Loading...
111521 Work Session Meeting Packet      CITY COUNCIL  WORK SESSION MEETING    New Hope City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue North  Northwood Conference Room    Monday, November 15, 2021  6:00 p.m. ‐ dinner  6:30 p.m. ‐ meeting    Mayor Kathi Hemken  Council Member John Elder  Council Member Andy Hoffe  Council Member Michael Isenberg  Council Member Jonathan London        1. CALL TO ORDER – November 15, 2021    2. ROLL CALL    11. UNFINISHED & ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS     11.1 Dialogue with Personnel Board   11.2 Emerald Ash Borer update by forester   11.3 Discussion regarding WMFRD Daytime Service Model and Staffing   11.4 Discuss increase in fee schedule for Administrative Citations   11.5 Review 2021 performance measures survey results   11.6 Discuss next steps related to the soil storage building at the Public Works Facility  (Improvement Project No. 1039)   11.7 Update and discussion regarding the 2022‐2031 Pavement Management  Plan/Strategy   11.8 Review updated draft long‐term financial plan with AEM   11.9 Discuss change order proposal with Abdo Financial Solutions for consultation of  FEMA and ARPA funding   11.10 Continue discussion on 2022 budgets   11.11 Discuss council and commission appointments for 2022    12. OTHER BUSINESS    13. ADJOURNMENT    I:\RFA\HR & Admin Svcs\Human Resources\2021\Worksessions\Dialog with PB November 15, 2021.docx   Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: HR & Admin Services  By: Rich Johnson, Director    Agenda Title  Dialogue between City Council and Personnel Board  Requested Action  At the city council’s request, all city commissions are invited and scheduled to meet with the Council on an  annual basis. The Personnel Board will attend the November 15 work session to dialogue with the Council  regarding personnel‐related issues. The most recent dialogue was in January 2020. Since that time, the  Personnel Board has assisted the city with the following recruitments (in order of occurrence):  Communications Coordinator; Office Specialist (in community development), Administrative Specialist (in  city manager’s department), Police Officer, Police Sergeant, Police Clerk, Police Chief, Police Officer (3  positions), Building Official, Administrative Specialist (in the police department – internal process), General  Inspector, Community Service Officer (2 positions), Police Officer (3 positions – 2 were internal), Police Clerk,  Police Sergeant (from certified list) and Police Captain (from certified list for police chief).    The Personnel Board also reviewed and updated various job descriptions and reviewed and supported  reorganizing the Community Development and the HR/Administrative Services department by upgrading  the CD Assistant role to become CD Coordinator/Management Analyst and the HR Coordinator to become  HR/IT Coordinator as part of the 2022 compensation plan.     The Personnel Board welcomes any questions or comments that council members have or issues they would  like to discuss.  Background  Per New Hope city code, the Personnel Board serves as the city’s Civil Service Commission. It is responsible  for the recruitment and hiring process of all employees covered by the personnel ordinance, the  establishment of general personnel rules and advising the city manager on personnel policies and issues. The  board consists of three members serving three‐year terms. Meetings are held on an as‐needed basis.    The current board consists of:   Chair Eric Galstad, member since 2008, 23+ years HR experience   Commissioner Anthony Brown, member from 1997‐2007 and 2015 to present, 33+ years of HR experience   Commissioner Wendy Brostrom, member since 2020, 24+ years of HR experience          Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.1  I:\RFA\PUBWORKS\2021\2021 Workshop\Council Work Session EAB Update 11‐15‐21   Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: Public Works  By: Shawn Markham, Forester    Agenda Title  Discussion of New Hope’s Emerald Ash Borer program including an update on efforts made in 2020‐21  Requested Action  Staff would like to provide the City Council with an update on progress made with the Emerald Ash Borer  program in 2020‐21.  Policy/Past Practice  The city of New Hope has continually sought opportunities to better the community at large, as well as make  the community a safer and better place. In the past the city of New Hope developed programs to help  manage invasive species in our community.    Background    Emerald Ash Borer:  In 2010, the New Hope City Council approved the creation and implementation of a city Emerald Ash Borer  (EAB) program. The creation of the program included increased funding to fulfill goals related to control of  the Emerald Ash Borer. Since 2010, the city’s primary focus has been the removal of boulevard ash trees and  replacement of removed Ash trees with trees of greater diversity to avoid problems associated with planting  species monocultures.    Since the inception of the Emerald Ash Borer program, the city has focused primarily on the voluntary  removal of Ash trees located within the city’s right‐of‐way; and in recent years Ash removals in  neighborhoods and business districts, where street infrastructure improvements occur. In 2016, the city  council increased the trees removal/replacement budget from $125,000 to $150,000 in the 2017 budget and has  been continued through 2021. In 2022, staff recommended a budget increase of $50,000, for a total of $200,000  dedicated to tree removal and replacement with a primary focus on public Ash trees.     Attachments  Activity during 2020‐21  Letter‐Tree planting update        Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.2  New Hope City Council Work Session  November 15th, 2021   2020‐21 Emerald Ash Borer Program Update    2021 Forestry Update     This year, the city has seen a significant number of trees infested with the Emerald Ash Borer.  (EAB). All areas of the city have been confirmed to contain EAB.   The city continued the removal and replacement of Ash trees in both the parks and on city  boulevards. 148 Ash trees were removed in 2021 and 14 non‐ash trees were removed. The non‐ ash species were removed due to a hazardous condition or severe decline in health.   A total of 42 trees were planted this year in the city. All 42 trees were intended to be planted as  a replacement for the loss of a boulevard tree. A few of the trees were planted in city parks,  when circumstances would not allow the tree to be planted i.e. tree location stake was not  placed on property, utility locates were not properly marked.   Fall planting of trees was suspended for several reasons (drought, change in ownership of our  tree care service, tree stock supply). Trees not planted this Fall are anticipated to be planted in  the Spring of 2022. (Letter attached)   New Hope will continue with the removal and replacement of Ash trees in the city in 2022. Ash  trees in poor health or showing possible signs of EAB.   The city received two grants that will aid in the success of the EAB program. Hennepin County  awarded us a grant in the amount of $15,000 for the planting of trees and The Minnesota  Department of Natural Resources awarded New Hope a grant in the amount of $35,000 for the  removal and replacement of trees in 2022.   Soon, the city’s Street Department will begin their annual tree trimming of boulevard trees. The  pruning is completed to remove deadwood, hanging branches, and/or limbs that prohibit safe  vehicle and pedestrian traffic.    2020      In the spring of 2020, a private tree located near the intersection of 49th Avenue North and  Virginia Avenue North was identified as having Emerald Ash Borer. The tree was immediately  removed by the property owner. The tree was located just northeast of the previously identified  EAB infested trees near Cooper High School. There have been several trees suspected of have  EAB, though none have had positive confirmations.   The city continued the removal and replacement of Ash trees in both the parks and on city  boulevards. 112 Ash trees were removed in 2020 and 14 non‐ash trees were removed. Typically,  non‐ash species are removed due to a hazardous condition or severe decline in health.    A total of 99 trees were planted this year. 51 trees were planted in the parks and 48 trees were  planted on the residential boulevards. The city has been planting trees in the parks prior to the  removal of many of the Ash trees. This is to minimize the aesthetic shock, when the mature Ash  trees have been removed. Residents that had boulevard trees removed after early October will  have trees planted in early spring.   New Hope will continue with the removal and replacement of Ash trees in the city in 2021. Ash  trees in poor health or showing possible signs of EAB will be identified and letters will be sent  to the property owners to either; let the property owner know their tree will be removed or ask  for permission to remove the tree if the tree is not deemed a hazard at the time.    The city’s Street Department performed their annual tree trimming of boulevard trees. When  the crew is not plowing snow or responding to emergencies, they pruned trees of a  predetermined neighborhood. The pruning is completed to remove deadwood, hanging  branches, and/or limbs that prohibit safe vehicle and pedestrian traffic.        2019   In August of 2019, Emerald Ash Borer was positively identified at the intersection of 47th Avenue  North and Boone Avenue North. The trees were located on private property   Continuation of the removal and replacement‐Ash program. Approximately 25 trees were removed  in the spring and 22 trees were planted in parks and boulevards.    Since 2010, we have averaged 100 tree removals and planted 58 trees planted.   Tree planting and removals continued into the lake Fall.   Received a Hennepin County‐Healthy Tree Canopy Grant in the amount of $20,000 for additional  tree planting.   Tree condition letters were handed out in the Fall letting residents know that their boulevard tree  was in decline. The letters also made residents aware of the city’s EAB removal/replacement  program. Many boulevard and park Ash trees are in severe decline and beyond pruning. The  condition of the Ash trees is not necessarily due to EAB.   The city continued its 1 to 1 removal/planting ratio for residents.                2021‐22 City of New Hope Tree Replacement Update       The City of New Hope has made the decision to postpone the planting of  citywide boulevard trees originally scheduled to take place this fall. Trees  that were originally scheduled for planting in fall 2021 will now take place  in spring 2022.   A number of extenuating circumstances led to this decision. Although fall  rain has helped, dry soil conditions persist as a result of severe drought  conditions over the summer. Snow thaw and spring conditions should  create more favorable planting conditions. Additionally, ongoing labor  challenges have led to delays with the city’s contracted tree service and  have also resulted in limited stock of replacement trees.   Additionally, the City has seen an increase in emerald ash borer  infestations, leaving many boulevard ash trees with dying limbs, damaged  branches and in some cases, total tree death. In an effort to prioritize the  safety of all New Hope community members, the focus for the remainder  of 2021 will be to remove existing hazards before moving forward with tree  replacement.   We understand many residents have been patiently waiting for  replacement boulevard trees and we understand that this decision may be  frustrating. The City of New Hope appreciates your patience as we work  through the challenges presented and we apologize for the delay.   Questions or comments? Please contact New Hope Forester  Shawn Markham at smarkham@newhopemn.gov or 763.592.6763.    I:\RFA\City Manager\2021\WMFRD\WS 111521\11.3 Q ‐ WMFRD Daytime Service Model and Staffing WS 111521.docx    Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Kirk McDonald, City Manager    Agenda Title  Discussion regarding WMFRD Daytime Service Model and Staffing  Requested Action  In follow‐up to the October 27 joint city council/fire board work session, staff is requesting that the Council  continue the discussion regarding the request from West Metro Fire‐Rescue District to apply for a SAFER  grant to add three additional full‐time employees. Representatives from WMFRD will be in attendance to  respond to questions.  Policy/Past Practice  The City Council receives regular updates from the fire district on a quarterly basis and discusses special  projects or requests, such as engine replacements, on an “as needed” basis.  Background  At the September 8 West Metro Fire‐Rescue District Board of Directors meeting Chief Larson made a request  to apply for a SAFER grant for three additional full‐time firefighter employees. If the grant was submitted,  approved and accepted, it would have an impact on the budgets in both cities in future years, starting in  2023. Due to the budget implications, some members of the board recommended that a joint city  council/board work session be conducted so the city council members were informed about the current  daytime service model, staffing and the costs associated with additional employees.    A joint New Hope/Crystal city council/fire board work session was conducted on October 27 and Chief  Larson reviewed the attached presentation and responded to questions. The fire board is requesting feedback  from both city councils before they make a determination on the chief proceeding with the grant application.  At the conclusion of the joint session it was decided that each council would discuss the matter further at  their work sessions in November and provide direction to the city managers.    In conjunction with the October 27 work session information, a memo was also distributed from me  regarding budget impact information (attached). The cities have already agreed to fund four new engines via  leasing starting in 2023, which will increase the annual contribution to the fire district. The hiring of three  new full‐time firefighters through the SAFER grant application process would also increase the annual  contribution to the fire district starting in 2023. The chief has already committed to utilizing a portion of the  District’s reserves to help off‐set the cost of the new engines.     At the October 27 work session the chief also commented that the District may also contribute some reserves  to off‐set the initial cost of new employees hired via the SAFER grant. In follow‐up to the work session  discussion, on November 2 Chief Larson submitted the attached memo to the city managers proposing that  the first three years of additional cost be split 50/50 between the Fire District and the cities.    Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.3      Request for Action, Page 2       In 2023 the additional cost to New Hope would decrease from $30,000 to $15,000     In 2024 the additional cost to New Hope would decrease from $24,000 to 12,000     In 2025 the additional cost to New Hope would decrease from $31,000 to $15,500     In 2026 the cities would absorb the full cost of three additional full‐time employees and New Hope’s  additional costs would be $218,000    While public safety is a top priority for New Hope and there may be a need to hire more full‐time staff,  everyone needs to understand the budget implications for future years. The city does have a fire capital  reserve fund that could be utilized to off‐set some of the future budget increase for new engine costs if  necessary.    Staff is requesting that the Council give the city manager direction regarding the chiefs grant application.  Attachments   November 2, 2021 Chief Larson Memorandum   October 27, 2021 Joint Council Work Session Minutes   October 20, 2021 New Hope Budget Information    October 27, 2021 Joint Session Presentation   September 8, 2021 Staffing Memo    I:\RFA\COMM DEV\2021\Work Session\11‐15‐21 Citation Fee Schedule\Q ‐ Citation Fee Schedule 11‐15‐21.docx    Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: Community Development  By: Jeff Sargent, Director  Agenda Title  Discussion on Increasing Fee Schedule for Level 2 Administrative Citations  Requested Action  Staff requests a discussion with the City Council regarding the possible changes to the fee schedule for  Administrative Citations.  Policy/Past Practice  Prior to increasing fines/fees for the public, staff regularly discusses the proposed increases with the City  Council to ensure that the fines/fees are not too obsessive, and that the increase in the fines/fees is warranted.  Background  The New Hope City Code has three different levels of Administrative Citation fines depending on the severity  of the infraction.   Level One Violations currently include, but are not limited to:   Failure to obtain required permit   Failure to obtain required rental registration permit   Failure to obtain Certificate of Property Maintenance   Unauthorized signs   Unlicensed, inoperable vehicles   Storing junk vehicles   Exterior storage   Home occupation   Interim erosion and sediment control   Improperly stored trash can   Weeds greater than 6 inches   Failure to remove graffiti   Display advertising on parked vehicle   Excess off‐street parking    Level Two Violations currently include, but are not limited to:   Vacated building   Removal or disconnection of safety devices such as smoke or carbon monoxide detectors    Level Three Violations currently include, but are not limited to:   A violation conducted in such a manner that the violation is an immediate life and safety matter,  supported by the enforcement officer’s written justification.    Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.4    Request for Action, Page 2    Recently, staff amended the fee schedule for Level One Violations so that the first citation is a $50.00 fine, and  all subsequent violations are $100.00. When citing large businesses, staff has determined that in some  instances, the business would rather pay the relatively small fine of $100.00 than have to correct a larger issue  that they are being fined for.  When staff polled surrounding cities, it was determined that New Hope’s fee schedule was very minimal in  comparison to other cities. Staff feels that increasing the fee schedule would help deter problems from  happening again.  Proposal  Staff’s proposal is outlined in the attached Memo to Valerie Leone, which would be included with the  proposed fee schedule changes that the City Council would act on at the December 13 City Council meeting.  To summarize, staff would shift some violations to Level Two, and then amend both Level Two and Level  Three Citation amounts to be more reflective of other cities in the area.    Recommendation  Staff recommends that the City Council discuss the possibility of increasing the fee schedule for  Administrative Citations and to then give staff direction on how to proceed.  Attachments   Memo to Valerie Leone Re: Administrative Citation Fee Increase   Proposed Administrative Fee Schedule for New Hope in 2022    1 Memorandum     To: Valerie Leone, City Clerk   Kirk McDonald, City Manager  From:  Jeff Sargent, Community Development Director  Date:  October 28, 2021  Subject: Administrative Citation Fee Increase       The following table lists administrative citation fees for code enforcement violations in New Hope  and other nearby cities as of October 2021. Information below the table constitutes Level 1‐4  violations in cities that use a multi‐tiered violation system.    New  Hope*  Brooklyn  Center**  Brooklyn  Park***  Coon  Rapids  Crystal**** Golden  Valley  Level 1 Citation #1 $50  $60  $55  $300  $75 $100     Citation #2 $100  $120  $110  $600  $90 $250     Citation #3 $100  $240  $220  $1,200  $110 $500     Citation #4 $100  $480     $2,400  $130 $500   Level 2 Citation #1 $100  $125  $200    $120      Citation #2 $200  $250  $400    $140      Citation #3 $200  $500  $800    $170      Citation #4 $200  $1,000       $220    Level 3 Citation #1 $150  $300       $180      Citation #2 $300  $600       $220      Citation #3 $300  $1,200       $260      Citation #4 $300  $2,000       $340    Level 4 Citation #1          $260      Citation #2          $320      Citation #3          $380      Citation #4          $500    Late  fees     Amount  increased by  40% if fine not  paid within 30  days  Late fee if not  paid within 10  days        10% added every  7 days; 1st late  fee waived if  paid within 7  days of due date      2 *New Hope fee levels include the following violations:   Level 1: Failure to obtain required permit, failure to obtain required rental registration  permit, failure to obtain Certificate of Property Maintenance, unauthorized signs,  unlicensed, inoperable vehicles, storing junk vehicles, exterior storage, home occupation,  interim erosion and sediment control, improperly stored trash can, weeds, failure to  remove graffiti, display advertising on parked vehicle, excess off‐street parking   Level 2: Vacated building, removal or disconnection of safety devices such as smoke or  carbon monoxide detectors   Level 3: Immediate life and safety matter, supported by the enforcement officer’s written  justification               **Brooklyn Center fee levels include the following violations:   Level 1: Waste container, setback, watering, local traffic/parking   Level 2: Parking surface, animal, failure to register vacant property, all other codes  misdemeanor or petty   Level 3: Failure to obtain permit or license               ***Brooklyn Park fee levels include the following violations:   Level 1: Waste container   Level 2: All other violations    ****Crystal fee levels include the following violations:   Level 1: Numbering of houses and buildings, refuse storage and disposal, snow removal  and sidewalks, designation of Level 2 violation as a minor infraction, supported by the  enforcement officer’s written justification   Level 2: Any violation not specifically listed as a Level 1 or Level 3 violation   Level 3: Property Maintenance Code, premises conducive to high‐risk sexual conduct,  tattoo, body piercing, body branding and body painting establishments, fire prevention,  dogs and kennels, confinement and control, procedures for licensing, designation of a  Level 2 violation as a major infraction that involves unsafe conditions, constitutes a  blighting influence on surrounding properties or neighborhood, involves neglect of  property maintenance, involves unlawful occupancy of non‐owner‐occupied dwelling  units, or endangers life or property, supported by the enforcement officer’s written  justification   Level 4: Violation conducted in such a manner that the violation significantly endangered  life or property or involved critical unsafe conditions           Proposal  Community Development staff proposes to keep the fee schedule in place for the Level 1  violations, but to increase the citation amounts for Level 2 and Level 3 violations as follows:     3   Current Proposed  Level 2 Citation #1 $100  $100    Citation #2 $200  $250    Citation #3 $200  $500    Citation #4 $200  $500      Current Proposed  Level 3 Citation #1 $150  $250    Citation #2 $300  $500    Citation #3 $300  $1,000    Citation #4 $300  $1,000    Staff also proposes to remove the following violations from the Level 1 list and add them to the  Level 2 list:     Failure to obtain required permit   Failure to obtain required rental registration permit or complete required inspection   Unauthorized signs and violations of sign code   Unlicensed, inoperable vehicles   Storing junk vehicles   Exterior storage    The following violations would be newly added to the Level 2 list:     Parking vehicle or recreational vehicle on unapproved surface   Improperly stored or unscreened recreational vehicles   Improper sump pump connection or discharge   Failed or missed hood and duct cleaning    The following violations would be added to the Level 1 list:     Failure to obtain Business Use Certificate of Occupancy   General maintenance   Construction of fence with unapproved material or damaged fence   Damaged light fixture   Noise ordinance violations   All other miscellaneous code violations not specified as Level 2 or Level 3 violations    A comprehensive list of Level 1‐3 violations and the proposed changes is attached.    4 Rationale  Staff has noticed, particularly with commercial and industrial properties, that the maximum $100  fine for violations is small enough for businesses to work it into their cost of business. A  conversation that staff had with one owner indicated that it would cost less for them to pay the  fine than to construct the fence needed to screen the violating outdoor storage. Staff feels that a  high fee schedule would result in better compliance by property owners in violation of the  ordinance.    Notes of Interest   Garbage can violations were left as a Level 1 offense because of the constant need to move  the cans to and from the street curb. Staff feels that these violations are different, for  example, than a resident purposefully storing a junk vehicle on the property or not  cleaning up their yard of outdoor storage materials.   Violators will still receive an Administrative Notice outlining the violation and giving the  same amount of time to correct the violation prior to a citation being issued.   Those who receive a citation would still have the ability to appeal the citation.   Late fees would still be assessed for unpaid citations    Attachments   Proposed Administrative Citation Fee Schedule for New Hope in 2022  Proposed Administrative Citation Fee Schedule for New Hope in 2022    Level 1   Failure to obtain Certificate of Property Maintenance   Failure to obtain Business Use Certificate of Occupancy   Unapproved home occupation   Interim erosion and sediment control   Improperly stored trash container   Weeds   Failure to remove graffiti   Display advertising on parked vehicle   General maintenance   Construction of fence with unapproved material or damaged fence   Damaged light fixture   Noise ordinance violations   All other miscellaneous code violations not specified as Level 2 or Level 3  violations    Level 2   Vacated building   Removal or disconnection of safety devices such as smoke or carbon monoxide  detectors   Failure to obtain required permit   Failure to obtain required rental registration permit or complete required  inspection   Unauthorized signs and violations of sign code   Unlicensed, inoperable vehicles   Storing junk vehicles   Exterior storage   Parking vehicle or recreational vehicle on unapproved surface   Improperly stored or unscreened recreational vehicles   Improper sump pump connection or discharge   Failed or missed hood and duct cleaning    Level 3   Level 3: Immediate life and safety matter, supported by the enforcement officer’s  written justification    I:\RFA\City Manager\2021\Performance Measures Survey Program\11‐15 WS Performance Measures Survey\11.5 Q ‐ WS Performance Measures Survey Results 11‐15‐ 21.docx   Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Brandon Bell, Community Development Assistant;   & Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Agenda Title  Review 2021 performance measures survey results  Requested Action  Staff requests to discuss the 2021 performance measures survey results from the 2021 City Services Survey.  Excerpts from the Survey results have been included in the budget public hearing presentation the last  several years, and staff plans to include in the presentation this year, therefore wanted to review with the  City Council prior to the public hearing.  Policy/Past Practice  In 2011, the Minnesota Legislature’s Council on Local Results and Innovation released a standard set of ten  performance measures for cities to aid residents, taxpayers, and state and local officials in determining the  effectiveness of cities in providing services and to measure the residents’ opinions of those services. The city  has participated in the program since 2011 to evaluate residents’ satisfaction with city services. Cities that  participate in the program are eligible for a reimbursement of $0.14 per capita, resulting in approximately  $3,000 per year for New Hope. Although the survey is unscientific, it still offers valuable feedback. The city  conducted a professional citywide survey in 2015 through the Morris Leatherman Company and the results  of that survey are probably a more accurate reflection of residents’ opinions on city services. The city planned  to have Morris Leatherman Company conduct the professional survey again in 2021, but due to the COVID‐ 19 pandemic the professional survey was postponed until 2022.   Background  At the April 19, 2021, work session, the City Council expressed support for continuing to participate in the  state’s performance measures program. The City Council reviewed the proposed Survey questions and  supported/recommended adding the following questions:  1. Question #4: How would you rate the appearance and function of the Civic Center Park, including the  new Aquatic Park?  2. Question #17: Of these sources, how do you obtain the majority of your city information? (Answers  were: City Website, City Publications, Social Media, Sun Post/CCX Media)  3. Question #21: How do you feel the city reacted to the COVID‐19 pandemic in the following areas  (Overall, Parks & Rec, Elections, Permits and Inspections)?    In order to participate in the 2021 performance measures program, it was necessary to adopt a resolution  adopting and implementing performance measures and file a report of last year’s results with the Office of  the State Auditor by July 1, 2021. The City Council adopted the resolution approving the program at the April  26, 2021, City Council meeting, and filed the required report with the state. The program requires cities to  implement ten standard performance measures to aid in evaluating residents’ satisfaction with local services.  Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.5    Request for Action, Page 2      The 2021 surveys were mailed to residents with July utility bills and were available on the city’s website and  at City Hall from July 1, 2021, to October 1, 2021.  Survey response rates since 2012 are as follows:   2012 – 189 residents   2013 – 1,114 residents   2014 – 1,062 residents   2015 – 400 residents (Morris Leatherman Professional Survey)   2016 – 646 residents (submission: 140 online, 506 paper)   2017 – 632 residents (submission: 98 online, 534 paper)   2018 – 679 residents (submission: 194 online, 485 paper)   2019 – 610 residents (submission: 246 online, 346 paper)   2020 – 839 Residents (submission: 375 online, 464 paper)   2021 – 663 Residents (submission: 297 online, 366 paper)    Survey Results  The 2021 Survey results are attached with comparison data from 2019 and 2020. In general, the responses  were very similar to 2020.   When asked about how many years respondents have lived in New Hope, 58% have lived in the city  more than 20 years, 14% between 11 and 20 years, and 25% have lived in the city under 10 years.    When asked how much longer into the future respondents expect to live in New Hope 25% answered  11 or more years, 45% answered between 6‐10 years, 23% answered between 2‐5 years and 7% did not  know or indicated less than one year.    The overall quality of city services rating of “excellent” or “good” increased from 81% to 82% between  2020 and 2021.   The payable taxable property market value for the city increased by 7.72% between 2020 and 2021.   The overall appearance of the city rating of “excellent” or “good” decreased slightly from 80% in 2020  to 79% in 2021.   The likelihood of using public transit if readily available decreased by 2% down to 27% from 2020 to  2021.   56% of citizens supported funding home repairs and improvement projects through the city, an  increase of 5% from 2020.    In its second year as a question on the survey, 58% of respondents indicated they feel “excellent” or  “good” about their opportunities to provide input and feedback about issues to the city of New Hope.  This is a decrease of 4% from 2020.   Citizens’ categorizing their overall feeling of safety in the city as “very safe” or “somewhat safe”  declined slightly from 92% to 88% between 2020 and 2021.    The overall quality of fire education, inspection, and response services receiving a rating of  “excellent” or “good” decreased from 79% to 76% between 2020 and 2021.   The overall condition of county roads receiving a rating of “excellent” or “good” increased from 53%  to 69% and for city roads increased from 64% to 72% between 2020 and 2021.   The average pavement condition rating for city streets increased from 76 to 80 between 2020 and 2021.   The overall quality of snowplowing services receiving a rating of “excellent” or “good” increased  from 81% to 82% between 2020 and 2021.    Request for Action, Page 3       The ratings of “excellent” or “good” for the quality of water supply and sanitary sewer service  dependability decreased, 88% to 87% and increased 80% to 83%, respectively.   75% of citizens rated the dependability and overall quality of stormwater management as “excellent”  or “good,” which is an increase of 3% from 2020.   The overall quality of recreational programs/facilities receiving a rating of “excellent” or “good”  increase from 72% to 75% between 2020 and 2021.   Citizens’ rating of the toughness of code enforcement being “about right” slightly decreased from 63%  to 62% between 2020 and 2021.   The overall quality of communication/distribution of information receiving a rating of “excellent” or  “good” increased from 71% to 73% between 2020 and 2021.   In its first year as a question on the survey, regarding respondents main sources for city information,  8% said the city website, 50% city publications, 19% social media, 11% Sun Post/CCX media and  another 11% said a combination of sources.    This year citizens were asked how they rated the new Civic Center Park, including the new Aquatic  Park. 82% of respondents rated the two as either excellent or good.    The survey also asked respondents how they felt the city responded to the COVID‐19 pandemic in  several areas. Respondents felt that the City responded excellent or good 67% overall, 60% excellent or  good for Parks and Recreation, 71% for Elections, and 51% for Permits and Inspections.    A copy of the survey data is attached and will be incorporated into the 2021 Performance Measurement  Report. Excerpts will also be included in the annual budget presentation. Early next year, staff will present  the proposed 2022 Morris Leatherman Company survey questions for review/approval by the City Council  and results from the 2021 Survey will be submitted to the state.    The feedback from residents on city services is very valuable. All comments submitted by respondents have  been compiled and organized by department within the attached memorandum. Inappropriate language and  some instances where specific addresses are referenced have been redacted. Some spelling errors have been  corrected; however, general content has not been edited. The last question on the survey allowed residents to  request that city staff contact them about comments or concerns. Staff was able to reach 38 of 43 residents that  requested to be contacted and left messages for the others. Many residents expressed concerns about the  amount of different garbage haulers driving on city streets and code enforcement issues ranging from  exterior storage to unscreened trash cans to noxious weeds and overgrown grass. Residents also stated  concerns about property tax increases, snow plowing, tree removal and traffic enforcement. Residents who  received follow‐up phone calls as they had requested, were very pleased that the city took the time to call  them back in regards to their concerns. A complete summary of comments is attached.   Attachments   2021 City Services Survey   Summary table/comparison of responses   Survey results PowerPoint   “2021 City Services Survey Comments” memorandum from Brandon Bell (October 20, 2021)    2021 New Hope City Services Survey  You have the option of completing this survey on paper or by visiting newhopemn.gov/survey. If you choose to fill out  the paper version, mail it back to the city with your utility bill or drop it off at New Hope City Hall (either inside or in the  utility drop box) by Oct. 1, 2021. Please submit only one copy of the survey per adult resident, per year. Thank you.    1. How many years have you lived in New Hope?     O  0‐1 Year             O 2‐5 Years             O  6‐10 Years             O  11‐20 Years             O  More than 20 Years    2. As things now stand, how long in the future do you expect to live in New Hope?   O  0‐1 Year             O 2‐5 Years             O  6‐10 Years             O  11‐20 Years             O  More than 20 Years    3. How would you rate the overall appearance of the city?     O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    4. How would you rate the appearance and function of the Civic Center Park, including the new Aquatic Park?   O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    5. Do you think the city is too tough, about right or not tough enough in enforcing the City Code on such nuisance  issues as trash can screening, exterior storage and inoperable vehicles?    O  Too Tough             O  About Right             O  Not Tough Enough    6. How would you describe your overall feeling of safety in the city?   O  Very Safe             O  Somewhat Safe             O  Somewhat Unsafe             O  Very Unsafe    7. What is your perception of the quality of fire education, inspection and response services provided by West Metro  Fire‐Rescue District?    O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    8. How would you rate the overall condition of county roads (Winnetka Avenue south of Bass Lake Road, Bass Lake  Road, 42nd Avenue and Medicine Lake Road)?  O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    9. How would you rate the overall condition of city streets (not including county roads)?   O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    10. How would you rate the overall quality of snowplowing of city streets?   O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    11. How likely would you be to use public transit if it was readily available?   O  Very Likely             O  Somewhat Likely             O  Somewhat Unlikely             O  Very Unlikely    12. How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of the city sanitary sewer service?   O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    13. How would you rate the dependability and overall quality of the city water supply?   O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    ‐Over‐  14. How would you rate the overall quality of stormwater management in the city?    O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    15. How would you rate the overall quality of city recreational programs and facilities (parks, trails, recreation facilities,  classes, etc.)?   O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    16. How would you rate the quality of communication/distribution of information?    O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    17. Of these sources, how do you obtain the majority of your city information?    O  City Website          O  City Publications         O  Social Media            O  Sun Post/CCX Media           18. If the city offered financial assistance for home repair and improvement projects, would this interest you?  O  Yes             O  No    19. How would you rate the overall quality of services provided by the city?    O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    20. How do you feel about your opportunities to provide input and feedback about issues of New Hope?   O  Excellent             O  Good             O  Neutral             O  Fair             O  Poor    21. How do you feel the city reacted to the COVID‐19 pandemic in the following areas?    Overall    O  Excellent O  Good O  Neutral O  Fair O  Poor  Parks & Rec    O  Excellent O  Good O  Neutral O  Fair O  Poor  Elections    O  Excellent O  Good O  Neutral O  Fair O  Poor  Permits and Inspections    O  Excellent O  Good O  Neutral O  Fair O  Poor    Additional comments or concerns (please print):  ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________  If you would like someone from the city to contact you about your comments/concerns, please provide your  name and phone number and a staff member will contact you.      Name ____________________________________    Daytime Phone ___________________________  City of New Hope Performance Measures Quantifiable performance measures are shaded and Summaries of Survey Questions are attached Category # Measure Comparison of results between online and paper city services surveys from  2019 (610 responses), 2020 (839 responses) and 2021 (663 responses) General  1. Rating of the overall quality of city services  2019: 20% excellent; 61% good; 12% neutral; 5% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank (81% excellent or good) 2020: 20% excellent; 61% good; 10% neutral;  6% fair, 1% poor; 2% don’t know/blank (81% excellent or good) 2021: 18% excellent; 64% good; 12% neutral;  5% fair, 1% poor; 0% don’t know/blank (82% excellent or good) 2. Percent change in the taxable property market value Payable 2019: 7.92% (total taxable market value: $1,831,436,951) Payable 2020: 10.37% (total taxable market value: $2,021,382,123) Payable 2021: 7.72% (total taxable market value: $2,177,389,934) 3. Citizens’ rating of the overall appearance of the city 2019: 15% excellent; 64% good; 9% neutral; 10% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (79% excellent or good) 2020: 15% excellent; 65% good; 11% neutral; 7% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank (80% excellent or good) 2021: 16% excellent; 63% good; 11% neutral;  8% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (79% excellent or good) 4. Citizens’ rating of appearance and function of Civic Center Park 2021: 50% excellent; 32% good; 15% neutral;  1% fair, 0% poor; 2% don’t know/blank  (82% excellent or good) 5. Bond rating 2019: AA 2020: AA 2021: AA 6. Citizens’ rating of the quality of city recreational programs and facilities  2019: 25% excellent; 49% good; 17% neutral; 7% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (74% excellent or good) 2020: 23% excellent; 49% good; 19% neutral;  5% fair, 1% poor; 2% don’t know/blank  (72% excellent or good) 2021: 23% excellent; 52% good; 18% neutral;  4% fair, 2% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (75% excellent or good) 7. Citizens’ rating of opportunity to provide input and feedback about issues 2019: N/A 2020: 15% excellent; 47% good; 24% neutral;  8% fair, 4% poor; 2% don’t know/blank  (62% excellent or good) 2021: 14% excellent; 44% good; 29% neutral;  7% fair, 4% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (58% excellent or good)     8. Would use public transit if readily available  2019: 10% very likely; 22% somewhat likely; 26% somewhat unlikely; 42% very unlikely; 0% don’t know/blank (32% very likely or somewhat likely) 2020: 8% very likely; 21% somewhat likely; 24% somewhat unlikely; 46% very unlikely; 2% don’t know/blank (29% very likely or somewhat likely) 2021: 8% very likely; 19% somewhat likely; 26% somewhat unlikely; 47% very unlikely; <1% don’t know/blank (27% very likely or somewhat likely) 9. Citizens’ support of funding home repair and improvement programs 2019: 50% Yes; 48% No; 2% Blank 2020: 51% Yes; 46% No; 3% Blank 2021: 56% Yes; 42% No; 2% Blank Police Services 10. Part I and II crime rates 2018: Part I: 682; Part II: 721 2019: Part I: 611; Part II: 680 2020: Part I: 600; Part II: 503 *Full crime stats for current year compiled after January 1 to ensure accuracy 11. Citizens’ rating of safety in the community 2019: 39% very safe; 54% somewhat safe: 6% somewhat unsafe; <1% very unsafe; <1% don’t know/blank (93% very safe or somewhat safe) 2020: 45% very safe; 47% somewhat safe: 7% somewhat unsafe; 1% very unsafe; <1% don’t know/blank (92% very safe or somewhat safe) 2021: 37% very safe; 51% somewhat safe: 11% somewhat unsafe; 0% very unsafe; <1% don’t know/blank (88% very safe or somewhat safe) 12. Average police response time 2018: 4.36 minutes for priority 1 calls 2019: 4.35 minutes for priority 1 calls 2020: 4.03 minutes for priority 1 calls *Full police stats for current year compiled after January 1 to ensure accuracy Fire & EMS Services 13. Insurance industry rating of fire services 2019: 3 2020: 3 2021: 3 14. Citizens’ rating of the quality of fire protection services 2019: 39% excellent; 41% good; 17% neutral; <1% fair, <1% poor; 2% don’t know/blank (80% excellent or good) 2020: 36% excellent; 42% good; 18% neutral; 1% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank (78% excellent or good) 2021: 33% excellent; 43% good; 21% neutral;  1% fair, 0% poor; 2% don’t know/blank (76% excellent or good) 15. Fire calls per 1,000 population 2018: 47.79 (1,097 calls for service, 20,339 pop) 2019: 53.94 (1,097 calls for service, 20,339 pop) 2020: 48.33 (983 calls for service, 20,339 pop) *Full fire stats for current year compiled after January 1 to ensure accuracy Streets 16. Average city pavement condition rating 2019: 76 2020: 76 2021: 80   17.   Citizens’ rating of county roads 2019: 8% excellent; 54% good; 15% neutral; 16% fair, 6% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (62% excellent or good) 2020: 5% excellent; 48% good; 18% neutral;  20% fair, 8% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (53% excellent or good) 2021: 10% excellent; 59% good; 15% neutral;  13% fair, 3% poor; 0% don’t know/blank  (69% excellent or good) 18. Citizens’ rating of city streets 2019: 9% excellent; 57% good; 14% neutral; 17% fair, 3% poor; <1% don’t know/blank  (64% excellent or good) 2020: 6% excellent; 58% good; 17% neutral;  15% fair, 3% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (64% excellent or good) 2021: 9% excellent; 63% good; 15% neutral;  11% fair, 1% poor; <1% don’t know/blank  (72% excellent or good) 19. Citizens’ rating of the quality of snowplowing on city streets 2019: 33% excellent; 45% good; 8% neutral; 10% fair, 4% poor; 0% don’t know/blank  (78% excellent or good) 2020: 33% excellent; 48% good; 7% neutral;  9% fair, 2% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (81% excellent or good) 2021: 33% excellent; 49% good; 7% neutral;  7% fair, 3% poor; % don’t know/blank  (82% excellent or good) Water 20. Citizens’ rating of the dependability and quality of city water supply 2019: 39% excellent; 48% good; 8% neutral; 3% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (87% excellent or good) 2020: 41% excellent; 47% good; 7% neutral;  3% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (88% excellent or good) 2021: 37% excellent; 50% good; 8% neutral;  4% fair, 0% poor; <1% don’t know/blank  (87% excellent or good) 21. Citizens’ rating of the quality of stormwater management in the city 2019: 20% excellent; 50% good; 20% neutral; 6% fair, 3% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (70% excellent or good) 2020: 19% excellent; 53% good; 19% neutral;  6% fair, 2% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (72% excellent or good) 2021: 24% excellent; 51% good; 17% neutral;  5% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (75% excellent or good) Sanitary Sewer 22. Citizens’ rating of the dependability and quality of city sanitary sewer service 2019: 28% excellent; 53% good; 14% neutral; 3% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (81% excellent or good) 2020: 27% excellent; 53% good; 16% neutral;  2% fair, 1% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (80% excellent or good) 2021: 27% excellent; 56% good; 15% neutral;  2% fair, 0% poor; 0% don’t know/blank  (83% excellent or good) 23. Number of sewer blockages on city system per 1000 connections 2019: 1 2020: 2 2021: 0 total as of November 1, 2021  Code Enforcement 24. Citizens’ rating of the quality of code enforcement services 2019: 7% too tough; 58% about right; 34% not tough enough; 1% don’t know/blank 2020:  8% too tough;  63% about right; 28% not tough enough; 1% don’t know/blank 2021:  6% too tough;  62% about right; 31% not tough enough; 1% don’t know/blank Communication 25. Citizens’ rating of the quality of communication/ distribution of information 2019: 17% excellent; 55% good; 16% neutral; 8% fair, 3% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (72% excellent or good) 2020: 18% excellent; 53% good; 16% neutral;  9% fair, 3% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (71% excellent or good) 2021: 20% excellent; 53% good; 18% neutral;  6% fair, 2% poor; 1% don’t know/blank  (73% excellent or good) 26. Citizens’ source for city information  2021: 8% city website; 50% city publications; 19% social media; 11% Sun Post/CCX Media; 11% a combination of sources; 1% blank. COVID‐19 27. Citizens’ rating of the city’s reaction to the COVID‐19 Pandemic in several areas. Overall: 22% excellent; 45% good; 24% neutral;  4% fair, <1% poor; 4% don’t know/blank (67% excellent or good) Parks & Recreation: 20% excellent; 40% good; 29% neutral;  4% fair, 2% poor; 5% don’t know/blank (60% excellent or good) Elections: 30% excellent; 41% good; 21% neutral;  4% fair, 2% poor; 3% don’t know/blank (71% excellent or good) Permits & Inspections: 19% excellent; 32% good; 39% neutral;  3% fair, 1% poor; 5% don’t know/blank (51% excellent or good)   2021 NEW HOPE CITY SERVICES SURVEYNovember 15, 2021 SUBMISSIONS AT A GLANCESurvey period of July 1 to Oct. 1, 2021663 total responses •366 paper surveys returned•297 completed onlineDecrease from 2020, but similar response rate to past years:82% of respondents rated the overall quality of city services as excellent or good (slight increase from last year)Top rated city services:•Police (88% very or somewhat safe)•Water Supply (87% excellent or good)•Sanitary Sewer (83% excellent or good)•Snowplowing (82% excellent or good)2020 – 839 2019 – 610 2018 - 679 2017 - 632 Q1: HOW MANY YEARS HAVE YOU LIVED IN NEW HOPE?0-1 Year, 3%2-5 Years, 12%6-10 Years, 10%11-20 Years, 14%More than 20 Years, 58% Q2: AS THINGS STAND NOW, HOW LONG IN THE FUTURE DO YOU EXPECT TO LIVE IN NEW HOPE?0-1 Year, 4%2-5 Years, 23%6-10 Years, 30%11-20 Years, 25%More than 20 Years, 15%Don't Know/Blank, 3% GENERAL Q19: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY?18%64%12%5%1%020%61%10%6%1%2%20%61%12%5%1%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 82% 2020 - 81% 2019 - 81% Q3: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL APPEARANCE OF THE CITY?16%63%11%8%1%1%15%65%11%7%1%1%15%64%9%10%1%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 79% 2020 - 80% 2019 - 79% Q4: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL APPEARANCE AND FUNCTION OF CIVIC CENTER PARK, INCLUDING THE NEW AQUATIC PARK?50%32%15%1%0%2%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANKEXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 82% Q11: HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO USE PUBLIC TRANSIT IF IT WERE READILY AVAILABLE?8%19%26%47%08%21%24%46%2%10%22%26%42%0%VERY LIKELY SOMEWHAT LIKELY SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY VERY UNLIKELY DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019VERY LIKELY OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY2021 - 27% 2020 - 29% 2019 - 32% Q18: IF THE CITY OFFERED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR HOME REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, WOULD THIS INTEREST YOU?56%42%2%51%46%3%50%48%2%YES NO BLANK202120202019YES2021 – 56% 2020 – 51% 2019 - 50% Q20: HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT YOUR OPPORTUNITIES TO PROVIDE INPUT AND FEEDBACK ABOUT ISSUES OF NEW HOPE?14%44%29%7%4%1%15%47%24%8%4%2%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR BLANKEXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 58% 2020 – 62% 2019 – N/A PUBLIC SAFETY Q6: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR OVERALL FEELING OF SAFETY IN THE CITY?37%51%11%0045%47%7%1%0%39%54%6%1%1%VERY SAFE SOMEWHAT SAFE SOMEWHAT UNSAFE VERY UNSAFE DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019VERY SAFE OR SOMEWHAT SAFE2021 - 88% 2020 - 92% 2019 - 93% Q7: WHAT IS YOUR PERCEPTION OF THE QUALITY OF FIRE EDUCATION, INSPECTION AND RESPONSE SERVICES PROVIDED BY WEST METRO FIRE-RESCUE DISTRICT?33%43%21%1%0%2%36%42%18%1%1%2%39%41%17%1%1%2%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 76% 2020 - 78% 2019 - 80% PUBLIC WORKS Q8: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL CONDITION OF COUNTY ROADS?10%59%15%13%3%0%5%48%18%20%8%1%8%54%15%16%6%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 69% 2020 - 53% 2019 - 62% Q9: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL CONDITION OF CITY STREETS?9%63%15%11%1%06%58%17%15%3%1%9%57%14%17%3%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 – 72% 2020 – 64% 2019 - 64% Q10: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF SNOWPLOWING ON CITY STREETS?33%49%7%7%3%033%48%7%9%2%1%33%45%8%10%4%0%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 – 82% 2020 – 81% 2019 - 78% Q13: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE DEPENDABILITY AND OVERALL QUALITY OF THE CITY WATER SUPPLY?37%50%8%4%0%041%47%7%3%1%1%39%48%8%3%1%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 87% 2020 - 88% 2019 - 87% Q14: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IN THE CITY?24%51%17%5%1%1%19%53%19%6%2%1%20%50%20%6%3%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 – 75% 2020 – 72% 2019 – 70% Q12: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE DEPENDABILITY AND OVERALL QUALITY OF CITY SANITARY SEWER SERVICE?27%56%15%2%0%0%27%53%16%2%1%1%28%53%14%3%1%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 83% 2020 - 80% 2019 - 81% PARKS & RECREATION Q15: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF CITY RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES (PARKS, TRAILS, RECREATION FACILITIES, CLASSES, ETC.)?23%52%18%4%2%1%23%49%19%5%1%2%25%49%17%7%1%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 75% 2020 - 72% 2019 - 74% CODE ENFORCEMENT Q5: DO YOU THINK THE CITY IS TOO TOUGH, ABOUT RIGHT OR NOT TOUGH ENOUGH IN ENFORCING THE CITY CODE ON SUCH NUISANCE ISSUES AS TRASH CAN SCREENING, EXTERIOR STORAGE AND INOPERABLE VEHICLES?62%6%31%1%63%8%28%1%58%7%34%1%ABOUT RIGHT TOO TOUGH NOT TOUGH ENOUGH DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019ABOUT RIGHT2021 - 58% 2020 - 63% 2019 - 62% COMMUNICATIONS Q16: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUALITY OF COMMUNICATION/DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION?20%53%18%6%2%1%18%53%16%9%3%1%17%55%16%8%3%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW/BLANK202120202019EXCELLENT OR GOOD2021 - 73% 2020 - 71% 2019 - 72% Q17: OF THESE SOURCES, HOW DO YOU OBTAIN THE MAJORITY OF YOUR CITY INFORMATION?City Website, 8%City Publications, 50%City Social Media, 19%Sun Post/CCX Media, 11%Combination of Sources, 11%Blank, 1% COVID-19 PANDEMIC 22%45%24%4%2%1%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR BLANKEXCELLENT OR GOOD – 67%Q20: HOW DO YOU FEEL THE CITY REACTED THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS? OVERALL Q20: HOW DO YOU FEEL THE CITY REACTED THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS? 20%40%29%4%2%5%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR BLANKEXCELLENT OR GOOD – 60%PARKS & RECREATION Q20: HOW DO YOU FEEL THE CITY REACTED THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS? 30%41%21%4%2%3%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR BLANKEXCELLENT OR GOOD – 71%ELECTIONS Q20: HOW DO YOU FEEL THE CITY REACTED THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS? 19%32%39%3%1%5%EXCELLENT GOOD NEUTRAL FAIR POOR BLANKEXCELLENT OR GOOD – 51%PERMITS & INSPECTIONS 1 Memorandum     To: Kirk McDonald, City Manager   From:  Brandon Bell, Community Development Assistant  Date:  October 20, 2021  Subject: 2021 City Services Survey Comments        The 2021 City Services Survey allowed residents the opportunity to list comments or concerns  and to request that someone from the city contact them directly. Comments have been compiled  and organized by department within the attached document. Inappropriate language and some  instances where specific addresses were referenced have been redacted. Some spelling errors  have been corrected when possible; however, general content has not been edited. Staff was able  to reach 38 of 43 residents that requested to be contacted and left messages for the others. Many  residents expressed concerns about the amount of different garbage haulers driving on city  streets and code enforcement issues like weeds, tall grass, unscreened trash cans and exterior  storage. Residents also reported concerns about property tax increases, snowplowing and traffic  enforcement. Residents who left their information in order to be called back, were for the most  part extremely happy that the city was taking the time to reach out and contact them.     Attachments     2021 City Services Survey Comments                            2 2021 City Services Survey Comments    City Manager/General     The city has done a great job; we have enjoyed the last 20 years here.   About covid‐19,over reacted.   Mail‐in/early voting/ballot drop‐off options during the election were most appreciated.   would like to see a ban on outdoor fire pits   ʺI think Winnetka is a shared road, but thanks for getting that fixed up ‐ it needed it.    I hope that New Hope continues to be a safe place for our neighbors of color. I have heard reports  that some people have had bad interactions with neighbors and/or police ‐ we need to ensure that  all members of our communities feel safe ‐ and I hope that this is a standard we are upholding  with our public servants also.ʺ   I have assumed services that I didnʹt use to be good, like the ones I know about.   I think the city should give a bigger discount to the aquatic park for residents. Our city tax dollars  paid for it. You also use to have a family rate, now it is per person. a family of 6 is over $400.00  for the year. $70.00 a person for a resident is steep, Valley fair is $78.00 for an unlimited gold pass  including waterpark, free parking etc. Donʹt price you residents out.   After living in Cottage Grove for most my life we are so much happier here. The parks are better,  the water tastes and has no smell. That is a huge plus.   Garbage collection is out of control. All day trucks are driving through the neighborhood  (6:30am‐4 or even later). 5 PLUS companies. This is ridiculous. The city should negotiate similar  to how recycling is handled‐ one company for the whole city: bundle with those services! This  would greatly improve things!!! Please, step in. This is what the city is for.   The City Council appears to do as they please and ignores complaints and input. I would like less  restrictions for Garage Sales‐‐placing signs is discouraging, confusing and difficult.   I have been pleased to live in New Hope but will be moving to a Sr residence sometime in the  nest year.   ʺMore single family homes are turning from owner‐occupied into rental housing. Two directly  across the street from me have had poor oversight as far as basic lawn maintenance. It is the start  of neighborhood blight. Perfection isnʹt expected, but itʹs not too much to ask for a decent  appearance. I have been a resident for 41 years and have seen the decline in neighboring (similar‐ type) first‐ring suburbs.   Another concern is the multiple garbage services. I have attended meetings in the past and saw  the resistance to having fewer trucks on our streets. Robbinsdale has incorporated citywide  garbage service just fine!ʺ   Eliminate through traffic on 46th Ave N between Boone and Winnetka. People going to Hy‐Vee  or the civic center park cut through there and blow through stop signs and exceed the speed  limits. Often very bad during 4p‐7p hours   New Hope still needs more restaurants and things to do. Less housing would be good especially  way too many apartments. Also the train horn going through the night is very annoying  especially when the trains are supposed to be no horns in the city.  3  I really have no idea about the above question ‐ how the city reacted to the COVID‐19 pandemic.  I was not out in the community for most of the year, I was home! Iʹm guessing (would hope) the  city followed all state mandates and did an excellent job.   Tired of anti‐police rhetoric AND city council members who don’t listen to New Hope residents.   We need police reform similar to that of Brooklyn Center.   The garbage truck situation needs to be addressed. Way too much traffic on the streets for a  simple utility. The number of group homes needs to be addressed. Too many disturbances and  too much constant street parking I know of at least four in the north wood east area   ʺWhile I overall feel safe in the city, thefts and crime are up. I feel our New Hope officers are  great and doing a good job especially with all that is going on. SO thankful for them.   And letʹs be diligent on group homes, if you are getting calls regarding noise, do something  about it proactively i.e. when 9‐1‐1 is called do something about it. I support group homes, but  not when they are a nuisance ‐ maybe the county needs to be notified and the owners  background and history or any other homes looked at.   Lastly ‐ BRING BACK DUK DUK DAZE! You allowed those teenagers from 2 years ago to do  exactly what they set out to do ‐ disturb it and close it down. They won. We lost. Figure out how  to bring it back so our children can enjoy it once again. Robbinsdale & Crystal ‐ didnʹt they have  something again this year?! So, letʹs bring ours back as well.   Property taxes ‐ they need to STOP going up. My mom lives in Minnetonka in a home valued  higher than ours yet her property taxes are lower. And itʹs Hopkins School District, which I  would prefer my kids were in compared to Robbinsdale. sure hoping this new Superintendent  turns this district around!   Thank you to the Mayor and City Council for serving, greatly appreciated.    ʺThe pool needs someone who can order the snack and treats as they are always out.   More spots for younger kids to do things.   Farmers market needs more farmers. Only 3 this last week and not a very big selection. Golden  Valley has a better farmers market then new hope right now.ʺ   I am 90 years old so I really appreciate how well kept New Hope City is. Thank you. Moved to  New Hope Oct. 15, 1964. You have provided the best services for 57 years.     We just moved to New Hope in May ‐ not a lot of time to know the answers to these questions.  We like what weʹve seen so far!   Lived in New Hope since Nov. 1976 and have been satisfied with every aspect. Only have been  trying to have a sound wall on hwy 169 with no success! We will be leaving New Hope to live in  a senior citizen apartment in Eden Prairie in July 2021. Sorry to leave our home but age has its  toll.    I love living in New Hope. I have been here for almost 60 years. New Hope takes wonderful care  of its parks and streets. There are some fallen trees in Northwood Park that should be hauled out,  but otherwise the park is beautiful.    #18 financial asst. would be helpful! I am a single mom and I donʹt get much help and itʹs too  expensive for me to find someone!   Weʹve been happy in New hope the last 20 years.   Moving as soon as my wife retires. But she wonʹt! #5 I do love freedom! #6 I have my CC and  own a few guns and rifles. #10 Wonderful! ʺCold Front Andreʺ always plows me out early! #11  Never. Waste of tax dollars! #13 Overpriced! I sue a filter. They canʹt get the estrogen from birth  control pills out of the Mississippi! I donʹt want to grow man boobs! #15 If I want I can tie a beer  4 keg to myself and go ice skating and nobody cares. What a city! Cloth masks donʹt work. When I  fart it goes through my cloth pants. Go to YouTube ʺTrump Loses 20000 Votes CNNʺ Mike  Lindell has the smoking gun! Frank Speech 9‐0 ‐ Watch this! If antifa and BLM start burning the  stores shoot to kill! These are communist organizations. Itʹs called ʺTough Loveʺ! 1932 veterans  bonus riot (white house lawn) to shot and killed it was over! 1934 teamsters riot Minneapolis ‐ 5  shot and killed and it was over! Kent State 1968 4 killed and it was over! I voted for your  democrat mayor because of how she handled the situation in may/June .    Good job City of New Hope, Police and Fire! Keep up the good work.    Keep up the good work! We built in 1962 and are the oldest ʺoriginalsʺ yet living here in our  house. We love the city, but regrettably must think of moving, both 92 years, to a lesser  maintenance facility.    The city spends ta money in insignificant ways. Many things are OVERDONE. Every time I have  been in City Hall I only see a few employees in a HUGE bldg. Our taxes are higher than most and  I think you can see that reflected in how many homes are suddenly up for sale. I will be moving  myself to get more house for my money and my taxes. Years ago you took out the bus parking  lane out of 47th and now traffic crosses the lane lines. Put it back and plant some trees there. Put  the drop off box that we can drive up to.    Very satisfied with New Hope. We have lived here since 1984. We feel safe and the city is well  maintained.    Would like to have city pick one trash company for the whole city and would like organic  composting pick up as well   ʺThe weather siren (next to my house, 5431 Yukon Ave.N. ) It needs to be on top of The North  education center. It will have better coverage also. It is dangerous to your hearing at my house..(  130+ db). I measured it.    We donʹt feel itʹs our obligation to monitor neighbors for ordinances. The look of our  neighborhoods suffer due to your inaction. Itʹs an old problem. Please address. Each newsletter  should include ordinance infractions.    Help bring in better quality retail and be more fiscally responsible (spend less). Real estate taxes  are highest among other cities, even with consideration of special assessments or lack thereof for  street maintenance.   #16: Booklets were sent from Brooklyn Park and Robbinsdale, but only a newsletter for New  Hope.   Great City   Provide some sort of help to the offices and malls that have been hurt by COVID that pay taxes to  the city of New Hope.   My neutral responses are due to not being used by me or my not knowing because I havenʹt been  to the park, etc.    I am most concerned about the likelihood of federal and state officials taking away your powers.   So happy I moved to New Hope 19 years ago. Clean, quiet, safe, friendly, great selection of  shopping available. Police response time ‐ FAST! Neighbors worth their weight in gold,  appreciate the free fire inspection. In other words, I really appreciate New Hope and ALL itʹs  staff.    1. My beef for 30 years ‐ Need 1 garbage service. 2. Snow plowed into my corner driveway ‐ takes  lots of snow as he/she rounds corner into my driveway.  3. Boone and 42nd light ‐No arrow.   Stop raising taxes!  5  Does the City of New Hope have a electronic email like Plymouth? GovDelivery  Communications Cloud. I signed up for electronic publications for New Hope. Just wondering...  Plymouth sends a weekly update, sometimes a daily update. Thank you!   Been in New Hope 45 years. Happy here and a good community for us and family.   I have lived in New Hope over 60 years. I have missed the peace and quiet of the community  where everyone knew your name, farm land that lived behind our small house, where we  respected neighbors and friends! Here today new apartments close us in, our freedom is gone!!   I am concerned that city leaders are spending too many $s on city pools‐ city buildings ‐ parks  and park equipment. I am a senior citizen and unhappy with the tax increases to pay for the  expenditures. None of these costs benefit seniors.    Try lowering our taxes, it seems the only thing you know how to do is spend more money and  raise taxes; freeze taxes for those over 70 years of age. Theyʹre usually on set incomes and would  like to be left alone.    Also rely on the city website. Snow removal is excellent! Well Done! Thank you. All city  employees Iʹve had contact with do a very good job.    My experience since moving from Brooklyn Park with my family in 2000 has been very positive  on a city level. Only concerns over time have been more neighbor based rather than  administrative (we moved into an area where many have been here since the 60s‐80s). Keep up  the good work!   Overall, New Hope is a great place to live! (48 years here!)   I would like to see yearly collection of yard debris, such as wood and brush!   COVID‐19: Overreacted. The pool should have opened last year! There is too frequent plowing.  The streets do not need to be plowed to the pavement with every little snowfall. Do not allow 5G  to be installed! The medical consequences is too great to risk the health of your residents.    My neutrality on some questions just means I’ve never thought about it comprehensively enough  to provide a valid answer.   I am concerned about the relationship between the New Hope police department and residents.  In follow‐up to the murder of George Floyd, I encourage the City Council to view this as an  opportunity to direct the police department to train/re‐train officers; reach out and renew  relationships with residents; and recognize and emphasize the need for officers to better  understand how they contribute to the pain that is there in the community. Any tiny step toward  rebuilding mutual respect and trust will have exponential benefits down the road.   I moved to New Hope in 1997 and have been a home owner here since 2004. I have said it is the  best kept secret in the Twin Cities. Great schools, great police (hard to find in the Twin Cities)  and great community. Do not plan to move if I donʹt have to.   The City needs to find area to save money on expenses. Too high of taxes and increases!!   I like New Hope and I appreciate all the things youʹve done to make it a safe and nice place to  live. I appreciate that you have taken houses in distress and rehabbed them to keep property  values high. Thank you. I get concerned about crime encroaching from neighboring cities, which  makes me concerned about how my property value will do over time, which is why I donʹt know  how long I will want to live here. As long as my property values stay up and crime stays down. I  feel very safe walking in my neighborhood (Hopewood Hills area). if that changes, I will want to  leave. I do wish there was a ʺʺdowntownʺʺ like Robbinsdale has with some restaurants like they  have. A small bakery. Independent coffee shops. Not chain restaurants and Caribou. Post office.  small library. I donʹt even know where the New Hope library is or if there is one. I think itʹs prob.  6 the one in Crystal on 42. that one looks like a jail, I donʹt even want to go in it. I like New Hope  but the lack of these things doesnʹt make it feel like a community. It lacks an identity. Some  breweries or cute little restaurants bars like Miltonʹs or the ones in Robbinsdale. I think the pool is  prob. nice for families but the open park part of that area got taken away and itʹs mostly parking  lot. Anyway, overall, thank you, I know you work hard to make things good in New Hope!   Sound wall on 169 looks like a disgrace. Why canʹt NH get it refreshed? It is a direct reflection on  the Cityʹs management. Crime rate and overall safety is a major concern. Is City ready to  reallocate or allocate funds to support MPD with rising crime we are seeing in NH?ʺ   Have options for condo owners for once a year pickup or drop‐off location nearby for oversized  items.   Our taxes are too high and the city seems to spend too money endlessly. More commerce and  fewer apartment buildings would be nice.   I follow Brooklyn Park city government and receive their emails. Brooklyn Park communications  blow New Hope out of the water. Activities, promotions, announcements.   Would strongly encourage having bids for garbage hauling and pick the best 2‐3 choices to avoid  the millions of extra dollars spent to repair the roads over time, noise starting at 6:45 am each  week, and having many carriers with probably more cost to residents than doing collective  bargaining. Thank you for the fine public servants including the police, first responders and the  help at the desk at the city office especially during the election season!ʺ   The staff functions as a team. Everyone seems to want to help get to the right department and  answers to my questions. Thanks, New Hope   Covid response overreaction   Thank you so much for having such a community oriented public safety department. Both the  police department and the fire department are phenomenal in their approachability, friendliness  and community involvement which fosters a happier, safer city. Thank you also for the yard  waste dump membership in Maple Grove. It is such a great resource and helps keep our yard  cleaner, and uses it for good.   I would like someone to come out to Ensign Avenue and assess the need for our mid street stop  sign with no intersecting roads. It was added several years ago in order to slow down road  construction crews for our water main and road repair. How many other streets had this added?  Gettysburg and Flag are the same distance and have no stop signs and Gettysburg actually has  two intersecting roads. Just because one neighbor enjoys having his children and dogs playing in  the street does not mean we all need to suffer. How about we try a YIELD sign and see if that  works ok...   Please do something with the crappy strip mall and good will on winnetka. It’s run down and  ugly. You can do better‐ look at how awesome the pool came out.   I am concerned about crime in Brooklyn park and other sketchy areas coming into our area that’s  the only reason I’ve thought of moving recently otherwise I’d stay a long time. I really hope those  other areas can get their crime under control. I appreciate that we are supporting our police  officers unlike some other city’s have been recently. I really think it’s important to support them  in order to keep crime from running rampant. I will say I think our officers do an amazing job I  really feel safe in our city.   New Hope need to contract one garbage service. I find the current arrangement wasteful. I live in  a cul‐de‐sac and on garbage day there’s a parade of garbage trucks only picking up a few cans  each in our neighborhood. The excess traffic tears up our streets and it’s not efficient.  7  The city did fine managing things.   There are major disparities in the beautification of our city which is why I answered that question  as neutral. The area of New Hope down by Medicine Lake Rd needs love and attention. There  has been so much great work that has been done in other parts of the City and I donʹt want to  take away from that but the South Side of New Hope needs help. It does not look like it is cared  for like other parts of the City.   Thanks for all you do!   I have lived in the city for 43 years and until the beginning of COVID, I find out about some  neighbor who are very unfriendly and they have been living in the area for 14 years and I didn’t  know they were there and when I wanted to watch the kids play basketball they were very rude.    Being on the outer boundary of New Hope, we donʹt see much police presence as routine  coverage (or nat night out). The current tax base seems to exceed neighboring cities.      Community Development     I would like to the area around Unique thrift store and the dollar store to improve. That is a dirty  area.   ʺEnforce the rules you have established as a city. Home owners need to know the current  qualification to living in New Hope. With services provided, following the rules is necessary. We  need to know what the current rules and regulations of living in New Hope . Complaints to city  need to be answered with follow through by department. The over‐all appearance of the city is  very important. The value of my property is based on what I do to maintain it.   I pay taxes to the city for services to be provided.ʺ   Trash containers being visible from the street is becoming an issue in this city. Also, cars being  parked in the street overnight are never ticketed. Other cities are proactive about notifying  residents of the ordinances and ticketing cars. I feel the city of New Hope isn’t doing this and our  neighborhoods are starting to look trashy. I would give my name if I felt it would be kept  anonymous but I feel that it won’t be.   I would love to see additional redevelopment of some of the strip malls, either attracting other  businesses that aren’t dollar stores, or completely revitalizing by tearing down and building new  businesses or homes that would allow people to continue to stay and grow in New Hope.   New Hope still needs more restaurants and things to do. Less housing would be good especially  way too many apartments. Also the train horn going through the night is very annoying  especially when the trains are supposed to be no horns in the city.   It surprises me to see vehicles or commercial vehicles sitting in the driveway or parked on the  side of a driveway with little known being said. But then I have seen the city car driving around  taking pictures of other situations that might be in violation and then they receiving letters  threatening a fine unless a vehicle is moved. I donʹt know if that is city wide or if they decide to  pick on certain parts of the city. It should be fair for all and not selective.   It seems the focus on homes is more about trash cans and vehicles that are an eyesore and little or  no concern about homes in general disrepair or yards are not maintained, especially back yards  that we have to look at and city response has not been good in the past. My only recourse is to  put up a privacy fence..  8  The number of group homes needs to be addressed. Too many disturbances and too much  constant street parking I know of at least four in the north wood east area   Regarding ʺʺdo you think the city is too tough.....re trash, etc.ʺʺ. I have looked at my neighbors  garbage & recycling cans for 20 years ‐ yet my other neighbor puts her trash cans out 4 hours  early and gets a letter. And Iʹll mention again what Iʹve said before, take a look at the overall  condition of the home that has been reported or been spotted. My neighbors keep their yard  immaculate, tidy, etc. So they go out of town and put their cans out a little early ‐ SO WHAT! Yet  the guy on Boone has a golf cart on a trailer in his driveway, maybe on the lawn, plus a list of  other items, and nothing happens.    And letʹs be diligent on group homes, if you are getting calls regarding noise, do something  about it proactively i.e. when 9‐1‐1 is called do something about it. I support group homes, but  not when they are a nuisance ‐ maybe the county needs to be notified and the owners  background and history or any other homes looked at.   The city needs to be more strict on places about driveway conditions, garbage overflowing and  the way properties look.   City needs big improvement on residents to clean up behind garages and houses. Branches, junk,  etc. and more junk.    I have a problem with how people take care of their homes. I would like to see more done with  that.    GROUP HOMES! How many do we have in New Hope? We know of several in our area along.  What is this doing to our home values? We keep our home and yard beautiful shape and the  group home next door looks like it belongs in North Minneapolis. We will be leaving the city  because of this!   Check offend the back yard to see if up to code clean and neat.   A lot of trash on sidewalks. Main streets (residential lots) need better maintenance to give the city  a better appearance and desirable place to live.    Overall I feel like a subject rather than a taxpaying resident. My interaction with staff have been  pleasant enough but I see code enforcement as inconsistent and uneven. I do not need a call back  but canʹt send this back unsigned.    Please continue with visual surveys of vacant or unoccupied homes, the home behind has been  vacant or unoccupied for about 2 years (located at 6032 Yukon Ave N). The yard is neglected and  for sale!   The city has to be stricter on code enforcement. Lawns look terrible, junk cars. House that are  junk houses. It hurts property values of people keeping up their homes.    City has done a good job in street conditions and appearance since I moved in. Seem like quicker  on nuisance property. Overall ‐ satisfied. Just do something on the property down on Winnetka  (east side) slightly north of thrift store. Garbage behind garage visible from Winnetka.    Attracting more business to area.    We feel the city is lax concerning inspections. Appreciate the rehab program to improve the dead  beat homes.    Quit wasting time on garbage cans and do the harder work of requiring home maintenance.  Xylon and Yukon 2 story white house. Yard maintenance is terrible.   I have neighbors who’s cars are parked on the grass. Trees are WAY overgrown in the back yard,  corner lot 50th & Wisconsin and no one cares. Yes, I’ve called.    Garbage cans up and down 50th Ave. in front of garages.   9  The city is starting to look dumpy.   We donʹt feel itʹs our obligation to monitor neighbors for ordinances. The look of our  neighborhoods suffer due to your inaction. Itʹs an old problem. Please address. Each newsletter  should include ordinance infractions.    When we bought our duplex city ordinance required they be owner occupied. You can definitely  tell now which duplexes are NOT owner occupied! Do renters get to read city publications?   When we moved to New Hope, people commented to us, ʺYou know they have strict rules so the  city looks attractiveʺ NOW‐‐ we are ASHAMED to tell people our address. Weedy lawns/junk in  yards/TERRIBLE   Enforce businesses to clean up their parking lots better. Unique Thrift Store is a nasty disaster.    More aggressive on city code enforcement. Our neighbors have been burning brush and limbs  since last Wednesday July 8. I called W. Metro Fire that day. It does not appear our neighbors  have been contacted. This issue has occurred numerous other times! Thanks!   1. House on corner of 36th and 34th (SE Corner) what a mess/needs citations! 2. Streets need  attention constantly. 3. Trees getting too large ‐ need trimming (2 and 3 should be worked on all  summer!) 4. Homeowners ‐ have too much junks ‐ boats, etc. visible from street. City needs to go  door to door where needed.    Nurind (ex care) homes should be STATE licensed (just because they are church owned doesnʹt  mean the overall care is good) We should not have dandelions everywhere. Something needs to  be done about those RAT looking squirrels.    Would like to have property lines defined.. Have a neighbor that is giving me problems.    I feel more should be done to ensure businesses are following city code (screening dumpsters,  upkeep of property, etc.). When a permit or application is submitted the city reviews the property  but doesnʹt appear they are proactively doing so.   More consistent enforcement of code around inoperable vehicles and junk littering people’s  property: We need to show people grace for specific circumstances for a time, but we also can’t  have people storing junk openly in their driveway for the long term.   Group homes: The situations on Boone and Wisconsin are unacceptable in any community. We  need some code around what constitutes a group home, how it’s licensed and how we enforce  that caretaking is following CMS regulations which is likely reimbursing the care provided by  these homes. Neighbors need viable legal recourse if they don’t feel safe in their own homes.   I continue to have an issue with the property next door to us: 7317 39 1/2 Ave N. The house is in  disrepair, the landscaping and lawn are overgrown and I am concerned about hoarding inside. I  would hate to have a fire at this house because it would end up damaging my house also!‐ I have  addressed my concerns with the city inspector and they believe they have done all they can do. I  just hope the resident ends up selling his home to someone who cares about the condition of the  house and the impact it has on the neighborhood. The current owner does not. It is very  frustrating to live next door to this house and to sit on my deck and look at the overgrown  landscaping and the dilapidated deck and house. It is also very embarrassing to entertain guests  on our deck. Believe me, they all comment on what a mess it is. Jeanne Super 7309 39 1/2 Ave N,  New Hope 763‐535‐6753   Do you think the city is too tough, about right or not tough enough in enforcing the City Code on  such nuisance issues as trash can screening, exterior storage and inoperable vehicles? * ‐ These  items are not all equal. For example, the trash can thing is ridiculous. Inoperable vehicles seem to  be somewhat ignored.  10  #5. There are some driveways, yards, trees not being up to a good standard.   I feel more should be done to ensure businesses are following city code (screening dumpsters,  upkeep of property, etc.). When a permit or application is submitted the city reviews the property  but doesnʹt appear they are proactively doing so.   I think the citizen leaders have done a good job with the city in the last year. There are a couple  areas worth discussing though, and I understand these are tough problems.   More consistent enforcement of code around inoperable vehicles and junk littering people’s  property: We need to show people grace for specific circumstances for a time, but we also can’t  have people storing junk openly in their driveway for the long term.   Group homes: The situations on Boone and Wisconsin are unacceptable in any community. We  need some code around what constitutes a group home, how it’s licensed and how we enforce  that caretaking is following CMS regulations which is likely reimbursing the care provided by  these homes. Neighbors need viable legal recourse if they don’t feel safe in their own homes.   I continue to have an issue with the property next door to us: 7317 39 1/2 Ave N. The house is in  disrepair, the landscaping and lawn are overgrown and I am concerned about hoarding inside. I  would hate to have a fire at this house because it would end up damaging my house also!‐ I have  addressed my concerns with the city inspector and they believe they have done all they can do. I  just hope the resident ends up selling his home to someone who cares about the condition of the  house and the impact it has on the neighborhood. The current owner does not. It is very  frustrating to live next door to this house and to sit on my deck and look at the overgrown  landscaping and the dilapidated deck and house. It is also very embarrassing to entertain guests  on our deck. Believe me, they all comment on what a mess it is. Jeanne Super 7309 39 1/2 Ave N,  New Hope 763‐535‐6753   Do you think the city is too tough, about right or not tough enough in enforcing the City Code on  such nuisance issues as trash can screening, exterior storage and inoperable vehicles? * ‐ These  items are not all equal. For example, the trash can thing is ridiculous. Inoperable vehicles seem to  be somewhat ignored.   There are some driveways, yards, trees not being up to a good standard.   We have been increasingly bothered by the number of residences that have multiple (often  inoperable) vehicles in their driveway, overgrown grass/bushes, extra driveways created on the  side of existing driveways, ʹstuffʹ left in yards. The corner of 42nd & Winnetka (by Walgreens) is  unkept ‐ lots of trash, messy landscaping. The Dollar Store & Unique Thrift do NOT attract great  clientele and that whole parking lot is a mess. Unfortunately, weʹre becoming less and less proud  to live in this city and it feels less safe than the years I spent growing up here.   I wish the city would crack down on homes (stuff all over the front/garage doors left open  exposed with items full to the brim) Our city is starting to look terrible in some areas near me.  The taxes are too high to turn our city into garbage looking homes. I am certain a number of these  are rental units..   The care & appearance of rental properties need to be addressed more, the properties on our  block are terrible they mow when lawn is a foot high than leave the grass lay in clumps, this  should not be allowed.   As the city seems to be adding new ordinances/codes, it seems to me they need to work on the  current ones they have. We still have many people leave garbage carts in the street (every week);  as a neighbor, I donʹt hardly see anyone anymore. The pandemic I think has put many people in  hiding. And then the summer hasnʹt helped. But now weʹre adding more things, and it just seems  11 to me that most people are just going to do what they feel like doing, and they seem to never get  kept in check. People parking on streets overnight is also an issue. The fireworks this summer  was worse than it ever has been; and people doing this in full force in the midst of a drought.  And with the many trees and dry lawns around, that to me is just extreme carelessness! NO  wonder...the ones I saw doing this lived in nearby apartments, so they donʹt know, and donʹt  care. How nice.    City needs to have a better way of watching out for cars etc that are unlicensed and not able to  run parked on house lots   The look of our city and neighborhoods. Residential areas are very poor looking with many code  violations that nothing is done about. The city gets shabbier looking each year. A shabby looking  city invites crime and criminals. Says ʺʺyou can get away with thing here. Relationship with City  Staff and City Council including City Planning Commission ‐ no trust there! We need change!  Beautify Winnetka Avenue! The boulevards look horrible, especially after driving through  Golden Valley. Replace all the weeds with daylilies or something. Weʹve spent the 41% taxable  property market value on new city buildings ‐ ‐ great. But now itʹs time to focus on the look of  residential. Simple drive by code enforcement of what can be seen by the street would be a huge  first step. Donʹt think that is too much to ask for. Planning Commission ‐ how is it acceptable that  a full room of citizens are against something and then the Commission immediately votes for it??  The meeting minutes online did not accurately represent what each citizenʹs made talking point  was. If city council is relying on those minutes, that is a big problem.   Noise, trash can, and yard upkeep ordinances need to be enforced much more!   In regards to enforcing city ordinances, I see a number of houses on major roads like Boone that  always have piles of junk in front of their houses with little change. Yet when the sticks in our log  pile on the side of our house are a bit messy, we get a notice from the city. Seems too tough on  generally orderly people, and not tough enough on disorderly people. I would prefer too tough  to not tough enough, though. Please follow up with the home on the 3900 block of Boone Avenue  that always has junk in their yard.    Ordinance enforcement needs to improve.   Garbage containers sitting outside and not shielded is a blight on the appearance of our  neighborhood   Overall, I am happy to live in the city. I feel like we all could do a better job keeping the houses,  yards, and debris outside better maintained and picked up. Seems as though we have more and  more run down home, weeds, and stuff being stored outside.   Enforce garbage cans to be out of sight. 60th and Quebec area. When removing boulevard trees‐  the stumps should be removed.   Who enforces city ordinances? Is it up to the homeowners to keep tabs on their neighbors  regarding noisy dogs, loud music, unkempt yards? The 42nd to 46th Aquila/Boone block has  some issues. Just Walk around it. It is .7 miles.    Police     Concerned about crime rate. Theft and vandalism seems to be on the rise. If true, I’d rather pay  more in taxes to combat the issue than let our city become a lower tier city.   Safety is becoming an issue. Vandalism to cars. whatʹs up with that?  12  I am disappointed that with the completion of resurfacing Winnetka Ave to 42nd Ave. was  maintained as a 4‐lane vs single through lanes with a continuous center turn lane, the same as  installed on Winnetka in Golden Valley. Since the road work was completed in New Hope, I have  observed an increase in vehicle speeds in far in excess of the posted limit. It is not unusual to see  some drivers traveling at 45, 50mph or more between 36th Ave. and 42nd Ave. at all hours of the  day or night. Other than emergency runs, I havenʹt observed any police cars actively patrolling  the Ave. for speeders. With the absence of a center turn lane and active patrols, I fear there will be  some serious accidents in the future.   Also, cars being parked in the street overnight are never ticketed. Other cities are proactive about  notifying residents of the ordinances and ticketing cars. I feel the city of New Hope isn’t doing  this and our neighborhoods are starting to look trashy. I would give my name if I felt it would be  kept anonymous but I feel that it won’t be.     I hope that New Hope continues to be a safe place for our neighbors of color. I have heard reports  that some people have had bad interactions with neighbors and/or police ‐ we need to ensure that  all members of our communities feel safe ‐ and I hope that this is a standard we are upholding  with our public servants also.ʺ   Speeders on Boone , 36th and residential streets   More patrols around Civic Center Park and skate park   We often have cars parked in front of our home or across the street from us on weekends, these  cars are from people parting across the street at the apartment they are there all night and seldom  get tickets. We live across for bass lake animal hospital. They have had the same cars try to park  in their lot over night. Our neighbors have asked us if they are from us, because they are not  theirs. I wish they would come through more often and ticket these kids so they donʹt continue to  park there. Occasionally they do it during the weekdays also. And have prevented our garbage  from being collected. Some do leave by 2 am, some donʹt.   Eliminate through traffic on 46th Ave N between Boone and Winnetka. People going to Hy‐Vee  or the civic center park cut through there and blow through stop signs and exceed the speed  limits. Often very bad during 4p‐7p hours   We need police reform similar to that of Brooklyn Center.   The city needs to be tougher on properties not mowing their lawn. especially rental properties.  and cars parking on streets over night and in front of mail boxes.   The number of group homes needs to be addressed. Too many disturbances and too much  constant street parking I know of at least four in the north wood east area   Traffic ‐ People speeding, excessively, running red lights and stop signs. I have been passed on  the right, tailgated, and nearly hit by drivers running red lights. Would like to see better traffic  enforcement in our city.    Next to 8431 Bass Lake Road is a parking lot for Garden and Village Aparts. Every night I hear  fighting, I see drug users, homeless, car break‐ins, loud music, sex and it is not properly lighted. .  So many drug deals and crime happens. Owners/mgmt. do not care. I have called, left voicemails  and wrote letter with no response! Police respond but go to different lots   Why no survey about police actions or LACK OF.    On survey question #6 I have refrained from judgement because the city has not been very clear  on their ideas about public safety (police). Any movement to reorg or defund law enforcement  will have a negative response.  13  Hire more police ‐ keep us safe!   I live on 40th Oregon. People buzz right through the newer stop sign. Would be nice for some  police presence to make some stops, educate and ticket offenders. Lots of kids in the  neighborhood.    Excellent police response.   Quality of life in New Hope is going down SO fast. It is sad. Noise is getting out of control day  and night. Traffic is out of control ‐ speeding and not stopping for stop signs or red lights.   I donʹt like people on Vikings Liquor start drinking outside of liquor. It is not safe and smell a lot  of weed (that donʹt look nice on city of New Hope)   On March 12, a tenant of Compass Pointe Apts smashed through their fence and hit my house. I  couldnʹt get information from police, I havenʹt been able to get the Apartment to fix the fence and  have had too get as much of my damaged electrical and siding fixed as my insurance would  cover. Itʹs been 4 months and still no fence.    I remain concerned about excessive speeding on Gettysburg Ave N (just south of Rockford  Road). Please consider a stop sign, midway uphill. Thanks ! (more and more young KIDS in the  area!)   More aggressive on city code enforcement. Our neighbors have been burning brush and limbs  since last Wednesday July 8. I called W. Metro Fire that day. It does not appear our neighbors  have been contacted. This issue has occurred numerous other times! Thanks!   We need a ʺnoise ordinance enforcesʺ sign on 60th and Louisiana. Every single night cars drive  by with bass so loud it vibrates our front window. This has been happening for over 15 years.  Reason to move.    I would like to do something about people not stopping for stop signs on 39th Ave North,  Louisiana Ave and Maryland Ave   The excessive fireworks this year was upsetting to pets and small children and elderly ‐ over the  top and surprising ‐ have considered moving! We have lived here for 42 years!! WORSE EVER.   Something needs to be done about those RAT looking squirrels. (FYI – they mean Opossums)   New Hope has the very best of police officers   Police need to address increase in speeding and reckless driving.    ʺPlease continue increased enforcement of speeds on Bass Lake Rd between 169 and Gettysburg,  Boone, etc. Drivers are going way too fast and not obeying the posted 35.   Please eliminate on street parking at 81 and Bass Lake Rd. There are parking lots for those  businesses and Bass Lake Rd carries too much traffic for on‐street parking.ʺ   I am concerned about the relationship between the New Hope police department and residents.  In follow‐up to the murder of George Floyd, I encourage the City Council to view this as an  opportunity to direct the police department to train/re‐train officers; reach out and renew  relationships with residents; and recognize and emphasize the need for officers to better  understand how they contribute to the pain that is there in the community. Any tiny step toward  rebuilding mutual respect and trust will have exponential benefits down the road.   Vehicles with boat trailers parked all the time 24/7 by Yunkers Park   Need to patrol streets with cars on them after 2:00 am. I have called many times but get tired of  always calling.ʺ   Police do not always respond when called. Have refused to enforce code. Not sure they will show  up if called. Hoping new Chief changes all this. Have literally been told by a woman police  14 officer that they will not enforce code upon a business. Wow, who in city hall or city council is  telling the police to ignore some calls?    In 2021, have had some positive interactions with police officers. Am thankful for that.   When renting out park pavilions, police should make a drive by (or city code staff) to see if  violations are occurring. We have been to the Northwood Park and have had loud music (via  speakers ‐ not allowed) and loud people (via mics ‐ not allowed). Annoying but also sets the  stage to invite more of such behavior and invite more people that donʹt care about the rules.   ʺIncreased crime in past few months (car thefts, home burglary, catalytic convertor cut off, RV  burglary) within 1 block for first time in living here over 20 yrs. Donʹt feel safe!    Noise, trash can, and yard upkeep ordinances need to be enforced much more!   Safety is going down as crime is increasing. Covid response overreation   Thank you so much for having such a community oriented public safety department. Both the  police department and the fire department are phenomenal in their approachability, friendliness  and community involvement which fosters a happier, safer city. Thank you also for the yard  waste dump membership in Maple Grove. It is such a great resource and helps keep our yard  cleaner, and uses it for good.   I feel safe in the little pocket of New Hope around Northwood Park, and this is the most well‐ maintained area of the city, in my opinion. Other areas around Winnetka, East of Winnetka, and  north of 42nd Ave, could use some investment to make look nicer and to make safer.    Being on the outer boundary of New Hope, we donʹt see much police presence as routine  coverage (or nat night out).   Speeding on Boone north of Bass Lake Road is DANGEROUS. Weʹve been passed on right when  signaling and turning right into our driveway. Weʹve been passed on left when signaling and  turning left into driveway. Weʹve almost been hit head on by cars passing into oncoming lane. No  one goes 30 mph‐ it is more like 40‐60 mph!    Public Works    If the train crossings were updated so that the trains wonʹt honk why are they still honking? Are  there signs along the tracks that they donʹt see??   Between 4741 and 4749 Winnetka, there is a ~1 foot rusty ʺVʺ shape piece of metal sticking out of  the ground at a 45 degree angle. It is located between the sidewalk and the curb. This should be  removed, it is very dangerous, someone could get hurt.   I am disappointed that with the completion of resurfacing Winnetka Ave to 42nd Ave. was  maintained as a 4‐lane vs single through lanes with a continuous center turn lane, the same as  installed on Winnetka in Golden Valley. Since the road work was completed in New Hope, I have  observed an increase in vehicle speeds in far in excess of the posted limit. It is not unusual to see  some drivers traveling at 45, 50mph or more between 36th Ave. and 42nd Ave. at all hours of the  day or night. Other than emergency runs, I havenʹt observed any police cars actively patrolling  the Ave. for speeders. With the absence of a center turn lane and active patrols, I fear there will be  some serious accidents in the future.   Weeds over a foot tall in yards is an eye sore.    ʺOld stop sign pole at Liberty Park at corner of 60th and Gettysburg sticks out above grass;  should be trimmed and filled in.  15  Also, one of the benches at Liberty Park is rotted around the screws and boards actually lift up  off the bench; please replace.ʺ   My only comment is snowplowing. I live on the end of a cul‐de‐sac and I get the majority of the  snow piled in my driveway. I would like my neighbors to have this opportunity now. I always  have feet of snow compared to their little inches. I appreciate the cities response and timeliness  when it comes to plowing, I just would like to see less of it on my property. Thanks!   ʺMore single family homes are turning from owner‐occupied into rental housing. Two directly  across the street from me have had poor oversight as far as basic lawn maintenance. It is the start  of neighborhood blight. Perfection isnʹt expected, but itʹs not too much to ask for a decent  appearance. I have been a resident for 41 years and have seen the decline in neighboring (similar‐ type) first‐ring suburbs.   City water is very hard, but I don’t know what can be done about that. Snow plows leave big  mounds at the end of every driveway, but I don’t know if that can be avoided either   ʺConsider making the roads and pavement better. Improve bike trails and access to nearby trails.  Consider rubber based flooring for the playgrounds (as mulch is not safe around toddlers).   Good job on fixing the Winnetka train crossing !ʺ   You should have a choice between fair and poor. Fair means they are doing their job, there have  been times when snowplowing especially on the city side streets got put on the back burner. The  main through fares were plowed 2 or 3 times and the side streets maybe got plowed once. We  live on a side street and the main through fare 1 block over was clean to the curb and we put up  with ice pot holes most of the winter.    The city needs to be tougher on properties not mowing their lawn. especially rental properties.  and cars parking on streets over night and in front of mail boxes.   Not sure why we pay for a city forester. Never calls back also complained to his boss ‐ nothing.    In the last Pipeline, you have a small paragraph about yard and weeds. On Ensign Ave South of  42nd Avenue are several homes that ignore mowing and yard upkeep. Have the forester look at  them.    The water bill is still a big concern in the city and the way the city handles or manages people  with water bill concerns. I rent and donʹt think I need to provide any information at this time.    Unhappy that the city took a healthy tree out of my front yard. I now only have 1 shade tree in  my yard.    I really want to commend the public works department for the street sweeping efforts here in the  Meadow Lake area. Thank you.   Shawn Markham is wonderful and a good communicator/honest/informative.   A lot of trash on sidewalks. Main streets (residential lots) need better maintenance to give the city  a better appearance and desirable place to live.    First place Iʹve lived that hasnʹt had hard water ‐ please donʹt mess with the water!!   Hold street contractors accountable and get it done in a timely fashion. Being torn up all year is  not a proper way to handle it. Also handle yard replacement according to spec. Both were done  very poorly and now I have to replace it. THAT IS NOT GOOD.   There sure looks like enough property owners that violate the sump pump discharge of water  straight out to the curb to go into the storm water drain. Isnʹt sump pump water only supposed  to be discharged on their own property. I see enough of them SW part of the city.   A thank you. Last year I commented that weeds around the trees in Meadow Lake Park needed  trimming. Throughout the rest of the summer that grass was cut regularly. Much appreciated.   16  The city has to be stricter on code enforcement. Lawns look terrible, junk cars. House that are  junk houses. It hurts property values of people keeping up their homes.    Two trees were removed from our yard because of the emerald ash borer. We though this all was  handled very well from taking the trees down to planting the new ones. Thank you.    Snowplowing quality has deteriorated (not plowing streets curb to curb). Attracting more  business to area.    There have times when I seek answers to question i.e. road work when no one calls back!   Kudos to public works for their excellent snow removal this past winter!   My one concern are for the power lines that run through the backyards. Trees are getting old and  big. Originally there was an open area that ran behind the houses. New Hope never held frim  and people have attached the backyard fences together ‐ blocking the way for any maintenance.  That back area was supposed to be an easement.    I remain concerned about excessive speeding on Gettysburg Ave N (just south of Rockford  Road). Please consider a stop sign, midway uphill. Thanks ! (more and more young KIDS in the  area!)   When we moved to New Hope, people commented to us, ʺYou know they have strict rules so the  city looks attractiveʺ NOW‐‐ we are ASHAMED to tell people our address. Weedy lawns/junk in  yards/TERRIBLE   The whirley birds in spring and leaves in fall to be picked up more often so that they donʹt end  up in city storm sewer and a lot of the time ends up plugging a catch spaces. Sweep streets more  often in spring and fall.    Wish the city would do a better (quicker response) job cleaning city maintained sidewalks in  winter, especially those that are more difficult to use because of snow plow clearing roads that  move the snow to adjacent sidewalks.   There are fees on everything. Multiple fees on the water bill that seem a bit high, fees to do  simple things in your own yards. More notification when street sweepers are coming to clean the  streets. More trash cleanup on city streets and enforce businesses to clean up their parking lots  better. Unique Thrift Store is a nasty disaster.    1. My beef for 30 years ‐ Need 1 garbage service. 2. Snow plowed into my corner driveway ‐ takes  lots of snow as he/she rounds corner into my driveway.  3. Boone and 42nd light ‐No arrow.   1. House on corner of 36th and 34th (SE Corner) what a mess/needs citations! 2. Streets need  attention constantly. 3. Trees getting too large ‐ need trimming (2 and 3 should be worked on all  summer!) 4. Homeowners ‐ have too much junks ‐ boats, etc. visible from street. City needs to go  door to door where needed.    Need a traffic turn around for the intersection of Medicine Lake Road and Hillsboro. Turn arrow  at intersection going E on Medicine Lake Road to Hillsboro.    Miss having the drive up mailbox for dropping off things for city of New Hope. Please bring  back. Shouldnʹt have to mail something like this in. Appreciate having city streets cleaned but  may want to consider doing it after the 4th of July. They came by the week of 6/28 but then  fireworks by people left trash all over the streets the weekend of the 4th.    Responsive police department. Hard‐working mayor who is passionate about the city and visible.  Sometimes the Terra Linda Park sewage building smells badly. We don’t like the reduction of  lanes on Winnetka Ave, Medicine Lake Road. The center turn lane on Med. Lake Road near  Lamphere Dr is dangerous when drivers are attempting to turn in different directions at the same  time.   17  Low water pressure ‐ no improvement in last 40+ years   Also rely on the city website. Snow removal is excellent! Well Done! Thank you. All city  employees Iʹve had contact with do a very good job.    There should be a drive up drop box. Now multiple poeple have to get out of their car to drop  stuff off, instead of just one person going out to drop box, just once a day. Not fair to the elderly,  handicapped and people donʹt want to use stamps.    We should not have dandelions everywhere.    Iʹve lived in New Hope cul de sac for 47 years. The seasonal service for roads and care is  EXCELLENT for all 47 years. BEST for cul de sac snow plowing. Thanks so much.    COVID‐19: Overreacted. The pool should have opened last year! There is too frequent plowing.  The streets do not need to be plowed to the pavement with every little snowfall. Do not allow 5G  to be installed! The medical consequences is too great to risk the health of your residents.    I would like to see the biking and walking infrastructure that Plymouth has on Bass Lake Rd  continued across 169 east towards Crystal. Why should New Hope and Crystal residents have  less than quality facilities for biking and walking? The grade separated paths that are on the west  side of 169 should be extended East all the way to 81 where that new park was built.   Please eliminate on street parking at 81 and Bass Lake Rd. There are parking lots for those  businesses and Bass Lake Rd carries too much traffic for on‐street parking.ʺ   Regarding city water, the price is too high AND I canʹt believe itʹs really water SOFTENED by  either Mpls. or N.H. Toilets discolor faster than they used to & plumbing fittings fill with  lime/sediment faster than they used to. Does anyone check hardness on a regular basis?   ʺI think the citizen leaders have done a good job with the city in the last year. There are a couple  areas worth discussing though, and I understand these are tough problems.   Trees: we need people who have removed their boulevard trees, ash and otherwise, to replace  them. The tree coverage in our city is one of the primary drivers of property value. There’s a  direct correlation between tree coverage and property value.ʺ   I continue to have an issue with the property next door to us: 7317 39 1/2 Ave N. The house is in  disrepair, the landscaping and lawn are overgrown and I am concerned about hoarding inside. I  would hate to have a fire at this house because it would end up damaging my house also!‐ I have  addressed my concerns with the city inspector and they believe they have done all they can do. I  just hope the resident ends up selling his home to someone who cares about the condition of the  house and the impact it has on the neighborhood. The current owner does not. It is very  frustrating to live next door to this house and to sit on my deck and look at the overgrown  landscaping and the dilapidated deck and house. It is also very embarrassing to entertain guests  on our deck. Believe me, they all comment on what a mess it is. Jeanne Super 7309 39 1/2 Ave N,  New Hope 763‐535‐6753   Please stop snow plowing yards   There are some driveways, yards, trees not being up to a good standard.   The company that was hired by the city for sewer was not professional cause much anxiety gave  no notice to residents and didn’t care that their life was impacted   One of my biggest concerns remains with the winter snow plowing. There has to be a better way  to get the sidewalks taken care of. Sidewalks should hold priority over parks trails. For disabled  folks and folks that walk this is absolutely unacceptable and a very serious safety issue, especially  around schools and public transportation access areas. The businesses that are responsible for  these sidewalks are not getting it done so we need to figure something else out and staff  18 appropriately to ensure safe walkways. Plowing parks before walkways comes off as insensitive  and ignorant to the public. I know thatʹs not the spirit of how its handled but I think its important  that you know how the citizens view how plowing is being prioritized.    I would like to see more city areas and roadsides planted with native plants and prairies. This is  vital to our ecosystem. Non‐natives are expensive, require more water and chemicals and can  become invasive. I would like to see incentives for homes and businesses to plant native  landscapes, including fine fescue lawns which are drought tolerant.   Winter sidewalk clearing needs to be prioritized, especially at 42nd and Winnetka Aves. N. For  years I have seen statements from the city claiming that property owners are responsible for the  sidewalks and that the city has no budget. Well, please find budget or start enforcing that the  property owners actually take care of the sidewalks. Pass an update to the ordinance that has  some real consequences for businesses. The year‐after‐year neglect of the sidewalks is a serious  safety hazard at one of the busiest intersections in the city.   Why is it so difficult to pay utility bills at public works ? Door is locked? Have to wait. Cannot  pay cash and expect change. Cannot meet with the utility billing staff after 3. Public Works  should be more open like city hall or have payments accepted only at city hall.   The 42 nd Ave road needs complete overhaul done. The Ash treeʹs need to be removed, we have  one on our blvd with large holes in it and next door to us has one too. Our address is 8401 40th  Ave N. and that same Ash tree roots have busted‐up our sewer line. The Ash tree is a city Blvd  tree.   I would like to comment on the street/pavement project that was recently completed on  36 1/2 Circle N and Northwood Pkwy. Our house is on one of these streets and it was extremely  frustrating the length of time it took (over 2 years) for this project to be completed. Our front yard  had a very large area that was dug (which we understand was because of the water and gas  pipes) however the grass seed they placed over this yard area did not work correctly and  therefore our front yard (and our neighborsʹ yards) were full of weeds. I know they are  continuing to work on this but I think that more thorough planning with the contractors would  have improved the situation.   I also want to comment on some of the grass areas off of the sidewalks on the main streets in  New Hope, such as 36th Ave N that face the back of homeowners houses. There are some houses  that have areas that have grass that have not been mowed all summer and it looks terrible. Most  homeowners are aware that it is their responsibility to cut that area of grass but then there are  some who do not do it. I suggest that those people who are not cutting these areas of grass  should receive a notification from the City of New Hope alerting them that it is their  responsibility to cut it.   My complaint is that I have tried to share my concerns about the city forester past and present  (tree issue) and it seems like nothing is taken care of or followed up on. Shawn either does not  answer emails or calls and when approached lucky for me I caught him in person once he says he  is going to do something but does NOTHING. Not just once either. Did voice my concern to  others at the city however still does nothing. Is there no repercussion for ones actions anymore.  Donʹt really care how long you have been at the job, get out if you canʹt do it. citizens of new  hope pay wages.   Regarding city water, the price is too high AND I canʹt believe itʹs really water SOFTENED by  either Mpls. or N.H. Toilets discolor faster than they used to & plumbing fittings fill with  lime/sediment faster than they used to. Does anyone check hardness on a regular basis?  19  Trees: we need people who have removed their boulevard trees, ash and otherwise, to replace  them. The tree coverage in our city is one of the primary drivers of property value. There’s a  direct correlation between tree coverage and property value.   Overall, I am happy to live in the city. I feel like we all could do a better job keeping the houses,  yards, and debris outside better maintained and picked up. Seems as though we have more and  more run down home, weeds, and stuff being stored outside.   What happened to the EXCELLENT snow plowing Early AM before snow gets packed/ icy NOW  mid‐ late day MORE salt & icing ⅲⅳⅴⅵⅶⅷ   I continue to have an issue with the property next door to us: 7317 39 1/2 Ave N. The house is in  disrepair, the landscaping and lawn are overgrown and I am concerned about hoarding inside. I  would hate to have a fire at this house because it would end up damaging my house also!‐ I have  addressed my concerns with the city inspector and they believe they have done all they can do. I  just hope the resident ends up selling his home to someone who cares about the condition of the  house and the impact it has on the neighborhood. The current owner does not. It is very  frustrating to live next door to this house and to sit on my deck and look at the overgrown  landscaping and the dilapidated deck and house. It is also very embarrassing to entertain guests  on our deck. Believe me, they all comment on what a mess it is. Jeanne Super 7309 39 1/2 Ave N,  New Hope 763‐535‐6753   Please stop snow plowing yards   61st and Sumter and 60th Ave N. One stump has been there over three years!    Parks and Rec     Sunnyside Park: The disc golf course needs a facelift.... itʹs basically just baskets randomly placed  on open fields with no directions or guidance. There is a lot of potential.. suggestions: signs  (containing hole numbers, yardage markers, a basic map of the holes, and maybe even sponsors!),  trees lining the holes, wood chips and rocks lining paths between the holes and around the  baskets, new baskets, and nice benches. These basic upgrades would make the course so much  better! Iʹd love to help redesign the course if the city is interested in making these upgrades!   I am wondering about safety at the New Hope Aquatic Center because it sounded like the  summer got off to a rough start . . .   Removing the basketball hoops was unnecessary and ridiculous   Old stop sign pole at Liberty Park at corner of 60th and Gettysburg sticks out above grass; should  be trimmed and filled in.   Also, one of the benches at Liberty Park is rotted around the screws and boards actually lift up  off the bench; please replace.ʺ   I think the city should give a bigger discount to the aquatic park for residents. Our city tax dollars  paid for it. You also use to have a family rate, now it is per person. a family of 6 is over $400.00  for the year. $70.00 a person for a resident is steep, Valley fair is $78.00 for an unlimited gold pass  including waterpark, free parking etc. Donʹt price you residents out.   Need a bigger lap pool, I bought a season pass and can never get a lane to swim. There are way  too many inoperable vehicles parked around neighborhoods. Love our city in the winter, our  roads are always plowed first and better than surrounding cities.   Too much trash in parks. Same kids doing it every day. Need someone to talk to them  20  Improve bike trails and access to nearby trails. Consider rubber based flooring for the  playgrounds (as mulch is not safe around toddlers).    Re: recreational programs ‐ letʹs put some things together for our teenagers ‐ 13 and up. Letʹs find  some things for them to do to keep them occupied during at least part of the summer.   The pool needs someone who can order the snack and treats as they are always out.   More spots for younger kids to do things.   More swim lessons for the younger kids.   I love living in New Hope. I have been here for almost 60 years. New Hope takes wonderful care  of its parks and streets. There are some fallen trees in Northwood Park that should be hauled out,  but otherwise the park is beautiful.    The space at the Spanish Immersion School by the new parking lot in back and the ball field  seems to be an eye sore. It needs some trees or something. If the city could work with the district  to plant some trees to make it look a little more than a field with a bunch of weeds.    Please develop a dog park (off leash) that is not the area inside the boards of a hockey rink. Our  dogs deserve more.    A thank you. Last year I commented that weeds around the trees in Meadow Lake Park needed  trimming. Throughout the rest of the summer that grass was cut regularly. Much appreciated.    New Civic Center Park needs at least three more trash bins. 1 at each bench north of pool and one  by the skateboard area.   Please supply recycle bins at ALL city parks. Please clearly mark the bins as garbage/recycle.   Begin Park needs picnic tables.ʺ   ʺThe pool needs more shaded areas, especially by the kiddy part. Everyone rushes in to get the  shaded spots. Moms with babies area left in the sun. The snack line also needs to be shaded.    COVID‐19: Overreacted. The pool should have opened last year! There is too frequent plowing.  The streets do not need to be plowed to the pavement with every little snowfall. Do not allow 5G  to be installed! The medical consequences is too great to risk the health of your residents.   When renting out park pavilions, police should make a drive by (or city code staff) to see if  violations are occurring. We have been to the Northwood Park and have had loud music (via  speakers ‐ not allowed) and loud people (via mics ‐ not allowed). Annoying but also sets the  stage to invite more of such behavior and invite more people that donʹt care about the rules.   I wish the pool would stay open longer. At least through August.   More bike lanes please ‐ connect to Grand Round from French Park   Excellent job on the new City Center and Aquatic Center. Itʹs great. However, I would encourage  greater accountability for the management of the Aquatic Center. The teenage staff of the park  this summer were very unprofessional‐‐often eating and lounging at the reception area and in the  concessions area, often swearing at each other or goofing around. They seemed to have little  training or low standards, and no one keeping them accountable to professional behavior. I also  was hesitant to trust the lifeguards who did not seem to be paying attention as well as I would  have liked. I also observed swimming lessons one day while there, and the two teenaged teachers  were chatting and flirting instead of teaching the kids. I saw no instruction happening and the  kids were left to themselves. I hope next year, with more time for training and hiring, the aquatic  center management will hold staff to a higher standard of professionalism and effectiveness.   Can anything more be done to reduce the population of geese at Northwood Park, and to clean  up their droppings from the trails and playground? They leave their droppings even in the  21 sandbox where children play. Itʹs disgusting and sometimes frightening to walk through the park  in the spring and summer when the geese congregate.    Thank you for the Gaga court at NW Park‐‐itʹs been a blast!   I do wish there was more places to ride bikes like a paved trail in New Hope.    Keep the pool open later into the season   I love all the programming that has happened throughout the summer at Civic Park. You have  done a wonderful job bringing that space to life!         I:\RFA\PUBWORKS\2021\Work Session\11‐15 1039 Soils Storage Building\11.6 Q Discuss Soils Storage building    Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: Public Works  By: Bernie Weber, Public Works Director    Agenda Title  Discuss next steps related to the soils storage building at the Public Works Facility (Improvement Project No.  1039)    Requested Action  Staff is requesting that the Council receive an update on the soils storage building and the latest  recommendations. The city engineer, Dan Boyum, will be in attendance.    Policy/Past Practice  Past policy and practice have been to provide the Council with updates on projects and receive input and  feedback.     Background  The contractor excavated for the footings for the soil’s storage building.  During the excavation, poor soils were  encountered, and there are concerns on the soil stability. At its meeting of October 11, 2021, Council authorized  soliciting proposals from geotechnical firms to conduct three 50‐foot borings at the soil storage building location  to determine the extent of the poor soils.     After review of the geotechnical information, the first option proposed was to excavate to a depth of 5 feet below  the original footings, place sand and geogrid material, and construct an oversized slab footing.  This option  required little building design changes and could be done the fastest.  Pricing was requested from the general  contractor.  The estimated costs for this work came in at around $350,000 in addition to the original building  costs. This was much higher than anticipated when first discussing the option.  Helical anchors were discussed,  but due to the weight of the soil and the original masonry building, those costs were anticipated to be higher  than the slab footing option.    Based on those costs, staff revisited the type of building being proposed for the soils storage building.  Staff  discussed options with Community Development and the architect. A building with less weight and a floating  floor would be better suited for the poor soils in this area.  As a result, a wood‐framed soils storage building  versus a masonry block structure was proposed.  The structure would have an asphalt floor, similar to the salt  storage building.  Interior walls would be precast versus poured in place.  The outside of the building would  have engineered wood lap siding.  Construction on this type of building could proceed in the winter months.        Staff is getting pricing and a revised schedule from the contractor for construction of this type of building, and  staff will provide an update to Council.      Funding  At the June 24, 2021 Council Meeting a separate capital fund for the public works facility was established in  the amount of $2,550,000. The contract award was $2,316,000 and indirect costs are estimated at $192,280, for a     Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.6  total estimated project cost of $2,508,280 with a project contingency of $41,720. Two change orders have been  approved along with the geotechnical services, reducing the contingency to $11,645.59. At the November 8  Council Meeting a transfer was approved for $400,000 of unspent city hall bond proceeds to the public works  facilities fund, so the project now has a fund balance of $411,645.59, as outlined below:    Item Amount  Public Works facility capital fund $ 2,550,000.00   Minus estimated project costs $ 2,508,280.00  Project contingencies  $ 41,720.00   Minus change order no. 1 $15,635.68  Subtotal $26,084.32  Minus change order no. 2 $7,113.73  Subtotal $18,970.59  Minus ITT geotechnical services $7,325.00  Subtotal (as of 10/11/21) $11,645.59  Transfer of unspent city hall bond proceeds (11/8/21) $400,000.00  Remaining project contingencies $411,645.59    Attachments   Color renderings of the wood‐framed building.   Precast wall pictures  PREFINISHED METALFASCIA AND VENTEDSOFFIT PANELSENGINEERED WOODLAP SIDING WITH 6-7/8"EXPOSUREINSULATED ROLLINGSERVICE DOORSPIPE BOLLARDS PAINTEDSAFETY YELLOWGROUND-CONTACTTREATED WOOD SKIRTDATE PROJ. NO. Plot Date: 11/04/2021 - 3:42pm Drawing name: V:\1938\active\193804913\CAD\Dwg\193804913-AB201-Color.dwg Xrefs:, 193804913-XBENA 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.comSOILS STORAGE BUILDING WEST ELEVATIONCITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTAPUBLIC WORKS FACILITY PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS11/04/2021 193804913SHEET AB201 PREFINISHED METALFASCIA AND VENTEDSOFFIT PANELSENGINEERED WOODLAP SIDING WITH 6-7/8"EXPOSURETRANSULCENT WALLPANELS WITHALUMINUM FRAMESGROUND-CONTACTTREATED WOOD SKIRTPREFINISHED METALSTANDING SEAM ROOFPANELS WITH SNOWDETENTION SYSTEMDATE PROJ. NO. Plot Date: 11/04/2021 - 3:43pm Drawing name: V:\1938\active\193804913\CAD\Dwg\193804913-AB201-Color.dwg Xrefs:, 193804913-XBENA 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.comSOILS STORAGE BUILDING SOUTH ELEVATIONCITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTAPUBLIC WORKS FACILITY PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS11/04/2021 193804913SHEET AB202 PREFINISHED METALFASCIA AND VENTEDSOFFIT PANELSENGINEERED WOODLAP SIDING WITH 6-7/8"EXPOSUREGROUND-CONTACTTREATED WOOD SKIRTTRANSULCENT WALLPANELS WITHALUMINUM FRAMESDATE PROJ. NO. Plot Date: 11/04/2021 - 3:43pm Drawing name: V:\1938\active\193804913\CAD\Dwg\193804913-AB201-Color.dwg Xrefs:, 193804913-XBENA 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.comSOILS STORAGE BUILDING EAST ELEVATIONCITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTAPUBLIC WORKS FACILITY PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS11/04/2021 193804913SHEET AB203 PREFINISHED METALFASCIA AND VENTEDSOFFIT PANELSENGINEERED WOODLAP SIDING WITH 6-7/8"EXPOSURETRANSULCENT WALLPANELS WITHALUMINUM FRAMESGROUND-CONTACTTREATED WOOD SKIRTPREFINISHED METALSTANDING SEAM ROOFPANELS WITH SNOWDETENTION SYSTEMPIPE BOLLARDS PAINTEDSAFETY YELLOWHOLLOW METAL DOORAND FRAME-PAINTEDDATE PROJ. NO. Plot Date: 11/04/2021 - 3:43pm Drawing name: V:\1938\active\193804913\CAD\Dwg\193804913-AB201-Color.dwg Xrefs:, 193804913-XBENA 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.comSOILS STORAGE BUILDING NORTH ELEVATIONCITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTAPUBLIC WORKS FACILITY PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS11/04/2021 193804913SHEET AB204   I:\RFA\PUBWORKS\2021\Work Session\11.7 Q 2021 Pavement Management Plan   Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: Public Works  By: Bernie Weber, Director    Agenda Title  Update and Discussion regarding the 2022‐2031 Pavement Management Plan/Strategy  Requested Action  Staff would like to update Council on the progress of the pavement management strategy and the results of  scheduled and advanced infrastructure projects. Staff encourages comments, concerns and input from  Council.  Background  In 2014, the City Council and city manager requested that the director of public works and the city engineer  formulate a pavement management strategy to advance the pavement surface replacement program beyond  the system that was previously developed. A plan to increase the utility fund balances was also requested.    From 2003‐2014, pavement condition surveys were performed by a consultant on one‐third of the road  network each year. The results provided a pavement condition index (PCI) for each street block. After re‐ evaluating the system in 2014, this rating has been performed by city and engineering staff. This rating allows  data to be incorporated into annual budgets and project forecasting parameters to create a street  infrastructure management plan. City and engineering staff now review one‐half of the city’s streets each fall.  Focusing on both the short‐term and long‐term issues, the pavement management strategy identified and  prioritized street maintenance activities to maximize the return on each dollar invested. Depending on  roadway and underlying maintenance conditions, maintenance strategies are identified as edge mill and  overlay, full mill and overlay, or full reconstruction.    City staff and the city engineer have updated the 10‐year pavement management plan to forecast street  improvement projects through 2031. Major changes from last year include the addition of 2031 pavement and  infrastructure strategies to this plan. Additionally, an extended life span on seal coat and fog seal applied on  the fully reconstructed streets has been observed in the yearly inspection of city streets. Based on that  extended life, staff has included a proposed pavement management schedule in the attached Pavement  Management Plan.  The condition of the 2022 seal coat and fog seal streets will be evaluated in spring 2022.  If  the condition is similar to findings seen in 2020 and 2021, then staff will implement the proposed changes to  the pavement management schedule and reflect in the 2022 Pavement Management Plan update.     The city engineer will be presenting the progress of the pavement management plan including these  additions.    Attachments:   Engineer’s Memo   Pavement Management Plan  Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.7  Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000, Minneapolis MN 55402-2309 November 9, 2021 File: 193805235 Attention: Kirk McDonald City Manager City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Reference: New Hope Pavement Management Update 2021 Pavement Management Plan (10-Year: 2022-2031) Dear Kirk, As requested, we have updated New Hope’s Pavement Management Plan to include street infrastructure and maintenance improvements over the next ten years. Street ratings have been updated through the project improvements completed in 2021 (see attached 2020 and 2021 PRI maps). The pavement management plan maps have also been updated for 2022-2031 (see attached maps). The general progress update is within this letter, and additional information is attached including the maps and costs estimates which will be presented at the November 15th Council Work Session. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY PHILOSOPHY The overall goal of the pavement management strategy is to improve the driving surface of the streets. Full reconstruction will only be completed on streets with an extreme amount of water breaks and/or other sewer infrastructure issues. Interim overlays will be planned, and the amount of utility rehabilitation or replacement will be limited. This more aggressive approach to pavement management was agreed to by City Council in 2014, and will provide the following: ·Improve Quality of Life ·Increase Aesthetic Value o Increase in Home Value ·Increase Safety ·Build up Water and Utility Funds November 9, 2021 Mr. Kirk McDonald Page 2 of 7 Reference:New Hope Pavement Management Update PAVEMENT RATING UPDATE Prior to 2015, the ratings were previously completed by GoodPointe Technology using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI). As city staff now has the ability to rate streets using the city’s asset management program, Infraseek, a similar but simpler rating system is being utilized, Pavement Rating Index (PRI). The PRI scale and description is shown below: New Hope has taken a more aggressive approach to pavement management and the higher pavement ratings are a result of the improvements completed since 2013. The table below provides the recent past ratings and the updated ratings completed in 2021. This table was separated by local roads and municipal state aid (MSA) roads, as they can be funded by using local or MSA funds. City Streets 2013 Average PCI 2015 Avg PRI 2016 Avg PRI 2017 Avg PRI 2018 Avg PRI 2019 Avg PRI 2020 Avg PRI 2021 Average PRI Local Streets 65.97 73.37 74.1 75.93 74.48 75.91 80.06 81.43 MSA Streets 62.05 71.42 77.12 75.51 80.95 81.24 82.06 80.79 Generally, a good target for the average PRI should be in the 61-80 or “Good” pavement rating range. As time goes by, street conditions degrade, and pavement ratings decline. Following the Pavement Management Plan shown below provides as a guide to complete structural and maintenance improvements and will keep the streets in good and acceptable conditions. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (2022-2031) Attached are maps of the current proposed street improvement projects. Streets identified for improvements were selected from a variety of factors including the pavement conditions, past improvements, utility conditions (such as water main breaks, and failing utility pipes and structures). The streets identified were also selected to be improved within the current capital improvement plan (CIP) budget. The associated cost estimates for the type of improvement is attached. The estimated costs include total project costs, including 3% inflation each year. We are seeing signs of higher than 3% inflation, so adjustments may be made in future reports. Pavement Rating Rating Description 81-100 Excellent 61-80 Good 41-60 Poor 21-40 Very Poor 1-20 Failing November 9, 2021 Mr. Kirk McDonald Page 3 of 7 Reference:New Hope Pavement Management Update The pavement management plan is a continual fluid process as project costs will change, as well as the conditions of the pavement and utility infrastructure. The plan generally follows the schedule shown on the following page, although some streets may deviate and require interim overlays or seal coat/fog seal improvements to improve the pavement condition while building up utility and street funds to complete a more extensive improvement in the future. The improvements shown in color below are more significant structural improvements. The intermediate crack seal, seal coat, and fog seal are maintenance improvements. General Pavement Management Schedule (Current) Year Pavement Management Improvement 0 Full Reconstruction/New Street 3 Crack Seal 6 Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal 9 Crack Seal 12 Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal 18 Mill & Overlay 21 Crack Seal 24 Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal 27 Crack Seal 30 Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal 36 Reclaim/Full Pavement Removal 39 Crack Seal 42 Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal 45 Crack Seal 48 Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal 54 Mill & Overlay 57 Crack Seal 60 Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal 63 Crack Seal 66 Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal 72 Full Reconstruction/New Street Because the City is seeing a longer life with seal coats and fog seals, Public Works and Engineering Staff are evaluating an adjustment to the General Pavement Management Schedule as follows: November 9, 2021 Mr. Kirk McDonald Page 4 of 7 Reference:New Hope Pavement Management Update General Pavement Management Schedule (Proposed) for Local Streets and Lower Traffic MSA Streets Year Pavement Management Improvement 0 Full Reconstruction/New Street 3 Crack Fill 5 Seal Coat, Fog Seal 9 Crack Fill 12 Crack Fill 13 Seal Coat, Fog Seal 15 Crack Fill 20 Mill & Overlay 23 Crack Fill 25 Seal Coat, Fog Seal 29 Crack Fill 32 Crack Fill 33 Seal Coat, Fog Seal 35 Crack Fill 40 Reclaim/Full Pavement Removal 43 Crack Fill 45 Seal Coat, Fog Seal 49 Crack Fill 52 Crack Fill 53 Seal Coat, Fog Seal 55 Crack Fill 60 Mill & Overlay 63 Crack Fill 65 Seal Coat, Fog Seal 69 Crack Fill 72 Crack Fill 73 Seal Coat, Fog Seal 75 Crack Fill 80 Full Reconstruction/New Street November 9, 2021 Mr. Kirk McDonald Page 5 of 7 Reference:New Hope Pavement Management Update The proposed adjustment would put Local Streets and lower traffic Municipal State Aid (MSA) Streets on an 80-year versus 72-year cycle. Also, because the city has experienced some stripping of seal coats on higher traffic MSA Streets, Public Works and Engineering Staff are evaluating an adjustment to the General Pavement Management Schedule for those streets as follows: General Pavement Management Schedule (Proposed) for Higher Traffic MSA Streets Year Pavement Management Improvement 0 Full Reconstruction/New Street 3 Crack Fill 6 Crack Fill 9 Crack Fill 12 Crack Fill 18 Mill & Overlay 21 Crack Fill 24 Crack Fill 27 Crack Fill 30 Crack Fill 36 Reclaim/Full Pavement Removal 39 Crack Fill 42 Crack Fill 45 Crack Fill 48 Crack Fill 54 Mill & Overlay 57 Crack Fill 60 Crack Fill 63 Crack Fill 66 Crack Fill 72 Full Reconstruction/New Street Some adjustments were made in the 2020 and 2021 Crack Seal, Seal Coat, and Fog Seal Project as a result of this proposed schedule. Public Works and Engineering Staff will continue to evaluate seal coat and fog seal conditions in Spring 2022. If we see a continual improvement in life of the seal coats and fog seals, we propose to transition to the new schedules and update the pavement management program to these new schedules in Fall 2022. November 9, 2021 Mr. Kirk McDonald Page 6 of 7 Reference:New Hope Pavement Management Update WATER MAIN INFRASTRUCTURE DISCUSSION As discussed above, failing infrastructure is one of the primary factors when considering when and what type of street improvement is necessary. Approximately 74% of the city’s water main is cast iron pipe and is over 40 and 50 years old. Although the water main may be aged, this may not necessarily mean all the pipe is in poor condition. Replacing water main is expensive, and full reconstruction is typically limited by the amount of water funding available. One way of analyzing the condition is through the amount of water main breaks and where they occur (see attached Water Break map). Since 2000, New Hope has averaged approximately 29 water main breaks per year, which results in high repair costs. As shown in the water main break charts below, the trend is declining, which may be a result of the focus to reconstruct the streets and replace the water main in the areas with a more extreme amount of water breaks. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Water Main Breaks (2000-2021) Number of Water Main Breaks Linear Trend (Number of Water Main Breaks) *2021 WaterBreaks as of 09/02/2021 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Total Estimated Water Break Repair Cost (2000 - 2021) Total Estimated Repair Cost *2021 Water Breaks as of November 9, 2021 Mr. Kirk McDonald Page 7 of 7 Reference:New Hope Pavement Management Update CURRENT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRESS – “WHERE ARE WE AT?” Since 2013, approximately 34.77 miles of street have been improved of the entire City’s approximate 65 miles of local and MSA streets. One way of identifying the progress of the more aggressive pavement management program is reviewing the past and current ratings, and more specifically reviewing those streets with a rating in the “Poor Condition” rating (less than 60 PRI) or worse. Prior to 2013, 23.47 miles or 36% of the streets were rated in poor condition. Although a city’s pavement management is never complete or “done”, the city currently has 3.76 miles or 5.8% of the streets rated in poor condition or worse as shown in the table below. “Poor Condition” or Worse (less than 60 PRI) 2017 Streets 2018 Streets 2019 Streets 2020 Streets 2021 Streets Miles of Street 10.55 10.38 9.37 4.96 3.76 Percent of Total Streets 16%16%14.4%7.6%5.8% Street improvements, maintenance or structural (or both), are planned to be completed for all New Hope streets within the updated 10-Year Pavement Management Plan. If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (612) 712-2021. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Dan D. Boyum, P.E. Attachments: Maps: 2020 & 2021 PRI Ratings, 2022-2031 Street Infrastructure and Maintenance Projects, Watermain Breaks; PMP Cost Estimate Summary. Cc: Bernie Weber, Susan Rader, Dave Lemke, Shawn Markham, Andrew Kramer, Matt Rowedder, Ann Ackerson, Lucas Miller – Stantec. New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BAS S L A K E FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1/2 AVE N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34TH AVE N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NDUDLEY AVE N ANGE L I N A D R VIRGINIA AVE N59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 48TH AVE N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NWISCONSIN AVE N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 37TH AVE N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE P L N 26TH VA L L E V I S T A S T ELM GROVE CT 34TH PL N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N35 1/2 AVE N 32ND CIR NMEADOW L A K E P L TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N ALLEN CIR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKON CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N33RD PL N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N36TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N61ST AVE N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2020-11-10 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2020_Pavement_Maps\PRI_Ratings_2020_Map.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. New Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan 2020 Pavement Rating Index (PRI) * As of 11/10/2019 PRI 01 - 2021 - 4041 - 6061 - 8081 - 100 0.00 miles 0.00 miles 4.88 miles 19.98 miles 42.29 miles New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE NHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42 ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60 TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AVE N HIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR31ST AVE NWINPARK DRHILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N58TH AVE N 35TH AVE N MARYLAND AVE NY U K O N A V E N 33RD PL NUTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34TH AVE N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N38TH AVE N 48TH AVE N RHODE ISLAND AVE NWISCONSIN AVE N41ST AVE N 51ST AVE N 44TH AVE NFLAG AVE NYUKO N AVE N NEVADA AVE N45TH AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-09 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\PRI_Ratings_2021_Map.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. New Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan 2021 Pavement Rating Index (PRI) * As of 11/09/2021 PR I 01 - 2021 - 4041 - 6061 - 8081 - 100 0.00 miles 0.00 miles 4.88 miles 19.98 miles 42.29 miles New Hope 10-Year Pavement Management Plan Unit Prices/Square Foot Inflation Rate =3.00%(Inflation will be monitored and adjusted as needed in 2022) Updated 11/09/2021 Note: All Costs include construction + 20% Indirect Costs LOCAL STREETS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 MAINTENANCE Area (SF)Cost Area (SF)Cost Area (SF)Cost Area (SF)Cost Area (SF)Cost Area (SF)Cost Area (SF)Cost Area (SF)Cost Area (SF)Cost Area (SF)Cost Crack Seal 1,649,658 $61,254.28 2,127,000 $81,348.06 2,146,000 $84,536.97 2,277,000 $92,388.35 1,987,000 $83,040.37 1,689,032 $72,705.37 1,611,000 $71,426.83 2,191,800 $100,093.07 392,639 $18,468.59 392,639 $19,022.65 Seal Coat 1,560,658 $331,140.41 1,645,000 $359,507.18 1,408,000 $316,943.28 314,000 $72,802.41 1,002,000 $239,288.08 724,032 $178,093.61 1,488,000 $376,990.78 1,703,800 $444,614.51 392,639 $105,534.80 392,639 $108,700.84 Fog Seal 1,560,658 $66,228.08 1,645,000 $71,901.44 1,408,000 $63,388.66 314,000 $14,560.48 1,002,000 $47,857.62 724,032 $35,618.72 1,488,000 $75,398.16 1,703,800 $88,922.90 392,639 $21,106.96 392,639 $21,740.17 Subtotal Maintenance $458,622.77 $512,756.68 $464,868.90 $179,751.24 $370,186.06 $286,417.70 $523,815.76 $633,630.48 $145,110.35 $149,463.66 INFRASTRUCTURE 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2" Mill & Overlay 157,560 $616,099.00 55,000 $131,618.97 314,000 $773,967.39 412,000 $1,045,989.81 49,000 $128,133.75 561,000 $1,511,010.73 21,000 $58,258.76 0 $0.00 361,219 $1,063,131.41 0 $0.00 Reclaim & 3" Overlay 29,320 $173,032.00 617,700 $2,274,674.07 202,268 $764,194.61 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 158,000 $654,858.64 588,000 $2,510,180.92 0 $0.00 100,026 $453,017.57 10,289 $47,996.27 Reconstruct 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 110,000 $2,525,778.82 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal Structural Improvements $789,131.00 $2,406,293.04 $1,538,162.00 $1,045,989.81 $2,653,912.57 $2,165,869.37 $2,568,439.68 $0.00 $1,516,148.98 $47,996.27 Total Street Cost $1,247,753.77 $2,919,049.72 $2,003,030.90 $1,225,741.05 $3,024,098.64 $2,452,287.07 $3,092,255.44 $633,630.48 $1,661,259.33 $197,459.92 MUNICIPAL STATE AID (MSA)2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 INFRASTRUCTURE 2" Mill & Overlay 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 227,000 $559,524.19 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 165,444 $486,930.95 0 $0.00 Reclaim & 3" Overlay 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 113,237 $429,503.94 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 221,000 $1,532,064.67 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 266,427 $1,242,845.89 Reconstruct 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal Structural Improvements $0.00 0 $0.00 $989,028.14 $0.00 $0.00 $1,532,064.67 $0.00 $0.00 $486,930.95 $1,242,845.89 Average Annual Cost - Maintenance $372,462.36 Average Annual Cost - Structural (Local Only)$1,473,194.27 2022 - 2031 2022-2031 PMP Project Costs 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 10-YR Totals Local Street Cost $1,247,753.77 $2,919,049.72 $2,003,030.90 $1,225,741.05 $3,024,098.64 $2,452,287.07 $3,092,255.44 $633,630.48 $1,661,259.33 $197,459.92 $18,456,566.33 MSA Street Cost $0.00 $0.00 $989,028.14 $0.00 $0.00 $1,532,064.67 $0.00 $0.00 $486,930.95 $1,242,845.89 $3,008,023.76 Water Cost $475,711.00 $50,000.00 $672,343.00 $60,000.00 $975,000.00 $65,000.00 $986,000.00 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 $2,282,197.69 $3,523,881.00 Sanitary Sewer Cost $84,268.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $150,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $1,080,078.00 Storm Sewer Cost $110,457.00 $80,000.00 $75,000.00 $150,000.00 $260,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $80,000.00 $200,000.00 $400,000.00 $1,807,509.25 Total $1,918,189.77 $3,149,049.72 $3,839,402.04 $1,535,741.05 $4,409,098.64 $4,349,351.74 $4,378,255.44 $883,630.48 $2,568,190.28 $4,272,503.50 $27,876,058.34 2029 2030 2031 New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenter !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(HIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS L A K E FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1/2 AVE N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34TH AVE N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NDUDLEY AVE N ANGE L I N A D R VIRGINIA AVE N59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 48TH AVE N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NWISCONSIN AVE N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 37TH AVE N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE P L N 26TH VA L L E V I S T A S T ELM GROVE CT 34TH PL N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N35 1/2 AVE N 32ND CIR NMEADOW L A K E P L 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N ALLEN CIR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKON CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N33RD PL N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N36TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N61ST AVE N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-09 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\Watermain_Breaks_Map.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. !(Watermain Breaks Watermain Breaks* New Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan* As of 09/02/2021 TERRA LINDA New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2022 Street Infrastructure Projects.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. 2" Mill & OverlayReclaim & Overlay 2022 StreetInfrastructure ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2022 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal Coat and Fog Seal 2022 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2023 Street Infrastructure Projects.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. 2" Mill & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay 2023 StreetInfrastructure ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-05 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2023 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal Coat and Fog Seal 2023 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2024 Street Infrastructure Projects.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. 2" Mill & Overlay (MSA Street)Reclaim & Overlay (MSA Street) 2" Mill & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay 2024 StreetInfrastructure ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-05 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2024 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal Coat and Fog Seal 2024 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-05 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2025 Street Infrastructure Projects.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. 2" Mill & Overlay 2025 StreetInfrastructure ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2025 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal Coat and Fog Seal 2025 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-05 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2026 Street Infrastructure Projects.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. 2" Mill & OverlayFull Reconstruct 2026 StreetInfrastructure ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-05 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2026 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal Coat and Fog Seal 2026 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-05 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2027 Street Infrastructure Projects.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Reclaim & Overlay (MSA Street)2" Mill & OverlayReclaim & Overlay 2027 StreetInfrastructure ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2027 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal Coat and Fog Seal 2027 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2028 Street Infrastructure Projects.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. 2" Mill & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay 2028 StreetInfrastructure ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-09 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2028 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal Coat and Fog Seal 2028 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2029 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal Coat and Fog Seal 2029 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2030 Street Infrastructure Projects.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. 2" Mill & Overlay Reclaim & Overlay 2030 StreetInfrastructure ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-08 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2030 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal Coat 2030 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-09 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2031 Street Infrastructure Projects.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Reclaim & Overlay 2031 StreetInfrastructure ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan New HopePlymouth Crystal Robbinsdale BrooklynCenterHIGHWAY 169BOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE N36TH AVE N 62ND AVE N 49TH AVE N BASS LAKE FLAG AVE N32ND AVE N NEVADA AVE NQUEBEC AVE N46TH AVE N 42ND AVE N (CSAH 9) 59TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 32ND PL N MEDICINE LAKE RD(CSAH 70) 54TH AVE N 50TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 45TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 30TH AVE NGETTYSBURG AVE N55TH AVE N JORDAN AVE NW E S T B R O A D W A Y 40 1/2 AVE N AQUILA AVE NENSIGN AVE NOREGON AVE N53RD AVE N 39TH AVE N 60TH AVE N 60 1 /2 AV E N XYLON AVE NHIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGEDEL DR 30TH ACE N31ST AVE NWINPARK DR HILLSBORO AVE N61 1/2 AVE N ZEALAND AVE NNORTHWOOD PKWYLOUISIANA AVE N56TH AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N35TH AVE N 33RD AVE N NORTHERN DR MARYLAND AVE NJERSEY AVE NINTERNATIONAL PKWYSCIENCE CENTER DR YUKON AVE N33RD PL N UTAH AVE NCAVELL AVE N34 TH AV E N 61ST AVE N 47 1/2 AVE N HOPEWOOD LN NINDEPENDENCE AVE NELM GROVE AVEDECATUR AVE NANGELINA DR VIRGINIA AVE N DUDLEY AVE N 59TH PL N LOUISANA AVE NOREGON AVEN38TH AVE N 4 8 T H A V E N PENNSYLVANIA AVE NERICKSON DRRHODE ISLAND AVE NSAINT RAPHAEL DR 52ND AVE NSUMTER AVENUE NW I S C O N S I N A V E N 27TH PL N 57TH AVE N 38 1/2 AVE N 41ST AVE N VALLEY PL 36 1/2 CIR N LAMPHERE DR51ST AVE N 46 1/2 AVE N 45 1/2 AVE N 3 7 T H A V E N LOMBARDY AVE COUNTY ROAD 9 KENTUCKY AVE NBOONE PL N 26TH VALLE VISTA ST ELM GROVE CT 34 TH P L N34 1/2 AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 59 1/2 AVE N RESEARCH CENTER RD E 44TH AVE N3 5 1 /2 A V E N 32ND CIR NMEADOW LAKE PL TERRA LINDA DR 48TH CIR N 43RD AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N A L L E N C IR SHIRLEY PL47 1/2 PL NWISCONSIN CIR N47 1/2 CIR NINDEPENDENCE CIR N YUKO N CIR32ND CT NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NINDEPENDENCE AVE N32ND AVE N MARYLAND AVE N58TH AVE NXYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NMARYLAND AVE NXYLON AVE NQUEBEC AVE N52ND AVE N UTAH AVE N31ST AVE N 58TH AVE N SUMTER AVE N3 3 R D P L N NEVADA AVE NNEVADA AVE NMARYLAND AVE NF L A G A V E N NEVADA AVE NRHODE ISLAND AVE N34TH AVE N 31ST AVE NYUKON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N45TH AVE NXYLON AVE N45TH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE N59TH PL NGETTYSBURG AVE N35TH AVE NFLAG AVE N30TH AVE N NEVADA AVE N59TH AVE N FLAG AVE NLOUISIANA AVE N6 1 S T AV E N 47TH AVE N 47TH AVE N XYLON AVE NSUMTER AVE NUTAH AVE N33RD AVE NYUKON AVE N46TH AVE N YUKON AVE N48TH AVE NBOONE AVE NWINNETKA AVE NNORTHWOOD PARKWAY 31ST AVE N 0 15,000 30,000Feet ($$¯ 1:18,000 (At original document size of 11x17)Revised: 2021-11-09 By: dmericksonV:\1938\Clients\New_Hope\Projects\2021_Pavement_Maps\2031 Street Maintenance P rojec ts.mxd Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied inelectronic format. The recipie nt ac cepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and age nts, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provisionof the data. Seal C oat and Fog Seal 2031 StreetMaintenance ProjectsNew Hope, Minnesota2021 Pavement Management Plan I:\RFA\City Manager\2021\Long Term Plan\WS 111521\11.8 Q ‐ Review Updated Long‐Term Financial Plan with AEM 111521.docx    Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Kirk McDonald, City Manager    Agenda Title  Review updated draft long‐term financial plan with AEM  Requested Action  Staff requests the City Council review the updated draft long‐term financial plan with AEM and provide  feedback on the assumptions. The plan incorporates estimates for ten years (2021‐2031) and incorporates the  2022 budget data into the long‐range forecast. Specific attention has been paid to the street infrastructure, park  infrastructure, utility (water/sewer/storm water), and enterprise (golf course/ice arena) funds, as well as, central  garage/equipment reserve funds. Efforts have been made to reduce capital improvement expenditures so they  are in line with forecasted revenue projections. The plan also includes the financing for the ice arena  improvements and the public works building expansion.    Per routine practice, proposed 2022‐2026 capital improvement projects will be reviewed in detail by  department heads at the March 2022 work session and most 2022 projects were discussed during the 2022  budget process.  Policy/Past Practice  It has been the practice over the past several years for representatives from AEM to attend the November or  December work session and review an updated long‐term financial plan and receive feedback from the City  Council.  Background  One of the city manager’s ongoing goals is to coordinate with AEM on a long‐range financial plan and  projections for city revenues and expenses. AEM prepared the first draft five‐year plan for all city funds and  reviewed the plan with the Council in 2011; the plan has been updated annually since that time. The plan  presented in November 2017 was expanded to include 10‐year projections for the street infrastructure fund to  coordinate with the pavement management plan. In 2018 the plan was expanded to include 10‐year projections  for all funds. This continues to be a good process to improve the understanding of the city’s financial operations  and long‐term outlook. Also, as council is aware, in 2011 Standard & Poor’s upgraded the city’s Financial  Management Assessment (FMA) from “standard” to “good” based in part on the city’s implementation of long‐ term financial planning.  Attachment   Long‐term Financial Plan    Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.8  CITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA LONG-TERM PLAN Presented on November 15, 2021 Prepared by Abdo Financial Solutions THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY City of New Hope, Minnesota Long Term Plan Table of Contents Page No. Compilation Disclosure 5 Introductory Section Transmittal Letter 8 Financial Section Schedule of Property Taxes Levied and Tax Rates 14 Schedule of Annual Fund Cash Balances 18 Outstanding Debt Schedule 20 Capital Improvement Plan Fire Reserve Fund 9010 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 22 Schedule of Projected Revenue, Expenditures and Debt 22 City Hall Reserve Fund 9202 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 24 Schedule of Projected Revenue, Expenditures and Debt 24 Street Infrastructure Reserve Fund 9203 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 26 Schedule of Projected Revenue, Expenditures and Debt 28 Parks Infrastructure Reserve Fund 9233 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 30 Schedule of Projected Revenue, Expenditures and Debt 32 Central Garage Internal Service Fund 9402 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 34 Statement of Cash Flows 34 Sewer Enterprise Fund 9300 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 36 Statement of Cash Flows 36 Water Enterprise Fund 9301 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 38 Statement of Cash Flows 38 Storm Water Enterprise Fund 9304 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 40 Statement of Cash Flows 40 Street Light Enterprise Fund 9305 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 42 Statement of Cash Flows 42 Ice Arena Enterprise Fund 9303 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 44 Statement of Cash Flows 46 Golf Course Enterprise Fund 9302 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 48 Statement of Cash Flows 50 Selected Graphical Data from Projections 52 3 THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 4 November 15, 2021 COMPILATION DISCLOSURE Honorable Mayor and City Council City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, Minnesota 55428 We have compiled the accompanying forecasted long-term plan that includes property tax, tax rate, fund balance and debt projections based on input from the City Council and City staff. This projection incorporates estimates through December 31, 2031. This forecast was compiled in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of forecast information that is the representation of management and does not include evaluation of the support for the assumptions underlying the forecast. We have not examined the forecast and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the accompanying statements or assumptions. Furthermore, there will usually be differences between the forecasted and actual results because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and those differences may be material. We have no responsibility to update this report for events and circumstances occurring after the date of this report. Sincerely, Abdo Financial Solutions 5 THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 6 INTRODUCTORY SECTION CITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA LONG TERM PLAN 7 November 15, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, Minnesota 55428 Introduction As discussed in prior communications to the City Council, we have been preparing a long term plan for the City that is intended to give a big picture view of the status now and ten years from now. We have measured and projected operations, capital and debt for the City based on assumptions made by management. The City’s assumptions made are as follows: Assumptions The following assumptions have been used to calculate the projections in this report: Interest earnings 1.00% Governmental fund revenue growth (2)3.00% Governmental fund expenditure growth (2)4.00% Enterprise fund revenue growth(1)5.00% Enterprise fund expense growth(1)5.00% General Fund levy growth (3)Varies Street Infrastructure levy growth 5.00% Park levy growth 5.00% Park levy for Ice Varies EDA levy growth Varies Tax capacity growth (4)3.50% Population growth 0.58% Median home value growth 0.50% Enterprise debt term N/A Enterprise debt interest rate N/A Governmental funds debt term (2)N/A Governmental funds debt interest rate (2)N/A (1) Specific enterprise fund assumptions are noted in the Financial Section. (2)Specific enterprise fund assumptions are noted in the Financial Section. (3) General Fund levy has been adjusted to meet minimum fund balance requirements. Levy increase is detailed on the Tax Summary in the Financial Section. (4)Growth in captured tax increment capacity has not been modeled, although it is expected to increase over time. A net 3.5% growth in non-captured tax capacity has been used for purposes of this report. 8 Assumptions with Future Action • Fire Capital Fund 9010 may implement a $100,000 levy in 2023 to build reserves for future capital outlay needs. A comprehensive CIP for this fund will be proposed in March 2022. • City Hall Capital Fund 9202 may implement a $100,000 levy in 2023 to build reserves for future building and major capital expenditure needs. A comprehensive CIP for this fund will be proposed in March 2022. Other significant assumptions are as follows: o A projected amount of $400,000 in unspent bond proceeds from the 2017A GO Bonds for the police department and city hall construction project remain after the completion of those projects. An analysis on the utilization of the 2017A bond proceeds has been provided independent of this report. City Management consulted with its municipal advisor, Ehlers and Associates, Inc., on appropriate uses of unspent proceeds which may include a transfer to the Public Works Facility Project Fund 9240 for coverage in expenses related to that fund’s capital projects. For purposes of our long-term financial analysis, we have modeled a transfer of the unspent proceeds from the City Hall Capital Fund 9202 into the Public Works Facility Project Fund 9240. • Swimming Pool Capital Fund 9204 may implement a $100,000 levy in 2023 to build reserves for future capital outlay needs. A comprehensive CIP for this fund will be proposed in March 2022. • Park Infrastructure Capital Fund 9233 will increase the levy for capital by 5 percent, annually. In addition, it is assumed that $500,000 will be levied each year to support Ice Arena capital and debt service obligations through 2031. The Ice Arena levy is shown as a transfer out from the Park Infrastructure Capital Fund. • Ice Arena Fund 9303 will continue to receive an annual transfer of levy dollars from the Park Infrastructure Capital Fund through 2031, other significant assumptions are as follows: o In March of 2021, the 2011A Taxable Lease Revenue Bonds were refunded by the issue of the 2021A GO Tax Abatement Bonds, resulting in $174,358 in debt service future value savings. o Ice Arena Fund 9303 will utilize a total of $1,417,120 interfund loan from the Temporary Financing Fund in from 2021-2023 to fund several large capital projects for the arena, including: replacement of the roof and skylight on the south rink ($450,000) in 2021, replacement of north rink dasher boards and glass ($210,000) in 2022, and re-cementing the floor and replacing the glass and boards at the south rink ($757,120) in 2023. The long-term plan assumes a fifteen (15) year amortization and no interest on the interfund loans. • Golf Course Enterprise Fund 9302 capital outlay needs will be monitored and adjusted based on operating performance of the facility and available cash reserves. When possible, capital purchases will be delayed to ensure adequate cash flow is available. As needed, temporary interfund loans may be used to provide cash flow needed for capital acquisition and may be repaid in the subsequent year from operating revenue. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Golf Course fund has seen a significant increase in sales in 2020 and 2021. Due to these recent revenue trends future assumptions for this fund will need to be monitored. 9 •Street Infrastructure Capital Fund 9203 will increase the levy for capital by 5 percent, annually. Other significant assumptions are as follows: o Franchise fee revenue of $440,000 will be allocated to the Street Infrastructure Capital Fund, with the remaining revenue allocated to the General Fund. o Municipal State Aid revenue will be received for applicable projects. o The interfund loan provided by the Temporary Financing Fund in 2016 to fund capital improvement projects will be repaid based on the original amortization, with final payment occurring in 2026. •Sewer Fund 9300 has planned average annual capital expenses of $654,526 over the life of the long-term plan. These expenses are projected to be paid with a pay-as-you-go methodology due to the projected growth in the fund’s cash reserves. •Water Fund 9301 will receive a $1,500,000 payment from the Joint Water Commission in 2023 will offset project costs related to the repainting of the south water tower. •Storm Water Fund 9304 will receive a repayment from the Shingle Creek Watershed related to the Meadow Lake Draw Down project which is contemplated in 2021. •Street Light Fund 9305 plans to incur costs related to the Boone Signal Replacement in the amount of $400,000. Temporary interfund loans may be necessary to provide adequate cash flow for the 2023 improvement projects and can be repaid with sales revenue in subsequent years. •Central Garage Fund 9402 assumes transfers in of unspent bond proceeds from the 2017A GO Bonds, CARES funds and ARPA funds totaling $4,253,980 from 2021-2023. •Park and Pool Improvement Fund 9234 is assumed to transfer remaining funds out of the fund on 12/31/2021. •General Fund 9001 reflects the transfer out of $1,641,664 of Coronavirus Relief Fund intergovernmental revenue in 2021 to the Central Garage Fund 9402. •No new debt issuance has been modeled in this long-term plan. 10 Key Highlights •At December 31, 2020 the General fund had a 63.0 percent unassigned fund balance. The Minnesota Office of the State Auditor defines an adequate reserve as 35-50 percent of the General fund expenditures. The City’s policy on fund balance currently specifies that a 42 percent reserve level shall be maintained. The projected General Fund balance remains within the 35-50 percent rage throughout the life of this Plan. We anticipate the General fund levy will grow by an average of 5 percent to maintain the desired reserve level. •The tax levy is projected to increase from $18.2 million (2022 proposed) to $26 million over the duration of this Plan. The levy increase will result in an increase in the projected tax rate, growing from 62.72 percent (2022 proposed) to 66.32 percent over the duration of this Plan. o Tax capacity is assumed to grow at a rate of 3.50 percent during the duration of this Plan. A growth in tax capacity in excess of these projections may result in lower tax rates in future years. •The annual tax amount for the Median Home is projected to increase from $1,532 (2022 proposed) to $1,706 over the duration of this Plan. •Total debt outstanding is projected to decrease from $51.4 million (2020 actual) to $10.6 million over the duration of this Plan. No new debt issuance has been modeled in this Plan. As a result, the debt per capita will decrease from $2,298 (2020 actual) per household to an estimated $445 over the duration of this Plan. •The total cash position of the City is projected to increase from $46.4 million (2020 actual) to $75.9 million over the duration of this Plan. •Contributions from the General Fund for Central Garage are assumed to remain at 100% over the duration of this Plan. •Intergovernmental revenue, tax increment, developer contributions or other outside funding has been identified in the separate capital fund worksheets. 11 THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 12 FINANCIAL SECTION CITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA LONG TERM PLAN 13 City of New Hope, Minnesota Schedule of Property Taxes Levied and Tax Rates For the Years Ended December 31, 2020 (Actual) and 2021 to 2031 (Estimated) 2020 2021 2022 2023 Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Property Taxes Levied for General Purposes 9001 General 10,511,431$ 10,879,465$ 11,393,354$ 11,934,538$ 9015 Economic Development Authority 348,000 365,000 153,000 203,000 9015 HRA - - 417,000 417,000 9203 Street Infrastructure 1,467,333 1,540,700 1,617,735 1,698,622 9233 Park Infrastructure (Additional Levy for Ice)400,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 9233 Park Infrastructure 367,290 385,655 404,938 425,185 9010 Potential levies for CIP capital - Fire Capital y - - - 100,000 9204 Potential levies for CIP capital - Swimming Pool y - - - 100,000 9202 Potential levies for CIP capital - City Hall y - - - 100,000 Subtotal 13,094,054 13,670,820$ 14,486,027 15,478,345 Property Taxes Levied for Debt Service 9144 2015A GO Tax Increment Bonds 240,162 237,747 235,227 237,852 9149 2015B GO Improvement Bonds 207,663 206,828 205,240 208,745 9148 2016A GO Improvement Bonds 259,142 260,979 262,502 263,709 9150 2017A GO Improvement Bonds 1,709,190 1,705,515 1,706,828 1,705,515 9151 2018A GO Tax Abatement Bonds 865,627 867,464 862,739 867,464 9152 2019A GO Tax Abatement Bonds 468,878 468,248 472,448 470,768 Subtotal 3,750,662 3,746,781$ 3,744,984$ 3,754,053$ Total Taxes Levied 16,844,716 17,417,601$ 18,231,011 19,232,398 Less: Value of Market Value Levies (348,000) (365,000) (417,000) (417,000) Less: Distribution from fiscal disparities (2,920,937) (2,996,822) (3,110,358) (3,110,358) City Net Levy 13,575,779$ 14,055,779$ 14,703,653$ 15,705,040$ Tax Capacity Personal and Real Estate 25,296,074$ 27,338,807$ 28,762,427$ 29,769,112$ Less: Contribution to fiscal disparities (2,941,213) (3,317,874) (3,682,171) (3,682,171) Less: Tax Increment (1,378,781) (1,565,751) (1,636,594) (1,636,594) Adjusted net tax capacity 20,976,080$ 22,455,182$ 23,443,662$ 24,450,347$ 14 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts 12,519,331$ 13,132,778$ 13,776,284$ 14,451,322$ 15,159,437$ 15,902,249$ 16,681,459$ 17,498,851$ 253,000 303,000 353,000 403,000 453,000 503,000 553,000 603,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 1,783,553 1,872,730 1,966,367 2,064,685 2,167,920 2,276,316 2,390,131 2,509,638 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 446,444 468,766 492,205 516,815 542,656 569,788 598,278 628,192 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 16,219,328 16,994,275 17,804,856 18,652,822 19,540,012 20,468,353 21,439,869 22,456,681 235,017 237,123 237,123 236,860 235,233 238,566 235,049 236,466 206,685 206,554 206,306 210,467 209,116 206,111 208,198 - 259,352 260,087 260,507 260,612 260,402 259,877 264,287 262,974 1,706,828 1,707,983 1,709,820 1,708,508 1,710,030 1,710,293 1,710,713 1,708,823 865,784 862,634 863,422 862,634 863,317 863,369 862,792 866,834 468,668 471,398 468,248 469,928 470,998 469,980 468,668 467,040 3,742,334$ 3,745,779$ 3,745,426$ 3,749,009$ 3,749,096$ 3,748,196$ 3,749,707$ 3,542,137$ 19,961,662 20,740,054 21,550,282 22,401,831 23,289,108 24,216,549 25,189,576 25,998,818 (417,000) (417,000) (417,000) (417,000) (417,000) (417,000) (417,000) (417,000) (3,110,358) (3,110,358) (3,110,358) (3,110,358) (3,110,358) (3,110,358) (3,110,358) (3,110,358) 16,434,304$ 17,212,696$ 18,022,924$ 18,874,473$ 19,761,750$ 20,689,191$ 21,662,218$ 22,471,460$ 30,811,031$ 31,889,417$ 33,005,547$ 34,160,741$ 35,356,367$ 36,593,839$ 37,874,624$ 39,200,236$ (3,682,171) (3,682,171) (3,682,171) (3,682,171) (3,682,171) (3,682,171) (3,682,171) (3,682,171) (1,636,594) (1,636,594) (1,636,594) (1,636,594) (1,636,594) (1,636,594) (1,636,594) (1,636,594) 25,492,266$ 26,570,652$ 27,686,782$ 28,841,976$ 30,037,602$ 31,275,074$ 32,555,859$ 33,881,471$ 15 City of New Hope, Minnesota Schedule of Property Taxes Levied and Tax Rates (Continued) For the Years Ended December 31, 2020 (Actual) and 2021 to 2031 (Estimated) 2020 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Tax Rates General 41.24%39.94%40.11%40.74% EDA 0.00%0.00%0.86%1.08% Proposed capital levies 8.77%8.91%8.88%9.98% Scheduled debt levies 14.71%13.75%13.19%12.82% Proposed debt levies 0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00% Total City Levy Tax Rate 64.72%62.59%62.72%64.23% Total HRA Tax Rate 1.37%1.34%1.54%1.56% Population 22,376 22,505 22,636 22,767 Taxes per Capita 753$ 774$ 805$ 845$ Median Home Value (Jan 2)244,000$ 257,000$ 258,285$ 259,576$ Median Home Taxes (from city)1,480 1,520 1,532 1,578 % change from prior year $'s 5%3%1%3% Tax Levy ($) General 10,511,431$ 10,879,465$ 11,393,354$ 11,934,538$ Street Infrastructure 1,467,333 1,540,700 1,617,735 1,698,622 Economic Development Authority 348,000 365,000 153,000 203,000 HRA - - 417,000 417,000 Park Infrastructure 767,290 885,655 904,938 925,185 Capital levies - - - 300,000 Scheduled debt levies 3,750,662 3,746,781 3,744,984 3,754,053 Proposed debt levies - - - - Tax Levy (%) General 62%62%62%62% Street Infrastructure 9%9%9%9% Economic Development Authority 2%2%1%1% HRA 0%0%2%2% Park Infrastructure 5%5%5%5% Capital levies 0%0%0%2% Scheduled debt levies 22%22%21%20% Proposed debt levies 0%0%0%0% General Fund Percentage Change in Levy (%)1%4%5%5% General Fund Levy Increase/(Decrease)1.32%3.50%4.72%4.75% All Funds Levy Increase/(Decrease)7.50%3.54%4.61%6.81% 16 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts 41.29%41.86%42.43%43.02%43.61%44.20%44.81%45.37% 1.29%1.49%1.67%1.83%1.98%2.11%2.23%2.36% 9.99%10.01%10.04%10.07%10.10%10.13%10.18%10.21% 12.34%11.94%11.54%11.16%10.78%10.42%10.07%9.18% 0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00% 64.47%64.78%65.10%65.44%65.79%66.15%66.54%66.32% 1.49%1.43%1.38%1.32%1.27%1.22%1.17%1.12% 22,898 23,031 23,164 23,298 23,433 23,568 23,705 23,842 872$ 901$ 930$ 962$ 994$ 1,028$ 1,063$ 1,090$ 260,874$ 262,179$ 263,490$ 264,807$ 266,131$ 267,462$ 268,799$ 270,143$ 1,593 1,610 1,627 1,645 1,663 1,682 1,702 1,706 1%1%1%1%1%1%1%0% 12,519,331$ 13,132,778$ 13,776,284$ 14,451,322$ 15,159,437$ 15,902,249$ 16,681,459$ 17,498,851$ 1,783,553 1,872,730 1,966,367 2,064,685 2,167,920 2,276,316 2,390,131 2,509,638 253,000 303,000 353,000 403,000 453,000 503,000 553,000 603,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 417,000 946,444 968,766 992,205 1,016,815 1,042,656 1,069,788 1,098,278 1,128,192 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 3,742,334 3,745,779 3,745,426 3,749,009 3,749,096 3,748,196 3,749,707 3,542,137 - - - - - - - - 63%63%64%65%65%66%66%67% 9%9%9%9%9%9%9%10% 1%1%2%2%2%2%2%2% 2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% 5%5%5%5%4%4%4%4% 2%1%1%1%1%1%1%1% 19%18%17%17%16%15%15%14% 0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% 5%5%5%5%5%5%5%5% 4.90%4.90%4.90%4.90%4.90%4.90%4.90%4.90% 4.64%4.74%4.71%4.72%4.70%4.69%4.70%3.74% 17 City of New Hope, Minnesota Schedule of Annual Fund Cash Balances For the Years Ended December 31, 2020 (Actual) and 2021 to 2031 (Estimated) 2020 2021 2022 2023 Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts GOVERNMENT-TYPE General Operations 101 General 8,797,433$ 7,155,769$ 7,155,769$ 7,193,361$ Special Revenue 9002 Drug Task Force Equitable Sharing Funds 10,581 10,581 10,581 10,581 9015 Economic Development Authority (1)4,010,484 1,672,864 1,637,821 1,619,239 9016 Solid Waste Management 191,259 193,247 195,334 197,526 *9017 Ice Arena Endowment 5,505 5,560 5,616 5,672 *9018 CEE Revolving Loan 75,998 76,758 77,526 78,301 *9021 Police Forfeitures 135,571 136,927 138,296 139,679 Subtotal 4,429,398 2,085,356 2,054,593 2,040,417 Debt Service 9117-9121 HRA Bonds (1)(2,122,026) (2,162,888) (2,073,798) (1,990,987) 9144 2015A GO Tax Increment Bonds 277,003 308,821 339,119 373,085 9148 2016A GO Bonds 274,209 302,151 330,685 359,670 9149 2015B GO Bonds 164,592 203,881 237,309 275,558 9150 2017A CIP Bonds 1,468,459 1,960,424 2,067,327 2,172,917 9151 2018A GO Tax Abatement Bonds 284,637 339,320 388,153 446,710 9152 2019A GO Tax Abatement Bonds 377,680 404,678 436,675 463,293 Subtotal 724,554 1,356,386 1,725,470 2,100,246 Capital Projects 9010 Fire Capital Projects 823,809 832,047 840,368 948,771 9202 City Hall CIP 1,411,332 600,000 606,000 712,060 9203 Street Infrastructure 1,779,491 2,180,042 2,101,808 1,061,398 9213-9228 HRA Construction (1)5,355,294 6,059,021 6,577,740 7,045,291 9233 Park Infrastructure 1,474,999 1,489,254 1,206,787 393,687 9234 Park/Pool Improvement Project 698,398 - - - 9242 Temporary Financing 3,249,809 2,883,809 2,786,309 2,154,189 Subtotal 14,793,132 14,044,173 14,119,011 12,315,397 Total - Governmental-type Funds 28,744,517 24,641,684 25,054,843 23,649,420 9402 Central Garage 8,282,096 8,713,195 9,847,171 11,089,638 *9407 Insurance Reserve 625,840 632,098 638,419 644,804 *9408 Employee Leave 1,673,358 1,690,092 1,706,992 1,724,062 *9409 Payroll Clearing 3,940 - - - *9410 Information Technology 583,540 589,375 595,269 601,222 Total - Internal Service Funds 11,168,774 11,624,760 12,787,852 14,059,726 BUSINESS-TYPE Enterprise Funds 9300 Sewer 1,400,403 2,028,652 2,604,567 3,280,650 9301 Water 2,345,370 3,631,202 4,085,145 4,461,250 9302 Golf Course 214,545 175,347 149,683 44,787 9303 Ice Arena 1,404,168 71,364 410,143 660,785 9304 Storm Water 1,024,563 917,977 1,107,779 1,371,952 9305 Street Lighting 70,954 124,469 181,160 (158,811) Total - Business-type Funds 6,460,003 6,949,011 8,538,476 9,660,613 AGENCY FUND *9504 Flexible Spending Fund 7,929 8,008 8,088 8,169 Grand Total - City 46,381,222$ 43,223,463$ 46,389,259$ 47,377,928$ *Annual growth in fund balance of 1% assumed (1)Projections based on TIF Cash Flow Analysis updated by AEM in 2021 Trend Indicator Adequate for reserve levels Adequate as of 2020 but decreasing balances, watch Below targeted reserve levels and should have a plan to address The fund has events in the future that need addressing now INTERNAL SERVICE 18 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Trend 7,290,573$ 7,453,575$ 7,688,995$ 8,003,954$ 8,406,092$ 8,903,605$ 9,505,279$ 10,220,528$ 10,581 10,581 10,581 10,581 10,581 10,581 10,581 10,581 1,608,258 1,609,651 1,624,242 1,601,373 1,385,733 1,184,194 1,119,244 1,065,938 199,828 202,244 204,781 207,445 210,243 213,180 216,264 219,502 5,729 5,786 5,844 5,902 5,961 6,021 6,081 6,142 79,084 79,875 80,673 81,480 82,295 83,118 83,949 84,789 141,076 142,486 143,911 145,350 146,804 148,272 149,755 151,252 2,033,974 2,040,042 2,059,452 2,041,551 1,831,036 1,634,784 1,575,293 1,527,623 (1,910,103) (1,833,069) (1,757,249) (1,659,598) (1,522,416) (1,522,416) (1,522,416) (1,522,416) 403,195 436,621 469,621 502,411 533,957 569,554 600,608 634,568 383,717 410,955 438,295 465,593 492,711 519,507 551,091 579,050 310,472 346,276 382,385 423,455 461,546 498,213 539,014 371,075 2,282,319 2,381,702 2,493,998 2,604,730 2,706,885 2,808,453 2,917,615 3,025,588 497,138 549,216 605,706 661,409 712,844 763,982 814,793 870,495 489,610 520,858 546,655 577,333 607,780 634,685 661,378 687,843 2,456,348 2,812,559 3,179,410 3,575,333 3,993,308 4,271,979 4,562,083 4,646,203 1,058,259 1,168,842 1,280,530 1,393,335 1,507,269 1,622,341 1,738,565 1,855,950 819,181 927,372 1,036,646 1,147,013 1,258,483 1,371,068 1,484,778 1,599,626 717,764 1,633,931 629,484 588,178 109,724 2,193,507 3,384,314 6,170,336 7,544,066 8,053,681 6,664,702 6,989,090 7,033,856 7,033,856 7,033,856 7,033,856 530,759 730,738 943,407 945,177 1,165,289 1,372,340 1,605,069 1,917,913 - - - - - - - - 2,328,164 2,500,638 2,671,613 2,766,088 2,860,562 2,955,037 3,049,512 3,049,512 12,998,193 15,015,203 13,226,383 13,828,880 13,935,182 16,548,149 18,296,094 21,627,193 24,779,087 27,321,378 26,154,240 27,449,719 28,165,618 31,358,517 33,938,749 38,021,547 5,603,924 5,896,145 6,263,501 6,710,353 7,041,288 7,559,126 8,039,918 8,547,680 651,252 657,764 664,342 670,985 677,695 684,472 691,317 698,230 1,741,303 1,758,716 1,776,303 1,794,066 1,812,007 1,830,127 1,848,428 1,866,913 - - - - - - - - 607,234 613,306 619,439 625,634 631,890 638,209 644,591 651,037 8,603,712 8,925,932 9,323,585 9,801,039 10,162,880 10,711,934 11,224,254 11,763,859 3,792,321 4,478,125 5,138,334 5,671,865 6,326,209 6,801,749 7,395,031 8,005,773 5,343,442 3,440,566 4,149,826 5,806,024 6,585,089 8,315,802 10,116,041 9,744,018 27,453 21,678 (6,766) 24,091 46,578 134,391 236,009 337,442 856,212 1,058,574 1,275,223 1,536,537 2,039,251 2,677,171 3,344,446 4,004,518 1,699,224 1,972,098 2,154,114 2,414,761 2,694,724 3,115,034 3,437,012 3,579,217 (99,270) (36,077) 30,957 102,031 177,354 257,145 341,636 431,067 11,619,383 10,934,964 12,741,688 15,555,309 17,869,206 21,301,293 24,870,174 26,102,034 8,251 8,333 8,417 8,501 8,586 8,672 8,759 8,846 45,010,433$ 47,190,607$ 48,227,930$ 52,814,567$ 56,206,290$ 63,380,416$ 70,041,936$ 75,896,287$ 19 City of New Hope, Minnesota Outstanding Debt Schedule For the Years Ended December 31, 2020 (Actual) and 2021 to 2031 (Estimated) 2020 2021 2022 Original Issue Maturity Interest Actual Estimated Estimated Fund Issue Issue Date Date Rate Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENT-TYPE General Obligation Bonds 9117 G.O. Tax Increment Refunding, Series 2012A 90%2,425,500$ 1/11/2012 2/1/2025 2.00 - 2.45 %1,174,500$ 949,500$ 720,000$ 9118 G.O. Tax Increment Refunding, Series 2012A 10%269,500 1/11/2012 2/1/2025 2.00 - 2.45 130,500 105,500 80,000 9119 G.O. Tax Increment Refunding, Series 2012B 1,330,000 1/11/2012 2/1/2031 1.35 - 4.65 1,005,000 940,000 865,000 9121 G.O. Tax Increment Finance, Series 2015A 1,859,000 6/17/2015 2/1/2032 2.00 - 3.00 1,532,989 1,419,146 1,303,743 9144 G.O. Tax Increment Finance, Series 2015A 2,536,000 6/17/2015 2/1/2032 2.00 - 3.00 2,091,333 1,936,026 1,778,591 9148 G.O Improvement Bonds, Series 2016A 2,824,075 12/29/2016 2/1/2033 2.25 - 3.00 2,515,783 2,355,820 2,190,040 9149 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2015B 2,075,000 12/1/2015 2/1/2031 0.75 - 2.90 1,611,175 1,486,404 1,353,495 9150 G.O Improvement Bonds, Series 2017A 18,435,000 12/28/2017 2/1/2034 3.00 - 5.00 17,530,000 16,580,000 15,605,000 9151 G.O Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A 9,520,000 12/20/2018 2/1/2035 3.00 - 5.00 9,520,000 9,055,000 8,565,000 9152 G.O Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2019A 5,235,000 7/18/2019 2/1/2035 3.00 - 4.00 5,235,000 4,970,000 4,695,000 Total Government-type 46,509,075 42,346,280 39,797,395 37,155,868 BUSINESS-TYPE General Obligation Bonds 9300 G.O. Tax Increment Finance, Series 2015A 528,000 6/17/2015 2/1/2032 2.00 - 3.00 435,469 403,130 370,348 9301 G.O. Tax Increment Finance, Series 2015A 504,000 6/17/2015 2/1/2032 2.00 - 3.00 415,809 384,930 353,628 9304 G.O. Tax Increment Finance, Series 2015A 533,000 6/17/2015 2/1/2032 2.00 - 3.00 439,401 406,770 373,692 9300 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2015B 200,000 12/1/2015 2/1/2031 0.75 - 2.90 155,294 143,268 130,457 9301 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2015B 1,200,000 12/1/2015 2/1/2031 0.75 - 2.90 931,765 859,608 782,745 9304 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2015B 350,000 12/1/2015 2/1/2031 0.75 - 2.90 271,765 250,719 228,301 9300 G.O Improvement Bonds, Series 2016A 231,901 12/29/2016 2/1/2033 2.25 - 3.00 206,585 193,450 179,836 9301 G.O Improvement Bonds, Series 2016A 1,072,408 12/29/2016 2/1/2033 2.25 - 3.00 955,338 894,594 831,641 9304 G.O Improvement Bonds, Series 2016A 726,616 12/29/2016 2/1/2033 2.25 - 3.00 647,294 606,137 563,482 9303 G.O Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2021A 2,020,000 3/11/2021 12/1/2028 1.00 - 1,800,000 1,555,000 Total G.O. Bonds 7,365,925 4,458,720 5,942,605 5,369,132 Revenue Bonds 9301 G.O. Public Facilities Authority Note, 2011 411,738 2/23/2011 8/20/2029 1.70 211,000 189,000 167,000 9301 G.O. Public Facilities Authority Note, 2013 1,035,000 7/24/2013 8/20/2032 1.00 688,000 634,000 579,000 9304 G.O. Water Revenue, Series 2010B 605,000 11/23/2010 2/1/2022 2.00 - 3.00 125,000 65,000 - 9301 G.O. Utility Revenue, Series 2010A 775,000 5/6/2010 2/1/2021 2.00 - 3.25 85,000 - - Total G.O. Revenue Bonds 2,826,738 1,109,000 888,000 746,000 Lease revenue bonds 9303 2011A Taxable Lease Revenue Bonds 3,505,000 12/1/2011 12/1/2028 5.00 3,505,000 - - Total Business-type 13,697,663 9,072,720 6,830,605 6,115,132 Total All Funds 60,206,738$ 51,419,000$ 46,628,000$ 43,271,000$ Population 22,376 22,505 22,636 Debt Per Capita - total 2,298$ 2,072$ 1,912$ 20 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance 486,000$ 247,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 54,000 27,500 - - - - - - - 780,000 690,000 595,000 500,000 395,000 295,000 195,000 95,000 - 1,186,780 1,066,699 945,058 820,298 692,419 561,421 427,304 288,508 146,594 1,619,028 1,455,211 1,289,266 1,119,066 944,611 765,901 582,936 393,588 199,986 2,018,443 1,841,030 1,660,708 1,474,569 1,282,613 1,084,841 881,251 671,845 453,714 1,217,874 1,076,829 933,070 786,600 637,417 482,809 325,489 165,456 - 14,580,000 13,505,000 12,375,000 11,210,000 9,985,000 8,700,000 7,375,000 6,010,000 4,590,000 8,055,000 7,515,000 6,955,000 6,370,000 5,755,000 5,110,000 4,445,000 3,760,000 3,055,000 4,405,000 4,105,000 3,795,000 3,470,000 3,135,000 2,785,000 2,420,000 2,045,000 1,660,000 34,402,126 31,529,767 28,548,101 25,750,532 22,827,059 19,784,971 16,651,979 13,429,397 10,105,293 337,123 303,012 268,458 233,018 196,692 159,480 121,382 81,955 41,642 321,903 289,332 256,338 222,498 187,812 152,280 115,902 78,255 39,762 340,167 305,748 270,882 235,122 198,468 160,920 122,478 82,695 42,018 117,386 103,791 89,935 75,817 61,438 46,536 31,372 15,948 - 704,314 622,745 539,608 454,902 368,628 279,216 188,236 95,687 - 205,425 181,634 157,386 132,680 107,517 81,438 54,902 27,909 - 165,746 151,177 136,370 121,085 105,322 89,082 72,364 55,169 37,257 766,479 699,109 630,634 559,950 487,057 411,955 334,645 255,125 172,292 519,332 473,684 427,289 379,396 330,008 279,122 226,740 172,861 116,737 1,295,000 1,025,000 740,000 445,000 135,000 - - - - 4,772,874 4,155,233 3,516,899 2,859,468 2,177,941 1,660,029 1,268,021 865,603 449,708 144,000 121,000 98,000 74,000 50,000 25,000 - - - 524,000 468,000 412,000 355,000 297,000 239,000 180,000 121,000 61,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 668,000 589,000 510,000 429,000 347,000 264,000 180,000 121,000 61,000 - - - - - - - - - 5,440,874 4,744,233 4,026,899 3,288,468 2,524,941 1,924,029 1,448,021 986,603 510,708 39,843,000$ 36,274,000$ 32,575,000$ 29,039,000$ 25,352,000$ 21,709,000$ 18,100,000$ 14,416,000$ 10,616,001$ 22,767 22,898 23,031 23,164 23,298 23,433 23,568 23,705 23,842 1,750$ 1,584$ 1,414$ 1,254$ 1,088$ 926$ 768$ 608$ 445$ 21 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Fire Capital Projects Fund 9010 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Department Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts WMFRD is anticipating equipment replacement over the next 10 years; each city -$ -$ -$ will be responsible for their portion of the cost. -$ -$ -$ City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Fire Capital Projects Fund 9010 Schedule of Projected Revenue, Expenditures and Debt 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Revenues Property taxes -$ -$ 100,000$ Interest on investments 8,238 8,320 8,404 Total Revenues 8,238 8,320 108,404 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 8,238 8,320 108,404 Other Financing Sources Transfer in - - - Transfers out - - - Total Other Financing Sources - - - Net Change in Fund Balances 8,238 8,320 108,404 Fund Balances January 1 823,809 832,047 840,368 Fund Balances, December 31 832,047$ 840,368$ 948,771$ Capital Project Fund Projected Activity 22 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 9,488 10,583 11,688 12,805 13,933 15,073 16,223 17,386 109,488 110,583 111,688 112,805 113,933 115,073 116,223 117,386 109,488 110,583 111,688 112,805 113,933 115,073 116,223 117,386 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 109,488 110,583 111,688 112,805 113,933 115,073 116,223 117,386 948,771 1,058,259 1,168,842 1,280,530 1,393,335 1,507,269 1,622,341 1,738,565 1,058,259$ 1,168,842$ 1,280,530$ 1,393,335$ 1,507,269$ 1,622,341$ 1,738,565$ 1,855,950$ Capital Project Fund Projected Activity 23 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - City Hall Capital Projects Fund 9202 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Department Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts City Hall 2021 City Hall Remaining Costs 454,309$ 454,309$ -$ -$ 454,309$ -$ -$ City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - City Hall Capital Projects Fund 9202 Schedule of Projected Revenue, Expenditures and Debt 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Revenues Property taxes -$ -$ 100,000$ Interest on investments 42,977 6,000 6,060 Total Revenues 42,977 6,000 106,060 Expenditures Capital outlay General government 454,309 - - Total Expenditures 454,309 - - Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (411,332) 6,000 106,060 Other Financing Sources Transfers out (remaining bond proceeds to Public Works Facility Fund)(400,000) - - Total Other Financing Sources (400,000) - - Net Change in Fund Balances (811,332) 6,000 106,060 Fund Balances January 1 1,411,332 600,000 606,000 Fund Balances, December 31 600,000$ 606,000$ 712,060$ *Transfers in from General Fund surplus in the amount of $100K were made in: 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2018 Capital Project Fund Projected Activity 24 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 7,121 8,192 9,274 10,366 11,470 12,585 13,711 14,848 107,121 108,192 109,274 110,366 111,470 112,585 113,711 114,848 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 107,121 108,192 109,274 110,366 111,470 112,585 113,711 114,848 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 107,121 108,192 109,274 110,366 111,470 112,585 113,711 114,848 712,060 819,181 927,372 1,036,646 1,147,013 1,258,483 1,371,068 1,484,778 819,181$ 927,372$ 1,036,646$ 1,147,013$ 1,258,483$ 1,371,068$ 1,484,778$ 1,599,626$ Capital Project Fund Projected Activity 25 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Street Infrastructure Fund 9203 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Department Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts Public works 2021 SI Lion's Park parking lot 41,033$ 41,033$ -$ -$ Public works 2021 SI 2021 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal)277,419 277,419 - - Public works 2021 SI 2021 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Lion's Park (incl parking lot)1,404,605 1,404,605 - - Public works 2021 SI Parks Hidden Valley Parking Lot (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal)10,000 10,000 - - Public works 2021 SI Retaining Walls 80,000 80,000 - - Public works 2021 SI Xylon Maintenance 42,000 42,000 - - Public works 2021 SI Winnetka RR Crossing 24,696 24,696 - - Public works 2021 SI Boone RR Crossing 75,000 75,000 - - Public works 2021 SI Joint Mill and Overlay with Crystal (38th and Louisiana)3,691 3,691 - - Public works 2021 SI Joint Full Reconstruct with Crystal (36th and Louisiana)10,000 10,000 - - Public works 2022 SI Sidewalk replace 100,000 - 100,000 - Public works 2022 SI 2022 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal)458,623 - 458,623 - Public works 2022 SI 42nd Ave Power Bury 727,515 - 727,515 - Public works 2022 SI 2022 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Liberty Park W 789,131 - 789,131 - Public works 2023 SI Sidewalk replace 100,000 - - 100,000 Public works 2023 SI 42nd Ave & Boone (Multiple Projects: Monument, Trail, Utilities, Lighting & Boone/Gettysburg Signal Replace; Henn Co Rockford Rehab)100,000 - - 100,000 Public works 2023 SI 2023 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal) 512,757 - - 512,757 Public works 2023 SI 42nd Ave & Boone (Multiple Projects: Monument, Trail, Utilities, Lighting & Boone/Gettysburg Signal Replace; Henn Co Rockford Rehab, Bridge) (MSA) 816,604 - - 816,604 Public works 2023 SI 2023 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Northwoods East 2,406,293 - - 2,406,293 Public works 2024 SI Sidewalk replace 100,000 - - - Public works 2024 SI 36th Ave. Bridge Replacement (MSA)100,000 - - - Public works 2024 SI 33rd Place N. and Virginia Ave.145,270 - - - Public works 2024 SI Noise Wall from Bass Lake Road to 62nd Ave 250,000 - - - Public works 2024 SI 2024 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal) 464,869 - - - Public works 2024 SI 2024 Street Infrastructure - 56th & Xylon (MSA)989,028 - - - Public works 2024 SI 2024 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Jaycee Park 1,538,162 - - - Public works 2025 SI 2025 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal) 179,751 - - - Public works 2025 SI 2025 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - St. Raphael 1,045,990 - - - Public works 2025 SI Sidewalk Replacement 100,000 - - - Public works 2026 SI 2026 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal) 370,186 - - - Public works 2026 SI 2026 Street Mill & Overlay 126,554 - - - Public works 2026 SI Sidewalk Replacement 200,000 - - - Public works 2026 SI 2026 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Northwoods South 2,653,913 - - - Public works 2027 SI Sidewalk Replacement 100,000 - - - Public works 2027 SI 2027 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal) 286,418 - - - Public works 2027 SI 2027 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - N of Bass Lake Rd 2,165,869 - - - Public works 2027 SI 2027 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - N of Bass Lake Rd (MSA)1,532,065 - - - Public works 2028 SI 2028 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal)523,815 - - - Public works 2028 SI 2028 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Meadow Lake North 2,568,440 - - - Public works 2029 SI 2029 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal) - S of Northwood 633,630 - - - Public works 2030 SI 2030 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal)145,110 - - - Public works 2030 SI 2030 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - (28th & 29th)1,516,149 - - - Public works 2030 SI 2030 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - (28th & 29th) (MSA)486,931 - - - Public works 2031 SI 2031 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Quebec (Winnetka to 49th)1,242,846 - - - Public works 2031 SI 2031 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal)197,459 - - - 1,968,444$ 2,075,269$ 3,935,654$ 26 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 145,270 - - - - - - - 250,000 - - - - - - - 464,869 - - - - - - - 989,028 - - - - - - - 1,538,162 - - - - - - - - 179,751 - - - - - - - 1,045,990 - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 370,186 - - - - - - - 126,554 - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - - - 2,653,913 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 286,418 - - - - - - - 2,165,869 - - - - - - - 1,532,065 - - - - - - - - 523,815 - - - - - - - 2,568,440 - - - - - - - - 633,630 - - - - - - - - 145,110 - - - - - - - 1,516,149 - - - - - - - 486,931 - - - - - - - - 1,242,846 - - - - - - - 197,459 3,587,329$ 1,325,741$ 3,350,653$ 4,084,352$ 3,092,255$ 633,630$ 2,148,190$ 1,440,305$ 27 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Street Infrastructure Fund 9203 Schedule of Projected Revenue, Expenditures and Debt 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Revenues Property taxes (5% increase annually)1,540,700$ 1,617,735$ 1,698,622$ Interest on investments 22,295 21,800 21,018 Franchise fees 440,000 440,000 440,000 Total Revenues 2,002,995 2,079,535 2,159,640 Expenditures Capital outlay Public works 1,968,444 2,075,269 3,935,654 Total Expenditures 1,968,444 2,075,269 3,935,654 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 34,551 4,266 (1,776,014) Other Financing Sources Intergovernmental revenue (Municipal State Aid - MSA)- - 816,604 Interfund loan repayment ($750,000 loan from Temporary Financing Fund issued in 2016)(84,000) (82,500) (81,000) Total Other Financing Sources (84,000) (82,500) 735,604 Net Change in Fund Balances (49,449) (78,234) (1,040,410) Fund Balances January 1 2,229,491 2,180,042 2,101,808 Fund Balances, December 31 2,180,042$ 2,101,808$ 1,061,398$ Capital Project Fund Projected Activity 28 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 1,783,553$ 1,872,730$ 1,966,367$ 2,064,685$ 2,167,920$ 2,276,316$ 2,390,131$ 2,509,638$ 10,614 7,178 16,339 6,295 5,882 1,097 21,935 33,843 440,000 440,000 440,000 440,000 440,000 440,000 440,000 440,000 2,234,167 2,319,908 2,422,706 2,510,980 2,613,801 2,717,413 2,852,066 2,983,481 3,587,329 1,325,741 3,350,653 4,084,352 3,092,255 633,630 2,148,190 1,440,305 3,587,329 1,325,741 3,350,653 4,084,352 3,092,255 633,630 2,148,190 1,440,305 (1,353,162) 994,167 (927,947) (1,573,372) (478,454) 2,083,783 703,876 1,543,176 1,089,028 - - 1,532,065 - - 486,931 1,242,846 (79,500) (78,000) (76,500) - - - - - 1,009,528 (78,000) (76,500) 1,532,065 - - 486,931 1,242,846 (343,634) 916,167 (1,004,447) (41,307) (478,454) 2,083,783 1,190,807 2,786,022 1,061,398 717,764 1,633,931 629,484 588,178 109,724 2,193,507 3,384,314 717,764$ 1,633,931$ 629,484$ 588,178$ 109,724$ 2,193,507$ 3,384,314$ 6,170,336$ Capital Project Fund Projected Activity 29 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Parks Infrastructure Fund 9233 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Department Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts Parks & Recreation 2021 Parks concrete, trail work 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ -$ Parks & Recreation 2021 Parks Corner Park play equipment project 185,000 185,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 Parks frisbee golf equipment 12,000 12,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 Parks court, equipment painting, benches 100,000 100,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 Parks lighting improvements 68,000 68,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 Parks maintenance (garages)22,000 22,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2022 Parks addition of bocce ball courts 25,000 - 25,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 Cgyms pitching machines 5,000 - 5,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 Parks concrete, trail work 75,000 - 75,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 Parks Hidden Valley Park play equipment project 250,000 - 250,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 Parks lighting improvements 100,000 - 100,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 Parks Civic Center hockey rink 220,000 - 220,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 Parks maintenance (courts, equipment painting, benches and picnic tables)80,000 - 80,000 - Parks & Recreation 2023 Parks Lighted Baseball Field 690,000 - - 690,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 Parks concrete, trail work 75,000 - - 75,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 Parks Hidden Valley Hockey rink 100,000 - - 100,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 Parks hockey rink fencing 10,000 - - 10,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 Parks Liberty Park play equipment project 200,000 - - 200,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 Parks lighting improvements 75,000 - - 75,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 Parks maintenance 155,000 - - 155,000 Parks & Recreation 2024 Parks concrete, trail work 50,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2024 Parks Elm Grove Park play equipment project 170,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2024 Parks lighting improvements 75,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2024 Parks maintenance 35,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2024 Parks outdoor fitness equipment 40,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2025 Parks concrete, trail work 50,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2025 Parks lighting improvements 75,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2025 Parks maintenance 85,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2025 Parks picnic shelter at Northwood 125,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2026 Parks concrete, trail work 50,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2026 Parks Holiday Park play equipment project 200,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2026 Parks lighting improvements 75,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2026 Parks maintenance 25,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2027 Parks concrete, trail work 50,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2027 Parks lighting improvements; retro fit Lighted softball field 305,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2027 Parks maintenance 135,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2027 Parks pavilion 100,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2028 Parks concrete, trail work 75,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2028 Parks lighting improvements 75,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2028 Parks maintenance 100,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2028 Parks shelter roofs 150,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2029 Parks concrete, trail work 100,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2029 Parks maintenance 135,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2029 Parks Lions Park playground project 210,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2030 Parks Civic Center playground project 250,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2030 Parks maintenance 105,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2030 Parks concrete, trail work 100,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2031 Parks Terra Linda playground project 200,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2031 Parks maintenance 85,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2031 Parks concrete, trail work 50,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2031 Parks lighting improvements 75,000 - - - 462,000$ 755,000$ 1,305,000$ 30 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - 170,000 - - - - - - - 75,000 - - - - - - - 35,000 - - - - - - - 40,000 - - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - 75,000 - - - - - - - 85,000 - - - - - - - 125,000 - - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - - - 75,000 - - - - - - - 25,000 - - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - 305,000 - - - - - - - 135,000 - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 75,000 - - - - - - - 75,000 - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 150,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 135,000 - - - - - - - 210,000 - - - - - - - - 250,000 - - - - - - - 105,000 - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - - - 85,000 - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - 75,000 370,000$ 335,000$ 350,000$ 590,000$ 400,000$ 445,000$ 455,000$ 410,000$ 31 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Parks Infrastructure Fund 9233 Schedule of Projected Revenue, Expenditures and Debt 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Property taxes (5% increase annually)385,655$ 404,938$ 425,185$ Additional property tax levy for Ice 500,000 500,000 500,000 Grant revenues 25,000 - - Interest on investments 14,750 14,893 12,068 Miscellaneous (Leases - cell and radio towers; developer revenue)50,850 52,702 54,648 Total Revenues 976,255 972,533 991,901 Expenditures Capital outlay Parks & Recreation 462,000 755,000 1,305,000 Total Expenditures 462,000 755,000 1,305,000 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 514,255 217,533 (313,099) Other Financing Sources Bond proceeds - - - Transfers out (Ice Arena levy transfer)(500,000) (500,000) (500,000) Total Other Financing Sources (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) Net Change in Fund Balances 14,255 (282,467) (813,099) Fund Balances January 1 1,474,999 1,489,254 1,206,787 Fund Balances, December 31 1,489,254$ 1,206,787$ 393,687$ Capital Project Fund Projected Activity 32 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts 446,444$ 468,766$ 492,205$ 516,815$ 542,656$ 569,788$ 598,278$ 628,192$ 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 - - - - - - - - 3,937 5,308 7,307 9,434 9,452 11,653 13,723 16,051 56,691 60,905 63,157 65,521 68,004 70,610 75,728 78,601 1,007,072 1,034,979 1,062,669 1,091,770 1,120,111 1,152,051 1,187,729 1,222,843 370,000 335,000 350,000 590,000 400,000 445,000 455,000 410,000 370,000 335,000 350,000 590,000 400,000 445,000 455,000 410,000 637,072 699,979 712,669 501,770 720,111 707,051 732,729 812,843 - - - - - - (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) 137,072 199,979 212,669 1,770 220,111 207,051 232,729 312,843 393,687 530,759 730,738 943,407 945,177 1,165,289 1,372,340 1,605,069 530,759$ 730,738$ 943,407$ 945,177$ 1,165,289$ 1,372,340$ 1,605,069$ 1,917,913$ Capital Project Fund Projected Activity 33 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Central Garage Fund 9402 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts Public Works 2021 CG Public Works Reduced Project Scope Improvements 1,632,852$ 1,632,852$ -$ -$ Public Works 2021 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,048,717 1,048,717 - - Public Works 2021 CG Replace 50,000 Lb Truck Lift 200,000 200,000 - - Public Works 2022 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,306,907 - 1,306,907 - Public Works 2023 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,272,135 - - 1,272,135 Public Works 2024 CG Public Works Remaining Expansion Improvements 5,767,592 - - - Public Works 2024 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,204,489 - - - Public Works 2025 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,208,062 - - - Public Works 2026 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,208,062 - - - Public Works 2027 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,208,062 - - - Public Works 2028 CG Paint inside PW 200,000 - - - Public Works 2028 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,208,062 - - - Public Works 2029 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,208,062 - - - Public Works 2029 CG Seal Coat and Fog parking lot 100,000 - - - Public Works 2030 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,208,062 - - - Public Works 2030 CG Replace roof 200,000 - - - Public Works 2030 CG Replace roof unit 30,000 - - - Public Works 2031 CG Equipment - Central Garage Master Asset List 1,208,062 - - - Public Works 2031 CG Paint inside PW, New Door, Security Camera Upgrades 300,000 - - - 2,881,569$ 1,306,907$ 1,272,135$ (1)Equipment replacement for years 2025-2031 calculated using an average of years 2021 through 2024. City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Central Garage Fund 9402 Statement of Cash Flows 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from interfund services provided (5% growth annually)2,260,641$ 2,373,673$ 2,492,356$ Payments to suppliers and employees (5% growth annually)(1,072,457) (1,126,080) (1,182,384) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 1,188,183 1,247,592 1,309,972 Cash Flows from Capital and Related Financing Activities Transfer of grant revenues and unspent bond proceeds 2,041,664 1,106,158 1,106,158 Acquisition of capital assets (2,881,569) (1,306,907) (1,272,135) Net Cash Used by Capital and Related Financing Activities (839,905) (200,749) (165,977) Cash Flows from Investing Activities Investment earnings 82,821 87,132 98,472 Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 431,099 1,133,976 1,242,467 Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1 8,282,096 8,713,195 9,847,171 Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31 8,713,195$ 9,847,171$ 11,089,638$ Department Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 34 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5,767,592 - - - - - - - 1,204,489 - - - - - - - - 1,208,062 - - - - - - - - 1,208,062 - - - - - - - - 1,208,062 - - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - - - 1,208,062 - - - - - - - - 1,208,062 - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 1,208,062 - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - - - 30,000 - - - - - - - - 1,208,062 - - - - - - - 300,000 6,972,081$ 1,208,062$ 1,208,062$ 1,208,062$ 1,408,062$ 1,308,062$ 1,438,062$ 1,508,062$ 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 2,616,974$ 2,747,823$ 2,885,214$ 3,029,475$ 3,180,948$ 3,339,996$ 3,506,995$ 3,682,345$ (1,241,503) (1,303,579) (1,368,758) (1,437,195) (1,509,055) (1,584,508) (1,663,733) (1,746,920) 1,375,471 1,444,244 1,516,456 1,592,279 1,671,893 1,755,488 1,843,262 1,935,425 - - - - - - - - (6,972,081) (1,208,062) (1,208,062) (1,208,062) (1,408,062) (1,308,062) (1,438,062) (1,508,062) (6,972,081) (1,208,062) (1,208,062) (1,208,062) (1,408,062) (1,308,062) (1,438,062) (1,508,062) 110,896 56,039 58,961 62,635 67,104 70,413 75,591 80,399 (5,485,714) 292,221 367,356 446,852 330,935 517,839 480,791 507,762 11,089,638 5,603,924 5,896,145 6,263,501 6,710,353 7,041,288 7,559,126 8,039,918 5,603,924$ 5,896,145$ 6,263,501$ 6,710,353$ 7,041,288$ 7,559,126$ 8,039,918$ 8,547,680$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 35 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Sewer Fund 9300 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Department Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts Sewer 2021 SS 2021 Line sewer pipes 350,000$ 350,000$ -$ -$ Sewer 2021 SI 2021 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Lion's Park 88,014 88,014 - - Sewer 2021 SS Bass Lake Road 67,500 67,500 - - Sewer 2022 SI 2022 Rebuild 10.5 Lift station and pump pipe 150,000 - 150,000 - Sewer 2022 SI 2022 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Liberty Park W 84,268 - 84,268 - Sewer 2022 SS 2022 Line sewer pipes 350,000 - 350,000 - Sewer 2023 SI 2023 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Northwoods East 100,000 - - 100,000 Sewer 2023 SS 42nd Avenue Rehab 60,000 - - 60,000 Sewer 2023 SS 2023 Line sewer pipes 350,000 - - 350,000 Sewer 2024 SI 2024 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Jaycee Park 100,000 - - - Sewer 2024 SS 2024 Line sewer pipes 450,000 - - - Sewer 2024 SS 2024 Rebuild lift station pipes and pump 150,000 - - - Sewer 2025 SI 2025 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - St. Raphael 100,000 - - - Sewer 2025 SS 2025 Line sewer pipes 450,000 - - - Sewer 2026 SI 2026 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Northwoods South 150,000 - - - Sewer 2026 SS 2026 Line sewer pipes 450,000 - - - Sewer 2027 SI 2027 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - N of Bass Lake Rd 100,000 - - - Sewer 2027 SS 2027 Line sewer pipes 500,000 - - - Sewer 2027 SS 2027 Rebuild lift station pipes and pump 150,000 - - - Sewer 2028 SI 2028 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Meadow Lake North 100,000 - - - Sewer 2028 SS 2028 Line sewer pipes 550,000 - - - Sewer 2029 SI 2029 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - S of Northwood 100,000 - - - Sewer 2029 SS 2029 Line sewer pipes 600,000 - - - Sewer 2029 SS 2029 Rebuild lift station pipes and pump 150,000 - - - Sewer 2030 SS 2030 Line sewer pipes 600,000 - - - Sewer 2030 SI 2030 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - (28th & 29th)150,000 - - - Sewer 2031 SI 2031 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Quebec (Winnetka to 49th)150,000 - - - Sewer 2031 SS 2031 Line sewer pipes 600,000 - - - 505,514$ 584,268$ 510,000$ City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Sewer Fund 9300 Statement of Cash Flows 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from customers and users (4% growth assumption)3,947,830$ 4,105,743$ 4,269,972$ Payments to suppliers and employees (5% growth assumption)(2,749,907) (2,887,402) (3,031,772) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 1,197,923 1,218,340 1,238,200 Cash Flows from Capital and Related Financing Activities Acquisition of capital assets (505,514) (584,268) (510,000) Existing principal and interest paid on long-term debt (78,164) (78,444) (78,162) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Capital and Related Financing Activities (583,678) (662,712) (588,162) Cash Flows from Investing Activities Investment earnings 14,004 20,287 26,046 Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 628,249 575,915 676,084 Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1 1,400,403 2,028,652 2,604,567 Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31 2,028,652$ 2,604,567$ 3,280,650$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 36 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 450,000 - - - - - - - 150,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 450,000 - - - - - - - - 150,000 - - - - - - - 450,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 500,000 - - - - - - - 150,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 550,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 600,000 - - - - - - - 150,000 - - - - - - - - 600,000 - - - - - - - 150,000 - - - - - - - - 150,000 - - - - - - - 600,000 700,000$ 550,000$ 600,000$ 750,000$ 650,000$ 850,000$ 750,000$ 750,000$ 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 4,440,771$ 4,618,402$ 4,803,138$ 4,995,264$ 5,195,074$ 5,402,877$ 5,618,993$ 5,843,752$ (3,183,361) (3,342,529) (3,509,656) (3,685,138) (3,869,395) (4,062,865) (4,266,008) (4,479,309) 1,257,410 1,275,873 1,293,483 1,310,126 1,325,679 1,340,012 1,352,984 1,364,444 (700,000) (550,000) (600,000) (750,000) (650,000) (850,000) (750,000) (750,000) (78,546) (77,993) (78,055) (77,978) (78,053) (77,735) (77,720) (77,652) (778,546) (627,993) (678,055) (827,978) (728,053) (927,735) (827,720) (827,652) 32,807 37,923 44,781 51,383 56,719 63,262 68,017 73,950 511,671 685,803 660,209 533,531 654,345 475,540 593,282 610,742 3,280,650 3,792,321 4,478,125 5,138,334 5,671,865 6,326,209 6,801,749 7,395,031 3,792,321$ 4,478,125$ 5,138,334$ 5,671,865$ 6,326,209$ 6,801,749$ 7,395,031$ 8,005,773$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 37 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Water Fund 9301 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Department Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts Water 2021 SI 2021 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Lion's Park 131,493$ 131,493$ -$ -$ Water 2021 SI Joint Full Reconstruct w/ Crystal (36th and Louisiana)10,000 10,000 Water 2022 WA Sensus Water Meters - 2022 37,340 - 37,340 - Water 2022 WA Watermain - Bass Lake Rd and 169 Ramp 590,495 - 590,495 - Water 2022 SI 2022 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Liberty Park W 475,711 - 475,711 - Water 2023 WA Sensus Water Meters - 2023 15,587 - - 15,587 Water 2023 SI 2023 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Northwoods East 50,000 - - 50,000 Water 2023 WA 42nd Ave - Gettysburg to Boone Ave (Henn Co Rockford Rehab)1,154,000 - - 1,154,000 Water 2023 WA JWC - Repaint South Water Tower 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 Water 2024 WA Sensus Water Meters - 2024 16,055 - - - Water 2024 SI 2024 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Jaycee Park 60,000 - - - Water 2024 SI 33rd Place N & Virginia Ave.672,343 - - - Water 2025 WA Sensus Water Meters - 2025 16,536 - - - Water 2025 SI 2025 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - St. Raphael 60,000 - - - Water 2025 WA Water meter replacement to AMI 3,500,000 - - - Water 2026 SI 2026 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Northwoods South 975,000 - - - Water 2027 SI 2027 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - N of Bass Lake Rd 65,000 - - - Water 2028 SI 2028 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Meadow Lake North 70,000 - - - Water 2028 WA Infrastructure - Gettysburg 60th to 62nd 916,000 - - - Water 2029 SI 2029 Local Projects (Crack, Seal Coat & Fog Seal) - S of Northwood 70,000 - - - Water 2030 SI 2030 Street & Infrastructure Improvements (28th & 29th)70,000 - - - Water 2031 SI 2031 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Quebec (Winnetka to 49th)2,282,198 - - - 141,493$ 1,103,546$ 2,719,587$ City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Water Fund 9301 Statement of Cash Flows 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from customers and users (4% growth assumption)5,651,721$ 5,877,790$ 6,112,901$ Payments to suppliers and employees (5% growth assumption)(3,848,668) (4,041,101) (4,243,156) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 1,803,053 1,836,688 1,869,745 Cash Flows From Capital and Related Financing Activities Acquisition of capital assets (141,493) (1,103,546) (2,719,587) Intergovernmental (Joint Water Commission)- - 1,500,000 Existing principal and interest paid on long-term debt (399,182) (315,511) (314,905) Net Cash Used by Capital and Related Financing Activities (540,675) (1,419,057) (1,534,492) Cash Flows from Investing Activities Investment earnings 23,454 36,312 40,851 Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 1,285,832 453,943 376,104 Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1 2,345,370 3,631,202 4,085,145 Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31 3,631,202$ 4,085,145$ 4,461,250$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 38 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16,055 - - - - - - - 60,000 - - - - - - - 672,343 - - - - - - - - 16,536 - - - - - - - 60,000 - - - - - - - 3,500,000 - - - - - - - - 975,000 - - - - - - - - 65,000 - - - - - - - - 70,000 - - - - - - - 916,000 - - - - - - - - 70,000 - - - - - - - - 70,000 - - - - - - - - 2,282,198 748,398$ 3,576,536$ 975,000$ 65,000$ 986,000$ 70,000$ 70,000$ 2,282,198$ 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 6,357,417$ 6,611,714$ 6,876,183$ 7,151,230$ 7,437,279$ 7,734,770$ 8,044,161$ 8,365,928$ (4,455,314) (4,678,080) (4,911,984) (5,157,583) (5,415,462) (5,686,235) (5,970,547) (6,269,074) 1,902,103 1,933,634 1,964,199 1,993,647 2,021,817 2,048,535 2,073,614 2,096,853 (748,398) (3,576,536) (975,000) (65,000) (986,000) (70,000) (70,000) (2,282,198) - - - - - - - - (316,125) (313,409) (314,344) (313,947) (314,812) (313,673) (286,533) (287,839) (1,064,523) (3,889,945) (1,289,344) (378,947) (1,300,812) (383,673) (356,533) (2,570,037) 44,612 53,434 34,406 41,498 58,060 65,851 83,158 101,160 882,193 (1,902,876) 709,260 1,656,198 779,065 1,730,713 1,800,239 (372,024) 4,461,250 5,343,442 3,440,566 4,149,826 5,806,024 6,585,089 8,315,802 10,116,041 5,343,442$ 3,440,566$ 4,149,826$ 5,806,024$ 6,585,089$ 8,315,802$ 10,116,041$ 9,744,018$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 39 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Storm Water Fund 9304 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Department Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts Storm water 2021 SI 2021 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Lion's Park 228,744$ 228,744$ -$ -$ Storm water 2021 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 100,000 - - Storm water 2021 SW MLR/Rosalyn Court - Flood Mitigation Project 50,000 50,000 - - Storm water 2021 BW Bass Lake Rd (Henn Co)67,500 67,500 - - Storm water 2021 SI Joint Full Reconstruct w/ Crystal (36th & Louisiana)50,000 50,000 - - Storm water 2021 Storm water pipe replacement between Meadow Lake and GC 70,000 70,000 - - Storm water 2022 SI 2022 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Liberty Park W 110,457 - 110,457 - Storm water 2022 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - 100,000 - Storm water 2023 SW 42nd Avenue Rehab (Henn Co)40,000 - - 40,000 Storm water 2023 SI 2023 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Northwoods East 80,000 - - 80,000 Storm water 2023 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - - 100,000 Storm water 2024 SI 2024 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Jaycee Park 75,000 - - - Storm water 2024 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - - - Storm water 2025 SI 2025 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - St. Raphael 150,000 - - - Storm water 2025 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - - - Storm water 2026 SI 2026 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Northwoods South 260,000 - - - Storm water 2026 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - - - Storm water 2027 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - - - Storm water 2027 SI 2027 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - N of Bass Lake Rd 200,000 - - - Storm water 2028 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - - - Storm water 2028 SI 2028 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Meadow Lake North 200,000 - - - Storm water 2029 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - - - Storm water 2029 SI 2029 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - S of Northwood 80,000 - - - Storm water 2030 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - - - Storm water 2030 SI 2030 Street & Infrastructure Improvements (28th & 29th)200,000 - - - Storm water 2031 SI 2031 Street & Infrastructure Improvements - Quebec (Winnetka to 49th 400,000 - - - Storm water 2031 SW Required TMDL projects 100,000 - - - 566,244$ 210,457$ 220,000$ City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Storm Water Fund 9304 Statement of Cash Flows 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from customers and users (4% growth assumption)1,314,465$ 1,367,044$ 1,421,726$ Payments to suppliers and employees (5% growth assumption)(740,718) (777,754) (816,642) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 573,747 589,290 605,084 Cash Flows from Capital and Related Financing Activities Acquisition of capital assets (566,244) (210,457) (220,000) Intergovernmental revenue (Meadow Lake Draw Down)70,000 - - Existing principal and interest paid on long-term debt (194,335) (198,210) (131,989) Net Cash Used by Capital and Related Financing Activities (690,579) (408,667) (351,989) Cash Flows From Investing Activities Investment earnings 10,246 9,180 11,078 Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (106,586) 189,803 264,173 Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1 1,024,563 917,977 1,107,779 Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31 917,977$ 1,107,779$ 1,371,952$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 40 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 75,000 - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 150,000 - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 260,000 - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 80,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - - - - 400,000 - - - - - - - 100,000 175,000$ 250,000$ 360,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 180,000$ 300,000$ 500,000$ 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 1,478,595$ 1,537,739$ 1,599,248$ 1,663,218$ 1,729,747$ 1,798,937$ 1,870,894$ 1,945,730$ (857,474) (900,348) (945,365) (992,633) (1,042,265) (1,094,378) (1,149,097) (1,206,552) 621,121 637,391 653,883 670,585 687,482 704,558 721,797 739,178 (175,000) (250,000) (360,000) (300,000) (300,000) (180,000) (300,000) (500,000) - - - - - - - - (132,568) (131,509) (131,588) (131,479) (131,666) (131,196) (130,969) (131,343) (307,568) (381,509) (491,588) (431,479) (431,666) (311,196) (430,969) (631,343) 13,720 16,992 19,721 21,541 24,148 26,947 31,150 34,370 327,272 272,874 182,016 260,647 279,963 420,310 321,978 142,205 1,371,952 1,699,224 1,972,098 2,154,114 2,414,761 2,694,724 3,115,034 3,437,012 1,699,224$ 1,972,098$ 2,154,114$ 2,414,761$ 2,694,724$ 3,115,034$ 3,437,012$ 3,579,217$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 41 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Street Light Fund 9305 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Department Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts 2023 SI 42nd Ave & Boone (Multiple Projects: Monument, Trail/Power Bury, Utilities, Lighting & Boone/Gettysburg Signal Replace; Henn Co Rockford Rehab) 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Street Light Fund 9305 Statement of Cash Flows 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from customers and users (5% growth assumption)171,807$ 180,398$ 189,418$ Payments to suppliers and employees (5% growth assumption)(119,002) (124,952) (131,199) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 52,806 55,446 58,218 Cash Flows from Capital and Related Financing Activities Acquisition of capital assets - - (400,000) Cash Flows From Investing Activities Investment Earnings 710 1,245 1,812 Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 53,515 56,691 (339,970) Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1 70,954 124,469 181,160 Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31 124,469$ 181,160$ (158,811)$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 42 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 198,888$ 208,833$ 219,274$ 230,238$ 241,750$ 253,838$ 266,530$ 279,856$ (137,759) (144,647) (151,880) (159,474) (167,447) (175,820) (184,611) (193,841) 61,129 64,185 67,395 70,764 74,303 78,018 81,919 86,015 - - - - - - - - (1,588) (993) (361) 310 1,020 1,774 2,571 3,416 59,541 63,193 67,034 71,074 75,323 79,791 84,490 89,431 (158,811) (99,270) (36,077) 30,957 102,031 177,354 257,145 341,636 (99,270)$ (36,077)$ 30,957$ 102,031$ 177,354$ 257,145$ 341,636$ 431,067$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 43 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Ice Arena Fund 9303 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts Ice Arena 2021 IA dehumidification system 140,000$ 140,000$ -$ -$ Ice Arena 2021 IA scoreboard (south rink)25,000 25,000 - - Ice Arena 2021 IA security cameras 50,000 50,000 - - Ice Arena 2021 IA door security 10,000 10,000 - - Ice Arena 2021 IA skate tile replacement 15,000 15,000 - - Ice Arena 2021 IA radiant heaters (north rink)25,000 25,000 - - Ice Arena 2021 IA replace roof and skylight (south rink)450,000 450,000 - - Ice Arena 2022 IA replace dasher boards and glass (north rink)210,000 - 210,000 - Ice Arena 2022 IA HVAC upgrades 50,000 - 50,000 - Ice Arena 2022 IA weight room upgrades 20,000 - 20,000 - Ice Arena 2023 IA meeting room carpet 8,000 - - 8,000 Ice Arena 2023 IA Zamboni room garage doors 15,000 - - 15,000 Ice Arena 2023 IA rebuild compressors 22,000 - - 22,000 Ice Arena 2023 IA bleacher caps (north rink)25,000 - - 25,000 Ice Arena 2023 IA concession stand upgrades 30,000 - - 30,000 Ice Arena 2023 IA replace water heaters 40,000 - - 40,000 Ice Arena 2023 IA re-cement floor and replace glass and boards (south rink) 757,120 - - 757,120 Ice Arena 2024 IA community room tile 20,000 - - - Ice Arena 2024 IA HVAC upgrades (south rink)50,000 - - - Ice Arena 2024 IA remodel bathrooms 50,000 - - - Ice Arena 2024 IA replace bleacher caps (south rink)25,000 - - - Ice Arena 2025 IA HVAC upgrades (south rink)50,000 - - - Ice Arena 2025 IA system relief valves 8,000 - - - Ice Arena 2025 IA reader board 55,000 - - - Ice Arena 2025 IA skate tile for locker rooms 20,000 - - - Ice Arena 2026 IA rebuild compressors 24,000 - - - Ice Arena 2026 IA shower replacement 20,000 - - - Ice Arena 2026 IA HVAC upgrades 75,000 - - - Ice Arena 2027 IA overhead doors 25,000 - - - Ice Arena 2027 IA water heater for showers 15,000 - - - Ice Arena 2027 IA remodel bathrooms (lower level public)30,000 - - - Ice Arena 2028 IA protective netting 15,000 - - - Ice Arena 2029 IA rebuild compressors 27,000 - - - Ice Arena 2030 IA system relief valves 10,000 - - - Ice Arena 2031 IA replace water heaters 30,000 - - - 715,000$ 280,000$ 897,120$ Department 44 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20,000 - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - 25,000 - - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - 8,000 - - - - - - - 55,000 - - - - - - - 20,000 - - - - - - - -24,000 - - - - - - - 20,000 - - - - - - - 75,000 - - - - - - - -25,000 - - - - - - - 15,000 - - - - - - - 30,000 - - - - - - - - 15,000 - - - - - - - - 27,000 - - - - - - - - 10,000 - - - - - - - - 30,000 145,000$ 133,000$ 119,000$ 70,000$ 15,000$ 27,000$ 10,000$ 30,000$ 45 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Ice Arena Fund 9303 Statement of Cash Flows 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from customers and users (enterprise assumption of 2.5% growth)1,026,456$ 1,052,117$ 1,078,420$ Payments to suppliers and employees (enterprise modified assumption of 2.5% growth)(819,257) (839,738) (860,732) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 207,199 212,379 217,688 Cash Flows from Noncapital Financing Activities Transfers in (levy, Park Infrastructure Fund)500,000 500,000 500,000 Transfers out (administrative charges)(11,038) (11,314) (11,597) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Noncapital Financing Activities 488,962 488,686 488,403 Cash Flows from Capital and Related Financing Activities Acquisition of capital assets (715,000) (280,000) (897,120) Proceeds from bonds and notes issued or interfund loan 2,470,000 210,000 757,120 Existing Principal and interest paid on long-term debt (234,589) (263,000) (275,550) Payment for refunding of bonds (3,563,417) - - Interfund loan payments (from Temp Financing for 2021-2023 improvements)- (30,000) (44,000) Net Cash Used by Capital and Related Financing Activities (2,043,006) (363,000) (459,550) Cash Flows from Investing Activities 14,042 714 4,101 (1,332,804) 338,778 250,643 (155,885) 71,364 410,143 1,560,053 - - 1,404,168 71,364 410,143 (1,698,689) 410,143 660,785 1,770,053 - - 71,364$ 410,143$ 660,785$ Investment earnings Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents Operating Cash Cash Held with Fiscal Agent Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1 (1) Operating Cash Cash Held with Fiscal Agent Cash and Cash Equivalents (1) The value of cash & cash equivalents includes cash held in escrow which is restricted for future debt service. Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 46 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 1,105,380$ 1,133,015$ 1,161,340$ 1,190,374$ 1,220,133$ 1,250,636$ 1,281,902$ 1,313,950$ (882,250) (904,306) (926,914) (950,087) (973,839) (998,185) (1,023,140) (1,048,718) 223,130 228,709 234,426 240,287 246,294 252,451 258,763 265,232 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 (11,887) (12,184) (12,488) (12,801) (13,121) (13,449) (13,785) (14,130) 488,113 487,816 487,512 487,199 486,879 486,551 486,215 485,870 (145,000) (133,000) (119,000) (70,000) (15,000) (27,000) (10,000) (30,000) - - - - - - - - (282,950) (295,250) (302,400) (314,450) (136,350) - - - - - - - - - - - (94,475) (94,475) (94,475) (94,475) (94,475) (94,475) (94,475) (94,475) (522,425) (522,725) (515,875) (478,925) (245,825) (121,475) (104,475) (124,475) 6,608 8,562 10,586 12,752 15,365 20,393 26,772 33,444 195,427 202,362 216,649 261,314 502,714 637,921 667,275 660,072 660,785 856,212 1,058,574 1,275,223 1,536,537 2,039,251 2,677,171 3,344,446 - - - - - - - - 660,785 856,212 1,058,574 1,275,223 1,536,537 2,039,251 2,677,171 3,344,446 856,212 1,058,574 1,275,223 1,536,537 2,039,251 2,677,171 3,344,446 4,004,518 - - - - - - - - 856,212$ 1,058,574$ 1,275,223$ 1,536,537$ 2,039,251$ 2,677,171$ 3,344,446$ 4,004,518$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 47 2021 2022 2023 Year to Estimated Estimated Estimated Replace Item Cost Amounts Amounts Amounts Parks & Recreation 2021 GC cash register 5,000$ 5,000$ -$ -$ Parks & Recreation 2021 GC concession equipment 12,000 12,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 GC security cameras 25,000 25,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 GC door security 15,000 15,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 GC clubhouse HVAC 12,500 12,500 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 GC misc equipment 6,000 6,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 GC golf carts (3 of 5)8,000 8,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2021 GC tee protector fence 6,000 6,000 - - Parks & Recreation 2022 GC paint maintenance shop 10,000 - 10,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 GC clubhouse update 20,000 - 20,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 GC golf carts (4 of 5)8,000 - 8,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 GC misc equipment 6,000 - 6,000 - Parks & Recreation 2022 GC golf cart parking area 20,000 - 20,000 - Parks & Recreation 2023 GC fireplace updates 20,000 - - 20,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 GC maintenance garage updates (doors and heaters)25,000 - - 25,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 GC golf carts (5 of 5)8,000 - - 8,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 GC fire system 30,000 - - 30,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 GC clubhouse carpet 12,000 - - 12,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 GC misc equipment 6,000 - - 6,000 Parks & Recreation 2023 GC cold storage 50,000 - - 50,000 Parks & Recreation 2024 GC paint clubhouse exterior 10,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2024 GC golf cart lease (1 of 5)10,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2024 GC fencing 25,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2024 GC misc equipment 6,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2024 GC cart paths 20,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2025 GC golf cart lease (2 of 5)10,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2025 GC fencing 25,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2025 GC gas grills 7,500 - - - Parks & Recreation 2025 GC irrigation pump and motor 20,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2025 GC misc equipment 6,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2026 GC golf cart lease (3 of 5)10,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2026 GC fencing 25,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2026 GC misc equipment 6,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2026 GC reader board 60,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2027 GC golf cart lease (4 of 5)10,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2027 GC fencing 25,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2027 GC VFD Irrigation 10,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2027 GC misc equipment 7,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2028 GC golf cart lease (5 of 5)10,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2028 GC misc equipment 7,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2028 GC fencing 25,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2028 GC restroom upgrades 30,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2029 GC golf cart lease (1 of 5)12,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2029 GC misc equipment 7,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2030 GC golf cart lease (2 of 5)12,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2030 GC misc equipment 7,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2031 GC replace clubhouse carpet 15,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2031 GC golf cart lease 12,000 - - - Parks & Recreation 2031 GC misc equipment 7,000 - - - 89,500$ 64,000$ 151,000$ Department City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Golf Course Fund 9302 Schedule of Planned Capital Outlay 2021 to 2031 48 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10,000 - - - - - - - 10,000 - - - - - - - 25,000 - - - - - - - 6,000 - - - - - - - 20,000 - - - - - - - - 10,000 - - - - - - - 25,000 - - - - - - - 7,500 - - - - - - - 20,000 - - - - - - - 6,000 - - - - - - - - 10,000 - - - - - - - 25,000 - - - - - - - 6,000 - - - - - - - 60,000 - - - - - - - - 10,000 - - - - - - - 25,000 - - - - - - - 10,000 - - - - - - - 7,000 - - - - - - - - 10,000 - - - - - - - 7,000 - - - - - - - 25,000 - - - - - - - 30,000 - - - - - - - - 12,000 - - - - - - - 7,000 - - - - - - - - 12,000 - - - - - - - 7,000 - - - - - - - - 15,000 - - - - - - - 12,000 - - - - - - - 7,000 71,000$ 68,500$ 101,000$ 52,000$ 72,000$ 19,000$ 19,000$ 34,000$ 49 City of New Hope, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan - Golf Course Fund 9302 Statement of Cash Flows 2021 2022 2023 Estimated Estimated Estimated Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from customers and users (modified enterprise assumption of 5% growth)346,260$ 343,573$ 360,752$ Payments to suppliers and employees (modified enterprise assumption of 3% growth)(287,065) (295,677) (304,547) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 59,195 47,896 56,204 Cash Flows from Noncapital Financing Activities Transfers out (administrative charges)(11,038) (11,314) (11,597) Cash Flows from Capital and Related Financing Activities Acquisition of capital assets (89,500) (64,000) (151,000) Net Cash Used by Capital and Related Financing Activities (89,500) (64,000) (151,000) Cash Flows from Investing Activities Investment earnings 2,145 1,753 1,497 Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (39,198) (25,665) (104,896) Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1 214,545 175,347 149,683 Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31 175,347$ 149,683$ 44,787$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 50 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 378,789$ 397,729$ 417,615$ 438,496$ 460,421$ 483,442$ 507,614$ 532,994$ (313,684) (323,094) (332,787) (342,771) (353,054) (363,645) (374,555) (385,791) 65,106 74,635 84,828 95,725 107,367 119,796 133,059 147,203 (11,887) (12,184) (12,489) (12,801) (13,121) (13,449) (13,785) (14,130) (71,000) (68,500) (101,000) (52,000) (72,000) (19,000) (19,000) (34,000) (71,000) (68,500) (101,000) (52,000) (72,000) (19,000) (19,000) (34,000) 448 275 217 (68) 241 466 1,344 2,360 (17,334) (5,775) (28,444) 30,857 22,487 87,813 101,618 101,433 44,787 27,453 21,678 (6,766) 24,091 46,578 134,391 236,009 27,453$ 21,678$ (6,766)$ 24,091$ 46,578$ 134,391$ 236,009$ 337,442$ Enterprise Fund Projected Activity 51 Tax Rates Tax Rates: General Fund Operations and All Funds Cash Balances General Fund Balance as a Percent of Revenue:Cash Balance by Planned Use: Tax rates are a function of the levy and total tax base. The city tax rate is computed by dividing the city levy by the taxable tax capacity. Future tax rates are based on the assumption of 3.5% growth in tax capacity (see Assumptions). Comparable communities are provided for reference. The General fund fund balance should be maintained at a level to provide for adequate working capital reserves. The MN State Auditor recommends a 35- 50% reserve. As the expenditure budget grows, the required reserve should increase accordingly. The City can build to this target by adding to contingency each year. This can be accomplished by reducing expenditures and maintaining the same level of revenue or increasing tax levy. The balances represented in this graph are categorized by the planned use and/or limitations determined by statute. $- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 Fund Balance Budget Target Fund Balance (42%) General Fund Balance as a Percent of Expenditures 2020 (Actual) 2021-2031 (Estimated) 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% City Tax Capacity Rates 2020 (Actual) and 2021-2031 (Estimated) General Proposed capital levies Scheduled debt levies $- $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 $80,000,000 Cash Balance by Planned Use 2020 (Actual) and 2021-2031 (Estimated) General fund Debt service Capital projects Special revenue Enterprise Internal service Agency (pass-through grant) 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Tax Capacity Tax Rate -Comparison Cities 2016 -2021 (Actual) Crystal Golden Valley Champlin Hopkins Brooklyn Center New Hope 52 Property Taxes by Type Debt Debt Balances No additional debt issuance has been modeled in this plan.New Hope debt per is in the middle range to comparable cities ratios. This graph highlights the percent of levy by planned use. Increases in the levy are primarily attributed to the growth in scheduled and proposed debt levies as well as growth in the City's General levy. The overall city tax burden for a $229,000 house in 2020 is shown in the graph on the right. The overall property tax levy for an average valued house is highlighted above. Percent of Property Taxes - General Levy and Bonds Projected City Tax Impact - 2020 $229,000 home $- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 Property Taxes -General Levy, EDA, Debt Service and Capital 2020 (Actual) and 2021-2031 (Estimated) General Street Infrastructure Economic Development Authority Park Infrastructure Scheduled debt levies Proposed debt levies Capital levies 1,350 1,400 1,450 1,500 1,550 1,600 1,650 1,700 1,750 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Projected City Tax Impact 2020 (Actual) 2021-2031 (Estimated) $- $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 Projected Debt Balances Based on Current Amortizations and New Debt Assumed in CIP 2020 (Actual) and 2021-2031 (Estimated) G.O. Tax Increment Debt (Gov't)Other Long-term DebtG.O. Revenue Debt G.O. Tax Increment Debt (Bus)Lease Revenue Bonds G.O. Tax Abatement Debt (Gov't)G.O. Improvement (Gov't)G.O. Improvement (Bus) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 2013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025202620272028202920302031Debt Per Capita - Comparison Cities 2013-2020 (Actual) 2021-2031 (Estimated) Crystal Golden Valley Champlin Hopkins Brooklyn Center New Hope 53 I:\RFA\City Manager\2021\Chg Order Abdo\11.9 ‐ Q Chg order 11.15.21 ws.docx       Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Kirk McDonald, City Manager    Agenda Title   Discuss change order proposal with Abdo Financial Solutions for consultation of FEMA and ARPA funding  Requested Action  Staff requests that the City Council discuss Federal Emergency Management Assistance (FEMA) and the  American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding as it relates to management of the funds.  Policy/Past Practice  The City Council provides direction to city staff regarding how funds acquired by the city should be  expended within the parameters of the regulations and guidelines provided. The city has not experienced a  pandemic in the past and the continuity of city operations during this event has presented challenges and  some additional unanticipated expenditures. The city has been eligible for various federal and state funds.    Background  At the council meeting of August 23, 2021, the city accepted the American Rescue Plan Act funds. Over the  next two years the city will be receiving $2,195,235. The city may also receive additional funding through  FEMA.    The city has a three‐year contract in place with Abdo Financial Solutions for years 2021‐23 for financial  consultation of routine city operations. Abdo has presented a change order of $25,000 to cover the additional  consultation work through December 31, 2024 that is required for consultation of the city’s FEMA and ARPA  funding. The change order can be paid for with ARPA funds. The change order covers the following tasks:    FEMA   Collection and manipulation of additional expense data eligible for reimbursement;   Coordination with FEMA to amend first request for reimbursement including: additional project budget  submission, grant reimbursement request with supporting documentation, communication with FEMA as  needed to finalize application;   Submit second application for funding of additional expenses incurred during the COVID‐19 pandemic;   Interim and final reporting to FEMA;   Preparing for and assisting the City with the single audit;   Policy revisions as needed to comply with Federal standards.    ARPA   Researching and determining eligibility of possible projects;   Performing various calculations to determine eligibility of possible projects, including possible revenue  loss calculation;   Researching and using best practices for accounting of funds and expenses;  Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.9    Request for Action, Page 2     Researching and using best practices for interim and final reporting to State and Federal government;   Preparing for and assisting the City with the single audit;   Policy revisions as needed to comply with Federal standards.    Council may recall that in September of 2020 a change order of $25,000 was approved to the 2018‐2020  contract with Abdo. That change order was funded with CARES funds. The additional charges covered Abdo  staff attendance at additional management team meetings for consultation and scenarios building regarding  COVID‐19 financial impacts, establishment of project accounting ledgers and grant expense tracking,  application for state/federal funding, reporting requirements, and additional support for the single audit.  Summary  Staff is seeking Council’s support for the change order to the service agreement that would be effective  through December 31, 2024. Generally, it is mutually understood that when special projects or tasks are  undertaken that require a signification amount of additional time and effort that an amendment or change  order to the agreement may be considered for additional compensation. The change order will be placed on a  future council agenda for formal approval.  Attachments   Change Order Proposal dated November 1, 2021    Proposed By: 5201 Eden Avenue, Ste 250 Edina, MN 55436 P 952.835.9090 F 952.835.3261Lighting the path forward Victoria Holthaus, CPA Partner | Abdo victoria.holthaus@abdofs.com Direct Line 952.715.3069 Change Order Proposal for 4401 Xylon Avenue New Hope,Minnesota 55428 City of New Hope November 1, 2021 Lighting the path forward AbdoSolutions.com Kirk McDonald, City Manager City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue New Hope,Minnesota 55428 November 1, 2021 Proposed by Abdo Financial Solutions Change Request: Per request of the City of New Hope (the City) we are expanding / modifying the agreement to include consultation for the City’s FEMA and ARPA funding. The additional investment is needed in order to provide consultation which may include:revenue loss calculation for ARPA application, review project accounting ledgers for COVID-19 related expenditures, application for State and Federal funding, including the ARPA funding and FEMA, required reporting to the State and Federal government until the FEMA and APRA funds are spent, and additional support for the single audit. Reason for requiring the change order: COVID-19 pandemic has opened up additional Federal and State funding opportunities Nature of work to be performed:Consultation and reporting Contract extended to: Terms and conditions from agreement dated July 24, 2020 apply Estimated cost of change/ additional work: Fixed fee of $25,000 will cover grant consultation and reporting for ARPA through December 31, 2024. In addition, it will cover grant consultation and reporting for FEMA through June 30, 2022. Change order will be invoiced within 10 days of execution of this contract. 3 APPROVED City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue New Hope, Minnesota 55428 Name Title Name Title Date Abdo Financial Solutions, LLC 5201 Eden Ave. Suite 250 Edina, Minnesota 55436 Name Title Partner Date November 1, 2021 REJECTED I do not want Abdo Financial Solutions to perform the additional services required. I will be responsible for ensuring that our personnel will provide the requested assistance. City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue New Hope, Minnesota 55428 Name Title Date I:\RFA\City Manager\2021\Budget 2022\WS 111521\11.10 Q ‐ 2022 Budget WS 111521.docx    Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Kirk McDonald, City Manager    Agenda Title  Continue discussion on 2022 budget  Requested Action  Staff is requesting that the Council continue to discuss the 2022 budget and direct staff if any changes are  required prior to the December 6, 2021 budget public hearing. Specific items to discuss include confirmation  of proposed utility rate increases, a review of the updated presentation for the public hearing and review of  information from the Hennepin County Assessor. Representatives from AEM will be present to assist with  the discussion.  Policy/Past Practice  After the preliminary budget and tax levy are adopted in September and work session discussions conducted  in the fall, it is routine practice to prepare an updated presentation for the budget public hearing and discuss  other unfinished budget‐related issues.  Background  The preliminary budget and tax levy was adopted at the September 13 city council meeting. This is the  maximum tax levy and budget that can be adopted; it can be reduced before final adoption in December, but  it cannot be increased. The Council reviewed all general fund budgets with department heads at their  September work session and reviewed utility and enterprise fund budgets at the October work session. No  changes have been made to date on the budget.    2022 Budget  The 2022 preliminary general fund budget is $16,179,193, which is an increase of $242,216 (1.5%) over the  2021 budget of $15,936,977. The tax levy for the general fund is $11,393,354, which is a $513,889 or 4.72%  increase over the 2021 general fund tax levy of $10,879,465 (3.5%). The major increases in the budget are for  wage/benefit increases, including Council salaries ($281,056), an increase in the IT budget for police  department body camera software, contractual costs with LOGIS and Solution Builders, and wage allocations  ($105,200), an increase in the West Metro Fire‐Rescue District Joint Powers Agreement ($65,859), additional  funding for the Emerald Ash Borer removal/replacement program ($50,000), and an increase for 2022  gubernatorial election judge costs ($39,000). There is a $315,454 decrease in central garage charges primarily  in the police department (for leasing vehicles) and the street department (reduced equipment purchases).  There is a decrease of $130,000 in building permit and related revenue due to the completion of the Windsor  Ridge single‐family home development. The city is scheduled to receive $866,642 in LGA (local government  aid) in 2022, an increase of $4,916 over 2021. LGA is utilized to offset central garage equipment and building  replacement charges; it is not used for general operations.    2022 Tax Levy  The total tax levy for 2022, including the general fund, street and park infrastructure funds, economic  Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.10    Request for Action, Page 2    development and housing and redevelopment authorities, and prior debt levies for City Center, Northwood  South and Northwood North infrastructure bonds, the 2017 Police Station/City Hall facility bonds, and the  2018/2019 Pool and Park improvement bonds is $18,231,011. This represents a 4.67% or $813,410 increase over  the 2021 levy of $17,417,601, which was a 3.4% or $572,885 increase. The total tax levy includes a 5% increase  in the street and park infrastructure levies to support the long‐term funding plans for street and park  improvements. There is no additional increase in the park infrastructure levy for ice arena to assist with ice  arena capital needs, as the final increase was implemented in 2021. A new HRA levy of $417,000 is included  for 2022, which is established as a special taxing district for the scattered site housing program. The EDA  levy, which is included in the city’s tax rate, is being reduced from $365,000 to $153,000 (‐$212,000) to help  offset the HRA levy. Three of the bond debt tax levies are decreasing (2015 City Center, 2015 Northwood  South, and 2018 Pool and Park) for a total decrease of $8,833. Three of the bond debt tax levies are increasing  (2016 Northwood North, 2017 Police Station/City Hall, and 2019 Pool and Park) for a total increase of $7,036.  Overall, the combined debt levies are decreasing by $1,797.    The median home value for taxes payable in 2022 is $275,000, which is a 7% increase from the median value  home in 2021. Per updated information recently received from Hennepin County the estimated impact on  residential homes based on the proposed 4.67% increase in the city tax levy is 7%. For homes valued between  $150,000 and $400,000 the tax increase estimate is $57 to $180. The city tax rate is projected to slightly increase  from 62.596% in 2021 to 62.719% in 2022.    Attached are the minutes from the September and October city council work session when the general and  utility/enterprise fund budgets were reviewed with the Council. Prior to the December 6 budget public  hearing, staff requests to briefly discuss, review the following topics:     1. 2022 Utility Rates – At the October work session the Council reviewed the recommendation from AEM on  2022 utility rate adjustments to offset increased charges from other agencies for water, sewer, and electric,  and for infrastructure improvements. An increase of 4% is recommended for water, sewer and  stormwater and a 5% increase for streetlights is recommended. A $.25 per household/per month increase  in recycling fees is recommended due to the implementation of residential organics recycling, reduced  funding from Hennepin County and the increasing costs of the bulky waste curbside collection program.  AEM has prepared the enclosed calculation showing the impact of the rate adjustments on an average  residential property is $3.90 per month and staff recommends implementing the adjustments. The  average rate adjustment for an average residential property was $4.34 per month in 2021, so the proposed  increase for 2022 is lower than the 2021 increase.    2. Updated Presentation for Budget Hearing – The attached presentation has been updated for the public  hearing and includes performance measures/2021 city services survey results, utility rates, and  information from the Hennepin County Assessor.    3. Hennepin County Assessor Information – Attached is information obtained from the Assessment Report  prepared by the Hennepin County Assessor’s Office. The single‐family resident valuation in the city  increased by 6.9% for 2021. The total taxable property market value in the city increased by 7.72%, from  $2,021,382,123 to $2,177,389,934. The estimated market value median for 2021 was $275,000. At this time  we have not received property tax comparisons for residential, apartment and commercial/industrial    Request for Action, Page 3    properties or sample tax statements from the Hennepin County Assessor. When that information is  received it will be forwarded to Council and included in the budget presentation.  Attachments   September/October Work Session Minutes   Utility Rates   Updated December 6 Budget Hearing Presentation   Hennepin County Assessor Information.    Updated December 6 Budget Hearing Presentation 2022 PRELIMINARY BUDGET New Hope City Council Presentation • Dec. 6,2021 Presentation Outline Review budget process Review past tax levies and bonds Review Local Government Aid (LGA) Present preliminary general tax levy Review specific tax levy detail Property tax levy limits 2 Review Budget Process September 13, 2021 Council Meeting Approved 2022 preliminary tax supported budgets Approved 2022 preliminary tax levy (maximum amount) September –November, 2021 Reviewed general fund budget detail Reviewed enterprise fund budget detail December 6, 2021 Public input meeting 3 Review Budget Process December 2021 Present budget and tax levy -final meeting December 14, 2021 Certify final levy to Hennepin County Auditor and Department of Revenue 4 Past Levies and Bonds, LGA Used For Equipment Replacement Funding 2019 Budget 18.50% levy increase over 2018 (13.24% was for addition of bonds for new police station/city hall facility). The levy increase would have been 5.26% without the facility bonds. $697,864 in LGA received ($4,750 increase from 2018) Full LGA used for general fund equipment replacement costs (100%) LGA not used for general operations 5 2020 Tax Levy, Bonds and Use of LGA 2020 Budget 10.08% levy increase over 2019 (8.72% was for addition of bonds for new pool and park improvements). The levy increase would have been 1.36% without the pool/park bonds. $815,623 received in LGA ($117,759 increase from 2019) Full LGA used for general fund equipment replacement costs (100%) LGA not used for general operations 6 2021 Tax Levy, Bonds and Use of LGA 2021 Budget 3.4% levy increase over 2020 No new bonds for 2021. Four of the previous debt bond tax levies decreased. $861,726 received in LGA ($46,103 increase over 2020) Full LGA amount used for General Fund central garage equipment/building replacement costs (100%) LGA not used for general operations 7 Proposed 2022 Tax Levy, Bonds and Use of LGA 2022 Budget 4.67% levy increase over 2021 No new bonds for 2022. Total bond debt tax levies are decreasing $1,797. Scheduled to receive $866,642 in LGA ($4,916 increase over 2021) Full LGA amount to be used for General Fund central garage equipment/building replacement costs (100%) LGA not used for general operations 8 Central Garage Fund Equipment/ Vehicle Replacement Funds are budgeted for both: Operations (gas, oil, tires, maintenance) Replacement (savings for future replacement) Includes variety of city vehicles/equipment (snowplows, police vehicles, trucks, etc.) Equipment replaced only when necessary –often delayed New for 2021-22: Leasing agreement for new police vehicles to achieve savings on replacement costs 9 General Fund Budget 10 2020 2021 Adopted Adopted 2020 to 2021 2020-2021 Budget Budget Increase % Increase $15,410,550 $15,936,977 $526,427 3.5% 2021 2022 Adopted Preliminary 2021 to 2022 2021-2022 Budget Budget Increase % Increase $15,936,977 $16,179,193 $242,216 1.5% Major General Fund Budget Changes $281,056 increase to fund 3% increase in wages/benefits; increase in Council salaries; EDA reallocation. $105,200 increase in IT charges; includes $30,000 for WatchGuard/PD body camera software and 10% of HR personnel costs. $65,859 increase in West Metro Fire-Rescue District joint powers agreement (includes aerial lease payment). $50,000 increase for Emerald Ash Borer removal/replacement program on public property. $39,000 increase in elections budget for election judge costs; 2022 is a gubernatorial election year. $315,454 decrease in central garage charges in the police department (leasing vehicles) and street department (reduced equipment purchases). 11 Street & Park Infrastructure Key points: New Hope does not assess taxable properties for street improvements. Street and Park infrastructure improvements are paid through the general property tax levy. A 5% increase for street infrastructure is proposed in the 2022 budget (increase of $77,035). A 5% increase for park infrastructure is proposed in the 2022 budget (increase of $19,283). Overall tax rate may appear high when compared to other cities due to New Hope including infrastructure improvements in general property tax levy rather than assessing to benefitting property owner (street levy is approximately 13% of local tax levy). 12 2022 Budget Initiatives Key points: Continue to provide existing services/programs with current resources. Public safety is a high priority; continue community engagement programs with the Joint Community Policing Partnership with Crystal and Robbinsdale, expand officer wellness program and complete CIP purchases. Support/coordinate with West Metro Fire-Rescue District in partnership with Crystal; including emergency preparedness training, support of long-term capital plan and station 3 improvements. Redevelopment of city center and other areas is a high priority, potential improvements at St. Therese Nursing Home campus and new medical equipment facility at 27th and Nevada. 13 2022 Budget Initiatives Key points (continued): Property maintenance and inspections to continue as top priority; continue aggressive scattered site housing program to remove or renovate deteriorated homes and increase property values with new construction or rehabilitation. Continue infrastructure/environmental improvements; complete street and water infrastructure improvements in Liberty Park neighborhood, including Bass Lake Road watermain loop; coordinate with Hennepin County on Bass Lake Road mill and overlay project; continue coordination on Boone and 42nd Avenue signal replacement and future 42nd Avenue bridge replacement, continue annual seal coat/crack repair/fog seal improvements and sewer lining, coordinate on Meadow Lake drawdown and golf course culvert improvements. Continue coordination with Joint Water Commission and maintain partnerships with Northwood Lake and Meadow Lake Watershed Associations. 14 2022 Budget Initiatives Key points (continued): Operate new aquatic facility for second season, replace playground equipment at Hidden Valley Park, replace additional picnic tables at Northwood Park picnic shelter, replace park name signage and make park lighting improvements. Facility improvements to include: Ice Arena –Replacement of glass and boards at north rink and HVAC upgrades. Golf Course –Clubhouse interior improvements and addition of cart parking area. Continue dance, gymnastics, and Movies and Music in Park Program and coordinate with OBMT on musical performances. Continue Emerald Ash Borer removal/replacement program on public property and buckthorn removal in parks. 15 2022 Budget Initiatives Key points (continued): Continue contractual arrangement with Solution Builders for IT services. Continue financial services contract with AEM, update ten-year financial plan, pavement management plan and long-term capital improvements plan. Conduct professional city-wide survey with Morris Leatherman to solicit resident feedback on city services/programs/issues, encourage public participation on city projects and promote inclusiveness. Continue MN Green Step Cities Program Cost of living increase (3%) and shared increase for insurance contributions included for employees; Council salary adjustments. 16 2022 Budget Initiatives Key points (continued): 2022 is gubernatorial election year; funds are budgeted for election judge costs and additional staffing; orient any new residents elected to serve on City Council to city departments, programs and operations. 17 2021 Performance Measures Overview City Services Survey conducted July 1 to Oct. 1, 2021 663 total responses 366 paper surveys returned 297 surveys completed online Decrease from 2020, but similar response rate when compared to past years. 18 2020 2019 2018 2017 839 610 679 632 2021 Performance Measures General City Services Survey conducted July 1 to Oct. 1, 2021; 663 responses Rating of the overall quality of city services *82% excellent or good; 12% neutral; 5% fair; 1% poor Percent change in the taxable property market value ▲7.72% increase ($2,021,382,123 payable in 2020 to $2,177,389,934 payable in 2021; 10.37% increase 2019 to 2020) Citizens’ rating of the overall appearance of the city * 79% excellent or good; 11% neutral; 8% fair; 1% poor Bond rating * AA Citizens’ rating of the quality of city recreational programs & facilities ▲75% as excellent or good; 18% neutral; 4% fair; 2% poor Citizen’s rating of the quality of communication/distribution of information * 73% excellent or good; 18% neutral; 6% fair; 2% poor 19 *= No significant change from last year ▲= Increase from last year ▼= Decrease from last year 2021 Performance Measures Public Safety Part I and II crime rates (for 2020) ▼Part I –600; Part II –503 Citizens’ rating of safety in the community ▼88% very or somewhat safe; 11% somewhat unsafe; 0% very unsafe Average police response time (for 2019) ▼4.03 minutes for Priority 1 calls Insurance industry rating of fire services * 3 Citizens’ rating of the quality of fire protection services * 76% excellent or good; 21% neutral; 1% fair; 0% poor Fire calls per 1,000 population ▼48.33 (983 calls for service in 2020) 20 *= No significant change from last year ▲= Increase from last year ▼= Decrease from last year 2021 Performance Measures Public Works Average city pavement rating index ▲80 (76 in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020) Citizens’ rating of overall condition of city streets ▲72% excellent or good; 15% neutral; 11% fair; 1% poor Citizens’ rating of quality of snowplowing on city streets *82% excellent or good; 7% neutral; 7% fair; 3% poor Citizens’ rating of dependability & overall quality of city water supply * 87% excellent or good; 8% neutral; 4% fair; 0% poor Citizens’ rating of the quality of stormwater management in the city ▲75% excellent or good; 17% neutral; 5% fair; 1% poor Citizens’ rating of the dependability & quality of city sanitary sewer service ▲83% excellent or good; 15% neutral; 2% fair; 0% poor Number of sewer blockages on city system * 0 in 2021 (through 11/1) 21 *= No significant change from last year ▲= Increase from last year ▼= Decrease from last year 22 Hennepin County Assessor Information Single-family residential property valuation in city increased approximately 7% for 2021 Total taxable property market value in city increased 7.72% from 2019 to 2020 (payable 2021) 23 Increase Rate 2021 Rate 2022 Water –base rate 4%$9.32 $9.69 Water –1 to 10,000 gallons 4%$6.87 $7.14 Water –10,001 to 20,000 gallons 4%$7.47 $7.76 Water –20,001+ gallons & irrigation 4%$8.40 $8.73 Water –commercial 4%$7.02 $7.30 Utility Rates 24 Increase Rate 2021 Rate 2022 Sewer –1 to 1,000 gallons 4%$9.34 $9.71 Sewer –1,001+gallons 4%$6.20 $6.45 Street lights 5%Non-decorative $1.39 Decorative $1.99 Non-decorative $1.45 Decorative $2.09 Storm drainage 4%Residential $8.78 Non-residential $13.17 Residential $9.13 Non-residential $13.70 Recycling 6.67%$3.75 $4.00 Utility Rates 25 2022 Utility Rates Increases necessary to pay for: Increasing water purchase costs from Minneapolis Sewage disposal costs from MCES Infrastructure improvements Impact on average residential user (5,000 gallons H20): Overall rate increase of $3.90 per month 2021 Legislative Session Impacts No levy limits LGA budget increased to $866,642 No change in PERA employer retirement contributions for 2022 26 General Fund Revenues 2020 & 2021 Adopted Budgets & 2022 Preliminary Budget 27 Taxes and franchise fees Intergovernmental Charges and fees Other Transfers in 2020 Budget $11,024,175 $1,405,262 $2,356,825 $285,000 $339,288 2021 Budget $11,415,965 $1,490,177 $2,310,160 $270,000 $450,675 2022 Preliminary $11,928,354 $1,524,542 $2,164,255 $260,000 $302,042 $- $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $14,000,000 2022 LGA Compared With Last 10 Years 28 $- $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 $900,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 General Fund Expenditures 2020 & 2021 Adopted Budgets & 2022 Preliminary Budget 29 General government Public safety Public works Parks and recreation 2020 Budget $2,038,450 $8,869,299 $1,620,168 $2,882,633 2021 Budget $2,061,129 $9,302,404 $1,655,393 $2,918,051 2022 Preliminary $2,329,586 $9,276,503 $1,598,929 $2,974,175 $- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,000 $10,000,000 Proposed Property Tax Levy 30 Tax Capacity Information 2022 Tax levy impact will vary by property type Commercial/Industrial properties have higher tax rates than Residential/Apartment properties Tax impact is based on estimated market value Parcel specific tax estimates prepared by county 31 Summary of Tax Capacities 32 Local Tax Rate 33 (1)Source: Hennepin County Tax Capacity Values by City/Town for Taxes Payable 2022 Proposed. (2)Source: Hennepin County Table VIII Computation of Area Wide Distribution Levy for Taxes payable in 2022. (3)Amounts for county, school and other districts are not known at this time. Prior year actual tax rates have been used for this illustration. •The city tax rate is projected to increase from •62.596% in 2021 to •62.719% in 2022 •The total tax rate is projected to increase from •136.277% in 2021 to •136.591% in 2022 Estimated Tax Impact Median home value in 2022 is $275,000, which is a 7% increase from 2021 Current estimated impact on residential homes based on 4.67% increase in city tax levy is 7% For homes valued between $150,000 and $400,000 the tax increase estimate is $57 to $180. 34 City Tax Rate For Past 10 Years 35 2022 Current Budget Summary Fund balance maintains close to 50% of expenditures if this budget is maintained Overall levy increase is 4.67%. Prior year increase was 3.4% LGA to be used for equipment replacement savings – not general operations 36 2022 Preliminary Budget Data Council and staff will continue to review budgets and programs Tax supported and rate supported budgets will be reviewed and finalized Final document will be submitted to Council in December 2021 for adoption Budget document also available at city hall 763-531-5117 cityhall@newhopemn.gov 37 Property Tax Relief Programs State provides direct property tax relief to taxpayers Homestead credit refund Renter’s refund Special property tax refund (referred to as the targeting program) Senior Citizen Property Tax Deferral Program. Contact MN Dept of Revenue 651-296-4444 or www.revenue.state.mn.us 38 Hennepin County Assessor Information I:\RFA\City Manager\2021\11.11 Q ‐ WS Council & Comm Reappts for 2022.docx   Request for Action  November 15, 2021    Approved by: Kirk McDonald, City Manager  Originating Department: City Manager  By: Valerie Leone, City Clerk‐Treasurer    Agenda Title  Discussion regarding council and commission appointments for 2022  Requested Action  Staff would like the opportunity to discuss next year’s appointments.  Policy/Past Practice  City code outlines terms and reappointments for commission members. City code also provides for the  appointment of Council to various boards/positions.  Background  Staff would like to update Council regarding commissioner terms. Commissioners with terms expiring  December 31 include:    Citizen Advisory – Scott Kulzer, Rick Riley, Mike Terres (all are interested in re‐appointment)  Human Rights – Donna Meyer, Trista Rehnke (both are interested in re‐appointment)  Planning – Roger Landy, Christopher Hanson (Landy is interested in re‐appointment; Hanson will not  be seeking re‐appointment)    Council will consider re‐appointments at the December 13 Council Meeting. Vacancies will be advertised in  city publications and the Sun Post.     Other appointments:    Acting Mayor ‐ based on rotation, it’s Council Member Hoffe’s turn as mayor pro tem next year.   Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission – Council Member Hoffe serves on this  commission along with the city manager, and these are continuous appointments.  Watershed appointments – expire January 31, 2022  Shingle Creek Watershed commission – Bill Wills (rep) and Bob Grant (alt rep)   Bassett Creek Watershed commission – John Elder (rep) and Pat Crough (alt rep). Council Member  Elder is not seeking reappointment and the Northwood Lake Association has been contacted to  determine if there’s interest from one of the association members.     Based on Council’s direction, staff will prepare resolutions for Council’s appointments on January 10, 2022.      Agenda Section Work Session Item Number  11.11