Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1965 Planning
~ber~ ~eseat .' N~ers AbS~t: MeetLug oas called to order by Ro Xuelbe!beck~ Io Public hearing op~ ~n the mezon~g f~om ~t~ ~dumt~ to m~tiple residencee p~pe~y ~ the vicL~ty of 73~ 36 Argue No~ho ~ He!~ W~sh~ adJo~ p~pe~y o~er ~ the ~s~ obJ~t~ to the ~eet~ rezon~g ~cat~g strong leg~ ~ts t~t r~e ~e~ By the Vi~ge mttorn~ ~s~ Wel~ did not ~1~ om ~his s~~ ~ice~t~g ~er c~cation wo~d be ~$h th~ Vii~ge atto~ She fe~ls m~tiplem wi~ dev~l~te h~ p~pe~y~ ~ she to d~ieate ~ o~ h~ p~op~y for etreets~ Vo ~ ~d R~ B~g~ pre~ent~ p~t refleet~g the p~pe~y develo~to ~s p~t ~co~rates a pri~te ~ich ~e C~e~ien ~di~t~ ~s tm ~o~%l~m of ~st~g or~ceeo Alth,~ they prefer the p~i~te ~d~ th~ ~re ~-~g to d~ieate one ~f a street on their ~t p~perty line ~g ~ 3~th to ~egon Argue No~h~ 'T~s rezon~g ~e con~de~ ~ever~ monks ago ~d the C~esion ~or~ sug~ gest~ t~mt ~ t~e p~operty now ~ned l~t~ ~du~t~ be zon~ ~iple It was ob~ou~ fr~m the r~o~i~ of ~$~ Welch t~t zhe ~ not ~onsid~ m~tipie zo~g for her' prope~y at thia During She discussion~ c~mm~nts were made by ~me Commission m~mber$ indiemti~g t~$ ~pproval of t~$ r~est ~d ~sult ~ "spot" zon~g ~ich is g~~ consid~ to be p~r plug p~ctice~ It ~mz ~o ~cat~ that became of the ~t~e of the l~d ~d its location t~t d~~t of ~t~ ~du~t~ on the proper~y in o~e~tion i's ~reme~ d~ficult~ Klo~te~ ~dic~ t~t the p~p~y ~et of that berg eonsid~w~ could wgll be develop~ for ~t~ ~dust~ and/er m~tiple regardless mf the zon~g ~f the ~y prope~y~ Motion by Kloster~z~ to recom~emd to the Village Council mpprov~I of the request f~r rezoning~ Seeond¢~. ~? C~ck~ DISCU~ION: The p~% fo~ t~ p~p~ty ~co~orate a public ~tr~t r~ng the private ~%reet~ V'~E: no, Moti~ c~i~ The following ~re the e~ecte~ o~ce~,e for c~lendar 1965: Chairm~n ~ , , ~ ~ ~ C~ck Kuelbelbeck ~dicated that bm~Luees and personal activities dictated hiz reeism~ tion f~ 'the Plam~tng Com~ssie~o It is with d~p regret that the Commission ~¢cepts the r~signationo The The ~,~H~ ho~ing ........... ~l~nate cae i~t~ ~tion iv~~ Krueg~~ to r~co~d t~ the Vilt~ge of the pre~ma~ p~% -~_th the fo~o~g 1o Width a~d are~ of lots Width of lot 7: ~ck ~ontage of ~;~t~ 2 Depth ~f ~t~ Depth of l~t~ i th~u~ Width ~d r~diuz Seconded b~j~ Admv~o Motion December Luvoic~ of ~dw~t Planner~ w~ reviewed° M~tion by Kru~g~r to autho~izs payment ef mcathky ~taine~ ,f $215~ r~fer $50 sp~ciai charg~ t~ the Village Co~ncil for approvaL~ Second~ hy Xloet~ ~tion carried~ D~ Pclloek~ Vili~e Plam~e~.~ pre~e~ted a dec~t de~cribM~g the ~r~izati~ f~cti~n of %h~ M~r~.t~u Pl~ug C~i~n~ }~meaot~ P~ng Co~i~ien~ r~e~end~ that th~ P3~m~iug ~r~esion ebon ~mbsr~hip in ~e ~e~ota The Dev~iopm~ut Plan wa~ rovi~w~I ~ f,u~ ~xisting problem, areas were A resolution will b~ ~dopt~d t~ r~Ive the~e pr~blem~o %~ apprevo mi~ute~ S~c. ond~ b~ PI~o }~tion c~r&~d~ 5,; ~tion by Xrueger to adjo~u~. S~on~d by Xl,~t,~% ~oti~n cs~Pt~d.~ VILLAGE 0¥ MEW ~OPE PubLic h~u-ing opened ~ 'request for rezo~ng of the p~erty immediatel~ East of Winnetka Avenue and approximately 1AO feet North of ~edic~ne Lake Road, Elme~ L~mphere, dames H~ben~ amd David Wyatt presented a site. plan of the dairy store pro~ posed for this property. Upon examina%lono %his site plan proved to be out of and the apglicants ~aid %hey would present a corrected ~ne te the Village Council° ~r~ Lamphere also ~hz%Itted an explanation of his zoning request, which stated, that the fifty feet of the property in question which is already zoned general bu.~£ue~$ excluded from tho rezoning request. ~0 Lamphere 'also Said that the north ten the property in question is intended to serve as a buffer between the dairy store ar~ the apartment building to the No~th~ and ~d/1 be inco~pora%ed into Lot Motion h~ Adams, seconded by Plufka~ to recommend to the Village Council that the fee% north ef the geaeral business zoning be rez~ned f~mm limited busines~ %0 retail business, that a variance be g~an%ed in the three acre mt~ lot size requirement, and that the north %eh feet of the p~oper~y be rez~ned fr~a limited business ~o multiple family residence an~ incorporated into Lo~ 13~ all subject %e %he g~n%ing an additional seven feet of easement for the full 200 feet ef the property ~l~ng Winnetka. Motion ea~riedo Plufka presented a reZ°Xu~ion in regard to the plam~ing Cemmiesion ~ht~aing a mem~ ship in the Z,~nnezota Pl~nai~ Assecintiono The re~lution was discussed, an~ table~ until a future meeting to petit further investtgatioao Adams moved that the. Planning Ccmnission recommend to the Village Council that the Village Development Plan be am~ded .%o Provide,. (a) ~ha~ ~h street be extended Sumter Avenue t~ Winne%ka~ (~-) that &9th Street be .extended acres~ %he ~&$ (c) %hat"Louisana A~enue be extend'ed across the. Soo Line and l,~&S %rack, s Mo%ion .by Plufka, seconded by Krueger, %o amend the mo~iea by striking out par% (O)o ~%i~n car~ied~' wt~h $ohoe~g..ppo~ed.'. UpOn:the mo%ion of Adams, 'seConded by Plufka~ the amended motion was carried u~utimouslYo ,; Mcti0n by Adam~, seconded, h~ X~Ueger that the planning Cc~misSion request %~e CoUncil Road 18~ and that the PI~ Ce~mieei~n red--end' t~ the Cevncil that p~oviai~n a~de for eontinutng 36%h Avenue ~orth across County. R~ad 18 thrm~h grade w~th or .w~thout int~chan~e: Motion ~az~iedo The Mlnute~ .of the previous Park Board N~ were .'revi~ed and A copy of a lette~ from the F~A to Eagle InveStm~t cOmpany ~. rega~d'.t~ Roy~l Oak ~ fifth addition was re~eived and reviewed. " D~ecuan~on of ~ho eotab~Lsbment of a~eso for ~~ ~ ~t~plo f~ dw~~ ~. ~ti~ ~ Pi~ s~o~ ~ S~o~ to 8pp~ve the ~uteo of ~o P~ VILLAGS O~ lq~ HOPE ~l.m~es of ?lanning Commiesim Meeting ~ l~etn'uar2 16~. 1965 Ne~bers Preseat~ Cliek~ Xloste,~man~ Xrueger~ Sehoenings Trucker Members Abse~%~ Adams~ Lloyd~ Plufka~ Zaske Dlscuesioa of the resolu*,iau t~ establish '"e~abership in the ~nneeota Planning Commlealon was tabled in ~he absence of P!uffkao Fur~he~ information is considered neeessar2 before' action can be taken o~ the resolu%lOno Trucker indicated %ha% the ~o%ion made at the February 2 meeting rega~g st~ changes ahoul~ have ~On~i~e~ed in~.llati~n ~f streets in %he southeastern comer Of the Village. (Area bordered by Loulelana~ 32ad Avenue He~h~ N~S ~ traok~ and Medicine Lake Road). A diseusmion t~ok place 'with no firm re~ommehdation re~Attingo In addit£on, traffic flow .~e*,we~n ~2nd Avenue North a~d 3'6th Avenue No~th, east of the Ng~ Railroad~. The Village Planner was requested to. investigate these t~ areas and any othere considered to be a possible problem and repo~t the ~esults ~o the Mr0 Rose~g;~Am appeared and requested an info~ review of a proposed plat for the property Wes*. o£ Quebec and ~ox~,h of ~2nd Aven~e l~orth and the rezoning of an area 3~0 x 270'from Retail Buatneso to (~eneraA BuSiness~ The resorted, area would Probably be used' for a dair2 store and ~es~au~ant to support the commercial establishments in the a~ea~ Roseag~Am indicated he would request a back yard set back variation to feet° The plat was diSCusSed and Er° ROSengrim ~as advised that no action c~uld taken prior to the pUblic hearing; The zoning, of ~he property in ~he ,vaci~t%y of ~2nd Avenue ~O~h and County R~ad 18 was discussed-, Previous pla% and zoning requee%a for this area were revi~,~ The Planner indicated that this ~io a desirable area fo~ Limited BusinetS~ MOtion by Sehoening to revise the Comprehensive D~elopmea. z Plan to ~eflect the Limited Busineos zoning as it now exist° and' delete %he Commercial designation in tho large area no~h~ east of *,he intersection° Seconded by xruege~o ~otio~ ca~ried~ Motion by Xrveger to oimilarl~ show Cum*eh% Llnited BUeinee, en the Comprehensive D~velopme~t Plan as it ~xists southeast of' the.interaeeti~u ef A2~d A~enue H~r~h County R~ad 1~o Seconded by Xlo0~er~n~ 'Motion ca~ried:~ .. Click ln~ieated ~hat Zaske had submitted h~s real§natiOn' ~ndA~&t~ that busines~ c~nsu~ al~ his available ti~eo ~%iea' by, Click to accept. Za'ake~ s resignation with deep regret, Seconded by Scheoningo Mo%i~n earried~ It is requested that the Deput~v' Clerk prepare a le%ter of appreciations ~o Charles Bukkila and William Wahl appea~ed before.the Planning CommiSsion for application for m~abershipo ¥~tion by Xrueger .to reco~ne~d to the .Village Council appointment of Bukklla and Wahl ~o replace Xuebelbeck and Zaeke, ~tion by X~ueger to accept for pa2ment the January-invoice of ~idweot Plar~erOo Seconded by Schoe~mgo ~otion car~iedo T~ucke~ indicated that the Village Attorney has advised that special use per. its are in disfavor with tho courts as a means of deviating from ostabliohod zonings° We ohould, thereforo~ evaluate all existing and propooed zoningo as well as delete use penmtto from the Ordtnano.eoo Xrueger suggested that the Village Attorney expreoo his reconnendationo before any ouch action ia taMen by the.Planning Conmisolono Click inquired &s to the statue of tho oidewalk plan for the Village. T~ucker indicated that a ~ough Plan is available and e~ncen,trateo on main %hor~ughfaree arid Bchool areas° Cli~k suggested we consider having the developero install oidewalk8 ~hich will reduce coot to the Village and expedite sidewalk installations, No action taken° The following is ~he 1965 bUdget for the P_l_~_nning Commission.. 'Salaries $ 120 Printing ~iocellaneouo 100 Professional Services Total tion by to Journ Seconded by Sehoenin o ot on ce.-r ed; VI:LI~(IE .OF ~ ItOPE ltlnute, of P~nning Cam~ts~ion ~eeting = l~arch 2, 1~ M~be~ Ab~e~t{ Adam~ Lloyd Public hearing ~pened on the p~op~sal for re~a~.~g fr~a s~gle f~ ~ ~tip~ f~ re~d~e ~e ~p~y of ~ C~st~cti~ ~ the ~e~ty of No~h ~d ~s~ Av~e No. ho R~ Fade~ at~o~ for the' ~v~p~ It was ~~ ~t the ~ ~tionl ~ the ~ ~ be ~z~ ~e el~t~ ~s~e to ~e it ~~e~ ~ c~ot~c~ s~e f~ d~oo f~c~ ~ot ~ o~~ a ~t of ~e ~ ~ qu~ for o~o f~ d~~8 ~uoe of ~ty to the R~I ~8~oas ~. The was ba.~ ~ ~o mdc ~or ~ ~se of' the ~ (~) ~..~ ~~tion. o~o the oo~ ~~ ~Fe rode ~; therefore, ~e~~ ~e ~~ of the The plat that was presented ~as for general information and no~ intended represent the plat that w~uld be p~vided when the rezoning wa~ acc~pliahed. p~poeed devilment ~as deacribed~ The The following appeared i~ eipposition to the Prot~sed roz~t~g~ ,~a. ~cio Bo The majority of those opposing .tho re~nina were property o, nors .bordering. the sOUth proper~y line and their main eonee~n was the devaluation of thetF pFopertyo Fadella re~ested that aotion on the tokening request b~ p~tp~ned until the CoBn:Lso:J. on ~eeting of ~oh 1~ ~ permit ~arther c~naideratiea of 'the ~il eemtt= time in the area° The p~otp~nement wa~ 'granted° It is requested that the Village Engineer provide a rePOrt of the soil an~ road Conditions in ~he area° Public hearing opened on the preliminary plat of the Trivia ~uith. P~per~y in the area of 62nd' and-Ensign'Avenue North. Nm varianeea are required° Notion by Xrueger to ~ecommend to tho Village Council approval of '%ho .pre~ plat with the requirement that ~ feet along the pl'optu.t2 line 'on ~ Averse ~th ~e d~i~&ted to the Village ~o permit a 70~foo~ streets ~econded by Plu.~o Motion A le~te~ f~on the .Walker Art Cente~ was x, eoeived indteatiag a preaentati~a on eooperative houai~..~ would be made on Hatch 1~o Lette~ e~dered plaoed on flle~ Letter received f~om Lloyd tendering hie resignation fr~m the Planning Ccmmiseioa, ~otien by Krueger to accept resigmat~.~n .with regret~ Seconded by Plufkao Motion Requested the Deputy Clerk %e prepare a letter cf appreciation, Plufka indicated that a representative of the F~nnezota Planning Aosociation ~uld be at the Village Hall at ?z30~ M~reh 16~ to present the function of the aaeoeia- tion and answer any ques%ionsQ Plufka moved that the resolution to e's~ablish me~bership in the Association be delayed until the meeting of F~rch 16, Seconded by Schoeningo 6,' ¥~nutes of the Cc~miselon~a Eeeting of February 16 were read° The fallowing ~orre~%ions were made: Para, 1 ~ "Cae~ieion" ahou!d read "Associationa Para. 2 - "N~S Railr~ad" ahould read "~S Railroad" Para, ? - "William 'Wahl" should read "Wilfred Wahl" ~otion by Plufka to accept minutes as corrected° Seconded by ~ahlo ~tien ca~iedo It was decided that the Village A%to~ney would be requested to attend ~he ¥~ch 16 meeting of the C~seion to discuss recent court actions on special uae permits and action that might be %ake~ by the Village to eliminate ~pecial use permite f~om the ordinancea ° 80 Ho~ion by Xrueger to adjourn° Second~ by Plufkao ~otion earriedo VILLAGE OF MEW HOPE- Minutes. of Planning Commission Meeting ~ ~areh 164 1965 ~lembers Present Hembers Absent: Bukkila, Click, Xlosterman, ~rueger~ Plufka~ T~ucker~ Wahl Adams~ Schoening ~rSo William Grahams. rePresenting the Minnesota Planning Asso~iati,n, reviewed the purpose, plans, znd accomplishments of the organization and answered several questions fr~n members of the Commission. The Association meets four times a year %~ discuss specific pla~ing subjects which are of in%erect on a state~wide baai~o. The ma~ority of the membership is comprised of lay planners representing mm~tci- pa~lities throughout the States : ' o Tho public hearing on the proposed rezoning from single family, to multiple fa~f!y residence the' property in the vactnity of 60th Avenue North and Hilleboro Avenue North was re-opened. Rs Feddel~, A~ Pe~erson, and H~ Olson, ~d~der Engineerin~ appeared to present the proposaie It was requested that Lots 10 tc 14~ Block 3~ he deleted f~om the proposed rezoning petition. These lots will be developed single fami~. · The detail of the soil borings were. again reviewed. Additio~l records dated were provided indicating soil conditions of .each lot in. the plat~ Block ~ h~ unstable s~il ran~ing in depth from ? to 2~ fee~. Other tb~n .Lot 10~ Block 3~ ~he borings indicated satisfactory soil. conditions for constructi~n without ~geciai previsions to prevent settling° Borne comments were made by both Commiasio~ and are~ residents indi~ating some soil moving had taken p~Aze in the area quest to the soil borings° No evidence was presented to indicate th~% ~oil eon~t~ tion~ 'had bees changed suffieientl~ since the borings. Pe~erson indicated tha~ FHA ~ould not approve %he area under consideration for single fami~ residence. Reference was made to ~n FHA report supporting this ~laim but no such repor~ w~s presented~ The point was made that the area in question: is zoned and platted for single family residence which conforms to' the land use approved by the Plann~g Co~zi~eiOno Comments by area residence, the same as attended the ~arch 2 hearing~ generally related to devalUation of property if multiples are permitted in 'the area° Motion by Xrueger t~ rec~ead to'the Village Council that the re~Aeste~ reZoni~g be denied° Seconded by Xlosterman° l~totion carried unanimouely,~ Motion by Plufka %o red,mend to the ~illago Council approval of ~xpendl%ure ~f $25 for group 'mem~ership in the ~4tnnesota Planning Ase~ciatio~o Seconde~ 'by Bukkilao DiscussiOn ~ Generally considered that participation in %he A~o~ia~i,n activities ~ould ~e a~vantageous to the ¥illage, ¥~tio~ 'c~ried~ ~0 Motion by Plufka that the Chairman of the Planning C~salon have the authority to appoint the three voting Associati~n members permit%ed by ~he by~l~w~o S~on~ed by WahXo ~o~ion tam,leds F~tioa by Plufka accepting resignation of ~choeniug fro= the Planuing Cemmta~on with reg~e%, Seoonded by ~ahl,. F~tion ca~, Request DePuty Clerk prepare a letter of appreciation~ ~nutes of the ~rch 2 Planning Cc~mieeion meeting were accepted as read, ~otion by Plufka to recommend ~o ~he Village Council to instruct the Deputy CXe~k that applicants for ordinance variances be informed that the petition be preeeated to the Planning CommiSsion for revie~ prior to su~aittal to the Village Council~ ' Seconded by Wahl~ ~tion c~rriedo Klosterms~ indica%e~ that. the Village A%tomey would attend the APril 20 .Planning CommiSSion meeting to discuss curren% legal philosophy relating tm special use permits ~ Click suggested that' the Plamuing Commission discuss with the Village Attorney the participation of the' COmmission in evaluating proposed Park Board land a©quisi~ione for parks, Resolution ~6~2, establishing the Planning Commission, is interprs%ed to include this activity within the defined duties of the Commission~. A petition ~aa presented by Wo S~ueker for membership to the Planning Commissiom~ Resum~ was reviewed, ~.ietion by Xrueger te recomaend to the Village CounoLl appointment of ~ Sueker tO replace Lloyd on the PlAunir~ Commisaton~ Seconded by BukkAlao Motion camped° Park Board meeting minutes of Februar2 ID were read and discueseds. Hotion by K~ueger to authorize payment of the ~2~0 invoice' from Midwest Planners for February retainer: Seconded by ~l~et .ermano Motion carried, Do PolX~k presented evidence of pro,ross in updating the Com~rehensive Developme~% Plans He recommended-that the Planning Commission consider{ Establishing Oregon Avenue North from Eedicine Lake Road to approximatei¥ ~1~!/2 Avenue North az a 70-foot collector street to provide a~cees %o the Limited Industry property° Bo RezOning the Limited Industry east of NN~S Railroad flmm' ~th' to 36th Avenue ~orth ~o residential to support the grade school being built on the borde~i_~g Crystal p~ope~tyo C, Rezontug the Limited Industry e~st of I~&S Rail~ad fr~m 36th to 38~h Avenue North to {,bAl%iPle Family Residence, Do .Est~lish Oregon Avenue North ~ 36th Avenue North t~ R~skford Boad. as ~ 70- f~Ot collector street, · It ~ae decided th&$ the initial-effort should be contact ~ith the V~ge of deec~ ~ .1~ a~e to s~o f~ resid~cea, Actl~ ~ ~he O~er it.s ~o d~d~t ~ ~ re~Xu~i~ of ~-s ~t, Do Po~k ~ ~e ~e con, et 1~o ~tion by Erueger to adjourn° Seconded by Klostermano ~etion carriedo VILLAGE OF N~'..~ HOPE i, iinutes of Pl~mir~g C~s..~ss~o~.,, Meeti~ag - April 6, 1965 Present: Ad~s~ F~.kkila~ Clzck~ Kloste~an~ K~eger~ Plufka~ ~nl~ $ ......... g attended for Trucker S~ek~r, Pub)~.c hearing o~oen~d, on th~ .~ prc,~os~ed~ o~eli~ua~~ - ~y plat of the p~rty ~ the vicinity of ~ ~ '~ ~a=,~ ~,,;~v~n~e North ~ud 36th Avenue North~ ~.. ~d ~s. J~ L~ X~es .~***~ ...... bac,,.$ ~.~ garage relocation wer~ discuss~. ~e P ~::o~a, Ocsa~ss:~.:.~. ....... c¢~'?~-=~,~M 'ona.'::, +'~;, garage eh'trance oe from Flag Avenue. ....... ~nac ...... had dedicate3 33 fe~t on both 36th ~d ?* · V' +~.~*,~4 .*-~- *- an a~dittoi~al seven feet wou~ be ' '~ Motion by Plufka t~, recom~and to tho Village Council approval of the pr¢~ary plat ..... ~ ~{ki!a, Motion ;,'.%~ ~Jolic hsarLug opon:~d on the r~quest for rezening from single f~ residence No~th at Winnetka .~?renue Yoz~,h~ !%~ develo~ent p~n was 'pres~t~ ~ ~ F. Meli? of ~ier a~ Melby av~.~%, C~ Schaib of ~rl-S~%e Developer. They ~ted out th. struct~es ~o~Id b~ d,a~i~.e.d to be co~o=tib.e ~th the c~to~ of th$ ~nd, plans e~eed the .... . '~'--~ ..... * ~.,,~uzse,,z~.~s of ~he recant~ re~_$~ o~ces for ~ltipie8 '~d tha daai~ab~ty of hav~g a buffer zone ~t~i the ~sidential ~d fetal ~..~._ca~a thaa ~.l~ge official'~ h~ request~ that th~ correct~- z~ned~_~.~_..~,~ ~y~ ~a b~%T~en the retail b~s~ess ~d ~posed ~Sth Av~rme No~h ~ exclud~ fram c~aiaidaratiou of d~el~ut at p~s~ ~'~on to .rez~e i~ ~tail A peti%i~n w~s presented by th~ proporty o~aers in the area Ludicating objection the proposed rezon~g. ~y voi,.~ed c~e~ over d,~ci'~aa~d property val-o.e~ road enterLug the school pax'king lot~ blocking of drainag~ on Virginia Avenue traffic flow onto l<;~%u~tka a%d u!~keep of the multiples. ~ir.o Scheib i~adicated that ~i-State ~-,iil r~tain o~nership of the develop~ont ba, s~ ~F~n the size of the investment and the mortgagee require~nts~ the p:~opert~ ~]i b~ properly ~.ta~ed. Re.seated if c~sideration ~d be~ Wen th~ size of th~ developer, Mr. Scheib ~dicat~ that it ia not feasible, The Pta~ai~g Co~$$i~ p. inted out the increased control that the Villag~ ....~%~u.,~.~ ,~:,;~;s if the de~elopiu~nt was authorized uuder a special um~ p~r~t rather t'h~a ;~e~ning,~ Motion b~ P!ufka to reco~e~i to the '' ~ -~ . ~zl_aae Council that the requa~st for r~a~oninil be d~nied. $®c~nded by Adams. Motion carried~ Public hearing opened ~n the request for rezoning from single family residence to retail business the property at 7900 51st Avenue NortH. Mr. J. T. Aarestad presented the sketch of the proposed Superette on the lot in question. The Planning Commission pointed out the Ordinance requirements for retail ~usiness: setbacks~ acreag®~ square footage and parking facilities-none of which ¢o-~l~ be met as proposed. M~.. Aarestad requested that the public hearing be postp~ed until April 20th to permit b/m %i~m to evaluate the Ordinance, So granted. Pablic hearing opened on the request for rezoning from single family residence to multiple ~m-,ily residence the property at Wisconsin Avenue North and p~mpe~ed ~6th A~emu® ~orth~ Nfo Lo And~rso~ represented ~orseman Construction. THe rollicking residents appeared in opposition to the rezoning: ~ Art~mr Grapentin 5621 ~[isconsin Ave° North Ferdinaad C~ Dates 56i~ Wisconsin Ave° North Joseph Digs%one ~6~ WiScons]~ Ave. North ~s. Joseph Digaton'$ " G. E. S~st~m 5630 Wisc~s~ Ave. NoPth' E, N. Olson 5618 WiSc~s~ A~ North C. M. Sc~tz 8~5 BaSs L~ke Road opposed opposed op~sed opposed opposed opposed opposed opposed The character of surron~ding im~d was discussed as was the drainage situti~u and p~P~sed 56th Avenue North. Mr, Anderson indicated that the instability of the laud did not make it i ec~omically feasible to build single family structures° No s~il boring ihformati~n was presented~ It w~s noted that the proposed rez~uing does not conform t~ t~e ~hensive D~e~t P~ ~ich s~cifies' s~_e fam~ re,donee ~ ~s ~a. ~tion by Ad~ to reco~ to the Village Co,oil t~t ~e ~~ ~que~t be d~ed. ~o~ by Kloste~. ~tion c~ed. ~. K. Weestr~ ~%y Ho~s, presented the p~~~ p~t for Royal O~ Hills 6th Additi~ Hs ~cat~ a ~~ess to ne~a~ ~ the Vitae for the piece ~f ~~y at the ~ co,er of 3~ ~ ~e A~e North. No ~ces ~r~ Hot~ by E~e~e~ ~ ~co~nd ~ th~ V~ Co~ app~v~ of the pre~~y William Co_~rick~s letter dated ~ch 25th was received mud read. Action v~ll withheld mntil April 20th m~ettng at ~hieh tame the plat revision will b~ discussed with William Corrick. The preliminary sidew~ plan was received and reviewed. Concern ~as expressed by some of the Con~ission members about the quality of the homes currently being built on Boc~e Avenue, South of ~ Aven~e North. The advantages off ~ucre~sing ~imum floor area, lot area or lot ~idth requiremen%s ~are discussed with no ccnclusio~ resulting. Motion by K~ueger to adjourn. Seconded by ~losterm~o Motion c~ied. MINUTES OF THE NE~ HOPE PLANNING COMMISSION April 20~ 1965 ¥~s~ Welch appeared to oppose the planner'.~ recommendation to designate Oregon a Collectors street. She stated her property should remain limited ind~.strial because she is paying "limited industrial rates of tam:es" which are legally binding in her opinion. ~eorge Jobmson appeared concerning ~ request to build double bungalows on Lots 8 through 17, Block 3, Twin Terra Linda. Discussions indicated that lot 17 of the above should not be included in this request. Chair- ~u Click indicated to Mro Johnson that a public hearing was necessary under the existing o~dinance for granting of a special house pernzit to sell double bungalows on this property. Discussion was held on the proposed plat of William Corrick and a letter from Mr. Corrick was read to the Commission along with the engineers comments° A motion by Krueger seconded by Wahl to recommend to the Village Council approval of the plat with a variance on the 50t radius and the 50t width of Flag Circle and a variance on lot depth in block 1, lots 1 through 5, 13 a~d i4 and ir~ block 2, lots i through 5. Motion carried. Mr~ Corrick and Mr~ Miller appeared z~or a discussion en the proposed multiple dwell~g ordinance. Their letter to the Flanning Commission was received, read, and each point discussed. A n~otion made to approve the invoice of Midwest Planning by Click seconded by Wahl was ca~ried. Planner discussed the new school being buil~ in Crystal and its impact on New Hope Planning decisions° Click confirmed the appointment of Krueger and appointed Wahl to the Civic Center Committee. Motion to adjourn by Plufka, seconded by Krueger. Motic~ carried° VILI~GE OF t~Et,.! HOPE ¥~inutes of Planning Commission Meeting - May ~.~ 1965 Members Present: A.dams~ Bukkila, C!~.ck, Krueger, Sueker~ Tr.~k~;, ~ahl Men. bets Absent: Kloster~an, Plufka Pu01ic hearL~g opened on the request for special use perr~it~ th~ vininity of 56th Aw3nue North ~nd Wisconsin Avenue North~ Request for delay ~ntil 8:~5 denied. Mr. L~ Anderson represented Norseman Constr~ction. Se'~eral site ~d building plans were presented by Anderson° The following appeared in opposition to the request: M~-~ E~ Olson M~. C~ Schmit~ The current drainage problem was discussed. It was again pointed o~t that the Vt~age Comprehensive Development Plan specifies sf~gle family residence in this area. Other objections ~ere Lucreass traffic in residential area, and devalu&tlon of ne!ghborLng property. ~!~nderson indicated that the l~d was suit,.tie for only a ~itiple dwelling aud i~_~ was planned to invest $5~000~OO in th~ development~ It was indicated that ~ petition was dn being, signed by approxin~tely 900 psrsons~ which requested a one y~a~ moratori~ on issu~nc~ of b~d]ding ~ts for mul~pl~ dw~l~gs. ~k~s~ D~is L~dicat~d that ~u New Ho~ th,~r~ are now 2~ single ~d ~,8 multiple ~its ~ Motion by K~eger to re~o~nend to th~ Village Cotu~cil that the request be denied. Seconded by Su~ker~ Si.:~ voted yes~ Trucke~~ no~ Motion carrl~d~ Public h~ar~g op~ne~ on :~equest for prelimin~ plat of H~ L~ Meyer property in ~i¢ln. ity of Flag ~venue Nerth and 33rd Avenue North~ Wil}~.~ Corrlck repres~t~ the property Mo%ion by K~.~.eger to r,~co~r~nd to the Council ~pprov~l of th~ request. Seconded Ad.~ms. Motion carried~ P~blic hearing op~n~d c~n the requast for special u~e 28~h Avenue North t~et~ Xylon ~d W~tka Avenue North~ Th~ ~tition~r did not ap~ar to pre~ent th~ Dr ~ l~!robel requested lot 17 b~ re~oved f~m the petition ~s that ts ~.s property and ~ot subject to the ~cla! use Click tabled th~ h~ar~ ~til ~y 18. Th~ d~puty clerk i~ :~,~q~st~ to notify Jo~so~ to ap~ar at t~s ~eting~ D. Jorgensen and J~ 14ali appeared in opposition to the r~qu~e~t~ PLA~NING COmmISSION MINUTES May ~ 1965 Public hearing opened on the request for variance of the Beal Property in the vicinity of Osseo R~ad and 62nd Avenue North. The petitioner did not appear and the hearing was tabled until the May 18 meeting. Trucker emphasized the need for Lucreased ccemercial activity in the Village and requested that the commission members develop some ideas for news releases that may attract business. Further discussion will take place at the May 18 meeting. Motion by Wahl to adjourn. Seconded by Adams. ~otion carried. Mambers Present: Adams~ Bukkila, Plufka, Sueker, Trucker Members Abs~nt~ Click-~, Klosterman~ K~aeger, Wahl Public hear~Jag reopened on th~ r~que~t for s~!ai ~se permit, to construct family dweli~ngs Ln the ~.c~J.ty of 28th Avenue North and ~'"*~, .~met~a A~en~ North. G.~ Johnso~ presented the petltion~ He requested that Lot 17 be removed From the petition~ E= ~ph~re indicated that at the t~e of sale of th~ peo~r~y Lq the ~m~ed/ate ar~ the pro~a~ u~ ~a t~f~ly d~ngs. ~u~ of th~ ~s~ ap~'~Lug :~q op~aition to the request ~thdraw ~n ~arlier ~ate~nt that he had be~a sokl pro~y ~&t.h th~ ~derstandi~g that $~gl~ fa~3=y units ~re *~ be r ~ + ~,t ~ th<~ lots In question~ Motion by' ~ ~:*~. ~,~.t~. to recon~end to tbs Village Cmmcaoi~ ~ ~ that the request us~ p~d;~ tw~ gra~,t~i~, Se~c~ded by Bukk~.la, Motion carrie~%. ~blic h~aring ~- "~ r~opens= on tho r~quest for vari~n~ on tho proTmrty in the vio~ni, ty of Osseo R,o~ and ~ad Avenue North. H~ B~a! pt',.~a'~k.ed the, petition, D, Pollock r~cc~mended that th~; rsqu~st b~ d~nled~ E~ i~mph~r~, a disLnt~rest~ ~y fm this he~ng~ su~est~ that th~ V~!..lag~ Atto~ey be ~-~qu~st~. to give an opLnion on the ~atter, Motio~ by PluP~a to table the hearing until June i, to ~rmi:t H~ Beal to obt~ f'~rther advi~e, oecond¢,~ by Sueker~ Motion carric~d~ ~ab!Ic hea~Lug op~n~d on a~ ~quest to r~zone from Single Resld~ue~ 'to Multiple R~sldenc~ th~ property %n tho vicinity of kb. th Av~mae North and $~ter Aven~ the petition, Th~ fot2owing apF~ar~d Ln oprositlon.~ '7810 4Ath Avenue North 7820 &~th Avenue North ~*~.~.~ North A ~tabsm~nt of oppositior~ w~s r~ceived frc~ }h-, & Mz~a~ J~ Meis:ick~ 7~ 4gth North. g. ~mphere ~dicat~. that m total of ~0 ~mlt~ wins p]_~m~ half one and ha~ t~ k~room~ k r~-~ f~nce would buffer th~ ~ntfre pro~y f~m t,~m, f~.i~ ar~a, t~s ~11 be pl~nt~ a~ the garages ~id. be ~ th~ East sid~ of d~velo~n% ~ Motion by Sucker to ~ecommend to the Village Council app~ovai of the ~quest, Seconded by P!ufka. Four yes votes~ Trucker Wostained. Motion carried. 4~. Public hearing opened on the request for special use permit to locate a billiard center in the Ne~' Hope ShoppLug Center~ B. Carlson presented the petition, One c~rrently is iu operation in Frldley which has been wisited by T~cker, ~o indicated he was ~pressed ~d~th the operation. Motion by Plufka to recommend to th~ Village Council ~pproval of the requ~t~ Seconded by Bukkila~ Motio~ carried° Public hea~g open~ on the r~qu~st for special use permit to const~ct ~ self ser~c~ car wash in the ~icinity of Bass ~mke Road and Nevada Mr~ Jewett presented the petition. L~ Dotas of Spe~ Wash presented the plat ~nd const~¢t~o~ plans. A sLmilar facility is now be~g built in ~t~ Paul~ Motion by Plufka to recomr~end to the Village Council approval of the r, equest ,~der the condition that all existing ordinances. Seconded by Bukkilao Motion carried~ 6~ Motion by Plu£ka to pay ~ttd~st Plmuning th~ May Invoice of $250. Seconded by Motion carried° 7~ Motion by Plufka to pay ~dwest Pla~ing invoice for $~1~2o for s~cial $~conded by Sucker. Motion carried, 8~ Motio~i by Plufka to adjourn. Second~ by Bukkila. Motia~ car,'led. ~[ILLAGE OF NE~ HOP~ Minutes of Fia~.~ug Commlsaic~ M~at~ ~ Ju~ i~ 196~ M,a,mb~ Ab~t : Adama~ Klo~ter~a~ B~kkiJ~ Mr~ ~ar~d~r~on ~nd ~ ~n Fi~be.v of Nor~e~n Oonstraction ~t~ ~uitip!~ ~ts ~uLd d~cr~ th~ v~e of their ~Jac~at ~tt~ a re.ri ~ fi~ dat~ J~ry 23~ [961~ pro~rty~ letter dat~ J~nua~ l. 198%~ ~i~ by ~rge T~ Bergen th~ ~u~tr~l fil~ ~ 'Moti~n by Suaker~ a~c~nd~ 'by' Kr~eEer.~ to rc~c~nd to th~ V~IJla~ Co.oil t~,t th~ r~at .f N~r~;~u Con~t~ction for re~>~:ng f~a~ Lndu~i~'~t~ to multi~.a re~i~ta on the p~.op~r~y at agth ~xd WL~a b~ grad~g of indus~r~al ~:~p~rty ~ad (!oe~ not m~at P~rk~ The p~nt co?~iuad ~i~'ht l-~t~ ~.wiu~br~i ~te~,.~ w~dch ,~t ~a j,6th ~ Commi~ionMinut~e June The minutes of Nay 18, 1965, were reviewed,: .the corrections a~e as follows: Item five paragraph three ~hould read - "Motion by Plufkm to recea~end to the Village Council approval of the request under the eonditie~ that all existing ordinances be complied with~". Item two paragraph two, strike or% second sentence frem the records. "Do Pollock recemmended that the re,vest be denied." Notion by Xrueger, se~omied by Sueker, approve the minutes as ~orre~ted. Motion carried. .held on ~aiti~e d~llin~ ftrepro~fing~ Notion by Sucker, seconded by Wahl to ~ec~m~end to the Village Council that e~e~.o~- walls and be~ing wall~ be of two ~u~ fi~e ~ated coz~truction ~d that all interior non~ partition wall~ be of one hour fire construction° This ~xmas~dation to be incorporated in our new multiple dwelling code. Motion by Sucker, meeonded by Wahl to ad jovan. Motion carried° Secreta~j' Ivan R o Krueger IX/cvJ VILLA~ OF NEW HOPE Ninutes of Planning C~mmission Neeting - June 15~ 1965 ¸5. 8~ Members Present: Wahl, Click, Bukkila~ Trucker, Erueger, Planning Con~ultaut~ Sucker arriviug at 9:05 Membe~ Ab~at : Pl~zl~, Adam~" Ele~term~,~ Oha/rman Click stated ti~t Nr~ Elostermmu w/shed t~ reatgn as secrstary and that he was appointing Mr~ Krueger as the new ~cretar~. Krueger stated that he would accept. Discussion held cm the p~operty i~ the viciuity of ~th ~md Smmpter Avco The quemtion being the ~op~r w~y to develepe laud. It wa~ further discussed that the best u~e would be clu~ter t~pe town b~using. Discussion held au the request of N~. Aariste, on Apmil 6, 1965o The property beimg ~ 51st Ave° No. The lot being eighty three feet b~y one hundred and ~enty feet, the request was for ~ ~uperette on the lot. MotiOn by E~eger, ~econded b~ Wahl t~ rec, omm:emd t~ the Village Cc~nc~ that the r~ue~t be ~e~eeted~ did ~ot meet the are~; met bae~; parkimg area; ~ide y~rd set b~ck; requirmmmt~. Net&on carried. The Plauuing Con~it~ut p~e~e~ted th~ Plauning Cemmtsmion with an up t~ date l~d u~e map. It w~s ~i~ed amd discussed, and corrections were made~ The. Plarmiug Oommimsio~ r~eete that the adminstrator please scad each mee~er of';the Commis~au the p~emeat names and addr~sse~ of the 0emmtss~, C~r~eetiom of a: nam~ on the list i~: k~ Wahl Discussien held on the ~eauey en the Pi~ Ccmmissica. ~% ~a~ suggested that interested resident ~t~ ~ Albert Click~ 5~5~E~o DiScussion held in getting beter co-ordination between the Park Board and the planning Commission in developing the ~mdeveloped land in the vi~,lage. It was s,Aggested that the chairman contact the members of the Park Board. Pubtic hearS.:~g reopened on .the request for variance of the Beal Property in the vicinity of West Broadway and 62nd Ave. No~ The petitioner did not appear at the May &th meeting and was tabled until ~h~V 18th meeting, at which he did net appear. Motion byTrucker, secondedbyBukkila, to recommend to the Village Council to deny the request for variance, due to the lack of meeting the requirements and did not appear to show due cause. Motion carried. Motion by Krueger, seconded byBukkila to adjourn, motion carried. Sec. Ivan R. Krueger Sro IK/cvj '¸% VILLA. GE OF NEW HOPE Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting, July 6, 1965 Members Present~ Krueger, Plufka, Klosterman, Trucker, Click, Bukkila Members Absent: Adams, Sueker, Wahl A ~ablic hearing on the proposed plat of the north 985 ~eet, plus or minus~ of Lot 3~, A~ditor~s Subdivision No, 226~ He~nepin' County, Minnesota~ was heldo The petitioners~ ~. Biane and Mr, Hirace presented a preliminary plat for Quebec Gardens~ in the vicinity of 58th Avenue and Quebec Avenue. Motion by Piufka~ se¢,:mded by Xlosterman, to recommend to the Village Comnctl the r~st for Quebec Gardens be apprm~ed, and that the Northwest angle b~ worked out e.u Lo-~', P~ Block I~ Motior~ carried. A public hear~.ng was opened at 8:~5 on the reqmest for special use perm~t for a Rest Hom~ on th~ following legally described property: The South ~. of the $~ath 213.6& feet of the N. 387.39 feet of the E ½ of the NE~ of the S,~ of Sec. 6, Twpo llS, P~mge 21, W of the 5th principal meridisn~ except the W 2~7 feet thereof. The W. 2Z~7 feet of that part of the E½ of the of road~ Th~ S. ~.63.10 fe~t of the N. 851 feet of that part of the E½ of th~ ~ of the SE~ lyir~g E. of the We 2&? feet thereof° The S. !06.82 fe~t of the N° 281.O8 feet of that p~rt of the E½ of th~ ~ of th~ ~;E~ ~kug E. of the W. 247 feet thereof. All in H~.~nep~n Co'~mty~ Minnesota. Mr. Frank Patio% Mr~ Jerry Choromanski ~d ~ Bi~ B~tey pr~ut~ the red, est for ~ special use ~t for m Rest Home ~ the Northwest co.er of W~etk~ Argus ~d ~ss ~e Road. It wou~ have app~t~!y 2t~ b~d~ a cha~l that hold~ 250 ~d a c~v~t that ~ld ho~ ~ ~st~rs m~d a ch~pla~n qu~rs~ 10 acres w~re ~n by Petersons ~ Lavo~s:~ the home ~uld t~ up app~tely LI acr~$~ ~d the cost w~ be appro~t~ly on~ mildion do~fia?~:~ Motion by Kloste~,.~u~ seconded by Kr~eger, that thi~ b® tabled until the f'i~st meeting J~ Au,~?~st while more information is being acqmir~d. Motion o~rried~ Ken Weestraud presented a revised preliminary plat of Royal O~ ~£~[~ 7th Addition~ in t.he vi, i~ity of 35th Avenue and Virginia Ava~a~e. Motion by K!oste~-m~n~ seconded by Trucker to recommend to the Village Co~u¢tl to approve the revlmed pr®llminary pl~t of Royal 0~ Hills 7th Addltion~ Motion carri~i ~ Mr. Lee presented a plat on the property just north of T.E.C. in the Science Industry Center facing on Boone Avenue. This lot betug 300 by 300 feet. The village requirements for L.I. is a 3 acre site. Mrs. L~e stated that the ll,OO0 sq. ft~ b~ilding proposed would be used, for m~uufacturing metal stamped products. The commission pointed out some of the LoIo site requirements. The building set back, side yard set ba~ shown on the plat preseated did not meet the requirem~nts. The petitioners stated they would like to study the site and their b~ilding to see if some adjustments could be made to meet the requirements, Motion by Plufka, seconded by Bu~la, to recommend to the Vi~_lage Council approval of the proposed plat with a lm~d area variance. Discussion was held with El~er Lamphere on a S.R. strip of land north of &2~d Avenue and east of Winnetka Avenue which he stated the village must be in error, because he felt the property in question was zoned R.B. The Invoice of Yddwest Planning & Research, Inco was reviewed. Motion by Plufka, seconded by Kloste~ to recommend t~ the Village Council to accept, th~ bill. Motion carried. The Park Board Minutes were read and placed on file. Bill Corrick presented a re~sed proposed plat of W. J. Corrick and N. To Meyers Properties. Motion by Plufka~ ~econded by Bmkkila, to reccmmen~ to the Village Council to aPprove th~ r~s~d proposed plat of W. J. Corrick and H. T. Meyers with a fro~t foot variance o~ Lots 9, lO~ ll, Block 3. Motion carried. Building Pe~dt Tabulatiou w~s viewed and placed on file. The minutes of June l~ 1965, were reviewed and the corrections were a~ foilows~ Pl~ka was absent. Item ~ne paragraph five should read: "Those r~sidents in favor of ~ultipl~, dwellLugs preliminary plan are:" Item one paragraph six should read: '~otion by Sucker, s~cond~d by Kru~ger to recommend to the Village Council that the request of Norseman Co~.st~ction fo~? tokening from industrial to multiple residential cn th~ property at &,gth and Winnetka be rejected, due to the down grading of 5~ndu*~trial property and doe~ not m~et bhe compreh~nsive land use plan." Item one p~ragraph stx~ Click also voted no. Motion by P!ufk~ s~conded by Klosterman that the miuutes ~e app~oved as corrected° Motion carried° q~ ~dmutes of J,~e 1.5, 1965, were reviewed, the corrections ar~ as foliows~ Strike ~ut pL~miug consultant as a member~ Item. eight pa~agraph one should read: "Public hearLug r~opened on the request £or ~ariance of th~ Beal Property Ln the vlc~inity of We~t Broad~ay and 62nd Avenue North. The pet!tick,er did not appear at th~ May gib m~4~t,i, ng and the petitioners request ~s tabl~ nntil May 18th n~,ti~:~ which time the petitioner did not app. ar~ Item thr~ cor~ct s}~iling of Aar~stad~ Plufka prcml~i he would have th*. m~sing ~nut, s of April off!c~ by ;'/~g;y ~ t965~ Motion by P!ufk.~ ~o,nded by Klosterm~u to approve; the ~inu~i~,®s ~ ~o~,"~:~,: :,~:: Mo~ion ¢~rri~d ~ Motion by Kr~,ger~ s~conded ~y Kloster*~u to adJo~r~ motion Sec. Iw~.~ B~ Krueg~r~ Sro, ~omm~s.~ion Eeetlng~ ~Yui¥ 20~ .~9.~8 Ninute~ of Planning ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~mbers Preser~t ~. w¥~ueg~ T~u. cke~ Ctick~ Adams ~ Wahl~ Suckered_. ~ PluFk~ ~$~bsrs Absent ~ Bukkiga Village Plant, st also p~esent loc .,...,6o Planning Commissim'~ Budget i)iseu~sior~ wa~ held on tbs ~o ~ D~ scusslon was held on the l~..~,tez~ from Co~rick a:o;d Miller to th~ ~ul~iple ~alling O~dinance~ !~.~ Planning ~o~mi~sim~ is to notify th~'~ Vi~l~.ge Attorney of th~ correotion~ a~d that were mad~ ~ir° Reime~ appeared before th~ P!ann~ng Oom~sion to · ~ n ~ ~ Addition(possibility of double 'b~ngalow~) d~velopment of Ho~woo~ Hizls . so~ia~zon~ which ~. Plufka read a letter to the Minnesota Planning As .... ~ the Pla=ning Commission wishes to join at the cost of ~25~ The voting members are Plufka~ Sueker~ and Wahl. N~ Dale Pollock~ the Village Planner~ presented a sketch, of the Hazel T~eth and adjoining properties~ north of 89th~ east of Xylon and west of Winnetka~ Silent flush toilets were discussed For multiple dwellings of ~ or ~Ore unit~ Notion by 8ueker~ seconded by Wahl to ~ecommend to the Village Council that stools of a silent flush type be ~equired i~ the revised Multiple ~vellir~ Ordinance~ Also the Plumbing Code shouzd indicate this change in re~uirementSo Notion ca~ried~ Discussion was held on fire doors and the length of halis~ It was tabled uutil a later date. Discussion was held on the Public Hea~ing request for the Aug~ 8~d meeting, a Child Care Center, Day Nursery And School ~o~ C~ifted Ohlldren~ No conclusion was ~eachedo DiscUssion Was held on the Public Hea~ing request for the Aug~ meeting, on the northeast corner of Ninnetka and 42nd Ave~, fo~ the p~oposed re~oning from single family r~sidence to ~etail buslness~ No conclusion was reached~ Discussion was held on the 1965 Planning Commission Budget. tabled until the Aug, 3rd meeti~go It warn Motion by Sucker, seconded by Xlosterman to adJourn~ motion carried~ Ivan R~ K~meger, Sr~ ~finutes of 21anning Commission ~..~eeting, Aug, ~ 196~5 ~embers present: Krueger, Adams, T~ucker~ '~hl, Bukkila~ P!u~a Members absent: Klosterman~ Click, Sueker The public hearing was opened at 8:00 on the proposed rezoning f~o~. Single Family ~esidence to Retail Business on the following legally described property: i~nat part of Lots 2 and 3 Aud, Sub. number 39.4 lying S of the N 935 ft, thereof and lying E of the W 333 ft. thereof and N of the S 330 ft~ as measured from the centerline of 42nd Ave~ No~., also that part of Lot 6 Aud~ Sub~ number 324 lying I~ of the S 330 ft~ as me~sured from the centerline of 4~.nd ,gve~ No~ l~ll in Hennepin County, Minnesota ~ Elme~ Latuphere presented the ~equest for the proposed rezoning from Single Family Residence to Retail Business on the Northeast corner of Winnetka Ave° No. and 42nd Ave~ Motion by Krueger, seconded by Adams, to recommend to the Village Council to accept the request for the proposed rezoning from Single Family Residence to Retail Business. Motion carried, The public hearing was opened at 8:15 on the proposed Special Use Permit to conduct a Child Care Center, Day Nursery and School for Gifted Childred on tM~ following legally described property~ Cor~ at a pt dis 738 9/10 ftc S of a pt in the N line of lot 39 dis 410 ft E f~om the I~W corner thereof the S 16v ftc the E l? ft. the N ~.00 ftc the W 85 ft. the S 33 ftc the W 90 £to to beg, Auditor's Subdivision No. ~6, all in Hen~uepin Oounty, Minnesota ~ M~o E~nest Almquist presented the request on the proposed Special U~e Permit to conduct a Child Care Cente~, Day Nursery and School for Gifted Children at 7621 56th Ave.. No. it wo~ld be for-15 children, ages 3 to 8. The ~o.mmission asked M~ Almquist if he wo%d circulate a petition for a dedicated village street° M~o Almquist stated he knew the feelinEs of his neighbor and/ they do not want a street with the ass~ssm~nt.~ ~ Also, if a stre,st were to go in it would be to close to the existing homes° M~o Almquist :stated he and one neighbor would like to petition for t~tllage water° Motion by Wahl, seconded by 21ufka, to recommend to the Village Council to reject the special use permit fo~ the Child Care Center, Day Nursery and School for Gifted Children because of lack of access to the property. Motion carried~ .. The public hearing of July 6, 1965 was reopened~ The request for special use permit to construct a Rest Home on the following legally described property: The S ~ of the S 213o64 ftc of the N 387°39 ft~ of the E ~ of the NE~ of the SF~4~ of Sec~ 6, Twpo 118, Range 21, W of the Sth principal meridian, emcept the W 247 ftc thereof. The W 24TM ftc of that part of the E ~. of the N~ of the S~- lying N of road° The S 163olO ftc of the N 851 ftc of that part of the ~ of the The S 106~8~. ft; of the }~ 981.08 ft~ of that 9art of %he E~% of the $~ i.~Ting E of the ~r~ ~,47 ft. thereof, Al! in Hennepiu County, Minnesota, ~¢r~ ~bank Pattee, Mr~ Jerry Choromanski~ ~,,Tr. Bill Bailey and Dr~ Jim Bowden presented the request for a special use permit to construct a Rest' Ho~e on the Northwest corner of Winnetka Ave. and Bass Lake Road~ ~ne st~ct~e would have approximatel~ 900 beds~ a chapel ~=~at wouiO ~ l~ 950~, a cor'.ven~ for 95 sisters and a chaplain quarters~ The home would requi~e the full 11 acres~ an~] the cost would be in the vicinity of one million dollars for a three story 100 per cent fire proof structor,. i,~!o~ion b~ ~ruager~ seconded by Plufka~ to recomme~':~ to the V~~ Council to approve the proposed special use permit for St~ Therese~s Home. 'Voti-.~g ~-es~ Kruego~,~ Adams, Nah!~ Bukkila~ and ~lufka~ Trucker obstaini.a~ ,~ The Bill for ~[idwest Ptamm[ng and hesearch~ inc~ wes rer~(~ and discussed~ ~,~otion by Plufka~ seconded by ~ams~ to recommend to the Village Council that the $~50 retainer for the Nidwest Planning and Research Inc~ Invoice number 587,, be paid. Motion carried~ Discussion was held on the splitting of the Wallace Brown property~ 4~1 Nevada Ave~ No~ Notion by Wahl, seconded by Plufka, to recommend to the Village Council to approve the splitting of the Wallace Brown property° The lots facing Nevada Ave. would be 59~ by 130 ftc a'~d there would be a petition for a 60 ft. right of away for future street developement, also a recommendation to accept variances for lot width and lot area requirement. Voting yes: Adams, Trucker, Wahl, Bukkila~ Plufka~ Krueger voting no~ Discussion on the proposed New Hope Planning Commission budget for Io66 and reviewing the 1~6~ budget. The 1968 budget was~ ~170 for salaries $3030 for profession consultant 1 400 for printing and publishing 100 for misCo ~$$$0--total The proposed 1966 budget is: $260 for recording secretary $68 for secretary ~3000 for professional consultant $~28 for misc. ~ total It was discussed favorably to have the village planning consultant and his superior p~esent at the next 2lanning Commission meeting~ to discuss the 1966 contract~ Motion by P!ufka, seconded by Krueger~ to adjourn. Motion carried° Sec° Ivan ~embers ~ r~s ~nt: ~embers Aosent: Krueger, Wahi¢ Sueker¢ Adams, Click Piuf~:o.~ Bukkila, Truoke:~~ A Public Hearing was opened at 8:00 on the proposed platting on the following legally described property: The SE~! of The SW~. of the ~ , SW~' SE~- of the T'~e W ~:5 ft of the ~.-~. of the ~. All that part of the following described property lying S of the N 440 ft~ as measured along the E and W lines thereof.~ The N 5 acr,~s of the St~- of the E~- of the ~'p, 118 Re, ~I: and the N 5 acres of the S 15 ac~es of the ~.: of the W~ of the F~ of Sec, 19 ~vp, 118 ~g~ 21: all in Hennepin County~ ~.~innesota. Mr~ Bill Corrick, Mr. Mark Jones~ ~r. Tom Neyer~ Nmo Herb Meyer~ Hr~ Gary Meyer were all present to discuss the proposed platting of Hidden Valley in the vicinity of 32nd Ave~ and Flag Ave. No. ~ae Planning omm~ssion 8~scus,.ed. the pedestrian walk way, the common areas~ the lot area requirements, and the lot depth requirements. The Public Hearing was held over until the first meeting in September° The bill for Midwest Planning and Research, inc. was ~ead. Notion by Krueger~ seconded by Klosterman~ to ~ecommend to the ¥illage Council that the $R50 retainer for the Midwest ~lannzug and Research Inc.~ Invoice number 645, be paid. Notion carried. ~ffotlon by Sueker~ seconded by Kloste~.man~ as there are no objections to the unapprove8 minutes of the p~evlous meetings, that the m~nu~ces of July 6, July 20~ Aug. 3 and April ?.0 be approved. ~otion car~.led~ A discussion was held on the next years contract with Midwest Planning and Rese~rch, Inc. Discussion ws.s held on a housing code for ~ew Hope~ Motion I b~ Klosterman, seconde~ by [f~ueger, to adjourn at It:00 C ar'~,i ed ~ Moti~ Ivan R~ .~ueger, See. VILLAGE OF N~ ItOFE Minutes of Planning Commission Meetings Sept~ 21, 1968 Members present: Krueger, Click, Trucker, Sucker, Adams, Plui~ga Members absent: Bukkila~ Klosterman, Wahl 0 A public hearing was reopened for the proposed platting of Hidden Valley, case number 6528, on the following legally described property: The SE~ of the S~ of the NW~o The W 498 ftc of the S.'~ of the S~-~.~ of the All that part of the following described property lying S of the N AAO ft. as measured along the E and ~ lines thereof: The N 8 acres of the S~ of the E~ of the W~ of the ~V~ of Sec~ 19 ~p~ ll8 Hgo 21, ~nd the N § acres of the S l§ acres of the ~ of the ~ of the ~ of Sec~ 19 Twp~ 118 Rg. 21, all in Hennepin County~ Minnesota~ Nrc Mark Jones, Nrc Dolan~ Nrc Bill Corrick and Mr° ~yer were all present to discuss the proposed platting of Hidden Valley in the vicinity of M~nd Ave° and~Flag Ave° The average lot size is lottO0 ft~ and all the lots are up to code on the width at the set back lineo ~otion by Sueker~ seconded by Ada~s~ to recommend to the Village Council to accept the proposed platting of Hidden Yalley~ subject to approval by the Village Engineer° Motion carried~ The Planning Commission wishes to bring it to the attention' of the Village Council some of the variances in the Flat of Hidden Valley: lot 1 block l, depth requirement lot 2 block 1, depth and area requirement lot i block 4, depth requirement lot 2 block 4~ depth and area rsquirem~nt lot 8 block 2, question of area requirement Also to bring it to the attention of the building i. spector: we request that the homes face ~Ynd Ave° in lots 7 and 9 block 2o Henceforth to have the Midwest Planning Report Case number included in minutes° Planning Commission received a letter from the State of Minnesota pertaining to the new administrative tool which has been added to aid Village Planning. A meeting will be held at ~vO1 42nd Ave° NCo on Oct~ 19~ 1965 at 8:00 The Invoice, number 8vo, was received fro~ Midwest Planners and He~e~.rch Inc~ Notion by Plufka, seconded by Adams, to recommend to the ~ilage Council to pay the ~9~0~00 retainer° Motion carried° ~ o NO Discussion was held on the Public Hearings for the Oct. 5 meeting. decision was reached. 6o Midwest Planners and A~ese~rch Inc. handed out a graphic map showing the minimum type o.f site developement for a service station. hequest to the administration tO please have the Planning Commission and Council minutes prepunched before mailing them. 8. Discussion was held on the street Inprovements in New Hope. The Planning Commission minutes of Sept. ? were read and discussed. Corrections are as follows: Stem 6 should read: Planning Commission recommends to the ¥illage Council that the performance standards in the Zoning Ordinance, See. X~, subsection D be complied with. The violators seem to be ~illage wide. "orion by Plufks, seconded by Click~ to approve the minutes as corrected, ~otion carried. 10o Discussion was held on the Platting Ordinance, Section V,~, g,(d),(2),(bb) the front foot requirement on a culdesac, fro~ not less than SO ft. to not less than 40 ft. Also Section ~, 4, (b), the improved street area re~ulre~ent be changed from 100 ft. to 90 ftc ~otion by Plufka, seconded by K~ueger, to recommend to the ¥illage Coumcil to approve the changes of the front foo~ requirement and the t~proved street area requirement in the Platting Ordinance° Notion carried o Park Board minutes were viewed and were placed on fileo Motion by Plufka, seconded by Adams to adjourn at 10:~0. Motion carried° Sec. Ivan ~° Krueger ~ Sro r ~w OF VI~LAu~ N~ !t0£~E Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting, 0ct~ 5, 1965 Members present: Members absent: Krueger~ Clicks Trucker, Flufka~ Wahl~ Bukkila ~? Adams, Klosterman~ Sucker A public hearing on the proposed rezoning from single family residence to multiple family residence for Hirsch Brothers, Inc., case numb~ 65~26~ on the following legally described property: That part of the North 0ne-Half of the NE~-of the NE~~ of Sec. 19, Twpo tl~ rig. 21~ lying East of hoyal Oak Hills 7th Addition~ exceoting the East 1V5 feet of the North 175 feet of said NE$ of t~e NE~. all lying in the County of Hennepin~ State of Minnesota~ (Subject to easement in favor of the public fo~ road purposes over the North 33 feet and the ~st 33 feet thereof~) Nr~ Hirsch and Mr~ Fred Melby were pre~eut to discuss the proposed rezoning from single family residence to ~ultiple family residence in the vicinity of the SW corner of ~innetka and 36th Ave~ No. The buildings would be built in two st?ges~ The pro.perry in question is approximately 6~ ac~es and would accomidate 120 units° The' total ~eQuirement area is 2~8~400 sq~ ft~ and th~ total lot area provided is 28~6~0 sq. ft~ The Plannin~,.Commisston~ through discu~sio~ wishes: 1o Eliminate the curb cuts on ~innetka Ave° due to the heavy t~affic and visibility problem. Have the entrances and exits on 36th Ave° Each garage should have a individual doo~o 4° Screening along the west and south boundary lines. 5o Meet the new mulitple building code in all resp~cts~ Motl~n by Plufka, seconded by Wahl, to recommend to the Village Council to grant the rezoning of the property in question~ Motion camried~ Erueger voting nco // A public hearing was opened at 8.R~ on the proposed rezoning from single family residence to multiple family residence~ for Norseman Gonstmuction~ Inc°, case nun~er 6~-27, on the following legally described property: Lots 1 through 8, Block 2 and Lot l, Block l, Nest Ninnetka Park First Addition, Hennepin County~ Minnesota Nrc Larry Anderson and Nrc Don Peterson were present to discuss th~ proposed rezoning from single famit~ residence to multiple family residence in the vicinity of Medicine Lake hoad and Flag Ave. No° The structures would be 2~ stories high and they would be built in two stages, each sB~ge having 108 units° The total area requirement is 291,600 sq. ft° Nr~ Bill Dobb who lives on 30th Ave~ No. is opposed to it because the builders told him when he moved in that it would be developed with single family residence~ TiRe Planning Gommfssion discussed: lo In good planning a school should be surrounded by single family residence. 9o Approximately four years ago the .Planning Commission recommended to th~ Village Council that the lsnd in Guestion be used fo~ !~ultiple ~elting. Now the character of the land is single fs~ily residence which should be maintainsd~ do to the land use~ '~e people who purchased homes in the ~rea to the north ~el!ed upon the present zoning~ 4~ %~]e ~ultiple Residence on the 'west side of ~isg Ave~ is the buffe~ between the commercial use along County Road. 18 and the Single Family t~esidence to the north of the area Pe~uested for ~ezoningo 5~ ~e ~e~uest for r~zouing doesn't fit the compmehensive land use Motion by ~uege~, seconded b}. Plu~a~ to recommend to the Village 0ouucil..~o~'~eject the request for rezoning to multiple dweiling. Not, on carried, T~ucke~ opposed~ Bukki!a ~a~.tained ~r~. Fazandak came and discussion was held on ~innetka Industrial Eequest to move the stmeet ovsm about five Feet: Notion by Plufka~ seconded by ~ahl~ to recommend to the Village ounci~ to accep~ the ~evision in the p~eliminary plat as pr~sented~ Motion ca~ried~ Discussion was~ne_d~ on two hou~ fi~e ~eslst~h~ wail~ and sound b~rriers~ Discussion was held on home occupations~ The minutes of Sept° 91~ 19~5 were read. Discussion on paragraph 10~ Discussion was held on the Flatting 0rdinance~ Section ~ 3, g~ (~)(R)(bb the front foot ~equirement on a culdesac~ ~o~.'~2oless than 40 ft~ fmom not less than 60 ftc Also Section 9, 4~ (b)~ the improved ~t~eet area requirement be changed to 90 ft. from 100 ftc ~otion by Plufka~ seconded by K~uege~ to recommend to the Village Council to change the f~ont foot requirement and the i~p~oved street area requirement in the Platting Ordlnance~ ~otion carried~ Notion b~ Wahl, seconded by Bukkila go approve the minutes as corrected~ Notion carried° ~otlon by Wahl, seconded by Click to adjourn at 10:30. Motion carried~ Sec. Ivan Re Krueger, Sr~ ~inutes of F!anning Co~mGission ~eeting~ 0ct~ ].9~ 1965 Nembers present: Krueger~ Ciick~ Sueker~ ?!t~fka~ Wahl., Klosterman~ Trucker Members absent: Adams~ Bukkiia Village Planner also present A public hearing on the proposed preliminary plat~ case number for Clifford Fraser was opened at 8:00~ The plat is in the vicinity of 45th Ave° and Decatur Ave, ~r~ Fraser~ Mr, Cardarelie, M~o Conner and Nz'~ Boose were all present to discuss the proposed plat~ The .~roporty in q~estion is approximately 4~V8 seres and it is proposed to be subdivided into ~l lots~ Notion by Klosterman, seconded by K~,ueger~ to recommend to the Village Council to approve the plat of Eidgeview Addition a.s revised in pencil by the Planning Comw~issiou~ ~otion carried~ The Planning Commission wishes to bring to the attention of the Council so~e of the variances: 50 foot street i~0 foot iot depth The Planning Commimsion discussed the last Council minutes~ The minutes of 0ct~ 5~ 1965 were read, ~ Notio~.--by Plufka~ seconded by Klosterman to approve the minutes as read~ ~ M~'tion carried~ The Planning Commission had a discussion with Dale Fol~ick~'the Village Flanner~ Th~ Planning Oo~ission wishes to have colored land maps used instead of the normal black and white° it would make it easier to locate non residential structures, and to determine multi~le zoning areas° Mr~ Sueker wished to be excused at 9:55~ Dal~ Pollick handed out proof sheets for cluster residential develop- merit a~ industrial design types$ 8~ Discussion:was held on the ~ark Board Minutes° MOtion by Plufka, seconded by Kloster~an to adjourn at 10:45o Motion car~ied~ Ivan R~ Krueger~ Sro Planning Go~t~mi~sioz~ Mee~ing~ No-~,'~. 2~ 1965 Members present~ M~mbers absent: Bukkila, P.iuFka~ Krueger~ Tru¢~er, Wahl~ ~ueke_~ Click Klosterman~ Adams A public hea~ing was opened at 8:00 on the proposed rezoning from retail business to single family mesidentialo The p~operty in question is in the vicinity of County Road i8 and Bass La~e Road° ~ro Leemah, whose property is adjacent to ~m~ ~m~tsons~ was present · to express his views~ He inquired why t~e property is being rezone~. ~otion by P!ufka~ seconded by Sueker~ to recommend to the Village Council that th~ .property in question be rezoned £ro~ retail business to singl~ family residence~ Motion carried~ Mro Bob Grandali, the building inspector, came in to discuss two hour fire resistent walls and sound proofing~ The invoice~ number 750~ was received from Nid, west Planning and es.~on~ Inoo Notion by Flu~a~ seconded by Bukki!a~ to recommend to the Village Council to pay the $280 retainer. Notion carried° The C~Tent no ster Planning Commission was handed out~ The secretary wishes to remind the Planning Commission of the meeting on Nov~ 16~ 196~ at ?:80 Po~o Nrc Robert Eidem~ Community Planner~ Division of Community Planning, will be present~ The minutes of Oct° 19 198~ were re~d~ Item number)fou~r~hould have this added: Pollock was reOuested to b~ing in~e~osts and ~ction was pended until this was b~ought back j~o ~.h~flannip~ Commission~ L?'/,~I''~ Motion oy ~ahl, seconded by Ciick, to spprove L~He-~nutes as cor~ected~ Motion carried~ Motion by Piufka~ seconded by Sueker~ to adjourn at 9:20~ Notion carried° Seo~ ivan Ro ~lrueger~ Sro ~inutes ©f Planning Co~.~s~on N~et~ng, Nov i6~ 1968 Nembe. rs present: I~euegez,~ Wahl~ Adams, Sueke~ ~ T~ucke~ Bukkila ~mbers .~bsent: Click~ Plufka~ Kloste~man Village Planne~-~ also present The meeting was opened ~t 7:~0 P~N~ to discuss with Mro Robert ~om~unmty Planner, Division of Community Planning~ the village · ~'~ pa~u_pa~on in the 70! Federal P~ogmam~ Nr~ ~ide~ ~as present with a questionaire to inquire on the vi!!ags progress in the Comprehensive Land Uss Plan, building electrial ood~s~ ordinances and basic code~ The !nvo~o~, number @24~ was received f~om ~idwest Planning and Resea~ch~ ino~ Motion by ~ueger~ seconded by Wah!~ to recom'mend to the Viiiag~ Council to pay the ~1250 r~tainer~. ~otion oarried~ T~ue Planning Co~nission discussed the Minnesota Plannin~ Association Conference, which is being held on ~Y'iday, Novembe~ Dale Po!!ock~ the Village Pl~nner~ repo~ted to the Planning Co~mission that it would cost approximately $~00 for the ~'~ ~ pr~p~o~ of a colored existing land use. map~ No action is b~ing taken un%il the entire mer~bership of the Planning Oommission.is p~esent to view the ptan~ r~qu~s~ee pezmxssion to leave at ~e minutes of November 2~ i965~ were r~ad~ approved a~ The minutes w~re Dale Polioe. k~ of ~i[idwe~st Piann~ng and Resea~ch~ inc. handed ou't Th~ Planning Cou~,~ission discussed th, possibility of starting an ~ndu~tri~l Comw~i~alon with the aid oF th~ ~ayo~,.~c4~ ~otion by Wahl, seconded by ~akkila~ to ad. jonah at i0:15~ carried. Ivan H~ ~ueger~ Sro }~embers present~ Krueger~ Adams~ T~,ucker~ Wah. i~ Sueker~ Ptufka ~,gembers absent: Cliok~ Bukkila~ Kiostex~man A public hearing was opened at 8:00~ case n~mber 65-30~ on the proposed.~ ~?ezoning from limited business to general business~, The property in ~uestion in the vicinity of th6 northeast corner of Bass Lake Road and ~nnetka Av~ l~r~ Norman Dyer and ~r~ l~eler wer~ present~ for the Shsli 0il Go~ 'to discuss the rezoning~ }.{obion by Sueker~ secondod by Flufka~ to recommend to the Village Gouncil to grant the requaat for the proposed reaching from limited business to general business~ They would be required to give additional V ft~ for roadway along Winnetka Ave. and Bass Lake hoad~ Notion ~:~arried ~ A public hearing was opened at 8:25~ case nun~er 65-31~ on the proposed rezonlng from single family residence to multiple family residence. The property in question iL on the south side of Bass Lake Road and int~rsection of Yukon Ave~ ~-~ro Jerry Ha~rington and Mro Stanley $opczyk were present~ ~p~esenting Diversified Deve!opers~ Inc~ to discuss the rezoning for Village ~r,, Lars Lodoen and Mr~ Rudy were also present to discuss the r~zoningo Notion by Plu.f~a~ seconded by Wah!~ to recommend to the Village Council~ to accept the proposed rezoning, as published~ from single family residence to multiple family residence~ subjmct to 30ft~ right of way on the east boundary and V ft~ for street easement abutting Bass Lake Road° Notion carried° 3 ~. A public hearing was opened at 9:00~ case number 65-$2~ on the proposed special use permit for double bungalows~ The property in question is on Boone Ave° between Boone Circle and 42nd Ave~ No~ N~ Hipp and Mr. Ouimette were present~ from Hipps Construction Co:~ to discus~ the proposed special use permit~ It was discovered they would need multiple rezoning~ instead of a special use permit~ so no action could be taken. ~r. Don E. Skoglund~ 8517 39th Ave~ Nrc Mossey~ 8609 Hopewood Lane~ Mrs, Alden Blake~ 8524 Hopewood Lane~ and Er~ James Hinrich were pmesent to discuss the special use permit° k public hearing was op~ned at 9:30~ case nu~Yoer 65=~33~ on the propoaed preliminary plat at 3555 Flag Ave° No~ and NrSo Charles S Oliver ars the owners of the property in question° lots would b~ Se~ feet deep~ ~Fn~y have no buying the, p;eoperty was also present ~: ~ ~ ~ e, ~ to recommend to the Village ..,.,~. ,::)~u ~'~' Krueger~ se~cnded by Ilu~.~ ..... ~ 0~ from the V11!age Planner s':'~"ja~..~t '~o the parkiug .~-:~ ~: ~;::~,'m. ing Commi:~sion received a memo from the~,~w~o~-~ Planning and '~,-::~e:::ar~ch~ ino~ Tho Flan~.ing Cow~i~sion is refering it to the Village · ..~,~ ..~ ~:~=~.~n.~ng ~ommi~sion ~ecelved a report from tb~s Civic Center 6ommi~y~_ ?';'~:~.~,~ m~,mo :~mo r~he Village Counoi'~ will be taken up at the next Planning. .,,.~ ............. on meeting,~ it i~ ~n regard to the sideyard setbacks in '.~;.~ .... o~e~., and similar type construction next F].a~ming Co~i.~ion meeting discussion of th~ colored land pl~r~ and ~lection of the ~966 officers of the rl~nning Co~i~ion~ w.%l], be recot'amende5 to the Village ,~oune~t:~ will take place~ Se¢~ I~an Ro Krueger ~--'~;~,~ should s,~, ~:ouslc{.ePe{i ....... --- Li~ted below are the items ,~b.~: ......... g ~,om,-~).ss~.o~: ................ '~o to the Village Oounoil ,~egard.~ng lee letSeP from the Vi'~q~.,~,e ~,~o. ,,'~ t all curb tuts shall be a x~-~-s, mitm of UO feet fPom .r-s .... ~.r,~-eP of the ~!.aJor a ~'b~ia] st~:,eets ,~ ~ .~,.,~ O~ ~Z-~. GOX'}IeZ~ [[Ot;S ~'i~'~'~"~ b~-' GOiN3-~ .......... b~ ,Iron,, and side ya~.d ~st i,, ~ as f~ont yard set backs, o~ ~ef8~ tO the P!an~i~g '"' '' ~" 'r',~ ,y [':~,Sa ~-~ 6 d, e~tabltshing ~;eve. da ,~w~, fPom ~edlclne L.~ke ~b~ad. ~o approximai;e.i.:f' ~ ~ ~ ...~ t~eet.(~¢$ P~ann~na Oommi~sion · oo~ c~oi!eo%eP $ ~m.~..ut-~ of }~e. rch 16. '~oS5 item 12) ' ~ ........ ,~ ~ne boundries e~ the portion of the zoning ordinance t~,at a,~e~. ,, ~ varioum zones should be eliminated. Th~ ofTicial ~,oLing ~hould be a m~p adopted~ .-~ ...... ~'s the .~u~i as the official bo~dri~s of all zones, ~e P!anni~ Ore. lesion discussed the .~a~te~- and dea~ded a raao easie~ to keep up then to ~ "'nevisinf~ ~"' '~ '" - the f~ p~fe~ence to section 4X of o~dinance 5°~I pla~ing ~'~ word ~lat should be ~ ..... ~ to plan~ g. the Police and fi~,~ depa~tmsnt should be the ~,espond~ible agency to en~fo~oe the items obviously unde~ *~ =~ '~ zonin~ ordinance ~ I. ~aleof caro~ illegal paeking ~nou~a ~o~ce~ jy the dependent, · '~.~ e,~ the 9~ burning and fi~e ~afetyff equipment should be erifo ..... , by fi~e department, Planning Comr~ission for recommendations~ then section V paragraph D of the zoning ordinance should 'be deleted from the ordinance, Dale Poilock~ the Village Ptanner,~ distributed "Presentation of a Workable Program for Co.~.munity improvement fo~' Small Communities~." Discus:sion will be hs!d over until the second meeting in January~ ~'~-were read, ~ additions are' The minutes of Decemb~P 7~ .~ item 2, paragraph 4~ line 4 ~hou!d read-30 ft, right off way on t~.~ east and south boundaries .~ item 7~ conce~ning Nevada ~,." ~-~_ ~ i.~oad and ~e Planning 0om~ission recommends to the Village Cornel! that the 1.986 Planning Comw~imsion offi. ce~s be: ... ~ Plufka~ chairman ~r. Click- vice chairman .-- ~r, i¢~ueger- secretary . N°tio.r~ by Plufka~ seconded by Wah!~ to adjourn at !0s45,. Motion carried,