Loading...
020514 Planning6 M Q 1 78, A M MW A M I 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. CONSENT BUSINESS 4. PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue North Wednesday, February 5, 2014 7:00 p.m. 4.1 PC 14-03, Request for a preliminary and final plat approval, as well as a Final Development Stage Planned Unit Development (Site Plan Review) for the construction of a 68 -unit apartment building known as Compass Pointe, 6113 West Broadway, Ron Clark Construction and Design, petitioner 4.2 PC 14 -01, Request for a text amendment for density increases in the R-O, Residential Office and R -B, Residential Business zoning districts, City of New Hope, petitioner 4.3 PC 14 -02, Request for a text amendment to regulate mobile food units (food trucks) throughout the city, City of New Hope, petitioner 5. COMMITTEE REPORTS 5.1 Design and Review Committee - next meeting February 13, 2014, 7:30 a.m. (if needed) 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OLD BUSINESS 7.1 Approve December 3, 2013, Planning Commission Minutes 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS 9. ADJOURNMENT Petitioner must be in attendance at the meeting Planning Commission Guidelines for Public Input The Planning Commission is an advisory body, created to advise the City Council on land use. The Planning Commission will recommend Council approval or denial of a land use proposal based upon the Planning Commission's determination of whether the proposed use is permitted under the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan, and whether the proposed use will, or will not, adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood. The Planning Commission holds informal public hearings on land use proposals to enable you to learn, first -hand, what such proposals are, and to permit you to ask questions and offer comments. Your questions and comments become part of the record and will be used by the Council, along with the Planning Commission's recommendation, in reaching its decision. To aid in your understanding and to facilitate your comments and questions, the Planning Commission will utilize the following procedure: 1. The Planning Commission Chair will introduce the proposal. 2. City staff will outline the proposal and staff's recommendations and answer any questions from the Planning Commission. 3. The petitioner is invited to describe the proposal, make comments on the staff report, and answer questions from the Planning Commission. 4. The chair will open the public hearing, asking first for those who wish to speak to so indicate by raising their hands. The chair may set a time limit for individual questions /comments if a large number of persons have indicated a desire to speak. Spokespersons for groups will have a longer period of time for questions /comments. 5. When recognized by the chair, the person wishing to speak is asked to come forward and to give their full name and address clearly. Remember, your questions /comments are for the record. 6. Direct your questions /comments to the chair. The chair will determine who will answer your questions. 7. No one will be given the opportunity to speak a second time until everyone has had the opportunity to speak initially. Please limit your second presentation to new information, not rebuttal. 8. At the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission will discuss the proposal and take appropriate action. A. If the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve or deny a request, the planning case will be placed on the City Council agenda for the next regular meeting. Usually this meeting is within one to two weeks of the Planning Commission meeting. B. If the Planning Commission tables the request, the petitioner will be asked to return for the next Commission meeting. PLANNING CASE REPORT City of New Hope Meeting Date: January 21, 2014 Report Date: February 5, 2014 Planning Case: 14-03 Petitioner: Ron Clark Construction and Design, Inc. Address: 6113 West Broadway Project Name: Compass Pointe Project Description: Re- platting of the properties located at 6113 West Broadway and 7601 -7661 - 62nd Avenue for the construction of a 68 -unit apartment building. Planning Request: Preliminary and Final Plat and Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development (Site Plan Review), for the construction of a 68 -unit apartment building. I. Type of Planning Request A. Preliminary Plat approval B. Final Plat approval C. Site Plan Review 11. Zoning Code References Section(s) 4 -35 Administration - Site Plan Review Chapter 13 - Subdivision and Platting III. Property Specifications Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development Location: Southwest corner of 62nd Avenue and West Broadway Adjacent Land Uses: CB, Community Business to the east, R -1, Single - Family Residential to the south, R -3, Medium Density Residential to the west, the City of Brooklyn Park to the north. Site Area: 1.68 acres Building Size: 4 stories, 68 units Lot Area Ratios: Impervious area: 1.10 acres (65.5°/x) Pervious area: 0.58 acres (34.5 %) Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 1 2/5/14 Planning District: Planning District 2. The city's Comprehensive Plan calls out this area specifically for redevelopment. It states, "the commercial sites located at Winnetka Avenue and 62nd Avenue and at the southwest corner of 62nd Avenue and West Broadway have been suggested for redevelopment due to the following conditions: 1) Small site, poor site design 2) land use compatibility issues. IV. Background HISTORY. The property located at 6113 West Broadway and the four properties to the west have been a redevelopment priority of the city for a long time. When given the opportunity, the City purchased the properties with the specific intent of preparing the properties for redevelopment. The City began working with Ron Clark Construction and Design to convert the dilapidated and underused properties into a site that would accommodate a 68 -unit apartment building. The first step in this process was to rezone and re -guide the land to accommodate an apartment complex. On May 29, 2012, the City Council approved the rezoning of the properties from CB, Community Business and R -3, Medium Density Residential to the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. The PUD zoning district provides for the integration and coordination of land parcels, allowing for a flexible building design and layout on the property. The proposed land uses of the properties were also re- guided from Commercial and Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential so that the proposed apartment building would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In May, 2012, the City Council also approved the demolition of the former Swift Service Station located at 6113 West Broadway. The gas station has since been removed from the property and the land has been cleaned up to meet the minimum Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards. ABOUT COMPASS POINTE. The proposed Compass Pointe development is considered workforce housing and utilizes tax credits to finance the construction and operations of the building. The Tax Credit Program is a financing program that gives income tax incentives to for - profit corporations in return for their commitment to the community and their investment capital that makes workforce housing feasible. The capital from the corporate investors is equity, not debt, and accounts for about 70% of the total cost of the project. Therefore, with so much equity, the project's debt (or mortgage amount) and mortgage payment is lower. This allows the project owner to charge a more competitive rent to meet the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) workforce housing requirements. Key points to consider regarding Compass Pointe: • Each resident must have a verified income to meet the MHFA requirements and they pay their own rent. Tenants must earn twice their rent: 1- bedroom = $733/mo., 2- bedroom = $880 /mo., 3- bedroom = $1,017/mo. There is no government rent subsidy with the tax credit program. Planning Case Report 14-03 Page 2 2/5/14 The MHFA compliance period lasts for 30 years, in which the project would have to meet the minimum MHFA standards during this time. MHFA inspects the project annually and substantial operating and replacement reserves are required (about $450,000 at the start with at least $30,600 added to the reserve each year) to ensure the project is maintained at a high standard for the entire 30 years. • The apartment will have a full -time management staff on site at all times. Each resident must pass credit, criminal and housing history background checks. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS. The City of New Hope conducted a series of two neighborhood meetings to gather input from the surrounding neighborhood regarding the proposed 68 -unit apartment building. The first neighborhood meeting was held in late 2012, and the second was held in early 2014. Some of the main concerns that neighboring property owners had regarding the project were: • The building is too large for the property. i There is a lack of green space and outside recreational area for children. • The building is too tall. Residents on the fourth floor will be able to see into the houses to the south. 0 Traffic generated by the project will be too much for the neighborhood streets to handle. 0 Single- family homes would be more conducive to the neighborhood and should be built instead of a large 68 -unit apartment building. Other concerns were expressed and answered at the neighborhood meetings. The concerns listed above will be addressed throughout the remainder of this report. It should be noted that the representatives from Ron Clark Construction took all concerns seriously and attempted to revise the site plan and building design to help address them. For instance, the building initially had a full fourth floor with 11 units facing south towards the single- family homes. The homeowners to the south had some privacy concerns in that they felt that residents living on the fourth floor would be able to peer into their homes. Kaas Wilson Architects redesigned the building, reducing the building to 3- stories along the south elevation and eliminating 8 units that faced that direction. For design reasons, they had to leave 3 units facing the south, but still managed to lower the building height and reduce the number of units facing south. Staff looked into the feasibility of redeveloping the property into five single- family homes. Staff contacted Rick Packer, who worked with the city in the Centra Homes proposal for the Winnetka Learning Center project, and has been a land development manager for different companies throughout his professional career. He stated three factors when determining if single - family homes would work in the area. 1. Is the land suitable? In his opinion, adding five more curb cuts onto 62nd Avenue in such close proximity to the controlled intersection at West Broadway would be hazardous and detrimental to traffic. 2. What would a house sell for in the neighborhood? Mr. Packer indicated that the type of house built in this area would be an "entry level" house, with a value in the $175,000 price range. Since raw Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 3 2/5/14 materials to construct this type of house would be a minimum of $100,000, a developer would need to purchase each lot of no more than $30,000 to make the project work financially. Lot prices in the area range from $40,000 - $60,000, suggesting that a developer would not be able to make the project work financially. 3. What is the competition in the area? Mr. Packer indicated that after reviewing recent sales of existing homes in New Hope and the surrounding area, it is evident that there are plenty of opportunities in solid, single - family neighborhoods to purchase a home for below what a developer could build a similar new house for. It is Mr. Packer's professional opinion that the corner of 62nd Avenue and West Broadway is not a viable single - family home location due to these reasons. He suggests that either a commercial or multi- family home development would be more economically feasible and would prosper better in this location. VII. Zoning Analysis A. Plan Description 1. Setbacks (Building Placement) The property is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development. The Zoning Code states that the PUD zoning is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture to promote the best use of the land. The PUD zoning allows for deviations from the strict provisions of the Zoning Code related to setbacks, density, heights, lot area, lot width and depth, yards, etc. For this reason, the proposed setbacks could be approved based on good planning practices, ensuring that the building would not encumber sightlines, would not impede pedestrian or vehicular traffic, and would be placed in a location on the property that would benefit the development as a whole. The proposed setbacks for the building are: North (Front): 10.1 feet East (Side): 10.0 feet West (Side): 92.0 feet South (Rear): 46.5 feet The placement of the building on the property is driven by other elements that need to be accounted for in order to make the development successful. Some of these elements include ample drive aisle widths for vehicular circulation, on -site parking stalls, the creation of green space, and the location of other outdoor amenities including the tot lot, grilling area and basketball court. 2. Lot Area/Dgnsity The property is approximately 1.68 acres, with a proposed 68 -unit apartment building constructed on it. This yields a density of 40 units per acre. The PUD zoning classification for this property allows for higher densities than normally allowed in other residentially zoned districts. The proposed density is also consistent with the previously approved concept plan for the area. Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 4 2/5/14 3. Proposed Preliminary/Final Plat The applicant is proposing to combine the lots located at 6113 West Broadway and 7601- 7661 - 42nd Avenue into one buildable lot for the purposed of constructing a 68 -unit apartment building on the land. The proposed plat indicates a five -foot utility easement along all property lines. The current overhead utility lines along 62nd Avenue will have to be placed underground as to not interfere with the construction of the building. PARK DEDICATION. Due to the increased density that this project involves, the city will require a park dedication fee that will go towards improvements to the city's open spaces and park land. The park dedication fee will be determined according to the process outlined in the ordinance, which requires a maximum of $5,000.00 per acre of land. The proposed development is located on 1.68 acres, which would yield a park dedication fee of $8,400.00 4. Circulation, Access, Traffic and Emerged Vehicle Access The proposed development will incorporate two access points into the property. The first is on the west end of the property with access directly on to 62nd Avenue. This access is intended as a two -way traffic access and would be the main access point from the public right -of -way to gain entry into the underground parking lot area. The second access point is along West Broadway along the south side of the property. This access point is also intended as a two -way traffic access. A two -way traffic flow throughout the development would allow a free - flowing circulation throughout the property freely and would ease congestion onto neighborhood streets. Again, it is anticipated that residents using the underground parking area would mostly use the 62nd Avenue access point to come into and leave the site. The current configuration of access points would also allow easy movement for all emergency vehicles entering the property. There has been some substantial neighborhood concern that the addition of a 68 -unit apartment building will substantially add to the traffic in the surrounding area, and would make the area dangerous for pedestrians and motor vehicle operators. Attached to the Planning Case Report is a traffic study performed by Wenck Associates, Inc. Three main conclusions were drawn from the study. They are: The proposed development is expected to add 33 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 39 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 425 daily trips. The proposed project generates less than half the number of trips than were generated by the previous land uses. Replacing the gas station/convenience store use with an apartment use results in a significant reduction in the number of trips generated. • All study intersections have adequate capacity with existing geometrics and control to accommodate the proposed development. No improvements are needed at these intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 5 2/5/14 Staff would defer to the Wenck Associates traffic study to conclude that the proposed apartment building will not encumber the traffic in the area. 5. Curbing, Sidewalk and Pavement Ron Clark Construction is proposing internal sidewalks to accommodate pedestrian traffic into an d throughout the site. During the construction process, it is anticipated that the existing sidewalk along 62nd Avenue will need to be replaced, and the applicant is agreeable to replace it. 6. Pedestrian Access The site plan indicates an internal sidewalk on the property that connects the entrances along the south side of the building to the sidewalk along West Broadway. It is recommended to continue the sidewalk through the outdoor recreational area so that pedestrians could gain access to the west side of the property. 7. Parkin The Zoning Coded requires a minimum of one enclosed and one and one - fourth open spaces per unit for multi- tenant residential buildings. In other words, the code requires a minimum of 1.25 parking spaces per unit for apartment building. Because this property is zoned PUD, there is room for negotiation for elements such as on -site parking. Through past conversations with Ron Clark Construction, they have been able to demonstrate that other properties with a similar number of units on a similar sized property can function adequately with 2.05 parking stalls per unit. Staff informed the applicant that 2.05 parking stalls per unit would be supported. The submitted plans indicate that there will be 68 underground parking stalls, and 72 above ground parking stalls, for a total of 140 parking stalls. This equates to 2.05 parking stalls per unit, meeting the negotiated number of required parking stalls for the development. The developer is cognizant of the need to keep as much green space on the property as possible, and would like to incorporate some proof -of- parking areas into the plan. Of the 72 above ground parking stalls, only 50 would be initially constructed, leaving 22 parking stalls as green space. 17 of the proof -of- parking stalls will 'be located along the western property line, and five would be located along the south side of the building, adjacent to southern entrance into the building. Should the development experience a parking problem, the remaining 22 parking stalls would be added to the property. Instances where the city would require the additional parking would be if there was evidence of: a. Parking outside of designated parking stalls in driveways, fire lanes, or green space due to insufficient on -site parking. b. Excessive on- street parking attributed to Compass Pointe tenants or guests. Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 6 2/5/14 BICYCLE PARKING. The applicant has illustrated bike racks at the southeastern end of the building. Staff recommends the following: a. Provide a detail of the bike rack to illustrate its capacity for bicycle parking. b. Place the bike rack on a hard surface rather than a green space to improve access and avoid deterioration of the green space. c. Consider another bike rack for the western end of the building. d. Remove the bike rack from the snow storage areas. 8. Landscaping and Screening The applicant has incorporated a landscape plan that meets the minimum requirements of the Zoning Code and that adequately addresses the screening needs of the surrounding properties. The proposed landscape plan uses a mixture of 58 different types of trees and 48 different types of shrubs around the perimeter and interior of the property to ensure appropriate screening. Staff had some initial concerns regarding the placement of the trees in relation to the underground utilities and storm water facilities. The applicant has submitted revised plans indicating that there will be no proximity issues between these two entities. In addition to the proposed trees on the property, the developer will also install an 8 -foot tall PVC fence along the south and west property lines to help screen the development from adjacent residential views. As part of the PUD approval, the applicant will be required to submit a landscape maintenance plan. The applicant will be required to replace any dead, diseased, or damaged plant material in order to maintain the plantings as indicated on the approved landscape plan. 9. Lighting Plan The Zoning Code limits the light intensity at shared property lines not to exceed 0.4 foot candles. The applicant's photometric plan indicates that they will meet this minimum standard along the shared south and west property lines. The Zoning Code limits light intensity along a street not to exceed 1.0 foot candles at the right -of -way line. The photometric plan indicates light readings about the 1.0 foot candle standard at a number of locations along both West Broadway and 62nd Avenue. Along 62nd Avenue, the applicant initially did not want to include any lighting on the building. At the suggestion of the Design and Review Committee, lighting was added to this side of the building to provide illumination of the public sidewalk and building area. Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 7 2/5/14 Due to the proximity of the building to the sidewalk, the photometric readings are greater than the maximum standards allowed. In review of the lighting plan, the Planning Commission and City Council have two options: a. Require the applicant to reduce the intensity of the lighting to bring the light levels into compliance with City standards. b. Consider the location and need for lighting along these streets and allow and exception to the 1.0 foot candle standard as part of the PUD flexibility. It should be noted that staff presented the data to the Chief of Police, who indicated that from a safety standpoint, he would fully endorse any overages of light intensity allowances. He stated that historically, that area has been a dark corner, and allowing a spillage of light onto the public right -of -way would further bolster safety needs for the area. 10. SigLiage The initial development plans for the property indicated the use of two monument signs — one at each entrance into the development. The Design and Review Committee raised some concerns over the size, location and traffic sight lines for the monument sign located along West Broadway. The Committee suggested a building- mounted sign to eliminate these concerns. In response to the Design and Review Committee, the applicant is now requesting the following: a. One monument sign at the 62nd Avenue entrance. This sign meets all the freestanding sign standards for size, height and location. b. Building- mounted signs 45 square feet in area proposed at two corners of the building (northeast and southeast). The location and design of the signs blend with the building architecture. These types of signs are not permitted within the city's multiple- family zoning district, but may be approved because of the overall PUD zoning classification of the property. 11. Utility Plan The applicant will be responsible for burying the overhead power lines that run parallel with 62nd Avenue so that development may occur. The Fire Inspector shall determine the required number and location of hydrants to serve the facility to be installed at the cost of the applicant. Water service has been split between the potable water supply for the building and water for the fire suppression system. 12. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Site drainage flows toward the southeast portion of the site and will be directed into an underground storage and infiltration under the parking lot area along the south side of the property. A plan for the ongoing maintenance of the stormwater infrastructure will be required to ensure its functionality over time. The maintenance plan must be approved by the city and filed with the County Recorder to run with the title of the property. Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 8 2/5/14 The stormwater and grading plan must be approved by the City Engineer and meet watershed district requirements. As the site is over 1.0 acres, a SWPPP may be required. 13. Design Guideline Compliance a. Building materials The building plan elevations are in general compliance with the architectural design guidelines pertaining to building materials. The applicant has created visual differences on the building by using a combination of brick, stone and vinyl siding, with accents consisting of lap siding and CMU panels. b. Building Design The building has been designed in a manner that allows the appearance of a 3 -story building along the south (rear) elevation and a 4 -story building along north (front) elevation. The alternate design was in response to a neighborhood concern of having too many 4th floor units facing south into the single- family neighborhood. The height of the building meets the minimum requirements of the code. c. Sig_nage The applicant will utilize a monument sign along 62nd Avenue at the main entrance of the building. The proposed sign plans indicate that the sign will meet all minimum requirements in relation to size, height, and building materials. 14. Snow Storage The proposed development will have 34.5% of the coverage as pervious, landscaped space. The applicant stated that most of the landscaped areas will be used for snow storage. In the event of a heavy snowfall or persistent snowy weather, the management company for the apartments will make accommodations for having excess snow hauled off the site. B. Zoning Code Criteria 1. Subdivision and Platting. It is the purpose of this chapter to make certain regulations and requirements for the subdivision and platting of land within the city pursuant to the authority contained in Minn. Stat. 462.358, which regulations the city council deems necessary for the health, safety and general welfare of this community. It is also the purpose of this chapter to safeguard the best interests of the city and to assist the subdivider in harmonizing his interests with those of the city at large. Findings. The applicant has submitted all of the necessary paperwork and plans related to the existing conditions and the preliminary plat. The applicant is also requesting both a preliminary and final plat approval from the City Council. 2. Site plan review Modification of or additions or enlargements to a building, or buildings, accessory site improvements, and /or land features of a parcel of land that result in the need for additional parking or increase the gross floor area of the building by 25 percent or more require site plan review. Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 9 2/5/14 Criteria. In making recommendations and decisions upon site and building plan review applications, the staff, planning commission and city council shall consider the compliance of such plans with the following standards: (a) Consistency with the various elements and objectives of the city's long range plans, including, but not limited to, the comprehensive plan. Findings. The city's long -range plan is for continued redevelopment, expansion, and renovation redevelopment areas in the city. This proposal is consistent with specific goals of the Comprehensive Plan, calling for redevelopment of this land. (b) Consistency with the purposes of this Code. Findings. The proposal is generally consistent with the purposes of the Code, meeting all minimum elements of the code consistent with a proper Planned Unit Development. (c) Preservation of the site in its natural state, insofar as practicable, by minimizing tree and soil removal, and designing any grade changes so as to be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed or developing areas. Findings. The property will have to be stripped of all tress and regarded to accommodate an underground parking area. With that said, the landscape plan indicates the planting of 58 trees and 48 shrubs, far exceeding the number of trees present on the property at the predevelopment stage. (d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of buildings and open spaces with the terrain and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the proposed development. Findings. Staff believes the proposal for site and building is adequate and will be of a harmonious nature. (e) Creation of a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features including: 1. Creation of an internal sense of order for the various functions and buildings on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors, and the general community. Findings. The proposed property entrances along 62nd Avenue and West Broadway, along with the use of internal sidewalks and landscaping will create a sense of order for tenants and visitors. The applicant has created outdoor amenities including a grilling area, basketball court and tot lot to help make the project more visually alluring. 2. Appropriateness of the amount and arrangement of open space and landscaping to the design and function of the development. Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 10 2/5/14 Findings_. The amount of open space and landscaping is abundant for the property, and used to help screen this development from adjacent residential uses. The applicant was aware that green space was an important factor of having a successful development and proposed the use of proof -of- parking to create as much green space as possible. 3. Appropriateness of the materials, textures, colors, and details of construction as an expression of the design concept of the project and the compatibility of the same with the adjacent and neighboring structures and functions. Findings. The proposed building materials and colors are consistent with the intent of the New Hope Design Guidelines. The architects for the project made it a point to include features that make the building more interesting and architecturally appealing. 4. Adequacy of vehicular, cycling and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking, in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian, cycling and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking so as to be safe, convenient and, insofar as practicable, compatible with the design of proposed buildings, structures and neighboring properties. Findings. Vehicular access and circulation will be achieved with an access point off of 62nd Avenue as the main entrance /exit and an access point off of West Broadway. The driveway is intended to be used as a two -way street with adequate drive aisle widths. A sidewalk will extend along the south side of the building and will connect to the sidewalk system along West Broadway. The location of the sidewalk in relation to the drive aisle and parking arrangement is adequate for safety standards. 5. Creation of an energy - conserving design through design, location, orientation and elevation of structures, the use and location of glass in structures, and the use of landscape materials and site grading. Findings. The proposed building will use modern building materials and technologies to maximize energy conservation. 6. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for such matters as surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air, and those aspects of design, not adequately covered by other regulations, which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Findings. The project will utilize an underground storage system for storm water, improving rate and run -off measures in the area. Adequate screening measures have been taken to screen vehicle headlights and tenants from the abutting residential neighbors to the south. Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 11 2/5/14 C. Design and Review Committee The Design and Review Committee met with the applicant on January 16. The committee was in favor of the proposed development and was excited to see an application for the redevelopment of the area. D. .ARnrr val 1. Type of Approval a. Subdivision and platting - quasi - judicial b. Site Plan Review - quasi - judicial 2. Timeline a. Date Application Deemed Complete: January 24, 2014 b. End of 60 -Day Decision Period: March 11, 2914 c. End of 120 -Day Decision Period: May 10, 2014 VI. Notification Property owners within 1,000 feet of parcel were notified by mail and a legal notice was published in the SunPost newspaper. Staff has received some questions regarding the development. VIII. Summary The applicant is requesting a preliminary and final plat approval in order to combine the properties located at 6113 West Broadway and 7601 -7661- 62nd Avenue in order to construct a 68 -unit apartment building on the site. In conjunction with the preliminary and final plats, the applicant has also requested a Final Stage Planned Unit Development (site plan) review to ensure that the location of the building, landscaping, parking, etc. meets all minimum city code requirements. After reviewing the application, staff has determined that the proposal meets all minimum requirements and will be a good fit for the neighborhood. IX. Recommendation This proposal provides an opportunity for redevelopment of underused property along 62nd Avenue. The proposed building and site design meet the objectives of the city's Design Guidelines. For these reasons, staff recommends approval. Preliminary and Final Plat Staff finds that the combination of the existing lots meets the city's zoning and subdivision standards and recommends approval subject to the following conditions: Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 12 2/5/14 1 The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the final plat that outlines all public site improvements and developer responsibilities. Public improvements will include, but not be limited to: a. Burial of the overhead utilities. b. Curb cut installation and removal of unused curb cuts. C. Installation of sidewalks along West Broadway. d. Replacement of sidewalk along 62nd Avenue. e. Utility connections. 2. Payment of park dedication in the amount of $8,400.00 Final Development Stage PUD (Site Plan Review) In conjunction with the preliminary and final plat approval, staff recommends that final development stage PUD be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Council will need to approve the adjusted building setbacks. 2. The terms for installation of the proof -of- parking stalls shall be outlined in the PUD agreement. 3. The applicant shall provide a snow removal plan to be included in the PUD agreement. 4. Bicycle parking shall meet the following conditions: a. Provide a design detail of bike racks for an evaluation of capacity. b. Remove bike rack from green space /snow storage area and provide hard surface for bike parking. c. Provide additional bike parking on west end of building. 5. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian sidewalk through the activity area to the western fence opening. 6. The applicant shall provide a management /maintenance plan for an underground stormwater storage system to be incorporated into the PUD agreement. 7. Drainage and utility plans will be subject to City Engineer comments. 8. Landscape components shall include: a. Any landscaping that dies or shows stress shall be replaced by the property owner in accordance with the approved landscape plan. b. Any planting or site improvements located in public easements may be removed by the City in conjunction with City projects. Replacement of the improvement and /or landscaping shall be the property owner's responsibility. Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 13 2/5/14 9. The applicant must provide a detail of the eight foot boundary line fence for City approval. 10. The City Council needs to approve the building signs as part of the PUD flexibility. 11. The City Council needs to address the light intensity at right -of -way lines by: a. Reduce light intensity to City standards; or b. Approve the light intensity as part of the PUD. 12. In conjunction with the final plat and final PUD stage, the applicant shall enter into a development agreement and PUD agreement that outlines the condition of approval, improvement responsibilities, and provides security for all improvements. The PUD agreement shall be recorded with the property title and be assigned to all future owners. Attachments: • Application Planning consultant memorandum (January 28, 2014) • Applicant narrative (January 10, 2014) Plans with Preliminary and Final Plat Location maps • Wenck Associates Traffic Impact Study (December 27, 2013) West Metro Fire and Rescue memorandum Qanuary 9, 2014) Design and Review Committee notes (January 16, 2014) • Application log Planning Case Report 14 -03 Page 14 2/5/14 NOR F'HWES`tr ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 f 763.231.2561 planners @nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Curtis Jacobsen FROM: Emily Shively/ Alan Brixius DATE: January 28, 2014 RE: New Hope — Overview of Compass Pointe Development Stage Site & Building Plan and Preliminary Plat Review; 6113 West Broadway FILE: 131.01 —14.01 BACKGROUND Ron Clark Construction and Design has submitted development stage plans for the proposed Compass Pointe multifamily housing project at 62 " Avenue and West Broadway. The City adopted a PUD ordinance in 2012 listing minimum design standards and conditions for the Compass Pointe development stage approval. A clause in the ordinance allows the City to adjust the minimum design and performance standards if deemed necessary to improve the site and building design for the purpose of compatibility, public health or public safety. The applicant has now submitted detailed development stage PUD plans for City consideration. Staff met on January 15 to outline staff review comments. These plans were reviewed by the City's Design and Review Committee on January 16 The following review comments are based on new PUD plans received on January 24, 2014, ISSUES Preliminary Plat The applicant is proposing to combine four lots and one outlot into a single lot for development. The new lot will have a total lot area of 1.66 acres and lot width, at the setback line, of approximately 140 feet. In platting the property, the applicant has shown five foot utility easements along all property lines. Overhead utilities currently exist along the north and south property lines. These utilities will interfere with site improvements and landscaping and must be placed underground. A plan for burying these utilities must be provided as a condition of plat approval. Park Dedication. Due to the increased density that this project involves, the City is requiring a cash payment in lieu of land dedication for park and open space enhancements. The park dedication fee will be determined according to the process outlined in the ordinance with a maximum amount expected to be approximately $8,350.00 ($5,000.00 per acre; 1.66 acre site). Site Plan and Development Stage In Spring of 2012, the City approved a PUD rezoning and PUD concept plan for Compass Pointe. In this ordinance, the City established the following performance standards for the PUD. Lot Area /Density. As stated in the preliminary plat review, the site has a total area of 1.66 acres. The approved concept plan proposed 68 dwelling units for a density of 40 units per acre. The development stage plan replicates the concept plan in lot area and density. Setbacks. follows: The concept plan setbacks are compared to the development plans as Concept Plan Development Stage Front (East) 10 feet Side Corner (North) 5 —12 feet Side Interior (South) 50 — 59 feet Rear (West) 95 feet 10 feet 10 —12 feet 46.5 feet 95 feet The footprint of the building was altered along with changes of the roof line to reduce the building height toward the single family homes. This alteration brings the building 3.5 feet closer to the south property line at the southeast corner of the lot. This alteration is requested by the applicant. All other setbacks are consistent with the concept plan. The applicant has altered the building plan per Design and Review Committee recommendations, relocating the exhaust fan well away from the northwest corner of the building to the southwest corner of the building to maintain a constant 10 -12 foot building setback from the north lot line. Parking. Concept plans for the site provided for 68 underground parking spaces and 72 surface parking stalls for a total of 140 off - street parking spaces for the facility (2.05 spaces per unit). This is a reduction from the City's parking standard of 2.25 spaces per unit for multiple family. This reduction in parking was approved based on past experience of the applicant and the availability of bus transit and nearby park and ride. 2 A recent tour of the applicant's similar projects revealed that even at a reduced parking standard, similar projects have an oversupply of parking. The development stage plan matches the concept plan in number of parking stalls, however, the development stage proposes 22 stalls be proof -of- parking and left as green space until there is a demonstrated demand for the additional stalls. Staff believes that this is an acceptable arrangement under the PUD, provided the following conditions are included in the PUD agreement and recorded against the property to be binding to all parties. The applicant shall construct additional parking stalls upon notification of the City that current parking is insufficient to meet on -site demand. Said notification may occur if the following events are observed: Parking outside of designated parking stalls in driveways, fire lanes, or green space. 2. City observes on- street parking attributed to Compass Pointe tenants or guests. The applicant's exterior parking stall lengths are shown as 18 feet. This is acceptable with a City approved snow removal plan. The applicant has designated areas of the site for snow storage. The applicant must include a plan for snow removal if the snow storage is not sufficient. Said snow removal plan shall run with the property as part of the PUD agreement. New curb cuts for access drives must match existing curbing. Any unused curb cuts from previous lots must be removed and new curbing installed at the expense of the applicant. Bicycle Parking. The applicant has illustrated bike racks at the southeastern end of the building. In review of this amenity, we offer the following recommendations: 1. Provide a detail of the bike rack to illustrate its capacity for bike parking. 2. Place the bike rack on a hard surface rather than a green space to improve access and avoid deterioration of the green space. 3. Consider another bike rack for the western end of the building. 4. Remove bike rack from snow storage areas. Pedestrian Circulation. All building entrances are on the south side of the building. The concept plan indicated sidewalks leading from the building entrances to 62 Avenue and West Broadway on both the east and west sides of the building. The development stage plans only show sidewalks leading from the entrance eastward to West Broadway and west terminating at the play and picnic area. The detail of the outdoor activity area shows a four foot fence surrounding the area with five foot openings to the sidewalk to the east and the parking lot to the south and west. To provide some pedestrian passage to the west side of the site, we would recommend winding a sidewalk from the western fence opening to the edge of the basketball court and then around the play area to the eastern sidewalk. This alteration would provide pedestrian circulation to both ends of the site. The applicant will be building a public sidewalk along West Broadway and they are proposing repair or replacement of the existing sidewalk along 62 Avenue if damaged during construction. Green Space. The development stage plans show a revised layout of the recreational space on the site. The area is in the same location, but now includes space for grills and picnic tables adjacent to the play area and basketball court. A four foot metal fence is proposed along the rear of the court area to contain balls and provide for safety where the driveway dips down to the underground parking area (a fence detail must be submitted for this feature). The applicant is also installing ornamental fencing around the entire perimeter of the grill /picnic and tot lot area due to the close proximity to the parking lot. A detail has been submitted with landscape details. Stormwater. Site drainage flows toward the southeast portion of the site and will be directed into an underground storage and infiltration facility. A plan for the ongoing maintenance of the stormwater infrastructure will be required to ensure its functionality over time. The maintenance plan /agreement must be approved by the city and filed with the county recorder to run with the title of the property. The stormwater and grading plan must be approved by the City Engineer and meet watershed district requirements. As the site is over 1.0 acre, a SWPPP may be required. Utilities. As part of the streetscape improvement requirements along 62 " Avenue, the developer is required to bury overhead utilities. This must be indicated on the site plans. The City Fire Inspector shall determine the required number and location of hydrants to serve the facility to be installed at the cost of the applicant. Water service has been split between the potable water supply for the building and water for the fire suppression system. Landscape Plan. Site constraints and utility easements located at the north and south edge of the property leave a very small area for tree plantings along the sidewalk and rear fence line. The plan shows tree plantings in the easements. The applicant will be permitted to install fences and landscaping within the drainage and utility easement. If the City needs to access these areas for placement or maintenance of utilities, any :I fencing and landscaping shall be removed and subsequently replaced at the cost of the applicant. The landscape plan has been revised to show the location of the catch basins along the north side of the building to ensure proper placement of the street trees. Tree placement should also be shown on the north building elevation rendering to show how the trees relate to the building fagade. The landscape plan differs slightly from the concept plan with regard to the landscape buffer along the southern edge of the property. The concept plan indicated tree plantings along the length of the parking lot to screen the apartment building from single family homes to the south. It appears that a closer review of site conditions resulted in the need for the placement of a retaining wall along a portion of the parking lot that will not allow for sufficient area for tree plantings (location of the retaining wall must be shown on the landscape plan). Columnar junipers and ornamental grasses are proposed that are suitable for the smaller space, however, these plantings will provide additional screening above the eight foot fence line. A section graphic has been submitted to demonstrate that sufficient screening is provided in this area. The applicant must also demonstrate that proposed tree plantings will not interfere with overhead utilities along the south property line. All tree pruning to maintain sufficient clearance will be the responsibility of the applicant. As part of the final PUD approval, the applicant will be required to submit a landscape maintenance plan. The applicant will be required to replace any dead, diseased, or damaged plant material in order to maintain the plantings as indicated on the approved landscape plan. Fence. An eight foot fence is proposed along the west and south property lines. A fence detail must be submitted showing the design and materials of the fence. Sign Plan. The initial development stage plan illustrates two monument signs — one at the entrance from 62 Avenue and one at the West Broadway entrance. Design and Review Committee raised concerns over the size, location, and traffic sight lines with the West Broadway sign. The Committee suggested building- mounted signs to eliminate concerns and to open up the site entrance. In response to the Design and Review Committee recommendations, the development stage plan now proposes the following: Monument sign at the 62 Avenue entrance. This sign meets all the freestanding sign standards for size, height and location. 2. Building- mounted signs 45 square feet in area are proposed at two corners of the building (northeast and southeast). The location and design of the signs blend with the building architecture. This type of sign is not permitted within the City's multiple family zoning district, however, it may be approved within the overall PUD. 5 Lighting Plan. The City Zoning Ordinance limits light intensity at shared property lines not to exceed .4 foot candles. The applicant's plan illustrates that they meet this standard along the shared south and west property lines. The City Zoning Ordinance limits light intensity along a street not to exceed one foot candle at the right -of -way line. The photometric plan shows light levels above the one foot candle standard at a number of locations along both West Broadway and 62 Avenue. At the southeast corner of the building, light levels at the right -of -way reach 2.6 foot candles. Along 62 Avenue, the applicant initially did not propose any building lighting. At the suggestion of the Design and Review Committee, lighting was added to this side of the building to provide some illumination for the public sidewalk and for building security. In review of the lighting plan, two options are available to the Planning Commission and City Council: 1. Require the applicant to reduce the intensity of the lighting to bring the light levels into compliance with City standards. 2. Consider the location and need for lighting along these streets and allow an exception to the one foot candle standard as part of the PUD flexibility. Record of the Management Company. The applicant has submitted letters from police liaison officers and documents of police calls from other facilities managed by Steven Scott Management, Inc. These submittals demonstrate that the management company has maintained a good relationship with police departments in communities in which it operates and takes a proactive approach to dealing with tenant issues. CONCLUSION ! RECOMMENDATION The City approved the zoning and concept plan for a 68 unit multiple family apartment for the subject site in 2012. The applicant has now advanced to PUD development and preliminary plat, which details the development plan for the site. Based on our review of the submitted plans, we offer the following recommendations: Preliminary Plat. We find that the combination of the existing lots and outlot meets the City's zoning and subdivision standards and we recommend approval subject to the following conditions: The applicant enter into a development agreement with the final plat that outlines all public site improvements and developer responsibilities. Public improvements will include, but not be limited to: a. Burying overhead utilities. b. Curb cut installation and removal of unused curb cuts. 0 C. Installation of sidewalks along West Broadway. d. Replacement of sidewalk along 62 " Avenue. e. Utility connections. 2. Payment of park dedication. Development Stage PUD. In review of the submitted plans, we recommend approval of the development stage PUD with the following conditions: The City approves the adjusted building setbacks. 2. The terms for installation of the proof -of- parking stalls are outlined in the PUD agreement. 3. The applicant provide a snow removal plan to be included in the PUD agreement. 4. Bicycle parking meets the following conditions: a. Provide a design detail of bike racks for an evaluation of capacity. b. Remove bike rack from green space /snow storage area and provide hard surface for bike parking. C. Provide additional bike parking on west end of building. 5. Provide a pedestrian sidewalk through the activity area to the western fence opening. 6. Provide a management/maintenance plan for an underground stormwater storage system to be incorporated into the PUD agreement. 7. Drainage and utility plans subject to City Engineer comments. 8. Landscape components shall include: a. Any landscaping that dies or shows stress shall be replaced by the property owner in accordance with the approved landscape plan. b. Any planting or site improvements located in public easements may be removed by the City in conjunction with City projects. Replacement of the improvement and /or landscaping shall be the property owner's responsibility. 9. The applicant must provide a detail of the eight foot boundary line fence for City approval. 10. The City approve the building signs as part of the PUD flexibility. 11. The City address the light intensity at right -of -way lines by: 7 a. Reduce light intensity to City standards; or b. Approve the light intensity as part of the PUD. 12. In conjunction with the final plat and final PUD stage, the applicant shall enter into a development agreement and PUD agreement that outlines the condition of approval, improvement responsibilities, and provides security for all improvements. The PUD agreement shall be recorded with the property title and be assigned to all future owners. cc: Jeff Sargent Steve Sondrall 8 ECUVED JAN 8 4 2014 CITY OF NEW HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Friday, January 10, 2014 Curtis Jacobsen City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 RE: 6113 West Broadway Site (including 7601 -7661 62 "d Ave No) Site Plan Review Final Development Plan Preliminary Plat Approval Final Plat Approval Subject: Project Narrative Curtis, 7500 West 78Th Street Edina, MN 55439 (952) 947 -3000 fax (952) 947 -3030 The proposed site is located immediately west of the Super America Gas Station at the southwest corner of the intersection of West Broadway and 62 " Avenue. Currently the site includes an abandoned gas station which the city just acquired through tax forfeiture, 3 4 -plex lots the city acquired for redevelopment over 15 years ago and an existing 4 -plex rental building. Ron Clark started discussion with the city over 3 years ago, but until the gas station site finally was tax forfeited there was no way to create a viable project, in addition Ron Clark obtained a purchase agreement for the existing 4 -plex located at 7661 62 " Ave No to complete the area needed to redevelop the site Our vision for the site is a high quality apartment building which will make a strong statement as the north entrance to New Hope. In the spring of 2012 the City approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District for the site. Ron Clark Construction & Design is now requesting Final Development Plan Approval in conformance with the approved PUD zoning, Site Plan Approval and Preliminary & Final Plat Approval. We are asking for the setback on the southeast end of the building to be reduced from 50 feet to 45 feet as referenced in the staff report. The current plan has gone through many changes based on feedback from the Planning Commission, City Council, City Staff and Neighbors. Our project is a 68 unit apartment with underground heated parking, community room, exercise room, washer & dryer in each unit, playground area, and extensive landscaping. The building will be non - smoking, will meet all the Minnesota Green Criteria for new construction and will feature high quality, low maintenance building materials. The 6113 West Broadway Narrative - continued building is proposed to be closer to the street for a more urban feel, with the parking and a landscape buffer to give the maximum distance between the Apartment building and the Single Family homes. The mix of apartments will be 13 -1 bedroom, 36 - 2 bedroom and 19 — 3 bedroom units to fill the need for a more family oriented development. We expect there will be about 190 total residences based on similar projects. There will be 1 underground parking stall per unit and 72 surface stalls for a total of 133 (of these we are requesting 22 stalls be kept as green space as proof of parking which will be built if requested by the City in the future). The project will create a pedestrian friendly environment with a focus on transit, with a bus stop just north of the site and a major park and ride with express bus service within %z mile. Based on input from Staff and the Planning Commission Design Committee over the past couple weeks. We have moved the main signage onto the ends of the building, along with shortening up the fences at the entrances to improve site lines at the driveways. We will provide a storm water management operation and maintenance plan which will be approved by staff and the city engineer, we will be responsible all maintenance of the system but the city will be able to do the work and assess us for the work if we are not in compliance. We have added bike racks at the east entry and additional bike storage in the garage. We will be burying the power lines on the north side of the project, and will bury as much of the power lines on the south side as we can, but we will need to work with each of the neighbors to determine if they want to bury the lines to their homes, we have proposals from Excel Energy and should have Proposals from phone and cable over the next few weeks. We plan to meet with each homeowner to review the proposed utility plans and discuss what each of them wants to do on their property prior to any utility work being done. The final plan for each homeowner will affect the size and amount of landscaping we can do along the new fence. We will provide Utility as built drawings for the City as required prior to issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. We have been approved for financing the project with Housing Tax Credits, through th Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. This is a very competitive process because of the limited dollars available. The Housing Tax Credit Program is not a subsidized housing program. It is a public/private partnership resulting in new investment in communities. It is a financing program that was created under the Tax Reform Act of 1986 that gives income tax incentives (e.g. income tax credits) to for -profit corporations in return for their commitment to the community and their investment capital that makes workforce housing feasible. The capital from these corporate investors is equity, not debt, and accounts for about 70 % of the total cost of the project. Therefore, with so much equity the project's debt (or mortgage amount) and mortgage payment is lower. This allows the project owner to charge a more competitive rent to meet the MHFA workforce housing requirements. Each resident must have verified income to meet the MHFA requirements and they pay their rent. There is no government rent subsidy with the tax credit program. Another benefit to the program is the MHFA compliance period which requires th project will need to meet these program requirements for 30 years. MHFA also inspects the project annually and substantial operating and replacement reserves are required (about $450,000.00 at the start with at least $30,600.00 added to the reserve each year) to make sure the project is maintained at a high standard for the entire 30 years. We believe 2of3 6113 West Broadway Narrative - continued it is the best financing program to promote community investment. We also received a pledge of Tax Increment Financing from the city to fill the financing gap, this amount has been determined by working with the cities consultant and we are now requesting the final approval of the TIF Loan and TIF District at this time. Based on questions and concerns we have also provided as part of the submittal a full traffic study for the project and the surrounding intersections. The apartment building will be professionally managed and operated by the highly respected Twin Cities property management company, Steven Scott Management. We are providing emails from various Police Departments which Steven Scott works with to show the great job that they do and the fact that there are very few if any problems at the apartments they manage. In the end, the project will foster a safe, walkable community with a new urbanism -type character. Care was taken in the site planning to conceal major areas of surface parking through environmental design, furthermore the site will incorporate sound landscape design plus landscape buffering to the neighbors to the South. The project will strive to incorporate Minnesota Green Community Criteria and sustainable building design in order to reduce energy expenditures and to enhance the health, well -being and productivity of the building occupants. We look forward to working with the City of New Hope to create a Development we can all be proud of Sincerely, . Michael Waldo Vice President 3 of 3 Frank French To: Barb Halverson (bhalverson @steven- scott.com) Cc- Carey Vaughan (cvaughan @ steven- scott.com) Subject: Mike Waldo information Request) Good Morning. Attached by City are the responses we received based on Mike Waldo's request for information on SSM management of communities located in the cities of Savage, Brooklyn Park, New Hope and Crystal. We received via email the following; Savaee: Positive remarks and calls for service report from James Caauwe the Crime Free Liaison Officer regarding Village Commons Brooklyn Park: Positive remarks from Andrew Dickman the Crime Free Liaison Officer regarding our communities of Moonraker, Point of America, Fountains in the Park and Ridgebrook New Hope: Positive remarks on City of New Hope letterhead and calls for service report, from Nichole Korth the Crime Free Liaison Officer regarding Continental & Parkridge Way Crystal: Comments back from Tracie Lee the Crime Free Liaison Officer noting that per her supervisor they cannot provide written feedback either negative or positive. They did offer and send a calls for service report regarding Louann Terrace. Please review and let me know what you would like me to forward to Mike Waldo today. Thanks, Frank J. French Vice President of Property Management Phone (952) 540 -8619 1 Cell (612) 708 -4117 1 Fax (952) 540 -8601 www.steven- scott.com ffren eli(@steven- scott.com y:: c STEVEN SCOTT UET T ER APARTMENTS. BETTER SERVICE. BETTER LIFE. Frank French From: Mike Waldo <Mwaldo @ronclark.com> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 4:56 PM To: Barb Halverson Cc: Brenda Hvambsal; Carey Vaughan; Frank French Subject: Re: Police info for New Hope area Attachments: image003 jpg Thanksl I I assume it's even tougher with the holidays Whatever you can get will be appreciated Mike Waldo Sent from my iPhone On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:39 PM, "Barb Halverson" < bha Iverson @ steven- scott.com <ma!Ito:bhalverson @steven- scott.com wrote: We're working on those police reports. Just wanted you to know. Not as easy as just picking up the phone and making a req uest. Barbara I Halverson President Phone (952) 540 -8631 I Cell (952) 292 -6181' Fax (952) 540 -8601 bhalverson @steven - scott.com <mailto:bha Iverson @steven- scott.com <image003.jpg> From: Mike Waldo [mailto:Mwaldo @ronclark.coml Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 20131:08 PM To: Brenda Hvambsal Cc: Carey Vaughan; Barb Halverson; Frank French Subject: RE: Police info for New Hope area Yes Jan 6th at 5:30 Thanksill Mike Waldo From: Brenda Hvambsal [ mailto •bhvambsalC&steven- scott.coml Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 20131:05 PM To: Mike Waldo Cc: Carey Vaughan; Barb Halverson; Frank French Subject: RE: Police info for New Hope area Mike, I am going to have Barb Halverson and Frank French help on this one. We have a great relationship with Brooklyn Park, so that should be fairly easy. Is January 6th the next meeting? Brenda From: Mike Waldo [mailto:MwaldoPronclark.coml Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:35 AM To: Brenda Hvambsal Cc: Carey Vaughan Subject: Police info for New Hope area Brenda �} Can we get a l etter or report from New Hope. Crystal and Brooklyn Park Police departments regarding the work you do with them on any building within 5 -10 miles of the New Compass Pointe site The attached info and positive statement Carey got from Savage was great and the New Hope council definitely feels your management is a key to the project being successful for the community -- So a positive and /or supportive letter from each of the area departments would be great to have at the Neighborhood meeting and the future city meetings If you have any questions or want to discuss, just give me a holler Thanks Mike Waldo 7500 West 78th St. Edina, MN 55439 952.947.3037 Direct 952.947.3035 Direct Fax mwaldo(&ronclark. com <mailto:mwaldoC&ronclark.com www.ronclark.com<htti)://www.ronclark.com/ RonClark Construction & Design Ron Clark Construction & Design is the proud recipient of the MN Business Ethics Award! Frank French From: Carey Vaughan Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 2:46 PM To: Mike Waldo Subject: FW: Village Commons From the Savage PD O Carey Vaughan Regional Asset Manager Phone (952) 540-86471 Cell (952) 292 -92221 Fax (952) 540 -86oi www.steven- scott.com evaughan0steven- scott.com ST&* v N SCOTT NAANAG I EMENT, INC. INFER AIPMii: AKNT5. BErM SRWE. BET M M From: James Caauwe fmailto :JCaauwe(&ci.savage.mn.us1 Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 2:44 PM To: Carey Vaughan Subject: RE: Village Commons I was literally just running your stats. 12/05/2013 (2013 - 11076) at 3:06 gm, officers responded to 14125 to speak with Abdulkadir Warsame about his children who don't listen to him. That is it. Other calls in 2013 at 14125 building: 07/17 Daughter stuck in the elevator 05/04 Party wanted to know why the police drive through the lot so much. 03/29 Call about a disturbance in the parking lot. Reports of shots fired, but nothing established. 03/18 Questions about snow removal. 02/15 Smoke alarm in elevator 09/10 Complaint about noise coming from vehicles in the parking lot. 08/11 Complaint about people being loud on the balcony at 11 pm. 05/03 Vehicle in the parking lot with windows broke out. Contacted resident and they advised the vehicle had been involved in an accident. Repair shop closed. 11/16 Question about her vehicle and her x boyfriend. 2012 10/27 Open garage door found. Checked OK. That is all I have. Quote from Jim Caauwe It has been a pleasure working with the management at Village Commons. I have coordinated the Crime Free Multi - Housing program in Bloomington and Savage. One thing I have learned in 14 years of doing this, is that it all comes down to the management. The management at Village Commons have been easy to work with and yet firm in their dealings with potential problems. Jim Caauwe ALSO, remember we have a Crime Free Multi- Housing meeting tomorrow morning at 10 am at the Savage PD. We will have Todd Ulligren from Minnesota Multi- Housing Association as a speaker. We will also discuss the new Savage False Alarm Ordinance and the proposed Savage Rental Ordinance. I hope you or someone else from the property can attend. Jim Caauwe From: Carey Vaughan fmailto:cvaughanca- steven -scott coml Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 2:19 PM To: James Caauwe Cc: Mwaldo(a�ronclark.com Carey Vaughan Subject: Village Commons Happy Monday to you! I hope you are finding a way to stay warm the rest of this cold spell. I am wondering and hoping that you would be able to run a report for the calls at Village Commons for 2013 and 2012? Also, any other information you would be able to provide to us on the Village Commons property as a whole. We are in the middle stages with a new development in New Hope and invited the Mayor & City Council members to Savage over the weekend. The request is for us to gather the requested information from the City of Savage. Hoping you are able to send me some reports and comments on Village Commons. Thanks in advance! Carey Vaughan Regional Asset Manager Phone (952) 540 -86471 Cell (952) 292 -92221 Fax (952) 540 -86oi www.steven- scott.com cvaughanO)steven- scott.com STEVEN SCOTT IMANA NT, !NC. BETTER APARTMENTS. BETTOR 51rWAM BETTER LIFE. Frank French From: Andrew Dickman < Andrew .Dickman @brooklynpark.org> Sent Thursday, December 19, 2013 4:28 PM To: Frank French Subject Letter To whom it may concern: I, Officer Dickman #190, with the Brooklyn Park Police Department am currently assigned to the Community Oriented Policing Unit. My job is to primarily work with rental properties which mainly focus on apartment complexes. I have had numerous encounters with several different management companies as I am responsible for five different apartment complexes in my assigned district. It has been my experience in dealings with properties managed by Steven Scott that they have been great to work with. Their individual on site'mangers are very responsive to our request for information and to respond quickly to dealing with problems at their complexes, many time before I need to take action. Steven Scott manages four different complexes in Brooklyn Park with their locations in high crime areas. Statistics show that their properties are generally below the average crime rate compared to other complexes in the same areas. Their employees attend our regular training for apartment managers as well as the quarterly meetings at the police department. In my experience, Steven Scott management does an excellent job managing their complexes and they are enjoyable to work with. Officer A. Dickman #190 Brooklyn Park Police Community Oriented Policing (COPS Unit) Phone: 763 - 493 -8127 Frank French From: Korth Nichole <nkorth @ci.new - hope.mn.us> Sent Monday, December 30, 2013 2:32 PM To: Frank French Subject: Letter and Information Attachments: Steven -Scott Letter.pdf, Calls for Service 1 -1 -13 thru 11 -20 -13 8100 Bass.pdf Attached is a letter for your use. I received your request for access to data — on which it appears you wish to sign up for monthly reports. There is a separate sign -up form for the 2014 monthly reports program which I will be sending out to all apartment contacts as soon I know how these reports will be generated in our new records system. If you wish to just request data periodically — you can do so with the form and do not need to sign up for monthly reports. In the meantime — I will run what I can for 2013 so you at least have a list of calls for service data for that property. There is no charge for what I will be sending you. Monthly reports would be what you want if you want information to be run and sent automatically without you needing to request. The Request for Access to Data should be used for any other data requests (if not receiving monthly, or if need to request more detailed information on a specific case) I hope this information is of assistance. I am in for a few hours today, and will be back to regular hours after January 2" d Sincerely, Nichole Korth Crime Prevention and D.A.R.E. Officer New Hope Police Department 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 763- 531 -5140 nkorth @ ci.new- hope.mn.us From: Frank French rmaflto:ffrenchO Steven -scott com Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:49 AM To: Korth Nichole Subject: RE: Our phone conversation about our Communities in New Hope Good Morning Nichole. I have completed the Request For Access To Date form as it pertains to Continental Apartments @ 8100 Bass Lake Road in New Hope. Thanks for sending. Hopefully, we can get a copy of the latest crime stats sent via email to my attention. Note this community is managed out of our Louann Terrace apartment community and I have provided you with that information so it can be sent to Savanh our Property Manager for active follow -ups when required. Regarding your comments below, they are appreciated. However, since these collective comments are part of the developers presentation to the City of New Hope can you please either cut and paste to letterhead and send with heading of; To Whom it May Concern...... or simply change it and resend your email with this heading and without the last sentence! Thanks again, Frank J. French Vice President of Property Management Phone (952) 540 -8619 J Cell (612) 708 -4117 1 Fax (952) 540 -8601 www.steven- scott.com ffrench(@steven- EVEN SCOTT MAN^GLMENT, INC. TTEP AD Nom. BETTjt 9R%d .13FTYRUM From: Korth Nichole [ mailto•nkorth(&d.new- hope.mn.usl Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 4:06 PM To: Frank French Subject: RE: Our phone conversation about our Communities in New Hope Here is what I can say: "Steven -Scott Manages two properties in New Hope. Parkridge is signed up to receive monthly reports as well as the weekly arrest reports and the manager has been active in contacting our office for information and to get help in dealing with problems. The management of Continental Apartments requested information from the New Hope Police Department to help educate residents in theft from auto crimes and was added to the weekly report list after this request. Management has been easy to work with on issues that have come up and seems dedicated addressing problems as they arise." if you want crime stats for Continental Apartments please let me know. (request form attached) Parkridge should already have theirs as they are signed up to receive monthly reports. Sincerely, Nichole Korth Crime Prevention and D.A.R.E. Officer New Hope Police Department 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 763 - 531 -5140 nkorth ci.new- hope.mn.us From: Frank French fmailto•ffrench @steven- scott.com Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:29 AM To: Korth Nichole Subject: Our phone conversation about our Communities in New Hope or 11 *is December 30, 2013 To Whom It May Concern: The New Hope Police Department can provide the following Information regarding properties managed by Steven -Scott in our City. Steven -Scott currently manages two properties in the city of New Hope. Parkridge Way Apartments is signed up to receive monthly reports as well as the weekly arrest reports. The manager has contacted our office for information and to get help in dealing with problems on -site, and has been easy to work with during the follow -up to this request. We have had limited contact with the management of Continental Apartments other than a request for information to help educate residents in theft from auto crimes. We have added managers for both properties to our e-mail contact list which provides updates on training and arrest activity within the City. Sincerely, Tim Fournier Chief of Police By: Nic ofe Korth Crime Prevention and D.A.R.E. Officer New Hope Police Department 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 763 -531 -5140 nkorth@cl.new-hope.mn.us CITY OF NEW HOPE 4401 Xylon Avenue North + New Hope, Minnesota 55428 -4898 • www. anew- hope.mn.us City Hall: 763 - 531 -5100 • Police (non - emergency); 763 - 531 -5170 • Public Works: 763-592-6777 • TDD: 763 - 531 -5109 City Hall Fax: 763- 531 -5136 + Police Fax: 763-531-5174 • Public Works Fax: 763- 592 -6776 1/,113 New Hope Police Department Incidents by Address Range Time Period: 1/1/2013 12:00:00 AM - 12129/2013 11:59:59 PM Addr Range: "8100 -8100 bass" Address: Apt/Unit: Reported: Incident Type: Case P: 8100 BASS LAKE RD 01/031201310:34 PM DISTURB UNWANTED PERSON NH13 -000090 01/1212013 1:56 AM MISC OFCR TRESPASS NOTICE SERVED NH13 -000456 01112/2013 1:56 AM MISC OFCR TRESPASS NOTICE SERVED NH13- 000457 01/12/2013 1:56 AM DISTURB UNWANTED PERSON NH13- 000348 01/12/2013 8 :41 PM ASSIST PUBLIC NH13- 000374 03/2212013 1:36 AM MISC OFCR INFORMATION NH13- 002426 06103/2013 7:49 PM MISC PUBLIC CIVIL MATTER NH13- 003626 05110/2013 7:35 PM DISTURB NOISE COMPLAINT NHIS- 003835 05120/2013 9:20 AM MISC OFCR UTILITIES NH13- 004141 06/03/201312:24 PM MISC OFCR INFORMATION NH13- 004619 06/171201312:53 PM ALARM FIRE NH13- 005148 07101/2013 1:43 PM MISC PUBLIC CIVIL MATTER NH13- 006800 07120/2013 5 :07 PM DISTURB NOISE COMPLAINT NH13 -006508 06/01/2013 7:26 AM ALARM FIRE NH13 -006896 09109/2013 3A9 PM LOST PROPERTY NH13- 008289 09/12013 7:64 PM SUSPICIOUS PERSON NH13 -008406 09129/2013 2:56 AM DISTURB NOISE COMPLAINT NH13- 008963 10/231201310:38 PM THEFT -OTHER PROPERTY- VALUE LESS THAN NH13 -009774 11101/2013 8:52 AM BURGLARY-3RD DEG - ENTERS BLDG INTENT NH13-010028 105 02111/2013 6:09 PM DISTURB- HARASSMENT OR STALKING NH13 -001293 105 04/17/2013 1:42 AM MISC OFCR WELFARE CHECK NH13- 003119 205 03/02/2013 1:13 PM ASSIST PUBLIC NH13- 001846 205 03/25/2013 8:15 AM DISTURB HARASSMENT NH13- 002612 206 08/161201310 :32 AM DISTURB NOISE COMPLAINT NH13- 007406 216 02/1212013 6:01 PM ALARM FIRE NH13- 001330 216 111111201312:28 PM ASSAULT -0TH DEG - COMMITS, ATTEMPTS OR NH13- 010379 305 05/151201310:62 AM MISC PUBLIC CIVIL MATTER NH13- 003983 305 0710912013 3:10 PM DISTURB HARASSMENT NH13- 006096 305 0711812013 10:57 PM MISC PUBLIC CIVIL MATTER NH13- 006430 305 08/1012013 9:07 AM MISC PUBLIC CIVIL MATTER NH13- 007232 307 06/27/2013 4 :18 AM ASSIST FIRE DEPT NH13- 005636 313 01102/2013 9:38 PM DISTURB NOISE COMPLAINT NH13- 000060 M rl Run: 1213012013 1:69 PM Page 1 of 2 oIncidents By Address Range.rep Address: ApIJUnit: Reported: Incident Type: Case M. End of Report Rort Run: 12130/2013 1:59 IM NH ep l Incidents By Address Range.rep Page 2 of 2 Frank French From: Matthew Haga <Matthew.Haga @crystalmn.gov> Sent. Saturday, January 04,2014 10.48 PM To: Frank French Cc: Trade Lee Subject: RE: Information Request Attachments: LouAnn Terrace - 2013 CFS (PUBLIC).pdf Mr. French: A list of potentially criminal and /or ordinance violating calls for service to the address you manage in Crystal is attached. Let either myself or Officer Lee know if you need further information. Thanks. Matt Haga Support Services Manager Crystal Police Department (763) 531 -1017 matthew.hasa @crystalmn.gov From: Frank French fmailto •ffrench @steven- scott.coml Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 8:43 PM To: Trade Lee Cc: Matthew Haga Subject: RE: Information Request Trade, by month in 2013 at this time would be appreciated. it is disappointing that such a general generic letter cannot be provided especially when making the request of three (3) other cities and receiving such letters without hesitation. Perhaps the City of Crystal will revisit that approach going forward. Thanks for at least running it past management. Frank J. French Vice President of Property Management Phone (952) 540 -8619 J Cell (612) 708 -4117 l Fax (952) 540 -8601 www.steven- scott.com ffrenchCQ? scott.com id STEVEN SCOTT MANAGEMENT, INC BETTER APARTNIENTS, BETTER SERVICE. BETTFA L FE- From: Trade Lee fmailto•tracie.lee @cn stalmn.4ov1 Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 6:41 PM To: Frank French Cc: Matthew Haga Subject: RE: Information Request Hi Frank, After discussing this request with me supervisor, I learned that we cannot produce a l We can, however, run calls for service for the LouAnn Terrace. I'm copying Matt Haga on this email, as he is our Support Service Specialist who can assist with this. Please let him know the time frames in which you'd like to have the documented calls. Thanks From: Frank French fmailto :ffrench@)steven- scott.com] Sent. Friday, January 03, 2014 12:12 PM To: Tracle Lee Subject: Information Request Good Afternoon Tracie. Based on my previous inquires is there any opportunity to obtain some level of written response from you as the Crime Free Liaison Officer, regarding Louann Terrace and our management involvement in coalition meetings or oversight of their calls for service? It would be appreciated. Thanks, Frank J. French Vice President of Property Management Phone (952) 540 -8619 1 Cell (612) 708 -4117 1 Fax (952) 540 -8601 ww w.steven- scott.com ffrench(@steven- scott.com STAN SCOTT MANAGEMENT, INC %TTER ALAI RTMENTS. BETTER SERVICE, BETM LIFE. LouAnn Terrace - 2013 CFS 1/2/201317:06 P130021145 PICKUP /WARRANT 720136TH AVE N 118 3335 NO CONTACT (4) 1/3/201311:47 P130030645 HARASSMENT 720136TH AVE N 3322 ADVISED (22) 733P13000331 1/4/2013 20:32 P130041376 PICKUP/WARRANT 720136TH AVE N 219 3331 NO CONTACT (4) 1/7/201315:21 P130070962 LANDLORD/TENANT 720136TH AVE N 13354 ASSISTED (21) 33P13000578 1/16/2013 17:50 P130161206 NARCOTICS COMPL 720136TH AVE N 3324 VERBAL WARNING (14) 33P13001390 1/22/201311:05 P130220537 THEFT /RPT 720136TH AVE N 118 3318 REPORT (8) 33P13001937 2/2/2013 14:52 P130330751 CAR THEFT /RPT 720136TH AVE N 3321 REPORT (8) 33P13002868 2/5/201316:14 P130360980 NARCOTICS COMPL 720136TH AVE N 219 33181 ASSISTED (21) 33P13003140 2/21/2013 19:33 P130521355 THREAT 720136TH AVE N 3 ?? 3328 REFERRED OUT (23) 33P13004591 3/17/2013 22:07 P130761209 DISTURBANCE 720136TH AVE N 104 3338 ASSISTED (21) 33P13006581 4/14/201311:50 P131040546 CAR THEFT /RPT 720136TH AVE N 3325 ASSISTED (21) 33P13009139 5/4/2013 14:54 P131240920 ALARM /POLICE 720136TH AVE N 3344 FALSE ALARM (5) 33P13010785 5/20/201316:59 P131401242 DAMAGE PROP /RPT 720136TH AVE N 3325 ASSISTED (21) 33P13012227 5/22/201317:58 P131421067 DISTURBANCE 720136TH AVE N 203 3342 VERBAL WARNING (14) 33P13012434 5/24/2013 0:03 P131440005 BURGLARY /RPT 720136TH AVE N 325 3335 ASSISTED (21) 33P13012584 5/31/2013 23:33 P131511706 ANIMALCOMPLAINT 720136TH AVE N 3378 ADVISED (22) 33P13013421 7/3/2013 19:12 P131941358 DAMAGE PROP 720136TH AVE N 3335 REPORT (8) 33P13016702 7/15/2013 10:28 P131960515 FORGERY /RPT 720136TH AVE N 321 3326 ADVISED (22) 33P13017828 7/23/2013 8:07 P132040272 THFT FRM AUTO RP 720136TH AVE N 3325 CLEAR (1) 33P1301871b 7/24/2013 20:45 P132051330 DAMAGE PROP/RPT 720136TH AVE N 3331 REPORT (8) 33P13018874 7/26/2013 23:14 P132071665 DISTURBANCE 720136TH AVE N 33311 ASSISTED (21) 331313019075 8/2/2013 22:05 P132141549 DISTURBANCE 720136TH AVE N 3328 ADVISED (22) 33P13019716 8/3/201313:50 P132150764 DISTURBANCE 720136TH AVE N 3325 ASSISTED (21) 331 8/8/2013 7:54 P132200332 THFT FRM AUTO RP 720136TH AVE N 3324 REPORT (8) 33P13020166 8/8/201314:40 P132200986 CAR THEFT /RPT 720136TH AVE N 125 3344 REPORT (8) 33P13020201 8/11/2013 9:30 P132230411 THFT FRM AUTO RP 720136TH AVE N 33251 REPORT (8) 33P13020426 8/13/201316:30 P132251116 DAMAGE PROP /RPT 720136TH AVE N 3326 REPORT (8) 33P13020639 8/20/201317:51 P132321233 ALARM /POLICE 720136TH AVE N 3318 FALSE ALARM (5) 33P13021268 8/21/2013 9:15 P132330383 ANIMAL COMPLAINT 720136TH AVE N 3356 REPORT (8) 33P13021324 9/7/2013 12:57 P132500784 HARASSMENT 720136TH AVE N 216 3336 UNFOUNDED (3) 33P13022838 9/9/2013 7:48 P132520260 THFT FRM AUTO RP 720136TH AVE N 3321 REPORT (8) 33P13022985 9/11/2013 20:14 IP1325413991 LOUD MUSIC 720136TH AVE N 3305 CLEAR (1) 33P13023240 9/22/2013 20:03 IP1326511101 THEFT /RPT 720136TH AVE N 3327 REPORT (8) 33P13024122 9/25/2013 6:58 IP1326802131 DISTURBANCE 720136TH AVE N 3334 ASSISTED (21) 33P13024316 LouAnn Terrace - 2013 CF5 10/12/2013 9:45 P132850515 BURGLARY /RPT 720136TH AVE N 217 3318 M ADVISED (22) 1.0/17/201312 :18 10/18/2013 P132900717 NARCOTICS COMPL 720136TH AVE N 106 3333 RECEIVED INFORMATION (17) 331313025670 33P13026046 9:41 P132910375 ANIMAL COMPLAINT 720136TH AVE N 123 3356 10/22/2013 9:55 P132950405 ANIMAL COMPLAINT 720136TH AVE N 123 3356 CLEAR (1) 33P13026102 11/6/2013 22:15 P133101473 BURGLARY /RPT 720136TH AVE N 3335 UNFOUNDED (3) 33P13026399 11/7/201314:52 P133110874 DISTURBANCE 720136TH AVE N 3309 ASSISTED (21) 331313027677 L1/19/201318:51 P133231150 HARASSMENT 720136TH AVE N 118 3337 ASSISTED (21) 33P13027714 L1/25/2013 21 :41 P133291264 LOUD MUSIC 720136TH AVE N 3306 ADVISED (22) 331313028636 12/2/2013 20:22 P133361216 LOUD MUSIC 720136TH AVE N 123 33411 UNFOUNDED (3) 33P13029010 12/11/201319:36 P133451126 DISTURBANCE 720136TH AVE N 212 33371 VERBAL WARNING (14) 33P13029589 l2/13/201313:00 P133470616 DRUG OVERDOSE 720136TH AVE N 221 3336 UNFOUNDED (3) 331 12/13/2013 20:53 P133471172 COURT ORDERS 720136TH AVE N 125 3337 REPORT (8) 33P13030232 l/19/2013 1 4:391P133530765T NARCOTICS COMPL 1720136THAVENI 219 3321 ARREST (11) RECEIVED INFORMATION (17) 33P13030261 33P13030667 .2/29/201318:32 P133630674 DISTURBANCE 720136TH AVE N 123 @LOU 3339 VERBAL WARNING (14) 33P130313041 Cr�nirst,r�rr � Cr��r��:ri�r� Traffic Impact Study for Apartment Building in New slope, MIS: Prepared for: RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN 7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439 Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 Wenck File #1531 -07 W enc k December 27 2013 FIGURE1 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................ ............................ -2 FIGURE2 CURRENT SITE PLAN .............................. . ............................................................. 2 -3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................ ............................ -2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ........ ............................4 -3 FIGURE S WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ...................... 5-4 I December 2`/0^13 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................. ............................ -1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ....................................................... ............................ -1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................. ............................ -1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ...................................................................... ............................ -1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................ ............................ -1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... ............................ -1 7.0 APPENDIX ..................................................................................... ............................ -1 FIGURES FIGURE1 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................ ............................ -2 FIGURE2 CURRENT SITE PLAN .............................. . ............................................................. 2 -3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................ ............................ -2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ........ ............................4 -3 FIGURE S WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ...................... 5-4 I December 2`/0^13 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this traffic impact study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed apartment building located in New Hope, MN. The project site is located southwest of the W. Broadway Avenue /62 Avenue N. intersection. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • W. Broadway Avenue /62 Avenue N. • W. Broadway Avenue /61' Avenue N. • 62 Avenue N. /Sumter Avenue N. • W. Broadway Avenue /development access (future only) • 62 Avenue N. /development access (future only) Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve the construction of a new 68 unit apartment building, including 140 parking stalls. The project includes two access points, with one on 62 Avenue and one on W. Broadway Avenue. The project is expected to be completed and fully occupied by the end of 2015. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 33 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 39 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 425 daily trips. • The proposed project generates less than half the number of trips than were generated by the previous land uses. Replacing the gas station /convenience store use with apartments results in a significant reduction in the number of trips generated. All study intersections have adequate capacity with existing geometrics and control to accommodate the proposed development. No improvements are needed at these intersections to accommodate the proposed project. 1 -1 December 2013 Wenck 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this traffic impact study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed apartment building located in New Hope, MN. The project site is located southwest of the W. Broadway Avenue /62 Avenue N. intersection. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • W. Broadway Avenue /62 Avenue N. • W. Broadway Avenue /61 Avenue N. • 62 Avenue N. /Sumter Avenue N. W. Broadway Avenue /development access (future only) • 62 Avenue N. /development access (future only) Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve the construction of a new 68 unit apartment building, including 140 parking stalls. The project includes two access points, with one on 62 Avenue and one on W. Broadway Avenue. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. The project is expected to be completed and fully occupied by the end of 2015. 2 -1 December 2013 ,'. A Wenck APPROXIMATE SCALE - - ! 0 1,500 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY V V enck FOR APARTMENT BUILDING Engineers • Scientists I I IN NEW HOPE, MN FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION t iiii Qg OL CD z cr) Crk LL F CL g 0 LLaz LL Z 0 LL m C C C W 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site currently contains one 4 unit apartment building. The remainder of the site is vacant. The site is bounded by 62 Avenue N. on the north, W. Broadway Avenue on the east, and residential units to the west and south. Near the site location, W. Broadway Avenue is a two -lane undivided roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. 62 Avenue N. is a two -lane undivided roadway which extends east and west of W. Broadway Avenue. 61 Avenue N. and Sumter Avenue N. are two -lane undivided local roadways. Existing conditions at intersections near the proposed project location are described below. W. Broadway Avenue /62 Avenue N. This four -way intersection is traffic signal controlled. All approaches provide a left turn /through lane and a through /right turn lane. W. Broadway Avenue /61 Avenue N. This four -way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound and westbound approaches. The eastbound 61 Avenue N. approach provides one lane shared by all movements. The westbound approach, which serves as a driveway access, provides one lane shared by all movements. The northbound and southbound W. Broadway Avenue approaches each provide one lane shared by all movements. 62 Avenue N. /Sumter Avenue N. This four -way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the Sumter Avenue N. All approaches provide one lane shared by all movements. Turn movement data for the intersection was collected during the weekday a.m. (7:00 — 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in November, 2013. 3 -1 December 2013 a Wenck ■� � lit _ \ � � » I 3 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2016. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2013 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. 2016 No- Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2016 No -BuRd volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on recent growth experienced near the site. • 2016 Build. Trips generated by the proposed apartment building were added to the 2016 No- Build volumes to determine 2016 Build volumes. Trip Generation Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed apartment building was calculated based on data presented in the ninth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Weekdav Trip Generation for Proposed Proiect Use Size A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily Existing Use — removed In Out Total In Out Total Total Apartments 4 DU 0 (2) (2) (2) (1) (3) (27) Proposed Use Apartments 68 DU 7 28 1 35 1 27 15 1 42 1 452 Net Added by project 7 26 33 25 14 39 425 DU= dwelling units Table 1 shows the net number of trips generated by the proposed development. As shown, the project adds 33 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 39 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 425 daily trips. 4 -1 December 2013 4Wenck Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 36 percent to /from the north on W. Broadway Avenue • 42 percent to /from the south on W. Broadway Avenue • 10 percent to /from the east on 62 Avenue N. • 12 percent to /from the west on 62 Avenue N Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes aree presented in Figure 4. 4 -2 December 2013 w_, Wenck AM PEAK HOUR 4 ih 1151115 �� 59/60/60 10110/14-1 32 —4 '— 20/21/21 E — 36/37/37 24/25/25 m ACCESS EJ �r 1381142/142 I 10311061109 1 / � � N TN 55/57 w w � N O/0/0 I I SISTAVE N 4 ih 1151115 �� 59/60/60 10110/14-1 32 —4 '— 20/21/21 E — 36/37/37 24/25/25 m ACCESS EJ �r 1381142/142 25/26/29 =1' � 77f79/ 1 T 3r T 80 � N TN T� T w � � N O/0/0 I I SISTAVE N E— 010/0 6A6 13/13113 f r 15/15l 1/1!1 10/10110 —� m� Sul PM PEAK HOUR o/oro �65rea/90 7f7f7 `1 T f 1140/143 11T x 4 - 6 113/113 1381142/142 25/26/29 =1' � 77f79/ 1 T 3r T 80 PROJECT LOCATION ti N EXISTING 2013 t F- 2016 NO BUILD 2016 BUILD NOT TO SCALE XX/X) M PROJECT LOCATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY A Wenck FOR APARTMENT BUILDING Engineers • Scientists I I IN NEW HOPE, MN u 13/13/13 E— 21/22123 f— 27/28/30 ACCESS <I + 413- T 444 � N TN T� T 2W C., en � � offilo 212/2 818TAVE N y 4/4/4 1/1!1 10/10110 —� m� Sul v FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 5.0 Traffic Analysis intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high - density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop- and -go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. 5 -1 December 2013 AWenck The LOS results for the study intersections are presented in Figure 5 and described below. W. Broadway Avenue 162 Avenue N. (traffic signal controlled) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing and all future conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A under all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing and all future conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A under all scenarios. Traffic generated by the proposed development has no significant impact on intersection operations. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. W. Broadway Avenue /61 N. (eastbound and westbound approaches stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing and all future conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. During the p.m. peak hour under existing and all future conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. Traffic generated by the proposed development has no significant impact on intersection operations. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. 62 n Avenue N. /Sumter Avenue N. (northbound and southbound stop controlled) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing and all future conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. During the p.m. peak hour under existing and all future conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. Traffic generated by the proposed development has no significant impact on intersection operations. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. 62 Avenue N. /development access (northbound stop controlled) — This intersection only exists under the 2016 Build scenario. During both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under 2016 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The access intersection as proposed operates at acceptable levels of service. No improvements are needed on 62 Avenue N. to accommodate the proposed project. W. Broadway Avenue /development access (eastbound stop controlled) —This intersection only exists under the 2016 Build scenario. During both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under 2016 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The access intersection as proposed operates at acceptable levels of service. No improvements are needed on W. Broadway Avenue to accommodate the proposed project. 5 -2 December 2013 -. -Wenck Trip Generation Comparison The project site currently contains one four unit apartment building located on the western side of the property. The area east of the existing apartment building previously contained three additional four unit apartment buildings and a gas station /convenience store. The three apartment buildings and the gas station /convenience store were removed, leaving an empty lot. The number of trips generated by the previous land uses and the proposed project were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Ninth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The trips generated by each scenario are presented in Table 2. kd A M nd P M Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison Table 2. Wee Use ay Size . -a . A.M. Peak Hour In Out Total P.M. Peak Hour In Out Total Daily Total Proposed Project 68 du 7 28 35 27 15 42 452 Apartments Previous Land Uses 6 vfp 31 30 61 41 40 81 977 Gas station /convenience store 3 10 106 Apartments 16 du 2 6 8 69 7 48 43 91 1083 To tals 33 36 du= dwelling units, vfp= vehicle fueling positions As shown, the number of trips generated by the proposed project is lower than the total generation of the previous land uses. 5 -3 December 2013 mWenck a a a +-- A/A/A r y f - AIAIA T A/A/A A/A/A 33 4 AM PEAK HOUR 4— A/A/A A/A/A -� -/-/ PROJECT LOCATION mm --+ 8�-3, ACCESS <J t� PM PEAK HOUR t AJ AIA A/A/A A/A/A -+ T A/A/A > ,-- A/A/A —> /- /A -q, a a PROJECT LOCATION N EXISTING 2013 2018 NO BUILD I 2018 BUILD i I NOT TO SCALE XX/X) m _ 11 ,j - 1AA V� TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1P V enck FOR APARTMENT BUILDING Engineers • Scientists I I IN NEW HOPE, MN mm--+ �/B --o, ACCESS J!4 E - B B � a JA�— aaa` aaa as 'a c/c/c �<--- c/c/c i J71 — aaa �T as 'a , c/c eIsrAVE N ccc J, B=-�� B/C /C -i aaa FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS c/c/c - I I I_ 81STAVE N E' �Y `> < — E— c/c/c c/c/c T r� /��B/B aaa PM PEAK HOUR t AJ AIA A/A/A A/A/A -+ T A/A/A > ,-- A/A/A —> /- /A -q, a a PROJECT LOCATION N EXISTING 2013 2018 NO BUILD I 2018 BUILD i I NOT TO SCALE XX/X) m _ 11 ,j - 1AA V� TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1P V enck FOR APARTMENT BUILDING Engineers • Scientists I I IN NEW HOPE, MN mm--+ �/B --o, ACCESS J!4 E - B B � a JA�— aaa` aaa as 'a c/c/c �<--- c/c/c i J71 — aaa �T as 'a , c/c eIsrAVE N ccc J, B=-�� B/C /C -i aaa FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 33 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 39 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 425 daily trips. • The proposed project generates less than half the number of trips than were generated by the previous land uses. Replacing the gas station /convenience store use with apartments results in a significant reduction in the number of trips generated. • All study intersections have adequate capacity with existing geometrics and control to accommodate the proposed development. No improvements are needed at these intersections to accommodate the proposed project. 6 -1 December 2013 _Wenck 7.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets 7 -1 December 2013 Wenck Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Broadway & 62nd �--- -- 12!27!2013 ..�,�- La ne Group EBL EBTBR ' WE3L " UVBT 1Ni3R NBL ` � N8T NBR SBL` $BT S813 Lane Configurations 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 36 0 20 0 25 <2> 152 0 25 0 37 <2> 293 0 51 Volume (vph) 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 32 1900 38 1900 24 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Said. Flaw (prat) 0 3268 0 0 3354 0 0 3451 0 0 3451 01911 0 Fit Permitted Said, Flow (perm) 0 0.908 2985 0 0 0.846 2880 0 0 0.891 3094 0 0 3160 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes SaW. Flow (RTOR) 46 24 so 30 30 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 152 302 171 Link Distance (ft) i78 3.5 6.9 3.9 Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor 0.83 4.0 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Shared Lane Traffic 0 97 0 0 96 0 0 243 0 0 459 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 8 26.0 26.0 2 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 45.9 4.0 45.9 Act Eflct Green (s) 6.9 6.9 0.79 0.79 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.25 0.12 0.27 0.10 0.16 v/c Ratio Control Delay 15.1 19.6 2.0 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 Total Delay 15.1 19.6 2.0 A LOS Approach Delay B 15.1 B 19.6 A 2.0 2.2 Approach LOS B B A 7 A 15 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 11 14 26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 26 91 Internal Link Dist (ft) 98 72 222 Turn Bay Length (ft) 1161 1101 2448 25 Base Capacity (vph) 0 St arvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0.08 0 0.09 0.10 0.18 Reduced v/c Ratio lntersaetionySumma _ .. Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 58.1 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.27 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.4 Intersedion LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:115311071synchro12013 am.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Sumter & 62nd 12!2712013 Movement' _ EBL f ;r `EST ' :; BR WBL 1NBT WBf . y� L .. Nt3T ;. NBR ':. 5t3L SDT::. .$BR Lanes 0 0> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Volume (vehlh) 1 55 3 2 103 0 6 8 3 1 5 4 Sign Control Free Free Slop Slop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 65 4 2 121 0 9 9 4 1 6 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (it) Walking Speed (f fs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 996 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 121 68 202 195 66 203 196 121 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 121 68 202 1.95 66 203 196 121 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3,5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 99 99 100 100 99 99 cM capacity(vehlh) 1466 1533 746 699 997 743 697 930 Dired6hj'1sne #- ✓ 7 EB` 1 ' WB'1 iVf31 ' -S6 ,I; Volume Total 69 124 22 12 Volume Left 1 2 9 1 Volume Right 4 0 4 5 cSH 1466 1533 755 780 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 1 Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.2 9.9 9.7 Lane LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.2 9.9 9.7 Approach LOS A A intersectidn' Summary . Average Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilizadon 16.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T.11531Wsynchro12013 am.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12127/2013 9: Broadway & 61St/ dri�eway Movement... EBL :. �.. •EgT. •.I^i3R. �' WBL, `v *WB7' VY_BR iVF3L V NBT. IV$R r : SBL SBT, ._.:SBR Lanes 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 3 227 1 1 338 3 Volume (vehlh) 13 0 Stop 15 6 0 Stop 0 Free Free Sign Control 0% 0% 0% 0% Grade Peak Hour Facia 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 1 0.91 1 0.91 393 0.91 3 Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 0 16 7 0 0 3 249 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftfs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) None None Median type Median storage veh) 302 Upstream signal (ft) pX, plalocn unblocked 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 397 251 vC, conflicting volume 654 654 395 670 655 250 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 631 631 365 647 6 250 366 251 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 B.5 6.2 4.1 41 tC, 2 stage (s) tF ( 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 96 100 98 98 100 100 100 100 1315 cM capacity (vehlh) 362 386 662 363 385 789 1160 Direction. Lane# - EB•1 Volume Total 31 7 254 398 Volume Left 14 7 3 1 Volume Right 16 0 1 3 cSH 494 363 1160 1315 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 12.8 15.1 0.1 0.0 Lane LOS B C A A Approach Delay (s) 12.8 15.11 0.1 0.0 Approach LOS B C IntersectioniSumma ` Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 0.8 29.6% ICU Level of Samoa A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report T:115311071synchro12013 am.syn Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Broadway $ 62nd 12127/2013 Lane, Group EBL ' - . EBT EYR W1BL ..: tNBT WBR NBL`: NBT - . N BR`- SBL ; : S13T :. ". SBR Lane Configurations 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 Volume (vph) 10 33 39 25 37 21 26 157 26 38 302 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Said. Flow (prof} 0 3268 0 0 3354 0 0 3451 0 0 3451 0 Flt Permitted 0.909 0.846 0.868 0.910 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2989 0 0 2880 0 0 3083 0 0 3156 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 47 25 31 42 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 178 152 302 171 Travel Time (s) 4.0 3.5 6.9 3.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow ivph) 0 99 0 0 100 0 0 251 0 0 474 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Act EfIct Green (s) 619 6.9 45.7 45.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.79 0.79 vlc Ratio 0.25 0.27 0,10 0.19 Control Delay 15.0 19.6 2.0 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.0 19.6 2.0 2.2 LOS B B A A Approach Delay 15.0 19.6 2.0 2.2 Approach LOS B B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 12 7 16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 27 15 27 Internal Link Dist (ft) 98 72 222 91 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1166 1110 2434 2494 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Sptllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reducin 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0A9 010 0.19 Intersection:Summary`'� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 58 Control Type: Actuated- Un000rdinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.27 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 16 TA153110Asynchro12016 am nb.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12J2712013 6: Sumter & 62nd Movement• �.� .., :>~BL : - = :EBT . IrBfts. ". WBL WBT %WBR � "NBL.:: NBT ` • NBR SBL, SBT.- SBR Lanes 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 1 1 <1 5 0 4 Volume (vehlh) 1 57 3 2 106 0 8 8 Stop 3 Stop Sign Control Free Free 0% 0% 0% Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0% 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 D,85 0.85 0.85 0.85 5 Hourly low rate (vph) 1 67 4 2 125 0 9 9 4 1 6 Pedestrians Lane Width (111) Wanting Speed (01s) Percent Blockage Right turn Aare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 998 pX, platoon unblocked 71 206 201 69 209 202 125 vC, ontticling volume c 125 VC1, stage 1 conf Vol vC2, stage 2 conf Vol vCu, unblocked Vol 125 71 208 201 69 209 202 125 IC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 IC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 10D 100 1530 99 739 99 694 100 994 100 737 99 692 99 926 cM capacity (vehlh) 1462 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB1 ` . NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 72 127 22 12 Volume Left 1 2 9 1 Volume Right 4 0 4 5 cSH 1462 1530 749 775 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 1 Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 10.0 9.7 Lane LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 10.0 9.7 Approach LOS A A interseotion•Summ - ... Average Delay Intersection Capacity U8lkation 1.6 16.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:11531107Wynchro12016 am nb.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignafted Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Broadway & 61 st/driveway 12/2712013 Movement_ _. EBL, ..EBT : EBR -WBL . WBT,.. WBR ,i: NSL - 'NBT, ,'NBR•. . SBL SST,. - SBR Lanes 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Volume (vehlh) 13 0 15 6 0 0 3 234 1 1 369 3 Sign Control Stop Slop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 0 16 7 0 0 3 257 1 1 405 3 Pedestrians Lane Width (IQ Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 302 pX, plaloon unblocked 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 vC, conflicting volume 674 674 407 690 675 258 409 256 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 oonf vol vCu, unblocked vol 648 648 373 665 649 258 374 258 1C, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 96 100 97 98 100 100 100 100 cM capacity (vehlh) 371 376 653 352 375 781 1148 1306 Dieotlon Lame # ..:. :. E91 M1 ' , NB 1 ... SB'1 Volume Total 31 7 262 410 Volume Left 14 7 3 1 Volume Right 16 0 1 3 cSH 483 352 1148 1306 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 Queue Length 95th (It) 5 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 13.0 15.4 0.1 0.0 Lane LOS B C A A Approach Delay (s) 13.0 15.4 0.1 0.0 Approach LOS B C Intersec liorl. Summary Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:115311071synchro12016 am nb.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 12/2712013 3: Broadway & 62nd Lane s ,V1► WBI .•, Nl . • 1`IBT. _4 NBR , : , SBI~ $ T ..: SBIR Lane Configurations 0 <2> 0 0 c2> 0 21 0 26 <2> 162 0 27 0 38 c2> 303 0 55 Volume (vph) 14 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 35 1900 41 1900 25 1900 37 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sold. Flow (prat) 0 3272 0 0 3354 0 0 3451 0 0 3448 0 Fit Permitted 0 0.893 2946 0 0 0.843 2870 0 0 0.889 3087 0 0 0.910 3153 Said. Flow (perm) Yes Yes Yes Yes Right Turn on Red 25 33 43 Said. Flow (RTOR) 49 30 30 Link Speed (mph) 30 178 30 152 150 171 Link Distance (ft) 4.0 3.5 3A 3.9 Travel Time (s) Peak hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 108 0 0 100 0 0 259 0 0 477 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA NA 6 Protected Phases 4 8 2 P erm 6 Permitted Phases 4 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 8 26.0 26.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.9 4.0 45.3 4.0 45.3 Act E1fct Green (s) 6.9 0.12 0.79 0.79 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.12 0.27 0.41 0.19 vic Ratio 0.27 15.4 19.5 2.0 2.3 Control Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Queue Delay Total Delay 15.4 19.5 2.0 2.3 LOS Approach Delay B 15.4 B 19.5 A 2.0 A 2.3 Approach LOS B B A 7 A 16 Queue Length 501h (ft) 9 12 15 27 Queue Length 95th (ft) 24 27 70 91 Internal Link Dist (ft) 98 72 Turn Bay Length (ft) 1156 1112 2434 2486 Base Capacity (vph) 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0.09 0.111 0.19 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.09 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 57.6 Control Type: Actuated - Uncoordinated Maximum vic Ratio: 0.27 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T :115311071synchro12016 am b.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Sumter & 62nd 12127/2013 Moverfient ' - - : ' .„ .. EBL •. n EBl .:- EBft' =UUBL VAT , WBR : "_ <NBL . NBT ;' ;NBR SBL SBT.. SI3F Lanes 0 <15 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Volume (vehlh) 1 56 3 2 109 0 8 8 3 1 5 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 Be 4 2 126 0 9 9 4 1 6 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn bare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 998 pX, platoon unblocked vC, confiicting volume 128 72 213 205 70 214 207 128 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 128 72 213 205 70 214 207 128 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 1C, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 99 99 100 100 99 99 cM capacity (vehlh) 1458 1528 734 690 993 732 668 922 Directio nlarte; #x - '., .... EI3'1 `.. WRA • . NB1 ; : .... Volume Total 73 131 22 12 Volume Left 1 2 9 1 Volume Right 4 0 4 5 cSH 1458 1528 744 771 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.03 O.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 1 Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 10.0 9.7 Lane LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 10.0 9.7 Approach LOS A A Intersecctionntummary Average Delay 1.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.8% ICU level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:11531k07ksynchrok2016 am b.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12127/2013 20: access & 62nd _ Movement EBT.' . ` EBR;. WBL' r W9T NBL "- NBR Lanes 1> 0 0 <1 1> 0 Volume (vehAr) 60 1 2 115 3 10 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 65 1 2 125 3 11 Pedestrians Lane Width (it) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 66 195 66 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 66 195 66 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 99 CM capacity (vehlh) 1535 793 998 Direction, l":ane # - • Y _ _ .. .. .. _ .: ; ..._ _ .. . .. _, Volume Total 66 127 14 Volume Left 0 2 3 Volume Right 1 0 11 cSH 1700 1535 942 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.00 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 8.9 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 8.9 Approach LOS A tntersection',Surmn' ' Average Delay Intersection Capacity Ll illzation 0.7 17.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report T:115311071synchro12016 am b.syn Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 18: Broadway & access 12/27/2013 Movement ' ,;` t=BL: ; E13R ..: NBL:.., tVBT. ; SBT SBR: Lanes 1> 0 0 <2 1> 0 Volume (vehlh) 6 9 3 247 368 1 Sign Control stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rale (vph) 7 10 3 268 400 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ills) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 150 pX, piatoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96 vC, conflicting volume 541 401 401 vC1 stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 496 349 350 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 98 100 cM capacity (vehlh) 479 618 1152 Direction Lane#:' E641 NB1 . NB's Volume Total 16 93 179 401 Volume Left 7 3 0 0 Volume Right 10 0 0 1 cSH 554 1i52 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.00 0.11 0.24 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 11.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 11.7 0.1 0.0 Approach LOS B lntersectfontSummary, 4 Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:115311071synchro12016 am b.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12127/2013 9: Broadway & 61 sttdriveway movement ' EBL EBT: • ,EBRt . WRL WBT '..WBR NBL•: 7 . NBT _ NBR •. SBL Lanes 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 0 0 3 <1> 0 1 0 1 <1> 0 3 Volume (vehlh) 13 0 Slop 15 6 Stop F 2337 F 380 Sign Control Grade 0% 0% 0% D% Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 1 0.91 0.91 418 3 Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 0 16 7 0 0 3 260 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) None None Median type Median storage veh) 302 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.97 0.97 690 0.97 419 0.97 705 0.97 691 261 0.97 421 262 vC, conflicting volume 689 vC1, stage 1 conf Vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 666 666 388 683 667 261 390 262 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.6 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 41 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 96 362 100 368 97 642 98 343 100 367 100 778 100 1136 100 1303 cM capacly (veh1h) Direction Lene #.:.' ` . 'JwB�'I V1t8'1. Nl3�1x ' SS 1 - Volume Total 31 7 265 422 Volume Left 14 7 3 1 Volume Right 16 0 1 3 cSH 472 343 1136 1303 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 13.2 15.7 0.1 0.0 Lane LOS B C A A Approach Delay (s) 13.2 15.7 0.1 0.0 Approach LOS B C intersection:Su'mma ` ... .. - - Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 0.6 30.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:1153110Asynchro12016 am b.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Broadway $ 62nd 112/27/2013 Lane GPot�p: EM I BT- ' J ASR t: ` WBL : -WBft. . WBR Lane Configurations 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 Volume (vph) 25 49 77 27 21 13 65 404 25 22 245 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sald. Flow (prof) 0 3241 0 0 3354 0 0 3490 0 0 3483 0 Flt Permitted 0.895 0.780 0.866 0.907 Said. Flow (perm) 0 2924 0 0 2675 0 0 3051 0 0 3172 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 85 14 11 19 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Dlstance (ft) 178 152 302 171 Travel Time (s) 4.0 3.5 6.9 3.9 Peak Flour Factor 0.91 0,91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Shared Lane Traffic (96) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 166 0 0 67 0 0 542 0 0 319 0 Turn Type Penn NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Act Sffct Green (s) 7.6 7.6 58,7 56.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.79 0.79 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.24 0.22 0.13 Control Delay 19.2 26.0 2.3 2.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.2 26.0 2.3 2.0 LOS B C A A Approach Delay 19.2 26.0 2.3 2.0 Approach LOS B C A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 11 22 11 Queue Length 95th (it) 44 28 41 23 Internal Link Dist (ft) 98 72 222 91 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1120 985 2411 2509 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reducln 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.07 0,22 0.13 Intsrgectionf5urnmary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 74.3 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.44 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.2 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 TM5311071synchro12013 pm.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1227/2013 6: Sumter & 62nd Movement EBT Y'EBR. Nt "�, 9 SBIL BT;--��; Sffl -, 77�s Lanes 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 0 1 0 1 <1> 7 0 2 Volume (vahlb) 7 136 14 3 85 Free 0 8 Stop Stop Sign Control Free 0% 0% 0% 0% Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.62 0.82 0.82 0,82 0.82 9 0.82 2 Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 166 17 4 104 0 10 11 1 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (fl) Walking Speed (ft1s) Percent Blookage Right turn Rare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 996 pX, platoon unblocked 104 183 309 302 M 309 311 104 vC, conflicting volume vC1. stage I conf vol vC2, stage 2 oonf Vol 104 183 309 302 174 309 311 104 vCu, unblocked vol 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.6 6.2 tC, single (s) IC, 2 stage (a) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 tF (a) pO queue free % 99 100 98 6311 98 805 100 869 100 629 99 599 100 951 cm capacity New) 1488 1392 Direction i Larie�,f hB 1 VI18 1,:; % N Volume Total 191 107 22 12 Volume Left 9 4 10 1 Volume Right 117 0 1 2 CSH 1488 1392 627 6 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3 1 Control Delay (s) OA 0.3 10.9 10.6 Lane LOS A A B B Approach Delay (a) 0.4 0.3 10.9 10.6 Approach LOS B B Intersection, Summa ry Average Delay Intersection Capacity UbTrzation 1.4 20.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report T:%15311OAsynchroWO1 pm-sYn Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Broadway & 61st1driveway 12127/2013 MoVsrdent'9L. S6T4.. SBR Lanes 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Volume (vehlh) 4 1 10 2 0 2 16 492 6 3 376 9 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly low rate (vph) 4 1 11 2 0 2 18 553 7 3 422 10 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft1a) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 302 pX, platoon unblocked 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 vC, conflicting volume 1029 1030 428 1036 1031 556 433 560 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1021 1022 411 1031 1024 556 416 560 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 98 100 98 99 100 100 98 100 cM capacity (v") 207 228 631 201 227 530 1126 1011 Direction Lane_# `` EB i WB:i NB' 1: "^ SB 1 r Volume Total 17 4 578 436 Volume Left 4 2 18 3 Volume Right 11 2 7 10 cSH 379 291 1126 1011 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 1 1 0 Control Delay (s) 14.9 17.6 0.4 0.1 Lane LOS B C A A Approach Delay (s) 14.9 17.6 0.4 0.1 Approach LOS B C Intersection Summary r :?• Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:115311071synchro12013 pm.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1212712013 3: Broadway & 62nd . - Lane.Grou E9L, = •iBT..`:`I:BR` - 1N8L..W6iL -, WBR = r;NBL. :NBT,.:; NBR, '•.SBLy::.St3T..=,: BR _ Lane Configurations 0 <2> 0 0 28 <2> 22 0 13 0 67 <2> 416 0 26 0 23 <2> 252 0 25 Volume (vph) 26 Ideal Flow (vphpQ 1900 50 1900 79 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0 Satd. Flow (prat) 0 3244 0 0 3356 0 0 3486 0.664 0 0 3� Flt Permitted 0 0.892 2917 0 0 OJ78 2671 0 0 3033 0 0 3161 Satd. Flow (perm) Yes Yes Yes Yes Right Turn on Red 14 11 Said. Flow (RTOR) 87 30 30 Lank Speed (mph) 30 178 152 302 171 Link Distance (ft) 4.0 3.5 6.9 3.9 Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Shared Lane Traffic (�) 0 171 0 0 69 0 0 560 0 0 329 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm N Protected Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 8 311.0 31.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 5 4 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 58.5 0 58.5 Act Mot Green (s) 7.7 7.7 0.10 0.79 0.79 Actuated 91C Ratio 0.10 0.45 0.24 0.23 0.13 v1c Ratio Control Delay 19.3 26.1 2'4 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 26.0 0 . 0 2.0 Total Delay 19.3 C A A Approach Delay ® 19.3 26.1 2.44 2.0 Approach L05 B C 11 23 11 Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 29 43 24 Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 72 222 91 Internal Link Dist (ft) 98 Turn Say Length (ft) 1120 984 2394 6 2496 Base Capacity (vph) 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Redu* 0 0.15 0 0.07 0.23 0.13 Reduced vlc Ratio Intersection_�mma ' Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 74.2 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum vic Ratio: 0.45 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report T:115311071synchro12016 pm nb.syn Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Sumter & 62nd 1212712013 Movement .: EBL= . EBT.:' ` WSL ; :. UVBT',::WBR.; :_ NBL..' = ,NBT...,NSR'- ..SBL ' , SBT _. SBR Lanes 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Volume (vehm) 7 140 14 3 Be 0 8 9 1 1 7 2 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 171 17 4 107 0 110 11 1 1 9 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fits) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 996 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 107 188 318 311 179 318 320 107 vCi, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 107 186 318 311 179 318 320 107 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 100 98 1 98 100 100 99 100 cM capacity (vehth) 1483 1386 622 599 864 621 592 947 Direction,19 - he # , EBB .. WB.1 NO f. $51. Volume Total 196 111 22 12 Volume Left 9 4 10 1 Volume Right 17 0 1 2 cSH 1483 13B6 620 643 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3 1 Control Delay (a) 0.4 0.3 11.0 10.7 Lane LOS A A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.4 0.3 11.0 10.7 Approach LOS B B In#ersectionrSummary Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:11 5 3 11071synchro12016 pm nb.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12/27/2013 9: Broadway & 61st/drivewayv Movement "' - - - Fi 3l'' I"f ? ?.y 1=8E� WBI . WBT ..°Nf81` `'NBt w NHT . '_NBR :' SBT ..SBL .. {1St3R Lanes 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 2 0 i6 <1> 077 0 6 0 3 <1> 3877 0 9 Volume (vehlh) Control 4 1 S � 10 2 Stop F Sign Grade P � 0 % 0� 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 0.89 435 0.89 10 Hourly Now rate (vph) 4 1 11 2 0 2 i8 570 7 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) None None Median type Median storage veh) 302 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 576 vC, conflicting volume 1058 1059 440 1067 1061 573 445 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 cant vol vCu, unblocked vol 1050 1051 421 1060 1053 573 4 541 IC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 IC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 98 99 98 99 100 100 98 100 997 cM capacity (vehfh) 198 218 621 191 218 519 1113 Direction Lane 9 X8.1 W8.1- NB`1 SB 1 Volume Total 17 4 594 448 Volume Left 4 2 18 3 Volume Right 11 2 7 10 c5H 367 279 1113 997 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.00 Queue Length 951h (ft) 4 1 1 0 Control Delay (s) 15.3 18.1 0.4 0.1 Lane LOS C C A A Approach Delay (s) 15.3 18.1 0.4 0.1 Approach LOS C C lntersectionAmma Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 0.6 47.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:115311oNynchro=16 pm nb.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Broadway & 62nd 12/27/2013 Lane Group' BBL. EB7 t: ELF - W�.:' _1NBT WBR "ABI. Lane Configurations 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 Volume (vph) 29 51 80 30 23 13 66 4i8 27 23 257 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prat) 0 3244 0 0 3361 0 0 3490 0 0 3476 0 Fit Permitted 0.886 0.772 0.864 0.905 Said. Flow (perm) 0 2901 0 0 2653 0 0 3033 0 0 3156 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 86 14 12 23 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 178 152 150 171 Travel Time (s) 4.0 3.5 3.4 3.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 176 0 0 72 0 0 562 0 0 339 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 6 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 59.0 5910 59.0 59.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Act Effct Green (s) 7.8 7.8 5114 58.4 Actuated 91C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.79 0.79 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.25 0.24 0.14 Control Delay 19.5 26.3 2.4 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.5 26.3 2.4 2.1 LOS B C A A Approach Delay 19.5 26.3 2.4 2.1 Approach LOS B C A A Queue Length 501h (ft) 18 12 23 12 Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 30 44 25 Internal Link Dist (ft) 98 72 70 91 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1114 977 2390 2491 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.16 0.07 0.24 0.14 tnhrsectianrSummary r Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 74.2 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.45 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:11531W71synchro12016 pm b.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12127/2013 6: Sumter & 62nd Movement `. El3L :; =EBT- ' EBR :: 1NBL_ " WBT 4 WBR NBL. NBT NBR' ' ,SBL , 587.: - SOR ; Lanes 0 41> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 1 0 1 <1> 0 2 Volume (vehlh) 7 143 14 3 90 0 Free 8 Stop Slop Sign Control Free 0% 0% 096 Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 D.82 0.82 1 0.82 9 0.82 2 Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 174 17 4 110 0 10 11 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (Rls) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (R) 998 pX, platoon unblocked 110 191 324 317 163 324 326 110 vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 110 191 324 317 183 324 328 110 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 IC, 2 stage (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 F (s) p0 queue free % 99 100 98 617 98 594 100 SBO 100 616 99 588 100 944 cM capacity (velVh) 1480 1362 Direction, Lape # - EB 1 . WB - N61 95 '1 '- Volume Total 200 113 22 12 Volume Left 9 4 10 1 Volume Right 17 0 1 2 cSH 1480 1382 615 639 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3 1 Control Delay (s) 0.4 0.3 11.1 10.7 Lane LOS A A B 8 Approach Delay (s) 0.4 0.3 11.1 10.7 Approach LOS B B i Intersection"5umma , Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 1.4 21.4% ICU Lave! of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 i T:115311071synchro12016 pm b.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 20: access & 62nd 12127/2013 Movement y' tav ita. wit", Mr'e 448L. r NBR.,'." Lanes 1> 0 0 <1 1> 0 Volume (veh/h) 142 3 6 113 2 6 Sign Control Free Free Slop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly now rate (Vph) 154 3 7 123 2 7 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fVs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median " None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 498 pX, platoon unblocked vC, confildng volume 158 292 156 VC1, stage I conr Vol YC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 158 292 156 IC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (a) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 99 oM capacity (veh1h) 1422 696 890 Direction �1ahe:4 ES 1, WBA NB ;1 Volume Total 168 129 9 Volume Left 0 7 2 Volume Right 3 0 7 cSH1 1700 1422 832 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.00 0.01 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 Control Delay (s) 0.0 CA 9.4 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 9.4 Approach LOS A intersectonisurrirriefry Average Delay 0.5 Intemecdon Capacity Udllzafion 20.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:%15311ONynchrd12O16 pm b.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1212712013 18: BroadwaY & access .�. Movement ,4 . , .. - EBL EBR .NI31: ,• VBT .:` "SBi :'� Lanes 1> 0 0 <2 1> 0 Volume (vehlh) 3 4 11 512 361 7 Sign Control Slop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 4 12 557 392 8 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftJs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 150 pX, platoon unblocked 0.97 0.97 0.97 VC, conflicting volume 698 396 400 vC1, stage 1 oonf vol vC2, stage 2 oonf vol vCu, unblocked vol 673 361 365 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 99 99 cM capacity (vehlh) 373 616 1153 Direction,lLane #,. BB 1, CvB 1: ° IVB °2 S61 Volume Total 8 197 371 400 Volume Left 3 12 0 0 Volume Right 4 0 0 8 cSH 481 1153 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.24 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 12.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 12.6 0.2 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersecfi� . Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 0.2 32.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:1153� ro12016 p b.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9 : Broadway & 61st/drivewa 12/27/2013 Movement - EBL;;_ EBT - ;EBR _ . W81.. „WBT WBR .' NBL NBT _` ' NBR. '' 88L- SBT ... SBR Lanes 0 <i> 0 0 <0 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Volume (veh/h) 4 1 10 2 0 2 16 517 6 3 390 9 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Now rate (vph) 4 1 11 2 0 2 18 581 7 3 436 10 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f fs) Percent Blockage Right turn Rare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 302 pX, platoon unblocked 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 vC, conflicting volume 1072 1074 443 1082 1075 584 448 588 vC1, stage 1 oonf vol vC2, stage 2 oonf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1065 1066 425 1075 1068 584 430 588 IC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 98 99 98 99 100 100 98 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 193 214 619 187 214 511 1110 987 Direction, 46ne. #� ` EB 1 W81 988 1: °' SB 1 sT '�'.7 7 _. Volume Total 17 4 606 452 Volume Left 4 2 18 3 Volume Right 11 2 7 10 cSH 361 274 1110 987 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.00 Queue Length 951h (ft) 4 1 1 0 Control belay (s) 15.5 18.4 0.4 0.1 Lane LOS C C A A Approach Delay (s) 15.5 18.4 0.4 0.1 Approach LOS C C Intersection ,Susmmary 3 Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 T:115311071synchro12016 prn b.syn Synchro 8 Report Page 1 @ COOPER LIGHTING - LUMARK® ` energy DESC RIPTION uh­ The Lumark Tribute Pole/Fixture Combo features all you need for easy selection and installation for poles and fixtures. Including the quality, die -cast Triubte area luminaire and Be arm complete with lamp, square straight steel pole and necessary anchorage. Available in single or dual fixture combinations. The Tribute/Pole Combo is ideal for parking areas, access roadways and other general off street area/site lighting applications. SPECIFICA FEATURES Construction Rugged one -piece die -cast alumi- num housing and door frame finished in dark bronze polyester powder paint. One -piece silicone gasket protects the optical chamber from performance degrading contaminants. One (1) stainless spring latch and two (2) stainless steel hinges allow toolless opening and removal of door frame. U.L. Listed and CSA certified for wet locations. Reflector Hydroformed anodized aluminum reflector offered in an adjustable Type II /111 or a Type IV distribution. Optical modules are field rotatable in 90" increments and offered standard with medium or mogul -base lampholders. DIMENSIONS Pole Shaft is one piece construction ASTM A500 grade "B" steel, shot blasted and finished in dark bronze polyester powder coat. Anchor base is fabricated from ASTM grade steel. ASTM A366 steel full base cover is provided to enclose base plate and anchor bolts. Anchor bolts are per ASTM A576 with (2) nuts, (2) flat washers, and (1) lock washer. Hardware and threaded portion of bolt are hot dip galvanized. 3" hook for 3/4" bolt. 4" hook for 1" bolt. COMPLIA F iC� LAMP TYPE WATTAGE Pulse Start Metal Halide (MP) 150, 250, 320, 400W High Pressure Sodium (HP) 150, 250, 400W L 151/2 . 1394mml J DRILLING PATTERNS 6 1/2' 1165mml I TYPE "M" 2 5/16" [58mm] 314" [20mm] dia. hole 2 7/16" 1124mml 4 7/8" [124r 1 (2) 5/6" 116mm] dia. holes Electrical Ballast and related electrical componentry are hard mounted to die -cast housing for optimal heat transfer and operating efficiency. Mounting Extruded Be aluminum arm features internal bolt guides for easy positioning of fixture during installation to pole. Finish Housing and arm finished in a 5 stage premium TGIC bronze polyester powder coat paint. 0 0 Base View Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. www.cooperlighting.com Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. PFT TRIBUTE AND POLE COMBO 150 - 400 W High Pressure Sodium Pulse Start Metal Halide 15' - 30' Square Straight Steel Pole POLE AND FIXTURE COMBO TECHNICAL DATA (Fixture) U.L. Wet Location Listed CSA Certified EISA Compliant ENERGY DATA Hi- Reactance Ballast Input Watts 150W HPS HPF (190 Watts) 150W MP HPF (185 Watts) CWA Ballast Input Watts 25OW MP HPF (283 Watts) 250W HPS HPF (295 Watts) 320W MP HPF (365 Watts) 40OW MP HPF (452 Watts) 40OW HPS HPF (465 Watts) EPA Effective Projected Area: (Sq. Ft.) Single: 1.62 Dual; 3.24 SHIPPING DATA Approximate Net Weight: 39 lbs. (1773 kgs.) ek e Ih'11f1 ADH082319 10/14/20091233:29 PM ORDERING INFORMATION - PFT TRIBUTE ND POLE COMBO Sample Number. PFT7153H169N /AB PFT I l 1����P 20 0 er of Lamp Distribrriion Lamp Type 1 Pole Height Zone Optioro F orms FT= Tribute Pole Fixtures Wattage 23 =Type 11/111 P =Pulse Start Metal 15 =15' g =90 MPH Wind Zone CEC= Calilomis Tide 20 Compliant Combo 1 =1 15 =15OW 4 F =Type IV Halide = =27 p =100 MPH Wlnd Zone Ballast (Applies to 200-32OW 2 =2 2g =250W Formed H =High Pressure 25 =25 and 400W MP only) 32 =32DW Sodium 5UA6 =No Anchor Bolts (Used when 80 =30 ordered separately) 40 =400W Notes: 1 a inch arm and pale adapter included with fixture. lamp Included with all PFT configurations. • Nots: Supplied with Multi Tap bellest 120/gOW40/277 (wired 277%0 with square straight steel °haft, anchor bold, template, ban cover and hardware. Lamp Source /Number of Fixtures Pole Height Wattage Distribution 8o MPH 90 MPH 100 MPH' HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM (HPS) Single Fixture 15' Pole 150W HPS Type IIAII PFT11523HI5 PFT11523H16' PFT11523H75 Type IV PFT1154FH15' PFT1154FH15I PFT1164FH15' 20'Pole 25OW HPS Type IIAII PFT12523H2O PFT125231-120 1 PFT12523H2O' TypelV PFT1254FH2O' PFT1254FH2O' PFT1254FH2O' 40OW HPS Type IIAII PFT140231-12O PFT140231-12O' PFT14023H2O' Type IV PFT1404FH2O' PFT1404FH2O' PFT1404FH2O' 25'Pole 260W HPS Type 111111 PFT12523H25' PFT12523H25' PFT12523H25' Type IV PFT1254FH25 PFT1254FH25 PFT1254FH25' 40OW HPS Type 11/111 PFT14023H25' PFT14023H25 PFT14023H25 TypelV PFT1404FH26 PFT1404FH25 PFT1404FH25' 30' Pole 25OW HPS Type IIAII PFT12523H30' PFT12523H30' PFT125231-1300 Type IV PFT1254FH30' PFT1254FH30' PFT1254FH300 400W HPS Type 11 /III PFT14023H30' PFT140231-130' PFT14023H300 TypelV PFT1404FH30 PFT1404FH30' PFT1404FH300 Dual Fixture 15' Pole 160W HPS Type IIAII PFT21523HJ5 PFT215231-115' PFT215231-115' Type IV PFT2164FH15' PFT2154FH15° PFT2154FH15 20' Pole 25OW HPS Type IIAII PFT2252SH2O PFT225231-120 1 PFT22523H2O TypelV PFT2254FH2O PFT2254FHZO PFT2254FH20 1 40OW HPS Type 11/111 PFf240231-12O' PFT240231-120 ' PFT24023H2O TypelV PFT2404FH2O PFT2404FH20 ' PFT2404FH2O 25' Pole 26OW HPS Type 11 /III PFT22523H25' PFT225231-125 PFT22523H250' TypelV PFT2254FH25' PFT2254FH25: PFT2254FH250: 40OW HPS Type II /III PFT24023H25' PFT240231-125' PFT24023H250 TypelV PFT2404FH25' PFT2404FH25 PFT2404FH250' 30' Pole 25OW HPS Type IIAII PFT22523H30' PFT22523H309 PFT22523H300' TypelV PFT2254FH30 PFT2254FH309 PFT2254FH300' 40OW HPS Type IIAII PFT240231-130' PFT24023H309 PFT24023H300' PULSE START METAL MAUDEIPSMH) TypelV PFT2404FH30' PFT2404FH309 PFT2404FH300'- Single Fixture 15' Pole 15OW PSMH Type IIAII PFT11523PI6 PFT11523P16' PFT11523P15' TypelV PFT1154FP15 PFT1154FP15' PFT1154FP15 20' Pole 25OW PSMH Type 111111 PFT12523P20 PFT12523P20' PFT12523P20' TypelV PFT1254FP20 PFT1254FP20' PFT1254FP20' 32OW PSMH Type 111111 PFT132231`20' PFT13223P20 PFT13223P20' Type IV PFT1324FP20 PFT1324FP20 PFT1324FP20' 40OW PSMH Type II /III PFT14023P20' PFT1402SP20 PFT14023P20' TypelV PFT1404FP20' PFT1404FP20 PFT1404FP20 25'Pole 250W PSMH Type IIAII PFT125 PFT126P25 PFT125P25' TypelV PFT1254FP25 PFT1264F4FP25 PFT1254F4FP25° 320W PSMH Type IIAII PFT13223P25' PFT13223P25 PFT13223P25 2 Type IV PFT1324FP25 PFT1324FP25I PFT1324FP25' 40OW PSMH Type II /111 PFT14023P25' PFT14023P25 PFT14023P25' Type IV PFT1404FP25 PFT1404FP25 PFT1404FP26' 30' Pole 25OW PSMH Type II /III PFT12523P30' PFT12523P30' PFT12523P300 Type IV PFT1254FP30' PFT1254PP30 PFT1254FP300' 320W PSMH Type IIAII PFT13223P30I PFT13223P30' PFT13223P300• Type IV PFT1324FP30 PFT1324FP30' PFT1324FP300• 40OW PSMH Type 111111 PFT14023P30' PFT14023P30' PFT14023P300 TypelV PFT1404FP30' PFT1404FP30 PFT1404FP300' Dual Fixture 15' Pole 15OW PSMH Type IIAII PFT21523P15' PFT21523P15I PFT21523P15 TypelV PFT2164FPISI PFT2164FP15 PFT2154FP15' 20' Pole 25OW PSMH Type 111111 PFT225231 PFT22523P20 PFT22523P20 Type IV PFT2254FP20 PFT2254FP20 PFT2254FP20' 32OW PSMH Type IIAII PFT23223P20 PFT23223P20 PFT23223P2D' Type IV PFT2324FP20 PFT2324FP20 PFT2324FP20 40OW PSMH Type 11/111 PFT24023P20 PFT24023P20' PFT24023P20' Type IV PFT2404FP20' PFT2404FP20 PFT2404FP20 25'Pole 25DW PSMH Type 11/111 PFT22523P25 PFT22523P25 PFT22523P250 TypelV PFT2254FP25 PFT2264FP25 PFT2254FP250 32OW PSMH Type II /III PFT23223P25' PFT23223P25' PFT23223P250' Type IV PFT2324FP25 PFT2324FP25 PFT2324FP250 40OW PSMH TypellAll PFT24D23P25 PFT24023P25' PFT24023P250' Typ I PFT PFT2404F P FT2404FP2 50' 30'Pole 25OW PSMH Type IIAII PFT22523P30' PFT22523P309' PFT22523P300' Type IV PFT2254FP30 PFT2214FP309 PFT2254FP300 320W PSMH TypellAll PFT23223P30' PFT23223P309 PFT23223P300' TypelV PFT2324FP30' PFT2324FP309 PFT2324FP300' Refer to In Stock Guide for availabilty. 40OW PSMH Type II /III PFT24023P30' PFT24023P309 4 PFT24023P300' NOTES:1 0 or 9 are noted where needed to designate a heavier gauge pole. Type IV PFT2404FP30' PFT2404FP309 4 PFT2404FP300' 2 Supplied with 4A Square Straight Steel shaft (SSS), anchor bold (A1111, template (TMP1l Hardware and base cover. 15' combo SSS4A75SFM4, 20' combo SSS4A20SFM4 and 25' combo SSS4A25SFM4. 3 Supplied with 5A Square Straight Steel shrift (SSS), anchor bolts (AB7), template (TMP11 Hardware and base cover. 25' combo 5855A25SFM4 and 30' combo SSS5A30SFM4. 4 Supplied with 5M Square Straight Steel shaft (S55), anchor bold (AB1), template ITMP7) Hardware and base cover. 30' combo SSS5M30SFM4. all S Supplied with SM Square Straight Steel shaft (SSS), anchor bold IA83), template (TMP2) Hardware and base cover. 30' combo SSSBM30SFM4. Lighting Specifications ant] Dimensions subject to change without notice ADHOS2319 wwwxooperlighting.com Lumark a Customer First Center a 1121 Highway 74 South a Peachtree City, GA 30289 a TEL 77OAK4800 a FAX 770ABOASM 10/14200912:33:28 PM PHOTOMETRICS (Complete IES files available at www.cooperlighfng.com) 4 0 1 2 3 4 PFT125231`25 250 —Watt MP 22,000 —Lumen Clear Lam Type III Formed 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 5 0 1 2 3 4 PFT13223P25 320 —Watt MP Lamp 30,000 —Lumen Clear Lamp Type III Formed 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 J4 5 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 ' FootcandleTable Select mounting height and read across for 3 footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height. 2 Mounting Footcandle Values for Height Isofootcandle Lines 1 A a C D E 20' 3.00 1.50 0.75 0.30 0.16 0 25' 2.00 1.00 0.50 020 0.10 30' 1.38 1.69 0.34 0.13 0.06 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 PFT1402SP25 PFT14023H25 400 —Watt MP 400 —Watt HP 40,000 —Lumen Clear Lamp 50,000 —Lumen Clear Lamp Type III Formed Type IV COOPER Ughting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADHOO2319 www.cooperlighting.com Lumerk • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 10/MOO812:33:28 PM ARE- aEDR -3M -R5 Cree Edge' Round Area Luminaire - TVDe III Medium - Product Description Slim, low profile design minimizes wind load requirements. Luminaire sides are rugged cast aluminum with integral, weathertight LED driver compartments, spun vented cover and high performance aluminum heat sinks. Post top mounting consists of four f precision machined, extruded aluminum arms mounted to weathertight cast lower hub with center bolt direct mount system for 5" (127mm) round poles. Direct mount j system provides clean hardware -less outer apperance. Performance Summary Utilizes BetaLED• Technology Patented NanoCiptle Product Technology Made In the U S.A of U.S and Imported parts CRI: Minimum 70 CRI CCT: S700K (+ / - 500K) Standard, 4000K (+ / - 300K) Limited Warranty *: 10 years on luminaire / 10 years on Colorfast DeltaGuard" finish EPA and Weight Reference EPA and Weight spec sheet Accessories XA- BRDSPK - i — - -- - - -- . -- --- Bird Spikes Ordering Information Example: ARE - EDR- 3M- R5- 04- E- UL -SV- 350 - OPTIONS T 21.4" (543mm) 17.4" (44 mm) 4.6" ( 117mm ) 4.0" ( 102mm ) A 3.9" (98mm) 23.0" y ( 584mm j f 13.; ( 344r I ARE -EDR 3M RS "' Available on luminaires with 40 -60 LEDs E "" Must specify village other than Lit UL or 34 N Be la. LCD c �� us � Rev. Date: 09/27/13 TECHNOLOGY 1 A SV ARE -EDR 3M RS 04' E UL 350 40K 4000K Color Temperature Type III Medium Spider Mount, 06' Universal Silver (Standard) 350mA - Colortemperatureperluminaire Center Direct 08' 120 -277V RK 525 DIM 0- 10VDImming 5" Round Pale 10' UH Black S25mA Control by others 12 Universal BZ 700 - ' Refer todimmirlg spec sheet for detailz 347 -480V Bronze 700mA Cant exceed specified drive current 34 PB F Fuse 347V Platinum Bronze Not available with all ML options. Refer to ML spec sheet 12 WIN for availability with ML options 120V White Not available with U or 34 voltages 27 HL Hi/ Law (175 /350 / 525 Dual ClrarR Input) 277V Refer to ML spec sheet for details Sensor not included P photocell Not available with all ML options Refer to ML spec sheet for availability with ML options Must specify voltage other than a -I. TL Two-Level 075 / 525 w/ Integrated Sensor CDntroD - Refer to ML spec sheet for details TL2 Two-Level (0 /350 w/ Integrated Sensor Cont or - Refer to ML spec sheet for details TL3 Two -Level (0/ 525 w/ Integrated Sensor Controir' Refer to ML spec sheet for details 'Consists of multiple 20 LED light bars. 411, 60, 80, and 100 LED units use blanks as needed in place of populated light bars " Available on luminaires with 60 -120 LEDs. "' Available on luminaires with 40 -60 LEDs "" Must specify village other than Lit UL or 34 N Be la. LCD c �� us � Rev. Date: 09/27/13 TECHNOLOGY A r% S r �M�< www.creemom/lighting T (800) 236 -6800 F (262) 504 -5415 ARE - EDR -3M-R5 Product Specifications CONSTRUCTION & MATERIALS • Slim, low profile, minimizing wind load requirements • Luminaire sides are rugged die cast aluminum with integral, weathertight LED driver compartments, spun vented cover and high performance aluminum heat sinks • Post top mounting consists of four precision machined, extruded aluminum arms mounted to weathertight cast lower hub with center bolt direct mount system for S" (127mm) round poles. Direct mount system provides clean hardware-less for outer apperance Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuard" finish features an E -Coat epoxy primer with an ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. Standard is silver. Bronze, black, white, and platinum bronze are also available Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM -79 -08 standards by a NVLAP certified laboratory. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Input Voltage: 120 -277V or 347 -480V, 50 / 60Hz, Class 1 drivers • Power Factor: > 0.9 at full load Total Harmonic Distortion: < 20% at full load Integral weather -tight electrical box with terminal strips (12Ga -20Ga) for easy power hookup Integral I0kV surge suppression protection standard To address in rush current, slow blow fuse or type C / D breaker should be used REGULATORY & VOLUNTARY QUALIFICATIONS • cULus Listed • Suitable for wet locations Enclosure rated IP66 per IEC 60529 when ordered without P or R options Consult factory for CE Certified products 10kV surge suppression protection tested in accordance with IEEE / ANSI C62.41.2 • Luminaire and finish endurance tested to withstand 5,000 hours of elevated ambient salt fog conditions as defined in ASTM Standard B 117 • Product qualified on the DesignLights Consortium' ( "DLC ") Qualified Products List ( "QPL') when ordered without full backlight control shield Meets Buy American requirements within ARRA ea 6m am ao- n• am lo• am am my 1 iffir,NFI MIF \►t\\ \Irli p©FIFA1 0MV20 1 0%[I aas — ru - in on - ua ea au CSA Test Report #: 6401 ARE - EDR- 3M- ••- 12 -E -UL- 525 -40K ARE- EDR- 3M-••- 06- E- 1JL- 700.40K Mounting Height: 25'(7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 10,657 Initial Delivered Lumens: 16,790 Initial FC at grade IES Flies To obtain an IES file specific to your project wnsult: httpzl/www. wee. cc: n /Ilghting/ tools- and-support /exterior- les-conf iguradon -tool Lumen Output, Electrical, and Lumen Maintenance Data 57M I 10g011 I I tWAtaMNF IFD Ceunl 6U4 I euc %norm WSt.. - RarsrroladadlaxndrMalnkrenu Factor (ri10) Rent- RMIro3s 129 -A80Y I VIN I 2{W 27N 344 4tAV @115 Dtlheredluners' !II gNireredLUrnatC 06 6242 62015 G2 6.011 1 B2 U0 U. i f:t 0.52 031 1 0.28 1 026 4d0 O:iS _ 3 93% f0 10. 3 M U0 G3 939A G3 110 1 0.92 1 053 1 1147 0.41 1 032 1 0 4 06 11X9 132 U0: 32 8145 112 U 101 0.84 0:49 .4 030'. 0.22 92% 0 14 1)3U0. 3 1 93 G3 0 . - :74 0.68 R39 90% 06 10,674 B3 U0 G3 10 279 B3 UO G3 134 1.14 0.65 Q,57 I 0.50 I 0.39 0.29 ' Acbelpodunion yield ray vary La wai 4 and -10:: W laialdelvered lunens. "Fornimeitmmatlonongr IESBUG(BxHiptt- Uplight- Gee:)RatYgvRitvnvw.i. ,anrglPDF/Dr".!iM$llRugRattki ,Addaidtncpol _For rejarnended omen mint ranoe Ixtm Masai M- 13.Catueted L aa-.d on 6A00 hours 1M -80 -00 li sting • 150.000 roux. C 2013 Cree, Inc. All rights reserved. For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. See www.cree.com/patents for patents that cover these products. Cree', the Cree logo, BetaLED , NanoOptl , the BetaLED Technology logo, and Colorfast DeltaGuard- are registered trademarks, and Cree Edge' is a trademark of Cree, Inc. The UL logo is a registered trademark of UL LLC. DesignLights Consortium'" and the DLC OPL logo are trademarks of Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships, Inc. S www.cree.com /lighting T (800) 236 -6800 F (262) 504 -5415 I� L /nvGN /A , c /GNT /NG' FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE— For building- and wall- mounted applications. CONSTRUCTION — Rugged, die -cast, single -piece aluminum housing. Die -cast door frame has a 118" thick tempered glass lens. Door frame is fully gasketed with one -piece solid silicone. OPTICS — Segmented reflectors for superior uniformity and control. Reflectors are interchangeable. Three full cutoff distributions available: FT (forward throw), MD (medium throw) and WT (wide throw). ELECTRICAL — Ballast 5OW -15OW utilizes a high reactance, high power factor ballast Metal halide 15OW and below are standard with pulse -start technology. 35S utilizes a reactance high power factor ballast 175W utilizes a constant- wattage autotransformer ballast. CSA, NOM or INTL required for probe start shipments outside of the US for 175M. Not available 175M SCWA. Ceramic metal halide lamps are recommended for use in applications where superior color rendition, lumen maintenance and longer lamp life are desired. Quick disconnect plug easily disconnects reflector from ballast. Ballasts are 100% factory- tested. Socket: Porcelain, medium -base socket with copper allay, nickel - plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed 66OW, 600V 4KV pulse rated. Finish: Standard finish is textured dark bronze IDDBT) corrosion- resistant polyester powder finish.Additional architectural colors are available. Striping is also available. INSTALLATION — Universal mounting mechanism with integral mounting support allows fixture to hinge down. Bubble level provides correct alignment with each installation. LISTINGS — UL Listed (standard). CSA Certified (see Options). Suitable forwet loca- tions (damp location listed in lens -up orientation). WLU option offers wet location listing in up orientation (see Options). I P65 rated. 25 *C ambient. ELED: U.S. Patent No. 7,737,640. NOTE: Specifications subjectto change without notice. Catalog Number WST- 150MHC- FT -TB- SWCA -LPI Notes TypeCC Decorative Wall- Mounted Lighting Specifications Length: 16.25 (41.2) Depth: 9.13 (23.2) Overall Height: 7.25 J18.4) *Weight: 30lbs (13.6 kg) WST METAL HALIDE 50W -175W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 35W -150W * Weight as configured in example below. All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise specified. ORDERING INFORMATION For shortest lead times, configure product using standard options (shown in bold). Example: WST 10oM FT TB LPI WST 15OMHC Series WST Wattage /source High pressure sodium 35S' 50S 70S 100S 150S me tal halide 50M 70M 100M 160M 175M' Ceramic MA19 50MHC 70MHC 10OMHC 15OMHC FT TB SCWA Voltage Ballast 120 ('blank) Magnetic 208 ballast 240' CWI Constant 277 wattage Emergency circuit 12 volt (20W isolated 347 2DC2012 TB° 23050HZI SCWA Super CWA Emergency LED secondary source pulse start battery pack with time delay (4 'F ballasts FT Forward throw MD Medium throw (coated lamp std.) WT Wide throw NOTES: 1 120V. 2 These wattages do not complywith California Title 20 regulations. 3 Must specify CWl for use in Canada. 4 Optional mufti -tap ballast (120, 208, 240,277V); (120, 277, 347V in Canada; ships as 120V/347VI. i Consult factoryfor available wattages. i Available with 150M or 150MHC,only. f May be ordered as an accessorywith prefix "WS ". Must specifyfinish. I Not available with DC options. I Not available with FLED, SF, DF, EC or QRS. Mounting Options (blank) Surface mount Shipped seperstely BBW Surface - mounted back box UT5 Uptilt5 degrees 10 Maximum wattage 100M, 70S.Must specify 120V or 277V. Not available with QRS, EC or DC. 11 Maximum allowable wattage lamp included. 12 Not available with ELED, ORS or OCs. 13 Not available with medium throw (MD,MDU, MDU5) distributions. 14 Must be ordered with fixture; cannot be field installed. 15 Not available with ELED, EC or DCs. 16 See www.lithonia.com /archcolors for additional color options. 17 Black finish only. 16 Must be specified. ULP not available with MHC. Shipped installed in fixture SF Single fuse 120, 277, 3477 OF Double fuse 208, 24OW DC12 Emergency circuit 12 volt (35W lamp included std.? 2DC12 Emergency circuit 12 volt (2,35W lamps included? DC2012 Emergency circuit 12 volt (20W lamp included)° 2DC2012 Emergency circuit 12 volt (2, 20W lamps included? ELED Emergency LED secondary source battery pack with time delay (4 'F min. operating temperature)" 2ELED Emergency LED secondary source (two modules) battery pack with time delay ( -4eF min, operating temperature)" DFL Diffusing lens EC Emergency circuit"-` IBS Internal backlight shield" PE Photoelectric cell -button type We TB)" (IRS Quartz restrike system"-"' WLU Wet location door for up orienta- tion CSA CSA Certified NOM NOM Certified' INTL International shipment for 175M Shipped separatelv WG Wire guard VG Vandal guard _ LPI Lamp LPI Lamp included L/LP Less lamp (blank) Dark bronze, textured DSST Sandstone, textured DNAT Natural aluminum, textured DWHG White, tex- tured DBLB Black,tex- tured CR Enhanced cor- rosion resistant CRT Non -stick protective coating" NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY Conalitent with LEED' goals S Green Globes- criteria for light pollution reduction Outdoor Sheet #. WST M -S BM -125 WST Metal Halide, High P Sodium Wall Mounted WST 15OMHC FT LTL11069P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footoandle) -2 [7 -1 w S C7 Z 09 Z D 10 2� LL 0 1.25 2 FN z 3? w 0 Z 4F v1 f] 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 15OW pulse start metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp orientation Footcandle values based on 12' mounting height, 14000 rated lumens. Luminaire Efficiency: 52.9 1 k WST 150MHC MD LTL11068P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) -2 t9 1w 2 C7 0� Z D 1g LL O 212 Z- 3 w Z Z 4F v1 D 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 15OW pulse start metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp orientation Footcandle values based on 12' mounting height, 12500 rated lumens. Luminalre EiRciency: 60.2% Initial , Lamp Options ( #lam s/wattages) Lamp Lemons Mounting Height 200012 Metal Halide ELED 10' 12' 14' 16' SOW MH 3,900 0.43 0.30 0.22 0.17 70W MH 5,500 0.62 0.43 0.31 0.24 10OW MH 8,500 0.95 0.66 0.48 037 15OW MH 12,500 1.41 0.98 0.72 0.55 '175WMH 12,800 1.44 1.0 0.73 0.56 High Pressure Sodium ■ ■ ■ t 35W HIPS 2,250 0.26 0.18 0.13 0.10 50W HPS 4,000 OA5 0.31 0.23 0.17 70W HPS 6,400 0.72 0.50 0.37 0.28 100W HPS 9,500 1.07 0.74 0.54 0.41 15OW HIPS 16,000 1.80 1.25 0.91 0.70 WST 150MHC MD LTL11068P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) -2 t9 1w 2 C7 0� Z D 1g LL O 212 Z- 3 w Z Z 4F v1 D 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 15OW pulse start metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp orientation Footcandle values based on 12' mounting height, 12500 rated lumens. Luminalre EiRciency: 60.2% WST 15OMHC WT LTL11070P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) -2 O -1 w x O 0 0 5 2 1 1E LL 0.25 O 2P z 3? w O 2 4F N 0 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 15OW pulse start metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp orientation Footcandle values based on 12' mounting height, 14000 rated lumens. Luminaire Efficiency: 62.5% fALAlnoyamm L /,amrmrju An %I kuliityBrands Company Sheet #: WST M -S 0 2003 -2010 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 11/25/10 Lithonia Lighting Outdoor Lighting One Lithonia Way, Conyers, GA 30012 Phone: 770-922-9000 Fax: 770-918-1209 www.iithonia.com Emergency Option Lamp CompatibilitV , Lamp Options ( #lam s/wattages) DC12 2DC12 OC2012 200012 EC ELED 2ELED 35S ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 50S ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 70S ■ IC ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ INS ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 150S ■ ■ ■ ■ t 50M ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 70M ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ loom ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Isom ■ 0) ■ Ei E 175M E ■ ■ ■ ■ WST 15OMHC WT LTL11070P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) -2 O -1 w x O 0 0 5 2 1 1E LL 0.25 O 2P z 3? w O 2 4F N 0 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 15OW pulse start metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp orientation Footcandle values based on 12' mounting height, 14000 rated lumens. Luminaire Efficiency: 62.5% fALAlnoyamm L /,amrmrju An %I kuliityBrands Company Sheet #: WST M -S 0 2003 -2010 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 11/25/10 Lithonia Lighting Outdoor Lighting One Lithonia Way, Conyers, GA 30012 Phone: 770-922-9000 Fax: 770-918-1209 www.iithonia.com C EMERGI -LITE CA TALOG NOTES: — �L 1 " Standard Features • Die -Cast aluminum housing, available in four finishes: dark bronze, off- white, black, and platinum gray • Nema -3R rated for indoor /outdoors wet and damp locations: 0 -40 °C (32- 104 °F) • Wall -mount installation on various junction boxes or via rigid conduit • Patent - pending design for easy installation: wall -mount back -plate includes electrical wire box with snap -on connector • Clear polycarbonate lens of reduced size (3" x 1,5 "), shock - absorbent and UV- resistant • Battery: environmentally friendly high- temperature rated, Nickel -Metal Hydride technology • Power consumption in stand -by: less than 5W • Optional: Self -test and diagnostic functions, operated by micro - controller • UL listed to the UL924 standard for wet and Damp locations • 5 -year limited warranty Options • Cold- weather: - 40 °F / -40 0 C • Forward -throw light distribution, for applications of outdoor exit discharge (OSHA 1910.36) • High -lumen output: 25 to 50% additional level of illumination • Dual -mode operation: normal lighting and/or emergency lighting with separate AC inputs • Photo - switch: dusk -to -dawn control of normal lighting • Remote test: infrared remote control (keyboard ordered separately) • Time delay: 5,10,15 minutes Outline and Dimensions Dimen are approximate and subject to change. Lux-Ray Till LED Series Die -Cast aluminum LED Emergency Lighting Interior or Exterior Capable Nickel -Metal Hydride battery nYL NEMAM Suggested Specification Supply and install the Lux -Ray LED Series of emergency lighting unit from EMERGI -LITE°. The unit body shall include a back -plate and housing made of Die -Cast Aluminum with paint Finish color: and a UV- and impact- resistant polycarbonate lens of reduced size: 3" X 1.5 ". The back -plate shall have knockouts for wires and wall - mount installation box as well as a threaded hole for rigid conduit entry at the top of the unit. The back -plate shall have a built -in electrical box with wire terminals and snap -on connector. After complete electrical installation of the back -plate the equipment housing shall be installed by a simple push & snap over the back- plate. The emergency lights shall be 4 Power - Light- Emitting Diodes (LED) with operational life of minimum 36,000 hours, until 70% of the initial light level (reported L70). The LED lamps shall have redundant interconnections: eventual failure of one lamp shall allow other LED lamps to function. The unit shall have a dual - voltage input rated: 120/277VAC, 60Hz. The battery charger shall include low voltage disconnect to prevent deep discharge, battery lockout to prevent battery drain prior to energizing the utility power, and brownout protection which will automatically switch unit into emergency mode if the utility power falls below 80% of nominal level. The unit with Nickel -Metal Hydride battery shall be equipped with a micro - controller -based non- audible Advanced Diagnostic circuit. The unit shall self -test for one minute every month, 30 minutes every six months and 90 minutes annually. The pilot light shall be integrated with the test button; it shall be a bi -color LED and shall change color from normal green to flashing red when a failure is detected from the battery, charger circuit or lamps, A label located inside the unit near the test button shall describe the diagnostic for each flashing code. When specified, models with dual -mode illumination shall include two separate AC input circuits: for emergency lighting and for normal lighting. When specified, models equipped with photo- switch shall automatically activate the lights only from dusk till dawn, for additional energy savings. The typical ambient illumination for the photo- switch shall be: one foot - candle (to turn-on) and three foot - candles (to turn- off). The unit shall be UL listed to the UL924 Standard for wet and damp locations. The unit shall be EMERGI -LITE® model: A Member of the A88 Group All IMormation and specifications contained In this specsheet are subject to change due to engineer design, errors and omissions. Illustrations and diagrams within this specsheet may vary from actual products. 20130 Thomas & Betts Lim had. All rights reserved. Order no. ELUSA- LUXRAYLEO- SPECSHEET Power Consumption Chart AC Specs:120/277VAC Model Type - Normal lighting Emergency fighting 6 -12VOC remote Current (max) Power (max) Current (max) Power (max) Power (max) AC, 2AC, ACDC, DC 0.12/0.08A 12W 0.11/0,08A 12W 8W AC, 2AC, ACDC, DC, -H 0.18/0.11A 18W 0.18/0.11A 18W 14W ACSD, SO, SD -H 0.12/0.06A 12W 0,05/0.02A 5W Nickel -Metal Hydride battery SD -CW - 0.15/0.07A 16W ACSD -CW, -CWRC n/r` 0.22/0.10A 24W Note: Only unswitched AC input; normal lighting with photo - swltch or remote control Photometry Performance Whether installed indoors or outdoors, with spacing measurements for a single unit or between two units center -to- center, the Lux -Raf m LED Series delivers a stable and consistent illumination making it easy to specify In a wide range of applications. The outstanding spacing of illumination ranges from 50 to 70 feet for standard units (wide beam) and from 40 to 50 feet with the forward -throw beam option. Average of 1 foot - candle Table A: Spacing for NFPA101 (average =1fc, see Note) Model Type Mouting Height Width X Lenght (Ft) Single Unit CenMr-to- Center Standard 9' 6' X 50' 6'X 50' With option -H 11' 6' X 60' 6'X60' 3' X 70' With option -FT 12' 6'X 40' 15' With option -FTH 15' 6' X 50' — Indoor reflectance: 60150/20 and 10-ft wide corridor. Outdoor retleclance: 013W10 Note: The illumination level meets ALL the requirements of the Life Safety Code (NFPA 101): 1) Average of 1 foot - candle or more 2) Minimum at any point of 0.1 foot- candle or more 3) Maximum -to- minimum Illumination uniformity ratio of 40:1 or lase How to Order Battery Unit Minimum of 1 foot - candle Table B: Spacing for minimum illuminationse It Model type Mouting Height Width X lenght (Ft) Single Unit Center -to- Center Standard 9' 4'x 28' 4' x 32' With option -H 11' 4'x 32' 4' x 40' With option -FT 12' 4' x 22' With option -FTH 15' 4' x 27' — Max. /min. uniformity ratio less than 3:1 1 •1r Color Series Model Options B= Black LUX= Lux -Ray' LED SD= Self - Powered & diagnostic -CW= Cold weather (- 40...30 °C / -40.., 86 *9; N/A with option -M BZ= Dark bronze (0... 50 °C/32... 122 °F) -D1= Time delay: 5 minutes, -111112= Time delay: 10 minutes, -03= Time delay: 15 minutes OW= Off -white ACSD= Dual -mode AC / -FT= Forward throw lighting PG= Platinum gray Self- Powered (0... 40eC/ -H= High lumen output (max. 30 °C/86 °F; model SD only) 32... 122 °F) -P= Photo - switch, normal lighting (ACSD only) -RC= Remote control - infrared' ' Remote control keypad (TB- RCI -E) ordered separately EXAMPLE: BZLUXACSD -RC Remote Fixture Color Series Model(-40 +50 °c.-- 40...122 "F) Options B= Black LUX= Lux -RayT' LED AC= AC -only -FT= Forward throw lighting BZ= Dark bronze ACDC= AC/6 -12VDC remote -H= High lumen output (- 40...30 °C / -40... 86'0 OW= Off -white DC= 6 -12VDC remote fixture -P= Photo - switch, normal lighting (AC. ACDC only) PG= Platinum gray 2AC= AC -only two circuits: 120 /120 or 277/277V -RC= Remote control - infrared' (AC, ACDC only) ' Remote control keypad (rB- RC1 -E) ordered separately EXAMPLE: BZLUXDC -FTH T/10was smef s A Member of the ABS Group All Information and specifications contained In this specsheet are subject to change due to engineer design, errors and omissions. Illustrations and diagrams within this specsheet may vary fmm actual products. 20130 Thomas & Betts Limited. All rights reserved. Order no. ELUSA- LUXRAYLED- SPECSHEET LUMIEREO DESCRIPTION Westwood 715 and 715 -2 are ultra - compact wall fixtures for use with PAR30 metal halide lamps. Both models are provided with a remote ballast/housing assembly and are suitable for use with 120, 208, 240, 277 or 347V line voltage (specify). Model 715 provides downlight or uplight by way of the 180° rotational fixture head. Model 715 -2 provides combination uplight and downlight Various lenses, louvers and color or dichroic filters can be combined - up to three at once - to create multiple lighting effects. Lumibre's exclusive Siphon Protection System (S.P.S.) prevents water from siphoning into the fixture through its own lead wires. SPECIFICATION FEATURES 41 A ... Material Housing and hood are precision - machined from corrosion - resistant 6061 -T6 aluminum billet. Mounting canopy is constructed from corrosion - resistant silicone aluminum. B ... Finish Fixtures are double protected by a chromate conversion undercoating and polyester powdercoat paint finish, surpassing the rigorous demands of the outdoor environment. A variety of standard colors are available. C ... Hood Hood is removable for easy relamping and accepts up to three internal accessories at once (lenses, louvers, filters) to achieve multiple lighting effects. The flush lens design sheds water and minimizes debris collection on the uplight position. D ... Gasket Housing and hood are sealed with a high temperature silicone o -ring gasket to prevent water intrusion. E ... Lens Tempered glass lens, factory sealed with high temperature adhesive to prevent water intrusion and breakage due to thermal shock. F ... Mounting & Adjustabllity Both models mount over a standard 4" J -box and connect to a remote metal halide ballaaVhousing assembly (provided). Model 715 provides downlight or uplight by way of the 180' rotational fixture head. Model 715 -2 provides combination uplight and downlight. Lumibre's exclusive Siphon Protection System (S.P.S.) prevents water from siphoning into the fixture through its own lead wires. G ... Hardware Stainless steel hardware is standard to provide maximum corrosion - resistance. H ... Socket Ceramic socket with 250° C Teflon® coated lead wires and medium base. I ... Ballast Remote core & coil ballast is standard (120/208/240/277/347V). Maximum remote mounting distance for a core & coil ballast is 50'. Remote electronic ballast (120/277V) is available as an option by adding the prefix "EL" to the ballast/mounting code. Maximum remote mounting distance for an electronic ballast depends upon the ballast manufacturer and may require the use of special low capacitance wire, separate conduit runs for lead wires, or other special installation requirements. See ballast manufacturer's Installation instructions or contact the factory for remote mounting distance and installation requirements. J ... Lamp Not included. Available from Lumibre as an accessory - see reverse side of this page. K ... Labels & Approvals UL and cUL listed, standard wet label. IP65 rated. Manufactured to ISO 9001 -2000 Quality Systems Standard. IBEW union made. L ... Warranty Lumibre warrants its fixtures against defects in materials & workmanship for three (3) years. Auxiliary equipment such as transformers, ballasts and lamps carry the original manufacturer's warranty. 7 04 -1/2" [114mml 9- 13/16' ::: —1 [249mml p4 -1/2' [114mm) 6- 13/16' 073mm1 Westwood 715 70W (max.) PAR30 Metal Halide WESTWOOD 41011119111. Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ' ADLO32483 www.cooperlighting.com Consult your reprewMethm for eddilionsl options end finishes. 07/09/2009 12:11:33 PM 715 715 -a 14-114' 04-1/2' [362mmi 1114m Ml J g4 -1/2' 1114mmJ 6- 13/16` [173mml Westwood 715-2 70W (max.) PAR30 Metal Halide WESTWOOD 41011119111. Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ' ADLO32483 www.cooperlighting.com Consult your reprewMethm for eddilionsl options end finishes. 07/09/2009 12:11:33 PM 715 715 -a PHOTOMETRIC DATA WESTWOOD 715/715 -2 Westwood 715/715 -2 Lamp= CDM70PAR30UM /SP (M98) CBCP = 48,000 Westwood 715/715,2 Lamp= CDM39PAR30USP (M 130KL -39) CBCP = 42,000 Cone of Light Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Illuminated Plane Footcandles Diameter Westwood 715/715 -2 Lamp= CDM70PAR30UM /FL (M98) CBCP =7000 Westwood 715/715 -2 Lamp= CDM39PAR30UFL (M130KL -39) CBCP=6500 Cone of Light Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Illuminated Plane Footcandles Diameter LAMP INFORMATION Lamp ANSI Code Watts Beam Spread CBCP OK Life (hrs.) Base Volts CDM70PAR30UM /SP M98 70 10e 48,000 3000 6000 medium 120 -347 CDM70PAR30UM /FL M98 70 30 7000 3000 6000 medium 120 -347 CDM39PAR30USP M130KL -39 39 10e 42,000 3000 9000 medium 120 -347 CDM39PAR30UFL M130KL -39 39 30 6500 3000 9000 medium 120 -347 NOTE. Inferior quality lamps may adversely affect the performance of this product. Use only name brand lamps from reputable lamp manufacturers. NOTES AND FORMULAS Beam diameter is to 50% of maximum footcandles, rounded to the nearest half -foot. • Footcandle values are initial. Apply appropriate light loss factors where necessary. Bare lamp data shown. Consult lamp manufacturers to obtain detailed specifications for their lamps. ORDERING INFORMATION Swiss Source Vohsge Finish Aeeesw►laa 715 =PAR30 Metal Halide Up/Down Metal Heil, 120 =120V Painted gh� Westwood Wall FixWre MH39PAR70 =39W Metal Halide 277 =277V OK-Black F7140 =Peach Dldrrdc Fiter, 3.95" Dia PAR30, Medium Base F Head Ouarltl 208 =20I3V BZ =Bronze F724d =Amber Dichrolo Filler, 3. %' Din tv MH70PAR70=70W Metal Halide Lamp Head+ PAR30, Medium Base 240 =240V °City Silver F7340 =men Dirlu DFilter, 3.% "Die Lamp HeadSa 747 -347V VE =Verde A440= Medium Blue D'idtrolo Finer, 3. %• Die =Whhe F75-3oc:Yshow Didtrde Filter, 3.%• Die F7949=Rod Diahroic Filter, 3.95 Die Notes; 1 Includes one remote HID ballast end housing (WR style). F7740=13ark Blue Dlchrdo Firer, 3.95' Die 2 Includes two remote HID bellaeo and housings (WR style). • F76-I0=Light Blue ddndc Finer, 3. %• Die Lamp not Included, • Consult your Cooper Lighting reprenmetiw for additional options and finiehea. F79.30= Neutral Density Dlrhrolc Filter, 3.95" Die Fe04o= Magenta DI :hrdc Filler, 3.%" Din F2240- Red Color Filler, 3.95" Dla F3340- Blue Color Filter, 3.95' Die F4440- Green Color Fier, 3.95' Dla Fa540= Yellow Color Filer, 3.95' Die Fse4o= Mercury Vapor Col Floor. 3.95" Die Dgtlrul Looses LSL40- Linear Spread Lem (elongate standard beam spread), 3.9T 'DJs os"o= Overall Spread Lem (increase beam spread), 3. 91' Die DIFdo- Dlaused Lens (provide even illumination), 3.95" Die Outland Lower LVR -30- Hex Cell Louver (reduce glare), 3.W' Dla Lem" atHP3o7a3R 70W PAR30 Motel Halide Spot Mlrp2a7o.FL= 70W PAR30 Metal Halide Flood COA Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADLOS2483 www.cooperlighting.corn Lumlers • Customer First Center a 1121 Highway 74 south • Peachtree City, GA 80M • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.488.4801 07/09/200912:11:33 PM Cone of Light Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Illuminated Plane Footcandles Diameter Cone of Light Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Illuminated Plane Footcandles Diameter 8301 -04 -page 1 of 1 Job Name: S po ea Gull 11'ghting, Comments: life 111to iinated I Since 1911) 8301 -04: Single -Light Outdoor Wall Lantern One Light Exterior Fixture with Satin Cast Aluminum Finish and White Polycarbonate Diffuser. Satin finish over cast aluminum with white polycarbonate diffuser. UPC #:785652830143 Finish: Satin Aluminum (04) Backplate / Canopy Details: Job Type: Quantity: Dimensions: Type UJ Width: 4 1/2" Extends: 4 3/4" Height: 61/4" Wire: 61 /Y' Mounting Proc.: Center Lock -Up Connection: Mounted To Box Bulbs: 1 - medium A - Line 60w max 120v - Not included Material List: 1 Body - Die Cast Aluminum - Satin Aluminum Safety Listing: UL Listed for Wet Locations Type Height r Length J Width ( Depth Diameter I Outlet Box Up I Outlet Box Down 6 Shipping Information: 41/2 Package Type I Product # Quantity UPC Length Width Height Cube Weight UPS Ship F Individual 8301 -04 1 4785652830143 5 5 8.75 . 0.127 1.15 Yes Master Pack 6 10785652830140 15.5 l l 9 0.888 7.9 Yes M NJ Pallet 480 48 40 69 76.667 632 No a NV Pallet 420 48 40 69 76.667 i 553 No Sea Gul L1gMing reserves the right to revise the design of components of any product due to parts avallablity or change In set ery gating standards without assuming any obligation or lability to modify any products previously manufactured and vdtho nogce. ThIa literature depV • product design that is the sole and as stve popery of Morde Carlo Fen Comperry. n compliance with US copydght and yetent rcquiemenla, notification Is hereby presented In grl. form that this iterature, or the product h depicts not to a copied, altered or used in any manner wgthout the express written cons.. off, or contrary to the beat Intercafa of Sea Gull Lighting —A Generation Brands Company, Shade 1 Glass / Diffuser Details: LUTRO® Specifications All Maestro Controls MAE(STQC6 Wallbox Wiring Devices Provide a minimum ten -year operational life while operating continually at any temperature in an ambient temperature range of 0 °C (32 °F) to 40 °C (104 °F) and 90% non - condensing relative humidity Operate at the rated capacity across the full ambient temperature range including modified capacities for ganging configurations which require the removal of fins • Utilize an easily recognizable air gap off, activated when user selects "off" at any control to disconnect the load from line supply eliminating any leakage current • Possess power failure memory such that if power is interrupted and subsequently returned, lights will automatically return to the same levels prior to power interruption for a minimum period of 10 -years • Designed and tested to withstand electrostatic discharges up to 16,000 V without impairment per IEC 801 -2 • Designed and tested to withstand line -side surges without impairment to performance when subjected to surges of 6,000 - volts, 200 -amps per ANSI / IEEE C62.41 C Ensure a precise color match between all plastic parts such that color variation does not exceed a delta E of 1.0 as defined in ASTM E 308 -99 Exhibit ultraviolet stability on all visible parts when tested with multiple actinic light sources as defined in ASTM D4674 -89 Capture all actuators internally to the control Fit a decorator wall plate opening Fit a standard 2 in wide electrical back -box in both single -gang and multi -gang applications Undergo full - function and safety testing during manufacturing end -of -line • Supported by Lutron Electronics technical support center 24 -hours a day, 7 -days a week Maestro Dimmers • Provide full- range, smooth and continuously variable control of light intensity Provide frequency compensation to minimize the effects of changing line frequencies Contain FIR suppression circuitry designed to reduce interference with radio, audio, and video equipment Provide a minimum high -end of 92% of line voltage for incandescent and magnetic low- voltage loads. For magnetic low- voltage dimmers, contain circuitry specifically designed to control and provide a symmetrical AC waveform to the input of magnetic low voltage transformers per UL1472 section 5.11 • Provide a minimum high -end of 95% of line voltage for electronic low- voltage loads For electronic low- voltage dimmers, contain circuitry specifically designed to provide reverse phase control to the input of electronic low voltage transformers For electronic low- voltage dimmers, contain overload protection that automatically shuts off when dimmer capacity is exceeded • For incandescent, magnetic low- voltage and electronic low- voltage dimmers, provide a programming mode for setting preset light levels and adjusting the on /off fade rates Maestro Fan Speed Controls and Fan / Light Controls Provide multi - location dimming from up to 3 locations Provide 7- speeds plus "off" for standard, 1 -Amp, 3 -speed paddle fans Provide a canopy module for each fan location being controlled Maestro Timer Switches • Provide a maximum 60 min countdown timer • Provide the ability to override the countdown timer • Provide a programming mode for disabling the countdown timer override and setting a preset countdown time • Provide a minimum of 98% of line- voltage for all approved loads 0111LUTHOM SPECIFICATION SUBMITTAL P/N 369 -114 Rev. B Page 1 Job Name: Location / Description: Job Number: 62nd Avenue Directional S ign - OVA, Vim= m 7 E r�' R �F R Y �, land�cap� hal $� $' Fence @ Test an South Property L ine } � a r 14 o y r � 3 h � O WTOP - MOM 11-m STORM DRAIN PARKING LOT STORM TECH TYPE DARK SKY WATER SYSTEM COMPLIANT SITE LIGHTING AN I•LOCR 3R FLOOR 2,',) FLOOR 1 ST FLOOR GARAGE M ABBREVIATIONS HATCH KEY AC AWCmO=m aw am am ® MTN ACOIET ACOUMOOETNL WHORE RC SHU ACT M mTBE NC HOLUMOWE RU NNENSNBNOROS11 AN ANER HDwdb RHWN0. NNBIA ®RIMAAANRL NF FIOQI am ME MEROITE MT MTRNATE IWHmOWPETM HOE NORMAL BM BLgOINOHIEM NO LFMAll WR OBYPRNom MIN mm RRHOIIR NR SMAUNARN FEBEMACIa E] EFNO M AMEUFMIL Hr RNR WE SPEBFmON ARCH IAC ffMRAL HNC XONNAY m WYRE IBM AVW 0 OENTOUTOMArEM YEANCEBIN O CONCIEIE AVE ASK H RCN Tell BWBIEAlIB01N" mmewimmm in BOOM BO NANNBAAI� �COMAEIFNABORYCM WE mw immus 10 ICMFAE NO BfmR1TA'LN It 61W ITO BrMONC WBOVABRIFACBRRG6rOE El BAT BMW ml MWEANNUOIDN SR BEL ROB BLEND BR RRROR STN ; NR BRNo RBI_ ® AMENBL U ROCK RRa RAmO NVmm AW Am IW SPRIY1001RE RWE BOULM M Mm RBR DFLOOR ®BIFFA RENMIBNNNNN jr awr BNIF SPUR) NOT BUM DO MOON 'IT DO KNOCK= Be RAFMEOTOIRM ®ARAIIYlOm RB MARYN in am T 1RFA0 IGQ'E �WDmOOCWIBmNW RR BRCH DOW WIDENT L L NI W IANOMTORY IN 7MIB R mm RWW BBWEM LN UDORUM VNINAR 7C TOP OF= ® RYWOm CAB CNRr m CATONBWN IAT IAAUOE OW IAYAM SON solilL TEL SLUM ®IARMRLM IIN0..10 Cal CaEM ILSBS PO1INNWOROS M 1RBRM ® WOOD MCOREAOLYR m LOAD TEN mm CP OASTRmPRE Lm nom mu mom EY GI COMIAOLiIIT 191BR1N 7BNOIIALL OL CENTBN N NffTHAM UBLBWRY RmN THOU TN RRI 7AMM ®UMORQRAWOTBA 0A cum OM cum ON LRORN TOMPOP... OLD am UMY IAUNAY TN TOWPMBINONRI (IRNAWRNwSLWMI•la'.1'4BIILIA O vmR LLm da OoE� TV MEMON CDOmm LR NMOROX LWWOFWRL SYMBOLS KEY C0. WEEK LT off TVP 7m A DOW MIM710n In ROABIE 0.mB11FRIM mm DOW GWONPON CVHO IE ND mmm Wa IAATRWL IBO IIIBF8ANa7mOTIEMB YAR VNAY CONTCmRRi m LWB MARION VBVAPmMARNNNELBAR C AIm B BEYATIm mM OBOWWB mMRCmTRACIOR lCUSCIRmRET LEm KNNWIGL YN SEER ERR VmTDR DOW OOROATM NEAR NNMNLE VER VERICM CON COAROW m AMOFWRVN VW VEMLE C CT CAM lm MARK vmwd LW QWNRRO Na AWEFACAR® Ym WNILRBLCOWIEO VETAL � Q �RNCfIE Y m UYLROOOAiPTU 1 9 OINOFmT RN WHIN W WEllwill I � CIER OHCRm RR AWROR NWW � / r \ cum CINOWM ASLiEEMEOm WD W AIRC dmTSN RO wWOOD CLOOEI CO DONE NO NNEANATOPNNB BO D ETA T mm" W W R7ARXR CET NL W ACIB REYA7GN V W CA CaLENR1 UAL ASNUON OR WA7RIRWBTAN Oµ0 ONmM N WRN AWWFAIERIFIR DID ODEMON RC IBNRCONINL7 WSQ WAAAmOIB IDONpN�CHVOE DN DON ON ROON II m NWF �IMPFARC Q I �1,NIOBIFCTB OPPf CMrRNOOP NB NNOTTOKU VOVMO NPPL WM M MFRDXM CA OYRWL 011mc BI6 m DMVN R DO ON®AER m DRAWTHAM OF M NIB ORAVOW aF OFF= R DM DONOR mmmum HOST 0 m TA EMW OB OvRR BOB QLSBLRN8T W pie PRmBCMVE ^ NImIORROBIRR " EL N 82 DU,ABIEWAL K�F P E TYTVPE ELEV SEXPOR Am WHANTLOFme" MR 9WNRA 0 PE BEER RPIN_ CeT AQIINMEIWRER mM RRP FERPONDEAAR mLIIP WRNN Pl. FLO A BIN ESINAh FLW PA TIMM (OI ENEAQIWAY 0. PIAIF ON MERIMPE EYC R&7ACWWACORER FLAG ?MR Nn ORALEIAER P. SEEM RAR PWAWING - BC E ME PLYIm PLYWOOD FAN mw REP FORM HfJr EAWNONJOf PQ KUM II mum ET EDBW FOOD POZA F70F RYQTumm IBF PQIOIPERSmN SDDY FN POOR PRPUMPERUNOICH RRA17gNIWORPONT PC FLOOR MAN AN FOLRIM FT PAWMNr FO PAPRATCWaCIPRE R N 0 RNREINOPNN FN Pm m FE RRERNNRAREA PREFAB NFARIICATm NORONARARY F FRINFAM RMFARNIB7 N ROME PIOF FPAPw FO "m RS AT WAD cmawqvAwm FNRA NRE� URE OTAY11E OT mAR R RO Ow amm HOO'ME0. FIRM RAM 0 B AODINBW RIBN RLOR6CBIN RS F RIWN04WIpB FAFRERWmR P ON FNOOF RB RFS NILBIICH0 IAEOLIIE PO FIREPROOF FIREPROOF RO R E B E FR FAME F RERCON ROY AINBERCQPO6Bm F R RC mm FAmBREBM R A REP miFACIE N ORAtBµl01R FEN RAMOFNWBW RED RED FT FDOTAUT REF RRNBNNCE F% Rum FOR) IIFFIRMITOR AIR RUN PER, AIRRARMEMIS POOR RRRNO R ENIED IEIFORCBE O E M iiVnRaD1ENRm FROM REWNA1Q00 OA MR RR RM aM DOWN PH ROEHOMMfr YE AV ®ALWBRD Rra R M BAR BANGS W RO W m BRNWN RORWNOPMW µ7m CAWMTML o a ORNINALOONRMH RDFm`1SWP FORD FDWnm OBL ®Am RR OANWATmIFW R. OLASURA R S Up 11 PM aNOTAN WON 00MINFNT BAR BAMARF A!'m BMmNI" RW BMIONPEAAEMIE an ORWE DO am ME NE mIO mR SCHEDOM I N WMAD RITE BRITM mSOAROBN m OAEA MD SUP BOIPO BYP SIPHON am ROOM sm 1p IEIOUONmR IEINRRNRN 4 W NOR. XMAIII AERIAL Compass Pointe 6113 West Broadway New Hope, MN ARTISTIC RENDERING ___ _ Cit o f B Pa rk T 62ND - - AVENUE NORTH City of New Hope ..� r _... —...— - Ed�Bgftn*tobe WNW - �- -T.-.— .- —.• � Existing Parking F I WI T j W C N I m t c r; f � F 0, 7 I c � 1, ' ,• I X 11, ...... ..... ........... ,.,..... ......, ....,,.............. `x25 ft Sml6ory Swnr Eaeemeat r pea Na Sp7eeQ1 ,'' ------ FeIe1Mq to M removed ,• CoordhiaN wM pft worm *4 yith m oexr eerft neednp nmoed- a - - - - -- All Existing buildings, I .; Parking, sidewalks, trees and fences to be removed =- -- - - -_.- A 1 � ' o M � T 10 111L;;1 1 1 f 3 % Son" sewn W nmt off ' ; W ft 91 s2 57 - - -r.. ° i I ) M 1 Oroliape .iiEley EWMt per plat of kw6H1S -o, f I I N _ it � _ ___________ ____ N � ____ ______ - -r 257.7515052� r � 2 I00 N89 0 W F - � 1 IL I I ICI J _ I 11 III � I I -•� �;��,,,; �, I Il t_ _ _ � I II � � I � I I I 61ST AVENUE LEGEND = Egsting Concrete --sT —= Storm Sewer ° --u_. - ..._ NORTH i r 1� I IJUL BI SMPTION : 001, Mort - Campion Helplae, Hennepin County, M NNW. Tomenepmp" _M.. I II I I J I 1` ♦ �_LW--- 11i- �`- - - - =�J i1'. -+. i.a_�SJ�CiL LL�s._ -_ - =T�� .. Sru L!4id�a�•� — -- ��ti�t�� - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I City of Brooklyn Park , um 62ND 62ND AVENUE NORTH City of New Hope Nnr 9dwdk s T. a Cp i.a � W-% Wk M A rn6CA b M0 9hRL R H DdmOOId ' _ ,_ p Il;oeehuduetkn �i d n . sr` � a^ �_' _� +� -W.r _T i.S'.- -T� : . ' -�,t�y ,; - `_'�« pyp�p� --.n !rrYa��' 1 W�TIYAm1R" i '.. \� ' LJ�S'aJr L.a.�-- ,� - - -� — �'ILi_ —rte_' J�•.i�S��' �f�li r� _ h Y.�1 • _ -------------------- ..- .----- - - --'— —"� �� � 'I — wftd — y{ I �� 88 Unit Apartment Building ft " r W/ Underground Parking 'a . T - -- FFE = 881.0 I I I g 6A � h Wd � 1 r' X1&4 Carhud nw � uc d I I IV NMI rntra� 84 l j odr kM i N p I I — 4 • T �0 U. Nia PAN M W - - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- - fL �' q F7 r ► I I � I I III I I I���'' %�'�,•`, I II I -"� I �� I I I I IL 61ST AVENUE 7 - - - - - - - - - - -� NORTH i � •I i� 11 � y A ' f I,, Aye �r i City of Brooklyn Park n _ 62ND _ AVENUE NORTH City of New Hope 45 0.00 S8991WE — — ...................................................................... ............................... per Daa No. UM UM EAIrAMIt- -aa�r. I GIDW 61ST AVENUE N ORTH 'ti 1'1 1 I m I LOT 168 N BLOCK I � $rlivy ���• ; p� Pr z 11 11?I IT M N I L. V 1 r I S• UUlty�axlnent 1 DiaYlap° Utrq Em no pr plot of Mdi -WON HEON19 -e, u m 1 - -- - - -- I - - -� -- -- +� -- - ----- -i--I- I 257,75 S83 °52'S8"W I 20500 N8911'221 I O ID I� / 61ST AVENUE N ORTH 'ti 1'1 1 I - — � ,--- �! R::,, .• �, ; ' �,,",---,-; �; n�', ��- az ...�'•�- T!- •ay.,�,,1:?F- :.�•;T- r�r ^^: �r , �;: - � ^Te- 7-� I ' \ L_ . - L' .i�_'•'!'_�s S- �.�___'_'_P��.i_ •_.x_�� '��4: L' LL ' - _ - _ r•i� . — - - - -- ----- - - - - -Y �� �1— BTifI�yT Stl MS City of Brooklyn Park 62ND AVENUE NORTH � City of New Hope � wS111H 7 °l wF-- T'"T,..�'j^ ■ Tea., ^`, — y-t" T . i '�'-T -4=_� �_, ��;, /�' — _� hB89 6 ' 1 HDp46'_1Z r HDPE'"' �Aa-12' HDPE� 55' -12" HDP • y A0; 8 10 H !a _. eoa •_ -- 90M __ -- easlr __ oa It ° ioa O8 8 OB 5 a8 4 08 3 CB 2 12t 1 I u F+B71.3 I-87a2 I -A7a1 1.8719 I•B725 I�730 I MI I II IL _ I -esa3 WATER LIFT STATION r SANITARY Building — n k 68 Unit A artment SEW SI Il 1 WITH BATTERY BACKUP p 9 IMe60.05 I I S T =8720 W/ Underground Parking S. amuT 1 =865.0 FE = 881.0 _ e TRENpi DRAIN 2 -A' waTER SER4KS I a I II 4 G =870.0 2-8' GATE VALVE �_ .I -eat f 1 =868.5 CB 12 I I _ _ ae7aa 1.871.5 I I IN EM I 11.5' -18' HOPE �' j t / T -8 011x10 I ■ rll�h 1 ■81 I MH 17 S'IVH 18 158 tlg -t� 1.81 I / IT7 I •eA AA ' Tt I- ' 0121�5fiHE m L_ W-111 HDPE 0 0.5% 1.887. L 1 -12° WE 20S' -12' NDPE ^ � I I - -- 017 -4% 0 2 I -1 0 r 1 ' G -875.0 I - - - - - -- - - ---------- - - - - -- 5' -12' NAPE S1MH 14 - l -- ■ 1 871,5 i C8 10 r 01111 -1 U i 0104 �I II.M2 I I K 888 a( I P - 5' 1 U �L D L i I I� � i I ►� I 1, -��� �� � 9195' m 11.5' 158.4 !'! ... SWH 16 r --------- j i FD09I ONE PIECE PK SCH, 40 OENDUTIWER f E10OG BINlNNowac 1ETE CURB so AND BOX WATER SERWCE TYPE N CORN FORD1YPEAISINGIf LOCRIN LID CASTE AS MRS IAS "mW CURB ON AND CIEANOUT Mid m Ks..ifww PRMaMN IN DRIVEWAY � ruaraa CITY OF NEW HOPE, MN SER-8 3 r° Cowell DA r oncrtm N ee B' Soo (M. %m mlem il; � b CAIf• PI" M c e ul — pr. I'd '. -d b 1 >Qerogota doss (me soccM ol,'e* SECTION 1 �� 1:o $Nie ( tl Cr.xrele ft eel — fi' Clue: 5 hk"eerer"d„: 'nr k0 menl °epnim jm A �a L;er of C. Famr .m luirl� Y°'dbP 0.1 l -- r- SEC 104 A -A y .:r TOM! i ' e . THR 96'P ^?: S FORD 79 Al SNGIE LOC= LIDCASIIMGASSPECIM VANS IDNGTURN TYn4D r' NOTE! E"ELONGSWOPBEND ORCDMBDDITDNWYEN GONOIETE ASWA. L E ICAE PK WIE IN CONCRETE MIN. 43QI.YOS. y SgwrcwypPMs A QTfwNMphadmild p edeeDxemp �. beyePivIrmi hR'4DH ���* � � f DNKOhkWhnlolPBPe Of LIPmNd egfid, i••'i 1 =311 o � N rsrcd am PLAN A -J ICe,dopeit] f buwal*w Tap CA f f iAgoom 54r WAw Y -C Weis Imo ---- • - ' - - � -- �__ SECTION 8-B DdpeStral .. Gale I ff CageOe rJI yI Mee50:,1 SdmR � f fine Her wgp v* (MNDOT3194) a A gutm SECTILNd A -A Ciss5 NBNMNBId 106 %aww Iln no _,...,..._. Quarryor*ad alW PVT 313 , PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAU 11 CITY OF NEW HOPE, MN j MUNEANIDNIAIE MEE RNM EDWITHCORBNLETBOR AND M. FRONFFA E NID 4' 119 MNI OPENING l POLY LE EG IHDPEIADIDS1FffNFRNIfS ( )ADJU 1 . CATCH MO STR MIE WITH TOPMOIXTICR, , , NEENAH 0.164111 MANHOLE RAMS WOVEN MEN FABRIC I ANDCOYER, HO DUMFOLYETME pPE)ADNBMI9TTRIHB e nk#,— M rantmens ve e MOT 96 -12 NOTE ®PIDa 0 4 Bar As Shown wham Di anaeB UmNy Tmd% wwh 1 -1! CoNr. r vm 6 AOOq SUBM 6-I I D(TUY �iNOUS DRNEFly 1 � 1 � 1 + 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 i � 1 e i 111 111 111 Fl■S N�Irn;i;� EPOSTNG NON BLIININW5 l EWSCNDROADWAY ` EIl6TDIG RAW CURB B 6UPIf!! � I i CONCRETE CURD DET _ Cit o City r 4��ih l� A 7�1 r I I III I I pay m MC I . Ir aliaw ' L I,•au r RE = E , a Y '" ory 6 1i4 f` qrM a r�.wi«'a r1�1 YiY I`d rr rw mr � 1. ■rM �y xy Mtt11A aMi4a� rarlrw �wtma � Ip'�'mIs"rs� � 1�'r I weit" r Nrw� r*+M Wo�llwaa IawNwtrw a ,rl md ddd r� YWws� -, M17 SILF • � wda•md °' � MYra li hYM �rY� Ye �r� �r�r w�YtYM •, �Tiiti d��r`!pN �r�[rlr w' �M�i6��1Y loi MY �4r r M�'M � �1F r rh IY r -2 low T'S oau rmrool RN w. °Armor r- d 1 rmdNA wmt mawk ti YFMi 1�MAlp ►r__� YWffi AWPWlwMAMl.11lf WIY wpM MIL Erb NOW YNR Pm rtmm Q . rrPOmnlrm ANm A mlmrlm. L� ENAwmtlr _, wurrmm m�11M1mY Q fh m0 YtlmelmN, YR mY6 ■ NQYN A Te1PmMT M!lIPIITAMA! NAMI MIN OflIET PP m�l-0I �� ttlmtrmmie � snuo ms xrx 1 . A. rmar r arp11 IW Y amar rNL & 1&F W &mPmA= IVA MNI VAN PPE WW — / l li P-i nor Safi aarlymmF P-2 X 11 mr bIV. ipir �rIN�1�A rrrwM�n N r d rWAl erfl �mmlyw�Y!rrM�r a d ir�ll�w 1 � rr m" NIIIYi r r�l lAr rMlrL dm r ■r x1111 kAL Lmm f I /J PUM IV g mNamYmrmmm w =mlmm mmm& U u AIrmlNmrrArr — r U� o amummom 9am1&la U U IMLEMPL= U W R U msY�mN wmmw Nmr m>t uymr mN net mmmsml.pas molm�rllmArlssomNc yNemfemimglRNm �TOmIaYYINNAl1i/AAIMMLrBRIF T T 1 ( llI. IWM MR May mRLOAm mrl m - Q me IA Nm nm�QN Nammr d i A HAMAIM MEIANI MEIEM ( (N,rm d I Itar � dY" .OWPAal"W Pik & !LT Ra MW MEt11 '� m YNr mrm ImOlm mII®mY - Ymo mQ ne YYIm YNm YNfd mrlomrt mrYmerl MEff ME�� mNOm E 11 I'll, raBJab9 G4a174 � m WMM INOPmm,, mY�rm umrmel�aum6tmo WR mt UMM Mal mrm rmmrR 16 N m4 AmrYM Am61oIA m IQ.11N mNWM mrlm WTYIrN mApmMY41mYm6lmrWy ► aw m!/m K" mFmN Mlml rnmmm mr ORW Ome mm m6 Irm mmmm mmm NI& MW Ym sojwmwm mm mlmmmImam ms artAmmAQ MIMI N 6L m m I LA mmWOU 10 Qm=MW - 1 mmm rrlm° LMT • NOM 1mEmomm Am MAMM 1 � m11 AmmmA1<A IW mrYmeamN Cllr msxm NmQmmmAm mul ,mme tw aw ry ��r ®� ry ur p �iw� OmYm r As mmr r � taomms mmllmQrml ,m1Ya, mYm trrMm T -d Nell _ Cit o Cfty J ; F L - r' m Li a— 1 - 1 6 YE8 uT I t L LIJ 00 Y I I I r -- —1 -BF I I I I PL ANT SC HEDULE - ENTIRE SITE I !--1 mil �J L y �I :-�. - --- �.� } p i tI k ,JJ IAJ i IYI •'� f l 4 � Ll lkl I ' :� ? , 'j r . _ I _. f W �4 : ! L ; I, L � / 1 � Ir I t1 f yr i i _ I_ I ETA SEE ycil y I I.� DIL , ` V II ;I 11154 � � 1 - :: �P ki, I IV QII I. SL 5 I � SYM OVANT, COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME 8' RT. PSG INSTALL ROOT PER KW. Sr�cS„ P Val -- - - - SYM OVANT, COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT COMMENTS -- - - - DECIDUOUS TREES DECBOUOVSSHRUBS ARM T AUTUMN RADIANCE RED MAPLE Acarll WAMmIladmoe' 23' B&B MIGHT LEADER, FULL FORM OHL 14 SUNBURST HONEY LOCUST GkdEalahlamlhoa'Smcda' 23" B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM pEO I PRINCETON 0TRYGINKGO(MALq GIn4obllobePdncalonSOW 25' BAB MIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM WSB 17 WHTTE$MREBRCH BeOulapapupfo0e Whiapke" 23' B&B STiWGHT LEADER. FULL FORM ORNAMENTALTAEES SSC 2 SPRNGSNOWCRABAPPLE M1143Spdngsmvl IS" SSB STRAIN LEADER. FULL FORM SB S SERVICEBERRY AmdmcNrxgmdlbre'AuWmBrianca 13" BBB STRWGHT LEADER, FULL FORM pg g IVORY SSK LILAC (TREE) aftpredcuhh'laoyS1W 13" B&S STRAIGHT LEW, FULL FORM Nepalarommoa'LINeTRW 01 CONT, GRASSES EVERGREEN TREES 23 KARL FOERSTER GRAN Calalmgroa4exawdbro1WFeemW' 12 I$ J tll^Lana'IFlM1 nyM1O ypeunr -- - - - DECBOUOVSSHRUBS AC 15 ALPINECURREM WN eaNPkaan 45 CONT. DENSEBRANCHING FLW T FRENCH LACEWSGELA Wdpdegoddo"FrenchLace" 15 CONT, DENSE BRANCHING EVERGREEN SHRUB 91 MEDORAJUNPER JunlperuaacopIVeoloro' 05 CONT. FULLFORM EGO 25 EMERALDGREENVMTECEDAR Thu(aocddeMeba'Smaragd" PERENNIALS OBDC 43 DARK BRONZE DAISY CHRYSANTHEMUM ChDmntamum'DrkftmDabT+ H CONT. LSRS 24 LITTLE SPIRE RUSSIAN BASE P ravdd®TIIU eS p r e' 01 CONT. LTC 34 LITTLETLTCHCATMINT Nepalarommoa'LINeTRW 01 CONT, GRASSES KFG 23 KARL FOERSTER GRAN Calalmgroa4exawdbro1WFeemW' 12 CONT. 7/ '*T PRUNEASREL)DREG ARCHRB,TTORIM NORLVL WQ ANTOPOFROO13 SURROLNCNGCAAOE SHREDDED HIM NEEPMILCHTFRDM' THEONNERSREPPRI FJIBTNGGRADE RDOTSATOUTEREDG ENSUREPWIERSUM SLOPE IDES OF HOLE — — E CIELLASPEASPEC plF= 1IF�II�IF= 1IRIla 1HREE1IMESWiTH OONCTEACAVAIEff OFROOMI SHRUB V NTS . ARCANECTTOMPRIN N0R11MTREES m THRffTK49G'NOOI TINDA ROSOFYAR SNALLBEPUCEDATI gETHEEADEDTHRWE TRUNLFLAEMM PLANT THEE P„TADM SNAEDOfO1WO'AOG SWGEAIDEPNlUD1 DEMNBTEYTHEC PROPOSED PLANflN65 DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE AT THISLOCAAON, 6' M P4G \ l I PRIVACY FENCE ROCK MULCH, TP v HEW BIT. PARKING LOT, TYP VEM /�FROPERn A SECTION AT SOUTH P r$ a so° lI s n a l,1 • 6' M PVC PRovZ RAM �� PRIVACY cawrNAR E4ER6REETI sHRLe6 ' AT 11 LOCATION r';� FAST. ROCK MULCH, lYP S� PROW LNE ARI% ENUL APPROX 3' N � RETAINS WALL, TYP { ` r A"� ADJVENT PRDPERIY NEW BIT, PARKING LOT, TYPE B SECTION AT SOUTH PROP. �. P 0 9d PROPO5E0 PLAMIN65 - C\ ly WRIGHT ORNAMENTAL 1 8' M P!C TREE AT THIS LOCATION ;Q( Irq PRIVACY ROOK Hiq LN lYP EAST. ! PROPERTY 0 BIT. PAWN6 LOL TYP� LINE APKENT PROPERTY I � r �r r rr �vrar 7 f 1 1 � y A� 1 ra 1 i 2 BLDG ENTRA DETA L N sRr a laa° �I�I�111�111�I�I�111�I�111�1�11 rfl�l�l�l�ll 3 NOR i WALK C TYP, S, I� caNC. wxr, ttP. EX1ER1� ` AIM,. TYP, 5� BASKEIBAU.'kET', PREPARE LAYOUT POR OWM APPROVAL PRIOR TO PAINTING FENCE OF91N6, NO 6ATEREdIIRED N 6005E NECK FffiT AFm- HVY OIM BASKEII�I 1 , � BALK DM I HOOP, LAYOUT AND FOOIN6 PER MAAIF.5FEC5, � . 62ND AVENUE sbft --------------------------------------------- / \ = nni P A77fP I 8� • 1'•Q V Sol i5 Bui Fkndmr Ekwtlo 1 sir. r•o� EIAWICII • Ekvdlm 3 r 3w.17 AurruP g mF5 1C1811WM >nI -To ao AV Ampimm ML NnL�eow ma •aroxoa�ll�n M 4".TM AmmL unaaa W.UW=m NSL.Q ® mll•WWW B Bud Elraatlm•EwYbn2 8 .1 Ela bn4 32..1. --- -- m OIE r \ \ 7, �ECTRICAL PLAN 0 I r f r T ADO 00- 9a DL 02 03 03 0.2 `01 r 00 01 0. 10 3A,\4.7 3.1 �`'r`u ^R� �f 6D uA PP' i'lf°pt Di P3"9t tt 3fi 9F 0. _ - - 0.1 03 2D 67 `34 5.98 0 02 ' 0 of OP0 0 DT o i4 } t.l' r7 P� 4 0,f 1 0., j oj 031t 00.15 P1' '229 7,8 `, ly p L l 2tl � - 4I U f, �01 04 'JA '9Oiu��2 11f, 02 01 0,1, rU,2 �6.I 07 '2.1 f1 1t1 �i 0.0 iJ.O �_ '902 `6T � 4� tl� OLG, 0.0 U 'DA ° Pt° A o 'D 'O.t '`h3 0.0 `q:B DO - P.� a0 1, vO.D �i' 0.0 4a U:4 nr,cclio-L , . D r �� D.0 1 .D. 2.��� .¢ '22 �. 6 p2 .D o D.0 'D,o 'o.a 'D.� o 'o.o 'o,o 'o,a 'so 'q:o 'D.o ',o 'D.D 'cA 'oA 'D.o o.a o.a 'o.D ��� lAkf!• �. �A I ITV �V C -4 Bor:�47 1 � � 'a.o �'bD `M1 � - o no 'a.o U. 'o.a 'o.D 'o.o `a.o 'D.o `o.o '�qd ao 'D.o 'o.D 'a,a 'u.o 'o.o 'o.a 'D.2 'Q1 'o.o I x, � yq 0.0 v Q7 �r '0.�..➢A.O 0 .0 '0.0 '0,0 '0,0 'OA 1 0A 'O,D '0.0 '0.0 'O.a 'OA 'OA '0.0 '0.1 '0.1 '0.0 '0.0 'OA 0.0 'b.q . 1.D ,I7' ", \7 ' 5. 'OA 'oo. `0. 0.0 '00 'o. 'QD X00 '0.0 '0.0 'o.o 0.0 '0.0 '0,0 'OA QO 'DA 'D.o . - . .o '0.0 .0 'D.D r ���ii � � •� 1, � _}� / ` I 0.P'" D.D I1 '2 'a.0 '0.0 'D. '6.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 'oA �D� 0.0 'O.D 0¢ '0D 'Q� 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 �. O. � .4 � I /' \ i FI 0.0 9 I � ., a� 1 ,6 '$,5 i' I 8' < PI r r0„ ' 0. y ' v OA '0.0 '0.0 '0. ' D O� QO 'DA '0.0 0.0 d,0 o.D o.D 'OA " /tl.1 'tl.11 a U UE AA -aY k EI 1 A i IT - _+9iC 4 r ,� C4 , �I 3.' p z.0 h l ! z as as A -at '3s 1:9. '� D `0,1 � � - l` I III 2. s, �rFF } I' p� _ 0.0 0[ f �. I I '1,B '.3 4 4 D31 r �T i p ��4 51 5d C FO �l 35 �3 �7 S2II alt. T 3 }- Y, r', E •�� li 'F ' F rl �. 'OA 1 7f117 '3.2 4 DircO 0�t �5� 12 12� A3E6{ AB Q3 1979F,� B 4 yq 1 jy, G0� {, EI ' I ��4 a ` ?' , 999 ' ''Y" E 0,0 u p6 P LP '1u '4.3 1.0 1 129 '2.B �,6 �i,8 �.4 s23 2y 9: 12.�� 8� 34 {3 . L2 '3.5' I ( I II I,,. " '41 ". l 0.0"o 0,5� '2.1 '9.0 1.5 02 0:2 '0.1 �0.1 '0:1 02; 40,. '1A to 1.4 19 '2.T 22 `3.1 22 23 D3 48 1B I09 k0 1.9 '3.8 I 0.0 0 .{ 4.� 1 '11 '1.4 '0.9 '0.2 '02 '0,1 '0.1 '0.1 '0,1 0.2 '0.5 'S.9 0.7 1.1 '22 `3.3 '3.3 1 3,2 - 99 ^ +'0,0 2.3 1. 1.0 .B 's.0 0.0 .8 OB 0,4 ! 0,2 � ` 01 D. aD ' 0 G1 q �.1 M0.3 O6 V'0.6 1Q� 2,1 3 � T � 7 �9� q t9� 1A Q6 D� 4� ty6 Q6 0,9 � - +' � HO2 � 'OA D 7 01 �2 01 3O1 ��iCDr 0A lo li i of '04 0� U .aAi t xf '�C, '�"'"T�p•,�f J �` i << ,r R Y't` 4 „i'h�5 3` ' I r 'o.a 'Q 1 I WOR150 $ . o,o oA `o.D 'oA Q 'o.o 'oa 'D.11 0.0 'D.D 'o.D `J.o o.D A.0 'O.b o.G OD '0;01`0.0 '0.0 'O,O OJI OA `0.0 'OA '0.1 tl.1 "OA O.d, }' ao 'D.1�0.1 'tl.1 'U.0 �AA 0,0 `0.0 0.1 '0A SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN sm IA N. LUMHME SCHEDULE ua Ae colm,,. MMMa IPam=& mom DWIMRND M 1 O X9 MM7f6mms WMEDM WWR-T Y M WALE MnYM MI! Mul agOLD MEMD" DwFoMNw BR MLM, a M I p6nplpD MM,M166 VIIWDMII W- MUM 1®n�MMDOD M EE � r ^ \ \ \�\ _ . ) ---- � --l\ ~-- |----||� | � ['- /r~ \ , � , �CTRICAL PLAN 0.1 02 is 3 47 d.1 j1 42 a�' D,ff 6P 'DD 00 D1' Ai DF 0.3 0� Bt t.F i+ff b'RQ ed a0 Ol 07. 03 03 02 D 0^ 59 , os ae 8f a. 418 Dr9 of 02 6 14y 17 Ug 0.1 of 99 p 04-' 11117 , r5 D,3 {D2 4t � �.�f -..} a0 0 7 _ { "> X 2,8 79 �. ` 0. , `a2 'D,1 h 0.o i 0 0.1; [A t.d '8.0 76 152 1.1 i 0.2.1 O.U� OA 6,2 J.7, 0.7 2.7 115 121 1,9 8s� .1 0.0 60''1x2 '8.T 9t 1 1 0. ` Di I \ 'OA 'ff.D 1 x2 e.0 09 DA 129 07 '13 0.0 o a� ¢0 00� t.E 90 it.0 0.0 cil6v 0.0 .0 :, ' 2 III 9 48�� y : "zz '@dP; � .2 �'D•o . D O.o 'OA 'O.D 'O.� 'ob 'DA 'OA d.0 `0.0 ;4.9 0.0 'o.0 0.0 0,9�. 0.0 'D.0 'O.D 0.0 n.0 , 1 D d a.7 4' 9 0 + D '0.0 'D.D o.o 'DA 'oA '0.D 1 10.0 '0.0 ,� 'o.o '0.0 'D.0 '0,0 'D.0 `D.o 'o:o 'az '0.1 `O,o i ��u a n P cl 0.7 0�0 + 1 111 „ p4 . + � r 1 I 22' i iE o.7 .6.U4 OA�D `D.D 0.0 O.D DA 'DA '0.9 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.1 0,1 `0.0 0.0 '10.0 sp M 0.0 COQ 11� 318 $� '50{ QO "D.0' 0, 'D,9 0.0 'o. 'DA 'AA 0.0 'OA 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 'DA '0:0 OO 'OA '.D 0.0 O.f `0¢ If' g •4 2.4 ' { 1 T-7 B 0. 8.0 '0.0 'D0 0. 1 0.0 '0,0 `0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 �d� 'OA '0. Of '0�,'Ofj 0.0 0.0 ' D 00 I �• � / 1 // 0.0 1 ' 9i �'r 109 DD OA OA 4 0.. 0.0 'OA x '0 + 9.0 0.D D. 'D,D '100 ,1018 D1 101' 0,1 rGd 001 A i I = „P 14� .E L lE,o 1� j oar' �� X }} w Y].E a boa 1 .1� ,9,! 3"�D. '0.1 qpB 21f 8 IA'I 2 A3 > 183 r DT \I 0.0 )0�`S'I2� �.1 3. �e"n 0.0 0�!! i'ILB '3.3t, Z4 4 35 "ro5 U U1 �1�'yD •�o "U.2 li ff3 34 �a T 13` d � ,1 1` 0' AEA \ C �II $ i S � , +�' 5 iB 5,1 121 1 E 68 8.a 131 9f Tf.- S r 0 0-� I I17 32 4 �UOI�4 01 '' -r 0 n � , � JJ g 1 � 9 %p6 1D 1.�, 23.2J Z.8 �.0 f3.6 13.4 11 12 � Bff 34 113 OD� 0 1 1.� 3.3 4.3 f ��krM 1 FY 0.010 { Q5 ;1.1 2.1 '9.0 '1.5 0.2 0.2 '0.1 '0.1 0.1 021 1D "1-0 1.4 1.8 '2.7 22 'a1 12 2.3 J 3p 48 42 s' "[0'109 r "9 118 0.6 I_li E;M1 I :� nns9 t 0,0 0 b4II10.7 '1:2 '1.4 '0.8 '0.2 '0.2 '0.1 '0.1 '0.1 0.1 '0.2 0.5 '10.18 '07 '1.1 2,2 '3.3 33 1 32<<36''3,0 '23 L9 '1J 1.5 1 +A I ^0 '3,D �- hl,, Klta } PI OI7 q.6 •• .0 q 1 0.3 OB i 0:51 10i 2 `37 4 I ' 0 X14 135 "19 0.0 M 10 5 05 ay `OB a4 OZ� 01 0� 00 0 Q1 01 n r P 1 I I �k�'ti O.D Ol y EY $P C AB 107 11112 all �1 UQ 1 71�f{0 a D 70 01 h� 02 Od 00 1 O,y , M ' r 0010 0.0 1 10.8• '0.� 'DA 0.1 'ail C.D I a0 '0.0 10.0 0.0 i0.0 ' 0.0 'o.0 0.6 'D.0 0.9 j'O.O y 0.0 0.0 'OA 'Oh 0,0 0,9 018 `a1 1 a1 ' @.D 0.0 0.1 Al 'D.o i0.0' 0.0 '0.a 'D,1 'D.0 • IGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN sDUE, •r WMINAI9E SCHEDULE WM WE MM m9nmr ONOM M IA Maw NEW Zammus Q 184 J MI MMMMRC m- C Em OM➢MM -rfEII MOIWIM11 MMOWE oms MMMMEMMEW N@EM " WIuMaE1pM IIMWMIIEA W M p NUL* M W"Muoh h1aIMM�U 0 4 � w p - �� y � q pYAYLSM 17MM,M - -------------- ---- ---- - --- - ------- �- I it E o EE I . EE I �I O�n Fl :11 I I L_ rnr: r�� 1., "n'" ^� P`E 13Y16 ":ABC" — •_.__ - S i c+u z •w ,r.�. _�"a�A.�.. -=— — :�...,.� _. �:� . mss _f�.s � L• f �I I f I � SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN mac IAN. '0.0 '0.0 *0.0 ,� '0.0 rdo 0.0 D.0 1 Va '0.0 0.0 �� 1 *0,0 10 Vo '0.0 '0,0 '0.0 '0 ' *0,0 '0 '0 *0 O '0.0 '0.1 '0.1 *o.o '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 10 Vo O'D 0,0 0.0 0.0 Vo 'o, '0.0 'a 0 Vo Vo 00 00 ' 100 10.0 �c 0 tAA * AA �A� '00 /,,0.0. " 0 ' 0 '0 D '00 '00 '00 [D '0.0 % '00 'o-o 'o'o Vo 2.6 '03 '0.3 '0.2 '0.1 '0.0 Ol 0,1 k4 '9-0 '7.0 15.2 �'0.2 �O,l .60 0.0 2 .7 n.k al I.0 U,b. U.1 a 00 oor2, 'o '0.0/ a - O.D - '0.0 - ?.1 'tt 't. 0.0 '0 2.1 00 O� 7 0.0 '0.0 '0.0 'co '10 '0.0 '0.0 �,��o to Vo '0.0 lo 10 0.0 '0.0 1 0.0 '0.0 �. 1� \. '0.0 'ao '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 u 0,2 '0.1 'D.0 '%D - 010 '0.0 '0.0 '10 Vo lo '0.0 Vo �, 2 43 ' 1.0 z 1 '21 '30 '1-5 0.2 '0.2 '0.1 '0.1 OJ 01 )[W 0.6 F1' 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.7 '2.2 3.1 '2.2 '2-3 1 '4.6 '4 1"•'lh f Oil. O'D 0.0 0.0 o 'o 'Do "m 'o 0.0 '01 'm l 6-1 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN seas 71r-4 I LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE I'M UW OW cAkkw WAM LW - Is Amumava L HEMILN m7Rw=wm -IMSM MM MO mmm, . "-- 1"on, wulawl 14' 1�SOM January 9, 2014 WEST METRO FIRE RES Dl5 CRIC:1 Serving the Cities of •Crystal •Ivew Hope Architects, LLC 100 Portland Ave South suite #100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 RE: Preliminary Plan Review Comments and Requirements for 55I0 West Broadway, Crystal. In reviewing the plans submitted for the-above mentioned address in the City of Crystal called Christina's child Care Center. The following items are the West Metro Fire- Rescue District's comments and requirements per tlfe 2007 Minnesota State Fire Code, NFPA Codes, West Metro Fire - Rescue District Policies and City Ordinance: 1. Fire alarm systems will be required in Group 1-4 childcare centers having an occupant load of 50. The occupant load of this day care is over 50 which will means afire alarm system is required in this daycare center. Manual pull station shall also be added in the common public corridor area leading to the exit. Neigbbors Sez °vinag Neigbbory 2. Every room or area shall have access to at least one approved exit. Access to at least two exits shall be provided when the occupant load exceeds 10 or is greater than 350 feet for this type of occupancy. All rooms have an occupant load that exceeds 10 and is greater. than 350 feet shall have two exits. All classrooms areas such as infant, toddlers, and preschool and afterschool rooms shall at minimum have two exits. All doors shall open to the exit pathway or go to the outside of the building. Most of the doors on the plan swing into the classrooms which are wrong and shall be changed to swing outward. 3. Verify that all existing exit and emergency lighting is working properly. Additional exit signs will be required. If exit signage and emergency lighting has not been installed it shall be installed according to the approved plan. 4. Provide a 10 lb. ABC fire extinguisher in the building every 75 foot travel distance. The extinguishers shall be mounted on a wall between 4 and 5 feet high. All extinguishers shall have current inspection tag attached by licensed contractor. Recommend placing by the travel pathway going to exits or by exit doors. 5. No extension cords shall be used in place of permanent wiring. Please y ou your electrical needs before you move in to ensure you have enough New l lope , � \Rl�' 55428 l i e Ave N. outlets where need them. Voice 763.230.7000 F 763.130.7029 6. The address or suite number shall be clearly visible from the addressed street with a minimum of 4 inch numbers in a contrasting color to their background. u-wv.westtnetrofire.com Preliminary Plan Review for 5510 West Broadway January 9, 2014 Page Two 7. If they will be adding a kitchen with commercial cooking equipment that produces grease -laden vapors shall be equipped with a ventilation hood and duct system meeting the requirements of the Mechanical Code. Commercial cooking equipment that produces grease -laden vapors shall be equipped with an approved fire suppression system. Provide a detailed plan of the kitchen area What type of appliances will be in the kitchen? A type 1 hood systent and fire suppression system may be required. 8. You will be required to provide a fire safety and evacuation plan and it shall be maintained. 9. All furniture shall meet the flammability requirements as described in the Minnesota State Policy for Daycare Centers. 10. Exit doors shall be open able from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. No exit door shall be locked, chained, bolted, barred, latched or otherwise rendered unusable. All locking devices shall be of an approved type. Any exit or exit'access serving an occupant load of 100 or more within Group 1 -4 child care center shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless such components are integral with approved panic hardware or fire exit hardware. This daycare center will have over SO or more people people for all occupant load and 1 -4 occupancy, so panic hardware or fire exit hardware will be required. 1 I . Smoke detection is required for egress travel from an interior room or rooms having an aggregate occupant load of more than 10. Smoke detection will be required irr the indoor play area of the daycare center. This area is an area of exit travel. 12. Ensure that any work or alterations within the building, and (or) zoning requirements, conditional use permits, environmental health licenses,etc. have been approved by the City of Crystal before the tenant space is occupied. All the above mentioned items must be addressed and approved for a Certificate of Occupancy to be issued. Any questions on this can be addressed to the City of Crystal at (763) 531 -1000. For further information on the fire codes for daycare centers you may go to www.dps.state.mn.us and look at the Child Care Center Information Sheet. if you have any questions or concerns about the above mentioned items, please don't hesitate to call me at (763) 230 -7006. Sincerely, Shelby Wo f Deputy Fire Mar 1 DESIGN & REVIEW COMMITTEE January 16, 2014 Committee: Houle, Nirgude, Svendsen, McKenzie, English The Development Review Team met on January 15 to consider a request for a Preliminary and Final Plat and the Development and Final Stage PUD (Site Plan Review) for the construction of a 68 -unit apartment building located at 6113 West Broadway. The property has previously been rezoned from CB, Community Business and R -3, Medium Density Residential to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district. The Comprehensive Plan is also in the process of being amended to re -guide the area from Commercial and Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential Staff: Jacobsen, Axel, Coone, Fournier, Rader, Sargent, Wolf Consultants: Brixius, Long PLANNING CASE: 14 -03 PROJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat, Site Plan Review (Compass Pointe) ADDRESS: 6113 West Broadway ZONING: PUD, Planned Unit Development PROPERTY OWNER: City of New Hope and Todd Handeland APPLICANT: Ron Clark Construction and Design DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Preliminary and Final Plat approval as well as a Development and Final Stage PUD (Site Plan Review) in order to construct a 68 -unit apartment building on the property. In 2012, Ron Clark Construction and Design applied for and received approval for the rezoning of the property and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re -guide the area to High Density Residential in order to accommodate an apartment building. The Development Review Team was supportive of the request and had the following comments: Existing Conditions • The City of New Hope owns four of the five lots in question. • A gas station at the corner of 62nd Avenue and West Broadway was recently demolished and contamination was mitigated meeting MPCA guidelines. • The fifth parcel contains an 8 -unit apartment building. The applicant is working with the owner of the apartment for its acquisition. • Once acquired, the 8 -unit apartment building will be demolished in preparation for construction of the subject project. Comments • All existing and proposed easements must be shown on the preliminary plat. A five foot drainage and utility easement must be dedicated around the entire perimeter of the property (this will require a new easement on the west side of the property) • The southeast building setback from the side (south) property line must be approved at a dimension less than originally proposed or the site design altered to meet the 50' minimum setback • The applicant must explore the possibility of relocating the exhaust well from the north to the west side of the building due to the limited setback on the north side of the property Space for seven additional parking stalls must be indicated on the plan as proof of parking in order to provide 72 surface parking stalls on the site • Curbing associated with new curb cuts for drive entrances must be matched to existing curbs at the expense of the applicant • The applicant must provide a plan for excess snow removal from the site when the areas designated for snow storage are at capacity or if future parking eliminates snow storage areas Bicycle parking facilities must be installed near the entrance to the building • A sidewalk along the west side of the building to 62nd Avenue North must be added (if deemed necessary) The applicant shall provide a sidewalk along West Broadway Avenue from the drive entrance to 62nd Avenue North • The applicant shall provide a sidewalk along 62 Avenue North from West Broadway to the drive entrance if replacement of the existing sidewalk is deemed necessary by the city o Improvements to the sidewalk such as pedestrian ramps at the 62nd Avenue and West Broadway intersection should be included • Ornamental fencing must be added around the picnic and play area to provide safe separation from the parking lot (a detail of this feature must be submitted) ■ A detail of the proposed fence around the basketball court must be submitted 9 A maintenance plan/agreement for the stormwater storage and infiltration facility must be submitted and approved by the city. The agreement shall then be filed with the county recorder to run with the title to the property. A legal description of the location of the underground infiltration facility is required • A plan for burying the overhead utilities along 62nd Avenue North must be submitted • A plan regarding the burial of the utilities along the south property line (if any) must be submitted The city fire inspector shall determine the required number and location of hydrants to serve the facility to be installed at the cost of the applicant Water service must be split between the potable water supply for the building and water for the fire suppression system. • The landscape plan must be revised to show the locations of catch basins in relation to the proposed street trees along 62nd Avenue North and the location of the retaining wall along the south property line • The City Forester recommends replacing the three (3) Ginkgo trees along the north side of the property with Sunbusrt Honey Locust due to the invasive nature of the Gingko roots in proximity to the underground utilities and adjacent sidewalk A graphic must be submitted to show sufficient screening of the property from adjacent residential properties to the south particularly in the area where no trees will be planted due to site constraints A detail of the eight foot west and south perimeter fence must be submitted • Sign setbacks must be resolved; a sign detail for the proposed sign at the 62nd Ave. entrance must be submitted Lighting cut sheets must be submitted and the photometric plan corrected and resubmitted Additional up /down building accent lights must be installed along the north side of the building The applicant must address building security related to first floor balconies ATTACHMENTS: Application Narrative • Plans Maps • Planning consultant memo dated 1/15/2014 NOTE: REVISED PLAN DEADLINE is Friday, January 24, by 3 p.m. Planning Commission, Wednesday, February 5, 7 p.m. City Council, Monday, February 24, 7 p.m. PLANNING CASE REPORT City of New Hope Meeting Date: February 5, 2014 Report Date: January 7, 2014 Planning Case: 14-01 Petitioner: City of New Hope Request: Text Amendment for Density Increases in the R -O and R -B Zoning Districts I. Request At the December 9, 2013, City Council meeting, the City Council reviewed and approved a rezoning request for the properties located at 9390 -9398 - 27th Avenue, to rezone the property from LB, Limited Business to R -O, Residential Office. The applicant presented preliminary plans for the property that included the construction of a 21 -unit apartment building with underground parking. Under the current R -O regulations, the site is only large enough to accommodate a 19 -unit building, even after meeting all available density bonus standards. The applicant stated that a 21 -unit building is needed in order to make the project work. During the course of the rezoning process, the applicant indicated his desire for the city to review the possibility of amending the zoning code to allow for higher density allowances in the R -O District. Staff presented the request to the Codes and Standards Committee on December 10, 2013, and they were in favor of bringing a proposal to the Planning Commission for further consideration. DENSITY The Metropolitan Council has recently issued the 2040 population, household and employment projections to all metropolitan -area cities. The common theme is that the Met Council is predicting a large increase in population in the next 25 years, mostly concentrating in downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul, and the first and second -ring suburbs. For the city of New Hope, the projections are as follow: City Staff has some concerns regarding these projections, as there isn't enough land in the city to accommodate the amount of growth as suggested by the Met Council. With that said, staff agrees that the population of New Hope will continue to grow and that the city needs to do what it can to prepare for such an increase. Since land is scarce, one way to accommodate population growth is to increase the allowable densities in some zoning districts. 2010 Actual 2040 Projected Growth Percentage Increase Population 20,339 26,800 +6,461 31.7% Households 8,665 11,800 +3,315 38.3% Em to ent 11,080 15,000 +3,920 35.4% City Staff has some concerns regarding these projections, as there isn't enough land in the city to accommodate the amount of growth as suggested by the Met Council. With that said, staff agrees that the population of New Hope will continue to grow and that the city needs to do what it can to prepare for such an increase. Since land is scarce, one way to accommodate population growth is to increase the allowable densities in some zoning districts. II. Recommendation Staff recommends an amendment to the Zoning Code that would increase the density allowances in the R -O, Residential Office and the R -B, Residential Business zoning districts from 2,200 square feet per unit to 2,000 square feet per unit. The proposed amendment would essentially increase the densities in these zoning districts from 20 units per acre to 22 units per acre. There are currently seven parcels zoned R-O in the city. All are fully developed with office /commercial or institutional uses with exception of apartment buildings on Pennsylvania Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue. At the December 10, 2013 Codes and Standards meeting, staff proposed the density increase in only the R-O, Residential Office District. However, the city's planning consultant pointed out that the R -B, Residential Business zoning district has the same purpose statement as the R -O District — to provide for high- density residential uses. The lot and setback requirements are the same in the two districts as well. There are currently eight parcels zoned R -B in the city. Three are multi- family and five are office /commercial. Staff has made a practice of reviewing the standards of surrounding cities when proposing a text amendment to the Zoning Code. The follow shows the highest densities allowances for different cities: 1. Golden Valley 2. Brooklyn Park 3. Ply, mouth 4. CryT III. Attachments A minimum of 15 units per acre in the Mixed Use District. 18 units /acre for one - bedroom units, otherwise the highest density allowed in a residential district is 13 units per acre. Regulates density with minimum lot area and building height requirements. Up to 22 units per acre. • Alan Brixius memo to Curtis Jacobsen • Exhibit A: R -O • Exhibit B: R -B • Draft ordinance NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners @nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Curtis Jacobsen FROM: - Emily Shively /Alan Brixius DATE: December 19, 2013 RE: New Hope - Amending Density Standards in the R -O Residential - Office and R -B Residential - Business Districts FILE: 131.00 -13.07 BACKGROUND A rezoning request has recently been submitted to allow for a multi - family residential building at 27 Street and Hillsboro Avenue. The site is currently zoned L -B Limited Business and the proposed zoning is R -0 Residential - Office. In the course of the evaluation of the request, preliminary site plans were reviewed for the proposed project. The applicant is proposing to build 21 -unit apartment building with underground parking. Under the current R -O District regulations, even if the applicant can meet density bonus standards, the site is only large enough to accommodate a 19 -unit building. The applicant has stated that 21 units are needed to make the project viable. Initial evaluation of the zoning request and preliminary project plans by the Planning Commission's Design Review Committee determined that the rezoning request is reasonable and the multifamily use of the site will be more compatible with surrounding uses than the current commercial zoning. The committee was also favorably inclined toward the proposed project and requested that staff explore options for allowing additional density on the site without requiring a variance from district standards. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Amount of Density Increase. The above - mentioned proposal would be compliant if lot area per unit was reduced from 2,200 square feet to 2,000 square feet and the 20% density bonus was applied. All yard, green space /recreational space, and setback requirements would still apply. The preliminary site plans show a three -story apartment building with seven units (4 two- bedroom and 3 one - bedroom units) on each floor. Buildings up to six stories or 72 feet in height are permitted in this district. Impact on other R -O District Parcels. There are currently seven parcels zoned R -O in the city. All are fully developed with office /commercial or institutional uses with the exception of apartment buildings on Pennsylvania Avenue N. (7 units) and Rhode Island Avenue N. (12 units). If the density standards were amended, the Bass Lake Apartments site could accommodate a total of 17 units; the apartment building on Pennsylvania Avenue N. would remain at 7 total units. (See Exhibit A) Increasing Density in the R -B Residential- Business District. The R -B District has the same purpose statement as the R -O Residential -Office District — to provide for high - density residential uses, provide a transition between mid - density residential and low - intensity business and allow for mixed -use developments. Lot and setback requirements are the same as well; the difference is in the type of permitted uses with R -B allowing limited commercial uses without a conditional use permit. There are eight parcels currently zoned R -B in the city. Three are multi - family and five are office /commercial. The multi - family parcels could accommodate additional units (typically up to six for a total of 18) with the new density standards if redeveloped. The 2030 Proposed Land Use Plan guides the existing multi - family parcels for High Density Residential and the parcels with offices are anticipated to remain Commercial land uses. (See Exhibit B) RECOMMENDATION The proposed density increases are modest and remain within the target densities for the mixed -use R -O and R -B Districts. Allowing for a few more units in these districts may enable multifamily projects to provide for underground parking versus detached garage spaces that are the current norm. Draft Ordinance Amendment. If the planning commission determines that this increase in density is appropriate, the following ordinance amendment may be considered: Sec. 4 -10. R-O, residential -office district. (f) Lot requirements, building heights, and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the R -O zoning district subject to additional requirements, exception, and modification set forth in this Code. (1) Lot area. a. Base lot. 1. Twinhome. 10,000 square feet. 2. Multiple - family dwelling or townhomes. 15,000 square feet. 3. Other uses. 15,000 square feet. b. Lot area per unit. 1. Twinhomes, quadraminiums or townhomes. 5,000 square feet. 2. Other multiple - family dwellings. 2 2.000 square feet. 3. Senior housing. 1,000 square feet. 2 The amendment to the R -B District standards would be identical and would apply to Sec. 4- 11(f)(1)b.2. Sec. 4 -11. R -B, residential - business district. (f) Lot requirements, building heights, and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the R -O zoning district subject to additional requirements, exception, and modification set forth in this Code. (1) Lot area. a. Base lot. 1. Twinhome. 10,000 square feet. 2. Multiple - family dwelling or townhomes. 15,000 square feet. 3. Other uses. 15,000 square feet. b. Lot area per unit. 1. Twinhomes, quadraminiums or townhomes. 5,000 square feet. 2. Other multiple - family dwellings. 2-,8A 2.000 square feet. 3. Senior housing. 1,000 square feet. The proposed changes impact limited, geographically specific areas in the city where the comprehensive plan has indicated that a mix of higher density residential and commercial uses are appropriate. In order to be allowed to develop multifamily residential facilities at the maximum density, the ordinance requires higher quality exterior construction materials in order to allow for greater investment in interior renovations throughout the life of the building. The ordinance also requires underground parking to make better use of lot area and create a higher - amenity facility for residents. All projects seeking to develop at the maximum density would still require a conditional use permit that would provide for additional review to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses and compliance with all performance standards. This minor adjustment in the density standards will allow the project at Hillsboro Avenue and 27 Street to proceed with their preferred number of units and will have little, if any, impact on the other properties in R -0 and R -B districts in the city. Existing Properties R -O Residential — Office District Commercial 7901 28th Ave N 0.38 acres 16,617 sq ft (Maximum density: 9 units current / 10 units proposed) 2. Institutional 3900 Winnetka Ave N 3.89 acres 169,375 sq ft (96 units current / 105 units proposed) 3. Commercial 5001 Winnetka Ave N 0.31 acres 13,501 sq ft (7 units current / 8 units proposed) 4. Residential —Apartments (7 units) 5617 Pennsylvania Ave N 0.28 acres 12,368 sq ft (7 units current / 7 units proposed) 5. Residential —Apartments (12 units) 7610 Bass Lake Rd 0.64 acres 27,946 sq ft 0 5 units current / 17 units proposed) Existing Properties R -O Residential — Office District 6. Commercial 8119 Bass Lake Rd 0.57 acres 24,740 sq ft (Maximum density: 14 units current / 15 units proposed 7. Commercial 9220 Bass Lake Rd 6.98 acres 303,991 sq ft (172 units current / 189 units proposed) Existing: L -B Limited Business Proposed: R -O Residential — Office District 1. Single- Family Residential 9398 27th Ave N 0.81 acres 35,154 sq ft 0 9 units current 121 units proposed) 2. Single - Family Residential 9390 27th Ave N 0.81 acres 35,350 sq ft (20 units current / 22 units proposed) Existing properties Commercial 9413 36th Ave. N. 1.59 acres 69,215 sq ft (Maximum Density: 39 units current / 43 units proposed) 2. Commercial 2738 Winnetka Ave N 0.56 acres 24,509 sq ft (13 units current / 15 units proposed) 3. Residential — Apartment (8 units) 2730 Winnetka Ave N 0.51 acres 22,195 sq ft (12 units current / 13 units proposed) 4. Commercial 3709 Winnetka Ave N 1.08 acres 46,863 sq ft (26 units current 129 units proposed) 5. Commercial 3701 Winnetka Ave N 0.49 acres 21,513 sq ft (12 units current/ 13 units proposed) R -B Residential — Business District Existing properties R -B Residential — Business District 6. Residential — Apartments (12 units) 4200 Zealand Ave N 0.67 acres 29,169 sq ft (16 units current / 18 units proposed) 7. Commercial 8500 42nd Ave N 0.76 acres 33,051 sq ft (18 units current / 20 units proposed) 8. Residential —Apartments (12 units) 8420 42nd Ave N 0.73 acres 31,945 sq ft (18 units current / 19 units proposed) ORDINANCE NO. 14- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 (ZONING) OF THE NEW HOPE CITY CODE RELATED TO CHANGES TO SECTION 4 -10, R -O RESIDENTIAL- OFFICE DISTRICT LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS; AND SECTION 4 -11, R -B RESIDENTIAL - BUSINESS DISTRICT LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW HOPE ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 4- 10(f), R -0 residential - office district, Lot requirements, building heights, and setbacks, of the New Hope City Code is hereby amended to repeal the strikeouts and add the following underlined text: (f) Lot requirements, building heights, and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the R -O zoning district subject to additional requirements, exception, and modification set forth in this Code. (1) Lot area. a. Base lot. 1. Twinhome. 10,000 square feet. 2. Multiple - family dwelling or townhomes. 15,000 square feet. 3. Other uses. 15,000 square feet. b. Lot area per unit. 1. Twinhomes, quadraminiums or townhomes. 5,000 square feet. 2. Other multiple - family dwellings. 2-,M 2.000 square feet. 3. Senior housing. 1,000 square feet Section 2. Section 4- 11(f), R -B residential- business district, Lot requirements, building heights, and setbacks, of the New Hope City Code is hereby amended to repeal the strikeouts and add the following underlined text: (f) Lot requirements, building heights, and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the R -O zoning district subject to additional requirements, exception, and modification set forth in this Code. (1) Lot area. a. Base lot. 1. Twinhome. 10,000 square feet. 2. Multiple - family dwelling or townhomes. 15,000 square feet. 3. Other uses. 15,000 square feet. b. Lot area per unit. 1. Twinhomes, quadraminiums or townhomes. 5,000 square feet. 2. Other multiple - family dwellings. X89 2.000 square feet. 3. Senior housing. 1,000 square feet Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication. APPROVED this day of 2014. Kathi Hemken, Mayor ATTEST. Valerie Leone, City Clerk PLANNING CASE REPORT City of New Hope Meeting Date: Report Date: February 5, 2014 January 10, 2014 Planning Case: 14 -02 Petitioner: City of New Hope Request: Text Amendment for Food Trucks I. Request City staff has recently seen some food trucks throughout the city and has looked into how these types of food vending vehicles are regulated. The city's current ordinance doesn't specifically address food trucks, and staff feels that it should in order to ensure food safety regulations. The National League of Cities has recently published an article titled, Food on Wheels: Mobile Vending Goes Mainstream, which outlines how larger cities are handling the up -an- coming popularity of food truck operations. Some key elements of this article suggest areas that each city should focus on when regulating food trucks. They are: Food S�afeiy As indicated in the attached memo from the city's planning consultant, food trucks are regulated by Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 157, Food, Beverage, & Lodging Establishments. This chapter directly addresses food trucks which the statute refers to as "mobile food units" or MFUs. Also, all food establishments in the state are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4626, the Minnesota Food Code. These rules address mechanical systems, water supply and disposal, washing and sanitation facilities, waste disposal, food preparation and cooking areas, and food preservation /refrigeration. The proposed ordinance would require that food trucks obtain proof of licensure that demonstrates compliance with state rules and regulations. Although the licenses that the food trucks would obtain would permit operation at any given location for only 21 days per calendar year, New Hope may permit longer operation times through specific ordinance regulations. Locations Cities should take into consideration where food trucks are allowed to operate. Limiting operations to non - residential zoning districts focuses operations to places where vehicle and pedestrian traffic is expected. Staff recommends allowing food truck operations in all commercially and industrially -zoned properties. In addition, food trucks should be allowed to operate on commercial properties within a mixed -use district, but not on residential properties. Exceptions to these regulations include the allowance of ice cream trucks to operate in residential areas, as well as allowing schools and churches to utilize food trucks for special events. Staff recommends allowing food trucks to operate on the public right -of -way in residential districts with administrative approval for such occasions as neighborhood block parties. In general, food truck operations should be restricted to private property, with no operation on the public right -of -way, with written permission of the property owner required as a condition of licensure. Operation on city park land may be granted at the city's discretion. Consideration should be made regarding how close the city should allow food trucks to locate from bricks- and - mortar (permanent) restaurants. The proposed ordinance calls for a 200 -foot separation between the food vehicle and the front door of a permanent restaurant, but this distance could be altered after deliberation by the Planning Commission and City Council. Attached is a radii map that shows 50, 100 and 200 -foot distances from current restaurants in the city. Hours of Operation It is important to regulate the hours of operation for food trucks as a measure of public safety. It is recommended to restrict hours of operation between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M., unless otherwise approved by the city. II. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the ordinance establishing guidelines for food trucks in the City of New Hope, with consideration made regarding the distance that such food trucks should be located from permanent restaurants. III. Attachments • Alan Brixius memo to Curtis Jacobsen • Memo from Valerie Leone, City Clerk • Response to Leone Memo from Al Brixius • Radii map • Draft ordinance NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 7e3.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.25e1 planners @nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Curtis Jacobsen FROM: Emily Shively /Alan Brixius DATE: December 31, 2013 RE: New Hope — Food Truck Regulations FILE: 131.00-13.08 BACKGROUND Food trucks are gaining in popularity and several have been providing services in New Hope. The city currently allows food trucks during special occasions such as Duk Duk Daze, but the city's ordinance does not specifically address the regulation of this use during the rest of the year. This memorandum outlines the potential licensing and land use issues related to food trucks such as food safety, locations, and hours of operation. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Existing Local Regulations. Regulation of food trucks would fall under Section 8 -6 Registration of solicitors, peddlers, hawkers, and transient merchants. This section contains the following definition that captures the basic characteristics of food truck businesses: 8 -6(c). Transient merchant means a person, whether as owner, agent, consignee, or employee who engages in a temporary business out of a vehicle, trailer, box car, tent, other portable shelter, store front, or from a parking lot for the purpose of displaying for sale, selling or attempting to sell, and delivering goods, wares, products, merchandise or other personal property and who does not remain or intend to remain in any one location. This definition could also apply to vendors selling from food carts as well as ice cream trucks. However, defining these uses separately may provide additional clarity in the ordinance. Section 8 -6(d) requires transient merchants to register with the city and provide information such as the type of goods to be sold, vehicle information, and personal identification details. The fee for registration is $50.00 (per Section 14 -8(4) Business and amusement license fees). Staff is recommending that ice cream truck vendors be required to complete a background check at the cost of the applicant. Section 8 -6(h) lists prohibited activities including excessive noise, exclusive use of streets or operating in a congested area that may impede public use of streets, and requires that permission be granted by the owner of the property on which the transient merchant is located. Section 8 -6(i) establishes the penalty for violation as a petty misdemeanor with a fine of up to $300.00. Transient merchant licenses would also be required under this section for a food truck associated with a permanent restaurant located within New Hope. Food Safety. Food trucks are regulated by Minnesota State Statues Chapter 157 Food, Beverage, & Lodging Establishments. This chapter directly addresses food trucks which the statute refers to as "mobile food units" or MFUs. Additionally, all food establishments in the state are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4626, the Minnesota Food Code. These rules address mechanical systems, water supply and disposal, washing and sanitation facilities, waste disposal, food preparation and cooking areas, and food preservation /refrigeration. To ensure that food trucks operating in New Hope are providing safe products to consumers, the city will require proof of licensure that demonstrates compliance with state statutes and rules. There are three ways a food truck can obtain such licensure: Itinerant license. If the food truck will be operating on a short term basis, they can apply through Hennepin County Environmental Health for an itinerant license. The fee is $49 per day and $10 for each additional day. Each license is specific to one location. Annual license as a catering vehicle. This 12 -month license is also issued by Hennepin County Environmental Health and requires a plan review process and inspection prior to operating. The fee is currently $473.00 (may increase in 2014) and allows the food truck to operate in any jurisdiction regulated by Hennepin County Environmental Health (all areas in the county with the exception of the cities of Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, Minnetonka, Wayzata, and Brooklyn Park which have their own food truck licensing provisions). Minnesota Department of Health license. A food truck may be licensed by the MDH which would allow it to operate anywhere in the state. The fee for plan review for new construction is $350.00. Each of the above licenses only allows operation at any given location for 21 days unless a local ordinance is passed permitting longer operation. Hennepin County Environmental Health is responsible for enforcing all food code and statutory provisions for food trucks operating in New Hope regardless of type of license obtained. 2 Locations and Hours. Additional restrictions may be imposed on where food trucks are allowed to operate within the city. Limiting operations to non - residential zoning districts focuses operations to places where vehicle and pedestrian traffic is expected, accommodated, and is appropriate. In mixed -use zoning districts (R -O and R -B), food trucks may be permitted to operate on a commercial or mixed use site (but not on a property used exclusively for residential uses). An exception may be made to allow ice cream trucks to operate in residential districts. A further exception could be granted to allow schools and churches to utilize food trucks for special events. This could be regulated via a temporary use permit (Section 4- 3(h)). Food trucks may also be allowed to operate on public rights -of -way in residential districts with administrative approval for such occasions as neighborhood block parties. Food truck operations should be restricted to private property (prohibiting operation on public streets or right -of -ways) with written permission of the property owner required as a condition of licensure. Operation on city park land may be granted at the city's discretion. A concern has been raised regarding the location of food trucks in proximity to existing brick - and -mortar food establishments in the city. In order to address issues of competition, a distance restriction may be imposed to separate food trucks from other food service businesses. Other jurisdictions have distance restrictions from 100 - 300 feet from building entrances unless permission from the business is granted to allow the food trucks to operate within closer proximity. (See Exhibit A — Food Service Buffer Analysis) The city may decide to limit the hours of operation of a food truck. This could be established by setting specific hours in the ordinance with extended hours allowed with administrative approval. RECOMMENDATION Section 8 -6 should be amended to address specific issues pertaining to the operation of food trucks. Establishing a clear process for obtaining a city license will provide tools for ensuring that food trucks are complying with state regulations with regard to food safety and are located in appropriate places within the city. The following ordinance amendments to Section 8 -6 of the New Hope City Code may be considered: Section 8 -6(c) Definitions. Mobile Food Unit A food and beverage service establishment that is a vehicle mounted unit, either: (1) motorized or trailered, operating no more than 21 days annually at any one place, or operating more than 21 days annually at any one Dlace with the approval of the regulatory authority as defined in Minnesota Rules. part 4626.0020, subpart 70; or (2) operated in conjunction with a permanent business licensed under Chapter 157 or Chapter 128A of the Minnesota State Statutes at the site of the permanent business by the same individual or company, and readily movable without disassembling for transport to another location. The following are also considered mobile food units for the purpose of this Ordinance: Food Cart: A food and beverage service establishment that is a non - motorized vehicle self - propelled by the operator. Ice Cream Truck: A motor vehicle utilized as the point of retail sales of pre - wrapped or prepackaged ice cream frozen yogurt, frozen custard, flavored frozen water or similar frozen dessert products. Transient merchant means a person, whether as owner, agent, consignee, or employee who engages in a temporary business out of a vehicle, trailer, box car, tent, other portable shelter, store front, or from a parking lot for the purpose of displaying for sale, selling or attempting to sell, and delivering goods, wares, products, merchandise or other personal property and who does not remain or intend to. remain in any one location including mobile food units Section 8 -6(d) Form of registration. Mobile food units are required to meet the following additional standards: 1. MFUs must be licensed by the Minnesota Health Department, and must adhere to State regulations for food trucks as provided in Food Code Chapter 4626 1860 Mobile Food Establishments; Seasonal Temporary Food Stands; Seasonal Permanent Food Stands. Evidence of the State license must be provided to the City as part of the local license application. MFU operations are permitted in the CB LB, and I districts, and on commercial or mixed use sites in R -B and R -O districts. MFUs may operate in the OSP district or on institutional sites or public rights -of- way in residential districts with a temporary use permit as provided for in Section 4 -3(h) and subject to the conditions of this section. Ice cream truck vendors may operate in all zoning districts, but must adhere to the described hours of operation. _MFUs must be located on private property, and the applicant must provide written consent from the property owner. Ice cream trucks are allowed to operate within the public right -of -way in residential districts. MFUs may be located in a public park or within the public right -of -way in residential districts with approval from the City. 4. MFU operations are not permitted between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and eight o'clock (8:00) A.M. except by approval from the C 5. MFU sites shall be kept in a neat and orderly manner, and shall adhere to the following site requirements: a. Trash and /or recycling collection and cleanup must be provided b. MFUs must provide independent power supply which is screened from view. Generators are permitted. c. MFUs shall be located on an asphalt or concrete surface. d. MFUs must close during adverse weather conditions when shelter is not provided. e. MFUs may not occupy parking spaces where the remaining parking will not meet minimum standards required by Section 4- 3e 6. Ice cream truck vendors are required to undergo a background check prior to operating in the community at the cost of the applicant 7. If MFU sites are found to be in non - compliance with any conditions as provided in Section 8 -6 of the Ordinance the City reserves the right to revoke the MFU transient merchant license. Section 8 -6(f) Registration requirements. (1) Duration. Each registration shall be valid only for the period specified therein, and no registration may extend beyond the 31 st day of December of the year in which it is granted. Mobile food units may operate for more than 21 days in one location for a duration approved by the City. Section 8 -6(h) Prohibited activities. (3) Private property. Registration under this section does not permit a person to conduct the activity on private property without the ongoing permission of the property owner or the property owner's authorized agent. Mobile food units shall not be located within 200 feet from the main entrance of any other food establishment on a separate lot. If the above ordinance amendments are approved, the existing New Hope Door -to -Door Solicitation Registration form should be updated to reflect the additional standards for food trucks. Following discussion and upon direction from the planning commission, staff will draft an ordinance amendment to receive further comment at a public hearing. Memorandum To: Jeff Sargent, Community Development Specialist From: Valerie Leone, City Clerk Date: January 16, 2014 Subject: Licensing Food Trucks Thank you for the opportunity to review the planner's memorandum dated December 31, 2013. I have a few comments /questions: 1) Agree with the recommendation to license mobile food unit (MFq under the transient merchant category. 2) Request clarification on fees — assuming the vendor would be required to pay a $50 city fee for each 21 -day duration per location; therefore, should discuss the fee amount if the city granted the MFU more than 21 days in same location per 8- 6(f)(1) — high probability especially for ice cream trucks. Question whether the 21 -day limit reasonable (catering vehicle can obtain 12 month county license). Perhaps the city's license should coincide with expiration of the county or state license. Door - to-door solicitation registration essentially covers a calendar year. 3) Discuss handling of licensure of food vendors at Duk Duk Daze (one weekend) and Farmers Market (Saturdays during summer months). 4) Ice cream trucks — need to modify code 9 -22(b) noisemaking devices from motor vehicles (if allowing ice cream trucks to play music). Also, when reviewing code 9-22 determine if 9 -22(a) requires modification. 5) Background checks for ice cream vendors — what type of check — and amount of proposed fee. 6) Should the distance from food establishments also address proximity to schools (perhaps during school hours only). 7) Would the city require any other type of permit. 8) In the past the topic of licensing food delivery vehicles (ie pizza delivery) was discussed. New Hope does not license. May want to clarify that definition of MFU does not include delivery vehicles. GACity ManageABUSLIOm -food truck licensure.docac Page 1 of I § 9 -21 NEW HOPE CODE Sec. 9 -21. Reserved. Sec. 9 -22. Outdoor sales of goods or services from motor vehicles. (a) Outdoor sales of goods or services from motor vehicles restricted. The practice of traveling upon the public streets of the city, selling, offering to sell, or soliciting orders for the sale of goods or services from a motor vehicle upon any major thoroughfare or within 125 feet of the right -of -way of any intersection constitutes a traffic hazard, is inherently dangerous to the safety of children, and therefore is declared to be a public nuisance, and is prohibited. (b) Use of noisemaking devices prohibited. The practice of giving notice of the presence of such motor vehicle by the ringing of a bell, gong, triangle, record, tape, musical instrument, or other similar device for the purpose of selling, offering to sell, or soliciting orders for the sale of goods or services is declared to be a public nuisance and is prohibited. (Ord. No. 72 -20) Supp. No. 26 CD9:24.2 Sargent Jeff From: Alan Brixius (abrixius @nacplanning.com] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:57 AM To: Sargent Jeff; Jacobsen Curtis; sas @jspattorneys.com Cc: 'Emily Shively' Subject: RE: Planning commission items. In review of Val's comments I offer the following: 1. We agree that these are transient licenses. 2. I have not examined the city fee requirements. The 21 days is a limit that is established by state regulation, however, local municipalities may approve permits for longer durations. We may choose to establish a fee structure for 21 day increments and allow the vendor to have a longer duration with the payment of multiple fees. The MFUs involve food preparation with the vehicle, I believe this distinguishes these vehicles from pizza delivery and catering trucks which are delivery food prepared at a permanent kitchen. 3. We have included an exception to allow MFUs with parks, schools, church and on public right of way in residential zoning districts for special events (i.e. Community events, fund raisers, Block Parties, etc.). I don't know how we recruit vendors for Duk Duk Daze or the Farmers market, however, as part of the recruitment the city could issue temporary MFU licenses to vendors participating in city sponsored events at no charge if this is an issue. 4. We did not pick up on Section 9 -22 of the city Code. We can abide by the prohibition of noisemakers or we can alter this code requirement. 5. In the latest version of the draft ordinance we called out that the Ice Cream Truck vendors must undergo a "criminal " background check. This fee should be similar to the cost associated with the background check. 6. Our schools are zoned residential. We do not allow MFU to operate in residential zoning districts. The exception is ice cream truck and special events approved as a temporary use by the city. Most of our schools are separated from our commercial and industrial areas. 7. The city has a Temporary use permit in its zoning ordinance we reference this section in the license ordinance to address temporary special events such as block parties, school or church fund raisers. 8. We can further change the MFU definition to exclude delivery trucks and caterers. Alan Brixius, AICP Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. 4800 Olson Memorial Hwy, Suite 202 Golden Valley, MN 55422 Phone: 763 - 231 -2555 Fax: 763 - 231 -2561 abrixius nacglanning.com From: Sargent Jeff [ mailtoJsament ci new- hope.mn.us Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:39 AM To: Alan Brixius Subject: RE: Planning commission items. Thanks, Al. Could you review the attached memo? We had Val look at your original memo, and she had some questions. Thanks. Jeff Sargent Community Development Specialist City of New Hope Food TrUc Regulations Food Service Buffer Analysis Distance From Entry 100 feet 200 feet 300 feet - •• -••- City Boundary ZONING R -1 R -2 R -3 R-4 R -5 R -B R -O PUD CB I LB OSP W NONINW96T ASSOC1ATlO CON6YLTANT6, INC. 1404 Op•n Man•,pl Nlbhwey, 6.11• 242. 0.1dm 9.11_ MN 66922 T•Iwpb•n• .2121964. I.- 9.2,121 1441 gmnp• ,uc,damm�p.cpn Map Date: December 31, 2013 ORDINANCE NO. 14-_ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 (BUSINESS AND AMUSEMENT REGULATION; LICENSE PROCEDURE) OF THE NEW HOPE CITY CODE RELATED TO CHANGES TO SECTION 8-6, REGISTRATION OF SOLICITORS, PEDDLERS, HAWKERS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS TO REGULATE MOBILE FOOD UNITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW HOPE ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 8 -6(c), Definitions, of the New Hope City Code is hereby amended to add the following definitions: Mobile Food Unit: A food and beverage service establishment that is a vehicle mounted unit, either: (1) motorized or trailered operating no more than 21 days an nually at any on place, or operating more than 21 days annually at any one place with the approval of the regulatory authority as defined in Minnes Ru les. part 4626 0020, subpart 70; or (2) operated in conjunction with a permanent business licensed under Chapter 157 or Chia ter 128A of the Minnesota State Statutes at the site of th permanent business by the same individual or company, and readies movable without disassembling for transport to another location. The following are also considered mobile food units for the pu rpose o f this Ordi nance: Food Cart A food and beverage service establishment that is a non - motorized vehicle self - propelled by the operator. Ice Cream Truck A motor vehicle utilized as the point of reta sales of p re wrapped or prepackaged ice cream frozen yogurt, frozen cus tard, flavored frozen water or similar frozen dessert products. Transient merchant means a person, whether as owner, agent, consignee, or employee who engages in a temporary business out of a vehicle, trailer, box car, tent, other portable shelter, store front, or from a parking lot for the purpose of displaying for sale, selling or attempting to sell, and delivering goods, wares, products, merchandise or other personal property and who does not remain or intend to remain in any one location including mobile food units Section 2. Section 8 -6(d), Form of Registration, of the New Hope City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: 14 Mobile food units are required to meet the following additional standards: 1. MFUs must be licensed by the Minnesota Health Department, and must adhere to State regulations for food trucks as provided in Food Code Chapter 4626.1860 Mobile Food Establishments: Seasonal Temporary Food Stands: Seasonal Permanent Food Stands. Evidence of the State license must be provided to the City as part of the local license application. 2. MFU operations are permitted in the CB, LB, and I districts, and on commercial or mixed use sites in R -B and R -0 districts. MFUs may operate in residential districts, public parks, school sites, church sites, or in conjunction with a block party or special event where a temporary use permit has been obtained per Section 4 -3(h) and subject to the conditions of this section. Ice cream truck vendors may operate in all zoning districts, but must adhere to the described hours of operation. 3. MFUs must be located on private property, and the applicant must provide written consent from the property owner. Ice cream trucks are allowed to operate within the public right -of -way in residential districts. MFUs may be located in a public park or within the public right -of -way in residential districts in association with a special event with approval from the City. 4. MFU aerations are not permitted between the hours of ten o'clock 00:00) P.M. and eight o'clock (8:00) A.M. except by approval from the City. 5. MFU sites shall be kept in a neat and orderly manner, and shall adhere to the following site requirements: a. Trash and /or recycling collection and cleanup must be provided. b. MFUs must provide independent power supply which is screened from view. Generators are permitted. c. MFUs shall be located on an asphalt or concrete surface. d. MFUs must close during adverse weather conditions when shelter is not provided. e. MFUs may not occupy parking spaces where the remaining parking will not meet minimum standards required by Section 4- 3(e) of the New Hope City Code. 6. Ice cream truck vendors are required to undergo a criminal background check prior to operating in the community at the cost of the applicant. 7. If MFU sites are found to be in non - compliance with any conditions as provided in Section 8 -6 of the Ordinance, the City reserves the right to revoke the MFU transient merchant license. Section 3. Section 8 -6(f), Registration Requirements, is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (1) Duration. Each registration shall be valid only for the period specified therein, and no registration may extend beyond the 31st day of December of the year in which it is granted. Mobile food units may operate for more than 21 days in one location for a duration approved by the City. Section 4. Section 8 -6(f), Prohibited Activities, of the New Hope City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (1) Loud noises and speaking devices. A person registered under this section may not shout, cry out, blow a horn, ring a bell, or use any sound amplifying device upon any of the streets, alleys, parks, or other public places of the city or upon private premises where sound of sufficient volume is emitted or produced there from to be capable of being plainly heard upon the streets, alleys, parks, or other public places, for the purpose of attracting attention to any goods, wares, or merchandise which such person proposes to sell. Ice cream trucks travelling through a residential district may have outdoor music or noise - making devi to announce their presence. (3) Private property. Registration under this section does not permit a person to conduct the activity on private property without the ongoing permission of the property owner or the property owner's authorized agent. Mobile food units shall not be located within 200 feet from the main entrance of any other permanent food establishment on a separate lot. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication. APPROVED this day of 2014. Kathi Hemken, Mayor ATTEST' Valerie Leone, City Clerk 3 CITY OF NEW HOPE 4401 XYLON AVENUE NORTH NEW HOPE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 55428 PLANNING COMVIISSION MINUTES December 3, 2013 City Hall, 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER The New Hope Planning Commission met in regular session pursuant to due call and notice thereof; Chair Svendsen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Jim Brinkman, Mikel Dumonceaux, Wade English, Greg Gehring, Jeff Houle, Sandra Hunten, Roger Landy, Christopher McKenzie, Ranjan Nirgude, Tom Schmidt, Steve Svendsen Also Present: Curtis Jacobsen, Director of Community Development, Jeff Sargent, Community Development Specialist, Steven Sondrall, City Attorney, Alan Brixius, Planning Consultant, Debra Somers, Recording Secretary CONSENT BUSINESS There was no Consent Business on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARING Chair Svendsen introduced Item 4.35, request for Comprehensive Sign Plan and Planning Case 13 -10 site review for the remodel of Domino's Pizza, 2720 Winnetka Avenue North, Item 4.1 Eric Stadtherr, petitioner. Mr. Jeff Sargent, community development specialist, stated the first case tonight is Case 13 -10, it is a request for a Site Plan Review and a Comprehensive Sign Plan for Domino's Pizza, 2720 Winnetka Avenue North. The petitioner would like to remodel the building at 2720 Winnetka. A Site Plan Review is required when modifications, additions or enlargements to building occur. The Comprehensive Sign Plan is needed for multi-tenant commercial buildings to ensure a consistent design for signs. The property is currently zoned CB, Community Business and is roughly in the northeast corner of Medicine Lake Road, which is 27th Avenue North, and Winnetka Avenue North. Adjacent land uses include Residential Business to the east, High - Density Residential to the east and Commercial to the west and south. Planning District 16 guides this site for commercial land uses. The applicant is currently located in the Midland Shopping Center. They bought the building at 2720 Winnetka for more visibility from the street and they want to be in their own building. Domino's would take the southern one -third of the building and would lease the remaining two tenant spaces to other users. The applicant would like to upgrade the appearance of the property grounds including resurfacing and restriping the parking lot, constructing a trash enclosure, replacing the pylon sign, installing landscaping along the Winnetka Avenue sidewalk, fixing the perimeter fence and installing a bicycle rack. The applicant would like to replace the brick with decorative stone, decorative stone veneer and EFIS panels. A repainting of the remainder of the building to match the new materials and extending the glass to the ground. In the proposed changes the stone veneer work along the front of the building would wrap around to the sides. The rest of the brick on the sides would be painted to match and the glass work in the front would be brought all the way down to the ground level. Previously, it was brick underneath the first row of glass and this would be brought down for a more aesthetic appeal. Along the property line for the business they want to do some kind of decorative work such as decorative concrete with planters to liven the area up with more green Some work will be done in the parking lot area, as well as fixing the perimeter fence, which is currently pushed over. The Site Plan indicates some type of landscaping will be done along the west side of this property. The trash enclosure will be located in the back of the building. They have also indicated an area that is to be used for snow removal. Under the pylon sign they are going to incorporate a bicycle rack. The site plan is needed to ensure there is adequate parking for the property and to make sure the proposed building materials are consistent with the New Hope Design Guidelines. As far as parking, the change in the use of the building triggers the need to look at the parking calculations. Applicant could either assume the retail / shopping center ratio of 1:200 or use square footage estimates based on use areas for the proposed restaurant. Using the 1:200 ratio the use would require 20 on -site stalls. Using the square footage estimates, the use would require 41 stalls. The Site Plan indicates a total of 54 on -site parking stalls, meeting the minimum requirements. The trash enclosure would take up approximately two stalls, and the snow removal would take about 3 stalls which would bring the total to 49 stalls. The proposed building materials consists stone veneer, glass and EFIS panels. The color palette is muted browns and tans. The proposed building materials and color schemes are consistent with the New Hope Design Guidelines. The site circulation and traffic will include Domino's delivery personnel and employees will park in the back and access the building from a rear door. Movement of delivery traffic should not conflict with patrons accessing the front doors. The applicant was not required to submit a landscape plan. The applicant will be upgrading the landscaping along Winnetka Avenue sidewalk with decorative concrete and planters. The existing group of rooftop units will be screened from view. The applicant will construct a new trash enclosure with materials to match the renovated building. Planning Commission Meeting 2 December 3, 2013 The applicant has submitted a Comprehensive Sign Plan. The signs for the building will all be the same size. The applicant is proposing a new pylon sign that incorporates an electronic message board. The Comprehensive Sign Plan will review the signage every time plans are brought in for a permit for new signage so the city will make sure these comply. The new pylon sign is a double pylon sign that will have two posts instead of a single post. It will be about twenty feet tall and each tenant will have their individual space with the electronic message board sign at the bottom of the sign. The applicant would like to reface the front of the building with upgraded building materials. A Site Plan Review is necessary to ensure compliance with the Design Guidelines. The change in occupancy of the building requires a parking study to ensure adequate on -site parldng for employees and patrons. The building materials consist of stone veneer, EFIS panels and glass, all acceptable materials according to the Design Guidelines. The applicant indicates 54 on -site parking stalls, meeting the minimum requirements for parking given the change of occupancy. The Site Plan Review meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Is consistent with the intent of the Code. It preserves the natural state of the site insofar practical and it creates a harmonious and functional visual relationship between the proposed use and surrounding buildings. Mr. Sargent stated no notifications are required for a Site Plan Review request. In summary, the applicant is requesting a Site Plan Review to ensure compliance with the Design Guidelines and parking regulations. The applicant is requesting A Comprehensive Sign Plan to ensure consistency with the signage on the building. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Site Plan Review and Comprehensive Sign Plan with the following conditions of approval: 1. A detail of the proposed screen fencing around the rooftop equipment must be provided; 2. The parking lot must be striped. 3. A detail of the trash enclosure must be provided with elevations indicating the building materials. 4. The existing perimeter fence must be repaired. 5. A detail of the planters and decorative concrete treatment along Winnetka Avenue must be provided. 6. Lighting at the rear of the building must be 90 degree cutoff lighting as to not impact the adjacent residential properties. Planning Commission Meeting 3 December 3, 2013 7. The site plan must be revised to show the location for the new multi - tenant sign that meets the required ten-foot setback from the property line. 8. Sign permits must be obtained for all site signage. 9. The new electronic reader board sign must comply with the signage regulations as outlined in Section 3 -50 (k)(3)f of the Sign Code. Staff and representatives for the applicant are present to answer any questions. Commissioners Brinkman, Hunten and Nirgude questioned the positioning of the sign on the property and the bicycle rack in the same location. The sign would not to be in the way of traffic entering or leaving the parking lot or another parking stall. Vehicles traveling north and south will be able to see the sign. Mr. Sargent indicated the new bicycle rack would be installed underneath the new pylon sign. Mr. Sargent stated all the parking lot and landscaping work would not be done until the spring of 2014. The applicant stated they would do the renovations in a timely and weather - friendly fashion. Chair Svendsen asked the petitioner to come forward and address the Commission. Mr, Eric Stadtherr, 809 Southeast Third Street, Palmer, Minnesota, acting as representative for Domino's Pizza and Kaukauna Properties in Minnesota, was recognized. Mr. Stadtherr stated he would like to purchase this property and do a complete facelift to make it a very nice property for the city. Chair Svendsen and Commissioner Houle questioned the photometric plan. It shows about 3 -1/2 foot candles at about 1 -1/2 to 2 feet from the property line. It requires no more than 1/2 foot at the property line. Al Brixius, city planner, explained that in the outdoor lighting ordinance does recognize existing conditions and gives the applicant some grandfather rights under the current conditions. Most of the light fixtures being proposed are existing lights not being replaced. Mr. Brixius is working with applicant regarding the 90 degree cutoff lights by reducing clarity of the luminary cast toward the joint properties. Staff looked at those being a grandfathered condition under the current ordinance. The lights are hooded and shielded so as to downcast. Mr. Brixius indicated that the new lights on the building would be downcast and are subject the city's code requirements. The city can certainly ask for a photometric plan, however, on the lighting plan the applicant gave the city what the existing and proposed lighting was going to be at the property lines. The city also requires a certain light level on the sidewalks and the applicant is Planning Commission Meeting 4 December 3, 2013 complying with that A discussion took place with Chair Svendsen, Commissioner Brinkman and Mr. Stadtherr concerning the materials for the new sign. The base would be a solid base that is not stone but a rubbery material that looks like stone. Chair Svendsen suggested Mr. Stadtherr get the full name for the rubbery material that looks like stone. Chair Svendsen asked what the landscape plans were along Winnetka Avenue. The applicant responded his understanding is that the property lines ends on the east edge of the sidewalk. He plans to install decorative, stamped concrete running the whole width of the parking lot and essentially putting planters with flowers in it about every fifteen to twenty feet. The contractor will get confirmation/permission from Hennepin County to allow concrete to butt up to the existing sidewalk to the property line. A discussion ensued about using a pervious material in this area instead of the decorative concrete. The applicant believes the concrete would be less problematic and need not be replaced as often. Mr. Stadtherr expressed concerns about the traffic along Winnetka and the potential for having foot traffic vandalism. Mr. Brixius stated that the city will face the bicycle parking issue with redesign plans. Staff to work with the applicant on plan details. Commissioner Brinkman asked if there would be any outdoor dining at this location and was advised there will not be any at this location. Commissioner Nirgude asked if the there would be new equipment added to the rooftop equipment already in place. Mr. Stadtherr plans to replace all the existing equipment on the roof due to its deteriorated condition. Commissioner Nirgude asked the size the delivery trucks. Mr. Stadtherr indicated that a semi truck comes twice per week at 4:30 am to deliver food to the restaurant. Commissioner Hunten asked what a Watch Fire was. Mr. Stadtherr explained that it is brand name for a reader board. It will be an illuminated reader board similar to what CVS has. The board will be approximately 5 -6' high, normal car level and back 10' from sidewalk & back toward building. There was no one else in the audience that wished to speak at the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Houle, to close the public hearing. All voted in favor. Motion carried. No other discussion by the Commission. Planning Commission Meeting 5 December 3, 2013 Motion Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Brinkman, to Item 4.1 approve Planning Case 13 -10, request for Comprehensive Sign Plan and Site Plan Review for remodeling of Domino's Pizza, 2720 Winnetka Avenue North, subject to the following nine: 1. That a detail of the proposed screen fence around the rooftop equipment must be provided; 2. The parking lot must be striped; 3. A detail of the trash enclosure must be provided with elevations indicating the building materials; 4. The existing perimeter fence must be repaired; 5. A detail of the planters and decorative concrete treatment along Winnetka Avenue must be provided; 6. Lighting at the rear of the building must be 90 degree cutoff lighting as to not impact the adjacent residential properties; 7. The site plan must be revised to show the location of the new multi-tenant sign that meets the required ten-foot setback from the property line; 8. Sign permits must be obtained for all site signage; and 9. The new electronic reader board sign must comply with the signage regulations as outlined in our Sign Code. Voting in favor: Svendsen, Brinkman, Dumonceaux, English, Gehring, Houle, Hunten, Landy, McKenzie, Nirgude, Schmidt Voting against: None Absent: None Motion approved. Chair Svendsen stated that the City Council would consider this planning case at its December 9 meeting and asked the petitioner to be in attendance. Planning Case 13 -09 Chair Svendsen introduced Case 13 -09, request for rezoning and Item 4.2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 9390 and 9398 27th Avenue North, Aaron Baruch, petitioner. Mr. Jeff Sargent, community development specialist, stated Case 13 -09 is a request for Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, 9390 and 9898 27th Avenue North. The petitioner requests rezoning of the properties and the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment would re -guide the properties from commercial to high- density residential. Zoning code references are 4 -32 under administration for the amendment. The zoning currently is LB, limited business, and the proposed zoning is R -0, residential office. The location is the northeast corner of Hillsboro Avenue North and 27th Avenue North, which is Medicine Lake Road. The adjacent land uses include high - density residential to the north and west, medium - density residential to the east, and the city of Golden Valley to the south. This is located Planning Commission Meeting 6 December 3, 2013 in Planning District 14 and our comprehensive plan which guides us in area land uses. Mr. Sargent reported the applicant has purdlased the property at 9398 - 27th Avenue North with the intent if constructing a 21 -unit apartment building on the site. The site currently is occupied by a single- family house. The current limited building zoning classification would not allow for high- density residential and for that reason the property would need to be rezoned to allow higher densities. The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for commercial. This is not consistent with High - Density Residential Use and for that reason the Comprehensive Plan would need amending to allow for the proposed use. Mr. Sargent presented the Planning Commission with slides showing a possible site plan and building elevations. He indicated that the applicant would like to give the Commission a representative idea of how a building could fit on the property and what type of materials would be used. Mr. Sargent reminded the Commission that the applicant is not seeking site plan approval at this time. The Planning Commission and City Council will have to consider the following factors when approving a zoning request: 1. The character of the area has changed to warrant consideration of an amendment. The findings show that the surrounding area has been developed into medium and high- density residential uses. The shopping center to the south which is in the City of Golden Valley is marginal with an unusual mix of tenants and vacancies. This supports the idea that commercial uses on the subject property may not be the best use and may not prosper well in the area. 2. The proposed action that has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official city Comprehensive Plan. They are asking for an amendment so we know that their proposed use is not consistent with the current comprehensive plan so there would need to be amendments to re- guide the property for high- density residential use. The two properties in question are the LB properties. High- density residential, R -4 zoning district that is directly to the north and a little to the west. To the east is R -3 which is still medium - density residential. The small LB district, which is a very intensive commercial uses, it is more the neighborhood type of commercial uses, it surrounded by the same type of uses as the applicant is proposing. As far as the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is concerned, amending the Comprehensive Plan for high- density residential would be consistent with two housing goals: Planning Commission Meeting 7 December 3, 2013 1. Provide a variety of housing types, styles and choices to meet the needs of New Hope's changing demographics. Applicant stated that the apartments would be market -rate with higher -end amenities, providing a different option than what is available in the area. Again, for the zoning analysis, the Comprehensive Plan guides the area for Commercial Use. The proposed land use of high- density residential is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and therefore the amendment is needed. 2. Maintain and enhance multiple family residential neighborhoods. The area is a multiple family neighborhood. Adding a brand new housing complex would enhance the area and updating the housing stock in the area. Mr. Sargent elaborated regarding the Site Plan just a little bit again. He stated the applicant's not asking for any Site Plan approval, but there some considerations that need to be made with this proposal. The property located at 9398 — 27th Avenue is 35,154 square feet in area. The R -O Zoning District would allow for up to 1 unit per each 2,200 square feet of land. Using these calculations, the applicant would be allowed to construct a 16 -unit building. The applicant is proposing a 21 -unit building. Mr. Sargent stated that the city has some incidences in our zoning ordinance that allows for a 20% density bonus increase if the property includes things such as durable exterior building material, underground parking, the incorporation of a recreational area, that is either indoor or outdoor, and the location within 300 feet of a public transit. The site plan that the applicant presented meets all of these. So they would get the 20 %; however, even with that bonus the applicant would still only be allowed 19 units on the property because of the size of the land involved. The applicant has requested staff to review a possible text amendment that would increase the density allotments in some of the residential district. Staff will be discussing this issue with the Codes and Standards Committee on December 10. Staff will get feedback from that committee to see if this should be brought back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Mr. Sargent indicated that there were a couple of other things regarding the rezoning of this property from LB to R-0. One is to make sure the existing State Farm use on the 9390 property did not become not - compliant due to an action by the city. The State Farm office use would be a permitted use in the R-0 zoning district. The R -O would allow for 1 unit for every 2,200 square feet of property. Mr. Sargent informed the Commission that the applicant stated he is interested in purchasing the State Farm property as well. He would want to build on that property also and would come back to the Commission with a different site plan that would incorporate a larger building on that one lot of property. Planning Commission Meeting 8 December 3, 2013 Property owners within 350 feet were notified by mail and a public hearing notice was published in the SunPost. Staff has received no phone calls or objections regarding this proposal. In summary, the applicant is requesting a rezoning of the property located at 9398 - 27th Avenue from LB to R-0 in order to construct an apartment building. Again, we are going to include the 9390 - 27th Avenue property to be consistent with the zoning ordinance and the zoning map. The applicant is also requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re -guide the area from commercial to high- density residential. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval for rezoning the properties located at 9390 and 9398 - 27th Avenue from LB, Limited Business to R -O, Residential Office. Staff felt it was prudent to include the property located at 9390 - 27th Avenue in the rezoning request in order to maintain zoning consistency in the area. Staff would also recommend that the Planning Commission recommend approval for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties located at 9390 and 9398 - 27th Avenue to re-guide the properties from commercial to high- density residential. Commissioners Schmidt, Houle and Hunten asked if this was the same location where the SuperAmerica was denied a while back. Mr. Brixius indicated it was denied due to lighting issues, size, traffic and other gas stations in the area. Commissioner Houle questioned if staff contacted the property owners at 9390 - 27th Avenue and whether the owners are aware of or in support of this proposal. Staff indicated the contact the city had was through the notification process and the SunPost which is required by State law. Staff reiterated that the city would not be making the property non - conforming by rezoning it. Commissioners Hunter, Landy, Chair Svendsen and Mr. Brixius discussed the notification to the owners at 9390 - 27th Avenue and the size of the space for 19 or 21 units. Mr. Brixius suggested the question of the density should be put to the applicant and it is prudent to the change of zoning. The site plan, while it is not being approved tonight, is essential for the Commission to look at and make a determination of whether this land use fits the site. Chair Svendsen asked the petitioner to come forward. Mr. Aaron Baruch, 9705 29th Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota was recognized and offered to answer any questions. Commissioners Landy and Houle asked if petitioner had considered 19 units versus 21 units and if he had any further status on purchasing the other property. Mr. Baruch stated his goal is to build up to a 21 unit complex if it fits Planning Commission Meeting 9 December 3, 2013 within the city guidelines. After Mr. Baruch indicated he would approach the owners of 9390 — 27th Avenue. The property is currently for sale and the owners are aware the property may be rezoned. There was no one else in the audience that wished to speak at the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Houle, to close the public hearing. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Chair Svendsen stated that the rezoning of these parcels, regardless of what is built there, is going to be a benefit to the city because the city has struggled through the years in trying to do some type of commercial development. It would give the city more latitude to looking at something in the future. Commission Landy concurred. Commissioner Houle commented that in the past the Council has not been in favor of higher density. Chair Svendsen mentioned the Met Council is promoting higher density. Commissioner Houle was surprised that staff did not directly contact the owners of 9390 — 27th Avenue and make sure they were aware their property was subject to rezoning. Mr. Jacobson stated the applicant was in conversations with the owner before this process was started. The owner was sent the official legal notice directly to his address, so the city was in contact with him. Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Gehring, to approve Planning Case 13 -09, request for Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment 9390 and 9398 — 27th Avenue North. Voting in favor: Dumonceaux, English, Gehring, Hunten, Landy, McKenzie, Schmidt, Svendsen, Brinkman Voting against: Houle, Nirgude Absent: None Motion approved. Chair Svendsen stated that the City Council would consider this planning case at its December 9 meeting and asked the petitioner to be in attendance. Planning Case 13 -08 Chair Svendsen introduced Case 13 -08, an ordinance amending the text in three Item 4.3 areas in driveways requiring paved driveways for all lots within the city and addressing front yards and side yards abutting a street for exterior storage, City of New Hope, petitioner. Mr. Sargent explained the proposed ordinance change has been discussed with the Codes and Standards Committee. The proposed amendment is a requirement for all properties in the City of New Hope to have a hard surface driveway. Planning Commission Meeting 10 December 3, 2013 The type of request is an ordinance amendment to the Zone Code in relation to requiring hard surface driveways in all zoning districts. Currently, New Hope does not require paved hard surface driveways within its R -1, Single Family and R -2, Single and Two Family Residential Districts. Staff has concerns related to neighborhood design, runoff from gravel driveways, and motor fluids being absorbed into the ground. The Codes and Standards Committee met on this on April 10, 2013 and determined that some ordinance changes were appropriate. The following amendments are offered for consideration: 1. The first ordinance change provides a definition for driveways in Section 4.2. 2. The second amendment will require hard surface driveways for all lots within the City of New Hope. This outlines the driveway design standards for both the sub -base and surfacing. 3. The third amendment addresses front yards and side yards abutting a street for exterior storage. It would require paved surfaces for storage of recreational vehicles on the street side of any home. These changes will only be applied with new construction or when a driveway permit is requested for an alteration or expansion. There are legally non - conforming properties that the city has to be aware of. If someone currently has a gravel driveway they can improve that driveway as far as adding more gravel on it. If they would come in for a driveway permit to widen or change it, the city would require that driveway at that point to be a hard surface driveway. Staff recommends approval. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review and offer comment to the City Council for consideration. Commissioner Houle asked what situation would cause the third amendment to take effect. Mr. Sargent stated a resident that is currently in compliance with storing their recreational vehicle on the side of their property, could continue to store it in the same location until they came in to the city to request a permit for a hard surface for any particular reason. At that point the resident would need to put in a hard surface driveway. Commission Houle asked if a resident currently parked an RV on a gravel surface on the side of their house and came in for driveway permit would this cause the city to request a hard surface under the RV. Mr. BzWus stated the city would have some discretion to push to have everything hard surfaced as part of one driveway permit. Mr. Sargent suggested a situation where someone currently has a hard surface Planning Commission Meeting 11 December 3, 2013 driveway and they purchased an RV to store on the side of their house, the city would require that the pad placed would need to be a hard surface and they would not be able to put gravel down. Mr. Brixius stated the city is setting a standard for all new construction that anything new has to meet this code. If someone comes in for a permit to correct an existing non - conforming condition the city will review on a case by case basis. City Attorney Sondrall suggested cobblestone be eliminated from the draft ordinance. There was no one else in the audience that wished to speak at the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Houle, to close the public hearing. All voted in favor. Motion carried. No other discussion by the Commission. Motion Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Brinkman, to Item 4.3 approve Planning Case 13 -08, ordinance 13 -08, an ordinance amending text in three areas in Section 4 -2 of the New Hope City Code providing a definition for driveways, requiring paved driveways for all lots within the city and addressing front yards and side yards abutting a street for exterior storage, and that we remove the term cobblestone from the ordinance. Voting in favor. English, Gehring, Houle, Hunten, Landy, McKenzie, Nirgude, Schmidt, Svendsen, Brinkman, Dumonceaux Voting against: None Absent: None Motion approved. Chair Svendsen stated that the City Council would consider this planning case at its December 9 meeting and asked the petitioner to be in attendance. COMMITTEE REPORTS Commissioner Brinkman stated the next meeting will be held on Tuesday, Codes & Standards December 10, 2013. Mr. Jacobsen reported there will be three items on the Item 5.1 agenda. Design & Review Chair Svendsen stated the Design and Review Committee met with the previous Item 5.2 group and asked if there would be anything coming forward. Mr. Jacobsen is expecting two pre - application meetings this Friday, December 6, 2013 and would expect one, possibly both of them to go forward to Design and Review Committee two weeks later. NEW BUSINESS Commissioner Schmidt found an article on the Star Tribune's website. It is an Planning Commission Meeting 12 December 3, 2013 article titled 'Botched Bloomington Kitchen Project Leads to Charges Against Remodeler." It talks about some cities not prosecuting remodeling contractors that are not licensed. City Attorney Sondrall advised that the City of New Hope does prosecute. OLD BUSINESS Approval of Minutes Item 7.1 ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Houle, to approve the Planning Commission minutes of August 7, 2013. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Chair Svendsen welcomed to Deb Somers to the Planning Commission. Chair Svendsen reminded everyone to respond back to the city if you wanted to go on the Crossings Tour on Saturday morning, December 7, 2013. Mr. Jacobsen stated there were about six responses from Planning Commission members so far and we have a seventeen passenger bus rented. Commissioner Schmidt commented that The Claws restaurant is open and he inquired how close the Goose Egg Restaurant was to opening. Mr. Jacobsen stated they are still trying to get financing in place. Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Houle, to close meeting. All voted in favor. Motion carried. The Planning Commission meeting was unanimously adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Deb Somers, Recording Secretary Planning Commission Meeting 13 December 3, 2013