Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1960 Planning
IS o January 7, 1960 Meeting of ~abl.~¢ He~.ring~ on Proposed Rezo~,ztug. Members present~ ~ueger~ Si~..~.a, Jessen~ Kelso, 2~nard., and Hinitz. Members absent~ Ohman~, Niel~n. Alternate Council ~mber p~ese~'~t~ ~ckero Chairman Kelso opened meeting ~:.:: 8~15 oeciock p.mo by reading notice of Public Hearing published .in the North H~nnepin Post. Chairman Kelso read letter from M~P~ Jenson dated Janu~ 3, .19605 ~tter was plaee~ on flleo ~. Hanson voiced hie opiniqn in favor of proposed rezone1 ~ in regard to its effect on his adjacent property. International PA~pertie~ In~ stated that they would l~ke to include the ~oody F~utson property in the proposod rezoning~ Mro Xnutsau ~ic~d that he would ~:~ke to have his p~operty i:m!udedo Pl~ Oommlssion member Menard was contracted by phone by M~rs~ Clemens and ~e stated that she ~d l~e to ha~ her Section 6) ~eluded ~ the pro~sed re~o~o She~ ~brouck ~ted out that the ~zo~ of the Ci~en~s pro~rty ~ Jea~ze the p!~us of 'Luter~tion~ ~o~ties Inc~ because of the~ ~ st~ds of develo~ent~ ~s~ssion ~ held by the P10m~ng Coca_ss!on on it ~ decided tb~t he r~est ~ phono foL~ rezo~ng pro~s~ for l~d use~ ~. Monad ~ notify ~g~. CloseRs on tho d!.ocus~ion held ~t this meet~ ~d ~so ad, se her that ~o P~u~tug Coumis~icu ~J. c~oider ~ p~r~ p~sented r~est for rez~i~-!~ ~Ich shm~s proi?ose~ us~ of the l~ndo ~. ~l~en, re~s~nt~ ~te~atio~! ~opertles Inc. presented the e~sien ~th a p~l~o- ~keteh p~ of ~e ~l~d l~out, lot ~r~g~ent~ ~d ~nterior ~x~ets~ ~ t~s ~r~ut of inte~or at,ets, ~. ~l~e?~ stated that the %-~tion of ~~y ~g ~~ 18 ~~t !~ a ~g'~er v~ue t~ the ~te~.or lots, th~ e~~ the ~tlon of ~! the sites~ Notion ~ 4ems~ to ~c~end t~ the Co~e~ ~ O~ere~ to h~ ~du~~ ~ the ~e~y he~gmeti~ ~pt the Ol~e~'~: p~pe~y~ ~ A~ue ~ the S~th ~'est ~er of Section 6 to~s~p the ~a No~h of the B~s ~e !~ad ~d the No~h 165 f~t ~f ~ ~h West ~r of So.ion 7 T~$~i'~ ll8 P~ 21~ Seeon~d by ~itz~ ~tien e~ed. '..Notion by Jessen, Seconded by ~tz to adjourn hear:~Ugo Motion earriedo~ J~nu~y 7~ 1960 M~mbers P~esent~ K~eg~r, Sicor&, Jesson, Kc!sober--nard, M~_tz..~ ~It~?nate Co~n~cil Member pre~ent~ Trucker~ Membe~a Aba~nt~- O?m~n, Nie!~en~ Mo~ioR b~ .Je~en to defer th~ r~ng of the ~ut~o of ~d~ pr~ meet~g ~ order to ~dite th~ me~%~g. Seconded ~ Si~ora~ ~fotion ~. N!eden~er ef ~!den R~e B~l~ng C~mp~ ~nd ~. ~rnc~t ~i~lie r~pre~Lo.E Wonderla~.d ist Addition c~w~e b~foro the ~am~.g C0~sion re~.~ the ~ ~ +~= of mu!.zple ~ey ~re ~Ferred to ~ H~b~u~ for su~e~tionm ~d con~tmtion~ the ~ssibiTity of deve!o~g on a site b~is. L~t~r from issocie~bed Contro. ctOrs ~ted ~c~oe~: 16, 1959 w~'~ by C~~ Kelso and placed o~ile. Motion by.J~ssen to vacato ~3-bbs m~eets ~ H~d-.Hei~tS A~tion~ SeCond~ b~:Sico~, ~tion ~ cop~Of a letter f~m Co~.: & ~t~ch ~ted ~c~er'iT~:.I9~9 con~~ a:. ~tion of ~ !stter f~. ~:.-t Eelbor ~ r~d au~ p~ced - ~ ~o-the ~f"a t~sibiO~ ~ea ~d ~.~t. this ~a be stupid by the-~ L~tter from. Otto B~estroo mud Asc~¢lates dated Dec.er 21,-i1~59 Was r~md ~nd plat.ed .on file~ ~-'~ ..... ead' ~ .~o~,~-.~n~ ~xpausien of N~' Hope ~J~ ~es. He' r~e~t~d to ~ow how cl~ ~e he could b~ld to p~y line Discussion w~ held ~ud it ~.~ms decidc ~%~t there was no ordL~uce cont~l~ this ~t~ ~e ~ss%~ty ~s ~.sc', :~$~ of vacating ~r~si~ ~.~ to the po~ef the Lut~sect~g mtL~et kd.~d the b~l~ ~cy ~d to ~ork out ~~' ~nue to the West of the Letter ~rom Ne~thern Land and R~lty Co, requesting 'the ~zo~g of Lot fo~ &u~rs ~~ion 3~j~ ~nd p~aced on ~e. ~tion ~ Sieo~ seconded by ~-[~d to refer tb~s matter to ~. E~brouck. Mo~on ~-~ed. A cheek Of $50.00 was given to the ~erk~ as p~ent of remor~h~g fee frem Northern Land mud Realty Co. Minutes of Ne~ Hope Pl~rz~ Oodles!on ~eetin~ of ~c~ber 10, 1959~ ~re ~d by Kelso. ~~ !~ now Stcor~ to rec~end to the C~c~.i to accept ~d ~eo-~e ~~tio~ ~rt!es ~nc. to proceed ~ the p~atto~ of their ~ for the ~ence ~d~t~ C~nter desc~bcd by th~ rep~s~tt~- It ap~S to be in the best ~teresta ~f ~c ~l~ ~d does net ~e~et ~_th ~ lo~ r~ge ~ of this c~ssion. Seconded ~ Nielsen. Motion e~rted. ~tes sto~ ~ ~u~s ef the ~cem~r~7, 1959 meet~g ~a~ one ~ to ~ ~d~tri~ ~ ~~tio~ ~rties Inc. ~utes stood ~ corseted. ~utes of ~e~ber ~, 1959 ~et~ ~ read aud ~u~ s~d a~ ~- ~s~on ~ held on bhe ~ let ~e ~ ~e ~~ Ghee tt f~ 9~ ~ feet ~ a ~~ ef lo,5~ ~ feet. A a~c~ m~tL~ ~ set for ~t~ J~ 16, 19~, ~t 9~ a.m. to ~s~ss the ~ong r~ P~- N~ ~~ ~et~ set for ~g no ~ther b~ess, ~tion by ~ ~nded ~ Sieora to Sec~ M~mbers Present ~ ~, g~ ~ ~-' Me~t~.g ~ o~n~d ~ ~ctLug chalmn~ Jessen by r~ding the ~uute~ of J~ 7, 1960~ ~r~ra%a ~, line one ps, gs ~ no~- r~ds: ~sc~sion ~s held on the possib~ity A ~e on Page 1 now of ch~gL~ the ~ ~- lot s~ Lu th~ V~e~'~ pmr~raph ~ads: ~:Motton by J~ss~n to ~ec~end to th~ Co, ell to v~c~te H~l~ud Heights Add~tion~ Thus the ~-~utes stood ~s read. ~ Bob Msn~d representing Pat Rooney of Bond Const~ctfon C~ ~c. ~ reg~d to Meld~ Meadows. Motion by Meted ~ r~c~end to the God, oil to accept the ~at East 750.5 of the Nerth~st ~ of Zaction _I~ t~ship ll8 P~e the Roc~erd P~d~ The ViSage Clerk sh~ be ad~d to ~et ~bl!c He~g for Feb~ ll~ 1960, S~conded ~ ~tm~ ~ctien ~. No~ ~oney pre~entsd prel~~ ~ngs ef the ~d~t~o to the N~ Ho~ B~l~g ~tion by Mena~ to rec~nd ~ the Co~cil to accept th~ pr~l~in~ ~a~ngs ~thout the b~ck f~Lug on the~ east side of t.he b~~ ~d to o~bilime ~chftect~l concrete bleckz ~st~.. ~ the e~nt ef the ~el~tton of Lo~si~u~ A~nue tc th~ We~, the %~est sid~ of the b~l~~ ~ be brick f~d. 8e~nded by Motion c~rled ~ ~ Ne~ Roon~y w~ ~re~$te to ths relocation of Iou~.s;~ua ...... ' ~ the We~t ef the Bew~g · ~n~,~ of Lot ~ Au~tors S~o~sion 32g~ He~ ..... ~_~ Co~'by, ~.nneso'ta f~oTM ~d~t~i~ ~ ~d by the C~o:~Lon~ ~so ~ ......... f~m ~. H~b~uck. ~scu~s!en ~ held en No~he~- Bui?~i~ Co. Petitien. It ~ decided t~t the ~tftien be t$1ed ~l i~ther ~fo~ztion ~g~ug the ~t~e us~ of the l~d be presented to the ~tien ~ Sieera~ ~ have the ~ec~t~.~' ~ite a letter to ~nee~e de~lo~ent ~d to ~' d ~tion. f~d cut ~at t~ &f Lud~ri~ ~ ~o on the p~rty Motten ~econded ~ Me~d. ~tten ~tten by ~tz mee~dedbby ~n~d to ad~o~ the meetS. at 8:00 o~ P~- Secretary, Ivan Krueger · S~co.~.o~., ~m. oer~ absent~ Menard .~emoers absent: Jes~n~ Ohmar:. and Nielsen. ~e ViLlage Plainer present: ~,~o Sherm~.u~ Has~rouek. A letter of tr~smitial on New Ho~ D~ks at i-to ~e ~ ~ad by Chai~u Joe Kelso, ~ ~el~m~ry dr~t ~s read~ discussed, ~d ~.sed very c~e~Ii ~ ~ Ha,b~.oac-~ to publish the ~port of the New Hope Motion by Slcora to ad~,se Sh~n ~ ~ '~' ' ~ ~a~ ~:ew Hope V.oa~.~s At !ts Plam~ng C~ssion as corrected from pz-~i~niua~7 ~'~ ~* ' - ..... Se~nded by l~en~d, l~tion c~r~ed, ~e artical ~ the St~. and Tri:rmue ~oout tho ~dcn~g of Co~uty Emad ~9 ~s~ brought ~ the ~ttsntlon of ths Plazming C~fiss!on,. Motion by P~.n!'t~ to reco~mend th.at t~o V~.l~e Council_ ~;up~o~?t thc County pl~ for devclol~nt of Co~ty Road f,.~9 as a four l~o hi~r~' fromm Victo~ i~[~.o~ ~ ' _ -~ ~ t ' '~ Long ~uge P!~ for to cowry Rogd 18. ~nis pro~sal ~ s c ~.s~, ~th ~n~ . Seconded by Hz~ue~r, ~otion c~'ried. ~t!on by ~eg~r to adjourn, socond,;d by Mer~.~d. ~.iotlon Socrct~ Ivs~. ~eger Special meeting of~the plam~ing Commission w~ called to ordoi- for the ~pose of rep~t~g H~l~d ~ight$ ~ '{-~-' . ........... ' ..... of ~ Retry ~c, desc~bed there plan to c.}~st:~ct o~n ~ket. ................ iT, w~s suggested to the developers that they ~ ..... ~ ,~ ,,.~ ........ ......... pare., to ~g ~ich ~d ~%ow sev~r~ b~ldin, gs ~i pi'-~speetive ~!~,h p~'ticul~2- at'tontion to the relationship to ~treets~ c,~os; di~,~.rs~ yar~5.:e~ ~eas; si.~is k~,Iks~ and entr~ces~ it was further su~este~ eh~t thc deve]a~ ........ ~--~ ~ ~ ~d ~. A~nson ~{cre in a/u~e~ent ~¢ith the co?J~ssion to st~mt canst~ctton on ici one block t~ ~ch %zoul. d be the start of the b~{'fer Eons betvzeem tho ~ndusb~al ~d ~sidenti~! zones, ~e des~reptive of BartiettS Addibion~ the lot~ of ~hieh 6~.~ to block t~, ekceot the lo+ Yes+~ {,f ~n{~-.-~h+. ~- ~ ,- Locker Pl~t ~ud the 3~9 foot by 2~0 f'::ot lot Sou~ of iota ten and eleven block on~. ~ll of this proporty is p~?z't of Ho~.~ud ~{eights{Ho~g_~ud Heights} {Leg~ ~sc~ption) Motion by ~es~en to r~c~mnd to tho ~pty Clerk to set up a l'~/.~llc he~g for the p~eed plat of tho B~tlett ~s Ad, ti. on. Se~ondsd by k%n~, :?ecretary Ivan R. Erueger HOPE pL~W~NG CO~$~SSION January28, 1960 Members present: Menard, Kelso, Ohms~u, Krueger, Hinitz, Jessen. Members Absents Nielsen Notion by Ohman to dispence with readi_~g the m~nutes'beeause all the members received the mdnutes in the mail. Secor~ by Sicorao ~otion carrY-ed. 'Gervais and Hunter came before the commission with an application for rezo~tiz~g of residential to commercial purposes on ~ich they intend to errect a super-market on Block 1 Meadow Lake Terrace. ~e street location of propertF Bass Lake Road & Yukon Avenue North. The Commission pointed out to ~'~. Ge~i.m and Mr. Hunter. (1) This would be spot zoning (2)- ~e supsr market would tend to take a~Y from good commercial zoning (3) it wo~m!d effect the stability of the near by homes. (2) It would tend to .start strip zoning along the Bass Lake Road. Motion by l~enard seconded by 0bm~n to refer },~. C~vais ~d Mro Hunter application for rezoriing to~t~® zoning ¢o~mzittse. ~tion carried< Roy EvenSon ~ud Don Olson came before the commission with a plat. Mr. Hasbrouck made some suggestions so the plat would meet the lot requirement. The com~ ission suggested to l~r. Evenson and '~. 01son to redraw the plat and present it at a later date. Mr. Bob Bald~n presented the plat of VLucent ~ick. Motion by Je~sen to have the 01e~uk set upaa public~ ~he3~ ~'.~.g and at the same time have the hea~tng on the rezoning of the Vimcent WL~ Plat. Seconded by N~nttz. Motion carried. Er. Hewitt Peterson pressnted the plat of Alls~ Hills. Motion by Jessen to have the Clerk sst up a public hearing for the proposed plat of Allen F3_lls at 7:30 O~clock ?.m. Februa~y /1, 1960 ~nd all notify the ~ounty Hig~ Department and also all ~butting property owners for this hearing~. Seconded by Me~mrd. ~mtio~'~ carried. Motion by K~3aeger seconded by O~m~n to adjourn. Motion carried. Secretary: Ivan R. Krueger R~ m~¢t~¢g of the New HOl~ Planning Commission February 1!~ 1960 ~nbers present~ Kaiso~ Krueger~ Jessen~ Si¢orm~ ~n !~!embers Absent ~- Hir~tm, ~e~rd ~ Nielsen Motion ~ Smc~r~ to defer ~th reading of ~'.e minutes of ~nuary Janu~~ 28~ and Jan~j 16~ 1960 until later in the meeting~ Seconded by Je~en~ ~otion carried. ~r~ Glen Kuch p~mented ~ud 01d Plat of ~:ILunetk¢ Hills Addition ~lth a request to re'wi~ it. Motion by Jesm~n to recommend to the Council to evacuate the r~mainder of &7th Avenue North b~tween lot i block 2 and lot I block 3 of Winnetka Hills Addition and this is to further recommend that the fo~er street property be approved for addition to the present lot I block 3 in order that it be platted L~to two 75 by 130 ft. lots. Seconded by 0haan. M~tion earried. Olden and Evenmon c~m® before the commission ~ith the pr~:.posed plat of Fair ~mk~$. Motion by Jenson seconded by Ohman to approve the plat of Fair Addition a~ amended by Sherm~ Hasbrouck. ~tion carried. Ohairman Kelso read the minutes of Jarrmary l&, Jar~y 16, January 28~ 1960 Of January l~Sec~ud paragraph now reads: "A represen~tive of Suburban Engineering appeared in regard to Melody Meadows,~ Of j~nuary iA~p~ragraph thr~e line four: "that the Village Cloak be advised to ~et Public Hemming for February ll, 1960 on the proposed plat of ~elody Of January 16--Paragraph t~ line one the word, revi~ed now i~'~reviewed." Of January 28--Paragraph one new r~ads; "N~tion by Ohmmn to defer reading the minutea of January 1~ & 16 until next regular meeting. Seconded by Sicora, Notion carried. Mo~on by Jesaen seconded by Sicora minutes of January 14, 16, and 28, 1960 stand aa corrected. Motion married, Motion by J~ssen %o have Vi!l~e Clerk set up ~blic hearing for Vineent ~ck for his application of re~oning to residential. The Spring Co. Sent a letter a plat and ~ photo-state of the New Xork Times in ~bich a layout of cluster p]~tting was sho~n, which is open for discussiomo the Spring r,,. ....... .¢a ,,,,~ to Mro H~.s'brouck ~ith Motion by Jcasen~ $~co~ded by O'-~an th~'t the me~tLug be adJourned~ ~!otion c~rried~ ~E ~ me,ting February ~0, !gd'? a Sap¥.~ Meeting~ Minutez o~ the Pu~olic Hearings held by the New Hope Pl~uning C on, mission Members Present: Nielsen, Hinitz, Menard, Krueger, Ohr~.n~ Members Absent: Kelso~ Jessen~ Affidavit of Publication of the Proposed Rezoning of the Vincent ~!ick Plat was read by Acting Chairman 0hman. Motion by Krueger, to recom~end to the Council to rezone from industrial to residential that part of the ~,~ of the E-~- of the S.~. ~ lying Easterly of the M~N.S. Railroad in Section 8, Township 118, Range 21, IIennepin County° Seconded by tIinit:~,. Motion carried. Motion by Sicora, to table the proposed plat of Vincent ~'ick~ and that he be notified to appear before the next re&~Alar mee~ag. Seconded by Hinitzo Motion carried° Notice of Public Hearing of proposed pl~t of Bartletts Addition was read by acting c]'~irmanOhm~%. A very len~thly discussion was held on the use, location, and distance bet~een the buildings on 'the layout on the Proposed Bartletts Addition and they did not meet with the existing Building Code. Motion by Hinitz to recommend to the Counmil to accept the Proposed Plat of Bartlett's ;~dd±tion for ~ltiple ~ellings. Seconded by Mended. Krueger voting No. Motion carried. A spont~ueous reactionby the p~ople of the Mee~o%~' L~e aud adjoining areas upon hearing about a r~tail store being proposed in their area came before the ple~uing co~uission.' Mr. Gervais ~ called to appear to protect his Lnterest. ~s was an informal discussion on the rezoning for Commercial purposes the intent to erect a super-m~ket on Block 1 Meadow Lake Terrace. All people present voiced they did not want a commercial store in this area. Mro Guy ttielnhofer from the Minnesota Department of ~?:~iness Development, wanted to know if we were satiofied with the progress, means, and ways that the Village Planner is ai~ing and advising New Hope. The Planning Commission ~els we are indebted to Sherman Ilasbrouck for for his part in the Modern Sound Planning which will aid the development of New Hope in a mann,er attractive to industry and residents alike. N°~ice of Public Hearing on Proposed Plat of Vincent ~.'ick was read by acting chairman Mr. Davenport of the N.N. and S. Railsx~d waa interested primarily in fencing along the ~;ick plat.' hi'.',ETiNG Hinitz~ Me.oars ~resent on Village Co-~ci!: Honsey~ T~cker~ ,~e~ !lope Looks At its Chaiz~-sm Kelso present¢~d bhe Co;mncii (,he bookiet~ ~'~'? ~' ~a'ture~~ a report by tlne P/.~u'ming Com.¥tssion, ldr~ Hasbrouck submitted the first drafi~ of a up to date zoning regulation for discussion purposes only~ hesponsloitl'y for putting t! .' ~, regulations into ordinance form ~ests ~th the Village Council and Vil!ag~ Attorney° The Ordinance draft was read ~nd was discussed step by step to section III District ~rovisions Part D Per~..ltted Usez. [~ae to the time it was suggested the members of the Council ~.nd Planning Com~ssion take the draft home and read th~ rest of the remaining ordinance ~d make conm~ents smd notes for the next special meeting February 27, 1960. A discussion was h~!d on increasinF~, the mm,~_:~" ...... :: ~n size lot in the Village. Mayor Honsey said he would contact the Home ?~i!ders Association to have them present so they could express their views on the subject at the next special meeting Ivan Krueger, secretary Minutes of the Public He~rings held by the New Hop~ Pl~.~uing Commission Members Present: ~ielsen, H±nitz~ ~lengrd, Kz~eger, Oh~a~n. Members Absent: Kelso, Jessen. Affidavit of Publication oi~ the Proposed Resoni_ug of the Vincent ~.~ick Plat was read by Acting Chai~n Ohman o Motion by Krueger, to reconm:ond to the Council to rezone from industrial to residentisJl that part of the -J-~- of the E~- of the S.~J. ~ lying Easterly of the M.~LS. Railroad in section 8, To~naship llS, Range 21, Hennepin County° Seconded by Hinitz. Motion carried. Motion by Sicora~ to table the proposed plat of Vin~nt ~'ick, and that he be notified to appear before the next regular mee~i'~g. Seconded by !iinitzo Motion carried. Notice of Public He~ring of proposed plat of Bartletts Addition was re~d by ~cting c~airman Ohman o ~ very len~thly discussion was held on the use, location, and distance between the buildings on the l~vout on the Proposed Bartletts ?.ddition and they did not meet with the existing BuilcLing Code° Motion by Itinitz to recommend to th~ Council to s~ccept the Proposed Plat of Bartlettms ~ddition for Multiple dwellings. S~conded by Mene~d~ Krueg~r voting No. Motion c~'~rriedo A spontaneous reaction by the p~ople of the Meadow L~J~e ~d adjoining areas upon hearing about a retail store being proposed in their area c~me before the planning co~zmission. Mr. Gervais ~m~ called to appear to protect his interest° This wa~ ~ inform~ discussion on the rezoning for Commerci~l 'put-poses the intent to erect a super-m~rket on Block 1 Meadow Lake Terrace~ All people present voiced they did not want a commercial store in this area° Mr. C-uy Hie!nhofer from the Minnesots. Department of Business Development, wanted to kn~ if we were satisfied with the progress, means, and ways that the Village Plan~ner is aiding and advising New Hope. The Planning Commission P_el~ we are indebted to Sherman Hasbrouck for for his part in the Modern Sound Planning which will aid the development of Nev~ Hope in a man, er attractive to industry and residents alike. N°~ice of Public He~.rLug on Proposed Plat of Vincent '.'ick was read by acting chairman ehman. Mr. Davenport of the N.N. and S. Railroad was interozted primarily in fencing along the ¥ick plat.~ ~{inutes <? the Public Hea_rings held by ~:.he New Hope Pl~uning Commission Hembers Present: ~ieisen, Members Absent: Keiso~ Jessen~ Affidavit of ~blication of thc Propose~ F~esoning of the Vincent ~[ick Plat ~.~ re~. by Acting Chs~rman 0~ Motion by K~eger~ to recommend to the Council 'to rezone from industrial to residential that ps~rt of the ~¥ of the E½ of the S.'~.. ~ lying Easterly of the M.N.S. Railroad in Section 8 ~ Township ll8, Range 21, IIennepin County~ Seconded by Hinitz. Motion carried. Motiun by Sicora~ to table the proposed plat of Vincent ~'ick, and that ~. regular meethg~ Seconded by he be noti~ie~ to aooear before the next '' tiinitz~ Kotion carried. Notice of Public tlearing of proposed plat of Bartletts Addition was read by acting ci'airm~ Ohman. A very len~thly discussion was held on the use, location, and distance bet~een the buildings on the layout on the Proposed B~rtletts Addition and they' did not meet v~th the existing ~uilding Code. ~ I~otionby Iiinitz to recommend to the Council to accept the Proposed Plat of Bartlett's Addition for Multiple dwellings. Secondedby Men~d.~Krueger voting No. Motion 'carried. A spont~a~ous reaction by the p~ople of the Meadow Lake ~md adjoining areas upon hearing -Joout a retail store being proposed in their area came before the planning cc~ission~ Mr. gervais mn~. called to appear to protect his interest. This was an informs2 discussion on the rezoning for Conmercial purposes the intent to erect a super-:~m-rket on Block 1 Meadow L~,e Terrace. All people present voiced they did not want a commercial store in this are~ Mr o guy !lie!nd%ofer from the ~innesota Department of BuSiness Development, wanted to know if we were sat~sfied with the progress, means, and ways that the Village Planner is aiding and advising New The Planning Commission ~els we are indebted to Sher~.~u Itasbrouck for for his p~t in the Modern So~ud Planning which will aid the development of New Hope in a m~.m~er attrective to industry and residents ~e. Notice of Public Hearing on Propoc~d Plat of Vincent ~'ick was read by acting chairman Ohman. Mr. Davenport of the N.N. and S, R:~lroadwas interested primarily in fencing along the ~ick plat. . ...... ,~.~ .... '~;o reco~.,~mend to the Council to acoe:~,t '~',~ Proposed Plat of V~cent ~'~ic~ ~th the reco?~endati~n to the Council of Sheen H~brouck to el~nate 47th Avenue No~h ~d redra~ th~ Plat with lots to replace 47th A~nue North, Seconded by Krueger, Moti~ c~ried ~ Mr~ Bjorki~u%d representing O.hmau and Sanders with a petition to re-zone land 17o88 located south and west of~e intersection of ~ irmetka Avenu~ and 3~th Avenue North° discussion was held on th~ rezon~ngo Olson and Evenson ~,.~ith a drawing of Fair Oakes with six 11 unit Multiple ih'~ellings. '~fith the layout t~:~,.~ they had there would be no street access. Norm Rooney from F & R Realty ~-~th a request to buiti 3 multiple dwellings on lots 3,4, and 5 Block 7 in Hockford Park ~ddition. Iiolion by Hensa~d to recommend to the Council to approve if it conforms with the ordinance set forth at this time. Seconded by Nielsen° Motion carried. John Niedenferer of the Oold,~n Rule Building Company with a 21 multiple d~elling unit on lot 13, 14, and. 15 of Golden Rule 2nd Addition. ~ discussion was held, The secretary to notify ~.M. Niedenferer of the t~m -. '~ the Public Hearing. Motion by Hinitz seconded by Sicora to adjourn. Motion carried° Next Meeting ~11 be saturday l.~;~rch 5, 1960 ~ joint P!~o~ming Commission and Co~ucil meeting, Secretary Ivan R. Krueger Hope ~as opened 9~30~, ~.~m~ch 2!~.~ 1960 Members Present: Kelso, Sicora, ~ueger~ V~x Auken, Menard, l~chaletz, Jessen, Ohman, Hasbroucko Members Absent: Hinitz, Nielse.~,: Uae chairman read the minutes of the 'March lO meeting, Motion by Van A~ken to except the m~nutes as read. · Secon.~ by Sicora. The mLuutes of the ~oint meeting of ~l~e New Hope Council and Planning Commission of ~rch 12, 1960~ were read. COrrection in paragraph two the word acceptc~nce now reade occupancy. Correction two add: I~tion by V~. Auken seconded by Sicora to adjourn. Motion carried. Motic~n by Sicora to except the minutes ac corrected. Seconded by Van A~.~en, Motion carried. Northern Building Compan~ request for rezoning of lot ~ Auditor's subdivision n~mber 324~ Hennepin County. The secretary is to notify Northern Building Company that their request will be taken care of at a public Hearing on th~ first Thursday' Lu April at 8:00 p.m. at the Village Pmll o Chairman Kelso nmde a report of a meeti~ ~.,~_th 'the Park Board, Cotmcil, i~Mo C0rwin and ~M. Doells, Park Board Advisers. TT.~e re~rt was for 5m~o~.,.~ative purposes only. A discussion was held but no action ~s taken. ~e Proposed Policy on P~igh~,z~,.I ff.!~8 ~as discusscdo Hotion by Van~:A~ken to recommend to the Council to adopt the propo,~¢d po!ic~r on highway 18. Seconded by Ohman, Motion carried. 2~. H~sbrouck said he would notify the Cou~lty with a registered letter to take action on our proposed policies of platting along County Road ~.Iotion by Menardo SeCondod ~y V~u J~uken to adjourn. Motion carried. Next meeting first ?~ur~da~, of April. Members Present: Kelso, ~icora, Krueger, Van Aukeno Menard, E~chaletz, O~ ~.hman, Hasbrouck. Jessen, Members Absent: HinttZ, Nielsen. The chairm~l read the m~uutes of the ~4arch l0 meeting. Motion by Van Auken to except the minutes as read. 'Seconded hy Sicora. The minutes of the Joint meetLug of +Jhe New Hope Counc~_l e~ud Pla~ Co~nission of ~.~rch 12, 1960, were read. Correction in Paragraph tw~ the word acceptance now reads occupancy. Correction two add: ~otion by Van Auken seconded by Sicora to adJomm. Motion carried. Motion by Sicora to except the mir~utes as corrected° Seconded by Van Aukeno Motion carried. Northern Bui!dlr~? Comp~ request for rezo~ing of lot ~ Auditor~s subdivision number 32~, Hennepin Co~ty. The secretary is to noti_~y Northern Building Company that their request will be taken care of at ~ public Hear~n~g ou the first Thursday in April at 8:00 p.m. at the Village Hallo Chairman Kelso made a report of a ~:ceting ~,~th the Par~ ~o~.rd, Council, Mro Oorwin and ~. Doells, P~k Beard ~,dvisers. The ~eport was for ,' ~;?o~ative purposes only. A discussion was held but no ~ction was taken. The Proposed Policy on Highws~ #18 we.,~ discussed. Motion by Van~:Auken to recommend to the Council to adopt thc .')ropoced poli~ on highw~ 18. Seconded by Ohman' ~.fotion carried. ~. Hasbrouck said he wo~d notify the County ~ith ~ registered letter to take action on our proposed policies of lat~ ~ P ~-'~ g along County Road 18. ~Iotion by Menard. Seconded by V~uu Auken to adjourn. ~tion carried. Secreta_~r Ivan H. Krueger Next meeting first Thursda~ of April. Public [lear~ug on Proposed R, ezo~-~:.~: for Block One Meadou· Lake Terrace Ma~'ch 2~ 1960 Members Present Members Absent: Sicora, Van Auken, Krueger, Menard, M~chelatz~ Ke!so~ Jessen, Hasbrouck~ Ohmano ~Linitz, Nielsen~ The Chairm_~u read the notice which ~.~as published in the North Henn~pin Post regarding Garvais and H~uuter rezoning, ~rch 17~ 1960. ~. Gervais and ~k.° Hunter were asked to describe their proposed usage if the request were granted. The reason for the rezoning W~s: The ten lots were low l~d end full of peat not s'citab!e for homes, uuless they were sl~ homes and this would cost a great deal of money because of fillo ~o Madrow of 8502 Bass Lake Road voiced, many homes are being built on pilLug, ar~d he had no objections to slab homes. He said they would be better than a supermarket° Mrs° Joe Erickson stated she was vLuder the :bupression the previous owner had doo~ted the land for a park° ~o Meisha~ 8008 South Vie~z ~oad~ voiced that he had been told that the land wo~.~d be developed into a park. ~ Stuga, 5777 Y~on Avenue.~ said a salesman for C~m~ais ~ud Hunter stated the l~ud ~.~ould be developed Luto a recreational ~ea. ~. Ta~as P~s. dy, ~.42i Bass Lake Road.~ pointed out ti. La~ s'oot zoning of this type has not been successful for the most part a~L~.~ it tends to devaluate the adjacent pro~rty~ ~'~. Hasbrouck, at this point, sh~.~.~d seven slides illustrating the effects of spot zon~ He pointed out that the homes abutting the com~ercial area were not well kept mud this %~pe of zonLug multiplies the problem because property clrcumcribing th~ commercial zone in all directions tend to devaluate. Mr. ~;ohnson, 8119 - 59 Avezr~e, voicc~Ll that he ~Jas neither for or against the rezon~ng, but in his opinion thc people were told that the lm~d in question was going to be a park and therefore it should be a park. ~'~° Hunter stated that he ~uld not donate the land for a p~rk, because he paid $25,000 (twenty five thousand dollars) for Block l, Meadow L~,:o Terrace o Pl~i~ Co~:~ission I~D.~rch 2~ ~ 1960 The following questions were asked of !~4~. Hunter from the chair: Question: ~'Have you made soil tests to support your opinion that the land is full of peat3' ~o Hunter, '~No~" Question: '~Was Block 1 platted as it is now sho%m on the Village records before you purchased it?'~ ~o Hunter, ~Yeso'~ Question: "~as a plat of Block 1 as shown on these Village records posted or displayed to prospective buyers of residential property ~djacent to Block i of Memdow Lake Terrace?" ~o Hunter, "Ye~o~' ~estion: ~'There-~'h~Je becn statements made from the floor that the sales- man told us that Block I ~-as to be a park° ~as this salesman an employee of your company?~ ~ Hunter, "Yes, but I never said it was to be a park and I did not know he said it~, Question: "How long v~ he in your employment?,' ~h-o Hunter, '~About six mont~.s." Question: "Do you deny that he was acting as your agent during that period?' ¥~. Hunter, '~No." Question: "~.en did you purchase land on Meadow Lake including Block 17" .Mr. Hunter, "About a year and ai~alf ago." Question: "h~as any request made ,by you to rezone Block 1 to commercial prior to your current petition?,~ ~.~. Hunter, "No." As a matter of L~formation to the Planning Co.~r~ssion, the question %~ asked of those present in favor of ~:'ezoniug of Block !, Meadow Lake Terrace to commerc.~_al would raise their h~,~.~. No hands were raised. The question was then asked, "Those opposing the rezoning Should raise their hand, opposition was unanimous except for two people who stated they did not vote either way." Motion by Sicora to recommend to the Co~uc.~ to deny the request for rezoning from residential to commerciefl, of all of Block !~ Meadow Lake Terrace. Seconded by Van Auken. ~.~tion car~_ed. Motion by Van Auken to close the Public Hee~,ing. Seconded by Sicora. Motion carried. (p~ge 2) Special meeting was called to order by Chairman Kelso for the purpose of a pu'2!ic hearing on a new Zoning Ordinance to ~end our present Zoning Ordin~ce. M~mbers present~ Kelso~ Jessen~ Ohmic, Hir~tz~ Sicora~ V~u A~en~ ~ch~etz, Mensmd. Members absent: Krueger ~ Nielsen, Affidavit of notice of he~'~g read ~d placed on file. Slides were sho~ by ~ Hasbrouck along ~th h~s co~ents on w~ t he th~s is proper zoning ~ud plaguing for o~ village. N. P. Jessen voiced his co~e~ts as to'proper zo~ for ~ltiple ~ll~gs on his pro~rty on the North side of Bass L~ke Road ~d how this shoed not be by s~ci~ use per, ts on a residenti~zoned property bo~ by a m~tipi~, ~l~g classification only. His th~ing is that his property is located Just ac~'~;s the road from industri~ property that was recent~ rezoned fr~ c~erci~L ~d residenti~ classification ~d ~_ll best be develo~ed ~th m~tiple ~ell~gs. Harl~ Peterson appe~ed to protest the zo~ng on the pro~rty located on the southeast corner of Co~ty Road !8 ~d ?~th Avenue North. M~. Tedesco appeared to pro~est ~ ch~ge ~ zo~g on his pro~rty located o~ the northwest corner of Win_uetka Avenue a~:~d ~6th Avenue North that wo~d affect his develo~ent of a Radio Broadcasting Studio, etc. ~oyd ~derson, representative of Dell H~cs~ ~q,~.red about zon~g on the ~ea aro~d the intersection of'36th Avenue North ~d W~etka Avenue. Art Berg ap~ed ~d voiced his co~ents on the zoni~, present ~d future~ of his property on the Rockford Road. ~ts pro~rty is between the ViSage pro~rty ~d the Rockford Road. He also made s~e c~ent~ on certa~ statements made at the t~e his property was p~chased for Village p~poses. ~scussion was held on the proper zonL~ of five ~res of pro~y, now zoned co~erci~, on Co~ty Road 18 that is locatod 660 feet north of the intersection of Medicine L~¢e Road, u~n ~ich Associated Contracters have a p~chase a~e~ent ~d have a tentative plat that proposes to use this pro~rty for residenti~ use. Co~ents were made by Glen ~,~urray e~d Claude C~mpion about the pre~ous rezo~ from co~erci~ to residenti~ the southeast corner of 62nd ~enue North and West Broadway ~d their plaus for the develo~ent of ~is pro~rty. Glen Kuch protested ~gorously agaiust the plus of rezo~ng of his presently zoned ind~stri~ pro~rty abuttin~ %he M N $ r~!~oad to re~!denti~! ".-.~ l~:'.'Rer~' also protested ag~st %:~0 pl~s to rez~ of t~s pre~nb~ zoned industri~ pro~rty abutLng the M I~; S r~!road to ~sldenti~. ~is pro~rty is located on the west side of the :: N S tracks between ;+Tth ~d >h Avenue No~h. Specis~ Meeting of Village of N~.~ Hope Pangs 2 ~,~ir~ DaYenport of the M N S railroad protested against the proposed rezoning of their property from industrial to resideuti~!o This property is located on the railroad in the v~_cinity of ~gth Avenue North° ~ Ro~engren of Northern Builders questioned i~ all of their property l~ng west of the M N S railroad and north of the Rockford Road would be zoned Ludustrial~ He had petitioned for this zoning at a previous date. Mro Yorm Boone'y protested the proposed zoning on property located on 'the Rockford Road that is between the M N S and eastbounda~z of the visage. He stated the proposed classification of zoning does not coincide v~[th their thinking on their present develo~ent plsm~s. Don Trucker, Vi].lage Clerk, suggested that ;'the zoning c!assifi'cation Off'the northeast corner of Rockford Road and Winnetka Avenue should be Retail Business instead of General ~siness. Fred Sims opposed the proposed Limited Bus~S zoning classification on part of his property located north of the Rockford~BH~tTld be General Business because of its proximity to the ~kmicipal Liquor' Store and the proposed Retail Business zoning classification of the property located suuth of the Rockford Road. Lloyd Anderson, representative of Dell Homes, loudly protested the proposed change in the size of the residential lot from 75 foot frontage to 80 foot frontage° Glen Murray also gave a discourse on the same and the c~z-i'~ of development of lots. Mr. Niedenfuer of Northern Homes raised the question about the square footage requirements of lots to be used for multiple dwellings. Being no further questions or protests from the floor, Iran A~¢en made a motion, seconded by Jessen, to adjourn this p~]olic hearing to the call of the chair. Motion carried. Harlan Peterson presented a letter and a revised plat of Allan Hills-as revised by the FPL&. Letter was read and placed on file. Motion was made by Jessen, seconded ~y Van Auken, to recommend this revised plat to the council. Motion carried. Revised plat attached. Minutes of the Publice Hearing on the rezoning ofoCertain property in the Meadow Lake Addition from residential to commercial as petitioned for byGervais Hunter were read and corrected. Motion byVanAuken, seconded by Sicora, to approve minutes corrected. Motion carried. Minntes of the Public Hearing on the rezoning of certain property, the southeast corner of 36th Avenue North and Winnetka Avenue, as petitioned for by the Spring Company were read. Motion by Ohms., seconded byMenard to approve the minutes as read. Motion was carried. M~bnutes of the ~rch 2&, 1960, meeting were read. Motion byMenard, seconded by Ohman, to approve minutes ~s re~d. Motion was carriedo~ ..... ~ .... Hope Page 3 ~ Niedenfuer of Ifforthern tfomes appeared Md r~sed question of the former zoning ~ud rezoning of property located on ~6th ~venue ~o?th ~nd how it was h~ed as he s~d he never w~s notified of~ bhis rezoni~ Discussion ~s held on ¥~t proced~e he shoed fo~ow for re~on~ theft ~ be necessary before he c~ be issued a p~t to u~d a ~u!tiple dwe~g on it~ Berg no f~ther busines$~ a motion was made ~ ~Ien~d~ seconded by V~ A~en to ~dJo~n~ ~tion~s c~ried~ Chris Jessen Acting Secretary April 15, ~ 960 Regular Meeting of the Ne~-~ Hope Planning Co~uission Members Proscnt~ Members Absent: Kelso, Jessen~ ~ichaletz, Krueger, Menardo Sicora, HLuitz, ~nAuken. Minutes of April 7 were read. The corrections are as follows: Page 2, p~agraph 8, line l, ~iedenfuer of Golden Rule. Page ~ paragraph l, line l, N!edenfuer of Golden Rul®. Motion by Jessen 'bo ~pprove the minutes as corrected, seconded by Menard. Motion carried. A $50°OO check received and a petition for rezoning in Mork Campion Heights was read. A discussion was held. ~. J~a~u pointed out in the last rezoning in the Village, when the stry?s zoning was eliminated that the ~ma__~n intersection in the Village ~re left zoned commercial~ Motion by Jessen to have a public hearing for rezoning of Outlets i and 2 of Mork Campion Heights first Addition and Outlets I and 2 of Mork Campion Heights Second Addition. Seconded byMenard. Motion carried. A discussion was held on the multiple dwellings on part of Outlet 2 Block 2~ Mork Campion Heights. Any future action would be taken up at the public hearing. Motion by Menard to send a c ~ to Sherman Hasbrouck. Seconded by Nielsen. Motion carried° Motign by Y~*ueger, seconded by ~!enard, to adjourn. Iva~7~ R. Krueger Sec~etary Next meetingwill be April 28, 196©. 'Members A~sent~ NiSl~n~ M~nard~ ~ l-~un~.~ present~, t~% H~brouck~ Htnut~s of April 15~ 1960~ ~re read ~d th~ c6r~ctions ~ ~ fo~o~ Motion '~ V~ A-~en to accept the ~utes as cerrected, Seconded by 0~ Motion c~ed~ M~ ~n~rt of the Mpls~ No~{ield ~d Southe~ ~ ~d ~ ~ers of Model c~,e before the C~.s~ion~th ~ p~i~n?~ pi~ to eonst~ct a Rea&y l~x . ! cement pl~t on th~ ~ ~c~s of~W of ~ ef Section 8 of T~SN~ R~ 21 l~g ~uth of the Soo L~e ~lro~d, Motion by V~u A~ ~ approve the pre~ plus for pl~ut~ Seconded by ~.tz, t~tion c~ed~ A letter fr~ ~, E, M~ ~phere was read ~d placed on file~ Motion by ~t~ to h~ve the sec~t~y notify F~ St~ey D~ K~e the attorney of ~a~p~er~ to h~ve ~ fill out ~ zo~ fo~'~ ~d place it on fil~e ~th t~ Village Clerk~ Second. ed by V~ A~3:en~ Motion c~ried~ A l~tter i~o~ Mr~ H~ Jonson represent~ }~ H~ .~derson Con~t~ction re~uestlng ~ F~olie he~ing ~or a prel~n~- plat. for ~orthwood T~rPace~ $~ of~ S%~; and ~ of the ~?~ of that p~t of th~ ~K~ of the S~ ]~ W of a lin~ e~,endJ~ fr~ the ~ co~e~- ~ there of th~ o.~]~ co~sr thereof ~]l in Section 18 T.%LP~ l!~ R, 21~ Hm~ep~ Couut, y ~ Hir~esota ~ A plat of V~u%~ ~ ....... ~e~c~ formsr!y g~r~etka Gardon~ Dicc~: l; Lots i thru 5 was presen~d Oh~m~ Motion ~,~ o~e~a omen relative Secret~r~ Iv~ R~ Krueger i~bers abssnt = M~z~rd~ Nielsen~ The special meeting of April 7, 1960, w~s reopened by Chairm~ Kelso for the purpose of recommending to the council each objection voiced by parties on the amended zoning Regulations. Re: N. P. Jessen, paragra~ 3 page 1, w~s read and discussed. to recommend we establish a multiple dwelling Classification. Moti°n, carried. Motion by Van Auken Seconded by Sicora. Re: Harlan Peterson, paragraph ~ page 1 was read and discussed, l~tion by V~u Auken to recc~nend to the council to leave the property as zoned under the new ordinance. Seconded by Sicora. Moti~u carried. Re: Mr. Tedesco, paragraph 5 page 1 to clarify the develo.r~_nt of a broadcasting Studio, the new rezoning would not hinder th~ type of developaent what so ever. Re: Art Berg, paragraph 7 page 1 was read and discussed. Mr. Murr$ of Associated Contractors wanted to gO on record in f-/?:-r of Retail Business on the Art Berg property. Motion by Van Auken to recommend to the council to make the Art Berg property Retail Business instead Of Limited Business. Seconded by Jesseno Those for: Van Auk'~.an, Jessen, [~chaletz. Those against: Ohman, Hinitz, Sicora, I~ueger. Re: Associated Contractors, parag~'aph 8, page 1. Adiscussion was held between the commission and Mr. Murry. Motion b~? Van Auken to rock, end to t~e coun~l to leave the 660 feet nc~th of the intersection on Medicine Lake P~ad ~ud Co,unty Road 18 as zoned in the new ordin~ceo Seconded by Jessen. ~otion carried. Re: Glen Murry and Claude Campion i:aragraph 9 ps. ge 1o This property will be taken up at the next commission me~tting, Re~ Glen Xuch ~ ~agraph 10 page I a Lengthy discussion was held.. Mr. Hasbrouck stated ~f the property did remain industrial it should be !:!./'f. ted industry because of the homes~ Motion by Jemsen to recommend to the counci~ t .at the Glen Kuch and the Perry Property be rezoned Limited Industry. Seconded by Sicorao Motion carried, Mr. Chris Jessen voiced ~tay is the property on the Bass Lake Road and County Ro~d 18 woned 'General ~t~ines$~ A disclL~siOrA WO.~ held on this p,~-~t. Being late in the evening motion by ~!nitz to adjourn the reop~ meeting but to take action on the remaining comments mt the next regular meeting. Seconded by Van Auken~ Motion carried. Re: Glen Kuch p~agraph !0 page 1, Motion by Jessen to strike out the sentence~ ~this property is located o~'. the ~st side of the MoNkS. tracks between &7th ~ud &9th Avenue North~,~ Seconded oy Sicora. Motion carried ~ meeting M~v 12~ 1960. Secretary, Ivan R. Erueger Minutes of Re?~lar New Hope Planning Co~mission ~mbers present: Me Nembers absemt: Kelso, Jessen, Van Amken~ Mich~letz, Krueger, Sieorao Village Plarkae~, present: Sherman Hasbrouck. H~litz~ Nielsen, Ohma~, Honard. Minutes of Ma~ /2, 1960 w~re read by the ch~_~an. Corrections were as foll~ws: Page 2, paragraph /2, line ~o With the agreement to estab ~lish a classification in the ne~ village ordinance for c'~er~ial pa~k ~d pool. Motion by Van Auken to accept the minutes as ccrrected. Seconded by Jesseao F~tion carried. Requirements of planued resld?nti~l ~ud Ludustr!ai deve!op~ents Mere discussed and placed on file. The zonlr~ ~mps were discussed ~d ~e~ed by ~ members p~sento Motion by V~u A~en to roc ~omm~cnd to the Cotu~ci! that they adapt the revised plat of the entire village desi~t~.g the no~ zc.~dng classifications areas and codes° Seconded by Jesse. u° Jessen and M~ch~3~ets voting no. i~uo~T~er, $icora, %ran Auken voting yes. ~m. Jessen and ~ Michaletz ~.~ish to [~o on record as being in favor of the entire plan except the zo~-ng proposed ~,%r the property lying between the Bass Lake Road &nd ~gth Avenue and Crusty Road 18 east to. Boone Avenue. Motion by Van Auken~ seconded by Jessen, to adjourn. Motion carried. Next meeting June 2, 1960 Secretary, Ivan R. Erueger New Hope Plannin~ Commission 196o M~mbers present 1 Members absent Krueger, M~nard, Sicora, Michaletz, Jessen, also Village Planner, Mr, Sherman Hasbrouck, Kelso, H~l~itz, Van Auken, Ohman, Nielsen. Minutes of 'April 28, 1960, were read the Corrections are as follows: Re: Mr. Ted~.:.co, page 2, paragraph ~. To c~'arify the development of a Broadcasting Studio the new zoning ordinance, (under Lf~mtted Business) would include a ~*'.adcasting Studio. MotiOn by Menard to acc~i:t the minutes as corrected, Seconded by Erueger, . M~tion carried, Public Hearing on Proposed Plat of Northwood Terrace Notice of public hearing was read by acting chairman, Jessen, and placed on file. Mr. HarrY Johnson, Mr. Mervin Anderson, and Mr' C~ Headland were representing Anderson Construction C~npany. Letter date ~v 12, 1960, from Bonestroo and ASsociates, Inc., was read and placed on f~le. Mr. Johnson, the spokesman for Anderson Construction C~npan~ stated they are intending to save as many trees as possible, also Independence Avenue ~]~ be altered to adjust for the 25 feet walkway on one of the lots between Gettysburg and Flag Avenues for access to the park area. Mr. Murry at this point asked Mr. Anderson this question, 'As a builder, do you think the bigger the lot the better the house?" Mr. Anderson did not agree with this. Mr. Murry asked Mr. Anderson and the commission this question, ~ould you agree that the average size lot in a plat should be 7~ feet, not the m~_~,~n size frontageS" Mr. Anderson did not agree with this either. At this point Mr. Hasbrouck pointed out to Mr. MurrY and the cc~nission that if the lot size was set at an average of 75 feet frontage it could be done by using the community planning method. Mr, and Mrs. Sutman objection to the plat was the cutting down the trees. Mrs. Sutman wanted to know if the Village or the county con!drift bu~ the land and use it as a p~rk in order to save the trees. Motion by Sicora to reco:.!:-~end to the 0ouncil to accept the pl~t of Northwood Terrace with a 25 feet wal~ easement to the park bet~en Gettysburg Avenue and Flag Avenue. Also, further recommends to the Council that lots 20, 21, 22, and 23 of Block 1 be included in the outlots either number one or twe as so desired by Mr. Anderson. Seconded by Menard. ~tion carried. Motion by Sicora to adjourn the Public Hearing of Northwood Terrace. Seconded by Menard. Motion carried. Open the Regular Meeting at 9830 ~a~ 12, 1960 Application for rezoning from e~.w-ercial and part residential to all cc~aercial that part of lot 2 and &~ivision 32~ lying South of the Morth 935 feet and also rezone fr~n residential to all c~aercial the south ~00 feet 'of attached legal which was placed on file. Received from Penn~es Supermarket, Inc. $50.00 rezoning fee. Hr. ~eorge Lavine displa~ed the New Hope Shopping center plans. Hotion by ~enard to recommcud that this preltm~y plat and New Hope Shopping Center site be rezoned to ret~41 shopping business district. Seconded by Sicora. Motion carried. The ree~mae~dation from Sherman Hasbrouck pretatning to Mork Campion Heights was read and placed on file. Mr. ~urr7 pointed out that an~ business between the Village and Associated Contractors was always out in the open. That this plat, when origi~ platted, was platted with the outlotS one and two of Mork Campion Heights with the understanding they would be used as ccemercial p~operty being they were commercial. Motion by Sic°rs to recammend to the Council to defer consideration of the rezOning of outlot 2 of ~Mrk CampiOn Heights 2nd Addition for a c~w._ercial classification until a further date and also to recommend to the Council that outlot 1 of Mork Campion Heights 2nd Addition,be zoned commercial to be used for multiple dwellings on~ and outlot 2 of ~tork Oampion Heights First Addition be zoned for commercial to be used for multiple dwel]~_~g units only and outlot ! of Mork Campion Heights FirSt Addition to be zoned con~,ercial for' use as a service station site. Also this rezoning of residential to commercial is to be done if the Village Attorney can not expedite it in a simpler, faster wa~. Seconded by Henard. Motion carried. Mork Campion Manor was reviewed for purpose to establish Mork Campion Manor Second Addition the lots 1 thru 13 Block 1 and lots 1 thru 14 Block 2. We understand that the plat in question is zoned industrial and an agreement was, made by the Council and Hr. Mutt7 to hold this property for one year. Van~s Terrace was reviewed and the lots meet the Village requirements and they are a minor change. Motion by Menard to reccmnend to the Council to accept the ~. Seconded by MAchaletz. ~/otion carried. Hr. Willie presented the plat of Wonderland 2nd Addition outlot 1 for Retail Shopping Business Distriet. The report from Sherman Ha~-~':::,rouck was read and placed on file. Motion by Sicora to reco~nend to the Council that outlot 1 be zoned for Retail ShOpping Business District and the remainder be zoned residential ~ :~cept the proposed park area be zoned as a commercial park and pool. ~lth the agreement to establish a zone in the new Viliage ordinance as a commercial park and pool zone. Seconded by Kruegero Motion carried. Motion by Menard, seconded bY Sicora to adjourn. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned 12~5 a.m. Secretary, Ivan R. Krueger Next meeting ~ 27, 1960 Public Hearing on Wonderlaud 2nd Addition Hay 26, 1960 Members present: Eelso, Jessen, Krueger, Michaletz~ Sicora, Van Auken$ Members absent: ~uitm, Ohman, Menard, Nielsen. Notice of Public Hearing ~-as read and placed on file. Sherman Hasbr~uck report was read and placed on fiie. Notion by Van Auken to recommend to the council to approve the plat, contingent upon outlot 1 being approved as commercial, and designate the park and pool as outlot 2. Seconded by ~chaletz. Motion carried. Motion by Krueger' to adjourn the public hearing. Seconded by Jessen. Motion carried ~ Secretary, Ivan R. Krueger Planning 0am~.~oion ~nutes of the Public Hearing on the Proposed Plat of Leonard ts i~t Addition ~ June 23, 1960 Members present: ~:~ueger, Ke!so~ Jessen, Sicora, Michaletzo Members absent: l~enard, ~elsen~ ~_~itz~ Van Au~en, 0hman. Affidavit of P~blication of the Proposed E.~t of Leonardts 1st Addition was read and placed on file. The objection ~r. HasbroucM ha~ ~as Lot 1 Block i the £~ont~ge was substandard~ Motion by Jessen to reco~m~d to the Co,nell to accept the plat subject to the change of Lot 1 Blod~ 1 ~o be 90 feet frontage° Seconded by Krueg~ro ~otion carried° Motion by Jessen to adjourn tho Yvblic Hearing° Seconded by Kr~egero Motion carried° Village of New Hope Planning Commission Minutes June 23, 1960 Members present: Krueger, Kelso, Jessen, Sicora, l~ichaletz, Menard. Members Absent: Van Auken, Ohman, Hini~z, Nielsen. Minutes of M~v 26, 1960, were read and approved as read. Letter fr~m Robert Rosene prepresm~ting Otto Bonestroo & Associates, Inc. File #593~ concerning lutem~atior~l Properties Plat was raad and placed on file A discussion was held on the rec~mmen~;.~o?~ions of Robert Romene and the comm~.~',~on wants to go on record as having no objections to minimum road grade of .~0% in the plat of ~nternational Properties Luc. being they intend to install concrete curb and gutter. Motion by Jessen to recommend to the Cotu~:,c~ to set the regular Planning Commission meeting on the ~,n-sday preceeding the re~.~,~.ar Council meeting. Seconded by . Michaletzo Motion carried. The Planning Column.' ssion request the schedule of the proposed regular Council meeting nights thr¢o '~ ~.~.ths in advance. Motion bySicora~ seconded by Jessen to adjourn. Motion carried. N~ HSpe Pl~g Co~oJ~!asion Fdnutes July 7, 1960 Members present: Krueger, Sicora, Kel~ Van Auken, ~ichaletz, Jessen; Council member, T~acker~ setting in for 0hmeno ~mmbers abser~: 0hmane ~telsen, Menardo The mimates of June 23, 1960 w~re read a~ud thoy st~d as read. A letter of resignation from Fm~ D~vid Hdnit. z was read ~d placed on ~e. Motion ~ Sicora to accept the ~i~tion of ~'. N~tz~ ~econded by ~ A~en. Motion c~ed. Motion by Michaletz to recommend to the council that Paul Meats be permitted to operate his consessic~ c~ a yearlL~ permit starting July l, 1960. Seconded by Jesseno Motion carried° A letter from Mr. Atkinsom was read conc~r~ug the ~arr?_:tt Addition. Motion By ~eseen to refer the letter back to the Council b~camse of the lack of necessary information amd have the D~ty Clerk take the necessary action to obtain this information. Mr. Willie came before the Cc~mission preta~u~ to the ~o!den ~ale 2nd Addition, L~t 16, Block 2o Motion by Van A~,en whereas Ernest ~illi~ appeared befome the Plmu~ing Commission on January ~ 1960 and discussed at le:::i.~.h his intentions to build an apartment b,,~:ldtng on L~t 16, Rl~ck 2, ~olden P~lc 2nd-Addition and whe~ as he ~s then told his plans ~ere not in eonflict with Uillage ordinonceso We therefor, recommend to the Co,mctl that Ernest Willf.o be grouted a special use permit to conetruct an apmrtm~t building of seven one-bedro~n units on Lot 16, Block 2, of Golden ~le ~nd Addition and that the ~f~d lot area per d~ell~g ~a~it be waved. Seconded by Sicorm. Motion car._ed. A letter from the New Hope Builders Association dated July 1, 1960 reigned by ~yman Smith of Hall, Smith~ Hed!und~ Jvster, Forsberg, and Herlin, Attorneys at L~w 311 Produce Bank Bu~.~g~ M~ueapolis, Mi~nesota$ addressed to the M~Vor and Council was read by the ecz~isalon, No action ~as taken because of length aud n~er of conditions or request for consideration. It ~as suggested that the secretary have copies made and send them to the members of the c~ssion so ~e could take formal action at the next meeting. Letter fr~a Sherman Nasbrouck was read and disct~sed. The Plat of the Eranm Addition w. ao viewed and previously discuesed. Motion by Sicora to reccamend to the cot_~ciL to accept the pl~t, seconded BY Van Auken. Motion carried. Motion by Erueger to adjourn, seccuded by Sicora. ~tion carried. ~ec. It~a~ R. K:~uoger ~200 Nevada ~en~e N.rth A~t 18~ 1960 Mmaber~ pre~eat~ Xrueger, Kel~o, Nieleen~ Mi~haletm, Ba-~a~eam, Sicor~ Members ~b~entl V~a Auken. ~, amd 0~ Paklie H~ oa ~do~ lake Heights that part of the SE~ of the NW~ amd ~f the NE~ of the S~ of Section 6 T~hip ~118 ~zuE~ 21 He~aepi~ Commty, Ml~emOtmo L~ts 17. 1~. Bleek 1 - L~ts l&~ 17~ ~'~.~o~k 2 - Lot 16, Block 3. Remoming fr~ Ee~identiml to Multiple ~b~lliug u~e~ Im bebal~ of M~tropolitam Realty. M~o Ourti~ Nam~a p~imted out the multiple umits wo~ld serwe a~ a ~ereen between the In. trial and residential. T~e parkimg entrance~ :~ere ~ the side street, mot om the mueh traveled 0oU~%y P~ad 10o The Cemaimsion pointed out to ~. Hanson that the l~tm did not ~eet with the village or~tne~e of 15,000 square feet for a four unit Mr. lla~b~ reee~men~ati~a~ are~ Deni~l of reso~g oa gro~nd~ of im~uffi~ie~t eite area. Mot~n by Sicorm, seeom~ed by X~aege~, to reee.~ae~ to th~ c~ancil to accept the petiti~ued rezoni~g onl~ if the lot simes come up to ~he villmss ordinauoe of 15,000 square feet. !~tion,:~arried. Pmblie Hemr4~ug of the Proposed Plat of Charle~ Thca.~on A diseussiom wa~ Motion by Michmletm, ~econded by Sieora, to fecund to the eo~ncil to ~ept the plat if the enti:.'~ plat ie drawn to scale~ ami in ~uoh & tomy a~ not to have lot~ robust o~ Bo~n~ Aven~e. ~oti~ c&r~iedo The miz~te~ of J~lY 21~ 1960 ~er~ read by the ChAirman, Oorretiom of Motiom by Vim A~ken, ~eco~,¥.oc! by Michaletz t~ ~e~o:~e~ to the of lotto 1, 2, 3, ~k 2 ~o t~t th~ do n~ ~t ~ ~"e t~ ~ steer ~d ~om ~th the co--c ted ~t ~te N~r, 1955 ~ f~e Nt-ute~ ~tood a~ corre~%ed, ~ copy of the letter fr~a the Ney H~pe B-~der8 Aa~oci~%~on vas reGd Gad diacusSed' ~' ~ette~ of no%~c® of the date of th~ ~e®ting with the ~e~ Hope Bn~d®r8 ~tion by Sicora, ~eeonded by ~[chaletz.~ ~ith regrets, ~o ~cept the resigna%ic~ of ~a~. ~[inits. ~otim carried. We, the mmaber8 of the Plamning replace Mr. I~tter of recitation frc~ Mr. Oh~ Jeis¢~. ~a~ x~do ~tion by Erueger, seconded by Nielsen, ~Ith regrets to accept the re,ignation ~f Ohri~ ~essen. The ~rttcle in the ~--esot~ 0c~ity ~ ~let%ers entitled "New Hopm P~ses Zc~t~E Or~!~nc®~ ~a~ read ~ the the ~embe~ of the ~ Commission attribute the success ~nd the vol~ of ~rk ~hi~h ~ dcae ~, such a shor~ time to ~o ~her~an ~br~uck, the Village Com~ult~to Next mee%~ August 30, 1~60 See~etary Ivan R. Eraeger, .~r. New Hope ~_~-'~n~ Cann~ss~on /~.00 Ne~ Avenue No~,h Septe~'~r 8, ~embe~ abaent~ Keleo~ Nielsen~ Van Auken, Ohaano FAnutes of Augast 18, 1960 were ~.oad by acting ohair~_a Sicora, being no emi~sion~ or corrections the m~autes etood aa read. Application f'o~ .special use permit from. Taras .~udy was read, A length~y dj: :~sion ~as held. ~otion by Brusse~u, aeconded by ~chaletz to defer until the next regalar planning cc~aission meet~_n~ at ~hich time it will be t~ken under com~ideration pending ~ubmi~sion of ~.~e ~ ~ outlined in the platting or~_~_~ce. Motion c~rried. Letter of resigrmtion frc~ Mr. ~Mnard ~as read. Motion by I~eger, ~eoonded by ~c~Jetz ~ith regrets to accept the reaign~tiono ~tio~ c~ried. ~ ~r. Kenneth C~een~ the A~i~stant Direotor of Ocemmmity Planntng$ Department of Business Devc!opmamt, came before the cceaaisaion ~ith a request to have a meeting of all the me,here on the Planning C.~m,~ ~ssicn possibly ~ special meeting. ~tion by Michalets, seconded by Brusseau, to adjourn. Motion ~rried. etin Septem e lS, Seer~tar~lvanR, X~ueger, Sr. Aug~tst 22~ 1960 ;,ia%ice is hereby given that ~he New Hope Pl~kimg Oo~issien '~.'.Ik ceeb at %he ?il!age Hall~ ~200 l[e~ A~sen~e North ~I ss2.~] Vi)_iage on. proper'by dasc:~ibed ss fo!tow~ ~Oz 7 ~,' 10 feet thereof sa~.d ~f~ ''~: a 12~e Pm~:~s~" ' .... frem a p~mnv ~.. the can ....... l~,.~e o~ PC; i ~msaance 873 2,~10 feet Persons inters" :.J are im~i'ted %0 a,p~:'~nr and ez~r'ess %heir views thereon~ Eeted the 22nd day of A~gust~ !:~o0~ DOn TP~¢ker~ ~l,~ ~ VILLAC~ OF NEW HOPE Notice of Public He~ing On Proposed Speolal Use Permit Notice is hereby given that the New Hope Plann~ C~,m~ssion will meet at the Vill~ge Hall, 4200 Nevada Avenue North in eaid Village on -the 22nd day of September, 1960, at 8~30 o eolook p.m. for the purpose of holding ~ public hearing on a special use permit r~queet for %he construction of apartment buildings on the property des~ribed ~ foilow~ Ar I of Block !, Meado~ lake Terrace Ail persons interested are ~'~lted to appear and express their vie~ on the issuance off this special use penait. Dated the 15th d~ of September.~ 1960o Don Trunker, Village Clerk Minutes of the New Hope Plann£ng Commission ~200 Nevada Avenue North ~eptember 22, 1960 Members present: Xrueger, Kelso, $icora, Ohman, Brusseau, Nichaletz. ~bers absent: Van Auken, Nielsen. Public hearing on a special use pe~.:.~t request for the construction of a ll-unit apartment at g~21 Bae~ Lake P. oad. Mr. Rudy requested that the PUblic Ee~ing be postponed until the next r~gular meeting because of lack of site plans, and struck, ute plans. ~otion by Sicora, seconded by Krueger~ to postpone the Pablic Hearing until the next regular meeting. M~tion carried. A motion was made and seconded to postpone the public hearing until the next regular meeting but in v~iew off the fact ~he parties interested were present their objections a'~ views were heard at this time. Peter Perri , 8520 ../~ass Lake Road ,.~oiced that he had no objections to the special use permit if }~r. F0ad¥-~o~d constr-act ~he b~l~ ~d ~ont~ue to ~t~ it; ~t ." he ~d object if ~fr. ~ ~nten~d to obt~ ~e ~t ~d ~en se~ ~e l~d ~d the ~.t. Hr. Harbert ~k~row, 8502 Bass Lake P~oad objected because he felt his property would decrease in value. Mr. Rudy asked the parties present if double bungi~ws wo~ld suit them better, There were no objections to this question. Joe Erickson, 8523 Bass Lake Road., he voiced in vie~ of constructing a ll- unit apartment buLldtng that this would create a water problem~ also the value of his property wo~ld go Gord~t Johnson~ 8119 - 5~th Avenue North voiced that he had no objections. P~bli~ Hearing on Proposed Special Use Permit of Block 1, Meadow Lake Terrace, Petitioners: ~o Gervais and ~r. Hunter for 6 - 12-~nit apartments. The p~hlished notice was read By the ~ha]rman. The Prel~mt~s~y recommendations of Sherman Hasbrou~k ~ere read: ~Approval of Special Use Permit, prow~ded require:~ents of zoning ordinance are met and subject to review of site pla~ (to pi~otect the homes to the North)"~ Page '2 Hr. Gordon Johnson voiced %he pro,.~er%y in this case is put %o the best possible use; and also wrested to gonon record as s~ing~ ~,~As loD~ as Mro Gervais and ~ro Hwlter meet uith the reeommendation~ of the Plann~.g Commission and the decision of the Village Co~ncil: ~£ ~u in favor of the land use.N ~r. Herbert 24odro~,, 8562 Bass L~e Road voiced that the layout was best suited for the land. Mr~ ~len~-d, 8000 Southvie%~ Road, voiced he had no objections to the proposed plato ~h-. Roger Engle, 800& $outhview Roo~d had no objections to the special use permit. Mr. Melsha, 8008 South.~.e%' Road vo!~ed thmt he objected to the apartments because he ~ould like to see si~ic-3a~dly homes built on the laud. A discussion was held on the population density in the Plat. F~otion by ~ueger, seconded by 0hman~ to rec~emd to the Council to approve 30 t~o-bedroom units and 30 one-bedro~'~ units all of which would be contained in five 12-plexes. Motion carried. Public Hearing for the purpose ~.hear the views of parties intereste~ in two H-unit ~ ~apartment buildings'along B~ss Lake Road and RHode Island Avenue North. The petition,s.r, Mr. Eugene Sulliv~u. The published notico of Public Hea~io~ Was read by the Chairman. The Pre33 mt nary Recommendations by Sherman ~-~asbrouck were read: Approval of Special Use Permit provided requirements o~~ the zom~n~ ordinance are met. The Planning ~cuusideratioDm are as follows: This is typical of a general situatiom that seems to be developing aloag Bass Lake Road. With the eltminatiom of strip zoning, efforts are bei~g made to develop vacant land along Bass Lake Road for m~!t£ple d~el!ings~ This is a very desirable trend. The problem is that these p~-~oposed developaents fall considerably below the standards established in the zoning ordnance. This development for e~ple has only 1,500 square feet of site area per dwellir~ unit'. The structures are not de$tg~ed by an architect and the site plan is poor~ It is important that the Plann~ Commission and the Council determine an over- all policy on this qaestiono ?~at standards of deveio~ment are you going to insist upon? And ~em and how much will you allow deviations frma the standards? ~. Sullivan voiced that ~ything %ha% would go on the land would be better tham ~ha% is now on the land. Mr. & ~ ~3%~u~ 7615 Bass Lake Load had no objections to the 2 ll-~uits. Page 3 Mr, Ohnmn voiced a pointl which is the pr°petty is surrounded by Orystal and considerations should be made in view~ of the fact that Crystal standards are very much lower than New Hope es stamdarelSo Notion by Erueger, seco~.ded by Brusseau, to .recommend to the Council to deny the application for special use pm~±t petitiOned by Nr, Sullivan for 2 ll- unit apartment buildings. Noti~a c~.riedo ~r. Rooney came before the C~m_!ssion for-approval of plans for a building which will house, na twenty cent wash~~: so he called it° A lengthy discussion was held on the various set backs along this particular street. Recognim~-g the ~J'? loot set back as a de~.'iation the motion was made by Ohman, ] - seconded by ~tchaic~z that the ~ be rccc~aended approved by the Core, oil as presented, Motion ca~ried. Secretary, Iv~n R, Y~eger, Sro Next regular meeting October 6, 1960. ~Abers present~ K~ueger~ Xelso~ F~fchaletz, Brusseau ~a~bers ~bsent~ Sicora~ ~, V~ A~en, ~ielmem ~ere ~s ~ offfici~ meet~ due t° ~ck of a ~sid~t~ of Meado~ L~e ~re p~s~t to object to ~e m~tiple ~ the~ area~ m~ th~ ~d not ~e~ not,ed of the ~ction t~eno ~ey ~$o ~o~ced p~tective cov~ts. ~e p~o~d ~tiple '~~ s~c~ ~e ~t f~ T~ A ~,cu~io~ ~,a~ held on ~he adeqL~acy of the ~i~ ~d the ad~sabi~ of de~at~a a Motion by ~s~au to r~fer to the co~c~ ~thou~ ~c~~ti~ ~ to ~ck of a ~o~ ~e ~peci~ ~e ~'~.'~t of T~as ~- Seceded by ~ch~etz. Motion c~.~d. meeting - October 20~ 1960 Secretary Ivan Ro Xrueger~ Mt,,ute8 of th~ New Hope Planning C~ssion ~2.00 Nevada Avenue North Nov~'~ ~ ~ l~ ~Iembers present: Nichaletz, Kelso, I~ueger, Bruseeau, Kuebelbeck. ~embere absents 0heron, Sieora, Nielsen° F~[nutes of O~tober 22, 1960 were read by the Chairman and were approved se read. A'lett~er dated October 25, 1960 from Otto Bonestroo and Aesociates signed by R. ~. Rosene was read. Attached to the letter ~as a -lire] tmt"ar~ cop~ Of ~he Pla~ 'of Winuetka Park Second Addition of Crystal ~anesota, pret~_~-~r~g to the Crystal - New Hope boundary, A discussion ~a8 held. Motion by.~chaletz,' seeonded by Rrusseautto recc~nend to the Council to take the ne:cesaar~ steps to change the boundar~ as .cutl~ed in red by R. ~. ROsene on the Pre~-_a~y Copy by Schoell and ~adson Engineers and Surveyors. Mot~n carried. A bill for planning cervices rendered during the month of September, 1960 was received fX~a Sherman S. Hasbrouck. Motion by Erueger, seconded by ~.~cha!etz to reco~nend to the Council to pay the One Hundred dollars ($100.00) to Sherman S. Haebrouek for services for the month of September, 1960. Glen Kuch and Frank Pattee came be£ore the commission with a revised proposed plat of Glen Euchre Multiple D~el~t,~ Plaza. Mr' and YmSo Donald Snetstuger came before the ccmaission?to obtain ~n~onnatic~ to move a d~elling into the ~'l'lage of New Hope. It ~aa COnveyed that they could move a specific d~elling on a 'specific lot into the Vi~aEe~ if the dwell~ met with the Village requirements and ~ust be compatible to the surrounding neighborhood. The Pl~ Camnission su~nits the ~.~e of Eugene Eo 3undt and reco~nend that he be appointed to the Plar~_~n~ Co~tssiono The Chairman voiced he ~a$ notified by the Pastor of the Baptist Church at 8615 Bass Lake Road in effect-if noone appeared at the meeting of the Plan~ Commission on November 3, 1960 in behalf of the Baptist Church it ~ould automatically ~ithdr~w their requ~mt~ Plannin~ Cmmis9ion l~inutes The request by the tk~pt~t Church, ~'~ Bass Lake Ro~d ~me read by the Chatman, and no one tins pre~nt ~m the~' b$halfo Secretary [~an R. Krueger, ~r. Next ~e~p~ meeting November 17, 1960 at the Village Hall PLANNING COMMISSION Viltao~e of New Hope A200 .~evada Avenue North Noveaber 17~ 1960 Members present~ Brusseau, KrueEc.-.'~ Sfcora~ Xuebelbeck~ Sundt, Hasbrouck. Members absent: ~chaletz~ Xeleo, Ohman. The minutes of November 3~ 1960 ~ere read by acting chairman, $icora, and were approved as read. Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Use Permit of Glen Lo ~uch Property was read and placed mi fileo The questiOn %~s a~ked~ -Has anyone ~osent have any objections of the request for special use permit of Glen Xuch~~' ~lr. and Mrs° E~nest I.[o Halg~ rimson, ~600 ~uater Avenue North, objected because ~We feel cur prope'~ty ~ill be devaluate~:, because of the multiple dwellings." Mrs. Svenddal~ 7709 - &6th'f?;enue '~orth objected because, ~Glen Xuch dwellings resemble the Sixth Avenue ['~[orth redevelolt:~nt housing area." Mrs. John Brent~up, 772~- ~6th Aven~ae No,-th objected to the multiple dwellings because to many chi~' ~-~.-e~ ~nd to amny apart~.ents. Mr. Dick Youngquist, 4556 Wirm. etka Avenue North objected to the units, ~,~. Donald Co Knutson~ &601 .rkhode Island Avonue ~orth, objected to the multiple dwellings, mi wo.~ld rather have single f_~m_t_ly homes." ~i~o Loren FresO~t~e, 76&9 - &6th Avenue Norths objected to the units. Mrs. Harold E. Battle, 7717 - ~6th Avenue North, objected to the units. }irs. Carl W. Bloomquist, 7701 - &6th Avenue No~h, objected to the units. From the conversation of the people ~ho objected to the units, it is concluded that everyone felt the units ~ould create an over poPU~lated area and decrease the Value of the surrounding hemes. Mr. Hasbrouck voiced at this point the problem is ~-d land use. The proposed land use is a big. project and the people who now live in this area live in wide open spaces and the feeling because the project is a large one° The people are be~E pushed together or out of the village. Motion by ~russeau to adjourn the public hearing until the next regular meeting as to Weigh all th® objections. Seconded by Kuebelbeck. Motion carried, Village of, New Rope November .1~. 1980 A dtseussion was held b~ %he ecmmies~Oa~ l~o~ton by Sundt~ seeded by ~e ~o~sed Plat of F~ ~. S~ansom, from Ncrther:;~ Realty C.~.p~, e~,~e before the c~=~fuic~ to obtain i~forma_ tion pretaining to m~tiple ~,~llings along ~Sth Average ~n~h, ~. Roc~ey came before the co~issien ~ith a ~'equest for special use permit fo~ mel%iple d~elling alo~-Ig ~%h Avenue ~rth' and ~'innetka Avenue. A diScuSsion was held. Being all the business had been taken care of ~e took time t° discuss the Gle~ Kuoh Plat, again. Se~tar~, Ivan R, Xrueger, St' ~200 Nevada Avenue North Decew/b~r i, 1960 8:CO o~clock p.m. Members present: Michaletz, Kuebetbeck, Brusseau, Krueger, Kelso, Sicora. }~embers absent: Ohman, Sundt. Affidavit of Publication of the Proposed Rezoning of the North East corner of WLunetka aud >h Avenue North (S ¼ of the S.W. ~ of the N.W. ~ of Section 8, Township 118, Range 21) was read by the Chairman. Mr. Rooney stated his reasons for making the request and presented his pcopo~m~ for developing the site with multiple dwellings. There was no opposition to the request either from the floor or in the rom of correspondence. This land use appeared to be Lu the best interest of the adjacent residential areas; the amount of industrial land lyi~ to the north to the w~st and to the northwest ms well as smaller parcels in a southerly and easterly direction made it reasonable to conclude that t~he petitioners r~mest could be gmanted without obstructing the industrial gr~bh of New Hope. In consideration of a buffer zone for the industrial, property to the north and the residential property to the south a motion ~ms made by Sicora, saconded by Brusse~u to recc~uend to the Council to cha~e the zoning of industri~l zord~g to multiple ~oning$ the ~ ~ of the S.W. ¼ of the N,W. ~ of Section 8, Towns?~p 11~, R~e 21; wit& a r~.tio of 75%' of the vnits be of 2 bedrooms and 25% one bedrocm ~ite with a minimum cost for each family ur~it shall not be less than $8,000.00 (eight thou~nd dollars) Sico~a, Brusseau~ Krueger, KuebsibeCk:l..?oting yes; M~cL~Letz voting ne. Motion c~rried. The Hearing was reopened on the special use permit at the request of Glen Kuch. A petition was presented opposing the construction of apartment buildings in this residential a~eao There were 79 ne~es in all. The following people spoMh in opposition from the floor. This is the list of names o~ the petition~ Mr. & Mrs. R. loungquist, Mrs. John Brentrup 7725 ~. Jo~ ~nt~p ~. & I~. ~d C. ~utson ~. & ~s. ~1 W. Blo~st ~O1 ~s. ~n ~so~e Winne~ Avenue North - ~6 Avenue North - &6 Avenue North - ~6 Avenue North ~hode Island Avenue North - 26 Avenue North S~mter Avenue North - &6 Avenue North - &6 Avenue North Winnetka Avenue North l~linnetka Avenue North New Hope Pl~fn~g G_~m!ssion Pag~ 2 Mrs. Jim Marks Mr. & Mrs. Selmer Undem Lot 9, Block 1 Winnetka Gardens 7919 - &6 Avenue North Mr, & Mrs. William Oo 3fraud, Jr, 8000 Mr. & Mrs. George Lee Mr. & Mrs. Joe Baker al0o Mro & Mrs. George P. Rokeris 8120 ~. & Mrs. Ronnie Parsens 81~0 Mr. & Mrs. Louis Neuburger 8220 Mr. & Mrs. Eugene Neilaen 8201 Mr. & Mrs. Robert A. Oleen 8139 Mr. B. T. Hanac~ 8019 Mr. & Mrs. ~aro~d N, Wright Mr. & F~s. E. F. Adelr2ms ~625 Mr. & Hrs. Vern C. Peters~n ~601 Mr. & Mrs. Herbert ~cIntosh Mr. & Hrs. Lawrence Je~en ~617 Mr. & Mrs. Einard E. Kor~nt.e~ ~600 Mr. & Mrs; Peter Keller 4608 Mro & Nra. Melvin Ande~son 4616 Hr. & Mrs. Richard Reichert Mr. & F~rs. Stam, ley Anderson Mr. RoBert B. Iveraon 4632 Mr. & Nra. Jehn Sigurdson Mr. & Mrs. ~ C. Anderson Mr. & Mrs. Robert Ritter 4600 Mr. & Nra. G~llhert H. Petereon Nra. C~arlee Crc~e 4617 Del Drive Del Drive Del Drive Del Drive Del Drive Del Drive Del Drive Del Drive Del Drive Del Drive ~ter Avenue North Smater Avenue North S~ater Avenue North Winnetka Avenue North &mater Avenue North Winnetka Avenue North Sumter Avenue North snarer Avenue North Sumter '/.~nue North Sunter A¥.:~ North ~innetka Avenue North W~nnetka Avenme North ~nnetka AvenueeNorth P~ode Island Avenue North Rhode Island Avenue North Rhode Island Avenue North Rhode Island Avenue North Mr. Xueh and Mr. Frank Potter again described their proposel to build apartment b-t1~t,~ and presented a sketch ~f the proposed site plan for the inspection of the ecemtaalon and others attending the hearing. Mr. Xuch wac asked for aU~ evidence that he might wish to present which~'W%id support a change in land uae mud Jueti~ the con~tructien of apa~~ buildings beunding on three eidee by residential development. Mr. Xuch stated he had preaented'hie case. N~tion by Brusaeau, ~conded by Xrueger, to recmmend to the Couacil to reject the requee~ for a special use permit of Glen Xuch. ~ion carried. ~ m4~es of Ncemmber 17, 1~60 ~ers read by the Chairman. ~ by ~Xehaletz, seconded by Xuebelbeck to adjourn. Motion carried. Secretary Iwan R. Xruege~, Sr. ~%~00 N~'~ Avenue North 8~00 o~cleek p.m. M~mber~ pr~$ent~ Euebelbeck, Smndt~ Brusseau, Michale%m, Keise, Xrueger, Sherman Fm~brouck. Eemb~ absent ~ ~icora, N~tice of ~pplie&ti~ for a special use permit for the Registered Land S~ey No. 426, Seetio~ 17, Tewn~op 118, Rauge 21 was read by the ~mai~mau. The recommendations frma the Villag~ Pla~er ~e read and placed on fileo M~. Thcma~ E. McKee of Bellair P~a2ty and Nr. Swanson of Noz~hern Realty presented a Preltm~ Plat of Golden Rule 3rd A~ditian ~d a Plat for special us~ permit for multiple dse~_lings. Mrs. M~mirako had no .bJeetien to the Plat or the Special Use Permit. S~ no propert application ~ms made w~ do not see fit to make a final recmmaendation on the Preli~ Pla%. If the Council wishes they m~v ~mve the faliuz~ to imalmde the b~J~noe of the Plat, ~ith donsideration of the ~ x 1~0 foot lotto · of B!~ck !~ ~tS 1 th~m 5 for si~le famil~ d~ll~. Neither Mr. Hasbrouck nor the cemmission or a~ome ~esent had a~ written or verble objections to the Pr~_~~ Plat, thus the Motion ~ms made by Kuebelbeck seconded by Brusseau to recmmaend to the Cc~m~il to accept the ~ltminm~y Pl~t of ~olden Rule 3rd A letter from R. W. Rosene pretaining to the Plat of Fai~ Oaks was reed and pla~ed on file. A final Plat of Mork Campien ~nor was received and checked by the Cmmaismiono ~tte~ ~ m~de by Ermeger, seconded by Brus~ea~A to accept the fi~l Plat of Nerk ~pi~ Mau~r° Hotion carried. p~ese~ted a pla~ for the ?ea~ of 1961 ~ the ~ope of his service° held. E~ebel~e~k seoem~ed by B~eau ~ ~~ to the ~1 to accept the ~ae year c~trm~t. Notion carried. Sec_-eta~ Ivaa R~ ~, Sr. HOPE PLANNING Village of New Hope December 22, 1960 Members present = Members absent t Krueger, Kelso, Brusseau, Sicora, Kuebelbeck. Michaletz, Sundt, O~an. mLuutes of December 1, 1960 were read and the corrections are as fo[to~s: Page 1, para~aph 5, line ~ - insert the word (to) line 7 - the word (shall) to be changed to the word (of). P~ge 2~ paragraph 2, line I- the name (Fr~k Potter) should be (Mr. Frarflc Pattee) and the word bo~nding)in rm~agraph 3, line 3 ~hou!d re~d (b~uded) - M~tion by Sicorm, scc,~ded by Kuebc!beck to accept the minutes as corrected. F~tion ce. tried. minutes <~ .... combe 8, 1960 were read mhd the cor~ct!ons ~re as foll~s: Page t, parmgra~ ~, line ! - the ~me Mrs. ~tnko n~ re~ (Mrs. Welch). Page 1, paragraph ~,. - Motion ~ Kuebelbeck, seconded by Bruise&u, to recommend to the council approval of application for spec~ use permit to plan multiple dwel!~xgs on lots 6, 7, 8 of Block 1 ~nd further, m subject to submtsalon of a proper application to recommend acceptance of lots 1, 2~ 3, ~ 5, of B~ck 1 for s~_ugle-family units. Motion by Kuebelbeck, 'seconded by Krueger, to accept the minutes as corrected, Motion carried. Motion by Sicora, ssconded by Bru~seau, to adjourn. Motion carried. Next regular meeting January 6, 1961. SeoretarT, Ivan R. Kruger, Sro