The URL can be used to link to this page

060419 Planning PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue North Tuesday, June 4, 2019 7:00 p.m. Petitioner must be in attendance at the meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. CONSENT BUSINESS 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 PC 19-07, Site plan review and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for removal of the current residential building and accessory buildings and constructing a new 22,500 square foot custom car manufacturing facility, 2919 Nevada Avenue North, Automotive Concepts, petitioner 4.2 PC 19-08, Rezoning, subdivision, and platting for the construction of a senior living facility, 3216 Winnetka Avenue North, Hampton Senior Care, petitioner 5. COMMITTEE REPORTS 5.1 Design and Review Committee – next meeting will be June 13, 2019 5.2 Codes and Standards Committee – next meeting 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OLD BUSINESS 7.1 Approve April 2, 2019, Planning Commission minutes 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS 9. ADJOURNMENT Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 1 5/31/19 PLANNING CASE REPORT City of New Hope Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Report Date: May 31, 2019 Planning Case: 19-07 Petitioner: Automotive Concepts Address: 2731 Nevada Avenue North Project Name: Automotive Concepts Project Description: Redevelopment of the property located at 2919 Nevada Avenue North. The current residential building and accessory buildings will be removed and replaced with a new 22,500 square foot custom car manufacturing facility. I. Type of Planning Request A. Site Plan Review B. Conditional Use Permit for PUD, Planned Unit Development II. Zoning Code References Section(s) 4-35 Administration – Site Plan Review 4-34 Administration – PUD, Planned Unit Development III. Property Specifications Zoning: I - Industrial Location: 2919 Nevada Avenue North Adjacent Land Uses: I, Industrial to the north, east and south. Railroad property to the west, with single-family residential to the west of the railroad. Site Area: 1.94 acres, or 84,299 square feet Lot Area Ratio: Green Space: 18.0% Planning District: Planning District 15. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that with limited vacant land in New Hope, the city needs to promote the in-place expansion of existing industries within Planning District 15. IV. Background Summary The owner of the subject property approached city staff with the desire to construct a new 22,500 square foot building as an extension to the Automotive Concepts business located on the parcel to the south. The new building would serve as their “clean” facility, and would focus on body work, Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 2 5/31/19 installation of tires and wheels, and overall customization of vehicles. They would also lease out approximately 6,000 square feet of the building for a use that would be compatible with their business. The owner anticipates the building will add about 35 new jobs. The property at 2919 Nevada Avenue is the location of the former residence and business owned and operated by Ray Kmetz. It is a land-locked parcel that has access to Nevada Avenue via a private service drive. One portion of the service drive is also owned by the applicant, and the other portion is owned by an adjacent business. For this reason, staff is requiring that the applicant apply for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Use Development (PUD) to allow for site access via a private drive over multiple lot lines. Staff will require that the applicant supply the city with an executed agreement between the two properties for the shared use and maintenance of this driveway. The property in question has some challenging topography, and there are significant costs involved with preparing the property from a topographical and grading/excavating perspective that have caused the owner to seek financial assistance from the city. A conservative estimate for land corrections is $300K-$400K. Automotive Concepts has applied for a TIF District in order to receive assistance from the city to help prepare the property for redevelopment, and the City Council will review this request at the July 22, 2019 meeting. Zoning Analysis 1. Setbacks The property is zoned I, Industrial. The setback requirements for commercial buildings located in this zoning district are as follows: Building Setbacks Required Proposed Compliant Front Yard, South 30 feet 85 feet Yes Side Yard, East 10 feet 32 feet Yes Side Yard, West 10 feet 75 feet Yes Rear Yard, North 30 feet 100 feet Yes 2. Parking The proposed building consists of first-floor operations and a mezzanine with offices. Based on the building plans, the following business uses and their related required parking are calculated: Use Area Required Stalls Sales Area 2,600 x 0.9 = 2,340 ÷ 200 12 Office Area 2,895 x 0.9 = 2,605 ÷ 300 7 Storage 2,047 x 0.9 = 1,842 ÷ 1,500 1 Service Stalls 17 x 3 51 TOTAL 71 Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 3 5/31/19 The calculations show a minimum number of parking stalls on-site at 71 stalls. The applicant has stressed that parking is a premium for the site and shows 93 parking stalls on the site plan. This meets the city’s minimum requirements. 3. Site Access The property in question does not have direct access to a public right-of-way. The applicant owns a portion of the roadway access just south of the subject parcel, as well as the parcel to the south of the access. However, there is no direct access from the Automotive Concepts property to the south to the proposed new building to the north. Access is limited via a private drive owned by the applicant and the property owner located at 2900 Nevada Avenue North. As stated previously, staff will allow the proposed development with the approval of a CUP for a PUD, in order to secure agreements for the shared use and maintenance of the driveway access. The driveway is also in poor repair and will require upgrades through the CUP process. The site plan proposes two curb cuts into the private street to access the proposed development. This will be acceptable through the PUD process. One of the curb cuts will be used for deliveries of vehicles and parts, and relies on the private drive to perform the required turning movements to gain access to the loading docks. For this reason, staff will require “No Parking” signs to be placed along the length of the private drive. The site also presents a dead-end situation for garbage haulers and emergency vehicles. The applicant has supplied adequate turning movement layouts proving that larger vehicles would be able to turn around. The site plan indicates two areas to the north of the building that would be striped as “No Parking” areas so that larger vehicles have the access to turn around. A condition of approval will require these areas to remain unencumbered. Staff will also require that all vertical elements in this area must be located away from the turning area to avoid damage. 4. Building Design The proposed building will be constructed of precast concrete panels, which are an acceptable building material in the industrial district. Windows and metal accents also provide a visual interest to the building. In general, the building elevations meet the minimum New Hope design standards for industrial buildings. All rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened by the parapet wall as well. 5. Trash Enclosure The trash enclosure is located at the end of the parking lot, along the north side of the property. The applicant has adequately proven that a garbage hauler would be able to make the necessary turning movements within the site to access the trash enclosure. The enclosure itself will be constructed of building materials that are compatible with the principal structure, meeting the minimum code requirements. 6. Landscaping The proposed landscape plan indicates eight (8) significant trees that will be removed to allow for the site development. City Code requires that 97 caliper inches of trees must be Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 4 5/31/19 replaced, and the proposed landscape plan indicates that the minimum code requirements will be met. 7. Snow Storage In addition to some green areas indicated on the northeast and northwest portions of the property, the proposed site plan indicates the use of seven (7) parking stalls along the west side of the parking lot that will be used for snow storage. Given the elevation of the property in comparison to the neighboring properties, simply pushing snow onto the steep- sloped green areas may cause the snow to slide onto the neighboring properties. Utilizing the proposed 7 parking stalls to help with snow storage will reduce the effect of piled snow sliding onto neighboring properties. 8. Lighting The proposed lighting plan indicates acceptable lighting standards in regards to parking lot lighting sidewalk lighting, and entrance lighting. The photometric plan does, however, show light levels exceeding 0.4 foot candles along the west and south property lines. Given that these areas are adjacent to the railroad right-of-way, staff will accept these light levels through the PUD process. 9. Demolition and Excavation The current condition of the property has a single-family home at the top of a hill at 960-foot elevation. The grading plan depicts the new building at 945 feet above sea level, and the parking at 940 feet. This portrayal calls for the removal of approximately 15 feet of elevation throughout various areas around the site. The cost associated with the removal of this amount of earth has been the main driving force behind the applicant’s request for a Tax Increment Financing District to be created. In order for the city to ensure that the developer follows the regulations pertaining to grading, erosion and sediment control, conditions of approval specific to the site excavation have been included in the land use request. 10. Utility Plan and Stormwater Management The submitted utility plan will be subject to review by the city engineer. The proposed hydrants will be on a dead-end line, and will need to be flushed periodically. Staff suggested that the water main be looped in order to create redundancy in the system, and this is something that the applicant will take under consideration. The proposed plans indicate an underground tank system and storm water structure. Calculations will be required to prove the adequacy of this system and a storm water maintenance agreement will be required to ensure the system remain in good working order. B. Zoning Code Criteria 1. Site plan review Modification of or additions or enlargements to a building, or buildings, accessory site improvements, and/or land features of a parcel of land that result in the need for additional Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 5 5/31/19 parking or increase the gross floor area of the building by 25 percent or more require site plan review. Criteria. In making recommendations and decisions upon site and building plan review applications, the staff, planning commission and city council shall consider the compliance of such plans with the following standards: (a) Consistency with the various elements and objectives of the city's long-range plans, including, but not limited to, the comprehensive plan. Findings. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that with limited vacant land in New Hope, the city needs to promote the in-place expansion of existing industries within Planning District 15. The removal of a non-conforming, single-family house and other outbuildings to accommodate the expansion of an existing business in this planning district would be consistent with the long-range goals for the area. (b) Consistency with the purposes of this Code. Findings. The proposal is generally consistent with the purposes of the Code, as the proposed building setbacks and design meet the minimum code requirements. An exception to light intensity along the west property line will be considered and supported through the PUD process, as this area is adjacent to a railroad right-of- way. The PUD process would also allow for the development of the subject parcel without it having direct access to a public right-of-way. (c) Preservation of the site in its natural state, insofar as practicable, by minimizing tree and soil removal, and designing any grade changes so as to be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed or developing areas. Findings. Preservation of the existing site conditions is not desirable as the current site improvements are in poor condition, and the former use is now non-conforming to the industrial district. Considerable grading needs to be performed in order to make the site a viable industrial use. The applicant will also conform to the tree replacement policy, and will replace any tree removed per the requirements of the code. (d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of buildings and open spaces with the terrain and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the proposed development. Findings. Staff believes the proposal for site and building improvements is adequate and will be of a harmonious nature. The proposed development is an extension of a current business and will create a strong visual relationship with the other businesses in the area. (e) Creation of a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features including: Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 6 5/31/19 1. Creation of an internal sense of order for the various functions and buildings on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors, and the general community. Findings. Staff finds that the applicant has created a good internal sense of order on the site. The proposed site plan delivers a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and the general community. 2. Appropriateness of the amount and arrangement of open space and landscaping to the design and function of the development. Findings. The arrangement and amount of open space and landscaping are appropriate given the design and function of the proposed development. 3. Appropriateness of the materials, textures, colors, and details of construction as an expression of the design concept of the project and the compatibility of the same with the adjacent and neighboring structures and functions. Findings. Staff finds the proposed building materials, textures, and construction details to be appropriate and compatible with neighboring structures. 4. Adequacy of vehicular, cycling and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking, in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian, cycling and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking so as to be safe, convenient and, insofar as practical, compatible with the design of proposed buildings, structures and neighboring properties. Findings. The proposed site plan provides for adequate vehicular circulation. There will be no access points directly to a public right-of-way, but this will be considered through the PUD process. The access points onto the private driveway are adequate and do provide for appropriate ingress and egresses to the site. The arrangement and amount of parking that has been provided is adequate, as the developer is proposing more parking stalls than what is required by code. 5. Creation of an energy-conserving design through design, location, orientation and elevation of structures, the use and location of glass in structures, and the use of landscape materials and site grading. Findings. All construction activity will comply with current building code standards that relate to energy efficiency. The storm water management system will be designed to adequately capture the required amount of rain water runoff. 6. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for such matters as surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 7 5/31/19 of views, light and air, and those aspects of design, not adequately covered by other regulations, which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Findings. As stated previously, there will be some extensive grading taking place on this property to prepare it for construction. Approximately 15 feet of elevation will be removed from the site. The grading and drainage plans incorporate the proper curbs and gutters and storm water management to control the rainwater runoff appropriately. For this reason, staff does not anticipate any negative effects to neighboring properties. A concern that staff does have is in regards to snow storage, given the steep slopes around the perimeter of the property. There could be potential for snow stored on the periphery of the property to slide down onto adjacent properties. The applicant has identified a snow storage area within the parking lot that could eliminate this situation. 2. Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development This section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of lots, buildings, and activities, which promote the goals, outlined in the comprehensive plan or serve another public purpose. It is further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance of parking, open space and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depth, yards, etc., by either conditional use permit or rezoning to a PUD district, is intended to encourage the following standards: (a) A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the comprehensive plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) Findings. The proposal is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that with limited vacant land in New Hope, the city needs to promote the in-place expansion of existing industries within Planning District 15. (b) Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and siting of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. Findings. Given the limited land available for new development, the proposed project promotes efficient land use through the redevelopment of a marginal property by allowing the use of a private drive as the primary access to the subject property. Staff will require that an easement agreement between the owners of the Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 8 5/31/19 private drive be established and recorded with the county, outlining the shared use and maintenance of the driveway. (c) The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography, and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. Findings. The elevation of the subject property will be reduced by 15 feet, making the site suitable for development. The remaining site will conform to minimum zoning code requirements to ensure preservation of the property. (d) A creative use of land and related physical development, which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. Findings. The proposed project promotes a creative use of the current site by integrating redeveloping a non-conforming property into a viable industrial use. (e) An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. Findings. This condition does not apply to the subject property, as there will be no public costs associated with the construction of utilities and streets. (f) Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the city. Findings. If the PUD was not granted, this land-locked parcel would likely remain a vacant, non-conforming property. The PUD flexibilities would allow for the redevelopment of the parcel into a viable industrial use. C. Design and Review Committee The Design and Review Committee met with the applicant on May 16, 2019. The committee was in favor of the proposed development and request for PUD flexibility. D. Approval 1. Type of Approval a. Site Plan Review – quasi-judicial b. Conditional Use Permit for PUD – quasi-judicial 2. Timeline a. Date Application Received: May 10, 2019 Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 9 5/31/19 b. Date Application Deemed Complete: May 10, 2019 c. End of 60-Day Decision Period: July 9, 2019 d. End of 120-Day Decision Period: August 8, 2019 VI. Notification Property owners within 500 feet of parcel were notified by mail and a legal notice was published in the SunPost newspaper and on the city’s website. Staff has not received any inquiries about this project. VIII. Summary This proposal provides an opportunity for the redevelopment of a non-conforming property into a viable industrial use. Such opportunities for redevelopment are a priority of the city, as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The property is land-locked, as it does not have direct access to a public right- of-way. The requested PUD flexibilities would allow for the property to be developed, and include: • A request to allow the access points into the subject property to be via a private street. The private street will require an easement agreement for its shared use and maintenance, and would provide the required access to a public right-of-way. • Light levels along the west and south property lines exceed the 0.4 foot candle requirement. PUD flexibility would allow this intensity to remain in place, given that these property lines are adjacent to the railroad right-of-way. IX. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the site plan and conditional use permit for PUD, with following conditions: 1. Copy of Access easement to ensure perpetual access to the subject property (Easement document number A9205253 may be the document) is provided for the review and approval of the City Attorney and recorded with the property. 2. Condition of the private street shall be upgraded to meet City Standards for private streets to allow the change in use of the property from low density single-family to industrial. Applicant shall provide a long-term maintenance agreement to address the on-going maintenance and repair of the shared private street and the responsibilities of both properties. 3. “No Parking” signs shall be placed along the private drive to ensure that this area remains unencumbered. 4. The applicant shall either combine the three site properties through a platted subdivision or the applicant shall provide a deed restriction for the review and approval of the City Attorney that prohibits the separate sale of either of the site’s two lots. Planning Case Report 19-07 Page 10 5/31/19 5. Demolition and excavation plan must be submitted and approved by the city as part of the building permit application. No demolition or site grading shall occur prior to the approval of the demolition and excavation plan. The demolition and exaction plan shall include the following information: a. Quantity of dirt to be removed b. Dump location and haul routes c. Schedule and timeframe for removal d. Daily street clean-up program e. Waste disposal plan f. Security for work performance 6. All site development shall occur in accordance with the approved plan sets dated 5/10/2019 and revised 5/24/2019. 7. The site and landscape plans shall be revised to provide a nine-foot clear overhang area behind the parking lot curb north of the building to allow unencumbered movements of a fire truck exiting the site. The striped areas on the north side of the building that are designated as “No Parking” to aid in the turning movements of emergency vehicles shall remain unencumbered at all times. 8. Utility and storm water management plans shall be subject to the review comments of the City Engineer, Fire Official, and Building Inspector. 9. Lighting Plan - the free standing light poles along the north end of the parking lot be relocated outside of the fire truck turning movement area to avoid damage to the poles. The freestanding light pole at the northwest corner of the parking lot is relocated to avoid damage from snow plowing and snow storage. Attachments: • Hennepin County property map • Application (May 10, 2019) • Plans • Lighting details • Plan Review Response letter from Jeremy Foss (May 24, 2019) • Northwest Associated Consultants memorandum from Alan Brixius (May 29, 2019) • West Metro Fire-Rescue District letter from Shelby Wolf (May 15, 2019) • Stantec Consulting Services letter from Chris Long (May 16, 2019) Hennepin County Property Map Date: 5/31/2019 Comments: 1 inch = 400 feet PARCEL ID: 2011821340015 OWNER NAME: John W Prosser PARCEL ADDRESS: 2731 Nevada Ave N, New Hope MN 55427 PARCEL AREA: 2.11 acres, 92,125 sq ft A-T-B: Torrens SALE PRICE: $1,580,000 SALE DATA: 07/2007 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed ASSESSED 2018, PAYABLE 2019 PROPERTY TYPE: Industrial-Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $1,455,000 TAX TOTAL: $57,038.60 ASSESSED 2019, PAYABLE 2020 PROPERTY TYPE: Industrial-preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $1,659,000 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 SITE DATA PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C0-10 SITE DATA BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS PROJECT LOCATION N S W E LOCATION MAP 0 SCALE IN FEET 500 1000 SITE SUMMARY ZONING:I - INDUSTRIAL SITE/LOT AREA:84,298 SQ. FT / 1.935 AC. IMPERVIOUS AREA:60,225 SQ. FT / 1.382 AC. (71%) GREENSPACE PROVIDED:24,073 SQ. FT / 0.553 AC. (29%) PARKING REQUIREMENTS (PER CITY CODE) TYPE UNIT / AREA STALLS REQ.STALLS PROVIDED RETAIL 1 / 200 SF 6 WAREHOUSE 1 / 1500 SF 15 AUTO REPAIR 5 + 3 PER BAY 44 TOTAL:65 93 SETBACKS PARKING BUILDING FRONT YARD 5'-0"30'-0" SIDE YARD 5'-0"10'-0" REAR YARD 5'-0"30'-0" PROJECT ADDRESS / LOCATION: 2919 NEVADA AVENUE N. NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA 55427 S20 T118N R21W NEW HOPE, MN, HENNEPIN COUNTY 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL (WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS), DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT AND COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK. 3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 5. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OF DETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR IN CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 6. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 7. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TO AVOID GALVANIC CORROSION. 8. THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, MINIMUM 2 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION (1-800-252-1166). PROJECT GENERAL NOTES ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF NEW HOPE REQUIREMENTS AND MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2018 EDITION, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND WATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2013, AND CURRENT VERSION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83(1996)) ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATES FOR THIS PROJECT. THIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS OF DATA COLLECTED IN MAY / 2018 BY ISG, INC. SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCE PROJECT DATUM TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LEGEND EXISTING CITY LIMITS ACCESS CONTROL SECTION LINE QUARTER SECTION LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE PROPERTY / LOTLINE EASEMENT LINE CULVERT WATER EDGE WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND / MARSH WATER FENCE LINE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN CONTOUR (MAJOR) UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TV GAS UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CONTOUR (MINOR) DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE TREE LINE MANHOLE/STRUCTURE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT CURB STOP VALVE UTILITY PEDESTAL / CABINET POWER POLE 990 989 PROPOSED CULVERT STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATER OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TV GAS CONTOUR MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT VALVE EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY STORM SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) 1015 LOT LINE SANITARY SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND UTILITY CITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA CIVIL SHEET INDEX C0-10 SITE DATA ---- 21724 C0-10 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER MEDICINE LAKE RD WI N N E T K A A V E N 32ND AVE N WI N N E T K A A V E N MEDICINE LAKE RD DULUTH ST NE V A D A A V E N NE V A D A A V E N 36TH AVE N LO U I S A N A A V E N DO U G L A S D R N Sheet #Sheet Title C0-10 SITE DATA C0-30 SITE DETAILS C0-31 SITE DETAILS C0-32 SITE DETAILS C0-33 SITE DETAILS C1-10 PRE-CONSTRUCTION SWPPP C1-20 PROPOSED SWPPP C1-30 SWPPP NOTES C1-31 SWPPP NOTES C1-32 SWPPP NOTES C1-33 SWPPP NOTES C1-34 SWPPP DETAILS C2-10 EXISTING SITE & REMOVAL PLAN C3-10 SITE PLAN C3-20 SITE UTILITY PLAN C4-10 SITE GRADING PLAN C5-10 SITE RESTORATION & TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN C5-20 SITE PLANTING PLAN C5-21 SITE PLANTING NOTES & DETAILS C6-10 SITE LIGHTING PLAN C6-20 SITE LIGHTING DETAILS & NOTES 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 DETAILS PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C0-30 SITE DETAILS BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C0-30 SITE DETAILS ---- 21724 C0-30 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER SEE PLAN 6" 6" SE E D E T A I L 2 - #4 CONT BARS AGGREGATE BASE ASCURB FOUNDATION #4 BARS @ 16" OC EXTEND TO OPPOSITE EDGE OF CONC WALK 12" SAND BASE CONCRETE (MIN 4000 PSI) TURN DOWN CONCRETE SIDEWALK NTS ST170 (MnDOT CLASS 5) ST 1 1 0 6" 4" 2 " 10 " 2 1 / 2 " COMPACTED SUBGRADE AGGREGATE BASE BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSEMnDOT SPEC 2360, BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSEMnDOT SPEC 2360, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NTS MnDOT CLASS 5 TYPE SPNWB230B TYPE SPWEB240B STANDARD ST110 2- 1 / 2 " 12 " 2- 1 / 2 " COMPACTED SUBGRADE AGGREGATE BASE BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSEMnDOT SPEC 2360, BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSEMnDOT SPEC 2360, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NTS MnDOT CLASS 5 TYPE SPNWB230B TYPE SPWEB240B HEAVY DUTY ST115 8"18" 6" 13 1 2 " 6" 3 1 R3" R12" R3" HORIZONTAL LINE 7" 2 NOTES: LONGITUDINAL JOINT WHEN ADJACENT TO RIGID PAVEMENT OR BASE. SLOPE 0.06FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT GUTTER SLOPE ISPERMITTED, THE FORM MAY BE TILTED. 1 2 1 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER NTS B618 ST206 TOP PAVEMENT TOP CONCRETE WALK TURN DOWN CONCRETE WALK TURN DOWN WALK TRANSITION N.T.S. BUILDING LINE TURN DOWN WALK W/ PAVEMENT TRANSITION * DIRECTION OF DETAIL MAY BE MIRRORED REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB (MIN 4000 PSI)W/ AGGREGATE BASE 8 " 6 " COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE PAVEMENT NTS MnDOT CLASS 5 W/ WELDED WIRE FABRIC STANDARD ST128 REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB (MIN 4000 PSI)W/ AGGREGATE BASE 6 " 6 " COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE PAVEMENT NTS MnDOT CLASS 5 W/ WELDED WIRE FABRIC HEAVY DUTY ST128 4-12"Ø PIPE BOLLARD TYPICAL BOLLARD NTS LD100 PL1/2"X10" Ø W/ (4) 3/4" Ø CONCRETE ANCHORS 42 " 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 DETAILS PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C0-31 SITE DETAILS BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C0-31 SITE DETAILS ---- 21724 C0-31 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER HORIZONTAL LINE MATCH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SECTION SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION SECTION TO MATCH CONCRETE CURB SHOE ROTATED TO DRAIN SEE PLANFOR LOCATION SLOPE TO DRAIN 2.0% (TYP) REVERSE PITCH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER NTS ST250 SLOPE VARIES SEE PLAN SEE PLAN & DETAIL FOR PAVEMENT SECTION COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER NTS ST260 2.0%2.0% 8" 6" 4' EQ EQ PARKING SURFACE VIOLATORS SUBJECT TO A FINE OF UP TO $200 VAN ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED PARKING STALL SIGN TO BE MOUNTED AT THE HEIGHT SHOWN. SIGN SHALLCOMPLY WITH MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 169.346,SUBDIVISION 2, PARAGRAPH (a). SIGN TO BE CENTERED ONPARKING STALL 60 " M I N 66 " M A X 1" T E X T (T Y P ) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN NTS PM100 N.T.S. COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE A A SECTION A-A NOTES: 1. FLOW LINE THROUGH CURB RADIUS AND VALLEY GUTTER IS TO MATCH CURB AND GUTTER FLOW LINE 2. THE CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ON A MINIMUM OF 6" AGGREGATE BASE (INCIDENTAL TO CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT) 3. NO SEPARATE PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FOR INTEGRANT CURB 4. INSTALL 2-#4 REINFORCING RODS CENTERED IN VALLEY GUTTER (AS SHOWN) FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF OF THE VALLEY GUTTER 7" THICK CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER 7" THICK CURB RADIUS WITH INTEGRANT CURB B612 CURB AND GUTTER B612 CURB AND GUTTER 5' (TYP) SEE PLAN CONC CURB & GUTTER (SEE DETAIL) SEE TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION SINGLE CONDUCTOR COPPERCLAD TRACER WIRE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS FORREQUIREMENTS (INCIDENTAL) 6" GATE VALVE & BOX SUPPORT CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL A HIGH-VISIBILITY HYDRANTMARKER ON EACH HYDRANT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT PRICEBID FOR HYDRANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO SUPPLY AN EXTRAHYDRANT MARKER TO BE DELIVERED TO CITY SHOP. 2" MIN. GROUND CLEARANCE COVER FILTER AGG. W/ 2 LAYERS OF 8 MIL PLASIC CONC THRUST BLOCKING & ANCHORING IN ACCORDANCE WITH 'CITY ENGINEERS ASSOC. OF MN STANDARD UTILITY SPECIFICATIONS' IGNEOUS ROCK FILTER, 1.0 CY MIN, AGGREGATE (NO LIMESTONE) TO 6" ABOVE WEEP HOLES CONC BASE CONC BLOCKING BEND AS REQUIRED JOINT RESTRAINT, NON-CORROSIVE BOLTS, (TYP) WATERMAIN DEEP WATERMAIN HYDRANTS SHALL HAVE16" TRAFFIC FLANGE AND 2-4 1/2" NST CONNECTIONS 2' 12" LONG x 3/4" PVC CONDUIT TO PROTECT TRACER WIRE, MIN 3" TO BE ABOVE GROUND. ATTACH TRACER WIRE TO BOLT ATTACH TRACER WIRE TO BOLT WRAP HYDRANT WITH 8 MIL PLASTIC 3' VARIES (SEE PLAN) TYPICAL HYDRANT INSTALLATION NTS WM100 GRADE DROP LID TOP BOTTOM EXTENSION BASE CAP TO BE SET 12"BELOW GRADE. BOX TO BE SET WITH12" OF ADJUSTMENT. RESILIANT WEDGE VALVECONFORMING TO AWWA C-509-80 STANDARDS GATE VALVE,BOX SCREW TYPE THREE PIECE, 514" SHAFT SIZE G BOX,7'6" EXTENDED, #6 STANDARD BASE GATE VALVE ADAPTOR ALL GATE VALVES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHCITY OF STANDARDS GATE VALVEADAPTER 1-1/2" WASHED ROCK (INCIDENTAL) MEGALUG CONC BLOCKING WATERMAIN PIPE BEDDING(SEE DETAIL) NOTES: INSTALL TOP NUT EXTENDER TO 7' DEPTH ON ALL VALVES WITH OVER-DEPTH TYPICAL GATE VALVE & BOX INSTALLATION NTS WM200 NEW HOPE PERFORATED DRAIN TILE (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE & LOCATION) SEED GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 18 " M I N 6" M I N A F T E R SE T T L E M E N T TOPSOIL MnDOT 3149.2H COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE MIN 6" ON ALL SIDES 1' (TYP) EXTENT OF FABRIC SUBSURFACE DRAIN NTS SD510 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 DETAILS PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C0-32 SITE DETAILS BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C0-32 SITE DETAILS ---- 21724 C0-32 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER NOTE: CLEANOUT LINE TO BE THE SAME DIAMETER AS DRAIN TILE AND SHALL BE TYPE PSM, PVC SEWER PIPE, SDR 35. SEE PLANS FOR SIZE. GRADE THREADED, INTERNAL NUT PLUG MARK WITH BURIED METAL FOR METAL DETECTION 45° LONG RADIUS BEND WYEEND OF DRAIN TILE DRILL 18" HOLE AND STUB 6" OF TRACER WIRE LONG SWEEP 90° SANITARY TEE TRACER WIRE OPTION 1 OPTION 2 SANITARY CLEANOUT NTS SA200 4" CLEANOUT PIPE W/ PLUG, FREE FLOATING INSIDE OF CLEANOUT HOUSING HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON CLEANOUT HOUSING W/ HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON COVER SEE PAVEMENT SECTION POUR CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND HOUSING. 2.0' MIN. DIAMETER, DEPTHSUFFICIENT TO COVER HOUSING FLANGE THREADED PLUG WITHINTERNAL NUT COIL 24" OF TRACER WIRE HEAVY-DUTY SANITARY CLEANOUT NTS SA201 SANITARY SEWER PIPE GRANULAR BEDDING AS REQUIRED FOR PVC PIPINGAS SPECIFIED IN THE "CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION"SPEC - INCIDENTAL TO SEWER CONSTRUCTION COMPACTED BACKFILL OD + 24" MAX 12 " OD 6" NOTES: GRANULAR BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION PIPE BEDDING SANITARY SEWER NTS SA400 1'-0" x 12"Ø DOWLS @1'-0" x OC W/ 6"EMBEDMENT, (TYP) 12" EXPANSION JOINT W/HEAVY-DUTY SEALANT (TYP) CASTING (SEE NOTES) 5" THICK CONCRETE SLAB (MIN. 4000 PSI) 1 18"MIN NOTES: CASTING = GRATE = CONCRETE TRENCH DRAIN NTS SD550 NEENAH R-4990-CX TYPE C 54"BASE SLAB 5" 2. 5 ' - 4 . 0 ' 5"5"3' 42 " BA S E S L A B 2' 5" 5" SECURE TRACER WIRE TO BACK BOLT OF CASTING (FEED 12" MIN ADDITIONAL INTO STRUCTURE CASTING ASSEMBLY(SEE SCHEDULES) ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED PRECAST CONCRETE CATCH BASIN POUR CONCRETE INVERT SLOPE 1"/FT TO PIPE(S) PRECAST CONC BASE SLAB INFI-SHIELD WRAP EXTERNAL MANHOLE SEAL OR APPROVED EQUAL OPENINGS FOR PIPES AS REQUIRED SECTION VIEW PLAN VIEW NOTES: INFI-SHIELD WRAP EXTERNAL MANHOLE SEAL, OR APPROVED EQUAL, SHALL BE PLACED AROUND CASTING AND ADJUSTING RINGS. TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN NTS SD200 WATERMAIN PIPE GRANULAR BEDDING ASREQUIRED FOR PVC PIPING AS SPECIFIED IN THE "CITY ENGINEERS ASSOC." SPEC - INCIDENTAL TO WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION. COMPACTED BACKFILL 12 " OD 6" OD+24" MAX NOTE: GRANULAR BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT FOR WATERMAIN PIPES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION PIPE BEDDING WATER MAIN NTS WM300 TRENCH WIDTH, SEE TABLE 1 1 6" GRANULAR BEDDING PIPE OD (BC) 12 " COMPACTED BACKFILL 0.15 BC STORM DRAIN PIPE BACKFILL W/GRANULAR MATERIAL OR SELECTMATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION TO 6"ABOVE PIPE TRENCH WIDTH PIPE Ø TRENCH WIDTH 36" OR LESS BC + 24" 42" TO 54"1.5 x BC 60" OR OVER BC + 36" NOTES: GRANULAR BEDDING AND BACKFILL FOR STORM DRAIN PIPES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION 0.6 BC NON-CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDING NTS SD600 PA Y H E I G H T (S E E S T O R M D R A I N S C H E D U L E ) SEE STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE RIM ELEVATION STEPS INSTALLED AS SPECIFICED IN MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4180J BRICK & MORTAR CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS 3 MIN, 6 MAXW/ MFRS SEALANT BETWEEN RINGS. PLACE BITUMINOUS MASTIC BETWEEN BOTTOMRING AND TOP OF STRUCTURE & MFRS SEALANT BETWEEN JOINTS SEE STORM SCHEDULE FOR CASTING PRECAST CONCRETE BASE (SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011) 3 PROVIDE A FULL MORTAR BED 1' M I N . 2 8" 4 NOTES: WHEN USED AS A CATCH BASIN AND REQUIRING A RECTANGULAR OPENING, USE 4022 CONCRETE COVER. WHEN REFERING TO A CURB CATCH BASIN, USE TOP BACK OF CURB ELEVATION. WALL CONSTRUCTION MAY BE: CLASS II PRECAST PIPE (MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 3000); CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS II PIPE; OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION, BRICK OR BLOCK (MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4000). PROVIDE MORTAR FILLETS TO FIT BOTTOM PORTIONS OF PIPE TO DIRECT FLOW TO OUTLET. 1 2 3 4 MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN CONCRETE COVER 1 4020 MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN NTS SD101 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ 0 1 I=935.89 (P-3)R=943.76A-3A I=936.44 (P-4) I=936.24 (P-3) R=943.39A-3 I=935.89 (P-7)R=943.50A-7A I=934.69 (P-2) I=937.81 (ADS-24) R=943.26A-2 P-7 (14") P-2 (24") P-3 (12") PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 DETAILS PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C0-33 SITE DETAILS BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C0-33 SITE DETAILS ---- 21724 C0-33 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER 941.50'941.50'941.33' SLOPE (SEE GRADING PLAN) 2'-0" SQUARE PRE-CAST CATCH BASIN UNDISTURBED EARTH OR ENGINEERED BACKFILL LOADING DOCK PAVEMENTSECTION (SEE DETAIL) HEAVY DUTY GRATE AND FRAME -NEENAH R-3210-Q (MAX 1/2" GRATE OPENING) SEAL WITH WATERSTOP FOUNDATION WALL & FOOTING (SEE ARCH) PROPOSED BUILDING FINISHED FLOORELEV= 945.50' INVERT ELEV= 939.33' 2'2' 2' N.T.S. LOADING DOCK CATCH BASIN A-6 DETAIL CONNECT 4" SUBDRAIN P-6 (12") 1' N.T.S. TYPICAL SECTION VIEW 'B' - 'B' N.T.S. TYPICAL SECTION VIEW 'A' - 'A' TYPICAL SECTION VIEW 'C' - 'C' N.T.S. A A BB C C N.T.S. ADS MC-4500 STORMWATER CHAMBER 161.03' 7 3 . 8 8 ' 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ GM W AC SB-5 SB-6 945 945 950 955 960 960 946 946 947 94 7 947 948 949 951 952 953 954 956 9 5 7 957 958 958 959 959 940 945 950 955 96 0 937938 939 941 942 943944 946947948949 951952953 954 956 957 958 9 5 9 93 0 9 3 5 940 94 5 92 8 92 9 93 1 93 2 933 9 3 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 94 1 94 2 94 3 94 4 92 5 93 0 935 92 6 92 7 92 8 92 9 93 1 931 9 3 1 9 3 2 932 932 933 93 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 940 94 0 9 4 0 9 4 0 94 5 9 4 5 950 950 9 3 8 9 3 9 941 94 1 9 4 1 941 942 942 94 2 942 9 4 2 942 94 3 943 943 9 4 3 9 4 4 94 4 94 6 9 4 6 947 9 4 7 948 9 4 8 949 9 4 9 951 951 952 952952 952 953 953 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 EX-SITE SWPPP PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C1-10 PRE-CONSTRUCTION SWPPP BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C1-10 PRE-CONSTRUCTION SWPPP ---- 21724 C1-10 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER BIO-ROLL EROSION CONTROL LEGEND SYMBOL ITEM NO.DESCRIPTION UNITS QUANTITY *PERIMETER CONTROL LF 1,230 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTIONEXIT EACH 1 EXISTING DRAINAGE ARROW * PERIMETER CONTROL CAN BE SILT FENCE, BIO-ROLL OR WOOD MULCH. ** QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT. NO GUARANTEE IS MADE TO THE ACTUAL QUANTITIESREQUIRED. *** THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE TOTAL FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT NOT SPECIFIC TO THIS SHEET. **** SEE SITE RESTORATION PLAN FOR FINAL TURF ESTABLISHMENT NOTE: SWPPP COVERAGE INCLUDES ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE, AND CABLE INSTALLATION. EACH COMPANY OR THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THISSWPPP INCLUDING PROVIDING THEIR OWN RESTORATION IF INSTALLATION OCCURS AFTER PRIMARY INSTALLATION OF SEEDING/SODDING/MULCHING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF EACH UTILITY. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL) 1' 1' 1' 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 SB-5 SB-6 945 945 950 955 960 960 946 946 947 94 7 947 948 949 951 952 953 954 956 9 5 7 957 958 958 959 959 940 945 950 955 96 0 937938 939 941 942 943944 946947948949 951952953 954 956 957 958 9 5 9 93 0 9 3 5 940 94 5 92 8 92 9 93 1 93 2 933 9 3 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 94 1 94 2 94 3 94 4 92 5 93 0 935 92 6 92 7 92 8 92 9 93 1 931 9 3 1 9 3 2 932 932 933 93 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 940 94 0 9 4 0 9 4 0 94 5 9 4 5 950 950 9 3 8 9 3 9 941 94 1 9 4 1 941 942 942 94 2 942 9 4 2 942 94 3 943 943 9 4 3 9 4 4 94 4 94 6 9 4 6 947 9 4 7 948 9 4 8 949 9 4 9 951 951 952 952952 952 953 953 945 941 942 943 944 9 4 6 946 9 4 5 94 5 9 4 4 94 4 945 944 9 4 5 9 4 4 9 4 0 9 4 1 9 4 2 94 3 9 4 3 945 945 950 946947948 949 951 952 953 954 945 950 943 944 946 947 948 949 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 EX-SITE SWPPP PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C1-20 PROPOSED SWPPP BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C1-20 PROPOSED SWPPP ---- 21724 C1-20 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER EROSION CONTROL LEGEND SYMBOL ITEM NO.DESCRIPTION UNITS QUANTITY 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP, CLASS IV CY 9 *PERIMETER CONTROL LF 1,230 2573.502 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 8 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG LF 20 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTIONEXIT EACH 1 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CATEGORY 2 SY 690 CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA EA 1 EXISTING DRAINAGE ARROW PROPOSED DRAINAGE ARROW * PERIMETER CONTROL CAN BE SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG, OR WOOD MULCH. ** QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT. NO GUARANTEE IS MADE TO THE ACTUAL QUANTITIES REQUIRED. *** THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE TOTAL FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT NOT SPECIFIC TO THIS SHEET. **** SEE SITE RESTORATION PLAN FOR FINAL TURF ESTABLISHMENT NOTE: SWPPP COVERAGE INCLUDES ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE, AND CABLE INSTALLATION. EACHCOMPANY OR THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SWPPP INCLUDING PROVIDING THEIR OWN RESTORATION IF INSTALLATION OCCURS AFTER PRIMARY INSTALLATION OF SEEDING/SODDING/MULCHING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF EACH UTILITY. CONCRETE WASHOUT (SEE DETAIL) SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG (SEE DETAIL) 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 EX-SITE SWPPP PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C1-30 SWPPP NOTES BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C1-30 SWPPP NOTES ---- 21724 C1-30 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 EX-SITE SWPPP PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C1-31 SWPPP NOTES BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C1-31 SWPPP NOTES ---- 21724 C1-31 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 EX-SITE SWPPP PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C1-32 SWPPP NOTES BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C1-32 SWPPP NOTES ---- 21724 C1-32 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 EX-SITE SWPPP PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C1-33 SWPPP NOTES BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C1-33 SWPPP NOTES ---- 21724 C1-33 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 EX-SITE SWPPP PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C1-34 SWPPP DETAILS BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C1-34 SWPPP DETAILS ---- 21724 C1-34 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER SILT FENCES TO BE CONSTRUCTEDON DOWNHILL SIDE OF ALL MANHOLES MIN 6" MI N 6" RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION OF PO S T EM B E D M E N T 1. 5 ' M I N 24 " M I N GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 5' TEE POST AT 5' - 4' MAXSPACING FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL WITH TAMPED NATURALSOIL SILT FENCE NTS EC100 25' M I N I M U M 50' M I N I M U M INPL A C E S U R F A C E 8" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 2" TO 4" WASHED RIVER ROCK LOOSEN AS NEEDED SO THAT ENTRANCEIS NOT COMPACTED, REPLACE/CLEAN AGGREGATE ONCE DIRTY MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3733 TYPE V PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BENEATH ROCK 18" HIGH (MIN) CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM LEAVING SITE EXTEND SILT FENCE FROM EITHER SIDE OF BERM AS NEEDED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NTS EC600 STAPLE DETAIL TERMINAL ENDBLANKET SIDE EDGE BLANKET ROLL END OVERLAP BLANKET SIDE OVERLAP ANCHOR TRENCH STAPLES STAPLE EVERY 12" FLOW DIRECTION 12" STAGGERED 1" MIN 6" T O 1 2 " CENTER OF WATERWAY STAPLE 6" MIN STAPLE FLOW DIRECTION 6" MIN 4" STAGGERED1 ROW OF STAPLES 12" O.C. 6" TAMP SOIL FIRMLY 6" 2 ROWS OF STAPLES 12" O.C. STAGGERED 2 ROWS OF STAPLES, STAGGERED 12" O.C. ALONG ROW SEAM SEAM RO W O F ST A P L E S COLUMN O F STAPLES 4 1 4 5 3 2 2 NOTES: INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (ECB) OVER WATERWAYS AS SHOWN IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. THE ECB SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 3885. PREPARE SOIL PRIOR TO INSTALLING ECB, INCLUDING SEEDING AND FERTILIZING. THE ECB SHALL BE PLACED IN FIRM CONTACT WITH THE SOIL AND NOT BE ALLOWED TO BRIDGE OVER SURFACE IRREGULARITIES. THE MAT SHALL NOT BE STRETCHED. START LAYING THE MATS BY ROLLING CENTER MAT IN THE DIRECTION OF FLOW, CENTERED ON THE CENTERLINE OF WATERWAY. THERE SHALL NOT BE AN OVERLAP OF MATS AT THE CENTER OF THE WATERWAY. THE ECB SHALL BE ANCHORED, OVERLAPPED, AND STAPLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. IF NO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE, INSTALL THE MAT AS FOLLOWS. STAPLES SHALL BE "U" SHAPED, 0.12" DIAMETER WIRE OR GREATER (#11 GAUGE). (SEESTAPLE DETAIL FOR DIMENSIONS) BURY UPSTREAM END OF MAT IN A TRENCH 6" WIDE BY 6" DEEP AND STAPLED IN STAGGERED ROWS ACROSS THE WIDTH AS SHOWN IN DETAIL 1. C. FOR JOINING ENDS OF ROLLS, OVERLAP END OF UP SLOPE MAT A MINIMUM OF 6" OVER DOWN SLOPE MAT (SHINGLE STYLE). USE A DOUBLE ROW OF STAGGERED STAPLES 4" APART, AS SHOWN IN DETAIL 2. D. MATS ON SIDE SLOPES SHALL OVERLAP A MINIMUM OF 6" OVER THE MAT BELOW (SHINGLE STYLE). STAPLE OVERLAP AT 12" INTERVALS. (SEE DETAIL 3) E. THE OUTER EDGE ALONG SIDES OF THE MAT SHALL BE STAPLED EVERY 12". (SEE DETAIL 4) F. STAPLES ARE TO BE PLACED ALTERNATELY IN COLUMNS (IN THE DIRECTION OF THE WATERWAY) 2' APART AND IN ROWS (ACROSS THE WATERWAY) 3' APART THROUGHOUT THE AREA COVERED BY THE ECB. G. DOWNSTREAM (TERMINAL) END OF BLANKET SHALL BE STAPLED WITH A DOUBLE ROW OF STAGGERED STAPLES 12" APART. (SEE DETAIL 5) 1 2 3 4 5 CENTER OF WATERWAY 3 4 5 21 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION NTS EC700 STAINLESS STEEL CLAMPING BAND 11 GA GALVANIZED STEEL SUSPENSION SYSTEM LIFT HANDLES REPLACEABLE SEDIMENT BAGS WITHGEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC STANDARD 2" OVERFLOW AREA NOTES: FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES VISIT WWW.INLETFILTERS.COM INSTALLATION: REMOVE GRATE DROP FLEXSTORM INLET FILTER ONTO LOAD BEARING LIP OF CASTING OR CONCRETE STRUCTURE REPLACE GRATE MATERIALS: FRAMING - 11 GAUGE STEEL; CORROSION RESISTANT SEDIMENT BAG - WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC; 2 CUBIC FOOT TYP VOLUME; STAINLESS STEEL LOCKING BAND SECURING BAG TO FRAME ROUND FILTER INLET PROTECTION NTS EC210 STANDARD 2" OVERFLOW AREA 11 GA GALVANIZED STEEL SUSPENSION SYSTEM LIFT HANDLES REPLACEABLE SEDIMENT BAGS WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC REAR CURB GUARD FLAP WITH MAGNETIC TIE DOWNS (SLIDE 2x4 THROUGH FLAP IF IRON CURB BACK NOT AVAILABLE) NOTES: FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES VISITWWW.INLETFILTERS.COM INSTALLATION: REMOVE GRATE DROP FLEXSTORM INLET FILTER ONTO LOAD BEARING LIP OF CASTING ORCONCRETE STRUCTURE REPLACE GRATE MATERIALS: FRAMING - 11 GAUGE STEEL; CORROSION RESISTANT SEDIMENT BAG - WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC; 2 CUBIC FOOT TYP VOLUME;STAINLESS STEEL LOCKING BAND SECURING BAG TO FRAME CURB BOX FILTER INLET PROTECTION NTS EC212 1' EMBED IN 2" DEEP TRENCH FLOW BIOROLL OR MULCH LOG BIOROLL OR MULCH LOG NOTES: BIOROLL/MULCH LOGS TO BE 6" DIAMETER UNLESS OTHEWISE NOTED. STAKED INTO THE GROUND WITH WOOD STAKES. WOOD STAKES ARE A MINIMUM OF 2"x16"x12" UNLESS PRECLUDED BY PAVED SURFACE OR ROCK. WOOD STAKES DRIVEN THROUGH BACK HALF OF BIOROLL OR WOOD MULCH LOG AT AN APPROXIMATE ANGLE OF 45° WITH THE TOP OF STAKE POINTING UP STREAM. WHEN MORE THAN ONE BIORLLL IS NEEDED, OVERLAP ENDS A MINIMUM OF 6" AND STAKE BIOROLL STAKING NTS EC300 2'1' M I N 3' D E E P 10'NATIVEMATERIAL 5'x10'x3' CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA 1' DEEP IMPERVIOUS CLAY LINER MINIMUM 10-MIL THICK PLASTIC SHEETING OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN WASHOUT AREA TO REMOVE MATERIALS BEYOND 75% CAPACITY. WASHOUT AREA SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 50' OF STORM DRAINS, OPEN DITCHES OR BODIES OF WATER. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT WASHOUT AREA AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT LEAKS AND OVER TOPPING. WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. CONCRETE WASHOUT NTS EC500 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ GM W AC 945 945 950 955 960 960 946 946 947 94 7 947 948 949 951 952 953 954 956 9 5 7 957 958 958 959 959 940 945 950 955 96 0 937938 939 941 942 943944 946947948949 951952953 954 956 957 958 9 5 9 93 0 9 3 5 940 94 5 92 8 92 9 93 1 93 2 933 9 3 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 94 1 94 2 94 3 94 4 92 5 93 0 935 92 6 92 7 92 8 92 9 93 1 931 9 3 1 9 3 2 932 932 933 93 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 940 94 0 9 4 0 9 4 0 94 5 9 4 5 950 950 9 3 8 9 3 9 941 94 1 9 4 1 941 942 942 94 2 942 9 4 2 942 94 3 943 943 9 4 3 9 4 4 94 4 94 6 9 4 6 947 9 4 7 948 9 4 8 949 9 4 9 951 951 952 952952 952 953 953 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 EX-SITE SWPPP PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C2-10 EXISTING SITE & REMOVAL PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C2-10 EXISTING SITE & REMOVAL PLAN ---- 21724 C2-10 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER REMOVAL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK REMOVE GRAVEL SURFACE DEMOLISH BUILDING CLEAR & GRUB TREES & UNDERBRUSH REMOVE DECIDUOUS TREE(CLEAR & GRUB) REMOVE CONIFEROUS TREE(CLEAR & GRUB) CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. PAVEMENT REMOVALS SHALL INCLUDE FULL DEPTHSAWCUT & SECTION REMOVAL. EXISTING DRAINAGE ARROW REMOVE WALK, TYP. REMOVE INPLACE BUILDING, (HATCH) REMOVE TREE REMOVE POST, TYP REMOVE LANDSCAPING REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION (HATCH) REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVING, (HATCH) REMOVE SHRUBS, TYP. REMOVE WALK, TYP. REMOVE LIGHT POLE & BASE CLEAR & GRUB TREES, TYP. REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVING, (HATCH) REMOVE GRAVEL SECTION, (HATCH) REMOVE GRAVEL SECTION, (HATCH) REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVING, (HATCH) REMOVE WALK, TYP. REMOVE RETAINING WALL, TYP. CLEAR & GRUB TREES, TYP. CLEAR & GRUB STUMP CLEAR & GRUB STUMP CLEAR & GRUB STUMP REMOVE POSTS REMOVE LIGHT POLE & BASE REMOVE LANDSCAPING REMOVE RETAININGWALL, TYP. REMOVE RETAINING WALL, TYP. REMOVE INPLACE BUILDING, (HATCH) REMOVE INPLACE BUILDING, (HATCH) REMOVE INPLACE BUILDING, (HATCH) REMOVE INPLACE BUILDING, (HATCH) REMOVE ELEC. TRANSFORMER (COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANY) CAP INPLACE WELL (COORD. W/ THE DEPT. OF HEALTH) REMOVE SHRUB REMOVE TREE REMOVE TREE REMOVE SHRUBS REMOVE TREE REMOVE TREE REMOVE TREE REMOVE POST REMOVE GAS METER REMOVE TREE REMOVE TREE REMOVE LIGHT POLE & BASE REMOVE LANDSCAPING REMOVE ELECTRIC METER REMOVE AC REMOVE INPLACE BUILDING, (HATCH) REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION (HATCH) BENCHMARKPROTECT HYDRANT PROTECT UTILITY PED REMOVE POST REMOVE SHRUB SAWCUT & REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVING (HATCH) REMOVE BOULDER RETAINING WALL REMOVE BOULDER RETAINING WALL REMOVE POST REMOVE TREE REMOVE WALK, TYP. REMOVE LARGE BOULDER REMOVE LARGE BOULDER PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ REMOVE BOLLARD REMOVE BOLLARD REMOVE BOLLARD PROTECT EXISTING FENCE & HANDRAIL 14 10 21 33 6 9 AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 SITE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C3-10 SITE PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C3-10 SITE PLAN ---- 21724 C3-10 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 PAVEMENT LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUSPAVEMENT STANDARD CONCRETEPAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETEPAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK REVERSE PITCH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 19'24'19' TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH RETAINING WALL (SEE ARCH) (14' x 18') HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT RETAINING WALL CAR DISPLAY PAD ( 20' x 10' ) STANDARD CONCRETE PAVEMENT NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER H.C. STRIPING, TYP. WHITE PARKING LOT STRIPING, TYP. B618 CURB & GUTTER, TYP. (SEE DETAIL) COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. (SEE DETAIL) BENCHMARK 6' WIDE CONCRETE WALK (SEE DETAIL) PROPERTY LINE VALLEY GUTTER ACROSS DRIVE APRON 20 ' R5' R10'R5' R30' R10' 6' 19 ' 24 ' 19 ' 6' 5' PARKING SETBACK, TYP. 10' BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE5' PARKING SETBACK, TYP. 10' BUILDING SETBACK 5' PARKING SETBACK, TYP. 30' BUILDING SETBACK B618 CURB & GUTTER, TYP. (SEE DETAIL) B618 CURB & GUTTER, TYP. (SEE DETAIL) STANDARD BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (SHADE) (SEE DETAIL) 6' WIDE CONCRETE WALK (SEE DETAIL) NOTE: F&I: ALL PARKING LOT STRIPING AND MARKINGS AS SHOWN LOADING DOCK SECTION (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) LOADING DOCK RETAINING WALL (SEE STRUCTURAL) STORE ENTRANCE (SEE ARCH) DOCK STAIRS (SEE ARCH) NOTES: ·ALL UTILITIES THAT ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO 5' OUTSIDE OF BUILDING ARE TO BE CONNECT TO BUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. ·ENSURE 18" VERTICAL BETWEEN ALL PROPOSED & EXISTING WATER, STORM, & SANITARY. ·R = TOP BACK OF CURB ELEVATIONS FOR CURB STYLE CATCH BASINS, NOT GUTTER ELEVATIONS R10' R3' 28 ' 20 ' 22 ' 6' WIDE CONCRETE WALK (SEE DETAIL) 19'28'19'6' F&I: HANDICAP SIGN MOUNTED TO BUILDING. CENTER ON STALL, TYP. OF 4 (SEE DETAIL) HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (DARK SHADE) (SEE DETAIL) SITE SUMMARY ZONING:I - INDUSTRIAL SITE/LOT AREA:84,298 SQ. FT / 1.935 AC. IMPERVIOUS AREA:60,225 SQ. FT / 1.382 AC. (71%) GREENSPACE PROVIDED:24,073 SQ. FT / 0.553 AC. (29%) PARKING REQUIREMENTS (PER CITY CODE) TYPE UNIT / AREA STALLS REQ.STALLS PROVIDED RETAIL 1 / 200 SF 6 WAREHOUSE 1 / 1500 SF 15 AUTO REPAIR 5 + 3 PER BAY 44 TOTAL:65 97 SETBACKS PARKING BUILDING FRONT YARD 5'-0"30'-0" SIDE YARD 5'-0"10'-0" REAR YARD 5'-0"30'-0" CAR DISPLAY PAD STANDARD CONCRETE PAVEMENT SL-6 SL-5 SL-4 SL-3 SL-2 SL-1 SURMOUNTABLE CURB SURMOUNTABLE CURB FDC BOLLARDS (2) (SEE DETAIL) FDC R15' R30' 'NO PARKING' STRIPING, TYP. 'NO PARKING' SIGN 'NO PARKING' SIGN 'NO PARKING' SIGN SNOW PILING LOCATION 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ 30' R3' R3' R20' R2.52' R4' R4' AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 I=937.97 (P-5) I=937.77 (P-4) R=944.60A-4 I=938.51 (P-9)R=944.29A-9 I=938.79 (P-6) I=938.59 (P-5) R=943.90A-5 I=937.82 (P-9) I=937.62 (P-8) R=943.47A-8 I=937.03 (P-8) I=936.06 (P-7) R=943.18A-7 I=936.44 (P-4) I=936.24 (P-3) R=943.39A-3 I=939.33 (P-6)R=941.33A-6 P- 6 ( 1 2 " ) P-5 ( 1 2 " ) P-4 (12") P-9 (1 2 " ) P- 8 ( 1 4 " ) P-7 (14") P-2 (24") FES-1 I=929.00 P-1 (24") I=934.55 (P-2) I=929.11 (P-1) R=939.53A-1 I=935.89 (P-7)R=943.50A-7A P-3 (12") I=935.89 (P-3)R=943.76A-3A I=934.69 (P-2) I=937.81 (ADS-24) R=943.26A-2 STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULE PIPE NO. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 P-9 DRAIN FROM A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 INLET ELEVATION 929.11 934.69 936.24 937.77 938.59 939.33 936.06 937.62 938.51 DRAIN TO FES-1 A-1 A-3A A-3 A-4 A-5 A-7A A-7 A-8 OUTLET ELEVATION 929.00 934.55 935.89 936.44 937.97 938.79 935.89 937.03 937.82 PIPE SIZE (IN) 24 24 12 12 12 12 14 14 12 MATERIAL PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PIPE CLASS PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PIPE GRADE 0.50% 0.40% 1.25% 0.83% 0.52% 0.50% 0.63% 0.50% 1.00% PIPE LENGTH (FT) 23 36 28 161 118 108 27 119 69 STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO. A-3A A-6 A-7A STRUCTURETYPE MnDOT 4020 SEE DETAIL MnDOT 4020 STRUCTURE SIZE (In) 48 Ø 24 Ø 48 Ø STRUCTUREMATERIAL RC RC RC CASTING R2570 NEENAH R3210-Q R2570 PAY HEIGHTLN FT 10.87 3.00 10.61 * TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION 943.76 941.33 943.50 SUMP ELEVATION 932.89 938.33 932.89 SUMPDEPTH 3.00' 1.00' 3.00' OUTLETPIPE P-6 STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-7 A-8 A-9 STRUCTURETYPE MnDOT 4020 MnDOT 4020 CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) MnDOT TYPE F CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) MnDOT TYPE N STRUCTURE SIZE (In) 48 Ø 48 Ø 36 x 24 48 Ø 36 x 24 36 x 24 36 x 24 30 Ø STRUCTUREMATERIAL RC RC RC RC RC RC RC RC CASTING R2570 R2570 NEENAH R3067-V R1791f NEENAH R3067-V NEENAH R3067-V NEENAH R3067-V R-2565 GRATE PAY HEIGHTLN FT 10.42 8.57 7.15 6.83 5.31 7.12 5.84 5.78 * TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION 939.53 943.26 943.39 944.60 943.90 943.18 943.47 944.29 INVERT ELEVATION 929.11 934.69 936.24 937.77 938.59 936.06 937.62 938.51 OUTLETPIPE P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-7 P-8 P-9 STORM DRAIN APRON SCHEDULE APRON NO. FES-1 APRON SIZE (in) 24 APRON MATERIAL HDPE INVERT ELEVATION 929.00 PIPE NO. P-1 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 SITE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C3-20 SITE UTILITY PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C3-20 SITE UTILITY PLAN ---- 21724 C3-20 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER EXISTING PROPERTY LINE, TYP. NOTES: ·ALL UTILITIES THAT ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO 5' OUTSIDE OF BUILDING ARE TO BE CONNECT TO BUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. ·ENSURE 18" VERTICAL BETWEEN ALL PROPOSED & EXISTING WATER, STORM, & SANITARY. ·R = TOP BACK OF CURB ELEVATIONS FOR CURB STYLE CATCH BASINS, NOT GUTTER ELEVATIONS * TOP OF CASTING ELEVATIONS OF CURB STYLE CATCH BASINS REPRESENTS TOP BACK OF CURB AND NOT GUTTER ELEVATIONS CONNECT 6" WATER SERVICE TO EXISTING 8" WATER STUB. (VERIFY DEPTH, SIZE, LOCATION) *NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS. SANITARY C.O. (SEE DETAIL) 151 LF 6" PVC SANITARY SEWER @ 2.00% 8" WATER SERVICE (MIN. 8.0' COVER) CONNECT 6" SAN SERVICE TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE. (VERIFY DEPTH, SIZE, LOCATION) I=930.99 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION. (COORDINATE W/ UTILITY COMPANY) EXISTING HYDRANT BENCHMARK 8"x45° BENDSUBDRAIN CLEANOUT 205 LF 12" PERFORATED SUBDRAIN @ 1.00%, TYP. (SEE DETAIL) FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION (SEE ARCH) 8" GATE VALVE & BOX (SEE DETAIL) EXISTING 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER @ 4.33 % (VERIFY DEPTH, SIZE, LOCATION) UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER MAIN GAS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND TV OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND UTILITY FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 6" PVC TO ROOF LEADERS, TYP. OF 4 HYDRANT & 6" VALVE 6" VALVE W/ BOX 2" CURB STOP 8" TEE8"x6" REDUCER UNDERGROUND STORM SYSTEM. (SEE DETAIL) 2-YR HWL = 939.04 10-YR HWL = 939.62 100-YR HWL = 940.71 DROP STRUCTURE HYDRANT & 6" VALVE 8"x6" REDUCER 6" WATER SERVICE (MIN. 8.0' COVER) 6" WATER SERVICE (MIN. 8.0' COVER) 2" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE (MIN. 8.0' COVER) 6" FIRE SERVICE (MIN. 8.0' COVER) STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS WQ VOLUME REQUIRED: 3,101 CF WQ VOLUME PROVIDED: 3,101 CF 100-YR RATE REQUIRED: 21.03 CFS 100-YR RATE PROVIDED: 20.31 CFS DETENTION VOLUME PROVIDED: 6,851 CF NOTE: REQUIREMENTS ARE PER BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT. SANITARY SEWER INV = 939.50 ADS ADS 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ BIOINFILTRATOR STRUCTURE (8'X6') BIOINFILTRATOR STRUCTURE (6'X4') BIOINFILTRATOR STRUCTURE (6'X4') 14 10 21 33 6 9 AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 ck 4 60010943.83 945.0 0 BW 94 5 . 5 0 T W 945.0 0 BW 94 7 . 3 0 T W 945.0 0 BW 94 8 . 3 0 T W 945.0 0 BW 94 6 . 5 0 T W 945.0 0 BW 94 5 . 5 0 T W 944.3 1 BW 94 8 . 0 0 T W 944 . 5 1 BW 949.0 0TW 9 5 0 955 960 946 946 947 947 948949 951 952 953 954 956 957 958 959 940 940 945 945 950950 955 955 960960 937937 938939 939941 941942 942943 943 944 944 946 946 947 947 948948 949949 951 951 952 952952952953953954954 956 956 957 957 958 958 959959 9 2 5 9 3 0 930 9 3 0 9 3 5 940 94 0 9 4 0 921 922 923 9 2 4 9 2 6 9 2 7 9 2 8 9 2 9 9 3 1 9 3 2 933 934 9 3 6 93 7 93 8 9 3 9 94 1 9 4 1 94 2 942 94 3 943 9 4 4 944 940 94 1 942 942 943 943 945 9 5 0 9 4 1 942 94 3 944 946 947 948 9 4 9 95 1 95 2 9 5 3 95 4 954 9 5 4 940 945 93 9 941 942 943 9 4 4 946 946 9 4 4 . 8 8 944.87 945. 0 8 945.02 945. 4 0 945. 4 0 FLU S H 9 4 5 . 4 0 9 4 5 . 4 0 F L U S H 945.0 2 9 4 5 . 0 2 945.0 2 945.40 945.40 FLUSH 945.40 945.39 945.01 944.48 944.2 0 944.4 7 944.5 8 945.12 943.13 943.64 943.85 943.75 9 4 5 . 6 8 9 4 6 . 2 8 94 6 . 1 7 945 . 0 8 944 . 9 9 945 . 0 8 945 . 0 7 94 5 . 0 5 944.9 1 9 4 4 . 9 4 9 4 5 . 4 0 F L U S H 94 5 . 4 0 94 5 . 0 8 945.32945.40945.50 94 5 . 4 0 94 5 . 5 0 94 5 . 5 0 944 . 4 6 944 . 3 5 944.3 0 944.58 94 4 . 4 8 944.9 1 945 . 1 5 943.1 8 945.2 9 941 . 5 8 942.5 0 942 . 5 0 941.7 1 941.7 1 941.5 8 945 . 5 0 945 . 5 0 945 . 4 9 945 . 3 3 945 . 2 2 945 . 3 1 944 . 8 9 943 . 9 0 945 . 9 8 945 . 8 2 9 4 6 . 4 2 945 . 4 0 FLUS H 944.90 944.1 5 944 . 4 5 943. 4 8 943.75 944.7 7 945. 4 0 FLU S H 945. 4 0 945.40 94 5 . 4 0 945.40 944.6 0 944.6 0 944 . 9 8 945 . 4 0 945 . 4 0 943.38 943.89943.57 944.69 944.99 943.52 9 4 5 9 4 5 945 9 4 5 9 4 3 9 4 4 9 4 0 9 3 9 9 4 1 9 4 2 9 4 3 945 945 950 946947948949 951 952 953 954 9 4 5 94 5 9 4 4 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 6 94 2 943 945 945 950 943 944 946 947 948 949 951 9 4 4 9 4 5 94 6 . 4 3 9 4 6 . 4 8 9 4 7 . 0 5 9 4 6 . 5 8 9 4 6 . 4 3 94 6 . 6 4 9 4 1 . 5 4 941.32MATCH 942 . 8 7 942 . 0 1 941 . 2 4 940 . 7 9 MA T C H 946 . 5 0 944.5 9 943.8 9 945 . 9 1 946 . 3 5 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 GRADING PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C4-10 SITE GRADING PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C4-10 SITE GRADING PLAN ---- 21724 C4-10 GRADING LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION GENERAL GRADING NOTES EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% PROCTOR DENSITY FOR THE UPPER 3', AND95% PROCTOR DENSITY BELOW 3' IN ALL BUILDING PADS. REFER TO THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD IN ALL OTHER AREAS. PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLDDOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED. 101 100 101 100 XXX . X X XXX . X X 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER TAPER CURB TO FLUSH TRANSITION TO FLUSH (SEE DETAIL) TRANSITION TO FLUSH (SEE DETAIL) TRANSITION TO FLUSH (SEE DETAIL) TRANSITION TO FLUSH (SEE DETAIL) TRANSITION TO FLUSH (SEE DETAIL) SURMOUNTABLE CURB SURMOUNTABLE CURB 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 950 955 949 951952953954 950 946 947 948 949 951 950 947 948 949 951952 9 4 1 9 4 2 9 4 3 94 4 945 9 4 4 944 941 94 2 942 944 EDGER EDGER SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY EDGER 336 lf SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY TURF SEED 5,435 sf MNDOT 36-711 WOODLAND EDGE-CENTRAL SEED WITH COVER CROP FOR >10% SLOPE AT RATE: 56 LBS/AC, WITH EROSION BLANKET. 11,750 sf ROCK MULCH, 3/4-INCH GRAY TRAP ROCK, 3-INCH DEPTH425 sf 4 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 LANDSCAPE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - DPP DPP DPP 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C5-10 SITE RESTORATION & TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C5-10 SITE RESTORATION & TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN ---- 21724 C5-10 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 1. 24" CAL. REMOVED 2. 10" CAL. REMOVED 3. 18" CAL. REMOVED 4. 10" CAL. REMOVED 6. 24" CAL. REMOVED 5. 18" CAL. REMOVED 7. 72" CAL. REMOVED 8. 18" CAL. REMOVED SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED PLANT SYMBOL KEY NOTE: TREES LOCATED WITHIN 15' OF PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT DO NOT NEED TO BE REPLACED (PER CODE) LIST OF SIGNIFICANT TREES TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED TREE SIZE REPLACEMENT SIZE 1.24"12" 2.10"5" 3.18"9" 4.10"5" 5.18"9" 6.24"12" 7.72"36" 8.18"9" ------------ ------------- 194"97" 97" OF REPLACEMENT CAL. REQUIRED SNOW PILING LOCATION 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 950 955 949 951952953954 950 946 947 948 949 951 950 947 948 949 951952 9 4 1 9 4 2 9 4 3 94 4 945 9 4 4 944 941 94 2 942 944 BSBSBSBSBS RB-M RB-M RB-M RB-M RB-M RB-M RB-M SS SS SS SS NC NC NC NC GL PE PE PEPE PE PE TH TH THTH TH TH TH (5) GOLDMOUND SPIREA (4) SEA GREEN JUNIPER (5) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(3) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD (2) GOLDMOUND SPIREA (2) SEA GREEN JUNIPER EDGER EDGER PE PE SS BS SS (2) SEA GREEN JUNIPER SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE CON.TREES CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT NOTE BS 6 Black Hills Spruce Picea glauca densata 6` Ht B & B OVERSTORY CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT NOTE GL 1 Greenspire Littleleaf Linden Tilia cordata `Greenspire` 2-1/2" Cal B & B NC 4 Northern Catalpa Catalpa speciosa 2-1/2" Cal B & B PE 8 Princeton Elm Ulmus americana `Princeton`2-1/2" Cal B & B RB-M 7 River Birch (Multi-Trunk) Betula nigra 10` Ht B & B Multi-trunk UNDERSTORY CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT NOTE SS 6 Spring Snow Crabapple Malus x `Spring Snow` 2-1/2" Cal B & B TH 7 Thornless Hawthorn Crataegus crus-galli `Inermis` 2-1/2" Cal B & B CON.SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT NOTE SEJ 13 Sea Green Juniper Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green` 24" Ht.Cont DEC.SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT NOTE FDD 3 Firedance Dogwood Cornus sericea `Bailadeline` 24" Ht.Cont GMS 7 Goldmound Spirea Spiraea x bumalda `Goldmound` 24" Ht.Cont BS GL NC PE RB-M SS TH PLANT SCHEDULE PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 LANDSCAPE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - DPP DPP DPP 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C5-20 SITE PLANTING PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C5-20 SITE PLANTING PLAN ---- 21724 C5-20 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 97" OF REPLACEMENT CAL. REQUIRED FOR REMOVED SIGNIFICANT TREES 97.5" CAL. SHOWN (39 TREES x 2.5" CAL. = 97.5 CAL.) UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UTILITIES ON-SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 1-800-454-0002 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 LANDSCAPE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - DPP DPP DPP 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C5-21 SITE PLANTING NOTES & DETAILS BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C5-21 SITE PLANTING NOTES & DETAILS ---- 21724 C5-21 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER 1.COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES (LINES, DUCTS, CONDUITS, SLEEVES, FOOTINGS, ETC.) WITH LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS (FENCE, FOOTINGS, TREE ROOTBALLS, ETC.). CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK. 2.SAVE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES NOT NOTED TO BE REMOVED. 3.REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND MATERIALS INJURIOUS TO PLANT GROWTH FROM PLANTING PITS AND BEDS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING WITH PLANTING MIX. 4.LAWN AREAS SHALL HAVE 6" MINIMUM DEPTH OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 85% MAXIMUM DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. 5.REFER TO PLANTING DETAILS PLAN FOR AMENDED SOIL DEPTH IN PLANTING BEDS AND SURROUNDING TREES. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR MIX TYPE. 6.FIELD STAKE PLANTINGS ACCORDING TO PLAN. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE ALL PLANT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE PLANTING LAYOUT AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. 7.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE TRUE TO THEIR SCIENTIFIC NAME AND SIZE AS INDICATED IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE. 8.IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS DRAWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS IN THE SCHEDULE, THE PLANTING PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 9.OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE QUANTITIES TO SUIT BUDGET LIMITATIONS. CONTRACTOR'S UNIT BID PRICES SHALL PREVAIL FOR ANY CHANGES IN QUANTITIES. 10.ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE MADE WITH PLANTS OF EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT, BRANCHING HABIT, FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, FRUIT AND CULTURE, AND ONLY AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND OWNER. 11.ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK (A.N.S.I.), LATEST EDITION PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANT MATERIALS OF THE SPECIES LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCK CONFORMS TO A.N.S.I. 12.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE IN A LIVE AND HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION FOR ONE FULL GROWING SEASON (ONE YEAR) AFTER FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE OR SHALL BE REPLACED FREE OF CHARGE WITH THE SAME GRADE AND SPECIES. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE A STRONG CENTRAL LEADER. 13.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO OPERATIONS. ANY AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 14.PLANTING BED EDGING - USE 1/8" x 4" METAL EDGING IN ALL AREAS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS LAWN AREAS OR WHERE INDICATED. USE 12" METAL SPIKES AS INSTRUCTED BY MANUFACTURER. 15.PROVIDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, NATURAL COLOR, SURROUNDING ALL PROPOSED TREES TO A 3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH AS SHOWN IN TREE PLANTING DETAIL. DO NOT USE AN UNDERLAYMENT SUCH AS PLASTIC SHEET OR LANDSCAPE FABRIC. IF LOCATED WITHIN A PLANT BED, SUBSTITUTE THIS MULCH WITH THE MULCH CALLED FOR WITHIN THAT PLANT BED. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO MULCHING. 16.PROVIDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, NATURAL COLOR, IN ALL PLANTING BEDS 3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH. DO NOT USE AN UNDERLAYMENT SUCH AS PLASTIC SHEET OR LANDSCAPE FABRIC. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO MULCHING. 17.FOR PLANT, SHRUB, AND TREE LOCATIONS: CONTRACTOR IS PERMITTED TO USE DISCRETION AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DRIVEWAYS, UTILITIES, OR OTHER CONFLICTS. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PLANTS, INCLUDING SHRUBS AND TREES SHALL MEET CITY CODE. 18.INDICATED QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATES AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR/BIDDER. 19.MAINTENANCE OF STEEP SLOPES / MNDOT SEED AREAS: 19.1.YEAR 1: MOW AT 6-INCHES TO KEEP BACK WEEDS. ESTIMATED 3 TIMES PER YEAR. 19.2.YEAR 2: MOW ONCE TO A HEIGHT OF 12-INCHES IN MID-JUNE. 19.3.THIRD YEAR AND BEYOND: MOW AS CLOSE TO GROUND AS POSSIBLE AND RAKE OFF CUT MATERIAL BETWEEN APRIL 10-MAY 10 GENERALLY. 19.4.NOTE IN ALL AREAS WHERE MOWING IS REFERENCED, A STRING TRIMMER SHALL BE SUBSTITUTED ON STEEP SLOPES WHERE MOWING IS UNSAFE. GENERAL PLANTING NOTES REMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF OF WIRE BASKETS, BURLAP, TWINE - REMOVE THESE AND ALL NON-BIODEGRADIBLE MATURIALS FROM THE PLANTING PIT. AVOID CUTTING OR SCARING ROOTS. ANY ROOTS THAT ARE SCARED OR BROKEN DURING PLANTING SHOULD BE CUT CLEAN AT 90 DEGREES BACKFILL PLANTING PIT PER TREE PLANTINGSPECIFICATIONS WHEN PROVIDED, OR WITH NATIVE SOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY CLAY, MIX AMENDED TOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE WITH NATIVE SOIL. DO NOT TAMP SOIL, BUT SATURATE WITH WATER THROUGHOUT BACKFILL PROCESS. EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL MINUS 3" AND AMINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL 3" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHMOUNDED AT EDGE TO FORM A SHALLOW SAUCER - DO NOT PLACE MULCH WITHIN 3" OF TRUCK. WHEN INPLANT BED, SUBSTITUTE WITH PLANT BED MULCH. ROOTBALL DIA 2X ROOTBALL DIA DEPTH OF ROOTBALL NEVER CUT PRIMARY LEADER PRUNE ALL BROKEN, DAMAGED, OR RUBBING LIMBSAND BRANCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING - ALL PRUNING CUTS CLEAN AT 90 DEGREES TREES 8'+TREES 6'-8' SET ROOT FLAIR ABOVE GRADE 3" WHEN STAKED, ATTACH 1/2" WIDE NYLONSTRAPPING SNUGLY AROUND TRUCK AND, WITH SOME LOOSENESS, TO STAKES AS SHOWN NOTE: * AVOID STAKING UNLESS NECESSARY. * NO STAKING TREES UNDER 6'. STAKING DIAGRAM MUST MAINTAIN TRUNK IN VERTICAL ORIENTATION MULCH - PER PLANS & NOTES PLANTING BED - SOIL PREPARATION PER PLANS& NOTES LAWN OR GROUND COVER FINISH GRADE LANDSCAPE EDGING AND STAKING - PER PLANS & NOTES SUBGRADE - PER PLANS & NOTES MULCH, PER PLANS & NOTES BACKFILL PLANTING PIT PER SHRUB PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS WHEN PROVIDED, OR WITH NATIVE SOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY CLAY, MIX AMENDED TOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE WITH NATIVE SOIL EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL / CONTAINER MINUS 3" ANDA MINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL / CONTAINER - TILL ALL PLANTING BEDS TO AMINIMUM DEPTH OF 6" THROUGHT PLACE ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED SOIL AND ENSURE PLANT IS PLUMB ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE TOP OF THE CROWN OF THE PLANT IS SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISH GRADE 3" ROOTBALL DIA 2 TIMES ROOTBALL DIA DEPTH OF ROOTBALL CUT AND REMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF OF WIRE BASKETS, BURLAP AND/OR TWINE, OR ENTIRE CONTAINER, AND REMOVE FROM THE PLANTING PIT, SCARIFY ROOTS FOR ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS 5 GALLONS OR SMALLER CONTAINER DIA 2 TIMES CONTAINER DIA SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NO SCALE LANDSCAPE EDGING DETAIL NO SCALE TREE PLANTING DETAIL NO SCALE UNDISTURBED SOIL 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y YYY1Y1 Y Y Y1 Y1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.3 1.8 1.9 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.4 2.0 1.9 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.2 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.0 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.1 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.2 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.9 4.1 3.5 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.9 2.7 1.8 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 2.2 2.3 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.2 2.0 2.6 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.9 3.1 4.6 6.4 3.8 2.3 1.9 2.4 4.3 3.4 1.7 0.9 1.8 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.4 0.9 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.7 2.3 5.0 2.9 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.3 4.5 5.4 2.7 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.4 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.4 2.2 3.9 6.1 8.8 2.1 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.5 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.5 2.5 4.2 6.4 8.3 2.9 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.7 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.7 2.8 4.4 6.1 6.7 5.5 3.8 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.8 4.1 5.4 7.8 5.7 4.3 3.3 2.2 1.4 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.7 3.7 4.4 5.2 5.3 4.7 3.6 2.3 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.8 2.9 3.2 5.5 4.9 3.8 2.3 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.6 7.2 4.9 3.6 2.1 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.1 0.8 6.7 4.8 3.2 1.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.5 4.1 3.4 2.6 1.5 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y1 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 LIGHTING PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C6-10 SITE LIGHTING PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C6-10 SITE LIGHTING PLAN ---- 21724 C6-10 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE SYMBOL MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER DESCRIPTION LAMP WATTAGE LITHONIA DSX1 LED P3 40K T4M MVOLT HS POLE MOUNTED 30 HIGH BRIGHTNESS LEDs 102Z TYPE HEIGHT 25'-0" SINGLE HEAD LITHONIA DSXW1 LED 10C 1000 40K ASYDF MVOLTWALLPACK 10 HIGH BRIGHTNESS LEDs 39Y 10'-0" FULL CUTOFF FULL CUTOFF 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 LIGHTING PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - AJR AJR JF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN C6-20 SITE LIGHTING DETAILS & NOTES BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS C6-20 SITE LIGHTING DETAILS & NOTES ---- 21724 C6-20 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER LIGHT POLE BASE DETAIL N.T.S. D-Series Size 1 LED Area Luminaire Catalog Number Notes Type Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. Specifications EPA: Length: Width: Height: Weight (max): 1.01 ft2 (0.09 m2 ) 33” (83.8 cm) 13” (33.0 cm) 7-1/2” (19.0 cm) 27 lbs (12.2 kg) HH LL WW Capable Luminaire This item is an A+ capable luminaire, which has been designed and tested to provide consistent color appearance and system-level interoperability. • All configurations of this luminaire meet the Acuity Brands’ specification for chromatic consistency • This luminaire is A+ Certified when ordered with DTL®controls marked by a shaded background. DTL DLL equipped luminaires meet the A+ specification for luminaire to photocontrol interoperability1 • This luminaire is part of an A+ Certified solution for ROAM®or XPoint™ Wireless control networks, providing out-of-the-box control compatibility with simple commissioning, when ordered with drivers and control options marked by a shaded background1 A+ Capable options indicated by this color background. Ordering Information DSX1LED Series DSX1 LED LEDs Forward optics P1 P2 P3 P111 P4 P5 P6 Rotated optics P101 P121 P131 P7 P8 P9 Color temperature 30K 40K 50K 3000 K 4000 K 5000 K AMBPC Amber phosphor converted2 Distribution T1S T2S Type I short Type II short T2M Type II medium T3S Type III short T3M Type III medium T4M Type IV medium TFTM Forward throw medium T5VS Type V very short Control options Shipped installed NLTAIR2 PER PER5 PER7 DMG DS PIR PIRH PIRHN nLight AIR generation 2 enabled10 NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 11 Five-wire receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 11,12 Seven-wire receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 11,12 0-10V dimming extend out back of honsing for external control (leads exit fixture) Dual switching 13,14 Bi-level, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 5fc 5,15,16 Bi-level, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 5fc 5,15,16 Network, Bi-Level motion/ambient sensor17 PIR1FC3V Bi-level, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 5,15,16 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. PIRH1FC3V Bi-level, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 5,15,16 BL30 BL50 Bi-level switched dimming, 30% 5,14,18 Bi-level switched dimming, 50% 5,14,18 PNMTDD3 Part night, dim till dawn 5,19 PNMT5D3 Part night, dim 5 hrs 5,19 PNMT6D3 Part night, dim 6 hrs 5,19 PNMT7D3 Part night, dim 7 hrs 5,19 FAO Field adjustable output20 T5S Type V short T5M Type V medium T5W Type V wide BLC Backlight control 2,3 LCCO Left corner cutoff 2,3 RCCO Right corner cutoff 2,3 To learn more about A+, visit www.acuitybrands.com/aplus. 1. See ordering tree for details. 2. A+ Certified Solutions for ROAM require the order of one ROAM node per luminaire. Sold Separately: Link to Roam; Link to DTL DLL EXAMPLE: DSX1 LED P7 40K T3M MVOLT SPA DDBXD Voltage MVOLT 4,5 120 6 208 5,6 240 5,6 277 6 347 5,6,7 480 5,6,7 Mounting Shipped included SPA RPA WBA SPUMBA RPUMBA Square pole mounting Round pole mounting Wall bracket Square pole universal mounting adaptor 8 Round pole universal mounting adaptor 8 Shipped separately KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 9 Other options Finish (required) Shipped installed HS SF DF L90 House-side shield 21 Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) 6 Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) 6 Left rotated optics 1 R90 Right rotated optics 1 Shipped separately BS Bird spikes22 EGS External glare shield22 DSX1-LED Rev. 07/25/18 Page 1 of 7 DDBXD DBLXD Dark bronze Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white D-Series Size 1LED Wall Luminaire Catalog Number Notes Type Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. Specifications Luminaire Width: Depth: Height: 13-3/4” (34.9 cm) 10” (25.4 cm) 6-3/8” (16.2 cm) D H W Ordering Information DSXW1 LED Series DSXW1 LED LEDs 10C 10 LEDs (one engine) 20C 20 LEDs (two engines) 1 Drive Current 350 350 mA 530 530 mA 700 700 mA 1000 1000 mA (1 A) 1 Color temperature 30K 40K 50K 3000 K 4000 K 5000 K AMBPC Amber phosphor converted Distribution T2S Type II Short T2M Type II Medium T3S Type III Short T3M Type III Medium T4M Type IV Medium TFTM Forward Throw Medium ASYDF Asymmetric diffuse 13-3/4 Weight:12 lbs (5.4 kg) Back Box (BBW, ELCW) Width:13-3/4” (34.9 cm) Depth: Height: D4 H6-3/8 FOR 3/4" NPTSIDE-ENTRY CONDUIT3-PLACES (BBW ONLY)For 3/4” NPT side-entry conduit (BBW only) 4” (10.2 cm) 6-3/8” (16.2 cm) W13-3/4 6-3/8 4 BBW Weight: ELCW Weight: 5 lbs (2.3 kg) 10 lbs (4.5 kg) FOR 3/4" NPTSIDE-ENTRY CONDUIT3-PLACES (BBW ONLY) Introduction The D-Series Wall luminaire is a stylish, fully integrated LED solution for building-mount applications. It features a sleek, modern design and is carefully engineered to provide long-lasting, energy-efficient lighting with a variety of optical and control options for customized performance. With an expected service life of over 20 years of nighttime use and up to 74% in energy savings over comparable 250W metal halide luminaires, the D-Series Wall is a reliable, low-maintenance lighting solution that produces sites that are exceptionally illuminated. EXAMPLE: DSXW1 LED 20C 1000 40K T3M MVOLT DDBTXD Voltage Mounting MVOLT 2 120 3 208 3 240 3 277 3 347 3,4 480 3,4 Shipped included (blank) Surface mounting bracket BBW Surface- mounted back box (for conduit entry) 5 Control Options Shipped installed PE DMG PIR PIRH Photoelectric cell, button type 6 0-10V dimming driver (no controls; wires pulledoutside fixture)) 180° motion/ambient light sensor, <15’ mtg ht 1,7 180° motion/ambient light sensor, 15-30’ mtg ht 1,7 PIR1FC3V Motion/ambient sensor, 8-15' mounting height,ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 1,7 PIRH1FC3V Motion/ambient sensor, 15-30' mounting height,ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 1,7 ELCW Emergency battery backup (includes external component enclosure), non CEC compliant 8 Other Options Finish (required) Shipped installed SF DF HS SPD Shipped separately 10 Single fuse (120, 277 or 347V) 3,9 Double fuse (208, 240 or 480V) 3,9 House-side shield 10 Separate surge protection Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. DSXWHS U DSXWBSW U House-side shield (one perlight engine) Bird-deterrent spikes DSXW1WG U Wire guard accessory DSXW1VG UVandal guard accessory BSW Bird-deterrent spikes WG Wire guard VG DDL Vandal guard Diffused drop lens NOTES 1 20C 1000 is not available with PIR, PIRH, PIR1FC3V or PIRH1FC3V. 2 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). 3 Single fuse (SF) requires 120, 277 or 347 voltage option. Double fuse (DF) requires 208, 240 or 480 voltage option. 4 Only available with 20C, 700mA or 1000mA. Not available with PIR or PIRH. 5 Back box ships installed on fixture. Cannot be field installed. Cannot be ordered as an accessory. 6 Photocontrol (PE) requires 120, 208, 240, 277 or 347 voltage option. Not available with motion/ambient light sensors (PIR or PIRH). 7 Reference Motion Sensor table on page 3. 8 Cold weather (-20C) rated. Not compatible with conduit entry applications. Not available with BBW mounting option. Not available with fusing. Not available with 347 or 480voltage options. Emergency components located in back box housing. Emergency mode IES files located on product page at www.lithonia.com 9 Not available with ELCW. 10 Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. DDBXD DBLXD DNAXD Dark bronze Black Natural aluminum DWHXD White DSSXD Sandstone DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white DSSTXD Textured sandstone One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2013-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSXW1-LED Rev. 3/13/18 TYPE Z CUTSHEET DETAIL N.T.S. TYPE Y CUTSHEET DETAIL N.T.S. 05/24/19 CITY COMMENTS #1 PJJ DN UP UP 12 0 ' - 0 " BED LINER BOOTH BY TENANT SHIPPING/ RECEIVING RACKING BY TENANT PARTS LOCKER LOWERED TRUCK DOCK 16' X 16' OVERHEAD DOOR SERVICE/ PARTS/ DISPATCH HALL/ LOCKERS OFFICE SALES VEST. WA S H B A Y SHOP 10' X 10' OVERHEAD DOOR 16' X 16' OVERHEAD DOOR CONF. ROOM BREAK ROOM 187' - 6" WOOD SHOP 57 ' - 0 " DISPLAYS TIRE STATION DECAL ZONE 38 ' - 6 " 24 ' - 6 " 76' - 7"26' - 11"84' - 0" 30 ' - 9 " 15 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 " 4' - 9 " MECH. WOMEN SALES OFFICE OFFICE CHAIN LINK FULL HEIGHT FENCE AND 6'-0" WIDE X 10'-0" TALL LOCKABLE GATE 10' X 10' KNOCK OUT PANEL SLOPE TO FLOOR DRAIN SLOPE TO FLOOR DRAIN 16' X 16' OVERHEAD DOOR DOOR WITH KEY DROP BOX 2 POST LIFT BY TENANT WORK TABLE BY TENANT WORK TABLE BY TENANT DOCK LEVELER , BUMPERS, AND SEALS MEN UNISEX TECH LOUNGE 15' - 0" FUTURE 16' X 16' OVERHEAD DOOR 10' - 7 31/32"16' - 4"9' - 10"9' - 10"14' - 2"22' - 2" 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " UTILITY CLOSET N 0 1/ 2 " 1" 2" 1/ 4 " PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. DATE LIC. NO. DATE LIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 5/23/2019 2:25:56 PM A1-21 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 21724 Arch R18.rvt LAR 5/24/2019 NEW HOPE MN 400 21724 A1-21 18-21724 AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N A1-21 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY DN DN OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW COMPRESSOR OFFICE OFFICE HALLWAY HALL 2,700 SF 22' - 1 1/4"6' - 4"8' - 0"3' - 7"6' - 7"11' - 0"25' - 4 3/4" STORAGE IT/ STOR 4' - 1 1 " 4' - 3 " 9' - 8 " 10 ' - 8 " 11 ' - 1 1 " 2' - 0 " 8' X 8' OVERHEAD DOOR AND REMOVABLE LIFT- OUT GATE 8' X 8' OVERHEAD DOOR AND REMOVABLE LIFT- OUT GATE OFFICE ROOF ACCESS LADDER DISPLAY SHELF OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE 10 ' - 8 " 4' - 1 0 " 7' - 0 " 5' - 6 " 4' - 9 " N 0 1/ 2 " 1" 2" 1/ 4 " PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. DATE LIC. NO. DATE LIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 5/21/2019 11:19:13 AM A1-22 MEZZANINE PLAN 21724 Arch R18.rvt LAR 5/24/2019 NEW HOPE MN 400 21724 A1-22 18-21724 AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N A1- 22 MEZZANINE PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"1 MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN PARTIAL HEIGHT WALL METAL FRAMED WINDOWS PARTIAL HEIGHT WALL REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY 14' - 0" 17 ' - 8 " 8" 1' - 0" 8" 7" 15 ' - 2 " 7" EF-1 EF-2 EF-1 EF-2 EF-5 EF-1 EF-2 EF-4 N 0 1/ 2 " 1" 2" 1/ 4 " PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. DATE LIC. NO. DATE LIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 5/21/2019 11:17:15 AM A1-24 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN, ELEVATIONS, AND SECTIONS 21724 Arch R18.rvt LAR 5/24/2019 NEW HOPE MN 400 21724 A1-24 18-21724 AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N A1- 24 TRASH EN CLO SU RE PLAN , ELEVATIO NS, AN D SECTIO NS REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1/4" = 1'-0"1 TRASH ENCLOSURE ENLARGED PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"3 WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"5 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"4 SOUTH ELEVATION EF-2 EF-1 EF-5 ROOFTOP MOUNTED MUA, SET BACK FROM FACADE 1 1/2 TIMES HEIGHT OF UNIT TO SCREEN FROM STREET KNOCK OUT PANEL EF-5 EF-8 EF-3 EF-4 EF-6EF-6EF-6EF-5EF-6 EF-2 EF-1 ROOFTOP MOUNTED MUA, SET BACK FROM FACADE 1 1/2 TIMES HEIGHT OF UNIT TO SCREEN FROM STREET KNOCK-OUT PANELS FOR FUTURE 16' X 16' OVERHEAD DOOR EF-4 EF-1 EF-2 EF-5EF-5EF-5EF-7 ROOFTOP MOUNTED MUA, SET BACK FROM FACADE 1 1/2 TIMES HEIGHT OF UNIT TO SCREEN FROM STREET PROPOSED LOCATION OF 30' LONG INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED LOGO SIGNAGE 12" TALL BLACK COATED ALUMINUM BUILDING IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TBD) 12345 EF-7 EF-1 EF-2 EF-5EF-7EF-5EF-6EF-6 EF-3 EF-8 EF-4 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION KNOX BOX ROOFTOP MOUNTED MUA, SET BACK FROM FACADE 1 1/2 TIMES HEIGHT OF UNIT TO SCREEN FROM STREET 0 1/ 2 " 1" 2" 1/ 4 " PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. DATE LIC. NO. DATE LIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 5/24/2019 8:39:30 AM A2-11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 21724 Arch R18.rvt LAR 5/24/2019 NEW HOPE MN 400 21724 A2-11 18-21724 AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N A2-11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIO NS EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK MATERIAL MANUFACTURER PRODUCT SIZE COLOR COMMENTS EF-1 PRECAST CONCRETE WELLS CONCRETE 10' WIDE PANEL GREY EF-2 PREFIN MTL CAP FLASHING METAL SALES 6" TALL BLACK EF-3 PREFIN MTL PANEL METAL SALES 12" TALL BLACK EF-4 PREFIN MTL CANOPY METAL SALES 12" TALL BLACK CABLES AND CONNECTIONS PAINTED TO MATCH EF-5 PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS RAILINGS AND HM DOORS SW 7067 CITYSCAPE EF-6 ALUMINUM KAWNEER WINDOWS AND DOOR CLEAR ANODIZED CLEAR GLAZING (TEMPERED AS REQUIRED) EF-7 PREFIN METAL RAYNOR OVERHEAD DOOR GREY EF-8 PREIN MTL COLOR ACCENT PANEL FIRESTONE BUILDING PRODUCTS UC-501 REVEAL FLUSH PANEL 16" WIDE REGAL RED INSTALL HORIZONTAL, KYNAR 500 FINISH EF-9 PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS PIPE BOLLARDS SW 7588 SHOW STOPPER GLOSS FINISH 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"3 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"4 SOUTH ELEVATION REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 AC TRUCK TURNING EXHIBITS PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - JMF JMF JDF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN EXHIBIT DELIVERY TRUCK TURNING PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS ---- 21724 AC Truck Turning Exhibits - Delivery truck turning ---- 21724 ---- 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER DELIVERY TRUCK PROFILE 14 10 21 33 6 9 AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 AC TRUCK TURNING EXHIBITS PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - JMF JMF JDF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN EXHIBIT FIRE TRUCK TURNING PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS ---- 21724 AC Truck Turning Exhibits - Fire Truck Turning ---- 21724 ---- 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER FIRE TRUCK PROFILE FDC 14 10 21 33 6 9 AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS 22,500 SF F.F.E. = 945.50 PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE 21724 AC TRUCK TURNING EXHIBITS PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, DATE DESCRIPTION BY - JMF JMF JDF 18-21724 05-10-19 NEW HOPE MN EXHIBIT GARBAGE TRUCK TURNING PLAN BAUER DESIGN BUILD AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS ---- 21724 AC Truck Turning Exhibits - Garbage truck turning ---- 21724 ---- 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 TRASH ENCLOSURE NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B.M. ELEVATION=943.83 T.N.F.H. LOCATED APPROX. 1' BACK OF NORTH CURB OF NEVADA AVE. N. AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER R5' R10' GARBAGE TRUCK PROFILE DSXW1 LED Series LEDs Drive Current Color temperature Distribution Voltage Mounting Control Options DSXW1 LED 10C 10 LEDs (one engine) 20C 20 LEDs (two engines) 1 350 350 mA 530 530 mA 700 700 mA 1000 1000 mA (1 A) 1 30K 3000 K 40K 4000 K 50K 5000 K AMBPC Amber phosphor converted T2S Type II Short T2M Type II Medium T3S Type III Short T3M Type III Medium T4M Type IV Medium TFTM Forward Throw Medium ASYDF Asymmetric diffuse MVOLT 2 120 3 208 3 240 3 277 3 347 3,4 480 3,4 Shipped included (blank)Surface mounting bracket BBW Surface- mounted back box (for conduit entry) 5 Shipped installed PE Photoelectric cell, button type 6 DMG 0-10v dimming wires pulled outside fixture (for use with an external control, ordered separately) PIR 180° motion/ambient light sensor, <15’ mtg ht 1,7 PIRH 180° motion/ambient light sensor, 15-30’ mtg ht 1,7 PIR1FC3V Motion/ambient sensor, 8-15' mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 1,7 PIRH1FC3V Motion/ambient sensor, 15-30' mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 1,7 ELCW Emergency battery backup (includes external component enclosure), CA Title 20 Noncompliant 8,9 Other Options Finish (required) Shipped installed Shipped separately 11 SF Single fuse (120, 277 or 347V) 3,10 BSW Bird-deterrent spikes DF Double fuse (208, 240 or 480V) 3,10 WG Wire guard HS House-side shield 11 VG Vandal guard SPD Separate surge protection 12 DDL Diffused drop lens DDBXD Dark bronze DSSXD Sandstone DWHGXD Textured white DBLXD Black DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DSSTXD Textured sandstone DNAXD Natural aluminum DBLBXD Textured black DWHXD White DNATXD Textured natural aluminum D-Series Size 1LED Wall Luminaire Ordering Information EXAMPLE: DSXW1 LED 20C 1000 40K T3M MVOLT DDBTXD NOTES 1 20C 1000 is not available with PIR, PIRH, PIR1FC3V or PIRH1FC3V. 2 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). 3 Single fuse (SF) requires 120, 277 or 347 voltage option. Double fuse (DF) requires 208, 240 or 480 voltage option. 4 Only available with 20C, 700mA or 1000mA. Not available with PIR or PIRH. 5 Back box ships installed on fixture. Cannot be field installed. Cannot be ordered as an accessory. 6 Photocontrol (PE) requires 120, 208, 240, 277 or 347 voltage option. Not available with motion/ambient light sensors (PIR or PIRH). 7 Reference Motion Sensor table on page 3. 8 Cold weather (-20C) rated. Not compatible with conduit entry applications. Not available with BBW mounting option. Not available with fusing. Not available with 347 or 480 voltage options. Emergency components located in back box housing. Emergency mode IES files located on product page at www.lithonia.com 9 Not available with SPD. 10 Not available with ELCW. 11 Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. 12 Not available with ELCW. Catalog Number Notes Type Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. DSXWHS U House-side shield (one per light engine) DSXWBSW U Bird-deterrent spikes DSXW1WG U Wire guard accessory DSXW1VG U Vandal guard accessory One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2013-2019 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. Introduction The D-Series Wall luminaire is a stylish, fully integrated LED solution for building-mount applications. It features a sleek, modern design and is carefully engineered to provide long-lasting, energy-efficient lighting with a variety of optical and control options for customized performance. With an expected service life of over 20 years of nighttime use and up to 74% in energy savings over comparable 250W metal halide luminaires, the D-Series Wall is a reliable, low-maintenance lighting solution that produces sites that are exceptionally illuminated. Luminaire Width:13-3/4” (34.9 cm) Depth:10” (25.4 cm) Height:6-3/8” (16.2 cm) Back Box (BBW, ELCW) Width:13-3/4” (34.9 cm) Depth:4” (10.2 cm) Height:6-3/8” (16.2 cm) For 3/4” NPT side-entry conduit (BBW only) Specifications Weight: 12 lbs (5.4 kg) BBW Weight:5 lbs (2.3 kg) ELCW Weight:10 lbs (4.5 kg) D H W 413-3/4 6-3/8 FOR 3/4" NPTSIDE-ENTRY CONDUIT3-PLACES (BBW ONLY) D H 413-3/4 6-3/8 FOR 3/4" NPTSIDE-ENTRY CONDUIT3-PLACES (BBW ONLY) W DSXW1-LED Rev. 3/06/19 Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. LEDs Drive Current (mA) System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70CRI)40K (4000 K, 70CRI)50K (5000 K, 70CRI)AMBPC (Amber Phosphor Converted) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 10C (10 LEDs) 350mA 13W T2S 1,415 0 0 1 109 1,520 0 0 1 117 1,530 0 0 1 118 894 0 0 1 69 T2M 1,349 0 0 1 104 1,448 0 0 1 111 1,458 0 0 1 112 852 0 0 1 66 T3S 1,399 0 0 1 108 1,503 0 0 1 116 1,512 0 0 1 116 884 0 0 1 68 T3M 1,385 0 0 1 107 1,488 0 0 1 114 1,497 0 0 1 115 876 0 0 1 67 T4M 1,357 0 0 1 104 1,458 0 0 1 112 1,467 0 0 1 113 858 0 0 1 66 TFTM 1,411 0 0 1 109 1,515 0 0 1 117 1,525 0 0 1 117 892 0 0 1 69 ASYDF 1,262 1 0 1 97 1,354 1 0 1 104 1,363 1 0 1 105 797 0 0 1 61 530 mA 19W T2S 2,053 1 0 1 108 2,205 1 0 1 116 2,220 1 0 1 117 1,264 0 0 1 67 T2M 1,957 1 0 1 103 2,102 1 0 1 111 2,115 1 0 1 111 1,205 0 0 1 63 T3S 2,031 1 0 1 107 2,181 1 0 1 115 2,194 1 0 1 115 1,250 0 0 1 66 T3M 2,010 1 0 1 106 2,159 1 0 1 114 2,172 1 0 1 114 1,237 0 0 1 65 T4M 1,970 1 0 1 104 2,115 1 0 1 111 2,129 1 0 1 112 1,212 0 0 1 64 TFTM 2,047 0 0 1 108 2,198 1 0 1 116 2,212 1 0 1 116 1,260 0 0 1 66 ASYDF 1,831 1 0 1 96 1,966 1 0 1 103 1,978 1 0 1 104 1,127 0 0 1 59 700 mA 26W T2S 2,623 1 0 1 101 2,816 1 0 1 108 2,834 1 0 1 109 1,544 0 0 1 59 T2M 2,499 1 0 1 96 2,684 1 0 1 103 2,701 1 0 1 104 1,472 0 0 1 57 T3S 2,593 1 0 1 100 2,785 1 0 1 107 2,802 1 0 1 108 1,527 0 0 1 59 T3M 2,567 1 0 1 99 2,757 1 0 1 106 2,774 1 0 1 107 1,512 0 0 1 58 T4M 2,515 1 0 1 97 2,701 1 0 1 104 2,718 1 0 1 105 1,481 0 0 1 57 TFTM 2,614 1 0 1 101 2,808 1 0 1 108 2,825 1 0 1 109 1,539 0 0 1 59 ASYDF 2,337 1 0 1 90 2,510 1 0 1 97 2,525 1 0 1 97 1,376 1 0 1 53 1000 mA 39W T2S 3,685 1 0 1 94 3,957 1 0 1 101 3,982 1 0 1 102 2,235 1 0 1 57 T2M 3,512 1 0 1 90 3,771 1 0 1 97 3,794 1 0 1 97 2,130 1 0 1 55 T3S 3,644 1 0 1 93 3,913 1 0 1 100 3,938 1 0 1 101 2,210 1 0 1 57 T3M 3,607 1 0 1 92 3,873 1 0 1 99 3,898 1 0 1 100 2,187 1 0 1 56 T4M 3,534 1 0 2 91 3,796 1 0 2 97 3,819 1 0 2 98 2,143 1 0 1 55 TFTM 3,673 1 0 1 94 3,945 1 0 1 101 3,969 1 0 1 102 2,228 1 0 1 57 ASYDF 3,284 1 0 2 84 3,527 1 0 2 90 3,549 1 0 2 91 1,992 1 0 1 51 20C (20 LEDs) 350mA 23W T2S 2,820 1 0 1 123 3,028 1 0 1 132 3,047 1 0 1 132 1,777 1 0 1 77 T2M 2,688 1 0 1 117 2,886 1 0 1 125 2,904 1 0 1 126 1,693 1 0 1 74 T3S 2,789 1 0 1 121 2,994 1 0 1 130 3,014 1 0 1 131 1,757 0 0 1 76 T3M 2,760 1 0 1 120 2,965 1 0 1 129 2,983 1 0 1 130 1,739 1 0 1 76 T4M 2,704 1 0 1 118 2,905 1 0 1 126 2,922 1 0 1 127 1,704 1 0 1 74 TFTM 2,811 1 0 1 122 3,019 1 0 1 131 3,038 1 0 1 132 1,771 0 0 1 77 ASYDF 2,514 1 0 1 109 2,699 1 0 1 117 2,716 1 0 1 118 1,584 1 0 1 69 530 mA 35W T2S 4,079 1 0 1 117 4,380 1 0 1 125 4,407 1 0 1 126 2,504 1 0 1 72 T2M 3,887 1 0 1 111 4,174 1 0 1 119 4,201 1 0 1 120 2,387 1 0 1 68 T3S 4,033 1 0 1 115 4,331 1 0 1 124 4,359 1 0 1 125 2,477 1 0 1 71 T3M 3,993 1 0 2 114 4,288 1 0 2 123 4,315 1 0 2 123 2,451 1 0 1 70 T4M 3,912 1 0 2 112 4,201 1 0 2 120 4,227 1 0 2 121 2,402 1 0 1 69 TFTM 4,066 1 0 2 116 4,366 1 0 2 125 4,394 1 0 2 126 2,496 1 0 1 71 ASYDF 3,636 1 0 2 104 3,904 1 0 2 112 3,928 1 0 2 112 2,232 1 0 1 64 700 mA 46W T2S 5,188 1 0 1 113 5,572 1 0 1 121 5,607 1 0 1 122 3,065 1 0 1 67 T2M 4,945 1 0 2 108 5,309 1 0 2 115 5,343 1 0 2 116 2,921 1 0 1 64 T3S 5,131 1 0 2 112 5,510 1 0 2 120 5,544 1 0 2 121 3,031 1 0 1 66 T3M 5,078 1 0 2 110 5,454 1 0 2 119 5,487 1 0 2 119 3,000 1 0 1 65 T4M 4,975 1 0 2 108 5,343 1 0 2 116 5,376 1 0 2 117 2,939 1 0 1 64 TFTM 5,172 1 0 2 112 5,554 1 0 2 121 5,589 1 0 2 122 3,055 1 0 1 66 ASYDF 4,624 1 0 2 101 4,965 1 0 2 108 4,996 1 0 2 109 2,732 1 0 1 59 1000 mA 73W T2S 7,204 1 0 2 99 7,736 2 0 2 106 7,784 2 0 2 107 4,429 1 0 1 61 T2M 6,865 1 0 2 94 7,373 2 0 2 101 7,419 2 0 2 102 4,221 1 0 1 58 T3S 7,125 1 0 2 98 7,651 1 0 2 105 7,698 1 0 2 105 4,380 1 0 1 60 T3M 7,052 1 0 2 97 7,573 2 0 2 104 7,620 2 0 2 104 4,335 1 0 2 59 T4M 6,909 1 0 2 95 7,420 1 0 2 102 7,466 1 0 2 102 4,248 1 0 2 58 TFTM 7,182 1 0 2 98 7,712 1 0 2 106 7,761 1 0 2 106 4,415 1 0 2 60 ASYDF 6,421 2 0 2 88 6,896 2 0 3 94 6,938 2 0 3 95 3,947 1 0 2 54 Performance Data One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2013-2019 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSXW1-LED Rev. 3/06/19 Lumen Output Motion Sensor Default Settings Option Dimmed State High Level (when triggered) Photocell Operation Dwell Time Ramp-up Time Ramp-down Time *PIR or PIRH 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 5FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min PIR1FC3V or PIRH1FC3V 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 1FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min *for use with Inline Dusk to Dawn or timer Performance Data One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2013-2019 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSXW1-LED Rev. 3/06/19 Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0-40°C (32-104°F). Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Ambient Lumen Multiplier 0°C 32°F 1.02 10°C 50°F 1.01 20°C 68°F 1.00 25°C 77°F 1.00 30°C 86°F 1.00 40°C 104°F 0.98 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the DSXW1 LED 20C 1000 platform in a 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM- 80-08 and projected per IESNA TM-21-11). To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. Operating Hours 0 25,000 50,000 100,000 Lumen Maintenance Factor 1.0 0.95 0.93 0.88 FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The energy savings, long life and easy-to-install design of the D-Series Wall Size 1 make it the smart choice for building-mounted doorway and pathway illumination for nearly any facility. CONSTRUCTION Two-piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance. The LED driver is mounted to the door to thermally isolate it from the light engines for low operating temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental contaminants (IP65). FINISH Exterior parts are protected by a zinc-infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi-stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in textured and non-textured finishes. OPTICS Precision-molded proprietary acrylic lenses provide multiple photometric distributions tailored specifically to building mounted applications. Light engines are available in 3000 K (70 min. CRI), 4000 K (70 min. CRI) or 5000 K (70 min. CRI) configurations. ELECTRICAL Light engine(s) consist of 10 high-efficacy LEDs mounted to a metal-core circuit board to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (L88/100,000 hrs at 25°C). Class 1 electronic drivers have a power factor >90%, THD <20%, and a minimum 2.5KV surge rating. When ordering the SPD option, a separate surge protection device is installed within the luminaire which meets a minimum Category C Low (per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). INSTALLATION Included universal mounting bracket attaches securely to any 4” round or square outlet box for quick and easy installation. Luminaire has a slotted gasket wireway and attaches to the mounting bracket via corrosion-resistant screws. LISTINGS CSA certified to U.S. and Canadian standards. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. DesignLights Consortium® (DLC) qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights.org/QPL to confirm which versions are qualified. WARRANTY Five-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitybrands.com/resources/terms-and-conditions Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Specifications subject to change without notice. Electrical Load Current (A) LEDs Drive Current (mA)System Watts 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V 10C 350 14 W 0.13 0.07 0.06 0.06 - - 530 20 W 0.19 0.11 0.09 0.08 - - 700 27 W 0.25 0.14 0.13 0.11 - - 1000 40 W 0.37 0.21 0.19 0.16 - - 20C 350 24 W 0.23 0.13 0.12 0.10 - - 530 36 W 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.14 - - 700 47 W 0.44 0.25 0.22 0.19 0.15 0.11 1000 74 W 0.69 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.23 0.17 To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Lithonia Lighting’s D-Series Wall Size 1 homepage. Photometric Diagrams Isofootcandle plots for the DSXW1 LED 20C 1000 40K. Distances are in units of mounting height (15’).Distribution overlay comparison to 250W metal halide. LEGEND DSXW1, 0.5 fc TWF2, 0.5 fc 10’ W Sidewalk LLDs: TWF2 = 0.72 DSXW1 = 0.95 Te s t N o . 2 2 6 0 1 P 2 2 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 Te s t N o . 2 2 6 0 2 P 2 2 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T3M LEGEND 0.1 fc 0.5 fc 1.0 fc DSXW1 LED 20C 40K 1000 T3M, TWF2 250M Pulse, 15’ Mounting Ht TWF2: 291W DSXW1: 74W Te s t N o . 2 2 5 9 7 P 2 2 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T3ST2M Options and Accessories T3M (left), ASYDF (right) lenses HS - House-side shields BSW - Bird-deterrent spikes WG - Wire guard VG - Vandal guard DDL - Diffused drop lens One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 12/18/18 Page 1 of 8 D-Series Size 1 LED Area Luminaire Catalog Number Notes Type Introduction The modern styling of the D-Series is striking yet unobtrusive - making a bold, progressive statement even as it blends seamlessly with its environment. The D-Series distills the benefits of the latest in LED technology into a high performance, high efficacy, long-life luminaire. The outstanding photometric performance results in sites with excellent uniformity, greater pole spacing and lower power density. It is ideal for replacing up to 750W metal halide in pedestrian and area lighting applications with typical energy savings of 65% and expected service life of over 100,000 hours. Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. L H L H1 WW H H2 Ordering Information EXAMPLE: DSX1 LED P7 40K T3M MVOLT SPA NLTAIR2 PIRHN DDBXD DSX1 LED Series LEDs Color temperature Distribution Voltage Mounting DSX1 LED Forward optics P1 P4 P7 P2 P5 P8 P3 P6 P9 Rotated optics P101 P121 P111 P131 30K 3000 K 40K 4000 K 50K 5000 K T1S Type I short T2S Type II short T2M Type II medium T3S Type III short T3M Type III medium T4M Type IV medium TFTM Forward throw medium T5VS Type V very short T5S Type V short T5M Type V medium T5W Type V wide BLC Backlight control 2 LCCO Left corner cutoff 2 RCCO Right corner cutoff 2 MVOLT 3 120 4 208 4 240 4 277 4 347 4,5, 480 4,5 Shipped included SPA Square pole mounting RPA Round pole mounting WBA Wall bracket SPUMBA Square pole universal mounting adaptor 6 RPUMBA Round pole universal mounting adaptor 6 Shipped separately KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 7 Specifications EPA:1.01 ft2 (0.09 m2) Length:33” (83.8 cm) Width:13” (33.0 cm) Height H1:7-1/2” (19.0 cm) Height H2:3-1/2” Weight (max):27 lbs (12.2 kg) Control options Other options Finish (required) Shipped installed NLTAIR2 nLight AIR generation 2 enabled 8 PIRHN Network, high/low motion/ambient sensor 9 PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 10 PER5 Five-pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 10,11 PER7 Seven-pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 10,11 DMG 0-10v dimming wires pulled outside fixture (for use with an external control, ordered separately) 12 DS Dual switching 12,13,14 PIR High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 5fc 15,16 PIRH High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 5fc 15,16 PIR1FC3V High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 15,16 PIRH1FC3V Bi-level, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 15,16 FAO Field adjustable output 14 Shipped installed HS House-side shield 17 SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) 4 DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) 4 L90 Left rotated optics 1 R90 Right rotated optics 1 Shipped separately BS Bird spikes 18 EGS External glare shield 18 DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white A+ Capable options indicated by this color background. One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 12/18/18 Page 2 of 8 Tenon O.D. Mounting Single Unit 2 @ 180 2 @ 90 3 @120 3 @ 90 4 @ 90 2-3/8" SPA/RPA AS3-5 190 AS3-5 280 AS3-5 290 AS3-5 320 AS3-5 390 AS3-5 490 SPUMBA AS3-5 190 AS3-5 280 AS4-5 290 AS3-5 320 AS4-5 390 AS4-5 490 RUPUMBA AS3-5 190 AS3-5 280 AS3-5 320 2-7/8" SPA/RPA AST25-190 AST25-280 AST25-290 AST25-320 AST25-390 AST25-490 SPUMBA AST25-190 AST25-280 AST25-320 RUPUMBA AST25-190 AST25-280 AST25-320 4" SPA/RPA AST35-190 AST35-280 AST35-290 AST35-320 AST35-390 AST35-490 SPUMBA AST35-190 AST35-280 AST35-290 AST35-320 AST35-390 AST35-490 RUPUMBA AST35-190 AST35-280 AST35-320 Tenon Mounting Slipfitter ** Drilling Top of Pole 0.563” 2.650” 1.325”0.400”(2 PLCS) Template #8 Ordering Information NOTES 1 P10, P11, P12 or P13 and rotated optics (L90, R90) only available together. 2 Not available with HS. 3 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). 4 Single fuse (SF) requires 120V, 277V or 347V. Double fuse (DF) requires 208V, 240V or 480V. 5 Not available in P1 or P10. 6 Universal mounting brackets intended for retrofit on existing, pre-drilled poles only. 1.5 G vibration load rating per ANCI C136.31. 7 Must order fixture with SPA option. Must be ordered as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. For use with 2-3/8” mast arm (not included). 8 Must be ordered with PIRHN. Sensor cover available only in dark bronze, black, white and natural aluminum colors. 9 Must be ordered with NLTAIR2. For more information on nLight Air 2 visit this link. 10 Photocell ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. See accessories. Not available with DS option. Shorting cap included. 11 If ROAM® node required, it must be ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. Node with integral dimming. 12 Provides 50/50fixture operation via (2) independent drivers. Not available with PER, PER5, PER7, PIR or PIRH. Not available P1, P2, P3, P4 or P5. 13 Requires (2) separately switched circuits with isolated neutrol. See Outdoor Control Technical Guide for details. 14 Reference Motion Sensor table on page 4. 15 Reference controls options table on page 4 to see functionality. 16 Not available with other dimming controls options 17 Not available with BLC, LCCO and RCCO distribution. Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. 18 Must be ordered with fixture for factory pre-drilling. 19 Requires luminaire to be specified with PER, PER5 or PER7 option. See PER Table on page 3. 20 For retrofit use only. Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. DLL127F 1.5 JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (120-277V) 19 DLL347F 1.5 CUL JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (347V) 19 DLL480F 1.5 CUL JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (480V) 19 DSHORT SBK U Shorting cap 19 DSX1HS 30C U House-side shield for P1, P2, P3, P4 and P517 DSX1HS 40C U House-side shield for P6 and P717 DSX1HS 60C U House-side shield for P8, P9, P10, P11 and P1217 PUMBA DDBXD U*Square and round pole universal mounting bracket (specify finish)20 KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 6 For more control options, visit DTL and ROAM online. Options .50 73˚ 12.05 12.476 .50 73˚ 12.05 12.48 HANDHOLE ORIENTATION A Handhole B C D EGS - External Glare Shield Drilling Template Minimum Acceptable Outside Pole Dimension SPA #8 2-7/8” 2-7/8” 3.5” 3.5” 3”3.5” RPA #8 2-7/8” 2-7/8” 3.5” 3.5” 3”3.5” SPUMBA #5 2-7/8” 3” 4” 4” 3.5”4” RPUMBA #5 2-7/8” 3.5”5” 5” 3.5”5” Mounting Option Drilling Template Single 2 @ 180 2 @ 90 3 @ 90 3 @ 120 4 @ 90 Head Location Side B Side B & D Side B & C Side B, C & D Round Pole Only Side A, B, C & D Drill Nomenclature #8 DM19AS DM28AS DM29AS DM39AS DM32AS DM49AS 1.75” for aluminum poles 2.75” for other pole types One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 12/18/18 Page 3 of 8 To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Lithonia Lighting’s D-Series Area Size 1 homepage. Photometric Diagrams Isofootcandle plots for the DSX1 LED 60C 1000 40K. Distances are in units of mounting height (25’). LEGEND 0.1 fc 0.5 fc 1.0 fc Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 1 1 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T1S Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 1 6 4 B t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T2M Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 2 2 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T2S Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 7 1 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T3M Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 1 1 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T3S Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 1 6 4 B t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T4M Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 2 2 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 TFTM Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 7 1 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T5VS Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 1 1 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T5S Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 1 6 4 B t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T5M Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 2 2 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 T5W Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 7 1 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 BLC Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 2 1 1 t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 LCCO Te s t N o . L T L 2 3 1 6 4 B t e s t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h IE S N A L M - 7 9 - 0 8 . 4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 RCCO One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 12/18/18 Page 4 of 8 Performance Data Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0-40°C (32-104°F). Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Ambient Lumen Multiplier 0°C 32°F 1.04 5°C 41°F 1.04 10°C 50°F 1.03 15°C 50°F 1.02 20°C 68°F 1.01 25°C 77°F 1.00 30°C 86°F 0.99 35°C 95°F 0.98 40°C 104°F 0.97 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the platforms noted in a 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM-80-08 and projected per IESNA TM-21-11). To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. Motion Sensor Default Settings Option Dimmed State High Level (when triggered) Phototcell Operation Dwell Time Ramp-up Time Ramp-down Time PIR or PIRH 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 5FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min *PIR1FC3V or PIRH1FC3V 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 1FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min *for use when motion sensor is used as dusk to dawn control. Current (A) Performance Package LED Count Drive Current Wattage 120 208 240 277 347 480 Forward Optics (Non-Rotated) P1 30 530 54 0.45 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.10 0.12 P2 30 700 70 0.59 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.16 P3 30 1050 102 0.86 0.50 0.44 0.38 0.30 0.22 P4 30 1250 125 1.06 0.60 0.52 0.46 0.37 0.27 P5 30 1400 138 1.16 0.67 0.58 0.51 0.40 0.29 P6 40 1250 163 1.36 0.78 0.68 0.59 0.47 0.34 P7 40 1400 183 1.53 0.88 0.76 0.66 0.53 0.38 P8 60 1050 207 1.74 0.98 0.87 0.76 0.64 0.49 P9 60 1250 241 2.01 1.16 1.01 0.89 0.70 0.51 Rotated Optics (Requires L90 or R90) P10 60 530 106 0.90 0.52 0.47 0.43 0.33 0.27 P11 60 700 137 1.15 0.67 0.60 0.53 0.42 0.32 P12 60 1050 207 1.74 0.99 0.87 0.76 0.60 0.46 P13 60 1250 231 1.93 1.12 0.97 0.86 0.67 0.49 Electrical Load Controls Options Nomenclature Descripton Functionality Primary control device Notes FAO Field adjustable output device installed inside the lumiaire; wired to the driver dimming leads. Allows the lumiaire to be manually dimmed, effectively trimming the light output.FAO device Cannot be used with other controls options that need the 0-10V leads DS Drivers wired independantly for 50/50 luminaire operation The luminaire is wired to two separate circuits, allowing for 50/50 operation.Independently wired drivers Requires two seperately switched circuits. Consider nLight AIR as a more cost effective alternative. PER5 or PER7 Twist-lock photocell recepticle Compatible with standard twist-lock photocells for dusk to dawn operation, or advanced control nodes that provide 0-10V dimming signals. Twist-lock photocells such as DLL Elite or advanced control nodes such as ROAM. Pins 4 & 5 to dimming leads on driver, Pins 6 & 7 are capped inside luminaire PIR or PIRH Motion sensors with integral photocell. PIR for 8-15' mounting; PIRH for 15-30' mounting Luminaires dim when no occupancy is detected.Acuity Controls SBOR Also available with PIRH1FC3V when the sensor photocell is used for dusk-to-dawn operation. NLTAIR2 PIRHN nLight AIR enabled luminaire for motion sensing, photocell and wireless communication. Motion and ambient light sensing with group response. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over-ride when wirelessly connected to the nLight Eclypse.nLight Air rSDGR nLight AIR sensors can be programmed and commissioned from the ground using the ClAIRity Pro app. Operating Hours Lumen Maintenance Factor 0 1.00 25,000 0.96 50,000 0.92 100,000 0.85 Performance Data Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Lumen Output Forward Optics LED Count Drive Current Power Package System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000 K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000 K, 70 CRI) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 30 530 P1 54W T1S 6,457 2 0 2 120 6,956 2 0 2 129 7,044 2 0 2 130 T2S 6,450 2 0 2 119 6,949 2 0 2 129 7,037 2 0 2 130 T2M 6,483 1 0 1 120 6,984 2 0 2 129 7,073 2 0 2 131 T3S 6,279 2 0 2 116 6,764 2 0 2 125 6,850 2 0 2 127 T3M 6,468 1 0 2 120 6,967 1 0 2 129 7,056 1 0 2 131 T4M 6,327 1 0 2 117 6,816 1 0 2 126 6,902 1 0 2 128 TFTM 6,464 1 0 2 120 6,963 1 0 2 129 7,051 1 0 2 131 T5VS 6,722 2 0 0 124 7,242 3 0 0 134 7,334 3 0 0 136 T5S 6,728 2 0 1 125 7,248 2 0 1 134 7,340 2 0 1 136 T5M 6,711 3 0 1 124 7,229 3 0 1 134 7,321 3 0 2 136 T5W 6,667 3 0 2 123 7,182 3 0 2 133 7,273 3 0 2 135 BLC 5,299 1 0 1 98 5,709 1 0 2 106 5,781 1 0 2 107 LCCO 3,943 1 0 2 73 4,248 1 0 2 79 4,302 1 0 2 80 RCCO 3,943 1 0 2 73 4,248 1 0 2 79 4,302 1 0 2 80 30 700 P2 70W T1S 8,249 2 0 2 118 8,886 2 0 2 127 8,999 2 0 2 129 T2S 8,240 2 0 2 118 8,877 2 0 2 127 8,989 2 0 2 128 T2M 8,283 2 0 2 118 8,923 2 0 2 127 9,036 2 0 2 129 T3S 8,021 2 0 2 115 8,641 2 0 2 123 8,751 2 0 2 125 T3M 8,263 2 0 2 118 8,901 2 0 2 127 9,014 2 0 2 129 T4M 8,083 2 0 2 115 8,708 2 0 2 124 8,818 2 0 2 126 TFTM 8,257 2 0 2 118 8,896 2 0 2 127 9,008 2 0 2 129 T5VS 8,588 3 0 0 123 9,252 3 0 0 132 9,369 3 0 0 134 T5S 8,595 3 0 1 123 9,259 3 0 1 132 9,376 3 0 1 134 T5M 8,573 3 0 2 122 9,236 3 0 2 132 9,353 3 0 2 134 T5W 8,517 3 0 2 122 9,175 4 0 2 131 9,291 4 0 2 133 BLC 6,770 1 0 2 97 7,293 1 0 2 104 7,386 1 0 2 106 LCCO 5,038 1 0 2 72 5,427 1 0 2 78 5,496 1 0 2 79 RCCO 5,038 1 0 2 72 5,427 1 0 2 78 5,496 1 0 2 79 30 1050 P3 102W T1S 11,661 2 0 2 114 12,562 3 0 3 123 12,721 3 0 3 125 T2S 11,648 2 0 2 114 12,548 3 0 3 123 12,707 3 0 3 125 T2M 11,708 2 0 2 115 12,613 2 0 2 124 12,773 2 0 2 125 T3S 11,339 2 0 2 111 12,215 3 0 3 120 12,370 3 0 3 121 T3M 11,680 2 0 2 115 12,582 2 0 2 123 12,742 2 0 2 125 T4M 11,426 2 0 3 112 12,309 2 0 3 121 12,465 2 0 3 122 TFTM 11,673 2 0 2 114 12,575 2 0 3 123 12,734 2 0 3 125 T5VS 12,140 3 0 1 119 13,078 3 0 1 128 13,244 3 0 1 130 T5S 12,150 3 0 1 119 13,089 3 0 1 128 13,254 3 0 1 130 T5M 12,119 4 0 2 119 13,056 4 0 2 128 13,221 4 0 2 130 T5W 12,040 4 0 3 118 12,970 4 0 3 127 13,134 4 0 3 129 BLC 9,570 1 0 2 94 10,310 1 0 2 101 10,440 1 0 2 102 LCCO 7,121 1 0 3 70 7,671 1 0 3 75 7,768 1 0 3 76 RCCO 7,121 1 0 3 70 7,671 1 0 3 75 7,768 1 0 3 76 30 1250 P4 125W T1S 13,435 3 0 3 107 14,473 3 0 3 116 14,657 3 0 3 117 T2S 13,421 3 0 3 107 14,458 3 0 3 116 14,641 3 0 3 117 T2M 13,490 2 0 2 108 14,532 3 0 3 116 14,716 3 0 3 118 T3S 13,064 3 0 3 105 14,074 3 0 3 113 14,252 3 0 3 114 T3M 13,457 2 0 2 108 14,497 2 0 2 116 14,681 2 0 2 117 T4M 13,165 2 0 3 105 14,182 2 0 3 113 14,362 2 0 3 115 TFTM 13,449 2 0 3 108 14,488 2 0 3 116 14,672 2 0 3 117 T5VS 13,987 4 0 1 112 15,068 4 0 1 121 15,259 4 0 1 122 T5S 13,999 3 0 1 112 15,080 3 0 1 121 15,271 3 0 1 122 T5M 13,963 4 0 2 112 15,042 4 0 2 120 15,233 4 0 2 122 T5W 13,872 4 0 3 111 14,944 4 0 3 120 15,133 4 0 3 121 BLC 11,027 1 0 2 88 11,879 1 0 2 95 12,029 1 0 2 96 LCCO 8,205 1 0 3 66 8,839 1 0 3 71 8,951 1 0 3 72 RCCO 8,205 1 0 3 66 8,839 1 0 3 71 8,951 1 0 3 72 30 1400 P5 138W T1S 14,679 3 0 3 106 15,814 3 0 3 115 16,014 3 0 3 116 T2S 14,664 3 0 3 106 15,797 3 0 3 114 15,997 3 0 3 116 T2M 14,739 3 0 3 107 15,878 3 0 3 115 16,079 3 0 3 117 T3S 14,274 3 0 3 103 15,377 3 0 3 111 15,572 3 0 3 113 T3M 14,704 2 0 3 107 15,840 3 0 3 115 16,040 3 0 3 116 T4M 14,384 2 0 3 104 15,496 3 0 3 112 15,692 3 0 3 114 TFTM 14,695 2 0 3 106 15,830 3 0 3 115 16,030 3 0 3 116 T5VS 15,283 4 0 1 111 16,464 4 0 1 119 16,672 4 0 1 121 T5S 15,295 3 0 1 111 16,477 4 0 1 119 16,686 4 0 1 121 T5M 15,257 4 0 2 111 16,435 4 0 2 119 16,644 4 0 2 121 T5W 15,157 4 0 3 110 16,328 4 0 3 118 16,534 4 0 3 120 BLC 12,048 1 0 2 87 12,979 1 0 2 94 13,143 1 0 2 95 LCCO 8,965 1 0 3 65 9,657 1 0 3 70 9,780 1 0 3 71 RCCO 8,965 1 0 3 65 9,657 1 0 3 70 9,780 1 0 3 71 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 12/18/18 Page 5 of 8 Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Forward Optics LED Count Drive Current Power Package System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000 K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000 K, 70 CRI) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 40 1250 P6 163W T1S 17,654 3 0 3 108 19,018 3 0 3 117 19,259 3 0 3 118 T2S 17,635 3 0 3 108 18,998 3 0 3 117 19,238 3 0 3 118 T2M 17,726 3 0 3 109 19,096 3 0 3 117 19,337 3 0 3 119 T3S 17,167 3 0 3 105 18,493 3 0 3 113 18,727 3 0 3 115 T3M 17,683 3 0 3 108 19,049 3 0 3 117 19,290 3 0 3 118 T4M 17,299 3 0 3 106 18,635 3 0 4 114 18,871 3 0 4 116 TFTM 17,672 3 0 3 108 19,038 3 0 4 117 19,279 3 0 4 118 T5VS 18,379 4 0 1 113 19,800 4 0 1 121 20,050 4 0 1 123 T5S 18,394 4 0 2 113 19,816 4 0 2 122 20,066 4 0 2 123 T5M 18,348 4 0 2 113 19,766 4 0 2 121 20,016 4 0 2 123 T5W 18,228 5 0 3 112 19,636 5 0 3 120 19,885 5 0 3 122 BLC 14,489 2 0 2 89 15,609 2 0 3 96 15,806 2 0 3 97 LCCO 10,781 1 0 3 66 11,614 1 0 3 71 11,761 2 0 3 72 RCCO 10,781 1 0 3 66 11,614 1 0 3 71 11,761 2 0 3 72 40 1400 P7 183W T1S 19,227 3 0 3 105 20,712 3 0 3 113 20,975 3 0 3 115 T2S 19,206 3 0 3 105 20,690 3 0 3 113 20,952 3 0 3 114 T2M 19,305 3 0 3 105 20,797 3 0 3 114 21,060 3 0 3 115 T3S 18,696 3 0 3 102 20,141 3 0 3 110 20,396 3 0 4 111 T3M 19,258 3 0 3 105 20,746 3 0 3 113 21,009 3 0 3 115 T4M 18,840 3 0 4 103 20,296 3 0 4 111 20,553 3 0 4 112 TFTM 19,246 3 0 4 105 20,734 3 0 4 113 20,996 3 0 4 115 T5VS 20,017 4 0 1 109 21,564 4 0 1 118 21,837 4 0 1 119 T5S 20,033 4 0 2 109 21,581 4 0 2 118 21,854 4 0 2 119 T5M 19,983 4 0 2 109 21,527 5 0 3 118 21,799 5 0 3 119 T5W 19,852 5 0 3 108 21,386 5 0 3 117 21,656 5 0 3 118 BLC 15,780 2 0 3 86 16,999 2 0 3 93 17,214 2 0 3 94 LCCO 11,742 2 0 3 64 12,649 2 0 3 69 12,809 2 0 3 70 RCCO 11,742 2 0 3 64 12,649 2 0 3 69 12,809 2 0 3 70 60 1050 P8 207W T1S 22,490 3 0 3 109 24,228 3 0 3 117 24,535 3 0 3 119 T2S 22,466 3 0 4 109 24,202 3 0 4 117 24,509 3 0 4 118 T2M 22,582 3 0 3 109 24,327 3 0 3 118 24,635 3 0 3 119 T3S 21,870 3 0 4 106 23,560 3 0 4 114 23,858 3 0 4 115 T3M 22,527 3 0 4 109 24,268 3 0 4 117 24,575 3 0 4 119 T4M 22,038 3 0 4 106 23,741 3 0 4 115 24,041 3 0 4 116 TFTM 22,513 3 0 4 109 24,253 3 0 4 117 24,560 3 0 4 119 T5VS 23,415 5 0 1 113 25,224 5 0 1 122 25,543 5 0 1 123 T5S 23,434 4 0 2 113 25,244 4 0 2 122 25,564 4 0 2 123 T5M 23,374 5 0 3 113 25,181 5 0 3 122 25,499 5 0 3 123 T5W 23,221 5 0 4 112 25,016 5 0 4 121 25,332 5 0 4 122 BLC 18,458 2 0 3 89 19,885 2 0 3 96 20,136 2 0 3 97 LCCO 13,735 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 RCCO 13,735 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 60 1250 P9 241W T1S 25,575 3 0 3 106 27,551 3 0 3 114 27,900 3 0 3 116 T2S 25,548 3 0 4 106 27,522 3 0 4 114 27,871 3 0 4 116 T2M 25,680 3 0 3 107 27,664 3 0 3 115 28,014 3 0 3 116 T3S 24,870 3 0 4 103 26,791 3 0 4 111 27,130 3 0 4 113 T3M 25,617 3 0 4 106 27,597 3 0 4 115 27,946 3 0 4 116 T4M 25,061 3 0 4 104 26,997 3 0 4 112 27,339 3 0 4 113 TFTM 25,602 3 0 4 106 27,580 3 0 4 114 27,929 3 0 4 116 T5VS 26,626 5 0 1 110 28,684 5 0 1 119 29,047 5 0 1 121 T5S 26,648 4 0 2 111 28,707 5 0 2 119 29,070 5 0 2 121 T5M 26,581 5 0 3 110 28,635 5 0 3 119 28,997 5 0 3 120 T5W 26,406 5 0 4 110 28,447 5 0 4 118 28,807 5 0 4 120 BLC 20,990 2 0 3 87 22,612 2 0 3 94 22,898 2 0 3 95 LCCO 15,619 2 0 4 65 16,825 2 0 4 70 17,038 2 0 4 71 RCCO 15,619 2 0 4 65 16,825 2 0 4 70 17,038 2 0 4 71 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 12/18/18 Page 6 of 8 Performance Data Lumen Output One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 12/18/18 Page 7 of 8 Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Performance Data Lumen Output Rotated Optics LED Count Drive Current Power Package System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000 K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000 K, 70 CRI) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 60 530 P10 106W T1S 13,042 3 0 3 123 14,050 3 0 3 133 14,228 3 0 3 134 T2S 12,967 4 0 4 122 13,969 4 0 4 132 14,146 4 0 4 133 T2M 13,201 3 0 3 125 14,221 3 0 3 134 14,401 3 0 3 136 T3S 12,766 4 0 4 120 13,752 4 0 4 130 13,926 4 0 4 131 T3M 13,193 4 0 4 124 14,213 4 0 4 134 14,393 4 0 4 136 T4M 12,944 4 0 4 122 13,945 4 0 4 132 14,121 4 0 4 133 TFTM 13,279 4 0 4 125 14,305 4 0 4 135 14,486 4 0 4 137 T5VS 13,372 3 0 1 126 14,405 4 0 1 136 14,588 4 0 1 138 T5S 13,260 3 0 1 125 14,284 3 0 1 135 14,465 3 0 1 136 T5M 13,256 4 0 2 125 14,281 4 0 2 135 14,462 4 0 2 136 T5W 13,137 4 0 3 124 14,153 4 0 3 134 14,332 4 0 3 135 BLC 10,906 3 0 3 103 11,749 3 0 3 111 11,898 3 0 3 112 LCCO 7,789 1 0 3 73 8,391 1 0 3 79 8,497 1 0 3 80 RCCO 7,779 4 0 4 73 8,380 4 0 4 79 8,486 4 0 4 80 60 700 P11 137W T1S 16,556 3 0 3 121 17,835 3 0 3 130 18,061 4 0 4 132 T2S 16,461 4 0 4 120 17,733 4 0 4 129 17,957 4 0 4 131 T2M 16,758 4 0 4 122 18,053 4 0 4 132 18,281 4 0 4 133 T3S 16,205 4 0 4 118 17,457 4 0 4 127 17,678 4 0 4 129 T3M 16,748 4 0 4 122 18,042 4 0 4 132 18,271 4 0 4 133 T4M 16,432 4 0 4 120 17,702 4 0 4 129 17,926 4 0 4 131 TFTM 16,857 4 0 4 123 18,159 4 0 4 133 18,389 4 0 4 134 T5VS 16,975 4 0 1 124 18,287 4 0 1 133 18,518 4 0 1 135 T5S 16,832 4 0 1 123 18,133 4 0 2 132 18,362 4 0 2 134 T5M 16,828 4 0 2 123 18,128 4 0 2 132 18,358 4 0 2 134 T5W 16,677 4 0 3 122 17,966 5 0 3 131 18,193 5 0 3 133 BLC 13,845 3 0 3 101 14,915 3 0 3 109 15,103 3 0 3 110 LCCO 9,888 1 0 3 72 10,652 2 0 3 78 10,787 2 0 3 79 RCCO 9,875 4 0 4 72 10,638 4 0 4 78 10,773 4 0 4 79 60 1050 P12 207W T1S 22,996 4 0 4 111 24,773 4 0 4 120 25,087 4 0 4 121 T2S 22,864 4 0 4 110 24,631 5 0 5 119 24,943 5 0 5 120 T2M 23,277 4 0 4 112 25,075 4 0 4 121 25,393 4 0 4 123 T3S 22,509 4 0 4 109 24,248 5 0 5 117 24,555 5 0 5 119 T3M 23,263 4 0 4 112 25,061 4 0 4 121 25,378 4 0 4 123 T4M 22,824 5 0 5 110 24,588 5 0 5 119 24,899 5 0 5 120 TFTM 23,414 5 0 5 113 25,223 5 0 5 122 25,543 5 0 5 123 T5VS 23,579 5 0 1 114 25,401 5 0 1 123 25,722 5 0 1 124 T5S 23,380 4 0 2 113 25,187 4 0 2 122 25,506 4 0 2 123 T5M 23,374 5 0 3 113 25,181 5 0 3 122 25,499 5 0 3 123 T5W 23,165 5 0 4 112 24,955 5 0 4 121 25,271 5 0 4 122 BLC 19,231 4 0 4 93 20,717 4 0 4 100 20,979 4 0 4 101 LCCO 13,734 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 RCCO 13,716 4 0 4 66 14,776 4 0 4 71 14,963 4 0 4 72 60 1250 P13 231W T1S 25,400 4 0 4 110 27,363 4 0 4 118 27,709 4 0 4 120 T2S 25,254 5 0 5 109 27,205 5 0 5 118 27,550 5 0 5 119 T2M 25,710 4 0 4 111 27,696 4 0 4 120 28,047 4 0 4 121 T3S 24,862 5 0 5 108 26,783 5 0 5 116 27,122 5 0 5 117 T3M 25,695 5 0 5 111 27,680 5 0 5 120 28,031 5 0 5 121 T4M 25,210 5 0 5 109 27,158 5 0 5 118 27,502 5 0 5 119 TFTM 25,861 5 0 5 112 27,860 5 0 5 121 28,212 5 0 5 122 T5VS 26,043 5 0 1 113 28,056 5 0 1 121 28,411 5 0 1 123 T5S 25,824 4 0 2 112 27,819 5 0 2 120 28,172 5 0 2 122 T5M 25,818 5 0 3 112 27,813 5 0 3 120 28,165 5 0 3 122 T5W 25,586 5 0 4 111 27,563 5 0 4 119 27,912 5 0 4 121 BLC 21,241 4 0 4 92 22,882 4 0 4 99 23,172 4 0 4 100 LCCO 15,170 2 0 4 66 16,342 2 0 4 71 16,549 2 0 4 72 RCCO 15,150 5 0 5 66 16,321 5 0 5 71 16,527 5 0 5 72 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 12/18/18 Page 8 of 8 FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The sleek design of the D-Series Size 1 reflects the embedded high performance LED technology. It is ideal for many commercial and municipal applications, such as parking lots, plazas, campuses, and streetscapes. CONSTRUCTION Single-piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance and future light engine upgrades. The LED drivers are mounted in direct contact with the casting to promote low operating temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental contaminants (IP65). Low EPA (1.01 ft2) for optimized pole wind loading. FINISH Exterior parts are protected by a zinc-infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi-stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in both textured and non-textured finishes. OPTICS Precision-molded proprietary acrylic lenses are engineered for superior area lighting distribution, uniformity, and pole spacing. Light engines are available in standard 3000 K, 4000 K and 5000 K (70 CRI) configurations. The D-Series Size 1 has zero uplight and qualifies as a Nighttime FriendlyTM product, meaning it is consistent with the LEED® and Green GlobesTM criteria for eliminating wasteful uplight. ELECTRICAL Light engine configurations consist of high-efficacy LEDs mounted to metal- core circuit boards to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (up to L85/100,000 hours at 25°C). Class 1 electronic drivers are designed to have a power factor >90%, THD <20%, and an expected life of 100,000 hours with <1% failure rate. Easily serviceable 10kV surge protection device meets a minimum Category C Low operation (per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). STANDARD CONTROLS The DSX1 LED area luminaire has a number of control options. Dusk to dawn controls can be utilized via optional NEMA twist-lock photocell receptacles. Integrated motion sensors with on-board photocells feature field-adjustable programing and are suitable for mounting heights up to 30 feet. nLIGHT AIR CONTROLS The DSX1 LED area luminaire is also available with nLight® AIR for the ultimate in wireless control. This powerful controls platform provides out-of-the-box basic motion sensing and photocontrol functionality and is suitable for mounting heights up to 40 feet. Once commissioned using a smartphone and the easy-to-use CLAIRITY app, nLight AIR equipped luminaries can be grouped, resulting in motion sensor and photocell group response without the need for additional equipment. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over-ride can be achieved when used with the nLight Eclypse. Additional information about nLight Air can be found here. INSTALLATION Included mounting block and integral arm facilitate quick and easy installation. Stainless steel bolts fasten the mounting block securely to poles and walls, enabling the D-Series Size 1 to withstand up to a 3.0 G vibration load rating per ANSI C136.31. The D-Series Size 1 utilizes the AERISTM series pole drilling pattern (template #8). NEMA photocontrol receptacle are also available. LISTINGS UL Listed for wet locations. Light engines are IP66 rated; luminaire is IP65 rated. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. U.S. Patent No. D672,492 S. International patent pending. DesignLights Consortium® (DLC) Premium qualified product and DLC qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC Premium qualified or DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights. org/QPL to confirm which versions are qualified. International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) Fixture Seal of Approval (FSA) is available for all products on this page utilizing 3000K color temperature only. WARRANTY 5-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitybrands.com/CustomerResources/Terms_and_conditions.aspx Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Specifications subject to change without notice. Capable Luminaire This item is an A+ capable luminaire, which has been designed and tested to provide consistent color appearance and system-level interoperability. • All configurations of this luminaire meet the Acuity Brands’ specification for chromatic consistency • This luminaire is A+ Certified when ordered with DTL® controls marked by a shaded background. DTL DLL equipped luminaires meet the A+ specification for luminaire to photocontrol interoperability1 • This luminaire is part of an A+ Certified solution for ROAM® or XPoint™ Wireless control networks, providing out-of-the-box control compatibility with simple commissioning, when ordered with drivers and control options marked by a shaded background1 To learn more about A+, visit www.acuitybrands.com/aplus. 1. See ordering tree for details. 2. A+ Certified Solutions for ROAM require the order of one ROAM node per luminaire. Sold Separately: Link to Roam; Link to DTL DLL 7900 International Drive + Suite 550 + Minneapolis, MN 55425 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING May 24, 2019 Jeff Sargent Community Development Director City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 RE: Plan Review Response for Automotive Concepts 2731 Nevada Avenue, New Hope, Minnesota File #: 193804506 Jeff, Thank you for your plan review letter dated May 16, 2019. We have prepared the following information to address your review comments. Please note that for your convenience each review item is restated below along with our corresponding response. STANTEC CONSULTING COMMENTS Site Details – C0-33 1. Provide sump structures prior to stormwater chamber isolator row to collect sediment. Response: Sumps added to catch basins as requested. Existing Site & Removal Plan – C2-10 1. Bituminous pavement removals are shown on the neighboring property to the east. Obtain right of entry agreement from 2900 Nevada Avenue North Response: An easement will be obtained from the property owner to the east for any impacts to the property. 2. Complete street improvements to deteriorating private driveway. Response: The private drive is now proposed to be removed and replaced. Site Plan C3-10 1. Provide ADA pedestrian ramps in walkway by handicap parking stalls. Response: Pavement is flush to provide ADA access. Stalls not to exceed 2% slope in any direction. 2. Provide truck turning movement details. Response: Exhibits provided. Site Utility Plan C3-20 1. Inspect and review condition of existing utilities within private driveway area and connection to Nevada Avenue North. Coordinate with New Hope Public Works. Response: Noted. 2. Storm water FES-1 shows outlet into property to the north. Provide agreement with 7101 31st Avenue North allowing storm water rip rap to be installed and storm water overflows directed onto the neighboring property. Response: The existing drainage for the site drains into the property to the north and utilizes the existing ditch along the property line. An easement agreement will be obtained for any work on the neighboring property. Page 2 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com a. Additional onsite review of the outlet elevation, rip rap installation, grades, and drainage within the railroad right of way is required. Response: Comment noted. 3. The water main is shown as a dead-end system and is not looped. Annual flushing of the hydrants will be required to maintain water quality. It is recommended to review looping the water main. Response: Looping of the main around the proposed building ties the main into the same water main along the private drive which still would act as a dead-end system. We understand the hydrants will need to flushed annually. Site Grading Plan C4-10 1. We recommend reviewing and coordinating site grading work with adjacent property owner to the east at 2900 Nevada Avenue North. Existing and proposed retaining wall may not be required or could be minimized. Response: We will approach the neighbor about possible options. Storm Water Management Comments 1. This property is located within the Basset Creek Watershed Management Commission and does not require a plan review. Response: Comment noted. 2. Provide storm water calculations. Response: Stormwater calculations are enclosed. 3. Provide details on how the infiltration/filtration requirements are being achieved for the site. Response: The enclosed stormwater narrative provides the requested details. Provide soil boring information. 4. Response: The soil borings are included in the stormwater report. General Comments 1. Provide detail on all easements on the property and within private driveway connection to Nevada Avenue North. Response: We are in the process of obtaining existing easement information. 2. A storm water maintenance agreement is required for the underground tank system and storm water infrastructure. A sample agreement can be provide by the City. Response: Comment noted. It would be appreciated to receive a sample from the City. 3. Provide record plans or as-built drawings following project completion, as required by engineering. Response: These will be provided following project completion. Page 3 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com PLANNING COMMENTS Lot Area The development site consists of two adjoining tax parcels under the same ownership. PID Area Building Site 201-182-134-0007 84,298 Sq. Ft. or 1.935 Acres Private Drive 201-182-134-0031 6,780 Sq. Ft. or .16 Acres 1. Site plan proposes two curb cuts into the private street. This may be acceptable through the PUD. The loading area is reliant on the private street for maneuvering. The turn radius for semi-truck/trailers are adequate. This section of the private street only serves the subject site. The design is acceptable since it will not impact any adjoining properties. Response: Noted. 2. The site sits on the dead end of a private street, this presents concerns for the access of emergency vehicles, and larger delivery vehicles. As the sole access drive the city will require the applicant to place "No Parking signs for the length of the street. Response: No parking signs have been added to the plans. 3. The site plan shall illustrate the turning movements for larger vehicle serving the site (i.e. garbage trucks, delivery vehicles. fire trucks, car carriers). To demonstrate that these vehicles can both access and egress the site. Response: Vehicle turning exhibits have been provided. Demolition and Excavation Plan C1-10 illustrates existing conditions of the site and plan C1-20 illustrates the proposed finished site grading plan. The current condition has a single family home at the top of a hill at 960 elevation. The grading plan shows the new building at a 945 elevation and parking lots at a 940 elevation. This calls for the removal of 15 feet of elevation from the site. Section 4-3(j) of the New Hope Zoning Code outlines the City regulations for grading, erosion, and sediment control. The City Engineer will comment on how the proposed SWPPP complies with the Engineering standards. The Planning conditions include: 1. Applicant shall identify the quantity of materials to be moved from the site. Response: The quantity of materials will be provided at a later date as part of the building permit process. 2. Applicant shall identify the destination of the dump site and haul routes to reach the dump site. All routes shall have the capacity to handle heavy trucks. Response: This information will be provided at a later date as part of the building permit process. 3. Schedule and timeframe for excavation and hauling so it is not disruptive to other industrial park operations. Response: This information will be provided at a later date as part of the building permit process. 4. Daily clean-up program. Response: This information will be provided at a later date as part of the building permit process. 5. Repair and reconstruction of the private street after hauling is complete. Response: Repairs will be made based on the impact to the private drive after hauling is complete. Page 4 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com 6. Applicant shall secure a demolition permit for the existing house, outbuildings and retaining walls from the City. Response: A demolition permit will be obtained for the existing house. 7. Demolition permit shall be accompanied with a waste disposal plan. Response: A waste disposal plan will be provided with the demolition permit. 8. Applicant shall provide a security for performance of work. Response: If the work is on private property and the improvements are considered private, we would like the City to consider if this is necessary. Utility Plan 1. Utilities are being extended into the site from the adjoining property to the east. The utilities enter the building in the display area of the building rather than a utility room. Response: The utilities have been revised to be coordinated with the floor plan. 2. The utility plan provides separate services for fire suppression and potable water. Response: Comment noted. 3. The fire department connection shall provide clear access. The parking stall in front of the FDC shall be striped "No Parking" Response: Striping added and noted. 4. The building shall have full fire suppression. The fire inspector shall comment on hydrant locations. Response: The building will have full fire suppression. 5. The hydrants will be on a dead end line. This will require periodic flushing. The flushing will need to consider the impact on adjoining properties and the underground storm system. Response: We understand periodic flushing will be required. Landscaping / Tree Replacement The tree replacement plan C5-10 identifies eight significant trees not within the proposed building envelope that will be removed to allow site development. The replacement for these trees will be 97 caliper inches of new landscaping to meet City Code. The landscape plan C5-20 meets the tree replacement requirements. The variety and size of trees meet City Code. We do have issue with proposed turf plan C5-10. Erosion blankets are proposed on the steep slopes along the east lot lines. However, turf seed is proposed along the east and north lot lines. The topography is steep in both locations, therefore slope stabilization and erosion control is critical. Applicant shall identify the proposed seed mix and long- term maintenance plan for the proposed turf area of the site. Response: The seed mix and short and long term maintenance plan notes for the proposed turf areas. Snow Storage Seventy-one percent of the site will be hard cover, and the remaining green space is characterized by steep slopes. In this regard, the landscape plan shall identify locations for snow storage. The snow storage locations shall be accessible to snow equipment, shall not be located over new landscaping and shall not push snow onto adjoining properties. Parking in excess of the required parking may be used for snow storage. Response: Snow storage is shown in a section of parking on the site plan and landscape plans. Page 5 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com Lighting In review of the site lighting plan C6-10 we offer the following comments: 1. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be buffered so as to mitigate noise in compliance with chapter 9 of the City Code. Response: Rooftop and ground mechanical equipment will be buffered as requested. 2. All ground mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view from adjacent properties and the public right-of-way by enclosures constructed of durable and permanent materials with architectural elements (type, quality and appearance) similar and compatible to the principal structure. Response: Ground mounted equipment will be screened from adjacent properties. There is no public right-of-way adjacent to the property. 3. All rooftop equipment shall be screened from view from across adjacent streets 15 feet behind the curb or adjacent properties at the property line. Response: Rooftop equipment will be screened from the adjacent properties. 4. Rooftop equipment shall be completely screened by the building parapet, or the equipment should be grouped behind an enclosure and set back a distance of one and one-half times its height from any primary faGade fronting a public street. Response: The rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened by the primary façade by setting back 1 ½ times height of unit from the edge. 5. Screens shall be of durable, permanent materials (not including wood) that are compatible with the primary building materials. Response: Screening to be provided by precast parapet and location of unit. 6. Exterior mechanical equipment, such as ductwork, shall not be located on primary building facades. Response: Exterior mechanical equipment will not be located on primary building facades. Conclusion The proposed site has been identified as an Industrial redevelopment plan in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed site plan and use fits the guidelines for land use plan and I-Zoning district. The site has a number of challenges due to its location, access and topography. Recognizing these conditions, we suggest the following applications may be necessary: 7. Conditional use permit/ Planned unit development to allow design flexibility for the development including private street access, curb cuts, lighting, etc. Response: This will be pursued upon confirmation by the City. 2. Site and Building Plan review. Response: This will be pursued upon confirmation by the City. The following items should be provided: 1. Copy of Access easement to ensure perpetual access to the subject property (Easement document number A9205253 may be the document). Response: We are in the process of obtaining a copy of the Access Easement. 2. Condition of the private street shall be upgraded to meet City Standards for private streets to allow the change in use of the property from low density single family to industrial. Page 6 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com Response: The private street will be removed and replaced to meet the city standards. 3. Demolition and excavation plan must include: a. Quantity of dirt to be removed b. Dump location and haul routes c. Schedule and timeframe for removal Response: This information will be provided as part of the demolition and building permits at a later date. WEST METRO FIRE-RESCUE COMMENTS 1. The building shall be fully sprinklered with a NFP A 13 system. You may want to consider upgrading the fire sprinkler system in the work area for higher rack and tire storage. The fire sprinkler system shall also be monitored by a fire alarm system. Response: The building will have full fire suppression. 2. There shall be a separate water main going into the building for the fire protection system, unless it can be proven to be hydraulically calculated out to work for the fire sprinkler system and domestic water. Response: Fire/water is shown as separated prior to entering building. 3. On the site plan the parking lot has a dead end and you shall either provide an approved turn around in the parking lot, or provide access around the whole building. This was discussed in the preliminary meeting a while ago. Provide information on the plan showing large vehicles can maneuver in this parking lot. Response: Fire truck turning exhibit provided to show turnaround movements. 4. Provide information on the site plan showing where the used oil containers will be stored on site. We will have to evaluate code compliance with storing the used oil outside and containment. Response: There will be no storage of oil containers outside of the building. 5. Concerned about snow removal and where it will be located. Provide an updated plan showing where the snow removal will be located. Response: Snow storage to be located in excess parking stalls per city allowance. 6. The site plan shows the fire depai1ment connection (FDC) located front (south) end of the building. The FDC shall be re-located to the southwest corner of the building. It can be on either the south or west wall in the corner. Response: FDC has been relocated as requested. DESIGN & REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMENTS Lot Area The development site consists of two adjoining tax parcels under the same ownership. PID Area Building Site 201-182-134-0007 84,298 Sq. Ft. or 1.935 Acres Private Drive 201-182-134-0031 6,780 Sq. Ft. or .16 Acres Both parcels are unplatted and exist as a Metes and Bounds description. The balance of industrial lots around Nevada Avenue cul-de-sac are platted lots. 1. Should the two parcels be combined into a single platted lot? This will require a preliminary and final plat per section 13-9. The City of New Hope will not allow a metes and bounds property conveyance. The combination of the two parcels would place all operations on a single lot. Page 7 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com Setback Required Proposed Compliant Front Yard, South 30 feet 85 feet Yes Side Yard, East 10 feet 32 feet Yes Side Yard, West 10 feet 75 feet Yes Rear Yard, North 30 feet 100 feet Yes Required Proposed Compliant Building Height 72 feet 28 feet Yes Required Proposed Compliant Impervious Surface 80% 72% Yes Response: The current owner purchased the property as two parcels and would prefer not to combine these parcels into a single lot at this time. Access 1. No direct access to public street. Response: Comment noted. 2. With change of use, we can allow the development via CUP/PUD Section 4/20 (e) (2) a. Applicant must provide evidence of access easement for the proposed new intended Industrial use (Easement Doc. No. A9205253, Assessed on Easement Parcel(s) 20-118-21- 34-0035 and 20-118-21- 34-0030) b. Easement must be recorded with the County c. Easement description must be a minimum of 30 feet wide d. Setbacks shall be measured off the edge of easement. Response: We are in the process of obtaining the existing access easement that provides rights to access the property through the property to the east. 3. The driveway access currently exhibits potholes and poor condition. With change of use, the entire private street shall be improved to meet City Standards for private streets. Street design shall be appropriate for the change of use from residential to industrial. Heavy duty pavement design is required. Response: The private drive on the owner's property will be removed and replaced to city standards. 4. Site plan proposes two curb cuts into the private street. This may be acceptable through the PUD. The loading area is reliant on the private street for maneuvering. The tum radius for semitruck/ trailers are adequate. This section of the private street only serves the subject site. The design is acceptable since it will not impact any adjoining properties. Response: Noted. 5. The site sits on the dead end of a private street, this presents concerns for the access of emergency vehicles, and larger delivery vehicles. As the sole access drive the city will require the applicant to place "No Parking signs for the length of the street. Response: No parking signs have been added to the plans. 6. The site plan shall illustrate the turning movements for larger vehicle serving the site (i.e. garbage trucks, delivery vehicles. fire trucks, car carriers). To demonstrate that these vehicles can both access and egress the site. Response: Vehicle turning exhibits provided. Page 8 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com Demolition and Excavation Plan Cl-10 illustrates existing conditions of the site and plan Cl-20 illustrates the proposed finished site grading plan. The current condition has a single family home at the top of a hill at 960 elevation. The grading plan shows the new building at a 945 elevation and parking lots at a 940 elevation. This calls for the removal of 15 feet of elevation from the site. Section 4-3(j) of the New Hope Zoning Code outlines the City regulations for grading, erosion, and sediment control. The City Engineer will comment on how the proposed SWPPP complies with the Engineering standards. The Planning conditions include: 1. Applicant shall identify the quantity of materials to be moved from the site. Response: The quantity of materials will be provided at a later date as part of the building permit process. 2. Applicant shall identify the destination of the dump site and haul routes to reach the dump site. All routes shall have the capacity to handle heavy trucks. Response: This information will be provided at a later date as part of the building permit process. 3. Schedule and timeframe for excavation and hauling so it is not disruptive to other industrial park operations. Response: This information will be provided at a later date as part of the building permit process. 4. Daily clean-up program. Response: This information will be provided at a later date as part of the building permit process. 5. Repair and reconstruction of the private street after hauling is complete. Response: Repairs will be made based on the impact to the private drive after hauling is complete. 6. Applicant shall secure a demolition permit for the existing house, outbuildings and retaining walls from the City. Response: A demolition permit will be obtained for the existing house. 7. Demolition permit shall be accompanied with a waste disposal plan. Response: A waste disposal plan will be provided with the demolition permit. 8. Applicant shall provide a security for performance of work. Response: If the work is on private property and the improvements are considered private, we would like the City to consider if this is necessary. Parking Area Stalls Sales Area 2600 X .9 = 2,340 + 200 12 Office Area 2,895 X .9 = 2,605 + 300 7 Storage 2,047 X .9 = 1,842 + 1,500 1 Service Stalls 17x3 51 TOTAL 71 The breakdown of uses in the building requires 71 parking stalls. The site plan illustrates 97 parking stalls. All parking stalls and drive aisles meet City dimensional standards. The parking lot meets the City design standards for pavement, curbing, and striping. Response: Noted. Page 9 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com Loading The site plan shows a loading area at the south side of the building. The loading area is located along the frontage of the private street. The loading area is reliant on the private street for access and egress. The loading area is properly dimensioned to accommodate the turning movements of semitrucks. Since the private street only serves the subject site at this location, the loading area location and design may be acceptable. The City may wish to have the two adjoining lots combined to have all operations on a single lot. The loading area enters into a storage room in the building. Applicant must identify how automobiles are delivered to the site. If tow trucks or car carriers are used to deliver automobiles to the site, applicant shall identify how these large vehicles will maneuver within the site to access, offload, and egress the site. Response: Vehicle turning exhibits provided. Trash Handling Equipment A trash enclosure is located at the northeast comer of the site located at the end of the parking lot. The site location and parking lot dimension raise concern for access and egress of a garbage truck in this area of the site. We recommend that the applicant illustrate the turning movements of a garbage truck and how it will egress the site without interfering with parking. The site has an oversupply of parking. Some of this parking may be eliminated if additional maneuvering space is needed at the north end of the site. Response: Vehicle turning exhibits provided. Utility Plan The utility plan will be subject to City Engineer comment. Additionally, we offer the following: 1. Utilities are being extended into the site from the adjoining property to the east. The utilities enter the building in the display area of the building rather than a utility room. Response: The utilities have been revised to be coordinated with the floor plan. 2. The utility plan provides separate services for fire suppression and potable water. Response: Noted. 3. The fire department connection shall provide clear access. The parking stall in front of the FDC shall be striped "No Parking". Response: Stall has been striped and noted. 4. The building shall have full fire suppression. The fire inspector shall comment on hydrant locations. Response: Noted. 5. The hydrants will be on a dead end line. This will require periodic flushing. The flushing will need to consider the impact on adjoining properties and the underground storm system. Response: We understand periodic flushing will be required. Landscaping / Tree Replacement The tree replacement plan CS-10 identifies eight significant trees not within the proposed building envelope that will be removed to allow site development. The replacement for these trees will be 97 caliper inches of new landscaping to meet City Code. The landscape plan CS-20 meets the tree replacement requirements. The variety and size of trees meet City Code. We do have issue with proposed turf plan CS-10. Erosion blankets are proposed on the steep slopes along the east lot lines. However, turf seed is proposed along the east and north lot lines. The topography is steep in both locations, therefore slope stabilization and erosion control is critical. Applicant shall identify the proposed seed mix and long- term maintenance plan for the proposed turf area of the site. Page 10 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com Response: The seed mix and short and long term maintenance plan notes for the proposed turf areas. Snow Storage Seventy-one percent of the site will be hard cover, and the remaining green space is characterized by steep slopes. In this regard, the landscape plan shall identify locations for snow storage. The snow storage locations shall be accessible to snow equipment, shall not be located over new landscaping and shall not push snow onto adjoining properties. Parking in excess of the required parking may be used for snow storage. Parking in excess of the required parking may be used for snow storage. Response: Snow storage is shown in a section of parking on the site plan and landscape plans. Lighting In review of the site lighting plan C6-10 we offer the following comments: 1. The light levels along the west and south property lines exceed .4 of a foot candle. Seeing that these sides of the lot abut railroad right of way and a parcel under the same ordinance to the south, we believe that the lighting is acceptable and may be approved as part of the PUD/CUP. Response: Comment noted. 2. The lighting for the parking lot and sidewalks is acceptable. Response: Comment noted. 3. Light levels at the building entrance fall below 5 foot-candles at some locations. This can be remedied by placing the proposed light above the door. Response: The lights have been placed above the doors. 4. Applicant shall provide cut sheet details for all exterior light fixtures to demonstrate that they are 90-degree cutoff lights with shielded light sources. Response: The cut sheets on C6-20 are full cutoff fixtures. Enclosed are additional pages of the cut sheets for reference. These lights classify as nighttime friendly as part of LEED criteria for eliminating wasteful uplight. 5. The proposed freestanding lights have pole heights that meet code. Response: Comment noted. Building Design A2-11 Exterior Building Elevations have mis-labeled building sides. 1. South elevation is incorrectly labeled East. This elevation has the loading area with overhead door. The elevation labeling must be corrected. Response: The label has been corrected. 2. West elevation is incorrectly labeled South. Response: The label has been corrected. 3. North elevation is incorrectly labeled West. Response: The label has been corrected. 4. East elevation is incorrectly labeled North. Response: The label has been corrected. Page 11 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com The building will be constructed of precast concrete panels. Windows and metal accents (canopy) provide visual interest. The building elevation meets New Hope design standards for industrial buildings. The building roof plan and elevations must identify the location and design of all mechanical equipment both ground mounted and roof top equipment. The location and design of all mechanical equipment shall meet the following standards: Section 4-3(b )(5)c Mechanical and rooftop equipment must meet the following standards: 1. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not exceed the building height standards by more than 15 feet. Response: Rooftop equipment will be screened from the adjacent properties. 2. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be buffered so as to mitigate noise in compliance with chapter 9 of the City Code. Response: Rooftop and ground mechanical equipment will be buffered as requested. 3. All ground mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view from adjacent properties and the public right-of-way by enclosures constructed of durable and permanent materials witl1 architectural elements (type, quality and appearance) similar and compatible to the principal structure. Response: Ground mounted equipment will be screened from adjacent properties. There is no public right-of-way adjacent to the property. 4. All rooftop equipment shall be screened from view from across adjacent streets 15 feet behind the curb or adjacent properties at the property line. Response: Rooftop equipment will be screened from the adjacent properties. 5. Rooftop equipment shall be completely screened by the building parapet, or the equipment should be grouped behind an enclosure and set back a distance of one and one-half times its height from any primary fa~ade fronting a public street. Response: The rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened by the primary façade by setting back 1 ½ times height of unit from the edge. 6. Screens shall be of durable, permanent materials (not including wood) that are compatible with the primary building materials. Response: Screening to be provided by precast parapet and location of unit. 7. Exterior mechanical equipment, such as ductwork, shall not be located on primary building facades. Response: Exterior mechanical equipment will not be located on primary building facades. Conclusion The proposed site has been identified as an Industrial redevelopment plan in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed site plan and use fits the guidelines for land use plan and I-Zoning district. The site has a number of challenges due to its location, access and topography. Recognizing these conditions, we suggest the following applications may be necessary 1. Conditional use permit/ planned unit development to allow design flexibility for the development including private street access, curb cuts, lighting, etc. Response: This will be pursued upon confirmation by the City. Page 12 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com 2. Site and Building Plan review. Response: This will be pursued upon confirmation by the City. The following items should be provided: 1. Copy of Access easement to ensure perpetual access to the subject property (Easement document number A9205253 may be the document). Response: We are in the process of obtaining a copy of the Access Easement. 2. Condition of the private street shall be upgraded to meet City Standards for private streets to allow the change in use of the property from low density single family to industrial. Response: The private street will be removed and replaced to meet the city standards. 3. Demolition and excavation plan must include: a. Quantity of dirt to be removed b. Dump location and haul routes c. Schedule and timeframe for removal d. Daily street clean-up program e. Waste disposal plan f. Security for work performance Response: This information will be provided as part of the demolition and building permits at a later date. 8. Applicant provide a description of delivery vehicles serving the site. If tow truck or car carriers deliver vehicles to the site, show traffic movement for these larger vehicles accessing and egressing the site. Response: Vehicles are typically dropped off by vehicle owner. Semi-trucks deliver parts to the loading dock. Smaller delivery trucks deliver packages to the overhead door on the south side of the building. The operations of the company do not include car carriers or tow trucks. 9. Applicant show turning movements for garbage truck accessing and egressing the trash enclosure. Response: Turning exhibits provided. 10. Utility plan shall be subject to the review comments of the City Engineer, Fire Official, and Building Inspector. The building floor plan shall show where utilities will enter the building. Response: A plumbing plan with the floor plan layout showing utilities entering the building will be provided as part of the Building Permit process. 11. Applicant provide a detail of the trash enclosure. Said enclosure shall match the building in materials and design. Response: A detail of the trash enclosure is provided on A1-24. 12. Applicant shall illustrate the turning movements of a garbage truck accessing and egressing the trash enclosure. Response: Vehicle turning exhibits provided. 13. Landscape Plan. Applicant provide a seed mix for proposed turf area of the site along with method for installation, erosion control, and long-term maintenance. Response: The seed mix has been updated for the proposed turf area. 14. Applicant identify snow storage plan on the landscape plan. Response: Excess parking stalls to provide snow storage per city allowance. Page 13 of 13 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com 15. Lighting Plan a. Provide light fixture details to show that they are 90-degree cut off fixtures with shielded light sources. Response: Enclosed are additional pages for the light fixture cut sheets. b. Lighting at building entrances shall be 5.0 foot-candles. Response: Lighting at building entrances has been revised to 5.0 foot-candles. 16. Building Design a. Applicant shall identify the location, size, and type of all mechanical and roof top equipment and demonstrate compliance with City Code. Response: Rooftop is shown on A2-11 which complies with City screening requirements. Please review this response letter and the accompanying materials at your earliest convenience and let me know if you have any questions, need additional information, or require further changes to the submittal. Feel welcome to contact me at 952.426.0699 for any clarifications as well. Sincerely, Jerremy Foss, PE, LEED AP, CNU-A Senior Civil Engineer NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. __________________________________________________________________ 415 0 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Jeff Sargent FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: May 29, 2019 RE: City of New Hope – Automotive Concepts CUP/PUD FILE NO: 131.01 – 19.17 BACKGROUND: Automotive Concepts has submitted the following applications to allow the redevelopment of the property located at 2917 Nevada Avenue North in New Hope. This property while zoned I industrial district contains a single family house. The development application will remove the house and construct a 22,500 sq. ft. industrial building. The site consists of two separate lots which do not directly abut a public street. Due to the reliance on a private street access to this industrial site, a Conditional Use Permit / Planned Unit Development are being processed to allow this redevelopment to occur. Required Applications: Conditional Use Permit / Planned Unit Development Site and Building Plan Review ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Comprehensive plan: The New Hope Comprehensive Plan guides this site for industrial land uses. The plan identifies this site as a priority redevelopment site within the City. The proposed project is consistent with the land use goals and recommendations of the New Hope Comprehensive plan. 2 I Industrial Zoning: As shown below the proposed uses for the site are allowed in the I zoning district. Permitted Uses: Major Auto Repair Office Business Warehousing Administrative Uses: Retail sales not to exceed 30% for gross floor area of the principle business Sales floor 2,583 square feet/22,500 square feet = 11.5% PUD CUP to allow access via Private Street and over multiple lot lines Lot Area. The development site consists of two adjoining tax parcels under the same ownership. In combination the site exceeds the I district lot area requirements. The applicant’s narrative indicates that the property owner wishes to keep the site as two separate parcels. The building site is dependent on the southern property for access and truck maneuvering. In this respect the southern lot cannot be allowed to be resold or allowed to go tax forfeit. This being the case the applicant may choose to combine the two properties into a single lot or place a deed restriction on the properties that will not allow the either property to be sold or conveyed without the other. The wording and terms of said deed restriction shall be submitted to the city for review and approval of the City Attorney. Said restriction shall be recorded against the property title. PID Area Building Site 201-182-134-0007 84,298 Sq. Ft. or 1.935 Acres Private Drive 201-182-134-0031 6,780 Sq. Ft. or .16 Acres Lot Width: The I district requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The proposed site has no frontage on a public street. Access is proposed through a private street shared by two properties. The lot has 225 feet of frontage onto the private street. This is acceptable through the CUP /PUD. Building Setbacks: The table below shows at the proposed building meets all the I district setbacks. Setback Required Proposed Compliant Front Yard, South 30 feet 85 feet Yes Side Yard, East 10 feet 32 feet Yes Side Yard, West 10 feet 75 feet Yes Rear Yard, North 30 feet 100 feet Yes 3 Access: The site has no direct access to a public street. The applicant is pursuing a CUP /PUD as a means of allowing development without public street frontage. In review of the existing conditions and the proposed development, staff can support the private access via CUP/PUD with the following conditions. 1. Applicant must provide evidence of access easement for the proposed new intended Industrial use (Easement Doc. No. A9205253, Assessed on Easement Parcel(s) 20-118-21-34-0035 and 20-118-21-34-0030). A permanent access easement must be established in favor of the new development to preserve the private drive for perpetuity. 2. Easement must be recorded with the County 3. Easement description must be a minimum of 30 feet wide 4. Setbacks shall be measured off the edge of easement. 5. The driveway access currently exhibits potholes and poor condition. With change of use, the entire private street shall be improved to meet City Standards for private streets. Street design shall be appropriate for the change of use from residential to industrial. Heavy duty pavement design is required. The proposed easement shall be accompanied by a long-term maintenance plan for the private street. Said plan shall outline the maintenance and upkeep of the shared drive and between the subject site and the property to the east. Said plan shall be recorded against the property.  Site plan proposes two curb cuts into the private street. This is acceptable through the PUD. The loading area is reliant on the private street for maneuvering. The applicant has provided the turning radii for semi-truck/trailers accessing and egress the loading area and has demonstrated that they are adequate. This section of the private street only serves the subject site. The design is acceptable since it will not impact any adjoining properties.  The site sits on the dead end of a private street, this presents concerns for the access of emergency vehicles, and larger delivery vehicles. As the sole access drive the city will require the applicant to place “No Parking signs for the length of the street. The applicant’s revised site plan show the “No Parking “signs along the private street.  The site plan shall illustrate the turning movements for larger vehicle serving the site (i.e. garbage trucks, delivery vehicles. fire trucks, car carriers). To demonstrate that these vehicles can both access and egress the site. The applicant has indicated that they will not receive automobiles at the site via car carriers or tow trucks. They have revised the site plan to expand the vehicle maneuvering area at the north side of the 4 building. With this revision the site appears to accommodate a 35 foot long garbage truck without interfering with on- site parking.  The applicant has also provided turning plans for a 40 foot long fire truck exiting the site. The turning movement on the north side of the building requires multiple movements to turn the fire truck around. In review of the proposed turning movements, we note that the fire truck must overhang the north parking lot curb line to make the backing movement to turn around. Within this overhang maneuvering area the site plan shows a catch basin, biofiltrator structure, a freestanding light pole and the landscape plan shows a Thorn less Hawthron being planted behind the curb. To make this fire truck turning movement work the site plan needs to have an nine foot clear zone beyond the curb line. At grade structures must provide vertical clearance for the fire truck undercarriage and bumper. Vertical improvements, trees and light posts must be relocated way from the turn area to avoid damage. Demolition and Excavation: Plan C2-10 illustrates existing conditions of the site and plan C4-10 illustrates the proposed finished site grading plan. The current condition has a single family home at the top of a hill at 960 elevation. The grading plan shows the new building at a 945 elevation and parking lots at a 940 elevation. This calls for the removal of 15 feet of elevation from the site. Section 4-3(j) of the New Hope Zoning Code outlines the City regulations for grading, erosion, and sediment control. The City Engineer will comment on how the proposed SWPPP complies with the Engineering standards. The Planning conditions include: 1. Applicant shall identify the quantity of materials to be moved from the site. 2. Applicant shall identify the destination of the dump site and haul routes to reach the dump site. All routes shall have the capacity to handle heavy trucks. 3. Schedule and timeframe for excavation and hauling so it is not disruptive to other industrial park operations. 4. Daily clean-up program. 5. Repair and reconstruction of the private street after hauling is complete. 6. Applicant shall secure a demolition permit for the existing house, outbuildings and retaining walls from the City. 7. Demolition permit shall be accompanied with a waste disposal plan. 8. Applicant shall provide a security for performance of work. 5 The applicant proposes to address the aforementioned items as part of the building permit process. This is acceptable, provided each of the items is address and approved by the city prior to any demolition or site grading begins. Parking The proposed building will consist of first floor operations and a mezzanine with offices. Based on the building floor plans A1-21 and A1-22, the following business uses and their related required parking are calculated Area Stalls Sales Area 2600 x .9 = 2,340 ÷ 200 12 Office Area 2,895 x .9 = 2,605 ÷ 300 7 Storage 2,047 x .9 = 1,842 ÷ 1,500 1 Service Stalls 17 x 3 51 TOTAL 71 The breakdown of uses in the building requires 71 parking stalls. The site plan illustrates 93 parking stalls. All parking stalls and drive aisles meet City dimensional standards. The parking lot meets the City design standards for pavement, curbing, and striping. Loading. The site plan shows a loading area at the south side of the building. The loading area is located along the frontage of the private street. The loading area is reliant on the private street for access and egress. The loading area is properly dimensioned to accommodate the turning movements of semi-trucks. Since the private street only serves the subject site at this location, the loading area location and design may be acceptable. The loading area enters into a storage room in the building. Applicant has indicated in their narrative that automobiles are individually driven to the site. Tow trucks or car carriers will not be used to deliver automobiles to the site. Trash Handling Equipment A trash enclosure is located at the northeast corner of the site located at the end of the parking lot. The site location and parking lot dimension raise concern for access and egress of a garbage truck in this area of the site. The site has been revised to reduce the number of parking stalls to provide the need maneuvering space for trucks north of the building.. Plan A1-24 provides a plan set for the trash enclosure. The design and materials match the principal building and meet the city zoning standards. 6 Utility Plan The utility plan will be subject to City Engineer comment. Additionally, we offer the following: 1. The utility plan provides separate services for fire suppression and potable water. 2. The fire department connection shall provide clear access. The parking stall in front of the FDC shall be striped “No Parking”. The site plan addresses this requirement. 3. The building shall have full fire suppression. The fire inspector shall comment on hydrant locations. 4. The hydrants will be on a dead end line. This will require periodic flushing. The flushing will need to consider the impact on adjoining properties and the underground storm system. The applicant understands that periodic flushing of the dead end water line is required. Landscaping / Tree Replacement The tree replacement plan C5-10 identifies eight significant trees not within the proposed building envelope that will be removed to allow site development. The replacement for these trees will be 97 caliper inches of new landscaping to meet City Code. The landscape plan C5-20 meets the tree replacement requirements. The variety and size of trees meet City Code. To accommodate the fire truck turning movements on the north side of the building plantings shall maintain a nine foot setback from the back of the parking lot curb. Erosion blankets are proposed on the steep slopes along the east, north and portion of the west lot lines. In areas of steep slopes the turf plan proposes using a MN DOT Woodland Edge grass seed mix applied with erosion blankets. These areas will be low maintenance turf areas. The site planting notes include a long –term turf maintenance plan. The plans as submitted are acceptable. Snow Storage Seventy-one percent of the site will be hard cover, and the remaining green space is characterized by steep slopes. In this regard, the landscape plan shall identify locations for snow storage. The snow storage locations shall be accessible to snow equipment, shall not be located over new landscaping and shall not push snow onto adjoining properties. The Revised site plan and landscape plan shows 93 total parking stalls on the site. This parking count provides 22 stalls above city requirements. The revised site plan and landscape plan proposes to use the oversupply of parking for their snow storage areas. The snow storage areas are located in the northeast and northwest corners of the site. The locations are acceptable provided they do not interfere with the site drainage and on-site storm water retention. 7 Required Proposed Compliant Impervious Surface 80% 72% Yes Lighting In review of the site lighting plan C6-10 we offer the following comments: 1. The light levels along the west and south property lines exceed .4 of a foot candle. Seeing that these sides of the lot abut railroad right of way and a parcel under the same ordinance to the south, we believe that the lighting is acceptable and may be approved as part of the PUD/CUP. 2. The lighting for the parking lot and sidewalks is acceptable. 3. Light levels at the building entrances are acceptable. 4. Applicant has provided cut sheet details for all exterior light fixtures to demonstrate that they are 90-degree cutoff lights with shielded light sources. The light details meet code. 5. The proposed freestanding lights have pole heights that meet code. We recommend that the freestanding lights along the northern parking lot curb line be move away from the fire truck maneuvering area. To allow free movement of the larger emergency vehicle. 6. The proposed freestanding parking lot light in the northwest corner of the lot should be relocated to avoid damage from snow plowing and snow storage at this location. Building Design The building will be constructed of precast concrete panels. Windows and metal accents (canopy) provide visual interest. The building elevation meets New Hope design standards for industrial buildings. Required Proposed Compliant Building Height 72 feet 28 feet Yes The building elevations and project narrative have identified the locations and design of mechanical equipment both ground mounted and roof top equipment. The location and design of all mechanical equipment comply with the city standards for location and screening: 8 Conclusion The proposed site has been identified as an Industrial redevelopment plan in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed site plan and use fits the guidelines for land use plan and I-Zoning district. The site has a number of challenges due to its location, access and topography. Recognizing these conditions, staff recommends approval of the following applications based on the plan sets submitted with the application dated 05/10/2019 and revised dated 05/24/2019. 1. Conditional use permit / Planned unit development to allow design flexibility for the development including private street access, curb cuts, lighting, etc. 2. Site and Building Plan review. Application approval is subject to the following conditions being met. 1. Copy of Access easement to ensure perpetual access to the subject property (Easement document number A9205253 may be the document). Is provide for the review and approval of the City Attorney and recorded with the property. 2. Condition of the private street shall be upgraded to meet City Standards for private streets to allow the change in use of the property from low density single family to industrial. Applicant shall provide a long-term maintenance agreement to address the on- going maintenance and repair of the shared private street and the responsibilities of both properties.. 3. The Applicant either combine the two site properties through a platted subdivision or the applicant provide a deed restriction for the review and approval of the City Attorney that prohibit the separate sale of either of the site’s two lots. 4. Demolition and excavation plan must be submitted and approved by the city as part of the building permit application. No demolition or site grading shall occur prior to the approval of the demolition and excavation plan. The Demolition and exaction plan shall include the following information.: a. Quantity of dirt to be removed b. Dump location and haul routes c. Schedule and timeframe for removal d. Daily street clean-up program e. Waste disposal plan f. Security for work performance 5. All site development shall occur in accordance with the approved plan sets dated 5/10/2019 and revised 5/24/2019. 9 6. The site and landscape plans shall be revised to provide a nine foot clear overhang area behind the parking lot curb north of the building to allow unencumbered movements of a fire truck exiting the site. 7. Utility plan shall be subject to the review comments of the City Engineer, Fire Official, and Building Inspector. . 8. Lighting Plan, the free standing light poles along the north end of the parking lot be relocated outside of the fire truck turning movement area to avoid damage to the poles. The freestanding light pole at the northwest corner of the parking lot is relocated to avoid damage from snow plowing and snow storage. Cc. Jeff Alger Stacy Wood Chris long. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 May 16, 2019 File: 193804506 Attention: Jeff Sargent Community Development Director City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Reference: Automotive Concepts – 2731 Nevada Avenue – Initial Plan Review Dear Jeff, We have reviewed the redevelopment plans submitted by Automotive Concepts for 2731 Nevada Avenue North as received on May 10, 2019. Following are our initial comments and/or recommendations. Site Details – C0-33 1.Provide sump structures prior to stormwater chamber isolator row to collect sediment. Existing Site & Removal Plan – C2-10 1.Bituminous pavement removals are shown on the neighboring property to the east. Obtain right of entry agreement from 2900 Nevada Avenue North. 2.Complete street improvements to deteriorating private driveway. Site Plan – C3-10 1.Provide ADA pedestrian ramps in walkway by handicap parking stalls. 2.Provide truck turning movement details. Site Utility Plan – C3-20 1.Inspect and review condition of existing utilities within private driveway area and connection to Nevada Avenue North. Coordinate with New Hope Public Works. 2.Storm water FES-1 shows outlet into property to the north. Provide agreement with 7101 31st Avenue North allowing storm water rip rap to be installed and storm water overflows directed onto neighboring property. May 16, 2019 Mr. Jeff Sargent Page 2 of 3 a.Additional onsite review of the outlet elevation, rip rap installation, grades, and drainage within the railroad right of way is required. 3.The water main is shown as a dead-end system and is not looped. Annual flushing of the hydrants will be required to maintain water quality. It is recommended to review looping the water main. Site Grading Plan – C4-10 1.We recommend reviewing and coordinating site grading work with adjacent property owner to the east at 2900 Nevada Avenue North. Existing and proposed retaining walls may not be required or could be minimized. Storm Water Management Comments 1.This property is located within the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and does require a plan review. 2.Provide storm water calculations. 3.Provide details on how the infiltration/filtration requirements are being achieved for the site. 4.Provide soil boring information. General Comments 1.Provide detail on all easements on the property and within private driveway connection to Nevada Avenue North. 2.A storm water maintenance agreement is required for the underground tank system and storm water infrastructure. A sample agreement can be provided by the city. 3.Provide record plans or as-built drawings following project completion, as required by engineering. If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (651)604-4808. Regards, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Christopher W. Long, P.E. May 16, 2019 Mr. Jeff Sargent Page 3 of 3 c. Bernie Weber, Dave Lemke, Megan Hedstrom, Jeff Alger, Dean Blom – New Hope; Alan Brixius – City Planner; Shelby Wolf – West Metro Fire; Kellie Schlegel, Ann Dienhart, Tyler Johnson, Lucas Miller – Stantec. Planning Case Report 19-08 Page 1 5/31/19 PLANNING CASE REPORT City of New Hope Meeting Date: June 4, 2019 Report Date: May 31, 2019 Planning Case: 19-08 Petitioner: Hampton Senior Care of New Hope, LLC Address: 3216 Winnetka Avenue North Project Name: Hampton Senior Care Project Description: Rezoning and subdivision and platting for senior living facility at 3216 Winnetka Avenue North I. Type of Planning Request A. Rezoning B. Preliminary and Final Plat II. Zoning Code References Sections: 4-32 Administration – Amendments Chapter 13 – Subdivision and Platting III. Property Specifications Zoning: Industrial district Location: 3216 Winnetka Avenue North Adjacent Land Uses: North: Industrial (New Hope) West: Single Family Residential (Crystal) South: Multifamily Residential (Crystal) East: Industrial (Crystal and New Hope) Site Area: 6.23 acres Building Area: 21,390 square feet (proposed) Planning District: Planning District 15 North. The Comprehensive Plan notes that the industrial sites located on Winnetka Avenue North in this planning district tend to be small, thus limiting their potential use while presenting opportunities for revitalization, reinvestment, or redevelopment. This site represents one of the few pieces of vacant land that has not been developed within the city. Development of the parcel would increase the city’s senior housing supply by providing lifecycle housing, a goal of both the city and Metropolitan Council. Planning Case Report 19-08 Page 2 5/31/19 IV. Background Hampton Senior Care of New Hope is requesting to rezone and subdivide the northern portion of the parcel located at 3216 Winnetka Avenue North in order to construct a 32-unit senior care center. The subdivision would result in a 4.4-acre parcel to the south, on which CubeSmart would be located, and a 1.8-acre parcel to the north, on which the new senior care center would be located. In 2018, the former J.R. Jones Fixture Company building was converted into a self-storage facility, now known as CubeSmart. The request requires approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning of the northern parcel from Industrial to R5, Single and Physical Disability Residential Housing. If the Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, and subdivision are approved, the applicant intends to submit a separate request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for a long-term care facility in the R-5 zoning district as well as a variance to the 30-foot rear yard setback requirement. The application that was submitted included a conceptual site plan and examples of building plans. The 21,390 square foot building would consist of 32 private suites, 20 of which would be assisted living units and 12 of which that would be devoted to memory care. The proposed site is one of the few pieces of vacant land in the city that has not been developed. It involves challenges relating to its location, access, configuration, and topography. If the guided land use is to be changed from Industrial to R5, Single and Physical Disability Residential Housing, staff requested that the applicant demonstrate that the proposed building and use can fit within the lot. After reviewing the conceptual site plan, staff believes it will be possible; however, there are concerns relating to access, loading, deliveries, and snow storage. These concerns will be more thoroughly addressed when the applicant applies for a Conditional Use Permit and variance. V. Zoning Analysis A. Plan Description 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment The subject site is presently guided for industrial use in its zoning classification as well as the city’s Comprehensive Plan. The proposed facility does not fit either, thus requiring a Comprehensive Plan amendment and zoning amendment, changing the guided use of the parcel to R5, Single and Physical Disability Residential Housing. Such changes are made at the discretion of the Planning Commission and City Council. Staff believes the proposed change would result in a compatible land use arrangement within the context of the site and would not overburden city services. The applicant has elected to apply for the Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, and subdivision at this time to determine if their project will be acceptable at this location. If these requests are approved, the applicant intends to submit a separate request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and rear yard setback variance. It is required that Metropolitan Council and adjacent governmental units review any amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Because the property is bordered on the west by the city of Crystal, it is not eligible for an administrative review by Metropolitan Council and the adjacent community review requirement cannot be waived. The planning consultant spoke with Metropolitan Council’s sector representative for New Hope and was Planning Case Report 19-08 Page 3 5/31/19 informed that Metropolitan Council will not accept comprehensive plan amendment requests at this time as the city’s 2040 Plan is presently under review and has yet to be formally approved. The city’s Land Use Plan can be incorporated into the resubmission of the full 2040 Comprehensive Plan document to the Metropolitan Council. Metropolitan Council is allowed up to 120 days to review comprehensive plans once they are determined to be complete. Formal approval will not occur until Metropolitan Council has approved the city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The planning consultant was informed that notification requirements for the proposed amendment need only to be provided to the city of Crystal. If the Planning Commission and City Council support the land use change, city staff will request that these reviews be expedited in order to streamline the process for the applicant. It is anticipated that Metropolitan Council’s review will take at least 60 days, meaning that the request could be approved in early September. It could also take up to 120 days, meaning that the request would not be approved until November. 2. Subdivision A review of the submitted preliminary plat drawing indicates that the following information must be provided with the submission of a final plat: (1) Subdivision name (2) Lot and block numbers (3) Property line drainage and utility easements (4) Access easement description 3. Site Plan The city requested that the applicant demonstrate that the proposed building and use can fit within the lot. A conceptual site plan and examples of building plans were submitted. The configuration of the building would require a variance for a 16-foot rear yard setback (30- foot required); which staff believes could be justified by the size and configuration of the lot. The proposed site is challenging for development due to its location, accessibility, configuration, and topography. The site is bordered by an industrial use with a significant amount of vegetation to the east. As previously stated, the applicant only intends to pursue the site plan review and variance request if the Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, and subdivision are approved. The proposed site plan meets minimum lot area and width requirements. The concept plan includes 24 parking stalls, one of which is designated as a handicap stall, meeting minimum parking requirements for a long-term care facility. Turning radiuses for garbage trucks, ambulances, and 26-foot delivery truck vehicles are demonstrated on the plans. A 55-foot circular pick-up and drop-off lane is proposed near the center of the main entrance. Stormwater treatment, snow storage, lighting, grading, pedestrian accessibility, loading, building materials, and all other standard site plan review criteria will be reviewed if the Planning Case Report 19-08 Page 4 5/31/19 applicant applies for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and rear yard setback variance in the future. 4. Impervious Surface Maximum City Code limits the amount of impervious surface allowed on industrial parcels to no more than 80% of the lot area. The lot on which the new senior care center would be located does not exceed 80% impervious surface; however, the applicant must show that the 4.4-acre parcel to the south would remain in compliance with this requirement. 5. Park Dedication Fees The city requires the dedication of parkland or fees to fund them as a result of higher demand associated with new development. The dedication of parklands or payment of cash in lieu thereof is required for platting, re-platting, subdivision, or lot division allowing the development of land for residential, commercial, industrial, or other uses or combination thereof. The city is categorizing the proposed subdivision as industrial, which is subject to a fee of $5,000 per acre, resulting in a total fee of $9,000. 6. Employment The developer anticipates the facility would result in at least 25 full and part time jobs within the city. The building would staffed 24-hours a day, seven days a week. B. Zoning Code Criteria 1. Subdivision and Platting Purpose. It is the purpose of this chapter to make certain regulations and requirements for the subdivision and platting of land within the city pursuant to the authority contained in Minn. Stat. 462.358, which regulations the city council deems necessary for the health, safety and general welfare of this community. It is also the purpose of this chapter to safeguard the best interests of the city and to assist the subdivider in harmonizing his interests with those of the city at large. Findings. Approval of the preliminary plat is subject to the final plat including the subdivision name, lot block and numbers, property line drainage and utility easements, and an access easement description, to be reviewed and approved by the city attorney. It must include a shared access maintenance agreement that outlines the long-term maintenance and upkeep responsibilities of each property for the shared drive. The applicant must also demonstrate that the 4.4-acre parcel to the south does not exceed impervious surface maximums and pay park dedication fees. 2. Rezoning Any request to change the zoning classification of a property requires City Council approval. Criteria. The Planning Commission and City Council shall consider possible effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: Planning Case Report 19-08 Page 5 5/31/19 (1) The character of the area has changed to warrant consideration of an amendment. Findings. The proposed site is irregularly shaped and presents a shallow lot depth that is further reduced by the severe topography along the east side of the lot. This complicates the site for potential industrial land uses. Any potential development would be restricted in size and operations, limiting uses that would be feasible. The building to the south was recently converted into a self-storage facility as the Planning Commission and City Council recognized the changing environment for industrial development and uses. The industrial land uses to the north and south are low intensity and the topography on the east side of the lot presents a significant physical separation from the adjacent uses. The site fronts Winnetka Avenue North to the west, which is comprised of single-family homes. The senior care facility will be compatible with this residential neighborhood. As an age restricted housing facility, the resident occupancy tends to be more confined and less impacted by adjacent land uses. (2) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official city comprehensive plan. Findings. The New Hope 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides this property for industrial uses consistent with its current zoning. The proposal allows the Planning Commission and City Council the opportunity to consider the city’s land use assumptions. The Comprehensive Plan has policies and housing goals that can support the land use change and development of alternative housing types in order to meet the city’s regional housing and population forecasts. C. Design and Review Committee The Design and Review Committee met on May 16, 2019. The committee was generally supportive of the request for rezoning, subdivision and platting, and the Comprehensive Plan amendment. D. Approval 1. Type of Approvals a. Preliminary and Final Plat b. Rezoning 2. Timeline a. Date Application Received: May 10, 2019 b. End of 60-Day Decision Period: July 9, 2019 Planning Case Report 19-08 Page 6 5/31/19 c. End of 120-Day Decision Period: September 7, 2019 IV. Notification Property owners within 500 feet of parcel were notified by mail, land use petition signs were placed on the property, and a legal notice was published in the SunPost newspaper and on the city’s website. Staff received some inquiries regarding the project, but no objections to the use. VI. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the rezoning and subdivision the northern portion of the parcel located at 3216 Winnetka Avenue North in order to construct a 32- unit senior care center, with the following conditions of approval: 1. Approval of preliminary plat is subject to the final plat including the subdivision name, lot block and numbers, property line drainage and utility easements, and an access easement description. 2. The plat and title are subject to review and approval of the city attorney. 3. The plat is subject to the review and approval of Hennepin County. 4. Applicant shall pay a park dedication in the amount of $9,000 prior to recording the final plat. 5. Applicant shall demonstrate that southern 4.4-acre parcel does not exceed impervious surface maximums. 6. The requested rezoning of the 1.8-acre parcel shall not take effect until the requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan has been formally approved by Metropolitan Council. If approved by the City Council, the applicant intends to submit a separate request for a CUP to allow for a long-term care facility in the R-5 zoning district as well as a variance to the 30-foot rear yard setback requirement. Attachments • Hennepin County property map • Application and preliminary plat (May 10, 2019) • Concept plan and traffic movements (May 21, 2019) • Email to Mayor Hemken (May 22, 2019) • Northwest Associated Consultants memorandum from Alan Brixius (May 29, 2019) • Stantec Consulting Services letter from Chris Long (May 16, 2019) • West Metro Fire-Rescue District letter from Shelby Wolf (May 15, 2019) Hennepin County Property Map Date: 5/30/2019 Comments: 1 inch = 400 feet PARCEL ID: 2011821230018 OWNER NAME: 3216 Winnetka Ave N Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 3216 Winnetka Ave N, New Hope MN 55427 PARCEL AREA: 6.23 acres, 271,308 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: $4,374,848 SALE DATA: 02/2018 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed ASSESSED 2018, PAYABLE 2019 PROPERTY TYPE: Industrial-Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $4,100,000 TAX TOTAL: $164,470.90 ASSESSED 2019, PAYABLE 2020 PROPERTY TYPE: Industrial-preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $4,920,000 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 t Basic Fee Deposit Land Use Petition Case # ______________________ Signs(s) Planning Deadline _____________ _________ _________ ___________ Receipt # ____________________ _________ _________ ___________ Received by ____________________ _________ _________ ___________ Name of Applicant: Phone:___________________________________ Applicant Address: _________________ _______ _ Street Location of Property: _______________ PID:_________________________________ Legal Description of Property: _______________________________________________________________________________ OWNER OF RECORD: Name: ______________ _______ _ _ Address:___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Home Phone: _________________________ Work Phone: ________________________________ Fax: ____________________ Applicant's nature of Legal or Equitable Interest: _____________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Type of Request: (pertaining to what section of City Code) ___________________________________________________ ______________________________________ ___________ Please outline Description of Request: (use additional pages if necessary) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Why Should Request be Granted: _______________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Attach narrative to application form if necessary) City of New Hope Community Development 4401 Xylon Ave N • New Hope MN 55428 • Phone: 763-531-5110 • Fax: 763-531-5136 • newhopemn.gov Application to Planning Commission and City Council Joshua Davis, Manager Hampton Senior Care of New Hope, LLC Suite Living Senior Care of New Hope, LLC 1341 County Rd D Circle E Vadnais Heights, MN 55109 STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:City of New Hope May 6, 2019 PROJECT NAME:Suite Living Senior Care of New Hope PROPERTY ADDRESS:xxx Winnetka Ave N., New Hope, MN APPLICANT:Hampton Senior Care of New Hope, LLC 1341 County Rd D Circle E Vadnais Heights, MN 55109 Joel Larson:651-248-6785 Joel.hamptoncompanies@gmail.com DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Hampton Senior Care of New Hope and Suite Living is proposing to develop a memory care and assisted living community to serve the care needs of the elderly citizens of New Hope and those with elderly family members in need of memory care and assisted living services. Suite Living Senior Care of New Hope community will feature a total of 32 private suites with 20 of them providing assisted living services and the other 12 providing memory care services. The assisted living residents will be able to enjoy a home-like atmosphere in a setting that allows them the freedom to participate in many amenities that not only help assist them in their daily care needs but also provide them with a higher quality of life than that offered in a more institutional setting. The memory care residents are provided with their own secured area of the building that has its own separate amenities like a congregate dining room sunroom, activity/craft area and a secure outdoor porch. These residents benefit from a life enrichment program that is specially designed for residents with Alzheimer’s and Dementia. At Suite Living Senior Car of New Hope our goal is to provide our residents with the right care at the right time. Building Description: Total Land Size: 1.84 Acres-Approx. Building Size: 21,390 Sq. Ft. Occupancy: 32 Private Suites Floor 1: 20 Assisted Living Units / 12 Memory Care Units Parking and Access: Hard Surface Parking (25 stalls, 1 designated handicapped will be designed with dimensions and area in accordance with state law) will provide parking for resident friends and family members along with Suite Living Senior Care staff. Since none of our residents drive there will not be a significant need for parking. Analysis currently and forward The difference between transient building occupants i.e.: those driving and with cars and fixed immobile occupants i.e.: residents 32 residents at any one time (immobile) 3 to 5 employees 1 to 3 visitors for a total of 4 to 8 transient occupants There will be a circular drive through turn around with a covered walkway to the entrance of the building which has a small portico which extends from the vestibule entry over the walkway and partially into the circular driveway. The portico will allow for enough clearance to allow for emergency vehicles to pass and thus be able to enter and exit the site freely. Illumination: Lighting from the installation of outdoor flood or spot lighting and illuminated signs shall be of an intensity that is reasonable for the purpose served and will be appropriately shielded minimizing the effects on the use and enjoyment of adjoining properties. Architectural Design: The building will combine stone, residential exterior materials, columns, roofline gables, extending porches and entrances to the building. The overall look is themed after a residential building providing a feeling of warmth and comfort for the residents. CONCLUSION: Thank you for your time to review our proposal. Suite Living Senior Care of New Hope will provide great economic benefits to the city and community with 32 assisted living and memory care suites, 25 plus full and part time jobs with annual payroll of $750,000 and a significant contribution to the tax rolls for this property and provide services to the residents of the City and surrounding area. The opportunity for the city to provide senior care options in a very demanding market well into the future is a compelling reason to approve this application. The project is designed and intended to accommodate the needs of development for benefit to the community, as Suite Living’s high level of care, access to hospice and respite will bring. Great care has been taken to make the building attractive both as a city and neighborhood friendly addition, utilizing high quality finishes like LP smart siding, colored hard shingle in the staggered edge notched panels, smoked glass in the fake dormers, cultured stone accents and wainscoting, an extensive landscape plan with special attention to maintaining the existing buffer between the neighbors and the building. The project will be designed exceeding the “required” landscaping and other basic requirements of code to upgrade the appearance of the building. The project will manage to maintain the required setbacks from the building to lot line front and back. Landscaping is for decorative purposes and can be moved when and if needed but provides a buffer and ornamental screening. As we work thru the grading plan, special attention will be paid to the drainage and excavation plan to assure that the drainage of this site does not disturb the neighborhood. By approving this project, the city is gaining an attractive, tax paying member to the community in an otherwise idle property. The building is a secure building, noise is not an issue, and the neighbors should appreciate a relatively peaceful co-existence with the new project. The project will bring many benefits to the community of New Hope. Such benefits will include: - Local Chamber of Commerce Membership - Meeting room space including use for business, choir practice, piano recitals, girl/boy scouts, book clubs, churches etc. - Be of host to community events - Offer wellness clinics - Charity drop off site for food and clothing - Partnerships with local daycare centers - Internship options for nursing students - Volunteer opportunities - Promote local businesses We look forward to continuing to work with the City of New Hope during the review and approval process for this application. Please contact me with any questions you have on any item as I would be more than happy to discuss it in further detail. Sincerely, Joel Larson Hampton Senior Care of New Hope Suite Living Senior Care Overview Suite Living Senior Care (“Suite Living”) will feature 32 single-bed units with 18 units dedicated to Assisted Living (“A/L”) and 14 units to Memory Care (M/C”). The building will be a 22,000-sf single-story wood framed structure, with high quality finishes that resembles a single-family residential design. The building includes an in-floor heating system to ensure all residents are always comfortable. The floorplan is an open concept with valuated ceiling in the entrance and all common areas, wide hallways, fire places, fish tanks, and indoor / outdoor activity spaces. The building will take approx. 7 months to construct and the facility will achieve full stabilization by month 12. The completed facility will provide an intimate setting where residents are encouraged to interact with one another in a homelike environment. Facility amenities will include dining facilities, sitting rooms, beauty shop, outdoor living areas, visiting physicians and home cooked meals. The open floor plan ensures ongoing care staff / resident interaction and monitoring. The A/L residents will enjoy a home-like atmosphere in a setting that allows them the freedom to participate in many activities that not only help assist them in their daily care needs but also provide them with a higher quality of life. Each A/L unit is a single-bed configuration providing approx. 300 sf. These units include a microwave, small fridge, resident controlled thermostat for in-room ductless HVAC system (mini-split), and a bathroom with walk-in, no-trip, shower. The M/C residents will be provided with their own code-lock secure area of the building that provides a congregate dining room, activity/craft area and a secure garden/patio area. These residents will benefit from life enrichment programs that are specially designed for residents with Alzheimer’s and Dementia. Each M/C unit is a single-bed configuration providing approx. 280 sf. These units include a care provider-controlled thermostat for in-room ductless HVAC system (mini-split), and a bathroom. Staff at Suite Living are trained in serving those with Alzheimer’s/Dementia, Parkinson’s and other specialty needs usually unmet by other larger senior care facilities. Suite Living will employ approx. 25 full-time equivalent and part-time positions who provide 24 X 7 personalized care to the residents. The 32-unit configuration is a dramatic departure from the senior care industry norm, where bigger is considered better, as a large facility helps create operational economies of scale. This “bigger is better” model has a number of drawbacks, the most important being the impersonalized resident care experience coupled with a lack of flexibility in the overall resident care model. By focusing on this 32-bed strategy, Suite Living can deliver a much more personalized care experience to its residents. This strategy further ensures that the Suite Living resident to care staff ratio never exceeds 8-1 (which is much lower than the typical large senior facility) and allows the care staff to deliver a highly flexible 24 X 7 care offering to the residents including customized group activities and meal plans. Sponsorship Collectively, the Suite Living sponsorship have over 150 years of collective development, construction, operations, and capital markets experience. They have developed and/or built 900 residential singe family lots, 2,000 single-family and hospitality units; 250,000 sf of commercial space; and developed 400 senior housing units; and completed over $1.5 BN in capital markets transactions. Business Plan The Suite Living executive team executes its business plan through 4 highly collaborative divisions being: - Land o Locates and entitles land, completes all reports and studies (Phase 1, soils, land appraisal, market analysis, etc.), completes all engineering and preliminary site planning - Construction o Completes all architectural drawings and constructs a fully completed “turn-key” 32-unit senior care facility - Healthcare o Provides daily management to each senior care facility including sales and marketing, leasing, resident care, property maintenance, etc. - Operations / Administration o Provides all of the above divisions with a comprehensive administrative support solution that includes all aspects of administration, reporting, accounting, and lender relationships Site Selection The Suite Living site selection process is driven by the combination of third-party empirical data and deep senior housing real estate development experience. Once a potential new site is identified, the management team will then run a comprehensive senior-specific demographic profile for the area based on a 3,5, and 10- mile radius. This demographic profile is then over-layed with a comprehensive traffic study to ensure that the site offers maximum suitability and visibility for a facility. Resident Care Profile The Suite Living business model focuses on providing high-acuity specialty care to its residents. The typical resident has an assessment grade of G or higher (based on the industry “A – K” assessment model). As previously noted, the 32-bed configuration allows the care staff to provide a highly customized care package to each resident based on his/her specific care needs. Based on existing facilities under management, the resident mix is forecasted to be 80% Private Pay and 20% Elderly Waiver. The Suite Living care model incorporates an “on-call” doctor model which ensures that each resident receives doctor assistance without having to leave the facility. This model helps significantly reduce the risk of outside viruses being brought into the facility. Rendering and Floorplan Example of Completed Facility - Vadnais Heights Exterior Entrance / Lobby Nursing Station / Assisted Living Nursing Station / Memory Care Activities Area Dining Area / Assisted Living Dining Area / Memory Care Beauty Salon Kitchen Existing Facilities Vadnais Heights, MN - 32 high acuity beds (18 Assisted Living and 14 Memory Care) - L-Shape configuration - Construction start date Dec/16 - Construction completion date Aug/17 - Formal opening date Sept/17 - Current occupancy 100% Roseville, MN - 25 high acuity beds (17 Assisted Living and 8 Memory Care) - L-Shape configuration - Construction start date Dec/17 - Construction completion date June/18 - Formal opening date July/18 - Current occupancy 100% Under Construction – Little Canada, MN Little Canada, MN - 32 high acuity beds (18 Assisted Living and 14 Memory Care) - Straight-Line configuration - Construction start date Nov/18 - Construction completion date Jun/19 Under Construction – North St Paul, MN North St Paul, MN - 32 high acuity beds (18 Assisted Living and 14 Memory Care) - L-Shape configuration - Construction start date Nov/18 - Construction completion date July/19 Additional Facilities Under Development – Ground Breaking 2019 - Inver Grove Heights, MN (Ground-breaking Feb/19) - Brooklyn Park, MN (Ground-breaking Mar/19) - Woodbury, MN (Ground-breaking May/19) - Maple Grove, MN (Ground-breaking June/19) - Anoka, MN (Ground-breaking Aug/19) - Lake Elmo, MN (Ground-breaking Sept/19) - Brooklyn Center, MN (Ground-breaking Nov/19) Facility Locations The map below highlights existing facilities + facilities under construction + future locations currently under contract (i.e. land is under contract and entitlements are being completed) Existing Facility Under Construction Under Development Sponsor Contact Info Please direct questions to Tim C. Eppler - Cell 916-390-0016 - Email tim@cofcapital.com 1 5 1 6 1 7 4 8 " S T A N D S T E A M E R E X H A U S T H O O D 8 9 3 1 3 0 6 0 3 0 7 1 0 D I S P O S E C L E A N T B L E 4 1 5 6 0 H A N D S I N K 3 C O M P S I N K 6 ' - 0 " S H E L F 2 9 ( 2 ) 7 ' S H E L V E S 2 3 RE F R I G E R A T O R 7 5 3 1 FR E E Z E R 7 5 3 1 M O P S I N K 4 1 5 6 0 1 2 1 3 M O P B U C K E T F D 1 1 T R A S H 1 P A N C O L D W E L L 3 P A N H O T W E L L 3 0 6 0 1 A I C E F D F D V E G S I N K U N D E R C T R R E F 3 0 6 0 1 A 3 0 6 0 1 A D R A W E R D R A W E R C O F F E E D R A W E R 1 B 1 B 3 4 3 3 1 8 2 2 2 4 2 5 2 1 2 3 2 8 1 9 3 0 3 1 6 2 9 5 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 2 F D X X X X X I C E / W A T E R M A C T H 6. 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 19 . 0 ' 5. 7 ' 17 . 2 ' 1311 RETAINING WALL, TYP. 8.8' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN CONNECT TO EXIST. WALK FLOATING DECK STRUCTURE (AT FIRST FLOOR ELEV.) RETAINING WALL, TYP. TRASH ENCLOSURE 16 . 0 ' R27. 5 'CONC. WALKCONC. WALK BIT. PVMT., TYP. SHARED PARKING ACCESS EASEMENT, AGREEMENT PENDING SITE MONUMENT SIGN PAINTED CROSSWALK, TYP. 35 . 0 ' 16.0' R 1 4 . 0 ' R14.0' R10.0 ' Project Number: Issue Date: Revision Number: Revision Date: 4931 W. 35TH ST., #200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 952.250.2003 / 763.213.394 www.CivilSiteGroup.com .. .. . . . 3216 WINNETKA AVE N, NEW HOPE MN CONCEPT PLAN P1.019109 05/02/19 . . 0 1" = 40'-0" 40'-0"20'-0" N 1 5 1 6 1 7 4 8 " S T A N D S T E A M E R E X H A U S T H O O D 8 9 3 1 3 0 6 0 3 0 7 1 0 D I S P O S E C L E A N T B L E 4 1 5 6 0 H A N D S I N K 3 C O M P S I N K 6 ' - 0 " S H E L F 2 9 ( 2 ) 7 ' S H E L V E S 2 3 RE F R I G E R A T O R 7 5 3 1 FR E E Z E R 7 5 3 1 M O P S I N K 4 1 5 6 0 1 2 1 3 M O P B U C K E T F D 1 1 T R A S H 1 P A N C O L D W E L L 3 P A N H O T W E L L 3 0 6 0 1 A I C E F D F D V E G S I N K U N D E R C T R R E F 3 0 6 0 1 A 3 0 6 0 1 A D R A W E R D R A W E R C O F F E E D R A W E R 1 B 1 B 3 4 3 3 1 8 2 2 2 4 2 5 2 1 2 3 2 8 1 9 3 0 3 1 6 2 9 5 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 2 F D X X X X X I C E / W A T E R M A C T H Project Number: Issue Date: Revision Number: Revision Date: 4931 W. 35TH ST., #200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 952.250.2003 / 763.213.394 www.CivilSiteGroup.com .. .. . . . 3216 WINNETKA AVE N, NEW HOPE MN CONCEPT PLAN - TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS P2.019109 05/21/19 . . 0 1" = 40'-0" 40'-0"20'-0" N STD. TRASH TRUCK N T S1 1 5 1 6 1 7 4 8 " S T A N D S T E A M E R E X H A U S T H O O D 8 9 3 1 3 0 6 0 3 0 7 1 0 D I S P O S E C L E A N T B L E 4 1 5 6 0 H A N D S I N K 3 C O M P S I N K 6 ' - 0 " S H E L F 2 9 ( 2 ) 7 ' S H E L V E S 2 3 RE F R I G E R A T O R 7 5 3 1 FR E E Z E R 7 5 3 1 M O P S I N K 4 1 5 6 0 1 2 1 3 M O P B U C K E T F D 1 1 T R A S H 1 P A N C O L D W E L L 3 P A N H O T W E L L 3 0 6 0 1 A I C E F D F D V E G S I N K U N D E R C T R R E F 3 0 6 0 1 A 3 0 6 0 1 A D R A W E R D R A W E R C O F F E E D R A W E R 1 B 1 B 3 4 3 3 1 8 2 2 2 4 2 5 2 1 2 3 2 8 1 9 3 0 3 1 6 2 9 5 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 2 F D X X X X X I C E / W A T E R M A C T H Project Number: Issue Date: Revision Number: Revision Date: 4931 W. 35TH ST., #200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 952.250.2003 / 763.213.394 www.CivilSiteGroup.com .. .. . . . 3216 WINNETKA AVE N, NEW HOPE MN CONCEPT PLAN - TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS P2.119109 05/21/19 . . 0 1" = 40'-0" 40'-0"20'-0" N AMBULANCE / METRO MOBILITY VAN N T S1AMBULANCE / METRO MOBILITY VAN VEHICLE DIAGRAM 1 5 1 6 1 7 4 8 " S T A N D S T E A M E R E X H A U S T H O O D 8 9 3 1 3 0 6 0 3 0 7 1 0 D I S P O S E C L E A N T B L E 4 1 5 6 0 H A N D S I N K 3 C O M P S I N K 6 ' - 0 " S H E L F 2 9 ( 2 ) 7 ' S H E L V E S 2 3 RE F R I G E R A T O R 7 5 3 1 FR E E Z E R 7 5 3 1 M O P S I N K 4 1 5 6 0 1 2 1 3 M O P B U C K E T F D 1 1 T R A S H 1 P A N C O L D W E L L 3 P A N H O T W E L L 3 0 6 0 1 A I C E F D F D V E G S I N K U N D E R C T R R E F 3 0 6 0 1 A 3 0 6 0 1 A D R A W E R D R A W E R C O F F E E D R A W E R 1 B 1 B 3 4 3 3 1 8 2 2 2 4 2 5 2 1 2 3 2 8 1 9 3 0 3 1 6 2 9 5 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 2 F D X X X X X I C E / W A T E R M A C T H Project Number: Issue Date: Revision Number: Revision Date: 4931 W. 35TH ST., #200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 952.250.2003 / 763.213.394 www.CivilSiteGroup.com .. .. . . . 3216 WINNETKA AVE N, NEW HOPE MN CONCEPT PLAN - TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS P2.219109 05/21/19 . . 0 1" = 40'-0" 40'-0"20'-0" N 26' BOX TRUCK / DELIVERY TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT 1 N T S126' BOX / DELIVERY TRUCK VEHICLE DIAGRAM 1 5 1 6 1 7 4 8 " S T A N D S T E A M E R E X H A U S T H O O D 8 9 3 1 3 0 6 0 3 0 7 1 0 D I S P O S E C L E A N T B L E 4 1 5 6 0 H A N D S I N K 3 C O M P S I N K 6 ' - 0 " S H E L F 2 9 ( 2 ) 7 ' S H E L V E S 2 3 RE F R I G E R A T O R 7 5 3 1 FR E E Z E R 7 5 3 1 M O P S I N K 4 1 5 6 0 1 2 1 3 M O P B U C K E T F D 1 1 T R A S H 1 P A N C O L D W E L L 3 P A N H O T W E L L 3 0 6 0 1 A I C E F D F D V E G S I N K U N D E R C T R R E F 3 0 6 0 1 A 3 0 6 0 1 A D R A W E R D R A W E R C O F F E E D R A W E R 1 B 1 B 3 4 3 3 1 8 2 2 2 4 2 5 2 1 2 3 2 8 1 9 3 0 3 1 6 2 9 5 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 2 F D X X X X X I C E / W A T E R M A C T H Project Number: Issue Date: Revision Number: Revision Date: 4931 W. 35TH ST., #200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 952.250.2003 / 763.213.394 www.CivilSiteGroup.com .. .. . . . 3216 WINNETKA AVE N, NEW HOPE MN CONCEPT PLAN - TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS P2.319109 05/21/19 . . 0 1" = 40'-0" 40'-0"20'-0" N 26' BOX TRUCK / DELIVERY TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT 2 N T S126' BOX / DELIVERY TRUCK VEHICLE DIAGRAM 1 Jeff Alger From:Barb Hemberger <BHemberger@youroasisadvisor.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 22, 2019 11:07 AM To:Kathleen Hemken Cc:Jeff Alger Subject:Per your request, information on Hampton Senior Living Dear Ms. Mayor, Last week at the New Hope Business Networking Group meeting, you mentioned that Hampton Senior Living was potentially interested in building a new senior living community in New Hope. At your request, I have done some checking and learned that this group is reputable in my opinion. They currently have Select Senior Living in Coon Rapids, which is a very nice facility. See here: https://www.selectseniorliving.net/ It appears they also have properties in Roseville and Vadnais Heights as can be seen on their website: http://www.hamptoncompaniesllc.com/senior‐living.html They do have a track record, which I think you were concerned about, but they do have a small footprint here in the Twin Cities. Let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Barb Barb Hemberger, CSA Certified Senior Advisor Oasis Senior Advisors Northern Twin Cities A 5215 Holly Lane North, Unit 1, Plymouth, MN 55446 O 612.406.1211 E BHemberger@YourOasisAdvisor.com W oasissenioradvisors.com/northerntwincities NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. __________________________________________________________________ 4150 Olson Memorial Highw ay, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Jeff Sargent FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: May 29, 2019 RE: New Hope - Hampton Senior Care Center FILE NO: 131.01 - 19.06 BACKGROUND Hampton Senior Care Center of New Hope has expressed an intent to construct a 32- unit, single story senior care center upon a 1.8-acre site located north of 32nd Avenue North and east of Winnetka Avenue. The proposed 1.8-acre site is presently part of an existing 6.2-acre site (3216 Winnetka Avenue North) which is devoted to an existing industrial use. Reflective of such industrial use, the site is guided and zoning for industrial use. At this point, the applicants have requested action regarding the acceptability of the proposed land use prior to investing in detailed site and building plans. As a result, the following approvals have been requested at this time: 1. Subdivision of an existing 6.2-acre site (3216 Winnetka Avenue North) site into a 4.4-acre parcel and a 1.8-acre parcel. The proposed senior care center would occupy the 1.8-acre parcel while 4.4-acre parcel would continue to be occupied by the present industrial use. 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the guided use of the subject 1.8- acre site from “Industrial” to “High Density Residential.” 3. Rezoning of the 1.8-acre parcel from I, Industrial to R-5, Senior and Physical Disability Residential Housing. 2 If the requested subdivision, comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning requests are approved, the following applications are expected to follow: 1. Conditional Use Permit to allow a “long term care facility” in a R-5 zoning district. The proposed senior care center qualifies as a “long-term care facility” as nursing care is to be provided. 2. Variance to the 30-foot rear yard setback requirement imposed in the R-5 zoning district. A 16-foot rear yard setback has been proposed on a conceptual site plan provided by the applicants. To be noted is that the applicants have submitted a concept plan which demonstrates that that the proposed senior care center and its accessory uses can effectively be accommodated upon the proposed site. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Description of Proposed Changes. The subject site is presently guided for “Industrial” use. Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Plan), the site is zoned “I” industrial district. The proposed “senior care center” cannot be accommodated by either the existing Land Use Plan or the current zoning designation as each direct industrial use of the proposed site. As a result, a comprehensive plan amendment must be processed to change the guided use of the 1.8-acre parcel to “High Density Residential” use. Also, a zoning map amendment must be processed which will apply an R-5 Senior and Physical Disability Residential zoning designation to the subject site (such that the Land Use Plan and zoning map are consistent). Amendment Evaluation Criteria. Any land use or zoning change is considered a policy decision that rests with the Planning Commission and City Council. According to Section 4-32(c), of the New Hope Zoning Code, the Planning Commission and City Council must consider possible effects of the proposed amendment and its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: (1) The character of the area has changed to warrant consideration of an amendment. Comment: In consideration of the character of the area , the following items are considered relevant: 3  The proposed site is irregularly shaped and present s a very shallow lot depth that is further reduced by the severe topography along the east side of the lot. This complicates the site for industrial land uses. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to determine if this site is suitable for future industrial development or if the change in land use is appropriate. If the site is kept for future industrial development , the City must consider the type and range of uses that would be permitted in the I , Industrial zoning district and might fit within the physical constraints of this site.  The industrial site to the south recently transitioned to a self-storage facility. Recognizing the changing environment for industrial development, industrial uses and industrial locations , this transition was found to be acceptable to the Cit y.  While the site is bordered on three sides by industrial use s (and zoning designations), severe topography on the east side of the lot presents a physical separation from the industrial uses to the east. The self-storage area to the south is a low intensity land use and will not create compatibility issues. The industrial land use to the north is also considered a low intensity industrial use.  The site borders and receives access from Winnetka Avenue. West of Winnetka Avenue is a single-family residential neighborhood. The senior care center is considered compatible with this residential neighborhood (and more compatible than the presently guided industrial use).  As an age-restricted housing facility, the resident occupancy is more confined and less impacted by the adjoining land use operations.  The building configuration lend s itself to the shallow configuration of the site. The applicant has demonstrated, via the submission of a conceptual site plan, that the building can fit on the site. Further, the site plan demonstrates that access, off-street parking, and on-site traffic circulation of delivery vehicles, ambulances and garbage trucks etc. can be accommodated. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to determine if the aforementioned conditions represent changes in the character of the area that warrant a land use and zoning change. As noted, the applicants have demonstrate d (via the submission of a conceptual site plan) that the proposed building and its site operation s can reasonably fit on the lot and meet applicable Code requirements. 4 (2) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides th e subject property for industrial uses which is consistent with current zoning. The proposed senior care center use provides an opportunity for the City to test its land use assumptions. If the Planning Commission and City Council believe that the change in land use is inappropriate, the Comprehensive Plan provides both the land use map and policies that may be used to defend the presently guided use (and not changing the land use and zoning designation). If however, the City finds the project to be desirable at this location , the 2040 Comprehensive Plan also has policies and housing goals which can support the land use change and the development of additional alter native housing to meet local needs and to satisfy New Hope’s regional housing and population forecasts. Metropolitan Council Review Process. Because the subject property is bordered on the west by the City of Crystal, the requested comprehensive plan amendment is not eligible for an administrative review by the Metropolitan Council (typically 15 days). Also, as a result of the sites adjacenc y to the City of Crystal, the adjacent community review requirement (of the Metropolitan Council ) cannot be waived. With this in mind, the following procedure must be followed. 1. City Officials make recommendation on amendment application and direct City Staff to distribute to adjacent and affected jurisdictions for review and comment (up to 60 days unless comments are received prior to such deadline). 2. Received comments are considered by City Officials. 3. City adopts resolution authorizing the amendment to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review (up to 60 days). 4. City Staff submits the requested amendment to the Metropolitan Council for approval. Subdivision. The subject 1.8-acre site presently does not exist; the applicant has submitted a preliminary plat to create two new lots. This is needed to create a legal description to which the requested R-5 zoning designation can be applied, In regard to the proposed subdivision of the subject property, the following comments are offered: 5 Submission Requirements. In review of the submitted preliminary plat drawing the following information must be provided with the submission of a final plat.  Subdivision name  Lot and block numbers  Property line drainage and utility easements  Access easement description Park Dedication. The newly created lot will be subject to park dedication requirements. The amount of such dedication has yet to be determined. Industrial District Lot Requirements. A determination must be made that the proposed subdivision will not result in the creation of any nonconforming conditions. Within I, Industrial Districts, a minimum lot area of one acre and a minimum lot width of 100 feet is required. Both proposed lots meet such requirements. It also appears that the existing structure upon the lot will meet applicable I, Industrial District setback requirements. To be noted is that the I, Industrial District imposes a maximum impervious surface coverage requirement of 80 percent. Considering that proposed 1.8 -acre subject site presently contributes significantly to the amount of green s pace upon the existing site, the applicants shall provide a calculation of the amount of impervious surface coverage which will remain on the 4.4-acre lot 1. Also, to be noted is that the minimum lot requirements of the I, Industrial District exceed those imposed in the R-5, Senior and Physical Disability Residential Housing District. Thus, under the initial I District zoning, the proposed 1.8-acre lot will meet or exceed the following requirements imposed in the R-5 District: Lot Area: 1,000 square feet per unit Lot Width: 100 feet Concept Plan. Appropriately, the applicants have submitted a conceptual site plan which demonstrates an ability to accommodate the proposed senior care center upon the subject 1.8-acre site. The proposed senior care center includes 32 private suites. Of the 32 proposed private suites, 20 are to be assisted living units while the 12 remaining units would be devoted to memory care. The proposed care center building measures 21,390 square feet in size and is to be a single story in height. 6 While no formal action is to be taken at this time on the submitted site plan, t he following comments are offered and should be addressed by the applicants as part of future conditional use permit processing: Site Access. The subject 1.8-acre site is to be accessed via an existing access along Winnetka Avenue. Such access is located within the adjacent 4.4 acre parcel and thus, will be shared with the adjacent industrial use. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, a shared access agreement must be provided subject to review and approval by the City Attorney and recorded with the county. Off-street Parking Supply. As indicated, the proposed senior care center includes 32 private suites. Of the 32 proposed private suites, 20 are to be assisted living units while the 12 remaining units would be devoted to memory care. The submitted concept plan illustrates a total of 24 off-street parking spaces one of which is to be devoted to use by disabled persons. According to the Ordinance, long term care facilities (nursing homes) must provide one off-street parking space for each four beds for which accommodations are offered, plus one space per each two employees. According to the applicant, a maximum of five employees will be on the premises at one time. This equates to a total off-street parking supply requirement of 13 stalls. Setbacks. The applicants will be requesting a variance from the 30-foot rear yard setback requirement imposed in the R-5 zoning district. In consideration of the City’s variance evaluation criteria, Staff feels that the following findings could justify approval of the requested setback variance:  The subject site is bordered on the east by an industrial use and a significant amount of vegetation. In this regard, the proposed 16-foot setback is not expected to impact the character of the area.  The proposed senior care center building measures 300 feet in length. The proposed 16-foot setback applies to only 70 feet of such building length. The balance of east the building elevation (230 feet) meets the 30 -foot rear yard setback requirement. Pick-up and Drop-off Activities. As shown on the submitted site plan, a circular pick- up/drop-off lane drop is proposed near the care center’s front entrance. The pick- up/drop-off lane exhibits a diameter of 55 feet. The applicants have submitted traffic movement diagram which demonstrates that the proposed pick -up/drop off-lane can accommodate ambulance and metro mobility van turning maneuvers. Trash Handling. A trash handling area is illustrated near the southwest corner of the building. Appropriately, a trash handling receptacle(s) is to be stored within an enclosure which will be screened from view (from Winnetka Avenue). The 7 applicants have submitted a traffic movement diagram which demonstrates that turning movements of a 30-foot long garbage truck can be accommodated. Loading. The submitted site plan does not illustrate a designated loading area. It is anticipated that this facility will have commercial kitchen and will have need of deliveries. Some concern exists whether delivery vehicle movements can be accommodated within the drop-off area near the senior center’s front entrance. In this regard, it is suggested that consideration be given to modifying the trash handling area in the southwest corner of the site to also accommodate deliveries. It is understood that such a change may impact the configuration of the stormwater pond located south of the senior center building. As a condition of conditional use permit approval, the applicants must address the accommodation of loading and delivery activities upon the site. Sidewalks. The submitted site plan illustrates sidewalks on the north, south and west sides of the senior center building. Connections to the Winnetka Avenue sidewalk are proposed along the north and south sides of the site. For convenience purposes, consideration should be given to also providing pedestrian connections (crossings) to the Winnetka Avenue sidewalk near the building’s main entrance. Snow Storage. As a condition of conditional use permit approval, the applicants must address the management of snow storage upon the subject site. Grading, Drainage and Utilities. The subject site includes some significant topography and slopes downward from northwest to the southeast. In this regard, a significant amount of grading will be required to accommodate the construction of the senior care center. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities will be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer as part of the forthcoming conditional use permit application. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the preceding review, the following is recommended: Subdivision Approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The subsequent final plat shall include the following information: 8 a. Subdivision name b. Lot and block numbers c. Property line drainage and utility easements d. Access easement description 2. Park dedication requirements of the City shall be satisfied with the submission of the final plat. 3. Applicant shall demonstrate that the existing industrial building on the 4.4-acre lot 1 meets the Industrial District hard cover requirements. 4. Applicant shall provide an access easement description to the city for the review and approval of the City Attorney. Said access easement shall be recorded against the property with the recording of the final plat. The access easement shall include a shared access maintenance agreement that outlines the long-term maintenance and upkeep responsibilities of each property for the shared drive. 5. Comments of other City Staff. Comprehensive Plan Amendment A decision regarding the desired use of the subject property (Industrial or High Density Residential) is considered a policy decision to be determined by City Officials. Staff does, however, feel the proposed change will result in a compatible land use arrangement within the site’s context and will not overburden City services. If the City supports the Land Use Plan change from “Industrial” to “High Density Residential” use, it is recommended that the City Council authorize Staff to distribute the Comprehensive Plan amendment to affected communities and agencies for review and comment. Upon conclusion of the community reviews authorize staff to submit the Comprehensive plan Amendment, including any comments received from adjacent jurisdictions, to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. Rezoning If the City supports the requested Land Use Plan change, Staff recommends approval of the rezoning of the 1.8-acre parcel from I, Industrial to R-5, Senior and Physical Disability Residential Housing subject to the following conditions: 1. The City approves the requested preliminary/final plat (to create a legal description to which the rezoning can be applied). 9 2. The requested rezoning of the 1.8-acre parcel shall not take effect until such time as the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment has been formally approved by the Metropolitan Council. Cc. Stacy Woods Christopher Long, City Engineer Michael Larson, Metropolitan Council Sector Representative Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 May 16, 2019 File: 193804506 Attention: Jeff Sargent Community Development Director City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Reference: Hampton Senior Care – 3216 Winnetka Avenue – Initial Plan Review Dear Jeff, We have reviewed the redevelopment plans submitted by Hampton Senior Care for 3216 Winnetka Avenue North as received on May 10, 2019. Following are our initial comments and/or recommendations. Preliminary Plat 1.Provide drainage and utility easements. 2.Provide existing easement information and conditions of site. Conceptual Site Plan – C2.0 1.Provide truck turning movement details. 2.Provide ADA pedestrian ramp access adjacent to handicap parking stalls and at the parking lot crossing north of the driveway entrance. Storm Water Management Comments 1.This property is located within the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and does require a plan review. 2.Provide storm water calculations. 3.Provide details on how the infiltration/filtration requirements are being achieved for the site. 4.Provide soil boring information. 5.Existing drainage issues and concerns are known for the neighboring property at 3209 Winpark Drive. Storm water improvements, storage, treatment, and overflows require further review and understanding. May 16, 2019 Mr. Jeff Sargent Page 2 of 2 General Comments 1.Provide plans on the following: existing conditions, site grading and drainage, utilities, site details. 2.Provide additional detail on utility improvements and connections. 3.A storm water maintenance agreement is required for the storm water pond and infrastructure. A sample agreement can be provided by the city. 4.Hennepin County review is required. a.Hennepin County is currently reviewing a 4-lane to 3-lane conversion on Winnetka Avenue. 5.Provide record plans or as-built drawings following project completion, as required by engineering. If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (651)604-4808. Regards, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Christopher W. Long, P.E. c. Bernie Weber, Dave Lemke, Megan Hedstrom, Jeff Alger, Dean Blom – New Hope; Alan Brixius – City Planner; Shelby Wolf – West Metro Fire; Kellie Schlegel, Ann Dienhart, Tyler Johnson, Lucas Miller – Stantec. CITY OF NEW HOPE 4401 XYLON AVENUE NORTH NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA 55428 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 2, 2019 City Hall, 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER The New Hope Planning Commission met in regular session pursuant to due call and notice thereof; Chair Schmidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Scott Clark, Jim Brinkman, Matt Mannix, Chris Hanson, Tom Schmidt, Roger Landy, Bill Smith, Matt Korkowski Absent: Michael Redden Also Present: Jeff Sargent, Director of Community Development; Jeff Alger, Community Development Coordinator/ Management Analyst; Stacy Woods, Assistant City Attorney; Al Brixius, Planning Consultant; Jessi Weber, Recording Secretary NEW BUSINESS None PUBLIC HEARING Planning Case 19-04 Item 4.1 Chair Schmidt introduced Item 4.1, a conditional use permit (CUP) amendment to expand use of outdoor athletic stadium, 8230 47th Avenue North, Robbinsdale Area Schools, petitioner. Mr. Jeff Alger, Community Development Coordinator/Management Analyst, gave background on the case. In February, the city received a request from Robbinsdale Area Schools for an amendment to the existing CUP, which was originally granted in 1994. The request was presented at the March 5, 2019 Planning Commission meeting and was tabled to allow the applicant to come back with further information requested from the commission. The current CUP allows for unlimited non-athletic community events with the following restrictions. 1) At least 50% of participants must be district residents. 2) Audience must be comprised of at least 50% district residents. 3) Limited to youth participation (up to 18 year of age). 4) PA system may not be used more than 2 times per year. 5) Events must conclude by 9:30 pm or 9:00 pm on Saturday, Sunday, or holiday. The applicant anticipates events such as youth & adult soccer, football, and lacrosse games, arts and craft fair, and one “Movies in the Park” event in the summer, which would require the use of the city’s audio system. Robbinsdale Area Schools has submitted a revised application for the April 4, 2019 meeting. Next, Alger explained the changes the applicant made from the March 5, 2019 meeting. The user requirements of the stadium did not change since the March meeting. The PA system usage has been modified to a maximum of 8 events per year, between June 1 and August 15, and only on Saturdays from 1-6 pm. The PA sound levels would be lowered for smaller group sizes. Stadium lights are not allowed for the renters to use. Parking is limited to the south lot. Groups requiring more parking 2 Planning Commission Meeting April 2, 2019 would not be allowed to rent the stadium. Renters are required to clean up all trash and debris from the area after their event. A deposit will be required with the facility rental and if trash is not removed , the deposit will be retained. A site supervisor would be onsite with each rental to ensure proper clean up. A new scoreboard/videoboard has been included with the revised application. Renters would only be able to use the scoreboard and not the videoboard. The scoreboard and videoboard would be used for school sponsored events only. The scoreboard will adhere to all the city’s light ordinances. Alger concluded that proper legal notice and mailing notice were given. Staff did receive feedback regarding this planning case. Comments and concerns focused on the use of the PA system, trash, noise, and traffic. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission review and offer comment and open the public hearing for comments. When Chair Schmidt questioned whether any of the Commissioners had any questions for staff, no one did. Chair Schmidt then invited the applicant to the podium. Kristine Wehrkamp, Executive Director of Community Education, and John Oafkee, Activities and Athletic Director, Cooper High School, 8230 47th Avenue N approached the podium. Ms. Wehrkamp provided a recap of the changes based on the feedback received at the March meeting. The first change regarded the unlimited use of PA system, which was not an acceptable request. Use of the PA has been limited to Saturdays from 1:00 pm – 6:00 pm from June 1st through August 15th, only if a renter requests the use of the PA system; if no request is received, the PA would remain idle. State law states that alcohol is not allowed on school property throughout Minnesota. The site supervisor will monitor for alcohol use and if alcohol is found and if the issue escalates, the Police Department will be called. The offending group will no longer be able to rent the facility again. The district is trying to align the stadium use with how the community gyms are used. Renters are required to pay a deposit and if trash is not cleaned up, the deposit will be retained and the group would not be rented to in the future. Parking is limited to the south lot; if a renter requires more parking, they would be not be allowed to rent the facility. No amplification would be coming through the scoreboard. Commissioner Brinkman asked for clarification on which lots parking would be allowed. Ms. Wehrkamp stated the New Hope Learning Center parking lot could not be used for parking, only the south lot is allowed. Commissioner Brinkman asked Mr. Oafkee how many soccer fields are at Cooper. Oafkee explained there are three fields; the three baseball diamonds are converted for lower level boys soccer, the northern baseball diamond is converted to girl’s lower level soccer, and the main field at the stadium. Commissioner Brinkman asked if that is enough space for soccer tournaments. Mr. Oafkee responded two of the fields would not be regulation sized for varsity games. Chair Schmidt clarified the specific soccer use would be located at the main field, to which Mr. Oafkee agreed. 3 Planning Commission Meeting April 2, 2019 Commissioner Smith asked if hours of use are adjustable. If the rental time could end at 5:00 pm to allow nearby residents to have supper without the potential of hearing the PA system. Mr. Oafkee said they had the cutoff time of 6:00 pm to take into consideration meal times for residents. If 5:00 pm ends up being a more preferable time, Oafkee said that is agreeable. Commissioner Korkowski asked if the PA system could be used for whatever the renter needs it for or if the use is limited. Mr. Oafkee responded the PA system would be used for whatever the rental group needed. Most likely, the PA would be used for announcing of games. Commissioner Smith asked for the PA system volume levels to be tested to ensure they comply with City Code. Mr. Oafkee said a decibel study was done in years past and the school district would be open to looking at the levels again and plan to lower the sound levels for smaller groups. Robbinsdale Area Schools wants to work with the city to ensure things are done correctly. Currently speakers are directed towards the bleachers in an attempt to mitigate sound disturbances to neighboring properties. With the comments regarding the noise of the PA system, it is something the school district needs to look into. Chair Schmidt addressed the flyer that was circulated to properties neighboring the school. He gave recommendation that flyers should include accurate information with specific facts to back up the claims. This will prevent people from making assumptions on what the actual project is. Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Mannix, to open the Public Hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. Brad Johnson, 8300 49th Avenue N, New Hope, suggested the Planning Commission pay attention to everyone’s property address, as each person is affected by the CUP amendment differently. Mr. Johnson wanted to know what the rental rates would be, what the revenue is allocated to, and if the wear and tear of the facility has been factored in with the process. Paul Solmon, 8231 50th Avenue N, New Hope, expressed the PA system used for non-school district sponsored events is undesirable. Trash and traffic negatively affect the neighborhood. The school has consistently not abided by the prior CUP requirements and feels the amendment should not be granted because of this. Outside groups renting a facility do not care as much about the space as residents do. Mr. Solmon wants to know what the training and qualifications the site supervisor will have, what the revenue is allocated to, and why Armstrong High School is not renting any space. Joe Inserra, 4940 Xylon Ave N, New Hope, wants to make sure the deposit amount is large enough to encourage proper cleanup. He provided a picture of trash in the parking lot, which is a common 4 Planning Commission Meeting April 2, 2019 occurrence. Mr. Inserra stated he submitted the photo to the school board, school staff, and city council. The only response he received was from one City Council member and received no response from the school. Trash is in every parking lot on the property and not just the south lot. Daryl Fields, 8224 49th Avenue N, New Hope, questioned what hours the field could be used Monday through Friday. He also wanted to know what rental revenue is allocated to, if taxpayers would be responsible for the repair and replacement of items from the use of outside groups, and how property values would be affected. Mary Arnold, 8000 47th Avenue N, New Hope, wanted to know how many times the school thinks the stadium will be used and suggested trash along the street should also be the responsibility of Cooper High School. Michelle Urbancic, 4509 Aquila Avenue N, New Hope, wants to see the numbers regarding light and sound levels to ensure everything related to the CUP are at the levels they should be. James Gabrielson, 8208 49th Avenue N, New Hope, expressed concern with the potential for alcohol use on school grounds in association with rentals. Julie Solmon, 8321 50th Avenue N, New Hope, wanted to know which other schools are currently renting facilities and what the revenue will be used for. Willie Howard, 8816 35th Avenue N, New Hope, made comments from the perspective of the Assistant Principal, Head Football Coach, and of a resident. This CUP amendment would allow the opportunity for adults to stay in this community to utilize the field and do fundraisers and games instead of going out of the district. Amira Friedson, Wisconsin and 49th Avenue N, wanted to know if the revenue would be enough to cover costs of repairs to the stadium and stated the PA system is being utilized too much. Stephanie Cook, 7636 Angeline Dr, New Hope, expressed appreciation in the district coming back with modifications to their application. She said the requirement to have 50% of audience be part of the district is difficult to enforce and many family and friends that attend games are not part of the district. Other districts rent facilities to outside groups and this is already done with the community gyms. Dan Smith, 4608 Aquila Ave N, New Hope, said it would be nice to know what the numbers are in regards to revenue and costs. He also inquired about waivers of liability for groups and adults using the facility. Val Skarphol, 8308 47th Avenue N, New Hope, stated the traffic noise is 5 Planning Commission Meeting April 2, 2019 disruptive to neighboring residents. She extended appreciation to the couple who walks the school property almost every day to pick up trash. It was also noted that drivers very regularly drive through the stop sign and the Police Department should monitor that intersection. Matthew Rucker, 4909 Wisconsin Ave N, New Hope, explained that even with having windows closed, the PA system is still heard. He asked if this CUP amendment were approved, would there be a limit to the number of times the school district can request amendments in the future. Kay Deutsch, 4913 Zealand Ave N, New Hope, wondered why the scoreboard is included in the amendment request. She felt that is something the school district handles and is not related to the CUP. Ms. Deutsch also questioned what the financial profit will be used for and who would benefit from it. Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Clark, to close the public hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. Commissioner Clark explained to the audience that any questions related to revenue and what those funds are used for is no business of the City or Planning Commission, therefore has no factor in the decision making process. If the residents would like that information that is something that can be directed to the School Board. Director Sargent reviewed the questions from those in the audience to provide answers. The first speaker asked about rental rates. Kristine Wehrkamp stated there are rental fees for the facilities that have been approved, though she did not have them with her to give the exact dollar amounts. The rental is based on how many hours, group size, etc. The school district has tried to break even with facilities and has been unable to do so in the past few years. Robbinsdale Area Schools is hoping this request will result in the athletic stadium rental being a community builder and trying to make the facilities available to others. The “Movies in the Park” event is another attempt to create a community event for many to enjoy. Director Sargent explained how the “Movies in the Parks” works. Normally, the city attempts to hold three movies per year at Civic Center Park. With the park being under construction this year, there will be no “Movies in the Park” events. The city is collaborating with the school district to offer a “Movies in the Park” event to make it available to the community. There are no fees for these events. The city pays the licensing fees to show the movies, and any donations or sponsorships received go towards the licensing fees. These are not moneymaking events, just a fun way to bring the community together. The second speaker asked about the authority and training a site supervisor would have and why this sort of rental is not being done at Armstrong. Kristin Wehrkamp said the site supervisor is a paid staff person. An administrator handles school sponsored events and the site supervisor handle the other events. When groups are utilizing the gym 6 Planning Commission Meeting April 2, 2019 space, a site supervisor is used to ensure everyone is behaving according to the rental agreement, which includes no alcohol being used on the property. The site supervisor asks renters to leave, or call the appropriate people if the situation warrants, if rules are not followed. They would also lock the facility after the rental period. Renters will be required to provide their own insurance as part of the rental agreement. Ms. Wehrkamp stated the discussion to offer this type of rental is starting at Armstrong in the upcoming weeks. The third speaker expressed concern with the current CUP stipulations not being followed in regards to trash removal. It was suggested the deposit be significant enough to encourage groups to clean up after their events. Ms. Wehrkamp stated she did not have the numbers in front of her. If groups do not clean-up, they will not be allowed to rent in the future. The fourth speaker wanted to know what times the athletic stadium could be used Monday through Friday. John Oafkee provided a response in that field use could be from 9 am – 9pm and lights would not be allowed during this time. The PA system could also not be used. School programs use the stadium extensively during the week, so not much time is available during the week for rentals. The speaker also wanted proof on how this amendment would no t negatively affect property value. Mr. Sargent replied there are many factors that contribute to property values. It is hard to pinpoint if one specific factor will affect the property value negatively or positively. In the past five years, everyone’s property values have increased. The fifth speaker inquired how the traffic from rentals would impact the neighborhood and if a traffic study has been done. Director Sargent replied that the road was reconfigured to accommodate the school. The new roadways are sized appropriately to accommodate the traffic. The speaker also wanted to know if the stadium would be used every day of the week. Mr. Oafkee said he has had four inquiries for rentals which include youth summer lacrosse camp and a men’s pickup soccer group on Sundays. He has had no inquiries that would need the entire parking lot. The speaker also asked that trash cleanup along the street be considered. The sixth speaker wanted to know what the light and decibel levels are and how they compare to city code. They also wanted to know how the school determines what size of group the PA system would be turned down for. Mr. Oafkee said they would need some help to obtain those numbers. Decibel testing has been done in the past, speakers are directed towards the bleachers, and there is a setting on the PA system to automatically adjust the levels based on group. The seventh speaker inquired on the potential for alcohol use on school property. Ms. Wehrkamp had addressed that topic earlier in the meeting. The eighth speaker asked if athletic stadium rental has been done at 7 Planning Commission Meeting April 2, 2019 other school districts and has it been successful. Mr. Oafkee said the other school districts that he is aware of that utilize stadium rentals include Minnetonka, Hopkins, Wayzata, Burnsville, and Osseo. The ninth speaker inquired on rental revenue usage and wanted the number of PA system uses reduced to less than eight times. Mr. Oafkee said they would work with the city for a recommendation as to an acceptable number. The tenth speaker had questions relating to revenue and the potential for liability issues. Ms. Wehrkamp stated the renter is required to provide liability insurance as part of the rental agreement. Stacy Woods, assistant city attorney, said most rental agreements include the waiver of liability and there is no way the fees would radiate back to taxpayers. She also brought up the fact that the handling of litter is very clearly addressed in the CUP language and it is laid out who is responsible for cleanup. The school district should take the issue seriously. Director Sargent said any CUP contains conditions of approval. If those conditions are not followed, there is the potential for the council to revoke the CUP. The city can only respond and address issues, such as the trash at the school, if made aware of the issue. In over 5 years of working at the city, Sargent stated he has never received a single complaint regarding trash at the school. Residents can call, email, mail, or utilize the complaint feature on the website to inform city staff of any issues. The eleventh speaker had concerns with traffic and people running the stop sign. Sargent said those would be forwarded to the Police Department for them to look into. The twelfth speaker asked if there is a limit to the number of times someone could bring a CUP back to the city for amendments. Sargent stated that would be based on each situation. Many factors are considered including the applicant, residents, and the overall good of the city. The thirteenth speaker had questions regarding rental revenue and why the scoreboard has been added to this CUP amendment. Sargent stated when there is a big enough change it requires a conditional use permit amendment. The proposed scoreboard is a big enough change from the current scoreboard, which results in the need for a CUP amendment. Al Brixius, city planner, wanted to address noise and light. The noise code uses the MPCA standards measured at property line at the adjoining property. The school district should do the test to verify if they are abiding by the requirements. Scott Clark stated section (e)2 already addresses the noise requirements in the existing CUP. Commissioner Hanson expressed concern with the school district not being in compliance with the current requirements and them still asking for these amendments. He questioned what steps would be taken to enforce those existing conditions. Sargent stated it is enforceable in 8 Planning Commission Meeting April 2, 2019 relation to the CUP if it can be proven trash is from a specific rental. Sargent clarified there is one conditional use permit for the property that has had amendments over the years. If there is a trash issue, it could be directed to the rental portion of the CUP. Jeff Alger stated the ordinances in the City Code address trash for any property in the city. It is enforceable from a code enforcement perspective. If the city receives a complaint, then the code enforcement inspector can look into the issues. Motion by Commissioner Clark, seconded by Commissioner Hanson, to reopen the Public Hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. Paul Solomon, 8231 50th Avenue N, New Hope, asked for clarification if there were two separate CUPs for the property. Sargent stated the school use on the land is only permissible through CUP. There is one CUP that has been amended over the years. Al Brixius stated there is only one CUP for the property. Motion by Commissioner Clark, seconded by Commissioner Landy, to close the public hearing. All present voted in favor. Motion carried. Motion Item 4.1 Motion by Commissioner Clark, seconded by Commissioner Landy, to table for future discussion Planning Case 19-04, a conditional use permit (CUP) amendment to expand use of outdoor athletic stadium, 8230 47th Avenue North, Robbinsdale Area Schools, petitioner Voting in favor: Clark, Mannix, Hanson, Schmidt, Landy, Korkowski Voting against: Brinkman, Smith Absent: Redden Motion approved 6-2 Chair Schmidt stated the case will be brought to the April 22, 2019 City Council meeting. COMMITTEE REPORTS Design and Review Committee Item 5.1 There are two applicants attending the Pre-Application meeting. There is the potential for the meeting to be held on April 18, 2019. Staff will update the Planning Commission closer to the date. Codes and Standards Committee Item 5.2 There currently is no meeting scheduled. NEW BUSINESS None OLD BUSINESS Approval of Minutes Item 7.1 Motion by Commissioner Landy, seconded by Commissioner Brinkman, to approve the Planning Commission minutes of March 5, 2019, Motion carried. ANNOUNCEMENTS Director Sargent stated at the next council meeting the Planning 9 Planning Commission Meeting April 2, 2019 Commission is to provide an update on what the commission has done over the last year. Chair Schmidt was unavailable to attend the council meeting and Vice Chair Clark agreed to do the presentation. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission meeting was unanimously adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jessi Weber, Recording Secretary