Imp. Proj. #679
COUNCIL
REQUEST FOR ACTION
OIigtnatlng Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section
Public Works June-26-2000 Development & Planning
Item No.
By: Guy Johnson By: 8.3
RESOLUTION APPROVING BID AND AW~DING CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF PUBLIC WORKS ADDITION AND RENOVATIONS TO HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 671 & 679)
REQUESTED ACTION
Staff recommends that Council review the bids received for the proposed Public Works building
addition and renovations. If the base bid and alternates one through four bids are acceptable to
the Council} staff recommends awarding a contract to Hunerberg Construction Company in the
amount of $894,384.00 for Projects 671 and 679.
BACKGROUND
The New Hope Public Works Facility was built in 1980 with a 1,800 square foot repair shop.
The proposed shop addition will allow staff to move all service work into the expanded repair
shop area from the parking garage and outside areas. The improvement has been considered
on two other occasions, 1991 and 1997.
The Council appr9ved contracts to TSP ONE1 Inc., for architectural services and to E&V, Inc.,
to be the owner's representative for the proposed project on March 13, 2000. Schematic
designs were approved March 27, 2000, and the Council approved specifications on May 22,
2000.
If a contract is awarded to Hunerberg Construction Company, they are proposing to begin
construction the first part of August and substantially complete the project by January 2001.
The final layer of asphalt for the repair shop approach, the landscaping, and seal coating the
parking and storage lots would be completed late spring or early summer 2001.
FUNDING
Hunerberg Construction bids: Shop Addition Base Bid
Sprinkler Alternate 1
Garage Ventilation Alternate 2
Garage Roof Alternate 3
Garage Floor & Drain Alternate 4
r:dt (t:,
MOTION BY , ')f;YJ1(__YJf!71/ SECOND BY {u:Y7.fI'/,
'O'1J.jl /7 ~ /7m 'l5
TO: fA ):,' I / / ~:l/.!..} {})U (J I: - / [I
/ \ jJu fHNIJf /r() (! /JfVJJ:uuJznv if; f9~ 1Y J
RFA-OOl
I: RF A\Pubworks\671 &679AwardingContract
Request For Action
Project 671 & 679 Award Contract
June 26, 2000
Page 2
Total project cost including estimated administrative costs would be $1,101,913.00. This is
approximately three percent under the architect's estimates included in the May 22 Council
packet Shop Addition Base Bid $615.872.00
Sprinkler Alternate 1 $ 9,689.00
Garage Ventilation Alternate 2 $ 82,053.00
Garage Roof Alternate 3 $3111670.00
GaraQe Floor & Drain Alternate 4 $112,609.00
$1,131,893.00
Figures above include estimated administrative costs.
This project was carried over to the 2000 Capital Improvement Program with funding coming
from the Central Garage Replacement Fund.
ATTACHMENTS
Memorandums from the Owner's Representative and the City's Assistant Attorney, a copy of
the resolution, and a copy of the bid tab are attached.
I:RF A\Pubworks\671 &679AwardingContract ..
RESOLUTION NO 00- 105
RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
PUBLIC WORKS ADDITION AND RENOV ATION
IMPROVEl\ffiNT NOS. 671 and 679
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of New Hope as follows:
1. That bids for the construction of the Public Warks building addition and
renovation, hnprovement Nos. 671 and 679 were duly opened at the New Hope City Hall, 4401
Xylon Avenue North, at 11:30 o'clock a.m. on the 15th day of June, 2000, as heretofore
authorized by this Council.
2. That advertisement for bids for the construction of said improvement was
published in the New Hope-Golden Valley Sun-Post, the official newspaper of the City, on the
31St day of May. 2000, and in The Construction Bulletin on the 26th day of May, 2000.
3. It is hereby found and determined by this Council that the bid of Hunerberg
Construction Company for the construction of said projects in the amount of $894,384.00 (Base
Bid plus Alternates!, 2, 3, and 4) is the lowest responsible bid submitted for the construction of
said improvement; that TSP One, Inc., Architects and Engineers for the City on said projects,
have recommended to this Council the said low bid for the award of the contract for the
construction to the designated lowest responsible bid.
4. The Mayor and Manager are authorized and directed to enter into an improvement
contract for the construction of said improvement in the name of the City with the lowest
responsible bidder, subject to the said contractor furnishing a public contractor's surety bond,
conditioned as required by law.
Adopted by the Council this 26th day of June , 2000.
%Y!fd~
W. Peter Enck, Mayor
Attest: ~1 :' ~U-
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
&11 rt{!3
COUNCIL ()) /1- tart?
REQUEST FOR ACTION
Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section
D
Public Works \, .. June 24, 2002 Consent
By: {~!; Item No.
Sy: Guy Johnson 6.5
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN REQUIRED UNDER THE WETLAND
CONSERVATION ACT
REQUESTED ACTION
Staff is recommending that the Council approve the Wetland Replacement Plan for the Hidden Valley Park
Improvements.
BACKGROUND
The reconstruction of the pond at Hidden Valley Park will impact 11,532 square feet of wetland. The Wetland
Conservation Act requires wetland replacement in the ratio of 2: 1 replacement, or 23,064 square feet of wetland. Acting
on behalf of the City of New Hope, Bonestroo has prepared the necessary Wetland Replacement Plan Application and has
submitted it to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Basset Creek Watershed Management Commission} and
Hennepin Conservation District for review and comment. No comments nor suggested revisions were received.
As the local governmental unit (LGU) administering the Wetland Conservation Act, New Hope is required to approve the
Wetland Replacement Plan. The development of this plan is a requirement of the Wetland Conservation Act.
ATTACHMENTS
A cover prepared by the engineer and resolution are attached.
MOTION BY J SECOND BY
/u
TO: ;/J"vJ o l~ -~ C1
I: RF A\Pubworks\2002\71 OApprovingWetlandReplacementPlan
.-
CITY OF NEW HOPE
RESOLUTION NO. 02- 98
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN
REQUIRED UNDER THE WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
WHEREAS) THIS represents approval of the Wetland Conservation Act Pennit for the Hidden Valley Park
Improvements made this 24th day of June, by the City of New Hope as the Local Government Unit
Administrating the Wetland Conservation Act. The City of New Hope is the project sponsor and herein
after is referred as the IIApplicant II
WHEREASl Applicant has submitted a Wetland Replacement Plan Application proposing to fill for berms and
excavate for water quality ponding resulting in a impact of 11,532 square feet of wetland; and
WHEREAS, the project has been shown to provide water quality treatment for downstream wetlands as required in
the Suriace Water Management Plan and by the Basset Creek Watershed Management Commission:
and
WHEREAS, Wetland Conservation Act Requires wetland replacement of 231064 square feet to meet the 2:1
replacement ratio requirement and the Applicant has provided replacement credits of 28, 1 09 square
feet of wetland replacement, and
WHEREAS, the Local Government Unit sent the application out for review to the Department of Natural Resources,
Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission} Hennepin Conservation District and requested
comments by June 7,2002. As of June 8,2002 no comments were received.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA:
the City of New Hope as the Local Government Unit administering the Wetland Conservation Act approves the
Wetland Replacement Plan Application FOR THE Hidden Valley Park Improvements. The Applicant shall make the
following declaration as to restrictions and covenants for the Replacement Wetland. The restrictions and covenants
described below shall run with the land and shall be binding on the landowner of the replacement wetland.
1. Applicant is responsible for maintaining the size and type of the Replacement Wetland, as specified in
the replacement plan approved by the LGU and on file at the office of the LGU. Declarant shall not make any use of
the Replacement Wetland which would affect the functions and values of the wetland as determined by Minn. Rules
part 8420.0540, subp. 10 and as specified in the replacement plan or bank plan.
2. Applicant is responsible for the costs of maintenance, repairs, reconstruction, and replacement of the
Replacement Wetland which the LGU or the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources may deem necessary to
comply with the specifications for the Replacement Wetland in the approved replacement plan or bank plan.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, : and Minn;sota this 24th Day of June 2002.
...--, ,/ !' / ...'
C /~. / .... ~ . --'
;tl ~t~ -~~
Mayor
Attest: tIL1L~. ;{17U-
City Clerk J
JL]J Bonestroo Bonestroo, Rosene. Anderlik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
and Employee Owned
Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E. · Marvin L SorvaJa. PE. · Glenn R. Cook. P.E. · Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. ·
III _ Rosene Jerry A. Bourdon. RE.
1\11 AnderJik & Senior Consultants: Robert VI. Rosene. P.E. · Joseph C. Ander/ik, PE. · Richard E. Turner, PE. · Susan M. Eberlin, C.PA.
Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordon. PE. · Robert R. Pfefferle. P.E. · Richard \V. Foster, RE. · David O. Loskota. PE. ·
Associates Mark A. Hanson. P.E. · Michael T. Rautmann. PE. · Ted K. Field. P.E. · Kenneth P. Anderson. PE. · Mark R. Rolfs. PE. ·
David A. 8onesrroo. M.B.A. · Sidney P. \VilJiamson. RE.. LS. · Agnes M. Ring. M.B.A. · AHan Rick Schmidt P.E. ·
Engineers & Architects Thomas W. Peterson. P.E. · James R. Maland, PE. · Miles 8. Jensen. PE. · L. Phillip Gravel Ill. P.E.. Daniel J. Edgerton. P.E. .
Ismael Martinez. P.E. · Thomas A. Syfko. P.E. . Sheldon J. Johnson · Dale A. Grove. P.E.. Thomas A. Roushar. P.E. ·
Roben J. Devery. P.E.
Offices: St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester and \f/ilimar. MN · r~"i1waukee. \)')1 · Chicago. IL
Website: www.bonestroo.com
June 17, 2002
Mr. Tom Schuster
City of NeVi Hope
5500 International Pkwy.
Nev~] rIope, 1'.1N 55428
Re: \Vetland Mitigation Resolution
Hidden \Jalley Park Improvements, City Project No. 710
BRRA # 34-02-134
Dear Tom:
The Hidden Valley Park In1provements include pond and shore land improvements by the
existing pond. Portions of the improvements are within the existing pond/wetland. As a result,
mitigation is required for the disturbed \vetlands.
Overall, the project is an enhancement to the City storm water and ~}etland system. The
improvements \vithin the project account for the required mitigation.
As required by the Wetland Conservation Act, a Notice of Wetland Conservation Act (WCA)
Application for Impacts greater than 10,000 sq. ft. \vas published and distributed to appropriate
agencies for reviev/. A copy is attached. The required comment period has expired with no
comments received.
The City of New Hope is the Local Government Unit (LGU) for administering the WCA in New
Hope. As required, we recommend that the City as LGU approve the \vetland mitigation plan for
Hidden Valley Pond by resolution. -
Sincerely,
BONESTROO ROSE:t\TE ANTIERLIK & ASSOCIA TES, INC.
~~~
Vincent T. Vander Top
Enclosure
2335 West Highway 36 · Sf~' p'aul, MN 55113. 651-636-4600 · Fax: 651-636-1311
COUNCIL
m REQUEST FOR ACTION
't-~ q il.1
WHo
Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section
Public Works \~ June 24, 2002 Consent
/ I Item No.
By: Guy Johnson, Director By: / // 6.11
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDER NO.3 TO THE CONTRACT WITH HUNERBERG
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING ADDITION AND RENOVATION
PROJECT (CITY PROJECT NO. 671 & 679)
REQUESTED ACTION
Staff is recommending that the Council authorize a change order that decreases the Hunerberg Construction
Company contract by $1,213.00.
BACKGROUND
On June 26, 2000, the City Council approved a contract with Hunerberg Construction Company for a building addition and
the renovation of the New Hope Public Works Facility. The original contract amount was $894,384.00. Two previous
Change Orders approved by the Council on November 13, 2000 and February 26, 2001 caused the revision in the contract
amount to $947,181.00
Change Order No.3 represents compensation for additional work in ten areas of the project and credits in two areas.
These changes are as follows:
1. A Code issue required disconnects at the city's welder outlets. $432.00
2. The concrete floors that were removed during demolition were up to 12 inches
thick instead of the normal 5 to 7 inches. $3,054.00
3. Finished end cap cement blocks for two walls in the repair shop that were not
called out on the blue prints. $11376.00
4. General contractors mark up on work that their utility subcontractor completed
for Public Works. (While relocating Public Works water service, buildings main
gate valve in the street failed.) $200.00
MOTION BY {(if iA1JL SECOND BY 77hl-~cl
(;: i:/'juf.yf /rJ!.LY. () d -I () :3 /
TO:
l
I:RFA\Pubworks\671-679\ Hunerberg Change Order #3
.-
RF A, Page 2
Change Order Project 671
June 24, 2002
5. Code issue required that a light switch in the electrical room be relocated. $167.00
6. Installation of additional air lines in the repair shop for staff. $299.00
7. After reviewing the condition of the existing fire protection riser couplings and
valves, fire protection contractor and fire inspector recommended replacing. $3,311.00
8. Code issue requiring GFI outlets in garage. $144.00
9. Costs for de-watering ground water on site during construction excavations. $3,625.00
10. Required corrections to the building's roof. After the installation of the new roof,
it was determined that there are three low spots in the building's existing metal roof
decking. In order to drain the water, it will require corrections to the insulation
thickness of the new roof at these locations. These corrections are necessary
in order to secure the warranty from the roofing materials manufacturer. $7,147.00
11. Credit to reimburse the city for fees paid to JR Optics for sanitary sewer televising. <$968.00>
12. Liquidated Damaqes charqed to contractor. <$20 ~ 000.00>
Total Change Order Credit <$1,213.00>
The new revised contract amount will be lowered from $947,181.00 to $945,968.00.
FUNDING
The project was approved in the 2000 Capital Improvement Program with funding coming from the Central Garage Fund.
ATTACHMENTS
Copies of Change Order NO.3 and Attachment lA' from TSP One (Project Architect), and the resolution are attached.
CITY OF NEW HOPE
RESOLUTION NO. 02- 103
RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO.3
TO THE CONTRACT WITH HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
FOR THE NEW HOPE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING ADDITION AND RENOVATION
PROJECT.
(IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 671 & 679)
WHEREAS, The City has entered into a contract with Hunerberg Construction Company for
the New Hope Public Works Building Addition and Renovation, and
WHEREAS, The City and Hunerberg have negotiated the final changes to the contract
represented by those items listed on "Attachment An attached heretol and
WHEREAS, Attachment A indicates ten areas of additional work for which additional
compensation is due Hunerberg and two areas for which the City is receiving a
credit to the contract price, and
WHEREAS, The net result to the contract price due to Change Order No. 3 is a reduction to
the contract price of $1,213.00, and
WHEREAS, The original contract price and two previously agreed to change orders
established the revised contract price at $947,181.00 and that Change Order No.
3 will reduce the contract price to $945,968.00, and
WHEREAS, Hunerberg has agreed to Change Order No.3.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of New Hope,
Hennepin County, Minnesota:
1. That the City Council hereby approves Change Order No.3 to the contract
with Hunerberg Construction Company, reducing the contract amount by
$1,213.00 to $945,968.00.
2. That the City Manager is authorized to sign Change Order No. 3 to the
contract with Hunerberg Construction Company.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota this 24th day
of June, 2002. -
~~
~ ~L'!.
! . /~), W. Peter Enck, Mayor
Attest: !~UL ~
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
I: RF A\Pubworks\571--679\671 HunerbergC hang eOrder#3 Resolution
ATTACHMENT 'A'
New Hope Public Works
Building Addition and Renovation
TSP Project # 0070]
Type Description No. Type Amount
Proposal Request disconnect at welder outlets #11 ..A. dd 432.00
Hunerberg Change Request removal of thicker concrete slab #13 Add 3,054.00
HunerbergChange Request emu end caps at east and west wall #16 Add 1,376.00
Hunerberg Change Request O&P for main gate valve #18 Add 200.00
Hunerberg Change Request move light switch in elec. Room #19 Add 167.00
Hunerberg Change Request install additional air lines #24 Add 299.00
Hunerberg Change Request fire protection riser couplings, valves #25 _Add 3 ~3 11.00
Hunerberg Change Request GFI outlets in garage #26 Add 144~OO
Hunerberg Change Request water removal from excavations #27 Add 3,625.00
Owner Change Request bill from JR Optics for sewer line #1 Deduct (968.00)
Liquidated Damages Deduct (20,000.00)
Proposal Request Roofing Corrections Add 7.,147.00
Total Change Order # 3 $ (1,213.00)
Note: Final Payment! Close-out on Contract
Direct payment to Commercial Roofing in the amount of $7,147.00
COUNCIL
m"y O~
. REQUEST FOR ACTION
-t-~ q 41
l1' HO
Originating Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section
Public Works . i0 June 24, 2002 Consent
Item No.
By: Guy Johnson By: 1/ 6 .12
RESOLUTION APPROVING F1NAL PAY REQUEST TO HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $46,147.00 FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE
PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY (PROJECTS NO. 671 & 679)
REQUESTED ACTION
Staff recommends that Council pass a resolution to accept Improvement Projects 671 & 679 and approve final payment to
Hunerberg Construction Company in the amount of $46,147.00.
BACKGROUND
The New Hope Public Works facility was built in 1980 with a 1,800 square foot repair shop. The shop addition will allow
staff to move all service work into the expanded repair shop area from the parking garage and outside areas. The
improvement has been considered on two other occasions, 1991 and 1997.
The Council approved contracts to TSP ONE, Inc., for architectural services and to E&V, Inc., to be the owner's
representative for the proposed project on March 13, 2000. Schematic designs were approved March 27, 2000, and the
Council approved specifications on May 22, 2000. On June 26, 2000, the City Council approved a contract with
Hunerberg Construction Company for a building addition and the renovation of the New Hope Public Works garage facility.
The project began in early August of 2000, with a proposed substantial completion date in January 2001. The final layer of
asphalt for the repair shop driveway approach and the landscaping were to be completed in the spring of 2001. Because of
delays due to the removal of additional materials and weather, it was agreed to extend the substantial completion date in
the contract to February 19, 2001. The ineffective management of subcontractors by the general contractor prolonged the
project into the summer of 2001. The actual substantial completion date was July 27, 2001. Because of this unacceptable
delay, the city pursued liquidated damages totaling $31,400.00 for 157 days at $200.00 per day. After receiving this
information, Hunerberg Construction Company informed the Project Architect that they had filed for arbitration to resolve
the issue. A settlement was agreed upon during negotiations between city representatives, including the City Attorney, and
Hunerberg Construction Company's attorney prior to the actual arbitration hearing. Change Order # 3, which includes
$20,000.00 in liquidated damages to the contractor, is the result of the negotiations.
MOTION BY ((it{ it JA j SECOND Byr7wuL-
, .' IV!! Ii / 1_ -Z;
TO: /I/2/i!)-oL /1.1~. {);J-- /0,
- I .
I:Rfa\PubworKs\671 &679\571 FinalPayRequest
Request for Action
Final Pay Request for Project No. 671
June 24, 2002
Page 2
FUNDING
The original contract amount was for $894,384.00. Two previous change orders changed the contract amount to
$947,181.00. A credit of $1,213.00 in Change Order # 3 reduces the final contract amount to $$945,968.00.
Original Contract Amount $894,384.00
Change Order # 1 $46,238.00
Chanqe Order # 2 $6~559.00
Revised Contract Amount $947,181.00
Proposed ChanQe Order # 3 <$1 ,213.00>
Final Contract Amount $945,968.00
Previous Payment Amount -$899~821.00
Final Payment Amount $46,147.00
The city is currently holding $47,340.00 in retainage from the contractor.
The project was approved in the 2000 Capital Improvement Program with funding coming from the Central Garage Fund.
A TT ACHMENTS
The Project Architect's certificate for final payment and the resolution are attached.
I: Rfa\Pubworks\671 &679\671 FinalPayRequest
.'
RESOLUTION NO. 02 - 104
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAY REQUEST
TO HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION COMP ANY FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
(PROJECT NOS. 671 & 679)
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ne\v Hope as follo\vs:
\VHEREAS, Change Order No.3 has been agreed to by Hunerberg Construction
Company reducing the contract price by $1,213.00, and
WHEREAS, based on Change Order No.3 the revised contract price has been
established at $945,968.00, and
WHEREAS, to date Hunerberg has been paid $899,821.00 leaving a final payment due
Hunerberg based on Change Order No.3 of $46, 147.00, and
WHEREAS, Hunerberg has directed the City to pay directly its roofing subcontractor
Commercial Roofing, Inc. $7,147.00 upon completion of the roofing repairs included in Change
Order No.3, and
WHEREAS, Hunerberg is owed the remaining $39,000.00 and should be paid said
amount upon completion of the eleven warranty items and submission of the required
documentation set out in the attachment to the architect's Certificate for Final Payment. It is
estimated these conditions can be completed by the Hunerberg on or before June 28th.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City ofNe\v
Hope as follows:
1. Hunerberg Construction Company shall be paid $39,000.00 upon completion of
the eleven warranty items and submission of required documentation referenced
above. The conditions should be completed and satisfied and payment made no
later than June 28, 2002.
2. Commercial Roofing, Inc. shall be paid $7,147.00 within 30 days of the
completion of the roofing corrections agreed to in Change Order No.3 and upon
receipt by the City of a letter from the roofing manufacturer that all drainage
issues have been satisfied so that the roofrng warranty previously provided to the
City is unrestricted.
1
Adopted by the City Counsel this 24th day of June, 2002.
I~
51;:2. W
w. Peter Enck, Mayor
Attest: tWiLL !.1Zl}~
,
Valene Leone, City Clerk
P:\:\no mey\S AS\Documents\CNH9953 072.00 I reso appro..ing Hunerberg final pay request-doc."f
.' 2
c:> >O~ :.J ?' Y' ~~~~ Q~O () ~ ~ )>
en > ~ 0
4' c ~ ~ ~ tdn~~,..., 0" ~ ~nzo ::::"'0 0 -a
~ g ~ 0 g.~ a: 0 -c
g. ~~ ~ 0 "P OOO~~ ~ "" z ~
:; ~ '? tI:)? ....., "'""':1 ~.-.. ..-.. s; > ~ e
n F; ~ S' ~ ~ ~ S" ~ ~ . ~ ~I ~I 2! @ ~ ~ r ~ gogO ~ c; C
g,) m ~ ~ m
'< ~ r:n => -. ~ ~ 0
o G) ~ ~@~~.~iS: ;;~o~o> 8nOJ~ ClJtr.I ?
tr.....a - g. ot:) 00 ~tT' ="'8 "'1 "" ...... :I: ~ ~tQ ~
..s 0 a ~ cl.~ ~ 0 ~ ~ S' "'l ~ t:1 ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ Q.1 (")
g,) - tT.1 O~fJJs
5"~ r~ ~S ~ ~8~
t.'? e: t"" ~ >< GI c::: fA c: '" g ...., +...... 0 t"" ~ t:r ~ ~S'-i -
< "0 cr' · ~ 00 t"" 8 []Q ~ (j - t1'l El .. 0 f3; a. (J ::r::~~ 0
to 5 0\ () -. ::) G 0 ~ tx:1
CJ c "< ~UJ ~t:lg rn- ?~~8 ~ ~ ~all,'j ~ ~O d I >--3
_CJ (j ~ '0 ,...,. t-..,) co 0 ~~Z Z
a:~ ::r "-' )oo!"t 0 ~ LIl 0 -. w ~ Q t:1 ~ :::0 .?"' ~ tt;3 fd Sb g ~
~~ ~ ~ i-4 1:1 S ~...., CI.J ~ g --- ~ 0 CD (;) ~ t:J ~ o . 2 ~ (j .. )>
"'0 0 ~ C) CLJ ~S' 0 p. ~ B en
o > ~ z ~ ::1. ..:. S @j -l VI la S c.. ::s 00 ~ (1l ~ lh ~ I ~;l>::I: Z
::I Z ~ () 0 (j- 0 to) C'D-"'-~ o~ tA rtr)> a 0
o 0 t"" ...:> '-' ~ ~ + :J. -.J 0 ,..:.. V\ E 16 C
....~ n i-1 l.I! e.. ~ 0 ~ ~ ffi ."
~~ ~ a ~ tT] ~ ~ ~ fg S' o~" ~Z:n L1'c (l) 0
~? ....... ~ z
~ 2 SiC/.) > 0 dG -10 .- ~ ~.
(F"Tl 13~r- m
Q.~ .-< o ~~ 0'" ~- 00 0
~ l~ m 0; d - e. ~
-. - _.
g ~ ;'[0 .....
(\)
c: .." ..., ro+ 0 ):> ~
:; 0 ~ v= v; ~ ~ 0 ."
CD :::0 g..v ~ 0 ...
a~ >- 8.Er - 0
0'";: a .gO < )>
'<m t:1 E5Z
a ~ > ('l) > -I
Oil -
.c - ~ 0
c t::) g' 0
CD ~ Z
~fg fI') E;I; :s.::CJ ~
U"l V. ::tj ~
=3 t....,) t..",) ~-a 0 -n
to ~ &II) ..~ ~ ~
Ul \0 ~ \0 fo.Il ~~ tE 0
Q) . "'"'" -l 0 -.3
g i u. b b (:) CJ q ;0
eo 0 0 0 00 ~
3 . ..;. ~~ ~ -Er'i ~~~~ ~s: ."
"'C (; b ;1:~j trj tv a-j ZUlZ
~~ c !!m ;< ..- CI'J (1) t.n Cb ~
~~~~~ z g :E! ~ ~ g ~
Q. -I tii ~ 0 ::r= S ::r:: s:
> ~:::::: _.~ =
I~ '-0 \0"'::: CQ g ~ ..CD o ...... 0
:; ~ ~ ~ ~~ VI \0 "t:$ (b ~ m
....... l-'" Lh lh U\ ~ ~ ~cn- JD a (tI
0 N '"'t'."J ~ \.0 'to \c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :>> toorj Z
....-1 ...... ~ 0\ 0'\ Q'\ 00 :: Z ~ ,-
0 w w 0 0 QO 0 00 oe ~ ('t) · o. cr- -=I
(") Q 8 8 en :0 0 b 00 8 8 M" t:t =-:
c 0 0 00 00 Vl Ul ~ 0
:3 Be Vl
t....J ~ ~ ~
4' w
=
..... ........ N i-f 0
C ~~x.
~ ~ tI1
:t:i! to (') g OJ ~~~ ~ to. e- ~ ~ = S;:ZCl'.lCl:) to (j "0 e-g g:~ ~ to ~
l m ~. g . ':<: ~~ GI G ;::w '<g&!a "<: 0 iG=o~ E: ~
. . ~
&'~ [J:';tCJ Q~~ ~ :: ~ (') ~ ('"J (') tnQ z: GQ~aS n ~ ~ >-
e. e:,., g o Q 0 ~
_. tQ C'":) ~2~ e e.. G tn."'"'l 0 ::: :::1 n Po) ~ ~ 25 m l--rj b
gat"\> ~d1~~
;12 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 2. ~. ~~. fr to t:t 2:. ~. ~ ~ C)
~~ ~ -qtn ::s _. er p... n I-t~ otz ~ """'" 0 ~
o t:S g n:::_ (J ~ ~8S-~ ~. g: E:i g s S' ::;) ctQ' tri n (j
~~~ ~ 0
s:u - ~~s tr1 0 ~. "'1 = ~ a q ~
~~ i g- ~ ~ :;. o .. p.. >
~:a ~ t;j 1:;1':) :;:d <~(")c. ~
o -l ::!. p.. 0'" g o. (b :;; . . g,.Q8g-n q Z 0 ~
~. ~ OQ t:r" t:S; ::: t:;:; o ~ (i""O s:- ~ 0 ~~~:;:g 0 . . ~ t:tj
o m ;:::roo ~~ t3 a~~g:f:r s 0 ~
t;~ tri <a -- t:;. 00("0 Cl1
o Er ii ~~ t:J o p;'"...0 ~ ("0 ~ 6' 3~B~~ ~ . .. z
o );0 ~. (JQ t-t) (ii' ~ o' g . -
(') :tI E?t;;"S- ::: <::> g- 5" 0 F ~ cr s.CP:sCi) 0 9 Q
= ~ S:S en (t)""1 .:e"
C1l La - . ~ ~ ~ :HI (") 0' ~
3 ~ 05 ~ o~S=-O?6 ........ 0
8 ~ n ~ (') """1 C 0
CD 0 ~;:s~ o~ ~.~o ('b ~e:~~:4. ::J -...J;
o ~ ~ ~ s (:I (J) -.
~~ (1) -. ""t ~~(jg::n ('tI 0
~:o ;1 o .... ~o.!2eo Ol N .-
en :- ~~ ,.. ::::r (") ;~g~~
)>-..J g~ G ~~ g~~~a Er 9'
5.~ ~ ell Q... (") V;' a~::ras- N
~g ~ ~ ~ ()~O""r-;.g o'~ ~ 0 .......
::rm ~~ tx:1 _~ G ~ (ij g.~!lC"o 0 ~
m ~ a '< 0
q ""! 0 ~~ ~S-=: .. cn5":;.s:-
= -< fi f:l ~ 15 ~ ~g.g, .~
t:to ~~ t;j ~::tl ~ S. (") co' G
CO) ::0 o~ ti1~cn~a ~-~~>[ "'0
- ;x;; f-tt.) ~ C )>
~~ &~ ~ :l t::1Q~5'o Q..{) a~=:g r-9- G>
a'ITI ~ft . ::I 0 g.;:3 ~ 0 ~~~_o m
()~q ~ ~ 0 5 ~ rn: -. I-t) 0
3 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~=ro~ ~q S~~~.~ Z
m
,... ;. ffi'[b 51 ~o ~~ ~::+" 0 ~~-gn 0
[~ ...... t:: Q Cll ~ ;;c~~g "11
Q~~ o :::s a ~ ~ 0 DDDDDi
r-UJ t;1 () - t:1 er'S 3 ~ t:t
_:!: ::s"'O -. _Og..C'"
('): Z qP:)tll: ~ a ~ ~1~~)> ~ ~" >t1~
CD G) ~e~ ~ ~~ ff = 0 r4
:s C p.g~ c - :::- ~ s a ""L
;:'3 ~ · tIJ tf.l ~ cr
~ ;t- ... R c. n ~ 0 c.
.... c:::r" ~ ~ ~ CL r:::. 0 S ~RC;-~c.o ~ () ~ g.
~ g a~ ~. ~ Q..EaOo; S' C6 ~...... s
8 s.::::: e-[[~ m _. ~ =r 0 ~... 0
~.% 00. tJl G ~ ~ =tl1o
8 s.a o _." Q.. Z l;1[0'"'c:r('b ~ (tl .. \J
~o ~ ~ r':;)(')oe- o rti r.:t 0.- >
t?l o [~Q ~ ('t>~OQ n tr) G)
t:l :::: 5~=J~
fS c-t-e:- ::~ t::l _Q.. ~ ~ m
0 ~... 5~ g- Q.. -g en
~~ ~ .- n _. ~
::s. ""t __ r:o . 0..
.....~ ~ ~
r) ~
r::t. (:)
:t;:
~~
~ t;-
""'"'
I
,~ I 11
{to
MINNESOTA DEPARTrvIENT OF HEALTH
Division of Environmental Health
REPORT ON PLANS
Plans and specifications on plumbing: New Hope Public Works Building, Addition and Renovation,
5500 International Parkway, New Hope, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Plan No. 010236
OWNERSHIP: City of New Hope, c/o ivls. Valerie Leone, Clerk, Ne\v Hope City Hall, 4401 Xylon Avenue
North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428
SUBrvIITTER(S): TSP One, Inc., Architects and Engineers, 1500 High\vay 52 North, Rochester,
Minnesota 55901
Plans Dated: May 22, 2000; Addenda Nos. 1 through 3; revisions dated September 1, 2000
Date Received: September 6, 2000, July 24, 2000
Date Reviewed: September 21, 2000
SCOPE: This revie\v is limited to the design of this particular project only insofar as the provisions of the
Minnesota Plumbing Code, as amended, apply, and does not cover the water supply or sewerage system to \vhich
this plumbing system is connected. The review is based upon the supposition that the data on which the design is
based are correct, and that necessary legal authority has been obtained to construct the project. The
responsibility for the design of structural features and the efficiency of equipment Inust be taken by the project
designer. Approval is contingent upon satisfactory disposition of any requirements included in this report.
Special care should be taken to insure that the material and installation of the plumbing system are in accordance
with the provisions of the 1vlinnesota Plumbing Code. A copy of the approved plans and specifications should
be retained at the project location for future reference.
INSPECTIONS: All plumbing installations must be tested and inspected in accordance with the requirements of
the Minnesota Plumbing Code. As specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2830, no plumbing work may be
covered prior to completing the required tests and inspections. Provisions must be made for applying an air test
at the time of the roughing-in inspection as outlined in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 2, of the code.
A manometer test, as specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 3, is required at the time of the
finished plumbing inspection. It is the responsibility of the contractor/installer to notify the State Health
Department \vhen the installation will be ready for a test and inspection. To schedule inspections, contact the
state plumbing standards representative for your region, or call the metro office at 1-800-926-6216, or Gary Topp
at 651/215-0841.
REQUIREMENT(S):
1. Sheet P21 0 indicates the installation of draintile around the vehicle lift in Repair Bay No.3. The revisions
dated September 1, 2000, show the draintile discharging to a sump, \vhich discharges indirectly to a vented
floor drain in a storage room. A detail of the vehicle lift \vas not provided. If it is possible that hydraulic
fluid may leak from buried hydraulic cylinders and/or related piping to the draintile, or if fluids leaked from
vehicle maintenance may reach the draintile, the following requirements must be met:
a. Documentation must be provided to this office from the local fire marshall allowing the sump
installation prior to construction.
b. Documentation must be provided to this office from the local electrical inspector allowing the sump
installation prior to construction.
c. The sump pump motor must be explosion-proof.
If no possibility exists for flamlnable liquids or pollutants to reach the draintile, and the sump \vill only
remove groundwater frOITI the vicinity of the lift, the draintile sump may discharge to grade or to the storm
se\ver.
Ne\\7 Hope Public \^/orks Building~ ~A.ddition and Renovation
Plumbing
Plan No. 010236
Page 2
September 21 ~ 2000
2. The draintile sump Intist be constructed in accordance with Millllesota Rules~ plli-I: 4715.2440. ",~.ccessible
gate and check -,/alves must be located on the discharge line of the sump, outside the sump.
j. Based on a horizontal drainage piping slope of liS-inch per foot~ and using Minnesota F..ules,
part 4715 ~271 0:
a. The 4-inch roof drain and leader over Repair Bay No.1, \vhich appears to serve 3~760 square feet or
roof area~ must be pitched at ~-inch per foot or be at least 5 inches in size.
b. The 4-inch roof drain and leader over Repair Bay No.4, \vhich appears to serve 2,160 square feet of
roof area, must b~ pitched at 1/4-inch per foot or be at least 5 inches in size.
4. Sheet P202Rl indicates a tloor drain serving an ice m.achine discharglllg to a tre.nch drain. Qniy TIA"tures
\vhich discharge flammable \vaste may discharge to the interceptor. All other fixtures must be routed
around the interceptor.
5. Sheet P201 indicates fire and domestic \vater connections to an existing singie \~vater service. The
combination fire protectionldolnestic. ,vater sery"ice shall comply \vith the baclcf1o\v protection requirements
or ..A.\\~A-lv114~ Chapter 6 (1990) with the exception that the follo\"ving statement is deleted from
section 6.3: Il.(-\t any time '\vhere the fire sprinkler piping is not an acceptable potable \vater system material,
there shall be a backflo\v-prevention assembly isolating the fire sprinkler system from the potable \vater
syste!n.ll
r The iIlstallation of reduced pressure zone backflo\v preventers is permirred only -vvhen periodic testing is
1""'\
done by a trained backflo\.v preventer tester acceptable to the administrative authority". Testing intervals
shaU not exceed one year~ and records must be kept. i\.li de,rices must be tested after initial installation to
assure that debris from the piping installation bas not interfered \vith the functioning of the device. The
devices shall be overhauled at least once every five years. The instaliation of ne\v .backflo\'v' pre venters must
be at least 12 inches~ but not more than 6 feet above the finished floor or ground level.
7 Double \~~'es ma'/ not be used for draina2:e fittings in the horizontal position (see Minnesota Rules_
part 4715~2420, ;ubpart 3). Proper pipe ~lope C3..t~ot be maintained -on both oime offset branches.
0 It is recommended that a cleanout be Drovided where ne\v \vaste and vent pipinQ connects v,rith existin~
c.
.I. '-'.......
plumbiIlg to facilitate required testing or the nevv" installation.
r-. Plastic pipe illust be iIlstal1ed in ac~ordance \vith Ivfir~Tles0ta B_ules~ part 4715 .0580(F) and part 4715.0600.
"'1
Above-~lade horizontal runs of plastic v,,'aste ~1}d 'vent pipe c.3.!LT}ot exceed 35 reet in total1ength. ~A.bove-
grade ~./ertical stacks constructed of plastic pipe may exceed 35 feet in total height only if an approved
expansion joint is used. Solvent \veld joints in PV~C and CP\iC pipe must include use of a primer \vhich is of
contrast1..t'1g color to the pipe and cement (see lvfinnesota Rules, pfu"'L 4715 .081 O~ subpart 2).
10. l~jl soider and flux used for the potable \vater distribution s:./stems shall contain less than 0.2 percent lead.
Lise of 50-50 solder or flux containing more than 0.2 percent lead is prohibited in potable \vater distribution
s~ystems. A_ny solder other than 95-5 tin-antimony or 96-4 tin-silver must be specifically approved by the
administrative authority prior to use (see Ivlinnesota Statutes~ Section 326.3(1).
New Hope Public Works Building, Addition and Renovation
Plumbing
Plan No. 010236
Page 3
Septeruber 21, 2000
NOTE(S):
1. The scope of this project consists of the addition to and the remodeling of an existing building. The
plumbing installation includes trench drains, a laundry tub, a clothes '~lasher; an eyewash, a draintile sump,
and an internal storm drainage system.
2. This facility is served by existing municipal water and se\ver service connections.
Authorization for construction in accordance with the approved plans may be \vithdrawn if construction is not
undertaken within a period of two years. The fact that the plans have been approved does not necessarily mean
that recommendations or requirements for change will not be made at some later time \vhen changed conditions,
additional information, or advancedkno\vledge make improvements necessary.
Approved:
~?tif~ ~
Bradley C. Erickson
Public Health Engineer
Environmental Health Section
P.O. Box 64975
81. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975
651/215-0853
BCE:mak
cc: TSP One, Inc.
City of New Hope 1/
Mr. Doug Sandstad, Building Official
Plumbing Unit
File
COUNCIL
~.. . ~. .~ REgUEST..FOR,mACTION
Ot1ginatlng Department Approved for Agenda Agenda Section
Public Works March 271 2000 Planning and Developme
Item No.
By: Guy Johnson 8.1
APPROVAL OF SCHEMATIC DESIGN FOR PUBLIC WORKS SHOP ADDITION AND
GARAGE RENOVATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO PRE,PARE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS (PROJECT NOS. 671 AND 679) ~R #~ fr., 7 / ~r -;;~t e K~/9
j
/
REQUESTED ACTION
Staff is recommending that Council review, make any necessary changes, and then approve a
final schematic design for the proposed Public Works addition and renovations project. If
Council approves the schematic designs, staff also request that Council authorize preparation
of plans and specs for Projects 671 and 679. The architectsl E&V, and City staff will be in
attendance to review the proposed design.
BACKGROUND
The Public Works facility was remodeled in 1979. An 11800 square foot repair shop was included
in the original design. The new repair shop addition would have allowed moving all service work
into the repair shop area from the parking garage and the outdoors.
Because of the existing conditions, some of the larger vehicles are unable to access the repair
shop. The current repair shop is only large enough to work on two average sized vehicles at a
time. Therefore, the space is restricted to service work, short term repairs, and police car set-up.
With these s.pace restraintsl larger, long term projects on equipment are unable to be completed
in the repair shop because of the time commitment. Alsol there are more large pieces of
analyzing equipment needed to service and maintain the City's vehicles and equipment that is
continually becoming more sophisticated. This would include an anti-freeze reclaimer, air
conditioner refrigerant reclaimer, multiple computerized analyzers, etc.
This improvement has been considered on two other occasions. Cost estimates were done in
1991 and 1997.
FUNDING
Funding for this project is budgeted in the 2000 Capital Improvement Program.
ATTACHMENTS
Schematic designs are attached along with an estimated budget b
MOTION BY SECOND BY
TO:
~'- ~~~;~~~ ~:":;~~i;:~~,- ;'{~f~ -~~,,~~j.Ji.:f~::~~;}~"{if!'?;i~;:,,]:::,~~:~ :-<"~: :.-~ ~~~i:':'rt:.:~;;':0.;~:;'{;~ RFA-OO 1
I: Rfa\PubWorks\670-B71 SchematicDesign
2000 Edition - Electronic Format
AlA Document G701- 2000
Change Order
PROJECT: CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: OWNER ~
New HODe Public Works Three ( 3 )
Building Addition and Renovation
New HODe. MN
(Name and address) DATE: June 13,2002 ARCHITECT [!J
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: 00701 CONTRACTOR []]
TO CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTDA TE: June 26, 2000 FIELD D
Hunerbera Construction Company
13705 - 26th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55441
{Name and address} CONTRACT FOR: General Construction OTHER 0
THE CONTRACT IS CHANGED AS FOLLOWS:
(Include) ~+1Jere applicable, any undisputed amount attnoutable to previously executed Construction Change Directives.) AUTHENTICA TlON OF THIS
ELECTRON/CALL Y DRAFTED AlA
See Attachment "A" DOCUMENT MAY BE MADE BY USING
AlA DOCUMENT 0401.
The original (Contract Sum) (Cu:J.rJ.nteed ~1aximum Price) was s 894.384#00
The net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 52.797#00
The (Contract Sum) (Cuarantced 1faximum Price) prior to this Change Order was s
947.181 #00
The (Contract Sum) (Cuaranteed 1faximum Price) will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by
this Change Order in the amount of s (1.213.00)
The nev{ (Contract Sum) (Cuaranteed }.1aximum Price) including this Change Order will be $
945.968.00
The Contract Time \ViII be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by Zero ( .Q ) days#
The dale of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is February 19.
2001
NOTE: This Change Order does not include changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or I!!!!!!!I
Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive for II
which the cost or time are in dispute as described in Subparagraph 7.3.8 of AlA Document A.2Ol. ~
Not valid until signed by the Architect, Contractor and Owner. ~, ~ ,:;
....... ....... ..'9
--
@ 2000 AIA@
AlA DOCUMENT G701-2000
CHANGE ORDER
The American Institute of
Architects
1735 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006..5292
@ 2000 The Amencan Institute ot Architects. Reproduction ot the matenal herein or substantial quotation
of its provisions without written permission of the AlA violates the copyright laws of the United States and
will subject the violator to legal prosecution. WARNING: Unlicensed photocopying violates U.S. copyright
laws and will subject the violator to legal prosecution. This document was electronically produced with
permission of the AlA and can be reproduced in accordance with your license without violation until the
date of expiration as noted below. User Document: co#3 revised.doc -.. 6/19/2002. AlA License Number
1102965, which expires on 2/28/2003.
1
ARCH ITECT (Typed name) CONTRACTOR (Typed name) OWNER (Typed name)
TSP One, Inc Hunerberg Const, Inc. City of New Hope
21 Water Street 13705 - 26th. Ave. South 4401 Xvlon Ave. N.
Excelsior, MN 55331 Plymouth, MN 55441 New Hope, MN 55428
~~~i-~j):1~\
(Signature)
~-TO \tN t+J' /7?~/ru:; j)rJAJ//Z L --/. 7)ddJl-d/~
-.... o. ,1:, 'Nl:-~ ~ -
BY BY BY
~~ ill I oy w/~4-/ v.2 ~ /z--dcJ '-
DATE DATE DATE
cg 2000 The Amencan Institute at Architects. Reproduction at the matenal herein or substantial quotation
of its provisions without written permission of the AlA violates the copyright laws of the United States and
will subject the violator to legal prosecution. WARNING: Unlicensed photocopying violates u.s. copyright
laws and will subject the violator to legal prosecution. This document was electronically produced with
permission of the AlA and can be reproduced in accordance with your license without violation until the
date of expiration as noted below. User Document: co#3 revised.doc .... 6/19/2002. AlA License Number
1102965, which expires on 2/28/2003.
2
ATTACHMENT 'A'
New Hope Public Works
Building Addition and Renovation
TSP Project # 00701
Type Description No. Type Amount
Proposal Request disconnect at welder outlets #11 Add 432.00
Hunerberg Change Request removal of thicker concrete slab #13 Add 3,054.00
Hunerberg Change Request emu end caps at east and west wall #16 Add 1,376.00
Hunerberg Change Request O&P for main gate valve #18 Add 200.00
Hunerberg Change Request move light switch in elec. Room #19 Add 167.00
Hunerberg Change Request install additional air lines #24 Add 299.00
Hunerberg Change Request fire protection riser couplings, valves #25 Add 3,311.00
Hunerberg Change Request OFI outlets in garage #26 Add 144.00
Hunerberg Change Request water removal from excavations #27 Add 3,625.00
Owner Change Request bill from JR Optics for sewer line #1 Deduct (968.00)
Liquidated Damages Deduct (20,000.00)
Proposal Request Roofing Corrections Add 7,147.00
Total Change Order # 3 $ (1,213.00)
Note: Final Payment! Close..out on Contract
Direct payment to Commercial Roofmg in the amount of $7, 147.00