Loading...
Imp. Proj. #633COUNCIL Originating Department I Approved for Agenda Parks & Recreation /Public Works June 14, 1999 Shari French /Guy Johnson By: Br # 4t ACCEPTANCE OF WETLAND INVENTORY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN AN[ CONDITION REPORT CONDITION .............. Agenda Section Development & Planning Item No. I.= REQUESTED ACTION Staff is recommending that the Council accept two reports from the City's engineering firm staff. One is the Wetland Inventory and Management Plan. The other is the Park Trails Condition Report. BACKGROUND An inventory of wetlands and their functions was completed in 1998 because wetlands provide several important services to the City and its residents: Wetlands are an important part of the storm drainage system in New Hope, and help to maintain water quality and reduce flooding. Large wetlands play particularly significant roles by holding large quantities of water during storm events, and by filtering sediments and nutrients (such as phosphorus) that run off with each storm. Wetlands provide food and habitat for wildlife, including a variety of birds, amphibians, and mammals. In fully - developed communities wetlands and undeveloped patches of uplands nearby provide areas for many animals to rest, hide, forage and breed. Wetlands are attractive natural landscapes that many residents enjoy for their own qualities, and in contrast to surrounding urban areas. Wetlands offer opportunities to view and learn about wildlife and their habitats, observe seasonal changes, and provide other aesthetic and educational values. The City completed the wetland inventory to better understand the characteristics of these resources, evaluate their quality, and develop priorities and strategies for managing and enhancing its wetlands. The Park Trails Condition Report was prepared as guide to the City for CIP planning purposes over the next few years. The Citizen Advisory Commission held a public meeting to discuss both of these reports on April 19, 1999. FUNDING The 1998 -99 CIP contained funding for preparation of these reports. ATTACHMENTS Both reports are attached as are the minutes from the Citizen Advisory Commission meeting of April 19 Iffl • to CITY OF NEW HOPE 4401 XYLON AVENUE NORTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 55428 Citizen Advisory Commission Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chair Rubin called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. April 19, 1999 City Hall, 7:00 p.m. Present: Commissioners Devine, Gassman, Johnson, Lange, Rubin, Runge, Schmidt Absent: Commissioners Nelson, Sanders Staff Present: Shari French, Staff Liaison Guy Johnson, Acting Director of Public Works Dan Donahue, City Manager (arrived 8:15) Sherri Buss, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc. Vince VanderTop, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik Commissioner Gassman made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 15, 1999 as amended. Commissioner Schmidt seconded the motion. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. WETLAND INVENTORY Sherri Buss, a Landscape Architect/Ecologist from Bonestroo, Rosene, REPORT Anderlik & Associates, addressed the commissioners. She informed the commissioners that the Wetland Inventory was compiled to help the City understand its wetlands and their quality, and to develop strategies for managing and improving them. She commented that when the City is working on a project that's near a wetland, it's often possible to incorporate some sort of wetland enhancement project at the same time. Ms. Buss revealed that a large portion of New Hope's wetlands have been lost due to development, and showed the commissioners a map of New Hope's wetlands from 1955. In preparing the Wetland Inventory Report, Ms. Buss related that a process approved by the DNR called the Minnesota Rapid Assessment Method (MNRAM), was used to assign a valuation to each wetland. She explained that this valuation is based on floral diversity, wildlife habitat, aesthetics and recreation. Commissioner Gassman wondered whether summer was the most appropriate time to inventory wetlands. Ms Buss replied that anytime from late spring through the first frost is the best time to take inventory. She went on to explain that there are four types of wetlands remaining in New Hope. They include marshes, or shallow open water; shrub wetlands, which typically border marshes; forested wetlands, which include silver maple and willow; and one wet meadow, which is located at the north end of Victory Park. Ms. Buss commented that marshes are the most common type of wetland in New Hope. She added that upland areas were also reviewed, and announced the discovery of a prairie area remaining along the Canadian Pacific railway east of Winnetka Avenue. New Hope Citizen Advisory Commission April 19, 1999 Page I Ms. Buss stated that following the field inventory, the wetlands were categorized by quality—high, medium and low. She explained that high quality wetlands are larger in size, more diverse, and are connected to bodies of water or other wetlands. Ms. Buss reviewed the Management Recommendations as outlined in the Wetland Inventory Report. She closed her presentation by briefly reviewing the Implementation Plan and cost estimates of proposed wetland improvements in New Hope. Commissioner Devine wondered what wood duck boxes were. Ms. Buss replied that wood duck boxes are man -made structures that are hung high in trees bordering wetlands, and are used as nesting sites for raising the young wood ducks. Commissioner Lange inquired why Meadow Lake is classified as a wetland, while Northwood Lake is not. Ms. Buss responded that Meadow Lake is classified as a wetland because it is only two or three feet deep and is considered shallow. She added that this classification was determined by the DNR as part of the City's Storm Water Management Plan. She also noted that if left in a natural state, Meadow Lake would be nearly covered by vegetation. Commissioner Schmidt commented that it was his understanding that Northwood Lake is also that shallow. Mr. VanderTop replied that Northwood Lake is a deeper lake, however there are some shallow spots due to sedimentation. Commissioner Devine asked about buckthorn and the reason for its eradication at Dorothy Mary Park. Ms. Buss explained that buckthorn is an aggressive shrub that was transported from Europe. She noted that it grows well in the shade and tends choke out native plants and shrubs. Commissioner Lange inquired about dead ducks and their removal. Ms. Buss explained that the parasite that causes botulism in ducks is usually present in wetlands where the water is shallow and warm. She stated that it is the duty of the Animal Control Officer to remove the dead ducks, and stressed the importance of removing them as soon as possible to control the botulism. Commissioner Lange noticed the wetland improvement suggestions for Erickson Drive and wondered why the cost estimates were so high. Ms. Buss replied that the excavation of reed canary grass and the creation of ponds are both very expensive projects. She added that these projects have also been identified in the Storm Water Management Plan. The commissioners thanked Sherri Buss for her presentation. New Hope Citizen Advisory Commission April 19, 1999 Page 2 TRAIL CONDITIONS Vince VanderTop explained that the objective of the Trail Conditions REPORT Report is to inventory the trails within New Hope's parks system and provide a guideline for determining Capital Improvement Projects, budgets, and funding. He stated that the report focuses on bituminous trails and identifies specific types of improvements and their cost estimates. Mr. VanderTop briefly reviewed the improvement options that are available, including reconstruction, bituminous overlay, and seal coating. He explained that while seal coating creates a rougher surface, it can extend the life of a trail by several years. Mr. VanderTop informed the commissioners that New Hope does not currently seal coat its trails, and asked them to take this matter into consideration. Mr. VanderTop mentioned that the City does not currently have an improvement priority schedule in place, however, Staff often works to incorporate trail improvements when doing other types of construction projects in adjacent areas. He informed the commissioners that the majority of the cost estimates for trail improvements were determined last fall and may not be accurate. Chair Rubin mentioned the bituminous overlay and seal coating, and wondered what their projected lifespans were. Mr. VanderTop replied that seal coating typically extends the life of a street from 15 or 20 years to 30 years. He added that bituminous overlay costs approximately five times as much as seal coating. Chair Rubin commented that he bikes many of the trails in the twin cities area, including the North Hennepin Trail, and noticed that recently there have been problems with eruptions and cracks along it. He expressed concern because he did not consider the trail to be very old. Mr. VanderTop explained that many problems that occur with trails are due to the subgrade (sand or gravel beneath the trail) getting wet, and commented that trails usually require less subgrade than streets. He added that tree roots also work to undermine a trail surface. Mr. VanderTop referred to the Trail/Natural Resource Inventory map that was distributed to the commissioners, and briefly reviewed it with them. He explained that it is a comprehensive map designed to show proposed improvements, and should prove beneficial to both residents and business owners. Commissioner Gassman wondered where the trails would be located through residential areas, for example, traveling from Meadow Lake to Liberty Park. Mr. VanderTop responded that he envisions the trail on the street with signage. He added that while a bike lane could be striped, it would be more expensive. New Hope Citizen Advisory Commission April 19, 1999 Page 3 Commissioner Gassman asked about the improvements under consideration at Victory Park. Mr. VanderTop replied that the City is proposing the construction of a sedimentation area along the edges of the wetland. He added that he envisions incorporating that project with a storm sewer project. Ms. French explained that one reason for preparing the Trail/Natural Resource Inventory was to plan future Capital Improvement Projects and their budgets. Chair Rubin commented that in checking his parks, he noticed that the play equipment appears to be in very good condition. He wondered if it would be possible to allocate some of the funds used for play equipment to trail construction. He expressed concern over the possibility of obtaining a right -of -way across the railway, and suggested that the City apply for a federal grant for trail construction. Mr. VanderTop stated if the City agrees with obtaining a right -of -way, he would like to move forward with the project. Ms. French stated that the City would also like to obtain federal funding for a trail crossing on 36' Avenue across Highway 169. She added that Staff supports the idea because many children from New Hope walk to Plymouth Middle School. Ms. French also noted that the City Managers of New Hope, Crystal and Robbinsdale would like to meet with Hennepin Parks to discuss the possibility of obtaining joint funding to construct a trail across Highway 100. The commissioners thanked Ms. Buss and Mr. VanderTop for their presentations and both left the meeting at 8:15. POLICE DEPARTMENT Dan Donahue, City Manager, stated that in 1997, Staff was notified that HIRING NEEDS, PROCESS the Police Chief intended to retire in one year. He informed the AND FUTURE DIRECTION commissioners that the City Council studied several options, including the possibility of a joint Public Safety Director with the City of Crystal. He explained that a Public Safety Director would oversee fire, police, and emergency management services. Mr. Donahue stated that at the conclusion of their study, the City Council decided that they were not interested in the Public Safety concept, although they may consider the possibility of combining some services with neighboring cities. Mr. Donahue informed the commissioners that the City intends to hire a Police Chief, as well as two Captains. Mr. Donahue announced that there are four internal candidates that qualify for these positions, and stated that Personnel Decisions, Inc. (PDI) will be utilized to assist with the hiring process. Chair Rubin inquired whether there was a timeline. Mr. Donahue replied that he hopes to have the Police Chief position filled by the end of May and the Captains positions filled in June. New Hope Citizen Advisory Commission April 19, 1999 Page 4 Chair Rubin inquired about other vacant positions within the Police Department. Mr. Donahue responded that the City is still in the process of hiring two additional officers to bring the Department to full strength. He added that the new Chief will decide whether or not to fill the Investigator position, which is currently vacant following the retirement of John Oberreuter. Commissioner Schmidt wondered who serves on the Personnel Board. Mr. Donahue replied that the Personnel Board is made up of three citizens appointed by the City Council and given the authority to recruit and administer the personnel ordinance. Mr. Donahue announced that the City is in the final stages of hiring a Finance Director. The commissioners thanked Mr. Donahue for addressing their concerns and he left the meeting at 8:35. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Chair Rubin stated that Boone Avenue traffic issues will be discussed in May. Ms. French informed the commissioners that they may be asked to review the Golf Course clubhouse master plan if the Council cannot review it at their May worksession. Commissioner Schmidt wondered whether there was a need to discuss Duk Duk Daze. Ms. French stated that a meeting is scheduled for May 10'' with the Duk Duk Daze committee and City staff. She added that she would let them know the outcome of that meeting at the Citizen Advisory Commission's next meeting. Ms. French announced that the Mayor and City Manager would like to conduct a parks tour this year from a community development perspective. She added that the City Council, the Citizen Advisory Commission, and local legislators would be invited to attend. The commissioners tentatively scheduled the parks tour for June 21" at 5:30 p.m. OTHER BUSINESS Commissioner Schmidt mentioned that K -Mart is in the midst of converting to a Big K and has tentatively scheduled its grand opening for the end of June. Commissioner Gassman inquired whether there were any improvements scheduled for Liberty Park in 1999 or 2000, other than trail improvements. Ms. French replied no. She mentioned that some money has been set aside for play equipment, but it is still on the wish list. She also noted that New Hope Citizen Advisory Commission April 19, 1999 Page 5 while the play equipment at Holiday Park looks bad, it is structurally sound, and Staff has discussed the possibility of having it painted. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Johnson made a motion to adjourn the Regular Meeting of the Citizen Advisory Commission. Commissioner Gassman seconded the motion. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Penny Spitzer Recording Secretary New Hope Citizen Advisory Commission April 19, 1999 Page 6 PROJECT June, 1999 File No. 34 -98 -225 JA Bonestroo Principals: Sonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer Otto G. Bonestroo, RE. • Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. • Marvin L. Sorvala, R.E. Rosene Robert Glenn R. Cook, RE. • Robert G. Schunicht, R.E. • Jerry A. Bourdon, R.E. W. Rosene, P.E., Richard E. Turner, RE, and Susan M. Eberlin, C.PA., Senior Consultants „ erlik Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford, R.E. • Keith A. Gordon, RE. • Robert R. Pfefferle, RE. Richard W. Foster, RE. • David O. Loskota, R.E. • Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson, RE. Associates ss ciates Michael T. Rautmann, RE. • Ted K.Field, P.E. • Kenneth R Anderson, RE. • Mark R. Rolfs, R.E. Sidney P Williamson, RE., L.S. • Robert E Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt, RE. Offices: St. Paul, Rochester, Willmar and St. Cloud, MN • Milwaukee, WI Engineers & Architects Website: www.bonestroo.com June 7, 1999 Shari French Director Parks & Recreation City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 -4898 Re: Park Trail Condition Evaluation City Project No. 633 Our File No. 34 -98 -225 Dear Shari: The attached study presents the needs for rehabilitating the trails in the Parks of New Hope. The primary purpose of this plan is to provide city staff with a planning tool to assist them in discussing park trail rehabilitation projects in the future. We will be pleased to meet and discuss this study at a mutually convenient time. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES Vincent Vander Top, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 a St. Paul, MN 55113 n 651-636 -4600 . Fax: 651-636 -1311 • • • ' Attachments Table 2 — Summary Figures 2 — 19 — Parks and Improvements Needed Civic Center Park Improvements Bid Tabulation Park Trail Condition Evaluation 2 Page No. Letter of Transmittal 1 Table of Contents 2 I. Introduction 3 Table 1 — Cost Summary 3 Figure 1 — Location Plan 4 II. Summary and Recommendations 5 III. Improvement Options 6 A. Remove 6 B. Seal Coat 7 C. Overlay 7 D. Reconstruction 7 E. New 7 IV. Proposed Improvements 8 V. Improvement Priority /Schedule 8 VI. Other Park Improvements 9 A. Future Trails 9 B. Bridges 9 C. Park Appurtenances 9 Attachments Table 2 — Summary Figures 2 — 19 — Parks and Improvements Needed Civic Center Park Improvements Bid Tabulation Park Trail Condition Evaluation 2 1. Introduction The City of New Hope authorized an evaluation of its City park trails to develop a rehabilitation program. The parks reviewed for this project are shown on Figure 1. The purpose of this report is to provide information and recommendation to guide decision making for maintaining and rehabilitating park trails. The study identifies improvements based on the condition of each trail. The improvements include seal coat, bituminous overlay, and reconstruction. In addition, construction of new trails is identified in some parks where new trails should be considered. Removal of existing trails is also recommended in certain parks where trails aren't warranted or design criteria cannot be met. Listed in Table 1 is the estimated cost for the various improvements for the 20,435 lineal feet of paved trail evaluated. Table 1— Summary of Estimated Costs Remove Seal Coat Overlay Reconstruction Construct New Total $1,076 $21,303 $16,350 $124,959 $28,826 $192,514 These costs include a 25% contingency for indirect costs. Park Trail Condition Evaluation 3 Summ a n d Recommend This study presents options how existing bituminous park trails can be maintained based on engineering and acceptable maintenance procedures. However, in some cases this criteria may not be the best option dependent on the trail users (e.g. pedestrians, bicyclists, roller blades, joggers, walkers, etc.). In addition, some trails may no longer satisfy the need they were initially intended to serve or new trails may be required where trails don't exist. Therefore, it is recommended City staff periodically review this study to determine where adjustments and modifications are required to satisfy the scope of this study. Park Trail Condition Evaluation 5 B. Seal Coat Similar to a street seal coat, a trail seal coat maybe beneficial for the same reasons. However, if the trail users are not comfortable with a seal coat application a bituminous overlay should be considered. C. Bituminous Overlay A bituminous overlay is more costly than a seal coat however less costly than total reconstruction. A bituminous overlay should not be considered if significant bituminous failures exist. Bituminous patching, drainage, and subgrade improvements may be required before constructing a bituminous overlay. D. Reconstruction The reconstruction of an existing trail should be considered if the existing bituminous surface has failed such that a patch/overlay is not feasible. In addition, reconstruction should be considered if an existing trail must be widened from 6' to 8' or 10'. E. New New trails should be considered if new uses or improvements to the overall park are being considered. Park Trail Condition Evaluation 7 �I • 0 A. Future Trails The City Comprehensive Plan and Trail/Natural Resource Inventory Map includes several future trails throughout the City. Generally, these trails are proposed outside of existing parks. They traverse the City providing through corridors and connecting points of interest. This report does not include cost estimates for these trail improvements. Costs will vary depending on the availability of lands and the ability to coordinate with future construction projects and property (re)development projects. It is recommended that the pedestrian bridges at Hidden Valley Park and Fred Sims Park be evaluated in coordination with park trail improvements. Constructing bridges similar to the new bridges in Northwood Park would cost approximately $35,000 each including indirect costs. This does not include soil correction or piling if required. C. Park Appurtenances Drinking fountains, benches, litter receptacles, and other appurtenances can also be upgraded in coordination with trail improvements. Please refer to the recent bid tabulation for Civic Center Park Improvements at the end of this report. Typical fountain, hydrant, picnic table, and bench/litter receptacle unit costs are identified on the second page. Park Trail Condition Evaluation 9 Z 0 - co Lo Cj Q C\j Z O . I O 00 0 a) D Z 4 to Q A Z u j UJ n z 0 0 uj a. u- a. W Z C) Z 0 U w w W 0 0 w (n LLI 0 2 LLJ w (D Z LLJ 0 0 Ln LO LL C� 00 C6 1 — — 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'IT 0 0 1• m m 0 0 rl- w 0 (0 (D N CD N LL C� cr� r--- cs:� N N M a0 N (D w w (0 N r- m m m m U j N r.- Cl cli T r T C\T txi (5 (6 -, Z� r cli cli d 04 - U) N r Co 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 00 LO 0 0 0 LO 0 Cl) O LO IT U*) (D LO (I- co C14 0) C\j r-• 00 0 (0 0) 00 V) LO rl• It CO Cl) LL� N r-. 0 co (D �r M N r- 04 CC) 0 M (D -1 (N LU LL cr- x < < Y ry ui < < cr- < CL - -j < 0- < cr- �e <�E CL IL IL y < W CL CL X CL < = LU cc CL Lu 0 -j — < cr- � < < ui ui < ui co 0 -j - a y < < 0- > X X UJ a. 0 z o< — zzmm < 0 > < 0, CL z a- 0 )- (1) C) < LU 0 (D Z LU = 0 W a < 0 x z 0 -) - x (n F- z < < Lli Z UJ cr 0 C 2 Z x x ui m C) w 0 'n x 5 0 0 Lu 0 0 0 0 a. m J> 1 m -j Z = w U- 0 Z= — 1 0 () C as cu co CL (1) I- E E 0 0 0 0 W E > 0 E a 0- > .E 0 Z E — C\J M 0 U') 0 0 LO 0 M CD C) 0 fl- (D 0 M — m 0 't CD LO r-• (D m T C) r- CD — 0 N 0) fl- N r (0 Cc 00 CN 00 u') IT 0) 1 tr) - r- LO C N (6 C6 cl� T cli P.: 'I CD CD 0 C) 0 LO LO CD 0 CD C) 0 C) a LO 0 0 0 Lo 00 C) 0 *ql N r- 0) 00 0 - CO C.0 co 04 C\1 00 C') r- to 0 Cl) co C (D IT (D r- co Cl) N 1* cy; C� C\i 05 r r ci V r-: Ili -: cli cli (6 U) C r t- 0 0 C) 0 CD CD CD 0 CD 0 to 00 't 04 cr R c q 69 LO CIJ co co T LO LO 0 0 0 r• (D M 0 00 rl- CD 0 0 T M a 0 CC) C) r- 0) 0) co 0 (o CN (n Cl) N 00 LO - O)l yg 'IT Cf) Lri cli cli cli C4 co 'IT N 'IT C C 6% CD CD CD a 0 C) CD CD co Lf) 0') LO It N N CD LL: 0 1- CD CD co IT 'IT LO CY) cc U5 cNi (6 C\i _: -: 1: C� 1: CN - 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 a C) 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 LO CD in Ci Cli Cl) 0 CD C) co 00 N C) Cn C6 Ili cli 0 0 LO 0 0 - "T CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 M r- CO 0) rr rl- C) 00 (N (0 C) CC! Co C) 0) V) N C:) 0 U') LO co 0 0 CD C) 11 cc fl- co C) C 0) 1q" LL lc� C r N lD r 00 00 N uj CD C V 0) C14 U") r- 1: L6 CO co 0 CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 CD (0 0 rl- IT CY) co 64 0 0 Ln LO LL C� 00 C6 1 — — 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'IT 0 0 1• m m 0 0 rl- w 0 (0 (D N CD N LL C� cr� r--- cs:� N N M a0 N (D w w (0 N r- m m m m U j N r.- Cl cli T r T C\T txi (5 (6 -, Z� r cli cli d 04 - U) N r Co 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 00 LO 0 0 0 LO 0 Cl) O LO IT U*) (D LO (I- co C14 0) C\j r-• 00 0 (0 0) 00 V) LO rl• It CO Cl) LL� N r-. 0 co (D �r M N r- 04 CC) 0 M (D -1 (N LU LL cr- x < < Y ry ui < < cr- < CL - -j < 0- < cr- �e <�E CL IL IL y < W CL CL X CL < = LU cc CL Lu 0 -j — < cr- � < < ui ui < ui co 0 -j - a y < < 0- > X X UJ a. 0 z o< — zzmm < 0 > < 0, CL z a- 0 )- (1) C) < LU 0 (D Z LU = 0 W a < 0 x z 0 -) - x (n F- z < < Lli Z UJ cr 0 C 2 Z x x ui m C) w 0 'n x 5 0 0 Lu 0 0 0 0 a. m J> 1 m -j Z = w U- 0 Z= — 1 0 () C as cu co CL (1) I- E E 0 0 0 0 W E > 0 E a 0- > .E 0 Z E — C\J BAS o C MEADOW LAKE PARK aL NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION ('ITY QPr),lP'rT Mr, 977 O Ju Bonestroo Rosene mc-Z Anderlik & " Associates Engineers & Architects 60th AVENUE N 0 LE • le i . i PIMA . ` ' •, �f E3 s3 0 x Q c" X• a 0} a3 fl X 'a x x C3 x d P L � W X _SS 0 42 ELD c� -.- TO PROVIDE ON STREET PARKING X LIBERTY PARK IMPROVEMENTS I z; x LJ k D El NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 FEASIBILITY REPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS v.A 7 AA 7117C\ Ie "T !,,, n ni_ • ^ 7"'1 , C z W a sm''� } \ o i x Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects pc i, {..�`� 1�. i ELM GROVE PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 5 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 J Bonestroo j Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects 55T]- 1 ) AVENUE i I / ! r x,31 i x I � I I t 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 r x� ! (Z) 1 Q I 0 i t W D z W <t z 0 J x a\ Q CI 0 x I irr I l� t t i t x I r 1 / x , ( Q © f / t ' t r i 1 I I II I ; I ! it t I� I' ! I' r 1 / <3 O t t � AVENU NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA PARK TRAIL CONDITION CITY PROJECT No. 633 EVALUATION FIGURE 6 l Q I � I ; W —' Z j I Q I 11 I � I ! x ----r d IQ i _ " it c3 1 i I Q !I G3 � ii z { 1 u� , r z I� 0 ct r o � / NOR Bones roc Rosene Anderiik & Associctes Engineers & Arcnitec*. 51 ST AVEN CIA b 1 l o x 9 20 LI TTLE � i ° + _ - ACRE `\ E..- c © + PARK Q _� © 4 I .Jo RE OV 1 to ® RECO TR and SEAL C � ALAND AVENUE 00 0 Q <3 � SEAL COAT ° �• - x � SN Water El FU s m 49th NEW HOPE ATHLETIC FIELDS AVENUE r -x , 0 I NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 8 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PRO,)F(T No -6- - 7 x / ' 11 NORTH Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects 0 Ldl �0 �3 I z Ld > CT 47 1/2 AVENUE X : 'n -j l �_ Lj RECONSTRUCT 47TH AVE a 43 0 0 a CI 0 0 o77 a a a a �l I F'313 S2 47TH AVENUE <3 HOLIDAY PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 9 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION ('ITY PPO,.)F(,T No, f;�7 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik Associates Engineers & Architects SUNNYSIDE PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 10 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 63,3 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects 3 Lj Z) Z uj > < 4"" C 45th FRED SIMS PARK AVENUE x--------- - - -------- -3rd AVE FRED SIMS PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 11 PARK TRAIL CONDITIONS EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 -' ac)q -1\1\1 711>-'� JA Bonestroo Rosene wr-G Anderlik �l " Associates Engineers & Architects M ui z C 45th FRED SIMS PARK AVENUE x--------- - - -------- -3rd AVE FRED SIMS PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 11 PARK TRAIL CONDITIONS EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 -' ac)q -1\1\1 711>-'� JA Bonestroo Rosene wr-G Anderlik �l " Associates Engineers & Architects ° = L. 4 11-A AQUILA N07 , 1mprovcrx--n1--5 /o be coordinated with Givic Gcnicr Park MaSfer Plan CIVIC CENTER PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 z 4 e O • 45TH AVE N Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects -- •I :ter--` 7�� � .�w � I 11 I , �I . �':' i r I loin POOL ��` P i ��� � . N07 , 1mprovcrx--n1--5 /o be coordinated with Givic Gcnicr Park MaSfer Plan CIVIC CENTER PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 z 4 e O • 45TH AVE N Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects NORTHWOOD PARK Bonestroo Rosene NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA or-vA Anderlik d& PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION FIGURE 13 " Associates CITY PROJECT No. 633 Engineers I Architects KA A\ Wo!e lonp -MA -z < II RECON STRUCT ----------- 6 OVER LAY % < 45 RECONSTRUCT 8 OVERLAY NORTHWOOD PARK Bonestroo Rosene NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA or-vA Anderlik d& PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION FIGURE 13 " Associates CITY PROJECT No. 633 Engineers I Architects KA A\ Wo!e lonp -MA -z 3 1 1 1 \ I I -- - 1- - - - -- , I f E-I-R-E L -- 3 04 3 -. - .-- r SEAL COAT 8� ALL TRAILS,,// ::D i I `� ` \ \� •._• <'. _ i �> X11 I �\\ \` 1, I I .q/ ' � � �� p It $ SB 0 0, 1 N /E 36th AVENUE N I \ / \ I I NORTHWOOD PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 13A PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 JA Bonestroo Rosene Anderiik & Associates Engineers d Architect O .6 0 a i < C m O 0 0 0 c ca d: < i / 41 s�� r 0 13 Z >- L.J = >a. to 0 O W <3 LZ/ O .1 1 ij Q CD I-- Z a 0 LU W Ui ctoz Q u > i cc U- co 0 oc a- 33RD AVE N O <3 O z 0 0 30VId ONZ Lr al LAJ cr D C) LL o Z 0 O LLJ < M 0 CL < z ro 09 to Ln I-- o Lj 8 o . �Z: z o 0 Z o , :2 u C) w =� LL A < z o cc LLJ T- CL W < z a- J.C. PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 15 PARK TRAIL CONDITIONS EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 T N i Bonestroa Rosene Ancer Associates Engineers & Architec-, i' TERRA L x 0 0 � / 4 A c 43 en 0 a 0 0 M 0 a 2 (D <3 Lj REW SLA L M Cj 1-3 MEDICINE LANE TERRA LINDA PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 16 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 6.3,3 > + QUEBEC AVENUE lo r ROAD Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & " Associates Engineers & Architects z iO O a: 0 0 ZA F7 sc z jr < -- 1�1 . > L uj 39 1 / 2 `-RECONSTRUCT LIONS PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 17 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 /• \ - 4 / \ - z A 1-) 1 ) 1 \ 7 11 1 ) -, r, - ' � , , " ( 1 -17- � , ❑ -- ') � (,-, (' Q - I I I 1 1 7 � Bonestroo Rosene mr-Nm Anderlik 6 " Associates Engineers A Architects W z W Q /E N 2 z 0 J X DOROTHY MARY PARK NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 18 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers 3 Architects Wl N,% f: TKA AVENUE N S. A.- I H. 156) NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 19 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 , / -A - z,-i\ 7 /19 ? r \ 7 /, ),) r c i a rwt f1 C!'`C!!4C^., 1 000 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik I Associates Engineers & Architects ---------- d ---------- - - ---- -- ------------- CORNER ----- ----- PARK Wl N,% f: TKA AVENUE N S. A.- I H. 156) NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 19 PARK TRAIL CONDITION EVALUATION CITY PROJECT No. 633 , / -A - z,-i\ 7 /19 ? r \ 7 /, ),) r c i a rwt f1 C!'`C!!4C^., 1 000 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik I Associates Engineers & Architects L� ROsene 1- 1U)CGr rVanlC UylC Center Falk Improvements I hereby certify that this is an exact Andertik & Project No.: 629 Associates File No: 34 -98 -224 reproduction of bids received. Engineers & Architects Bid Opening: 3/16/99 11:00 AM Owner: City of New Hope Vince Vander Top, P.E. Registration No. 25770 Bid No. 1 Bid No. 2 Bid No. 3 Bid No. 4 Bid No. 5 North Valley Inc Arricioni Brothers W R Millpr Inc Artie, � u _w_:.._. item - -- -- __.._.. ,i -, ..... Item Units City Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Base Bid 1 Demolish & remove ex. paving & fencing (four tennis courts) LS 1.00 $4,350.00 $4,350.00 $7,400.00 $7,400.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $8,300.00 $8,300.00 $6,550.00 $6,550.00 2 Demolish & remove ex. driveway to fire station LS 1.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,600,00 $4,600.00 $3,700,00 $3,700.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $7,100.00 $7,100.00 3 Remove &salvage poles, wire, etc. (fire Gall appranaus) LS 1.00 $1,000.00 $1,00000 $500.00 $500.00 $365.00 $365.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $850.00 $850.00 4 5 Clear and Grub Remove and salvage hydrant Tree EA 1.00 $150.00 $150.00 $500.00 $500.00 $55.00 $55.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $35000 6 Remove /reloeatehydrant EA 1 00 $903.00 $90300 $1,40000 $1,40000 $1,675.00 $1,675.00 $900.00 $900.00 $945.00 $945 00 7 Reconstruct sanitary manhole LF 2.00 $2,112.60 $4,22520 $1,700.00 $3,40000 $1,950.00 $3,900.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,215.00 $4,430.00 8 Reconstruct cleanout sta. 1 +60 LF 410 3.61 $105.00 $35.70 $493.50 $128.88 $180.00 $170.00 $846.00 $380.00 $1,786.00 $150.00 $705.00 $160.00 $752.00 9 Remove and remount time controls EA 4.00 $157.50 $630.00 $160.00 $613.70 $640.00 $160.00 $260.00 $577.60 $1,040.00 $75.00 $275.00 $270.75 $1,100.00 $85.00 $306.85 10 Refurbish ex. tennis court light poles EA 3,00 $1,260.00 $3,780.00 $1,300.00 $3,900.00 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,260.00 $3,780.00 $165.00 $660.00 and time control $1,320.00 $3,960.00 11 Extend concrete base for ex. light pole LS 1.00 $866.25 $866.25 $900.00 $900.00 $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 $900.00 $900.00 12 13 Remove concrete curb and gutter Silt fence, regular LF 64.00 $7.50 $480.00 $3.00 $192.00 $5.25 $336.00 $5.00 $320.00 $3.30 $211.20 14 Temporary fence during construction LF LS 360.00 1.00 $3.15 $4,650.00 $1,134.00 $4,650,00 $2.00 $1,000.00 $720.00 $1,000.00 $2.10 $1,775.00 $756.00 $1,775.00 $3.00 $1,080.00 $110 $612.00 15 Site grading /final shaping LS 1.00 $6,500.00 $6,500,00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,500.00 $39,000.00 $1,500,00 $39,000.00 16 17 Natural stone retaining wall Driveway paving Including aggregate SF SY 150.00 $10.00 $1,500,00 $18.00 $2,700.00 $12.50 $1,875.00 $18,00 $2,700.00 $23.00 $3,450.00 18 Trail paving including aggregate SY 1150.00 1320.00 $12.90 $14,835.00 $12.50 $14,375.00 $14.35 $16,502.50 $16.00 $18,400.00 $12.60 $14,490.00 19 Tennis court paving including SY 2800.00 $9.50 $13.50 $12,54000 $37,800.00 $12.50 $11.60 $16,500.00 $10.25 $13,530.00 $12.50 $16,500.00 $10.70 $14,124.00 aggregate base, granular base and $32,480.00 $13.25 $37,100.00 $21.00 $58,800.00 $16.05 $44,940.00 bituminous paving 20 Basketball court, paving including SY 650.00 $15.75 $10,237.50 $11.60 $7,540.00 $14.25 $9,262.50 $16.00 $10,400.00 $16.75 $10,887.50 aggregate base and bitumnous paving 21 Color coating & tennis court line marking SY 2800.00 $1.99 $5,572.00 $2.90 $8,120.00 $2.50 $7,000.00 $3.00 $8,400.00 $2.42 $6,776.00 22 Color coating & basketball court line SY 590.00 $1.99 $1,174.10 $3.00 $1,770.00 $2.50 $1,475.00 $3,00 $1,770.00 marking $2.42 $1,427 80 23 Furnish & install basketball pole, backboard, rile, net EA 2.00 $1,680.00 $3,360.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $1,675.00 $3,350.00 $2,500,00 $5,000.00 $1,760.00 $3,520.00 24 Tennis Court chain link fencing (wind screen) LF 410.00 $32.48 $13,316.80 $34.00 $13,940.00 $32.50 $13,325.00 $34.00 $13,940.00 $3400 $13,940.00 25 Tennis Court chain link fencing (standard) LF 240.00 $21,91 $5,258.40 $23.00 $5,520.00' $22.00 $5,280.00 $23.00 $5,520.00 $23.00 $5,520.00 26 27 Tennis post and net Volleyball posts, net, nylon rope and EA LS 400 $668.85 $2,675.40 $700.00 $2,800.00 $750.00 $3,000.00 $800.00 $3,200.00 $770.00 $3,080.00 anchors 1.00 $1,207.50 $1,207.50 $200.00 $200.00 $1.200.00 $1,200.00 $900.00 $900.00 $1,265.00 $1,265.0 28 29 Subgrade excavation ([V) Granular borrow (CV) CY 000.00 $7,85 $4,71000 $0.00 $3,600.00 $4.20 $2,520.00 $7.00 $4,20000 $4.95 $2,97000 30 Volleyball sand CY CY 600.00 120.00 $14,50 $25.00 $8,700.00 $9.00 $5,400.00 $1050 $6,300.00 $8.00 $4,800.00 $10.10 $6,060.00 31 Topsoil borrow (CV) CY 500.00 $9.50 $3,000.00 $4,750.00 $17.00 $2,040.00 $27.00 $3,240.00 $13.00 $1,560.00 $16.85 $2,022 00 32 Sodding, lawn type SY 8700.00 $1.83 $15,921.00 $8.00 $2.10 $4,000.00 $18,270.00 $1,05 $525.00 $11.00 $5,500.001 $12.10 $6,050.00 33 12" PVC sanitary sewer, SOR 35 LF 100.00 $13.65 $1,36500 $2.35 $20,445.00 $2.56 $22,272.00 $2.10 $18,27000 $17.00 $1,700.00 $16.75 $1,675.00 $18.00 $1,800.00 $14.30 $1 430 00 a 0 0 m C) 0 occoom 000=000 0 . C, c) CD C) 00 009000 00000000 -00 . . 0 (3 0 0 C) : c) C) a 0 0 0 0 0 C) W) I 1 0 c, 9 0 0 0 CD 1 0 0 C, 0 co oc M��m 0 a 0 Ln 0 0 cilci 6 6 io 0 (p 0 MN In [V 0 m C'� 04 IC� a � 10� a 0 1 10 � � 0 m C,� C,� �� - n � � I - 0 CD 0 0 m m C� oo� cv o 00 14 N 'T � N e- - 69-64 " (3 � - - - 00 64 w 64 'N m N N 6q 64 64 64 O co cc C) a C, C) a 0 0 CD 00 0 (U '0 �2 0 (:D;O a' 0 - 0 0 0 c) a a o 00,00 co 00C)OO a g , a) t-- N a a , m CD 0 0 0-0 . C? C), C) 0 C) 0 o 0 o CD co > a. o N ;; 64 - a 64 0 M1 o � Lu 10 0 V) 0 C) 0 0 N N 64 m v Ij U) C4 0 C, 0 v 0 cc� N 64 w 'o w 611. 6'� C14 64 b.'+ w wlw C9 O C) C) C 0 0 a 0000000:00000000 0000 0 0 V 09 0 0 0 0 00 a 00 CD 0 a W) 0 0 ? 9 q 0 - - h 0 0 0 C, 0 0 ootnoco 0 0 C) (D 0 0 0r0 0 C) 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 oic, 0 'n CD 9 C� :0 0 a a N 0 a N C) N m 000000 0 M M 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0:0 0:0 M1 m 'n N a N 0 010 0 cli C) tf�!� V W N (o N cr� to N v Ln (o v N N N 61� m to (o - tfm 6 6 w 64 64 6"+ 6 6 6 64 U9. 64 69. 49 6 U9. V) 01 c C4 14 io% :6a 64i 6 6% 6 64 fie. 6 N -0: I . I., 6Q, w 0 2 a 0000C)OC) 000000 1 000 C, C, 'D C, a, 0 0 9 0 M 0 qqoNoq a 9C !9 0 9999 a 0 0 a a 000 0 00 0 00 0 N o a o a 00060 6 'n CL C 0 In 0 m 0 0 &9.�69 0 Corr -N C'4 O 000 0 a 0 6 (m ) b% (a co (D 04 0 0 � C) C) P co N In N C 04 a .2 v N 6% v 0 N U') m 61� W> C , C 4 64 w w w vi w 6 ': 603 fA fA w w Cq w 603, L; w 64 wl %91 (A m 0 V 0 0 C) C) 0 0 0 a 0 0 C) 000000 080 0 0 000010 0 0 99 C C, LO 9 0 C? C!09cqo8lo0o0! a 0 oo o 0 0 0. 0 � C) 'o C) � a C) C) CD 0 a I (:? Co 0 00 -7; 0 o 016 010 0 . c . 1 ( i LO 6 10010 0 0. U3 In 6 6 0 t- W) N M m r- 0 a 0 0 M r) 0 1 C, 0 . C 0 . 1 12 � O V) 0 N 0 cli 0 � - (D U) r-- r� 0 � N Q N o C � a 'n ��o V!.T 0 h M1 co " - 0 M w - C' � m 10 - Ct C l "i 7 - - b" V 6 " ' : " Ci I vll ': 64 w 6 61). 64 (6 69 Ln" C4 1: C14 r w r 69 6 " r 69 V) 6 6 64 w 6% w 64 w oil 6 69. 64 v> v) te w V* 69 6% 64 w w w - W) 44 Ll LO 0 a 0 C) C) 0 V) a C) C) 0 to C) CH . w C 0 CD 0 W) 0 0 C) 0 0 C) 0!0 0 0 0 ;o o C) 0 00 0 00 cl 00 0 co I' N 0 a 0 0 0 Cr O 91— 9 7 000 9 N O 9! C! Q 10 C 0 0 0 C) 0 c) 0 N n 64 L Lx) m co 'T o N LC) 0 N ICA C C) IN 0 M a 'n 0 'n 0 olo 'o 0 tC, C) N CO 10 CL N 6,3, 6-� r, C 04 ;; 64 P 0 64 69 64 LO a V� - - M 'n 64 (D C) N 6 -n C) C) - Ir C) �R N V) w� w 604 6 69 �4 b4 N 64 m m 69 64 V) ;i 69 164 "q 6'� 6') w t4 w 000000 0 0 C) C a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 C8 0 0 0 0 OiC 0 0 0 a C3 00000c) 0 0 0 C) 0 0 8 - . 3) C - 0 c C! 0 0 C) ) 0 00 a 0 m CD C, C) CD 0 a � 0 0 dici 0i6 o a 0 a 0 00000 0 0 C, 11000 C) In 0 0010 'i c , 00000 000000 0606, C) T C) 0 m N C) C, 0 C) C) a C) 0 v 0 " C) v N 0 'T 0 00 04 P- N 0) C.) co W) M m N N (D 64 - : w 64 w 'T 4 64 C'i 64 r b% w" 64 69 64 U3 64 16 1.4 10 0 0 000000 C) 0 C) 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 1=4 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 a, C) C) C) O10 a 00 C, 00 0 0 0 C) 0 0 C C) 0 0 Cl 0 C) 0 (D ID 0 C4 0 C) N 0 C) 0 0 0 C) q C) 010 ' 0 0 C) 0 00 0 00 �2 c' 0 a' C) m 0 o C) a -T - - o 6 CD O'cq 6 60 o 0 0 N o 010 a (D c, n ' o o 'o o C) o CD 0 fL 6 ; 6 � � N 0 C) a �; 64 in a C) 6% 0 U 0 0 U9. 0 ;; CD C) 0 0 N 0 0;0 0 N N 04 m a N C) M C, � 6-, 69 U) N r N 04 64 W r� CN 0 M M 4, 6 , 64 w r w 64 69 69 t4 w 64 64 69 0 0 0 C) N C) 0 C) 0 0 0 0 00000000000000 CD C) 0 0 LO; 0 O 0 U� � C, 0 C) 'n 0 0 0 NO0000c,:No , 0 0 C) 0 0 S . U a 0 0 M - N v m Ln v to . �. I I I 1 0 M�O 0 � � 00 C, C) m (0 a n co w 0 m 0 0 C. at m cn a m a o to C o m mic Lo n co co M1 (7) a) m 0 Lo N n �o (o h P C 0 00 co v 0 C) N m VIC, M " , N to CO M 0) N M M V O M 0 - C4 M N n (0 M1 r Q N 0 CD -� w cl� ul v 00 CN a - 19 N m NI cl! N C 0) " m co "� "i C'i - - : 1-: Lll� -: w V� C4 V� (6 N - - 6914w - � 4 C "1 4 N N oi w 6q 64 64 6 ww 603 w 69 w ww w 69 64 w 6% 6416% 64 v) to 4% w V, V) C > (D In N In 0 O m M1 O O O N Q m N N o oi a oia o o CD a o 0 0 0 ullo 0 U) V) co 0 0 t-- " LO C � 109 1, Cl) V U ? . I - N (-)! 0 0 t- i t-- (D m f.- 10 r- N 0) MIO M v o N V c Lo CN - co > 6op 64 co r to m (�2 bq 6-� t9 bq v C4 r'�n 0) - C) � m m 6 a) W Lci ([i (6 N 0) Lo oi 0) C13 6" 0 � 04 03 V C4 N N C N V) co 6� N 0 - � 6 m C 0 m v� 61� , � "I "'�: 1 N N V) M to N C-1 &4 w t cli "1 6" w w 64 :1,. 6% w w 6 64 w 0 6 64 � w w 69169 bq z 000000 0 a a 0 0 a 040 010 0 0 C) 0 C) 0 a a o;o 0 0 0 coo 0 C, a a 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 090000 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 a 9 9 C, a 0 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 00 0 00 _0 a c, N c, cc 0 ­0 - C) -0- C n c) - m to 0 co a) In 'n m C) 0 0 C- 0 �o 00 C14 CN N U- U. < w w U- CrA i� 0 0:> Cn LL Co cn < < LL < << < < < < < < < < < < -j W -.j -j (1) W � W LU J UJ LLJ LU uj LIJ uj W Lu LU uj Uj LIJ uj LU LU ID al p G: a a 2 -, a (D L) aj i W 70 C 0 a (U 0 co E 5 5 - 6 Lai 19 c 0 O) cm U =W! 0 CD (D * 0 st a Sew C a a I ' D �4 -5 -a m 10 ;FA ! m 2 a M U M c c m F m 0 (D m cn CL 0 aL .M 0 c E 11 0 CL (D al -e -2 a) a c "03 M z Lo cu r_ S m :3 Q) a) 7u � 2 a m CL L m d 0) co m N 6 E 2 71 0 )� a- 0) 5 u C, a (U (n U 0 - ' 3: o > m o � a . m 0 5 0 01 — 0 zo 2 C E m q c 0 c : ,S 1 E 0 0 ' a) t-. 3: '=I - M 2 2 u c �J'p - a 0 — m m 5 5 > 2 j U U .8 -8 o w c c q j 'o > m L) �c w cm 3: E > C 0 0 —2 m > "' 0 ' m u a a 0 LL L 6 g� >. 2 0 > IL �5 IL �5 L CL 0 -2 4 U u > > > > > Q) r a »> -C -- � a, CL u c > < < = 0 0 0 0 , - M) 04 2 C �6 a -0 c -0 U 0 U C 0 c a. a. a. E CL < c �M E E E E E E E 2 � . -T 0 (o In 0 M W CD 0) Q) (V a Cr,. ( U w o w M u m m CL c f o Z o ( V v ;T C4 U Lm Q3 U m = x x = x < < v cl = CL M 0. OL u < u U, a3 E P N m M1 m c ;: N M v to 00 m 0 �; m N 2 2 0 0 G N D I m ( '00