. Members absent: Brusseau, S~udt. The Public He,ring of ~s~oci~ted Contractors~ Inc. for a special use permit to construct multiple dwellings on Block lO and !l in West Winnetka Park was called to order to consider the application. Mr. Glen Murray in behalf of Associated Cont?~tors stated the dwellings would be eleven two-b~iroom, two and one-h~lf stories hi~'~ho Further he wanted it understood the reason he had not prepared a Propomed Pl~t Pl~u sho~ng the parking, set backs, and ect~ provid~ in the ordinS~ce is becs~u~e he w~nted to know if the co~m~ ssion was in favor of multipl~ ~'.~ this proposed Mr. Murray then stated that b~h~ com~oiete Proposed ~fest Winnetka Park would be drmwn by the F. H. Ao and the plan would m~et all the ~.~c~!%~irements of the village codes and ordin~.ce$ ° Motion by Trucker~ ~econd®d by Sicor~ to ~djo~rn th~~. Public He~rLug of Associated Contractors, Inc. for the gr~nting of a Sp~cial Use Permit for ~Ultiple dwellings per 'the description i~ the public notice, dated ~y 12, 1961~ To permit the presentation of the rev±sed plat of ~est Wi~etka Pe~k in ~ccord~uce w~th the village o~din~uc~ ~ud codes by M~o ~ray. None op?osed° Motion carried~ M~. Bob BaldWin and ~. C~ Wo ~i~r.ch~nt prement~_g ~ combined plat of the Coltier property sm~d Wonderland 2nd Addition which they ~tated they would officially present ~d .abide by the village codes ~.nd ordinances~ A discussion was held on multiple ~lling on part of the property. The m~uute~ of ~y ~ 1961~ ~er~ read hy the Ch~irman~ and the correction is as follows: Page 2, pa~agraph 6~ line 1 the word (Ne!kef) now reads (Wachtler). ~otio~ by ~?ichaletz, seconded by Sicora that the minutes bs accepted as corrected° None opposed. Motion c~rried~ Donald We~tmor®tand submitted a plan of a ~J~niature golf co,-se to be located on Coun.~y Road 18. Motion.,byMichaletz, seconded by Euebelbeck 'bo issue a temporary special use Permit for a minlature golf course to run concurrent ~,ith his~e~taurant license. None opposed. Motion ca-~riedo A discussion was held on the change cf date of. the Planning Commission meeting nighto~ The Plauning Commission recon~nends to th~ Council that the meeting night of the Planning Commission be the first ~ud third Tuesday of every montho Don Trucker submitted .... :~e ~" ~h~ of Keith Engen, ~y~,l VirgLuia Avenue North, a~ a prospective member of th~ ~!~ug Commission. ~h~ Trucker ws~s a~vised to invite Mro Er~en to the next Play, Lug Commission m~ting~ Page The Co~mission again wants the Council to take action so each member of the Planning Commission receive by mail to their homes the Council minutes and agendas. Motion by Sicora, eeconded by Michaletz to adjourn. None opposed. Motion carried. Secr.atary, Ivan R. Krueger, Sr. NEW HOPE PLANNING CO~SSION ~200 Nevand Avenue North June 6, 1961 8:00 present: Ohman, Kelso, Sicora, Moffitt~ Kuebelbeck, Trucker, Michaletz Eruegero Members absent: Brusseau~ Sm~dt. Notice of ~biic Hearir~ on the ~ " . ~ ropossc~ ~zmt fop ~eorge Robi~son ~ re~ ~ the ch~ ~d placed ~ A ~ fr~ ~nestr~ ~ene, ~d A~soc~t~s~ inc. si~ed by J~e 5, 1961, Concer~_~g.~e ~sed ~at of M~ud Te~ce ~ read~ ~d p~ced on f~le~ ~e p~~ ~rt ~f the ~l~ ~t for ~nd Terrmce read~ ~scu~sed ~d ~ .n ~le. 1~ 50 f~et ~t bac~, ~ tho~ f~sS ~e desisted, 2~ The ~ive w~s cf lots 9 to 15 ~d ~ ena th~hf~eo Motion by ~ ~Cconded ~ ~cker to ad.Jo~ the ~lic He~ o~ ~ RobSon ~til J~me 20~!96!; 8:~ P,M~ None oppos~d~ ~tion c~ed~ 9:~ PoM~ joLut ~s'~g of the co~c~ ~d ~_~ Co~msion ~held ~ co~eCticn ~th the ~,~sed Pl~t for ~en ~~ West Wi~etka ~e co~ ~d the pl~ C~selon had a le~ d~'%~i,m :~th ~ ~r~ The cce~tssion sugge~.ed to Mr.,~arra~ if he ~,,.ten~ed to 'Pl~t West ~Annetka with a gremt percentage of th::~ lot ~mder size~ he could do so -~nder s~ction C? $ P~ovisei,n Seven (7) in the ~onir~ Ordimanceo Mr~Vmrra~ stated he wauted to Plot. West .W~netka Fark as s~e f~y ~el~s~ but hi~ ~tenti~ is to b~ld ~tiple ~i~ on a p~i~ of the ~ot by z~eets~d bo~d~ ~mc~ption~ No ~ction ~ t~m~ on the Pl~t of West ~mueti-:~. ~k ~t~ such t~ ~$ ~ ~.~ ~bide~ ~ the o~ces of th~ 'v~~ before the with ~ F~L~~ pl~. ~f app~?~<..e ~c-~t cz V~;O0 on ~d Ave~ N~.~ ~ of lot The problem in this ~ i~ the b~d ~::~tr~nce onto A2nd Ave~ ~h J~t ~st ~ff the M~N~ ~d $~' R~R~ o~r~ P]~s th~ !ot~ ~d b~ ~der mime f~r their ~e ~n ~o~r~c, ~th the o~oem~ ~ &i~c~ion ~s held~ t~t a ~0~ x 320~ ~i~ ~c~t be in the ~ of th~ t~s 1.ts ~ich ~uld enter on ~gon Ave ~ ~d t~s ~sugjesti.n ~ ~me~n ~ Motion by Trucker s®cen~ed by K~eger to ~c.~m~end to th® 'co~ucil to approve the Proposed P~t of that p~t of lot 5 Aud~ SUb #3245 z~bmitted by Earl Vo Roseng.~n~ Trucker~ Er~'~eger~ Michaletz~ ~ Kelso. ~ral voting Ku~b~]b~ck voting no~ ~ti~n carried~ N~. A1 Ho!lo app~od before th~ commission' with the pro~sed ~t of the South ~ feet of th~ ~ 130 ft~ of lot 32 Au~t~r~ Sub~ M~ion ~ TrueSt seconded ~ ~ rat. ap~r~e the F!at~ Non~ oP~sed~ ~ti~ Bob ~fitt~ the vllia~e ~ula~er.~ ~0resente~ a propaz~, d imyout of the ~'~m north ~f ~gth Av~ ~ud e~st of %~unetka Ave~ ~ich wae ;'dimcu~s~d at !e~ho A discuss!on w~s held on the side v~ on th~ m~in thoroughfares ~d streets ~ur~d~~g the .cheol sit®~ Motion by T~ok~3 ~oconded by K~b~:ibeck to ~o~ad to thc cotmc~ to a~ro~ the ~y~ut ~d ~c~end~tion for ~idew~2d~ ~ab~tted ~ the v~g~ N~ ~p~ed~ ~bt!on .... ~ - ~ r~gu~r meeting ~ue~.d~:~ys J~e 20: 196!~. Secr~t~y, Ivan K, ~eger~ HOPE ~G C~MISSiON Pa~e ~ Motion by Sicora, seconded by Ohman to z c~pt the minutes of June 20, as ¢orr~¢ted~ None opposed~ ~oti~n carried. I~r. H~-witt Peterson came befor the_~._w'~ :~-~.~ Commission with a request to approve the Prel~ ~minar7 Plat of the To~bers prope~oy, described as follows: The we~t ~ of the N~ ~, ¼ of Section i? T~WoP~ ll8, Range 21o .The ~eli.mi~-ary Plat which Mr. Petersen ?:~nted approved is a plat with multiple d~ellings along County Road #18. This ~l~t the Commission took ne ~ction on ~ec~us$ ~e feel that the m~ltiple d~.~Lli.::g development should be studied~ Mro Peterson stated that the Village Engi:~er wanted lets along County Road #18 te be 150 feet deep, but the Commissio:~ had no letter to verify t~So Mr~ Peterson did nc-': ::~ve a copy of the plat to !eav~ .with the Pl~r ~Ing 0~m~mis~ion for ~ :: ' ~s~ ~. ~rcon than ~.t~ted he ~'~d go b~k ~ the old p~t ~ub~t, ted to the Pl~ C~sion~ A:::c~ 20, 1951. io in this plat the lot depth~ are i20 feet~ 2~ With th~ ex~eption ef 13 inter!o:~ lots ~nd the corner lots, ~ iot~ ar~. be!~: the re~rsd mtn~m~ of 9,500 ~q. ft~ of lot aremo the street ns~®m do not appeaT- on the p!~_t~ Tni~ pl~t is ba~ica].4~ a gridir~u p~tt~rn the na~ow parcel of laud b~tng developed i~ p~rti~J, ly r~eponeible for ~ome of the v~ri~.ee~ to the or~u~uCe~o Apprc,-a! to thi~ plat provided~ . lo ~e lot a~a is Luc~ed to meet the ~ r~ent of the ~o~ Oz-~c~ and m r~% ~'~ ~e V~e ~eer to the ~r~ O~ssi~n ~ favor .f t~ plat~ the ~ ~ti~ ~i~ t~ de~h ~f lotto ~ C~ty R~d ~18, ~d the ~~ for ~b~. ~ ~e F~d ~ of the S~~i~ ~d ~e ~s'~' z~ el~sifications leah ~ ~d~ ~ ~ desisted om th~ ~t~ ~d ~thsr, ~ copiee of ~e P re~~ R~ ~ pres~t~ t~ the Pla:ni~ O~m~ion~ the ye;fiance ~ th~ !~t depths each lot shall have its ~r®a dssign~£ed o: the pl~t to m~t the ~ re~irement~o pl~t i~ to b~ dra~n at the scale of I inch Eq:ai~ i00 feet~ ~t~ 300 f~t ~f the tract. NEW HOPE PLAN!~G COM~SSION ~200 Nevada Avenue North July !8~ !961 8:00 p,m. Members Pre~ent.- Kuebelbeck, Ob~u, Sv~dt, Engen~ .Trucker, ~.~[chaletz, Sicora F~eger, Me~bers Absent: Kelso The request for a ~a~i~uoe in the zor~g or~J~uce was read:by the Vice-Chair- man to ¢o~Ider a Gc~Eart-Track ~t &~76 Co~ty Road #18o A request by Arthur P~zite to eo~truct a Co-F~t-Track at ~576 Co~uty Road' #18 which req3~i~es m variance in the z~uing 0rdinauce was read by the Vice- Ch~n. The Vt~l~ge Pioneer's repo~ ~ read by the Vice-Ohai~.~ ~t~eh is as follo~s ~ T~e ~a in which this p~op~rty is' located is zoned rezidentialo ~ Zordng Oz..din~nce doe~ n~t ~!iow ~ ~E~c-Trm~k in ~ re~den~! ~ns ~der a?<- c~c~st~ces~ 2~ The o~y ~ tkis proposal could proceed wo'~Id be a re~oning the ~ to ~neral Bu~.n~ss ~th a special u~e p~t~ This~ of ¢ol~se, ~m~Ild be sp~t mo~ and c~P~r~ry to the Vlilage~s d~velop~ent plan~ The ?~.c.~f;ar p!mce for C~E~_rt.s is ~%rther out in the cctuctry, near a ~a~ high~ !~! a ~ral mrea~ where residential development i~ man~ ye~s ~'~ Under the cir~mmst~uce ~hich would be ental!cd to obta~u a peri. it to construct a ~Emrt-Track.~ Mr~ White stated that he wished .to ~tlidraw hie re~esto M~tion by Erueger~ s®conded by Sieorm to reco~end to the Co~ucil to de~y the ~st of ~ ~te for a v~c~ of the ~i~ c~de t~ co~t~ct a ~- WiLl® c~ before th$ Pla~in~ Cc,~.~ssion with a request for special use p~rmlt fsr ~u $1®v$n~ two bedroam ~p~rt~ent b~ildLug on lot 15~ blc~k 3~ Wonderl~d l~t Addltion~ A lengtbj discussion ~s h~ld ~nd ,it of the disc'~sion ~&~ ~b~u~ stated h~ would prefer to h~ve another look mt t~e proposed apartment building site ~ W~l~ s~ted he ~o~mld go to M~ ~D~.~brouck office ?f_th the site plam~ thu~ th~r~ ~%~ ~o formal aotlon +~J<®n at this time~ ~ ~s~io~ w~ held o~ the multiple dwelling problem ~n ~b~uc k st~ted t~t h~ ~&d pr~ ~pi~s for th~ ~~ ~e ~l~ ~ro Ed T~scher ~ Vi~ O~t ~ W~e A~ 5330 S~ter Avenu~ ~ Je~ Ho~e 60~0 Y~on Avenue ~e ~n ~ be notified by th~ P~~ O~i~ secret~ to ~ p~se~t mt ~e n~xt ~~ ~sei~ ~:l:~t~g due *~ the f~t one of th~se me n ~d not ~et ~th th~ ~r~u~ O~ssion bec~e the ~~ O~ssi~n Sec~t~ ~d not ~t~ the mmn ~ t~ fo~~, t~s ~t~ Motion by ¥~cbm~e~z~ seconded by Sundt to adjoin-no None opposed~ Motion carried~ Ivan K~®ger Sr~ M~ePs Absen%~ None Page 2 last I~er~r~u~ ~The C~'~is~ion inf~x.~aed ~-~ Peterson that the b~ild£~og a drive Ir~u by pem~i,t ©n ~ ye~~ to ye~ basi:~ and is in the catego~ of ~e gsa ~iv® ir~%~ not an office~ If th~ N~idlng h~ b~co~s ~ total loss by fir~ the m~e i~ no lo~er the~ so ~h~ property restarts to rssidental~ thu~ th~ ~hc~,id b~ to~ dow~~ Metion by Trucker~ seconded by ~u to accept the minutes Motion Hro Willt~ came b~for~ the C~sion with a sketch of lot 15~ block 35 Wonderl~d Addition prepared ~y Sher~ Hasbrouck~ Upon steadying th~ sketch the Commission found that the location ~f the buildi~ w~s ~ve femt f~'c~ the lot 1Lue: thus a lem~thy dfsc~sslon followed to corrmct thi~ gaud still ha~e ~ consolidated ~_a~ area which Mr. H~sbr~uck ~'am ~ndeavor~g to d~ and ~ti]3_ b~ve adequ~t~ room for the sewer easment~, ~tion by Sicora~ seconded by ~n to reco~aend to the Council to accept the proposed ~lat of WonderlAnd 1st Addition ~th the foll~i~ rec~uendation~ E!~inate the drt~,,~ay enteriD~ on 36th Avenue North~ The north ~est corner ef the st~acture must malnte~ at least 28 feet fro~ lot 15 ~ block 15 C~lden P~,~le Second Addttlon~ 3o The park~%g area shall, maintain a 20 foot landscaped area on each ~ide of t~he ~ £t~ drivew~y~ which enters on Lo~.~sf..a~,~ Avenue North° None opposed~ Motion carried° Mr~ George Rueter appeared be£or® the Ccr~ssion to discuss the side yard sera-back of a single f~mi!y dwellir~ primarily the ~t~rpretation on the o~ce of t~s ~t~ A ~ic~~ sit. rich wa~ ~ted out thr~h the ~sc~sion ~ch is a~ fo~ A si~e f~h~e n~occu~ied ~ehhas a ~de y~d se~b~k of 7 feet fr~the lot ~e on the g~e~ side but the ~ci~e ~ of the h~e is dlrec~be~d the g~e$ thus the s~le f~ st~ct~e is 7 feet fr~ the lot ~e ~d is ~ ~olatiom ~f the V~ge ~ce~ ~er ~sc~sion~s ~eld~thim ~Lut~ %%e out e~e beL~the cha~ ap~ted D~n ~cker to contact the Vi,H~e Attom~ to cl~ tlds subJect~ Calvin Hsdiund of M~rVinAnderaon ConetrmctionOompauy appeared before the Ccmmis~on to d~cuss the side yard set-back on lot i6, Bloek 1; lots l& and 15, Bioct: 25 lots 10 ~ndll, Bloek 35 lot 9, Block ~ and lot !1, Block 55 NorthwoodTerrace itt Addidion, which all of these lots abutt on 36th Avenue North m major arterial ~treet~ HOPE :~£AN~ING C~SSION P~e 2 The Village Planner,s considerations and reco:/:uendations were read by the chairman and the Platforms recc~mendation~ are: approv:! of the v~rlauce to permit a 3~ fro side yard~ A discussion w~s held /)n the ent~uce of driw~-w~ys on 36th Argue North He~d s'~ted he ~ not f.u fair of t~-~d ~.iv~m ~ca~e ~derson Co~mt~ction O~ ~d ~ fi~r ~?.d ~o~e p~ ~e to th~ ~i~d cont~ of the ~d ~t ~d he felt he co-ed fit a st~xct~e to the ::riou~ lots ~ question ~d no ~ive-~s ~ter~ on 36th Avenue No~h ~d $~J~l $~y ~itb~n t&e or~ces~ The Commission pointed o-~t.1 to Mr~ Hedi~d that if a home beir~ const~acted on one ~ the lot~ ~ ~estion ~-!thout ~n at~ched g~ge th~ st:':~ct~e m~t be p~d to leave ~I ro~ for m ~t~ g~ge m~d st~ r~ ~t~u th~ o~J~ces~ ~ H~d s~ted t~ ~d be d~ne~ Motion by Enge~u~ seconded by Trucker to reclaimed to the C°~Uucil that a building permit be grated subject to ~ That ~ sid.~y~rd b~ug !in~ be 3~ feet frc~ the right~a-~y all the l~t~ ~outtin~g 'on 36th Avenue North Lu Nort~h~od Terrace° 2~ No construction of ~ driv~-w~y ~nt~:~ng or, 36th Avenue North~ None oppesed~ ~tion c~riedo A t~0ed ~ess~4~e £r~ Hobert W~ P~sene~ the ~ubJect being the Hewitt Peterson revised plat of th~ :!~:.~bers property~ wm~ read ~d placed on file~ held on ~e lot widths~ depths aud ~i~mum ~rea of t~m Pl~t~ Mo*;lon by ~ohaletz~ seconded by Kuebelbeck to recommend to the Oo~acil to ~ccept the r~vised prs~try plmt of tho Tembers s~b~tted by Hewitt Peter~on subject t~ The ~0mi~si~n of s~tiefacto~y street grades ~nd dra~e plans° 2~ Vari~uce be granted in regard t° th~ minimum lot depth~ 3o ~X41 lots al.n~ Oounty Ro~d #18 bs 135 ft~ in depth° ~o Ail lets m~u~t mai~t~u the mi~m lot area rec~ztrsm~ntSo Nome opp~d~ M~tion carr::,:!~ George R.bi~,son ~d F~ George Johnson app~arod b~_~for~ t_h~ ~.a~ ~nln~Z C~:ssion with mn ~rz~ed Fro~sed ~at prepared by Ca~ll ::::~gln~.~ering Comp~ny~ dated ~ly i961 for ~orge J~s~n~ Motion by Kuebelbeck~ seconded by $~mdt to refer the unu~ed Plat of Ceorge Johu~on~ t, the V~ge Pl~uner so it can be plm~ed on the ~gendm for the next reg~l~v Planning Commission ~eting~ N~ne opposed~ Motion ca~ed~ A ~,ugge~ted r-~vision of the Zoning 0rdlnmnce by Bob }foffett ~w~s rend by the Che~brmau a~ad l~l~ced on ..*ile~ Fr*~ th~ discu~sien of the $~'g~sted r~_~ion of S~= ~ ~vision 05 ~a~aph & ~ the ~n~ Or~~ M~tion by ~u~er~ ~ecc~ded by Si~ra %0 accept the ~uggested ~_~ion off th~ ~.~ ~5~uc~ by the V~lage ~sr a~d rec~ to the Co~c~ ~ Set Back~ Along Thoro~ghfmres Along the foi!owLug streets~ 27~ A~nue North 36~h A~nue L~d ~v~nue No~h ~gth /':'~uu~ North ~t of ~e A~nue No~h he~ des!~mt~d ~ ~Jor M~i~~ by the set.~ba~ sh~l be 90 f~et,.~ ~-~ - ~om the center ~ of the f~ the ~gh~oiu~ !Lue~ wkiek~vo~ i~ the grater se~bmck~ ~Pner~ the side yzrd is adj~c®nt to a 'w~jor ~rterlalw the set- b~ck ehall be 3~ feet fro~ the riEht~of~ l~e or ,75 feet fr~ the center l~Ine of th~ street~ which ever is the. greater set-back° None ~pposedo ~tioa c~?~.ed, Tae M~litiple ~lli~ report f~ Shelterer ~ P~oroueh ~$ ~d ~d die~sed by the ~ad ~ds~I:'~E~ al~o mude~ed D~tipl~ ~e~ ~d ~ed ~out the~ effect on ~e ~e C~i~sion ¢gre®s ~!th th~ ~ple ~'ellir~ report f~ th$ Vi ~ge effort ~mkil b~ ~d~ by th~ P~an~ug C~s~ien to ~p-g~d~ multiple Mi~o ~y~ A~ ~ud Je~y ~e ~e2e pre~ent at the Cotillion ~t~g ~d ~ NEW HOPE PLANNL~ CO~SSION Dis~uasion on th~ v~ant seat of the Pls~-w~ng Co:~sion aural b~ held over until the nexb regular meeting, ~tien by Michaletm, seconded by Sircora to adjouz-,n~ Next re~iar meetir~ ~i!l be ~gust 1~ 196!~ at ~' ~00 P~M~ Ivan ~ueger, Sro 4200 Neva~ Avenue North ~ugust 15~ i961 MegO®rs pr~t~ Ke!so~ Sicora~ Eo~®n~ Trucker~ Sundt~ M~ic~etz~ K_~ueger. Ma~bers absent~ Ob~u~ Kuebelbeek Notice of Public Hearing on the P~oposed Plat for C$orge A~ Jol~-~on [Robinson ~T~op~rty~ wa~ read by the chalr~au~ A report signed by ~ C~ Moffitt (th~ V~age ~_~uer) was ra~d ~d placed on file o discussion ~ held ~d ~ n~ber of th~ abutting property o~ners present ~estionsd the co~t ~ud ~o was to pay for the sto~ se~r in tb~$ pl~to The ch~ir pointed out that ~sessments are not one of the dutie~ of the Pla~ng Co~i~sion ~ Th, question was m~ked if any one present hmd any obJecti~n~ conc~z'~g the No on~ h~d any ML~nlr~g Con~ider~tions~ !~ M~uy of the lots ~r~ bolow the m:h~ depth of 3~5 f~et~ Six lots ar~ llO f®et in depth~ 24 lot~ ~e 120 feet ~ d~pth~ and 8 lots ~re ll5 feet ~ d®pth~ 2~. i~t 2 in Block 8' contains 2~800 ~q~ ft~ of lot area~ Lot 2 ~% Block ? contains 9~350 ~q~ ft~ of l~t ar~a~ All other lots cont~ the mi ~nim~ ~a lot 3~ ~ cor~r lots have a md~imum of 90 ft~ at the b~~ ltneo location of 28th Ack, hUe was prevlo~sly e~bablish~d~ }~otion by Trucker second®d by Sicora to recommend to the Co~ucll to approv~ the ~at of G~org~ Jo!~u~on subject to ~k:o~mJ.ng !ot~ 5 though 8 startL~ at ~ lO feet Lu from th~ South W~st co~~ of lot 5~ ~o~ i o~. ~ l~e en~ug ~t the North W~t co~r of lot E~ Bl~ck l~ and ~so that the ~:~.~ of ~l the lots ~ Block I m~t th~ 75 ft. ~im~ ~nd tb~ corner lot must m~t the ~~ of 90 ft~ fr~ntag~ None op~ed~ Motion carri~d~ Mr~ Simm~ app~®d b~for~ the Plan~J. ng Commission to discuss th~ x~t~e of the old fa~ ho~ ~nd th~ ~ott~g of ~.$ p~p:~rty~ ~e C~Ission poLuted out to F~ S~ t~t the c~$sion co~t ~e c,~y rec~endation ~th out ~ plot plain ~d if he so ~em~ed he co~d contract t?.: V~age ~anner or the V~ge office to g~t the info~.tion hs dssired~ Vern Tou~ist mppear~"~d before the O~=~:ion with a surveyors draft of lots ~k~eh he ~ted to change° A discussion wa~ bold and from it, motion by Erueger seconded by Trucker to recOm- mend to the Council to approve the plat of ~ Toungq~ist subject to. Meet the requirements of the Platting Ordinance° ~EW HOP~; PLAN}~!N~ C~SiON P~ge 2 2o All lots must meet the m!~uim~m lot ~dth and lot area° 3o Subject to the approval of the Village ~u~_eer~ &~ P~esent a Proposed Plat Plau to the Co~ucil drm~n by ~u E~g!neer, Mr~ Jim Halks of Midwest Pl~r~m~ ~ud Re~arch IPPeared bez%pe t, he C~msion w~th fiw~ prelacy plau~ ~~O~1' ~Itipl~ ~;el~ugs o~ th, pro~rty 'W~st of the schoo~ ! .:pe~y on Medicf~ue ~,l~ Ro~ ~ep~ed for Gl~n A discussio~ ~ h~eld a~d fr~-m it the C~_~m~,::~siou advised ~h~o He, ks t~o proceed ~th l.~s pl~m~ and that ha should first ~k~ a r~quest for ~ultipl~ ~o~g due to I~ lerge ~c~le pl~i~g~ Mr~ ~-~mr~:y~d tT~ i~lks st,,ted they ~uld pro~oed with their pi~a'~s and they ~d ~eet ~n.d exceed the req~od~re~x~ts of the Village~ Pmge 3~ P~.gr~ph 5~ I~ne one ~ the wo~d {vi~d} now re,de {~e}!et:ed}~ Motion by Ts~oke~~ seconded by Sicors~ to accept the mi~.uutes ~s corrected~ Non~ epposed~ Motion o~:~.ed~ dlscuss~on '~ hold on the side yard set b. ~ Motion by 2;~ch~tz second®d by Sicora to reo~end to the Council thet resl, d~nt:~ atte~hed ~rage sh~ be n~t less th~u fiv~ feet ~Al ~ther t~u feet~ ,as stated ~ the A discussion ~ held on the intent a~f the Zoning Ordi~ce i~, re g~d to the ~pec® between b~d3~ in a re~iden~xL,~.l are~.~ Motion by Trgcker seconded by Engen te rocca, mend to the Coumcil that tho -zoi~ing Or~i~ce be ~mended to ~clude the r~%~re~ents~ that a ~i~o~ of 15 feet bet~en ~t~ct~ee on ~j~oent lots ~ ~clude ~t~ched g~r~gem f~ this ~ee budget for the year 1962~ w~ di~cu~e,d ~d the chai~u ~ill ~ub~It thi~ report to th~ Village Clerk° -~ The three Jerry House Ed Teeohsr NEW HOPE ~Nl~ii~ COMI~SS~O~ ?age 3 After the v~ote~ the Commission reoo~'~ionded to tile Council that Ed Tescher b~ appointed to serve on the Planning ....... A discussion wa~ held on the Village Ordln~ac~s ~id codes. A committee was set up comprising of Sundt~ 1~chaletz, and Engen to study the necemmary revi~ions~ * .... ~by~ueg~r ~econdedbySic~ to mdjourn~ Nona oppo~d~ Motion carried~ The n~t r~ar ~neeting will be Sept~ ~i~ 1961~ Secrstary~ Ivan R~ Krueger~ Sr~ Members present~ Kelso, O?mm~u~ TPucker, ~gen, Micha!etz, Sundt, Kuebeibeck~ Moffitt~ Memb$~s absent: K~eger, Sieora Notice of public hearing on the proposed rezoning of the f:lg~l F. BrJ~ property. Thi~ property is located at the Northwest corner of Medicine Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue. Mr~ Darkenwald of the Eberhardt Company, and Mr. Brix, owner of the property, presented the proposal~ Mro Brix stmt~d he had poten%i~l buyers for the property if it were rezoned from part ~ltiple dwelling ~ud part residential to limited industry° ¥~o D~rkenwald pointed out that this zoning would be eompatable with the proposed Graphics APts Center ~cross the street Valley. i Also, Mr. Davenport of the M.N~ & S. RR, stated the possibility of a s~ track serving the property was within reason~ Discussion was he~xf regarding the property Just North of the property :~n q~.: :st:~on~ This property is owned by Mr. Brix. He stated that if the property oon'~,i:me~ 'to develop industrially he wou]~ rezone thi~ remaining prope~y~ with the exception of his own home, to limited industry~ Motion by Trucker to recomme.~ to the Council to accept the re~oning of this property. Seconded by Oh~ None opposed. Motion c~.~ied,, Notice of public hemming on the proposed pl~c of the property Jo~ut!y owned ~y Modrow, Zilge~ Ne!~on, Perri~ Peterson~ Jorn~on ~ad Zubeck~ was ?cad and pla¢~d on file. Thi~.proper-~y !.~ ~j~,~ to B!o~k 2~ Headow Lake Terrace Addition~ ,The platters report w®.s re~.d and pl~c~d on fite~ A letter f~. Bonestro©~ Roeen~ & Assoelate~ ~, signe~! by R.W. Rosene~ d~ted Septex~ber 5, 1981, regardless, the Prof~se~. Plat adJ~:~nt 'bo Block 2~ Meadow L~ke T~rrace Addition, wa~ read and placed on fil~o Mr. H. Modrow~ Mro Co Ne!sen~ ~ad ,!r. T~ Peterson presented 'this pr~posal~ Pat Murphy, 8105 Me~low Lake R ace~ Ph~, B. F. Mum, 8029 W. Meadow Lake Rosd~ and Dr. Jo?,~n T. Schaefer, 5801 Tukon Avenue North~ -?~,~ property owners p~¢~nt~ They h~ no obJ~.~tions to ~his plat. Discussion was he]J~ ~ud recommend~t~ on ~.~ given to the ~titi°ners, that all the lot~ be brecht up to m!nir~ e~ea. ~e Co~ssion felt the ~ea, ~d a better ~h~d lot~ co~d be~t be obt~n~ if a lot line wo~d occur at the place the outside pro~rty i~x; ~ ~d the cu!~-de.:~sac were newest each other. (SMlar to the ori~.n~ propo~i of Mr. Mcdrow~s) ~ ~w ~greed %o this, ~d ask~ for the op~port~ty .o have t~s plat redra~. ~e re~o~r~ation on. t~s ~o~s~ plat ~ tabled until it c~ be r~ra~ ~ repre~ent~ to the P~ Co~sion. Minutes of the Pia:m~,&ng Co,~ssSoT, ~L~eeting of i~&ast 15, 19~i appro'~ed without add ~ +'~ Gordon E~ Nelson presented his o~tit~cm for a varianc~ so that his lot /~9 B~ L~e Road Mr'~ Nelson stated that h~ ~shed to remodel his'aouse~ to ac:;ommedate offic~s ~ud a ri, tail ~hoe store., ~cksr ~o~ted out th~ ambiguity of ti~e Zoming Ordln~uce in r~gard 'bo the exte~ of g~neral bu~Laess zoning in t...~s are~.~ Nc so~?~.ion to this was arrived ~t thi.~ time. Motion by Ohm~u to inform the Village Offices that Mr. Nelson?s petition be t,~en care of by ~ rez~g of t~ p:~"o'~ty... This w.l~ th~n require Th~ "SU~G~TED REVISION OF T~ DEFINITION ©? ~PUBLiC UTILJTY USES~" was r's~d a~ discusaed~ Motion by Trucker to advise the Council. to reject this r~ds%r~ The Plarming Commission feels any variance regarding radio and television to¥'~!~ and ~tructur, es should be taken car~ of by rezoning~ Seeor~l by 01~ None opposed~ Hotion ca~ried~ Trucker brought, up a question given klm by Mayor Honesty. ~n~ question was regarding tP~e use of a buiJ~ing North of Rockford Romd a.~ East of the M.N~ & So discussion that the preset zo~g is g~ra] busi, n~ss~ ~d a ~mufactu~ pla~ is not ~lo~ in tP~s z~e. ~e o~ ~ssibility of ~lo~g v~s t~ of o~ration tm to have the pro~rt,y r,:~on~ to ~t~d busin~ss. The Commim$ion would iik~ to br~g to 'the :~tt~n'tion of the~,~i& ''~' ~ ~ that of the lot~ ~ th~ ~ienc~ ~.~%r. Center dew~lo~ent ~e on~ acre lots. ~~ l.g~l ~iz. in this .one i~ :hre~ Mogion by ~ch~ l~tz to adjo~,rn. Second.~d by Sundto None opposed. Motion ActinE~secretary, Rob~ Kuebelbeck i~~ HOPE PLAEq'~ 0~£SSION ~200 ~.~evad~ ~venue North September 19, 1961 8~OO Members present i Members absent ~ Kelso~ Ohman, Mlcha!~tz, Sundt~ T~cker, Engen~ K~Aegero Kuebelbeck, Stcor& Minutes of September 5, 1961, were read by Chairman Kelso, ~nd the corrections are as follows g PAge 2~ paragraph 5 now reads~ "~ne Planning Commission recommends to the Village Council t.hat ~.~ Nelsones petition must be taken care of by a rezoning of this property~ This will then require a public hearing~" 2. Page 2~ paragraph 7.~ the last word i~ this paragraph now reads "industry~- Motion byTrucker~ seconded by Sundt that the minutes be accepted as corrected° None opposed° Motion carriedo 'A discussion~as held on a pr~!~osed Plastics Plant in the area south of the Soo Line tracks ~udw~st of Boone Avenue~ The probl~m~ are as follo~: 1. L/m~ted industry requires a minimum of three acres~ 2. Location of the street and eas~entSo 3~ Possible remoningo No action was taken at this time b~cause of lack of information° ~ne tabled propomed pl~t of the p~perty Jointly owned by Messrs~ Modrow~ Zilge~ Nelson, Perri~ Pet~rson~ Jo~nson and Zubeck now called Meadow Gardens was di~c~sed~ Messrs. Murphy~ Mum, Cotie ~d Dr~ Schaefer wer~ present frc~ M~mdow L~ke Terrace~ ~ Cotie objected to the ?lac~ent of the h~es which h~ felt ~d be too clo~e to the h~es ~ M~a.~o~- ~ke T~rrace~ p!~ the fe~ of c~at~g a sto~ ~t~r probl~, on the ?~ck lot 1Lue of lots &~ 5, 6~ ~d 7 ~f Mead~ ~ ~~ The Commission pointed out to the parties present that the sto~w~ ~'~t~o problem would be handled by the ¥iLlage ~ugtneer~ &ud any Info~tio~ which they desired on this subject could be ~uswered at the Comucll meeting of September 26, . Moti°n by Engen.~ secon~ed~ by O~hu~n tore~on~en~~ ~ to the Co~cil to accept the proposed Dlmt of Meado~ L~e G~rder~ ~foJect to a ~ari.ar~ce of the Zoning Ordinance, allow~g.~.25 foot front ~t !~.~_ck on lot~ 6, 7, 8, 9, and !0° N. ne opposed~ Motion carried~ Mr. ~urray and ~ Plekarcmyk appea~.med before the Ccemission with the proposed plat of Weet ~nnetka ?ark~ lots l, 2 s2~d 3 Block 35 lets I to 6 inclusive Block ~$ lets i to ~ inclusive Block 5~$ lots I to ~l inclusD~e Block ~, and let i Block l~ ~r~ Murray s~ated he desired to have duplexes on lets i to 8 inclusiv~ Block 2~ multiple dwe~gs on lot 1, Block 1o By special use permit ~ud the remaining above mentioned lots are to be used for single f~mily ~ Murray stated he would ~rk ~ut the half-street abutting the echo.! pr~perty~ Decatur and 30~ Avenue North~ The Cemm~iszion pointed out to Mr~ E%U~ray that thim portion of West W~lr~uetka Park spells out the depths of the lot~ facing Boone Av~r~e~ and that the required set back on Boone Avenue is 50 feet~ Mr~ Murre~v stated he would meet the requirement of 50 feet front set ba~k on Boone Avenue when he submits that portion of the p3mt, except the east side of Boone~ then some solution should be made in regards to this problem at that time° The Secretary of the Planning C~mmission is to contact the Deputy Clerk ~ sst up a public hearing for ~est Wirmetka ~rk for the first ~esd~y of October. Iampe~ ~ber Oom~ ~ ad~ioed to appear befo~_~e the P%~maing Commission ~th a p~sed p!~m of a l~ber ~d located on ~etP~ A~~th ef %he ~r ~~y ~ the S~ L~e R.R~ ~d~%~ ~~y m~d ~~ ~mt~. A l~er c~ need~ tra~!~ge b~ is a r~t~ b~s. ~ese ~ ~ ~se~ed at l~gth~ i l~ber ~ is not ~ed ~t ~ ~e ~~ce~ b~ open s~rage is~ s~ t~$ sit.rich is l~'t up to the di~c~tion the Co~c~.~ ~ae C~slon refer~d the ~pr~s~tmtive~ of ~~ L~er O~ to She~ ~mbr~ok~ the V~age ~er. Discussion wa~ held on Section 6, S~otitle A, pe~agraph 2 of the Platting Ordinance, to submit a proposed plat to the Park Board for their appmaval. Motion by Engen, se~ded by E~eg~r to adJourn~ Next regular meeting October 2~ 1961. Secretary Ivan Krueger~ Sr~ Members presort% ~ Member absent Minute~ of O~%obsr 3~ 1961 w~re read by Vi~e~Chair~n Euebelbed~ ~r~ ~ fo~lo~; Page ~% ~r~ph two, ~ the word read~ elos~o Motion by T~ck~r~ s~co~d by 0~ to ac~pt the ~tuuts~ a~ ~or~t~o Ne~e op~ Motion Notioe of Publio Hearing on Proposed Re~oning of ~a%lot 2. Mork Campion Heights wa~ read by Vi¢~Chai~an Kuebelbeok and placed on ftle~ The Village oon~ideratiom.~ ~d ~~ndation~ were. rsad snd placed on fiieo ~ Gra~e Hubbard~ 6119 Wi~retk~ Avenue North objeoted to the re~on~g of ~sid~tial to general burliness. T~ere were ~everai other parlies pre~ent interested the re~on!r~ but none voiced any favorabl~ ~.~a~nts or objeotion~ A wa~ held by the C~lo~ reEarding th~ Motion by Sico~ s~eond~d by T~eker to teeny, mend to '~he Co,=~ci~ that the ~ ~ ~:~d~nt~ai to general ~'' ~ , "- O~ 'b~et 2~ Mork C~pi~% Heights ~uh~tted ~ ~ ~,.de Campion ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ........ ~.~ c~e~ subsequent to rec~ndati~%~ of the Vil~gs ~la~mero Mon~ oFpos~d~ Motion Motion by S~era~ ~e~ded by S~...~:dt te ~!ose ~he R~b}~e F~a.r~g~ None opposed~ Motion he ~o~d sell ihs p~,y ~d th~ n~w owner oouid ~intr~!n the bus~.sss ~ a ~sidentia! ~o~ ~ithout re~%~.g~ A dlsous~ion was he., ~ ~md fr~ It ths C~ions d~i~ wa~ l., Cle~ up the proE~y= 2~ !f the green houss ~d ~ e~ded, off st~et par~ wo~fM be d~st~d. Motion ~ ~en~ se~snded by Sicor~ to ~co~ to the Co~,ci~ %~mt part of Outlot 32~ Audi~or~ ~6 w~ch I~ de.cried 5~; the ~b!i~ Notice ~ re~oned to R~tail ~ot~ No~. K~eger~ Te~sr Ab~~g~ Noti~ ~rried~ Motion by Ohmen~ ~conded by Sundt that the Public Hea~ be closedo None opposed. Motion carried. ap~a~er~ befe~ the .... to app~ for a s~cial use ~r~t to e.~p~ to the Mro Murray appeared b~fore the Commission with a revised plat of the r~vised plat submitted at the Public Hear~Lug of October }~ 1961o Before the Commission would make any reco~m~ndationm to the Council t~he Commission w~ld IAke to ha~ the approval of the School Board to at least have them aw~re of the abutt~g street and the utilities in the street° The Co~iis~ion feels the p~oblem of the street and the utilities in the street is between Mro Murx~y and the S~hool Board° Mr, Murray stated he will notify the School Board of the lo~ation of Decat~r Avenue and the utilities in the st~eet~ A discussio~ was held on the side ~et back of a residential lot~ Xt ~s be~n brought to the attention of the Commission that Groom Construction Company l~ continuing to con~truct hc~es ~th a f~i_~ room w~ch violates the Ordin~nce~ t~ additio~ the fir~ place projects Beyond the famil~ room° The minutes of the .Pla~l~ Core,mission dated August 15, 1961 clearly states our POsition° Motion by Trucker, seconded by M~ckalet~ that the Secretary of the Planning Commission notify the ¥il~ge Clerk to advertise for a Village Planner for the year 1962o That they sub~!t in writ~ their quz:.!ifications to the Chairman of the Plar~ O~am~lssion aud that they ~.]! be 5~tervie-~d by the entire Ccmmzission on November l?~ 1961 snd at that time be recommended to the Village Council for their approval~ None oppo~ed~ Motion ,~rriedo Motion by Ohman, seconded by T~cker to adJou~no None opposedo Motion ~arriedo Ivan Ro Krueger, Sro~ Secretary Next regular meeting November 7~ 196i NEW HOPE P LA N~ IN G C OMM iS S SON 4200 Nevada. Avenue North October 3, 1961 8:00 Members present: Kelso, Olm~n~ S!cora~ Kuebelbeck~ Trucker, ~'~chaletz~ H~sbrouck~ El~eg~r ~ Engeno Members absent~ Tesc~uer~ Sundt. The min~/~s of September 19, 196! w~r~ read by C?mdzmmn Kelso. There beLug no corrections~ motion by Ohman ~nd seconded by Trucker to ~ccept the r~b~s a~ read.. No~ opposed~ Motion carried~ Corrected notice of Public Hearing d~t~l Septem~r 27, 1961 for the purpo~ to consider the application of Lampert L~bsr Company for a S~c~! U~e Pez~t o~ra~ a i~er ~ ~ New Ho~ ~s r~ad~ A co~y of a !et~r from L~rt L~ Co~ to ~cel t~ ~q~st fc~~ a S~oi~! Use Pe~t ~ ~d by C~.~ Xslsc~ Th~ c~ of the let~~ ~s ~t~d Septe~er 29~ 1961 ~ hzd no ~i~t'~e~ There berg no one ~esent on motion by Ob~.r~ ~ seco~ by ~cker to ~dJ~n tP~ P~lic o~osed~ ~ti~n Notice of ~hllc Hesring dated September 26, 1961 for the purpose ~ hoi~iLug ~ Public H,~Ing on thee .prelim~~ pl~t of West Wi~'~tk~ P~k let &~dd~t~n ~s read by t~he ChaL~n~ Mr~ Piearczyk representing ~ssoc~t~d Contradictors, Inc~ w~.s p~r~sent ~d dis~sed the intentions of lssoclated Contr~cto?~ ~i~dng the dis~sion ~ P~mrczyk stated th~ ~Itiple u~_it in block one would be s~, to eleven ~its~ of ~hich the highest structure w~ld be two and one ~ ~to~i~ high~ The Co~&ssiou zsked ~. Piee~cz~%~ if the ViU~ago cub~cribed to the 701 ~nt ~o~ ~hich ~s d~.sor~3o~:2 at a ~tLng of th~ Vi~ag~ Co~nc~ on Sep~r 26~ 1961 ~uld ~Ynis ~ogr~ e~mJ~!e h~. to oor~t~ct the ~tiple d~gs b~ ~d in mi~. ThL~ is ~m~i~rs'to~ but ~hat ~ddition~ ber~fit t~ V~ ~. Piearczyk stated th~ progr~ ~.iscu~d at t~ Counc~ ~t~g ~d nothing to do with the de~!op~nt of West M~u~t~ P~.rk !st ~d~tion b~t ~ the ViS, Es Jo~s this ~o~ D~ co~Id ~t~i~ fL~noLug f~ ~noth~r F~de~ i~ncy ~Ich r~m the V~la~ ~ ~er ~ aid of t~ 701 Redews~,j~nt ~o~m~ With the aid of this pro~m ~ c~o~ld cons~ct ~t~r b~i~ ~ ch~ge !es~ mont~y ~nts ~r u~t. At this point Mr~ Hambr~ck poLnt~d ~ut to t~he Com~,~ssion and to Mr. Pie~vczyk tb~t the Public He~=rLug ~s for ~ p~%i~ potion of the prelimi~u~y plat~ T?~ is in direct violation of the ViiL~g~ Ord~ce~ The Chair stated that t~be Co~m~ssion ho~d m~e commitments tBmt We w~01d consider the partial plat because -~ r®alize the north west portion of the plat would some street relocation due to C.~uty Road 18 ar~ the abutting p!at~ This situation ~s discussed ar~ from it~ the commission felt tb~t the o'~~ ~ ~ a~ st~ not si~ d~ pro~ss of Assoc~ Core, factors ~y ref~rrin~, the to the V~a~ P!~r~ ~.' ~'~ Motion by Sicora, secor~ed by En~n to refer t~ plat of ~Jast WL~t~ Patak to the Village Planner ~nd t!~t the requ~m~nt~ of th~ VILlag~ be ~t~ ~one opposed~ Motion carried. Motion by Sicora~ Seconded by iCuebelbeck to adjour~ the ~.~blic Hsaring~ None opposed° Motion carried~ Discussion was held on Section 5 in lat ~zng., Ordinance. Motion by Trucker, Seconded by Sicora to r~co.~m~.~ to the Council that the Park Board be included to r~ceive '~- ~'~aLt a notic~ of Public H~aring on pre ~lim~mry plans and refer a copy of the pr~limina~y plm~ to the Park Board° None opposed. Motion carried, This motion r.::~fers to Section 5 Prelim!z-tory Plan; Sub~ Title Ac Procedure: paragraph number 2 pr.c,.c~d~_~e (a) mud (b)o Mr. 0 Bannon s-ms p~esent to discu~.~ the lots that abutt on Bass Lake Road in Meadow Lake Nelghts First Addition° Mro Campion was present to discuss property on 62md ~ud $'~ter Avenue North~ The Commission ad~sed him to have s. ~ab!ic He~rLug to discuss his proposal° Motion by Krueger, seconded by Miclm!etz to recommend to t/~e C~ncil no action be takmn on providing ~ * no~i=~ to the F~.~:~ml Goverrm~nt of our pl~ for p~vention of blight until ~ceipt of more evidence that such action would be in the best interest of New Hope° No~ opposed. Motion carried. No one was present for the Public Heari~.Z on tl~e Birkner proper%y~ · Mr, Trucke~ and }~. Michaletz were appoi~-~ted to advise ~o Bir~ner to b~ at. the next Planning Commission meeting~ Motion by Krueger, seconded by Si¢ora te adj~urno None Oppo~d, Motion Next. regular m~eting October 17~ 1961o Secretary Ivan Krueger, Sro 8:00 Members present: Kelso, Teschner, Trucker, Obm~an, Michaletz~ Kuebelbeck, Sundt, Mo fret, Kr~ager ~ Members absents Sicora, Engen. Notice of Public Heari~ on proposed razoning of the west meventy (70) feet of the east (]40) feet of that part of i~t 38~ Auditor's Subdivision #226~ was read byChairman Kelso° The Village Planners~ report an~i' recommendations were read and placed on file~ The Village Engineer~ report was read and placed on file~ A discussion was held and from this discussionMr. Laliberte, 5559 Sumter Avenue North~ objected only because the rezonin~ did not include .his property~ Motion by Ohman, seconded By Trucker to recommend to the Council startLug at a point on the northeast cm~er of the lot m:~ed by the Pure Oil 0ompany at Winnetka ~ud Bass L~ke Road, and extending ~st meventy (70 J feet, then on a line south eno hundred ~ud forty (~Y,O) feet ~ then ~est seventy (70) feet~ then north to the starting P~int, to be zoned fr~ General Business, and Residential to Lfmited Busines~ ths. t p~t of lot 38, Auditor's Subdivision #226, ~e~nepin Oounty~ None opposing, l~tion car.~led~ Notice of Public He~ing of C~pion Murre~y Deve!o~ent Comps~uy for a special use permit to construct three ~ix-unit multiple dwellings on the property described as follow~, Lots 2, 3: &~ 5, 6, and 7.~ Mork Campion Manor 2nd Addition was read by the Chairm~no The Village Planner's report and rec~nm~ndationswere read and placed on file~ A diseussion was held on the requirements of the re~ya/i set back° ~otionbyOBm_au, seconded byTesc~:~r to recommend to the Council to approve the application for special use permit to construct t~ee~aixtwobedroommultiple d~el!ings on Lots 2, 3, ~, 5, 6, 7, Mork Campion Mauor2nd Addition .m~bJect to submission of plans drawn bya regicteredarchitect, to be approved by the Buil~~ctor. Trucker, Sundt ~-otingno; M~chal~tz, Teschner, Krueger, Xuebelbeck, Ohman votingyes. Motion carried. ' Notice of Public Hearing to consider the application for Special Use Permit to construct one twenty-four unit multiple .dwelling on Tract (A), Registered Land Survey No. 8~0 ($.E~ corner of West Br°~ and 62nd Avenue North)° George B. Nelson ~as present to present his plans and views. The Vtllage Flanner~s report was read and placed on file. The Village Engineeres report was read and placed on f1_le. Mr. Howard Beal, 6136 W. Broa.dwa~ and Mr. Wm. Mitchell, 6132 West Broadwa~ approve of the special use permit b~' before the application is granted the storm water problem must be solved° P~ge 2 ~Mo Bob Moffet voiced his approval o£ the-special use perm~_t subject to meeting the area requirement mud the park~ a~ea should be to the west of the building° Motion by Tr~cker, seconded by F~c¥~r to rec~end to the Council to approve the special use permit to b~ild a multiple dwe!ii~? subject to meeting the land area requirements ~ud thmt th~ p~mg ~rea be located on the west side of the structure and that th~ Village Engineer approve a storm water plan for the siteo None opP~sed~ Motion c~rriedo Notice of P~blic Hearing on the preLt~ plat of the registered land survey for ~alter Ah~ preperty, T~act A and B, Registered Land Survey No~ 2~O~ A lengthy discu~o~,,~.s h~ld ~ud the Con.lesion advised Mr~ Ahlm that he not getting full benefit out of his I~ the wa~' he w~s subdividing his thus the public hca~ng w~uld be adjoined ~ ' ~ ~.Aut~l the next regular Planning Cmmmission meet~ug, Mr. ~farr~y w~s present to present the Plat of West l~nnetka Park Addition° A ler~h?~ ~iscussion '~s held. Mm~ion by Tr~cker, seconded by ]~ichaletz to ~commend t~ the Couucil to approve the prel~m~nary Plat o* %~est ~et~ ~ F~mst Add~txon s~ject to the V~ ~neer ~d to ~e a2~ ~ -_~o~ of the ~lllage ~ ~ .~.~mer. ~e op~sed~ ~tt0n c~ed~ ~utes of October 17~ 1961, w~re read by ~ O~ ~d the correc~o~ ~e ~ ~s p~ph to be ~cluded as ~a~a~ three~ ~ ~or~t~e ~th~ 6133 S~ter Ave~me No~h voiced he was in f~vo~~ of the ~zo~ug because he w~ted ~s prope~y ~c~ded i~ th~ rezo~g so he~co~Id b~ild a t~ck g~ge on l~s p~pe~y~ Motion by Tesc~er to accept th~ ~utes mS corrscted~ ~ A letter of re~ign~tion from the Village P3~uuer w~s read by Chairman Kelso. Motion by Tesc~m. er, seconded by Xu~. olbec,~ th~.t the resignation of the Village Plaz~er not be accepted and that him services have been satisfactory in all ~ ~ b~ ~ respects ~ud that he m~bmi~ a ~d ~or Village Planner for the year 1962 Motion by Tesch~er~ seconded by Kuebelbeck to adJourn~ None opposed, Motion carried° Secreta~-y~ Ivan R~ K~aeger N~t r~g~!~' m~ting November 21, 1961~ ~EW HOPE PL~A~NING COMNISSION 4200 Nevada Avenue November ~i~ 1961 '8:15 Members present: Xelso~ Teschner~ Trucker~ Kuebelbeck, Krueger Members absent: Sundt, i~gen~ Michaletz, Sicora Pablic hear~ notice to consider the application of O~Bannon Construction Company for a special use permit to construct one four plex and two eight unit m~ultiple dwellings on Lot 16, Block 31 Lots 17 and 18~ Block il and Lots 16 a~.d 17 Bl~ck 21 Meadow Lake Heights First Addition was read by the Chairman~ Nr~ O~Bannon presented his building and plat plans for the multiple units° The reports and recommendations from the ~illage Planner were read and placed on fileo ~ and Mrs~ Robert S~hilling~ Nrc (llen Amundson-5817 Cavell, and Mro Roger Nelson- 5809 Caveil objected to the m~ltiple dwellings~ 1~ They stated the units would depreciate their hom~$~ 2~ They were being constructed too close. 30 They stated the contractor had the lots in question set aside fo~ larger homes~ ~ The units would be a hamard for childr~n~ Motion by Trucke~, seconded by Teschner to rec~d to the Com~cil to accept the Village Planners reoc~m~dation which are as follows: Lot 16, Block 3 - Approval - pro~lded the st~cture is designed by an arohitect~ parking acces~ is off En~iga Avenue and' proper screer~g is provided~ Lo%s 17 and 18~ Block 1~ Lots 16 ~ud 1'~, Block 2 ~ Denied - The lots ~ahlch were designed for single famil~ hc~es do not adapt themselves to multiple units of this ~i~eo None opposed. Motion carried~ Minute~ of November 7~ 1961 were read b2' the Chairman s~d the corrections are as follows: ' ~o~e opposed~ Motion carrted~ to follow paragraph eleven, page two° Motion by the Chairmano~ do the mi~ute~ stand as corrected? If so, the minutes sta~d am cor~ectedo No~e opposed, Hotio~ ~arried~ ~ne Public Heari~ of the proposed plat of the Registered Land Survey No 240, Tra~t A and B fo~ ~lter Ahlm warn reopened with a discussion on the width of the North boundry line of Tra~t B~ which was agreed upo~ to be 310005 feet~ This then leaving 330°55 fe~t for the North bouudry line of Tract A which was agreed upon by ~11o Thu~ Tract A would be s~arting at the South West corner of T~act A then East 26~o87, the~ North 392.81 feet then East 5~o17 feet, the~ North 700~ feet them West 330~55~ then South 1087o0~ feet this being the starting poin~ Motion by Krueger~ meco~ded by Trucker to recommend to the Council to accept the revimed proposed plat of ~alte~ Ahlm subject to the opinion of the Village Attorney on the Plat~ whioh does not show the street easement on Tract B~ None opposed° Mot&o~ carried~ Letter of resignation from John Sicora was read by the Chairman and placed on fileo Motion by Tes~hner~ seconded by Kuebelbeck that John Sicora be cca~ended by letter for the faithful year he has served on the Planning Commission in the Village of New Hope° None oppo~edo Motion carried~ HOPE PLYING O(~ISSION November gl, 1961 Page of Fair Oakeso It was snggested they take the proper charm~ls to expodite their intentions~ The Building Inspector was present to discuss lot 15, Block l~ Del Neights~ The lot depth ~eing under size and the lot widths Notion by Krueger, seconded by Teschner to recommend to the C~ancil to accept the location of the home with a side yard set back of seven feet. But the aide yard sst ba~k off Wir~etka must be maintained at thirty-five (35) feeto Also a perm~ .~ent turn around driveway be installed leading onto Winnetka Avenue before the completion of the home is accepted~ None opposed~ Moti~ carried. A discussion was held on the steel fabricated hemes proposed to be built in the Village~ 1o The outcome of the discussio~ was that any portion of a room being below the surface of the ground will be called a basement as described in Black~t Law~ 2o ~nat the single family floor area ~dll be met according to the Ordin~uce of 960 square recto 3~ The question of building ~teel frame homes in the ~illage - the Commission dis~us~ed their feasibility° No formal a~tion was taken° MOtion by Xue~elbeck~ secoaded by Km~eger to adjourn° Next regular meettngDecember 5, 1961 Secretary - Iva~ Ro Krueger, Sr~ December 5~ 1961 PLANNinG CO~SSION Pzge 1, last pe~,:~aph: ldne 3: The word yeez, now z~ads :~ars~'~ ?~,ge 2~ p~agra!:& 2~ Znse.~ the word '~st" as the f~st Lu 3~e ]+~ ~aere be~ no other correcbi.ons~ the mAnu'bss stood ~e correct~d~ ~,'~tion by Ohmau¢ seco~ed by Y~zgen~ to reoo~z~ to the Co~,:ucil to deny ~*-~-~ ~'~,~-'~-,',~ to issue a pe~t to F~?, Ho:e:~er fo~ sale of Cbz*±st~s trees a~d to refftmd th~ fee, None opposed~ ~tion ce~¢rie?i~ Motion by E~gen~ seco~.~.-~d by O;~au¢ to reoccmend to the Cm:ucil to &pprova th~ site p].~ ~th None oppos~l. ~tion ~. SfL~r¢ ~s p~ree;ent to discusa hi:~ f.rop~;x~y~ but ~.o solution The representative for P&dg~¢oo~d Bu%id.~r® rezoning r&ther Lot 15¢ Block I, Del H~3ight~, ~.~ a6~dn b:¢o~2~t befere the Co~.~ission for diac;~?~icn due to protective Motion by Krueger: second, sd by T,~schr~,er¢ to der(z '~e vaz%e~o~ ~,~th a lesser set back off W~etk~ due to the vim!on p~.'ob.'2~ ',~.ich wo~ld create a traffic hazard ~ None opposed~ ~4b'bio:¢~. c~:¢,:'~ed ~. A discussion ~ms held ~.,~ith ~% H&sbro%*ck J:uu r~g.s,~d to bis being retain~:d by Village as a pl~%ue~- for th,~a yo~r 1¢62. ~{is rep]y ~aa that he could not ~fford to give se~ce to az~ suh.'~tvb ~-~ 1962~, Mro Ha~brouck gave a report orz the p?o~,,ss8 of the ~illageo PLkNNi~[G The second% major ~?ailimE ...... of the v~r~. wa.-~ the pz-oced%~'o '~.~'~,' z~'~ ....... ng~ a~d special a ~rm~g~r. A reoor%, from the Cr~tmi and New ~:~,-~.~.~.p.~ ?lsa~ning Co~mmsomon meeting w~ch was. indus,~ ~a_ park. Bsing no furth~ b~sln~ss~, a met, ion kY Fru,ag,,Tr~ seconded bF E~gen~ to adjo~ra.~ None opposed. Motion i~ R~ kYu~ger~ Sr~ r~ot b~ ~ol~ted. foil~s~ ~t p~"~.~i.::i~ p~c, one i:ie.~ ~ ,~,..~ .... ,, ~stion oy Oh .... n~~ ........ .... one's,:-,": ..... by T~sc~er, to ~e~emd a~~. of P~n~s 'Lgh~d Addition ez:R:'.~pt %hat th~3 lot t~e be ~'~b~sh~d iri ~?~:coPcP~,nce ?f. th th~ Villa:~ OrdY~-mc::~ Non:~ O~?~Ssdo Motion ~ied.~ Corrections on page ~ :fiPst Mirs, KPa!~ li:,?.z one~ the ~:or~i%.i.~s~now ~d. South Of 36th Av~:~:~ ~' ~'~ ' ' ~ ~ Bei~ no ~es~ eOZTec%ioi2S er o~.,ssior~ the mimi'bes at~d ':is ccc'u, ected,~ %~inn~tk~'A~enue North b~ o~ide~ed as a~~nt to the Village. Commission. ~one opposed. M~tic~ ~:~rri~d~ the Commission The ~~ ~s~icn: ca~ied, - ~embers of ~e~ Hope Planning Commission This is a brief report on Future planning needs of the Village: i) Probably the primary need ts the obta/ning of land for permanent open apace, It might be ~sll to consider requiring a dedication of land or cash equivalent ~hen Final plats are submitted. In fac%, a "plan re= open space" migh% be high on the i/at of planning commission business For 1962o Inciden%ally~ the Faders! government sill cont=tbute 20~ on the cost of carrying out such a piano 2) Administration of %he subdivision and zoningordinances needs to be atrsngthenedo There have been too many cases where mix-upa and misunderstandings have occurred. Standards For multiple dwellings should be raised° Site plans and building plans are still tendin9 %o be amateurish° 1% migh% be ~ell if ~ew Hope got more t~o-level apar%men% struc%ureso These tend to be more compatible ~ith a communi%y of ramblers and split levslso Rote planning should be done for pedestrian circula%tOno A capital improvement program could provide For yearly progress toward a long-range plan of sidewalks° s) There could be more attention given to public rslationso Ulttma%ely~ %ha success eF planning in ~e~ Hope ~ill depend upon public unde~- s~andin9 of planning° There is no[ much understanding a% the p~esen% %imco Possibly more attention could be given %o newspaper coverage of planningo It is questionable ~hethsr a high level of municipal services can ever be provided by our presen% f~agmen%ed municipal areas. Poss- Ibilities of merger - perhaps ~l%h Plymouth '- should be investiga%edo · P~obab[y ~he main land use p~oblem has to do with the area between Winne%ka and the railroad~ north of the Rockford Road, This area is now in an inde%erminant state. In my opinion, %his a~ea should ~e__set%led once and for all. Uncsrtain%y prevents high-quality dev- ~idpmspt of any kind° As you know~ I believe that it is imperai-ive %o elimina%e a large pa~% of the strip zoning along the ~ailroad in t~'~ea° SSH/Jb 8) · ith respect to the pianntng commission itself, you might do ~ell -~consider having one regular meeting a month - ~ith a second meeting devoted %o planning and [ohandling emergency busineseo This conforms ~o prac%ice common in many other communi%ieso It ~ould allow more siren%ion %0 long-range planning and discussion of policies° It also would help you use your professional staff to better advantage° Respectfully submitted,. Sherman S. Hasbrouck