Loading...
IP #702COUNCIL REQUEST FOR ACTION 2�� H 0 Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section Public Works May 14, 2001 Planning and Develo Item No. By: Guy Johnson By: /,, 8.2 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEW HOPE AND GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PROJECT NO. 702) REQUESTED ACTION Staff is recommending that Council pass a resolution approving a contract between the City of New Hope and GoodPointe Technology for Infrastructure Analysis and the development of a Pavement Management Program. The amount of the contract for pavement analysis and development of the Pavement Management Program is $39,345.00. Analysis of City sidewalks was included as an alternate and will be added to the project. The price of the sidewalk analysis is not to exceed an additional $9,000.00. POLICY/PAST PRACTICE Many of the streets in New Hope were built in the 1950's, 60's and 70's, and are approaching the end of their expected functional life. Since they were originally built, these streets have been maintained primarily by being seal coated, and when necessary, overlaid with additional layers of asphalt. Since 1995, the streets in worst condition have been completely reconstructed rather than just overlaid. Street reconstruction projects have taken place in 1995, 1997, and 1999. In December of 2000, the New Hope City Council established a new Infrastructure fund that sets aside 1 million dollars of property tax revenue each year for street construction and maintenance needs. This fund was established in the hope that special assessments to residential property for street improvements could be drastically reduced or eliminated. BACKGROUND For many years Bonestroo and Associates has provided engineering services for New Hope. For the Infrastructure Analysis and Pavement Management Program, it was decide that we should look for another, independent engineering firm. In March of this year, the City solicited proposals to four engineering firms to objectively assess the condition of New Hope's streets and to establish a long -term priority list for street maintenance and street reconstruction. The consulting firm selected, GoodPointe Technology, will perform the analysis and develop a program that will address the maintenance requirements of the infrastructure. The analysis and the resulting maintenance program will include the assessment of sidewalks and the type and conditions of curbs, and takes into account the history of water main breaks throughout the City. Once the Pavement Management Program is developed, Bonestroo will work with city staff to implement the program. MOTION BY SECOND BY TO: I:Rfa \Pworks \702 Award Infrastructure Management Request for Action Infrastructure Consultants May 14, 2001 Page 2 In addition to the proposal received form GoodPointe Technology, proposals where received from Bloom Consultants, Short- Elliot- Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and Toltz, King, Duvall, and Anderson (TKDA). FUNDING The project is funded by the Streets Operating Budget. A portion of the funds set aside for the Infrastructure Analysis were originally intended for seal coating in 2000 but were carried over to this year's budget. The cost of the project will not exceed $48,345.00. This includes $39,345.00 for the Infrastructure Analysis and Pavement Management Program, and an amount not to exceed $9,000.00 for alternate #2, the sidewalk analysis. ATTACHMENTS The proposal from GoodPointe Technology and a resolution is attached. RESOLUTION NO. 01- 78 Wiffilmaliffil"M ' .' Project No. 702 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows: 1. That City Staff solicited bids for preparation of an infrastructure analysis and pavement management program identified as Project No. 702, as previously authorized by this Council. 2. That in response to Staff's request for bids, the City received proposals for Project No. 702 from the following consulting firms: Bloom Consultants; Goodpointe Technology Corporation; Short- Elliot- Hendrickson (SEH); and Toltz, King, Devall and Anderson (TKDA). 3. That the consulting firms referenced were each given an opportunity to present its proposals to the City Council at its April 23, 2001 meeting and each firm did in fact make a presentation at said meeting. 4. That preparation of an infrastructure analysis and pavement management program are a request for professional services and as such award of a contract for Project No. 702 is not subject to the requirements of the Minnesota Municipal Contracting Law. 5. That based on the written proposals and oral presentations by each consulting firm and the recommendation of City Staff and the City Engineer, it is hereby found and determined by this Council that the bid of Goodpointe Technology Corporation in the amount of $48,345.00, which includes a cost not to exceed $9,000.00 for an alternate to integrate the City's 26 mile sidewalk network information in the pavement management database as described in its proposal, is the most responsible bid for Project No. 702; that the City Council hereby accepts the bid of Goodpointe Technology Corporation, including the sidewalk network information alternate, for Project No. 702. 6. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into an improvement contract for Project No. 702 in the name of the City with Goodpointe Technology Corporation, subject to said contractor furnishing public contractor surety bonds as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 14`' day of May, 2001. (-7/ - W. Peter Enck, Mayor '1 Attest: Valerie Leone, City Clerk P:\ Attorney \SAS \Documents \resolution awarding contract for infrastructure analysis Goodpointe.wpd May-10-01 11:56A Goodpointe Technology 612 721 3434 P-02 ICON Get to the mint i I $O - t F W4 May 9, 2 00 t T Schuster COW-tract Mana city of New Hope 5 00 International Park vay lie w Rap MN 55 428 GoodPoInte Project: '1 Re: C Fstirnateto provide Project Ali cmatc 2: lin.cgrate Sidewalk inventory and Condition Information Dcar Mr. Schuster: GoodPointe Technolou will provide the scope o f se rvices for the above-referenced Project Alternate described in GoodPointe Technology proposal dated April 1 1, '4001, for a trot-to-excced amourit of S9,000,00. The p"Ject, will proceed according to the schedule outlined on page 1 435 of the April 11, 01 prQposal. The saute, data for this project vvit] include the 1.9 6, Bonestm Roscae Anderl ik & Associates hardcopy report on the sidewalk netxvo&-_ as well as additional h project-related information. If vou have any questions or need additional information pl contact me at (612) 7 Sincerely G- oodPointe Technology 0 4 Anthony J. Kaadly Vi ce pre-Slident )rporation gpo i, k 'I c FftAlvarlus !W- 2 Annue SM6 Wwmp�*, YA 154-N j r pbre_,jar tMI hope 61,T724.5-555 Estimated Cost Develop and Implement Street Infrastructure Proces and Plan City of New Hope. Minnesota Task Descripuos P art I - Process i Units Quality Uait Coat Rite Total Cost $25.00 95.00 75.00 S1.500 75 1,875 ark to fwtepute lavenlo" Iafanaatwa Measure Sue ct Dimensions with aiaomated DL%wice Meavam8 Egurpmeut Project Senior r � cemedine im7es hours 60 5 Task u latepute Hkiincal Pnject 1MOroatwn SeniorFmgmexr hags 40 S75M $3,000 Senior Engineer boors 20 S75.OD S1.5w Tack 1A latc7erate Pavmt Layer Den Senior Engineer hags 1$ $75,00 S1,125 Task 1S Pawmew Coadif a Sanity oent ine•nales 60 $200.00 12000 Twk 1.4 Cescreee Crrb aad Getter Swwy CetaC11111e411tIC5 60 $10.00 1,800 Teak 1.7 Ceardiare Water Ma® Break l/au wbb Street Infrastrucnre Pbm P-ject Mariam hours 15 S95.00 1,425 Senior Engu=r hags 25 75.00 1,875 Subtotal: S26,575 Trk2.1 Develop Proposed Pro to Develsp the Street hdrartrucmrc Plow ubtotal: so 1ask3.1 Project KkUW MeewitlRevew Prepped Precna with City Staff pad Ca..a Project Manager hags 4 $95.00 SM 0 Senior Enpneer hags $75.OD S300 Subtotal: P art 2 - Eviluiiion Tack 4.1 F.recute rbe Dm Callectw.1.Kpa1wn Taab F7eorrrarrka L! - 1.7abr.e rite aMrr Task 4S TraW Staff w the Dot* Manarteset Pratxn Project Mmtager Haas 4 $95.00 IC380 Senior Engineer Haas 4 $75.00 300 Tak 4.31CON Sym— Mawtwrte md idonnacma Rq�ft Support Option mdudes 30 hours of System Support and Coosultmg Labor BFMIW support I S2,500.OD 2,500 Twk 4A Pravfdc Recite wdstieur fire Mawtenaace l�proreww by Street Sectiom Projat MMVw Hours 25 95.00 2,375 SentorEllor Haas 25 S75.00 1,875 Twk 4.5 Devebp Recorendad WFaerrae M Project Coat Project Mir Haas 1 95.00 S1,425 Senior Engirim Haas 25 75.00 $1,875 Subtotal: S12,090 Part 3 - Alternates A -berWt 1: loaeeratt GIS Centerane Map with Street Databre To be deemed i Project Kielrff Meeelod a Cfry w bwereaKd. AYeroaae 2: lasegmse SdewWk h mewy W CwdRN Laforwtiae To be dbcwed to Project Kkh ff M eetbgt / City is lotereatN. Aheraate 3: Addten GASS Stateaent 34 lafragrock— Rep twg lane To be dhcwed be PnFect Kkbvff Meetiet. a City it inneseed. Subtotal: Grand Total Not to Exceed 539,345 04/11/2001 1:59 PM CITY OF NEW O' CONTRACT FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS 1 DEVELOPMENT OF A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 702 For valuable consideration as set forth below, this Contract dated the 14` day of May, 2001 is made and signed by the City of New Hope, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter "City ") and GoodPointe Technology Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter "Contractor "). 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The Contract shall consist of the following documents: a. This Contract; b. Contractor's April 11, 2001 Proposal to Develop and Implement a Street Infrastructure Process and Plan for the City of New Hope including the following attachments: i. Estimated Cost; ii. Appendix B "General Process Proposed By City "; and iii. Contractor's May 9, 200lCost Estimate from Anthony J. Kadlec indicating Cost Estimate to Provide Project Alternate 2; Integrate Sidewalk Inventory and Condition Information. The Contractor hereby promises and agrees to perform and comply with all the provisions of this Contract, its April 11, 2001 Proposal and its May 9, 2001 Cost Estimate, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. This Contract shall comprise the total agreement of the parties hereto. No oral order, objection or claim by any party to the other shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in this Contract. 1 • The work to be performed by Contractor under this Contract is defined in the April 11, 2001 Proposal accepted by the City at its May 14, 2001 Council Meeting (hereinafter the "Work "). Regarding the Project Alternates in Part 3, it is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that only Alternate 2, "Integrate Sidewalk Inventory and Condition Information" of Part 3 set out on pages 21 and 22 of the April 11, 2001 Proposal is included in the Work in addition to Part 1 and 2 set out in pages 1 through 20 of the April 11, 2001 Proposal. -1- 3. CONTRACT PRICE The City agrees to pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed Forty -Eight Thousand Three Hundred Forty -Five and No /100ths Dollars ($48,345.00). An "amount not exceed" figure is used due to Contractor's Proposal to perform Alternate 2 for an amount not to exceed Nine Thousand and No /100ths Dollars ($9,000.00). Contractor shall complete his performance under this Contract by the 28` day of September, 2001 (hereinafter "Completion Date "). 5. INSURANCE Before beginning actual work under this Contract, the Contractor shall submit to the City and obtain the City's approval of a certificate of insurance on Standard Form C.I.C.C. -701 or ACORD 25 forms, showing the following insurance coverage and listing the City as a loss payee under the policies: a. General Contractor Liability: $1,000,000.00 b. Automobile Liability for all automobiles: $1,000,000.00 C. Workman's Compensation: Statutory Amounts This certificate must provide for the above coverages to be in effect from the date of the Contract until 30 days after the Completion Date, and must provide the insurance company will not cancel the insurance coverage without 30 -days' written notice to the City of intent to cancel. The certificate must further provide that the Contractor's insurance coverage is primary coverage notwithstanding any insurance coverage carried by the City that may apply to injury or damage relating to the maintenance or repair of City owned property by either the City or any employee, agent, independent contractor or any other person or entity retained by the City to perform the services described herein. All insurance is subject to the review and approval of the New Hope City Attorney. The Contractor shall give all notices and comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations applicable to performance under this Contract. t -2- The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any damages, including costs and attorneys' fees, from any claims, demands actions or causes of action arising out of any act or omission on the part of the Contractor or its agents, servants or employees in the performance of or with relation to any of the work or services performed or furnished by the Contractor under this Contract. 8. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign or transfer, whether by an assignment or notation or otherwise, any of its rights, duties, benefits, obligations, liabilities or responsibilities without prior written consent of the City. 9. NOTICE The address and telephone numbers of the Contractor for purposes of giving notices and any other purposes under this Contract shall be: 3940 - 27"' Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406. Telephone Numbers: (612) 729 -5555 and Fax (612) 721 -3434. The address and telephone numbers of the City for purposes of giving notices and any other purposes under this Contract shall be: 4401 Xylon Avenue North, New Hope, MN 55428. Telephone Numbers: (763) 531 -5100 and Fax (763) 531 -5136. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Contract have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. Its City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 2001, by W. Peter Enck and Daniel J. Donahue, the Mayor and City Manag r, respectively, of the City of New Hope, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said municipal corporation. CORPORATION By: Its: L 6 .3 Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of - d — 2001, by "4,W6 -/ a_ -- ---- - - - - a- - a7- , the y e and of GoodPointe Technology Corporation, a MiniXota corporation, on behalf of said corporation- N GREGORY k WHITTEMORE NC,TA,RY PU WC-MINNESOTA ro't cofWISSION EXPIRES 141-2OD ?:\Au.—y\SAS'•.D.—o .m\C'iH99,11266-001-C. c t f., Pmj.r N.. 702 -N K o - . i Submitted by: W wj=jw]ig= 1 •, I IRS ` GoodPointe Technology Corporation 394027 th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55406 Direct: (612) 729 -5555 Fax: (612) 721 -3434 Internet: www..qoodi)ointe.com Email: info(d)goodpointe.com City of New Hope Street Infrastructure Plan Report December 27, 2001 Page 1 Executive Summary Studies conducted by a number of agencies indicate that as pavement conditions decrease, the cost for the appropriate method of repair can quadruple. A graph of a typical case taken from the American Public Works Association, The Hole Story, is shown in the following figure. o O 10 75% Time > Each 51.00 of > �% Renovation Quality cost Here — 8 o Lowest Annual Drop Will Cost $4.00 o Resurfacing Cost to $5.00 If _ 6 Delayed to Here. L —4 Cl 0 0 40% °' Quality — 2 a` Drop Total Failure 0 0 a 12% Time > 4 8 12 16 Years (Time Varies for Each Road Section) The City of New Hope contracted GoodPointe Technology to perform pavement management consultation services, which included a comprehensive street infrastructure condition evaluation to determine the current condition of the New Hope pavement network and to develop a detailed multi -year Street Infrastructure Plan. This report summarizes the work accomplished in this project on a per task basis. The New Hope pavement network consists of 63.35 miles of asphalt - surfaced pavement. Each of the pavements in the City of New Hope was visually inspected using the Paver -based Pavement Condition Index (PCI) methodology. The methodology is based on a numeric rating system ranging from 100 for a newly surfaced pavement to 0 for a failed pavement. Based on the survey data collected in 2001, the average PCI of the New Hope pavement network is 82.7. Customized pavement performance curves were developed based on actual historical data from New Hope to accurately model the performance characteristics of the New Hope infrastructure network. GoodPointe Technology Street Infrastructure Plan Recommendations Generally, this Street Infrastructure Plan has been designed to optimize the return on investment (ROI) that the City realizes in the plan, by: City of New Hope Street Infrastructure Plan Report December 27, 2001 Page 2 Programming the right projects at the right time from an engineering- and economic standpoint, to maximize the useful remaining life of each pavement management strategy (e.g. seal coats, overlays, reconstructs); and, Maximizing the overall pavement condition of the street network by preserving the condition of pavements already in good condition and simultaneously minimizing the deferred maintenance backlog of paving projects for the network. GoodPointe Technology recommends the following implementation strategy for the Street Infrastructure Plan presented in this report: Divide and Conquer. The street infrastructure network has been divided into three mutually exclusive areas (project zones) to aid in the logistical coordination of future street improvement projects. To preserve pavements that are currently in good condition, the Street Infrastructure Plan recommends seal coat projects on an annual basis, rotating through the three project zones. To rehabilitate pavements that are at the end of their infrastructure life cycle, rehabilitation projects will be scheduled on a bi- yearly basis (even years: 2002, 2004, etc.), generally rotating through the network according to the three project zones. To maximize the City's return on investment for the infrastructure network, the City should coordinate the replacement of cast iron water main line- segments with the pavement reconstruction projects recommended in the SIP. This practice will allow the City to minimize the amount of network disruption experienced by the traveling public and will minimize the cost associated with the repair and replacement of the cast iron water main system already in place. The Street Infrastructure Plan includes analysis projections for the next 30- analysis years; detailed plan recommendations for years 2002 -2006 (see appendix 2-6) with network level projections in each year of the plan or 2002- 2031. The average annual network backlog maintained over the course of the projected 30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan is $7.5 Million. Although the City of New Hope currently enjoys a relatively low maintenance backlog, the City is expected to experience a moderate backlog increase over the course of the projected 30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan. This trend is reversed, however, in years 11 through 30 of the plan, as more cost effective strategies become applicable for the pavement network. The average annual network PCI maintained over the course of the ro e p � cted 30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan is 70.4. Although the City of New Hope pavement network is currently in very good condition with an average network City of New Hope Street Infrastructure Plan Report December 27, 2001 Page 3 PCI of 82.7, the average network PCI is expected to experience a moderate decline in average pavement condition over the next 10 years of the projected 30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan. This trend is reversed, however, in years 11 through 30 of the plan, as more cost effective strategies become applicable for the pavement network. To actively monitor the ongoing health of the City pavement network, GoodPointe Technology recommends that a follow -up pavement condition survey be performed on one -third of the street network on an annual basis. The surveys should be conducted in the spring of each year so that this information can be used to update and validate the Street Infrastructure Plan for the current and upcoming construction seasons. MIR This Street Infrastructure Plan generally maintains the average network PCI above the target level of 60 and eventually reduces the network backlog over the course of the 30 -year scenario. . These budget analysis scenarios are based on the application of pavement management strategies in an optimal fashion, across the network. The final step in the Street Infrastructure Plan process is to take the detailed project recommendations of this report and to further develop the strategy into a more practical project plan, given physical and project -level constraints of the network. It is important to note that these scenarios were initially generated at the network level and adapted for implementation at the project level. The results presented in this plan _ are based on pavement repair and rehabilitation costs that may require additional project -level costs such as curb and gutter replacement, water main replacement, and /or right -of -way restoration. Additional detailed, project -level analysis on a portion of the network analyzed and presented in this document may change the overall results of the analysis. Two alternate tasks were also accomplished in coordination with this project: Alternate 1: Integrate GIS Centerline Map with the Street Infrastructure Database; and, Alternate 2: Integrate Sidewalk Inventory and Condition Information. The results of these alternate tasks have been provided to the City under separate cover. r r r Analysis Parameters Us ed to Develop the Street Infrastructure P lan ;t�.Rai�ge #�id�ble # of Ree#t� red � t�f YW+'w� 2 W ;w Crack Seal $0.03 Sq.Ft No 86 95 1 1 Seal Coat $0.10 Sq.Ft No 61 85 3 3 1.5 in Overlay $0.35 Sq.Ft Yes 41 60 2 5 Mill and 1.5 in Overtay $0.41 Sq.Ft Yes 41 60 2 9 Reconstruct $3.84 Sq.Ft Yes 0 40 Unlimited 19 t Fill Pothole $20.00 Pothole No Any Unlimited 1 Crack Seal $0.50 Foot No Any Unlimited 1 Skin Patch $0.80 S . Ft No Any Unlimited 1 Full Depth Patch $3.00 Sq..Ft No Any Unlimited 1 r r r r M Id w r r City of New Hope Street Infrastructure Plan Report December 27, 2001 Page 9 Current Network Condition- Pavement Condition Distribution The distribution of the pavement condition index (PCI), shown in 5 -point increments, is presented in the following figure. Based on the 2001 survey, the average PCI for the City of New Hope is 82.7. Task 1.1 Results The following figure shows the breakdown of centerline mileage within each functional class grouping for the New Hope pavement network in 2001. Functional (by Centerline Mileage) 60 50 40 Mileage W 20 10 0 Community Local Neighborhood Collector Collector v Task 1.7 Results The incidence of historical water main breaks was reviewed and is presented in the following .table: * Note: only one complete year of water main break data was available for the time period of 2000 -2004, for inclusion in the analysis generated for this report. City of New Hope Street Infrastructure Plan Report December 27, 2001 Page 19 The network level projection of the required budget and corresponding deferred maintenance backlog is presented in the following figure. r r The annual network backlog maintained over the course of the projected 30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan is $7.5 Million. Although the City of New Hope currently enjoys a relatively low maintenance backlog, the City is expected to initially experience a moderate increase and then a gradual decrease in backlog over the course of the projected 30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan. This projected increase in maintenance backlog is primarily due to the fact that the City infrastructure network is reaching the end of its expected lifecycle; over the next ten years, certain pavement management strategies will no longer be applicable, due to engineering constraints. As a result, certain pavement management strategies that are relatively cost effective to apply (e.g. overlays) are no longer a viable option and more costly strategies such as full -depth pavement reconstruction are left as the only alternative. The accumulation of these occurrences at the network level results in an increase in the amount of deferred maintenance backlog over the next ten years. This trend is reversed, however, in years 11 through 30 of the plan, as more cost effective strategies become applicable for the pavement network. 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r Annual Budget Summary Street infrastructure Plan City of New Hope 1 i newbopeheportlamual budget resuh.sds go Total Total December 27, 2005 2002 Recommended Infrastructure Plan NEVADA AVE N NORTHWOOD CIR NORTHWOOD PKWY OREGON AVE N QUEBEC AVE N RHODE ISLAND AVE N SUMTER AVE N UTAH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE N 41ST AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N OREGON AVE N CUL DE SAC W JORDAN AVE N HILLSBORO AVE N GETTYSBURG AVE N NORTHWOOD CIR FLAG AVE N ENSIGN AVE N DECATUR AVE N BOONE AVE N 38TH AVE N 39TH AVE N 39 1/2 AVE N 40TH AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N 45TH AVE N 46TH AVE N WINNETKA AVE N 45TH AVE N 46TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 46TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 48TH AVE N 47TH AVE N 48TH AVE N 41 1/2 AVE N 303 8,484 42ND AVE N 134 3,752 49TH AVE N 412 11,536 NORTHWOOD PKWY 370 18,210 HILLSBORO AVE N 1,227 36,810 GETTYSBURG AVE N 375 11,250 NORTHWOOD CIR 340 10,200 FLAG AVE N 416 12,480 ENSIGN AVE N 259 7,770 DECATUR AVE N 251 7,530 BOONE AVE N 432 12,960 36TH AVE N 1,680 47,040 39TH AVE N 493 13,804 39 1/2 AVE N 376 10,528 40TH AVE N 453 12,684 41 1/2 AVE N 1,182 33,096 42ND AVE N 134 3,752 46TH AVE N 715 20,020 NEVADA AVE N 1,602 44,856 42ND AVE N 2,475 69,300 45 1/2 AVE N 301 8,428 47TH AVE N 656 18,468 47 1/2 AVE N 282 10,146 47TH AVE N 656 18,368 48TH AVE N 650 18,200 49TH AVE N 430 12,040 48TH AVE N 640 17,920 49TH AVE N 670 18,760 $ 811 $ 0 $ 811 $ 405 $ 0 $ 405 $ 1,522 $ 0 $ 1,522 $ 2,786 $ 0 $ 2,786 $ 3,627 $ 0 $ 3,627 $ 1,045 $ 0 $ 1,045 $ 975 $ 0 $ 975 $ 1,126 $ 0 $ 1,126 $711 $0 $711 $ 720 $ 0 $ 720 $ 1,204 $ 0 $ 1,204 $ 7,340 $ 0 $ 7,340 $ 1,888 $ 0 $ 1,888 $ 1,137 $ 0 $ 1,137 $ 1,644 $ 0 $ 1,644 $ 4,694 $ 0 $ 4,694 $ 405 $ 0 $ 405 $ 2,269 $ 0 $ 2,269 $ 4,923 $ 0 $ 4,923 $ 7,853 $ 0 $ 7,853 $ 896 $ 0 $ 896 $2,127 $0 $2,127 $ 1,339 $ 0 $ 1,339 $ 1,810 $ 0 $ 1,810 $ 2,785 $ 0 $ 2,785 $ 1,617 $ 0 $ 1,617 $ 2,206 $ 0 $ 2,206 $2,519 $0 $2,519 $ 226,997 $ 0 $ 226,997 2003 Recommended Infrastructure Plan BOONS CIR N LAMPHERE DR NEVADA AVE N QUEBEC AVE N ROSALYN CT SUMTER AVE N TERRA LINDA DR VALLE VISTA ST VIEWCREST LN VIRGINIA AVE N WINPARK DR WISCONSIN AVE N XYLON AVE N YUKON AVE N ZEALAND AVE N ,k 32ND PL N 33RD AVE N 298 13,112 33RD AVE N BOONE CIR N 445 19,580 BOONE CIR N 34TH AVE N 279 12,276 34TH AVE N YUKON AVE N 302 13,288 YUKON AVE N AQUILA AVE N 637 28,028 AQUILA AVE N 36TH AVE N 279 12,276 BOONE AVE N CUL DE SAC E 285 15,065 27TH AVE N QUEBEC AVE N 185 5,180 QUEBEC AVE N TERRA LINDA DR 670 18,760 27TH AVE N CUL DE SAC N 690 24,992 35TH AVE N 36TH AVE N 623 17,444 LAMPHERE DR VALLE VISTA ST 736 20,608 VALLE VISTA ST VIEWCREST LN 483 13,524 27TH AVE N CUL DE SAC N 220 12,519 TERRA LINDA DR VIEWCREST LN 464 12,992 WINNETKA AVE N SUMTER AVE N 502 14,056 QUEBEC AVE N VIEWCREST LN 655 18,340 SUMTER AVE N VALLE VISTA ST 289 8,092 VALLE VISTA ST QUEBEC AVE N 489 13,692 27TH AVE N CUL DE SAC N 581 24,118 PAVEMENT CHANGE 35 1/2 AVE N 228 6,384 35 1/2 AVE N CUL DE SAC N 220 13,699 32ND AVE N WINNETKA AVE N 2,436 68,208 35 1/2 AVE N 36TH AVE N 474 13,272 27TH AVE N 28TH AVE N 828 23,184 28TH AVE N 29TH AVE N 263 7,364 33RD AVE N 33RD PL N 498 13,944 33RD PL N 34TH AVE N 390 10,920 34TH AVE N 36TH AVE N 647 18,116 27TH PL N 28TH AVE N 536 15,008 29TH AVE N NORTH END 121 3,388 33RD AVE N 33RD PL N 380 17,725 BOONE AVE N AQUILA AVE N 285 7,980 AQUILA AVE N 36TH AVE N 1,321 36,988 27TH AVE N 27TH PL N 305 8,540 27TH PL N 28TH AVE N 528 14,784 AQUILA AVE N 36TH AVE N 865 24,220 $ 1,416 $ 0 $ 1,416 $ 2,538 $ 0 $ 2,538 $ 1,391 $ 0 $ 1,391 $ 1,271 $ 0 $ 1,271 $ 3,076 $ 0 $ 3,076 $ 1,285 $ 0 $ 1,285 $ 1,764 $ 0 $ 1,764 $ 534 $ 0 $ 534 $ 2,271 $ 0 $ 2,271 $ 3,297 $ 0 $ 3,297 $ 2,301 $ 0 $ 2,301 $ 3,034 $ 0 $ 3,034 $ 1,918 $ 0 $ 1,918 $ 1,915 $ 0 $ 1,915 $ 1,573 $ 0 $ 1,573 $ 1,791 $ 0 $ 1,791 $ 2,700 $ 0 $ 2,700 $ 834 $ 0 $ 834 $ 1,369 $ 0 $ 1,369 $ 4,349 $ 0 $ 4,349 $ 813 $ 0 $ 813 $ 1,908 $ 0 $ 1,908 $ 11,540 $ 0 $ 11,540 $ 1,390 $ 0 $ 1,390 $ 3,059 $ 0 $ 3,059 $ 796 $ 0 $ 796 $ 1,506 $ 0 $ 1,506 $ 985 $ 0 $ 985 $ 1,957 $ 0 $ 1,957 $ 2,129 $ 0 $ 2,129 $ 1,185 $ 0 $ 1,185 $ 1,856 $ 0 $ 1,856 $ 934 $ 0 $ 934 $ 4,331 $ 0 $ 4,331 $ 1,211 $ 0 $ 1,211 $ 3,467 $ 0 $ 3,467 $ 2,790 $ 0 $ 2,790 $ 138,463 $ 0 $ 138,463 2004 Recommended Infrastructure Plan YUKON AVE N YUKON CIR ZEALAND AVE N 54TH AVE N YUKON AVE N 49TH AVE N FAIRVIEW AVE N 54TH AVE N 55TH AVE N CUL DE SAC N FAIRVIEW AVE N BOONE AVE N 55TH AVE N 633 160 313 923 660 17,724 4,480 8,764 25,844 18,480 $ 2,182 $ 926 $ 1,483 $ 3,805 $ 3,822 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,182 $ 926 $ 1,483 $ 3,805 $ 3,822 $ 150,702 $ 0 $ 150,702 ,10 r Uyy {jL3] .� yy AMEL 2005 Recommended Infrastructure Plan QUEBEC AVE N UTAH AVE N VIRGINIA AVE N WISCONSIN AVE N XYLON AVE N ZEALAND AVE N 42ND AVE N 48TH CIR N 38 1/2 AVE N 39TH AVE N XYLON AVE N VIRGINIA AVE N 38TH AVE N 39TH AVE N WISCONSIN AVE N ZEALAND AVE N XYLON AVE N 48TH CIR N 49TH AVE N 40TH AVE N WISCONSIN AVE N VIRGINIA AVE N 40TH AVE N 39TH AVE N WISCONSIN AVE N ZEALAND AVE N 40TH AVE N 40TH AVE N 3,518 98,504 $ 15,072 $ 0 $ 15,072 457 12,796 $ 1,659 $ 0 $ 1,659 966 27,048 $ 3,016 $ 0 $ 3,016 677 18,956 $ 1,813 $ 0 $ 1,813 769 21,532 $ 2,220 $ 0 $ 2,220 251 7,028 $ 895 $ 0 $ 895 262 7,336 $ 845 $ 0 $ 845 293 8,204 $ 915 $ 0 $ 915 248 6,944 $ 1,508 $ 0 $ 1,508 380 10,640 $ 960 $ 0 $ 960 798 22,344 $ 2,016 $ 0 $ 2,016 $ 106,080 $ 0 $ 106,080 X IL 2006 Recommended Infrastructure Plan 36TH AVE N DECATUR AVE N ENSIGN AVE N ENSIGN CT N FLAG AVE N GETTYSBURG AVE N GETTYSBURG CT N YUKON AVE N XYLON AVE N WISCONSIN AVE N WINNETKA AVE N NEVADA AVE N MARYLAND AVE N CUL DE SAC S 32ND AVE N ENSIGN CT N CUL DE SAC S 34TH AVE N 35TH AVE N ENSIGN AVE N 32ND AVE N GETTYSBURG AVE N FLAG CT N FLAG CIR N 34TH AVE N 34TH AVE N 34 1/2 AVE N 35TH AVE N 32ND AVE N GETTYSBURG CT N GETTYSBURG AVE N XYLON AVE N WISCONSIN AVE N WINNETKA AVE N NEVADA AVE N MARYLAND AVE N LOUISIANA AVE N 36TH AVE N ENSIGN CT N FLAG AVE N 34TH AVE N 35TH AVE N 36TH AVE N CUL DE SAC N GETTYSBURG AVE N FLAG CT N FLAG CIR N 34TH AVE N 34TH AVE N 34 1/2 AVE N 35TH AVE N 36TH AVE N GETTYSBURG CT N FLAG AVE N CUL DE SAC N 301 13,244 $ 1,230 $ 0 $ 1,230 300 13,200 $ 1,226 $ 0 $ 1,226 1,047 46,068 $ 4,278 $ 0 $ 4,278 1,866 89,568 $ 8,318 $ 0 $ 8,318 217 10,416 $ 967 $ 0 $ 967 417 20,016 $ 1,859 $ 0 $ 1,859 250 14,850 $ 1,321 $ 0 $ 1,321 332 9,296 $ 1,144 $ 0 $ 1,144 313 8,764 $ 904 $ 0 $ 904 230 12,799 $ 2,121 $ 0 $ 2,121 849 23,772 $ 3,940 $ 0 $ 3,940 645 18,060 $ 2,341 $ 0 $ 2,341 150 12,050 $ 1,483 $ 0 $ 1,483 416 12,480 $ 2,581 $ 0 $ 2,581 328 9,840 $ 2,248 $ 0 $ 2,248 293 8,790 $ 2,865 $ 0 $ 2,865 183 5,490 $ 1,322 $ 0 $ 1,322 111 3,330 $ 500 $ 0 $ 500 312 9,360 $ 1,983 $ 0 $ 1,983 303 9,090 $ 786 $ 0 $ 786 657 19,710 $ 3,478 $ 0 $ 3,478 394 11,032 $ 1,250 $ 0 $ 1,250 334 9,352 $ 964 $ 0 $ 964 90 10,370 $ 1,175 $ 0 $ 1,175 $ 79,937 $ 0 $ 79,937 4-7 7 043 4 1 The Transportation Plan for the City of New Hope is a document that is intended to help guide transportation and land use decisions made by the City. The Plan that is contained in this document is a multi -modal expression of transportation improvements that should be programmed and provided by the City of New Hope. The Plan is a blueprint that will help to provide a more efficient transportation system within the City and provide for effective transportation options for the residents of New Hope. Elements of the Plan that are contained in this document include the following: * Fxisting Transportation Characteristics * Transportation System Analysis * Functional, Classification of Roadways * Transit Service * Trail/Pedestrian Systems * Rail Systems * Travel Demand Management * Public Input * Plan Implementation The plan was developed after receipt of public input, field reconnaissance and analysis of transportation elements and concerted input and review by City staff. The Plan is structured in such a fashion that elements of the Plan can be revised and /or updated without having to redo the entire Plan. A summation of the major recommendations that are contained in this Transportation Plan is provided below. Functional Classif f cation of Roadways The roadway system within the City of New Hope has been classified and contains the following functional roadway types: Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Community Collector Neighborhood Collector Local The major change from the 1974 plan is the classification of collectors as community and neighborhood facilities. This classification was not contained in the previous plan. New Hope Transportation Plan i Proportion of Service Mobility Arterials Collectors Locals Figure 12 Bonestroo Rosene Functional Classification Anderlik & Relationship — Access and Mobility Associates COMM. 34173 R �I TraiflTedestrian Systems A major component of the Plan is the provision of a trail/pedestrian system that will allow for bicycling and walking within the city along a dedicated system of facilities. The bikeway portion of the plan will allow for connection to the regional trail plan and allow for movement within the City. Much more emphasis is placed upon this transportation mode as more and more persons are bicycling and walling. Transit System The City should begin the process of discussing the methods in which a City shuttle system can be provided to serve City residents. Improvements to the regional system within the City should also be sought These discussions must begin with the Metropolitan Council Transit Operations (MCTO) division of the Metropolitan Council. Operations and Safety The City should continue to monitor traffic operations along certain roadways within the City. These facilities include Bass Lake Road, 42nd Avenue North, 36th Avenue North and the segment of Boone Avenue in the north section of the City. These roadways, due to increased traffic and operations problems may require future improvements and should be monitored. The City should embark on a program, with Hennepin County, to install emergency vehicle preemption on all traffic signals within the City. Rail Systems Consideration should be given to the possible provision of rail grade separations at the intersection of the CP Rail System east -west rail line with Winnetka Avenue and with Boone Avenue. The above provides some of the major elements of the New Hope Transportation Plan that are recommended in order to better serve the citizens of the City. Some of these elements can be implemented in a short time frame, but most will require longer periods of time in order to implement The Plan, and the various components within the Plan, are intended to be dynamic and able to react to change. That is a requirement of any transportation plan. . :1 New Ho Transportation Plan ii M7 to N. 6 co :I A. !,d 391t, AVis — RL 3 'V vALLEY] PL N. ,�; Y. . '� .V+u ' �:i .. �� ' �� .0 +. •c #e, i t ". tr'G ,..,., w� m�rr Via. -. ✓.,.. ... �,�� '. µms' � „' : '� ��': �" $ }`,� .. q b. 'Oi jdL R . e, r. ,. t 9 } ��� �� , 9 s y 3i: y � C hid. �` G6vernmin tit 0 Y�lY11i I21i�r 4 lJ Febrinty 11 Ciry ColnICit Agenda February 11 EDA Meeting A gencta .}anuary 28 Cary Council Meeting Minutes Winter Parking and Plowing Basics Crime Alert -- Burgary New Hobe officer receives state atlrard Cdty Council Sets 2002 Sewer and 14 Rates 2002 Adopted Cdty of New Hope Budget Pickup Rasketball and Volleyball We Care About Kids Activities Volunteers Paint Mural in Police Lobby Crime Fund Celebrates 20 Years Outdoor Skating Rinks Open Winter Parks and Recreation Prot rams December City Report Transition to New Recyclinrl Proyrttt► PROJECT NO. 699 PROJECT BULLETIN #3 PROJECT BULLETIN #3 7901 49th Avenue North Overview On August 17, 2001, the City of New Hope purchased the property located at 7901 49th Avenue North as part of the City's Scattered Site Housing Program. The intent of this purchase was to rehabilitate the property, sell to a program qualified first -time homeowner and improve the neighborhood. The property is located in a highly visible area and has been in extreme disrepair for some time. In the past, the City has received numerous complaints about the lack of maintenance at this site. On November 13, the New Hope City Council approved rehabilitation specifications for the home and directed staff to seek bids on the project. Bids were accepted through December 27. The bids received were higher than expected, and on January 14, 2002, the Council rejected all bids, approved revised specifications, and directed staff to re -bid the project. On February 25, the Council awarded a contract to M -Con, Inc., the low bidder. Although the specifications have been revised, the project will still include replacement of roof, siding, driveway, and garage door, landscaping, and the repair and /or replacement of a number of interior items. Rehabilitation activities are expected to begin in March. Landscaping of the property will occur in the spring. Site Upkeep The City will maintain the site. Please be aware that the property was recently broken into and vandalized. As a neighboring property owner, if you notice any suspicious activity on the property, do not hesitate to contact the New Hope Police Department at 911 anytime, day or night. Construction Hours Construction activities may occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. on weekends and holidays. All work will take place during these hours. City Contacts If you have questions or comments regarding this property, please contact Ken Doresky, Community Development Specialist, at 763- 531 -5137, or Kirk McDonald, Director of Community Development, at 763 -531 -5119. The City appreciates the cooperation of all residents and businesses in the area that may be impacted by this project. Additional bulletins will be sent to you as the project progresses. Thank you for your cooperation. Neighboring property owners will continue to be notified as rehabilitation activities proceed. City of New Hope, 4401 Xylon Avenue North, New Hope, MN 55428 02 -26 -02 PROJECT NO. 685 PROJECT BULLETIN #4 9168 Overview As part of the City's Scattered Site Housing Program, the New Hope City Council approved the purchase of 7105 62nd Avenue North from a willing seller. As you may know, the original intention of the purchase was to rehabilitate and preserve the existing home. Upon further inspection, city staff found that the foundation of the home was failing and consequently removed the home from the site and prepared the site for redevelopment. On November 13, the Council directed staff to seek design proposals from consultants to develop plans and specifications for an accessible twinhome on the site, similar to the twinhome located directly to the south of the lot. On January 28, the Council hired Project for Pride in Living, Inc. (PPL) to complete the design. PPL expects to complete the plans by the end of March. The City will schedule a meeting for neighboring residents during design development to provide them with an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed plan before Council approval. This neighborhood meeting will take place at New Hope City Hall in March. City staff will send an announcement for this meeting approximately two weeks prior to the meeting date. Site Upkeep The City will continue to maintain the site. As a neighboring property owner, if you notice any suspicious activity on the property, please contact the New Hope Police Department at 911 anytime, day or night. Construction Hours When needed, construction activities may occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. on weekends and holidays. All work will take place during these hours. City Contacts If you have questions or comments regarding this property, please contact Ken Doresky, Community Development Specialist, at 763 - 531 -5137, or Kirk McDonald, Director of Community Development, at 763- 531 -5119. The City appreciates the cooperation of all residents and businesses in the area that may be impacted by this project. Additional bulletins will be sent to you as the project progresses. Thank you for your cooperation. Neighboring property owners will continue to receive periodic updates as the redevelopment process proceeds. City of New Hope, 4401 Xylon Avenue North, New Hope, MN 55428 2 -22 -02 CAC AGENDA ITEMS FOR UPCOMING MONTHS AS OF 02/05/02 The following are agenda items that have either been assigned to CAC, a CAC member has asked that the item be discussed, or staff has asked that the item be discussed by CAC. March 18: • Discuss final results of infrastructure study, tying all with City's Transportation Plan, with Guy Johnson, Public Works Director. • View Twin West Power Point presentation with Kirk McDonald, Community Development Director. Future: • Update on Livable Communities Task Force with Kirk McDonald, Director of Community Development. (May 20) • City tour. (June 17) • Host a public discussion or surrey after fall 2002 (free, tentative) curbside pickup (such as the one Bloomington holds). Discussion /survey would involve seeking input as to the residents' interest in paying a monthly fee, which would be charged on utility billing to pay for an annual curbside program. • Discussion regarding use of treated lumber (waiting for Hennepin Parks study results).