Loading...
052389 Planning2. 3. 3.1 3.2 AGENDA SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 23, 1989 CITY OF NEW HOPE, MINNESOTA 4401 XYLON AVENUE NORTH 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PUBLIC HEARINGS Case 89-10 - Request for Preliminary Plat Approval, Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit , Construction Approval 3900 Winnetka Avenue North, Holy Nativity Lutheran Church/All American Self Storage Case 89-11 - Request for Preliminary Plat Approval, Rezoning, Planned Unit Development Conditional Use Permit "Concept Stage" Approval 3540 Winnetka Avenue North, All American Self Storage ADJOURNMENT m.2i )900 nnetka )540 ~innetka Av CITY OF NEW ~{OPE PLANNING CASE REPORT Planning Case: 89-10 Request: Location: PID No.: Zoning: Petitioner: Report Date: Meeting Date: Preliminary Plat Approval, Rezoning, Permit, and Construction Approval 3900 Winnetka Avenue North Conditional Use 17-118-21 32 0002 I-1 (Limited Industrial) Holy NativitY Lutheran Church/All American Self Storage May 19, 1989 May 23, 1989 BACKGROUND The petitioner is requesting approval of a preliminary plat, rezoning of property from I-1 (Limited Industrial) to R-O (Residential-Office), conditional use permit to allow a church in an R-O Zoning District, and construction approval. These requests are made pursuant to Sections 4.202, 4.034, 4.21 and Chapter 13 of the New Hope Code of Ordinances. The petitioner proposes to develop a church in the westerly 4.0 acres of a vacant property currently zoned limited industrial. Property owners within 350 feet of the site have been notified. Staff has received no comment to date. The petitioner met with the Design and Review Committee of May 4, 1989. ANALYSIS Attachment A, a report from the City's planning consultant, is attached. Staff has a few additional comments. Public Streets: The City of New Hope has presented preliminary plans to the Hennepin County Department of Transportation for the Quebec Avenue extension. The plans show the extended alignment with 40th Avenue as it. in~ersec, ts with Winnetka, and an a!tern, ate wfhich shows the off-set intersection preiimin~rypl~t. Hennepin County is in the process of reviewing these plans and has not released comments to date. The County may request that the City undertake a traffic analysis relevant to the proposed off-set intersection. Preliminary Plat: The name "Winnetka Industrial Park" must be changed because the City has a subdivision which currently exists with that name. Water and Sanitary Sewer: Public utilities needed for the project would be analyzed in the feasibility report for Quebec Avenue currently being developed by the City Engineer. The City Engineer's comments are contained in Attachment B. Storm Sewer Improvements: Storm sewer improvements would be constructed as part of the Quebec Avenue intersection. Plans must be reviewed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. The Crystal City Engineer's comments are contained in Attachment C. RECOMMENDATION The proposed extension of Quebec Avenue and the configuration alternatives have an impact on this request. If Hennepin County or the Minnesota Department of Transportation is unwilling to allow an off-set intersection at 40th and Winnetka, then the church property rezoning proposal and the church development is affected. Staff recommends that the planning case be reviewed as proposed. However, staff recommends that any action on the case be tabled until June 6, 1989, so that the Quebec Avenue extension can be reviewed by Hennepin County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Attachments: Attachment A - City Planner's Report, 5-17-89 Attachment B - City Engineer's Letter, 5-18-89 Attachment C - Crystal City Engineer's Report northwes as_sociated ATTACHMENT A consultants, inc. PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: Dan Donahue Curtis Gutoske/Alan Brixius 16 May 1989 New Hope - Holy Nativity Church 131.01 - 89.10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background: The Holy Nativity Lutheran Church has submitted a development application for the construction of a 16,770 square foot church facility located at 3900 Winnetka Avenue (the old Minnegasco site, see Exhibit A). The . development application includes the following requests: o o o Rezoning from I-1 to R-O, Residential-Office. Subdivision approval for a preliminary plat. Conditional Use Permit, to allow for a church facility within an R-O District. As mentioned above, the property requesting to be developed is the old Minnegasco site. The specific church development, however, will only occupy the westerly 4.0 acres of the site with the easterly 9.0 acres to be platted as an outlot. As the City will recall, the subject property underwent a detailed land use analysis and subsequent development recommendation in the recently adopted Vacant Land Study. This recommendation was given under the Site MM analysis. The development application will, therefore, be subject to the findings of the Vacant Land Study as well as the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 4601 excelsior blvd., ste. 410, minneapolis, mn 55416 (612) 925-9420 fax 925-2721 Attached for reference to this report are the following exhibits: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G - Site Location - Preliminary Plat - Grading and Drainage Plan - Utility Plan - Site Plan - Landscaping Plan - Vacant Land Study-Site MM Concept Recommendation: Based upon the review which follows, our office recommends the determination of.the requested rezoning be a policy decision to be undertaken by the Planning Commission and City Council. If it is determined the rezoning is to be approved, we recommend approval of the requested subdivision and conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: The preliminary plat be revised to reflect the street right- of-way configuration of the 40th Avenue extension as illustrated in the Site MM concept plan of the Vacant Land Study. This recommendation is subject to the comments of the City Engineer. .2. The provisions of the northerly Winnetka Avenue access and the cul-de-sac within Outlot A (if deemed needed) are accommodated via temporary easements to be eliminated at the time the 40th Avenue extension is complete. A resolution is made by the Planning Commission and City Council in regards to the plat's lot configuration relative to the development potential of the southwest portion of the Winnetka Properties parcel. If it is found the development potential of the above stated parcel is too restrictive, the preliminary plat must be revised to reflect the lot configuration illustrated in the Site MM concept plan of the Vacant Land Study. The southerly Winnetka Avenue curb cut is closed and access road eliminated. Special approval is given by the City Engineer and City Counci~ for the curb cut off of the 40th Avenue extension. A drop-off area is provided at the main entrance to the assembly hall. Consideration should also be given to a second drop-off area near the day care entrance. 7. The temporary access to Winnetka Avenue (if needed) is increased to 22 feet in width and maintains a five foot setback from the north property line. The comments of other City staff. CASE ANALYSIS Rezoning: The applicant is requesting that the site be rezoned from I-1 to R-O to allow the church by conditional use permit. The consideration of this rezoning remains a policy decision of the Planning Commission and City Council, however, such consideration must evaluate the proposed land use in the context of the following elements: Comprehensive Plan/Vacant Land Study. The Vacant Land Study determined this site (Site MM) to be best utilized for a combination of office, warehouse, and manufacturing uses (see Exhibit the church development. receive their Street that Avenue. G). The particular portion of Site MM where is proposed is recommended for office All of the future uses of the site are to access from a easterly extension of 40th is to loop northward to connect with Quebec While the proposed church is in conflict with the provisions of the Vacant Land Study, there appears to be mixed consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan suggests that the City increase the potential for achieving full development of its existing industrial districts by allowing compatible, non-industrial uses to be developed. These uses include professional offices, restaurants, motels and commercial-recreational facilities. Review of these uses indicate that they provide services that complements the other industrial park tenants and they can compatibly co- exist in the industrial setting. The following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been found to be relevant to the consideration of the requested rezoning and use. Industrial Goals o Provide for a sound industrial base will be stable and on-going. for the City that Concentrate industrial development in the existing industrial parks (Science and Industry Center, Olson, Winnetka). O Fully develop existing industrial parks. Promote continued industrial development in order to create an expanded employment base and opportunity within New Hope. Industrial Policies Continue to maintain and expand, the City's industrial and commercial tax base to assistI in paying for needed services and in reducing tax impact on housing costs. Encourage the development of compatible, non-industrial activities within industrial parks in order to increase the potential ~utilization of undeveloped industrial park land. Identify industrial activities complementary t existing activities and promote and facilitate the development of such industries in New Hope. o Promote the type of maximizes the return facilities and services. industrial development which on City investments in public From the review of the aforementioned policies, it would appear the Comprehensive Plan could be interpreted to be in favor of or against the proposed rezoning and use. Because of this mixed review, an analysis of the compatibility of the proposed land use may serve as a better guide to properly judge the request at hand. Land Use Compatibility. The proposed church would serve as a transitional'use between the potential industrial uses to the east and the existing single family neighborhood to the west. The church's physical characteristics would be similar to that of an office development's (as recommended in the Vacant Land Study), with respect to the building's size, the amount of open space provided, and general amenities of the site. In addition, churches are generally considered a compatible use in adjoining residential areas as they are allowed in all residential districts as a conditional use. Differences lie, however, in the functional relationship of the church with the existing and potential industrial uses to the: north and east. As was found in the case of the Church of the Open Door request last summer, the introduction of an incompatible, non-industrial use into an industrial setting or an area devoted to industrial uses may compromise the integrity of the neighboring industries. The conditions inherent to industrial areas, e.g., noise, dust, traffic, odors, etc. are recognized and are acceptable to businesses that locate there. This is the reason these districts are generally secluded from other less intense uses. This type of land use segregation benefits the industries in that they can freely operate without negatively impacting adjacent land uses. This freedom of operation is an incentive for the attraction of new industries and expansion of existing industries. Industrial parks also benefit from the principal of accumulative attraction, whereby similar or complementary businesses located in a common setting, each benefiting through business interchange among the various industrial uses. Furthermore, the introduction of a church into an industrial setting may present security issues similar to that when S.R. Harris located a non-industrial use (retail sales) into his industrial site at 5100 County Road 18. The introduction of this use into the industrial park was disruptive to the neighboring businesses and presented public safety concerns with regard to traffic circulation and parking. While it is recognized church services most likely will occur during the off-peak operational hours of most businesses, other services provided by a church facility (the proposed day care) will function during the normal operation hours of the adjacent businesses and industries. Conclusion. Based upon the above analysis, we have found the requested rezoning of the subject property from I-1 to R-O, Residential-Office District to be a policy decision of the Planning Commission and the City Council. We take this position as there are many factors that would lead the City to approve the request and many factors that would suggest denial. Because of this, the determination of the rezoning becomes a point of policy for which the City must decide the appropriate direction it must take. Subdivision: Lot Standards. The proposed subdivision (Exhibit B) illustrates one lot to be initially buildable and one outlot. The buildable lot, on which the church is to be developed upon, has been found to satisfy the minimum R-0 District lot standards of 100 feet lot width and 15,000 square feet lot area. Vacant Land Study. Review of the proposed lot configuration, however, does not conform to the lot arrangement recommended in the Vacant Land Study. Within the proposed plat, the property is confined to the boundaries of the Minnegasco site. The Vacant Land Study recommends a lot layout that utilizes both the Minnegasco site and the Winnetka Properties site for development along Winnetka Avenue. This layout was recommended to increase the buildable area across the Winnetka Properties site for which the 40th Avenue extension will be provided. The proposed church property, which will receive significant benefit from this street, is illustrated in the Study to be slightly reduced in area to accommodate the expanded area of the property to the north. With regards to this northern property, ~ it is estimated its resultant size will be approximately 30,000 square feet upon completion of the street extension. This will accommodate an office building of approximately 3,500-4,000 square feet including the required parking and setback areas. This is in comparison to the 6,500 square foot office building upon the 50,000 square foot lot il~lustrated in the Site MM concept plan. It is recommended the applicant provide a conceptual layout of the immediate northerly parcel illustrating its potential for development in conformance with the provisions of the Vacant Land Study. If it is found the development potential of this parcel is at an acceptable level, the lot configuration proposed would be acceptable. If, however, the northerly parcel is found to be too restrictive in size to properly accommodate appropriate uses, the proposed subdivision should be revised to reflect the lot layout of the Vacant Land Study. If this recommendation is chosen, the resultant triangular parcel upon the Minnegasco site should be dedicated as an outlot until the time the property to the north develops for which the two parcels can be combined. Streets. The preliminary plat illustrates a 30 foot street right-of-way along the property's northern boundary culminating in a 60 foot radius cul-de-sac within Outlot A. This right-of- way configuration should be revised to reflect that illustrated in the Vacant Land Study. Specific curvatures and distances of the street right-of-way should be developed in accordance with the City Engineer. If the 40th Avenue street extension and right-of-way acquisition is not to be completed on a similar time table as the construction of the church, then the provision of the cul-de-sac and direct access to Winnetka Avenue should be maintained but via temporary easements. Once the 40th Avenue extension is complete, the elimination of these temporary access facilities must occur. Gradinq, Drainaqe and Utilities. Preliminary grading, drainage and utility plans have been submitted along with the preliminary plat. Th~ acceptability of these documents will be subject to the review of the City Engineer. Conclusion. Based upon the review of the proposed subdivision and preliminary plat documents, the acceptability of the subdivision revolves around the development potential of the Winnetka Properties parcel to the north. Upon a determination to be made by the Planning Commission and City Council, the subdivision may be approved subject to the comments of this report and those of the City Engineer regarding the street right- of-way and the grading and utility plans. However, if it is found the proposed lot configuration is not acceptable, the subdivision shall be required to be revised in accordance with the provisions of the Vacant Land Study and again subject to the comments regarding the street right-of-way and the grading and utility plans. Conditional Use Permit: The acceptability of the conditional use permit (CUP) for the proposed church facility will obviously be contingent upon the acceptability of the rezo~ing and the subdivision request. If, however, these requests are to be approved, the acceptability of the CUP will be subject to the review of the submitted site plan. The sections which follow provide the analysis and review of the subject site plan. Buildinq Setbacks. The proposed placement of the principle building and accessory structure (garage) conform to all applicable setbacks of the R-O District. In addition, the proposed placement of the building would appear to conform to the required setbacks if the subdivision were to be revised in accordance with the Vacant Land Study. This, however, would have to be verified if such revisions are to be required. Buildinq Height. The R-O District allows for buildings up to three stories in height. The proposed church is to consist of a single level with a maximum measured height of approximately 23 feet (as measured to be mid-point of the highest gable). The proposed building height is acceptable. Parkinq. A total of 123 parking spaces have been provided on the site (two of which are handicap spaces). As determined in our previous site plan review (27 April 1989), 122 spaces are required by the Ordinance for the uses of the main assembly hall, the Sunday School, and the proposed day care. As such, the amount of parking provided satisfies the Ordinance requirements. In review of the parking stall size, drive aisle widths and parking lot setbacks, all dimensions have been found to be in accordance with Ordinance requirements. In addition, proper snow storage area has been identified on the site plan. Circulation:. The church has proposed to utilize the existing curb cut along Winnetka Avenue as a second access to the site. In review of this provision, we recommend this access not be allowed and the curb opening be closed. This is recommended due to the poor sight lines that exist along Winnetka at ~%his location and the standing City policy of discouraging individual access points onto a collector street when other alternatives are available. The other alternatives in this case, is the access off of the 40th Avenue extension and the temporary access (if needed) off of Winnetka along the northern property line of the site. The curb cut off of the 40th Avenue extension measures at approximately 30 feet in width. This width will require the special approval of the City Engineer and the City Council. A temporary access has also been illustrated off of Winnetka Avenue (as previously indicated). This access is to only be developed and utilized if the approval for construction of the church is given prior to the development of the 40th Avenue extension. The access must be a minimum of 22 feet wide and must maintain a minimum five foot setback from the side property line. This provisions shall be subject to the further comments of the City Engineer. 40th Avenue Extension. The future right-of-way for the 40th Avenue extension has not been illustrated on the site plan. This right-of-way, when its specific placement is determined, must be identified on the site plan and all subsequent setbacks adhered to. This would include building setbacks as well as parking lot setbacks. Loadinq Area. A loading area has not been identified on the site plan. It is recommended such an area be provided to at least provide a drop-off area for the main church entrance and possibly for an entrance near the proposed day care facility. Such drop-off areas must be properly marked and signed and must not interfere with the use of any of the required parking spaces. To accommodate such drop-off areas, approximately two to three additional parking spaces must be provided elsewhere in the site. Landscapinq. Review of the proposed landscaping plan has found it to be acceptable and in conformance with the minimum Ordinance criteria. It should be noted the applicant has responded to a previous review of the landscape plan in providing additional plant material in front of the building and along the east side of the main parking lot. These additional plantings are found to be acceptable. Trash Facility. The proposed trash facility has also been revised in accordance with the previous review of the site plan. Its location (adjacent to the garage) and enclosure is found to be acceptable. Liqhtin~. The site plan indicates two ground building lights are to be provided to illuminate the Winnetka Avenue facade of the main assembly hall. In addition, a free-standing pole with two lamps located in the center of the parking lot is to illuminate the entire parking area. The Building Official should review this' provision of the lighting plan to determine if this is adequate lighting for this portion of the site. An alternative to better distribute the light might be to place a fixture upon each semi-circular island located at the north and south ends of the parking lot. Conclusion. From the above described review, the submitted site and landscaping plans have been found to be generally acceptable. Revisions must be made with regards to the southerly Winnetka Avenue access and loading area provisions, however, these revisions are relatively minor and can be accommodated through a conditional approval. Therefore, our office recommends approval of the requested conditional use permit subject to the site plan recommendations stated in the "Executive Summary" section of this report and the approval of the requested rezoning and subdivision. cc: Jeannine Dunn Doug Sandstad Mark Hanson American Self Storage/Richard Curry Probe Engineering new hope, minn. ~ 1/~ mi EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATIOI~ IT! "13 33 rn r- LEGAL DESCRIPTION .A. REAS SCALE: l'=SO' PRELIMINARY PLAT WINNETKA INDUSTRIAL PARK Itl Z Z AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN · ~. ,.. VILLAGE BUILDERS . WINNETKA INDUSTRIAL PARK:, ITl /- MH-2 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN WINNETKA INDUSTRIAL PARK II SCALE: 1'=50' rrl I I /* Z 0 '0 Z Z LANDSCAPE .L uJ uJ OFFICE 50O0 NEW CITY STREET 24000 SF. WAREHOUSE 59000 POND MANUFAC' WARE~ 26;O00 ? / CEMETARY (SITE MM CONCEPT) EXHIBIT G - VACANT LAND STUDY Bonestroo Rosene.. Ander. hk & Associates Engineers & Architects ATTACHMENT B Otto G. 8onestroo, RE.Keith A. Gordon, RE. Michael C. Lynch, RE. Philip J. Caswell, I~E. Robert ~ Rosene. RE. Richard L~Z Foster, 'RE.' James R. Maland, RE. Mark D. Wallis. RE. Joseph C. Andedik, RE.Donald C. Burgardr., RE. Kenneth tR Anderson, PE.Thomas R. Anderson. A.I.A. Brai~rd A. Ler~berg, P.E. ? ,Jerry A. Bourdon, ,RE. Keith A. Bachmann, RE. Gary E Rylander, RE. Richard E. Turner. RE.Mark A. Hanson, RE.Mark R. Rolfs, RE. Charles A, Erickson James C. Olson, RE. Ted K. Field, RE. Robert C. Russek. A.I.A.Leo M. Pawelsky Glenn R. Cook. RE. Michael '[ Rautmann, RE. Thomas E. Angus, RE. Hadan M. Olson Thomas E. Noyes. RE. Robert R. Pfeffefle, RE. Howard A. Sanford, RE. Susan M. Ebedin. CRA. Robert G. Schunicht, RE. David O. Loskota, P.E. Daniei J. Edgerton, RE. Marvin L. Sorvala, RE.Thomas ~ Pe/erson, RI:. Mark A. Seip. IRE. May 18, 1989 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue No. New Hope, MN 55428 Attn: Ms. Jeannine Dunn Re: Holy Nativity Church 3900 Winnetka Avenue Our File No. 34 Gen. Dear Jeannine, We have reviewed the above project and recommend the following: 1.) The church is proposed to be located on the Minnegasco property at 3900 Winnetka Avenue. The Minnegasco property incorporates approximately 12.6 acres of which the church is proposed to be located on the westerly 3.7 acres. The drainage on the site is directed to a ponding area located in the southeast corner of 0utlot A. The storage capacity in the pond be- tween 914 and 917 is approximately 2.3 acre-feet which is acceptable based on saturation development for this area. The pond outlet will be con- structed as part of the street construction to Old Dutch Pond located to the north. Ail internal drainage fromthe Minnegasco property and the property to the north will be conveyed by storm sewer located in the pro- posed street discharging to the ponding area. It is recommended the ponding area be constructed as part of the street construction. The plan shall be reviewed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission because it exceeds 5.0 acres. 2.) Sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth exists near the railroad tracks approximately 400' to the north. The sanitary sewer will be ex- tended in the proposed street to serve the church and other developments along the roadway. Water main exists along the north property line of the Minnegasco property which is of sufficient size. The existing water main elevation shall be reviewed in relation to the proposed street grade to determine if reconstruction is required. 3.) It is recommended the extension of Quebec Avenue to Winnetka Avenue be completed in conjunction with the church construction. From an engineer- ing standpoint, the street connection at Winnetka Avenue~ should occur opposite 40th Avenue to the west. Presently Hennepin County is reviewing 28 Page 1. 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, Minnesota S5113 · 612-636-4600 the proposed connection at the common property line between the Minnega§co property and the property to the north. This connection is approximately 235' south of 40th Avenue. It should also be noted the site distance along Winnetka Avenue at 40th Avenue is much better than it is 235, south of 40th Avenue. It is also recommended existing Quebec Avenue south of 42nd Avenue to the existing cul-de-sac be upgraded based on its present condition. The City should also determine if it's desirable to designate the proposed roadway between 42nd Avenue and Winnetka Avenue as a State Aid roadway. If so, it's alignment, grade, width and section must conform to State Aid standards. Easements will be required for the street construction. It is presently felt a minimum 60' wide street right-of-way is required. Driveway access onto Winnetka A~enue shall be reviewed by Hennepin County along with any additional right-of-way dedication on Winnetka Avenue. 4.) Sidewalk construction along Winnetka Avenue abutting the church site is required. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, B0~TR0~ R~E, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, Mark A. Hanson MAH: li INC. 28 Page 2. ATTACHMENT C CITY CRYSTAL 4141 Douglas Drive North · Crystal, MN 55422-1696 · 537-8421 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE May 16, 1989 Ms. Jeanine Dunn City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Dear Ms. Dunn: After reviewing the preliminary documents for the conve- nience center at 36th Avenue and the plat of Winnetka Indus- trial Park, I offer the following comments: - Drainage from the convenience center site at 36th and Winnetka Avenues is a major concern. Run-off from this dense development proposal is to be directed into a 42- inch RCP storm sewer that is already over capacity given the sizeable drainage area it serves. Signifi- cant sewer back-ups are anticipated that will impact the proposed parking area based on its elevation relative to the balance of the overall watershed. ~dditionally, with no plans for future capacity increases to the outlet line in 36th Avenue as it proceeds east, this entire area remains prone to periodic flooding as occurred in July of 1987. Although the center does not contribute greatly to overall run-off volumes, the site will be subject to the area-wide results. - Traffic on 36th Avenue is also a concern given the high volumes and lack of channelization. The proximity of the two westernmost accesses on 36th Avenue to drives across the street will create conflicting movements that could be eliminated by modifying the parking area and utilizing a single access in the middle of the parking area. Ms. Jeanine Dunn May 16, 1989 Page 2 - My two comments regarding the Winnetka Industrial Park both regard drainage. First, Crystal will request development of the detention pond shown at the eastern edge of the plat during the initial development phase to limit downstream impacts. Second, if Quebec Avenue is extended from the north, it is critical there be no reduction in the storage volume of Old Dutch Pond due to its impact on Memory Lane Pond in Crystal. As more detailed development plans become available for either project, I will provide additional analysis from Crystal's perspective as requested. Should you have any questions regarding the above comments, please let me know. Sincerely, William Monk City Engineer WM:jrs CITY OF NEW HOPE PLANNING CASE REPORT Planning Case: 89-11 Request: Location: Preliminary Development Approval Plat Approval, Conditional Use 3540 Winnetka Avenue North Rezoning, Planned Unit Permit "Concept Stage" PID No.: 20-118-21 22 0001 Zoning: Petitioner: Report Date: R-0 (Residential. Office) Holy Nativity Lutheran Church/All American Self Storage May 19, 1989 Meeting Date: May 23, 1989 BACKGROUND The petitioner is requesting preliminary plat approval, rezoning from R-O (Residential-Office) to B-4 (Community Business), and Planned Unit Development Conditional Use Permit "Concept Stage" Approval to allow a shopping center in a B-4 Zoning District. The petitioner proposes to develop a 46,017 square foot shopping center. This request is pursuant to Sections 4.134, 4.19, and 4.202 and Chapter 13 of the New Hope Code of Ordinances. Property owners within 350 feet of the development have been notified. Staff has received no comment to date regarding land use impacts. Staff has received comments relevant to the proposed use of tax increment financing to facilitate the development. A public hearing will be held by the Economic Development Authority (EDA) to consider public comment on the tax increment issues. The site is currently occupied by Holy Nativity Lutheran Church. The church has two buildings which would be removed to facilitate the development. The petitioner met with the Design and Review Committee on May 4 1989. ' ANALYSIS Attachment A is the project narrative submitted by the developer as required by the PUD Ordinance. Planning Case 89-11 Page 2 Attachment B, a report from the city's planning consultant is attached. Staff has a few additional comments. Rezoning: The property has been classified within the following zoning classification: 1956 - Commercial Vacant 1960 - Commercial (west 1/2) Residential (east 1/2) Vacant 1961 - Industrial Church built'in 1961 1979 - Residential-Office Traffic: In considering the land use compatibility of rezoning, staff recommends that the petitioner produce a traffic impact analysis. Such analysis would review on-site conditions as well as the impact on 36th and Winnetka Avenues. Preliminary Plat: The preliminary plat is routine. However, the utility companies and Hennepin County have not completed their review. The plat sho~s an outlot which has no street curb cuts. Therefore, cross easements between the shopping center and the outlot must be a part of the final PUD agreement. Storm Water Drainage The storm water drainage system for the area must be redesigned so that all ponding is done at the northwest corner ponding area. To accommodate all of this run-off, the size of the proposed pond must be increased (See city Engineer's 5-18,89 letter, Attachment C). Staff also asked for comment from the Crystal Engineering staff which is contained in Attachment D. Sanitary Sewer and Water Sanitary sewer and water is sufficient. An additional hydrant for fire protection shall be placed near the southeast corner of the building. RECOMMENDATION Additional information is needed to fully consider the rezoning and preliminary plat approval requests. Staff recommends approval of the "Concept Stage" planned unit development conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: Planning Case 89-11 Page 3 That a traffic impact analysis be provided by the developer to determine the adequacy of the plans on the lot, and the impact to public streets. That the plans be revised to accommodate 21 additional parking stalls. That the landscaping plan be increased to sufficiently screen this development from the residential development to the west. That the on-site drainage pond be increased per the recommendations of the City Engineer. 5. That the development stage plans include a comprehensive sign plan. Staff recommends that the preliminary plat and rezoning action be tabled until June 6, 1989. Attachments: Attachment A - Developer's Project Narrative Attachment B - City Planner's Report, 5-17-89 Attachment C - City Engineer's Letter, 5-18-89 Attachment D - Crystal City Engineer's Report PROJE~ NARRATIVE FOR THE NEW HOPE SHOPPING CENTER LOCATION 3540 Winnetka Avenue, 220,095 square feet of land. The shopping center proposed is located on the southeast quadrant of 36th Avenue North and Winnetka Avenue. PROJECT To erect a shopping center of approximately 46,000 square feet, and create an outlot of 36,720 square feet. The shopping center construction would begin late summer, 1989. The outlot would be constructed at a future date which currently is unknown. Developer estimates within three years. The access to the shopping center and outlot would be shared with cross easements created. Holy Nativity Church which currently occupies the site will relocate to 3900 Winnetka Avenue North. SHAPE AND SIZE The retail facility proposed is L shaped, approximately 46,000 square feet on one level, with all tenants having direct outside access and exposure. The plans submitted show the orientation of the storefronts to the northwest directed at the intersection. ANCHOR TENANTS Two major anchors are proposed, one at each end. The exterior treatment would be different than the typical small tenant storefront, although of matching materials. COVERED WALKWAY A continuous covered walkway, partially glazed at the roof, will extend from anchor to anchor to afford customers easy access to all tenants. PARKING AND SERVICE Parking for 221 cars (based on 6 cars per 1,000 net sq. ft.) is required. Parking for 228 is provided with the majority at the front of the building and 25 at the rear for employees. The entire rear area of the building is accessible for service and truck loading and some employee parking. LANDSCAPING Landscaping is provided in groupings at several locations. Please refer to plan for those areas. We have also shown additional screening by using alternating plantings and wood fencing along the east side property line adjacent to the apartments. The landscaping also shows existing plantings on the adjacent properites Go the east and south which will help enhance and screen this prcT~eutv. The new plantings shown will equate to 2-3% of the con£~ruct.ion cc~t. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Utilities are shown c:r~ . · ' ........ ~} .... {tt~. The storm water will be directed <:irc~'' : ~, ~i~ Avenue. Please see attached letter fr : page 2 NEW HOPE SHOPPING CENTER EXTERIOR DESIGN The materials used on the exterior will consist of the following major elements: 1. Permanently colored light grey rock face and smooth scored concrete block alternately used to soften and break up the anchors and rear of building. 2. The covered walk way will be made of prefinished light grey metal roofing material. The glazing inserts in the sloping metal roof will be in red frames with gray tinted glass, and the support columns will be of a gloss red metal material. e Tenant signage will be mounted on the light grey masonry vertical face above the sloping covered walkway. The tenants will be allowed their choice of color and style for their signs. They will be limited to a signage area and all signs must be individually illuminated with neon through plexiglass faces. e The major anchors and the inside corner spaces will have unique separate entry units with large triangular sloping glass skylights above. 0 Ail storefronts will have ample glass area for maximum ex- posure. e A continuous red neon band in a recessed reveal will extend from anchor to anchor across to the top of the front para- pet wall. The neon will glow red at night and the recess will be finished in red for a similiar day time effect. e The underside of the walkway will be illuminated with con- tinuous uplit flourescent strips which will also cast a beautiful glow at night through the glass areas in the sloping roof. SITE ACCESS We have proposed a total of five access points to the site, two off Winnetka and three off 36th Avenue. The plan shows two of the entries are to provide access to the service area at the rear of the building only. The other entry points access the main parking lot, two of which link the main access drive and one provides a convenient shared access to the proposed o~t!ot. page 3 NEW HOPE SHOPPING CENTER OUTLOT The extreme northwest corner is set aside as an outlot for a future development. No determination is made as to its pro- posed use. Possibilities include, but are not limited to, a bank drive through facility, restaurant, stand alone retail, etc. Ail city requirements regarding setbacks, parking, landscape, signage, etc. for this outlot would apply at the time of its development. Cross easements and shared expense and maintenance agreements will be drafted. Access will be with common driveways with the shopping center. No separate entrances will be used. NOISE AND EMISSIONS The addition of parking spaces provided will have a minimal effect to the area regarding noise pollution and auto emissions. We believe that since there is such a high concentration of vehicular traffic on 36th and Winnetka, that traffic will be very minimally increased due to the addition of this facility. Secondly, unlike an office or manufacturing use, there is not major traffic movement at one time relative to "rush hour". Traffic at a retail facility comes and goes all day long with a slight increase during the evening rush hour. ADJACENT USES The current use of immediately adjacent properties are: South - Industrial East - Multi-family The other three corners of Winnetka Avenue north and 36th Avenue North are: a. Southwest corner: Retail, Service station. West and South of corner is multi-family. b. Northwest corner: Retail, Service station. c. West: Second retail use, then multi-family. d. Northeast corner: Retail (Super America) East - Multi family North - Vacant, but sign says proposed retail. The use of the southeast corner of Winnetka Avenue North and 36th Avenue as retail is consistent with the other three corners, and single family uses are for the most part two to three blocks away. There would appear : ~ ~ ::' ~'~t i~cts with the proposed use. page 4 NEW HOPE SHOPPING CENTER CONCLUSION We believe that we have designed a facility which will appropriately utilize this high profile intersection; To the best of our knowledge, we have complied with all city requirements regarding setbacks, parking, landscaping, signage, etc.. The building elements and choice of materials will present an eye catching yet quietly elegant retail facility for the City fo New HOpe. OBE CONSU~.'~,NG ENGINEERS IGINEERIHG ,' .RNNERS o,,d ,.RNr, SUR.,O COMPnNV, IHt. , I000 EAST 146~ STREET. B~NsVILLE, MINNESOTA 5 337 P 43~'30~ ~ May 11, 1989 Mr. Dick Curry Winnetka Center Limited Partnership 8000 Town Line Avenue Suite 203 Bloomington, Minnesota 55438 Re: New Hope Shopping Center - Narrative This 5.01 Acre site presently consists of a church, school, a bituminous parking lot and driveway with approximately 60 percent of the property being green area. All of the existing runoff is directed toward an 18 inch diameter concrete pipe located near the northwesterly corner of the site, then subsequently through a conduit system thewater is discharged to the low area i~ately north of the Superamerica site at the northeast quadrant of Winnetka Avenue and 36thAvenue North. Barr Engineering, the consulting engineer for the Bassett Creek Water- shed District, has designed this 18 inch outlet to handle the runoff from this site, in its present condition, without the need for any on site detention ponding. The proposal is to develop 4.14 acres of this site into a strip shopping center along with the required parking area and to create a 0.87 acre outlot at the northwesterly portion of the site. At this time we are unsure of the eventual use of the outlot but we will assume that in its developed state the runoff conditions will be the same as the shopping center. Understanding that the only place to discharge the runoff will be to the north of 36thAvenue which is in the city limits of Crystal, we asked their city engineer for his verbal conxnents. He is quite concerned about the flooding of the intersection and the Superamerica station. He indicated that he would like to reduce the flow into the existing 18" pipe and redirect a substantial amount into their pond north of 36th Avenue and easterly of the entrance to the Winnetka Village Apartments. The runoff into this pond should be routed so that water will get to the pond .quickly. This can be accomplished by routing the roof drain- age and the drives at the rear of the shopping center to an existing catch basin, at the southeast corner of the site, situated over a 42 inch conduit and from there directly into this pond. Presently there is 14 cfs being discharged ~hrough the 18 inch pipe. We will limit this discharge do~^~ to 6 gfs by constructing a detention pond with a holding volume of about 0.35 acr~ feet and constructing a discharge control device. These measures should addres~ th~ concerns of the watershed district and the City of Crystal. ATTACHMENT B northwest associated consultants, inc. PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: Dan Donahue Robert Kirmis/Alan Brixius 17 May 1989 New Hope - Neighborhood Convenience Center (36th and Winnetka) - REVISED 131.01 - 89.11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND All-American Self Storage Company/Richard Curry is seeking City approval to construct a 46,017 square foot neighborhood convenience center to be located on a 5.01 parcel of land located directly southeast of the intersection of 36th and Winnetka Avenues. The propose~ convenience center would consume the existing Holy Nativity Church site and as shown on Exhibit A. The applicants have submitted several requests to allow the development of the convenience center. A rezoning of the subject site from R-O, Residential Office District to B-4, Community Business District. Preliminary plat approval to subdivide the 5.01 acre subject site into a 4.11 acre lot and a 0.90 acre outlot. Approval of a planned unit development CUP to allow a shopping center within a "B-4" Zoning District. RECOMMENDATION Provided the City finds the proposed rezoning from R-0, Residential Office to B-4, Community Business as acceptable, our office recommends approval of the planned unit development- conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: 4601 excelsior blvd., ste. 410, minneapolis, mn 55416 (612) 925-9420 fax925-2721 No additional vehicular access points are conjunction with the designated outlot. allowed in City approval and final platting of the subdivision of the subject property. The submitted proposal parking standards. is reconfigured to meet required Consideration is given to northern access points to points lying to the north. realigning the site's three coincide with existing access The submitted landscape and utility plans are subject to the review and comments of the City Engineer. The submitted grading plan is comments of both the City Watershed District. subject to the review and Engineer and Bassett Creek A detailed signage plan be submitted indicating sizes and materials of all signs to be used on the property. The submitted site plan is modified to include type and location of all exterior lighting to occur upon the subject property. CASE ANALYSIS Rezoninq. As mentioned earlier, the applicants are seeking to rezone the subject property from R-O, Residential Office to B-4, Community Business. According to City policy, the City will only rezone a property under two instances: If the character of the area has changed to warrant consideration of a zoning change. 2. If the current mistake. rezoning resulted from a past rezoning It should be noted that, in recent years, the area has experienced zoning changes which would complement the proposed convenience center. Former I-2 properties to the east have been rezoned to hold R-4 zoning designations. In considering the appropriateness of the proposed commercial use and consequent B-4 zoning designation, the City has established a set of criteria from which an evaluation of the proposed conditional use permit may be based: Comprehensive Plan. The proposed land use should be considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions set forth within applicable planning documents which have been formally adopted by the City including the Comprehensive Plan, 42nd Avenue Market Study and 1989 Market Study. The aforementioned studies indicate a financial investment by the City in its examination of existing commercial areas through various planning and redevelopment efforts. Issues: o There are no shopper's goods facilities in the general proximity to the site. A shopper's goods facility on this site would have to be a destination shopping facility with its own identity. Demand for a shopper's goods facility at that intersection is marginal. o A shopping center facility located at the 36th Street site would compete with the New Hope Center area to the north and the Midland Shopping Center to the south. Each of the centers offer a variety of both convenience and shopper's goods and services, further dividing up the existing markets. Land Use Compatibility. It must be determined whether the proposed land use is compatible with adjacent land uses. ISSUES= Adjacent land use mixture does not create land use compatibility concerns. High density residential development in close proximity to the site will provide local market support for a new business. o The existing commercial uses in the area are convenience goods and service establishments that serve the immediate area. In fact, three of the four corners at the adjacent intersection already have convenience store operations. It is questionable if there is sufficient demand for additional convenience store square footage. Additional convenience goods development may be successful due to its newness, superior accessibility, parking, etc., but most likely a~ the expense of the existing facilities. Performance Standards. The proposed use must conform with all applicable performance standards as listed within the City Ordinance and discussed in later sections of this report. 3 Traffic. It must be determined whether the proposed use will cause traffic hazards or congestion. Issues: Access from 36th Street and Winnetka Avenue at a signalized intersection. Traffic volumes along Winnetka Avenue range from 14,000 to 14,200 ADT. Traffic volumes ion 36th Avenue range from 9,900 to 11,600 ADT. 36th Street is primarily a residential collector street between Highway 100 and Highway 18. Significant increase in traffic on this street is not anticipated or desired. Utilities. It must be determined whether the subject site may physically accommodate the proposed development. Issues: o o The site is fully serviced with municipal utilities. The 36th Avenue site is characterized by poor soils that will increase development costs. A final determination regarding the appropriateness of the proposed land use and subsequent rezoning is viewed as a policy decision to be made by the City. As such, our office offers no formal recommendation on the matter of appropriate land use other than the comments presented in the preceding section of this report. It should be recognized, however, that the proposed use should be evaluated on a City-wide scale with its development likely to affect the entire community and not just the site's immediate area. Preliminary Plat. The submitted preliminary plat as shown on Exhibit B proposes to subdivide the 5.01 6cre subject property into two separate parcels. A 0.90 acre outlot is being proposed at the site's northwestern corner, while the proposed convenience center would consume the remaining 4.11 acre lot. The subdivision of the subject property is relatively simple in nature and would appear to allow efficient and functional development of the site. As shown on Exhibit C, the proposed outlot is provided shared access points with the convenience center proposal, thereby limiting vehicular access to the adjacent high volume rights-of- way. It is recommended that no additional access points via 36th or Winnetka Avenues are permitted to t~he outlot to ensure against future vehicular congestion problems. 4 Planned Unit Development-CUP. According to Section 4.134 of the City Zoning Ordinance, a commercial use as proposed by the applicants is allowed within a B-4 Zoning District only via the granting of a commercial PUD conditional use permit. As a consequence, the project must meet the criterion outlined within the said section of the Ordinance. Land Use. By examining the subject site's existing adjacent land uses, a determination may be made regarding the appropriateness of the site's proposed land uses. The foll~owing is a listing of surrounding land uses and zoning designations. Direction North Land Use Commercial/Multiple Family (Super America/Winnetka Village Apartments) Zoning NA (within City of Crystal) South Industrial (U.S. Wire and Cable, Thyssen Specialty Steel) I-l, Limited Industrial East Multiple Family (New Hope Terrace Apartments) R-4, High Density Residential West Commercial/Multiple Family R-3, Auto- oriented Business R-4, High Density Residential As shown above, the subject site is bounded by a variety of residential, commercial and industrial uses. Should the City find the proposed use to be appropriate, effective visual screens will be required adjacent to residential areas. Setbacks. building below: As shown on the setbacks conform submitted site plan, all proposed to minimum B-4 standards as listed Required Proposed Front Yard 50 feet 60 feet Side Yard 35 feet 35 feet Rear Yard 50 feet 51 feet *50 foot front yard setback required along major thoroughfares. *50 foot rear yard setback required where said yard abuts an R-4 Zoning District. 5 Parkinq. Based on parking requirements set forth in the City Ordinance, six parking stalls are required for every 1,000 square feet of shopping centers over 30,000 square feet. As shown below, 249 parking stalls are required of the commercial proposal. Gross Floor Space 10% Parking Credit Net Floor Space 46,017 square feet -4~602 square feet 41,415 square feet 41,415 - 1,000 = 41.42 x 6 = 249 parking stalls According provided. to the submitted site plan only 228 stalls are This results in a parking deficit of 21 spaces. It should be noted that the aforementioned method of calculating required parking stalls is identical to that used in determining required off-street parking standards for the New Hope Mall, which presents a similar use to the proposed convenience center. It appears the site's parking requirements as listed within the site data have been derived via leasable area (80% of gross building area), a method not generally permitted per Ordinance standards. To rectify the parking deficit, two options would appear to exist: Reduce the size of the building to accommodate the required number of parking stalls. 2. Expand the size of the building to accommodate the required number of parking stalls. Parking stall sizes and drive aisle widths are both found to be in accordance with Ordinance standards. Access. The submitted plan presents a number of concerns relating to the location of the three proposed access points via 36th Avenue. All fail to align with existing access locations lying to the north, thereby presenting significant vehicular circulation conflicts. With a large commercial service population being anticipated from the Winnetka Village Apartments lying to the north, alignment of the proximate access points would seem imperative. In addition, with 36th Avenue being a carrier of high traffic volumes, consideration should be given to consolidating the adjacent access points as shown on Exhibit C. While the shared northern access of the proposed shopping center and the designated outlot is. viewed as desirable, the access should be realigned to coincide with an existing Super America access point lying to the north in order to produce a more efficient site access scenario. Loadinq Areas. According to the submitted site plan, all loading activities are to occur directly east and south of the principal building. Designated loading activities are bounded by a six foot wooden fence which serves to visually screen the said activities from the eastern lying apartments. Lightinq Plan. In the subsequent development stage of the PUD, a lighting plan for the parking lot and building must be provided. The said plan should address location, illumination, and lighting fixture styles. Styles and locations should be coordinated with existing area fixtures. According to Ordinance standards, all lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the right-of-way or from a residential zone or use. Landscape Plan. According to Section 4.033 (3) of the City Ordinance, where any business abuts property zoned for residential use, that business shall provide screening along the boundary of the residential property. Screening must also be provided where a business is across the street from a residential zone, but not on the side determined to be the front. According to the submitted landscape plan (Exhibit D), screening efforts appear to occur in key areas of the site where specific landscaping efforts are desired. One point of concern, however, lies in the amount of green space provided. With only 13% of the total site area devoted to green space, it may be suggested that an over utilization of the property exists. The submitted planting plan will be subject to the review of the City Engineer and will require the approval of the Planning Commission. Siqnaqe. According to the building elevations shown on Exhibit E, all wall signs will be mounted on the building canopy. In addition, two pylon signs are proposed along the site's periphery. Prior to final approval of the neighborhood shopping center, a detailed signage plan must be submitted indicating sizes and materials of all signs to be used on the property. The said plan must be found to be in accordance with Section 3.4 of the City Ordinance and be approved prior to occupancy of any leased area within the building. Trash Areas. As shown on Exhibits B and E, trash dumpsters are provided within enclosures and are located south and east of the proposed commercial center. The enclosures are to be constructed of rock faced concrete block with stained wooden gates and should complement :the principal building quite well. Gradinq. Of particular concern in regard to grading is the site's questionable soil conditions which may escalate development costs. The submitted grading plan as shown on Exhibit F will be subject to the review of both the City Engineer and Bassett Creek Watershed District. Utilities. A Specific utility plan has been submitted and will be subject to the review of the City Engineer (see Exhibits G). CONCLUSION Provided the City deems the proposed land use and rezoning as appropriate, our office recommends approval of the planned unit development-conditional use permit subject to the conditions as listed within the Executive Summary of this ~report. cc: Doug Sandstad Jeannine Dunn Mark Hanson American Self Storage Co./Richard Curry 8 new hope, minn. northwest associated consultants, inc. EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATION 3OVI:I~3.L 3dOH M3N 3rlN3AY VNJ.3NNI/~ 'EXHIBIT B-'PRELIMINARY PLAT ITl '-I ITl '13 r- CONSIDER REALIGNMENT, OF ACCESS POINT SUPER .~4ERICA STATION L' .J L OUll. OT ., WNN[T~A VIL~C~ APARTMENTS CONSIDER CONSOLIDATION AND RE~ GNMENT OF ACCESS POINTS DATA BUILDING AREA 46,017 SF LEASABLE AREA 36 814 St: PARKING REQUIRED 221 STALLS PARKING PROV!DED 2~a STALLS .AREA BREAKDOWN GREENSPAC[ . 13% ASPHALT 57% BUILDING 26% WALKWAYS /4% (~hERAL NO~S .. J'---' u.s. ~.SEN SP~CIAUTY STEE~& GAYNOR SALES'A(~NCY o '~w ~IT~RR~'APAR ~rs PROPOSED SITE PLAN I NEIGHBORHOOD CONVENIENCE C[NTER 3&TH &. WINN£TKA II SITE .PLAN IIII rn O '13 rtl '13 I-- .Z 3bin. ~,'Eh~L,~ NOP,~H II m_r-m NEIGHBORHOOD CONVENIENCE CENTER 36TH & WINNETKA PLAN II IT! C: · NORTH ELEVATION --' .llt. tJlill!lJ;..~.ls J l,lllltll~~~~j .WEST.. ELEVATION- 'FA. ST ELEVATION ' .*014.8 16' 32 5.C~J.E' ~ FEET :o14 a .~ hl FEET 04 8 16 )2 ~ hi FT. ET DETAIL TENANT=,=--SIGN==...fr.. 3' LETTERS' J-C' ....~:-..--~, ' , iD-',",'F"i' "' '~ 'L~_________ .: 'DETAIL ELEVATION o:2~4 a ~ · . . . 5C.A~ Ihl IrEET. Ill ;Z 'SOUTH ELEVATION. rp-L_L ~ P,~ ~ I,,f FEET SUPER AMERICA STATION WINNETKA VILLAGE APARTMENTS THYSSEN SPECIALITY STEEL l GAYNOR SALES AGENCY PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN DICK CURRY NEW HOPE SHOPPING CENTER MINNESOTA IT! SUPER AMERICA STATION 36TH AVENUE NORTH // WINNETKA VILLAGE ~ ~! APARTMENTS THYSSEN SPECIALITY STEEL & GAYNOR SALES AGENCY PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN NEW HOPE SHOPPING CENTER Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects ATTACHMENT C ' Otto G. Bonestroo, RE.Keith A. Gordon, IRE. Michael C. Lynch, RE. Philip J. Casw~ll, RE. Robert ~xZ Rosene, RE.Richard ~(Z Foster, RE.' James R. Maland, RE. Mark D. V~llJs. RE. Joseph C. Andedik, RE.Donald C. Burgardt, PR. Kenneth_ R Anderson, IRE. Thomas R. Anderson, AJ.A. Bradford A. Lemberg, RE. Jerry A. Bourdon. IRE.Keith A. Bachmann. RE.Gary E Ry/ander, Re. Richard E. Turner, RE,Mark A. Hanson, RE. Mark R. Rolls, RE. Chades ^. Enckson James C. Olson. RE. Ted K. Field, RE. Robert C. Russek, AAA.Leo M. Pawelsky Glenn R, Cook, RE. Michael ~ Rautmann, RE. Thomas E. Angus, RE. Hadan M, OJson Thomas E. Noyes. RE. Robert R. Pfeffede, RE. Howard ^. Sanford, RE.Susan M. Ebedin, C,R^. Robert G. Schunicht, RE. David Ct Loskota, RE. Daniel J. Edgerton, RE. Marvin L. Sorvala, RE.Thomas ~'. Paterson, IRE. Mark A. Seip. RE. May 18, 1989 City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue No. New Hope, MN 55428 Attn: Ms. Jeannine Dunn Re: New Hope Shopping Center Our File No. 34 Gen. Dear Jeannine, We have reviewed the above plan and recommend the following: 1.) The drainage on the site is directed to the 42" storm sewer located in the southeast corner and the ponding area located in the northwest corner. Due to the limited capacity in the 42" storm sewer, it is recommended ALL drainage from the site be directed to the ponding area located in the northwest corner. Therefore, the roof drainage and the drainage area located south and east of the proposed building shall all be incorporated in storm sewer and be directed to the ponding area located in the north- west corner. The ponding area presently provides approximately 0.67 acre-feet of storage between 884 and 889. The pond outlets into an exist- ing storm sewer in Winnetka Avenue. The capacity of the existing storm sewer shall be reviewed in detail, however, it is presently felt the out- flow from this site shall be restricted to 3-5 cfs. Based on an outflow of 3 cfs, the required storage is 0.87 acre-feet. Therefore, the pond storage shall be increased from 0.67 acre-feet to 0.87 acre-feet. In addition, the site plan shall be reviewed and Conform to the requirements of the Bassett Creek Watershed. 2.) Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size and depth are available in 36th Avenue and Winnetka Avenue. An additional hydrant for fire protection should be considered near the southeast corner of the building. 3.) Access to the site from 36th Avenue and Winnetka Avenue shall be limited. The access to Winnetka Avenue shall be reviewed by Hennepin County. However, it is presently felt the two accesses as proposed are adequate provided the future access to Outlot A is directed to the most northerly access on Lot 1. The three accesses proposed on 36th Avenue should be limited to two and should align with the accesses to Winnetka Village and Super America. Also, the future access to 0utlot A shall be directed to the most westerly access from Lot 1. 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 · 612-636-4600 4.) The existinE riEht-of-way on Winnetka Avenue varies, however, it appears to be adequate because a left turn lane and center median presently exist. However, Hennepin County should review their riEht-of-way re- quirements on Winnetka Avenue and determine if additional riEht-of-way is required. The existinE half riEht-of-way on 36th Avenue is 33'. The present ADT on 36th Avenue is 13,000 while the ADT on Winnetka Avenue is 14,000. These counts are very similar to Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue where left turn lanes and center media~s are proposed to be con- structed. Therefore, it is recommended a minimum 7' of additional riEht- of-way be dedicated on 36th Avenue and the riEht-of-way for a left turn and center median be reviewed prior to final plat to determine if addi- tional riEht-of-way is required from Outlot A and Lot 1 for a future left turn lane and median. 5.) Sidewalk construction alonE both Winnetka Avenue and 36th Avenue shall be required. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00,,/ROS~NE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, Mark~'. · Hanson MAH:li INC. 28 ATTACHMENT CITY CRYSTAL 4141 Douglas Drive North · Crystal, MN 55422-1696 · 537-8421 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE May 16, 1989 Ms. Jeanine Dunn City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428 Dear Ms. Dunn: After reviewing the preliminary documents for the conve- nience center at 36th Avenue and the plat of Winnetka Indus- trial Park, I offer the following comments: - Drainage from the convenience center site at 36th and Winnetka Avenues is a major concern. Run-off from this dense development proposal is to be directed into a 42- inch RCP storm sewer that is already over capacity given the sizeable drainage area it serves. Signifi- cant sewer back-ups are anticipated that will impact the proposed parking area based on its elevation relative to the balance of the overall watershed. Additionally, with no plans for future capacity increases to the outlet line in 36th Avenue as it proceeds east, this entire area remains prone to periodic flooding as occurred in July of 1987. Although the center does not contribute greatly to overall run-off volumes, the site will be subject to the area-wide results. - Traffic on 36th Avenue is also a concern given the high volumes and lack of channelization. The proximity of the two westernmost accesses on 36th Avenue to drives across the street will create conflicting movements that could be eliminated by modifying the parking area and utilizing a single access in the middle of the parking area. Ms. Jeanine Dunn May 16, 1989 Page 2 - My two comments regarding the Winnetka Industrial Park both regard drainage. First, Crystal will request development of the detention pond shown at the eastern edge of the plat during the initial development phase to limit downstream impacts. Second, if Quebec Avenue is extended from the north, it is critical there be no reduction in the storage volume of Old Dutch Pond due to its impact on Memory Lane Pond in Crystal. As more detailed development plans become available for either project, I will provide additional analysis from Crystal's perspective as requested. Should you have any questions regarding the above comments, please let me know. Sincerely, William Monk City Engineer WM:jrs