IP #702COUNCIL
REQUEST FOR ACTION
2�� H 0
Originating Department
Approved for Agenda
Agenda Section
Public Works
May 14, 2001
Planning and Develo
Item No.
By: Guy Johnson
By: /,,
8.2
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEW HOPE AND GOODPOINTE
TECHNOLOGY FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM (PROJECT NO. 702)
REQUESTED ACTION
Staff is recommending that Council pass a resolution approving a contract between the City of New Hope and
GoodPointe Technology for Infrastructure Analysis and the development of a Pavement Management Program. The
amount of the contract for pavement analysis and development of the Pavement Management Program is $39,345.00.
Analysis of City sidewalks was included as an alternate and will be added to the project. The price of the sidewalk
analysis is not to exceed an additional $9,000.00.
POLICY/PAST PRACTICE
Many of the streets in New Hope were built in the 1950's, 60's and 70's, and are approaching the end of their expected
functional life. Since they were originally built, these streets have been maintained primarily by being seal coated, and
when necessary, overlaid with additional layers of asphalt. Since 1995, the streets in worst condition have been
completely reconstructed rather than just overlaid. Street reconstruction projects have taken place in 1995, 1997, and
1999.
In December of 2000, the New Hope City Council established a new Infrastructure fund that sets aside 1 million dollars
of property tax revenue each year for street construction and maintenance needs. This fund was established in the
hope that special assessments to residential property for street improvements could be drastically reduced or
eliminated.
BACKGROUND
For many years Bonestroo and Associates has provided engineering services for New Hope. For the
Infrastructure Analysis and Pavement Management Program, it was decide that we should look for another,
independent engineering firm. In March of this year, the City solicited proposals to four engineering firms to
objectively assess the condition of New Hope's streets and to establish a long -term priority list for street
maintenance and street reconstruction. The consulting firm selected, GoodPointe Technology, will perform the
analysis and develop a program that will address the maintenance requirements of the infrastructure. The
analysis and the resulting maintenance program will include the assessment of sidewalks and the type and
conditions of curbs, and takes into account the history of water main breaks throughout the City. Once the
Pavement Management Program is developed, Bonestroo will work with city staff to implement the program.
MOTION BY SECOND BY
TO:
I:Rfa \Pworks \702 Award Infrastructure Management
Request for Action
Infrastructure Consultants
May 14, 2001
Page 2
In addition to the proposal received form GoodPointe Technology, proposals where received from Bloom Consultants,
Short- Elliot- Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and Toltz, King, Duvall, and Anderson (TKDA).
FUNDING
The project is funded by the Streets Operating Budget. A portion of the funds set aside for the Infrastructure Analysis were
originally intended for seal coating in 2000 but were carried over to this year's budget. The cost of the project will not
exceed $48,345.00. This includes $39,345.00 for the Infrastructure Analysis and Pavement Management Program, and
an amount not to exceed $9,000.00 for alternate #2, the sidewalk analysis.
ATTACHMENTS
The proposal from GoodPointe Technology and a resolution is attached.
RESOLUTION NO. 01- 78
Wiffilmaliffil"M
' .'
Project No. 702
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows:
1. That City Staff solicited bids for preparation of an infrastructure analysis and
pavement management program identified as Project No. 702, as previously
authorized by this Council.
2. That in response to Staff's request for bids, the City received proposals for Project
No. 702 from the following consulting firms:
Bloom Consultants;
Goodpointe Technology Corporation;
Short- Elliot- Hendrickson (SEH); and
Toltz, King, Devall and Anderson (TKDA).
3. That the consulting firms referenced were each given an opportunity to present its
proposals to the City Council at its April 23, 2001 meeting and each firm did in
fact make a presentation at said meeting.
4. That preparation of an infrastructure analysis and pavement management program
are a request for professional services and as such award of a contract for Project
No. 702 is not subject to the requirements of the Minnesota Municipal Contracting
Law.
5. That based on the written proposals and oral presentations by each consulting firm
and the recommendation of City Staff and the City Engineer, it is hereby found and
determined by this Council that the bid of Goodpointe Technology Corporation in
the amount of $48,345.00, which includes a cost not to exceed $9,000.00 for an
alternate to integrate the City's 26 mile sidewalk network information in the
pavement management database as described in its proposal, is the most responsible
bid for Project No. 702; that the City Council hereby accepts the bid of Goodpointe
Technology Corporation, including the sidewalk network information alternate,
for Project No. 702.
6. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into an
improvement contract for Project No. 702 in the name of the City with Goodpointe
Technology Corporation, subject to said contractor furnishing public contractor
surety bonds as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 14`' day of May, 2001.
(-7/ -
W. Peter Enck, Mayor
'1
Attest:
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
P:\ Attorney \SAS \Documents \resolution awarding contract for infrastructure analysis Goodpointe.wpd
May-10-01 11:56A Goodpointe Technology 612 721 3434 P-02
ICON
Get to the mint
i I $O
- t F W4
May 9, 2 00 t
T Schuster
COW-tract Mana
city of New Hope
5 00 International Park vay
lie w Rap MN 55 428 GoodPoInte Project: '1
Re: C Fstirnateto provide Project Ali cmatc 2:
lin.cgrate Sidewalk inventory and Condition Information
Dcar Mr. Schuster:
GoodPointe Technolou will provide the scope o f se rvices for the above-referenced Project Alternate
described in GoodPointe Technology proposal dated April 1 1, '4001, for a trot-to-excced amourit of
S9,000,00. The p"Ject, will proceed according to the schedule outlined on page 1 435 of the April 11,
01 prQposal.
The saute, data for this project vvit] include the 1.9 6, Bonestm Roscae Anderl ik & Associates
hardcopy report on the sidewalk netxvo&-_ as well as additional h project-related information.
If vou have any questions or need additional information pl contact me at (612) 7
Sincerely
G- oodPointe Technology 0
4
Anthony J. Kaadly
Vi ce pre-Slident
)rporation
gpo i, k 'I
c FftAlvarlus
!W- 2 Annue SM6
Wwmp�*, YA 154-N
j r pbre_,jar
tMI hope 61,T724.5-555
Estimated Cost
Develop and Implement Street Infrastructure Proces and Plan
City of New Hope. Minnesota
Task Descripuos
P art I - Process
i Units
Quality
Uait Coat Rite
Total Cost
$25.00
95.00
75.00
S1.500
75
1,875
ark to fwtepute lavenlo" Iafanaatwa
Measure Sue ct Dimensions with aiaomated DL%wice Meavam8 Egurpmeut
Project
Senior r �
cemedine im7es
hours
60
5
Task u latepute Hkiincal Pnject 1MOroatwn
SeniorFmgmexr
hags
40
S75M
$3,000
Senior Engineer
boors
20
S75.OD
S1.5w
Tack 1A latc7erate Pavmt Layer Den
Senior Engineer
hags
1$
$75,00
S1,125
Task 1S Pawmew Coadif a Sanity
oent ine•nales
60
$200.00
12000
Twk 1.4 Cescreee Crrb aad Getter Swwy
CetaC11111e411tIC5
60
$10.00
1,800
Teak 1.7 Ceardiare Water Ma® Break l/au wbb Street Infrastrucnre Pbm
P-ject Mariam
hours
15
S95.00
1,425
Senior Engu=r
hags
25
75.00
1,875
Subtotal:
S26,575
Trk2.1 Develop Proposed Pro to Develsp the Street hdrartrucmrc Plow
ubtotal:
so
1ask3.1 Project KkUW MeewitlRevew Prepped Precna with City Staff pad Ca..a
Project Manager
hags
4
$95.00
SM 0
Senior Enpneer
hags
$75.OD
S300
Subtotal:
P art 2 - Eviluiiion
Tack 4.1 F.recute rbe Dm Callectw.1.Kpa1wn Taab
F7eorrrarrka L! - 1.7abr.e
rite aMrr
Task 4S TraW Staff w the Dot* Manarteset Pratxn
Project Mmtager
Haas
4
$95.00
IC380
Senior Engineer
Haas
4
$75.00
300
Tak 4.31CON Sym— Mawtwrte md idonnacma Rq�ft
Support Option mdudes 30 hours of System Support and Coosultmg Labor
BFMIW support
I
S2,500.OD
2,500
Twk 4A Pravfdc Recite wdstieur fire Mawtenaace l�proreww by Street Sectiom
Projat MMVw
Hours
25
95.00
2,375
SentorEllor
Haas
25
S75.00
1,875
Twk 4.5 Devebp Recorendad WFaerrae M Project Coat
Project Mir
Haas
1
95.00
S1,425
Senior Engirim
Haas
25
75.00
$1,875
Subtotal:
S12,090
Part 3 - Alternates
A -berWt 1: loaeeratt GIS Centerane Map with Street Databre
To be deemed i Project Kielrff Meeelod a Cfry w bwereaKd.
AYeroaae 2: lasegmse SdewWk h mewy W CwdRN Laforwtiae
To be dbcwed to Project Kkh ff M eetbgt / City is lotereatN.
Aheraate 3: Addten GASS Stateaent 34 lafragrock— Rep twg lane
To be dhcwed be PnFect Kkbvff Meetiet. a City it inneseed.
Subtotal:
Grand Total Not to Exceed
539,345
04/11/2001 1:59 PM
CITY OF NEW O'
CONTRACT
FOR INFRASTRUCTURE
ANALYSIS 1 DEVELOPMENT
OF A PAVEMENT
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NO. 702
For valuable consideration as set forth below, this Contract dated the 14` day of May, 2001 is
made and signed by the City of New Hope, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter
"City ") and GoodPointe Technology Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter
"Contractor ").
1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The Contract shall consist of the following documents:
a. This Contract;
b. Contractor's April 11, 2001 Proposal to Develop and Implement a Street
Infrastructure Process and Plan for the City of New Hope including the following
attachments:
i. Estimated Cost;
ii. Appendix B "General Process Proposed By City "; and
iii. Contractor's May 9, 200lCost Estimate from Anthony J. Kadlec
indicating Cost Estimate to Provide Project Alternate 2; Integrate Sidewalk
Inventory and Condition Information.
The Contractor hereby promises and agrees to perform and comply with all the provisions
of this Contract, its April 11, 2001 Proposal and its May 9, 2001 Cost Estimate, all of
which are incorporated herein by this reference. This Contract shall comprise the total
agreement of the parties hereto. No oral order, objection or claim by any party to the
other shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in this Contract.
1 •
The work to be performed by Contractor under this Contract is defined in the April 11,
2001 Proposal accepted by the City at its May 14, 2001 Council Meeting (hereinafter the
"Work "). Regarding the Project Alternates in Part 3, it is understood and agreed by the
parties hereto that only Alternate 2, "Integrate Sidewalk Inventory and Condition
Information" of Part 3 set out on pages 21 and 22 of the April 11, 2001 Proposal is
included in the Work in addition to Part 1 and 2 set out in pages 1 through 20 of the April
11, 2001 Proposal.
-1-
3. CONTRACT PRICE
The City agrees to pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed Forty -Eight Thousand
Three Hundred Forty -Five and No /100ths Dollars ($48,345.00). An "amount not exceed"
figure is used due to Contractor's Proposal to perform Alternate 2 for an amount not to
exceed Nine Thousand and No /100ths Dollars ($9,000.00).
Contractor shall complete his performance under this Contract by the 28` day of
September, 2001 (hereinafter "Completion Date ").
5. INSURANCE
Before beginning actual work under this Contract, the Contractor shall submit to the City
and obtain the City's approval of a certificate of insurance on Standard Form C.I.C.C. -701
or ACORD 25 forms, showing the following insurance coverage and listing the City as a
loss payee under the policies:
a. General Contractor Liability: $1,000,000.00
b. Automobile Liability for all automobiles: $1,000,000.00
C. Workman's Compensation: Statutory Amounts
This certificate must provide for the above coverages to be in effect from the date of the
Contract until 30 days after the Completion Date, and must provide the insurance company
will not cancel the insurance coverage without 30 -days' written notice to the City of intent
to cancel. The certificate must further provide that the Contractor's insurance coverage
is primary coverage notwithstanding any insurance coverage carried by the City that may
apply to injury or damage relating to the maintenance or repair of City owned property by
either the City or any employee, agent, independent contractor or any other person or
entity retained by the City to perform the services described herein.
All insurance is subject to the review and approval of the New Hope City Attorney.
The Contractor shall give all notices and comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and
regulations applicable to performance under this Contract.
t
-2-
The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any damages,
including costs and attorneys' fees, from any claims, demands actions or causes of action
arising out of any act or omission on the part of the Contractor or its agents, servants or
employees in the performance of or with relation to any of the work or services performed
or furnished by the Contractor under this Contract.
8. ASSIGNMENT
The Contractor shall not assign or transfer, whether by an assignment or notation or
otherwise, any of its rights, duties, benefits, obligations, liabilities or responsibilities
without prior written consent of the City.
9. NOTICE
The address and telephone numbers of the Contractor for purposes of giving notices and
any other purposes under this Contract shall be: 3940 - 27"' Avenue South, Minneapolis,
MN 55406. Telephone Numbers: (612) 729 -5555 and Fax (612) 721 -3434.
The address and telephone numbers of the City for purposes of giving notices and any
other purposes under this Contract shall be: 4401 Xylon Avenue North, New Hope, MN
55428. Telephone Numbers: (763) 531 -5100 and Fax (763) 531 -5136.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Contract have hereunto set their hands and
seals as of the day and year first above written.
Its City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2001, by W. Peter Enck and Daniel J. Donahue, the Mayor and City
Manag r, respectively, of the City of New Hope, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf
of said municipal corporation.
CORPORATION
By:
Its:
L 6 .3
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
- d
—
2001, by "4,W6 -/ a_ -- ---- - - - - a-
-
a7-
, the y e and of
GoodPointe Technology Corporation, a MiniXota corporation, on behalf of said corporation-
N
GREGORY k WHITTEMORE
NC,TA,RY PU WC-MINNESOTA
ro't cofWISSION EXPIRES 141-2OD
?:\Au.—y\SAS'•.D.—o .m\C'iH99,11266-001-C. c t f., Pmj.r N.. 702 -N
K
o - . i
Submitted by:
W wj=jw]ig= 1
•, I IRS `
GoodPointe Technology Corporation
394027 th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55406
Direct: (612) 729 -5555 Fax: (612) 721 -3434
Internet: www..qoodi)ointe.com Email: info(d)goodpointe.com
City of New Hope
Street Infrastructure Plan Report
December 27, 2001
Page 1
Executive Summary
Studies conducted by a number of agencies indicate that as pavement conditions
decrease, the cost for the appropriate method of repair can quadruple. A graph of a
typical case taken from the American Public Works Association, The Hole Story, is
shown in the following figure.
o
O
10
75% Time
>
Each 51.00 of
>
�% Renovation
Quality cost Here
— 8
o
Lowest Annual Drop Will Cost $4.00
o
Resurfacing Cost to $5.00 If
_ 6
Delayed to
Here.
L
—4
Cl
0 0
40%
°'
Quality
— 2
a`
Drop Total Failure
0
0
a
12% Time
>
4 8 12 16
Years
(Time Varies for Each Road Section)
The City of New Hope contracted GoodPointe Technology to perform pavement
management consultation services, which included a comprehensive street
infrastructure condition evaluation to determine the current condition of the New Hope
pavement network and to develop a detailed multi -year Street Infrastructure Plan.
This report summarizes the work accomplished in this project on a per task basis.
The New Hope pavement network consists of 63.35 miles of asphalt - surfaced
pavement. Each of the pavements in the City of New Hope was visually inspected
using the Paver -based Pavement Condition Index (PCI) methodology. The
methodology is based on a numeric rating system ranging from 100 for a newly
surfaced pavement to 0 for a failed pavement.
Based on the survey data collected in 2001, the average PCI of the New Hope
pavement network is 82.7.
Customized pavement performance curves were developed based on actual historical
data from New Hope to accurately model the performance characteristics of the New
Hope infrastructure network.
GoodPointe Technology Street Infrastructure Plan Recommendations
Generally, this Street Infrastructure Plan has been designed to optimize the return on
investment (ROI) that the City realizes in the plan, by:
City of New Hope
Street Infrastructure Plan Report
December 27, 2001
Page 2
Programming the right projects at the right time from an engineering- and
economic standpoint, to maximize the useful remaining life of each pavement
management strategy (e.g. seal coats, overlays, reconstructs); and,
Maximizing the overall pavement condition of the street network by preserving
the condition of pavements already in good condition and simultaneously
minimizing the deferred maintenance backlog of paving projects for the network.
GoodPointe Technology recommends the following implementation strategy for the
Street Infrastructure Plan presented in this report:
Divide and Conquer. The street infrastructure network has been divided into
three mutually exclusive areas (project zones) to aid in the logistical
coordination of future street improvement projects.
To preserve pavements that are currently in good condition, the Street
Infrastructure Plan recommends seal coat projects on an annual basis, rotating
through the three project zones.
To rehabilitate pavements that are at the end of their infrastructure life cycle,
rehabilitation projects will be scheduled on a bi- yearly basis (even years: 2002,
2004, etc.), generally rotating through the network according to the three project
zones.
To maximize the City's return on investment for the infrastructure network, the
City should coordinate the replacement of cast iron water main line- segments
with the pavement reconstruction projects recommended in the SIP. This
practice will allow the City to minimize the amount of network disruption
experienced by the traveling public and will minimize the cost associated with
the repair and replacement of the cast iron water main system already in place.
The Street Infrastructure Plan includes analysis projections for the next 30-
analysis years; detailed plan recommendations for years 2002 -2006 (see
appendix 2-6) with network level projections in each year of the plan or 2002-
2031.
The average annual network backlog maintained over the course of the
projected 30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan is $7.5 Million. Although the City of
New Hope currently enjoys a relatively low maintenance backlog, the City is
expected to experience a moderate backlog increase over the course of the
projected 30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan. This trend is reversed, however, in
years 11 through 30 of the plan, as more cost effective strategies become
applicable for the pavement network.
The average annual network PCI maintained over the course of the ro e
p � cted
30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan is 70.4. Although the City of New Hope
pavement network is currently in very good condition with an average network
City of New Hope
Street Infrastructure Plan Report
December 27, 2001
Page 3
PCI of 82.7, the average network PCI is expected to experience a moderate
decline in average pavement condition over the next 10 years of the projected
30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan. This trend is reversed, however, in years 11
through 30 of the plan, as more cost effective strategies become applicable for
the pavement network.
To actively monitor the ongoing health of the City pavement network,
GoodPointe Technology recommends that a follow -up pavement condition
survey be performed on one -third of the street network on an annual basis. The
surveys should be conducted in the spring of each year so that this information
can be used to update and validate the Street Infrastructure Plan for the current
and upcoming construction seasons.
MIR
This Street Infrastructure Plan generally maintains the average network PCI above the
target level of 60 and eventually reduces the network backlog over the course of the
30 -year scenario. .
These budget analysis scenarios are based on the application of pavement
management strategies in an optimal fashion, across the network. The final step in the
Street Infrastructure Plan process is to take the detailed project recommendations of
this report and to further develop the strategy into a more practical project plan, given
physical and project -level constraints of the network.
It is important to note that these scenarios were initially generated at the network level
and adapted for implementation at the project level. The results presented in this plan
_
are based on pavement repair and rehabilitation costs that may require additional
project -level costs such as curb and gutter replacement, water main replacement,
and /or right -of -way restoration. Additional detailed, project -level analysis on a portion of
the network analyzed and presented in this document may change the overall results of
the analysis.
Two alternate tasks were also accomplished in coordination with this project:
Alternate 1: Integrate GIS Centerline Map with the Street Infrastructure
Database; and,
Alternate 2: Integrate Sidewalk Inventory and Condition Information.
The results of these alternate tasks have been provided to the City under separate
cover.
r
r
r
Analysis Parameters
Us ed to Develop the Street Infrastructure P lan
;t�.Rai�ge #�id�ble # of Ree#t� red � t�f
YW+'w� 2
W ;w
Crack Seal
$0.03
Sq.Ft
No
86
95
1
1
Seal Coat
$0.10
Sq.Ft
No
61
85
3
3
1.5 in Overlay
$0.35
Sq.Ft
Yes
41
60
2
5
Mill and 1.5 in Overtay
$0.41
Sq.Ft
Yes
41
60
2
9
Reconstruct
$3.84
Sq.Ft
Yes
0
40
Unlimited
19
t
Fill Pothole
$20.00
Pothole
No
Any
Unlimited
1
Crack Seal
$0.50
Foot
No
Any
Unlimited
1
Skin Patch
$0.80
S . Ft
No
Any
Unlimited
1
Full Depth Patch
$3.00
Sq..Ft
No
Any
Unlimited
1
r
r
r
r
M
Id
w
r
r
City of New Hope
Street Infrastructure Plan Report
December 27, 2001
Page 9
Current Network Condition- Pavement Condition Distribution
The distribution of the pavement condition index (PCI), shown in 5 -point increments, is
presented in the following figure.
Based on the 2001 survey, the average PCI for the City of New Hope is 82.7.
Task 1.1 Results
The following figure shows the breakdown of centerline mileage within each functional
class grouping for the New Hope pavement network in 2001.
Functional
(by Centerline Mileage)
60
50
40
Mileage W
20
10
0
Community Local Neighborhood
Collector Collector
v
Task 1.7 Results
The incidence of historical water main breaks was reviewed and is presented in the
following .table:
* Note: only one complete year of water main break data was available for the time
period of 2000 -2004, for inclusion in the analysis generated for this report.
City of New Hope
Street Infrastructure Plan Report
December 27, 2001
Page 19
The network level projection of the required budget and corresponding deferred
maintenance backlog is presented in the following figure.
r
r
The annual network backlog maintained over the course of the projected 30 -year Street
Infrastructure Plan is $7.5 Million. Although the City of New Hope currently enjoys a
relatively low maintenance backlog, the City is expected to initially experience a
moderate increase and then a gradual decrease in backlog over the course of the
projected 30 -year Street Infrastructure Plan.
This projected increase in maintenance backlog is primarily due to the fact that the City
infrastructure network is reaching the end of its expected lifecycle; over the next ten
years, certain pavement management strategies will no longer be applicable, due to
engineering constraints. As a result, certain pavement management strategies that are
relatively cost effective to apply (e.g. overlays) are no longer a viable option and more
costly strategies such as full -depth pavement reconstruction are left as the only
alternative. The accumulation of these occurrences at the network level results in an
increase in the amount of deferred maintenance backlog over the next ten years. This
trend is reversed, however, in years 11 through 30 of the plan, as more cost effective
strategies become applicable for the pavement network.
0
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
Annual Budget Summary
Street infrastructure Plan
City of New Hope
1 i newbopeheportlamual budget resuh.sds
go
Total Total
December 27, 2005
2002 Recommended Infrastructure Plan
NEVADA AVE N
NORTHWOOD CIR
NORTHWOOD PKWY
OREGON AVE N
QUEBEC AVE N
RHODE ISLAND AVE N
SUMTER AVE N
UTAH AVE N
VIRGINIA AVE N
41ST AVE N
41 1/2 AVE N
OREGON AVE N
CUL DE SAC W
JORDAN AVE N
HILLSBORO AVE N
GETTYSBURG AVE N
NORTHWOOD CIR
FLAG AVE N
ENSIGN AVE N
DECATUR AVE N
BOONE AVE N
38TH AVE N
39TH AVE N
39 1/2 AVE N
40TH AVE N
41 1/2 AVE N
45TH AVE N
46TH AVE N
WINNETKA AVE N
45TH AVE N
46TH AVE N
47TH AVE N
46TH AVE N
47TH AVE N
48TH AVE N
47TH AVE N
48TH AVE N
41 1/2 AVE N
303
8,484
42ND AVE N
134
3,752
49TH AVE N
412
11,536
NORTHWOOD PKWY
370
18,210
HILLSBORO AVE N
1,227
36,810
GETTYSBURG AVE N
375
11,250
NORTHWOOD CIR
340
10,200
FLAG AVE N
416
12,480
ENSIGN AVE N
259
7,770
DECATUR AVE N
251
7,530
BOONE AVE N
432
12,960
36TH AVE N
1,680
47,040
39TH AVE N
493
13,804
39 1/2 AVE N
376
10,528
40TH AVE N
453
12,684
41 1/2 AVE N
1,182
33,096
42ND AVE N
134
3,752
46TH AVE N
715
20,020
NEVADA AVE N
1,602
44,856
42ND AVE N
2,475
69,300
45 1/2 AVE N
301
8,428
47TH AVE N
656
18,468
47 1/2 AVE N
282
10,146
47TH AVE N
656
18,368
48TH AVE N
650
18,200
49TH AVE N
430
12,040
48TH AVE N
640
17,920
49TH AVE N
670
18,760
$ 811
$ 0
$ 811
$ 405
$ 0
$ 405
$ 1,522
$ 0
$ 1,522
$ 2,786
$ 0
$ 2,786
$ 3,627
$ 0
$ 3,627
$ 1,045
$ 0
$ 1,045
$ 975
$ 0
$ 975
$ 1,126
$ 0
$ 1,126
$711
$0
$711
$ 720
$ 0
$ 720
$ 1,204
$ 0
$ 1,204
$ 7,340
$ 0
$ 7,340
$ 1,888
$ 0
$ 1,888
$ 1,137
$ 0
$ 1,137
$ 1,644
$ 0
$ 1,644
$ 4,694
$ 0
$ 4,694
$ 405
$ 0
$ 405
$ 2,269
$ 0
$ 2,269
$ 4,923
$ 0
$ 4,923
$ 7,853
$ 0
$ 7,853
$ 896
$ 0
$ 896
$2,127
$0
$2,127
$ 1,339
$ 0
$ 1,339
$ 1,810
$ 0
$ 1,810
$ 2,785
$ 0
$ 2,785
$ 1,617
$ 0
$ 1,617
$ 2,206
$ 0
$ 2,206
$2,519
$0
$2,519
$ 226,997
$ 0
$ 226,997
2003 Recommended Infrastructure Plan
BOONS CIR N
LAMPHERE DR
NEVADA AVE N
QUEBEC AVE N
ROSALYN CT
SUMTER AVE N
TERRA LINDA DR
VALLE VISTA ST
VIEWCREST LN
VIRGINIA AVE N
WINPARK DR
WISCONSIN AVE N
XYLON AVE N
YUKON AVE N
ZEALAND AVE N
,k
32ND PL N
33RD AVE N
298
13,112
33RD AVE N
BOONE CIR N
445
19,580
BOONE CIR N
34TH AVE N
279
12,276
34TH AVE N
YUKON AVE N
302
13,288
YUKON AVE N
AQUILA AVE N
637
28,028
AQUILA AVE N
36TH AVE N
279
12,276
BOONE AVE N
CUL DE SAC E
285
15,065
27TH AVE N
QUEBEC AVE N
185
5,180
QUEBEC AVE N
TERRA LINDA DR
670
18,760
27TH AVE N
CUL DE SAC N
690
24,992
35TH AVE N
36TH AVE N
623
17,444
LAMPHERE DR
VALLE VISTA ST
736
20,608
VALLE VISTA ST
VIEWCREST LN
483
13,524
27TH AVE N
CUL DE SAC N
220
12,519
TERRA LINDA DR
VIEWCREST LN
464
12,992
WINNETKA AVE N
SUMTER AVE N
502
14,056
QUEBEC AVE N
VIEWCREST LN
655
18,340
SUMTER AVE N
VALLE VISTA ST
289
8,092
VALLE VISTA ST
QUEBEC AVE N
489
13,692
27TH AVE N
CUL DE SAC N
581
24,118
PAVEMENT CHANGE
35 1/2 AVE N
228
6,384
35 1/2 AVE N
CUL DE SAC N
220
13,699
32ND AVE N
WINNETKA AVE N
2,436
68,208
35 1/2 AVE N
36TH AVE N
474
13,272
27TH AVE N
28TH AVE N
828
23,184
28TH AVE N
29TH AVE N
263
7,364
33RD AVE N
33RD PL N
498
13,944
33RD PL N
34TH AVE N
390
10,920
34TH AVE N
36TH AVE N
647
18,116
27TH PL N
28TH AVE N
536
15,008
29TH AVE N
NORTH END
121
3,388
33RD AVE N
33RD PL N
380
17,725
BOONE AVE N
AQUILA AVE N
285
7,980
AQUILA AVE N
36TH AVE N
1,321
36,988
27TH AVE N
27TH PL N
305
8,540
27TH PL N
28TH AVE N
528
14,784
AQUILA AVE N
36TH AVE N
865
24,220
$ 1,416
$ 0
$ 1,416
$ 2,538
$ 0
$ 2,538
$ 1,391
$ 0
$ 1,391
$ 1,271
$ 0
$ 1,271
$ 3,076
$ 0
$ 3,076
$ 1,285
$ 0
$ 1,285
$ 1,764
$ 0
$ 1,764
$ 534
$ 0
$ 534
$ 2,271
$ 0
$ 2,271
$ 3,297
$ 0
$ 3,297
$ 2,301
$ 0
$ 2,301
$ 3,034
$ 0
$ 3,034
$ 1,918
$ 0
$ 1,918
$ 1,915
$ 0
$ 1,915
$ 1,573
$ 0
$ 1,573
$ 1,791
$ 0
$ 1,791
$ 2,700
$ 0
$ 2,700
$ 834
$ 0
$ 834
$ 1,369
$ 0
$ 1,369
$ 4,349
$ 0
$ 4,349
$ 813
$ 0
$ 813
$ 1,908
$ 0
$ 1,908
$ 11,540
$ 0
$ 11,540
$ 1,390
$ 0
$ 1,390
$ 3,059
$ 0
$ 3,059
$ 796
$ 0
$ 796
$ 1,506
$ 0
$ 1,506
$ 985
$ 0
$ 985
$ 1,957
$ 0
$ 1,957
$ 2,129
$ 0
$ 2,129
$ 1,185
$ 0
$ 1,185
$ 1,856
$ 0
$ 1,856
$ 934
$ 0
$ 934
$ 4,331
$ 0
$ 4,331
$ 1,211
$ 0
$ 1,211
$ 3,467
$ 0
$ 3,467
$ 2,790
$ 0
$ 2,790
$ 138,463
$ 0
$ 138,463
2004 Recommended Infrastructure Plan
YUKON AVE N
YUKON CIR
ZEALAND AVE N
54TH AVE N
YUKON AVE N
49TH AVE N
FAIRVIEW AVE N
54TH AVE N
55TH AVE N
CUL DE SAC N
FAIRVIEW AVE N
BOONE AVE N
55TH AVE N
633
160
313
923
660
17,724
4,480
8,764
25,844
18,480
$ 2,182
$ 926
$ 1,483
$ 3,805
$ 3,822
$ 0
$ 0
$ 0
$ 0
$ 0
$ 2,182
$ 926
$ 1,483
$ 3,805
$ 3,822
$ 150,702
$ 0
$ 150,702
,10
r Uyy {jL3] .� yy
AMEL
2005 Recommended Infrastructure Plan
QUEBEC AVE N
UTAH AVE N
VIRGINIA AVE N
WISCONSIN AVE N
XYLON AVE N
ZEALAND AVE N
42ND AVE N
48TH CIR N
38 1/2 AVE N
39TH AVE N
XYLON AVE N
VIRGINIA AVE N
38TH AVE N
39TH AVE N
WISCONSIN AVE N
ZEALAND AVE N
XYLON AVE N
48TH CIR N
49TH AVE N
40TH AVE N
WISCONSIN AVE N
VIRGINIA AVE N
40TH AVE N
39TH AVE N
WISCONSIN AVE N
ZEALAND AVE N
40TH AVE N
40TH AVE N
3,518
98,504
$ 15,072
$ 0
$ 15,072
457
12,796
$ 1,659
$ 0
$ 1,659
966
27,048
$ 3,016
$ 0
$ 3,016
677
18,956
$ 1,813
$ 0
$ 1,813
769
21,532
$ 2,220
$ 0
$ 2,220
251
7,028
$ 895
$ 0
$ 895
262
7,336
$ 845
$ 0
$ 845
293
8,204
$ 915
$ 0
$ 915
248
6,944
$ 1,508
$ 0
$ 1,508
380
10,640
$ 960
$ 0
$ 960
798
22,344
$ 2,016
$ 0
$ 2,016
$ 106,080
$ 0
$ 106,080
X IL
2006 Recommended Infrastructure Plan
36TH AVE N
DECATUR AVE N
ENSIGN AVE N
ENSIGN CT N
FLAG AVE N
GETTYSBURG AVE N
GETTYSBURG CT N
YUKON AVE N
XYLON AVE N
WISCONSIN AVE N
WINNETKA AVE N
NEVADA AVE N
MARYLAND AVE N
CUL DE SAC S
32ND AVE N
ENSIGN CT N
CUL DE SAC S
34TH AVE N
35TH AVE N
ENSIGN AVE N
32ND AVE N
GETTYSBURG AVE N
FLAG CT N
FLAG CIR N
34TH AVE N
34TH AVE N
34 1/2 AVE N
35TH AVE N
32ND AVE N
GETTYSBURG CT N
GETTYSBURG AVE N
XYLON AVE N
WISCONSIN AVE N
WINNETKA AVE N
NEVADA AVE N
MARYLAND AVE N
LOUISIANA AVE N
36TH AVE N
ENSIGN CT N
FLAG AVE N
34TH AVE N
35TH AVE N
36TH AVE N
CUL DE SAC N
GETTYSBURG AVE N
FLAG CT N
FLAG CIR N
34TH AVE N
34TH AVE N
34 1/2 AVE N
35TH AVE N
36TH AVE N
GETTYSBURG CT N
FLAG AVE N
CUL DE SAC N
301
13,244
$ 1,230
$ 0
$ 1,230
300
13,200
$ 1,226
$ 0
$ 1,226
1,047
46,068
$ 4,278
$ 0
$ 4,278
1,866
89,568
$ 8,318
$ 0
$ 8,318
217
10,416
$ 967
$ 0
$ 967
417
20,016
$ 1,859
$ 0
$ 1,859
250
14,850
$ 1,321
$ 0
$ 1,321
332
9,296
$ 1,144
$ 0
$ 1,144
313
8,764
$ 904
$ 0
$ 904
230
12,799
$ 2,121
$ 0
$ 2,121
849
23,772
$ 3,940
$ 0
$ 3,940
645
18,060
$ 2,341
$ 0
$ 2,341
150
12,050
$ 1,483
$ 0
$ 1,483
416
12,480
$ 2,581
$ 0
$ 2,581
328
9,840
$ 2,248
$ 0
$ 2,248
293
8,790
$ 2,865
$ 0
$ 2,865
183
5,490
$ 1,322
$ 0
$ 1,322
111
3,330
$ 500
$ 0
$ 500
312
9,360
$ 1,983
$ 0
$ 1,983
303
9,090
$ 786
$ 0
$ 786
657
19,710
$ 3,478
$ 0
$ 3,478
394
11,032
$ 1,250
$ 0
$ 1,250
334
9,352
$ 964
$ 0
$ 964
90
10,370
$ 1,175
$ 0
$ 1,175
$ 79,937
$ 0
$ 79,937
4-7 7 043
4 1
The Transportation Plan for the City of New Hope is a document that is intended to help
guide transportation and land use decisions made by the City. The Plan that is contained
in this document is a multi -modal expression of transportation improvements that should
be programmed and provided by the City of New Hope. The Plan is a blueprint that will
help to provide a more efficient transportation system within the City and provide for
effective transportation options for the residents of New Hope.
Elements of the Plan that are contained in this document include the following:
* Fxisting Transportation Characteristics
* Transportation System Analysis
* Functional, Classification of Roadways
* Transit Service
* Trail/Pedestrian Systems
* Rail Systems
* Travel Demand Management
* Public Input
* Plan Implementation
The plan was developed after receipt of public input, field reconnaissance and analysis of
transportation elements and concerted input and review by City staff. The Plan is
structured in such a fashion that elements of the Plan can be revised and /or updated without
having to redo the entire Plan. A summation of the major recommendations that are
contained in this Transportation Plan is provided below.
Functional Classif f cation of Roadways
The roadway system within the City of New Hope has been classified and contains the
following functional roadway types:
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Community Collector
Neighborhood Collector
Local
The major change from the 1974 plan is the classification of collectors as community and
neighborhood facilities. This classification was not contained in the previous plan.
New Hope Transportation Plan i
Proportion of Service
Mobility
Arterials
Collectors
Locals
Figure 12 Bonestroo Rosene
Functional Classification Anderlik &
Relationship — Access and Mobility Associates
COMM. 34173
R
�I
TraiflTedestrian Systems
A major component of the Plan is the provision of a trail/pedestrian system that will allow
for bicycling and walking within the city along a dedicated system of facilities. The bikeway
portion of the plan will allow for connection to the regional trail plan and allow for
movement within the City. Much more emphasis is placed upon this transportation mode
as more and more persons are bicycling and walling.
Transit System
The City should begin the process of discussing the methods in which a City shuttle system
can be provided to serve City residents. Improvements to the regional system within the
City should also be sought These discussions must begin with the Metropolitan Council
Transit Operations (MCTO) division of the Metropolitan Council.
Operations and Safety
The City should continue to monitor traffic operations along certain roadways within the
City. These facilities include Bass Lake Road, 42nd Avenue North, 36th Avenue North and
the segment of Boone Avenue in the north section of the City. These roadways, due to
increased traffic and operations problems may require future improvements and should be
monitored. The City should embark on a program, with Hennepin County, to install
emergency vehicle preemption on all traffic signals within the City.
Rail Systems
Consideration should be given to the possible provision of rail grade separations at the
intersection of the CP Rail System east -west rail line with Winnetka Avenue and with
Boone Avenue.
The above provides some of the major elements of the New Hope Transportation Plan that
are recommended in order to better serve the citizens of the City. Some of these elements
can be implemented in a short time frame, but most will require longer periods of time in
order to implement The Plan, and the various components within the Plan, are intended
to be dynamic and able to react to change. That is a requirement of any transportation
plan. .
:1
New Ho Transportation Plan ii
M7
to
N.
6
co
:I
A.
!,d
391t, AVis
— RL 3 'V
vALLEY] PL
N.
,�;
Y. .
'�
.V+u ' �:i
.. �� ' ��
.0 +.
•c #e,
i t ". tr'G ,..,., w� m�rr Via. -.
✓.,..
...
�,�� '. µms' � „' : '� ��': �" $ }`,� ..
q b. 'Oi jdL R .
e,
r. ,.
t 9 } ���
��
, 9 s y
3i: y � C
hid. �`
G6vernmin
tit
0 Y�lY11i
I21i�r
4
lJ
Febrinty 11 Ciry ColnICit Agenda
February 11 EDA Meeting A gencta
.}anuary 28 Cary Council Meeting Minutes
Winter Parking and Plowing Basics
Crime Alert -- Burgary
New Hobe officer receives state atlrard
Cdty Council Sets 2002 Sewer and 14 Rates
2002 Adopted Cdty of New Hope Budget
Pickup Rasketball and Volleyball
We Care About Kids Activities
Volunteers Paint Mural in Police Lobby
Crime Fund Celebrates 20 Years
Outdoor Skating Rinks Open
Winter Parks and Recreation Prot rams
December City Report
Transition to New Recyclinrl Proyrttt►
PROJECT NO. 699
PROJECT BULLETIN #3
PROJECT BULLETIN #3
7901 49th Avenue North
Overview
On August 17, 2001, the City of New Hope purchased the property located at 7901 49th Avenue North
as part of the City's Scattered Site Housing Program. The intent of this purchase was to rehabilitate the
property, sell to a program qualified first -time homeowner and improve the neighborhood. The property is
located in a highly visible area and has been in extreme disrepair for some time. In the past, the City has
received numerous complaints about the lack of maintenance at this site.
On November 13, the New Hope City Council approved rehabilitation specifications for the home and
directed staff to seek bids on the project. Bids were accepted through December 27. The bids received
were higher than expected, and on January 14, 2002, the Council rejected all bids, approved revised
specifications, and directed staff to re -bid the project. On February 25, the Council awarded a contract to
M -Con, Inc., the low bidder. Although the specifications have been revised, the project will still include
replacement of roof, siding, driveway, and garage door, landscaping, and the repair and /or replacement
of a number of interior items. Rehabilitation activities are expected to begin in March. Landscaping of the
property will occur in the spring.
Site Upkeep
The City will maintain the site. Please be aware that the property was recently broken into and
vandalized. As a neighboring property owner, if you notice any suspicious activity on the property, do not
hesitate to contact the New Hope Police Department at 911 anytime, day or night.
Construction Hours
Construction activities may occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. on weekends and holidays. All work will take place during these hours.
City Contacts
If you have questions or comments regarding this property, please contact Ken Doresky, Community
Development Specialist, at 763- 531 -5137, or Kirk McDonald, Director of Community Development, at
763 -531 -5119.
The City appreciates the cooperation of all residents and businesses in the area that may be impacted by
this project. Additional bulletins will be sent to you as the project progresses. Thank you for your
cooperation. Neighboring property owners will continue to be notified as rehabilitation activities proceed.
City of New Hope, 4401 Xylon Avenue North, New Hope, MN 55428
02 -26 -02
PROJECT NO. 685
PROJECT BULLETIN #4
9168
Overview
As part of the City's Scattered Site Housing Program, the New Hope City Council approved the purchase
of 7105 62nd Avenue North from a willing seller. As you may know, the original intention of the purchase
was to rehabilitate and preserve the existing home. Upon further inspection, city staff found that the
foundation of the home was failing and consequently removed the home from the site and prepared the
site for redevelopment.
On November 13, the Council directed staff to seek design proposals from consultants to develop plans
and specifications for an accessible twinhome on the site, similar to the twinhome located directly to the
south of the lot. On January 28, the Council hired Project for Pride in Living, Inc. (PPL) to complete the
design. PPL expects to complete the plans by the end of March. The City will schedule a meeting for
neighboring residents during design development to provide them with an opportunity to review and
comment on the proposed plan before Council approval. This neighborhood meeting will take place at
New Hope City Hall in March. City staff will send an announcement for this meeting approximately two
weeks prior to the meeting date.
Site Upkeep
The City will continue to maintain the site. As a neighboring property owner, if you notice any suspicious
activity on the property, please contact the New Hope Police Department at 911 anytime, day or night.
Construction Hours
When needed, construction activities may occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. on weekends and holidays. All work will take place during
these hours.
City Contacts
If you have questions or comments regarding this property, please contact Ken Doresky, Community
Development Specialist, at 763 - 531 -5137, or Kirk McDonald, Director of Community Development, at
763- 531 -5119.
The City appreciates the cooperation of all residents and businesses in the area that may be impacted by
this project. Additional bulletins will be sent to you as the project progresses. Thank you for your
cooperation. Neighboring property owners will continue to receive periodic updates as the redevelopment
process proceeds.
City of New Hope, 4401 Xylon Avenue North, New Hope, MN 55428
2 -22 -02
CAC AGENDA ITEMS FOR UPCOMING MONTHS
AS OF 02/05/02
The following are agenda items that have either been assigned to CAC, a CAC member has
asked that the item be discussed, or staff has asked that the item be discussed by CAC.
March 18:
• Discuss final results of infrastructure study, tying all with City's Transportation Plan, with
Guy Johnson, Public Works Director.
• View Twin West Power Point presentation with Kirk McDonald, Community
Development Director.
Future:
• Update on Livable Communities Task Force with Kirk McDonald, Director of
Community Development. (May 20)
• City tour. (June 17)
• Host a public discussion or surrey after fall 2002 (free, tentative) curbside pickup (such
as the one Bloomington holds). Discussion /survey would involve seeking input as to the
residents' interest in paying a monthly fee, which would be charged on utility billing to
pay for an annual curbside program.
• Discussion regarding use of treated lumber (waiting for Hennepin Parks study results).