Loading...
111422 City Council Meeting Packet    NEW HOPE CITY COUNCIL  MEETING AGENDA  November 14, 2022  7:00 p.m.  City Hall – Council Chambers  4401 Xylon Avenue North    Mayor Kathi Hemken  Council Member John Elder  Council Member Andy Hoffe  Council Member Michael Isenberg  Council Member Jonathan London    The City Council wants and encourages citizen participation at Council Meetings. Your input and  opinions count and are valuable. You are encouraged to bring forth your comments and issues at  the appropriate point on the agenda.     A 15‐minute maximum Open Forum is held at the beginning of each Council Meeting. At this time  any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to City business not listed on this  agenda or scheduled as a future agenda item. The Council requests that you limit your presentation  to 3 minutes. Anyone wishing to address the City Council on a particular item should raise their  hand and be recognized by the Mayor. Approach the podium and speak into the microphone by  first stating your name and address. Also, please record your name on the roster at the table near  the door so that your name will be spelled correctly in the minutes.    Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight; Council  may refer the matter to staff for handling or for consideration at a future meeting. You are welcome  to contact the city clerk at 763‐531‐5117 after the council meeting.    COUNCIL MEETING BROADCASTS AND STREAMING  Government Access channel 16 programming includes live/taped meeting replays  Live on‐line meetings and past meetings on‐demand are available through www.nwsccc.org.    www.newhopemn.gov New Hope Values and Vision City Mission Strong local government that is proactive in responding to the community needs and issues by delivering quality public service to all city residents, businesses, property owners, and organizations in a prudent and e cient manner. Values Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional and cost-e ective manner. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fi scal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds and city assets is essential if residents are to have confi dence in government. Ethics, Integrity and Professionalism We believe that ethics, integrity, and professionalism are the foundation blocks of public trust and confi dence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values. Respect for the Individual We believe in the uniqueness of every individual, and welcome, appreciate, and respect diversity and the di ering of opinions. Open, Honest, and Respectful Communication We believe that open, honest, and respectful communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive environment for those interacting with our city. Cooperation and Teamwork We believe that the public is best served when all work cooperatively. Visionary Leadership and Planning We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be responsive to current goals and needs, and visionary in planning for the future. Vision e city is a great place to grow as a family, individual, or business. All within our city are safe and secure. Essential services will be those that promote a safe and healthy environment for all residents. Essential services and programs will be enhanced and streamlined, and will be provided in an economical manner and with measurable results. e city views residents as its greatest asset and seeks their input and participation. e city will meet the communication needs of citizens, elected o cials, and city sta . Strategic Goals e city will maintain and improve its infrastructure (water distribution, storm water, sewer, roads, parks, lighting, and city facilities). e city will use frugal spending and resourceful fi nancial management to maintain its fi scal health. e city will encourage maintenance, redevelopment, and reinvestment of existing properties to improve or enhance its tax base. e city will provide core services with a professional sta who are equipped with the necessary tools and equipment and given necessary direction. e city will facilitate and improve communications to promote e ective intergovernmental cooperation between sta , citizens, and Council. Adopted by the New Hope City Council, August 2006 Reaffirmed by the New Hope City Council, February 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue North Monday, November 14, 2022 7:00 p.m. Regular Session 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – November 14, 2022 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: • Regular Meeting Minutes – October 24, 2022 4. OPEN FORUM 5. PRESENTATIONS 5.1 Presentation of 2022 city survey responses by Morris Leatherman Company 6. CONSENT BUSINESS 6.2 Approval of financial claims through November 14, 2022 6.4 Resolution approving revolving loan fund policy 6.5 Motion approving appointment of Malloy, Montague, Karnowski and Radosevich (MMKR) to Perform 2022 City Audit 7. PUBLIC HEARING 7.1 Resolution supporting city’s application as a legal sponsor for Minnesota Investment Fund Program Application for Padagis US LLC 8. DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING 8.1 Resolution authorizing the appropriation of funds in the amount of $1,065,001 to replace the floor, dasher boards and glass in the south rink at the New Hope Ice Arena (Improvement Project No. 1092) 9. PETITIONS AND REQUESTS 10. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 10.1 Resolution establishing findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to revocation of rental property registration permit for Ashton Homes LLC and Sekou AM Dukuly for having a third instance of disorderly behavior at the property located at 3840 Boone Avenue North 10.2 Resolution authorizing the purchase of equipment and appropriation of funds in the amount of $322,097.58 for the purchase of a 2023 Mack cab and chassis, dump body and snow removal equipment 11. UNFINISHED AND ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS 12. OTHER BUSINESS 12.1 Exchange of communication between members of the city council 13. ADJOURNMENT Memorandum              To:  New Hope City Council  From: Tim Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Date: November 10, 2022  Subject: Agenda Items for Monday, November 14, 2022      The Canvas Board Meeting will be held at 6:45 pm prior to the regular Council Meeting to certify the  election results of the November 8 municipal election. A separate agenda packet was provided.    Open Forum  Staff is not aware of anyone planning to address the Council for the Open Forum.    Item 5.1  Mr. Peter Leatherman of Morris Leatherman Company will be present to review the city survey responses to  the public. The survey was conducted this summer. The results will also be posted on the city’s website.    Item 6.1  There are no new business license requests.    Item 6.2  This item involves routine financial claims.    Item 6.3  There are no new liability claims to report.    Item 6.4  Per Council’s direction at the October work session, a Revolving Loan Fund Policy has been drafted by  Abdo. The policy will be part of the city’s Financial Management Plan. The public hearing to consider the use  of a loan to Padagis is on the agenda as Item 7.1. Director Sargent and I recommend approval of the policy.    Item 6.5  Council is asked to approve the appointment of MMKR to perform the 2022 city audit and CAFR  preparation for a total of $39,965. The engagement letter presented to Council is consistent with the  pricing that was listed in the three‐year proposal approved by Council in 2019. Funds are budgeted for  the annual audit. Abdo and I recommend approval.    Item 7.1  This is a public hearing to support the city’s application as a legal sponsor for a Minnesota Investment Fund  program loan, up to $980,000, through the Minnesota DEED for Padagis US LLC. Staff reviewed the request  from Padagis at the October work session. If the MIF loan is approved, Padagis would receive an interest free  repayable loan of up to $980,00 that would be used to add approximately $5 million in new manufacturing  machinery and equipment and add 60 new employees to the New Hope business. There is minimal risk to  the city as the loan funds are provided by DEED with the city serving as a pass‐through entity for the loan.  The city would retain up to $100,000 in repayments, as permitted by DEED, for future projects.  Representatives from Padagis and DEED will be in attendance at the meeting to answer questions. Director  Sargent and I recommend approval.     Item 8.1  This item approves a bid of $1,065,001 to All American Arena Products for improvements to the south rink at  the ice arena. The project includes replacement of the floor, dasher boards and glass. All American Arena  Products is on the cooperative purchasing program. The 2023 CIP has $1,200,000 budgeted. Director Rader  and I recommend approval.    Item 10.1  A public hearing was held on October 24, 2022, regarding disorderly conduct at 3840 Boone Avenue North.  Council voted to revoke the property’s rental registration permit. The item before Council at this time is a  resolution establishing findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to the revocation of the rental  property registration permit for Ashton Homes LLC and Sekou Dukuly. The property owner is prohibited  from applying for another rental registration permit in the city for three years. Director Sargent and I  recommend adoption of the resolution.    Item 10.2  This item approves the purchase of a 2023 Mack cab and chassis, dump body and snow removal equipment  for $322,097.58. The purchase would be made through the cooperative purchasing venture. The current  vehicle replacement fund has $311,178 dedicated for this vehicle replacement and the shortfall would be  funded by the equipment replacement fund. A 2006 Sterling dump truck (Vehicle #20) would be sent to  auction. Director Weber and I recommend approval.    Item 12.1  Mayor Hemken will review upcoming meetings and events.    EDA #4  Staff recommends the EDA approve the acquisition of the property at 3611 Louisiana Avenue North for  $205,000 plus traditional closing costs. The city has been interested in acquiring the property since 2020. The  2022 assessed value of the property was $251,000. Staff recommends demolition of the house with  construction of a new home. Funds are available in the EDA budget. Director Sargent and I recommend  approval.          If you have any questions regarding items in the agenda packet, please call the city clerk or me  before the meeting so that staff can research any issues and be prepared to respond at the meeting.    New Hope City Council  October 24, 2022  Page 1   City of New Hope  4401 Xylon Avenue North  New Hope, Minnesota 55428    City Council Minutes October 24, 2022  Regular Meeting City Hall, 7:00 p.m.      CALL TO ORDER The New Hope City Council met in regular session pursuant to due call and notice  thereof; Mayor Hemken called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.    PLEDGE OF  ALLEGIANCE    The City Council and all present stood for the Pledge of Allegiance.  ROLL CALL Council present:            Staff present:       Kathi Hemken, Mayor  John Elder, Council Member  Andy Hoffe, Council Member  Michael Isenberg, Council Member  Jonathan London, Council Member    Tim Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Dan Boyum, City Engineer  Valerie Leone, City Clerk  Jeff Sargent, Director of Community Development  Bernie Weber, Director of Public Works  Stacy Woods, City Attorney    APPROVAL OF  MINUTES  Motion was made by Council Member Hoffe, seconded by Council Member  London, to approve the regular meeting minutes of October 10, 2022. Voted in  favor thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg, London; and the following voted  against the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None. Motion carried.    OPEN FORUM    There was no one present desirous of addressing the council.  ROTATING VOTES    Please note that votes taken on each agenda item are called by the secretary on a  rotating basis; however, the written minutes always list the mayor’s name first  followed by the council members’ names in alphabetical order.    CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Hemken introduced the consent items as listed for consideration and stated  that all items will be enacted by one motion unless requested that an item be  removed for discussion. Mr. Tim Hoyt, acting city manager, reviewed the consent  items.    BUSINESS LICENSES  Item 6.1    Approval of business license(s).  FINANCIAL CLAIMS  Item 6.2    Approval of financial claims through October 24, 2022.  New Hope City Council  October 24, 2022  Page 2   RESOLUTION 2022‐111  Item 6.4    Resolution approving an amendment to the revenue note (Homeward Bound  Project), Series 2014, and authorizing the execution and delivery of an allonge to  the note.    RESOLUTION 2022‐112  Item 6.5    Resolution in support of three Hennepin Youth Sports Program grant applications.  RESOLUTION 2022‐113  Item 6.6    Resolution approving Fencing Consortium Joint Powers Agreement.  MOTION  Consent Items  Motion was made by Council Member Isenberg, seconded by Council Member  Elder, to approve the Consent items. All present voted in favor. Motion carried.    RENTAL LICENSE  3840 BOONE AVE N   Item 7.1    Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 7.1, Civil hearing regarding  revoking rental property registration permit for 3840 Boone Avenue, relating to  three disorderly behavior violations.    Mr. Jeff Sargent, director of community development, explained that the properly  located at 3840 Boone Avenue North is a group home owned by Berkeley Heights  Homes, LLC.  He stated three disorderly behavior violations have occurred at the  property since April 17, 2022, which prompted a hearing by the city. He stated the  Council will decide to take any of the following actions against the property owner  relating to the rental property registration permit: 1) impose a fine; 2) revoke the  permit; 3) suspend the permit for a specific period of time; or 4) take no action. He  stated at this time staff is recommending revoking the rental registration license  due to inadequate management of the property and its tenants. The entity would  not be allowed to reapply for a rental license at this address for up to three years.    Mr. Sargent explained that the Disorderly Behavior at Registered Rental Dwelling  Units ordinance was adopted in 2006 to assure that rental housing in the city is  decent, safe and sanitary and is so operated and maintained as not to become a  nuisance to the neighborhood or to become an influence that fosters blight and  deterioration or creates a disincentive to reinvestment in the community.     He stated as outlined in the ordinance, the property owner is given the opportunity  to be heard at a public meeting. The property owner may be represented by  counsel and the city official may be represented by the city attorney.  The Council  shall hear all relevant evidence and arguments and shall review all testimony,  documents, and other evidence submitted. Following the hearing, the Council  shall make findings based on the evidence and shall make a decision on the  recommendation to fine, revoke, suspend, deny, or not renew a registration permit  based on the findings. He stated a written decision will be issued to the property  owner within 30 days of the hearing. He stated the city attorney will preside over  the hearing.    Ms. Stacy Woods, city attorney, accepted testimony relative to the three disorderly  behavior slips issued on April 17, 2022; June 28, 2022; and September 19, 2022. She  presented Exhibits A‐H.    New Hope City Council  October 24, 2022  Page 3   Testimony was accepted by Officer Michael TenEyck, Officer Sabrina DeMars,  Officer Corey Cracknell and Police Chief Tim Hoyt. Chief Hoyt explained that  there have been 62 police calls to the property in a 12‐month period.    Mr. Sheikh K. Dukuly II, on‐site property manager, and Anna Rollag, program  coordinator, also provided testimony.       Ms. Woods thanked the individuals for their testimonies. She stated the City  Council will issue a verbal decision at this time, and the decision will be provided  in writing to the property owner within 30 days.    CLOSE HEARING  Item 7.1  Motion was made by Council Member London, seconded by Council Member  Elder, to close the public hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried.     Discussion ensued between the members of the Council regarding the disorderly  behavior citations. It was determined that the property owner had violated Section  3‐31(i) of the City Code by allowing tenants of the property to engage in three or  more acts of disorderly behavior at the property within a 12‐month period.    MOTION  Item 7.1  Motion was made by Elder, seconded by Council Member London, to revoke the  rental property registration permit for 3840 Boone Avenue North for three years.  Voted in favor thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg, London; and the following  voted against the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None. Motion carried.    2023 PROJECT  (IMPROVEMENT  PROJECT NO. 1090  Item 7.2    Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 7.2, Resolution ordering the  construction of and preparation of plans and specifications for the 2023  Infrastructure project (Improvement Project No. 1090).    Mr. Dan Boyum, city engineer, stated the 2023 infrastructure improvements  include the Northwood southeast neighborhood, the Winnetka Green townhome  area, and parts of 61st Avenue North and Sumter Avenue North. He stated due to  the street surface rating of 72.5, the street work proposed for the Northwood  northeast area will be delayed except for 37th Avenue North. The project includes  street improvements, water main replacement, sanitary sewer improvements, and  storm sewer improvements. Alternates will be sought for a pollinator/rain garden,  storm outlet improvements at Meadow Lake, and possibly park trail  improvements.     The estimated project cost is $4,884,623 and the CIP budget contains $4,980,371.    Mr. Boyum reviewed the funding sources. The project will be funded with street  infrastructure funds and utility funds. There are no tax‐exempt properties in the  proposed project area so there be no assessments. He pointed out there is a funding  shortfall in the water fund and some streets proposed for water main  improvements may need to be delayed.     Mr. Boyum reviewed the project schedule. He stated neighborhood meetings will  be held in November. If Council orders the project, plans and specifications will be  presented in January of 2023.    New Hope City Council  October 24, 2022  Page 4   Mayor Hemken opened the floor for the public hearing. There was no one present  desirous of addressing Council for the public hearing.    CLOSE HEARING  Item 7.2  Motion was made by Council Member Elder, seconded by Council Member  Isenberg, to close the public hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried.    RESOLUTION 2022‐114  Item 7.2  Council Member Elder introduced the following resolution and moved its  adoption: “RESOLUTION ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF AND  PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2023  INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1090).” The  motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Council  Member London, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor  thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg, London; and the following voted against  the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None; whereupon the resolution was  declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was attested to by  the city clerk.    2020 PROJECT  ASSESSMENTS   (IMPROVEMENT  PROJECT NO. 1034)  Item 7.3    Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 7.3, Resolution adopting  assessments for improvement project no. 1034 (2020 Infrastructure Improvement  Project).    Mr. Tim Hoyt, acting city manager, explained this is the assessment hearing for the  2020 Infrastructure Project No. 1034. There are two properties to be assessed:  Hidden Valley Park owned by the city of New Hope for $1,889.25 and 3351  Independence Avenue North owned by Evergreen Community Church for  $6,244.20. The final assessments are lower than the estimate. He stated Evergreen  Church was notified of the assessment and the public hearing.     Mayor Hemken opened the floor for the public hearing. There was no one present  desirous of addressing Council for the assessment public hearing.    CLOSE HEARING  Item 7.3  Motion was made by Council Member Hoffe, seconded by Council Member  Isenberg, to close the public hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried.    RESOLUTION 2022‐115  Item 7.3    Council Member Isenberg introduced the following resolution and moved its  adoption: “RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT  PROJECT NO. 1034 (2020 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT).”  The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Council  Member Elder, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor  thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg, London; and the following voted against  the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None; whereupon the resolution was  declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was attested to by  the city clerk.    CHANGE ORDER   NO. 5  (IMPROVEMENT  PROJECT NO. 1039)  Item 8.1    Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 8.1, Resolution approving Change  Order No. 5 for $18,654.60 with Rochon Corporation for Phase 1 improvements at  the Public Works facility (Improvement Project No. 1039).    Mr. Dan Boyum, city engineer, explained change order number 5 for $18,654.60  with Rochon Corporation for the public works facility project. He stated the change  New Hope City Council  October 24, 2022  Page 5   order includes light fixtures and long‐range RFID readers and extra cost for wear  course paving and patching in the parking lot. Staff reviewed the change order  with Council at the October work session.    RESOLUTION 2022‐116  Item 8.1  Council Member London introduced the following resolution and moved its  adoption: “RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 FOR  $18,654.60 WITH ROCHON CORPORATION FOR PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS  AT THE PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1039).”  The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Council  Member Elder, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor  thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg, London; and the following voted against  the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None; whereupon the resolution was  declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was attested to by  the city clerk.    MOBILE FOOD  UNITS  Item 10.1  Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 10.1, Ordinance No. 22‐10, An  ordinance amending section 8‐6(d)(14)a of the New Hope City Code related to  mobile food units.    Mr. Tim Hoyt, acting city manager, stated the ordinance amendment is a minor  change to chapter 8 regarding mobile food units. Applicants must submit copies  of a county license to the city in order to be considered for a mobile food unit  permit in New Hope. The state of Minnesota recently delegated licensing authority  to Hennepin County. The ordinance amendment was prepared by the city  attorney.    ORDINANCE 22‐10  Item 10.1  Council Member Elder introduced the following ordinance and moved its  adoption: “ORDINANCE NO. 22‐10, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION  8‐6(D)(14)A OF THE NEW HOPE CITY CODE RELATED TO MOBILE FOOD  UNITS.” The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was seconded by  Council Member Isenberg, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted  in favor thereof: Hemken, Elder, Hoffe, Isenberg, London; and the following voted  against the same: None; Abstained: None; Absent: None; whereupon the  ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the mayor which was  attested to by the city clerk.    EXCHANGE OF   COMMUNICATION  Item 12.1  Mayor Hemken introduced for discussion Item 12.1, Exchange of communication  between members of the City Council.    Mayor Hemken reported on upcoming events.    ADJOURNMENT    Motion was made by Council Member Elder, seconded by Council Member  Isenberg, to adjourn the meeting, as there was no further business to come before  the Council. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. The New Hope City  Council adjourned at 8:55 p.m.  Respectfully submitted,    Valerie Leone, City Clerk  New Hope City Council  October 24, 2022  Page 6     I:\RFA\City Manager\2022\Performance Measures Program\CM 11‐14‐22 Morris Leatherman\5.1 Q ‐ Morris Leatherman Survey RFA.docx   Request for Action  November 14, 2022    Approved by: Tim Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Brandon Bell, CD Coord/Management Analyst     Agenda Title  Presentation of 2022 city survey responses by Morris Leatherman Company  Requested Action  Staff requests the City Council to receive a presentation regarding the 2022 city survey responses from Peter  Leatherman from the Morris Leatherman Company. The Council received an informal review of the  responses at the September 19 work session.    This presentation is intended to present the results of the survey to the public. The results will also be  published in the In Touch newsletter, posted on the city website, presented via cable TV, utilized in the  budget presentation and included in the state performance measurement program.  Policy/Past Practice  The city has conducted a professional community wide survey every ten years since 1995. In 2015 the City  Council concluded that it would be advantageous for the city to start conducting the professional community  wide survey once every five years instead of ten. The professional survey scheduled to be conducted in 2020  was delayed until 2022 due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. The cities of Golden Valley and Crystal have  completed surveys in the last several years utilizing the services of this firm.   Background  The City Council reviewed the preliminary Morris Leatherman Company survey at the March 21, 2022,  work session and added one question pertaining to whether the city is doing enough to create a diverse,  inclusive and fair community. The survey included 136 questions, involved 400 households, and cost  $25,000. Mr. Leatherman reviewed the survey results with the City Council and management team at the  September work session. The presentation at the Council Meeting will reach a broader audience.    The survey responses along with an executive summary and abbreviated power point presentation are  attached. The survey data meets the state performance measurement criteria, and the city will be eligible for  a per capita reimbursement by the state (last year’s reimbursement amount was $3,078).  Attachments   Executive summary   Power point presentation   2022 city survey responses       Agenda Section Presentations Item Number  5.1  The Morris Leatherman Company EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2022 City of New Hope Methodology: This study contains the results of a telephone survey of 400 randomly selected residents of the City of New Hope. Professional interviewers contacted survey respondents across the community between April 26th and May 16th, 2022. The average interview took twenty minutes. The non-response level was 4.5%. Random samples such as this yield results projectable to the entire universe of adult New Hope residents within ± 5.0 percentage points in 95 out of 100 cases. Cellphone-only households were 51% of the sample, landline-only households were 12%, and households with both landlines and cellphones were 37%. Residential Demographics: New Hope is a dynamic and diverse second-to-third-ring suburban community. The median longevity of adult residents is 10.5 years. Twenty-three percent report moving to the city during the past five years, while 26% were there over two decades. Fifty-six percent own their homes, while 44% report renting. Twenty-six percent of the households contain senior citizens. Thirty percent report the presence of school-aged or preschool children. The average age of adult respondents is 48.0 years old. Twenty-six percent state ages under 35 years old, while 23% are 65 years old or older. Women outnumber men by two percent in the sample. Sixty-two percent of the sample classifies themselves as "White." Twenty-two percent are "African-American," and eight percent call themselves "Hispanic-Latino." Five percent are "Asian or Pacific Islander," three percent report they are "Mixed or biracial," and one percent self-classify as "Native American." Ninety percent report their primary language spoken at home is English. Five percent report their home language is "Spanish" and two percent say it is "Somali." Twelve percent report household members who have physical limitations that make it difficult to access City services. The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 2 Sixty-one percent are financially secure – either "managing very well" or "managing comfortably" – and 40% are financially insecure – "monthly expenses exceeding income" or "meeting monthly expenses but having little or no savings." The location of the residence of each respondent is noted. Twenty-three percent live in Southern New Hope, Precincts One or Two, thirty-eight percent reside in Central New Hope, Precincts 3- 5, and 40% live in Northern New Hope, Precincts 6-8. Quality of Life Rating: A solid 94% rate the quality of life in New Hope as "excellent" or "good;" only six percent rate it lower. The 26% "excellent" rating places the City of New Hope within the second quartile of suburban communities in the Metropolitan Area. A super-majority of 90% rate New Hope as an "excellent" or "good" place to raise children: only eight percent rate it more unfavorably. Similarly, 85% rate the city as "excellent" or "good" as a place to retire; eleven percent see it as "only fair" or "poor." Like Most about the Community: Residents are drawn to the community because of "quiet and peacefulness," at 17%, and "housing and neighborhoods," at 13%. Twelve percent each focus on "friendly people" or "small town ambience." Nine percent each list "close to job," "convenient location," or "good schools." Eight percent point to "parks and trails." Four percent each mention "safe area" or "close to family." Two percent list "available shopping and services." Two percent post scattered responses. COVID-19 and City Leadership: By a comparatively high 85%-15% margin, residents rate the City's job of overseeing the COVID-19 pandemic as either "excellent" or "good." The level of critics is among the lowest in the Metropolitan Area. Similarly, by an 83%-16% split, residents favorably rate the City's communication about the COVID-19 pandemic. The positive communications rating is also among the highest in the Metropolitan Area. General Household Health Rating: Seventy-six percent rate their household as doing an "excellent" or "good" job financially, mentally, and physically; twenty-five percent, though, rate their household as doing "only fair" The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 3 or "poor." These levels are slightly above the norm for second-or-third ring suburban communities. Most Serious Issue Facing the City: "High taxes" and "growth" are each offered by 16% the most serious issues facing the City of New Hope. "Rising crime" follows at 14%, then "redevelopment," at 13%, and "street maintenance," at eight percent. No other issue is mentioned by more than five percent. Nine percent are "unsure." Thirteen percent, though, think the City of New Hope is facing no serious issues today. This latter group is below the norm for Metropolitan Area suburbs, but still represents "boosters" and form a strong core of steadfast supporters. Direction of the Community: A high 90% endorse the general direction in which New Hope is headed, while only three percent feel things are off on the wrong track. Seven percent are unsure. The exceedingly small sub-sample of critical opinions base their judgment on one issue: "rising crime." Sense of Community: Eighty-five percent rate the general sense of community among New Hope residents as either "excellent" or "good." Sixteen percent see it as "only fair" or "poor." The 85% positive rating is among the top quartile in the Metropolitan Area suburbs. A near-unanimous 99% think the City of New Hope is either "very welcoming" or "somewhat welcoming;" a comparatively large 58% see it as "very welcoming." Eighty-seven percent rate the City of New Hope in creating a welcoming community to residents of all backgrounds as either "excellent" or "good;" eleven percent rate the City as "only fair" or "poor." Ninety percent favorably rate the City for treating all residents with respect; nine percent rate the City lower. Ninety percent also rate the City of New Hope as either "excellent" or "good" in treating all residents fairly;" seven percent are more critical. Ninety percent again favorably rate the City in providing services to residents of all backgrounds; three percent unfavorably rate the City, and eight percent are unsure. Concerning the last issue, three city services are focused on needing improvement: "social services," "job placement," and "affordable housing." Eighty-six percent think the City is doing enough to create a diverse, inclusive, and fair community, while six percent disagree, and eight percent are unsure. Regardless of their rating, 42% think this should be a "high priority," and 43% see this as a "moderate priority." The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 4 City Services: "Police protection," "park maintenance," "snow plowing of city streets," and "recycling service" each post approval ratings of 90% or higher. At the next level of overall satisfaction, "fire protection," "street lighting," "taste and quality of drinking water,” "sanitary sewer service" and "condition of trails" each receive between 80% and 89% approval. Between 70% and 79% favorably rate "animal control," "recreational programs," and "pavement repair and patching on city streets." The lowest approval ratings, at 69% for "building inspection," and 65% for accommodation and control of stormwater run-off," also post high percentages unable to state an opinion. The mean positive rating of city services is 82%, while the mean negative rating is 13%. City service ratings would rank the City of New Hope within the second quartile of Metropolitan Area suburban communities. Value of City Services: In considering the general value of city services for the tax money paid, 78% feel it is "excellent" or "good." Sixteen percent see it as "only fair." Residents place a moderately high value on the city services they receive. Tax Increase to Maintain City Services: By a decisive 70%-19% margin, residents favor increasing city property taxes to maintain city services at their current level. Eleven percent are undecided. Opponents specified three services they would like to see cut instead: fifty-eight percent indicate "reduce waste but do not cut services;" sixteen percent cite "parks and recreation services;" fifteen percent want a cut in "Administration;" three percent choose "recycling." Street Improvement Plan: Respondents were informed the City of New Hope changed to a street improvement plan in 2015, focusing on less expensive "mill and overlay" improvements to improve driving and the appearance of streets rather than full reconstruction and utility replacement. The new approach facilitates improving ten or more miles of city streets each construction year instead of one or two miles of roads under the old process. By a solid 73%-20% majority, residents support this new plan. Fifty-four percent of the supporters would also support a property tax increase to allow additional miles of street reconstruction during a construction year; however, this support for a tax increase is 41% of the citizenry – short of a majority. The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 5 Organized Garbage Collection: By a near tie of 40%-42%, residents narrowly oppose the City of New Hoping changing from its current "open collection system" to an "organized collection system." Eighteen percent, though, are undecided. Supporters cite "less cost" at 17%, "fewer trucks on the streets" at 26%, and "less damage to streets" at three percent. Opponents base their decision on "want choice," at 27%, "like current hauler," at 16%, and "less cost," at nine percent. Interviewers asked opponents if they would still oppose the change if the new system would reduce truck traffic in neighborhoods and save the city money on street repair and maintenance. Fifty percent would fight the new system, while 34% would no longer resist it. In sum, opposition to the change drops by 15% overall, resulting in a 52%-27% majority in favor of organized collection. Empowerment: Eighty-four percent think they have adequate opportunities to provide input and feedback about issues facing New Hope. A small five percent disagree, while 11% are uncertain. This level of empowerment is well above the suburban norm. New Hope residents feel somewhat more connected to their local decision-makers than their peers in other communities. Mayor and City Council: Fifty-five percent feel they know either "a great deal" or "a fair amount" about the work of the Mayor and City Council. Forty-five percent, though, admit they know "very little." Eighty-five percent either "strongly approve" or "somewhat approve" of the job of the Mayor and City Council. Only four percent register disapproval. The 21-to-one approval-to-disapproval ratio is among the highest in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area suburbs. A low 12% are uncertain. City Staff: Thirty-three percent report they have "quite a lot" or "some" first-hand contact with the New Hope City Staff; this level of contact is at the suburban norm. Eighty-one percent rate the staff as "excellent" or "good," while nine percent rate them lower. The nine-to-one favorable-to- unfavorable ratio is among the highest in the Metropolitan Area suburbs. Again, a small ten percent are unsure. Sixty percent did not contact or visit City Hall during the past year. Thirty-three percent The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 6 telephoned, while seven percent reached it in person. In thinking about their last contact, 38% contacted "Utility Billing," 15% were in touch with the "Parks and Recreation Department," 11% reached "Licenses and Permits," nine percent contacted the "Public Works Department," and eight percent each communicated with "City Administration" or "General Information." Ninety percent rate the ease of obtaining the service they needed as either "excellent" or" good;" ninety- four percent rate the waiting time for a staff member to assist [them] similarly; and 94% rate the courtesy of the City Staff highly. In each case, the percentage of positive ratings significantly exceeds 80%, the threshold indicating high-quality customer service in the public sector. Appearance of Neighborhood: Ninety-four percent of the sample rate the overall general appearance of their neighborhood as either "excellent" or "good." Only seven percent rate it lower. The major complaints of the small number of neighborhood critics include "rundown residential properties," "messy yards," and "junk cars." Code Enforcement: In assessing code enforcement, a super-majority of 86% think it is "about right." Eleven percent see it as "not tough enough," and three percent think code enforcement is "too tough." Among respondents not rating code enforcement as "about right," 26% cite "junk cars," 19% point to "messy yards," and 13% cite "tall grass or weeds." Characteristics of the Community: Interviewers read a list of 14 characteristics of a community. For each feature, interviewers asked respondents if they think there are "too much or too many," "too few or too little," or "about the right amount.” Majorities think the city currently contains about the right number of each of 11 characteristics: "starter homes," "move-up housing," "affordable housing," "assisted living for seniors," "nursing homes," "parks and open spaces," "trails and bikeways," "service and retail establishments," "entertainment opportunities," "fine dining restaurants," and "sit-down family restaurants." Over 30% of the residents, though, see "too few or too little" of four types of development: "entertainment opportunities," "service and retail establishments," "fine dining restaurants," and "affordable housing." Over 30% of the sample thinks there are "too many" "apartments" and" condominiums or townhouses." Future Development: Fifty percent of survey respondents can think of no other type of development they would like to The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 7 see in the community. Among the 50% expressing a preference, none of the 17 types posted scored over six percent. Fifty-eight percent report there is no type of development they would strongly oppose. Only one type, "apartments" reaches a moderate level of opposition, at 14%. Financial Incentives for Specific Development: Sixty-five percent support the City providing financial incentives to attract specific types of development; twenty-seven percent oppose this type of incentive. Nine percent are undecided. Redevelopment of the Southwest corner of Winnetka and 45th Avenues: The survey informed residents about the current redevelopment of the former K-Mart site, just east of the new Hy-Vee grocery store. Interviewers asked about four types of development on the site. By a 77%-17% majority, residents support medical office space; by a 68%-23% majority, residents support senior housing; by a 73%-27% margin, residents support retail stores; by a much narrower 50%-47% split, residents support high-density residential, such as townhouses or apartments. Purchase and Redevelopment of Deteriorating and Blighted Properties: By a super-majority of 85%-9%, residents favor the City purchasing deteriorating and blighted properties for redevelopment. Only six percent are unsure. Home Remodeling and Improvements: Twenty-seven percent report undertaking remodeling or home improvements during the past five years. The list of home improvement or remodeling includes: "bathroom" or deck/landscaping," each at 21%; "kitchen," at 19%; "roof," at 11%; "finished basement" or "windows or doors," each at 10%. Public Safety Issues: Sixty-four percent believe the crime rate has "remained about the same" during the past two years. Twenty-two percent see an "increase," and 12% a "decrease." Eighty-four percent of city residents feel safe walking in their neighborhood alone at night. Fourteen percent who do not feel safe report they fear "everywhere in the neighborhood," at 46%, as well as "parks" and "busy streets," each at 11%. They feel unsafe due to "crime," "loitering youth," or "age/health The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 8 vulnerability." During the past 12 months, seven percent reported they or other household members were victims of a crime in New Hope. A comparatively high 32% are members of a Neighborhood Watch Organization Sixty percent of city residents chose four issues as their most significant public safety concerns in New Hope: "traffic speeding," by 20%; "youth crimes and vandalism," by 14%; "drugs" or "residential crimes" each by 13%. Twenty-one percent think none of the seven public safety concerns listed is a severe issue. Thirty-three percent believe speeding in their neighborhood is a serious problem. Similarly, 23% think stop sign and traffic signal violations are serious neighborhood problems. Job Specifics: Fifty-five percent leave the City of New Hope regularly or daily to go to work. Among those holding jobs outside of the City, 42% have Minneapolis-based employment and 16% are employed by Plymouth-based organizations, 13% travel to job locations in Bloomington, and nine percent hold jobs in Maple Grove. The average commute time for this group is 18.1 minutes each way. Seventy-seven percent rate the ease of getting to work as either "excellent" or "good;" twenty-three percent rate it as "only fair" or "poor." Public Transit: Thirty-three percent say household members ride public transit regularly. The main reasons for not using public transit include: "prefer to drive," at 58%; "need a car at work," at 16%; "inconvenient," at 12%. Eighty-eight percent rate the ease of getting from place to place within the City of New Hope as "excellent" or "good;" only 11% rate it as "only fair" or "poor." Usage and Rating of Specific Park System Components: In a summary rating of the park and recreation facilities in New Hope, 88% rate them as "excellent" or "good," while 11% rate them as "only fair." The survey asked about the eight components of the New Hope Park and Recreation System. Ninety-three percent state they or household members used the city's parks during the past year. Somewhat behind, at 84%, are recent trail users. Seventy percent report visiting community ballfields during the past year, 63% recently visited the New Hope Performance Center, 62% The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 9 used the New Hope Village Golf Course, and 60% used the New Hope Aquatic Park during the past year. Fifty-eight percent visited the New Hope Ice Arena during the past year, and 53% visited or used the New Hope Community Gyms. When users during the past year are asked to judge each component, at least 90% of those offering judgments rate six of the eight elements – New Hope Village Golf Course, city parks, New Hope Performance Center, New Hope Aquatics Park, community ballfields, and trails, and community ballfields – as "excellent" or "good." Just below, 89% highly rate the New Hope Ice Arena, and 84% think the same about city trails. Generally, regarding usage and quality, New Hope park and recreation facilities register impressive scores. City-Sponsored Recreational Programs: Twenty-two percent of the city's households report members participated in City-sponsored recreational programs during the past year. The most popular types are "youth sports" at 29%, "baseball/softball" at 15%, "adult sports” at 12%, and "youth basketball" at eight percent. Eighty- six percent report satisfaction with their experience, and 14% report dissatisfaction. A majority of 85% think the current mix of recreational programming in the city adequately meets the needs of their households; only one percent disagrees. City Communications: In considering their primary source of information about the City government and its activities, 51% cite the City Newsletter, and 16% point to the local newspaper. Twelve percent each rely upon the City website or "the grapevine." Regarding preferred communications channels, the City Newsletter leads the list at 54%. The local newspaper is the favorite of 16%, while the City website is the choice of 13%. An additional five percent prefer e-mail. Eighty-five percent receive and regularly read the City Newsletter, "In Touch." Ninety-one percent of the readers rate "In Touch" as either "excellent" or "good." Sixty-one percent prefer to receive the City's newsletter "only in print," 24% prefer to receive it "only electronically," and 12% prefer to receive the newsletter "both ways." Forty-one percent of the city's households currently subscribe to cable television, while 12% have satellite television, and 47% have neither service. Twelve percent of cable television subscribers report they watch City Council or Planning Commission meetings either "frequently" or "occasionally." The total reach of City Council or Planning Commission cablecasts is five The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 10 percent of New Hope households. Fifty percent accessed the City's website in the past. Ninety-six percent were able to find what they sought there. Sixty-eight percent of site visitors are looking for one of four types of information: "Parks and Recreation System information," at 27%; "Utility Department information," at 19%; "City codes and ordinances," at 12%; "general information," at 10%. Twenty-two percent viewed City Council and other public meetings on the New Hope website. Thirty-eight percent of city website visitors are either "very interested" or "somewhat interested" in subscribing to receive e-mails containing city information and news. Using standard market projection techniques, 11% of New Hope households will subscribe to this service. Next, respondents were asked about social media to obtain information about the City of New Hope. Sixty-five percent of Internet users access Facebook; seventy-nine percent would use Facebook as a means of getting knowledge. Thirty-nine percent read Next Door; this time, 68% would use this platform to obtain information. Thirty-three percent open Twitter; 68% would use Twitter for getting city information. In rating the City's overall performance in communicating critical local issues to residents, a solid majority of 80% say they do an "excellent" or a "good" job; thirteen percent rate it lower as "only fair" or "poor." Conclusions: New Hope today is a diverse and dynamic community. Over twenty year residents are 26% of the community, down from 40% in the previous study, while less than five years are 23%, up three percent from 2015. The twenty-three percent of newer families moving to New Hope ensures a significant presence and abundance of younger residents in the coming years. Most residents consider the community an excellent place to raise children and a good place to retire. Almost as important, a super-majority also highly rates the sense of community among city residents. Respondents view city services as a good value for the property taxes paid. Residents rate the city highly in general, but some concern is evident in the rating of animal control, accommodation and control of stormwater run-off, as well as pavement repair and patching. In the case of public safety, there is growing concern about crime rates in the community, focused on traffic speeding, youth crime and vandalism, drugs, and residential crimes. In the case of city streets and roads, the "mill and overlay" approach is highly popular, and a majority would support a property tax increase to accelerate the program. As usual in Metropolitan Area The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 11 suburbs, residents were also evenly split, with 42% opposed and 40% in favor, on the issue of organized garbage collection. If the new system would reduce neighborhood truck traffic and save the City money on street reconstruction and maintenance, a majority of 52% would support this change. By a 99%-2% judgment, residents think New Hope is a welcoming community; fifty-eight percent, with a comparatively high rating, judge the community as "very welcoming." On three attributes of a welcoming city, ninety percent each rate the City of New Hope highly on treating all residents with respect, treating all residents fairly, and providing services to residents of all backgrounds. On a fourth attribute, eighty-seven percent feel the same way, creating a welcoming community for residents of all backgrounds. Eighty-six percent believe the city is doing enough to make a diverse, inclusive, and fair community; only six percent disagree. A comparatively high 85% would rate creating a diverse, inclusive, and equitable community at least a "moderate" priority; forty-two percent see it as a "high" priority. The City of New Hope is uniquely successful in creating a socially just city because of the actions taken by the leadership and the alignment with residential attitudes. City residents also have clear development and redevelopment priorities. There is sufficient support for attracting more service and retail establishments, entertainment opportunities, fine dining restaurants, and affordable housing. But there is significant opposition to more apartment developments and moderate resistance to condominium and townhouse developments. Just as noteworthy, a solid majority supports using financial development incentives to attract specific types of development. When queried about a redevelopment project, the southwest corner of Winnetka and 45th Avenues site, the antipathy toward apartments – both high-density residential townhouses or apartments and high-end apartments – again appears. But, in any case, there is widespread support for the City purchasing deteriorating and blighted properties for redevelopment. Approval ratings of the Mayor and City Council are among the highest in the Metropolitan Area suburbs, at 85% favorable. Similarly, City Staff ratings are also solid at 81% positive. In both cases, uncertainty is insignificant, indicative of an effective communications program. The current communication effort receives an 80% favorable rating. The city communications network has three key nodes serving at least 75% of the residents: the City Newsletter, local newspapers, and the City website. All the city-operated media, whether print or electronic, are awarded high grades. Further electronic expansions, except for Facebook, should be carefully considered regarding their potential usage and costs. However, concerns about crime and other issues do not diminish residents' confidence in City leadership. Ninety percent of the residents think the community is heading in the "right The Morris Leatherman Company 2022 New Hope Residential Study October 2022 Page 12 direction." And 13% are "city boosters" who are usually supportive and positive about city activities. Overall, residents are more optimistic than in other suburbs. The reservoir of good will already established will provide decision-makers with a consistently high level of support for future decisions and actions. City of New Hope 2022 Residential Survey The Morris Leatherman Company Survey Methodology 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 400 random household sample of New Hope residents Telephone interviews conducted between April 26th and May 16th, 2022 Average interview time of 20 minutes Non-response level of 4.5% Projectable within +/- 5.0% in 95 out of 100 cases Cellphone Only Households: 51% Landline Only Households: 12% Both Landline and Cellphone Households: 37% ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Like Most about City 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 17 13 12 12 9 9 9 8 4 4 2 2 Quiet and Peaceful Housing/Neighborhood Small Town Feel Friendly People Close to Job Schools Convenient Location Parks and Trails Safe Close to Family Shopping and Services Scattered 0 5 10 15 20 Percentage Most Serious Issue 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 16 16 14 13 8 4 3 2 2 1 9 13 Growth High Taxes Rising Crime Redevelopment Street Maintenance Diversity Economy Poor Spending Run-down Properties Scattered Unsure Nothing 0 5 10 15 20 Percentage Quality of Life Rating 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 23 67 9 2 30 68 2 0 26 68 6 0 Excellent Good Only Fair Poor 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2005 2015 2022 Headed in Right Direction 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company Right Direction 90% Wrong Track 3% Unsure 7% City Service Ratings 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 92 88 69 81 65 73 92 82 75 85 93 86 72 90 9 2 12 14 23 20 6 13 11 15 6 14 28 10 Police Fire Building Inspection Sanitary Sewers Storm Water Run-Off Animal Control Park Maintenance Condition of Trails Recreational Programs Street Lighting Recycling Service Taste/Quality of Drinking Water Pavement on City Streets Snowplowing of City Streets 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Positive Negative Value of City Services 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 7 50 26 2 12 17 70 9 1 2 11 67 16 0 6 Excellent Good Only Fair Poor Unsure 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2005 2015 2022 Mayor and City Council 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 13 42 45 1 18 67 3 1 12 Great Deal Fair Amount Very Little Unsure Strongly Approve Approve Disapprove Strongly Disapprove Unsure 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Percentage City Staff 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 3 30 46 20 21 60 9 0 10 Quite A Lot Some Very Little None At All Excellent Good Only Fair Poor Unsure 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Area Crime Last Two Years 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company Increased 22% Decreased 12% About the Same 63% Unsure 3% Greatest Public Safety Concern 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 6 20 13 14 6 13 5 1 21 2 Violent Crime Traffic Speeding Drugs Youth Crimes/Vandalism Business Crimes Residential Crimes Identity Theft All Equally None Unsure 0 5 10 15 20 25 Rating of Park System Components 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 88 53 34 32 44 67 41 37 5 5 4 3 2 13 3 3 City Parks Community Ballfields Ice Arena Community Gyms Village Golf Course Trails Performance Center Aquatic Park 0 20 40 60 80 100 Positive Negative Source of Information 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 51 16 12 12 4 2 0 2 2 54 16 13 4 3 2 5 2 2 City Newsletter Local Newspaper City Website Word of Mouth Social Media Star Tribune E-mail Scattered Nothing 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Primary Preferred Overall Communications Performance 2022 City of New Hope The Morris Leatherman Company 11 50 15 3 21 15 71 13 1 1 15 65 12 1 8 Excellent Good Only Fair Poor Unsure0 20 40 60 80 2005 2015 2022 1 THE MORRIS LEATHERMAN COMPANY CITY OF NEW HOPE 3128 Dean Court RESIDENTIAL SURVEY Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 FINAL APRIL 2022 Hello, I'm __________ of the Morris Leatherman Company, a nationwide polling firm located in Minneapolis. We've been retained by the City of New Hope to speak with a random sample of residents about issues facing the city. The survey is being taken because your city representatives and staff are interested in your opinions and suggestions. I want to assure you that all individual responses will be held strictly confidential; only summaries of the entire sample will be reported. (DO NOT PAUSE) 1. Approximately how many years LESS THAN TWO YEARS.....8% have you lived in New Hope? TWO TO FIVE YEARS......15% SIX TO TEN YEARS.......28% ELEVEN TO TWENTY YRS...24% 21 TO THIRTY YRS.......12% OVER THIRTY YEARS......14% REFUSED.................0% 2. What do you like MOST, if any- DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% thing, about living in New Hope? CONVENIENT LOCATION.....9% HOUSING/NEIGHBORHOOD...13% PARKS/TRAILS............8% SMALL TOWN FEEL........12% QUIET AND PEACEFUL.....17% FRIENDLY PEOPLE........12% CLOSE TO JOB............9% SCHOOLS.................9% SAFE....................4% CLOSE TO FAMILY.........4% SHOPPING/SERVICES.......2% SCATTERED...............2% 3. How would you rate the City’s job EXCELLENT..............27% of handling the COVID-19 pandemic GOOD...................58% - excellent, good, only fair or ONLY FAIR..............13% poor? POOR....................2% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......1% 4. How would you rate the City’s com- EXCELLENT..............35% munication about the COVID-19 pan- GOOD...................48% demic –- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR..............13% fair, or poor? POOR....................3% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......1% 2 5. How would you rate how you and EXCELLENT..............14% members of your household are do- GOOD...................62% ing financially, mentally and phy- ONLY FAIR..............23% sically –- excellent, good, only POOR....................2% fair, or poor? DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% Aside from the COVID-19 pandemic.... 6. What do you think is the most DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......9% serious issue facing New Hope NOTHING................13% today? REDEVELOPMENT..........13% RISING CRIME...........14% HIGH TAXES.............16% STREET MAINTENANCE......8% GROWTH.................16% DIVERSITY...............4% POOR SPENDING...........2% RUN-DOWN PROPERTIES.....2% ECONOMY.................3% SCATTERED...............1% 7. How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT..............26% life in New Hope -- excellent, GOOD...................68% good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR...............6% POOR....................0% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% 8. How would you rate the City of EXCELLENT..............38% New Hope as a place to raise GOOD...................62% children -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR...............8% fair, or poor? POOR....................0% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3% 9. And, how would you rate New Hope EXCELLENT..............36% as a place to retire -- excellent, GOOD...................49% good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR..............10% POOR....................1% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5% 10. How would you rate the general EXCELLENT..............29% sense of community among New Hope GOOD...................56% residents -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR..............15% fair, or poor? POOR....................1% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% 3 11. All in all, do you think things in RIGHT DIRECTION........90% New Hope are generally headed in WRONG TRACK.............3% the right direction, or do you DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......7% feel things are off on the wrong track? IF “WRONG TRACK,” ASK: (N=11) 12. Could you tell me why you feel that way? RISING CRIME, 100%. 13. How welcoming, if at all, do you VERY WELCOMING.........58% think New Hope is -– is it very SOMEWHAT WELCOMING.....41% welcoming, somewhat welcoming, NOT TOO WELCOMING.......1% not too welcoming or not at all NOT AT ALL WELCOMING....1% welcoming? DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% IF “NOT TOO WELCOMING” OR “NOT AT ALL WELCOMING,” ASK: (N=4) 14. Who do you think does not feel welcomed in New Hope? PEOPLE OF COLOR, 75%; NON-ENGLISH SPEAKING, 25%. For each of the following, please rate the City of New Hope as excellent, good, only fair, or poor. EXC GOO FAI POO DKR 15. Creating a welcoming community to residents of all backgrounds. 41% 46% 11% 0% 2% 16. Treating all residents with respect. 39% 51% 8% 1% 2% 17. Treating all residents fairly. 43% 47% 7% 0% 3% 18. Providing services to residents of all backgrounds. 40% 50% 2% 1% 8% IF “ONLY FAIR” OR “POOR,” ASK: (N=9) 4 19. Is there a particular city service which needs to improve? POLICE, 11%; NON-ENGLISH SPEAKING SERVICES, 11%; COMMUNITY EVENTS, 11%; SOCIAL SERVICES, 22%; JOB PLACEMENT, 22%; AFFORDABLE HOUSING, 22%. 20. Do you think the City is doing STRONGLY YES...........20% enough to create a diverse, in- YES....................66% clusive and fair community? (WAIT NO......................6% FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel STRONGLY NO.............0% strongly that way? DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......8% 21. Should this be high priority, HIGH PRIORITY..........42% moderate priority, low priority, MODERATE PRIORITY......43% or not a priority at all for the LOW PRIORITY...........10% City of New Hope NOT A PRIORITY AT ALL...4% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......2% Moving on.... I would like to read you a list of a few city services. For each one, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of the service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor? EXC GOO FAI POO DKR 22. Police protection? 50% 42% 9% 0% 0% 23. Fire protection? 44% 44% 2% 0% 10% 24. Building inspection? 12% 57% 11% 1% 19% 25. Sanitary sewer service? 19% 62% 13% 1% 6% 26. Accommodation and control of storm water run-off? 21% 44% 20% 3% 13% 27. Animal control? 24% 49% 19% 1% 8% 28. Park maintenance? 32% 60% 6% 0% 2% 29. Condition of trails? 37% 45% 13% 0% 6% 30. Recreational programs? 28% 47% 10% 1% 15% 31. Street lighting? 28% 57% 15% 1% 0% 32. Recycling service? 39% 54% 6% 0% 0% 33. Taste and quality of drinking water? 25% 61% 13% 1% 1% Roadways in the City of New Hope consist of both city and county streets and state highways. The county maintains 42nd Avenue, Bass Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue, while the state maintains Highway 169. Now, for the next two city services, please consider only city-maintained streets and roads. How would you rate.... 5 EXC GOO FAI POO DKR 34. Pavement repair and patching on city streets? 27% 45% 25% 3% 0% 35. Snowplowing of city streets? 42% 48% 9% 1% 0% 36. When you consider the property EXCELLENT..............11% taxes you pay and the quality of GOOD...................67% city services you receive, would ONLY FAIR..............16% you rate the general value of city POOR....................0% services as excellent, good, only DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......6% fair, or poor? 37. Would you favor or oppose an in- FAVOR..................70% crease in your city property OPPOSE.................19% taxes if it were needed to main- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....11% tain city services at their current level? IF “OPPOSE,” ASK: (N=76) 38. What services would you be DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......8% willing to see cut? NONE/CUT WASTE.........58% ADMINISTRATION.........15% PARKS/RECREATION.......16% PUBLIC WORKS............1% RECYCLING...............3% In 2015, the City of New Hope implemented a new street improvement plan, which focuses on less expensive “mill and overlay” improvements, to improve driving and the appearance of streets, rather than full reconstruction and utility replacement. This new approach makes it possible for the City to make improvements to ten or more miles of city streets each construction year, rather than one or two miles if the streets were fully reconstructed and the utilities were replaced. 39. Do you support or oppose this STRONGLY SUPPORT.......18% plan? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do SUPPORT................55% you feel strongly that way? OPPOSE.................19% STRONGLY OPPOSE.........1% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......8% IF “STRONGLY SUPPORT” OR “SUPPORT,” ASK: (N=293) 6 40. Would you support a property YES....................54% tax increase to increase the NO.....................41% number of miles that can be DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......5% completed during a construc- tion year? Most communities have one of two systems for garbage collection. In an open collection system, which the City of New Hope currently has, residents choose their hauler from several different companies serving the community. Other cities use an organized collection system, where the City contracts with a hauler or haulers for collection throughout the city. 41. Would you favor or oppose the City STRONGLY FAVOR.........12% of New Hope changing from the FAVOR..................28% current system in which residents OPPOSE.................36% may choose from several different STRONGLY OPPOSE.........6% haulers to a system where the City DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....18% chooses a specific hauler or haulers for the whole community? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly that way? IF A RESPONSE IS GIVEN, ASK: (N=330) 42. Could you tell me one or two DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% reasons for your decision? WANT CHOICE............27% LIKE CURRENT HAULER....16% CHOICE/COST LESS........9% ORGANIZED/COST LESS....17% ORGANIZED/LESS TRUCKS..26% ORGANIZED/STREET REP....3% SCATTERED...............2% IF “OPPOSE” OR “STRONGLY OPPOSE,” ASK: (N=173) 43. Would you still oppose if YES....................50% changing to an organized sys- NO.....................34% tem would reduce truck traf- DON’T KNOW/REFUSED.....17% fic in neighborhoods and save the city money on street re- pair and maintenance? Moving on.... 7 44. Do you think you have adequate YES....................84% opportunities to provide input and NO......................5% feedback about issues to the City DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....11% of New Hope? IF "NO," ASK: (N=19) 45. What additional opportunities would you like to see the City of New Hope offer residents to provide input and feedback on issues? UNSURE, 10%; ISSUES FORUM, 43%; MAILINGS, 22%; RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS, 16%; SURVEYS, 10%. 46. How much do you feel you know GREAT DEAL.............13% about the work of the Mayor and FAIR AMOUNT............42% City Council -- a great deal, a VERY LITTLE............45% fair amount, or very little? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......1% 47. From what you know, do you ap- STRONGLY APPROVE.......18% prove or disapprove of the job APPROVE................67% the Mayor and City Council are DISAPPROVE..............3% doing? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) And do STRONGLY DISAPPROVE.....1% you feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....12% 48. How much first-hand contact have QUITE A LOT.............3% you had with New Hope City SOME...................30% staff -- quite a lot, some, very VERY LITTLE............46% little, or none at all? NONE AT ALL............20% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......1% 49. From your experience, how would EXCELLENT..............21% you rate the job performance of GOOD...................60% New Hope City staff –- excel- ONLY FAIR...............9% lent, good, only fair, or poor? POOR....................0% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....10% 50. During the past year, have you IN-PERSON...............7% visited or contacted New Hope TELEPHONE..............33% City Hall in person, or on the NO.....................60% telephone? DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% IF "IN-PERSON” OR “TELEPHONE," ASK: (N=160) 8 51. On your last contact with the POLICE DEPARTMENT.......3% City, which Department did FIRE DEPARTMENT.........0% you contact -- the Police De- PUBLIC WORKS............9% partment, Fire Department, PARK AND RECREATION....15% Public Works, Parks and BUILDING INSPECTIONS....3% Recreation, Building Inspec- PLANNING................4% tions, Planning, Administra- ADMINISTRATION..........8% tion, Finance Department, FINANCE DEPARTMENT......1% General Information, Licenses GENERAL INFORMATION.....8% and Permits or Utility LICENSE PERMITS........11% billing? UTILITY BILLING........38% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......1% Thinking about your last contact with the City, for each of the following characteristics, please rate the service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor.... EXC GOO FAI POO DKR 52. Waiting time for a staff member to assist you? 39% 55% 5% 1% 0% 53. Courtesy of the City Staff? 51% 43% 6% 1% 0% 54. Ease of obtaining the service you needed? 47% 43% 8% 2% 0% Thinking about your neighborhood for a moment.... 55. How would you rate the overall EXCELLENT..............35% general appearance of your nei- GOOD...................59% ghborhood -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR...............7% fair, or poor? POOR....................0% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR," ASK: (N=28) 56. Why do you feel that way? UNSURE, 7%; RUNDOWN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, 21%; MESSY YARDS, 21%; LONG GRASS/WEEDS, 4%; TRASH/LITTER, 14%; RUNDOWN BUSINESS PROPERTIES, 4%; JUNK CARS, 21%; TOO MANY CARS, 4%; SCATTERED, 4%. 9 57. Do you feel the City is too tough, TOO TOUGH...............3% about right, or not tough enough ABOUT RIGHT............86% in enforcing the City Code on such NOT TOUGH ENOUGH.......11% nuisances as animal control, gar- DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......1% bage disposal, junk cars, messy yards, and noise? IF "TOO TOUGH” OR "NOT TOUGH ENOUGH," ASK: (N=54) 58. Could you tell me one or two reasons why you feel that way? RUNDOWN PROPERTIES, 11%; MESSY YARDS, 19%; LONG GRASS/WEEDS, 13%; TRASH/LITTER, 2%; LOOSE ANIMALS, 4%; TOO RESTRICTIVE STREET PARKING, 9%; JUNK CARS, 26%; TOO STRICT ON PROPERTY CODES, 2%; TRASH BIN STORAGE, 4%; BARKING DOGS, 2%; TOO TOUGH ON YARD MAINTENANCE, 6%; SCATTERED, 2%. I would like to read you a list of characteristics of a community. For each one, please tell me if you think New Hope currently has too many or too much, too few or too little, or about the right amount. (ROTATE LIST) MANY FEW/ ABOUT D.K./ MUCH LITT RIGHT REF. 59. Apartments? 40% 12% 47% 2% 60. Starter homes? 9% 30% 58% 4% 61. “Move-up” housing? 13% 21% 61% 6% 62. Condominiums and townhouses? 30% 23% 45% 2% 63. Affordable housing, defined by the Metropolitan Council as a single family home costing less than $316,000? 8% 32% 54% 7% 64. Assisted living for seniors? 7% 22% 58% 13% 65. Nursing homes? 7% 15% 65% 13% 66. One-level housing for seniors maintained by an association? 5% 29% 49% 17% 67. Parks and open spaces? 13% 11% 74% 2% 68. Trails and bikeways? 12% 25% 60% 4% 69. Service and retail establishments? 11% 36% 53% 1% 70. Entertainment opportunities? 6% 37% 54% 3% 71. Fine dining restaurants? 6% 32% 61% 2% 72. Family sit-down restaurants? 9% 27% 65% 0% 10 73. Are there any types of development you would like to see in the city? (IF "YES," ASK:) What are they? (PROBE) UNSURE, 2%; NO, 48%; FINE DINING, 5%; VARIETY FOR DINING, 3%; RETAIL/SERVICE, 6%; AFFORDABLE HOUSING, 2%; TRAILS/SIDEWALKS, 3%; TOWNHOMES, 4%; PARKS, 2%; FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, 6%; GROCERY STORE, 3%; STARTER HOMES, 3%; JOBS, 3%; SENIOR HOUSING, 5%; SCATTERED, 5%. 74. Are there any types of development you would strongly op- pose? (PROBE) UNSURE, 3%; NO, 55%; APARTMENTS, 14%; LOW-INCOME HOUSING, 3%; INDUSTRIAL, 2%; BARS, 3%; RETAIL, 2%; HIGH-END HOUSING, 2%; TOBACCO SHOPS, 2%; ADULT ENTERTAINMENT, 2%; LIQUOR STORES, 2%; CONVENIENCE STORES, 3%; SCATTERED, 7%. As the City of New Hope continues development and redevelop- ment.... 75. Do you support or oppose the City STRONGLY SUPPORT........7% providing financial incentives to SUPPORT................58% attract specific types of develop- OPPOSE.................20% ment? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you STRONGLY OPPOSE.........7% feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......9% I would like to ask about a specific redevelopment site.... Discussions are underway about potential redevelopment of the shopping center on the southwest corner of Winnetka and 45th avenues, just east of the new Hy-Vee. For each of the following types of development, please tell me if you would strongly support it, support, oppose or strongly oppose it. (ROTATE) STS SUP OPP STO DKR 76. High-density residential, such as townhouses or apartments? 14% 36% 36% 11% 4% 77. Retail stores? 29% 44% 20% 7% 1% 78. Medical office space? 31% 46% 14% 3% 7% 79. Senior housing? 26% 42% 19% 4% 10% Continuing.... 11 The City of New Hope has again started to purchase deteriorating and blighted properties, demolish them and resell the lots for new home construction. 80. Do you favor or oppose the City STRONGLY FAVOR.........19% purchasing deteriorating and FAVOR..................66% blighted properties for redevelop- OPPOSE..................8% ment? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you STRONGLY OPPOSE.........1% feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......6% 81. Have you done any remodeling or YES....................27% home improvements in the past five NO.....................73% years? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% IF "YES," ASK: (N=109) 82. What remodeling or home im- DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% provements have you under- KITCHEN................19% taken? BATHROOM...............21% FINISHED BASEMENT......10% WINDOWS/DOORS..........10% ROOF...................11% DECK/LANDSCAPING.......21% INSULATION..............4% SIDING..................2% SCATTERED...............2% Moving on... 83. During the past two years, has INCREASED..............22% crime increased, decreased, or DECREASED..............12% remained about the same in your REMAINED ABOUT SAME....64% area of the city? DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......3% 84. Do you generally feel safe YES....................84% walking in your neighborhood alone NO.....................14% at night? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......2% IF "NO," ASK: (N=56) 85. In which areas do you not feel safe? UNSURE, 4%; EVERYWHERE, 46%; PARKS, 11%; TRAILS, 4%; APARTMENTS, 4%; LOW-INCOME AREAS, 4%; BUSY STREETS, 11%; BUS STOPS, 4%; SCATTERED AREAS, 13%. 12 86. What makes you feel unsafe? UNSURE, 4%; CRIME, 27%; NOT ENOUGH LIGHTS, 4%; LOITERING YOUTH, 25%; AGE/HEALTH/VULNERABLE, 30%; ISOLATED AREA, 4%; BUSY TRAFFIC, 7%. 87. During the past twelve months, YES.....................7% were you or a member of your NO.....................93% household the victim of a crime DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% in New Hope? 88. Are you a member of a Neighborhood YES....................32% Watch? NO.....................67% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......1% I would like to read you a short list of public safety concerns. 89. Please tell me which one you consider to be the greatest concern in New Hope? If you feel that none of these problems are serious in New Hope, just say so. (ROTATE AND READ LIST) VIOLENT CRIME...............................6% TRAFFIC SPEEDING...........................20% DRUGS......................................13% YOUTH CRIMES AND VANDALISM.................14% BUSINESS CRIMES, SUCH AS SHOPLIFTING AND CHECK FRAUD........................6% RESIDENTIAL CRIMES, SUCH AS BURGLARY AND THEFT.............................13% IDENTITY THEFT..............................5% ALL EQUALLY.................................1% NONE OF THE ABOVE..........................21% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED..........................2% 90. Is speeding in your neighborhood YES....................33% a serious traffic problem? NO.....................67% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......1% 91. Are stop sign and traffic signal YES....................23% violations a serious problem in NO.....................76% your neighborhood? DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......2% Continuing.... 13 92. Do you leave the City of New Hope YES....................55% on a regular or daily basis to go NO.....................30% to work? NOT EMPLOYED/RETIRED...15% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% IF "YES," ASK: (N=220) 93. In what city is your job DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% located? MINNEAPOLIS............42% SAINT PAUL..............5% PLYMOUTH...............16% MAPLE GROVE.............9% BLOOMINGTON............13% CRYSTAL.................5% GOLDEN VALLEY...........5% SCATTERED...............5% 94. How many minutes does it take FIVE MINUTES OR LESS....3% you to get to work? SIX TO TEN MINUTES.....13% 11 TO 15 MINUTES.......21% 16 TO 20 MINUTES.......26% 21 TO 25 MINUTES.......19% 26 TO 30 MINUTES.......12% OVER 30 MINUTES.........6% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% 95. How would you rate the ease EXCELLENT..............17% of getting to and from work GOOD...................60% -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR..............23% fair, or poor? POOR....................0% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% 96. Do you or anyone in your YES....................33% household ride public transit NO.....................67% on a regular basis? DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% IF “NO,” ASK: (N=147) 97. Why don’t you use public DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% transit? NEED CAR...............16% PREFER TO DRIVE........58% UNSAFE..................7% INCONVENIENT...........12% DOESN’T GO WHERE NEED...6% 14 98. How would you rate the ease of EXCELLENT..............19% getting from place to place within GOOD...................69% the City of New Hope –- excellent, ONLY FAIR..............12% good, only fair, or poor? POOR....................0% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% Turning to parks and recreation.... 99. How would you rate park and rec- EXCELLENT..............23% reation facilities in New Hope GOOD...................65% –- excellent, good, only fair, or ONLY FAIR..............11% or poor? POOR....................0% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......2% The New Hope Park and Recreation system is composed of larger community parks and smaller neighborhood parks, community ballfields, the Ice Arena, New Hope Community Gyms, the Golf Course and trails. For each of the following facilities, first, tell me if you or members of your household have used it during the past year. Then, for those you have used, please rate them as excellent, good, only fair, or poor. If you have no opinion, just say so.... NOT EXC GOO FAI POO DKR 100. City parks? 7% 38% 50% 5% 0% 0% 101. Community ballfields? 31% 20% 33% 5% 0% 12% 102. New Hope Ice Arena? 42% 10% 24% 4% 0% 20% 103. New Hope Community Gyms? 47% 13% 19% 3% 0% 18% 104. New Hope Village Golf Course? 39% 21% 23% 2% 0% 16% 105. Trails? 16% 36% 31% 13% 0% 4% 106. New Hope Performance Center? 38% 14% 27% 3% 0% 19% 107. The New Hope Aquatic Park? 40% 20% 17% 3% 0% 20% 108. Have you or members of your house- YES....................22% hold participated in any city NO.....................78% sponsored recreational programs DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......1% during the past year? IF "YES," ASK: (N=87) 15 109. Which ones? DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% BASEBALL/SOFTBALL......15% ADULT SPORTS...........12% YOUTH SPORTS...........29% YOUTH PROGRAMS..........2% ADULT PROGRAMS..........5% ADULT FITNESS...........4% YOUTH BASKETBALL........8% YOUTH SOCCER............5% GOLF....................5% YOUTH HOCKEY............5% SCATTERED..............10% 110. Were you satisfied or dis- SATISFIED..............86% satisfied with your exper- DISSATISFIED...........14% ience? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% 111. Does the current mix of recrea- YES....................85% tional programming in the city NO......................1% adequately meet the needs of your DON’T KNOW/REFUSED.....15% household? IF “NO,” ASK: (N=3) 112. What additional recreational programs would you like to see offered? ADULT FITNESS, 33%; CITY EVENTS, 33%; SENIOR PROGRAMS, 33%. Moving on.... 113. What is your primary source of in- DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% formation about city government NOTHING.................2% and its activities? CITY NEWSLETTER........51% LOCAL NEWSPAPER........16% CITY WEBSITE...........12% WORD OF MOUTH..........12% STAR TRIBUNE............2% SOCIAL MEDIA............4% SCATTERED...............2% 16 114. How would you prefer to receive DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......1% information from the city? NOTHING.................1% CITY NEWSLETTER........54% LOCAL NEWSPAPER........16% CITY WEBSITE...........13% WORD OF MOUTH...........4% STAR TRIBUNE............2% E-MAIL..................5% SOCIAL MEDIA............3% SCATTERED...............2% The City publishes a bi-monthly newsletter, “In Touch,” which is mailed to all residents. 115. Do you receive and regularly read NO.....................15% the City newsletter? (IF “YES,” YES/EXCELLENT..........36% ASK:) How would you evaluate the YES/GOOD...............42% newsletter overall –- excellent, YES/ONLY FAIR...........7% good, only fair, or poor? YES/POOR................0% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......1% 116. How would you prefer to receive ELECTRONICALLY.........24% the city’s newsletter –- only PRINT..................61% electronically, only in print or BOTH...................12% both? DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......4% 117. Does your household currently sub- CABLE..................41% scribe to cable television, satel- SATELLITE..............12% lite television, or neither? NEITHER................47% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......0% IF "CABLE," ASK: (N=163) As you may know, the City currently cablecasts City Council and Planning Commission meetings. 118. How often do you watch City FREQUENTLY..............1% Council or Planning Commis- OCCASIONALLY...........11% sion meetings -- frequently, RARELY.................29% occasionally, rarely, or NEVER..................59% never? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% 119. Have you accessed the City's web- YES....................50% site? NO.....................49% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......2% IF "YES," ASK: (N=198) 17 120. Were you able to find what YES....................96% you were looking for? NO......................4% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......1% 121. What information were you looking for? UNSURE, 3%; GENERAL INFORMATION, 10%; PARKS AND RECREATION, 27%; UTILITY DEPARTMENT, 19%; CITY NEWS, 5%; ELECTIONS, 2%; CODES AND ORDINANCES, 12%; CITY EVENTS, 3%; CRIME REPORTS, 3%; SCHOOLS, 2%; SCATTERED, 14%. The City webstreams its City Council and other public meetings on its website. Meetings are archived and can also be viewed anytime after their original airing. 122. Have you ever viewed meetings YES....................22% from the City's website? NO.....................76% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......2% 123. How interested would you be VERY INTERESTED........12% in subscribing to receive SOMEWHAT INTERESTED....26% e-mails containing city in- NOT TOO INTERESTED.....26% formation and news –- very NOT AT ALL INTERESTED..33% interested, somewhat inte- DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......3% rested, not too interested or not at all interested? I would like to ask you about social media sources. For each one, tell me if you currently use that source of information; then, for each you currently use, tell me if you would be likely or not likely to use it to obtain information about the City of New Hope. NOT USE USE DK/ USE LIK NLK REF 124. Facebook? 35% 51% 14% 0% 125. Twitter? 67% 22% 10% 1% 126. Next Door? 61% 30% 9% 1% 18 127. How would you rate the City's EXCELLENT..............15% overall performance in communicat- GOOD...................65% ing key local issues to residents ONLY FAIR..............12% in its publications, website, POOR....................1% mailings, and on cable television DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......8% -- excellent, good, only fair, or poor? Now, just a few more questions for demographic purposes.... Could you please tell me how many people in each of the following age groups live in your household. Let's start oldest to young- est.... 128. First, persons 65 or over? 0......................74% 1.......................7% 2 OR MORE..............19% 129. Adults under 65? 0......................21% 1......................15% 2......................58% 3 OR MORE...............6% 130. School-aged children or pre- 0......................71% schoolers? 1.......................7% 2......................18% 3 OR MORE...............5% 131. Do you own or rent your present OWN....................56% residence? RENT...................44% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% 132. What is your age, please? 18-24...................9% 25-34..................17% 35-44..................19% 45-54..................17% 55-64..................16% 65 AND OVER............23% REFUSED.................0% 19 133. Which of the following categories WHITE..................62% represents your ethnicity -- AFRICAN-AMERICAN.......22% White, African-American, Hispanic- HISPANIC-LATINO.........8% Latino, Asian-Pacific Islander, ASIAN-PACIFIC ISLANDE...5% Native American, or something NATIVE AMERICAN.........1% else? (IF "SOMETHING ELSE," ASK:) SOMETHING ELSE..........0% What would that be? MIXED/BI-RACIAL.........3% DON'T KNOW..............0% REFUSED.................0% 134. What is the primary language REFUSED.................0% spoken in your home? ENGLISH................90% SPANISH.................5% SOMALI..................2% SCATTERED...............3% 135. Does anyone in this household have YES....................12% a physical limitation that makes NO.....................88% it difficult to access City ser- DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......1% vices? 136. Finally, thinking about your STATEMENT A.............7% household finances, how would you STATEMENT B............33% describe your financial situation, STATEMENT C............43% would you say that -- STATEMENT D............18% A) Your monthly expenses are ex- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......0% ceeding your income; B) You are meeting your monthly expenses but are putting aside little or no savings; C) You are managing comfortably while putting some money aside; D) Managing very well? 137. Gender MALE...................49% FEMALE.................51% 138. ZONE PRECINCT 1..............9% PRECINCT 2.............14% PRECINCT 3.............14% PRECINCT 4.............14% PRECINCT 5.............10% PRECINCT 6..............5% PRECINCT 7.............20% PRECINCT 8.............15% G:\City Manager\AGENDA\6.2 R‐Approval of Claims Merge Doc.docx   Request for Action  November 14, 2022    Approved by: Tim W. Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Tim W. Hoyt, Acting City Manager    Agenda Title  Approval of claims through November 14, 2022  Requested Action  Claims for services and commodities purchased through this period are listed on the Check Disbursement  Report  Attachments   Check Disbursement Report  Agenda Section Consent Item Number  6.2  I:\RFA\COMM DEV\2022\City Council\11‐14‐22 Revolving Loan Fund Policy\Q ‐ Revolving Loan Fund Policy 11‐14‐22.docx    Request for Action  November 14, 2022    Approved by: Tim Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Originating Department: Community Development  By: Jeff Alger, Community Development Specialist;   Jeff Sargent, Director of Community Development  Agenda Title  Resolution adopting Revolving Loan Fund Policy  Requested Action  Staff requests that the City Council approve a resolution adopting a Revolving Loan Fund Policy, which has  been prepared by the city’s financial consultant, Abdo.  Background  At the October 17, 2022, work session, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Revolving Loan Fund Policy,  which must be adopted prior to approval of a Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) loan application to the  Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). The MIF loan program is  intended to provide financing to help add new workers and retain high‐quality jobs on a statewide basis. The  focus is on industrial, manufacturing, and technology‐related industries to increase the local and state tax base  and improve economic vitality statewide. All projects must meet minimum criteria for private investment,  number of jobs created or retained, and wages paid. MIF loans are either forgiven (after a business meets its  goals) or repaid. If repaid, the local government unit has the option of keeping 40% of the repayments, up to  $100,000. The Revolving Loan Fund Policy dictates how those funds can be utilized by the local municipality,  requiring that it adhere to the project selection process and expenditure specifications required by DEED.  Recommendation  Staff recommends that the City Council approve a resolution adopting a Revolving Loan Fund Policy.  Attachments   Resolution   Draft Revolving Loan Fund Policy    Agenda Section Consent Item Number  6.4  RESOLUTION NO. 22-___ RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVOLVING LOAN FUND POLICY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows: WHEREAS, the City of New Hope has been requested to serve as a legal sponsor for a state-funded Minnesota Investment Fund (“MIF”) program loan which is administered through the Department of Employment and Economic Development (“DEED”); WHEREAS, included in the operating guidelines for revolving loan funds seeded by State MIF awards is that the City must adopt a “Revolving Loan Fund Policy”; WHEREAS, the City desires to participate in the MIF loan program as it will provide valuable resources for businesses in the City and promote economic vitality; and WHEREAS, the City desires to adopt the Revolving Loan Fund Policy attached hereto as Exhibit A that details the general purposes and operating guidelines of how to administer revolving loan funds seeded with repayments from MIF loans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope that the City Council hereby approves this resolution adopting the Revolving Loan Fund Policy attached as Exhibit A. Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota this 14th day of November, 2022. ______________________ Kathi Hemken, Mayor Attest: __________________________ Valerie Leone, City Clerk EXHIBIT A Revolving Loan Fund Policy See attached. P:\Attorney\SAS\1 Client Files\2 City of New Hope\99-10011(community development general)\Resolution approving Revolving Loan Fund Policy.docx City of New Hope, Minnesota Financial Management Plan Revolving Loan Fund Adopted by City Council on: November 14, 2022 A local unit of government may establish a Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) with funds from a variety of sources. The guidelines outlined in this document pertain only to a RLF seeded with funds received through the repayment of a loan provided from the state-funded Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) or Economic Recovery Fund programs administered through the Department of Employment and Economic Development or its predecessors. The local government must follow the RLF guidelines that were submitted with the initial MIF application and approved by your DEED Senior Loan Officer. Although the guidelines provide the policies and procedures for the reuse of these funds, the RLF policies and procedures must also adhere to the same requirements that are followed by the state’s Minnesota Investment Fund program. In addition to the local government’s underwriting criteria, the guidelines from Minn. Stat. 116J.8731 (some of which is summarized below) and from the Minnesota Busi ness Subsidy Law (Minn. Stat. 116J. 993 and 116J.994) must be included in the policies and procedures General Purposes and Guidelines for RLFs Seeded by the Minnesota Investment Fund Purpose and Goals The purpose of the RLF is to provide financial and technical assistance for the creation and retention of new employment. These objectives may be accomplished through the following means: 1.Create/retain permanent private sector jobs to fuel above-average economic growth consistent with environmental protection; 2.Investment in technology and equipment that increase productivity and provide for higher wages; 3.Leverage of private investment to ensure economic renewal and competitiveness; 4.Increase the local tax base to guarantee a diversified industry mix; 5.Improve the quality of existing jobs, based on increases in wages or improvements in the job duties, training, or education associated with those jobs; 6.Improve employment and economic opportunities and create a reasonable standard of living; and 7.Enhance productivity growth through improved manufacturing or new technologies. One way to meet these objectives is to assist businesses that have location options o utside Minnesota. These firms bring income into the state and raise the overall standard of living. Eligible Expenditures The MIF-seeded funds may be used in a variety of ways include example noted below. More information is available in Minn. Stat. 116J.8731 and through conversations with your loan officer. 1.Provide loans, loan guarantees, interest buy-downs, and other forms of participation, ensuring that RLF funds are matched by private financing. 2.Fund strategic investments in renewable energy market development. Any expenditure for external marketing for renewable energy market development is not subject to the matching requirements listed above. 3.Provide entrepreneurs with training, other technical assistance, and financial assistance as defined by federal guidelines. 54DRAFT City of New Hope, Minnesota Financial Management Plan Eligible Projects Assistance must be evaluated on the existence of the following conditions as noted in Minn. Stat. 116J.8731: 1.Creation or retention of jobs, or the improvement of jobs as measured by wages, skills or knowledge; 2.Increase in the tax base; 3.Attraction of private funds to the project; 4.Incapacity of local communities and finance partners to finance project; 5.Results in higher wage levels or workforce skills; 6.Supports development of microenterprises, as defined by federal guidelines, through technical assistance or financial assistance. 7.Need for assistance to retain existing business; 8.Importance of assistance to attract out-of-state business; and 9.The project promotes or advances the green economy. The assistance cannot meet solely 7. or 8.; other conditions must also be present. Eligible Activities RLF’s may be used to fund a variety of business activities including: 1.Acquisition of land 2.Construction or rehabilitation of facilities 3.Site improvements 4.Utilities or infrastructure 5.Machinery and Equipment 6.Training 7.Working capital Advance approval from DEED is necessary if the local government would like to provide financing for activities not listed above. Approval is more likely to occur in projects that relate to business development and involve other local government funds. Ineligible Activities In contrast to federal MIF funds, there are industry limitations on how state MIF RLFs may be used. State MIF R LFs may not be used for the operation, construction or expansion of a casino, a sport facility that that has a professional sports team as a principal tenant or any firm engaged in retailing merchandise. All assistance should follow the approved RLF guidelines. Please call your loan officer to discuss any prospective financing. Wage Goals Businesses receiving RLF-State MIF assistance must pay each employee total compensation, including benefits not mandated by law, that on an annualized basis is equal to at least 110 % of the federal poverty level for a family of four, which as of February 1, 2015 is $12.82 per hour. Each year’s compensation level changes and can be found on DEED’s Business Finance MIF website. Other Eligible Uses of the Funds Minn. Stat. 116J.8731 allows local governments to loan or grant RLF funds to a regional devel opment commission, other regional entities, or a certain statewide community capital funds to provide the local match required for capitalization of a regional or statewide RLF. Unlike federal MIF funds, state MIF funds held by local governments never los e their state identify and must follow all applicable laws and regulations. 55DRAFT City of New Hope, Minnesota Financial Management Plan The local government must request permission from the DEED before it can commit to providing funds to any of these organizations. The local government does not have the authority to turn over to another entity, such as Port Authority, Economic Development Authority, Housing Authority, etc. revolving loan funds for any purpose; these entities may administer MIF transactions provided the MIF grantee still maintains control over th e RLF. Conflict of Interest Minn. Stat. 471.87 and 471.88 provide guidance on conflict of interest in a MIF transaction. An actual conflict of interest shall be deemed to exist when a decision on a MIF transaction would compromise a duty to another party or if special advantage is deemed to occur. Potential conflict of interests should also be considered. Business Subsidy Law As mentioned on page 1, Minn. Stat. 116J.993 and 116J.994 must be followed in the administration of RLF -State MIF. These sections pertain to the definition of a business subsidy, public purpose of the subsidy, criteria, subsidy agreements, wage and job goals, timing of the project, public notice and hearing requirements, failure to meet goals, and reporting of information regarding the outcomes of the subsidy. Job Listing Requirements Per Minn. Stat. 116L.66, a business that receives grants or loans in an amount greater than $200,000 must agree to list any vacant or new positions related to the financial assistance on the MinnesotaWorks.net job bank website. Prevailing Wage Per Minn. Stat. 116J.871, laborers and mechanics at the project site during c onstruction, installation, remodeling, and repairs must be paid the state prevailing wage if the financial assistance is greater than $500,000 for a loan. All contracts for publicly owned infrastructure using the RLF must comply with the prevailing wage provisions. Data Privacy The provision of any information related to any applications for assistance is guided by Minn. Stat. 13.591, particularly Subd 1 and 2. These operating guidelines provide a summary of how to administer revolving loan funds seeded with repayments from Minnesota Investment Fund loans. Specific transactions and RLF administration should be discussed with your DEED Senior Loan Officer. Other applicable state and federal laws and rules must also be followed . 56DRAFT I:\RFA\City Manager\2022\Audit\CC 11.14.22\6.5 Q ‐ MMKR 111422.docx   Request for Action  November 14, 2022    Approved by: Tim Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Valerie Leone, City Clerk‐Treas.    Agenda Title  Motion approving appointment of Malloy, Montague, Karnowski and Radosevich (MMKR) to Perform 2022  City Audit  Requested Action  Staff recommends that the City Council approve a motion to appoint MMKR to perform the independent  audit of the city’s financial records for 2022.   Policy/Past Practice  The City Council annually approves a motion appointing a professional firm to complete an audit of the  city’s financial transactions and records. The city has utilized the services of MMKR in past years to complete  the annual audit. The City Council has approved four, three‐year audit proposals from MMKR in the past for  fiscal years 2011/2012/2013, 2014/2015/2016, 2017/2018/2019 and 2020/2021/2022. For each of the years  included in the three‐year proposals, a specific engagement letter is presented to the council for approval for  that year.  Background  At the October 28, 2019 council meeting the City Council approved a three‐year audit proposal from MMKR  for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022. The cost for the auditing services in the  proposal are outlined as follows:    Year Ending  December 31,    Basic Audit  Alternative Bid  CAFR Preparation    Total  2020 $34,230 $4,500 $38,730  2021 $34,745 $4,600 $39,345  2022                  $35,265                                    $4,700                                $39,965____  Total $104,240 $13,800 $118,040    This engagement letter is consistent with the pricing in the three‐year proposal.     Staff also recommends accepting the alternate bid for the preparation of the Comprehensive Annual Financial  Report in the amount of $4,700. The preparation of this report was removed from the Abdo contract to  enhance the audit timeline and to save of report preparation costs. Abdo continues to facilitate preparation of  the statistical section of the CAFR and oversee the application to the Government Finance Officers  Association Excellence in Financial Reporting award. No single audit is necessary this year.      The total cost of the 2022 audit proposal is $39,965, as outlined below:    Agenda Section Consent Item Number  6.5      Request for Action, Page 2    $34,745 Basic Audit  4,600 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report  $39,965     Funding  There are funds budgeted in the 2023 budget for the preparation of the 2022 audit.    Attachments   Letter of Engagement from MMKR    Abdo correspondence RE: Letter of Engagement    September 27, 2019 MMKR three‐year audit proposal      November 8, 2022 Mr. Tim Hoyt Acting City Manager City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Dear Mr. Hoyt: We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City of New Hope and believe this letter accurately summarizes the significant terms of our engagement. If you have any questions, please let us know. If you agree with the terms of our engagement as described in this letter, please sign and return to mmkr@mmkr.com. Also, if you prefer to sign the engagement letter electronically using RightSignature, please reply to this e-mail and provide me with two e-mail addresses (representing both parties) for processing your signatures electronically. In order to provide documentation that certain required communications included in the engagement letter have been received by governance, please note that we are requesting the letter be signed by a representative of the City Council in addition to management. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you believe the letter should be modified or if you have any questions. Sincerely, MALLOY, MONTAGUE, KARNOWSKI, RADOSEVICH & CO., P.A. William J. Lauer, CPA Principal WJL:lmb Enclosures C E R T I F I E D A C C O U N T A N T S P UBLIC PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA Kalen T. Karnowski, CPA Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com Standard Letterhead-r2.qxp_167639 Letterhead-RV1 9/7/18 6:34 PM Page 1 November 8, 2022 To the City Council and Management of the City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Dear Councilmembers and Management: We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services we are to provide the City of New Hope (the City) for the year ended December 31, 2022. Audit Scope and Objectives We will audit the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information, and the disclosures, which collectively comprise the basic financial statements of the City as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. Accounting standards generally accepted in the United States of America provide for certain required supplementary information (RSI), such as management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A), to supplement the City’s basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. As part of our engagement, we will apply certain limited procedures to the City’s RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. These limited procedures will consist of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We will not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. The following RSI is required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and will be subjected to certain limited procedures, but will not be audited: 1)MD&A 2)GASB-required pension and other post-employment benefits information We have also been engaged to report on supplementary information other than RSI that accompanies the City’s financial statements. We will subject the following supplementary information to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS), and we will provide an opinion on it in relation to the financial statements as a whole in a separate written report accompanying our auditor’s report on the financial statements OR in a report combined with our auditor’s report on the financial statements: 1)Combining and individual fund statements and schedules, presented as supplemental information C E R T I F I E D A C C O U N T A N T S P UBLIC PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA Kalen T. Karnowski, CPA Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com Standard Letterhead-r2.qxp_167639 Letterhead-RV1 9/7/18 6:34 PM Page 1 City of New Hope Page 2 November 8, 2022 In connection with our audit of the basic financial statements, we will read the following other information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other information and the basic financial statements, or the other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other information exists, we are required to describe it in our report. 1)Introductory section 2)Statistical section We will perform the required State Legal Compliance Audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 6.65, and will include such tests of the accounting records and other procedures we consider necessary to enable us to conclude that, for the items tested, the City has complied with the material terms and conditions of applicable legal provisions. We will also prepare a management report for the City Council and administration. This report will communicate such things as our concerns regarding accounting procedures or policies brought to our attention during our audit, along with recommendations for improvements. The report will also contain certain financial comparisons and analysis. Our services will not include an audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), which would only be required if the City expended $750,000 or more in federal assistance funds during the year. If the City is required to have a Single Audit of federal assistance funds, this engagement letter would need to be modified. The objectives of our audit are to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion about whether your financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with GAAP; and report on the fairness of the supplementary information referred to in the second paragraph when considered in relation to the financial statements as a whole. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and, therefore, is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements, including omissions, can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment of a reasonable user made based on the financial statements. The objectives also include reporting on internal control over financial reporting and compliance with provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and award agreements, noncompliance with which could have a material effect on the financial statements in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. City of New Hope Page 3 November 8, 2022 Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements We will conduct our audit in accordance with GAAS and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and will include tests of your accounting records of the City and other procedures we consider necessary to enable us to express such opinions. As part of an audit in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We will evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management. We will also evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and determine whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation. We will plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether from (1) errors, (2) fraudulent financial reporting, (3) misappropriation of assets, or (4) violations of laws or governmental regulations that are attributable to the government or to acts by management or employees acting on behalf of the government. Because the determination of waste and abuse is subjective, Government Auditing Standards do not expect auditors to perform specific procedures to detect waste or abuse in financial audits nor do they expect auditors to provide reasonable assurance of detecting waste or abuse. Because of the inherent limitations of an audit, combined with the inherent limitations of internal control, and because we will not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements may not be detected by us, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards. In addition, an audit is not designed to detect immaterial misstatements or violations of laws or governmental regulations that do not have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, we will inform the appropriate level of management of any material errors, fraudulent financial reporting, or misappropriation of assets that comes to our attention. We will also inform the appropriate level of management of any violations of laws or governmental regulations that come to our attention, unless clearly inconsequential. Our responsibility as auditors is limited to the period covered by our audit and does not extend to any later periods for which we are not engaged as auditors. We will also conclude, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the government’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. Our procedures will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts; and may include tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct confirmation of receivables and certain assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected customers, creditors, and financial institutions. We will also request written representations from your attorneys as part of the engagement. We have identified the following significant risk(s) of material misstatement as part of our audit planning , both of which are presumed to be applicable in every audit: 1) Management override of controls 2) Revenue recognition At this time, audit planning has not concluded and modifications may be made to significant risks of material misstatement. If modifications are made, we will communicate them to you. City of New Hope Page 4 November 8, 2022 We may, from time to time and depending on the circumstances, use third party service providers in serving your account. We may share confidential information about you with these service providers but remain committed to maintaining the confidentiality and security of your information. Accordingly, we maintain internal policies, procedures, and safeguards to protect the confidentiality of your personal information. In addition, we will secure confidentiality agreements with all service providers to maintain confidentiality of your information and we will take reasonable precautions to determine that they have appropriate procedures in place to prevent the unauthorized release of your confidential information to others. In the event that we are unable to secure an appropriate confidentiality agreement, you will be asked to provide your consent prior to the sharing of your confidential information with the third party service provider. Furthermore, we will remain responsible for the work provided by any such third party service providers. Our audit of financial statements does not relieve you of your responsibilities. Audit Procedures – Internal Control We will obtain an understanding of the government and its environment, including internal control relevant to the audit, sufficient to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and to design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks and obtain evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinions. Tests of controls may be performed to test the effectiveness of certain controls that we consider relevant to preventing and detecting errors and fraud that are material to the financial statements and to preventing and detecting misstatements resulting from illegal acts and other noncompliance matters that have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. Our tests, if performed, will be less in scope than would be necessary to render an opinion on internal control and, accordingly, no opinion will be expressed in our report on internal control issued pursuant to Government Auditing Standards. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentation, or the override of internal control. An audit is not designed to provide assurance on internal control or to identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. Accordingly, we will express no such opinion. However, during the audit, we will communicate to management and those charged with governance internal control related matters that are required to be communicated under American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) professional standards and Government Auditing Standards. Audit Procedures – Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we will perform tests of City’s compliance with the provisions of applicable laws, regulations, contracts, agreements, and grants. However, the objective of our audit will not be to provide an opinion on overall compliance and we will not express such an opinion in our report on compliance issued pursuant to Government Auditing Standards. Other Services We will also assist in preparing the financial statements and related notes of the City in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America based on information provided by you. These nonaudit services do not constitute an audit under Government Auditing Standards and such services will not be conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. We will perform the services in accordance with applicable professional standards. The other services are limited to the financial statement services previously defined. We, in our sole professional judgment, reserve the right to refuse to perform any procedure or take any action that could be construed as assuming management responsibilities. City of New Hope Page 5 November 8, 2022 You agree to assume all management responsibilities relating to the financial statements and related notes and any other nonaudit services we provide. You will be required to acknowledge in the management representation letter, our assistance with preparation of the financial statements and related notes and that you have reviewed and approved the financial statements and related notes prior to their issuance and have accepted responsibility for them. Further, you agree to oversee the nonaudit services by designating an individual, preferably from senior management, with suitable skill, knowledge, or experience; evaluate the adequacy and results of those services; and accept responsibility for them. Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Our audit will be conducted on the basis that you acknowledge and understand your responsibility for designing, implementing, establishing, and maintaining effective internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and for evaluating and monitoring ongoing activities to help ensure that appropriate goals and objectives are met; following laws and regulations; and ensuring that management and financial information is reliable and properly reported. Management is also responsible for implementing systems designed to achieve compliance with applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements. You are also responsible for the selection and application of accounting principles, for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements and all accompanying information in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements. Management is responsible for making drafts of financial statements, all financial records, and related information available to us and for the accuracy and completeness of that information (including information from outside of the general and subsidiary ledgers). You are also responsible for providing us with (1) access to all information of which you are aware that is relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements, such as records, documentation, identification of all related parties and all related party relationships and transactions, and other matters; (2) additional information that we may request for the purpose of the audit; and (3) unrestricted access to persons within the government from whom we determine it necessary to obtain audit evidence. At the conclusion of our audit, we will require certain written representations from you about your responsibilities for the financial statements; compliance with laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements; and other responsibilities required by GAAS and Government Auditing Standards. Your responsibilities include adjusting the financial statements to correct material misstatements and for confirming to us in the written representation letter that the effects of any uncorrected misstatements aggregated by us during the current engagement and pertaining to the latest period presented are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements of each opinion unit taken as a whole. You are responsible for the design and implementation of programs and controls to prevent and detect fraud, and for informing us about all known or suspected fraud affecting the government involving (1) management, (2) employees who have significant roles in internal control, and (3) others where the fraud could have a material effect on the financial statements. Your responsibilities include informing us of your knowledge of any allegations of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the government received in communications from employees, former employees, grantors, regulators, or others. In addition, you are responsible for identifying and ensuring that the government complies with applicable laws, regulations, contracts, agreements, and grants and for taking timely and appropriate steps to remedy fraud and noncompliance with provisions of laws, regulations, or contracts or grant agreements that we report. City of New Hope Page 6 November 8, 2022 You are responsible for the preparation of the supplementary information, which we have been engaged to report on, in conformity with GAAP. You agree to include our report on the supplementary information in any document that contains, and indicates that we have reported on, the supplementary information. You also agree to include the audited financial statements with any presentation of the supplementary information that includes our report thereon OR make the audited financial statements readily available to users of the supplementary information no later than the date the supplementary information is issued with our report thereon. Your responsibilities include acknowledging to us in the written representation letter that (1) you are responsible for presentation of the supplementary information in accordance with GAAP; (2) you believe the supplementary information, including its form and content, is fairly presented in accordance with GAAP; (3) the methods of measurement or presentation have not changed from those used in the prior period (or, if they have changed, the reasons for such changes); and (4) you have disclosed to us any significant assumptions or interpretations underlying the measurement or presentation of the supplementary information. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a process for tracking the status of audit findings and recommendations. Management is also responsible for identifying and providing report copies of previous financial audits, attestation engagements, performance audits or other studies related to the objectives discussed in the Audit Scope and Objectives section of this letter. This responsibility includes relaying to us corrective actions taken to address significant findings and recommendations resulting from those audits, attestation engagements, performance audits, or other studies. You are also responsible for providing management’s views on our current findings, conclusions, and recommendations, as well as your planned corrective actions, for the report, and for the timing and format for providing that information. Engagement Administration, Fees, and Other We understand that your employees will prepare all cash, accounts receivable, or other confirmations we request and will locate any documents selected by us for testing. We will provide copies of our reports to the City; however, management is responsible for distribution of the reports and the financial statements. Unless restricted by law or regulation, or containing privileged and confidential information, copies of our reports are to be made available for public inspection. The audit documentation for this engagement is the property of Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. (MMKR) and constitutes confidential information. However, subject to applicable laws and regulations, audit documentation and appropriate individuals will be made available upon request and in a timely manner to a regulator agency or its designee, a federal agency providing direct or indirect funding, or the U.S. Government Accountability Office for the purposes of a quality review of the audit, to resolve audit findings, or to carry out oversight responsibilities. We will notify you of any such request. If requested, access to such audit documentation will be provided under the supervision of MMKR personnel. Furthermore, upon request, we may provide copies of selected audit documentation to the aforementioned parties. These parties may intend or decide to distribute the copies or information contained therein to others, including other governmental agencies. The audit documentation for this engagement will be retained for a minimum of five years after the report release date or for any additional period requested by the regulatory agency. If we are aware that a federal awarding agency or auditee is contesting an audit finding, we will contact the party(ies) contesting the audit finding for guidance prior to destroying the audit documentation. City of New Hope Page 7 November 8, 2022 William J. Lauer, CPA, is the engagement partner and is responsible for supervising the engagement and signing the reports or authorizing another individual to sign them. We expect to begin our audit shortly after the end of the fiscal year and to issue our report no later than June 30, 2023. Our fees for these services will be at our standard hourly rates plus out-of-pocket costs (such as report reproduction, word processing, postage, travel, copies, telephone, etc.). Unless additional work is requested, or circumstances require additional work, our estimated fees for the services described herein are $39,965. Our standard hourly rates vary according to the degree of responsibility involved and the experience level of the personnel assigned to your audit. Our invoices for these fees will be rendered each month as work progresses and are payable on presentation. In accordance with our firm policies, work may be suspended if your account becomes 60 days or more overdue and may not be resumed until your account is paid in full. If we elect to terminate our services for nonpayment, our engagement will be deemed to have been completed upon written notification of termination, even if we have not completed our report(s). You will be obligated to compensate us for all time expended and to reimburse us for all out-of-pocket costs through the date of termination. These fees are based on anticipated cooperation from your personnel and the assumption that unexpected circumstances will not be encountered during the audit. If we find that additional audit procedures are required, or if additional services are requested by the City, those services will be billed at our standard hourly rates. Additional audit procedures might be required for certain accounting issues or events, such as new contractual agreements, transactions and legal requirements of new bond issues, new funds, major capital projects, new tax increment districts, if there is an indication of misappropriation or misuse of public funds, or if significant difficulties are encountered due to the lack of accounting records, incomplete records, or turnover in the City’s staff. If significant additional time is necessary, we will discuss it with you and arrive at a new fee estimate before we incur the additional costs. During the year, you might request additional services such as routine advice, assistance in implementing audit recommendations, review of your projections or budgets, and other similar projects. Independence standards allow us to perform these routine services; however, it is important that you understand that we are not allowed to make management decisions, perform management functions, nor can we audit our own work or provide nonaudit services that are significant to the subject matter of the audit. Our audit engagement ends on delivery of our audit report. Any follow-up services that might be required will be a separate, new engagement. The terms and conditions of that new engagement will be governed by a new, specific engagement letter for that service. Please be aware that e-mail is not a secure method of transmitting data. It can be intercepted, read, and possibly changed. Due to the large volume of e-mails sent daily, the likelihood of someone intercepting your e-mail is relatively small, but it does exist. We will communicate with you via e-mail, if you are willing to accept this risk. To ensure that MMKR’s independence is not impaired under the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, you agree to inform the engagement partner before entering into any substantive employment discussions with any of our personnel. With regard to the electronic dissemination of audited financial statements, including financial statements published electronically on your website, you understand that electronic sites are a means to distribute information and, therefore, we are not required to read the information contained in these sites or to consider the consistency of other information in the electronic site with the original document. City of New Hope Page 8 November 8, 2022 If you intend to publish or otherwise reproduce the financial statements, such as in a bond statement, and make reference to our firm name, you agree to provide us with printers’ proofs or masters for our review and approval before printing. You also agree to provide us with a copy of the final reproduced material for our approval before it is distributed. If a dispute occurs related in any way to our services, our firm and the City agree to discuss the dispute and, if necessary, to promptly mediate in a good faith effort to resolve it. We will agree on a mediator, but if we cannot, either of us may apply to a court having personal jurisdiction over the parties for appointment of a mediator. We will share the mediator’s fees and expenses equally, but otherwise will bear our own attorney fees and costs of the mediation. Participation in such mediation shall be a condition to either of us initiating litigation. To allow time for the mediation, any applicable statute of limitations shall be tolled for a period not to exceed 120 days from the date either of us first requests in writing to mediate the dispute. The mediation shall be confidential in all respects, as allowed or required by law, except that our final settlement positions at mediation shall be admissible in litigation solel y to determine the identity of the prevailing party for purposes of the awarding of attorney fees. We both recognize the importance of performing our obligations under this agreement in a timely way and fully cooperating with the other. In the event that either of us fails to timely perform or fully cooperate, the other party may, in its sole discretion, elect to suspend performance or terminate the agreement regardless of the prejudice to the other person. We agree we will give 10 days’ written notice of an intent to suspend or terminate, specifying the grounds for our decision, and will give the other an opportunity to cure the circumstances cited as grounds for that decision. In the event of suspension or termination, all fees and costs are immediately due on billing. We agree that it is important that disputes be discussed and resolved promptly. For that reason, we agree that, notwithstanding any other statutes of limitations or court decisions concerning them, all claims either of us may have will be barred unless brought within one year of the date the complaining party first incurs any damage of any kind, whether discovered or not, related in any way to acts or omissions of the other party, whether or not the complaining party seeks recovery for that first damage and whether or not we have continued to maintain a business relationship after the first damage occurred. Notwithstanding anything in this letter to the contrary, we agree that regardless of where the City is located, or where this agreement is physically signed, this agreement shall have been deemed to have been entered into a t our office in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Hennepin County shall be the exclusive venue and jurisdiction for resolving disputes related to this agreement. This agreement shall be interpreted and governed under the laws of Minnesota. When requested, Government Auditing Standards require that we provide you with a copy of our most recent external peer review report and any subsequent peer review reports received during the period of the contract. Our most recent peer review report accompanies this letter. Reporting We will issue a written report upon completion of our audit of the City’s financial statements. Our report will be addressed to the City Council and management of the City. Circumstances may arise in which our report may differ from its expected form and content based on the results of our audit. Depending on the nature of these circumstances, it may be necessary for us to modify our opinions, add a separate section, or add an emphasis-of-matter or other-matter paragraph to our auditor’s report, or if necessary, withdraw from this engagement. If our opinions are other than unmodified, we will discuss the reasons with you in advance. If, for any reason, we are unable to complete the audit or are unable to form or have not formed opinions, we may decline to express opinions or issue reports, or we may withdraw from this engagement. City of New Hope Page 9 November 8, 2022 We will also provide a report (that does not include an opinion) on internal control related to the financial statements and compliance with the provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a material effect on the financial statements as required by Government Auditing Standards. The report on internal control and on compliance and other matters will state (1) that the purpose of the report is solely to describe the scope of testing of internal control and compliance, and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control on compliance, and (2) that the report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. The report will also state that the report is not suitable for any other purpose. If during our audit we become aware that the City is subject to an audit requirement that is not encompassed in the terms of this engagement, we will communicate to management and those charged with governance that an audit in accordance with GAAS and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards may not satisfy the relevant legal, regulatory, or contractual requirements. We will also provide a report (that does not include an opinion) on the City’s compliance with applicable provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 6.65. The report will state (1) whether, in connection with our audit, anything came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to comply with the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide, insofar as they relate to accounting matters, and (2) that the purpose of the report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. The report will also state that the report is not suitable for any other purpose. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City and believe this letter accurately summarizes the significant terms of our engagement. If you have any questions, please let us know. If you agree with the terms of our engagement as described in this letter, please sign where indicated below and email it to mmkr@mmkr.com. Sincerely, MALLOY, MONTAGUE, KARNOWSKI, RADOSEVICH & CO., P.A. William J. Lauer, CPA Principal WJL:lmb Response: This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of the City of New Hope. City Council Representative City Management Representative By: ________________________________ By: _________________________________ Title: ________________________________ Title: _________________________________ Date: ________________________________ Date: _________________________________ MEMO TO: TIM HOYT FROM: VICKI HOLTHAUS, ABDO FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS SUBJECT: ENGAGEMENT FOR 2022 AUDIT SERVICE DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2022 BACKGROUND In 2019, the City Council accepted a multi-year proposal from MMKR for audit services. The pricing for the 2020, 2021 and 2022 audits are set and include a 1.5% annual increase. The following audit fees do not include any services beyond the basic audit (including a Federal single audit and Annual Comprehensive Financial Report preparation, which would be priced separately). Year Ending December 31, Basic Audit 2020 $ 34,230 2021 34,745 2022 35,265 Total $ 104, 240 RECOMMENDATIONS On November 8, MMKR submitted its annual Engagement Letter for the 2022 audit. The audit is priced at $35,265 as set forth in the multi-year proposal accepted in 2019. The City has worked with MMKR (“the Firm”) for several years and the Firm is very familiar with the City’s finances and processes. The Firm completes the audit in a timely, professional manner and the audit Engagement staff assigned to the City’s audit are knowledgeable and efficient. It is our recommendation that the City approve the Engagement with MMKR for audit services for the 2022 fiscal year. I:\RFA\COMM DEV\2022\City Council\11‐14‐22 Padagis MIF Loan\Q ‐ Padagis MIF Loan 11‐14‐22.docx    Request for Action  November 14, 2022    Approved by: Tim Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Originating Department: Community Development  By: Jeff Alger, Community Development Specialist;   Jeff Sargent, Director of Community Development  Agenda Title  Resolution supporting city’s application as a legal sponsor for Minnesota Investment Fund program  application for Padagis US LLC  Requested Action  Staff requests that the City Council conduct a public hearing and approve a resolution supporting the city’s  application as a legal sponsor for a Minnesota Investment Fund program loan, up to the amount of $980,000,  through the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development for Padagis US LLC.  Policy/Past Practice  It is a past practice of the City Council to approve resolutions approving the use of loan/grant funds for the  creation of jobs and expansion projects within the city.  Background  The City Council discussed a request from Padagis for the city to serve as a legal sponsor for a Minnesota  Investment Fund (MIF) program loan, up to the amount of $980,000, through the Minnesota Department of  Employment and Economic Development (DEED) at the October 17, 2022, work session. Padagis owns and  operates a manufacturing site in New Hope at 3940 Quebec Avenue North. Staff was directed to prepare a  revolving loan fund policy, which is required by DEED for repayable MIF loans, to schedule a public hearing,  and to prepare a resolution supporting the request. The revolving loan fund policy was included as part of the  consent agenda.    If the MIF loan were to be approved, Padagis would receive an interest free repayable loan of up to $980,000  that would be used to add approximately $5,000,000 in new manufacturing machinery and equipment and 60  new employees at the New Hope site. Currently, Padagis is New Hope’s sixth largest employer, with  approximately 315 employees. The proposal also includes potential training funds through the Minnesota Job  Skills Partnership that could be used to train new employees to be hired. The training funds require a match  from the company and can be used to assist in the costs of training to be provided by an accredited Minnesota  college or university. Wages for the 60 new jobs would range from $27 to $96 an hour plus full benefits for all  team members. The $5,000,000 of investment in new machinery and equipment would increase the long‐term  viability of the New Hope plant due to modernized equipment and increased capacity that positions it well to  serve growing market demand. MIF financing at 0% interest is considered an important factor in the company’s  decision to expand at this location.     The MIF loan program is intended to provide financing to help add new workers and retain high‐quality jobs  on a statewide basis. The focus is on industrial, manufacturing, and technology‐related industries to increase  the local and state tax base and improve economic vitality statewide. All projects must meet minimum criteria  for private investment, number of jobs created or retained, and wages paid. At least 50% of total project costs  must be privately financed through owner equity and other lending sources.    Agenda Section Public Hearing Item Number  7.1    Request for Action, Page 2    It is required that a local municipality sponsor the MIF loan via resolution of support, and the local unit of  government must hold a public hearing on the request. DEED does not provide money directly to businesses.  DEED and the local government unit enter into an agreement that stipulates that the funds must be used to  assist the specified business. The funds are then loaned to the business by the local unit of government. The  loan would be repaid over ten years. The city has the option of keeping 40% of the repayments, up to $100,000,  which could be administered to other businesses if the city follows the same project selection process and  expenditure requirements that DEED utilizes when administering MIF loans.     Serving as a legal sponsor for the MIF loan does not require investing any funds for the loan, as the city serves  as a pass‐through entity. There are other expenses involved with the request, such as establishing a revolving  loan fund policy, advertising for the public hearing, and utilizing the city’s legal and financial consultants to  review the company’s financial records, the application, legal documents, and contract. City staff would also  be responsible for completing a portion of the application, completing annual reports, and coordinating the  request. Staff believes the expenses are a worthwhile investment as the city’s Comprehensive Plan supports  the in‐place expansion of existing businesses and bringing additional jobs to the area.  Funding  Funding for the public hearing publication costs and consultants’ time would come from the EDA budget.  There is minimal risk to the city as the loan funds are provided by DEED with the city serving as a pass‐through  entity for the loan. Should the business not meet the conditions of the loan, the city would be responsible for  attempting to recuperate any funds owed. If the business were to close or the city were unable to recuperate  the funds, the city would not be required to pay DEED for any portion of the loan.  Recommendation  Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing and approve a resolution supporting the city’s  application as a legal sponsor for a MIF program loan, up to the amount of $980,000, through DEED for Padagis  US LLC. The city would retain up to $100,000 in repayments, as permitted by DEED, for future projects.  Representatives from Padagis and DEED will be in attendance at the meeting to help answer any questions.  Attachments   Resolution   Map  For more information, please refer to the report included in the October 17, 2022, work session packet, which  was previously distributed.  −1− RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___ RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CITY’S APPLICATION AS A LEGAL SPONSOR FOR MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR PADAGIS US LLC BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows: WHEREAS, the city of New Hope has been proactive in supporting local businesses in its community and has the opportunity to act as a legal sponsor for Padagis US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Padagis”) regarding a potential loan from Minnesota Investment Fund (“MIF) through the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (“DEED”); WHEREAS, Padagis operates a manufacturing site at 3940 Quebec Ave. N., New Hope, MN; WHEREAS, the MIF loan program provides financing to businesses that create or retain high- paying, full-time permanent jobs, and invest in machinery or real property acquisition or improvements; WHEREAS, enacting this resolution will allow the City to act as the legal sponsor for the project contained in the MIF Application to be submitted on or about November 14, 2022 and that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to apply to DEED for funding of this project; WHEREAS, the City has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to administer the proposed project; WHEREAS, the City has not violated any Federal, State, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice; WHEREAS, upon approval of its application by the State, the City may enter into a Grant Contract with the State of Minnesota for the approved project, and that the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws, statutes, regulations and rules as stated in the Grant Contract and described in the Project Compliance Certification of the Application; and WHEREAS, as applicable, the City has obtained credit reports and credit information on Padagis. Upon review by the City and City Attorney, no adverse findings or concerns regarding, but not limited to, tax liens, judgments, court actions, and filings with state, federal and other regulatory agencies were identified. Failure to disclose any such adverse information could result in revocation or other legal action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows: 1. That the Mayor and City Manager, or their successors in office, are hereby authorized to execute the Grant Contract and amendments, thereto, as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City. Dated the 14th day of November, 2022. ____________________________________ Kathi Hemken, Mayor Attest: __________________________ Valerie Leone, City Clerk 5212 Pennsylvania Ave N R-1, Single-family residential 3940 Quebec Avenue North I, Industrial zoning district 39403940 I:\RFA\P&R\ARENA\2022\South Rink Floor, Boards and Glass #1092\Q&R ‐ Replacement Floor, Boards and Glass ‐ South Rink.docx    Request for Action  November 14, 2022    Approved by: Tim Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Originating Department: Parks & Recreation  By: Susan Rader, Director and   Mark Severson, Recreation Facilities Manager    Agenda Title  Resolution authorizing the appropriation of funds in the amount of $1,065,001 to replace the floor, dasher  boards and glass in the south rink at the New Hope Ice Arena (Improvement Project No. 1092)  Requested Action  Staff requests that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the replacement of the floor, dasher  boards and glass in the south rink at the New Hope Ice Arena by All‐American Arena Products for $1,065,001  (improvement project no. 1092).   Policy/Past Practice  The city develops a ten‐year capital improvement program (CIP) for capital equipment, facility  improvements, and infrastructure projects. Each year the CIP is reviewed, updated, and extended for another  ten‐year period. Replacement of the south rink floor, dasher boards and glass is included in the 2023 CIP  budget.  Background  The Ice Arena is located at 4949 Louisiana Avenue North. The south rink was built in 1996 and the existing  boards and glass were reset in 2016 due to failing anchors. The normal life expectancy of a hockey rink floor is 20‐25  years, and a board/glass system is 20 years. The replacement project was initially identified several years ago,  but staff has postponed the project each year until 2023.    The cement floor and refrigeration piping need replacement. As these age, leaks develop making for expensive  repairs causing major disruptions in operations and revenue loss. The current cement slab is also flaking, cracking  and the header in the center of the rink isn’t positioned properly making ice installation and maintaining good ice  in the center area more challenging.    When a dasher board system ages, the hardware for all of the gates wears, which makes it difficult to keep them  functioning properly and safely. Also, over time, board sections and gate sections are hit so intensely that gaps start  to form between them. These gaps can be a safety hazard as sticks and sometimes skate blades can get caught  between them. And as the glass gets older, the frequency of a piece of glass breaking also increases. When glass  breaks, it causes delays in the ice schedule and the replacement process has become increasingly more difficult to  do in a timely manner as the hardware holding the glass in place has become difficult to use.     The base project will include replacement of the 86’x201’ concrete floor system including replacement of the piping,  insulation, vapor barrier, and concrete. It will also include replacement of the existing dasher boards and glass,  including the player, penalty, and timekeeper boxes. The new board system will be similar to the board  system that currently exists, with 6‐foot‐tall glass around the entire rink.       Agenda Section Development &  Planning Item Number  8.1    Request for Action, Page 2    Several alternates were identified, and staff is recommending most of these be included in the project. They  include painting of the concrete floor with white rink sealer and markings, removal of the existing dasher  system and a trade‐in value, the addition of a backer panel along the west side of the rink that is adjacent to  the walkway, installation of a FlexPost shielding system, a powder coat on the support faceplates and the  installation of 25 advertising panels.     All‐American Arena Products is able to provide this replacement of the floor, dasher boards/glass and  alternates through the Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing Program (Contract #120320) for $1,065,001. All‐ American Arena Products and their sub‐contractors have an excellent reputation and are well‐known in the  field of ice arena products. Staff have worked with the sub‐contractors on numerous occasions.    The project would start in mid‐March and is expected to take approximately three months.  Funding  The cost for the replacement of the floor, dasher boards and glass system and alternates in the south rink by  All‐American Arena Products is $1,065,001. This project is included in the 2023 CIP for the Ice Arena Fund  and was shared with the Council during 2022 CIP planning and 2023 budget meetings. The amount budgeted  for this project is $1,200,000.    The funding source will be the Ice Arena Fund, however staff and Abdo recommend an interfund loan from  the Temporary Financing Fund, which will be paid back over 15 years. A resolution will be brought forward  to the City Council at the conclusion of the project.     Attachments   Resolution   Recreation Facilities Manager’s memo   Quote from All‐American Arena Products   Copy of 2023 CIP listing  I:\RFA\P&R\ARENA\2022\South Rink Floor, Boards and Glass #1092\Q&R ‐ Replacement Floor, Boards and Glass ‐ South Rink.docx   City of New Hope    Resolution No. 2022 ‐    Resolution authorizing the appropriation of funds in the amount of $1,065,001 to replace the floor, dasher  boards and glass in the south rink at the New Hope Ice Arena (Improvement Project No. 1092)    WHEREAS,  the city of New Hope prepares a ten‐year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as a guiding  document for equipment acquisition and improvement projects to assist with the preparation of  each annual operating budget; and,    WHEREAS,  having safe, well‐maintained facilities is important; and,    WHEREAS,  staff recommends All‐American Arena Products to replace the floor, dasher boards and glass in  the south rink at the New Hope Ice Arena; and,  WHEREAS,  the funding source for this project is the Ice Arena Fund.    NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of New Hope, Minnesota, that the  appropriation of $1,065,001 from the Ice Arena Fund for payment to All‐American Arena  Products is hereby authorized.    Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota, this 14th day of  November, 2022.               ______________________________           Mayor    Attest: ________________________  City Clerk  Memorandum   To: Susan Rader‐Director of Parks and Recreation  From: Mark Severson‐Recreation Facilities Manager  Date: October 18, 2022  Subject: South Arena Floor and Boards  Staff is recommending replacing the south arena cement floor and the board/glass system in the south  arena as part of the 2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).   The city develops a ten‐year capital improvement program (CIP) for capital equipment, facility  improvements, and infrastructure projects. Every year the CIP is reviewed, updated, and extended  another year for another ten‐year period.  The south arena was built in 1996. The cement floor as well as the boards and glass are original from  1996, making the system almost 27 years old.  The normal life expectancy of a cement floor is 20‐25  years, and the life expectancy of a hockey rink board system is 20 years. The key element of the cement  floor is the miles of tubing encased in the cement to keep the cement floor cold enough to have ice.   When those start to deteriorate and leak, then there are major and expensive repairs causing loss of  revenue.  When a board system gets this old, the hardware for all the gates is so worn that it is difficult  to keep them functioning properly and safely.  Over time, the board sections and gate sections have  taken such a beating that there are gaps that have developed between them.  These gaps are a safety  hazard as sticks and sometimes skate blades can get caught between them.  As the glass gets older,  the frequency of a piece of glass breaking has increased.  This sometimes will cause delays in the ice  schedule and has become increasingly more difficult to do in a timely manner as the hardware  holding glass in place has become difficult to use.  To minimize revenue loss, the project needs to be  done in a timeframe that works best for the ice arena operation with the work to be done by industry  professionals who specialize and have experience in ice arena floors and ice arena product  installations.  This proposal gives us that opportunity.     Staff recommends the bid proposal from All American Arena Products of $1,065,001.  The bid is part  of the Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing Program.          This has been budgeted in for in the 2023 ice arena CIP.  The amount budgeted is $1,200,000.          City of New Hope, MinnesotaCapital Improvement Plan - Ice Arena Fund 9303Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2022 to 20322022 2023 20242025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032Year toEstimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated EstimatedReplace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts AmountsIce Arena 2022 IA door security and security cameras60,000 60,000 - - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2022 IA HVAC upgrades50,000 50,000 - - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2022 IA replace dasher boards and glass (north rink)210,000 210,000 - - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2022 IA scoreboard (south rink) 25,000 25,000 - - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2022 IA weight room upgrades20,000 20,000 - - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2023 IA compressors26,500 - 26,500 - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2023 IA concession stand36,000 - 36,000 - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2023 IA meeting room carpet9,600 - 9,600 - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2023 IA re-cement floor and replace glass and boards (south rink) 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2023 IA skate tile18,000 - 18,000 - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2023IA water heaters48,000 - 48,000 - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2024IA bathrooms50,000 - - 50,000 - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2024IA bleacher caps (south rink)25,000 - - 25,000 - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2024IA HVAC (south rink)50,000 - - 50,000 - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2024IA Zamboni room garage doors20,000 - - 20,000 - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2025 IA bleacher caps (north rink)33,000 - - - 33,000 - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2025 IA HVAC (south rink)50,000 - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2025 IA reader board- - - - - - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2025 IA skate tile for locker rooms20,000 - - - 20,000 - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2025 IA system relief valves8,000 - - - 8,000 - - - - - - - Ice Arena 2026 IA community room tile22,000 - - - - 22,000 - - - - - - Ice Arena 2026 IA compressors24,000 - - - - 24,000 - - - - - - Ice Arena 2026 IA HVAC75,000 - - - - 75,000 - - - - - - Ice Arena 2026 IA radiant heaters (north rink) 30,000 - - - - 30,000 - - - - - - Ice Arena 2026 IA shower20,000 - - - - 20,000 - - - - - - Ice Arena 2027 IA bathrooms (lower level public)30,000 - - - - - 30,000 - - - - - Ice Arena 2027 IA overhead doors25,000 - - - - - 25,000 - - - - - Ice Arena 2027 IA water heater for showers15,000 - - - - - 15,000 - - - - - Ice Arena 2028 IA protective netting15,000 - - - - - - 15,000 - - - - Ice Arena 2029IA compressors27,000 - - - - - - - 27,000 - - - Ice Arena 2030IA system relief valves10,000 - - - - - - - - 10,000 - - Ice Arena 2031IA water heaters30,000 - - - - - - - - - 30,000 - Ice Arena 2032IA cameras30,000 - - - - - - - - - - 30,000 Ice Arena 2032IA compressors30,000 - - - - - - - - - - 30,000 365,000$ 1,338,100$ 145,000$ 111,000$ 171,000$ 70,000$ 15,000$ 27,000$ 10,000$ 30,000$ 60,000$ Department I:\RFA\COMM DEV\2022\City Council\11‐14‐22 Rental Revocation 3840 Boone Ave\Q ‐ 3840 Boone Ave Rental License Revocation 11‐14‐22.docx   Request for Action  November 14, 2022    Approved by: Tim Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Originating Department: Community Development  By: Jeff Sargent, Director  Agenda Title  Resolution establishing findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to revocation of rental property  registration permit for Ashton Homes, LLC and Sekou Dukuly for having a third instance of disorderly  behavior at the property located at 3840 Boone Avenue North  Requested Action  Staff requests the City Council consider a resolution establishing findings of fact and conclusions of law  relating to the revocation of a rental property registration permit for Ashton Homes, LLC for violations of  rental property registration permit requirements for having a third instance of disorderly behavior at the  property located at 3840 Boone Avenue North.  Policy/Past Practice  The Disorderly Behavior at Registered Rental Dwelling Units ordinance was adopted in 2006 to “assure that  rental housing in the city is decent, safe and sanitary and is so operated and maintained as not to become a  nuisance to the neighborhood or to become an influence that fosters blight and deterioration or creates a  disincentive to reinvestment in the community.” Upon the issuance of a third disorderly behavior slip, the  City Council has the discretion to take corrective action against the property owner.  Background  A public hearing to consider the revocation of the rental property registration permit for 3840 Boone Avenue  North was held at the October 24, 2022, City Council meeting. Disorderly behavior slips were issued to  residents at the property on April 17, 2022, June 28, 2022, and September 19, 2022. At the October 24, 2022,  City Council meeting, the City Council heard relevant evidence and arguments and reviewed all testimony,  documents, and other evidence submitted related to issuance of the disorderly behavior slips. It was  determined that the property owner had violated Section 3‐31(i) of the City Code by allowing tenants of the  property to engage in three or more acts of disorderly behavior at the property within a 12‐month period.    Pursuant to Section 3‐31(i)(5) of the City Code, the City Council has the authority to revoke, suspend, or not  renew a rental registration permit if three instances of disorderly behavior occur at a rental dwelling unit  within 12 months. Following the public hearing at the October 24, 2022, City Council meeting, staff was  directed to prepare a resolution revoking the rental registration permit for Ashton Homes, LLC, as the owner  of the property at 3840 Boone Avenue North and prohibiting the owner from re‐applying for another rental  registration permit for 3840 Boone Avenue North or any other property in the city of New Hope for a period  of three years. The resolution requires that tenants of 3840 Boone Avenue North must vacate the property  within 60 days (January 13, 2023) and prohibits the property owner from having an ownership interest in any  other entity that attempts to apply for another rental registration permit for 3840 Boone Avenue North or any  other property in the city for three years.  Recommendation  Staff recommends that the City Council consider a resolution establishing findings of fact and conclusions of  law relating to the revocation of a rental property registration permit for Ashton Homes, LLC for violations  Agenda Section Ordinances &  Resolutions Item Number  10.1    Request for Action, Page 2    of rental property registration permit requirements for having a third instance of disorderly behavior at the  property located at 3840 Boone Avenue North.  Attachments   Resolution   Unapproved City Council minutes (October 24, 2022)    For more information, please refer to the reports included in the October 24, 2022, City Council meeting  packet, which was previously distributed.      RESOLUTION NO. 22-___ RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RELATING TO REVOCATION OF RENTAL PROPERTY REGISTRATION PERMIT FOR ASHTON HOMES LLC AND SEKOU AM DUKULY FOR HAVING A THIRD INSTANCE OF DISORDERLY BEHAVIOR AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3840 BOONE AVENUE NORTH BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows: RECITALS AND FINDINGS OF FACT WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the New Hope City Council on October 24, 2022, to consider revocation of property registration permit against ASHTON HOMES LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, (whose principal is: Sekou AM Dukuly) (ASHTON HOMES LLC and Sekou AM Dukuly sometimes jointly referred to as “Owner”) for violations of New Hope City Code §3-31 relating to a third instance of disorderly behavior within a 12 month period at the real property located at 3840 Boone Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota (“Property”) with a property tax identification number of 18-118-21-42-0103; and WHEREAS, Sekou AM Dukuly owns the Property and operates it as a group home under the name of ASHTON HOMES LLC; and WHEREAS, it is the purpose of City Code §3-31 to assure that rental housing in the city is decent, safe and sanitary and is so operated and maintained as not to become a nuisance to the neighborhood or to become an influence that fosters blight and deterioration or creates a disincentive to reinvestment in the community (§3-31(b)); and WHEREAS, the operation of rental dwelling units is a business enterprise that entails certain responsibilities. Operators are responsible to take such reasonable steps as are necessary to assure that the citizens of the city who occupy such units may pursue the quiet enjoyment of the normal activities of life in surroundings that are: safe, secure and sanitary; free from crimes and criminal activity, nuisances or annoyances (§3-31(b)); and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code §3-31(i)(5), the City Council has the authority to revoke, suspend or not renew the rental registration permit if a third instance of disorderly behavior occurs at a rental dwelling unit within 12 months after the first of two previous notices of disorderly behavior at the same unit; and WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the Owner to assure that tenants not engage in disorderly behavior in the rental dwelling unit as stated in City Code §3-31 (i)(1); WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code §3-31(i)(2), “Disorderly behavior” at registered rental dwelling units includes (1) acts of violence or threats of violence; (2) violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.72 (Disorderly Conduct); (3) violation of Minn. Stat. §§609.74 and 609.745 (Public nuisance); 2 (4) violation of Minn. Stat. §609.50 (Obstructing legal process); and (5) violation of New Hope Code section 9-42 (Regulation and abatement of prohibited noise) relating to the rental unit; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2022, the New Hope Police Department issued the first disorderly behavior slip to a resident at the Property for Disorderly Conduct per City Code Section 3-31 (i)(2)(c) and (h), and a notice was sent to the Owner per City Code Section 3-31 (i)(3); and WHEREAS, on June 28, 2022, the New Hope Police Department issued the second disorderly behavior slip to a resident at the Property for Disorderly Conduct per City Code §3-31 (i)(2)(c), (d) and (h) and a notice was sent to the Owner per City Code §3-31 (i)(4); and WHEREAS, on September 19, 2022, the New Hope Police Department issued the third disorderly behavior slip to a resident at the Property for Disorderly Conduct per City Code §3-31 (i)(2)(b), (c) and (f) and outside fire violation, and a notice was sent to the Owner per City Code Section 3-31 (i)(5); and WHEREAS, on October 24, 2022 a public hearing was held before the City Council regarding Owner’s violation of the rental registration permit requirements set out in City Code §3- 31 as referenced above; and WHEREAS, at the October 24, 2022 public hearing the City Council determined Owner had in fact violated City Code §3-31(i) by allowing a tenant of the Property engage in three or more acts disorderly behavior at the Property within a 12-month period; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing the City Council revoked the rental registration permit for the real property located at 3840 Boone Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota with a property tax identification number of 18-118-21-42-0103. FINDINGS OF FACT WHEREAS, based on the testimony of Director of Police and Acting City Manager Tim Hoyt, Officer Michael TenEyck, Officer Sabrina DeMars, Officer Corey Cracknell, Director of Community Development, Jeff Sargent, and Sheikh K. Dukuly II, the New Hope City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. Sekou AM Dukuly owns the real property located at 3840 Boone Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota. 2. Owner is currently renting the Property to tenants, operating the Property as a group home. 3. Owner obtained a rental registration permit with the City in March of 2021 as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 3 4. A tenant of the Property has engaged in three or more disorderly behavior acts within a 12-month period with New Hope Police being called to the Property on at least 3 separate occasions. See Exhibits B, D and F. 5. The Acting City Manager notified Owner of each of the 3 separate incidents of disorderly behavior by first class mail pursuant to City Code §3-31. See Exhibits C, E and G. 6. Owner failed to assure that the tenants not engage in disorderly behavior in the rental dwelling unit as required by City Code §3-31(i)(1)-(9). 7. Owner was provided with at least a 20-day notice of the public hearing on September 20, 2022, and had the opportunity to be heard to contest the proposed revocation of the rental registration permit. See Exhibit G. 8. Owner Sekou AM Dukuly did not attend the public hearing. 9. The defenses and/or explanations of Sheikh K. Dukuly II who acted as the On-Site Property Manager were not persuasive and did not effectively disprove the actual incidents of disorderly behavior. . CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WHEREAS, based on the testimony of Director of Police and Acting City Manager Tim Hoyt, Officer Michael TenEyck, Officer Sabrina DeMars, Officer Corey Cracknell, Director of Community Development, Jeff Sargent, Sheikh K. Dukuly II and the New Hope City Council hereby makes the following conclusions of law: 1. That Owner of the real property located at 3840 Boone Avenue North, has violated City Code §§3-31(i) by allowing a tenant of the property to engage in three or more acts of disorderly behavior at the Property within a 12-month period. 2. That City Code §3-31(i)(5) provides for the City Council’s ability to revoke, suspend or not renew the rental property registration permit for the Property after the occurrence of a third disorderly behavior act at the Property within a 12-month period. 3. The arguments presented by Sheikh K. Dukuly II did not refute the fact that they had violated §3-31 by allowing at least 3 disorderly behavior incident to occur at the Property. ORDER 1. Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as set out in this Resolution and Exhibits A-H, this Council hereby revokes the rental registration permit for ASHTON HOMES LLC and Sekou AM Dukuly, as Owner of the Property at 3840 4 Boone Avenue North in the city of New Hope pursuant to New Hope City Code §3-31(i)(5) and 3-31 (j)(5) with the following terms: a. The tenants of the Property must vacate it within 60 days of this resolution b. If the Owner fails to remove the tenants within 60 days of this resolution, then the City may commence legal action seeking injunctive relief requiring him to do so. c. Neither Sekou AM Dukuly nor Sheikh K. Dukuly II may re-apply for another rental registration permit for 3840 Boone Ave. N. or any other property in the City of New Hope for at least 3 years. d. Neither Sekou AM Dukuly nor Sheikh K. Dukuly II may have an ownership interest in any other entity that attempts to apply for another rental registration permit for 3840 Boone Ave. N. or any other property in the City of New Hope for at least 3 years. 2. This order shall take effect immediately. Dated: November 14, 2022 ____________________________________ Kathi Hemken, Mayor Attest: ________________________________ Valerie Leone, City Clerk P:\Attorney\SAS\1 Client Files\2 City of New Hope\99-54021 rental permit revocation 3840 Boone Ave N\Resolution revoking rental license 3840 Boone Ave N.docx   I:\RFA\PUBWORKS\2022\Council\2023 Purchase Mack Cab‐chasis‐dump‐snow removal equipment\Q R 2023 Mack and dump body.docx   Request for Action  November 14, 2022    Approved by: Tim Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Originating Department: Public Works  By: Bernie Weber, Director    Agenda Title  Resolution authorizing the purchase of equipment and appropriation of funds in the amount of $322,097.58   for the purchase of a 2023 Mack cab and chassis, dump body and snow removal equipment  Requested Action  Staff is recommending that the Council approve a resolution authorizing the purchase of a 2023 Mack cab and  chassis, dump body and snow removal equipment as proposed in the 2022 Capital Improvement Program  (CIP).  Policy/Past Practice  The city develops a ten‐year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for capital equipment, facility  improvements, and infrastructure projects. Every two years the CIP is reviewed, updated, and extended   two years for another ten‐year period. The purchase of a 2023 Mack cab and chassis, dump body and snow  removal equipment is listed in the 2022 CIP.  Background  The 2023 Mack dump truck would replace a 2013 International dump truck (vehicle #7) currently used by  street department staff. This vehicle is used primarily for snow/ice removal. Rather than selling the 2013  International dump truck, staff recommends the 2013 International be utilized by the New Hope Public  Works per the department’s request. The 2006 Sterling dump truck (#20) Public Works currently uses would  be sent to auction.     Staff recommends using the purchasing opportunity provided through the Minnesota Department  of Administration’s Materials Management Division, called the cooperative purchasing venture (CPV).   The State of Minnesota Department of Administration has awarded contract No. 194871 to Nuss Truck   for the Mack cab and chassis and contract No. 212541 to Towmaster Truck Equipment for the dump body and  snow removal equipment. Staff recommends removing the 2006 Sterling dump truck (#20) from the fleet and  dispose through auctioning services provided by the Minnesota Department of Administration Surplus Services  Division.   Funding  The state contract total for purchase of the Mack cab and chassis is $135,732 plus sales tax of $8,822.58 for a total of  $144,554.58. The dump body, snow removal equipment, set‐up, and installation costs are estimated at $177,543. The  total cost for the plow truck complete is $322,097.58. The current vehicle replacement fund has $311,178 dedicated  for this vehicle replacement, leaving a shortfall of $10,919.58 which could be supplemented by the equipment  replacement fund.    Attachments   Resolution  Agenda Section Ordinances &  Resolutions Item Number  10.2           Central Garage Supervisor Memorandum   Quotations from Nuss Truck and Towmaster Truck Equipment          City of New Hope    Resolution No. 22‐    Resolution authorizing the purchase of equipment and appropriation of funds in the amount of $322,097.58   for purchase of a 2023 Mack cab and chassis, dump body and snow removal equipment    WHEREAS, the city of New Hope prepares a ten‐year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as a guiding  document for equipment acquisition and improvement projects to assist with preparation of each  annual operating budget; and,    WHEREAS, the CIP is not formally adopted as a budget document, nor does it authorize the acquisition of  individual equipment and/or projects listed therein; and,    WHEREAS, the Public Works Department recommends the acquisition of a 2023 Mack Cab and Chassis from  Nuss Truck and dump body and snow removal equipment from Towmaster Truck Equipment;  and,    WHEREAS, the funds for this equipment have been provided within the central garage equipment  replacement fund CIP account for the Public Works Department.    NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council, of the city of New Hope, Minnesota, that the  appropriation of $135,732 for payment to Midway Ford, and $177,543 to Towmaster Truck  Equipment for a dump body and snow removal equipment from the central garage equipment  replacement fund, is authorized and the central garage equipment replacement fund budget is  hereby amended.    Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota this 14th day of  November, 2022.             __________                                   __________________         Mayor    Attest:  ________                                 _________________   City Clerk    Memorandum   To: Bernie Weber‐Public Works Director  From: Bill Robberstad‐Central Garage Supervisor  Date: November 3, 2022  Subject: Purchase of a Mack Cab and Chassis, Dump Body and Plow Equipment  Staff is recommending purchase of a 2023 Mack cab and chassis, dump body and snow removal  equipment as proposed in the 2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The cab and chassis  would be purchased from Nuss Truck.  The dump body and snow removal equipment would be  purchased and set‐up by Towmaster Truck Equipment.    The 2023 Mack dump truck would replace a 2013 International dump truck (vehicle #7) currently  used by street department staff. This vehicle is used for primarily for snow/ice removal. Rather than  selling the 2013 International dump truck, I recommend the 2013 International be utilized by the  New Hope Public Works per the department’s request. The 2006 Sterling dump truck (#20) Public  Works currently uses would be sent to auction.     Staff recommends using the purchasing opportunity provided through the Minnesota Department  of Administration’s Materials Management Division, called the cooperative purchasing venture  (CPV). The State of Minnesota Department of Administration has awarded contract No. 194871 to  Nuss Truck for the Mack cab and chassis and contract No. 212541 to Towmaster Truck Equipment  for the dump body and ancillary equipment.     The state contract total for purchase of the Mack cab and chassis is $135,732.00 plus sales tax of  $8,822.58 for a total of $144,554.58. The dump body, ancillary equipment, set‐up and installation  costs are estimated at $177,543.00. The total cost for the dump truck complete is $322,097.58. The  current vehicle replacement fund has $311,178 dedicated for this vehicle replacement, leaving a  shortfall of $10,919.58 which could be supplemented by the equipment replacement fund.      TRKQT3 Ship To: Cust: Phone:Bill To: Phone: ATTN: Reference No. Accepted by Date PO#Salesman Created Last Revised Appx CompTerms Serial No. Price: Total Discounts: Net Cost: Freight Total: NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 5500 INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY NEW HOPE NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 4401 XYLON AVE N accountspayable@newhopemn.gov NEW HOPE BILL ROBBERSTAD 763-592-6769 JOSH PAULSON QT 75844 NET 30 DAYS 10/24/22 11/01/22 2925 Order Comments: STATE OF MN CONTRACT #212541 Build Instructions VALID THRU 11/30/2022 Other Instructions F.O.B. LITCHFIELD, -OR- CUSTOMERS W/FUEL CHARGES ONLY Qty Part No. Description Price Ea. Net Amt. 1 9900022 - Body 14'6" EDGE-SC/CS-56-36-46 - - 56" 3/16" Hardox 450 $18,021.00 $18,021.00 Front w/CS hoist doghouse, 36" 3/16" Hardox 450 sides w/pockets, 46" 3/16" Hardox 450 Tailgate, 1/4" Hardox-450 Floor, 8" I-Beam Longsills, Air- trip ready linkage, unpainted. 1 CUSTOM - Custom Equipment Pkg consisting of: $2,476.00 $2,476.00 TO CONSTRUCT/WELD/PAINT CARBON STEEL SIDE BOARDS IN LIEU OF WOOD SIDE BOARDS. FOR BOTH SIDES OF TRUCK TOTAL (2) TO PAINT BODY COLOR BLUE 1 9901704 - Painting of Dump Body; includes media blasting of entire $4,093.00 $4,093.00 exterior & understructure, Urethane Primed, & Urethane Top Coat s applied. CAB MATCH (BLUE) Understructure is seam sealed, and painted Gloss Black. 1 9901701 - Installation of Dump Body to hoist $2,036.00 $2,036.00 1 9900145 - Body acc'y TMTE Air trip kit, w/solenoid valve, $456.00 $456.00 1 9901702 - Installation of air operated tailgate latch kit, with $395.00 $395.00 solenoid valve in hydraulic valve enclosure. 1 9900147 - Body acc Box Vibrator - Cougar model DC3200 $784.00 $784.00 1 9901703 - Installation of Box Vibrator, with solenoid located in $461.00 $461.00 hydraulic valve enclosure. 1 9900155 - Cabshield, 1/2 type Stationary Free-Standing style, $3,400.00 $3,400.00 w/painted CARBON STEEL canopy, Hot-Dipped Galvanized tubing *--- Continued ---* MN 55428 USA MN 55428 0/00/00 ** QUOTATION ** TRKQT3 Ship To: Cust: Phone:Bill To: Phone: ATTN: Reference No. Accepted by Date PO#Salesman Created Last Revised Appx CompTerms Serial No. Price: Total Discounts: Net Cost: Freight Total: NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 5500 INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY NEW HOPE NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 4401 XYLON AVE N accountspayable@newhopemn.gov NEW HOPE BILL ROBBERSTAD 763-592-6769 JOSH PAULSON QT 75844 NET 30 DAYS 10/24/22 11/01/22 2925 tion support stand, (2) shovel holders, & reservior mounts, Installed. 1 9900205 - Ladder (CS) Tuck-A-Way Access ladder Pkg, Including Steps & $474.00 $474.00 Grab Handle Above, (ea) (SC & SS BODIES ONLY), Installed SPECIFY LOCATION HERE: 1 9900211 - Body acc'y Dual "split" sander manifolds in rear corner $485.00 $485.00 posts 1 9904246 - Light Warning TMTE1SS-3 PKG: (2) STAINLESS STEEL 23H $4,709.00 $4,709.00 3-light LED Micro-Edge, (2) 5M-400 Super-LED, (2) Side TIR3 LED, (2 ) 400 Max B-T-T LED, & (2) 400 LED BU Lights, in Stainless M Housings, (1) TIR3 LED Wing light, and (2) 4" LED work lights Installed 1 9905778 - Light Mirror Mounted ABL 3800 LED HEAD LAMP PLOW LIGHTS $1,325.00 $1,325.00 W/ICE MELTING TECHNOLOGY Installed 1 9900265 - Conspicuity Tape Installed (Single or Tandem Application) $250.00 $250.00 1 9900267 - Fender set Minimizer M400, for Tandem Axle, black Poly, $1,685.00 $1,685.00 Installed 1 9905144 - Tarp Shur-Co Arm-Matic electric tarp SGL & TDM w/air lock $5,010.00 $5,010.00 kit, front hold down roller kit, & STD motor Installed 1 9900970 - Tire Chains ON-SPOT for 1 Axle Installed $3,748.00 $3,748.00 1 9904691 - INSTALLATION of (Initial) Single camera system $396.00 $396.00 **NOTE: MOUNTED ON RH STROBE TUBE, FOR WING VIEWING USAGE, WIRED AS DEFAULT *--- Continued ---* MN 55428 USA MN 55428 0/00/00 ** QUOTATION ** TRKQT3 Ship To: Cust: Phone:Bill To: Phone: ATTN: Reference No. Accepted by Date PO#Salesman Created Last Revised Appx CompTerms Serial No. Price: Total Discounts: Net Cost: Freight Total: NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 5500 INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY NEW HOPE NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 4401 XYLON AVE N accountspayable@newhopemn.gov NEW HOPE BILL ROBBERSTAD 763-592-6769 JOSH PAULSON QT 75844 NET 30 DAYS 10/24/22 11/01/22 2925 Qty Part No. Description Price Ea. Net Amt. 1 9904692 - Camera System option, NORTECH 9100-2HC 120 degree night $182.00 $182.00 vision CCD weather-proof HEATED camera, only GEN 5 6100 1 9904693 - Camera System option, NORTECH 9100-4 Harness, 65' $118.00 $118.00 Waterproof GEN 5 6100 1 9905502 - PreCise ARC Sensor Mount #1126929, only GEN 5 6100 $50.00 $50.00 1 9905835 - PreCise ARC Sensor #1117640, only, for Wireless GEN 5 $680.00 $680.00 CONTROLLER Applications (LESS MTG BRKT), installed 1 9900296 - Pre-Wet Towmaster/Varitech LDS-TG150-EGF Tailgate mt $6,168.00 $6,168.00 System. 150 gal tank, SS mtg hardware, plumbing, & Electric Gravit y Feed Valve system. 1 9902487 - Installation of TAILGATE pre-wet system (New Towmaster) $922.00 $922.00 1 9900317 - Hoist Towmaster/MAILHOT G4 130-5-3 DOUBLE ACTING $4,891.00 $4,891.00 1 9901711 - Installation of Telescopic DOUBLE acting hoist $1,209.00 $1,209.00 1 9900311 - Hoist TMTE 48" Stabilizer $2,555.00 $2,555.00 1 9902503 - Installation of TMTE Stabilizer & Safety Props $629.00 $629.00 1 9902921 - Scraper FALLS IB-11A 1" MB, w/dual lift cylinders, LESS $9,493.00 $9,493.00 CUTTING EDGES 2 9902874 - VBL 78541WPTSB-PK 7/8" X 5" - 4' w/25 Tungsten Carbide $353.00 $706.00 Insert, Std Punch, Flat Blade, Sgl Bevel FOR SCRAPER *--- Continued ---* MN 55428 USA MN 55428 0/00/00 ** QUOTATION ** TRKQT3 Ship To: Cust: Phone:Bill To: Phone: ATTN: Reference No. Accepted by Date PO#Salesman Created Last Revised Appx CompTerms Serial No. Price: Total Discounts: Net Cost: Freight Total: NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 5500 INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY NEW HOPE NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 4401 XYLON AVE N accountspayable@newhopemn.gov NEW HOPE BILL ROBBERSTAD 763-592-6769 JOSH PAULSON QT 75844 NET 30 DAYS 10/24/22 11/01/22 2925 Qty Part No. Description Price Ea. Net Amt. 1 9902873 - VBL 78531WPTSB-PK 7/8" X 5" - 3' w/25 Tungsten Carbide $279.00 $279.00 Insert, Std Punch, Flat Blade, Sgl Bevel FOR SCRAPER 1 9901706 - Installation of underbody fixed angle scraper w/dual lift $4,371.00 $4,371.00 cylinders 1 9904232 - Scraper FORCE Electric pressure transmitter to read on LCD $625.00 $625.00 screen, installed 1 9900351 - Scraper FORCE reverse/Auto-Lift system, ADD-A-FOLD valve, $703.00 $703.00 installed 1 9902951 - Wing Falls RHSDL10A-HYDPB-TRIP EDGE Primed LESS CUTTING $14,161.00 $14,161.00 EDGES 1 9900389 - Installation Falls SDL Series Wing - w/Dripless Bulkhead $5,545.00 $5,545.00 Couplers 1 9901431 - Wing Falls RL (REAR LIFT) up charge SDL WING $549.00 $549.00 1 9904688 - Wing Falls POST-LESS Toe Lift in lieu of Std Front post/slide system 1 9900477 - Wing Falls Hwy Orange - Paint Moldboard $395.00 $395.00 1 9900545 - Plow Hitch Falls Installation of (supplied) Multi-Coupler 1 9900555 - Plow Hitch Falls 44XB2/STD/STD/SA/SPR-RET/HITCH $3,823.00 $3,823.00 1 9900591 - Installation Falls Plow Hitch - 40 Series 3Line/DRPLSBLKHD $2,509.00 $2,509.00 *--- Continued ---* MN 55428 USA MN 55428 0/00/00 ** QUOTATION ** TRKQT3 Ship To: Cust: Phone:Bill To: Phone: ATTN: Reference No. Accepted by Date PO#Salesman Created Last Revised Appx CompTerms Serial No. Price: Total Discounts: Net Cost: Freight Total: NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 5500 INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY NEW HOPE NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 4401 XYLON AVE N accountspayable@newhopemn.gov NEW HOPE BILL ROBBERSTAD 763-592-6769 JOSH PAULSON QT 75844 NET 30 DAYS 10/24/22 11/01/22 2925 1 9900625 - Plow Push Unit Falls 24/44 Series Std $1,121.00 $1,121.00 1 9900637 - Plow Falls High Visibility Marker Set $131.00 $131.00 1 9900638 - Plow Falls Level-Lift/Assembly $224.00 $224.00 1 9900639 - Plow Falls Rubber Belt Deflector Kit - Installed $433.00 $433.00 1 9900641 - Plow Falls Parking Stand - Screw Adj Style $354.00 $354.00 1 9903073 - Plow Falls Poly PTE-1148/TRP-EDG/NOSHU/POLY-BLK Plow LESS $11,133.00 $11,133.00 CUTTING EDGES 1 9900730 - Plow Falls SCR-ADJ/SHOE/REV-PLW/STD $781.00 $781.00 3 9902871 - VBL 3/4" x 6" - 3' w/25 Tungsten Carbide Insert, Std $242.00 $726.00 Punch, Flat Blade 3 9902872 - VBL 3/4" x 6" - 4' w/25 Tungsten Carbide Insert, Std $323.00 $969.00 Punch, Flat Blade 1 9900791 - Sander Falls 1ASD-6CDSS-6P-1D-1S-LM, Salt Special 6", SS $6,173.00 $6,173.00 Unit, LH Discharge, Single Poly Spinner Ass'y, (includes extra salt shield), complete. 1 9901720 - Sander Install & dual manifold RH & LH rear with dripless $1,518.00 $1,518.00 1 9900823 - Sander TMTE Exterior (removable) sander/tailgate spill $498.00 $498.00 plates, Stainless Steel 1 9900851 - Valve System, Force Add-A-Fold MCV-ISO Valve 9 Functions, $15,465.00 $15,465.00 INSTALLED *--- Continued ---* MN 55428 USA MN 55428 0/00/00 ** QUOTATION ** TRKQT3 Ship To: Cust: Phone:Bill To: Phone: ATTN: Reference No. Accepted by Date PO#Salesman Created Last Revised Appx CompTerms Serial No. Price: Total Discounts: Net Cost: Freight Total: NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 5500 INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY NEW HOPE NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS 4401 XYLON AVE N accountspayable@newhopemn.gov NEW HOPE BILL ROBBERSTAD 763-592-6769 JOSH PAULSON QT 75844 NET 30 DAYS 10/24/22 11/01/22 2925 $177,543.00 HOIST, PLOW LIFT, PLOW STEER, WING TOE, WING HEEL, WING PUSH-BAR, SCRAPER, AUGER, SPINNER 1 9902497 - Control System Force ULTRA-4-6100 Commander control, $13,781.00 $13,781.00 Installed 1 9900882 - Reservoir TMTE 31 Gal Cabshield mt (stainless steel) $3,975.00 $3,975.00 w/intank filter for system, installed 1 9900889 - Pump Force FASD45L LS (6 ci) 3750 psi, w/Elect shut down $6,582.00 $6,582.00 installed 1 9900893 - Valve Force Cable pull-off (for use w/telescopic hoist) $675.00 $675.00 installed 1 9900871 - Switch TMTE BODY UP Installed (electric controls only) $248.00 $248.00 1 9900884 - Sensor Force Low oil indicator system, SLIM-LINE AND $366.00 $366.00 CABSHIELD MOUNTED w/light mounted in cab, installed 1 9900904 - Valve 2-port 1/2" Multi-Hose coupler system installed $1,251.00 $1,251.00 FOR PLOW STEER 1 9905014 - Hydraulic Valve Hose Guard installed $372.00 $372.00 1 WARRANTY - TOWMASTER EXCLUSIVE WARRANTY: 5 yr Steel/Stainless Steel Body Structure; 5 yr Whelen LED Light Systems; 3 yr Palfinger Hoists; 4 yr SwapLoader Hoists; 1 year Swenson Spreaders, 2 yr Hyd, FALLS Snow Equip, Tele Hoists, and all other items. $177,543.00 $177,543.00 MN 55428 USA MN 55428 0/00/00 ** QUOTATION ** EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 1 of 20 Print Date & Time 11/10/2022 11:59 VENDOR NAME YEAR, MAKE AND MODEL This section for use when ordering WB 193" CA 125.9"Grand Total 135,732.00$ AF 75" Rear Ratio 4.63 Cab Color WHITE Wheel Color ALUM nn State Contract T 647(5) Note Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 1.0 Price for Base Unit:1 92,924.00$ 92,924.00$ 1.9 1 2.0 FRAME OPTIONS 1 2.1 Front frame extension 1 886.00$ 886.00$ 2.2 Custom hole punching in frame 100.00$ -$ 2.3 Deduct for no front bumper -$ 2.4 Frame fastener option (bolt or huck spun)1STD 2.5 Frame, R.B.M., S.M., PSI, CT 2.6 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 87 - 112 CA (64.00)$ -$ 2.7 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 113 - 133 CA STD 2.8 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 134 - 152 CA 107.00$ -$ 2.9 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 153 - 199 CA 406.00$ -$ 2.10 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 200 - 236 CA 482.00$ -$ 2.11 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 87 - 112 CA 176.00$ -$ 2.12 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 113 - 133 CA 240.00$ -$ 2.13 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 134 - 152 CA 347.00$ -$ 2.14 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 153 - 199 CA 646.00$ -$ 2.15 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 200 - 236 CA 722.00$ -$ 2.16 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 87 - 112 CA 521.00$ -$ 2.17 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1 585.00$ 585.00$ 2.18 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 134 - 152 CA 692.00$ -$ 2.19 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 153 - 199 CA 991.00$ -$ 2.20 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,067.00$ -$ 2.21 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 87 - 112 CA 744.00$ -$ 2.22 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 113 - 133 CA 808.00$ -$ 2.23 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 134 - 152 CA 915.00$ -$ 2.24 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,214.00$ -$ 2.25 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,290.00$ -$ 2.26 DOUBLE FRAME - PARTIAL IC REINFORCEMENT 2.27 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 87 - 112 CA 801.00$ -$ 2.28 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 113 - 133 CA 865.00$ -$ 2.29 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 134 - 152 CA 972.00$ -$ 2.30 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,214.00$ -$ 2.31 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,290.00$ -$ 2.32 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,041.00$ -$ 2.33 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,105.00$ -$ NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 2024 MACK GRANITE 64BR (T) TA Tandem Axle Cab & Chassis CITY OF NEW HOPE AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 2 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 2.34 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,212.00$ -$ 2.35 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,511.00$ -$ 2.36 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,587.00$ -$ 2.37 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,376.00$ -$ 2.38 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,450.00$ -$ 2.39 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,657.00$ -$ 2.40 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,856.00$ -$ 2.41 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,932.00$ -$ 2.42 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,832.00$ -$ 2.43 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,673.00$ -$ 2.44 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 134 - 152 CA 2,003.00$ -$ 2.45 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 154 - 199 CA 2,301.00$ -$ 2.46 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 200 - 236 CA 2,384.00$ -$ 2.47 DOUBLE FRAME - FULL IC REINFORCEMENT 2.48 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,001.00$ -$ 2.49 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,065.00$ -$ 2.50 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,172.00$ -$ 2.51 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,414.00$ -$ 2.52 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,490.00$ -$ 2.53 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,241.00$ -$ 2.54 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,305.00$ -$ 2.55 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,412.00$ -$ 2.56 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,711.00$ -$ 2.57 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,787.00$ -$ 2.58 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,576.00$ -$ 2.59 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,650.00$ -$ 2.60 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,857.00$ -$ 2.61 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 153 - 199 CA 2,056.00$ -$ 2.62 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,787.00$ -$ 2.63 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,576.00$ -$ 2.64 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,650.00$ -$ 2.65 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,857.00$ -$ 2.66 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 153 - 199 CA 2,056.00$ -$ 2.67 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 200 - 236 CA 2,132.00$ -$ 2.68 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 87 - 112 CA 2,032.00$ -$ 2.69 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,873.00$ -$ 2.70 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 134 - 152 CA 2,203.00$ -$ 2.71 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 153 - 199 CA 2,501.00$ -$ 2.72 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 200 - 236 CA 2,584.00$ -$ 2.73 TRIPLE FRAME - FULL IC REINFORCEMENT 2.74 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 87 - 112 CA 4,960.00$ -$ 2.75 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 113 - 133 CA 5,024.00$ -$ 2.76 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 134 - 152 CA 5,131.00$ -$ 2.77 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 153 - 199 CA 5,430.00$ -$ 2.78 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 200 - 236 CA 5,506.00$ -$ 2.79 Flush bright finish channel steel 113.00$ -$ 2.80 Extended stylized-silver-bright finish steel w/stone guard 1,495.00$ -$ 2.81 Extended - swept back steel, bright finish with stone guard - includes center tow pin 1,139.00$ -$ 2.82 Mill finish, flush mounted, unpainted aluminum 68.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 3 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 2.83 Extended swept back channel steel (includes center tow pin) w/stone guard 805.00$ -$ 2.84 Extended swept back channel steel with bright finish w/painted center tow pin 620.00$ -$ 2.85 Extended swept back steel channel w/bright finish 258.00$ -$ 2.86 Extended swept back painted steel 1STD 2.87 Flush painted steel (15.00)$ -$ 2.88 Flush stainless clad aluminum 143.00$ -$ 2.89 Plate type radiator guard 105.00$ -$ 2.90 Bright finish plate type radiator guard 258.00$ -$ 2.91 Tectyl 185 GW pigmented compound between frame rails 110.00$ -$ 2.92 BOC crossmember, steel HD back to back channel intermediate 66.00$ -$ 2.93 BOC & intermediate crossmember, HD I-Beam 332.00$ -$ 2.94 Frame rail clearance 62.00$ -$ 2.99 1 3.0 FRONT AXLE/SUSPENSION/BRAKE/OPTION 1 3.1 Set back front axle option 1 STD 3.2 12,000 front axle & matching suspension - Mack FXL12 STD 3.3 14,600 front axle & matching suspension - Mack FXL14.6 771.00$ -$ 3.4 16,000 front axle and matching suspension -$ 3.5 18,000 front axle and matching suspension - Mack FXL18 1 1,361.00$ 1,361.00$ 3.6 20,000 front axle and matching suspension - Mack FXL20 2,147.00$ -$ 3.7 23,000 front axle and matching suspension - Mack FXL23 2,448.00$ -$ 3.8 Heavy duty front axle shocks 1STD 3.9 Front stabilizer bar -$ 3.10 Right hand air bag suspension per Spec 3.6, Driver controlled -$ 3.11 Left air bag suspension per Spec 3.6, Driver controlled -$ 3.12 Front axle lubrication cap with slotted venthole 3.13 Front brake dust shields 1 18.00$ 18.00$ 3.14 Dual front auxiliary steering gear 569.00$ -$ 3.15 RH spring build up for wing plow application 30.00$ -$ 3.16 LH spring build up for wing plow application 30.00$ -$ 3.17 All wheel drive front axle 43,000.00$ -$ 3.18 Twin Steer Front Axle 12,612.00$ -$ 3.19 Aluminum front hubs 53.00$ -$ 3.20 Centerfuse outboard mounted brake drums 217.00$ -$ 3.21 Multileaf front spring ILO taperleaf (2 leaf spring)35.00$ -$ 3.22 HD mulitileaf front spring ILO taperleaf (2 leaf spring)65.00$ -$ 3.23 HD taperleaf (3 leaf spring) ILO of taperleaf (2 leaf spring)65.00$ -$ 3.24 Meritor EX+ Air Disc Brakes requires Meritor rear brakes 653.00$ -$ 3.25 Meritor front slack adjustors - Need same slack on rear axle 1.00$ -$ 3.26 Meritor front slack with stainless steel pins 58.00$ -$ 3.27 Haldex front slack adjustors - Need same slack adjustor on rear axle STD 3.28 Haldex front slack with stainless steel pins 1 57.00$ 57.00$ 3.29 Meritor front brakes ILO of Bendix - requires Meritor rear brakes 131.00$ -$ 3.30 Power steering reservoir with visible sight glass 30.00$ -$ 3.99 1AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 4 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 4.0 4.0 TANDEM REAR AXLE/SUSPENSION/BRAKE/OPTIONS 1 4.1 46,000# rear axle & matching suspension Make & Model - Mack SS462 Mack Camelback Suspension 2,240.00$ -$ 4.2 40,000# walking beam rear suspension and axle Make & Model - Meritor MT-40-14X4D with Hendrickson HMX400 1 1,558.00$ 1,558.00$ 4.3 46,000# walking beam rear suspension and axle Make & Model Meritor RT-46-160 with Hendrickson HMX460 3,362.00$ -$ 4.4 40,000# air suspension and axle Make & Model Meritor MT-40-14X4D with Mack AL461 46,000 lbs. air suspension 1,578.00$ -$ 4.5 46,000# air suspension and axle Make & Model Meritor RT-46-160 with Mack AL461 46,000 lbs. air suspension 2,976.00$ -$ 4.6 Dash mounted air dump system - With air ride suspension STD 4.7 Driver activated differential lock on one rear axle (front axle ____ rear axle ____, check one)484.00$ -$ 4.8 Driver activated differential lock on both front and rear axles 1 968.00$ 968.00$ 4.9 Driver activated differential lock on both front and rear axles, and lubrication pump and filter system 1,210.00$ -$ 4.10 Meritor MT-40-14X4DP, both axles driver differential lock and pump, HMX400 40,000 # walking beam suspension 2,768.00$ -$ 4.11 Meritor RT-46-160P, both axles driver differential lock and pump, HMX460 46,000 # walking beam suspension 4,572.00$ -$ 4.12 ½ round universal joints 1STD 4.13 Spicer 1810 HD drive line with half round universal joints 126.00$ -$ 4.14 Rear Dust Shields 1 34.00$ 34.00$ 4.15 Driver activated differential lock on both front and rear axles with individual switches 1,102.00$ -$ 4.16 Meritor 18 MXL extended lube 1 31.00$ 31.00$ 4.17 Meritor 176 MXL extended lube 32.00$ -$ 4.18 Dana-spicer SPL170XL extended lube series 453.00$ -$ 4.19 Dana-spicer SPL250XL extended lube series 493.00$ -$ 4.20 Dana-spicer SPL250HDXL extended lube series 502.00$ -$ 4.21 Dana-spicer SPL350HDXL extended lube series 776.00$ -$ 4.22 Mack S38R fabricated steel housing STD 4.23 Mack SB38 fabricated steel housing -40,000 # recertification 450.00$ -$ 4.24 Mack S40 40,000 # rear axle 450.00$ -$ 4.25 Mack S402 40,000 # cast iron housing 450.00$ -$ 4.26 Mack S440 44,000# fabricated steel housing 1,350.00$ -$ 4.27 Mack S440-46 fabricated steel housing - recertification 1,350.00$ -$ 4.28 Mack S462 46,000# cast ductile iron housing 1,800.00$ -$ 4.29 Mack S462R 46,000# cast ductile iron housing 1,800.00$ -$ 4.30 Meritor 40,000# MT-40-14X4C Amboid (High Entry)765.00$ -$ 4.31 Meritor 40,000# MT-40-14X4C Hypoid (Low Entry)765.00$ -$ 4.32 Meritor 46,000# RT-46-160 2,163.00$ -$ 4.33 Meritor 46,000# Rt-46-164EH 2,163.00$ -$ 4.34 Spicer 46,000# DS405 2,628.00$ -$ 4.35 Spicer 46,000# D46-170H 4,305.00$ -$ 4.36 Mack SS38 Mack multileaf camelback spring without anti-sway springs (80.00)$ -$ 4.37 Mack SS38 multileaf camelback spring with anti-sway springs STD 4.38 Mack SSB 38 multileaf camelback spring (boost-a-load)(40.00)$ -$ 4.39 Mack SSB 38 multileaf camelback spring 40,000# recertification 273.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 5 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 4.40 Mack SS40 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension without anti sway 226.00$ -$ 4.41 Mack SS40 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension with anti sway 330.00$ -$ 4.42 Mack SS40 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension 46,000# - recertification 228.00$ -$ 4.43 Mack SS462 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension without anti sway 336.00$ -$ 4.44 Mack SS462 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension with anti sway 440.00$ -$ 4.45 Mack AL-461 46,000# air ride 813.00$ -$ 4.46 Mack M-Ride 40 parabolic 2-leaf, 40,000# normal stiffness 959.00$ -$ 4.47 Mack M-Ride 40 parabolic 3-leaf, 40,000# stiffer than normal 959.00$ -$ 4.48 Mack M-Ride 46 parabolic 3-leaf 46,000#1,289.00$ -$ 4.49 HMX 400 Hendrickson Haulmax rubber suspension 40,000#803.00$ -$ 4.50 HMX 460 Hendrickson Haulmax rubber suspension 46,000#1,199.00$ -$ 4.51 Chambers 46,000# L high stability W#29 can 3,798.00$ -$ 4.52 PAX 460 High Stability Hendrickson Primaxx Air Suspension 1,319.00$ -$ 4.53 PAX 462 High Stability Hendrickson Primaxx Air Suspension 1,319.00$ -$ 4.54 Neway AD-246 air ride suspension 1,825.00$ -$ 4.55 Neway AD-252 air ride suspension 2,287.00$ -$ 4.56 Delete power divider lockout (153.00)$ -$ 4.57 Urethane bushing on Mack camelback suspension (58.00)$ -$ 4.58 55" axle spacing 122.00$ -$ 4.59 60" axle spacing 317.00$ -$ 4.60 Dual leveling valve air suspension height control 149.00$ -$ 4.61 Mack CRDP1501/1511 with interwheel power divider - both axles 2,735.00$ -$ 4.62 Outboard centrifuse rear brake drums 206.00$ -$ 4.63 Haldex automatic rear slack adjustor STD 4.64 Haldex automatic rear slack adjustor with stainless steel pins 1 96.00$ 96.00$ 4.65 Meritor automatic rear slack adjustor 1.00$ -$ 4.66 Meritor automatic rear slack adjustor with stainless steel pins 231.00$ -$ 4.67 Haldex S-ABA slack adjustors 50.00$ -$ 4.68 30/36 rear brake chamber 156.00$ -$ 4.69 Comet aluminum hubs w/preset bearings & seals 385.00$ -$ 4.70 Aluminum preset rear hubs with integrated spindle nut 37.00$ -$ 4.71 Chicago Rawhide (Scotseal Longlife) oil seal 59.00$ -$ 4.72 National/Federal Mogul 23.00$ -$ 4.73 Stemco-Grit Guard oil seals 63.00$ -$ 4.74 Stemco - Guardian oil seal 31.00$ -$ 4.75 Stemco (Voyager) oil seals (5.00)$ -$ 4.76 Scotseal longlife rear oil seals 59.00$ -$ 4.77 Air Disc Brake (17") H-Type - Require Air Disc Front Brakes & M- Ride 3 leaf suspension 2,430.00$ -$ 4.78 Bendix ES165-08D, 16.5" x 8 5/8" Cast Spider - Require M-Ride suspension. N/A with dust shields 272.00$ -$ 4.79 Meritor rear brakes - 16.5"7" Q+115.00$ -$ 4.80 Meritor rear brakes - 16.5" x 8 5/8+ Q+ - N/A with dust shields 291.00$ -$ 4.81 Meritor rear brakes - 16.5" x 8"+ Q+ - N/A with dust shields 213.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 6 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 4.82 13,500 lbs. Hendrickson steerable composite HLUC-2 pusher axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.83 10,000 lbs. Hendrickson steerable composite HLUC-2 pusher axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.84 20,000 lbs. Watson-Chalin steerable SL-2089 Thu Track Series pusher axle - includes tire and rims 12,381.00$ -$ 4.85 13,200 lbs. Watson-Chalin steerable SL-1187 Thu Track Series pusher axle - includes tire and rims 10,173.00$ -$ 4.86 20,000 lbs. Watson-Chalin non-steerable AL-2200 Atlas Series pusher axle - includes tire and rims 9,198.00$ -$ 4.87 20,000 lbs. Hendrickson non - steerable composite HLM pusher axle - includes tires and rims 9,091.00$ -$ 4.88 13,200 lbs. Hendrickson steerable HLUS2Z pusher axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.89 20,000 lbs. Hendrickson Paralift HLP20 steerable pusher axle - includes tires and rims 11,192.00$ -$ 4.90 13,500 lbs. Hendrickson steerable composite HLUC-2 tag axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.91 10,000 lbs. Hendrickson steerable composite HLUC-2 tag axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.92 20,000 lbs. Watson-Chalin steerable SL-2089 Thu Track Series tag axle - includes tire and rims 12,381.00$ -$ 4.93 13,200 lbs. Watson-Chalin steerable SL-1187 Thu Track Series tag axle - includes tire and rims 10,173.00$ -$ 4.94 20,000 lbs. Watson-Chalin non-steerable AL-2200 Atlas Series tag axle - includes tire and rims 9,198.00$ -$ 4.95 20,000 lbs. Hendrickson non - steerable composite HLM tag axle - includes tires and rims 9,091.00$ -$ 4.96 13,200 lbs. Hendrickson steerable HLUS2Z tag axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.97 20,000 lbs. Hendrickson Paralift HLP20 steerable tag axle - includes tires and rims 11,192.00$ -$ 4.98 6S/6M systems sensing both rear axle wheel end sensors 440.00$ -$ 4.99 Furnish Meritor wide track axle option - Need for Super Singles 1,032.00$ -$ 4.99 1 5.0 Fifth Wheel options 1 5.1 Frame end tapered and open -$ 5.2 Frame end tapered and closed 30.00$ -$ 5.3 Fixed fifth wheel - Holland FW-35 684.00$ -$ 5.4 Mechanical slide fifth wheel - Holland FW35 Travel - 24" slide 562.00$ -$ 5.5 Air operated slide fifth wheel - Holland FW35 Travel 24" slide 986.00$ -$ 5.6 Stainless 1/4 fenders, mounted front of tandems 109.00$ -$ 5.7 Plastic 1/4 fenders, mounted front of tandems 110.00$ -$ 5.8 Tractor package hookup 297.00$ -$ 5.9 Behind cab deck plate 681.00$ -$ 5.10 Holland fixed with non-tilt 5th wheel 1,385.00$ -$ 5.11 Holland manual slide 5th wheel 537.00$ -$ 5.12 Mack mud flaps with brackets 98.00$ -$ 5.13 Betts B60 stainless steel angled mud flap brackets 161.00$ -$ 5.14 Hose tender & towel bar assembly 48.00$ -$ 5.15 Coiled trailer air hose 28.00$ -$ 5.16 Coiled trailer electrical hose 44.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 7 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 5.17 Air Weight AW5800 onboard scales 963.00$ -$ 5.18 Medium height 5th wheel ramp guide 192.00$ -$ 5.19 Trailer hook up light 37.00$ -$ 5.99 1 6.0 TIRES/RIMS OPTIONS: 6.1 Nylon wafers or wheel guards on all wheels (10 ea.)44.00$ -$ 6.2 Heavier 7500 lb. 22.5 x 8.25 Steel rims in lieu of standard 7300# rims (10 ea.) STD 6.3 Heavier 7500 lb. 22.5 x 8.25 Steel rims in lieu of standard 7300# rims (8 ea.) in rear only 16.00$ -$ 6.4 11R 22.5 H front tires 39.00$ -$ 6.5 12R 22.5 H front tires 198.00$ -$ 6.6 9000 lb. 22.5 9” front steel rims, 315/80R 22.5 J front tires 187.00$ -$ 6.7 10,000 lb. 22.5 9” front steel rims, 315/80R 22.5 J front tires 407.00$ -$ 6.8 10,500 lb. 22.5 x 12.25 front steel rims, 385/65R 22.5 J front tires 1 609.00$ 609.00$ 6.9 10,500 lb. 22.5 x 12.25 front steel rims, 425/65R 22.5 J front tires 669.00$ -$ 6.10 11R 22.5 H rear tires 1 656.00$ 656.00$ 6.11 7,300 lb. 24.5” x 8.25” steel front rims 5.00$ -$ 6.12 7300 lb. 24.5” x 8.25” rear steel rims 44.00$ -$ 6.13 8,000 lb. 24.5” x 8.25" steel front rims 10.00$ -$ 6.14 8,000 lb. 24.5” x 8.25” steel rear rims 164.00$ -$ 6.15 11R 24.5 G front tires 63.00$ -$ 6.16 11R 24.5 H front tires 105.00$ -$ 6.17 11R 24.5 G rear tires 164.00$ -$ 6.18 11R 24.5 H rear tires 480.00$ -$ 6.19 Steel spare rim, size 22.5 x 8.25 125.00$ -$ 6.20 Steel spare rim, size 24.5 x 8.25 148.00$ -$ 6.21 Steel spare rim, size 22.5 x 9.0 380.00$ -$ 6.22 Steel spare rim, size 22.5 x 12.25 430.00$ -$ 6.23 12R22.5 H front tires 439.00$ -$ 6.24 12R 22.5 H rear tires 1,752.00$ -$ 6.25 Wheel lug wrench - includes handle 48.00$ -$ 6.26 Aluminum front wheel - 22.5 x 8.25 141.00$ -$ 6.27 Aluminum front wheel - 24.5 x 8.25 156.00$ -$ 6.28 Aluminum front wheel - 22.5 x 9.0 329.00$ -$ 6.29 Aluminum front wheel - 22.5 x 12.25 387.00$ -$ 6.30 Polished aluminum front wheel 48.00$ -$ 6.31 Dura-bright bright finish front wheels 204.00$ -$ 6.32 Wheel finishing with extra polished front wheels 76.00$ -$ 6.33 Aluminum rear wheels - 22.5 x 8.25 492.00$ -$ 6.34 Aluminum rear wheels - 24.5 x 8.25 600.00$ -$ 6.35 Polished aluminum rear wheel four outboard of dual wheels 132.00$ -$ 6.36 Polished aluminum rear wheel all eight (8) wheels 265.00$ -$ 6.37 Dura-bright bright finish on all eight (8) rear wheels 1,334.00$ -$ 6.38 Dura-bright bright finish on all four (4) outboard rear wheels 667.00$ -$ 6.39 11R22.5 G Bridgestone M843 front tires 223.00$ -$ 6.40 11R22.5 G Michelin XZE2 front tires 296.00$ -$ 6.41 315/80R22.5 L Michelin XZA1 front tires 532.00$ -$ 6.42 385/65R22.5 J Michelin XZY3 front tires 712.00$ -$ 6.43 425/65R22.5 L Michelin XZY3 front tires 959.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 8 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 6.44 11R22.5 G Bridgestone M843 rear tires 892.00$ -$ 6.45 11R22.5 G Michelin XDN2 rear tires 1,892.00$ -$ 6.46 11R22.5 H Michelin XDN2 rear tires 1,964.00$ -$ 6.47 11R22.5 G Goodyear G622RSD rear tires 2,504.00$ -$ 6.48 11R22.5 H Goodyear G622RSD rear tires 2,672.00$ -$ 6.99 1 7.0 BRAKE SYSTEM OPTIONS:1 7.1 Wabco System Saver 1200 E heated air dryer 1STD 7.2 Manual cable drain valves on air tanks with lanyard on all tanks 24.00$ -$ 7.3 Heated air tank 7.4 Auto drain valves on air tanks 1 31.00$ 31.00$ 7.5 MGM type TR-T rear brake chambers 50.00$ -$ 7.6 S.S. pins on slack adjuster yoke (2 ea. per yoke) For all air brake chambers -$ 7.7 Inverted rear brake chamber mounting in lieu of regular mounting -$ 7.8 Relocate air dryer 49.00$ -$ 7.9 Bendix AD9 heated air dryer 118.00$ -$ 7.10 Bendix AD-IP heated air dryer 164.00$ -$ 7.11 Meritor/Wabco system twin heated air dryer 539.00$ -$ 7.12 Auto heated drain valve- heated supply tank, manual petcock 42.00$ -$ 7.13 Auto heated drain valve- heated supply tank, with lanyard on all other tanks 72.00$ -$ 7.14 Aluminum air reservoirs 192.00$ -$ 7.15 Polished aluminum air reservoirs 252.00$ -$ 7.16 Increase air capacity for installation of extra axles 289.00$ -$ 7.17 MACK Road Stability Adv. Bendix ABS/ATC/RSA w/YAW control with mud/snow switch 1,873.00$ -$ 7.18 Meritor/Wabco ABS system w/o automatic traction control 142.00$ -$ 7.19 Bendix ABS system with traction control 1 270.00$ 270.00$ 7.20 Meritor/Wabco ABS system w/auto traction control 357.00$ -$ 7.21 Furnish automatic traction control (ATC full disable switch)1 105.00$ 105.00$ 7.22 Lanyard control on supply wet tank 16.00$ -$ 7.23 Haldex "Gold Seal" brake chamber 1.00$ -$ 7.24 Haldex "Life Seal" brake chamber STD 7.25 MGM TR 30/30 LP3 (3" Stroke) brake chamber 105.00$ -$ 7.26 MGM LTR (3" Stroke) brake chamber 285.00$ -$ 7.27 MGM TR3030LP3THD 133.00$ -$ 7.28 MGM TR-T (Tamper Resistant brake chamber) reclock inlet ports for optimum ground clearance 68.00$ -$ 7.29 Haldex "Gold Seal" 3.0" stroke brake chamber 399.00$ -$ 7.30 Electric horn sound when driver door open with park brake released 67.00$ -$ 7.31 Alarm to sound when driver door open & parking brake not on 1 43.00$ 43.00$ 7.32 Schreader valve located in supply tank 47.00$ -$ 7.33 Schreader valve, secondary 47.00$ -$ 7.34 Two (2) valve dual brake system-trailer supply and tractor-trailer park 42.00$ -$ 7.35 Relocate all air reservoir in frame 48.00$ -$ 7.36 Air reservoir in frame, one reservoir on the RH rail behind Cleartech 48.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 9 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 7.37 Never-seize to brake shoes pins & cam rollers 1 33.00$ 33.00$ 7.99 1 8.0 ENGINE/EXHAUST AND FUEL TANKS OPTIONS:1 (List Make & Model, H.P., torque of engine and exhaust and fuel tank options) 8.1 Mack MP7-325M 325HP@1400-1900 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov 1250 LB-FT Torque STD 8.2 Mack MP7-355A 355HP@1500-1800 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov 1250 LB-FT Torque 481.00$ -$ 8.3 Mack MP7-375M 375HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov 1360 LB-FT Torque 813.00$ -$ 8.4 Mack MP7-425M 425HP@1500-1800 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov 1560 LB-FT Torque 1 1,508.00$ 1,508.00$ 8.5 Mack MP7-345C 345HP@1450-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1360 LB-FT Torque 300.00$ -$ 8.6 Mack MP7-365C 365HP@1400-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1460 LB-FT Torque 651.00$ -$ 8.7 Mack MP7-395A 395HP@1450-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPMGov 1560 LB-FT Torque 1,112.00$ -$ 8.8 Mack MP7-395C 395HP@1450-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1560 LB-FT Torque 1,112.00$ -$ 8.9 Mack MP8-415C 415HP@1400-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1660 LB-FT Torque 2,064.00$ -$ 8.10 Mack MP8-445C 445HP@1300-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1860 LB-FT Torque 2,589.00$ -$ 8.11 Mack MP8-505C 505HP@1500-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1860 LB-FT Torque 3,311.00$ -$ 8.12 Mack MP8-425M 425HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 21000 RPM Gov 1560 LB-FT Torque 2,247.00$ -$ 8.13 Mack MP8-455M 455HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 21000 RPM Gov 1760 LB-FT Torque 2,635.00$ -$ 8.14 Mack MP8-505M 5055HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 21000 RPM Gov 1860 LB-FT Torque 3,759.00$ -$ 8.15 Clear Back of Cab - DPF & SCR Frame Mounted , RH Side under Cab 1 114.00$ 114.00$ 8.16 PK7-17C2 93 gallon sleeved fuel tank, 20" clearance for outrigger/wing plow 317.00$ -$ 8.17 Cleartech, DPF RH side under cab w/SCR vertical RH side of cab 601.00$ -$ 8.18 Cleartech with DPF vertical RH side BOC, w/SCR vertical LH side BOC 3,308.00$ -$ 8.19 No Muffler, Single (R/S) Vertical Exhaust Cab Mounted, Lower Ventura Diffuser, Turned End 1 318.00$ 318.00$ 8.20 No Muffler, Single (R/S) Vertical Exhaust Cab Mounted, Lower Ventura Diffuser, Plain End 318.00$ -$ 8.21 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End (16.00)$ -$ 8.22 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Turned Out 1STD 8.23 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End Perf Stack Diffuser 32.00$ -$ 8.24 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End Side Outlet Diffuser 126.00$ -$ 8.25 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain Top Outlet Diffuser 126.00$ -$ 8.26 Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End - N/A with Allison Transmission 1,065.00$ -$ 8.27 Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Turned Out End - N/A with Allison Transmission 1,091.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 10 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 8.28 Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain Side Outlet Diffuser - N/A with Allison Transmission 1,507.00$ -$ 8.29 Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain Top Outlet Diffuser - N/A with Allison Transmission 1,507.00$ -$ 8.30 Single, Bright finish heat shield & stack 1 65.00$ 65.00$ 8.31 Dual, Bright finish heat shield & stack 130.00$ -$ 8.32 Single, Bright finish heat shield, stack & elbow 162.00$ -$ 8.33 Dual, Bright finish heat shield, stack & elbow 344.00$ -$ 8.34 Single, Bright finish stack only 50.00$ -$ 8.35 Dual, Bright finish stack only 99.00$ -$ 8.36 Single, Bright finish lower elbow & stack 148.00$ -$ 8.37 Dual, Bright finish lower elbow & stack 294.00$ -$ 8.38 Single, Bright finish heat shield only 16.00$ -$ 8.39 Dual, Bright finish heat shield only 31.00$ -$ 8.40 Bright finish stainless steel heat shield for frame mounted Mack Cap DPF 171.00$ -$ 8.41 50 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank (118.00)$ -$ 8.42 66 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank (96.00)$ -$ 8.43 72 Gallon LH steel 26" Dia fuel tank (62.00)$ -$ 8.44 88 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 164.00$ -$ 8.45 93 Gallon LH steel 26" Dia fuel tank 267.00$ -$ 8.46 116 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 222.00$ -$ 8.47 50 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank (64.00)$ -$ 8.48 66 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank (45.00)$ -$ 8.49 72 Gallon LH aluminum 26" Dia fuel tank 24.00$ -$ 8.50 88 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 231.00$ -$ 8.51 93 Gallon LH aluminum 26" Dia fuel tank 272.00$ -$ 8.52 116 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 292.00$ -$ 8.53 50 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape (118.00)$ -$ 8.54 66 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape (68.00)$ -$ 8.55 88 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape 101.00$ -$ 8.56 116 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape 300.00$ -$ 8.57 50 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape (118.00)$ -$ 8.58 66 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape (27.00)$ -$ 8.59 88 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 173.00$ -$ 8.60 93 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 195.00$ -$ 8.61 116 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 367.00$ -$ 8.62 66 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank (47.00)$ -$ 8.63 88 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 213.00$ -$ 8.64 111 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 325.00$ -$ 8.65 66 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 1STD 8.66 72 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 26" Dia. with Integral DEF Tank 171.00$ -$ 8.67 88 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 240.00$ -$ 8.68 93 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 26" Dia. with Integral DEF Tank 304.00$ -$ 8.69 111 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 378.00$ -$ 8.70 111 & 66 Gallon Aluminum D-Shape tanks, 66 Gallon isolated for Hyd oil 839.00$ -$ 8.71 50 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 503.00$ -$ 8.72 66 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 529.00$ -$ 8.73 88 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 814.00$ -$ 8.74 116 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 871.00$ -$ 8.75 50 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 570.00$ -$ 8.76 66 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 593.00$ -$ 8.77 88 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 879.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 11 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 8.78 116 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 849.00$ -$ 8.79 50 Gallon RH Steel D-Shape 503.00$ -$ 8.80 66 Gallon RH Steel D-Shape 566.00$ -$ 8.81 88 Gallon RH Steel D-Shape 751.00$ -$ 8.82 116 Gallon RH Steel D-Shape 950.00$ -$ 8.83 50 Gallon RH Aluminum D-Shape 569.00$ -$ 8.84 66 Gallon RH Aluminum D-Shape 617.00$ -$ 8.85 88 Gallon RH Aluminum D-Shape 822.00$ -$ 8.86 116 Gallon RH Aluminum D-Shape 1,016.00$ -$ 8.87 Single polished aluminum fuel tank 197.00$ -$ 8.88 Dual polished aluminum fuel tank 393.00$ -$ 8.89 Isolate RH fuel tank from fuel system for hyd oil 30.00$ -$ 8.90 Dual draw & return fuel system 82.00$ -$ 8.91 Filter neck screen for fuel tank 71.00$ -$ 8.92 Lockable fuel tank cap 31.00$ -$ 8.93 Bright finish DPF tank cover - Requires with bright finish tanks 171.00$ -$ 8.94 Bright finish DEF tank cover 29.00$ -$ 8.95 Bright Finish Aluminum steps & stainless steel bright finish straps 189.00$ -$ 8.96 Bright Finish Fuel Tank Straps - Single Tank 1 32.00$ 32.00$ 8.97 Flocs oil change system w/disconnecting fittings 114.00$ -$ 8.98 Engine oil drain kit, Flocs, SAE 100R2 hose 136.00$ -$ 8.99 1 9.0 ENGINE RELATED OPTIONS:1 9.1 Oil fill and dipstick EZ access 1STD 9.2 Delco 35 SI Brushless Alternator, 135 AMP 1 102.00$ 102.00$ 9.3 Delco 24 SI Alternator, 130 AMP STD 9.4 Delco 24 SI Alternator, 145 AMP 18.00$ -$ 9.5 Leece-Neville Alternator, 145 AMP 70.00$ -$ 9.6 Dual element air cleaner 9.7 Donaldson Single Stage Air cleaner per spec 12.1 1 278.00$ 278.00$ 9.8 Thumb screws for Donaldson. Single stage Air Cleaner -$ 9.9 Fuel/water separator/heated/ Thermostatically controlled, __ (Brand)-$ 9.10 Davco 382 fuel/water separator, non heated -$ 9.11 Non-heated fuel/water separator, Mack w/manual drain valve (integral w/primary fuel filter STD 9.12 Coolant spin on filter/conditioner 47.00$ -$ 9.13 Front engine powered take off adapter and radiator cut out 103.00$ -$ 9.14 Air applied fan drive, Kysor two speed K32 Duro speed fan 1 135.00$ 135.00$ 9.15 Air applied fan drive, ______(Brand)-$ 9.16 Viscous fan drive - Behr Electronically modulated STD 9.17 Radiator hose package (Silicone) per Spec 12.2 1 240.00$ 240.00$ 9.18 Curved exhaust pipe end 1STD 9.19 Fuel tank per specification 12.7 -$ 9.20 Engine block heater 1 65.00$ 65.00$ 9.21 In line fuel heater 407.00$ -$ 9.22 In tank fuel heater 351.00$ -$ 9.23 Fuel cooler -$ 9.24 Radiator bug screen 1STD 9.25 Engine brake system 1 604.00$ 604.00$ 9.26 Relocate air dryer 66.00$ -$ 9.27 Extended life anti-freeze 1 20.00$ 20.00$ 9.28 Starter motor options -$ 9.29 Starter motor options - Delco 39MT-MXT 1STD 9.30 Mitsubishi electric 105P planetary gear reduction 46.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 12 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 9.31 Relocate fuel filter 38.00$ -$ 9.32 Non-heated fuel/water separator, Racor 1000 FH 349.00$ -$ 9.33 Silicone radiator & heater hose with gate valve on each heater hose 201.00$ -$ 9.34 Silicone radiator, spring clamps on radiator & heater, 1/4 turn ball valve heater hose 212.00$ -$ 9.35 Mack brand EPDM radiator & heater hoses with 1/4 turn ball valve 79.00$ -$ 9.36 Mack brand EPDM radiator & heater hoses with constant torque clamps on all coolant lines 22.00$ -$ 9.37 Leece-Neville Alternator, 200 AMP 464.00$ -$ 9.38 Leece-Neville Alternator, 270 AMP 659.00$ -$ 9.39 Leece-Neville Alternator, 160 AMP Brushless 106.00$ -$ 9.40 Delco 24 SI Alternator, 160 AMP 54.00$ -$ 9.41 Delco 36SI Alternator, 165A Amp Brushless 178.00$ -$ 9.42 Delco 36SI Alternator, 165A Amp Brushless, w/remote voltage sensing 166.00$ -$ 9.43 Leece-Neville Alternator, 140 Amp 49.00$ -$ 9.44 Leece-Neville Alternator, 160 AMP Brush 103.00$ -$ 9.45 Meritor/Wabco 636 (37.4 CFM) air compressor 783.00$ -$ 9.46 Without bug screen (22.00)$ -$ 9.47 Winterfront over radiator mtg bug screen 97.00$ -$ 9.48 Winter front cover only 52.00$ -$ 9.49 Corrosion resistant oil pan - Recommended for snow plow trucks 1 126.00$ 126.00$ 9.50 Stainless steel oil pan 1,950.00$ -$ 9.51 Davco 382 heated fuel-water separator 1 387.00$ 387.00$ 9.52 Racor fuel filter 1000 FH, 12V electrical heater with Mack integral fuel-water separator 374.00$ -$ 9.53 120V, 1500W block heater with 150W oil pan heater wired to same receptacle 137.00$ -$ 9.54 Electric preheater 1 53.00$ 53.00$ 9.55 Tether device -furnish cap retainer for oil fill, radiator overflow tank, battery box & tool box when furnish 23.00$ -$ 9.56 Electric primer pump (Mack engine) with momentary switch located LH rail BOC 96.00$ -$ 9.57 Rear engine PTO (Repto)1,817.00$ -$ 9.58 Furnish transmission thru shaft for local installation of RMPTO for Fuller transmission (lower left)28.00$ -$ 9.59 Provision for local installation of rear mounted PTO (lower center) includes dash mounted indicator light 159.00$ -$ 9.60 Air operated PTO control - includes in cab control (RMPTO only)118.00$ -$ 9.61 PTO switch and light with wiring and piping 156.00$ -$ 9.62 PTO switch and light with wiring and piping - M-Drive transmission 156.00$ -$ 9.999 1 TRANSMISSION OPTIONS:1 10.0 (After the first Six listed options, list manual and automatic transmission options. List make and model, # of speeds, type of shifting and whether or not transmission includes PTO gear(s) or not). Example: Allison 3000 HS, 5 speed, push button, no PTO. 10.1 2 plate 14" ceramic clutch option for manual transmission -$ 10.2 2 plate 15½" ceramic clutch option for manual transmission -$ -$ 10.3 External grease fitting for throw out bearing 7.00$ -$ 10.4 Adjustment free option for 2 plate clutches 47.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 13 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 10.5 Synthetic (TranSynd) lubrication for Automatic Transmission 1 301.00$ 301.00$ 10.6 Synthetic lubrication for manual transmission STD 10.7 Factory option lube - transmission (56.00)$ -$ 10.8 Allison 3000-RDS 5/6 speed push button, PTO 6,147.00$ -$ 10.9 Allison 3000-RDS 5/6 speed push button, PTO, w/output retarder 8,178.00$ -$ 10.10 Allison 3000-EVS 6 speed push button, PTO 8,108.00$ -$ 10.11 Allison 4000-RDS 5 speed push button, PTO 14,280.00$ -$ 10.12 Allison 4000-RDS 5/6 speed push button, PTO 13,776.00$ -$ 10.13 Allison 4000-RDS 6 speed push button, PTO, w/output retarder 13,536.00$ -$ 10.14 Allison 4000-EVS 6 speed push button, PTO 14,972.00$ -$ 10.15 Allison 4500-RDS 6 speed push button, PTO 1 13,776.00$ 13,776.00$ 10.16 Allison 4500-RDS-R 6 speed, with retarder, push button, PTO 16,776.00$ -$ 10.17 Allison 4500-EVS 6 speed push button, PTO 14,972.00$ -$ 10.18 Mack TMD12AFD-HD automated 12 speed transmission (direct drive)3,718.00$ -$ 10.19 Mack TMD12AFD-HD automated 12 speed transmission (over drive)3,718.00$ -$ 10.20 Mack TMD13AFD-HD automated 13 speed. Transmission, creeper/multi-speed reverse (direct drive)7,438.00$ -$ 10.21 Mack TMD13AFD-HD automated 13 speed. Transmission, creeper/multi-speed reverse (over drive)7,438.00$ -$ 10.22 Mack TMD13AFD-HD automated 14 speed. Transmission, ultra-low creeper/multi-speed reverse (over drive)7,839.00$ -$ 10.23 Mack T309, 9 speed transmission, PTO STD 10.24 Mack T309LR, 9 speed transmission, PTO 142.00$ -$ 10.25 Mack T310, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO (516.00)$ -$ 10.26 Mack T310M, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,029.00$ -$ 10.27 Mack T310ME, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,193.00$ -$ 10.28 Mack T310MLR, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,250.00$ -$ 10.29 Fuller FRO-14210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 377.00$ -$ 10.30 Fuller RTO-14908LL, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 855.00$ -$ 10.31 Fuller FRO-15210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,639.00$ -$ 10.32 Fuller FRO-16210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,298.00$ -$ 10.33 Fuller RTO-16908LL, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,585.00$ -$ 10.34 Fuller FRO-18210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,614.00$ -$ 10.35 Fuller RTO-14909ALL, 11 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,390.00$ -$ 10.36 Fuller RTO-16908ALL, 11 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,102.00$ -$ 10.37 Mack T313LR, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,128.00$ -$ 10.38 Mack T313, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,089.00$ -$ 10.39 Fuller RTLO-16913A, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,111.00$ -$ 10.40 Fuller RTLO-18913A, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,848.00$ -$ 10.41 Fuller RTO-16915, 15 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,220.00$ -$ 10.42 Mack T318LR21, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,561.00$ -$ 10.43 Mack T318LR, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,277.00$ -$ 10.44 Mack T318, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,306.00$ -$ 10.45 Fuller RTLO-16918B, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,725.00$ -$ 10.46 Fuller RTLO-18918B, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 3,407.00$ -$ 10.47 Air assist clutch 359.00$ -$ 10.48 Mechanical clutch cable 160.00$ -$ 10.49 Open grated clutch pedal 14.00$ -$ 10.50 Transmission oil cooler 1STD 10.51 Driveshaft guard for center bearing 27.00$ -$ 10.52 Transmission dust proofing 15.00$ -$ 10.53 T-Handle shift lever for Allison - Floor mounted 203.00$ -$ 10.54 Allison shift to neutral when park brake engaged 1STD AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 14 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 10.55 3rd or 4th gear hold for Allison transmission 300.00$ -$ 10.56 Stainless steel transmission coolant pipes 1 175.00$ 175.00$ 10.57 Allison fill tune and dip stick under hood 1 138.00$ 138.00$ 10.58 Remote lube fittings: clutch release, brg & both cross-shaft; mounted under LH door 50.00$ -$ 10.59 GP1-23 Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 425.00$ -$ 10.60 GP1-41 Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 434.00$ -$ 10.61 GP1-60 Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 548.00$ -$ 10.62 GP1-80 Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 588.00$ -$ 10.63 F1-61R Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 637.00$ -$ 10.64 F1-81R Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 710.00$ -$ 10.65 F1-101R Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 857.00$ -$ 10.999 1 11.0 ELECTRICAL OPTIONS:1 11.1 Resettable circuit breaker electrical protection -$ 11.2 Automatic reset circuit breakers -$ 11.3 Solid state circuit protection -$ 11.4 Circuit box under hood or end of frame, each -$ 11.5 Battery disconnect off negative side in cab control 1 97.00$ 97.00$ 11.6 Remote jump start terminals 1 111.00$ 111.00$ 11.7 Back up alarm (Preco Factory Model)-$ 11.8 OEM daytime running lights 1STD 11.9 3000 CCA batteries in lieu of 1950CCA 66.00$ -$ 11.10 3 each 650/1950 CCA batteries in lieu of 2 each batteries 1STD 11.11 Battery box aft of cab -$ 11.12 Grote 44710 flasher -$ 11.13 Signal Stat 935 turn signal per Spec 12.6 -$ 11.14 Auxiliary customer access circuits -$ 11.15 Switch for snowplow lights mounted on instrumental panel. Includes wiring terminated near headlights, for customer mounted auxiliary snowplow lights.1 80.00$ 80.00$ 11.16 Power source terminal-2 stud type-mounted on firewall or inside cab with ground to frame rail and to starter, with 6 gauge wire.-$ 11.17 10-position switch panel mounted on instrument panel. Includes 10 lighted switches, ignition control; switches will control relays which will feed stud type junction block mounted inside cab.-$ 11.18 Vehicle speed sensor with speed signal at fuse panel for sander ground speed control system.1 20.00$ 20.00$ 11.19 Battery box left hand rail back of fuel tank 48.00$ -$ 11.20 Battery terminal cable with tall battery terminal nuts 8.00$ -$ 11.21 Dash mounted indicator body/hoist up body builder lamp 1 71.00$ 71.00$ 11.22 RH/LH led work light on both side of truck 113.00$ -$ 11.23 Polished aluminum battery box cover 52.00$ -$ 11.24 Molded plastic with splash guard 29.00$ -$ 11.25 Painted steel battery box 23.00$ -$ 11.26 Lockable steel battery box 69.00$ -$ 11.27 Battery shock pad 14.00$ 4.00$ 11.28 Body Link w/cab floor pass thru hole/rubber boot 11.00$ 1.00$ 11.29 Body Link w/o cab floor pass thru hole/rubber boot STDAMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 15 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 11.30 2 Extra dash mounted illuminated toggle switches 16.00$ -$ 11.31 One extra dash mounted rocker switch thru battery for local installed items 10.00$ -$ 11.32 One extra dash mounted rocker switch thru ignition for local installed items 10.00$ -$ 11.33 Six extra switches 2-15A ignition, 1-20A ignition, 1-10A ignition, 1- 5A battery, & 1-20A battery 111.00$ -$ 11.34 Eight switches - front strobe, rear strobes, wing light, wing strobe, sander light, tail gate lock, and vibrator 1 237.00$ 237.00$ 11.35 Back up alarm with intermittent feature (Ambient noise sensitive)98.00$ -$ 11.36 Ecco back-up alarm 575 constant sound level 74.00$ -$ 11.37 Ecco back-up alarm SA917 ambient noise sensitive 1 98.00$ 98.00$ 11.38 Pollak 41-722 constant audible (mounted on rear crossmember)80.00$ -$ 11.39 Fog lights 93.00$ -$ 11.40 Fog lights provisions - includes dash control & wiring for local installation of fog lights 13.00$ -$ 11.41 Omit rear tail lights (38.00)$ -$ 11.42 Incandescent tail light module 91.00$ -$ 11.43 Brake lighting on with engine brake 84.00$ -$ 11.44 LED type tail lights 1 199.00$ 199.00$ 11.45 Two Mack M/F 925/1850 CCA batteries 56.00$ -$ 11.46 Three Mack 730/2190 CCA batteries 5.00$ -$ 11.47 Three Mack 800 CCA AGM Long Life Batteries 263.00$ -$ 11.48 Four Mack 1000/4000 CCA 182.00$ -$ 11.49 Switch in dash with wiring to cab roof, above LH & RH doors for local installation of strobe lights 32.00$ -$ 11.50 LED strobe beacon lights mounted on top of cab with switch on D- panel 196.00$ -$ 11.51 LH roof mounted spot light 71.00$ -$ 11.52 Trucklite LED side marker light 102.00$ -$ 11.999 1 12.0 CAB EXTERIOR OPTIONS:1 12.1 Dual electric horns 16.00$ 6.00$ 12.2 Air horns, dual, round, with snow shields 95.00$ -$ 12.3 Dual rectangular air horns 1 72.00$ 72.00$ 12.4 Fender mirrors per Spec 12.4 133.00$ -$ 12.5 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -West Coast 104.00$ -$ 12.6 Remote control for R.H. mirror & heated -Bulldog stylized mirrors 378.00$ -$ 12.7 Remote control for dual mirrors & heated - Bulldog stylized mirrors with integral convex mirror 474.00$ -$ 12.8 Upcharge for cab extension or larger cab -$ 12.9 Severe duty aluminum cab option -$ 12.10 Dupont Highway orange paint or equal 31.00$ -$ 12.11 Premium paint color option 233.00$ -$ 12.12 Imron paint option STD 12.13 Imron and clear coat paint option 1STD 12.14 Top of hood painted flat black 607.00$ -$ 12.15 Cab Air Ride Suspension 1STD 12.16 Tilting hood per Spec 12.8 1STD 12.17 Butterfly option on hood 1 413.00$ 413.00$ 12.18 Transverse hood opening w/setback axle -$ 12.19 Front fender mounted turn signals -$ 12.20 Cab visor, external, painted to match cab color 1 184.00$ 184.00$ 12.21 Front fender extensions 1 105.00$ 105.00$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 16 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 12.22 Front fender mud flaps 1STD 12.23 Arctic winter wiper blades 1 19.00$ 19.00$ 12.24 Optional windshield washer tank 26.00$ -$ 12.25 Per truck charge for all trucks, key identical 20.00$ -$ 12.26 RH observation prism window in door 28.00$ -$ 12.27 Spotlight LH, RH, or roof mounted each 71.00$ -$ 12.28 Front tow hooks STD 12.29 Rear tow hooks 22.00$ -$ 12.30 Per truck charge for all trucks, key identical - 4 keys 39.00$ -$ 12.31 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -West Coast heated & illuminated 123.00$ -$ 12.32 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -Bulldog Stylized mirrors w/integral convex mirrors 1 272.00$ 272.00$ 12.33 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -Body color aero mirror with integrated convex mirror (49.00)$ -$ 12.34 Remote control for R.H. mirror & heated -Aerodynamic 344.00$ -$ 12.35 Hadley/Kam 4-way mirrors with chrome steel - RH motorized & heated 214.00$ -$ 12.36 Remote control for dual mirrors & heated - Bulldog stylized mirrors illuminated with integral convex mirror 502.00$ -$ 12.37 Remote control for dual mirrors & heated - Aerodynamic 444.00$ -$ 12.38 Remote control for dual mirrors & heated - Aerodynamic body color 134.00$ -$ 12.39 Hadley/Kam 4-way mirrors with chrome steel - RH/LH both motorized & heated 252.00$ -$ 12.40 RH observation prism window in door 28.00$ -$ 12.41 Heated electric wiper blades 118.00$ -$ 12.42 Heated windshield 1 425.00$ 425.00$ 12.43 One piece windshield 1 83.00$ 83.00$ 12.44 Tinted windshield and sides w/50% transmittance gray, tinted rear window 50.00$ -$ 12.45 Bright finish hood intake 1 16.00$ 16.00$ 12.46 Bright finish bars with surround grille 1 240.00$ 240.00$ 12.47 Bright finish grille 32.00$ -$ 12.48 Bullet type chrome marker & clearance lights 75.00$ -$ 12.49 Led type marker & clearance lights 75.00$ -$ 12.50 RH tool box mounted on frame rail 221.00$ -$ 12.51 Heated convex mirrors 34.00$ -$ 12.52 Electronic keyless entry 130.00$ -$ 12.53 Bright finish RH fender mirror 67.00$ -$ 12.54 Bus style 1/4 round black finish fender mirrors 191.00$ -$ 12.55 Stainless steel exterior sun visor 247.00$ -$ 12.56 Bright Finish hood latches 89.00$ -$ 12.57 10" round bright finish heated fender mirrors 1 234.00$ 234.00$ 12.58 Rect convex mirror above RH driver door window 23.00$ -$ 13.0 CAB INTERIOR OPTIONS:1 13.1 Medium grade interior trim package -$ 13.2 Sandstone Color with woodgrain instrument panel 292.00$ -$ 13.3 Sandstone Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 292.00$ -$ 13.4 Slate Gray Color with woodgrain instrument panel 292.00$ -$ 13.5 Slate Gray Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 292.00$ -$ 13.6 Premium grade interior trim package includes power window and locks in package 13.7 Sandstone Color with woodgrain instrument panel 1,087.00$ -$ 13.8 Sandstone Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 1,087.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 17 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 13.9 Slate Gray Color with woodgrain instrument panel 1,087.00$ -$ 13.10 Slate Gray Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 1 1,087.00$ 1,087.00$ 13.11 Round universal gauge package STD 13.12 Power window, passenger side 158.00$ -$ 13.13 Power window/both passenger and driver window 1 325.00$ 325.00$ 13.14 O.E.M factory installed, AM/FM Premium stereo, CD-Player, Weatherboard, Handfree interface, Bluetooth 1STD 13.15 O.E.M factory installed, AM/FM Premium stereo, CD-Player, Weatherband, Handfree interface, Bluetooth, Sirius/XM Satellite 157.00$ -$ 13.16 Radio accommodation package includes antenna, power supply and two speakers (No radio)(175.00)$ -$ 13.17 O.E.M factory installed, AM/FM stereo, MP3, Weatherband, Handfree interface, Bluetooth (45.00)$ -$ 13.18 O.E.M factory installed, air conditioning 1STD 13.19 Cab mounted non-resettable hour meter -$ 13.20 Dash mounted air cleaner air restriction gauge - (Display in Co-Pilot only)1STD 13.21 Transmission temp gauges 1STD 13.22 Windshield defroster fan w/switch dash mounted 87.00$ -$ 13.23 Between seats mounted console 308.00$ -$ 13.24 Transmission oil sensor (check & fill)1STD 13.25 CB hot jacks dash mounted 13.00$ -$ 13.26 Tilt & telescope steering wheel 1STD 13.27 Tilt steering wheel -$ 13.28 Self canceling turn signals 1STD List seating options for driver and passenger seats. Use as many options as you need to offer seat variations customers have been buying. 13.29 Bostrom Talladega 915 Hi-Back air driver seat 26.00$ -$ 13.30 Bostrom Talladega 915 wide ride Hi-Back air driver with 4 chamber air lumbar 181.00$ -$ 13.31 Bostrom Talladega 915 Hi-Back air driver seat and air lumbar support 137.00$ -$ 13.32 Air-Sears Atlas 70 hi-back driver seat 246.00$ -$ 13.33 Air-Sears Atlas 70 hi-back driver seat "Premium comfort with height adj. Air lumbar 301.00$ -$ 13.34 Air-Sears Atlas 80 hi-back driver seat 4 chamber air lumbar 1 374.00$ 374.00$ 13.35 National 2000 hi-back air driver seat - single chamber air lumbar, 2 position front cushion adjustable 104.00$ -$ 13.36 National 2000 hi-back air driver seat - three chamber air lumbar, 2 position front cushion adjustable front cushion with adjustable rear cushion 199.00$ -$ 13.37 Mack fixed rider seat mid-back with integral storage compartment 82.00$ -$ 13.38 Mack fixed rider seat hi-back with integral storage compartment 106.00$ -$ 13.39 Extended non suspension rider seat with seat belts (2)101.00$ -$ 13.40 Mack fixed hi-back rider seat 44.00$ -$ 13.41 Bostrom Talladega 900R mid-back non suspension rider seat 74.00$ -$ 13.42 Bostrom Talladega 900R hi-back non suspension rider seat 95.00$ -$ 13.43 Bostrom Talladega 915 mid back air rider seat 200.00$ -$ 13.44 Bostrom Talladega 915 hi-back air rider seat 297.00$ -$ 13.45 Bostrom Talladega 915 hi-back air rider seat with air lumbar 297.00$ -$ 13.46 National 2000 mid-back air rider seat 214.00$ -$ 13.47 National 2000 hi-back air rider seat 1 250.00$ 250.00$ 13.48 Omit rider seat (40.00)$ -$ 13.49 Inboard mounted driver arm rest 1-$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 18 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 13.50 Inboard mounted rider arm rest - Air Ride Seat Only 1-$ -$ 13.51 Cloth with vinyl driver & rider seat 1-$ -$ 13.52 Driver seat dust cover 1-$ -$ 13.53 Passenger seat dust cover - Not Available with fix passenger seat -$ -$ 13.54 All ultra leather drive and ride set 95.00$ -$ 13.55 Orange driver & rider seat belt 76.00$ -$ 13.56 Light & buzzer for seat belt 1 35.00$ 35.00$ 13.57 Push button type starter 13.00$ -$ 13.58 Diagonal grab handle on inside of driver door 1 35.00$ 35.00$ 13.59 Co-pilot driver display (enhanced 4.5" diagonal graphic LCD display w/4-button stalk control - includes guard dog routine maintenance monitoring 1STD 13.60 Roadwatch ambient air temp gauge for outside and road temps - requires aero-dynamic mirrors 648.00$ -$ 13.61 Roadwatch ambient air temp gauge for outside and road temps without display - includes cable to D panel with 6" extra wire 967.00$ -$ 13.62 Roadwatch ambient air temp gauge for outside and road temps with display on dash panel 1,081.00$ -$ 13.63 5lb fire extinguisher between LH seat base and door with valve aimed rearward 1 66.00$ 66.00$ 13.64 Reflector kit parallel to inside of rider base seat 1 27.00$ 27.00$ 13.65 Air conditioning blend air HVAC with ATC temp regulation 81.00$ -$ 13.66 Air conditioning blend air HVAC with ATC temp regulation & APADS 226.00$ -$ 13.67 Air conditioning with air conditioning protection & diagnostic system (APADS)132.00$ -$ 13.68 Cab cleanout - includes in cab pneumatic line 1 46.00$ 46.00$ 13.69 40 Channel CB Radio, 10 channel weather 205.00$ -$ 13.70 48" Radio antenna right side mirror mounted 4.00$ -$ 13.71 48"CB Antenna left side mirror mounted 38.00$ -$ 13.72 CB hot jacks mounted on the dash and in header console 17.00$ -$ 13.73 CB mounting in console & external speakers 107.00$ -$ 13.74 Auto shutoff for radio when truck is in reverse 47.00$ -$ 13.75 Exhaust pyrometer & transmission oil temperature gauges STD 13.76 Exhaust pyrometer, transmission oil temperature, manifold pressure and air application gauges 75.00$ -$ 13.77 Exhaust pyrometer, transmission oil temperature, manifold pressure and air application gauges, Air Suspension 100.00$ -$ 13.78 Rear Axle temperature gauge 91.00$ -$ 13.79 Red floor lighting w/switch plus (4) door lamps w/switches 103.00$ -$ 13.80 Interior storage console mounted on floor between seats w/12 volt power outlet 308.00$ -$ 13.81 Bodybuilder interior console mounted to floor between seats 209.00$ -$ 13.999 1 14.0 MN/DOT OPTIONS: 14.10 Additional warranty coverage per spec 12.9 -$ 14.20 Engine Plan 1 60 months 250,000 miles 1,200.00$ -$ 14.30 Engine Plan 1 72 months 250,000 miles 2,200.00$ -$ 14.40 Engine Plan 1 84 months 250,000 miles 2,520.00$ -$ 14.50 Engine Plan 1 60 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 2,000.00$ -$ 14.60 Engine Plan 1 72 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 3,300.00$ -$ 14.70 Engine Plan 1 84 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 3,800.00$ -$ 14.80 Engine Plan 2 60 months 250,000 miles 1,900.00$ -$ 14.90 Engine Plan 2 72 months 250,000 miles 3,800.00$ -$ 14.10 Engine Plan 2 84 months 250,000 miles 4,300.00$ -$ 14.11 Engine Plan 2 60 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 2,950.00$ -$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 19 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 14.12 Engine Plan 2 72 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 5,675.00$ -$ 14.13 Engine Plan 2 84 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 6,450.00$ -$ 14.14 Engine after-treatment systems (EATS) 60 months 250,000 miles 675.00$ -$ 14.15 Engine after-treatment systems (EATS) 72 months 250,000 miles 825.00$ -$ 14.16 Engine after-treatment systems (EATS) 84 months 250,000 miles 950.00$ -$ 14.17 M-Drive Transmission 48 months 500,000 miles 971.00$ -$ 14.18 M-Drive Transmission 60 months 500,000 miles 2,067.00$ -$ 14.19 M-Drive HD Transmission 48 months 250,000 miles 775.00$ -$ 14.20 M-Drive HD Transmission 60 months 250,000 miles 1,150.00$ -$ 14.21 M-Drive Clutch 48 months 250,000 395.00$ -$ 14.22 M-Drive Clutch 60 months 250,000 695.00$ -$ 14.23 HVAC (Air Conditioning) 60 months 600.00$ -$ 14.24 Starter 60 months 300,000 miles 203.00$ -$ 14.25 Alternator 60 months 300,000 miles 231.00$ -$ 14.26 Starter & Alternator 60 months 300,000 miles 315.00$ -$ For Prebuild and Pilot meets See RFP special Terms and conditions 14.27 Prebuild specification meeting (per person) to be held in St. Paul/Minneapolis area. 1.00$ -$ 14.28 Pilot inspection meeting (per person). 900.00$ -$ 14.9 1 14.9 1 15.0 TRAILER TOW OPTIONS:1 15.1 Trailer tow package extended to rear of frame 317.00$ -$ 15.2 Trailer package extend to rear of frame per Spec 12.12 417.00$ -$ 15.3 Single 7 pin SAE type, end of frame 117.00$ -$ 15.4 Dual 7 pins standard SAE type, end of frame (1) for trailer with electric brakes, (1) for trailer with air brakes 158.00$ -$ 15.5 Hand control valve for trailer brakes 47.00$ -$ 15.9 1 16.0 MANUALS / TRADE-IN INTEREST FEE:1 16.1 Percent interest per month (non-compounding) on unpaid cab & chassis balance. Applies only to CPV Members. (Payable after trade-in is delivered to vendor). Percentage/per month. 1.50$ -$ SEE Special Terms and Conditions re interest to State agencies. 16.2 Manuals in print form, parts repair and service, per set 900.00$ -$ 16.3 Manuals in CD form, parts repair and service, per set 1 500.00$ 500.00$ 16.4 Premium Tech Tool 3,200.00$ -$ 16.9 1 17.0 Delivery Charges:1 17.1 2.00$ 17.9 1 18.0 Maintence/ Body Shop Labor Rates Per Hour 1 18.1 Rate for Initial Inspection/Diagnostoce 148.00$ -$ 18.2 Rate for Mechanical Work 148.00$ -$ 18.3 Rate for Body Work 148.00$ -$ 18.9 1 19.0 Quantity Discounts:1 Enter the number of units that must be purchased and the corresponding discount offered to the purchaser. More than one quantity discount may be entered. 20 Next Model Year Upcharges AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA EVENT G0210-2000006496 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS 20 of 20 Spec #Description Qty Price Subtotal 20.1 Enter the following Production Model Year here >>>>>>>>>2024 -$ 20.2 2023 MY material surcharge 1 7750 3,200.00$ 20.3 2024 MY Material surcharge 1 4000 4,000.00$ 20.4 Percentage Upcharge for the following Model Year 2023 1 1.50% 2,049.00$ 20.5 Percentage Upcharge for the following Model Year 2024 1 1.50% 2,049.00$ Total Cost:135,732.00$ AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS TA S:\November 14, 2022 Council Meeting\12.1 Q ‐ Upcoming Events.docx   Request for Action  November 14, 2022    Approved by: Tim W. Hoyt, Acting City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Tim W. Hoyt, Acting City Manager    Agenda Title  Exchange of communication between members of the city council  Upcoming meetings and events:  Nov. 16 8:30 a.m. – Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Meeting    5:30 p.m. – North Metro Mayors Board of Directors Meeting at Champlin    Nov. 17 7:30 a.m. – Northwest Cable Television Cable Board Meeting    Nov. 21 6/6:30 p.m. – City Council Work Session    Nov. 24 Thanksgiving Holiday, City Offices Closed    Nov. 25 Thanksgiving Holiday, City Offices Closed    Nov. 28 7 p.m. – City Council Meeting      Agenda Section Other Business Item Number  12.1